183
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 S.R. NEHAD, an individual, K.R. ) CASE NO. 15-cv-1386- 4 NEHAD, an individual, ESTATE OF ) WQH-NLS FRIDOON RAWSHAN NEHAD, an ) 5 entity, ) ) 6 Plaintiffs, ) ) 7 v. ) ) 8 SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN, in her ) personal and official capacity ) 9 as Chief of Police, NEAL N. ) BROWDER, an individual, CITY OF ) 10 SAN DIEGO, a municipality, and ) DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) 11 ) Defendants. ) 12 ________________________________) 13 14 15 DEPOSITION OF NEAL BROWDER 16 July 12, 2016 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Mary Anne Young, CSR No. 12799 409986 25

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 S.R. NEHAD, an individual, K.R. ) CASE NO. 15-cv-1386-

4 NEHAD, an individual, ESTATE OF ) WQH-NLS FRIDOON RAWSHAN NEHAD, an )

5 entity, ) )

6 Plaintiffs, ) )

7 v. ) )

8 SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN, in her ) personal and official capacity )

9 as Chief of Police, NEAL N. ) BROWDER, an individual, CITY OF )

10 SAN DIEGO, a municipality, and ) DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, )

11 ) Defendants. )

12 ________________________________)

13

14

15 DEPOSITION OF NEAL BROWDER

16 July 12, 2016

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24 Mary Anne Young, CSR No. 12799 409986

25

Page 2: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 S.R. NEHAD, an individual, K.R. ) CASE NO. 15-cv-1386-

4 NEHAD, an individual, ESTATE OF ) WQH-NLS FRIDOON RAWSHAN NEHAD, an )

5 entity, ) )

6 Plaintiffs, ) )

7 v. ) )

8 SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN, in her ) personal and official capacity )

9 as Chief of Police, NEAL N. ) BROWDER, an individual, CITY OF )

10 SAN DIEGO, a municipality, and ) DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, )

11 ) Defendants. )

12 ________________________________)

13

14

15 The Videotaped Deposition of NEAL BROWDER, a

16 Defendant, taken by Plaintiffs pursuant to the applicable

17 sections of the Code of Civil Procedure, on Tuesday,

18 July 12, 2016, before me, Mary Anne Young, CSR No. 12799,

19 beginning at the hour of 9:35 a.m. at 1200 Third Avenue,

20 Suite 1200, in the City of San Diego, County of San Diego,

21 State of California.

22

23

24

25

2

Page 3: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A P P E A R A N C E S

2

3 For the Plaintiffs:

4 MILLER BARONDESS, LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1000

5 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 552-4400

6 Facsimile: (310) 552-8400 E-mail: [email protected]

7 [email protected] BY: DAN S. MILLER

8 SEAN G. McKISSICK

9

10 For the Defendants:

11 OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO CITY ATTORNEY 1200 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

12 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 533-5910

13 Facsimile: (619) 533-5856 E-mail: [email protected]

14 [email protected] BY: JOHN E. RILEY

15 BEVERLY A. ROXAS

16

17 The Videographer: LAURA VELASCO

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3

Page 4: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 I N D E X

2

3 EXAMINATION: PAGE

4 BY MR. MILLER 6

5

6

7 E X H I B I T S

8 NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE

9 1 San Diego Police Department Investigator's 156 Report

10 Bate Stamped COSD00000113 through 124 12 pages

11 2 Officer Involved Incident Checklist 160

12 Bate Stamped COSD00000125 1 page

13 3 Certificates 162

14 Bate Stamped BROWDER 000047, 62, 71 and 147 4 pages

15

16

17

18

19

20 PORTIONS MARKED CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY

21 Page 38, Line 7 - Page 42, Line 11

22 Page 164, Line 20 - Page 165, Line 7

23

24

25

4

Page 5: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

2 TUESDAY, JULY 12, 2016 9:35 A.M.

3 - o0o -

4

5 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. Here begins

6 media number 1 of the deposition of Neal Browder in the

7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al.

8 This case is in the United States District Court,

9 Southern District of California. The case number is

10 15-cv-1386-WQH-NLS. Today's date is July 12, 2016, and

11 the time on the monitor is 9:35 a.m.

12 This deposition is taking place at 1200 Third

13 Avenue, Suite 1200, San Diego, California, 92101. The

14 videographer is Laura Velasco appearing on behalf of

15 Barkley Court Reporters located in Irvine, California,

16 92614.

17 Would counsel please identify yourselves and

18 state whom you represent?

19 MR. MILLER: Dan Miller on behalf of

20 plaintiffs.

21 MR. McKISSICK: Sean McKissick on behalf of

22 plaintiffs.

23 MR. RILEY: John Riley on behalf of Neal

24 Browder and City Defendants.

25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The court reporter today is

5

Page 6: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Mary Anne Young with Barkley Court Reporters.

2 Would the reporter please swear in the

3 witness?

4 NEAL BROWDER,

5 A Defendant herein, being first duly sworn, testifies as

6 follows:

7 EXAMINATION

8 BY MR. MILLER:

9 Q Good morning.

10 A Good morning.

11 Q Have you had your deposition taken before?

12 A As far -- yes.

13 Q On how many occasions?

14 A Just one.

15 Q And what case was that?

16 A That was during a traffic collision.

17 Q A traffic collision that you were involved in?

18 A Yes.

19 Q Were you a plaintiff in that case?

20 A No, I was a defendant.

21 Q Okay. Someone sued you, the lady with the

22 traffic incident?

23 A The insurance, yes.

24 Q What was the result of that case?

25 A It was not only myself, it was another driver

6

Page 7: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 that was involved in the collision, so we were found at

2 fault.

3 Q You were found at fault?

4 MR. RILEY: If we can hold on a second? I

5 understand the question in terms of deposition for

6 purposes of the familiarity of how this process works.

7 Getting into the merits of a personal lawsuit, I'd like

8 to stay away from that.

9 MR. MILLER: Okay. I think we'll -- I just

10 want to understand the basics and see if there is any

11 relevance; otherwise I understand where you're coming

12 from.

13 MR. RILEY: It is personal business, it sounds

14 like.

15 BY MR. MILLER:

16 Q Okay. Was that lawsuit in any way related to

17 your job with the San Diego Police Department?

18 A No.

19 Q So is there -- have you -- are you on any

20 medication or have you had any -- taken any substances

21 that would prevent you from giving truthful and accurate

22 testimony today?

23 A No.

24 Q Do you have any -- have you been diagnosed

25 with any memory issues or any -- any health issues

7

Page 8: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 related to your memory?

2 A No.

3 Q Are you -- well, let me just go through. Have

4 you testified at trial before?

5 A Yes.

6 Q And is that in connection with your duties as

7 a police officer?

8 A Yes.

9 Q On how many occasions have you testified at

10 trial?

11 A I can't give you an exact number because I've

12 been a police officer for 28 years, so --

13 Q Understood, and that's kind of that -- let me

14 get into some of the ground rules here. When I ask a

15 question like that that calls for a number, I'm entitled

16 to your best estimate, so if you can give me an

17 estimate, great, I don't want you guess or speculate.

18 But if you have an estimate, if it's more than 20,

19 between 20 and 30, try and give me a range.

20 A couple other ground rules: When I'm

21 talking, try not to jump in even if you know the answer

22 to the question already. I know in normal conversation

23 we do that but it's easier for the court reporter --

24 A Okay.

25 Q -- if we can try not to talk over each other.

8

Page 9: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 If you need a break, please tell me. I have

2 no problem whatsoever with breaks. All I ask is that

3 you answer the question that's pending and then I'm

4 happy to go off the record and take a break.

5 A Okay.

6 Q If I ask a question and you don't understand

7 the question, please just tell me. I will try and

8 rephrase it if it's a bad question.

9 A Okay.

10 Q Okay. So could you give me an estimate for

11 the number of trials you've testified at?

12 A So we're talking in the course of my career?

13 Q Yes.

14 A I would estimate 250.

15 Q And of those 250 cases, did they involve

16 criminal defendants that were on trial for crimes?

17 A Well, that -- those cases include

18 traffic-related cases in addition to criminal cases.

19 Q Do you have an estimate of how many were

20 felony cases?

21 A That actually went to trial as far as having a

22 jury, or is it -- are we just talking like preliminary

23 cases?

24 Q Any kind of testimony you gave.

25 A I would estimate over the course of my career

9

Page 10: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 probably conservatively, I'd say 75.

2 Q 75 felony cases in which you've given

3 testimony?

4 A I would say yes.

5 Q Do you receive any training at the police

6 department about testifying at trial?

7 A Yes, during -- during the academy, yes.

8 Q What type of training?

9 A We -- I believe, as part of the POST

10 requirements, I think we have a segment in there

11 regarding court testimony and law procedures.

12 Q For -- for the deposition today, I don't want

13 to know what you spoke to your attorney about, but

14 putting that aside, what did you do to prepare?

15 A Other than just my conversation with my

16 attorney, I saw the video of the incident and also I was

17 given a copy of the homicide investigator's report.

18 Q Did you read the homicide investigator's

19 report?

20 A A portion of it, yes.

21 Q When were you given that?

22 A Earlier this week, I believe.

23 Q And when did you watch the -- when you say

24 "the video," are you referring to the video of the

25 actual shooting?

10

Page 11: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q Okay. I'm trying to differentiate between --

3 I know there's some body camera footage after, but the

4 video you're referring to is from Keco, the store

5 nearby, of the shooting when you actually pull up in the

6 car and shots were fired?

7 A Yes.

8 Q And when did you watch that?

9 A About a week ago.

10 Q How many times did you watch it?

11 A I think we reviewed it, I'd estimate, three

12 times, probably.

13 Q And where did you watch it?

14 A My attorney's office.

15 Q Who is your attorney?

16 A Mr. John Riley.

17 Q Was anyone else there when you watched the

18 video?

19 A No.

20 MR. RILEY: Objection. I think you're getting

21 awful close to the attorney/client privilege.

22 MR. MILLER: Okay. I don't agree, but that's

23 okay, we'll go question by question.

24 BY MR. MILLER:

25 Q How much time did you spend meeting with your

11

Page 12: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 attorney to prepare for this deposition?

2 MR. RILEY: Objection. Don't answer. It

3 invades the attorney/client privilege.

4 BY MR. MILLER:

5 Q In your meeting with your attorney one week

6 ago, how long was your meeting?

7 MR. RILEY: Objection. Don't answer. Same

8 objections. Any questions about a meeting with him,

9 besides the fact that it took place, would reflect my

10 thought processes and we're not going to go there, so

11 ask your questions as you may, but it's a standing

12 objection to this line.

13 MR. MILLER: Okay. I just want to make sure I

14 understand the objection. You will be objecting if I

15 ask the length of time or anyone who attended the

16 meeting?

17 MR. RILEY: Yes.

18 MR. MILLER: Okay.

19 BY MR. MILLER:

20 Q And just so I have a clear record, did anyone

21 else attend the meeting besides your attorney?

22 MR. RILEY: Objection. Don't answer.

23 BY MR. MILLER:

24 Q And you're going to follow your attorney's

25 instruction not to answer these questions?

12

Page 13: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A That's correct.

2 Q Okay. What -- could you tell me your

3 experience as far as having firearms training, if you

4 could give me -- I know it calls for maybe a long

5 answer, but give me -- if you could give me a summary of

6 your training over the course of your career?

7 MR. RILEY: Objection. Calls for a narrative.

8 Could you break that down, please?

9 MR. MILLER: Sure. Just trying to speed

10 things along.

11 BY MR. MILLER:

12 Q In your original -- when you first entered the

13 police academy, how many years ago was that, about 27?

14 A It's 28 now.

15 Q Okay. What training did you receive in using

16 firearms?

17 A We received academy training and we also have

18 to qualify every quarter, which is every four months.

19 Q And since that time, have you received

20 additional training every four months?

21 A Could you be more specific as far as --

22 additional training as far as, you know, I take my

23 personal time to go on training my own time, so I guess

24 you could consider that training.

25 Q Okay. That's helpful.

13

Page 14: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Let's -- let's say the last ten years, how

2 often do you spend personal time training with a gun?

3 A I try to at least go once a month, my personal

4 time to train.

5 Q And do you go to a shooting range?

6 A Yes. Yes. Majority of the time, yes.

7 Q Do you own any guns personally now?

8 A Yes.

9 Q What types of guns?

10 MR. RILEY: Objection. We can go off the

11 record, but I don't -- I don't want to get into his

12 personal life. We're here to discuss what happened that

13 evening, so I'm not sure if this is relevant. Do you

14 have some thoughts?

15 MR. MILLER: Sure. I think any, you know,

16 prior use of guns, understanding of how guns work,

17 training in guns is relevant in a shooting case.

18 MR. RILEY: It is, but his ownership of

19 personal possessions, TVs, guns, et cetera, I don't

20 think we want to go there.

21 MR. MILLER: I think what type of guns he uses

22 and owns --

23 MR. RILEY: Uses on the force?

24 MR. MILLER: If you want to just say uses

25 personally, that's fine. Whether he actually owns it, I

14

Page 15: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 don't care but as long as --

2 MR. RILEY: Okay.

3 MR. MILLER: -- I can get into what he uses.

4 MR. RILEY: Fair enough.

5 MR. MILLER: Okay.

6 MR. RILEY: Sure.

7 BY MR. MILLER:

8 Q What type of guns do you use in your personal

9 life to train?

10 MR. RILEY: Objection. We're not going into

11 his personal life. We're here to discuss what happened

12 on the evening of the event and anything related to his

13 police life. I don't know why you keep interjecting

14 personal stuff in here. I think you could ask the

15 question in a way that doesn't invade his home, his

16 family, his wife, his kids. We want to stay away from

17 that personal side of it. If that's not where you're

18 going, that's fine, but it sounds like you're trying to

19 go there.

20 MR. MILLER: But let me -- let me be clear

21 because I'm not trying to get into your life with your

22 wife and kids. What I -- what I understand is time you

23 spend practicing with a gun.

24 MR. RILEY: That's a fair question.

25

15

Page 16: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 BY MR. MILLER:

2 Q And let's start with outside of the San Diego

3 Police Department.

4 A Yeah, there, again, I -- I try to go at least

5 once a month if I can, depending on what I have going on

6 at home. So I would just estimate probably once a

7 month, probably.

8 Q Okay. Once a month for the last how many

9 years?

10 A Probably -- consistently probably the last --

11 about like maybe five years or so.

12 Q What type of gun -- guns have you used?

13 A As far as training goes or --

14 Q Uh-huh.

15 A Majority of the time, just my handgun.

16 Q And what type of gun is that?

17 A I have a Glock 21. It's a 45.

18 Q 45 caliber?

19 A Yes.

20 Q And what type of police -- in your line of

21 work as a police officer in the last five years, what

22 type of guns have you used?

23 A Can you be a little more specific as far as --

24 Q Let's start with training. What type of guns

25 have you been trained on?

16

Page 17: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Okay. I've been trained on an AR-15, a 308

2 rifle, the Glock 21, MP-5. Those -- yeah, those are the

3 ones.

4 Q And is the Glock 21, is that different than

5 the Glock that was used on the night of the incident in

6 April of 2015?

7 A No, it's the same one.

8 Q Same gun?

9 A Uh-huh.

10 Q And the Glock 21 is a 45 caliber?

11 A Yes.

12 Q And focusing on -- on the Glock 21, over the

13 past 10 years at -- while at the San Diego Police

14 Department, how many -- how much time have you spent

15 training with the Glock?

16 A With that particular gun?

17 Q Yes.

18 A I'd estimate -- I would say five years with

19 that particular gun.

20 Q During those five years, do you -- do you have

21 any -- how many number of hours or how often you would

22 train with the -- with the Glock?

23 A There again, it's -- we have to qualify every

24 four months. In addition to that, just when I train,

25 probably, you know, once a month when I go out and train

17

Page 18: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 with it on my own.

2 Q And did you -- in those five years, did you

3 always qualify?

4 A Oh, yes.

5 Q And were you given a rating or a measure of

6 accuracy with the gun?

7 A Yes. If you shoot a certain score, you can

8 get a level of what they consider an expert.

9 Q Did you obtain that level?

10 A Yes, I have.

11 Q And how many times have you obtained the level

12 of an expert marksman with a Glock?

13 A With that particular gun?

14 Q Yes.

15 A I'd estimate three.

16 Q And to obtain the level of an expert with the

17 Glock 21, do you -- do you have any knowledge of -- is

18 that a -- is that a hard thing to do? How many -- what

19 percentage of officers obtain that, that level?

20 A I don't know the exact number as far as who

21 actually would qualify as an expert, but it's a set

22 course of fire and you only can miss, I believe -- it's

23 five rounds off of a particular scored target, so if you

24 miss less than five rounds, then you can obtain the

25 level expert -- what they consider to be expert.

18

Page 19: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And how many rounds do you fire in the test?

2 A During the test, I want to say for the course

3 of fire I believe it's 20.

4 Q Okay. So you need to hit -- you need to hit

5 the target 15 to 20 times?

6 A Well, to obtain the level of expert you only

7 can miss five rounds, and we're not saying miss the

8 target completely, we're just saying that if it's -- if

9 it's a silhouette target, it's -- there is a scoring

10 target within that target that is clearly marked. So if

11 you miss five rounds outside -- let's consider like the

12 10 zone, which would be center mass, then it's not that

13 you're failing the course of fire, it's just that you --

14 you won't reach the level of expert, I guess.

15 Q So you can still pass the test?

16 A Oh yeah, yes.

17 Q Okay. And when you say "center mass," center

18 mass of what?

19 A Center mass of the target.

20 Q And what is the target shaped like?

21 A The target we normally use is called a bottle

22 -- a bottle-shaped target. It's a silhouette target.

23 And then within that target, there's -- it's numbered,

24 and that's how they -- that's how the target is scored,

25 based on the number system.

19

Page 20: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Is the shape supposed to be similar to a human

2 body?

3 A It's -- I would say it's similar to a human

4 body, yes. It's the shape of a body if you were to look

5 at it.

6 Q And what part of the -- of the -- of the

7 target are you aiming for, is it the -- what would be

8 the chest area of the human body?

9 A Yes.

10 Q Okay. And have you obtained the level of

11 expert with any other guns besides the Glock 21?

12 A To my knowledge, no, no. I believe it's with

13 the 21.

14 Q And the Glock 21 is the gun you use most

15 often, once a month or so, you train on your own,

16 correct?

17 A Yes.

18 Q Are you a member of the Special Weapons --

19 Special Weapons And Tactics, otherwise known as SWAT, at

20 San Diego Police Department?

21 A Yes.

22 Q How long have you been a member?

23 A 22 years.

24 Q And what type of test or proficiency with

25 respect to use of firearms did you have to obtain to

20

Page 21: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 become a member of SWAT?

2 A Well, you have to go through the SWAT academy

3 and then there is a -- what we call a standards test

4 that you have to pass in order to make the team.

5 Q So you went through the SWAT academy about

6 22 years ago?

7 A Yes.

8 Q And you passed?

9 A Yes.

10 Q How many officers are on SWAT, if you know?

11 A As of right now? Let's see, we're allotted

12 100, and I believe we're anywhere between 86 to 90 on

13 the team.

14 Q And do you have an estimate of how many SWAT

15 missions you've done since you've been a member?

16 A Now, as far as missions go, are we talking

17 about warrant services in addition to the missions or

18 actual missions itself?

19 Q Let's do actual missions first.

20 A Actual missions, I would -- let's just say

21 15 actual missions.

22 Q And then how about with the services as well?

23 A With the warrant services, in addition to the

24 missions, I would estimate, over 22 years, let's go with

25 150.

21

Page 22: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And what is the -- could you tell me the --

2 the training that you went through at SWAT to become a

3 member?

4 A Well, you have to interview for the position.

5 You have to pass a physical agility test, and then once

6 you -- and also you have to pass a -- an additional

7 firearms proficiency test that they have set up. Once

8 you meet those requirements, then if you're elected to

9 go to the SWAT academy, then you attend the SWAT

10 academy, which is three weeks long.

11 Q And does part of the SWAT academy -- academy

12 training include firearms?

13 A Yes.

14 Q Are there any particular firearms that are

15 used in SWAT and not used by officers on regular patrol?

16 A Yes.

17 Q What are those firearms?

18 A Well, when I first was on the team, it was

19 just only the MP-5. There are three weapons systems

20 that we use, which is the MP-5, the shotgun, and then

21 also your handgun. And now that's expanded out to -- we

22 no longer -- even though you can still carry the shotgun

23 on duty as a patrol officer, but as far as being a team

24 member on SWAT, we have the AR-15, the MP-5 and our

25 handgun.

22

Page 23: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q So as far as the Glock -- the Glock 21, you

2 would -- you're fairly -- you're pretty good with a gun,

3 you're proficient with it; would you agree?

4 A To whose standard? To department standard?

5 Q Department standard.

6 A I'm pretty proficient with it, yes.

7 Q How about -- other than SWAT, are you a member

8 of any other particular teams or divisions within the

9 department?

10 A Other than SWAT, as far as -- can you clarify

11 that, as far as? I'm not sure what you're asking.

12 Q Let me -- let me try again.

13 A Okay.

14 Q Have you -- have you achieved any

15 certifications with respect to firearm use at the

16 department?

17 A Oh, any other certain certifications?

18 Q Yes.

19 A No, that's -- that's just it, other than just

20 our qualification sheets through the police department

21 and just our -- we have to do a standard shoot through

22 SWAT, which is also -- that's a quarterly shoot, so --

23 and that's just to be certified in the weapons system

24 that we use for SWAT.

25 Q What type of missions are SWAT called in for?

23

Page 24: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A It could be anything related to hostage

2 rescue. It could be barricaded suspect situations.

3 Those are the prime examples. There, again, we do

4 harvest warrant services any time where an incident

5 commander may need additional equipment and resources

6 that we have available on the team that they could use

7 as a resource to resolve a particular incident.

8 Q And have you -- have you ever been -- obtained

9 any training or certification as a sniper?

10 A Yes.

11 Q Okay. Tell me what certification you've

12 achieved.

13 A Now, to become a sniper on the SWAT team? Is

14 that what you're referring to?

15 Q A sniper with the San Diego Police Department

16 either in SWAT or without.

17 A Okay. So in order to be a sniper, you have to

18 be on the SWAT team.

19 Q Okay.

20 A So -- and that's one of the positions applied

21 for, and there again you have to go through an interview

22 process and also there's a proficiency -- a firearms

23 proficiency course that you have to perform. And once

24 you're selected, then you have to go through a -- it's

25 called a sniper academy which is put on through our

24

Page 25: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 unit. In addition to that, you have to be P.O.S.T.

2 certified by going through a sniper -- basic sniper

3 course.

4 Q And when did you apply to become a sniper with

5 SWAT?

6 A The first time was in 1998 when I made the

7 team, and then I left the team back in '98, and I've

8 been currently on the team now for, I believe, six --

9 six years, I think, currently.

10 Q You've been on the sniper team?

11 A Yes.

12 Q And how many officers are on the sniper team

13 now?

14 A There's ten officers and two supervisors.

15 Q Are you a supervisor or an officer?

16 A Officer.

17 Q And that's ten officers in the entire

18 department that are on the sniper team?

19 A Yes.

20 Q And those ten officers are -- they have to be

21 members of SWAT as well, correct?

22 A Yes.

23 Q Okay. And did you -- so you -- you passed all

24 of the proficiency certification requirements to become

25 a sniper, correct?

25

Page 26: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q And what type of guns did you train on --

3 train with to become a sniper?

4 A Our primary weapon system is the 308, the

5 rifles, the 308 rifle.

6 Q I'm sorry. What? What was that?

7 A It's a 308 rifle.

8 Q And did you have to pass accuracy -- to be

9 tested for accuracy with the 308 rifle?

10 A Yes.

11 Q And did you pass those tests?

12 A Yes.

13 Q And what type of missions are -- is the sniper

14 team called in for?

15 A Well, what we consider a Code 11, which means

16 that it can be a hostage rescue situation or any type of

17 barricaded suspects, and those are primarily the two

18 main focal points that we would respond to, so any Code

19 11s or Code 12s, responses.

20 Q And have you -- have you ever taught firearms

21 to other officers at the San Diego Police Department?

22 A Informally or formally? Because informally, I

23 -- to answer that question, I would say yes. But

24 formally, no.

25 Q Okay. What have you done informally to teach

26

Page 27: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 other officers about firearms?

2 A Well, just essentially -- you know, we have

3 officers that would come up to me, just for the fact of

4 being on the SWAT team so -- and they just ask for --

5 for, you know, additional guidance to -- you know, as

6 far as, you know, it can be weapons handling, to shoot

7 more accurately, those types. So I just give them tips

8 regarding that, you know.

9 Q And you -- but you -- but as far as formally

10 within the department, have you ever taught a course

11 using firearms?

12 A No, not in the department, no.

13 Q Have you ever taught a course anywhere in the

14 use of firearms?

15 A Yes.

16 Q Where did you teach?

17 A I used to teach security officers. I used to

18 run a course for security officers, so that's where I

19 would actually -- that's where I taught a firearms

20 course.

21 Q These are private security officers?

22 A Yes.

23 Q When did you teach that course?

24 A Oh, this is years ago. I would probably say

25 maybe about ten years ago.

27

Page 28: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. And so -- have you ever been a firearms

2 instructor for the San Diego Police Department?

3 A No.

4 Q Going back to the Glock 21, is there a safety

5 on that gun?

6 A On the Glock 21, there's no external safety,

7 no.

8 Q So the gun is -- it's ready to shoot if you

9 pull the trigger? You don't have to flip a switch

10 anywhere?

11 A Correct.

12 Q Is -- is there any type of safety?

13 A I think it has an internal thing that blocks

14 the hammer, but there again I don't -- I'm not a Glock

15 armor so I'm not -- I really can't go into any

16 information regarding the internal safety.

17 Q Understood. Do you -- are you -- would you

18 describe the Glock as having -- well, could you tell me

19 how much pressure is required when you depress your

20 finger to pull the trigger on the Glock?

21 A The poundage, I think the minimum -- the

22 minimum poundage can be three pounds, and I think it can

23 go up to seven pounds, I believe. Between three to

24 seven pounds.

25 Q Okay. And do you know what the difference --

28

Page 29: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 does that depend on different types of Glock?

2 A It depends on how it comes from the

3 manufacturer, and I don't know if it's different for

4 every Glock, but I think that's the range -- the trigger

5 poundages, from three to seven, I believe.

6 Q And in your experience with the -- the other

7 guns that you described, was that poundage more or less

8 than the AR-15?

9 A We're talking about the average?

10 Q Uh-huh.

11 A I'd probably say more, more than average.

12 Q How about the MP-5?

13 A I probably would say either about the same or

14 more than the M-5.

15 Q And in -- at the time of the -- and we'll get

16 into more detail of the, you know -- the incident in

17 this case. At the time that you were -- April 30th,

18 2015, did you have any knowledge as far as how many

19 pounds per pressure were needed to pull the trigger on

20 your Glock?

21 A Prior to the incident?

22 Q Yes.

23 A Yes.

24 Q And how much -- and how many pounds of

25 pressure were needed to pull the trigger on your Glock

29

Page 30: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 prior to the April 30th, 2015 incident?

2 A Well, in order to use my handgun, it has to be

3 checked at the range, and part of their process is in

4 order to authorize you to carry that gun on duty is that

5 they check the trigger poundage on -- to check to see

6 how many pounds of pressure are on your trigger, I would

7 say. And what I can remember on mine at the time when

8 it was authorized for me to carry on duty, it was over

9 three pounds. The exact amount of pounds, I don't

10 remember.

11 Q But it was -- was it less than four pounds?

12 A It may have been between three to four pounds.

13 Q That's your best memory?

14 A That would be my best memory because they were

15 not authorized to be carried on duty if it was under

16 three pounds.

17 Q Three is the cut-off?

18 A Three's the cut-off, yes.

19 Q And how about after --

20 MR. RILEY: Can we take a break here, please?

21 MR. MILLER: Oh, sure. Yeah.

22 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The

23 time is 10:11 a.m.

24 (A short break was taken)

25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.

30

Page 31: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 The time is 10:18 a.m.

2 BY MR. MILLER:

3 Q Do you know whether after the -- well, after

4 the incident on April 30th, 2015, did you turn your gun

5 in so -- as part of the investigation?

6 A Yes.

7 Q And did you receive it back at any point in

8 time?

9 A Yes.

10 Q When did you receive it back?

11 A I would estimate maybe a week later.

12 Q Did anyone tell you anything about whether it

13 was tested as far as pounds per pressure?

14 A No.

15 Q Did that week, did you receive a replacement

16 gun to use?

17 A Yes.

18 Q Were you on duty that week?

19 A Can you clarify that?

20 Q Where were you working that week?

21 A I was put on administrative assignment.

22 Q What is administrative assignment?

23 A I was working at the office.

24 Q So you were working at a desk?

25 A Yes.

31

Page 32: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q What were you doing?

2 A Administrative duties around the station,

3 processing tickets, things like that.

4 Q How long were you on administrative

5 assignment?

6 A For a month, I believe.

7 Q After that month, were you put back on patrol?

8 A Yes.

9 Q Have you received training in the use of --

10 use of force?

11 A Yes.

12 Q And have you received training on the, you

13 know, difference between a use of deadly force versus

14 non-deadly force?

15 A Yes.

16 Q When -- in your training and experience, when

17 is it appropriate to use deadly force?

18 A When your -- when your life or someone else's

19 life is in danger of great bodily injury or death.

20 Q Did you receive any training as far as how to

21 deal with a suspect who is armed with a knife?

22 A Can you be more specific as far as your

23 question?

24 Q Sure. Did you receive any training as far as

25 how to respond or handle a situation in which you are in

32

Page 33: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 fairly close contact with someone who has a knife?

2 A We received academy training regarding edged

3 weapons.

4 Q What type -- what type of training?

5 A They essentially talked about the dangers of

6 someone with edged weapons and also they talked about

7 how to address the immediate threat if someone

8 presented -- if someone -- someone actually presented an

9 edged weapon or something to that effect. It was all

10 academy related stuff.

11 Q And this goes back to your training when you

12 first joined the police department?

13 A Right.

14 Q Did you receive any training as far as how to

15 deal with someone with an edged weapon after that?

16 A After the academy?

17 Q (Attorney nodded his head)

18 A I was just thinking. I'm sorry. Yes.

19 Q What type of training?

20 A During -- we have what's called advanced

21 officers training which is -- it's additional training

22 that takes place once a year, and during that course, we

23 probably received some additional training regarding

24 that.

25 Q Do you remember any specific training you

33

Page 34: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 received as far as how to approach a suspect with an

2 edged weapon?

3 A I can't recall.

4 Q Would you agree that if you -- if a suspect

5 has an edged weapon, you should approach them with

6 caution?

7 A Yes.

8 Q And if a suspect has an edged weapon and

9 you're approaching them, would you agree you should have

10 your gun drawn?

11 MR. RILEY: Objection. Incomplete

12 hypothetical.

