1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

    1/9

    The relationship between patient safety culture and adverse

    events: A questionnaire survey

    Xue Wanga, Ke Liu b,*, Li-ming You b, Jia-gen Xiang c, Hua-gang Hu d,Li-feng Zhang b, Jing Zheng b, Xiao-wen Zhu e

    aDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chinab School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Chinac School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Chinad School of Nursing, Soochow University, ChinaeDepartment of Nursing, School of Medicine, Jinan University, China

    International Journal of Nursing Studies xxx (2014) xxxxxx

    A R T I C L E I N F O

    Article history:

    Received 17 April 2013

    Received in revised form 10 December 2013

    Accepted 18 December 2013

    Keywords:

    Adverse events

    Patient safety

    Patient safety culture

    Chinese hospitalNursing

    A B S T R A C T

    Background: Patient safety culture is an important factor in the effort to reduce adverse

    events in the hospital and improve patient safety. A few studies have shown the

    relationship between patient safety culture and adverse events, yet no such research has

    been reported in China.

    Objectives: This study aimed to describe nurses perception of patient safety culture and

    frequencies of adverse events, and examine the relationship between them.

    Design: This study was a descriptive, correlated study.

    Setting and participants: We selected 28 inpatient units and emergency departments in 7

    level-3 general hospitals from 5 districts in Guangzhou, China, and we surveyed 463nurses.

    Methods: The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was used to measure nurses

    perception of patient safety culture, and the frequencies of adverse events which

    happened frequently in hospital were estimated by nurses. We used multiple logistic

    regression models to examine the relationship between patient safety culture scores and

    estimated frequencies of each type of adverse event.

    Results: The Positive Response Rates of 12 dimensions of the Hospital Survey on Patient

    Safety Culture varied from 23.6% to 89.7%. There were 47.875.6% nurses who estimated

    that these adverse events had happened in the past year. After controlling for all nurse

    related factors, a higher mean score of Organizational Learning-Continuous Improve-

    ment was significantly related to lower the occurrence of pressure ulcers (OR = 0.249),

    prolonged physical restraint (OR = 0.406), and complaints (OR = 0.369); a higher mean

    score of Frequency of Event Reporting was significantly related to lower the occurrence

    of medicine errors (OR = 0.699) and pressure ulcers (OR = 0.639).

    Conclusions: The results confirmed the hypothesis that an improvement in patient safety

    culture was related to a decrease in the occurrence of adverse events.

    2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    * Corresponding author at: School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou 510089, China. Tel.: +86 20 87334850.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (K. Liu).

    G Model

    NS-2333; No. of Pages 9

    Please cite this article in press as: Wang, X., et al., The relationship between patient safety culture and adverse events: A

    questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007

    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

    International Journal of Nursing Studies

    journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/ijns

    0020-7489/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00207489http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00207489http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007
  • 8/12/2019 1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

    2/9

    What is already known about the topic?

    Theoretically, patient safety culture (PSC) is regarded as

    an important factor in the prevention of adverse events

    (AEs) in healthcare settings, but the relationship lacks

    quantitative evidence.

    Few studies have examined the relationship between

    PSC

    and

    AEs. Although some studies have investigated the rates of

    some AEs and nurses perception of PSC, no study had

    examined the relationship between them in Chinese

    hospitals.

    What this paper adds

    Nurses perception of PSC was not satisfactory and the

    nurse-estimated AEs were high in Chinese hospitals.

    Improvement in nurses perception of PSC was related to

    a decrease in the occurrence of patient AEs.

    1. Introduction

    1.1. Background

    The Institute of Medicine (IOM) emphasized that it was

    important for healthcare organizations to establish a safety

    culture to ensure that patients were not inadvertently

    harmed by errors in the care which was supposed to heal

    them (Stefl, 2001). PSC in healthcare organizations,

    specifically hospitals, includes communication founded

    on mutual trust, good information flow, shared perception

    of the importance of safety, organizational learning,

    commitment from management and leadership, and the

    presence of a non-punitive approach to incident and error

    reporting

    (Sanders

    and

    Cook,

    2007).

