10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

  • Upload
    j-doe

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    1/13

    -1-

    PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVETO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY

    C-10-4381 (HRL

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    D. GILL SPERLEIN (SBN 172887)

    THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN

    584 Castro Street, Suite 879

    San Francisco, California 94114

    Telephone: (415) 404-6615

    Facsimile: (415) 404-6616

    [email protected]

    Attorney for plaintiff

    IO GROUP, INC.

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

    SAN JOSE DIVISION

    IO GROUP, INC. d/b/a TITAN

    MEDIA, a California corporation,

    Plaintiff,

    vs.

    DOES 1-138 individuals,

    Defendants.

    ________________________________

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    ))

    )

    CASE NO.: C-10-4381 (HRL)

    PLAINTIFFS MISCELLANEOUS

    ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST

    PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 FOR

    LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR

    TO RULE 26 CONFERENCE

    Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, Plaintiff seeks leave to take limited discovery prior to

    the scheduled Rule 26 conference for the reasons set forth herein, and in the concurrently

    filed Declaration of Michael Eichner in support of this motion. Plaintiff could not obtain

    stipulation for this motion because Plaintiff cannot identify the Doe Defendants until the

    requested discovery takes place.

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4 Filed10/08/10 Page1 of 7

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    2/13

    -2-

    PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVETO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY

    C-10-4381 (HRL

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    Io Group, Inc. is a California corporation doing business as Titan Media, with its

    principal place of business located at 69 Converse Street, San Francisco, California 94103.

    Titan Media produces, markets, and distributes adult entertainment products, including

    Internet website content, videos, DVDs, photographs, etc. Plaintiff operates and maintains

    a website by and through which individuals who pay a monthly subscription fee can view

    its photographic and audiovisual works. (Complaint at 2.)

    Defendant DOES 1-138 are individuals whose true names and addresses are

    unknown to Plaintiff. (Id. at 3.) DOE Defendants 1 through 138distributed unauthorized

    and infringing copies of Plaintiffs audiovisual works. (Id.,passim.)

    Io Group, Inc. engaged Media Protector International GmbH (Media Protector

    International) to locate and document infringing copies of its copyright protected works on

    the P2P Network eDonkey2000. (Decl. of Michael Eichner at 2.) Media Protector

    International identified locations from which individuals distributed files previously

    verified to be Io Group movies. (Id. at 9.) Media Protector International then recorded

    the IP address and the exact time and date at which it witnessed the infringing files. (Id.)

    Plaintiff can only identify the infringers by way of further investigation

    Specifically, in order to determine the identity of the subscribers, Plaintiff must now

    subpoena Verizon Internet, the Internet service provider (ISP) that provided Internet access

    to the infringers. Internet access providers only maintain subscriber activity logs for a

    short period before destroying the information contained in the logs. (Id. at 10.)

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4 Filed10/08/10 Page2 of 7

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    3/13

    -3-

    PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVETO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY

    C-10-4381 (HRL

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks leave from the Court to serve a Rule 45 third-party subpoena

    on Verizon Internet prior to the Rule 26 Case Management Conference in this matter.

    Federal law provides for the relief Plaintiff seeks.

    ARGUMENT

    Federal Rules Allow for Early Discovery

    The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that, generally, a party may not

    initiate discovery before the parties have met and conferred pursuant to Rule 26(f).

    However, Rule 26(d) provides that a court may authorize earlier discovery for the

    convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice. Fed. R. Civ. Pro

    26(d). A court may grant a request to take discovery prior the parties meeting under Rule

    26(f) where the requesting party demonstrates good cause. See Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo

    Electron Am., Inc., 208 F.R.D. 273, 276 (N.D. Cal. 2002). Good cause may be found

    where the need for expedited discovery, in consideration of the administration of justice,

    outweighs the prejudice to the responding party. Id. Courts frequently find good cause in

    cases involving claims of infringement and unfair competition. Id.