13 BY MR. MILLER:

14 Q You can answer if you understand.

15 A Can you repeat the question?

16 Q Sure. And by the way, I didn't cover that in

17 the beginning. Your counsel, as he has done, will

18 object throughout the deposition. Unless he instructs

19 you not to answer, I would ask that you answer my

20 question.

21 A Okay.

22 Q If you're approaching a suspect with a -- with

23 an edged weapon, you should have your gun drawn?

24 MR. RILEY: Objection. Incomplete

25 hypothetical.

34

Page 35: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 THE WITNESS: So answer -- answer the

2 question?

3 MR. RILEY: Yes.

4 THE WITNESS: It depends on the circumstances.

5 In every occasion -- I mean, there's not every situation

6 where you would draw your handgun, but then there's a

7 lot of situations where you wouldn't, so I mean, it's

8 depending on the circumstances.

9 BY MR. MILLER:

10 Q And if someone -- but if someone does have an

11 edged weapon or knife, you should take steps to protect

12 yourself from being stabbed; agree?

13 MR. RILEY: Objection. Incomplete

14 hypothetical.

15 THE WITNESS: Yes.

16 BY MR. MILLER:

17 Q How many times have you fired your gun in the

18 line of duty?

19 A Are we including training? In addition to

20 training?

21 Q Let's -- let's -- let's do training first.

22 A Okay. So if we're considering training, so we

23 have monthly SWAT training, which we normally have a

24 course of fire to do, so that's once every month on the

25 average, and then our department training, which is once

35

Page 36: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 every quarter for qualification shoots, and then --

2 yeah, so regarding that, yes, that's it.

3 Q And that's been true for the last five years

4 or six years since you joined SWAT?

5 A As far as my training?

6 Q Yes.

7 A Yes.

8 Q How about outside of training, how many times

9 -- putting aside the April 2015 incident -- have you

10 fired your gun in the line of duty?

11 A Twice.

12 Q When was the second time?

13 A Let's see. I want to say in 1998 --

14 Q Could you tell me the circumstances?

15 A -- or actually, 1999. We just had a suspect

16 that shot his roommate in the head and he barricaded

17 himself in their apartment.

18 Q And this was -- was this a SWAT mission?

19 A It turned out to be a SWAT mission, yes.

20 Q And were you on SWAT at the time?

21 A Yes.

22 Q And how many times did you fire your gun

23 during this mission?

24 A I believe seven.

25 Q Were you shooting at a suspect?

36

Page 37: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q What type of gun did you fire?

3 A My AR-15.

4 Q Did you hit the suspect?

5 A No.

6 Q So other than the 1999 incident and the

7 April 2015 incident, have you ever fired your gun in the

8 line of duty as a San Diego Police Department officer?

9 MR. RILEY: Let me put an objection on the

10 record here. As I understand it, we are now in front of

11 the judge on a dispute whether some subsequent event --

12 subsequent to this particular incident is relevant or

13 not. How do you think we should handle that?

14 MR. MILLER: Well, my suggestion would be to

15 let him -- let him answer questions about it because,

16 you know, we're -- if we win that dispute, we'll want to

17 have him back here to answer questions, so, you know, my

18 preference is always to try and finish a deponent's

19 deposition so we don't have to bring them back for more

20 questions. So that would be what I would suggest, but

21 if you -- if it works for you.

22 MR. RILEY: Well, let's mark this portion of

23 the transcript and have it sealed for this point in

24 time, and then depending on how the court ruling goes,

25 then -- then we'll have it on record. How's that?

37

Page 38: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 MR. MILLER: That's fair. So we're -- we're

2 sealing a portion of the deposition just with respect to

3 this particular subsequent shooting?

4 MR. RILEY: Any shooting that occurred

5 subsequent to the event.

6 MR. MILLER: Okay.

7 ///

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25 ///

38

Page 39: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 ///

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11 ///

12 BY MR. MILLER:

13 Q Are you -- are you currently on patrol?

14 A No.

15 Q What are you doing now?

16 A I work at the FTO Administration Office.

17 Q And what does FTO stand for?

18 A Field training office.

19 Q What do you do there?

20 A Administrative duties. We're assigned

21 trainees to field officer, scheduling.

22 Q How long have you worked there?

23 A Since February.

24 Q Since February of 2016?

25 A Yes.

42

Page 40: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And let's say the last five years, could you

2 estimate how many arrests that you've made while a

3 San Diego police officer?

4 A Can you be more specific as far as the

5 arrests? Is it a generalization or DUI arrests, how

6 many misdemeanor arrests, felony arrests?

7 Q Overall arrests.

8 A People I've booked into custody or people that

9 I've cited?

10 Q Put aside traffic stops.

11 A In the past five years?

12 Q (Attorney nodded his head)

13 A Let's just go conservatively -- let's just say

14 150.

15 Q 150 arrests?

16 A Yes.

17 Q And in past five years, how many suspects have

18 you interviewed?

19 A For criminal cases or just for physical

20 arrests?

21 Q Criminal cases.

22 A I'd estimate -- let's just say 100.

23 Q 100 suspect interviews in criminal cases. And

24 at the department, did you receive any training as far

25 as how to interview suspects?

43

Page 41: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q What type of training?

3 A Academy training, and I believe I attended a

4 -- an interrogation class years ago. I don't recall

5 what year I attended.

6 Q Did you receive any training as far as the

7 importance of trying to interview suspects close in time

8 to when the alleged crime was committed?

9 A Yes.

10 Q What type of training?

11 A Well, that's just -- you know, it's part of

12 the academy training, you know, just -- you know, you

13 want to try to interview the suspect as soon as you can

14 within reason.

15 Q Why is that?

16 A Just to get their side of the story of what

17 happened for accuracy.

18 Q When you say "for accuracy," why is it good to

19 interview them as soon as you can?

20 A Because you essentially want to get their side

21 of the story of whatever event that they may be involved

22 in.

23 Q But you want to get it close in time to the

24 incident, correct?

25 A Yeah, you try.

44

Page 42: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q So if it's possible, you try to get it close

2 in time to the incident?

3 MR. RILEY: Incomplete hypothetical. Lacks

4 foundation. Calls for speculation.

5 BY MR. MILLER:

6 Q Can you answer?

7 A Oh, as soon as you can. You try to interview

8 the suspect as soon as you can.

9 Q And would you tell me in your experience why

10 it's important to interview suspects as soon as you can

11 after an alleged incident?

12 MR. RILEY: Objection. Asked and answered.

13 Incomplete hypothetical. It depends on the

14 circumstances. It's an unfair question. Go ahead and

15 answer if you can.

16 MR. MILLER: Okay. Counsel, just going

17 forward, if we could avoid coaching. I would appreciate

18 it if we could just keep objections to what's

19 permissible.

20 MR. RILEY: Objection. Incomplete

21 hypothetical. Lacks foundation. Assumes facts not in

22 evidence. It's -- lacks all the circumstances for

23 anything related to this incident and irrelevant.

24 THE WITNESS: You just try to interview the

25 suspect, you know, within reason whenever possible just

45

Page 43: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 to get an accurate statement.

2 BY MR. MILLER:

3 Q So it's important in order to get an accurate

4 statement.

5 MR. RILEY: Objection. Incomplete

6 hypothetical again. Assumes facts not in evidence. It

7 doesn't describe all the circumstances of this event.

8 MR. MILLER: That last one, I think, again is

9 not an objection that's permissible under the code, so

10 I'd ask that you try not to do that. I'd appreciate it.

11 THE WITNESS: So with the -- it's, you know,

12 you try to interview the suspect as soon as possible.

13 BY MR. MILLER:

14 Q Do you -- in your career, have you -- have you

15 received any promotions since you started?

16 A Promotions as far as rank?

17 Q Yes.

18 A As far as -- well, I'm just trying to -- to

19 clarify that because you have pay grades, you know,

20 steps that, you know, which is -- but as far as your

21 rank, I'd say no.

22 Q But pay grade increases you've received?

23 A Yeah, pay grade increases.

24 Q Okay. Prior to this April 2015 incident, had

25 you ever been investigated in any use of force

46

Page 44: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 incidents?

2 A Okay. Can you be more specific on that as far

3 as --

4 Q Yeah, let me -- let me try and be more

5 specific. Have you been interviewed in any use of force

6 incidents involving your use of force?

7 A Well, we're talking the span of my career or

8 just any particular time frame or --

9 Q The span of your career.

10 A Yes.

11 Q On how many occasions?

12 A I -- I don't recall.

13 Q Has it ever been determined by the San Diego

14 Police Department that you used excessive force?

15 A Are we talking the span of my career?

16 Q Uh-huh.

17 A Yes.

18 Q On how many occasions?

19 A One.

20 Q When was that?

21 A 20 years ago.

22 Q Could you describe the circumstances?

23 A From what I can recall, we were looking for a

24 domestic violence suspect, and while taking him into

25 custody, he started to resist and he was exhibiting

47

Page 45: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 assaultive behavior and that's when he was forced.

2 Q And who determined that the force used was

3 excessive?

4 A Internal Affairs, during their investigation.

5 Q What type of force did you use?

6 A I used an impact weapon.

7 Q Which weapon?

8 A It was my PR-24.

9 Q Is that a baton?

10 A Yes.

11 Q Did you strike the suspect with the baton?

12 A Yes.

13 Q How many times?

14 A Twice.

15 Q Where did you hit the suspect?

16 A Let's see. The first impact was a jab and

17 that was to -- to the stomach area, and then the second

18 impact was to his calf, I believe.

19 Q Were any other officers involved in that

20 incident?

21 A Yes.

22 Q How many?

23 A I'd estimate between four to five.

24 Q Four to five. This happened on the street?

25 A It was inside the apartment.

48

Page 46: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Inside an apartment?

2 A Yeah.

3 Q And were the other four to five officers in

4 the apartment with you?

5 A Yes.

6 Q Were you -- at the time that you struck him

7 with the baton, were you trying to subdue the suspect?

8 A Yes.

9 Q How many other officers were trying to subdue

10 the suspect?

11 A Initially there were just two. It was myself

12 and one other officer.

13 Q And then more officers joined?

14 A Right.

15 Q When you -- how many officers were trying to

16 subdue the suspect when you struck the suspect with the

17 baton?

18 A The second time?

19 Q The first time.

20 A There was only two officers. There was myself

21 and another officer from the department.

22 Q And when you struck the suspect the second

23 time in the calf, how many officers were trying to

24 subdue him?

25 A There were, I believe, four. Four officers

49

Page 47: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 that were trying to subdue him.

2 Q And was the suspect on the ground at the time?

3 A Yes.

4 Q So four officers beside yourself were trying

5 to subdue the suspect at that time?

6 A Yes.

7 Q And while the four officers were trying to

8 subdue the suspect, you struck him in the calf with a

9 baton?

10 A Yes.

11 Q Did Internal Affairs determine that both

12 strikes were excessive?

13 A I think the findings on that was it wasn't the

14 amount of force that was successful, they said that I

15 should have opted for a different force option.

16 Q Did they tell you which force option you

17 should have opted for?

18 A They wouldn't clarify that, no.

19 Q But they said a lesser force option would

20 have --

21 A They didn't say a lessor force option; they

22 just said I should have opted for a different force

23 option.

24 Q Were you disciplined as a result of that

25 incident?

50

Page 48: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q What type of discipline?

3 A It was a -- I believe it was a written

4 reprimand.

5 Q A written reprimand?

6 A Uh-huh.

7 Q Who wrote the reprimand, do you know?

8 A I have no idea. It was through Internal

9 Affairs.

10 Q Were you docked in pay as a result of that?

11 A No, no.

12 Q Were you suspended as a result of the

13 incident?

14 A No.

15 Q Did you have to undergo any training as a

16 result of that incident?

17 A No.

18 Q So other than the written reprimand, there was

19 no other discipline?

20 A No, that was it.

21 Q Have there been any other times where it was

22 determined by Internal Affairs or anyone else at the

23 police department that you used excessive force?

24 A No.

25 Q Are you aware of complaints against you by

51

Page 49: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 suspects who claim you used excessive force during your

2 career?

3 A Yes.

4 Q On how many occasions?

5 A Over 28 years, I can't give you an exact

6 number on that. I have no idea. Sometimes if someone

7 calls in a complaint, I mean, t's not even brought to

8 your attention. It can be handled by a supervisor or

9 whoever they call in to.

10 Q How many of those complaints resulted in an

11 actual investigation?

12 A Through the command or through Internal

13 Affairs?

14 Q Through Internal Affairs.

15 A And we're talking about the expanse of my

16 career, I'd estimate maybe less than five, maybe.

17 Q How about through the command?

18 A That, I don't know. I can't remember all

19 that.

20 Q Okay. Do you wear glasses or contacts, by the

21 way?

22 A Contacts.

23 Q And that for -- seeing things far away, seeing

24 things close or both?

25 A I'm near-sighted.

52

Page 50: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. What's your -- what is your vision, if

2 you know?

3 A I think it's 250 in one eye and 300 in the

4 other.

5 Q And in April 2015, was that your -- do you

6 know what your vision was then?

7 A Probably the same.

8 Q I'm sorry. What was it?

9 A I believe it's 250 in one eye and 300 in the

10 other.

11 Q Were you wearing contacts on the evening of

12 April 30th, 2015?

13 A Yes.

14 Q And you need the contacts to see things far

15 away?

16 A Yes.

17 Q And how long have you worn contacts for?

18 A I believe since I was 16.

19 Q Do you wear glasses as well or just contacts?

20 A Primarily contacts.

21 Q And when you're -- when you're on duty as a

22 San Diego police officer, say in the last ten years,

23 have you worn contacts consistently?

24 A Yes.

25 Q And with your vision, you need the contacts to

53

Page 51: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 perform your job; would you agree?

2 A Yes.

3 Q Okay. The evening of April 30th, 2015, you

4 were in a parking lot somewhere near where the incident

5 happened, correct, before when you received a call?

6 A Oh, when I initially received the call?

7 Q Yes.

8 A Yes, I was in a parking lot.

9 Q And where was that parking lot located?

10 A It would be on the south side of Sports Arena

11 Boulevard.

12 Q And about how far from the location of the

13 incident was that -- driving?

14 A Three to four blocks, probably.

15 Q So very close.

16 What were you doing in your car?

17 A From what I can recall, I believe I was

18 getting some paperwork together for the sergeant's exam

19 that I was planning on taking.

20 Q And do you recall when the sergeant's exam was

21 that you were planning on taking?

22 A That, I don't recall.

23 Q You were studying?

24 A I was getting some material together to study,

25 yes.

54

Page 52: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And you were by yourself in the car?

2 A Yes.

3 Q Did you have a partner at the time?

4 A No.

5 Q Is there any reason you didn't have a partner

6 at the time?

7 A No, it can be due to staffing. I have no

8 idea.

9 Q Is it more common to have a partner when

10 you're on patrol than not?

11 A Not necessarily.

12 Q Sometimes you patrol by yourselves?

13 A Uh-huh.

14 Q And around that time frame, April 2015, you

15 were patrolling by yourself the majority of the time?

16 A Yes.

17 Q Okay. Well, what -- who initially called you?

18 A Can you clarify that as far as --

19 Q Sure. What was the -- tell me the first time

20 you learned that there was some type of activity that

21 you needed to respond to on April 30th, 2015.

22 A That came out through our communications,

23 dispatch.

24 Q Okay. And what did dispatch tell you?

25 A Well, she assigned two units that were

55

Page 53: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 responding from the beach to a call at an adult book

2 store.

3 Q When you say "she," who is she?

4 A The dispatcher.

5 Q And were you one of those two units?

6 A No, not initially.

7 Q So do you know who those -- when you say "two

8 units," do you mean two separate patrol officers?

9 A Yes.

10 Q Okay. And do you know who those officers that

11 were assigned to the call were?

12 A Officer Dan Laughlin and Officer Vincent Dow

13 (phonetic).

14 Q Were they partners?

15 A No.

16 Q So the two units were separate vehicles?

17 A Yes.

18 Q And did you volunteer to handle the call?

19 A I volunteered to respond to the call, yes.

20 Q And did the dispatcher -- what did the

21 dispatcher say when you volunteered?

22 A She -- she assigned me to the call.

23 Q Okay. And why did she assign you to the call?

24 A Because I volunteered.

25 MR. RILEY: Objection. Calls for speculation.

56

Page 54: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 BY MR. MILLER:

2 Q Did she tell you why she assigned you to the

3 call -- why she assigned you to the call?

4 A Well, I volunteered to go to the call.

5 Q Okay. And was it a certain type of call, you

6 know, in -- in the coding system as far as what type of

7 call it was?

8 A The call came in as a male threatening the

9 clerk with a knife.

10 Q And were you given a description of the male?

11 A Yes.

12 Q Do you recall the description that was

13 provided?

14 A It was provided through -- our dispatcher?

15 Q Yes.

16 A I believe she said it was an Asian male

17 wearing a gray sweater and I believe gray shorts.

18 Q And was there a height or weight description

19 provided to you by the dispatcher?

20 A I believe there was a height. I don't recall

21 what the height was.

22 Q And after you received that call, did you go

23 to the scene of the incident?

24 A Yes.

25 Q And did you drive there?

57

Page 55: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q On your drive there, did you make any other

3 calls, either with your cell phone or on your police

4 radio?

5 A To my knowledge, no.

6 Q And when was the next time you spoke to

7 anyone, either by dispatch -- well, let me -- let me ask

8 a different question.

9 Did you use your cell phone -- from the time

10 you received the initial call from dispatch until the

11 time of the shooting, did you use your cell phone at all

12 to call anyone or text anyone?

13 A Not that I can recall, no.

14 Q Okay. So after that first dispatch call, when

15 was the next time you -- you spoke to anyone?

16 A Just when I advised the dispatcher I was going

17 to be en route to the call.

18 Q Okay. And then when you arrived at the scene,

19 did you speak to dispatch again?

20 A Yes.

21 Q Okay. And did you speak to the same person at

22 dispatch?

23 A I believe so.

24 Q Okay. Was it a woman?

25 A Yes.

58

Page 56: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. Do you know the woman's name?

2 A I believe the dispatcher that was working at

3 the time -- I believe her last name is Cavanaugh.

4 Q Did you know her personally?

5 A No.

6 Q And during the second call, tell me the

7 conversation between you and Ms. Cavanaugh.

8 A Well, that's when I put myself on scene.

9 Q Okay. And was there another call after that

10 before the shooting?

11 A She was giving updates regarding the -- the

12 actions of the suspect, and I believe the last

13 information I received from communications was that the

14 witness or victim last saw the suspect leaving through

15 the alley.

16 Q Okay. And so did you receive any other

17 updates about the suspect?

18 A Other than the fact that he was threatening

19 the reporting party with a knife, and the next update

20 that I can remember was they last saw him either leaving

21 through the parking lot towards the alley, and that was

22 the last update that I can remember.

23 Q Okay. And no one from dispatch ever told you

24 that the suspect had a gun, correct?

25 A No.

59

Page 57: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q When you say "no," that's correct, no one ever

2 told you?

3 A No, no one ever told me he had a gun, no.

4 Q So -- and no one told you he had any type of

5 weapon other than a knife, correct?

6 A No, just from what the reporting party stated,

7 that he was armed with a knife.

8 Q And the reporting party, they did not tell you

9 he was armed with anything else, right?

10 A That's the only information I received is

11 that.

12 Q So -- okay. So you were looking for an Asian

13 male fitting that description that may be armed with a

14 knife, correct?

15 A Yes.

16 Q And when you arrived on the scene, did you --

17 were your -- were the headlights on on your police

18 vehicle when you arrived?

19 A Do you mean just the regular lights on --

20 Q Regular lights.

21 A -- the car? Yes.

22 Q And was your siren on?

23 A No.

24 Q Were the police lights on top of your car on?

25 A No.

60

Page 58: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And when I say "the police lights on top of

2 your car," are those -- are those red and blue?

3 A Yes.

4 Q Okay. At any point in time on April 30th,

5 2015 before the shooting, did you turn on your police

6 lights or your siren?

7 A No.

8 Q And did you -- when was the first time you saw

9 any other -- any other people when you arrived?

10 A That's -- when I initially arrived on scene, I

11 saw two -- two individuals in the parking lot.

12 Q And when you arrived, did you see them after

13 you had parked your police car?

14 A No I saw them before --

15 Q Okay.

16 A -- I get out of the car.

17 Q Did you speak to either of those individuals?

18 A No. No, I did not.

19 Q What direction were they, from where you were

20 facing when you pulled up?

21 A I believe one individual was standing more

22 towards the middle of the parking lot and I want to say

23 the second individual was -- I can't recall exactly what

24 his location was, but I want to say it was somewhere in

25 the parking lot by the parked cars. I know for a fact

61

Page 59: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 there were two people in the parking lot when I pulled

2 up.

3 Q And do you -- about how far away from you were

4 the two individuals?

5 A Well, when I initially saw them, I was on

6 Hancock Street. I would probably say -- maybe two car

7 lengths, two, two and a half car lengths.

8 Q And car lengths, you mean the long way?

9 A Right.

10 Q When did you first see -- did you -- well, did

11 you come to learn that the individual that -- that you

12 shot is named Fridoon?

13 A Yes.

14 Q When did you first see Fridoon when you

15 arrived at the scene?

16 A Shortly after I turned into the alley is when

17 I saw him.

18 Q And when you first saw him, were the

19 headlights on your police car on?

20 A Yes.

21 Q At some point did you switch your bright

22 headlights on in the police car?

23 A Yes.

24 Q At what point in time did you do that?

25 A Probably -- well, not probably, but as soon as

62

Page 60: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 I made that left turn into the alley, I turned my high

2 beams on.

3 Q Okay.

4 A I don't mean to interrupt you. Can I take a

5 break real quick? I just have to use the bathroom.

6 MR. MILLER: Absolutely.

7 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This marks the end of media

8 number 1 in the deposition of Neal Browder. We are

9 going off the record at 11:06 a.m.

10 (A short break was taken)

11 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are back on the record

12 at 11:20 a.m. and this marks the beginning of media

13 number 2 of the deposition of Neal Browder.

14 BY MR. MILLER:

15 Q Why did you turn on your bright headlights?

16 A To provide more light down the alley.

17 Q So you could see the -- better see the

18 suspect?

19 A Yes.

20 Q And are police cars -- are they outfitted with

21 particularly bright lights, do you know, or are they

22 similar to bright lights on a regular car?

23 A Just standard lights, you know, for that

24 particular car.

25 Q What type of car were you driving?

63

Page 61: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A It was a Ford Crown Victoria.

2 Q And from the time -- so you say you turned the

3 headlights on when you turned into the alley; is that

4 correct?

5 A Shortly after I turned into the alley.

6 Q Okay. And you kept the bright headlights on

7 throughout the -- until you fired your gun, correct?

8 A Yes.

9 Q And when you saw Fridoon, did he match the

10 description of what you -- of what you heard on the

11 dispatch call?

12 A I confirmed the description with dispatch.

13 Q When you say you "confirmed," when did you do

14 that?

15 A Shortly after I saw Fridoon.

16 Q Did you get out of your car before you

17 confirmed?

18 A No.

19 Q Okay. And when you confirmed, what did

20 dispatch tell you?

21 A I gave the description of what he was wearing

22 and -- well, no, actually, I asked her the description

23 of the suspect again and she broadcast it over the radio

24 again.

25 Q And they -- and you confirmed that the

64

Page 62: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 description matched?

2 A Yes.

3 Q And could you -- when you observed Fridoon,

4 could you describe his -- his height, his weight?

5 A He appeared to be between five eight and five

6 ten, thin build.

7 Q A thin, skinny build?

8 A He was thin.

9 Q And when you first saw him, did you see if he

10 was holding anything?

11 A When I initially saw him?

12 Q (Attorney nodded his head)

13 A Not initially, no.

14 Q So initially, you couldn't see anything in his

15 hands?

16 A I knew he had something in his hand, but I

17 couldn't tell what it was.

18 Q Okay. And how far away was he when you first

19 saw him?

20 A Probably two to three car lengths.

21 Q Okay. And what direction was he facing when

22 you first saw him?

23 A He was facing me, so that would be -- he was

24 facing northbound.

25 Q And was he standing? Was he moving?

65

Page 63: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Oh, he was moving, yeah.

2 Q And was he walking?

3 A He was -- he was -- I would say that he was

4 moving with a purpose would be the best way to describe

5 it.

6 Q And when you say "moving with a purpose," what

7 do you mean?

8 A Because when I saw him in the alley, he

9 started to transition to the driver's side of my car, I

10 would say.

11 Q What do you mean "transition to the driver's

12 side"?

13 A Because when I initially saw him, he was --

14 because the alley -- it's a north/south alley and he was

15 on the west side -- if -- if you're in the alley, it

16 would be on the west side of the alley and then he

17 crossed over to the east side, which would be to the

18 driver's side of the car.

19 Q How far away was he when he crossed over?

20 A By then, he was probably less than three car

21 lengths after I initially saw him, so maybe about two

22 and a half, two car lengths.

23 Q And what time of night was it?

24 A It was like -- I believe like 12:00 at night.

25 Q Was it dark outside?

66

Page 64: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q Was there -- were there any street lights that

3 illuminated the area?

4 A I know that the book store had some street

5 lights that faced the rear parking lot, and in front the

6 store they had some exterior lights, and then I want to

7 say the business that's on the west side -- yeah, I

8 think that was it.

9 Q Was there a street light near the alley that

10 was broken or not working?

11 A I don't recall.

12 Q Was there a street light in the back of the

13 alley that was flickering?

14 A That, I don't recall.

15 Q Do you recall any street lights that were

16 broken or not working?

17 MR. RILEY: Asked and answered. Go ahead.

18 THE WITNESS: Not that I can recall.

19 BY MR. MILLER:

20 Q Do you recall any street lights in the area

21 that were flickering on and off?

22 MR. RILEY: Asked and answered.

23 THE WITNESS: I can't recall now.

24 BY MR. MILLER:

25 Q When you first saw Fridoon, did you get out of

67

Page 65: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 your -- how long from when you first saw him, how much

2 time until you exited your police vehicle?

3 A When I initially saw Fridoon as he was

4 approaching the car, then I confirmed the description

5 with communications. I -- after I confirmed that he was

6 the right person that I had, that's when I noticed that

7 it appeared to me that he had a knife in his hand, and

8 that's when I threw the mic in the passenger seat and

9 then put the car into park, and that's when I got out of

10 the car.

11 Q And did you keep your car door open on the

12 driver's side?

13 A Yes, I had my car door propped open.

14 Q Did you do that for any purpose?

15 A Because I didn't want to get trapped in the

16 car, so I -- when I first saw him in the alley, that's

17 when I propped my car door open.

18 Q When you say you didn't "want to get trapped

19 in the car," what do you mean?

20 A Well, just for my -- I just didn't want to get

21 trapped in the car. You know, if someone is armed with

22 a knife, I just didn't want to be stuck in the car and

23 be stabbed while I'm sitting in my car, so that's why I

24 propped my door open.

25 Q Okay. And after you exited the vehicle when

68

Page 66: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 you were outside the car, did you close your door?

2 A No, my car door was open.

3 Q Did you keep it open in front of you for any

4 reason?

5 A Well, my car door was open and then I stepped

6 to the left of my car door.

7 Q Is there any reason you kept it open after you

8 exited your vehicle?

9 A No, other than the fact just to get out of the

10 car.

11 Q Okay. Is there any reason you didn't close

12 your car door after you got out?

13 A It happened so -- so quick, I didn't -- I

14 mean, it wasn't something I thought about doing was

15 closing the car door.

16 Q And after you exited your vehicle, you were

17 standing beside your driver's side car door, correct?

18 A When I got out of the car, yeah, I was behind

19 the door, yes.

20 Q When you drew your gun, were you behind the

21 door?

22 A No.

23 Q Where were you when you drew your gun?

24 A I was to the -- I took a step to the left of

25 the door.

69

Page 67: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Did you take a step back or just to the left?

2 A No, it would be to my left, to the left.

3 Q How far away from the car door were you at

4 that point in time?

5 A I was right next to the car door.

6 Q Was part of your body still behind the car

7 door?

8 A No, I don't believe it was, no, not when I

9 stepped to the left.

10 Q Okay. Did you -- and you had your contacts

11 on, correct?

12 A Yes.

13 Q Were there any lights shining in your face

14 that obscured your view of Fridoon?

15 A No.

16 Q You had a -- you had a -- there -- were there

17 any objects in your way that obscured your view of

18 Fridoon?

19 A No.

20 Q And there were no people in your way that

21 obscured your view of Fridoon, correct?

22 A No.

23 Q Did you have your -- did you have your

24 bullet-proof vest on that night?

25 A Yes.

70

Page 68: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And is there -- is there a front part that you

2 had on of the bullet-proof vest? Is there -- is there

3 two pieces of the bullet-proof vest, in other words?

4 A To the bullet-proof vest, yes, there is a

5 front panel and a back panel.

6 Q Okay. Did you have the front panel and the

7 back panel on?

8 A Yes.

9 Q And was that part of your training, to have

10 the bullet-proof vest on?

11 A It's a department policy.

12 Q Do you have it on at all times when you're on

13 patrol?

14 A Yes.

15 Q Okay. And did you receive any training as far

16 as whether a bullet-proof vest would protect --

17 project -- protect you against sharp edged weapons?

18 A Yes.

19 Q Okay. What training did you receive?

20 A Well, the training that I received or that

21 I -- was the fact that edged weapons can cut through a

22 bullet-proof vest.

23 Q Did you receive any training that bullet-proof

24 vests may help you against edged weapons?

25 A No, I was told that bullet-proof vests will

71

Page 69: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 not protect you against edged weapons.

2 Q And when you -- from the time that you first

3 saw Fridoon until the time that you fired your gun, did

4 you see him threaten anyone?

5 A Can you repeat the question again?

6 Q Sure.

7 A I'm sorry.

8 Q From the time you first saw Fridoon until the

9 time that you fired your gun, did you see him threaten

10 anyone?

11 A No.

12 Q From the time you first saw Fridoon until the

13 time you fired your gun, did you see him approach

14 anyone?

15 A No.

16 Q From the time you first saw Fridoon until you

17 fired your gun, did you hear him say anything?

18 A No.

19 Q From the time -- did you observe his facial

20 expression before you fired your gun?

21 A No.

22 Q At any time did you observe his facial

23 expression before you fired your gun?

24 A No.

25 Q Did you observe whether his eyes were opened

72

Page 70: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 or closed prior -- prior to the time you fired your gun?

2 A Oh, his eyes were open.

3 Q And could you tell which direction he was

4 looking?

5 A He was looking at me.

6 Q Did he -- and he never said anything to you,

7 correct?

8 A No.

9 Q Did he -- did he make any threatening gesture

10 towards you?

11 A Can you explain what you mean by

12 "threatening"?

13 Q Sure. Did he ever -- did he raise his arm

14 above his head at any point in time?

15 A No.

16 Q Did he make any thrusting motion with either

17 of his arms?

18 A Well, he had what appeared to me the knife in

19 his hand, and it was held in this manner here.