    AEs

    have

    become

    aglobal problem; they are an important indicator of patient

    safety (Baker et al., 2004). The IOM pointed out that

    preventable AEs happen not only due to individual factors

    such as inadequate skills or knowledge of nurses or

    doctors; it claimed that system errors due to problems in

    areas such as management, work environment and staffing

    are a more important aspect of preventable AEs (Stefl,

    2001). It is therefore urgent to build a safety system, and

    building a safety culture is the first step towards it

    (Maurette, 2002).

    There are several methods of collection of AEs data,

    such as reviews of medical or nursing records, direct

    observation,

    reporting

    systems,nurses

    estimates,

    patientinterviews and so on (Cina-Tschumi et al., 2009; Flynn

    et al., 2002; Olsen et al., 2007). Each method has its

    strengths and weaknesses. For example, a review of

    medical or nursing records and direct observation can

    provide accurate information of antecedents and out-

    comes of AEs, butimplementing it maycost more time and

    staffing (Flynn et al., 2002). A reporting system is an

    accepteduseful method to collect information about AEs,

    but the high missed report rate is its weakness (Grenier-

    Sennelier et al., 2002). Many hospitals have a reporting

    system, but most of them do not work well in China (Dai

    et al., 2009). Nurses estimates can notonly collect mass of

    data

    in

    a

    short amount

    of

    time with

    little

    money

    andstaffing, but also collect more accurate information

    without fear of punishment (Stratton et al., 2004).

    Although this method of data collection may be subject

    to respondent bias and recall bias (Manojlovich and

    DeCicco, 2007), Cina-Tschumi et al. (2009) showed that

    nurses estimated patient fall frequencies over the

    period of oneyear wereconcordant with continuously and

    systematically assessed data and more accurate than the

    latter over one month. This method

    has showed useful-ness in other studies (Aiken et al., 2001; Sochalski, 2004).

    For these reasons,we havechosen to usenurses estimates

    to collect data about the frequencies of AEs overa periodof

    one year.

    It has been suggested that establishing a good safety

    culture can help prevent an error chain from causing a real

    error (Reason, 1995), but the relationship between PSC and

    AEs lacks quantitative evidence. Some researches (Hansen

    et al., 2011; Singer et al., 2009; Zohar et al., 2007) found

    that PSC was negatively correlated with some AEs

    (medicine error, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure

    or Patient Safety Indicators which monitored AEs). Another

    study

    (Ausserhofer

    et

    al.,

    2012)

    found

    that

    none

    of

    the

    AEsit looked at (medication administration error, pressure

    ulcer, patient fall, urinary tract infection, bloodstream

    infection and pneumonia) was significantly correlated

    with PSC, while rationing of nursing care was significantly

    correlated with patient satisfaction, medicine errors,

    bloodstream infection and pneumonia; this indicated that

    nurse-related organizational factors may have affected

    AEs. Studies that examined the relationship between PSC

    and a single type of AE employed controls for nurse-related

    factors such as staffing ratio and education (Hansen et al.,

    2011; Vogus and Sutcliffe, 2007). We deduced from this

    that for our examination of the relationship between PSC

    and

    AEs,

    we

    would

    need

    to

    take

    account

    of

    nurse-relatedfactors.

    To our knowledge, a few researches have been

    conducted to explore the relationship between PSC and

    AEs, yet none examined the relationship between PSC and

    AEs in China.

    1.2. Objectives

    The objectives of this study were to describe nurses

    perception of PSC and their estimate of the frequencies of

    AEs and to examine the relationship between PSC and AEs

    in Chinese hospitals.

    2. Methods

    2.1. Design

    This study was a descriptive, correlated study.

    2.2. Sample and setting

    Eight out of Guangzhous twelve districts are described

    as main urban areas due to high population density. Based

    on stratified sampling, we sampled seven level-3 hospitals

    (the large, high-tech hospitals with 10002500 beds) in

    five

    main

    urban

    areas

    of

    Guangzhou,

    covering

    1

    in

    3

    ofGuangzhous total count of level-3 hospitals and 5 in

    X. Wang et al./ International Journal of Nursing Studies xxx (2014) xxxxxx2

    G Model

    NS-2333; No. of Pages 9

    Please cite this article in press as: Wang, X., et al., The relationship between patient safety culture and adverse events: A

    questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007
  • 8/12/2019 1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

    3/9

    8 of all its main urban areas. One medical unit, one surgical

    unit, one Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and one emergency

    department from each hospital were selected, 28 units in

    total. The study surveyed all of the nurses working in these

    units from October 2010 to January 2011. The inclusion

    criteria of nurse were as follows: registered nurses who

    had worked at least one year in the current hospital.