    Courts have recognized that, [s]ervice of process can pose a special dilemma for

    plaintiffs in cases like this in which the tortuous activity occurred entirely on-line.

    Columbia Ins. Co. v. Seescandy.com, 185 F.R.D. 573, 577 (N.D. Cal. 1999). Accordingly

    courts have developed the following factors to consider when granting motions for

    expedited discovery to identify anonymous Internet users: (1) whether the plaintiff can

    identify the missing party with sufficient specificity such that the court can determine that

    defendant is a real person or entity who could be sued in federal court; (2) all previous

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4 Filed10/08/10 Page3 of 7

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    4/13

    -4-

    PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVETO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY

    C-10-4381 (HRL

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    steps taken by the plaintiff to identify the Doe defendant; and (3) whether the plaintiffs

    suit could withstand a motion to dismiss. Id. at 578-80. Each of these factors resolves in

    favor of granting Plaintiffs requested relief.

    First, Plaintiff has sufficiently identified individuals who are real persons Plaintiff

    could sue in Federal Court. Plaintiff observed and documented infringement of its

    registered works by the individuals identified as DOES in the Complaint. (Eichner Decl

    at 9.) The requested discovery is necessary for Plaintiff to determine the true name and

    address of the individuals who performed the infringing acts. (Id. at 11 and 13.)

    Second, there are no other practical measures Plaintiff could take to identify the

    DOE Defendants. (Id. at 11.) Plaintiff is aware of no available information that would

    identify the infringing users, other than information maintained by Verizon Internet (the

    name and address of account holders assigned the IP addresses identified by Media

    Protector International). Due to the nature of on-line transactions, Plaintiff has no way of

    determining Defendants identities except through a third-party subpoena.Id.

    Third, Plaintiff has asserted a prima facia claim for copyright infringement in its

    Complaint that can withstand a motion to dismiss. Specifically, Plaintiff has alleged that

    a) it owns and has registered the copyrights in the works at issue and b) the Defendants

    made unauthorized reproductions of those works and distributed them without Plaintiffs

    authorization. These allegations state a claim for copyright infringement. 17 U.S.C.

    106(1)(3). As further proof of copyright ownership, Plaintiff submits concurrently with

    this request, Keith Ruoffs declaration attaching copies of the relevant copyright

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4 Filed10/08/10 Page4 of 7

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    5/13

    -5-

    PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVETO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY

    C-10-4381 (HRL

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    registration certificates issued by the United States Copyright Office or applications

    therefore. See Ruoff Application Exhibit A.

    When outlining the above factors, the courtin Columbia noted that in cases where

    injured parties are likely to find themselves chasing unidentified tortfeasors from ISP to

    ISP, the traditional enforcement of strict compliance with service requirements should be

    tempered by the need to provide injured parties with a forum in which they may seek

    redress for grievances. Columbia, 185 F.R.D. at 579. An analysis of the factors clearly

    demonstrates Plaintiffs legitimate interest in identifying the name and address of the

    individuals who infringed upon its copyrighted works.

    Explanation of Specific Requests

    In addition to the three factors discussed above, courts have indicated that a plaintiff

    requesting early discovery to identify defendants should justify specific requests and

    explain how such requests will lead to identifying information about defendant that would

    make service of process possible. SeeColumbia 185 F.R.D. at 580; Gillespie v. Civiletti

    629 F. 2d 637, 642 (9th

    Cir.1980).

    The infringement at issue in this action occurred through a distribution method

    commonly referred to as peer-to-peer (P2P). Users download software to their computers

    that allows them to locate and transfer files to and from other users. In order to use the

    software to locate and exchange files, a user must connect to the Internet. (Eichner Decl.a

    5.)

    Individuals gain access to the Internet through an Internet service provider (ISP).

