24
1 The Relationship between Pay- The Relationship between Pay- for-Performance Incentives and for-Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven Pearson, Ateev Mehrotra, Steven Pearson, Kathryn Coltin, Ken Kleinman, Janice Kathryn Coltin, Ken Kleinman, Janice Singer, Barbra Rabson, Eric Schneider Singer, Barbra Rabson, Eric Schneider RAND Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Brigham and RAND Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard School Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard School of Public Health, and Massachusetts Health Quality of Public Health, and Massachusetts Health Quality Partners Partners Supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Rewarding Results Supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Rewarding Results Initiative and an National Research Service Award (#6 T32 Initiative and an National Research Service Award (#6 T32 HP11001-17)

1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

3 Research Questions 1. What is the prevalence and magnitude of P4P incentives? 2. Are these incentives financially important to physician groups? 3. Do P4P incentives lead to increased use of QI initiatives? 4. How do physician group leaders view P4P?

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

1

The Relationship between Pay-The Relationship between Pay-for-Performance Incentives and for-Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey Quality Improvement: A Survey

of Massachusetts Physician of Massachusetts Physician Group LeadersGroup Leaders

Ateev Mehrotra, Steven Pearson, Kathryn Ateev Mehrotra, Steven Pearson, Kathryn Coltin, Ken Kleinman, Janice Singer, Coltin, Ken Kleinman, Janice Singer,

Barbra Rabson, Eric SchneiderBarbra Rabson, Eric Schneider

RAND Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Brigham and Women’s RAND Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard School of Public Health, Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard School of Public Health,

and Massachusetts Health Quality Partnersand Massachusetts Health Quality Partners

Supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Rewarding Results Supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Rewarding Results Initiative and an National Research Service Award (#6 T32 HP11001-17) Initiative and an National Research Service Award (#6 T32 HP11001-17)

Page 2: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

2

Previous ResearchPrevious Research

Few published studies on P4P Few published studies on P4P incentives have shown limited or no incentives have shown limited or no impact impact 11

Potential reasonsPotential reasons Providers reject conceptProviders reject concept Magnitude not significantMagnitude not significant Insufficient timeInsufficient time

1. Rosenthal and Frank. Med Care Research Review, Rosenthal et al. JAMA. 2005 Oct 12, 294:1788-93.

Page 3: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

3

Research QuestionsResearch Questions1.1. What is the prevalence and What is the prevalence and

magnitude of P4P incentives?magnitude of P4P incentives?2.2. Are these incentives financially Are these incentives financially

important to physician groups?important to physician groups?3.3. Do P4P incentives lead to Do P4P incentives lead to

increased use of QI initiatives?increased use of QI initiatives?4.4. How do physician group leaders How do physician group leaders

view P4P?view P4P?

Page 4: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

4

Study SampleStudy Sample 100 groups on Massachusetts 100 groups on Massachusetts

2005 physician group report card2005 physician group report card Interviewed leaders of 79 groups Interviewed leaders of 79 groups

between May and September 2005between May and September 2005 Semi-structured phone interviews Semi-structured phone interviews

lasting 30-60 minlasting 30-60 min

Page 5: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

5

Physician Group Physician Group Characteristics Characteristics

(n=79) (n=79)Number of Primary Care Number of Primary Care

ProvidersProviders%%

<= 10 MD<= 10 MD 1313 11-25 MD11-25 MD 2828 26-100 MD26-100 MD 4141 > 100 MD> 100 MD 1818Significant Capitation Significant Capitation (>25% of commercial revenue)(>25% of commercial revenue)

1313

Page 6: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

6

Research QuestionsResearch Questions1.1. What is the prevalence and What is the prevalence and

magnitude of P4P incentives?magnitude of P4P incentives?2.2. Are these incentives financially Are these incentives financially

important to physician groups?important to physician groups?3.3. Do P4P incentives lead to Do P4P incentives lead to

increased use of QI initiatives?increased use of QI initiatives?4.4. How do physician group leaders How do physician group leaders

view P4P?view P4P?

Page 7: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

7

Prevalence and Magnitude Prevalence and Magnitude of of

P4P in MassachusettsP4P in Massachusetts

* Limited to 37 groups

Groups with P4P Groups with P4P incentives in health incentives in health plan contractsplan contracts

89%89%

Overall revenue tied Overall revenue tied to P4Pto P4P

2.2%2.2%(0.3 – 8.0)*(0.3 – 8.0)*

Page 8: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

8

Focus of Current P4P Focus of Current P4P Incentives Among Groups Incentives Among Groups

with Any P4P (n=71)with Any P4P (n=71)  MeasuresMeasures Groups reporting Groups reporting

any P4P tied to any P4P tied to measuremeasure

%%HEDIS measures HEDIS measures 100100Utilization measuresUtilization measures 6464Use of EMR or other ITUse of EMR or other IT 5151Patient Satisfaction Survey Patient Satisfaction Survey MeasuresMeasures

3535

Page 9: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

9

Research QuestionsResearch Questions1.1. What is the prevalence and What is the prevalence and

magnitude of P4P incentives?magnitude of P4P incentives?2.2. Are these incentives financially Are these incentives financially

important to physician groups?important to physician groups?3.3. Do P4P incentives lead to Do P4P incentives lead to

increased use of QI initiatives?increased use of QI initiatives?4.4. How do physician group leaders How do physician group leaders

view P4P?view P4P?