    Totally,

    640

    questionnaires

    were

    delivered,

    539

    (84.2%)nurses returned the questionnaires and 463 (72.3%)

    questionnaires were valid.

    2.3. Measuring instrument

    The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC)

    and AE questionnaires were used to collect data.

    The HSOPSC was pilot tested, revised and then released

    by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

    (Sorra and Nieva, 2004). The HSOPSC contains 42 items to

    measure 12 patient safety culture dimensions. The items

    used 5-point Likert response scales of agreement

    (strongly

    disagree

    to

    strongly

    agree)

    or

    frequency(never to always), so the mean score of each dimension

    could be calculated. In addition, a Positive Response Rate

    (PRR) could be calculated for each item from responses of

    strongly agree/agree or always/most of the time. To

    calculate the PRR of one dimension, first step is to compute

    the PRR for each item and then calculate the mean PRR

    across all items of this dimension. Similarly, the mean PRRs

    of overall HSOPSC can be calculated. If the PRR is over 75%,

    this dimension is defined as patient safety strength. The

    HSOPSC was translated into Chinese by this research team

    and content validity was established, and the reliability

    test showed a good internal consistency: Cronbachs a

    (Xiang

    et

    al.,

    2012) was

    0.853.We investigated the following 7 AEs which occurred

    frequently in hospitals and considered to be sensitive to

    nursing care as the indicators to report (Aiken et al., 2001;

    Flynn et al., 2002; Yang et al., 2010): medicine error (ME),

    pressure ulcer (PU), patient falls (PF), physical restraints

    for more than 8 h (PR 8 h), surgical wound infection

    (SWI), infusion or transfusion reaction (IR/TR) and patients

    or their family complaints (PC/FC). The frequencies of AEs

    were scored as never happen = 0, several times a

    year = 1, once a month or less = 2, several times a

    month = 3, once a week = 4, several times a week = 5,

    everyday = 6 in the past year using a 7-level rating scale

    estimated

    by

    nurses.Additionally, nurses demographic data were collected,

    including gander, age, the highest education in nursing,

    current work unit, hospital working years and hours

    worked per week.

    2.4. Statistical analysis

    We used SPSS (Version 17.0) to perform the statistical

    analysis. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies,

    percentages and tables were used for nurses demographic

    data, the HSOPSC and AEs. We used a series of Chi-square

    tests to confirm that the samples came from a same

    statistical

    mass.

    We calculated

    intra-class

    correlationcoefficient (ICC) both within unit and hospital and in the

    same unit of different hospitals to examine the validity of

    this method of measuring AEs.

    To examine the relationship between PSC and AEs, we

    used bivariate regression models for each AE and 12

    HSOPSC dimensions at first; then we performed multiple

    logistic regression models with one type of AE as the

    dependent variable and 12 HSOPSC dimensions as

    independent

    variables

    with

    control

    for

    all

    nurse

    relatedfactors. The standard of significance was set at a

  • 8/12/2019 1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

    4/9

    2.58 0.60 to 4.10 0.47. The overall PRR was 57.4%. The

    PRR of Organizational Learning-Continuous Improvement

    (PRR = 89.7%) was the highest followed by Teamwork within

    Units (PRR = 86.5%). The PRR of Staffing (PRR = 23.6%) was

    the lowest. The PRRs of Non-punitive Response to Error,

    Communication

    Openness

    and

    Frequency

    of

    EventReporting were all less than 50%.

    3.3. Adverse events

    To examine the validity of this method of measuring

    AEs, we calculated intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)

    both within unit (average measure ICC from 0.514 to 0.854,

    P-values

  • 8/12/2019 1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

    5/9

    In the multiple logistic regression models, Organiza-

    tional Learning-Continuous Improvement correlated

    with 3 out of 7 AEs, Frequency of Event Reporting,

    Feedback and Communication About Error and Hospi-

    tal Management Support for Patient Safety correlated

    with

    2

    out of

    7

    AEs,

    Supervisor Expectation &

    ActionsPromoting Safety, Non-punitive Response to Error and

    Hospital Handoffs and Transitionscorrelatedwith 1 out

    of 7 AEs. The variance of ORis from 0.249 (the odds of PU

    were 24.9% as large for each unit increase in the score of

    Organizational Learning-Continuous Improvement) to

    0.739 (the odds of IR/TR were 73.9% as large for each unit

    increase in the score of Feedback and Communication

    About Error).