    When an ISP such as Verizon Internet provides Internet access to a subscriber, it does so

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4 Filed10/08/10 Page5 of 7

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    6/13

    -6-

    PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVETO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY

    C-10-4381 (HRL

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    through a modem located at the subscribers home or office. (Id. at 6.) Each time the

    subscriber accesses the Internet, Verizon Internet provides a unique number to the

    subscriber called an Internet protocol (IP) address. This is somewhat akin to a telephone

    number. (Id.) The IP address for a subscriber may stay the same (a static ip address) or it

    may change from time to time (a dynamic ip address). (Id.) ISPs generally record the

    times and dates it assigns each IP address to a subscriber. (Id.)

    P2P technology used to locate and exchange files relies on the ability to identify the

    computers to and from which users search and exchange files. The technology identifies

    those computers through the IP address from which the computer connects to the Internet.

    In this manner, Media Protector International identified the IP addresses from which

    individuals connected to the Internet for the purpose of distributing unauthorized copies of

    Plaintiffs works to others by and through P2P technology. (Id. at 7.) Media Protector

    International recorded the exact date and time individuals used various IP addresses to

    access the Internet to make these files available. (Id.) In all cases, Media Protector

    International also conducted test downloads in order to provide conclusive evidence of the

    fact that the logged IP addresses uploaded copyrighted works of the Io Group to others by

    and through the eD2K network. (Id.)

    Anyone can perform a simple search on public databases to determine which

    Internet access provider controls a specific ip address. (Id. at 12.) All of the Internet

    connections used to distribute Plaintiffs works as alleged in this action originated from IP

    addresses controlled by Verizon Internet. (Id. at 13.) Plaintiff now seeks to subpoena

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4 Filed10/08/10 Page6 of 7

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    7/13

    -7-

    PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVETO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY

    C-10-4381 (HRL

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Verizon Internet to determine the name and address of the subscribers to whom Verizon

    Internet assigned the various IP addresses recorded by Media Protector International.

    Plaintiff requests that the Court issue an order allowing Plaintiff to serve a subpoena

    on Verizon Internet in substantially the same form as the example attached hereto as

    Exhibit A. Judges of this District have issued similar orders. See, UMG Recordings, Inc

    v. Does, 2006 U.S. Dist LEXIS 32821, *6 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2006). Judge Susan Illston

    recently issued such an order in a case identical in every detail to the one now before the

    Court except that all the infringers used a different ISP to access the Internet. See

    Declaration of D. Gill Sperlein, Exhibit A.

    Since 47 U.S.C. 551 (The Cable Privacy Act) prohibits cable operators from

    disclosing personally identifiable information concerning subscribers without the prior

    written or electronic consent of the subscriber or a court order, and since some Internet

    service providers, are also cable operators, Plaintiff requests that the Court order state

    clearly that the Court contemplated the Cable Privacy Act and that the order specifically

    complies with the Acts requirements. See, 47 U.S.C. 551.

    CONCLUSION

    For the forgoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully asks that the Court grant Plaintiffs

    request and enter an order substantially in the form of the attached Proposed Order.

    Dated: October 8, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

    /s/ D. Gill Sperlein

    _______________________________

    GILL SPERLEIN

    Attorney for Plaintiff IO GROUP, INC.

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4 Filed10/08/10 Page7 of 7

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    8/13

    $2%5HY6XESRHQDWR3URGXFH'RFXPHQWV,QIRUPDWLRQRU2EMHFWVRUWR3HUPLW,QVSHFWLRQRI3UHPLVHV

    81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857IRUWKH

    'LVWULFWRI

    Plaintiff

    Y &LYLO$FWLRQ1R

    ,IWKHDFWLRQLVSHQGLQJLQDQRWKHUGLVWULFWVWDWHZKHUH

    Defendant BBBBBBBBBB'LVWULFWRIBBBBBBBBBB

    SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS

    OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES

    7R

    u Production:YOU ARE COMMANDED WRSURGXFHDWWKHWLPHGDWHDQGSODFHVHWIRUWKEHORZWKHIROORZLQJGRFXPHQWVHOHFWURQLFDOO\VWRUHGLQIRUPDWLRQRUREMHFWVDQGSHUPLWWKHLULQVSHFWLRQFRS\LQJWHVWLQJRUVDPSOLQJRIWKHPDWHULDO