20 Q And when -- okay. When you -- when he was

21 holding what you believed was a knife, how was he

22 holding it? Could you demonstrate?

23 A He was holding it like this.

24 MR. RILEY: I've got concerns about

25 demonstrations in a room where we've got bright lights,

73

Page 71: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 et cetera. I don't know where you plan on going with

2 this. I'll let him hold up his hand like that, but

3 anything beyond that I don't think it's appropriate or

4 it's not permissible under these circumstances. They

5 have a demonstration, so go ahead with your question.

6 MR. MILLER: Okay. All right. Okay. I -- I

7 don't agree at all, but we'll see where it goes.

8 MR. RILEY: Okay.

9 BY MR. MILLER:

10 Q Could you show me -- from your observation on

11 that night -- and I understand it was dark that night

12 and we're in a totally different setting, but from what

13 you could observe, how was he holding the object?

14 A Just like this.

15 Q Was his hand out-stretched like that?

16 A It was bent.

17 Q Was it closer -- was it -- how close to his

18 abdomen region was it?

19 A It wasn't close to his abdomen.

20 Q It was out-stretched?

21 A Well, what do you mean by "out-stretched"?

22 Q Okay. Let's demonstrate one more time where

23 you viewed his --

24 MR. RILEY: Wait. Can we clarify the

25 question? What do you mean --

74

Page 72: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 MR. MILLER: Sure.

2 MR. RILEY: -- by out-stretched?

3 BY MR. MILLER:

4 Q Yes. Let me -- let me ask you a different

5 question.

6 A Okay.

7 Q And if I'm going too fast, please just tell

8 me.

9 A Okay.

10 Q You know, sometimes -- sometimes that happens.

11 Just demonstrate one more time what you

12 observed as far as the position of his arm when he was

13 holding the object in his hand.

14 A It was in this manner here.

15 Q Okay. And when you observed that, about how

16 far away was he from you, if you could estimate?

17 A I'd estimate maybe a -- maybe a car length, a

18 car length and a half.

19 Q And at that time when you observed him when he

20 was a car length or a car length and a half away from

21 you, did you see any other people near by him?

22 A By him?

23 Q Yes.

24 A No.

25 Q So you weren't concerned for the safety of

75

Page 73: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 anyone other than yourself at that point, correct?

2 A Well, then individuals were in the parking lot

3 to my left.

4 Q How close was he to the individuals in the

5 parking lot?

6 A Well, I believe -- well, there was one

7 civilian that was behind me to my left in the parking

8 lot.

9 Q And that civilian, could you estimate how far

10 Fridoon was from that civilian?

11 A Well, let's see. Fridoon was -- I'd say a car

12 length, a car length and a half, so I believe the

13 civilian was probably maybe -- probably from what I can

14 remember, maybe anywhere between five and ten feet from

15 me off to my left.

16 Q Off to your left and behind you, or just off

17 to your left?

18 A I think he was behind me off to my left.

19 Q Well, was anyone that you observed closer to

20 Fridoon than you were?

21 A No.

22 Q And did you identify yourself as a police

23 officer to Fridoon?

24 A I don't recall.

25 Q Did you say, "Stop, police. I'm a police

76

Page 74: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 officer," anything like that?

2 A I don't recall.

3 Q Are you trained to identify yourself as a

4 police officer when you encounter suspects?

5 A When feasible we identify ourselves as a

6 police officer.

7 Q And is that --

8 A Depends.

9 Q And is that part of your training?

10 A Well, that's training we've received.

11 Q And why are you trained to identify yourself

12 as a police officer when feasible?

13 A So the person that you're contacting knows

14 that you're a police officer.

15 Q And why is that important?

16 A Because you want to let the person know that

17 you're contacting that you're a police officer.

18 Q Because they may respond different --

19 differently to you, correct?

20 A Yes.

21 Q And it's important, if feasible, to identify

22 yourself as a police officer prior to using force,

23 correct?

24 A Yes.

25 Q Do you recall saying anything to Fridoon prior

77

Page 75: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 to firing your gun?

2 A No.

3 Q Do you recall saying anything to anyone at the

4 scene prior to firing your gun?

5 A I don't recall.

6 Q Do you recall that Fridoon slowed down before

7 you fired your gun?

8 A He didn't slow down. When I saw him as he was

9 aggressing me, he didn't slow down.

10 Q When you say he was "aggressing" you, what

11 does -- what does aggressing mean?

12 A Well, to me, it -- there again, like I said,

13 it appeared to me he was definitely focusing on me and

14 was walking towards me with that purpose -- with a

15 purpose.

16 Q And other than he's walking towards you, why

17 do you say he was walking with a purpose?

18 A I felt that he was walking -- he was walking

19 to stab me with the knife because that's what I saw.

20 That's what I saw in his hand.

21 Q Other than him walking towards you, did he do

22 anything else to cause you to believe that he was going

23 to stab you with the knife?

24 A Just the way that he had -- had that metal

25 object in his hand, the way he was -- the way he was

78

Page 76: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 carrying it, the nature of the call, how it came out,

2 and what kept going through my mind is, "Why isn't this

3 guy stopping?" And he never stopped, and I thought he

4 was going to stab me.

5 Q When you say -- I understand what's going

6 through your mind, why isn't this -- this guy stopping.

7 You don't recall telling him to stop or saying anything

8 to him, correct?

9 A I don't recall, no.

10 Q Is there a -- when you -- when you pulled up

11 to the scene and you did not have your siren or your red

12 and blue police lights on, is there a reason you did not

13 have them on?

14 A No.

15 Q Is there any training you received as far as

16 responding to calls of the nature of someone with a --

17 with a knife where you're advised on whether or not to

18 use your police lights or siren?

19 A It just depends on the circumstances of the

20 call.

21 Q Did you consider using your -- your police

22 lights or siren when you pulled up?

23 A No.

24 Q Did it -- did it cross your mind at any point

25 in time prior to the time you fired your gun that

79

Page 77: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Fridoon may not know you're a police officer?

2 A No. It never crossed my mind that he didn't

3 know I was a police officer.

4 Q Have you received any -- any training in using

5 lights when you -- just stepping away from that evening

6 for a second.

7 A Okay.

8 Q Using lights on suspects, flashlights or your

9 bright headlights to make it more difficult for them to

10 see you?

11 A Yes. That's a tactic that could be used.

12 Q And could you just tell me the training you've

13 received on that particular tactic?

14 A During traffic stops, you would use your

15 lights to your advantage to obviously, you know, allow

16 you to see the individual that you're stopping, you

17 know, so that way you try to make them as visible as

18 possible to you when you approach.

19 Q So part of the tactic is to make the person as

20 visible as possible but make it harder for them to see

21 you. Is that in case they have a weapon?

22 A Yes, that's one of the tactics used.

23 Q Okay. Was that tactic in your mind when you

24 turned on your bright head lamps that were pointed at

25 Fridoon?

80

Page 78: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A I used my head lamps so that way I could get a

2 better look at Fridoon.

3 Q Understood. You used your bright head lamps

4 to get a better look at him.

5 Was it also in your mind to use your bright

6 head lamps to make it harder for him to see you in case

7 he had a weapon?

8 A Well, my -- my focus was -- is to use my

9 headlights so that way I can get a better view of

10 Fridoon. Does that put you at a better tactical

11 advantage? It depends. I mean, you would hope it

12 would, so --

13 Q And in terms of does it put you at a better

14 tactical advantage, would that be because it's dark

15 outside and the suspect has bright head lamps shine in

16 their face while you don't?

17 A Well, it gives you the ability to better see

18 the suspect, you know, when you do use your -- your

19 lights to your advantage.

20 Q I think -- okay. I think I -- I think I

21 understand. I understand the -- you use the head -- the

22 bright head lamps so you can better see the suspect, but

23 do you also sometimes use the bright head lamps to blind

24 the suspect or make it harder for the suspect to see

25 you?

81

Page 79: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A It depends on the -- on the situation, so --

2 Q Going back to that situation that night, did

3 you use your head lamps as a -- for a tactical advantage

4 to blind or make it harder for Fridoon to see you?

5 A I was more -- it was more for me to be able to

6 identify Fridoon and make sure that he was the right

7 individual I had just because of the light in the alley.

8 Q Okay. So that -- the other aspect of the

9 tactic to try and blind Fridoon or make it harder for

10 him to see you, that was not in your mind on that night?

11 A There like -- again, like I said, my -- my --

12 my focus was to make sure that I had the right

13 individual, and when I had my high beams on, it just

14 allowed me to get a better look at his clothing and

15 description to make sure I had the right individual, you

16 know, because he was the only person in the alley, so --

17 Q Have you ever -- have you ever used that

18 tactic before in your time on patrol, to use your bright

19 head lamps to blind a suspect or make it harder for them

20 to see you to gain a tactical advantage?

21 A I don't necessarily think you're blinding

22 someone when you use your high beams. It allows you to

23 identify the individual easier. It's just the same as

24 using your flashlight so that way you can get a better

25 look to see, you know, if they're armed with anything,

82

Page 80: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 so that -- that's a -- that's a tactic that I use just

2 so that way it allows me to get a better look at the

3 person I want to contact, so --

4 Q And are you trained -- have -- have you

5 received any training at the San Diego Police Department

6 to use your flashlight to try and -- maybe "blind" is

7 the wrong term, but make it harder for the suspect to

8 see you?

9 A We've received training in the use of our

10 flashlight, and the focus of that is there again, like I

11 said, because you want to be able to -- to identify

12 anything that they may have in their hands or anything

13 to that effect to give you a better -- put you at a

14 better advantage of -- a technical advantage, I suppose

15 I want to say.

16 Q Okay. And part of that training is in

17 addition to be able to get a better view of the suspect

18 and also to make it harder for the suspect to see you

19 because they have a light shined in their eyes; is that

20 correct?

21 A I wouldn't necessarily say "shine in their

22 eyes," but I mean the more light you -- I guess to

23 answer your question, I guess would -- it would be

24 depends, but -- it depends on -- on the circumstances.

25 It depends on different scenarios. I mean, I don't want

83

Page 81: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 to get into any detail about it, but I mean, there are

2 certain situations where you would use your lights to

3 illuminate someone so that way you can see what's in

4 their hands, and there's certain circumstances where you

5 may not use your lights at all, so --

6 Q Understood. And then in certain other

7 circumstances you may use your lights, per your

8 training, to make it harder for the suspect to see you,

9 correct?

10 A Yes.

11 Q But on that evening, April 30th, 2015, that

12 was not in your mind, to use your lights to make it

13 harder for Fridoon to see you?

14 A No, no, it was just for me to identify who I

15 had in the alley and just to confirm that -- that

16 description.

17 Q I think we -- I think we covered this, but I

18 just want to ask these specific questions just to make

19 sure.

20 Did you ever say to Fridoon, "This is your

21 final warning, stop or I will shoot you," anything

22 telling him that you had a gun pointed at him?

23 MR. RILEY: I will object because I think it's

24 been asked about three or four times. Asked and

25 answered. Go ahead.

84

Page 82: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 THE WITNESS: I don't recall.

2 MR. MILLER: Why don't we take a break?

3 MR. RILEY: Yeah, it's noon. What do you want

4 to do for lunch?

5 MR. MILLER: Do you want to do 30 minutes,

6 fast, or do you need more time?

7 MR. RILEY: It's up to you guys. How much

8 time do you folks need to eat?

9 MR. MILLER: Yeah.

10 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The

11 time is 11:54 a.m.

12 (A lunch break was taken)

13 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.

14 The time is 12:36 p.m.

15 BY MR. MILLER:

16 Q On the evening of April 30th, 2015, did you

17 make any hand gestures towards Fridoon, any non-verbal

18 communication?

19 A No.

20 Q Did you ever raise your hand at him, any kind

21 of hand movement towards him or signal to him?

22 A No.

23 Q Before you previously testified about certain

24 circumstances you weren't putting on your police lights

25 and siren.

85

Page 83: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 On -- on this evening of April 30th, 2015 when

2 you first arrived, was there anything about this

3 circumstance that indicated to you whether you should

4 have your siren and your police lights on or off?

5 A No.

6 Q Did anything in your training tell you -- that

7 you've learned at the department about when it -- when

8 is it a good idea to have your police lights on top of

9 your car, your red and blue lights and your siren on?

10 A When you're in vehicle pursuit, when you're

11 responding to an 1199 call, and then also if you're

12 responding to any type of life-threatening medical

13 emergency.

14 Q Those are the three circumstances where you're

15 advised to turn your siren and lights on?

16 A Yes.

17 Q Any other times?

18 A I believe that's it.

19 Q And what is an 1199 call?

20 A Oh, that's when an officer is calling for

21 help.

22 Q And have you ever used your sirens or police

23 lights to indicate to a suspect that it is a police

24 vehicle?

25 A Yes.

86

Page 84: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Have you done that frequently?

2 A What do you mean by "frequently"?

3 Q Well, let's say over -- over -- in the course

4 of patrolling, say for a year -- let's say 2015, how

5 many times would you turn your police lights or siren on

6 to indicate to someone that you -- your car was a police

7 car?

8 A Do you want a physical number or --

9 Q You --

10 A I'm sorry. So give me the -- give me the time

11 frame again and then do you want an -- do you want me to

12 estimate the actual time -- how many times I used it,

13 correct?

14 Q Yeah. Estimate as best you can, you know,

15 over the course of, say, 2015.

16 A Okay. So -- so one year, essentially?

17 Q Yeah.

18 A An estimation, probably 25 times.

19 Q 25 times about in a year. Of those 25 times,

20 was it more often at night when it was dark out?

21 A Yes.

22 Q Because it's harder for anyone, a suspect or

23 anyone else, to see your police car -- to know it's a

24 police car without seeing lights or hearing a siren,

25 correct?

87

Page 85: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Repeat the question again.

2 Q Sure. I guess it's kind of an obvious

3 question. In -- do you use -- do you use your siren and

4 your police lights more at night because it's harder to

5 tell your car is a police car at night; is that correct?

6 A Yes.

7 Q Prior to the evening of April 30th, 2015, had

8 you ever met Fridoon?

9 A No.

10 Q Had you ever heard Fridoon's name?

11 A No.

12 Q Did you know anything about Fridoon prior to

13 the evening of April 30th, 2015?

14 A No.

15 Q So you knew nothing about his background,

16 whether he had any previous arrests or anything like

17 that? You didn't know anything like that, correct?

18 A No.

19 Q And you had never come across him before

20 that -- that evening, correct?

21 A Yes, that's correct.

22 Q And your -- the police car on the driver's

23 side was open. Did you receive any training at the

24 San Diego Police Department about keeping your police

25 car door open for tactical reasons?

88

Page 86: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q And could you tell me what that training was?

3 A We use that tactic for vehicle hot stops.

4 Q Anything else?

5 A We also use it to -- when we're conducting

6 traffic stops, whenever we're issuing a citation, we use

7 our car doors for cover.

8 Q When you says "use your car door for cover,"

9 what does you mean?

10 A It's normally -- prop the door open and stand

11 behind the door so you can complete your citation

12 provides you that -- that little bit of protection

13 between you and the individual that may be contacting

14 the vehicle.

15 Q And what type of protection does it provide?

16 A Protection, it -- it actually -- it provides

17 you some protection, I would say. To give an example --

18 well, let's see. Well, just put it this way: As far as

19 our training goes, as far as how we're taught in the

20 police academy and it's always ingrained on us as far

21 as, you know, when you're completing a citation, stand

22 behind the door and provide you a little bit of

23 protection, a little bit of -- not necessarily

24 concealment so that when you're completing your

25 citations, those things, and -- and that's how it was

89

Page 87: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 addressed to us as far as training goes.

2 Q Okay. Was it -- was it ever told to you in

3 the course of training that this could provide a little

4 bit of cover against if a suspect starts running at you

5 or coming towards you?

6 A Yes.

7 Q On that evening of April 30, 2015 when you

8 kept your car door, was that -- was that training tactic

9 in your mind at all that this would provide a little bit

10 of cover?

11 A In my mind that night, it happened so quick

12 that I wasn't thinking of using that door for

13 protection. In my mind I was thinking of just getting

14 away from the car because I just didn't want to be

15 trapped in the car.

16 Q Okay. And I recall that testimony, you didn't

17 want to be trapped in the driver's seat.

18 And once you got out of the car and you were

19 behind the door, I believe you testified you took a step

20 to the left, correct?

21 A Yes.

22 Q So you were already out of the car. What was

23 your thinking in taking the step to the left?

24 A It was to -- it was to address the threat.

25 And just based on my training, we're always taught

90

Page 88: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 whenever you're engaging, you normally -- you step off

2 line or you step to the left or to the right, so it's

3 just part of my training. And just given the

4 circumstances that I was -- it just happened so quickly,

5 I stepped to the left away from the door.

6 Q And when you say "engaging," what do you mean?

7 A Engaging the threat, which would be

8 Mr. Fridoon.

9 Q And when -- in your training when you're

10 taught to step to the -- step to one side, move to one

11 side, what is the -- what's the reason that you learned

12 in training that that is -- that's what you're supposed

13 to do?

14 A Well -- well, part of the training was -- is

15 that they want you to move off line to -- kind of to --

16 when you're stepping off line, it gives you more

17 reactionary gap, I would say, to respond to the threat,

18 and also it -- I guess the best way to put it would be

19 to just step off line of the suspect. I mean, if he's

20 coming at you, you want to step off line, which means

21 you want to step either to the left or to the right of

22 the suspect.

23 Q So -- okay. So part of the training is to

24 step out of the -- out of the line. If the suspect's

25 coming at you, part of your training is to step out of

91

Page 89: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 the way of the suspect?

2 A Right, or step -- right.

3 Q Okay. And -- and you used the phrase

4 "reactionary gap." What does that mean?

5 A What you -- what you want to try to do is you

6 want to try to -- whenever you're addressing a threat,

7 to give you as -- try to increase that reactionary gap,

8 I would say, because if someone's coming at you, you

9 want to give yourself enough time to respond to that

10 threat -- I guess would be the best way to say it. So

11 by stepping off line or stepping to the left or to the

12 right, that would give -- in my case, that gave me

13 that -- that -- that reactionary time to address the

14 threat.

15 Q So it gave you more time to address the threat

16 by stepping off line in -- in this instance on

17 April 30th, 2015?

18 A That's why I stepped to my left, to give

19 myself more time to react to the threat.

20 Q Was your gun in your holster when you drove

21 up?

22 A While I was in my patrol car?

23 Q Yes.

24 A Yes.

25 Q When did you remove it from your holster?

92

Page 90: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A I was drawing my holster -- I was outside my

2 car and as I was stepping to my left, I was drawing.

3 Q Okay. And before firing, did you -- are you

4 familiar with the phrase "take up the slack"?

5 A No.

6 Q Did you depress the trigger at all before

7 firing?

8 A No.

9 Q So it was -- it was one motion with your --

10 with your trigger finger, you just pulled it once?

11 A Yes.

12 Q Was it -- before you pulled the trigger, was

13 your -- was your finger actually on the trigger touching

14 it?

15 A Well, if I pulled the trigger, yes, it was

16 touching the trigger.

17 Q Sure. Understood. But while you were

18 pointing your -- your weapon at Fridoon before you

19 pulled the trigger, was your finger touching the

20 trigger?

21 A So your question is was I touching the trigger

22 as I was pointing it at Fridoon?

23 Q Let me try and rephrase it.

24 A Okay.

25 Q So you exited the vehicle. When you -- when

93

Page 91: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 you drew your gun and first pointed it at Fridoon, did

2 you have your finger on the trigger?

3 A No.

4 Q Okay. How far away from the trigger was your

5 -- was your finger?

6 A It was probably right there at the --

7 alongside of the trigger guard.

8 Q Okay. And how far away from the -- from the

9 actual trigger is that?

10 A Probably a half an inch.

11 Q And to move your finger from where it was on

12 the trigger guard half an inch to pull the trigger, how

13 much time is that -- would that take?

14 A Probably a second, a second and a half.

15 Q Other than moving your finger from the trigger

16 guard to pulling the trigger, do you have to do anything

17 -- any other steps in between to fire the gun?

18 A No.

19 Q And the trigger guard, what -- what is the --

20 what's the trigger guard shaped like?

21 A Oh, it's the -- I guess you would consider the

22 piece of metal that surrounds the trigger itself.

23 Q Okay. So your finger was on the trigger guard

24 and then you had to move it half an inch to the trigger

25 before shooting, correct?

94

Page 92: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q How much time elapsed between when you got out

3 of the car and when you -- you fired your gun at

4 Fridoon?

5 A Where I physically got out of the car and

6 fired at Mr. Fridoon?

7 Q Yes.

8 A Just an estimation, probably two to three

9 seconds probably.

10 Q And in those two to three seconds, did you --

11 what did you do to assess the situation and make the

12 determination to pull the trigger?

13 A I assessed the situation when I saw him

14 aggressing -- well, approach me with the knife in his

15 hand and the position of the hand, and it's -- it's one

16 of those -- it was -- it was real quick. There again,

17 my thought process and what I was thinking was that he

18 wasn't stopping and so it's almost -- it was just real,

19 real -- it was a real quick assessment.

20 Q Okay. Did you observe that at any point in

21 time before you -- you fired your gun that Fridoon had

22 slowed his pace at all?

23 A It didn't appear to me he was slowing his

24 pace.

25 Q When you --

95

Page 93: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A I -- go ahead. I'm sorry.

2 Q Were you finished with your answer?

3 A Yes.

4 Q Did it appear to you at any point in time that

5 he stopped --

6 A No.

7 Q -- prior to you?

8 When you -- when you watched the video of --

9 of the shooting, did that remind you at all that he had

10 slowed his pace?

11 A At the time of the incident, he didn't slow

12 his pace. When -- when I was there at that moment in

13 time, he -- he wasn't slowing down.

14 Q So was he speeding up or was he maintaining a

15 consistent pace?

16 A He was -- from what I remember, it was a

17 consistent pace.

18 Q And how would you describe that -- that pace?

19 A How would I describe the pace? It was a pace

20 with a purpose, like I stated before. It was a moderate

21 pace and it was a directed pace. He was -- he was

22 coming at me.

23 Q When you say it was a "moderate pace" -- so he

24 was not moving rapidly, right?

25 A Well, moderate pace, he wasn't -- he wasn't --

96

Page 94: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 it was not a non-chalant pace. I mean, it was -- it was

2 a pace where -- I don't know how to describe it. I'm

3 just trying to be as accurate as I can so -- so bear

4 with me. How would you describe moderate? I guess it

5 would be a quickly paced walk, I guess, would be maybe

6 the best answer I can give you.

7 Q Did you -- did you have a flashlight with you

8 that night?

9 A Yes.

10 Q Was it attached to your gun?

11 A Yes.

12 Q Is it removable from the gun?

13 A Yes, you can take it off.

14 Q But on -- before you fired your gun, the

15 flashlight, you never took it off, correct, on that

16 night?

17 A No.

18 Q Did you use the flashlight at all that night?

19 A Yes, I did.

20 Q What did you do to use it?

21 A I activated the light.

22 Q What did you shine it -- the light on?

23 A Mr. Fridoon.

24 Q Okay. And did you -- what -- what part of his

25 body or face did you illuminate with your flashlight?

97

Page 95: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A I just pointed it -- well, the light was in

2 his direction, so his -- his body.

3 Q Okay. What point in time did you do that?

4 A Just before I shot him.

5 Q How much time before you shot him, if you can

6 estimate?

7 A I would say probably within seconds.

8 Q Okay. When you -- when you shined the light

9 on him, did it illuminate his entire body?

10 A Yes. Yes.

11 Q Okay. Did you -- were you able to see any

12 better what he was holding in his hand after you shined

13 the flashlight on him?

14 A Was I able to see any better what he was

15 holding in his hand? I was just getting the -- the

16 metallic object was reflecting off the light.

17 Q Of your flashlight?

18 A Well, the lights also because I had the

19 lights.

20 Q Okay. So when you shined the flashlight on

21 him, you had your bright patrol car lights on him and

22 you also had your flashlight on him, correct?

23 A Yes.

24 Q Did your flashlight cover his face too or just

25 his body?

98

Page 96: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Well, it's -- it covered his body, I would

2 say.

3 Q Okay. From that distance, it probably was his

4 whole face and body?

5 A Yes.

6 Q Okay. So -- and at the same time, your --

7 your bright head lamps were pointed at him and also

8 illuminating him as well, correct?

9 A Yes.

10 Q Okay. And did the -- when you shined the

11 flashlight on him and that illuminated him, did that

12 inform your decision to shoot?

13 A Yes, because I thought what he had in his hand

14 was a knife and he wasn't stopping so, yeah, that's when

15 the decision made -- was made to shoot him.

16 Q Which hand was he holding the object that you

17 believed was a knife?

18 A When I first saw him, I believe he had it in

19 his left hand.

20 Q And did he switch it to the other hand at any

21 point in time?

22 A Then as -- at one point he was transitioning

23 or when he was crossing over the alley to -- to my

24 driver's side, I believe that's when he may have

25 switched it to the right hand.

99

Page 97: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. And when you say "may have switched

2 it," are you -- are you not sure --

3 A From what I remember, it was in his left hand.

4 That's what I recall was it was in his left hand.

5 Q And then he may have switched it to his right

6 hand?

7 A Yes.

8 Q And how far away was he when he switched it to

9 his right hand?

10 A From when I -- I think -- probably if he had

11 had two and a half car lengths, maybe three car lengths.

12 Q Okay. And when he switched the -- the object

13 to his right hand, was he holding it the same way as he

14 was holding it in his left hand?

15 A No. When he had it in his right hand, that's

16 when, as I described before, his arm was bent and it

17 appeared that it was -- the weapon was being pointed at

18 me, and that's what I remember.

19 Q And that was what you demonstrated previously

20 in your deposition, correct?

21 A Yes.

22 Q Okay. And when you say it -- it was pointed

23 at you, was -- was it in the same position that you

24 demonstrated before?

25 A Yes.

100

Page 98: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. Could you tell the -- the shape of the

2 -- of the object before you fired your weapon?

3 A It was a pointy metallic object.

4 Q Could you tell anything else beyond that?

5 A It looked like a knife to me.

6 Q And about how big was it?

7 A How big? It appeared to be that night about

8 two to three inches.

9 Q And at any point in time did -- did Fridoon

10 ever suddenly move the object?

11 A What do you mean by "suddenly"?

12 Q Did he ever make any sudden movement with the

13 object, a quick movement with the -- with the object in

14 his hand?

15 A No.

16 Q Did he ever -- did he ever raise the object up

17 to higher in his chest?

18 A No.

19 Q So he never raised it above -- above his head

20 either, correct?

21 A No.

22 Q Did he ever move it away from his body and

23 closer to you in any sort of thrusting or jabbing

24 motion?

25 A Other than what I described earlier in the

101

Page 99: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 deposition?

2 Q I don't recall you describing him moving it in

3 any jabbing or thrusting motion, but if you did, just

4 tell me.

5 A No.

6 Q Okay. Let me ask the question just so it's

7 clear.

8 A Okay.

9 Q Do you recall him moving the object in any

10 jabbing or thrusting motion?

11 A No.

12 Q Do you recall him moving the object in any way

13 prior to the time that you fired your gun?

14 A No.

15 Q Do you recall whether he was holding -- when

16 he switched from his left -- the object from his left to

17 his right hand, was he holding anything in the other

18 hand that you could see?

19 A I don't remember.

20 Q Did seeing the video of the shooting, did that

21 refresh your recollection at all that he was holding

22 something else?

23 A Looking at the video just only affirmed what I

24 initially remembered the night of the incident.

25 Q It didn't change your recollection of events

102

Page 100: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 at all?

2 A No.

3 Q And you're -- so when you watched the video --

4 how many times have you seen the video since the

5 incident?

6 A Since the incident, two times. Two times.

7 Q Okay. On two occasions?

8 A Two occasions.

9 Q And I know you testified about one of them,

10 which is about a week ago.

11 When was the -- when was the other occasion

12 that you watched the video?

13 A It was prior to the homicide interview.

14 Q And on that occasion, how many times did you

15 watch the video?

16 A Prior to that occasion? Prior to the homicide

17 interview?

18 Q Yes.

19 A None.

20 Q Okay. And then when you watched it before you

21 were interviewed, how many times did you watch the

22 video?

23 MR. RILEY: Objection. Let's lay a foundation

24 here. Who was with you when you looked at the video

25 prior to the homicide investigation?

103

Page 101: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 THE WITNESS: Oh, my attorney.

2 MR. RILEY: He was with his attorney. I don't

3 want you going into any attorney/client work product or

4 privilege.

5 MR. MILLER: I don't intend to.

6 MR. RILEY: Okay.

7 MR. MILLER: Understood.

8 BY MR. MILLER:

9 Q So your -- your attorney was with you when

10 you -- when you watched the video, and, as counsel said,

11 I don't want to know your communications with your

12 attorney. Keep that out.

13 Was anyone else there when you watched the

14 video?

15 A No, just myself and my attorney.

16 Q Were you in a separate room from the

17 investigators?

18 A Yes, I believe so.

19 Q And who -- who gave you the -- the video to

20 watch? Did one of the investigators hand it to you?

21 A They didn't hand me the video. That was an

22 arrangement between my attorney and the investigators.

23 Q Okay. Did you -- did you see the

24 investigators give your attorney a copy of the video?

25 A Probably. I don't remember.

104

Page 102: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. But when you watched it in the room

2 with your attorney, none of the investigators were in

3 the room, correct?

4 A No, that's correct.

5 Q Was the door closed?

6 A I don't remember.

7 Q And before you -- before you watched the

8 video, did any of the investigators say anything to you

9 about the video?

10 A No.

11 Q Okay. And in those -- so now you -- and do

12 you recall how many times you watched the video when you

13 were in the room?

14 A I don't recall how many times we actually

15 reviewed the video.

16 Q Was it more than once?

17 MR. RILEY: And we're getting into attorney

18 work product, the thought process of how an attorney

19 decides to communicate with his client. Let's not go

20 there.

21 MR. MILLER: I won't. Absolutely. I just

22 want to know if you could give me --

23 MR. RILEY: How many times his attorney

24 decided to show him the video? Is that what the

25 question is?

105

Page 103: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 MR. MILLER: The question is how many times he

2 watched the video.

3 MR. RILEY: When he was in a room alone with

4 his attorney?

5 MR. MILLER: Correct.

6 MR. RILEY: Wouldn't that be the same as

7 saying, "How many times did your attorney make the

8 decision to show you the video?" Isn't that where we're

9 going with all of this?

10 MR. MILLER: I don't think so.

11 MR. RILEY: I think it is.

12 MR. MILLER: It's the same thing as if your

13 attorney shows you documents before your deposition, I'm

14 entitled to ask about what documents were shown.

15 MR. RILEY: And he told you.

16 MR. MILLER: Okay. I think I'm entitled to

17 see how many times you either looked at a document or

18 watched a video.

19 MR. RILEY: And he's told you he looked at it

20 with his attorney. I think we should stop right there.