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Patient safety culture needs to be improved

    In our findings, Organizational Learning-Continuous

    Improvement (PRR = 89.7%) and Teamwork Within

    Units (PRR = 86.5%) were patient safety strengths; these

    results were in line with other researchers findings

    (Alahmadi, 2010; Chen and Li, 2010; El-Jardali et al.,

    2010). From these findings, it can be seen that patient

    safety strengths are almost identical across different

    countries. We found, through interviews with the nursing

    directors of the hospital we surveyed, that all hospitals

    held several training courses every month (at least one per

    unit) to help nurses to improve professional knowledge

    and skills and to emphasized the importance of teamwork.

    They

    indicated

    a

    firm

    belief

    that

    through

    this

    effort

    theycould create an atmosphere of learning and cooperation in

    the organization and strengthen patient safety.

    The dimension with the lowest PRR was Staffing,

    which was also in line with other researchers findings

    (Alahmadi, 2010; El-Jardali et al., 2010). About 70% of

    nurses felt there was not enough staff to handle the

    workload and work in crisis mode trying to do too much,

    too quickly. As previously reported (Aiken et al., 2002),

    patient failure-to-rescue (deaths following complications)

    and mortality were correlated with increases in nurses

    experience of job dissatisfaction and burnout in high

    patientnurse ratio hospitals. A multi-centre study in

    Mainland

    China

    found

    when

    the

    nurse-to-patient

    ratio(total number of nurses on all shifts on the unit divided by

    total number of patients who stay on the unit) increased to

    the 0.5 to

  • 8/12/2019 1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

    6/9

  • 8/12/2019 1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

    7/9

    individual level. We have tested and confirmed that the

    sample came from the same statistical mass and the

    validity of nurse-estimated method which indicated the

    concordance of reported AEs rates in the same unit of

    different hospitals. In addition, we have done a split half

    analysis both in bivariate and multiple logistic regressions

    which

    were

    not

    different

    from

    the

    total

    sample

    analysis.These analysis methods reinforced our results therefore we

    believed it could be used in further researches.

    There was a marked difference in the result before and

    after controlling nurse-related factors, some relation-

    ships vanishedwhile others appeared.Additionally, there

    were a few positive correlation coefficients in the

    multiple logistic models, though none of them were

    significant. We thought the most likely reason for these

    was that some potential related factors were not

    controlled, such as the unit or hospital related factors.

    It indicated that further study need to explore potential

    organizational factors when examination of the relation-

    ship between

    PSC

    and AEs.According to our findings in the multiple logistic

    models, Organizational Learning-Continuous Improve-

    ment, which got the highest PRR (89.7%), could predict 3

    out of 7 AEs. Because organizational learning was held

    every month in surveyed hospitals, nurses felt learning

    could prevent AEs indeed. Mardon et al. (2010) also found

    there was an inverse relationship between this dimension

    and rates of AEs. A good learning climate could also reduce

    nursing related medication errors (Chang and Mark, 2011).

    It is better for nurses to learn specific knowledge and skills

    together before and after AEs happened, they can discuss

    the antecedents and outcomes of AEs, and develop

    strategies

    to

    prevent

    and

    solve

    problems

    more

    successfully(Kim et al., 2007).

    In our study, Frequency of Event Reporting was in

    inverse proportion to the rate of AEs (ME and PU). While

    47.875.6% nurses estimated AEs had happened, more

    than half of surveyed nurses did not report the AEs in

    hospital report system. Possibly because of blame

    culture and the attitude of none of my business, nurses

    may

    have

    hesitated

    to

    report

    errors

    which

    were

    not

    foundto avoid receiving punishment, and errors which were

    nothing with themselves to avoid getting into trouble. That

    is why near-miss errors as well as real errors were not

    found or discussed and consequently resulted in the same

    errors occurred again. Event reporting, an essential

    component for achieving a learning culture, only happens

    in a non-punitive andjust environment, where people can

    report events without being blamed (Smits et al., 2008). A

    research (Kantelhardt et al., 2011) conducted in a

    neurosurgical department in Germany developed coun-

    ter-strategies using reporting system data, reported a 12%

    reduction in medication-related AEs in only 5 months.