    3ODFH 'DWHDQG7LPH

    u Inspection of Premises:YOU ARE COMMANDEDWRSHUPLWHQWU\RQWRWKHGHVLJQDWHGSUHPLVHVODQGRURWKHUSURSHUW\SRVVHVVHGRUFRQWUROOHGE\\RXDWWKHWLPHGDWHDQGORFDWLRQVHWIRUWKEHORZVRWKDWWKHUHTXHVWLQJSDUW\PD\LQVSHFWPHDVXUHVXUYH\SKRWRJUDSKWHVWRUVDPSOHWKHSURSHUW\RUDQ\GHVLJQDWHGREMHFWRURSHUDWLRQRQLW

    3ODFH 'DWHDQG7LPH

    7KHSURYLVLRQVRI)HG5&LY3FUHODWLQJWR\RXUSURWHFWLRQDVDSHUVRQVXEMHFWWRDVXESRHQDDQG5XOHGDQGHUHODWLQJWR\RXUGXW\WRUHVSRQGWRWKLVVXESRHQDDQGWKHSRWHQWLDOFRQVHTXHQFHVRIQRWGRLQJVRDUHDWWDFKHG

    'DWH

    CLERK OF COURT25

    Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorneys signature

    7KHQDPHDGGUHVVHPDLODQGWHOHSKRQHQXPEHURIWKHDWWRUQH\UHSUHVHQWLQJ(name of party)

    ZKRLVVXHVRUUHTXHVWVWKLVVXESRHQDDUH

    IO GROUP, INC.

    DOES 1 - 138

    C-10-4381 (HRL)

    orthern istrict of California

    Verizon Online, LLC

    Documents sufficient to identify the names, addresses, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses for yoursubscribers assigned ip addresses identified on Attachment A on the corresponding dates and times.

    The Law Office of D. Gill Sperlein ph: 415-404-6615584 Castro Street, Suite 879 fx: 415-404-6616San Francisco, CA 94114 [email protected]

    The Law Office of D. Gill Sperlein ph: 415-404-6615584 Castro Street, Suite 879 fx: 415-404-6616San Francisco, CA 94114 [email protected]

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4-1 Filed10/08/10 Page1 of 6

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    9/13

    IP Address Date Time (GMT)

