Upload
theresa-price
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
Agenda
10am – 1:00pm• Welcome & Introductions• Policy Discussion
– Context– Research Findings– Facilitated Discussion & Working Lunch
1pm - 2:00pm• Update on Doing What MATTERS for Jobs & Economy
– Interactive Map, Onboarding & Self-Help Resources– Key Talent ‘Meet and Greet’
• Jose Anaya, Sector Navigator, Advance Manufacturing• Steve Glyer & Lynn Shaw, LA/OC Regional Consortia
• 2013-14 EWD Expenditure Plan• Consent Items• Next Meeting: January 22, 2014, 10AM-2PM
• Public Comments
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 3
Policy Discussion
Context: California Economic Summit ‘Workforce Action Team’Van Ton-Quinlivan
Amy Wallace, California Workforce Investment Board
“Workforce Investments: State Strategies to Preserve Higher-Cost Career Education Programs in Community and Technical Colleges” ReportJodi Lewis, Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy
Facilitated Discussion & Working Lunch
Facilitators: Catherine Swenson, Elaine Gaertner and Denise Brosseau
4
Jobs & Economy Goals:
• Supply in-demand skills for employers• Create relevant pathways and stackable credentials
• Get Californians into open jobs• Promote student success
What are our Jobs & Economy Goals?
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
• San Diego/Imperial-----• Los Angeles• Orange County-----• East Bay• North Bay• SF/Mid Peninsula• Silicon Valley• Santa Cruz/Monterey-----• Inland Empire/Desert-----• Greater Sacramento• Northern Inland CA• Northern Coastal CA-----• South Central-----• Central• Mother LodeCalifornia Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
California’s reality: many regional economies
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 6
• Phase 1: Doing What MATTERS for Jobs & Economy Framework– Target incentive investment (EWD, SB70, Perkins 1B)
• Sector
• Region
• Technical Assistance
– Braided RFA
– Common accountability metrics
Administrative Fixes Empower Regions Rethink Funding
• Phase 2: Moving the Needle
• Phase 3: Scaling Excellence
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 7
Continuum for increasing system’s responsiveness to workforce needs
Administrative Fixes Empower Regions Rethink Funding
DIFFICULTY
IMPACT
Low
Medium Medium High
Medium High
8
Cost Creates Disincentive to Offer CTE10-year trend in CTE portfolio of community colleges (as % of Full Time Equivalent Students)
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 9
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 10
The Convergence
10
- California State Workforce Plan - Feedback from Regional Forums - Community college field feedback
Unmet Regional Need for In-Demand and High-Growth CTE
Workforce Investments: State Strategies to Preserve Higher-Cost
Career Education Programs in Community and Technical Colleges
Nancy ShulockJodi LewisConnie Tan
Institute for Higher Education Leadership & PolicySacramento State University
The California Context
• Enrollment funding = one rate for all programsInstructional Costs Per Student Credit Hour
National Averages (2011-2012)Humanities/Humanistic Studies $52
Biology, General $64
Engineering-Related Technologies $73
Allied Health and Medical Assisting Services $131
Drafting/Design Engineering Technologies/Technicians $163
Respiratory Care Therapy/Therapist $265
Source: National Community College Cost & Productivity Project, National Higher Education Benchmarking Institute
Scope of Study• Examine how 20 states are using finance
strategies to preserve high-cost CTE/workforce programs– Limited to the use of state general funds– Limited to postsecondary institutions
CTE in Other States• Thoughtful prioritization of CTE• A larger portion of associate degrees (includes Associate of
Applied Science)
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
CTE Degrees as Percent of All Degrees inPublic Two-Year Colleges, 2010-11
Strategy Number of States (out of 20) California Approach
Separate technical institutions/system
11 All colleges have comprehensive mission
Differential funding based on costs
13 Constant funding rate regardless of program
Performance- or outcomes-based funding
14 Enrollment-based funding
Differential tuition (either for whole system or individual college discretion)
11 Same tuition for all programs
Differential course fees 17 Course materials fees limited by statute
Strategies that May Preserve CTE/Workforce Programs
Separate Technical Systems/Institutions
– 11 out of 20 states have “technical” colleges in 3 types of governance structures, e.g.,
– “Technical” Colleges within a comprehensive system• Washington SCTCS• Louisiana CTCS
– Technical college systems • Technical College System of Georgia • Texas State Technical College System
– Free-standing technical colleges not in a system• Kansas• Ohio
Differential Funding
• 13 of 20 states differentiate funding by discipline• Assign costs to discipline categories• Incorporate cost differentials in final allocations– Usually 3-6 categories– Higher-cost programs funded 2-3 times higher