    Where

    previous

    researches

    have

    shown

    that

    effectivereporting systems have a relationship with reduced rates

    of AEs (Kantelhardt et al., 2011), our findings indicated that

    nurses attitude towards reporting is a key to increase the

    reporting rate. Therefore, we suggested that hospital

    managers can implement a non-punitive reporting system

    and reward reporting nurses to increase the reporting rate

    (Peng and Wang, 2012).

    4.4. Limitations

    First, because we collected the data in level-3

    hospitals, sampling bias remained possible and it was

    not

    representative

    of

    the

    whole

    nurse

    population

    inGuangzhou. Nevertheless, our study surveyed one

    Table 4 (Continued )

    Unadjusted (bivariate) models Adjusted (multiple) models

    r/OR P-values r/OR P-values

    Teamwork Within Units 0.128/0.880 0.538 0.051/0.950 0.883

    Communication Openness 0.010/0.990 0.951 0.057/0.944 0.822

    Feedback and Communication About Error 0.208/1.232 0.218 0.553/0.739 0.041*

    Non-punitive Response to Error 0.097/0.980 0.543 0.010/0.990 0.965

    Staffing 0.148/0.863 0.434 0.086/1.090 0.965

    Hospital Management Support for Patient Safety 0.359/0.698 0.040* 0.686/0.504 0.027*

    Teamwork Across Hospital Units 0.388/0.678 0.049* 0.222/0.801 0.500

    Hospital Handoffs and Transitions 0.423/0.655 0.034* 0.640/0.527 0.034*

    Overall Perceptions of Safety 0.350/0.705 0.104 0.167/0.846 0.599

    Frequency of Event Reporting 0.066/1.069 0.614 0.257/1.293 0.166

    Patients or their family complaints

    Supervisor Expectation & Actions Promoting Safety 0.086/0.918 0.681 0.716/0.646 0.029*

    Organizational Learning-Continuous Improvement 0.297/0.743 0.200 0.996/0.369 0.013*

    Teamwork Within Units 0.235/0.791 0.237 0.124/0.884 0.684

    Communication Openness 0.065/1.067 0.691 0.218/1.243 0.358

    Feedback and Communication About Error 0.055/1.056 0.732 0.317/1.373 0.183

    Non-punitive Response to Error 0.279/0.757 0.069 0.271/0.763 0.182

    Staffing 0.332/0.717 0.064 0.189/0.828 0.429

    Hospital Management Support for Patient Safety 0.345/0.708 0.035* 0.481/0.618 0.065

    Teamwork Across Hospital Units 0.191/0.826 0.296 0.072/1.074 0.803

    Hospital Handoffs and Transitions 0.181/0.835 0.328 0.044/0.957 0.868

    Overall Perceptions of Safety 0.213/0.808 0.290 0.128/0.880 0.649

    Frequency of Event Reporting 0.300/0.741 0.018* 0.237/0.789 0.147

    Adjusted models were controlled nurses demographic factors, including gander, age, the highest education in nursing, current work unit, hospital working

    years and hours worked per week. Nurse-estimated adverse events (0 = never happened, 1 = had happened).

    * P

  • 8/12/2019 1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

    8/9

    third of level-3 hospitals in Guangzhou and these

    hospitals cover five out of eight urban districts of this

    city.

    Second, we used the nurses estimates to collect the

    frequencies of AEs which might cause bias more or less.

    Some Chinese studies reported that about 50% AEs were

    not reported through administration channel (Liu et al.,

    2008;

    Xiang

    et

    al.,

    2012). Furthermore,

    Barbara

    et

    al.

    foundthat nurses estimates of AEs over 1 year were reliable;

    therefore our design chose nurses to estimate the

    frequencies of AEs over last 1 year as well. Also, we tested

    the validity of this measure which indicated the con-

    cordance of reported AE rates both within unit and hospital

    and in the same unit of different hospitals. Wealso suggest

    that further studies could use various methods to collect

    data at the same time.

    Third, there was a possibility that unmeasured vari-

    ables could confound our results. We believe that we had

    accounted for key factors of nurses as covariates. Some

    researchers found that other potential factors may be

    involved,

    such

    as

    nursepatient

    ratio,

    which

    may

    indicatethe need to introduce controls for other factors in future

    studies.