    1 72.87.175.170 April 29, 2010 06:26:18

    2 71.104.98.141 April 30, 2010 21:58:31

    3 96.250.250.153 May 2, 2010 18:27:10

    4 98.112.133.145 May 10, 2010 15:53:17

    5 71.243.138.130 May 19, 2010 16:35:13

    6 96.251.197.161 May 22, 2010 18:12:177 71.105.115.183 May 27, 2010 23:38:24

    8 98.110.4.32 June 11, 2010 04:21:40

    9 71.179.148.87 June 12, 2010 06:24:52

    10 173.49.157.78 June 13, 2010 01:44:04

    11 71.97.132.164 May 14, 2010 15:40:49

    12 96.232.167.51 June 10, 2010 15:53:38

    13 173.50.140.173 June 14, 2010 15:53:32

    14 71.246.120.136 May 20, 2010 14:14:29

    15 173.52.133.70 May 31, 2010 18:56:26

    16 71.114.63.229 June 7, 2010 20:23:00

    17 96.251.9.116 June 9, 2010 08:30:31

    18 72.66.94.195 April 10, 2010 21:31:5119 151.205.99.148 June 6, 2010 15:53:23

    20 71.191.229.197 May 26, 2010 02:30:12

    21 72.64.78.187 May 4, 2010 03:39:19

    22 138.89.86.33 April 25, 2010 15:38:19

    23 71.163.138.20 May 8, 2010 03:56:49

    24 71.188.80.12 May 10, 2010 00:19:55

    25 173.76.22.163 April 2, 2010 07:28:16

    26 71.101.228.190 April 11, 2010 01:45:51

    27 74.99.5.137 April 15, 2010 07:37:32

    28 96.241.217.147 April 18, 2010 09:45:27

    29 173.53.17.72 April 19, 2010 08:35:55

    30 71.120.233.121 April 20, 2010 04:51:05

    31 173.57.183.70 April 28, 2010 05:25:4832 68.161.233.229 May 4, 2010 11:23:44

    33 96.229.57.217 May 5, 2010 15:53:11

    34 173.51.164.191 May 11, 2010 09:36:21

    35 173.56.150.207 May 19, 2010 00:07:43

    36 71.177.2.172 May 23, 2010 22:48:11

    37 71.249.126.137 May 24, 2010 20:54:21

    38 96.244.85.246 May 24, 2010 11:52:48

    39 74.101.164.153 June 5, 2010 03:05:06

    40 173.58.70.139 June 7, 2010 02:01:29

    41 68.162.209.244 June 12, 2010 18:12:15

    42 98.116.172.220 June 19, 2010 17:04:44

    43 71.105.91.78 April 28, 2010 03:44:2744 96.246.40.248 May 6, 2010 15:53:38

    45 98.111.158.42 June 2, 2010 13:13:34

    46 141.154.235.249 June 11, 2010 21:42:04

    47 173.49.61.33 June 12, 2010 06:11:46

    48 173.66.150.218 April 19, 2010 03:40:37

    49 71.163.227.74 May 30, 2010 01:19:22

    50 72.70.73.14 May 31, 2010 05:12:01

    51 96.255.96.80 May 11, 2010 14:26:08

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4-1 Filed10/08/10 Page2 of 6

