1

WELCOME!

Pocatello/Chubbuck District #25 SIOP Coaches Training

2

Evaluations/QuestionsSIOP Coaches’ Training ObjectivesSIOP Coaches’ Training Objectives

Content Objectives:Coaches will:

Understand how SIOP fits into the district improvement planUnderstand the process and time line for LEP Grant and district implementationLearn spring SIOP coaching expectationsRecognize the importance of observing and calibrating lessons

Language Objectives:SIOP Coaches will participate in observing other coaches and calibrating lessons

3

Pocatello/Chubbuck

School District 25

Strategic Plan

Draft August 2008

4

5

SIOP

Tier I: Core Instruction ALL

Tier II Supported Instruction

SOME

Tier IIIIntensive

Instruction FEW

RtI: Pyramid of Interventions:

6

$50,000 LEP Enhancement

GrantAwarded 07-08

$150,000 LEP Enhancement

GrantAwarded 08-011

7

LEP Enhancement Grant

• $50,000 per year 08-11 • Meet the needs of LEP Learners

AcademicLinguisticCultural Needs

8

1.Chubbuck – SIOP 22.Highland 3.Century4.Irving

SIOP Model School Grants

9

10

SIOP Training ObjectivesSIOP Training ObjectivesContent Objectives:

Administrators will: Understand how SIOP fits into the district improvement planUnderstand the process and time line for district implementationLearn what to expect from building SIOP coachesLearn the 8 components of SIOP Instructional Framework

Language Objectives:Administrators will begin to develop a SIOP-related lexicon

11

Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction

• Communicating Clearly and Accurately– Teacher’s oral and

written communication is clear and expressive, anticipating possible student misconceptions.

• SIOP Components1. Preparation 2. Building Background3. Comprehensible

Input

12

Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction

• Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques– Students formulate

many of the high-level questions and assume responsibility for the participation of all students in the discussion.

• SIOP Component4. Strategies

13

Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction

• Providing Feedback to Students– Teacher’s feedback to

students is timely and of consistently high quality, and students make use of the feedback in their learning.

• SIOP Component8. Review/Assessment

14

Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction

• Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness– Teacher is highly

responsive to student’ interests and questions, making major adjustments if necessary, and persist in ensuring the success of all students.

• SIOP Component2. Building Background7. Lesson Delivery

15

Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction

• Engaging Students in Learning– Students are highly

engaged throughout the lesson and make meaningful contributions to the representation of content, the activities and the materials. The structure and pacing of the lesson allow for student reflection and closure.

• SIOP Components5. Interaction6. Practice and Application7. Lesson Delivery

16

Pocatello/Chubbuck Demographics

• 16 different languages

• 65% Hispanic– Up from 47% last year

• Greatest number of ESL students in any building is 8

• District migrant population is 5

17

District Classified in Improvement

•Improvement 1 3rd Indicator-Graduation Rate, Improvement 2 Reading, Alert

Math•Graduation Rate (83.32% - needed 84.2%)•American Indian Reading Proficiency (60.24%)•Hispanic Reading Proficiency (71.64%)•LEP Reading Proficiency (48.94%)•Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (74.52%)•Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (51.11%)•African American Math Proficiency (62.92%)•American Indian Math Proficiency (47.77%)•Hispanic Math Proficiency (63.33%)•LEP Math Proficiency (57.45%)•Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (65.07%)•Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (44.89%)

18

Percent Proficient by Special Percent Proficient by Special ProgramsPrograms

Reading

74.5%75.6%75.9%71.3%61.0%

51.1%

38.5% 36.6%34.2%

22.3%

48.9%

62.8%52.0%

45.5%

25.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Spring 2003 Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007

Economically Disadvantaged Special Ed LEP

19

Percent Proficient by Special Percent Proficient by Special ProgramsPrograms

Math

57.5%48.7%62.9%

72.9%65.9% 65.1%

18.8%

33.0%43.9%

38.0% 44.9%37.5%

68.2%

44.0%

75.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Spring 2003 Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007

Economically Disadvantaged Special Ed LEP

20

Active LEP Students IELA Comparison 2006-07

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41

students

loss

- g

ain

listening growth

speaking growth

reasoning growth

writing growth

compreh growth

21

LEP-X students IELA 2006-07 Comparison

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

students

los

s -

ga

in

listening growth

speaking growth

reading growth

writing growth

compreh. growth

Total growth

level growth

22

Past Practices

• Two ESL teachers traveled to the 20 buildings.

• 30 minutes, maximum, instruction time to each students, often in small, mixed ability groups.

23

Changes to the ESL program

• We purchased ELLis Essentials software to support the elementary students.

• An evaluation of individual student needs allowed a priority list to be developed.

24

Changes to the ESL program• This year, we began a secondary magnet

program. • 7 – 12 grade students travel to an ESL

classroom for first and second hour.• Twelve students and two teachers are involved.• ELLis Academic software was purchased for

reinforcement.

25

Evaluations/QuestionsSIOP Coaches Training 07-09• Identified 2 coaches per elementary• 4 coaches per secondary• Coaches received 5.5 days of training• Monthly follow-up training

26

Spring SIOP Coaching• Post content and language objectives• Observe another coach and calibrate one SIOP lesson component

- Include a pre/post conference - Money for subs is available

•Turn in Spring SIOP Lesson Calibration form by Monday, May 8th

27

Spring SIOP Lesson CalibrationSIOP Coaches Name: _________________________________ School:__________________

SIOP Coach Observed:________________________________ Date:______ Time:_________

Lesson Component Observed/Calibrated___________________________________________

Comments: __________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Please return form to Kathy Luras by Monday, May 18th. Thank You!

28

SIOP Implementation Celebrations