    Forth, this was a cross-sectional study which could not

    identify the effects of PSC on AEs. However, the multiple

    logistic regression models could predict that higher PSC

    scores would be related to lower incidence rates of some

    AEs.

    5. Conclusion

    Weexamined the relationship between PSC and AEs in

    level-3 hospitals in Guangzhou, China, and analyzed the

    relationship at

    individual level.

    Our

    study found thatnurses perceptions of PSC were not satisfactory, and that

    proportions of nurse-estimated AEs were high. Building a

    non-punitive environment and developing nurses initia-

    tive to report AEs voluntarily was necessary. This study

    reinforced the findings of previous studies which identi-

    fied that PSC wasa predictor forAEs, and an improvement

    of PSC was related to a decrease in the occurrence of

    AEs. Further study is needed to determine the generality

    of these results to a large scope of hospitals, and to

    identify interventions which would improve PSC so as to

    reduce AEs.

    Conflict of interest: None of the authors has a conflict of

    interest with respect to the authorship and or publicationof this article.

    Funding: This research was supported by the China Medical

    Board (grant 10-021), Li-ming You, principal investigator (PI).

    Ethical approval: The research project was approved by Ethics

    Committee of School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University.

    Acknowledgement

    Our sincere appreciation is extended to all participating

    hospitals and nurses.

    References

    Aiken, L.H., Clarke, S.P., Sloane, D.M., Sochalski, J., Silber, J.H., 2002.Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, andjob dissatisfaction. JAMA 288 (16) 19871993.

    Aiken, L.H., Clarke, S.P., Sloane, D.M., Sochalski, J.A., Busse, R., Clarke, H.,Giovannetti, P., Hunt, J., Rafferty, A.M., Shamian, J., 2001. Nursesreports on hospital care in five countries. Health Aff. (Millwood) 20(3) 4353.

    Alahmadi, H.A., 2010. Assessment of patient safety culture in SaudiArabian hospitals. Qual. Saf. Health Care 19 (5) e17.

    Ausserhofer, D., Schubert, M., Desmedt, M., Blegen, M.A., De Geest, S.,Schwendimann, R., 2012. The association of patient safety climate andnurse-related organizational factors with selected patient outcomes:a cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 50 (2) 240252.

    Baker, G.R., Norton, P.G., Flintoft, V., Blais, R., Brown, A., Cox,J., Etchells, E.,Ghali, W.A., Hebert, P., Majumdar, S.R., OBeirne, M., Palacios-Der-flingher, L., Reid, R.J., Sheps, S., Tamblyn, R., 2004. The CanadianAdverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospi-tal patients in Canada. CMAJ 170 (11) 16781686.

    Chang, Y., Mark, B., 2011. Effects of learning climate and registered nursestaffing on medication errors. Nurs. Res. 60 (1) 3239.

    Chen, I.C., Li, H.H., 2010. Measuring patient safety culture in Taiwan usingthe Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). BMCHealthServ. Res. 10, 152.

    Cina-Tschumi, B., Schubert, M., Kressig, R.W., De Geest, S., Schwendimann,R., 2009. Frequencies of falls in Swiss hospitals: concordance betweennurses estimates and fall incident reports. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 46 (2)164171.

    Dai, H.S., Shi, Y., Mao, Y.F., 2009. Research status quo and thinking ofnursing adverse events reporting system. Nurs. Res. 23 (23) 21372138.

    El-Jardali, F., Jaafar, M., Dimassi, H., Jamal, D., Hamdan, R., 2010. Thecurrent state of patient safety culture in Lebanese hospitals: a study atbaseline. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 22 (5) 386395.

    Flynn, E.A., Barker, K.N., Pepper, G.A., Bates, D.W., Mikeal, R.L., 2002.Comparison of methods for detecting medication errors in 36 hospi-tals and skilled-nursing facilities. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 59 (5)436446.

    Grenier-Sennelier, C., Lombard, I., Jeny-Loeper, C., Maillet-Gouret, M.C.,Minvielle, E., 2002. Designing adverse event prevention programsusing quality management methods: the case of falls in hospital. Int.J.Qual. Health Care 14 (5) 419426.