    ATTACHMENT A

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    10/13

    52 74.100.253.213 April 28, 2010 16:56:27

    53 71.251.234.189 May 17, 2010 01:15:05

    54 96.231.238.95 May 22, 2010 22:00:47

    55 173.67.138.193 June 2, 2010 06:13:34

    56 96.240.140.7 June 4, 2010 10:49:13

    57 96.255.159.102 May 27, 2010 23:38:43

    58 71.112.209.90 May 23, 2010 00:02:1259 71.180.77.159 June 9, 2010 07:17:18

    60 72.64.99.126 June 11, 2010 13:17:02

    61 72.95.45.149 May 9, 2010 09:46:26

    62 173.58.89.102 April 22, 2010 09:57:48

    63 173.79.64.104 June 8, 2010 00:04:45

    64 71.246.147.217 April 14, 2010 02:27:45

    65 71.164.1.186 June 12, 2010 18:24:33

    66 72.68.197.28 June 2, 2010 21:47:25

    67 71.252.201.12 May 9, 2010 11:05:41

    68 151.203.243.50 May 24, 2010 18:12:47

    69 98.119.60.114 June 7, 2010 15:44:50

    70 173.48.238.25 May 14, 2010 09:53:5671 72.70.38.34 June 10, 2010 07:10:14

    72 173.64.159.177 May 22, 2010 17:37:15

    73 173.68.240.188 May 29, 2010 07:36:53

    74 162.83.141.46 June 2, 2010 05:26:25

    75 96.242.250.167 June 11, 2010 01:24:12

    76 74.106.77.88 April 1, 2010 00:09:44

    77 74.101.36.149 May 15, 2010 04:38:30

    78 68.161.106.68 June 15, 2010 06:25:05

    79 96.251.161.197 April 9, 2010 09:18:21

    80 70.108.31.202 June 10, 2010 04:19:42

    81 173.68.170.158 May 25, 2010 12:05:53

    82 71.108.198.251 May 22, 2010 08:11:42

    83 96.227.60.19 May 30, 2010 21:02:1384 74.101.27.201 June 9, 2010 20:25:39

    85 96.236.125.34 June 12, 2010 15:07:22

    86 71.121.53.138 May 1, 2010 03:38:39

    87 72.68.94.23 May 6, 2010 09:39:48

    88 71.162.1.90 April 6, 2010 09:22:14

    89 71.187.1.219 April 8, 2010 00:28:53

    90 71.96.139.216 April 28, 2010 03:23:37

    91 71.162.34.44 May 13, 2010 22:18:51

    92 70.107.248.129 June 12, 2010 20:00:15

    93 141.156.161.141 April 14, 2010 16:38:02

    94 138.88.134.37 May 8, 2010 05:39:15

    95 70.110.215.103 June 6, 2010 21:21:2996 71.245.234.70 April 29, 2010 08:19:42

    97 71.191.83.165 May 10, 2010 09:50:14

    98 74.96.182.229 June 9, 2010 21:51:30

    99 71.173.130.168 June 10, 2010 12:16:49

    100 173.78.55.176 June 1, 2010 20:27:04

    101 74.96.134.74 June 12, 2010 21:38:08

    102 173.56.133.251 May 9, 2010 22:08:07

    103 71.99.13.100 June 4, 2010 03:09:25

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4-1 Filed10/08/10 Page3 of 6

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    11/13

    104 98.117.127.35 June 10, 2010 19:24:37

    105 71.174.174.200 June 12, 2010 06:20:46

    106 71.247.71.218 April 2, 2010 07:44:21

    107 71.163.232.144 May 14, 2010 18:41:01

    108 72.91.75.222 May 20, 2010 07:07:00

    109 71.244.120.95 May 23, 2010 03:12:09

    110 71.182.163.188 May 20, 2010 10:08:16111 173.78.93.143 June 14, 2010 15:25:25

    112 96.224.146.27 May 10, 2010 21:38:27

    113 96.226.231.171 May 19, 2010 11:43:49

    114 96.234.180.122 May 8, 2010 21:59:05

    115 141.154.241.7 June 14, 2010 15:04:32

    116 72.94.239.152 June 1, 2010 10:54:37

    117 98.113.70.215 June 9, 2010 18:33:55

    118 96.233.153.178 April 5, 2010 21:47:31

    119 71.116.4.57 May 27, 2010 10:16:52

    120 173.79.117.38 June 2, 2010 12:49:04

    121 96.244.251.15 June 9, 2010 06:11:28

    122 71.99.191.81 June 10, 2010 17:58:40123 74.99.50.159 May 28, 2010 01:29:04

    124 70.20.20.143 May 29, 2010 17:44:20

    125 173.56.199.134 June 9, 2010 14:16:16

    126 72.64.231.98 June 11, 2010 14:43:34

    127 98.110.150.204 April 13, 2010 15:52:19

    128 71.254.185.101 May 20, 2010 02:17:19

    129 173.75.192.28 May 20, 2010 17:46:01

    130 74.108.21.182 May 18, 2010 12:26:05

    131 173.73.17.170 June 5, 2010 15:40:43

    132 74.108.83.109 April 2, 2010 07:28:02

    133 96.241.146.193 April 2, 2010 07:22:27

    134 173.69.175.140 April 21, 2010 10:21:17

    135 72.83.161.119 May 23, 2010 00:24:24136 71.108.136.170 April 22, 2010 13:46:48

    137 74.209.41.50 May 26, 2010 03:43:09

    138 74.109.114.154 June 3, 2010 16:35:33

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4-1 Filed10/08/10 Page4 of 6

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    12/13

    $2%5HY6XESRHQDWR3URGXFH'RFXPHQWV,QIRUPDWLRQRU2EMHFWVRUWR3HUPLW,QVSHFWLRQRI3UHPLVHV3DJH

    &LYLO$FWLRQ1R

    PROOF OF SERVICE

    (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)

    7KLVVXESRHQDIRU(name of individual and title, if any)

    ZDVUHFHLYHGE\PHRQ(date)

    u ,SHUVRQDOO\VHUYHGWKHVXESRHQDRQWKHLQGLYLGXDODW(place)