21 And that -- and to answer your question, that was not an

22 act of conduct in preparation for a deposition when he

23 was with his attorney back then, so I'm not sure it's on

24 all four points asking him today what he reviewed in

25 preparation for his deposition. It's a different

106

Page 104: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 question. What it really does is invade, in my opinion,

2 the attorney work product privilege. And if I was

3 here -- or later on having his attorney saying, "What

4 are you doing allowing your deponent to answer questions

5 about his communications with me?," I don't think I want

6 to be in that position.

7 MR. MILLER: Okay. I just want to ask my

8 question, and if you want to instruct him not to answer,

9 I understand your position.

10 MR. RILEY: Okay.

11 BY MR. MILLER:

12 Q When you were in the room before your

13 interview with the homicide investigators, how many

14 times did you watch the video?

15 MR. RILEY: Objection. Attorney/client

16 privilege and attorney work product. You don't need to

17 answer that.

18 THE WITNESS: Okay.

19 BY MR. MILLER:

20 Q And you're going to follow your attorney's

21 instructions not to answer?

22 A That's correct.

23 Q Okay. Would you agree that deadly force

24 should be the last option in terms of use of force?

25 A Yes.

107

Page 105: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And you should exhaust all other feasible

2 possibilities before taking someone's life, right?

3 A Yes.

4 Q After the shooting, did you reholster your gun

5 immediately?

6 A No.

7 Q How soon after you fired did you do that, did

8 you reholster?

9 A I'd estimate probably five to ten seconds

10 after.

11 Q And what did you do next?

12 A That's when I ran up to Mr. Fridoon.

13 Q And you rendered aid, correct?

14 A Yes.

15 Q At some point did you learn that the object in

16 Fridoon's hand was a blue and silver pen rather than a

17 knife?

18 A When I was rendering first aid to Mr. Fridoon,

19 that's when I saw the pen.

20 Q And when you first saw it, where -- where was

21 it?

22 A From what I can recall, I believe it was to

23 the -- up over here, so this would be to his left, to my

24 right.

25 Q Was it still in his hand?

108

Page 106: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A No.

2 Q It was on the ground?

3 A Yes.

4 Q When you saw it on the ground, did you -- you

5 realized that was the object in his hand that you

6 believed was a knife?

7 A I didn't know for sure, I'll say.

8 Q Okay. So at that point in time you believed

9 there's -- there still may be -- he still may have had a

10 knife, correct?

11 A Yes.

12 Q And before rendering aid to Fridoon, were you

13 concerned at all that he still had a knife and he may

14 stab you?

15 A No.

16 Q Did you take any steps to keep yourself safe

17 from being stabbed before rendering aid?

18 A No.

19 Q Would you agree a suspect, just in general, is

20 more dangerous with a knife the closer they are to you?

21 A Yes.

22 MR. RILEY: I would too.

23 BY MR. MILLER:

24 Q And is there -- is there a reason you didn't

25 consider that Fridoon still may have a knife when you

109

Page 107: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 ran up to him?

2 A When I shot Mr. Fridoon, there -- there was an

3 immediate reaction. Just bear with me one second,

4 please.

5 There was an immediate response, and then the

6 first thing I -- I can think is, "Man, I've got to

7 render first aid to this guy," and so that was my -- my

8 next reaction to -- to -- to it.

9 Q Was -- was your body camera on the evening of

10 the incident?

11 A No, it was not.

12 Q Did you have any understanding of what the

13 policy was as far as turning the body camera on before

14 encountering a suspect with respect to a call like this?

15 A Yes.

16 Q What was your understanding?

17 A The policy at the time was any type of

18 enforcement contact, your camera should be on.

19 Q Did anyone ever tell you that you should have

20 had your camera on that night?

21 A Did anyone tell me that? No.

22 Q Did -- did anyone ever tell you after the --

23 after the shooting incident that you -- you violated the

24 policy, your camera should have been on, anything like

25 that?

110

Page 108: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A No.

2 Q How long had you been wearing the body camera

3 prior to the night of April 15th?

4 A This is just a rough estimate, I -- I believe

5 it was a year. I was wearing it for a year.

6 Q Do you want to take a break?

7 A No, no, I'm fine.

8 Q Did you -- did you think that identifying

9 yourself as a police officer prior to shooting Fridoon

10 could have put you at risk in any way, your safety?

11 A No.

12 Q Did you think that identifying yourself as a

13 police officer, again prior to firing your gun, could

14 have jeopardized the safety of anyone else?

15 A No.

16 Q Did you -- on that evening April 30th, 2015,

17 did you have any other -- did you have a baton?

18 A No, I don't carry a baton.

19 Q Did you have any other -- any other weapons on

20 your -- on your person?

21 A As far as my utility belt, what I carry?

22 Q I just want to know on that night April 30th,

23 2015.

24 A Yes.

25 Q What else did you have?

111

Page 109: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A A mace canister, an asp and then my -- my

2 taser.

3 Q And I missed the -- what was the -- in between

4 the mace canister and the taser?

5 A Oh, my asp.

6 Q What is that?

7 A It's a -- it's an expandable -- it's an

8 expandable baton, but it's not a traditional baton.

9 That's why I thought you were describing a PR-24. I

10 don't carry that.

11 Q And you've received training with a taser,

12 correct?

13 A Yes.

14 Q And with a mace canister?

15 A Yes.

16 Q And a collapsible baton, correct?

17 A Yes.

18 Q What is the range of the taser?

19 A The range, the maximum effective range is

20 21 feet.

21 Q And where was your taser? Was it on your

22 utility belt on April 30, 2015?

23 A Yes.

24 Q Did you ever remove it from your utility belt

25 that evening?

112

Page 110: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A No.

2 Q And where was your mace canister?

3 A It was on my utility belt.

4 Q What's the range of the mace canister?

5 A I have the -- the small canister, so I believe

6 the range -- this is just a rough estimate -- five to

7 seven feet, I believe.

8 Q Prior to drawing your -- your gun on that

9 evening, did you consider using any lesser -- lesser

10 means of force against Fridoon?

11 A No, I did not.

12 Q Did you have any other -- any other weapons in

13 your car?

14 A No.

15 Q And I think we are -- I think we -- I

16 apologize if I asked this before, but did you have

17 your -- your bullet-proof vest, your front and your back

18 on, on April 30th, 2015?

19 A Yes.

20 Q Did you -- prior to firing your gun, did you

21 consider any other -- putting aside use of force

22 options, did you consider any other tactical options?

23 Backing away further? Moving in a different direction?

24 A No.

25 Q Did you consider waiting for back-up?

113

Page 111: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A No.

2 Q Was there -- in the alleyway, how much -- how

3 much distance was there between you and the wall on one

4 side? I think it was -- was there a wall on your right

5 side?

6 A If you're describing -- if I'm facing

7 southbound in the alley, on the west side I believe it's

8 a fenced-in business and then on the -- which is the

9 west side, which would be to my right. To the left

10 would be part of the book store.

11 Q Okay. And was there -- how much space was

12 between you and the book store?

13 A Can you be a little more specific? I mean,

14 are we talking the wall of the book store? Are we

15 talking the front entrance to the book store?

16 Q Yeah, let me try and break it down a little

17 bit better.

18 A Okay.

19 Q So if you're standing facing Fridoon,

20 immediately to your left --

21 A Right.

22 Q -- if you were to walk to your left, what

23 would you run into?

24 A To the parking lot.

25 Q Okay. So there's open space into a parking

114

Page 112: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 lot?

2 A Right.

3 Q And immediately to your right if you were to

4 walk immediately to your right, what would you run into?

5 A Well, it would be my car because my car is

6 parked there, but do you mean on the other side of the

7 car?

8 Q Yes.

9 A It would be --

10 Q Good clarification.

11 A Okay.

12 Q Thank you.

13 A It would be -- to my recollection, I believe

14 there is a fenced-in business on the right-hand side of

15 the alley, which would be to the west.

16 Q Okay. And behind you is the back of the alley

17 leading to the street?

18 A Yes.

19 Q Okay. So you were not in a -- in a confined

20 space?

21 A No.

22 Q Did you have -- at the time, April 30th, 2015,

23 did you have any injury or disability that limited your

24 physical -- physical abilities?

25 A No.

115

Page 113: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Was the -- from what you could tell, was the

2 alley flat? There was no elevation?

3 A It's flat.

4 Q And there were -- when you received the call

5 regarding the man with the knife, were there -- did you

6 receive a call about any other suspect in the immediate

7 vicinity?

8 A No.

9 Q And you were not aware of any other potential

10 suspects at the time you encountered Fridoon, correct?

11 A That's correct.

12 Q And how -- how tall are you?

13 A Approximately six feet.

14 Q And about how much do you weigh?

15 A 230.

16 Q Was that approximately your weight at the time

17 of the incident?

18 A Yes.

19 Q And other than your -- I know you testified --

20 I asked you questions about your use of the -- of the

21 Glock that you had, the Glock 21. Did you -- did you

22 obtain any other certifications? I know you obtained

23 the rank of expert before.

24 Were there any other certifications or tests

25 that you took to measure your proficiency with the

116

Page 114: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Glock?

2 A Other than just what I previously described at

3 SWAT training or just our core certs at the department.

4 Q Okay. So you've covered it before?

5 A Yeah.

6 Q Okay. Have you received any training in

7 de-escalation techniques to try and -- if you encounter

8 a suspect, calm the situation down?

9 A Yes.

10 Q What type of training have you received at the

11 department in that regard?

12 A From what I remember, I believe it was a --

13 maybe a four-hour block regarding de-escalation of

14 force.

15 Q When did you --

16 A Classroom, classroom setting.

17 Q Okay. When was it?

18 A I don't recall. It's been a long time.

19 Q Do you recall the nature of -- of what you

20 learned?

21 A Yes.

22 Q What was it?

23 A Essentially you just try to use -- again,

24 depending on the circumstances that's given to you at

25 the time, you just try to -- try to minimize the

117

Page 115: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 situation, you know, through verbal commands and then

2 just use whatever appropriate force which is reasonable

3 at the time.

4 Q And did you -- did you employ any

5 de-escalation techniques with Fridoon that evening?

6 A I didn't have time, no.

7 Q And other than that four-hour block, did you

8 have any other de-escalation training?

9 A Not that I can recall.

10 Q And again, how long ago was that?

11 A There again it's -- it's been quite a while so

12 I don't know the specific time.

13 Q Did you have any training as far as

14 encountering suspects that may be mentally ill?

15 A We do receive training bulletins and we may

16 have received some training regarding that.

17 Q When you encountered Fridoon, did you have any

18 reason to believe that he may be mentally ill?

19 A I have no idea, no.

20 Q On the night of the -- moving to -- to after

21 the shooting, did you have any -- as part of the

22 investigation, did you have any blood that was drawn?

23 A Oh, for me?

24 Q Did they give you a blood test?

25 A Oh, no, no.

118

Page 116: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Did anyone ask you to take a blood test?

2 A No.

3 Q How about a -- a breath test?

4 A No.

5 Q A urine test?

6 A No.

7 Q No one asked you to take any of those tests,

8 correct?

9 A No.

10 Q No, just so I'm clear for the record, no one

11 asked you; is that right?

12 A Right, no one asked me -- no one asked me to

13 take a urine test.

14 Q Were you tested in any way for alcohol or

15 drugs on that evening?

16 A No.

17 Q When you did -- do you recall doing a

18 walk-through of the incident?

19 A Yes.

20 Q And who was present during the walk-through?

21 A My attorney and the homicide investigators.

22 Q And was your attorney Mr. Brad Fields?

23 A Yes.

24 Q Is that still your attorney?

25 A Yes.

119

Page 117: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And what matter does that attorney represent

2 you in connection with?

3 A He's our POA attorney which is covered by our

4 association, so he's assigned to us -- any

5 officer-involved type shooting investigations.

6 Q Okay. Had you met that person before that

7 evening?

8 A No.

9 Q What is a POA?

10 A Police Officers Association.

11 Q And was anyone else present during the

12 walk-through?

13 A To my knowledge, no.

14 Q And what time was the walk-through?

15 A I believe it was -- just a rough estimation,

16 maybe -- I want to say anywhere between two to four

17 hours after the shooting.

18 Q And -- okay. So before you did the

19 walk-through -- so -- so you rendered aid.

20 After that, what did you do next before the

21 walk-through?

22 A I was -- I was transported to Western

23 Division.

24 Q Okay. Who transported you?

25 A It was a peer support officer which is

120

Page 118: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 assigned to us through the department, and then he

2 transported me to Western Division.

3 Q Do you recall the name of that peer support

4 officer?

5 A Officer Jeff Gross.

6 Q Did you discuss the shooting with Officer

7 Gross?

8 A No, I didn't.

9 Q Before the -- and then at Western Division,

10 who did you meet with?

11 A Chief Zimmerman came by and -- just to check

12 my welfare and ask how I was doing. Captain Lucas,

13 Lieutenant Carter, and they were just there to check --

14 like to see how I was doing, if I needed anything.

15 Q Did you discuss the shooting with them?

16 A No.

17 Q How long were you at the Western Division?

18 A Probably until my attorney, Mr. Fields,

19 arrived, and then we remained there at the station until

20 the walk-through.

21 Q Okay. And then someone transported you back

22 for the walk-through?

23 A Yes.

24 Q Who did -- who did that?

25 A It was just me and my attorney.

121

Page 119: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. And then at the walk-through, do you

2 recall answering any questions about the incident?

3 A Yes.

4 Q And who asked you questions?

5 A It was either Sergeant Del Toro or Lieutenant

6 Hastings.

7 Q And do you recall what they asked you during

8 the walk-through?

9 A Yes.

10 Q What did they ask you?

11 A I believe it was to the effect is were there

12 any outstanding weapons at the scene.

13 Q And you told them no, right?

14 A Right.

15 Q And at the time you told them no, had you

16 canvassed the scene? Had you looked around for weapons?

17 A No.

18 Q And when you told Mr. Del Toro and

19 Mr. Hastings there were no weapons, that was a truthful

20 statement, correct?

21 A Yes.

22 Q Did -- at some point shortly after that, do

23 you recall your attorney telling Mr. Del Toro and

24 Hastings that there would be no more questions?

25 A Yes.

122

Page 120: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And did anyone, Mr. Del Toro, Mr. Hastings,

2 protest that or say, "No, we'd like to ask a few more

3 questions"?

4 A To my recollection, no.

5 Q Okay. And did you leave -- leave the scene at

6 that point in time?

7 A Yes.

8 Q Okay. And did you do anything else during the

9 walk-through other than answer questions?

10 A Yes.

11 Q And how long was the walk-through?

12 A There again, an estimate, I would say 15 to

13 30 minutes.

14 Q And what was done during that 15 to

15 30 minutes?

16 A They were asking essentially the position

17 where my patrol car was parked, where I was standing,

18 where I was rendering first aid and where I saw

19 Mr. Fridoon initially.

20 Q Did you answer their questions?

21 A Yes.

22 Q And after you left, did you leave with your

23 attorney?

24 A Yes.

25 Q And did you go home after that?

123

Page 121: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes, I did.

2 Q Did anyone say to you before you left, "We'd

3 like to interview you further now to, you know, talk to

4 you more about the incident"?

5 A That was a discussion between my attorney and

6 myself.

7 Q Okay. I don't want to know between you and

8 yourself (sic) what -- what I -- what I want to know is

9 did you, you or your attorney, have that discussion with

10 any outside -- you know, any people at the department?

11 A That discussion was between my attorney and

12 the homicide investigators, and that was relayed to me

13 through my attorney.

14 Q Okay. Got it.

15 And before your -- I know you were interviewed

16 a few days later. During that time period, were you at

17 home during that time period?

18 A Yes.

19 Q Did you return to work?

20 A No. I believe I took -- I took that time off.

21 Q And during that -- during that period of time

22 before your -- your interview a few days later, did you

23 talk to anyone about -- putting aside your attorney, did

24 you talk to anyone about the incident?

25 A Just my wife. My wife.

124

Page 122: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Yeah. Okay. Anyone -- put aside your wife

2 and your -- your attorney, did you speak to anyone else

3 about the incident in that -- in those few days before

4 your interview?

5 A (Witness shook his head)

6 MR. MILLER: Why don't we take a break?

7 MR. RILEY: Sure.

8 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This marks --

9 MR. RILEY: What do you -- go ahead.

10 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This marks the end of media

11 number 2 of the deposition of Neal Browder. We're going

12 off the record at 1:45 p.m.

13 (A short break was taken)

14 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are back on the record

15 at 1:57 p.m. and this marks the beginning of media

16 number 3 of the deposition of Neal Browder.

17 BY MR. MILLER:

18 Q During your -- your walk-through, did you see

19 any -- I know you testified before about having said you

20 were unaware of any weapons.

21 When you did your walk-through, did you see

22 any weapons anywhere in the vicinity?

23 A No.

24 Q Was your -- so your interview a few days

25 later, was that the first time that you told someone

125

Page 123: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 that you saw a knife -- what you believed was a knife in

2 Fridoon's hand?

3 A You're talking about with on-site

4 investigators?

5 Q Yeah, and -- and again, I want to just be

6 clear. I don't know -- I don't want to know what you

7 talked with your wife or your attorney about.

8 A Okay.

9 Q I just want to know when is the first time you

10 told anyone else that Fridoon -- you believed Fridoon

11 had a knife in his hand when you shot him?

12 A That would be with the homicide investigators.

13 Q And what was -- was that on May 5th, a few

14 days after the shooting?

15 A I would say it may have been during -- it may

16 have been during the walk-through. Let -- let's just

17 say this: From what I could recall, it was during the

18 homicide interview.

19 Q Which was a few days after the incident,

20 correct?

21 A Yes.

22 Q And I know you testified already that during

23 the walk-through there was one question asked while your

24 attorney was there about weapons, were you aware of any

25 weapons.

126

Page 124: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Other than that question, were there any other

2 questions you recall them asking during the

3 walk-through, other than what we've already covered?

4 A Not -- not that I can remember at the moment.

5 Q And during the days before your homicide

6 interview between the date of the incident and the

7 homicide interview, did anyone from San Diego Police

8 Department call you and say, "Hey, we'd like to talk to

9 you sooner. Can you come in, you know, before that

10 date?"

11 A No.

12 Q When was the first time you discussed the --

13 the incident with Chief Zimmerman?

14 A That was maybe -- there again, this is just a

15 rough estimate. Maybe a month after the incident.

16 Q And do you recall what you discussed with her

17 about it?

18 A It was just a -- essentially, it was just a

19 meeting that I set up with her and there's nothing

20 specific about the OIS; it was just more of I just

21 wanted to thank her essentially for just her support,

22 and then the conversation kind of spinned off on sports,

23 because she's a big sports fan. And she just asked me

24 how I was doing, just generalized questions like that.

25 Q Nothing more specific about the incident?

127

Page 125: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A No.

2 Q Did she ever ask any specific questions about

3 the incident?

4 A No, not that I can recall.

5 Q Other than your interview by the homicide

6 detectives, did you give any other interviews to the

7 San Diego Police Department regarding the incident?

8 A No.

9 Q Did Internal Affairs get involved, to your

10 knowledge?

11 A Regarding the OIS?

12 Q (Attorney nodded his head)

13 A They were doing a parallel investigation, from

14 what I understand. That was the only interview I did

15 was with homicide investigators.

16 Q So Internal Affairs never interviewed you in

17 connection with this incident?

18 A No.

19 Q Do you recall when you first learned that

20 Fridoon passed away?

21 A Yes. I was at Western Division, and I learned

22 that from my lawyer.

23 Q And this was shortly after the incident,

24 correct, the same evening or morning?

25 A It would be that same morning.

128

Page 126: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q When you were -- before the incident when you

2 were sitting in your car before you got the call, how

3 much -- how much sleep had you had the night before?

4 A The night before? I believe about eight

5 hours.

6 Q So you had a good night's sleep?

7 A Yes.

8 Q Had you taken any -- any drugs or alcohol the

9 preceding 48 hours before the incident?

10 A No.

11 Q Any prescription medication?

12 A No.

13 Q Was there anything about the sergeant's exam

14 that made you particularly anxious on that evening -- or

15 nervous?

16 A No, no, I was just getting some material

17 together, just to study.

18 Q So before the incident, there was nothing

19 about that day, you weren't sick? Nothing was different

20 than just a normal day?

21 A Just a normal day.

22 Q On the night of the -- the incident after --

23 do you have your -- do you have a department-issued cell

24 phone?

25 A It would be for the body worn camera.

129

Page 127: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. Did you have your own personal cell

2 phone?

3 A Yes.

4 Q Do you use that for police business?

5 A Just other than just vetting messages from

6 co-workers, but that's about it.

7 Q When you say "vetting messages from

8 co-workers" regarding issues at --

9 A No, just general conversations, you know,

10 with, you know, your co-workers. That's -- essentially

11 that's what you use it for.

12 Q And on the evening of the incident and the

13 days leading up to the homicide investigation interview,

14 did you call or text anyone regarding the incident,

15 putting aside your attorney and your wife?

16 A To what, to discuss the incident? Is that

17 your question?

18 Q Anything about the incident.

19 A No. A lot of the -- a lot of the messages I

20 was receiving were, you know, just checking on my

21 welfare. And that's pretty typical after an OIS. A lot

22 of your friends, a lot of your co-workers will call just

23 to see how you're doing, but that's it. There was no

24 discussion regarding the shooting at all.

25 Q How about e-mails, do you -- do you have a

130

Page 128: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 personal e-mail?

2 A Yes.

3 Q You also have a department -- a San Diego

4 Police Department e-mail?

5 A Yes.

6 Q And did you use either e-mail to send any

7 messages about the incident?

8 A No.

9 Q And this -- the call -- I read -- what is a

10 hot call?

11 A A hot call is what we consider like a crime in

12 progress, which means that it's an incident that's

13 occurring now. There is no delay in it and you're

14 receiving, I guess, realtime information regarding the

15 call.

16 Q Okay. Was the Fridoon call that you received

17 from dispatch a hot call?

18 A Yes, they upgraded that to a hot call, yes.

19 Q Was it originally not a hot call?

20 A That's how the call came out. It came out as

21 a hot call, I believe.

22 Q And is there a -- is there -- are you familiar

23 with a code system for calls, a Code 1, a Code 2, a

24 Code 3?

25 A Are you referring to like priority calls?

131

Page 129: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Yes.

2 A Yes.

3 Q Was there a code assigned to the call you

4 received from dispatch regarding Fridoon?

5 A That was a priority -- I believe, because it

6 was a hot call, which would make that a priority 1.

7 Q Priority 1, is that the highest priority?

8 A Yes.

9 Q And is that -- would that be priority 1 or a

10 Code 1?

11 A Well, we don't call it a Code 1.

12 Q You call it a priority?

13 A It's just priority, priority 1 call.

14 Q And priority 1, if there was a man who had

15 his -- you know, a knife to another man's throat, would

16 that be a priority 1 call if that was reported, or would

17 that be another elevation?

18 A No, that would be -- well, there again, I

19 mean, is it -- is the -- I guess my question to you

20 would be given your example, is that in progress or is

21 that, you know --

22 Q Fair enough. Let me try and do it a different

23 way --

24 A Okay.

25 Q -- because I think you can describe this

132

Page 130: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 better than I can.

2 A Okay.

3 Q Tell me the -- the order of priorities. How

4 many categories of priorities are there?

5 A There's -- there's -- there's three -- there's

6 three priorities. You have priority 1 through

7 priority 4, and under the priority 1 umbrella, I would

8 say, would be considered your -- a hot call, and that

9 would be like I described before, that would be a call

10 -- normally it would be a call of violence or something

11 that's occurring now that's in progress, so --

12 Q And was -- would the Fridoon call that you

13 received from dispatch fall in that category?

14 A That's how they formatted the call.

15 Q Okay. And was the call that he had threatened

16 someone or that he was threatening someone as -- it was

17 in progress?

18 A The call came out as he was threatening one of

19 the employees at the adult book store with a knife.

20 Q So the call -- it was relayed to you as the

21 highest possible priority call?

22 A Yes.

23 Q And who told you that?

24 A Well, it's -- it's formatted through

25 communications, so it would be through the dispatch.

133

Page 131: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. And does the type of call, the priority

2 of the call, impact whether or not you're supposed to

3 wait for back-up?

4 A Well, it depends on the type of call, because

5 there are different priority calls. To give an example,

6 you could have a residential burglary where you may have

7 a reporting party hearing noises in the house. They can

8 make that a priority 1 call, so it really depends. It

9 depends on the type of calls, I would say, because

10 there's just -- there's a variety of calls that can be

11 priority 1 calls, if that makes sense.

12 Q So depending on the type of priority 1 call,

13 in some situations you should wake -- wait for back-up

14 and others you don't need to; is that it?

15 A It depends -- it depends on -- on the

16 information you receive and the type of call. It's up

17 to the discretion, I guess, of the officers depending

18 on -- given the circumstances that they're responding

19 to.

20 Q It's up to the -- to the responding officer --

21 in Fridoon's case, you -- to determine whether to wait

22 for back-up?

23 A Well, I was the first unit on scene, so yes.

24 Q Okay. And you determined not to wait for

25 back-up, correct?

134

Page 132: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Yes.

2 Q Okay. And when you -- when you -- when you

3 fired your gun on -- on -- on April 30th, 2015, did you

4 believe anyone other than yourself was in threat of

5 immediate bodily harm or death?

6 A At that specific moment, no, because I thought

7 he was -- he was going to stab me.

8 Q How -- how soon after April 30th, 2015 were

9 you back on patrol?

10 A I think I was back in patrol -- I want to say

11 in the month of June. April -- right, April, May,

12 probably either at the -- the end of May or some time in

13 the beginning of June.

14 Q And prior to being back on patrol, what were

15 you doing? Were you working at the police department?

16 A Right, I was on administrative duties at the

17 Western Division.

18 Q And was there some -- some event that

19 coincided with you being put back on patrol?

20 A I'm sorry. Can you clarify that?

21 Q Who told you you can go back on patrol?

22 A Well, that direction would have to come from

23 the chief's office, so it had to come from them. I

24 don't know.

25 Q Did the chief tell you directly that you were

135

Page 133: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 back on patrol?

2 A No. No, that's filtered through the command.

3 Q Who -- who told you?

4 A I believe it was either my captain or it could

5 have been my lieutenant.

6 Q And who is your captain and your lieutenant at

7 the time?

8 A It's Captain Lucas, Keith Lucas.

9 Q Who's the lieutenant?

10 A William Guard.

11 Q And do you recall when you were told you're

12 back on patrol, did they give you any kind of reason,

13 "We finished our investigation," anything?

14 A They just said, "You're clear to -- to go back

15 to patrol."

16 Q Okay. Were you -- were you disciplined in any

17 way as a result of the April 30th, 2015 incident?

18 A Disciplined? Are you referring to Internal

19 Affairs or --

20 Q Through anything through the department.

21 A No.

22 Q Were you -- was anyone at the department

23 critical of anything you did on the night of April 30th,

24 2015?

25 A That's kind of a broad question, so can you

136

Page 134: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 kind of narrow it down for me?

2 Q Sure. Did anyone at the department, Internal

3 Affairs, chief, anyone, say anything to you about the

4 evening of April 30th, 2015 negative of your tactics or

5 your actions that night?

6 A No, not to me, no.

7 Q Did you -- did you learn through someone else

8 that anyone at the department, other than your

9 attorney -- and that's true for all these questions. I

10 don't want to know what you learned from your attorney.

11 But did you learn from someone else that

12 anyone at the department was critical of your actions,

13 your tactics, on the evening of April 30th, 2015?

14 A To my knowledge, no.

15 Q Were you told by anyone at the department that

16 you -- you could have done something differently, your

17 tactics could be improved?

18 A No.

19 Q Were you told to participate in any training

20 or study or course at the department as a result of the

21 April 30th, 2015 incident?

22 A No.

23 Q Did anyone at the department tell you you

24 should, you know, revisit use of force policy or go back

25 and look at things as a result of that incident?

137

Page 135: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A No.

2 Q Did anyone at the department say anything

3 positive or complimentary about how you handled yourself

4 or your tactics on the evening of April 30th, 2015?

5 A No.

6 Q Did anyone at the department comment one way

7 or the other on your conduct, your tactics, your actions

8 the night of April 30th, 2015?

9 A Not to me, no.

10 Q Did you hear anything from someone else that

11 someone at the department had commented about your

12 actions that evening?

13 A No.

14 Q Did anyone at the department tell you you

15 should have identified yourself as a police officer

16 prior to firing your weapon?

17 A That I should have?

18 Q You should have.

19 A No.

20 Q Did anyone tell you you should have considered

21 other non-lethal uses of force?

22 A No.

23 Q In your -- I read your interview and we'll get

24 to that in a minute. I wanted to ask you, you talked

25 about something called the 21-foot rule.

138

Page 136: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Did you receive training on that at the

2 San Diego Police Department?

3 A I would say yes.

4 Q And how long ago did you receive that

5 training?

6 A It had been probably during the academy time,

7 1988.

8 Q And since that time you haven't heard the

9 phrase "21-foot rule"?

10 A Just other than just the training I received

11 from the academy.

12 Q And does this 21-foot rule involve how quickly

13 a suspect can get to you from that distance.

14 A Yes. That's part of it, yes.

15 Q And does it refer to needing time to take your

16 gun out of your holster, draw it, point it at a suspect

17 and shoot?

18 A I -- the 21-foot rule, from what I can

19 remember from the training, I guess it was more of a --

20 the -- kind of like a guideline. Like if someone is

21 within 21 feet, you know, your reactionary time, it

22 diminishes. So does that answer your question?

23 Q Yeah, and I know it was a long time ago. Do

24 you recall anything more specific than that about what

25 you were trained about the 21-foot rule?

139

Page 137: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A The -- the only thing that I can recall is

2 just the reactionary time within that 21 feet, from the

3 officer's reaction time versus the suspect's -- you

4 know, can -- you know, close that distance from the

5 certain amount of time. It had to do with reactionary

6 time within that 21 feet. That's vaguely what I

7 remember.

8 Q Do you recall when you learned about the

9 21-foot rule, did it have to do with when an officer's

10 gun is already drawn and pointed at a suspect and their

11 finger is on the -- close to the trigger?

12 A So is your question is that part of the

13 training, like if your gun is already out, does that

14 apply --

15 Q Yeah.

16 A -- to the 21 --

17 Q My question is did you learn anything specific

18 about -- is there something about if your gun is in the

19 holster versus if it's already drawn and pointed at the

20 suspect, or did it -- you don't -- do you not recall

21 those kind of specifics?

22 A I can't recall that kind of specifics.

23 Q Okay.

24 MR. RILEY: Dan, I'm thinking of proposing a

25 15-minute break. Do you think you've got more than an

140

Page 138: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 hour?

2 MR. MILLER: It's close. I don't -- I don't

3 have that much more.

4 MR. RILEY: I'm thinking of grabbing a cup of

5 coffee.