• “Fair”– Equity in terms of student access to quality
programs
Performance Funding
• 14 out of 20 states have approved PF• Treats high and low cost programs the same– Rewards completions of degrees and certificates
• Can incentivize variety of workforce outcomes– Some metrics include job placement, wages, high-
need completions, and industry certifications
Differential Tuition
• 11 out of the 20 states • Some use it broadly, some selectively• Some marginally higher, some much higher
Examples of Differential Tuition (by Program)
Number of Tiers/Rates Programs/Disciplines Tuition Rate
Arizona-Pima District
3
General (liberal arts) $65.50 per credit hour
Level A (e.g., aviation tech; respiratory tech)
$85.50 per credit hour
Level B (e.g., nursing, radiologic tech) $91.50 per credit hour
Illinois-Central College
Rates vary by program, for multiple programs
Standard $99 per credit hour
E.g., welding, auto body, health $124-$173.25 per credit hour
Ohio-Mid-East Career & Technology Center
Each program has a separate tuition/fee total listed
Practical nursing $10,214 for 42 week program
Welding $9,280 for 38 week program
Heating & air conditioning $6,031 for 41 week program
Course Fees
• 17 of the 20 states charge course fees• Fees cover lab operation and equipment,
supplies, specialized training, assistants• Examples:– Indiana’s Ivy Tech college course fees range from
$10 to $50 for automotive courses, to $300 for principles of advanced manufacturing
– At Blue Mountain CC in Oregon, fees range from $80 for music courses, to $150 lab fees in welding
Conclusions
• There is much to learn from other states– Most states are very thoughtful about the issue of
finance– Most celebrate the CTE mission without
hesitation, and without detriment to the transfer mission
• These 5 strategies are adaptable
Implications for California
• Strategy 1: “Technical colleges”– Messaging is important
• Strategy 2: Differential funding– A different take on equity
• Strategy 3: Performance funding– Flexible applications to incentivize workforce outcomes
• Strategy 4: Differential tuition– Could apply very selectively
• Strategy 5: Course fees– Could loosen statutory restrictions
Clarification Questions?
• Contact Information: [email protected]
• IHELP Publications: http://www.csus.edu/ihelp
Strategy Number of States (out of 20) California Approach
Separate technical institutions/system
11 All colleges have comprehensive mission
Differential funding based on costs
13 Constant funding rate regardless of program
Performance- or outcomes-based funding
14 Enrollment-based funding
Differential tuition (either for whole system or individual college discretion)
11 Same tuition for all programs
Differential course fees 17 Course materials fees limited by statute
Strategies that May Preserve CTE/Workforce Programs
Poll & Discuss
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 26
The Courageous Conversation
26
- California State Workforce Plan - Feedback from Regional Forums - Community college field feedback
Unmet Regional Need for In-Demand and High-Growth CTE
Is there a path forward?
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
1st Group of Internal & External StakeholdersName Organization Category
Alma Salazar L.A. County Chamber External/Workforce Partner
Amy Wallace California Workforce Investment Board External/Workforce Partner
John Melville California Economic Summit External/Workforce Partner
Rebecca Miller SEIU United Healthcare West External/Workforce Partner
Tim Rainey California Workforce Investment Board External/Workforce Partner
Larry Good Corporation for Skilled Workforce External/Workforce Partner
Nancy Shulock Institute for Higher Ed Leadership & Policy External/Workforce Partner
Sarah Bohn Public Policy Institute of California External/Workforce Partner
Susan Hackwood CA Council on Science and Technology External/Workforce Partner
Beth Smith Academic Senate (ASCCC) Internal
Jeff Cummings CCC Assoc of Occupations Educators (CCCAOE) Internal
Jonathan Lightman Faculty Association of the CCs (FACC) Internal
Jon Sharpe Chief Business Officer/Los Rios CCD Internal
Linda Collins Career Ladders Project Internal
Mary Benard Chief Instructional Officer/Mira Costa College Internal
Rock Pfotenhauer Bay Area Regional Consortia/CTE Dean Internal
Van Ton Quinlivan CCCCO Internal
Cris McCullough CCCCO Internal
Debra Jones CCCCO Internal
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students28
1st Group of Internal & External Stakeholders
Name Organization Category
Catherine Swenson CCCCO Outreach/Facilitation
Denise Brosseau Thought Leadership Lab Outreach/Facilitation
Elaine Gaertner CCCCO Outreach/Facilitation
Rhiannon Surrenda CA Corp College/Cabrillo College Outreach/Facilitation
Pat McNellis Compression Planning Facilitation
Jerry McNellis Compression Planning Facilitation
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 29
Is There a Path Forward?