    Hansen, L.O., Williams, M.V., Singer, S.J., 2011. Perceptions of hospital

    safety climate and incidence of readmission. Health Serv. Res. 46 (2)596616.

    Hofso, K., Coyer, F.M., 2007. Part 2. Chemical and physical restraints in themanagement of mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: a patientperspective. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs. 23 (6) 316322.

    Hsieh, S.Y., 2009. Factors hampering the use of patient complaints toimprove quality: an exploratory study. Int.J. Nurs. Pract. 15 (6) 534542.

    Kantelhardt, P., Muller, M., Giese, A., Rohde, V., Kantelhardt, S.R., 2011.Implementation of a critical incident reporting system in a neuro-surgical department. Cent. Eur. Neurosurg. 72 (1) 1521.

    Kim, J., An, K., Kim, M.K., Yoon, S.H., 2007. Nurses perception of errorreporting and patient safety culture in Korea. West.J. Nurs. Res. 29 (7)827844.

    Liu, Y.L., Zhang, L., Xu, J., Wang, G.L., Zhao, G.H., Ji, X.N., Yao, S.L., 2008.Investigation on hospital safety culture among nurses.J. Nurs. Sci. 23(23) 4547.

    Ljunggren, G., Phillips, C.D., Sgadari, A., 1997. Comparisons of restraint usein nursing homes in eight countries. Age Ageing 26 (Suppl. 2) 4347.

    Manojlovich, M., DeCicco, B., 2007. Healthy work environments, nursephysician communication, and patients outcomes. Am.J. Crit. Care 16(6) 536543.

    Mardon, R.E., Khanna, K., Sorra, J., Dyer, N., Famolaro, T., 2010. Exploringrelationships between hospital patient safety culture and adverseevents. J. Patient Saf. 6 (4) 226232.

    Maurette, P., 2002. To err is human: building a safer health system. Ann.Fr. Anesth. Reanim. 21 (6) 453454.

    Olsen, S., Neale, G., Schwab, K., Psaila, B., Patel, T., Chapman, E.J., Vincent,C., 2007. Hospital staff should use more than one method to detectadverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting,pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may allhave a place. Qual. Saf. Health Care 16 (1) 4044.

    Peng, H., Wang, Y., 2012. Reporting system construction of medicaladverse event and patients potential safety hazard. Chinese Hosp.

    Manage. 32 (12) 5354.

    X. Wang et al./ International Journal of Nursing Studies xxx (2014) xxxxxx8

    G Model

    NS-2333; No. of Pages 9

    Please cite this article in press as: Wang, X., et al., The relationship between patient safety culture and adverse events: A

    questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007

    http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0120http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0115http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0110http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0105http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0100http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0095http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0090http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0085http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0080http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0075http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0070http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0065http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0060http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0055http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0050http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0045http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0040http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0035http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0030http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0025http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0020http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0015http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0010http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7489(13)00385-4/sbref0005
  • 8/12/2019 1-s2.0-S0020748913003854-main

    9/9

    Reason, J., 1995. Understanding adverse events: human factors. Qual.Health Care 4 (2) 8089.

    Sanders, J., Cook, G., 2007. ABC of Patient Safety. Blackwell, Oxford.Singer, S., Lin, S., Falwell, A., Gaba, D., Baker, L., 2009. Relationship of

    safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv. Res.44 (2 Pt 1) 399421.

    Smits, M., Christiaans-Dingelhoff, I., Wagner, C., Wal, G., Groenewegen,P.P., 2008. The psychometric properties of the Hospital Survey onPatient Safety Culture in Dutch hospitals. BMC Health Serv. Res. 8,230.

    Sochalski, J., 2004. Is more better?: the relationship between nursestaffing and the quality of nursing care in hospitals. Med. Care 42(2 Suppl.) I67I73.

    Sorra, J., Nieva, V., 2004. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture.Westat, Rockville, MD.

    Stefl, M.E., 2001. To err is human: building a safer health system in 1999.Front. Health Serv. Manage. 18 (1) 12.

    Stratton, K.M., Blegen, M.A., Pepper, G., Vaughn, T., 2004. Reporting ofmedication errors by pediatric nurses.J. Pediatr. Nurs. 19 (6) 385392.

    Van den Heede, K., Florquin, M., Bruyneel, L., Aiken, L., Diya, L., Lesaffre, E.,Sermeus, W., 2