6 MR. MILLER: Okay.

7 MR. RILEY: But if we're -- if we're going

8 another hour, I need a cup of coffee. What do you

9 think? Is that fair enough? I mean it's just

10 15 minutes.

11 MR. MILLER: Yeah, let's -- let's take

12 15 minutes.

13 MR. RILEY: Okay.

14 MR. MILLER: That's fine.

15 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The

16 time is 2:23 p.m.

17 (A short break was taken)

18 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.

19 The time is 2:42 p.m.

20 BY MR. MILLER:

21 Q After the -- well, after the April 30th, 2015

22 incident, was anyone -- I think we covered this, but the

23 specific area of using your body camera. Did anyone

24 criticize you or say you should have used your body

25 camera on that evening? You should have turned it on?

141

Page 139: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Personally?

2 Q Yeah.

3 A Say that to me? No.

4 Q Did you -- did you hear that from anyone else

5 that someone at the department said about you, you

6 should have used your body camera on that night?

7 A I was asked after the incident if the body

8 camera was turned on, and I told them no.

9 Q Okay. And beyond that "yes" and "no," did

10 anyone say next time turn it on, that's a violation of

11 the policy, anything like that?

12 A No, not to my knowledge, no.

13 Q Have you ever been disciplined for failing to

14 use your body camera in the line of duty?

15 A No.

16 Q Have you ever been criticized for failing to

17 use your body camera in the line of duty?

18 A No.

19 Q Has anyone ever told you, "Please use your

20 body camera more often in the line of duty," anything

21 like that?

22 A No.

23 Q Have you -- in your time at the -- at the

24 police department, did you become aware of any other

25 offenses that were involved in OISes, officer-involved

142

Page 140: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 shootings?

2 MR. RILEY: I'm sorry?

3 BY MR. MILLER:

4 Q Did you become -- I'll ask the question again.

5 I used the acronym you used before.

6 A Okay.

7 Q Did you -- did you become aware at any time of

8 other officers who you knew who were involved in

9 officer-involved shootings?

10 MR. RILEY: Objection. Relevance. Go ahead.

11 You can answer. I don't know where you're going with

12 this, but --

13 THE WITNESS: Yes.

14 BY MR. MILLER:

15 Q Okay. And in -- in the -- in the five years

16 -- the previous five years, how many other officer-

17 involved shootings at the San Diego Police Department

18 did you become aware of?

19 A In the past five years that I became aware of

20 the OISes that happened in our department, how many?

21 Q Yes.

22 A Let's see. Conservatively, between five and

23 ten.

24 Q And in those five to ten, do you recall

25 learning whether any of the officers involved were

143

Page 141: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 disciplined in any way by the department?

2 And John, just I'll give you a sense before we

3 -- because I can see -- can tell you're uncomfortable,

4 so this -- I'm asking questions that I believe are

5 consistent with the magistrate's order. I'm only going

6 back five years related to other shootings.

7 MR. RILEY: Do you want to confer?

8 MS. ROXAS: Yes.

9 MR. RILEY: Okay. Let's go off the record for

10 a minute.

11 MR. MILLER: Okay.

12 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The

13 time is 2:46 p.m.

14 (A short break was taken)

15 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.

16 The time is 2:51 p.m.

17 BY MR. MILLER:

18 Q In the five to ten instances of other officers

19 that were involved in -- in other shootings, keeping out

20 the names of the specific officers, do you recall

21 learning whether any of those officers were disciplined

22 or reprimanded as a result of the shootings?

23 A No.

24 Q Do you recall that they were not disciplined,

25 or do you just not recall one way or another?

144

Page 142: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Well, I don't recall any of those incidents

2 where the officer was disciplined.

3 Q Okay. So in those five to ten incidents, your

4 recollection is the officers were not disciplined,

5 correct?

6 A To my knowledge, yes.

7 Q Okay. Do you recall -- do you recall ever

8 learning of an incident where an officer -- leaving out

9 names -- where an officer of the San Diego Police

10 Department was disciplined on an officer-involved

11 shooting?

12 A No.

13 Q Did you -- have you ever had any kind of

14 firearms license?

15 A Yes.

16 Q What type of license?

17 A It was through BSIS.

18 Q What's that?

19 A It's the Bureau of Investigative Services.

20 It's normally -- it's -- it's a licensing division which

21 allows you to train security guards for their firearms

22 permit.

23 Q And is that a firearms training instructor's

24 license that you have?

25 A Yes.

145

Page 143: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q And do you still have that license?

2 A No.

3 Q How long did you have it for?

4 A I believe the license was valid for two years.

5 Q And did you have to go through training to

6 obtain that license?

7 A Training? As far as the application process,

8 I didn't have to receive any training from BSIS because

9 I think it was where I just did my law enforcement

10 experience.

11 Q Understood. Did you ever receive any training

12 at the San Diego Police Department about using your gun

13 and shooting a suspect in a leg or somewhere less likely

14 to -- to kill the person?

15 A Did we receive training to shoot people in the

16 leg?

17 Q The leg or somewhere else that's not -- the

18 arm maybe. Somewhere less likely to cause -- result in

19 death.

20 A No.

21 Q Where -- what area of the -- of the body were

22 you trained to shoot at?

23 A We were trained to shoot center mass.

24 Q And center mass is?

25 A I'd describe the torso area.

146

Page 144: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. And that's where you were aiming when

2 you shot Fridoon, correct?

3 A Yes.

4 Q Other than the San Diego Police Department and

5 your job there, did you have any other law enforcement

6 related jobs?

7 A No.

8 Q Have you ever been a prison guard?

9 A Yeah, in the military.

10 Q Okay. And what was -- what's your military

11 background?

12 A I did four years in the Marine Corps.

13 Q When did that tour in the Marine Corps end?

14 A 1987.

15 Q Okay. And when you were in the Marines, did

16 you receive firearms training?

17 A Yes.

18 Q And what type of firearms were you trained to

19 use?

20 A It would be the AR-15 and I believe we did

21 some training with the -- with the handgun also.

22 Q Do you recall what type of handgun you were

23 trained in?

24 A It was just the familiarization. It wasn't

25 that I was certified with it because it wasn't part of

147

Page 145: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 the scope of my job description, but it was with a 45.

2 Q And did you receive firearms training

3 throughout your time in the Marines?

4 A We had to qualify -- I want to say annually, I

5 believe.

6 Q And did you receive -- so you had to pass a

7 test annually to be -- to show proficiency with the use

8 of firearms?

9 A Yes.

10 Q And did you pass that test?

11 A Yes.

12 Q Each year?

13 A Yes.

14 Q Did you have any sniper training while you

15 were in the Marines?

16 A No.

17 Q In the Marines, did you receive any training

18 as far as use of force when you were a prison guard?

19 A Yes, as it pertains to working in the prison.

20 Q Did you carry a gun while you worked in the

21 prison?

22 A No. Firearms were not allowed in the prison

23 unless you worked the towers.

24 Q Okay. Which prison did you work in?

25 A I worked in Camp Pendleton for two years at

148

Page 146: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 their detention facility there and then two years at

2 Levenworth in Kansas.

3 Q And during your time at Camp Pendleton or

4 Levenworth, were you involved in any use of force

5 incidents?

6 A Not that I can recall at Camp Pendleton.

7 Q At Levenworth?

8 A There was one incident in Levenworth, yes.

9 Q Can you tell me the circumstances?

10 A Just real brief, essentially an inmate

11 attacked one of our guards and we had to take him into

12 custody.

13 Q Okay.

14 A That was it.

15 Q Are you aware of -- going back to the 21-foot

16 discussion we had, are you aware of any written policy

17 that the police department has about the 21-foot rule?

18 A Well, I think it was more of a guideline than

19 a policy --

20 Q Okay.

21 A -- regarding that.

22 Q So you don't recall seeing anything in writing

23 passed out to you, a hand-out or anything like that?

24 A No.

25 Q When this lawsuit was -- was filed around the

149

Page 147: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 time it was, did you -- did you take any -- did you

2 remove any social media profiles or anything from the

3 internet --

4 A Yes.

5 Q -- about yourself?

6 What did you take down?

7 A Oh, as far as social media, no, because I

8 don't have social media. You're talking regarding like

9 FaceBook?

10 Q Anything like that, yeah.

11 A I don't have any social media --

12 Q Okay.

13 A -- accounts.

14 Q As a result -- when this lawsuit was filed,

15 did you take anything off the internet about yourself?

16 A The -- I removed just some of the search

17 engines, I would say, where I had my name removed

18 because I was receiving death threats.

19 Q Officer Browder, I want to just -- my

20 colleague is --

21 MR. RILEY: Yeah, he's not going to touch it.

22 MR. MILLER: Yes, understood.

23 MR. RILEY: Okay.

24 BY MR. MILLER:

25 Q I just wonder if we can put that just in front

150

Page 148: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 of -- I want it to be in the camera so we can see it.

2 Tell me if you --

3 MR. RILEY: Is that close enough?

4 MR. MILLER: -- can see it.

5 MR. RILEY: Yeah.

6 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Okay.

7 BY MR. MILLER:

8 Q Okay. Officer Browder, what I have put in

9 front of you is a -- is a blue pen -- blue and some

10 silver in it. I just want to -- and this is a pen that

11 was brought today. It was collected from the scene of

12 the incident. It's logged in evidence so we're going to

13 -- we're going to put it back when we're done with it

14 today, but I just want to -- I just wanted to ask you

15 about it before we do that.

16 Does this -- does this pen look familiar to

17 you? Does this look like the pen you saw on the ground

18 next to Fridoon?

19 A Yes.

20 Q Okay. And when you were observing -- prior to

21 firing your -- your weapon that evening, did you see any

22 blue? Because if you look at this pen, it's -- there's

23 a lot of blue in it.

24 Did you see any blue in the object that you

25 had observed prior to firing your weapon?

151

Page 149: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A No.

2 Q Do you recall seeing any color of the object

3 prior to firing your weapon?

4 A What I saw was a metal object and then it was

5 reflected off of the lights.

6 Q Off of the headlights and the flashlight that

7 you had?

8 A Yes.

9 Q Okay. And other than seeing this pen next to

10 Fridoon, have you seen it any other time?

11 A To my knowledge, I think that was it from what

12 I can remember.

13 Q Okay. Okay. That's all -- that's all the

14 questions I have about the pen, so we can put that back

15 and send it back to evidence.

16 MR. RILEY: Are you -- are you using any of

17 these or what's going on?

18 MR. MILLER: I don't think we need the other

19 -- thank you for the offer, though.

20 BY MR. MILLER:

21 Q In the year preceding April 30th, 2015, did

22 you visit any psychiatrist, psychologist or mental

23 health professionals?

24 MR. RILEY: Objection. Can we go off the

25 record?

152

Page 150: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 MR. MILLER: Sure.

2 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The

3 time is 3:03 p.m.

4 (A short break was taken)

5 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.

6 Time is 3:05 p.m.

7 BY MR. MILLER:

8 Q So before we went off the record, I asked the

9 question: Have you -- in the past -- in the year

10 preceding the April 30th, 2015 incident, did you see any

11 mental health professionals? And I'm including

12 psychiatrists, psychologists.

13 A Yes.

14 Q And do you recall the name of the person you

15 saw?

16 A No, I don't.

17 Q Is this a psychiatrist?

18 A It was during the -- the debrief, which is one

19 of our protocols that we have to go through with a

20 mental health professional, so I don't know what her

21 title was.

22 Q A mental health professional within the

23 department?

24 A Well, it's through Focus, and that's -- it's

25 -- it's a -- it's a service -- I would say the best way

153

Page 151: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 to describe it is it's a service that's provided through

2 our department for officers.

3 Q Is this after the incident?

4 A Well, it -- like I said, it's before you're --

5 you're -- you're cleared to go back into the field, you

6 normally have what's called a debrief, what -- with a

7 mental health professional just to see how you're doing,

8 you know, how's your mental state, your state of mind,

9 those issues, so --

10 Q And this was after the incident of April 30th,

11 2015?

12 A Yes.

13 Q How about in the year before the incident, so

14 going back to --

15 A Before.

16 Q -- April 30th of 2014, did you see any mental

17 health professionals?

18 A No.

19 Q Psychiatrists, psychologists?

20 A No.

21 Q In that year before the incident, were you

22 taking any prescription drugs?

23 A No. No.

24 Q In the year before the incident, were you

25 using alcohol?

154

Page 152: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A Okay. That's kind of a general statement so

2 what do you mean by -- okay. Is --

3 Q How -- how much alcohol in the year before on

4 average did you drink?

5 A Just recreationally.

6 Q Okay. Every day?

7 A No, we're probably talking maybe -- maybe once

8 a month, maybe.

9 Q And I'm assuming no recreational drugs?

10 A No.

11 Q And you don't smoke?

12 A No, I don't smoke.

13 Q Any other types of therapy during that year

14 preceding the incident, any anger management or any type

15 of behavioral therapy that you went to?

16 A No.

17 Q Did you see any doctors for any reason the

18 year before the incident?

19 A No.

20 Q Do you recall what shift you worked before the

21 incident, how many hours, what your previous shift was?

22 A It was graveyards, probably a ten-hour shift,

23 I believe.

24 Q And it was graveyard shift?

25 A I think so.

155

Page 153: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Is that -- was that typical for you at the

2 time to work graveyard?

3 A Yes.

4 Q How many days a week do you work?

5 A My regular shift schedule is four days a week.

6 Q Four ten-hour shifts?

7 A Four ten-hour shifts, yeah.

8 Q Had you worked the night before the incident?

9 A No, I think I was on a day off if I'm not

10 mistaken. I think that that Tuesday was my first day

11 back to work, if I'm not mistaken. I would have to look

12 at the schedule.

13 Q Does the police department in the -- in the

14 year prior to the incident, did they give you any type

15 of drug test ever?

16 A Yes, we receive random drug testing.

17 Q Do you recall whether between April 30th, 2014

18 and April 30th, 2015 you received any drug test?

19 A Yes.

20 Q And did any of those come out positive?

21 A No, they were negative.

22 Q I want to mark as Exhibit 1 -- this is your

23 statement from the homicide interview.

24 (Whereupon, Exhibit Number 1 was

25 marked for identification.)

156

Page 154: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Officer Browder, do you recognize this

2 statement?

3 A Yes.

4 Q And other than your attorney -- I think you

5 answered this -- did you tell anyone else that you were

6 unavailable for an interview between April 30th and

7 May 5th?

8 A To my knowledge, no, I don't believe so.

9 Q Other than the video of the actual shooting,

10 did you watch any other videos prior to your interview,

11 body camera footage, anything else?

12 A No.

13 Q And I see in your statement -- this is

14 page 6. You said, "I couldn't get it out of my -- this

15 guy's not stopping, you know, and that's when I bailed

16 out of my car."

17 Did you consider staying in your car and

18 backing up at that point?

19 A No.

20 Q Did you have a megaphone in your car that

21 would project sound outside your car?

22 A Yes, we -- yeah -- yes, I did.

23 Q Did you -- did you use that megaphone and say

24 anything that could be -- say anything to anyone outside

25 the car?

157

Page 155: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 A No.

2 Q Did you consider using the megaphone and

3 identifying yourself as a police officer to Fridoon?

4 A No.

5 Q There's a statement -- just turning to page 9

6 of your statement here, it's the second line at the top.

7 It starts, just the sentence, "And normally when a cop

8 rolls up on it, they know that you're a police officer.

9 You know, they'll stop. You know, they'll either wait

10 for directions or they'll turn, or they'll take off

11 running. They'll do something completely different,"

12 so -- and you go on to say, "Fridoon didn't stop."

13 Is it your experience -- putting aside

14 Fridoon -- that when you identify yourself as a -- as a

15 police officer, someone sees a police officer, they

16 either stop or they -- they react, stop what they're

17 doing?

18 A It depends. Depends on the circumstances.

19 Q Is that one of the reasons you identify

20 yourself as a police officer, to get someone to stop

21 what they're doing?

22 A Yes.

23 Q Did it -- after you -- you shot your weapon on

24 the evening of April 30th, 2015 and you had gone to

25 render aid, did it occur to you that -- in your mind, "I

158

Page 156: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 think I made a mistake. I shouldn't have shot this

2 guy"?

3 A Absolutely not.

4 Q At any point in time did that occur to you

5 that you made a mistake and you shouldn't have -- you

6 shouldn't have done this?

7 A No.

8 Q And in retrospect, would you have done

9 anything differently that night as far as tactics or

10 what you did?

11 A Given the situation that was -- at that

12 specific time, no.

13 Q You would have done things exactly the same

14 way and shot him, correct?

15 A Based on the radio call and what I saw that

16 night, yes.

17 Q If you could just look at the last page?

18 A Could you give me a page number?

19 Q It's CO -- it's Bate numbered -- it looks like

20 that's not --

21 MR. McKISSICK: I think it's a different

22 document.

23 MR. MILLER: Okay. We'll use that one. You

24 can put that one aside. Thank you.

25 Let's mark this as Exhibit 2.

159

Page 157: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 (Whereupon, Exhibit Number 2 was

2 marked for identification.)

3 BY MR. MILLER:

4 Q This says, "Officer Involved Incident

5 Checklist."

6 Have you seen this document before?

7 A No, this is the first time I've seen it.

8 Q Do you see partway down on the left side, it

9 says, "Eyesight 20/15"?

10 A Right.

11 Q Is that correct?

12 A Yes.

13 Q And is that correct when you wear your

14 contacts?

15 A Yes.

16 Q Okay. Do you see where it says "contacts" --

17 there is a check next to -- or an X next to "No"?

18 A Yes.

19 Q Is that wrong?

20 A That's incorrect because I have to wear my

21 contacts.

22 Q And you had your contacts in that night?

23 A Yes.

24 Q So this document is incorrect in that regard?

25 A Regarding the contacts, yes.

160

Page 158: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. Were you a field training officer?

2 A Yes.

3 Q What does that involve?

4 A Essentially when new officers graduate from

5 the police academy, they're assigned to a field training

6 unit, which they're assigned to a training officer.

7 Q Okay. And how long have you been a field

8 training officer?

9 A 22 years.

10 Q Have you ever given a PowerPoint presentation

11 to your trainees?

12 A Yes.

13 Q And does it involve use of firearms?

14 A No, the PowerPoint essentially covers the

15 training anchors, which is indicated in the blue book.

16 Q Okay. In your performance reviews after the

17 April 30th incident, did anyone ever bring up the

18 incident in the course of your job performance reviews?

19 A As far as my annual evaluation?

20 Q Yes.

21 A Is that what you're referring to?

22 Q Yes.

23 A I'm sorry. Ask the question again.

24 Q Sure.

25 A I'm --

161

Page 159: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q How often are you reviewed in the performance

2 of your job?

3 A Annually.

4 Q And an annual review, is it at the end of the

5 year?

6 A Well, it's on your -- your date of hire, which

7 would be in February.

8 Q In your review in February of 2016, did anyone

9 bring up the April 30, 2015 incident?

10 A No.

11 Q I just want to mark as the next in line

12 Exhibit 3. And these are, it looks like, training

13 certifications regarding taser, air taser and bean bag.

14 (Whereupon, Exhibit Number 3 was

15 marked for identification.)

16 Q Have you seen these before?

17 A Yes.

18 Q And is there anything -- is there anything

19 inaccurate that you see there?

20 A No.

21 Q And the taser training, the taser training was

22 -- included training regarding the taser that you had

23 with you on the evening of April 30th, 2015?

24 A Let me be sure.

25 Yes.

162

Page 160: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q Okay. Was that a required certification you

2 need to obtain in order to use a taser?

3 A Yes.

4 Q Did you have any communications with the

5 District Attorney regarding the April 30th, 2015

6 incident?

7 A No.

8 Q Did you ever speak to anyone at the District

9 Attorney's Office?

10 A No.

11 Q About the incident?

12 A No.

13 Q How about to the press or the media, did you

14 ever talk to anyone in the press or the media about the

15 incident?

16 A No.

17 Q Did you search your e-mails to see if you had

18 found -- if you had sent anything, any e-mails regarding

19 the incident?

20 A Do you mean after the incident -- after the

21 OIS?

22 Q I mean, after this lawsuit was filed, did you

23 go back and look at your e-mails and see if you had sent

24 any e-mails regarding the incident?

25 A No.

163

Page 161: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 Q You never did that search?

2 A I don't believe so, no.

3 Q And do you -- is it possible that you sent

4 e-mails regarding the incident?

5 A The only e-mails was the -- the dialogue

6 between myself and my attorney.

7 Q Okay. Other than e-mails with your attorney,

8 you never sent any e-mails about the incident?

9 A No.

10 MR. MILLER: Okay. Why don't we -- let's go

11 off the record for a minute.

12 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The

13 time is 3:24 p.m.

14 (A short break was taken)

15 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.

16 The time is 3:30 p.m.

17 BY MR. MILLER:

18 Q And this can be under seal because this is

19 just a follow-up question on the more recent shooting.

20 ///

21

22

23

24

25 ///

164

Page 162: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 ///

2

3

4

5

6

7 ///

8 MR. MILLER: Okay. I have no further

9 questions. I propose to relieve the court reporter of

10 her duties under the code and that the transcript be

11 sent to your counsel, Mr. Riley; that you have 30 days

12 to review, make any changes to your transcript; and if

13 the transcript is lost or destroyed for any reason, a

14 certified copy can be used at trial?

15 MR. RILEY: So stipulated.

16 MR. MILLER: Thank you.

17 MR. RILEY: Thank you, Mary Anne and Laura.

18 Thank you.

19 THE REPORTER: Thank you.

20 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This concludes today's

21 deposition of Neal Browder. The number of media used

22 was three. We're off the record at 3:32 p.m.

23 (Whereupon, at 3:32 p.m., the deposition was

24 adjourned.)

25 --o0o--

165

Page 163: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 I certify (or declare) under penalty of

2 perjury under the laws of the State of California

3 that the foregoing is true and correct.

4

5 Executed at ________________________ on ______________. (Place) (Date)

6

7 _______________________________ (Signature of Deponent)

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

166

Page 164: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 DEPOSITION OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss.

3 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )

4

5

6 I, Mary Anne Young, hereby certify:

7 I am a duly qualified Certified Shorthand

8 Reporter in the State of California, holder of

9 Certificate Number CSR 12799 issued by the Certified Court

10 Reporters' Board of California and which is in full

11 force and effect. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 28(a)(1)).

12 I am authorized to administer oaths or

13 affirmations pursuant to California Code of Civil

14 Procedure, Section 2093(b) and prior to being examined,

15 the witness was first duly sworn by me. (Fed. R. Civ.

16 P. 28(a)(a)).

17 I am not a relative or employee or attorney or

18 counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a relative or

19 employee of such attorney or counsel, nor am I

20 financially interested in this action. (Fed. R. Civ. P.

21 28).

22 I am the deposition officer that

23 stenographically recorded the testimony in the foregoing

24 deposition and the foregoing transcript is a true record

25 / / /

167

Page 165: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

NEAL BROWDER

1 of the testimony given by the witness. (Fed. R. Civ. P.

2 30(f)(1)).

3 Before completion of the deposition, review of

4 the transcript [XX] was [ ] was not requested. If

5 requested, any changes made by the deponent (and

6 provided to the reporter) during the period allowed, are

7 appended hereto. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(e)).

8

9 Dated: JULY 27, 2016

10

11

12

13

14 ______________________________

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

168

Page 166: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

ERRATA SHEETCHANGES IN TESTIMONY

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMANNEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

PAGE LINE FROM TO

SIGNATURE OF WITNESS DATE

Page 167: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

/

/// (8) 38:7,25;42:1,11; 164:20,25;165:1,7

A

abdomen (2) 74:18,19abilities (1) 115:24ability (1) 81:17able (5) 82:5;83:11,17; 98:11,14above (3) 73:14;101:19,19Absolutely (3) 63:6;105:21;159:3academy (19) 10:7;13:13,17; 21:2,5;22:9,10,11, 11;24:25;33:2,10,16; 44:3,12;89:20;139:6, 11;161:5accounts (1) 150:13accuracy (5) 18:6;26:8,9;44:17, 18accurate (4) 7:21;46:1,3;97:3accurately (1) 27:7achieved (2) 23:14;24:12acronym (1) 143:5across (1) 88:19act (1) 106:22actions (5) 59:12;137:5,12; 138:7,12activated (1) 97:21activity (1) 55:20actual (9) 10:25;21:18,19,20, 21;52:11;87:12; 94:9;157:9actually (11) 9:21;11:5;14:25; 18:21;27:19;33:8; 36:15;64:22;89:16; 93:13;105:14addition (7) 9:18;17:24;21:17,

23;25:1;35:19;83:17additional (7) 13:20,22;22:6; 24:5;27:5;33:21,23address (4) 33:7;90:24;92:13, 15addressed (1) 90:1addressing (1) 92:6adjourned (1) 165:24Administration (1) 42:16administrative (6) 31:21,22;32:2,4; 42:20;135:16adult (2) 56:1;133:19advanced (1) 33:20advantage (8) 80:15;81:11,14, 19;82:3,20;83:14,14advised (3) 58:16;79:17;86:15Affairs (10) 48:4;50:11;51:9, 22;52:13,14;128:9, 16;136:19;137:3affirmed (1) 102:23again (28) 16:4;17:23;23:12; 24:3,21;28:14;46:6, 8;58:19;64:23,24; 72:5;78:12;82:11; 83:10;87:11;88:1; 95:16;111:13; 117:23;118:10,11; 123:12;126:5; 127:14;132:18; 143:4;161:23against (6) 51:25;71:17,24; 72:1;90:4;113:10aggressing (4) 78:9,10,11;95:14agility (1) 22:5ago (12) 11:9;12:6;13:13; 21:6;27:24,25;44:4; 47:21;103:10; 118:10;139:4,23agree (9) 11:22;23:3;34:4,9; 35:12;54:1;74:7; 107:23;109:19ahead (7) 45:14;67:17;74:5; 84:25;96:1;125:9;

143:10aid (8) 108:13,18;109:12, 17;110:7;120:19; 123:18;158:25aiming (2) 20:7;147:1air (1) 162:13al (1) 5:7alcohol (4) 119:14;129:8; 154:25;155:3alleged (2) 44:8;45:11alley (23) 59:15,21;62:16; 63:1,16;64:3,5;66:8, 14,14,15,16;67:9,13; 68:16;82:7,16; 84:15;99:23;114:7; 115:15,16;116:2alleyway (1) 114:2allotted (1) 21:11allow (1) 80:15allowed (2) 82:14;148:22allowing (1) 107:4allows (3) 82:22;83:2;145:21almost (1) 95:18alone (1) 106:3along (1) 13:10alongside (1) 94:7always (4) 18:3;37:18;89:20; 90:25amount (3) 30:9;50:14;140:5anchors (1) 161:15anger (1) 155:14Anne (2) 6:1;165:17annual (2) 161:19;162:4annually (3) 148:4,7;162:3answered (5) 45:12;67:17,22; 84:25;157:5anxious (1) 129:14

apartment (4) 36:17;48:25;49:1, 4apologize (1) 113:16appear (2) 95:23;96:4appeared (6) 65:5;68:7;73:18; 78:13;100:17;101:7appearing (1) 5:14application (1) 146:7applied (1) 24:20apply (2) 25:4;140:14appreciate (2) 45:17;46:10approach (5) 34:1,5;72:13; 80:18;95:14approaching (3) 34:9,22;68:4appropriate (3) 32:17;74:3;118:2Approximately (2) 116:13,16April (50) 17:6;29:17;30:1; 31:4;36:9;37:7; 46:24;53:5,12;54:3; 55:14,21;61:4; 84:11;85:16;86:1; 88:7,13;90:7;92:17; 111:3,16,22;112:22; 113:18;115:22; 135:3,8,11,11; 136:17,23;137:4,13, 21;138:4,8;141:21; 152:21;153:10; 154:10,16;156:17, 18;157:6;158:24; 161:17;162:9,23; 163:5AR-15 (5) 17:1;22:24;29:8; 37:3;147:20area (7) 20:8;48:17;67:3, 20;141:23;146:21,25Arena (1) 54:10arm (4) 73:13;75:12; 100:16;146:18armed (6) 32:21;60:7,9,13; 68:21;82:25armor (1) 28:15arms (1)

73:17around (4) 32:2;55:14; 122:16;149:25arrangement (1) 104:22arrests (9) 43:2,5,5,6,6,7,15, 20;88:16arrived (9) 58:18;60:16,18; 61:9,10,12;62:15; 86:2;121:19Asian (2) 57:16;60:12aside (9) 10:14;36:9;43:10; 113:21;124:23; 125:1;130:15; 158:13;159:24asp (2) 112:1,5aspect (1) 82:8assaultive (1) 48:1assess (1) 95:11assessed (1) 95:13assessment (1) 95:19assign (1) 56:23assigned (11) 42:20;55:25; 56:11,22;57:2,3; 120:4;121:1;132:3; 161:5,6assignment (3) 31:21,22;32:5association (2) 120:4,10Assumes (2) 45:21;46:6assuming (1) 155:9attached (1) 97:10attacked (1) 149:11attend (2) 12:21;22:9attended (3) 12:15;44:3,5attention (1) 52:8attorney (53) 10:13,16;11:15; 12:1,5,21;33:17; 43:12;65:12;104:1,2, 9,12,15,22,24;105:2, 17,18,23;106:4,7,13,

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (1) /// - attorney

Page 168: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

20,23;107:2,3,16; 119:21,22,24;120:1, 3;121:18,25;122:23; 123:23;124:5,9,11, 13,23;125:2;126:7, 24;128:12;130:15; 137:9,10;157:4; 163:5;164:6,7attorney/client (4) 11:21;12:3;104:3; 107:15attorney's (4) 11:14;12:24; 107:20;163:9authorize (1) 30:4authorized (2) 30:8,15available (1) 24:6Avenue (1) 5:13average (4) 29:9,11;35:25; 155:4avoid (1) 45:17aware (9) 51:25;116:9; 126:24;142:24; 143:7,18,19;149:15, 16away (19) 7:8;15:16;52:23; 53:15;62:3;65:18; 66:19;70:3;75:16, 20;80:5;90:14;91:5; 94:4,8;100:8; 101:22;113:23; 128:20awful (1) 11:21

B

back (43) 25:7;28:4;30:25; 31:7,10;32:7;33:11; 37:17,19;63:11; 67:12;70:1;71:5,7; 82:2;85:13;106:23; 113:17;115:16; 121:21;125:14; 135:9,10,14,19,21; 136:1,12,14;137:24; 141:18;144:6,15; 149:15;151:13; 152:14,15;153:5; 154:5,14;156:11; 163:23;164:15background (2) 88:15;147:11Backing (2)