Deliberation of OptionsCost: - Start up - Do
Time: - Buy-in - Do
Difficulty: - Start up - On-going
Impact & side effects to CA’s community college system:- Primary- Secondary- Tertiary
IHELP research on 20 states
Initial mix of external and
internal stakeholders
Structured discussion technique
How likely will this strategy fix the funding
barriers to offering
in-demand, high growth and more costly CTE courses?
The Filters
The Strawman
Vet &Refine
The Process
The Issue
How to meet
regional need for in-
demand and high-growth
CTE?
Path forward:
Explore differential
(or enhanced) funding
Is there a “shared
investment” concept
Shared ownership
Outcomes of DF
• A college with more students enrolled in higher cost programs (e.g., CTE) would receive, on average, more funding per student than other colleges
• Overall funding is more closely representative of the actual costs to serve students
• Equal opportunity for students to access programs• Equal opportunity for colleges to offer the programs
their regions need
One Concept: Many Approaches
• 13 of the 20 states we studied use DF• Disciplines assigned to cost categories• Funding rates assigned to categories• Costs based on data from the state’s colleges or
national cost studies • 3 main approaches: – Rate based on student/faculty ratio– Rate based on total cost – FTES weighting
ArkansasFunding Based on Four Cost Categories Derived from
Student Semester Credit Hours (SSCH)
Cost Categories Sampling of Disciplines (based on CIP codes) Workload Standards
General Education Agriculture, business, natural resources, communications, education, engineering, foreign languages, law, letters, liberal studies, biology, visual/ performing arts, social sciences
22 students (660 SSCH)
Technical Education Marketing, Communications technology, engineering technology, construction trades, mechanics, protective services
16 students (480 SSCH)
Basic Skills Remedial/developmental 16 students (480 SSCH)
Allied Health Health professions 12 students (360 SSCH)
Source: Arkansas Department of Higher Education
IllinoisCredit Hour Rates by Category
Baccalaureate Business Technical Health Remedial Adult Basic Ed
FY2011 Unit Cost $254.60 $287.49 $277.88 $345.00 $220.43 $242.14
FY2013 Weighed Cost
$261.28 $295.03 $285.18 $354.05 $226.21 $248.50
Less:
Tuition & Fees $105.06 $105.06 $105.06 $105.06 $105.06 -
Local Tax Revenue $103.83 $103.83 $103.83 $103.83 $103.83 $103.83
Total $52.38 $86.14 $76.28 $145.16 $17.32 $144.67
Source: Illinois Community College Board
Nebraska• Courses are weighted, and colleges receive funding
based on FTES enrollment in courses– 1.0 weighting for academic transfer courses– 1.5 weighting for technical courses that don’t require
expensive equipment– 2.0 weighting for technical courses requiring expensive
equipment (e.g. welding and nursing)
Other Examples
Cost-Based Method
Number & Type of Rates RangeKentucky 52 per credit hour rates Highest: Construction Trade $286
Lowest: Protective Services $56
Texas 29 per credit hour rates Highest: Career Pilot $29.27Lowest: Psychology, Social Sciences, History $7.16
Kansas 25 course rates Highest: $382Lowest: $146
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
Facilitated Discussion QuestionsRound #1
Address:- Pros & Cons of each design- What must occur for this design to be successful?
Design A:Tiered Funding –
Based on cost
Design B:Weighted
Funding – 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, etc.
Design C:CTE Equipment Enhancement
Funds
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students38
Facilitated Discussion QuestionsRound #2
Address:- What constituency concerns must be consideredor addressed?
Design A:Tiered Funding –
Based on cost
Design B:Weighted
Funding – 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, etc.
Design C:CTE Equipment Enhancement
Funds
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
Next Steps
• Facilitators will provide feedback to California Economic Summit (CAEconomy.org) on designs
• Other designs?
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 40
Update
Interactive Map, Onboarding & Self-Help Resources
Key Talent ‘Meet and Greet’
EWD Budget
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 41
doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 42
doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 43
doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 44
Download banner link to Interactive Map:http://www.doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu/CommunicationToolKit.aspx#share
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 45
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 46
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 47
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 48
Meet & Greet of Key Talents
Jose AnayaAdvanced Manufacturing
Director & Sector Navigator
Steve Glyer & Lynn ShawLA/OC Regional Consortia
Chair & Vice Chair
49
2014-15 Proposed Expenditure PlanSB-1042 Economic & Workforce Development (EWD) Program
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
Recommendation:Request restoration this categorical to $46.3M*
Approve 2014-15 expenditure plan for $22.9M of that pot
* (from 2002)
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 50
Consent
Next Meeting: January 22th, 10AM-2PM
Public Comments