Upload
primrose-stafford
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
• Introduction. Introduction. • OECD Model Convention.OECD Model Convention.• Why is TP a problem.Why is TP a problem.• Main methods. Main methods. • Cost contribution Agreements.Cost contribution Agreements.• Advanced pricing agreementsAdvanced pricing agreements• etcetc• etcetc• etcetc
22
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
OECD Model ConventionOECD Model Convention No specific articleNo specific article No specific prohibitions in domestic lawNo specific prohibitions in domestic law Article 9 Model Convention Article 9 Model Convention
Associated EnterprisesAssociated Enterprises Article 24 Model ConventionArticle 24 Model Convention
Non DiscriminationNon Discrimination
33
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricingmine
Source country Operating Co.
Source Country Parent Co.
Australian Holding Co.
AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC COMPANY
dividends
dividends
Australian Shareholders
dividends
Foreign Shareholder
s
44
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
Risk to source countryRisk to source country Manipulation of revenue / sale price Manipulation of revenue / sale price manipulation of expensesmanipulation of expenses
essential imput costsessential imput costs management servicesmanagement services use of tangible property; leasinguse of tangible property; leasing use of intangible property; IPuse of intangible property; IP
Cost contribution agreementsCost contribution agreements Research & developmentResearch & development but NO royalty incomebut NO royalty income
55
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
LabourLabour Technical Technical
Assistance FinanceAssistance Finance Essential inputs Essential inputs explorationexploration
CapitalCapital activities Research andactivities Research and
equipmentequipment developmentdevelopment
mine
Source country Operating Co.
Source country Parent Co.
PROFIT TRAP TAX HAVEN: Hong Kong.
Australian group
66
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
Conventional Result
Transfer Pricing, Thin capitalisation,Leasing, capital allowances.
Difference
Revenue 100 75 (25)
Expenses (50) (75) 25
Net Profit Before Tax
50 NIL (50)
Tax at 50% (25) NIL (25)
Net Cash 25 50 2525
77
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
The problem parent controls source The problem parent controls source county subsidiary. Not acting at arms county subsidiary. Not acting at arms length, manipluation of prices WILL occurlength, manipluation of prices WILL occur
Traditional methodsTraditional methods comparable uncontrolled price (cup)comparable uncontrolled price (cup) resale price methodsresale price methods cost pluscost plus
Profit splitProfit split Comparable profitsComparable profits Profit split methodProfit split method
88
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
Which methodWhich methodChoice based on degree of comparability.
Completeness and accuracy of data.
Reliability of assumptionsSensitivity of results to data deficiencies
99
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing Target industriesTarget industries
PetrochemicalsPharmaceuticalsMotor tradeFinancial servicesComputers, consumer electronicsBranded consumer goodsMedia
1010
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing (1) Inflated (1) Inflated expenses direct Parent co transactionexpenses direct Parent co transaction
Sale $100 Revenue
Sale $90 Expense
Third Party Source
Source SubParent
ResidentSource Market
Sale $50
Source subThird Party Parent Difference Solution
Revenue 100 100 - 100
Expenses (50) (90) (40) (50)
NPBT 50 10 (40) 50
Tax 50% (25) (5) (20) (25)
1111
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing (2) Inflated (2) Inflated expenses indirect third party sells first to expenses indirect third party sells first to
parent co parent co
Sale $90 expenses
Third Party Source
Source Sub
ParentResident
Source Market
Sale $50
Sale $100 revenue
Sale $50
Source sub Third Party Parent Difference Solution
Revenue 100 100 - 100
Expenses (50) (90) (40) (50)
NPBT 50 10 (40) 50
Tax 50% (25) (5) (20) (25)
1212
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing : (3) reduced : (3) reduced revenue revenue
Sale $60$100
$100
Market ParentResident
Source Sub
Costs
Third Party Source
Sale $100
$50
$50
Source sub Third Party Parent Difference Solution
Revenue 100 60 - 100
Expenses (50) (50) (40) (50)
NPBT 50 10 (40) 50
Tax 50% (25) (5) (20) (25)
1313
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
Sale $75Sale $75
Comparable Uncontrolled price: cupComparable Uncontrolled price: cup
Unrelated Party
Sub Co.Parent Co.
Unrelated Party
Sale $100
Sale $75
1414
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
The problem of comparabilityThe problem of comparability Suitability. Degree of comparability. Lack of comparable prices. Problem areas:
quantity quality level of the market Intangibles Foreign exchange Business strategies
Burden of proof
1515
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing Resale price method: (resale Resale price method: (resale
minus)minus) Distributors: work back from sale price Price earned by the controlled entity
from third party sales LESS, Arms length GROSS margin for a
comparable uncontrolled transaction EQUALS,
Arms length price for transaction with related party.
Emphasis is on functional comparability NOT product comparability.
1616
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing Cost plus methodCost plus method
Similar to RSPM but works back from the other end ie the sale price is suspect not the imput
Start with cost of the product or service ADD,
Arms length gross profit mark up EQUALS,
Arms length sale price to related party.
Focus on functional comparability.
1717
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
Comparable profitsComparable profits Based on comparable ratios
ROI ROE GP Berry ratio.
Suitability. Advantages cf to transactional
methods. Disadvantages.
1818
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
The problem of The problem of comparabilitycomparabilityCharacteristics of the property / service.
Characteristic of the intangible Contractual termsEconomic circumstancesBusiness strategies
1919
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing Advanced Pricing Agreements
Advantages Certainty, Non adversarial, Development of actual policies.
Disadvantages Disclosure, Prior years Inflexible Overseas associates
2020
Transfer PricingTransfer Pricing
Scrap value $5
OldAsset
Improvements“New”Asset
MNC Related Party MNC
SourceSub
Sale $25
Sale$50
Cost $5 $10 Market value
Source Sub Third Party MNC Difference
Revenue $100 $100 -
Capital Allowances (10) (50) (40)
NPBT 90 50 (40)
Tax 50% 45 25 (20)