    RQ(date) RU

    u ,OHIWWKHVXESRHQDDWWKHLQGLYLGXDOVUHVLGHQFHRUXVXDOSODFHRIDERGHZLWK(name)

    DSHUVRQRIVXLWDEOHDJHDQGGLVFUHWLRQZKRUHVLGHVWKHUH

    RQ(date) DQGPDLOHGDFRS\WRWKHLQGLYLGXDOVODVWNQRZQDGGUHVVRU

    u ,VHUYHGWKHVXESRHQDWR(name of individual) ZKRLV

    GHVLJQDWHGE\ODZWRDFFHSWVHUYLFHRISURFHVVRQEHKDOIRI(name of organization)

    RQ(date) RU

    u ,UHWXUQHGWKHVXESRHQDXQH[HFXWHGEHFDXVH RU

    u RWKHU(specify):

    8QOHVVWKHVXESRHQDZDVLVVXHGRQEHKDOIRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVRURQHRILWVRIILFHUVRUDJHQWV,KDYHDOVRWHQGHUHGWRWKHZLWQHVVIHHVIRURQHGD\VDWWHQGDQFHDQGWKHPLOHDJHDOORZHGE\ODZLQWKHDPRXQWRI

    0\IHHVDUH IRUWUDYHODQG IRUVHUYLFHVIRUDWRWDORI

    ,GHFODUHXQGHUSHQDOW\RISHUMXU\WKDWWKLVLQIRUPDWLRQLVWUXH

    'DWHServers signature

    Printed name and title

    Servers address

    $GGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQUHJDUGLQJDWWHPSWHGVHUYLFHHWF

    0.00

    C-10-4381 (HRL)

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4-1 Filed10/08/10 Page5 of 6

  • 8/6/2019 10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Request

    13/13

    $2%5HY6XESRHQDWR3URGXFH'RFXPHQWV,QIRUPDWLRQRU2EMHFWVRUWR3HUPLW,QVSHFWLRQRI3UHPLVHV3DJH

    Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective 12/1/07)

    (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

    (1)Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. $SDUW\RUDWWRUQH\UHVSRQVLEOHIRULVVXLQJDQGVHUYLQJDVXESRHQDPXVWWDNHUHDVRQDEOHVWHSVWRDYRLGLPSRVLQJXQGXHEXUGHQRUH[SHQVHRQD

    SHUVRQVXEMHFWWRWKHVXESRHQD7KHLVVXLQJFRXUWPXVWHQIRUFHWKLVGXW\DQGLPSRVHDQDSSURSULDWHVDQFWLRQZKLFKPD\LQFOXGHORVWHDUQLQJVDQGUHDVRQDEOHDWWRUQH\VIHHVRQDSDUW\RUDWWRUQH\ZKRIDLOVWRFRPSO\

    (2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.

    (A)Appearance Not Required. $SHUVRQFRPPDQGHGWRSURGXFHGRFXPHQWVHOHFWURQLFDOO\VWRUHGLQIRUPDWLRQRUWDQJLEOHWKLQJVRUWRSHUPLWWKHLQVSHFWLRQRISUHPLVHVQHHGQRWDSSHDULQSHUVRQDWWKH

    SODFHRISURGXFWLRQRULQVSHFWLRQXQOHVVDOVRFRPPDQGHGWRDSSHDUIRUDGHSRVLWLRQKHDULQJRUWULDO

    (B) Objections. $SHUVRQFRPPDQGHGWRSURGXFHGRFXPHQWVRUWDQJLEOHWKLQJVRUWRSHUPLWLQVSHFWLRQPD\VHUYHRQWKHSDUW\RUDWWRUQH\GHVLJQDWHGLQWKHVXESRHQDDZULWWHQREMHFWLRQWRLQVSHFWLQJFRS\LQJWHVWLQJRUVDPSOLQJDQ\RUDOORIWKHPDWHULDOVRU