Page 10: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

10

Evaluation of Financial Evaluation of Financial Importance Stratified by Importance Stratified by

Revenue at RiskRevenue at Risk

* Limited to 37 non-IPA groups with P4PMantel-Haenzel chi-squared test for trend significant with p value of 0.01

% of Overall Revenue tied to

P4P

N* P4P are “very important” or “moderately important” to group’s financial success

%<1% 19 11

1-3% 9 22

>3% 9 56

Page 11: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

11

Research QuestionsResearch Questions1.1. What is the prevalence and What is the prevalence and

magnitude of P4P incentives?magnitude of P4P incentives?2.2. Are these incentives financially Are these incentives financially

important to physician groups?important to physician groups?3.3. Do P4P incentives lead to Do P4P incentives lead to

increased use of QI initiatives?increased use of QI initiatives?4.4. How do physician group leaders How do physician group leaders

view P4P?view P4P?

Page 12: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

12

Use of QI InitiativesUse of QI Initiatives

0 20 40 60 80 100

Hypertension Control

LDL control

Hyperlipidemia Screening

Chlamydia Screening

Adequacy of Well Child Visits

Asthma Controller Medication Use

Mammogram Screening

HbA1c Measurement

Page 13: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

13

Relationship between P4P Relationship between P4P & QI Initiatives& QI Initiatives

0 20 40 60 80 100

Hypertension Control

LDL control

Hyperlipidemia Screening

Chlamydia Screening

Adequacy of Well Child Visits

Asthma Controller Medication Use

Mammogram Screening

HbA1c Measurement

P4P Incentive

QI Initiative

Page 14: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

14

Variables Associated with Variables Associated with Increased Use of QI Increased Use of QI

InitiativesInitiativesOdds Ratio(95% CI)

PValue

Pay-for-performance incentive 1.6 (1.0-2.4)

0.04

Employed Physician Group 3.2 (1.5 – 7.1)

0.004

Larger group (>39 physicians) 2.2 (1.0 - 4.9)

0.06

Page 15: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

15

Research QuestionsResearch Questions1.1. What is the prevalence and What is the prevalence and

magnitude of P4P incentives?magnitude of P4P incentives?2.2. Are these incentives financially Are these incentives financially

important to physician groups?important to physician groups?3.3. Do P4P incentives lead to Do P4P incentives lead to

increase use of QI initiatives?increase use of QI initiatives?4.4. How do physician group leaders How do physician group leaders

view P4P?view P4P?

Page 16: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

16

Views of P4PViews of P4P% of

Physician Group

LeadersPhysician groups should be paid based performance on HEDIS measures

77

P4P will lead to quality improvements over next 3 years

79

Page 17: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

17

LimitationsLimitations Findings do not address any Findings do not address any

problems with how current P4P problems with how current P4P incentives are structuredincentives are structured

Does not address actual Does not address actual performance on quality measuresperformance on quality measures

Cannot comment on potential Cannot comment on potential adverse impacts of P4P incentivesadverse impacts of P4P incentives

Page 18: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

18

Key FindingsKey Findings Vast majority of groups face P4PVast majority of groups face P4P Leaders support concept of P4P tied Leaders support concept of P4P tied

to HEDIS measures to HEDIS measures Current magnitude of P4P may be Current magnitude of P4P may be

insufficientinsufficient P4P incentives are associated with P4P incentives are associated with

increased use of QI initiativesincreased use of QI initiatives

Page 19: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

19

Policy ImplicationsPolicy Implications Support among physician leaders for Support among physician leaders for

incentives based on qualityincentives based on quality Help us understand the necessary Help us understand the necessary

financial magnitude of incentivesfinancial magnitude of incentives Demonstrate potential for pay-for-Demonstrate potential for pay-for-

performance incentives to increase performance incentives to increase attention paid to quality attention paid to quality improvementimprovement

Page 20: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

20

For further information: For further information: [email protected]@rand.org

Page 21: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

21

Independent Variables in Independent Variables in ModelModel

P4P Incentive on that measureP4P Incentive on that measure Percentage of Employed Physicians Percentage of Employed Physicians

(majority vs. less than majority) (majority vs. less than majority) Use of EMR (majority use EMR vs. less Use of EMR (majority use EMR vs. less

than majority)than majority) Size of group (>39 PCP vs. <=39 PCP)Size of group (>39 PCP vs. <=39 PCP) Types of MD (Mostly specialty vs. Equal Types of MD (Mostly specialty vs. Equal

mix or mostly primary care)mix or mostly primary care) Significant capitation Significant capitation Part of a NetworkPart of a Network

Page 22: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

22

Assessing Prevalence of Assessing Prevalence of QI Initiatives QI Initiatives

Focus on 8 HEDIS measuresFocus on 8 HEDIS measures Open-ended question Open-ended question Follow-up questions to Follow-up questions to

determine whether met criteria determine whether met criteria for 12 pre-specified categories for 12 pre-specified categories of QI initiativesof QI initiatives

Not all reported QI initiatives Not all reported QI initiatives codedcoded

Page 23: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

23

Measures Discussed in Measures Discussed in InterviewInterview

HEDIS measuresHEDIS measures Patient Patient

satisfaction survey satisfaction survey resultsresults

Utilization Utilization measuresmeasures

Use of EMR or Use of EMR or other ITother IT

Asthma Controller Asthma Controller Medication UseMedication Use

Adequacy of Well Child Adequacy of Well Child VisitsVisits

Chlamydia ScreeningChlamydia Screening Mammogram ScreeningMammogram Screening HbA1c ScreeningHbA1c Screening Hyperlipidemia Hyperlipidemia

Screening in patients Screening in patients with CADwith CAD

LDL control among LDL control among patients with CADpatients with CAD

Hypertension ControlHypertension Control

Page 24: 1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven

24

Ideally What % of Overall Ideally What % of Overall Revenue Should be Tied to Revenue Should be Tied to

P4P Incentives?P4P Incentives?

  % of Physician Group Leaders

Ideal Percentage 5% or Greater 91