113:23;157:18back-up (5) 113:25;134:3,13, 22,25bad (1) 9:8bag (1) 162:13bailed (1) 157:15Barkley (2) 5:15;6:1barricaded (3) 24:2;26:17;36:16based (3) 19:25;90:25; 159:15basic (1) 25:2basics (1) 7:10Bate (1) 159:19bathroom (1) 63:5baton (10) 48:9,11;49:7,17; 50:9;111:17,18; 112:8,8,16beach (1) 56:1beams (3) 63:2;82:13,22bean (1) 162:13bear (2) 97:3;110:3became (1) 143:19become (10) 21:1;22:2;24:13; 25:4,24;26:3; 142:24;143:4,7,18beginning (4) 34:17;63:12; 125:15;135:13begins (1) 5:5behalf (4) 5:14,19,21,23behavior (1) 48:1behavioral (1) 155:15behind (10) 69:18,20;70:6; 76:7,16,18;89:11,22; 90:19;115:16belt (4) 111:21;112:22,24; 113:3bent (2) 74:16;100:16

beside (2) 50:4;69:17besides (3) 12:9,21;20:11best (9) 8:16;30:13,14; 66:4;87:14;91:18; 92:10;97:6;153:25better (18) 63:17;81:2,4,9,10, 13,17,22;82:14,24; 83:2,13,14,17;98:12, 14;114:17;133:1beyond (3) 74:3;101:4;142:9big (3) 101:6,7;127:23bit (6) 89:12,22,23;90:4, 9;114:17blind (5) 81:23;82:4,9,19; 83:6blinding (1) 82:21block (2) 117:13;118:7blocks (2) 28:13;54:14blood (3) 118:22,24;119:1blue (10) 61:2;79:12;86:9; 108:16;151:9,9,22, 23,24;161:15bodily (2) 32:19;135:5body (26) 11:3;20:2,4,4,8; 70:6;97:25;98:2,9, 25;99:1,4;101:22; 110:9,13;111:2; 129:25;141:23,24; 142:6,7,14,17,20; 146:21;157:11book (8) 56:1;67:4;114:10, 12,14,15;133:19; 161:15booked (1) 43:8both (2) 50:11;52:24bottle (1) 19:21bottle-shaped (1) 19:22Boulevard (1) 54:11Brad (1) 119:22break (18) 9:1,4;13:8;30:20,

24;63:5,10;85:2,12; 111:6;114:16;125:6, 13;140:25;141:17; 144:14;153:4; 164:14breaks (1) 9:2breath (1) 119:3brief (1) 149:10bright (16) 62:21;63:15,21, 22;64:6;73:25;80:9, 24;81:3,5,15,22,23; 82:18;98:21;99:7bring (3) 37:19;161:17; 162:9broad (1) 136:25broadcast (1) 64:23broken (2) 67:10,16brought (2) 52:7;151:11Browder (11) 5:6,24;6:4;63:8, 13;125:11,16; 150:19;151:8;157:1; 165:21BSIS (2) 145:17;146:8build (2) 65:6,7bulletins (1) 118:15bullet-proof (10) 70:24;71:2,3,4,10, 16,22,23,25;113:17Bureau (1) 145:19burglary (1) 134:6business (5) 7:13;67:7;114:8; 115:14;130:4

C

calf (3) 48:18;49:23;50:8caliber (2) 16:18;17:10CALIFORNIA (4) 5:1,9,13,15call (67) 21:3;52:9;54:5,6; 56:1,11,18,19,22,23; 57:3,3,4,5,7,8,22; 58:10,12,14,17;59:6, 9;64:11;79:1,20;

86:11,19;110:14; 116:4,6;127:8; 129:2;130:14,22; 131:9,10,11,15,16, 17,18,19,20,21; 132:3,6,11,12,13,16; 133:8,9,10,12,14,15, 18,20,21;134:1,2,4,8, 12,16;159:15called (8) 19:21;23:25; 24:25;26:14;33:20; 55:17;138:25;154:6calling (1) 86:20calls (14) 8:15;13:4,7;45:4; 52:7;56:25;58:3; 79:16;131:23,25; 134:5,9,10,11calm (1) 117:8came (7) 55:22;57:8;79:1; 121:11;131:20,20; 133:18camera (17) 11:3;110:9,13,18, 20,24;111:2;129:25; 141:23,25;142:6,8, 14,17,20;151:1; 157:11Camp (3) 148:25;149:3,6can (90) 7:4;8:16,25;14:10; 15:3;16:5,23;18:7, 22,24;19:7,15;22:22; 23:10;26:16;27:6; 28:22,22;30:7,20; 31:19;32:22;34:14, 15;43:4;44:13,19; 45:6,7,8,10,15;47:2, 23;52:8;54:17;55:7, 18;58:13;59:20,22; 63:4;67:18;71:21; 72:5;73:11;74:24; 76:13;81:9,22; 82:24;84:3;87:14; 89:11;97:3,6,13; 98:5;108:22;110:6; 114:13;118:9;127:4, 9;128:4;132:25; 133:1;134:7,10; 135:20,21;136:25; 139:13,18;140:1,4; 143:11;144:3,3; 149:6,9;150:25; 151:1,4;152:12,14, 24;159:24;164:18; 165:14canister (6) 112:1,4,14;113:2,

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (2) attorney/client - canister

Page 169: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

4,5canvassed (1) 122:16Captain (4) 121:12;136:4,6,8car (85) 11:6;54:16;55:1; 60:21,24;61:2,13,16; 62:6,7,8,19,22; 63:22,24,25;64:16; 65:20;66:9,18,20,22; 68:4,9,10,11,13,16, 17,19,21,22,23;69:1, 2,5,6,10,12,15,17,18; 70:3,5,6;75:17,18, 20,20;76:11,12;86:9; 87:6,7,23,24;88:5,5, 22,25;89:7,8;90:8, 14,15,18,22;92:22; 93:2;95:3,5;98:21; 100:11,11;113:13; 115:5,5,7;123:17; 129:2;157:16,17,20, 21,25care (1) 15:1career (9) 9:12,25;13:6; 46:14;47:7,9,15; 52:2,16carried (1) 30:15carry (7) 22:22;30:4,8; 111:18,21;112:10; 148:20carrying (1) 79:1cars (2) 61:25;63:20Carter (1) 121:13case (11) 5:8,9;6:15,19,24; 14:17;29:17;80:21; 81:6;92:12;134:21cases (10) 9:15,17,18,18,20, 23;10:2;43:19,21,23categories (1) 133:4category (1) 133:13cause (2) 78:22;146:18caution (1) 34:6Cavanaugh (2) 59:3,7cell (5) 58:3,9,11;129:23; 130:1center (6)

19:12,17,17,19; 146:23,24certain (8) 18:7;23:17;57:5; 84:2,4,6;85:23;140:5certification (4) 24:9,11;25:24; 163:1certifications (5) 23:15,17;116:22, 24;162:13certified (4) 23:23;25:2; 147:25;165:14certs (1) 117:3cetera (2) 14:19;74:1change (1) 102:25changes (1) 165:12check (5) 30:5,5;121:11,13; 160:17checked (1) 30:3checking (1) 130:20Checklist (1) 160:5chest (2) 20:8;101:17Chief (4) 121:11;127:13; 135:25;137:3chief's (1) 135:23circumstance (1) 86:3circumstances (19) 35:4,8;36:14; 45:14,22;46:7; 47:22;74:4;79:19; 83:24;84:4,7;85:24; 86:14;91:4;117:24; 134:18;149:9; 158:18citation (3) 89:6,11,21citations (1) 89:25cited (1) 43:9City (1) 5:24civilian (4) 76:7,9,10,13claim (1) 52:1clarification (1) 115:10clarify (7)

23:10;31:19; 46:19;50:18;55:18; 74:24;135:20class (1) 44:4classroom (2) 117:16,16clear (6) 12:20;15:20; 102:7;119:10;126:6; 136:14cleared (1) 154:5clearly (1) 19:10clerk (1) 57:9client (1) 105:19close (16) 11:21;33:1;44:7, 23;45:1;52:24; 54:15;69:1,11;74:17, 19;76:4;140:4,11; 141:2;151:3closed (2) 73:1;105:5closer (4) 74:17;76:19; 101:23;109:20closing (1) 69:15clothing (1) 82:14CO (1) 159:19coaching (1) 45:17Code (12) 26:15,18,19;46:9; 131:23,23,23,24; 132:3,10,11;165:10coding (1) 57:6coffee (2) 141:5,8coincided (1) 135:19collapsible (1) 112:16colleague (1) 150:20collected (1) 151:11collision (3) 6:16,17;7:1color (1) 152:2coming (6) 7:11;90:5;91:20, 25;92:8;96:22command (3) 52:12,17;136:2

commander (1) 24:5commands (1) 118:1comment (1) 138:6commented (1) 138:11committed (1) 44:8common (1) 55:9communicate (1) 105:19communication (1) 85:18communications (7) 55:22;59:13;68:5; 104:11;107:5; 133:25;163:4complaint (1) 52:7complaints (2) 51:25;52:10complete (1) 89:11completely (2) 19:8;158:11completing (2) 89:21,24complimentary (1) 138:3concealment (1) 89:24concerned (2) 75:25;109:13concerns (1) 73:24concludes (1) 165:20conduct (2) 106:22;138:7conducting (1) 89:5confer (1) 144:7confined (1) 115:19confirm (1) 84:15confirmed (7) 64:12,13,17,19,25; 68:4,5connection (3) 8:6;120:2;128:17conservatively (3) 10:1;43:13;143:22consider (15) 13:24;18:8,25; 19:11;26:15;79:21; 94:21;109:25;113:9, 21,22,25;131:11; 157:17;158:2

considered (2) 133:8;138:20considering (1) 35:22consistent (3) 96:15,17;144:5consistently (2) 16:10;53:23contact (3) 33:1;83:3;110:18contacting (3) 77:13,17;89:13contacts (15) 52:20,22;53:11,14, 17,19,20,23,25; 70:10;160:14,16,21, 22,25conversation (4) 8:22;10:15;59:7; 127:22conversations (1) 130:9cop (1) 158:7copy (3) 10:17;104:24; 165:14core (1) 117:3Corps (2) 147:12,13counsel (5) 5:17;34:17;45:16; 104:10;165:11couple (1) 8:20course (20) 9:12,25;13:6; 18:22;19:2,13; 24:23;25:3;27:10,13, 18,20,23;33:22; 35:24;87:3,15;90:3; 137:20;161:18Court (8) 5:8,15,25;6:1; 8:23;10:11;37:24; 165:9cover (6) 34:16;89:7,8;90:4, 10;98:24covered (6) 84:17;99:1;117:4; 120:3;127:3;141:22covers (1) 161:14co-workers (4) 130:6,8,10,22crime (2) 44:8;131:11crimes (1) 9:16criminal (5) 9:16,18;43:19,21,

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (3) canvassed - criminal

Page 170: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

23critical (2) 136:23;137:12criticize (1) 141:24criticized (1) 142:16cross (1) 79:24crossed (3) 66:17,19;80:2crossing (1) 99:23Crown (1) 64:1cup (2) 141:4,8currently (3) 25:8,9;42:13custody (3) 43:8;47:25;149:12cut (1) 71:21cut-off (2) 30:17,18

D

Dan (3) 5:19;56:12;140:24danger (1) 32:19dangerous (1) 109:20dangers (1) 33:5dark (4) 66:25;74:11; 81:14;87:20date (4) 5:10;127:6,10; 162:6day (6) 129:19,20,21; 155:6;156:9,10days (11) 124:16,22;125:3, 24;126:14,19;127:5; 130:13;156:4,5; 165:11deadly (3) 32:13,17;107:23deal (2) 32:21;33:15death (4) 32:19;135:5; 146:19;150:18debrief (2) 153:18;154:6decided (1) 105:24decides (1) 105:19

decision (3) 99:12,15;106:8de-escalation (4) 117:7,13;118:5,8Defendant (2) 6:5,20Defendants (2) 5:24;9:16definitely (1) 78:13Del (4) 122:5,18,23;123:1delay (1) 131:13demonstrate (3) 73:22;74:22;75:11demonstrated (2) 100:19,24demonstration (1) 74:5demonstrations (1) 73:25Department (61) 7:17;10:6;16:3; 17:14;20:20;23:4,5, 9,16,20;24:15;25:18; 26:21;27:10,12; 28:2;33:12;35:25; 37:8;43:24;47:14; 49:21;51:23;71:11; 83:5;86:7;88:24; 117:3,11;121:1; 124:10;127:8;128:7; 131:3,4;135:15; 136:20,22;137:2,8, 12,15,20,23;138:2,6, 11,14;139:2;142:5, 24;143:17,20;144:1; 145:10;146:12; 147:4;149:17; 153:23;154:2; 156:13department-issued (1) 129:23depend (1) 29:1depending (6) 16:5;35:8;37:24; 117:24;134:12,17depends (17) 29:2;35:4;45:13; 77:8;79:19;81:11; 82:1;83:24,24,25; 134:4,8,9,15,15; 158:18,18deponent (1) 107:4deponent's (1) 37:18deposition (20) 5:6,12;6:11;7:5; 10:12;12:1;34:18; 37:19;38:2;63:8,13;

100:20;102:1; 106:13,22,25; 125:11,16;165:21,23depress (2) 28:19;93:6describe (12) 28:18;46:7;47:22; 65:4;66:4;96:18,19; 97:2,4;132:25; 146:25;154:1described (5) 29:7;100:16; 101:25;117:2;133:9describing (3) 102:2;112:9;114:6description (13) 57:10,12,18; 60:13;64:10,12,21, 22;65:1;68:4;82:15; 84:16;148:1desk (1) 31:24destroyed (1) 165:13detail (2) 29:16;84:1detectives (1) 128:6detention (1) 149:1determination (1) 95:12determine (2) 50:11;134:21determined (4) 47:13;48:2;51:22; 134:24diagnosed (1) 7:24dialogue (1) 164:5DIEGO (23) 5:1,13;7:17;16:2; 17:13;20:20;24:15; 26:21;28:2;37:8; 43:3;47:13;53:22; 83:5;88:24;127:7; 128:7;131:3;139:2; 143:17;145:9; 146:12;147:4difference (2) 28:25;32:13different (17) 17:4;29:1,3;50:15, 22;58:8;74:12;75:4; 77:18;83:25;106:25; 113:23;129:19; 132:22;134:5; 158:11;159:21differentiate (1) 11:2differently (3) 77:19;137:16;

159:9difficult (1) 80:9diminishes (1) 139:22directed (1) 96:21direction (6) 61:19;65:21;73:3; 98:2;113:23;135:22directions (1) 158:10directly (1) 135:25disability (1) 115:23discipline (2) 51:2,19disciplined (10) 50:24;136:16,18; 142:13;144:1,21,24; 145:2,4,10discretion (1) 134:17discuss (5) 14:12;15:11; 121:6,15;130:16discussed (2) 127:12,16discussion (5) 124:5,9,11; 130:24;149:16dispatch (15) 55:23,24;58:7,10, 14,19,22;59:23; 64:11,12,20;131:17; 132:4;133:13,25dispatcher (7) 56:4,20,21;57:14, 19;58:16;59:2dispute (2) 37:11,16distance (4) 99:3;114:3; 139:13;140:4District (4) 5:8,9;163:5,8Division (7) 120:23;121:2,9, 17;128:21;135:17; 145:20divisions (1) 23:8docked (1) 51:10doctors (1) 155:17document (4) 106:17;159:22; 160:6,24documents (2) 106:13,14domestic (1)

47:24done (10) 21:15;26:25; 34:17;87:1;123:14; 137:16;151:13; 159:6,8,13door (27) 68:11,13,17,24; 69:1,2,5,6,12,15,17, 19,21,25;70:3,5,7; 88:25;89:8,10,11,22; 90:8,12,19;91:5; 105:5doors (1) 89:7Dow (1) 56:12down (11) 13:8;63:16;78:6,8, 9;96:13;114:16; 117:8;137:1;150:6; 160:8draw (2) 35:6;139:16drawing (3) 93:1,2;113:8drawn (5) 34:10,23;118:22; 140:10,19drew (3) 69:20,23;94:1drink (1) 155:4drive (2) 57:25;58:2driver (1) 6:25driver's (8) 66:9,11,18;68:12; 69:17;88:22;90:17; 99:24driving (2) 54:13;63:25drove (1) 92:20drug (3) 156:15,16,18drugs (4) 119:15;129:8; 154:22;155:9due (1) 55:7DUI (1) 43:5duly (1) 6:5during (32) 6:16;10:7,7;17:20; 19:2;33:20,22; 36:23;48:4;52:1; 59:6;80:14;119:20; 120:11;122:7;123:8, 14;124:16,17,21,21;

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (4) critical - during

Page 171: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

125:18;126:15,16, 17,22;127:2,5;139:6; 149:3;153:18; 155:13duties (5) 8:6;32:2;42:20; 135:16;165:10duty (12) 22:23;30:4,8,15; 31:18;35:18;36:10; 37:8;53:21;142:14, 17,20

E

Earlier (2) 10:22;101:25easier (2) 8:23;82:23east (1) 66:17eat (1) 85:8edged (13) 33:2,6,9,15;34:2,5, 8,23;35:11;71:17,21, 24;72:1effect (3) 33:9;83:13;122:11effective (1) 112:19eight (2) 65:5;129:4either (16) 24:16;29:13;58:3, 7;59:20;61:17; 73:16;91:21;101:20; 106:17;122:5;131:6; 135:12;136:4;158:9, 16elapsed (1) 95:2elected (1) 22:8elevation (2) 116:2;132:17else (23) 11:17;12:21; 51:22;60:9;78:22; 87:23;89:4;101:4; 102:22;104:13; 111:14,25;120:11; 123:8;125:2;126:10; 137:7,11;138:10; 142:4;146:17;157:5, 11else's (1) 32:18e-mail (3) 131:1,4,6e-mails (9) 130:25;163:17,18, 23,24;164:4,5,7,8

emergency (1) 86:13employ (1) 118:4employees (1) 133:19en (1) 58:17encounter (2) 77:4;117:7encountered (2) 116:10;118:17encountering (2) 110:14;118:14end (5) 63:7;125:10; 135:12;147:13; 162:4enforcement (3) 110:18;146:9; 147:5engaging (3) 91:1,6,7engines (1) 150:17enough (5) 15:4;92:9;132:22; 141:9;151:3entered (1) 13:12entire (2) 25:17;98:9entitled (3) 8:15;106:14,16entrance (1) 114:15equipment (1) 24:5essentially (12) 27:2;33:5;44:20; 87:16;117:23; 123:16;127:18,21; 130:10;149:10; 161:4,14estimate (29) 8:16,17,18;9:10, 14,19,25;11:11;16:6; 17:18;18:15;21:14, 24;31:11;43:2,22; 48:23;52:16;75:16, 17;76:9;87:12,14; 98:6;108:9;111:4; 113:6;123:12; 127:15estimation (3) 87:18;95:8;120:15et (3) 5:7;14:19;74:1evaluation (1) 161:19even (3) 8:21;22:22;52:7evening (30)

14:13;15:12; 53:11;54:3;80:5; 84:11;85:16;86:1; 88:7,13,20;90:7; 110:9;111:16; 112:25;113:9;118:5; 119:15;120:7; 128:24;129:14; 130:12;137:4,13; 138:4,12;141:25; 151:21;158:24; 162:23event (6) 15:12;37:11;38:5; 44:21;46:7;135:18events (1) 102:25evidence (4) 45:22;46:6; 151:12;152:15exact (4) 8:11;18:20;30:9; 52:5exactly (2) 61:23;159:13exam (3) 54:18,20;129:13EXAMINATION (1) 6:7example (3) 89:17;132:20; 134:5examples (1) 24:3excessive (5) 47:14;48:3;50:12; 51:23;52:1exhaust (1) 108:1Exhibit (6) 156:22,24;159:25; 160:1;162:12,14exhibiting (1) 47:25exited (5) 68:2,25;69:8,16; 93:25expandable (2) 112:7,8expanded (1) 22:21expanse (1) 52:15experience (6) 13:3;29:6;32:16; 45:9;146:10;158:13expert (10) 18:8,12,16,21,25, 25;19:6,14;20:11; 116:23explain (1) 73:11expression (2)

72:20,23exterior (1) 67:6external (1) 28:6eye (2) 53:3,9eyes (4) 72:25;73:2;83:19, 22Eyesight (1) 160:9

F

face (5) 70:13;81:16; 97:25;98:24;99:4FaceBook (1) 150:9faced (1) 67:5facial (2) 72:19,22facility (1) 149:1facing (6) 61:20;65:21,23, 24;114:6,19fact (6) 12:9;27:3;59:18; 61:25;69:9;71:21facts (2) 45:21;46:6failing (3) 19:13;142:13,16Fair (5) 15:4,24;38:1; 132:22;141:9fairly (2) 23:2;33:1fall (1) 133:13familiar (3) 93:4;131:22; 151:16familiarity (1) 7:6familiarization (1) 147:24family (1) 15:16fan (1) 127:23far (59) 6:12;9:21;13:3,21, 22;16:13,23;18:20; 21:16;22:23;23:1,10, 11;27:6,9;29:18; 31:13;32:20,22,24; 33:14;34:1;36:5; 43:4,24;44:6;46:16, 18,20;47:2;52:23;

53:14;54:12;55:18; 57:6;62:3;65:18; 66:19;70:3;71:15; 75:12,16;76:9; 79:15;89:18,19,20; 90:1;94:4,8;100:8; 110:13;111:21; 118:13;146:7; 148:18;150:7;159:9; 161:19fast (2) 75:7;85:6fault (2) 7:2,3feasible (4) 77:5,12,21;108:1February (4) 42:23,24;162:7,8feet (7) 76:14;112:20; 113:7;116:13; 139:21;140:2,6felony (3) 9:20;10:2;43:6felt (1) 78:18fenced-in (2) 114:8;115:14few (7) 123:2;124:16,22; 125:3,24;126:13,19Field (6) 42:18,21;154:5; 161:1,5,7Fields (2) 119:22;121:18filed (3) 149:25;150:14; 163:22filtered (1) 136:2final (1) 84:21findings (1) 50:13fine (4) 14:25;15:18; 111:7;141:14finger (10) 28:20;93:10,13, 19;94:2,5,11,15,23; 140:11finish (1) 37:18finished (2) 96:2;136:13fire (8) 18:22;19:1,3,13; 35:24;36:22;37:2; 94:17firearm (1) 23:15firearms (23)

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (5) duties - firearms

Page 172: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

13:3,16;20:25; 22:7,12,14,17;24:22; 26:20;27:1,11,14,19; 28:1;145:14,21,23; 147:16,18;148:2,8, 22;161:13fired (22) 11:6;35:17;36:10; 37:7;64:7;72:3,9,13, 17,20,23;73:1;78:7; 79:25;95:3,6,21; 97:14;101:2;102:13; 108:7;135:3firing (10) 78:1,4;93:3,7; 111:13;113:20; 138:16;151:21,25; 152:3first (40) 6:5;13:12;21:19; 22:18;25:6;33:12; 35:21;48:16;49:19; 55:19;58:14;61:8; 62:10,14,18;65:9,18, 22;67:25;68:1,16; 72:2,8,12,16;86:2; 94:1;99:18;108:18, 20;110:6,7;123:18; 125:25;126:9; 127:12;128:19; 134:23;156:10; 160:7fitting (1) 60:13five (30) 16:11,21;17:18, 20;18:2,23,24;19:7, 11;36:3;43:1,11,17; 48:23,24;49:3; 52:16;65:5,5;76:14; 108:9;113:6;143:15, 16,19,22,24;144:6, 18;145:3flashlight (14) 82:24;83:6,10; 97:7,15,18,25;98:13, 17,20,22,24;99:11; 152:6flashlights (1) 80:8flat (2) 116:2,3flickering (2) 67:13,21flip (1) 28:9focal (1) 26:18focus (4) 81:8;82:12;83:10; 153:24focusing (2) 17:12;78:13

folks (1) 85:8follow (2) 12:24;107:20follows (1) 6:6follow-up (1) 164:19footage (2) 11:3;157:11force (30) 14:23;32:10,13,14, 17;46:25;47:5,6,14; 48:2,5;50:14,15,16, 19,21,22;51:23;52:1; 77:22;107:23,24; 113:10,21;117:14; 118:2;137:24; 138:21;148:18; 149:4forced (1) 48:1Ford (1) 64:1formally (3) 26:22,24;27:9formatted (2) 133:14,24forward (1) 45:17found (3) 7:1,3;163:18foundation (3) 45:4,21;103:23four (20) 13:18,20;17:24; 30:11,12;48:23,24; 49:3,25,25;50:4,7; 54:14;84:24;106:24; 120:16;147:12; 156:5,6,7four-hour (2) 117:13;118:7frame (3) 47:8;55:14;87:11frequently (2) 87:1,2Fridoon (65) 62:12,14;64:9,15; 65:3;67:25;68:3; 70:14,18,21;72:3,8, 12,16;76:10,11,20, 23;77:25;78:6;80:1, 25;81:2,10;82:4,6,9; 84:13,20;85:17;88:8, 12;91:8;93:18,22; 94:1;95:4,6,21; 97:23;101:9;108:12, 18;109:12,25;110:2; 111:9;113:10; 114:19;116:10; 118:5,17;123:19; 126:10,10;128:20;

131:16;132:4; 133:12;147:2; 151:18;152:10; 158:3,12,14Fridoon's (4) 88:10;108:16; 126:2;134:21friends (1) 130:22front (10) 37:10;67:5;69:3; 71:1,5,6;113:17; 114:15;150:25; 151:9FTO (2) 42:16,17further (3) 113:23;124:3; 165:8

G

gain (1) 82:20gap (3) 91:17;92:4,7gave (5) 9:24;64:21;92:12, 15;104:19general (3) 109:19;130:9; 155:1generalization (1) 43:5generalized (1) 127:24gesture (1) 73:9gestures (1) 85:17given (11) 10:2,17,21;18:5; 57:10;91:3;117:24; 132:20;134:18; 159:11;161:10gives (2) 81:17;91:16giving (2) 7:21;59:11glasses (2) 52:20;53:19Glock (26) 16:17;17:2,4,5,10, 12,15,22;18:12,17; 20:11,14;23:1,1; 28:4,6,14,18,20; 29:1,4,20,25;116:21, 21;117:1goes (6) 16:13;33:11; 37:24;74:7;89:19; 90:1Good (8)

5:5;6:9,10;23:2; 44:18;86:8;115:10; 129:6grabbing (1) 141:4grade (2) 46:22,23grades (1) 46:19graduate (1) 161:4graveyard (2) 155:24;156:2graveyards (1) 155:22gray (2) 57:17,17great (2) 8:17;32:19Gross (2) 121:5,7ground (6) 8:14,20;50:2; 109:2,4;151:17guard (9) 94:7,12,16,19,20, 23;136:10;147:8; 148:18guards (2) 145:21;149:11guess (15) 8:17;13:23;19:14; 83:22,23;88:2; 91:18;92:10;94:21; 97:4,5;131:14; 132:19;134:17; 139:19guidance (1) 27:5guideline (2) 139:20;149:18gun (60) 14:2;15:23;16:12, 16;17:8,16,19;18:6, 13;20:14;23:2;28:5, 8;30:4;31:4,16; 34:10,23;35:17; 36:10,22;37:2,7; 59:24;60:3;64:7; 69:20,23;72:3,9,13, 17,20,23;73:1;78:1, 4,7;79:25;84:22; 92:20;94:1,17;95:3, 21;97:10,12,14; 102:13;108:4; 111:13;113:8,20; 135:3;139:16; 140:10,13,18; 146:12;148:20guns (14) 14:7,9,16,16,17, 19,21;15:8;16:12,22, 24;20:11;26:2;29:7

guy (4) 79:3,6;110:7; 159:2guys (1) 85:7guy's (1) 157:15

H

half (10) 62:7;66:22;75:18, 20;76:12;94:10,12, 14,24;100:11hammer (1) 28:14Hancock (1) 62:6hand (37) 65:16;68:7;73:19; 74:2,15;75:13;78:20, 25;85:17,20,21; 95:15,15;98:12,15; 99:13,16,19,20,25; 100:3,4,6,9,13,14,15; 101:14;102:17,18; 104:20,21;108:16, 25;109:5;126:2,11handgun (7) 16:15;22:21,25; 30:2;35:6;147:21,22handle (3) 32:25;37:13;56:18handled (2) 52:8;138:3handling (1) 27:6hand-out (1) 149:23hands (3) 65:15;83:12;84:4happened (9) 14:12;15:11; 44:17;48:24;54:5; 69:13;90:11;91:4; 143:20happens (1) 75:10happy (1) 9:4hard (1) 18:18harder (12) 80:20;81:6,24; 82:4,9,19;83:7,18; 84:8,13;87:22;88:4harm (1) 135:5harvest (1) 24:4Hastings (4) 122:6,19,24;123:1head (19)

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (6) fired - head

Page 173: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

33:17;36:16; 43:12;65:12;73:14; 80:24;81:1,3,6,15, 21,22,23;82:3,19; 99:7;101:19;125:5; 128:12headlights (9) 60:17;62:19,22; 63:15;64:3,6;80:9; 81:9;152:6health (7) 7:25;152:23; 153:11,20,22;154:7, 17hear (3) 72:17;138:10; 142:4heard (3) 64:10;88:10;139:8hearing (2) 87:24;134:7height (4) 57:18,20,21;65:4held (1) 73:19help (2) 71:24;86:21helpful (1) 13:25herein (1) 6:5Hey (1) 127:8high (3) 63:1;82:13,22higher (1) 101:17highest (2) 132:7;133:21himself (1) 36:17hire (1) 162:6hit (4) 19:4,4;37:4;48:15hold (2) 7:4;74:2holding (14) 65:10;73:21,22, 23;74:13;75:13; 98:12,15;99:16; 100:13,14;102:15, 17,21holster (5) 92:20,25;93:1; 139:16;140:19home (4) 15:15;16:6; 123:25;124:17homicide (16) 10:17,18;103:13, 16,25;107:13; 119:21;124:12;

126:12,18;127:5,7; 128:5,15;130:13; 156:23hope (1) 81:11hostage (2) 24:1;26:16hot (9) 89:3;131:10,11,17, 18,19,21;132:6; 133:8hour (2) 141:1,8hours (5) 17:21;120:17; 129:5,9;155:21house (1) 134:7How's (2) 37:25;154:8human (3) 20:1,3,8hypothetical (7) 34:12,25;35:14; 45:3,13,21;46:6

I

idea (5) 51:8;52:6;55:8; 86:8;118:19identification (3) 156:25;160:2; 162:15identified (1) 138:15identify (12) 5:17;76:22;77:3,5, 11,21;82:6,23;83:11; 84:14;158:14,19identifying (3) 111:8,12;158:3ill (2) 118:14,18illuminate (3) 84:3;97:25;98:9illuminated (2) 67:3;99:11illuminating (1) 99:8immediate (5) 33:7;110:3,5; 116:6;135:5immediately (4) 108:5;114:20; 115:3,4impact (4) 48:6,16,18;134:2importance (1) 44:7important (4) 45:10;46:3;77:15, 21

improved (1) 137:17inaccurate (1) 162:19inch (3) 94:10,12,24inches (1) 101:8incident (87) 6:22;10:16;17:5; 24:4,7;29:16,21; 30:1;31:4;36:9;37:6, 7,12;44:24;45:2,11, 23;46:24;48:20; 50:25;51:13,16;54:4, 13;57:23;96:11; 102:24;103:5,6; 110:10,23;116:17; 119:18;122:2;124:4, 24;125:3;126:19; 127:6,13,15,25; 128:3,7,17,23;129:1, 9,18,22;130:12,14, 16,18;131:7,12; 136:17;137:21,25; 141:22;142:7;145:8; 149:8;151:12; 153:10;154:3,10,13, 21,24;155:14,18,21; 156:8,14;160:4; 161:17,18;162:9; 163:6,11,15,19,20, 24;164:4,8incidents (5) 47:1,6;145:1,3; 149:5include (2) 9:17;22:12included (1) 162:22including (2) 35:19;153:11Incomplete (7) 34:11,24;35:13; 45:3,13,20;46:5incorrect (2) 160:20,24increase (1) 92:7increases (2) 46:22,23indicate (2) 86:23;87:6indicated (2) 86:3;161:15individual (9) 61:21,23;62:11; 80:16;82:7,13,15,23; 89:13individuals (5) 61:11,17;62:4; 76:2,4inform (1)

99:12informally (3) 26:22,22,25information (5) 28:16;59:13; 60:10;131:14; 134:16ingrained (1) 89:20initial (1) 58:10Initially (14) 49:11;54:6;55:17; 56:6;61:10;62:5; 65:11,13,14;66:13, 21;68:3;102:24; 123:19injury (2) 32:19;115:23inmate (1) 149:10inside (2) 48:25;49:1instance (1) 92:16instances (1) 144:18instruct (1) 107:8instruction (1) 12:25instructions (1) 107:21instructor (1) 28:2instructor's (1) 145:23instructs (1) 34:18insurance (1) 6:23intend (1) 104:5interjecting (1) 15:13internal (12) 28:13,16;48:4; 50:11;51:8,22;52:12, 14;128:9,16;136:18; 137:2internet (2) 150:3,15interrogation (1) 44:4interrupt (1) 63:4interview (27) 22:4;24:21;43:25; 44:7,13,19;45:7,10, 24;46:12;103:13,17; 107:13;124:3,22; 125:4,24;126:18; 127:6,7;128:5,14;

130:13;138:23; 156:23;157:6,10interviewed (5) 43:18;47:5; 103:21;124:15; 128:16interviews (2) 43:23;128:6into (23) 7:7;8:14;14:11; 15:3,10,21;28:15; 29:16;43:8;47:24; 62:16;63:1;64:3,5; 68:9;84:1;104:3; 105:17;114:23,25; 115:4;149:11;154:5invade (2) 15:15;107:1invades (1) 12:3investigated (1) 46:25investigation (8) 31:5;48:4;52:11; 103:25;118:22; 128:13;130:13; 136:13investigations (1) 120:5Investigative (1) 145:19investigators (12) 104:17,20,22,24; 105:2,8;107:13; 119:21;124:12; 126:4,12;128:15investigator's (2) 10:17,18involve (4) 9:15;139:12; 161:3,13involved (12) 6:17;7:1;44:21; 48:19;128:9;142:25; 143:8,17,25;144:19; 149:4;160:4involving (1) 47:6irrelevant (1) 45:23Irvine (1) 5:15issues (4) 7:25,25;130:8; 154:9issuing (1) 89:6

J

jab (1) 48:16jabbing (3)

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (7) headlights - jabbing

Page 174: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

101:23;102:3,10Jeff (1) 121:5jeopardized (1) 111:14job (6) 7:17;54:1;147:5; 148:1;161:18;162:2jobs (1) 147:6John (3) 5:23;11:16;144:2joined (3) 33:12;36:4;49:13judge (1) 37:11JULY (2) 5:2,10jump (1) 8:21June (2) 135:11,13jury (1) 9:22

K

Kansas (1) 149:2Keco (1) 11:4keep (6) 15:13;45:18; 68:11;69:3;104:12; 109:16keeping (2) 88:24;144:19Keith (1) 136:8kept (4) 64:6;69:7;79:2; 90:8kids (2) 15:16,22kill (1) 146:14kind (14) 8:13;9:24;85:20; 88:2;91:15;127:22; 136:12,25;137:1; 139:20;140:21,22; 145:13;155:1knew (3) 65:16;88:15;143:8knife (31) 32:21;33:1;35:11; 57:9;59:19;60:5,7, 14;68:7,22;73:18,21; 78:19,23;79:17; 95:14;99:14,17; 101:5;108:17;109:6, 10,13,20,25;116:5; 126:1,1,11;132:15;

133:19knowledge (11) 18:17;20:12; 29:18;58:5;120:13; 128:10;137:14; 142:12;145:6; 152:11;157:8known (1) 20:19knows (1) 77:13

L

Lacks (3) 45:3,21,22lady (1) 6:21lamps (10) 80:24;81:1,3,6,15, 22,23;82:3,19;99:7last (15) 14:1;16:8,10,21; 36:3;43:1;46:8; 53:22;59:3,12,14,20, 22;107:24;159:17later (5) 31:11;107:3; 124:16,22;125:25Laughlin (1) 56:12Laura (2) 5:14;165:17law (3) 10:11;146:9;147:5lawsuit (5) 7:7,16;149:25; 150:14;163:22lawyer (1) 128:22lay (1) 103:23leading (2) 115:17;130:13learn (5) 62:11;108:15; 137:7,11;140:17learned (8) 55:20;86:7;91:11; 117:20;128:19,21; 137:10;140:8learning (3) 143:25;144:21; 145:8least (2) 14:3;16:4leave (3) 123:5,5,22leaving (3) 59:14,20;145:8left (35) 25:7;63:1;69:6,24; 70:1,2,2,9;76:3,7,15,

16,17,18;90:20,23; 91:2,5,21;92:11,18; 93:2;99:19;100:3,4, 14;102:16,16; 108:23;114:9,20,22; 123:22;124:2;160:8leg (3) 146:13,16,17length (7) 12:15;75:17,18,20, 20;76:12,12lengths (8) 62:7,7,8;65:20; 66:21,22;100:11,11less (7) 18:24;29:7;30:11; 52:16;66:20;146:13, 18lesser (3) 50:19;113:9,9lessor (1) 50:21level (9) 18:8,9,11,16,19, 25;19:6,14;20:10Levenworth (4) 149:2,4,7,8license (6) 145:14,16,24; 146:1,4,6licensing (1) 145:20Lieutenant (5) 121:13;122:5; 136:5,6,9life (8) 14:12;15:9,11,13, 21;32:18,19;108:2life-threatening (1) 86:12light (11) 63:16;67:9,12; 82:7;83:19,22;97:21, 22;98:1,8,16lights (39) 60:19,20,24;61:1, 6;63:21,22,23;67:2, 5,6,15,20;70:13; 73:25;79:12,18,22; 80:5,8,15;81:19; 84:2,5,7,12;85:24; 86:4,8,9,15,23;87:5, 24;88:4;98:18,19,21; 152:5likely (2) 146:13,18limited (1) 115:23line (18) 12:12;16:20; 35:18;36:10;37:8; 91:2,15,16,19,20,24; 92:11,16;142:14,17,

20;158:6;162:11little (8) 16:23;89:12,22, 23;90:3,9;114:13,16located (2) 5:15;54:9location (2) 54:12;61:24logged (1) 151:12long (19) 12:6;13:4;15:1; 20:22;22:10;32:4; 42:22;53:17;62:8; 68:1;111:2;117:18; 118:10;121:17; 123:11;139:4,23; 146:3;161:7longer (1) 22:22look (13) 20:4;81:2,4;82:14, 25;83:2;137:25; 151:16,17,22; 156:11;159:17; 163:23looked (5) 101:5;103:24; 106:17,19;122:16looking (5) 47:23;60:12;73:4, 5;102:23looks (2) 159:19;162:12lost (1) 165:13lot (20) 35:7;54:4,8,9; 59:21;61:11,22,25; 62:1;67:5;76:2,5,8; 114:24;115:1; 130:19,19,21,22; 151:23Lucas (3) 121:12;136:8,8lunch (2) 85:4,12

M

M-5 (1) 29:14mace (5) 112:1,4,14;113:2,4magistrate's (1) 144:5main (1) 26:18maintaining (1) 96:14Majority (3) 14:6;16:15;55:15makes (1)

134:11male (4) 57:8,10,16;60:13Man (3) 110:6;116:5; 132:14management (1) 155:14manner (2) 73:19;75:14man's (1) 132:15manufacturer (1) 29:3many (49) 6:13;8:9;9:19; 11:10;13:13;16:8; 17:14,21;18:11,18; 19:1;21:10,14; 25:12;29:18,24; 30:6;35:17;36:8,22; 43:2,6,17;47:11,18; 48:13,22;49:9,15,23; 52:4,10;87:5,12; 103:4,14,21;105:12, 14,23;106:1,7,17; 107:13;133:4; 143:16,20;155:21; 156:4Marine (2) 147:12,13Marines (4) 147:15;148:3,15, 17mark (4) 37:22;156:22; 159:25;162:11marked (4) 19:10;156:25; 160:2;162:15marks (5) 63:7,12;125:8,10, 15marksman (1) 18:12Mary (2) 6:1;165:17mass (6) 19:12,17,18,19; 146:23,24match (1) 64:9matched (1) 65:1material (2) 54:24;129:16matter (2) 5:7;120:1maximum (1) 112:19may (29) 12:11;24:5;30:12; 44:21;60:13;71:24;

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (8) Jeff - may

Page 175: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

77:18;80:1;83:12; 84:5,7;89:13;99:24; 100:1,5;109:9,9,13, 25;118:14,15,18; 126:13,15,15;134:6; 135:11,12;157:7maybe (23) 13:4;16:11;27:25; 31:11;52:16,16; 62:6;66:21;75:17, 17;76:13,14;83:6; 97:5;100:11;117:13; 120:16;127:14,15; 146:18;155:7,7,8McKISSICK (3) 5:21,21;159:21mean (33) 35:5,7;52:7;56:8; 60:19;62:8;63:4; 66:7,11;68:19; 69:14;73:11;74:21, 25;78:11;81:11; 83:22,25;84:1;87:2; 89:9;91:6,19;92:4; 97:1;101:11;114:13; 115:6;132:19;141:9; 155:2;163:20,22means (4) 26:15;91:20; 113:10;131:12measure (2) 18:5;116:25media (12) 5:6;63:7,12; 125:10,15;150:2,7,8, 11;163:13,14;165:21medical (1) 86:12medication (2) 7:20;129:11meet (2) 22:8;121:10meeting (7) 11:25;12:5,6,8,16, 21;127:19megaphone (3) 157:20,23;158:2member (7) 20:18,22;21:1,15; 22:3,24;23:7members (1) 25:21memory (4) 7:25;8:1;30:13,14mental (7) 152:22;153:11,20, 22;154:7,8,16mentally (2) 118:14,18merits (1) 7:7messages (4) 130:5,7,19;131:7

met (2) 88:8;120:6metal (3) 78:24;94:22;152:4metallic (2) 98:16;101:3mic (1) 68:8middle (1) 61:22military (2) 147:9,10MILLER (87) 5:19,19;6:8;7:9, 15;11:22,24;12:4,13, 18,19,23;13:9,11; 14:15,21,24;15:3,5, 7,20;16:1;30:21; 31:2;34:13;35:9,16; 37:14;38:1,6;42:12; 45:5,16;46:2,8,13; 57:1;63:6,14;67:19, 24;74:6,9;75:1,3; 85:2,5,9,15;104:5,7, 8;105:21;106:1,5,10, 12,16;107:7,11,19; 109:23;125:6,17; 141:2,6,11,14,20; 143:3,14;144:11,17; 150:22,24;151:4,7; 152:18,20;153:1,7; 159:23;160:3; 164:10,17;165:8,16mind (13) 79:2,6,24;80:2,23; 81:5;82:10;84:12; 90:9,11,13;154:8; 158:25mine (1) 30:7minimize (1) 117:25minimum (2) 28:21,22minute (3) 138:24;144:10; 164:11minutes (5) 85:5;123:13,15; 141:10,12misdemeanor (1) 43:6miss (5) 18:22,24;19:7,7,11missed (1) 112:3mission (3) 36:18,19,23missions (10) 21:15,16,17,18,19, 20,21,24;23:25; 26:13mistake (2)

159:1,5mistaken (2) 156:10,11moderate (4) 96:20,23,25;97:4moment (3) 96:12;127:4;135:6monitor (1) 5:11month (12) 14:3;16:5,7,8; 17:25;20:15;32:6,7; 35:24;127:15; 135:11;155:8monthly (1) 35:23months (3) 13:18,20;17:24more (45) 8:18;13:21;16:23; 27:7;29:7,11,11,14, 16;32:22;37:19; 43:4;47:2,4;49:13; 55:9;61:21;63:16; 74:22;75:11;80:9; 82:5,5;83:22;85:6; 87:20;88:4;91:16; 92:15,19;105:16; 109:20;114:13; 122:24;123:2;124:4; 127:20,25;139:19, 24;140:25;141:3; 142:20;149:18; 164:19morning (5) 5:5;6:9,10;128:24, 25most (1) 20:14motion (5) 73:16;93:9; 101:24;102:3,10move (6) 91:10,15;94:11, 24;101:10,22movement (3) 85:21;101:12,13moving (11) 65:25;66:1,4,6; 94:15;96:24;102:2,9, 12;113:23;118:20MP-5 (5) 17:2;22:19,20,24; 29:12much (17) 11:25;17:14; 28:19;29:24;68:1; 85:7;94:13;95:2; 98:5;114:2,3,11; 116:14;129:3,3; 141:3;155:3myself (8) 6:25;49:11,20;

59:8;92:19;104:15; 124:6;164:6

N

name (6) 59:1,3;88:10; 121:3;150:17; 153:14named (1) 62:12names (2) 144:20;145:9narrative (1) 13:7narrow (1) 137:1nature (3) 79:1,16;117:19Neal (8) 5:6,23;6:4;63:8, 13;125:11,16;165:21near (3) 54:4;67:9;75:21nearby (1) 11:5near-sighted (1) 52:25necessarily (4) 55:11;82:21; 83:21;89:23need (13) 9:1;19:4,4;24:5; 53:14,25;85:6,8; 107:16;134:14; 141:8;152:18;163:2needed (4) 29:19,25;55:21; 121:14needing (1) 139:15negative (2) 137:4;156:21Nehad (1) 5:7nervous (1) 129:15new (1) 161:4next (13) 58:6,15;59:19; 70:5;108:11;110:8; 120:20;142:10; 151:18;152:9; 160:17,17;162:11night (32) 17:5;66:23,24; 70:24;74:11,11;82:2, 10;87:20;88:4,5; 90:11;97:8,16,18; 101:7;102:24; 110:20;111:3,22; 118:20;129:3,4,22;

136:23;137:5;138:8; 142:6;156:8;159:9, 16;160:22night's (1) 129:6nodded (4) 33:17;43:12; 65:12;128:12noises (1) 134:7non-chalant (1) 97:1non-deadly (1) 32:14None (2) 103:19;105:2non-lethal (1) 138:21non-verbal (1) 85:17noon (1) 85:3normal (3) 8:22;129:20,21normally (8) 19:21;35:23; 89:10;91:1;133:10; 145:20;154:6;158:7north/south (1) 66:14northbound (1) 65:24noticed (1) 68:6number (19) 5:6,9;8:11,15; 9:11;17:21;18:20; 19:25;52:6;63:8,13; 87:8;125:11,16; 156:24;159:18; 160:1;162:14; 165:21numbered (2) 19:23;159:19

O

o0o (1) 5:3o0o- (1) 165:25object (22) 34:18;74:13; 75:13;78:25;84:23; 98:16;99:16;100:12; 101:2,3,10,13,13,16; 102:9,12,16;108:15; 109:5;151:24;152:2, 4objecting (1) 12:14Objection (22) 11:20;12:2,7,12,

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (9) maybe - Objection

Page 176: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

14,22;13:7;14:10; 15:10;34:11,24; 35:13;37:9;45:12, 20;46:5,9;56:25; 103:23;107:15; 143:10;152:24objections (2) 12:8;45:18objects (1) 70:17obscured (3) 70:14,17,21observation (1) 74:10observe (5) 72:19,22,25; 74:13;95:20observed (6) 65:3;75:12,15,19; 76:19;151:25observing (1) 151:20obtain (9) 18:9,16,19,24; 19:6;20:25;116:22; 146:6;163:2obtained (4) 18:11;20:10;24:8; 116:22obvious (1) 88:2obviously (1) 80:15occasion (4) 35:5;103:11,14,16occasions (7) 6:13;8:9;47:11,18; 52:4;103:7,8occur (2) 158:25;159:4occurred (1) 38:4occurring (2) 131:13;133:11off (39) 9:4;14:10;18:23; 30:22;63:9;67:21; 76:15,16,16,18; 85:10;86:4;91:1,15, 16,19,20;92:11,16; 97:13,15;98:16; 124:20;125:12; 127:22;141:15; 144:9,12;150:15; 152:5,6,24;153:2,8; 156:9;158:10; 164:11,12;165:22offenses (1) 142:25offer (1) 152:19office (6) 11:14;31:23;

42:16,18;135:23; 163:9officer (48) 8:7,12;16:21; 22:23;25:15,16; 37:8;42:21;43:3; 49:12,21;53:22; 56:12,12;76:23;77:1, 4,6,12,14,17,22;80:1, 3;86:20;111:9,13; 120:25;121:4,5,6; 134:20;138:15; 145:2,8,9;150:19; 151:8;157:1;158:3,8, 15,15,20;160:4; 161:1,6,8officer- (1) 143:16officer-involved (4) 120:5;142:25; 143:9;145:10officers (36) 18:19;21:10; 22:15;25:12,14,17, 20;26:21;27:1,3,17, 18,21;33:21;48:19; 49:3,9,13,15,20,23, 25;50:4,7;56:8,10; 120:10;134:17; 143:8,25;144:18,20, 21;145:4;154:2; 161:4officer's (2) 140:3,9often (6) 14:2;17:21;20:15; 87:20;142:20;162:1OIS (4) 127:20;128:11; 130:21;163:21OISes (2) 142:25;143:20once (16) 14:3;16:5,6,8; 17:25;20:15;22:5,7; 24:23;33:22;35:24, 25;90:18;93:10; 105:16;155:7one (43) 6:14;12:5;17:7; 24:20;46:8;47:19; 49:12;53:3,9;56:5; 59:23;60:1,3,4; 61:21;74:22;75:11; 76:6;80:22;87:16; 91:10,10;93:9; 95:15;99:22;103:9; 104:20;110:3;114:3; 119:7,10,12,12; 126:23;133:18; 138:6;144:25;149:8, 11;153:18;158:19; 159:23,24

ones (1) 17:3only (12) 6:25;18:22;19:6; 22:19;49:20;60:10; 82:16;102:23; 128:14;140:1;144:5; 164:5on-site (1) 126:3open (13) 68:11,13,17,24; 69:2,3,5,7;73:2; 88:23,25;89:10; 114:25opened (1) 72:25opinion (1) 107:1opted (3) 50:15,17,22option (6) 50:15,16,19,21,23; 107:24options (2) 113:22,22order (8) 21:4;24:17;30:2,4; 46:3;133:3;144:5; 163:2original (1) 13:12originally (1) 131:19others (1) 134:14otherwise (2) 7:11;20:19ourselves (1) 77:5out (32) 17:25;22:21; 36:19;55:22;61:16; 64:16;67:25;68:9; 69:9,12,18;79:1; 87:20;90:18,22; 91:24,24,25;95:2,5; 104:12;131:20,20; 133:18;139:16; 140:13;144:19; 145:8;149:23; 156:20;157:14,16outfitted (1) 63:20outside (10) 16:2;19:11;36:8; 66:25;69:1;81:15; 93:1;124:10;157:21, 24outstanding (1) 122:12out-stretched (4) 74:15,20,21;75:2

over (15) 8:25;9:25;13:6; 17:12;21:24;30:8; 52:5;64:23;66:17, 19;87:3,3,15;99:23; 108:23Overall (1) 43:7own (5) 13:23;14:7;18:1; 20:15;130:1ownership (1) 14:18owns (2) 14:22,25

P

pace (15) 95:22,24;96:10,12, 15,17,18,19,19,21, 21,23,25;97:1,2paced (1) 97:5page (4) 157:14;158:5; 159:17,18panel (4) 71:5,5,6,7paperwork (1) 54:18parallel (1) 128:13park (1) 68:9parked (4) 61:13,25;115:6; 123:17parking (14) 54:4,8,9;59:21; 61:11,22,25;62:1; 67:5;76:2,5,7; 114:24,25part (22) 10:9;20:6;22:11; 30:3;31:5;44:11; 70:6;71:1,9;77:9; 80:19;83:16;91:3,14, 23,25;97:24;114:10; 118:21;139:14; 140:12;147:25participate (1) 137:19particular (12) 17:16,19;18:13, 23;22:14;23:8;24:7; 37:12;38:3;47:8; 63:24;80:13particularly (2) 63:21;129:14partner (3) 55:3,5,9partners (1)

56:14partway (1) 160:8party (4) 59:19;60:6,8; 134:7pass (8) 19:15;21:4;22:5,6; 26:8,11;148:6,10passed (4) 21:8;25:23; 128:20;149:23passenger (1) 68:8past (5) 17:13;43:11,17; 143:19;153:9patrol (20) 22:15,23;32:7; 42:13;55:10,12; 56:8;71:13;82:18; 92:22;98:21;123:17; 135:9,10,14,19,21; 136:1,12,15patrolling (2) 55:15;87:4pay (4) 46:19,22,23;51:10peer (2) 120:25;121:3pen (9) 108:16,19;151:9, 10,16,17,22;152:9, 14pending (1) 9:3Pendleton (3) 148:25;149:3,6People (8) 43:8,8;61:9;62:1; 70:20;75:21;124:10; 146:15per (3) 29:19;31:13;84:7percentage (1) 18:19perform (2) 24:23;54:1performance (3) 161:16,18;162:1period (3) 124:16,17,21permissible (3) 45:19;46:9;74:4permit (1) 145:22person (11) 58:21;68:6;77:13, 16;80:19;82:16; 83:3;111:20;120:6; 146:14;153:14personal (13) 7:7,13;13:23;14:2,

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (10) objections - personal

Page 177: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

3,12,19;15:8,11,14, 17;130:1;131:1personally (4) 14:7,25;59:4; 142:1pertains (1) 148:19phone (5) 58:3,9,11;129:24; 130:2phonetic (1) 56:13phrase (3) 92:3;93:4;139:9physical (5) 22:5;43:19;87:8; 115:24,24physically (1) 95:5piece (1) 94:22pieces (1) 71:3place (3) 5:12;12:9;33:22plaintiff (1) 6:19plaintiffs (2) 5:20,22plan (1) 74:1planning (2) 54:19,21please (9) 5:17;6:2;9:1,7; 13:8;30:20;75:7; 110:4;142:19pm (13) 85:14;125:12,15; 141:16,19;144:13, 16;153:3,6;164:13, 16;165:22,23POA (2) 120:3,9point (22) 31:7;37:23;61:4; 62:21,24;70:4; 73:14;76:1;79:24; 95:20;96:4;98:3; 99:21,22;101:9; 108:15;109:8; 122:22;123:6; 139:16;157:18; 159:4pointed (9) 80:24;84:22;94:1; 98:1;99:7;100:17, 22;140:10,19pointing (2) 93:18,22points (2) 26:18;106:24pointy (1)

101:3Police (84) 7:17;8:7,12;10:5; 13:13;15:13;16:3,20, 21;17:13;20:20; 23:20;24:15;26:21; 28:2;33:12;37:8; 43:3;47:14;51:23; 53:22;58:3;60:17, 24;61:1,5,13;62:19, 22;63:20;68:2; 76:22,25,25;77:4,6, 12,14,17,22;79:12, 18,21;80:1,3;83:5; 85:24;86:4,8,22,23; 87:5,6,23,24;88:4,5, 22,24,24;89:20; 111:9,13;120:10; 127:7;128:7;130:4; 131:4;135:15; 138:15;139:2; 142:24;143:17; 145:9;146:12;147:4; 149:17;156:13; 158:3,8,15,15,20; 161:5policy (8) 71:11;110:13,17, 24;137:24;142:11; 149:16,19portion (3) 10:20;37:22;38:2position (7) 22:4;75:12;95:15; 100:23;107:6,9; 123:16positions (1) 24:20positive (2) 138:3;156:20possessions (1) 14:19possibilities (1) 108:2possible (7) 45:1,25;46:12; 80:18,20;133:21; 164:3POST (2) 10:9;25:1potential (1) 116:9poundage (4) 28:21,22;29:7; 30:5poundages (1) 29:5pounds (12) 28:22,23,24;29:19, 24;30:6,9,9,11,12, 16;31:13PowerPoint (2) 161:10,14

PR-24 (2) 48:8;112:9practicing (1) 15:23preceding (4) 129:9;152:21; 153:10;155:14preference (1) 37:18preliminary (1) 9:22preparation (2) 106:22,25prepare (2) 10:14;12:1prescription (2) 129:11;154:22present (2) 119:20;120:11presentation (1) 161:10presented (2) 33:8,8press (2) 163:13,14pressure (5) 28:19;29:19,25; 30:6;31:13pretty (3) 23:2,6;130:21prevent (1) 7:21previous (3) 88:16;143:16; 155:21previously (3) 85:23;100:19; 117:2primarily (2) 26:17;53:20primary (1) 26:4prime (1) 24:3prior (30) 14:16;29:21;30:1; 46:24;73:1,1;77:22, 25;78:4;79:25;88:7, 12;96:7;102:13; 103:13,16,16,25; 111:3,9,13;113:8,20; 135:14;138:16; 151:20,25;152:3; 156:14;157:10priorities (3) 133:3,4,6priority (20) 131:25;132:5,6,7, 7,9,12,13,13,14,16; 133:6,7,7,21;134:1, 5,8,11,12prison (6) 147:8;148:18,19,

21,22,24private (1) 27:21privilege (5) 11:21;12:3;104:4; 107:2,16probably (36) 10:1;11:12;16:6,7, 10,10;17:25;27:24; 29:11,13;33:23; 53:7;54:14;62:6,25, 25;65:20;66:20; 76:13,13;87:18;94:6, 10,14;95:8,9;98:7; 99:3;100:10;104:25; 108:9;121:18; 135:12;139:6;155:7, 22problem (1) 9:2procedures (1) 10:11process (6) 7:6;24:22;30:3; 95:17;105:18;146:7processes (1) 12:10processing (1) 32:3product (4) 104:3;105:18; 107:2,16professional (3) 153:20,22;154:7professionals (3) 152:23;153:11; 154:17proficiency (7) 20:24;22:7;24:22, 23;25:24;116:25; 148:7proficient (2) 23:3,6profiles (1) 150:2progress (4) 131:12;132:20; 133:11,17project (2) 71:17;157:21promotions (2) 46:15,16prop (1) 89:10propose (1) 165:9proposing (1) 140:24propped (3) 68:13,17,24protect (4) 35:11;71:16,17; 72:1

protection (6) 89:12,15,16,17,23; 90:13protest (1) 123:2protocols (1) 153:19provide (5) 63:16;89:15,22; 90:3,9provided (4) 57:13,14,19;154:1provides (2) 89:12,16psychiatrist (2) 152:22;153:17psychiatrists (2) 153:12;154:19psychologist (1) 152:22psychologists (2) 153:12;154:19pull (7) 11:5;28:9,20; 29:19,25;94:12; 95:12pulled (8) 61:20;62:1;79:10, 22;93:10,12,15,19pulling (1) 94:16purpose (7) 66:4,6;68:14; 78:14,15,17;96:20purposes (1) 7:6pursuit (1) 86:10put (20) 24:25;31:21;32:7; 37:9;43:10;59:8; 68:9;81:10,13; 83:13;89:18;91:18; 111:10;125:1; 135:19;150:25; 151:8,13;152:14; 159:24putting (7) 10:14;36:9;85:24; 113:21;124:23; 130:15;158:13

Q

qualification (2) 23:20;36:1qualify (5) 13:18;17:23;18:3, 21;148:4quarter (2) 13:18;36:1quarterly (1) 23:22

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (11) personally - quarterly

Page 178: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

quick (6) 63:5;69:13;90:11; 95:16,19;101:13quickly (3) 91:4;97:5;139:12quite (1) 118:11

R

radio (3) 58:4;64:23;159:15raise (3) 73:13;85:20; 101:16raised (1) 101:19ran (2) 108:12;110:1random (1) 156:16range (9) 8:19;14:5;29:4; 30:3;112:18,19,19; 113:4,6rank (3) 46:16,21;116:23rapidly (1) 96:24rather (1) 108:16rating (1) 18:5reach (1) 19:14react (2) 92:19;158:16reaction (3) 110:3,8;140:3reactionary (7) 91:17;92:4,7,13; 139:21;140:2,5read (3) 10:18;131:9; 138:23ready (1) 28:8real (6) 63:5;95:16,18,19, 19;149:10realized (1) 109:5really (3) 28:15;107:1;134:8realtime (1) 131:14rear (1) 67:5reason (13) 44:14;45:25;55:5; 69:4,7,11;79:12; 91:11;109:24; 118:18;136:12;

155:17;165:13reasonable (1) 118:2reasons (2) 88:25;158:19recall (68) 34:3;44:4;47:12, 23;54:17,20,22; 57:12,20;58:13; 61:23;67:11,14,15, 18,20,23;76:24;77:2, 25;78:3,5,6;79:7,9; 85:1;90:16;100:4; 102:2,9,12,15; 105:12,14;108:22; 117:18,19;118:9; 119:17;121:3;122:2, 7,23;126:17;127:2, 16;128:4,19;136:11; 139:24;140:1,8,20, 22;143:24;144:20, 24,25;145:1,7,7; 147:22;149:6,22; 152:2;153:14; 155:20;156:17receive (28) 10:5;13:15;31:7, 10,15;32:20,24; 33:14;43:24;44:6; 59:16;71:15,19,23; 88:23;116:6;118:15; 134:16;139:1,4; 146:8,11,15;147:16; 148:2,6,17;156:16received (32) 13:17,19;32:9,12; 33:2,23;34:1;46:15, 22;54:5,6;57:22; 58:10;59:13;60:10; 71:20;77:10;79:15; 80:4,13;83:5,9; 112:11;116:4;117:6, 10;118:16;131:16; 132:4;133:13; 139:10;156:18receiving (3) 130:20;131:14; 150:18recent (1) 164:19recognize (1) 157:1recollection (5) 102:21,25;115:13; 123:4;145:4record (27) 9:4;12:20;14:11; 30:22,25;37:10,25; 63:9,11;85:10,13; 119:10;125:12,14; 141:15,18;144:9,12, 15;152:25;153:2,5,8; 164:11,12,15;165:22

recreational (1) 155:9recreationally (1) 155:5red (3) 61:2;79:11;86:9refer (1) 139:15referring (6) 10:24;11:4;24:14; 131:25;136:18; 161:21reflect (1) 12:9reflected (1) 152:5reflecting (1) 98:16refresh (1) 102:21regard (2) 117:11;160:24regarding (26) 10:11;27:8;28:16; 33:2,23;36:2;59:11; 116:5;117:13; 118:16;128:7,11; 130:8,14,24;131:14; 132:4;149:21;150:8; 160:25;162:13,22; 163:5,18,24;164:4region (1) 74:18regular (5) 22:15;60:19,20; 63:22;156:5reholster (2) 108:4,8related (8) 7:16;8:1;15:12; 24:1;33:10;45:23; 144:6;147:6relayed (2) 124:12;133:20relevance (2) 7:11;143:10relevant (3) 14:13,17;37:12relieve (1) 165:9remained (1) 121:19remember (18) 30:7,10;33:25; 52:18;59:20,22; 76:14;96:16;100:3, 18;102:19;104:25; 105:6;117:12;127:4; 139:19;140:7; 152:12remembered (1) 102:24remind (1)

96:9removable (1) 97:12remove (3) 92:25;112:24; 150:2removed (2) 150:16,17render (2) 110:7;158:25rendered (2) 108:13;120:19rendering (4) 108:18;109:12,17; 123:18repeat (3) 34:15;72:5;88:1rephrase (2) 9:8;93:23replacement (1) 31:15report (2) 10:17,19reported (1) 132:16reporter (5) 5:25;6:2;8:23; 165:9,19Reporters (2) 5:15;6:1reporting (4) 59:19;60:6,8; 134:7represent (2) 5:18;120:1reprimand (4) 51:4,5,7,18reprimanded (1) 144:22required (2) 28:19;163:1requirements (3) 10:10;22:8;25:24rescue (2) 24:2;26:16residential (1) 134:6resist (1) 47:25resolve (1) 24:7resource (1) 24:7resources (1) 24:5respect (4) 20:25;23:15;38:2; 110:14respond (7) 26:18;32:25; 55:21;56:19;77:18; 91:17;92:9responding (6)

56:1;79:16;86:11, 12;134:18,20response (1) 110:5responses (1) 26:19result (11) 6:24;50:24;51:10, 12,16;136:17; 137:20,25;144:22; 146:18;150:14resulted (1) 52:10retrospect (1) 159:8return (1) 124:19review (3) 162:4,8;165:12reviewed (4) 11:11;105:15; 106:24;162:1reviews (2) 161:16,18revisit (1) 137:24rifle (4) 17:2;26:5,7,9rifles (1) 26:5right (40) 21:11;33:13; 49:14;60:9;62:9; 68:6;70:5;74:6;82:6, 12,15;91:2,21;92:2, 2,12;94:6;96:24; 99:25;100:5,9,13,15; 102:17;106:20; 108:2,24;114:4,9,21; 115:2,3,4;119:11,12; 122:13,14;135:11, 16;160:10right-hand (1) 115:14RILEY (73) 5:23,23;7:4,13; 11:16,20;12:2,7,17, 22;13:7;14:10,18,23; 15:2,4,6,10,24; 30:20;34:11,24;35:3, 13;37:9,22;38:4; 45:3,12,20;46:5; 56:25;67:17,22; 73:24;74:8,24;75:2; 84:23;85:3,7; 103:23;104:2,6; 105:17,23;106:3,6, 11,15,19;107:10,15; 109:22;125:7,9; 140:24;141:4,7,13; 143:2,10;144:7,9; 150:21,23;151:3,5; 152:16,24;165:11,

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (12) quick - RILEY

Page 179: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

15,17risk (1) 111:10rolls (1) 158:8room (7) 73:25;104:16; 105:1,3,13;106:3; 107:12roommate (1) 36:16rough (4) 111:4;113:6; 120:15;127:15rounds (5) 18:23,24;19:1,7,11route (1) 58:17ROXAS (1) 144:8rule (7) 138:25;139:9,12, 18,25;140:9;149:17rules (2) 8:14,20ruling (1) 37:24run (3) 27:18;114:23; 115:4running (2) 90:4;158:11

S

safe (1) 109:16safety (7) 28:4,6,12,16; 75:25;111:10,14Same (15) 12:7;17:7,8;29:13; 53:7;58:21;82:23; 99:6;100:13,23; 106:6,12;128:24,25; 159:13SAN (23) 5:1,13;7:17;16:2; 17:13;20:20;24:15; 26:21;28:2;37:8; 43:3;47:13;53:22; 83:5;88:24;127:7; 128:7;131:3;139:2; 143:17;145:9; 146:12;147:4saw (40) 10:16;59:14,20; 61:8,11,14;62:5,17, 18;64:9,15;65:9,11, 19,22;66:8,13,21; 67:25;68:1,3,16; 72:3,8,12,16;78:8, 19,20;95:13;99:18;

108:19,20;109:4; 123:18;126:1; 151:17;152:4; 153:15;159:15saying (7) 19:7,8;77:25;78:3; 79:7;106:7;107:3scenarios (1) 83:25scene (13) 57:23;58:18;59:8; 60:16;61:10;62:15; 78:4;79:11;122:12, 16;123:5;134:23; 151:11schedule (2) 156:5,12scheduling (1) 42:21scope (1) 148:1score (1) 18:7scored (2) 18:23;19:24scoring (1) 19:9seal (1) 164:18sealed (1) 37:23sealing (1) 38:2Sean (1) 5:21search (3) 150:16;163:17; 164:1seat (2) 68:8;90:17second (12) 7:4;36:12;48:17; 49:18,22;59:6; 61:23;80:6;94:14, 14;110:3;158:6seconds (4) 95:9,10;98:7; 108:9security (4) 27:17,18,21; 145:21seeing (7) 52:23,23;87:24; 102:20;149:22; 152:2,9sees (1) 158:15segment (1) 10:10selected (1) 24:24send (2) 131:6;152:15

sense (2) 134:11;144:2sent (5) 163:18,23;164:3, 8;165:11sentence (1) 158:7separate (3) 56:8,16;104:16Sergeant (1) 122:5sergeant's (3) 54:18,20;129:13service (2) 153:25;154:1services (5) 21:17,22,23;24:4; 145:19set (3) 18:21;22:7;127:19setting (2) 74:12;117:16seven (5) 28:23,24;29:5; 36:24;113:7shape (3) 20:1,4;101:1shaped (2) 19:20;94:20sharp (1) 71:17sheets (1) 23:20Shelley (1) 5:7shift (5) 155:20,21,22,24; 156:5shifts (2) 156:6,7shine (3) 81:15;83:21;97:22shined (5) 83:19;98:8,12,20; 99:10shining (1) 70:13shook (1) 125:5shoot (12) 18:7;23:21,22; 27:6;28:8;84:21; 99:12,15;139:17; 146:15,22,23shooting (27) 10:25;11:5;14:5, 17;36:25;38:3,4; 58:11;59:10;61:5; 94:25;96:9;102:20; 108:4;110:23;111:9; 118:21;120:5,17; 121:6,15;126:14; 130:24;145:11;

146:13;157:9; 164:19shootings (6) 143:1,9,17;144:6, 19,22shoots (1) 36:1short (7) 30:24;63:10; 125:13;141:17; 144:14;153:4; 164:14Shortly (5) 62:16;64:5,15; 122:22;128:23shorts (1) 57:17shot (10) 36:16;62:12;98:4, 5;110:2;126:11; 147:2;158:23;159:1, 14shotgun (2) 22:20,22shots (1) 11:6show (4) 74:10;105:24; 106:8;148:7shown (1) 106:14shows (1) 106:13sic (1) 124:8sick (1) 129:19side (24) 15:17;44:16,20; 54:10;66:9,12,15,16, 17,18;67:7;68:12; 69:17;88:23;91:10, 11;99:24;114:4,5,7, 9;115:6,14;160:8signal (1) 85:21silhouette (2) 19:9,22silver (2) 108:16;151:10similar (3) 20:1,3;63:22siren (12) 60:22;61:6;79:11, 18,22;85:25;86:4,9, 15;87:5,24;88:3sirens (1) 86:22sitting (2) 68:23;129:2situation (10) 26:16;32:25;35:5; 82:1,2;95:11,13;

117:8;118:1;159:11situations (4) 24:2;35:7;84:2; 134:13six (4) 25:8,9;36:4; 116:13skinny (1) 65:7slack (1) 93:4sleep (2) 129:3,6slow (3) 78:8,9;96:11slowed (3) 78:6;95:22;96:10slowing (2) 95:23;96:13small (1) 113:5smoke (2) 155:11,12sniper (15) 24:9,13,15,17,25; 25:2,2,4,10,12,18,25; 26:3,13;148:14social (4) 150:2,7,8,11Someone (28) 6:21;32:18;33:1,6, 7,8,8,15;35:10,10; 52:6;68:21;79:16; 82:22;84:3;87:6; 121:21;125:25; 133:16,16;137:7,11; 138:10,11;139:20; 142:5;158:15,20someone's (2) 92:8;108:2Sometimes (5) 52:6;55:12;75:10, 10;81:23somewhere (5) 54:4;61:24; 146:13,17,18soon (9) 44:13,19;45:7,8, 10;46:12;62:25; 108:7;135:8sooner (1) 127:9sorry (9) 26:6;33:18;53:8; 72:7;87:10;96:1; 135:20;143:2; 161:23sort (1) 101:23sound (1) 157:21sounds (2) 7:13;15:18

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (13) risk - sounds

Page 180: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

south (1) 54:10southbound (1) 114:7Southern (1) 5:9space (3) 114:11,25;115:20span (3) 47:7,9,15speak (5) 58:19,21;61:17; 125:2;163:8Special (2) 20:18,19specific (19) 13:21;16:23; 32:22;33:25;43:4; 47:2,5;84:18; 114:13;118:12; 127:20,25;128:2; 135:6;139:24; 140:17;141:23; 144:20;159:12specifics (2) 140:21,22speculate (1) 8:17speculation (2) 45:4;56:25speed (1) 13:9speeding (1) 96:14spend (3) 11:25;14:2;15:23spent (1) 17:14spinned (1) 127:22spoke (3) 10:13;58:6,15Sports (3) 54:10;127:22,23SR (1) 5:7stab (5) 78:19,23;79:4; 109:14;135:7stabbed (3) 35:12;68:23; 109:17staffing (1) 55:7stand (3) 42:17;89:10,21standard (5) 23:4,4,5,21;63:23standards (1) 21:3standing (6) 12:11;61:21; 65:25;69:17;114:19;

123:17start (2) 16:2,24started (3) 46:15;47:25;66:9starts (2) 90:4;158:7state (3) 5:18;154:8,8stated (2) 60:6;96:20statement (9) 46:1,4;122:20; 155:1;156:23;157:2, 13;158:5,6States (1) 5:8station (2) 32:2;121:19stay (2) 7:8;15:16staying (1) 157:17step (14) 69:24;70:1;90:19, 23;91:1,2,10,10,19, 20,21,24,25;92:2stepped (4) 69:5;70:9;91:5; 92:18stepping (6) 80:5;91:16;92:11, 11,16;93:2steps (4) 35:11;46:20; 94:17;109:16still (10) 19:15;22:22;70:6; 108:25;109:9,9,13, 25;119:24;146:1stipulated (1) 165:15stomach (1) 48:17Stop (9) 76:25;79:7;84:21; 106:20;158:9,12,16, 16,20stopped (2) 79:3;96:5stopping (6) 79:3,6;80:16; 95:18;99:14;157:15stops (4) 43:10;80:14;89:3, 6store (9) 11:4;56:2;67:4,6; 114:10,12,14,15; 133:19story (2) 44:16,21street (9)

48:24;62:6;67:2,4, 9,12,15,20;115:17strike (1) 48:11strikes (1) 50:12struck (4) 49:6,16,22;50:8stuck (1) 68:22study (3) 54:24;129:17; 137:20studying (1) 54:23stuff (2) 15:14;33:10subdue (7) 49:7,9,16,24;50:1, 5,8subsequent (4) 37:11,12;38:3,5substances (1) 7:20successful (1) 50:14sudden (1) 101:12suddenly (2) 101:10,11sued (1) 6:21suggest (1) 37:20suggestion (1) 37:14Suite (1) 5:13summary (1) 13:5supervisor (2) 25:15;52:8supervisors (1) 25:14support (3) 120:25;121:3; 127:21suppose (1) 83:14supposed (3) 20:1;91:12;134:2sure (27) 12:13;13:9;14:13, 15;15:6;23:11; 30:21;32:24;34:16; 55:19;72:6;73:13; 75:1;82:6,12,15; 84:19;88:2;93:17; 100:2;106:23;109:7; 125:7;137:2;153:1; 161:24;162:24surrounds (1) 94:22

suspect (56) 24:2;32:21;34:1,4, 8,22;36:15,25;37:4; 43:23;44:13;45:8, 25;46:12;47:24; 48:11,15;49:7,10,16, 16,22;50:2,5,8; 59:12,14,17,24; 63:18;64:23;81:15, 18,22,24,24;82:19; 83:7,17,18;84:8; 86:23;87:22;90:4; 91:19,22;92:1; 109:19;110:14; 116:6;117:8;139:13, 16;140:10,20;146:13suspects (10) 26:17;43:17,25; 44:7;45:10;52:1; 77:4;80:8;116:10; 118:14suspect's (2) 91:24;140:3suspended (1) 51:12SWAT (29) 20:19;21:1,2,5,10, 14;22:2,9,9,11,15, 24;23:7,10,22,24,25; 24:13,16,18;25:5,21; 27:4;35:23;36:4,18, 19,20;117:3swear (1) 6:2sweater (1) 57:17switch (3) 28:9;62:21;99:20switched (6) 99:25;100:1,5,8, 12;102:16sworn (1) 6:5system (5) 19:25;23:23;26:4; 57:6;131:23systems (1) 22:19

T

tactic (9) 80:11,13,19,23; 82:9,18;83:1;89:3; 90:8tactical (6) 81:10,14;82:3,20; 88:25;113:22Tactics (8) 20:19;80:22; 137:4,13,17;138:4,7; 159:9talk (6)

8:25;124:3,23,24; 127:8;163:14talked (4) 33:5,6;126:7; 138:24talking (13) 8:21;9:12,22; 21:16;29:9;47:7,15; 52:15;114:14,15; 126:3;150:8;155:7tall (1) 116:12target (14) 18:23;19:5,8,9,10, 10,19,20,21,22,22, 23,24;20:7taser (11) 112:2,4,11,18,21; 162:13,13,21,21,22; 163:2taught (7) 26:20;27:10,13, 19;89:19;90:25; 91:10teach (4) 26:25;27:16,17,23team (15) 21:4,13;22:18,23; 24:6,13,18;25:7,7,8, 10,12,18;26:14;27:4teams (1) 23:8technical (1) 83:14techniques (2) 117:7;118:5telling (3) 79:7;84:22;122:23ten (13) 14:1;25:14,17,20; 27:25;53:22;65:6; 76:14;108:9;143:23, 24;144:18;145:3ten-hour (3) 155:22;156:6,7term (1) 83:7terms (3) 7:5;81:13;107:24test (16) 19:1,2,15;20:24; 21:3;22:5,7;118:24; 119:1,3,5,13;148:7, 10;156:15,18tested (3) 26:9;31:13;119:14testified (9) 8:4,9;9:11;85:23; 90:19;103:9;116:19; 125:19;126:22testifies (1) 6:5testifying (1)

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (14) south - testifying

Page 181: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

10:6testimony (5) 7:22;9:24;10:3,11; 90:16testing (1) 156:16tests (3) 26:11;116:24; 119:7therapy (2) 155:13,15thin (3) 65:6,7,8thinking (7) 33:18;90:12,13, 23;95:17;140:24; 141:4Third (1) 5:12though (2) 22:22;152:19thought (8) 12:10;69:14;79:3; 95:17;99:13;105:18; 112:9;135:6thoughts (1) 14:14threat (10) 33:7;90:24;91:7, 17;92:6,10,14,15,19; 135:4threaten (2) 72:4,9threatened (1) 133:15threatening (6) 57:8;59:18;73:9, 12;133:16,18threats (1) 150:18three (23) 11:11;18:15; 22:10,19;28:22,23; 29:5;30:9,12,16,17; 54:14;65:20;66:20; 84:24;86:14;95:8, 10;100:11;101:8; 133:5,6;165:22Three's (1) 30:18threw (1) 68:8throat (1) 132:15throughout (3) 34:18;64:7;148:3thrusting (4) 73:16;101:23; 102:3,10tickets (1) 32:3times (29) 11:10,12;18:11;

19:5;35:17;36:8,22; 48:13;51:21;71:12; 84:24;86:17;87:5,12, 18,19,19;103:4,6,6, 14,21;105:12,14,23; 106:1,7,17;107:14tips (1) 27:7title (1) 153:21today (6) 5:25;7:22;10:12; 106:24;151:11,14Today's (2) 5:10;165:20together (3) 54:18,24;129:17told (21) 59:23;60:2,3,4; 71:25;90:2;106:15, 19;122:13,15,18; 125:25;126:10; 133:23;135:21; 136:3,11;137:15,19; 142:8,19took (7) 12:9;69:24;90:19; 97:15;116:25; 124:20,20top (4) 60:24;61:1;86:8; 158:6Toro (4) 122:5,18,23;123:1torso (1) 146:25totally (1) 74:12touch (1) 150:21touching (4) 93:13,16,19,21tour (1) 147:13towards (9) 59:21;61:22; 73:10;78:14,16,21; 85:17,21;90:5towers (1) 148:23traditional (1) 112:8traffic (6) 6:16,17,22;43:10; 80:14;89:6traffic-related (1) 9:18train (9) 14:4;15:9;17:22, 24,25;20:15;26:2,3; 145:21trained (10) 16:25;17:1;77:3,

11;83:4;139:25; 146:22,23;147:18,23trainees (2) 42:21;161:11training (110) 10:5,8;13:3,6,15, 17,20,22,23,24;14:2, 17;16:13,24;17:15; 22:2,12;24:9;32:9, 12,16,20,24;33:2,4, 11,14,19,21,21,23, 25;35:19,20,21,22, 23,25;36:5,8;42:18; 43:24;44:2,3,6,10, 12;51:15;71:9,15,19, 20,23;77:9,10;79:15; 80:4,12;83:5,9,16; 84:8;86:6;88:23; 89:2,19;90:1,3,8,25; 91:3,9,12,14,23,25; 112:11;117:3,6,10; 118:8,13,15,16; 137:19;139:1,5,10, 19;140:13;145:23; 146:5,7,8,11,15; 147:16,21;148:2,14, 17;161:1,5,6,8,15; 162:12,21,21,22transcript (4) 37:23;165:10,12, 13transition (2) 66:9,11transitioning (1) 99:22transported (4) 120:22,24;121:2, 21trapped (5) 68:15,18,21;90:15, 17trial (6) 8:4,10;9:16,21; 10:6;165:14trials (1) 9:11trigger (31) 28:9,20;29:4,19, 25;30:5,6;93:6,10, 12,13,15,16,19,20, 21;94:2,4,7,9,12,12, 15,16,19,20,22,23, 24;95:12;140:11true (2) 36:3;137:9truthful (2) 7:21;122:19try (29) 8:19,21,25;9:7; 14:3;16:4;23:12; 37:18;44:13,25;45:1, 7,24;46:10,12;47:4; 80:17;82:9;83:6;

92:5,6,7;93:23; 114:16;117:7,23,25, 25;132:22trying (14) 11:2;13:9;15:18, 21;44:7;46:18;49:7, 9,15,23;50:1,4,7; 97:3t's (1) 52:7TUESDAY (2) 5:2;156:10turn (8) 31:4;61:5;63:1,15; 86:15;87:5;142:10; 158:10turned (9) 36:19;62:16;63:1; 64:2,3,5;80:24; 141:25;142:8turning (2) 110:13;158:5TVs (1) 14:19Twice (2) 36:11;48:14two (32) 25:14;26:17; 49:11,20;55:25;56:5, 7,8,16;61:11,11; 62:1,4,6,7,7;65:20; 66:21,22;71:3;95:8, 10;100:11;101:8; 103:6,6,7,8;120:16; 146:4;148:25;149:1type (42) 10:8;14:21;15:8; 16:12,16,20,22,24; 20:24;23:25;26:2,13, 16;28:12;33:4,4,19; 37:2;44:2,10;48:5; 51:2;55:20;57:5,6; 60:4;63:25;86:12; 89:15;110:17; 117:10;120:5;134:1, 4,9,12,16;145:16; 147:18,22;155:14; 156:14types (4) 14:9;27:7;29:1; 155:13typical (2) 130:21;156:1

U

umbrella (1) 133:7unavailable (1) 157:6unaware (1) 125:20uncomfortable (1)

144:3under (6) 30:15;46:9;74:4; 133:7;164:18; 165:10undergo (1) 51:15Understood (8) 8:13;28:17;81:3; 84:6;93:17;104:7; 146:11;150:22unfair (1) 45:14unit (3) 25:1;134:23;161:6United (1) 5:8units (4) 55:25;56:5,8,16Unless (2) 34:18;148:23up (25) 11:5;22:7;27:3; 28:23;61:20;62:2; 74:2;79:10,22;85:7; 92:21;93:4;96:14; 101:16;108:12,23; 110:1;127:19; 130:13;134:16,20; 157:18;158:8; 161:17;162:9update (2) 59:19,22updates (2) 59:11,17upgraded (1) 131:18urine (2) 119:5,13use (68) 14:16;15:8;19:21; 20:14,25;22:20; 23:15,24;24:6; 27:14;30:2;31:16; 32:9,10,13,17;46:25; 47:5,6;48:5;58:9,11; 63:5;79:18;80:14; 81:5,8,18,21,23; 82:3,18,22;83:1,6,9; 84:2,5,7,12;88:3,3; 89:3,5,6,8;97:18,20; 107:24;113:21; 116:20;117:23; 118:2;130:4,11; 131:6;137:24; 142:14,17,19; 147:19;148:7,18; 149:4;157:23; 159:23;161:13; 163:2used (26) 16:12,22;17:5; 22:15,15;27:17,17;

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (15) testimony - used

Page 182: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

47:14;48:2,6;51:23; 52:1;80:11,22;81:1, 3;82:17;86:22; 87:12;92:3;141:24; 142:6;143:5,5; 165:14,21uses (5) 14:21,23,24;15:3; 138:21using (14) 13:15;27:11; 77:22;79:21;80:4,8; 82:24;90:12;113:9; 141:23;146:12; 152:16;154:25; 158:2utility (4) 111:21;112:22,24; 113:3

V

vaguely (1) 140:6valid (1) 146:4variety (1) 134:10vehicle (10) 60:18;68:2,25; 69:8,16;86:10,24; 89:3,14;93:25vehicles (1) 56:16Velasco (1) 5:14verbal (1) 118:1versus (4) 5:7;32:13;140:3, 19vest (8) 70:24;71:2,3,4,10, 16,22;113:17vests (2) 71:24,25vetting (2) 130:5,7vicinity (2) 116:7;125:22victim (1) 59:14Victoria (1) 64:1video (29) 10:16,24,24;11:4, 18;96:8;102:20,23; 103:3,4,12,15,22,24; 104:10,14,19,21,24; 105:8,9,12,15,24; 106:2,8,18;107:14; 157:9VIDEOGRAPHER (22)

5:5,14,25;30:22, 25;63:7,11;85:10,13; 125:8,10,14;141:15, 18;144:12,15;151:6; 153:2,5;164:12,15; 165:20videos (1) 157:10view (5) 70:14,17,21;81:9; 83:17viewed (1) 74:23Vincent (1) 56:12violated (1) 110:23violation (1) 142:10violence (2) 47:24;133:10visible (2) 80:17,20vision (3) 53:1,6,25visit (1) 152:22volunteer (1) 56:18volunteered (4) 56:19,21,24;57:4

W

Wait (6) 74:24;134:3,13,21, 24;158:9waiting (1) 113:25wake (1) 134:13walk (3) 97:5;114:22;115:4walking (7) 66:2;78:14,16,17, 18,18,21walk-through (17) 119:18,20;120:12, 14,19,21;121:20,22; 122:1,8;123:9,11; 125:18,21;126:16, 23;127:3wall (3) 114:3,4,14warning (1) 84:21warrant (3) 21:17,23;24:4watch (9) 10:23;11:8,10,13; 103:15,21;104:20; 107:14;157:10watched (12)

11:17;96:8;103:3, 12,20;104:10,13; 105:1,7,12;106:2,18way (32) 7:16;15:15;34:16; 52:21;62:8;66:4; 70:17,20;78:24,25, 25;80:17;81:1,9; 82:24;83:2;84:3; 89:18;91:18;92:1, 10;100:13;102:12; 111:10;119:14; 132:23;136:17; 138:6;144:1,25; 153:25;159:14weapon (21) 26:4;33:9,15;34:2, 5,8,23;35:11;48:6,7; 60:5;80:21;81:7; 93:18;100:17;101:2; 138:16;151:21,25; 152:3;158:23Weapons (20) 20:18,19;22:19; 23:23;27:6;33:3,6; 71:17,21,24;72:1; 111:19;113:12; 122:12,16,19; 125:20,22;126:24,25wear (4) 52:20;53:19; 160:13,20wearing (5) 53:11;57:17; 64:21;111:2,5week (10) 10:22;11:9;12:5; 31:11,15,18,20; 103:10;156:4,5weeks (1) 22:10weigh (1) 116:14weight (3) 57:18;65:4;116:16welfare (2) 121:12;130:21weren't (3) 75:25;85:24; 129:19west (6) 66:15,16;67:7; 114:7,9;115:15Western (6) 120:22;121:2,9, 17;128:21;135:17what's (12) 33:20;45:18;53:1; 79:5;84:3;91:11; 94:20;113:4;145:18; 147:10;152:17; 154:6whatsoever (1)

9:2whenever (4) 45:25;89:6;91:1; 92:6Whereupon (4) 156:24;160:1; 162:14;165:23whole (1) 99:4Who's (1) 136:9whose (1) 23:4wife (7) 15:16,22;124:25, 25;125:1;126:7; 130:15William (1) 136:10win (1) 37:16within (11) 19:10,23;23:8; 27:10;44:14;45:25; 98:7;139:21;140:2, 6;153:22without (2) 24:16;87:24witness (14) 6:3;35:1,4,15; 45:24;46:11;59:14; 67:18,23;85:1; 104:1;107:18;125:5; 143:13woman (1) 58:24woman's (1) 59:1wonder (1) 150:25words (1) 71:3work (12) 14:16;16:21; 42:16;104:3;105:18; 107:2,16;124:19; 148:24;156:2,4,11worked (6) 42:22;148:20,23, 25;155:20;156:8working (8) 31:20,23,24;59:2; 67:10,16;135:15; 148:19works (2) 7:6;37:21worn (3) 53:17,23;129:25writing (1) 149:22written (4) 51:3,5,18;149:16wrong (2)

83:7;160:19wrote (1) 51:7

Y

year (18) 33:22;44:5;87:4, 16,19;111:5,5; 148:12;152:21; 153:9;154:13,21,24; 155:3,13,18;156:14; 162:5years (34) 8:12;13:13;14:1; 16:9,11,21;17:13,18, 20;18:2;20:23;21:6, 24;25:9;27:24,25; 36:3,4;43:1,11,17; 44:4;47:21;52:5; 53:22;143:15,16,19; 144:6;146:4;147:12; 148:25;149:1;161:9Young (1) 6:1

Z

Zimmerman (3) 5:7;121:11;127:13zone (1) 19:12

1

1 (18) 5:6;63:8;131:23; 132:6,7,9,10,11,13, 14,16;133:6,7;134:8, 11,12;156:22,241:45 (1) 125:121:57 (1) 125:1510 (2) 17:13;19:1210:11 (1) 30:2310:18 (1) 31:1100 (3) 21:12;43:22,2311 (1) 26:1511:06 (1) 63:911:20 (1) 63:1211:54 (1) 85:111199 (2) 86:11,1911s (1)

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (16) uses - 11s

Page 183: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ... · 7 matter of S.R. Nehad versus Shelley Zimmerman, et al. 8 This case is in the United States District Court, 9 Southern

S.R. NEHAD v. SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN

NEAL BROWDERJuly 12, 2016

26:1912 (2) 5:2,1012:00 (1) 66:2412:36 (1) 85:141200 (2) 5:12,1312s (1) 26:1915 (6) 19:5;21:21; 123:12,14;141:10,12150 (3) 21:25;43:14,1515-cv-1386-WQH-NLS (1) 5:1015-minute (1) 140:2515th (1) 111:316 (1) 53:181987 (1) 147:141988 (1) 139:71998 (2) 25:6;36:131999 (2) 36:15;37:6

2

2 (5) 63:13;125:11; 131:23;159:25; 160:12:23 (1) 141:162:42 (1) 141:192:46 (1) 144:132:51 (1) 144:1620 (5) 8:18,19;19:3,5; 47:2120/15 (1) 160:92014 (2) 154:16;156:172015 (45) 17:6;29:18;30:1; 31:4;36:9;37:7; 46:24;53:5,12;54:3; 55:14,21;61:5; 84:11;85:16;86:1; 87:4,15;88:7,13; 90:7;92:17;111:16, 23;112:22;113:18;

115:22;135:3,8; 136:17,24;137:4,13, 21;138:4,8;141:21; 152:21;153:10; 154:11;156:18; 158:24;162:9,23; 163:52016 (4) 5:2,10;42:24; 162:821 (18) 16:17;17:2,4,10, 12;18:17;20:11,13, 14;23:1;28:4,6; 112:20;116:21; 139:21;140:2,6,1621-foot (8) 138:25;139:9,12, 18,25;140:9;149:15, 1722 (4) 20:23;21:6,24; 161:9230 (1) 116:1525 (3) 87:18,19,19250 (4) 9:14,15;53:3,927 (1) 13:1328 (3) 8:12;13:14;52:5

3

3 (4) 125:16;131:24; 162:12,143:03 (1) 153:33:05 (1) 153:63:24 (1) 164:133:30 (1) 164:163:32 (2) 165:22,2330 (8) 8:19;85:5;90:7; 112:22;123:13,15; 162:9;165:11300 (2) 53:3,9308 (5) 17:1;26:4,5,7,930th (38) 29:17;30:1;31:4; 53:12;54:3;55:21; 61:4;84:11;85:16; 86:1;88:7,13;92:17; 111:16,22;113:18;

115:22;135:3,8; 136:17,23;137:4,13, 21;138:4,8;141:21; 152:21;153:10; 154:10,16;156:17, 18;157:6;158:24; 161:17;162:23; 163:5

4

4 (1) 133:745 (4) 16:17,18;17:10; 148:148 (1) 129:9

5

5th (2) 126:13;157:7

6

6 (1) 157:14

7

75 (2) 10:1,2

8

86 (1) 21:12

9

9 (1) 158:59:35 (2) 5:2,1190 (1) 21:1292101 (1) 5:1392614 (1) 5:1698 (1) 25:7

Min-U-Script® Barkley Court Reporters (17) 12 - 98