    WRLQVSHFWLQJWKHSUHPLVHVRUWRSURGXFLQJHOHFWURQLFDOO\VWRUHGLQIRUPDWLRQLQWKHIRUPRUIRUPVUHTXHVWHG7KHREMHFWLRQPXVWEHVHUYHGEHIRUHWKHHDUOLHURIWKHWLPHVSHFLILHGIRUFRPSOLDQFHRUGD\VDIWHUWKHVXESRHQDLVVHUYHG,IDQREMHFWLRQLVPDGHWKHIROORZLQJUXOHVDSSO\

    (i) $WDQ\WLPHRQQRWLFHWRWKHFRPPDQGHGSHUVRQWKHVHUYLQJSDUW\PD\PRYHWKHLVVXLQJFRXUWIRUDQRUGHUFRPSHOOLQJSURGXFWLRQRULQVSHFWLRQ

    (ii) 7KHVHDFWVPD\EHUHTXLUHGRQO\DVGLUHFWHGLQWKHRUGHUDQGWKHRUGHUPXVWSURWHFWDSHUVRQZKRLVQHLWKHUDSDUW\QRUDSDUW\VRIILFHUIURPVLJQLILFDQWH[SHQVHUHVXOWLQJIURPFRPSOLDQFH(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.

    (A) When Required. 2QWLPHO\PRWLRQWKHLVVXLQJFRXUWPXVWTXDVKRUPRGLI\DVXESRHQDWKDW

    (i) IDLOVWRDOORZDUHDVRQDEOHWLPHWRFRPSO\(ii) UHTXLUHVDSHUVRQZKRLVQHLWKHUDSDUW\QRUDSDUW\VRIILFHU

    WRWUDYHOPRUHWKDQPLOHVIURPZKHUHWKDWSHUVRQUHVLGHVLVHPSOR\HGRUUHJXODUO\WUDQVDFWVEXVLQHVVLQSHUVRQH[FHSWWKDWVXEMHFWWR5XOHF%LLLWKHSHUVRQPD\EHFRPPDQGHGWRDWWHQGDWULDOE\WUDYHOLQJIURPDQ\VXFKSODFHZLWKLQWKHVWDWHZKHUHWKHWULDOLVKHOG

    (iii) UHTXLUHVGLVFORVXUHRISULYLOHJHGRURWKHUSURWHFWHGPDWWHULIQRH[FHSWLRQRUZDLYHUDSSOLHVRU

    (iv) VXEMHFWVDSHUVRQWRXQGXHEXUGHQ

    (B) When Permitted. 7RSURWHFWDSHUVRQVXEMHFWWRRUDIIHFWHGE\DVXESRHQDWKHLVVXLQJFRXUWPD\RQPRWLRQTXDVKRUPRGLI\WKHVXESRHQDLILWUHTXLUHV

    (i) GLVFORVLQJDWUDGHVHFUHWRURWKHUFRQILGHQWLDOUHVHDUFK

    GHYHORSPHQWRUFRPPHUFLDOLQIRUPDWLRQ(ii) GLVFORVLQJDQXQUHWDLQHGH[SHUWVRSLQLRQRULQIRUPDWLRQWKDW

    GRHVQRWGHVFULEHVSHFLILFRFFXUUHQFHVLQGLVSXWHDQGUHVXOWVIURPWKHH[SHUWVVWXG\WKDWZDVQRWUHTXHVWHGE\DSDUW\RU

    (iii) DSHUVRQZKRLVQHLWKHUDSDUW\QRUDSDUW\VRIILFHUWRLQFXUVXEVWDQWLDOH[SHQVHWRWUDYHOPRUHWKDQPLOHVWRDWWHQGWULDO

    (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. ,QWKHFLUFXPVWDQFHVGHVFULEHGLQ5XOHF%WKHFRXUWPD\LQVWHDGRITXDVKLQJRUPRGLI\LQJDVXESRHQDRUGHUDSSHDUDQFHRUSURGXFWLRQXQGHUVSHFLILHGFRQGLWLRQVLIWKHVHUYLQJSDUW\

    (i) VKRZVDVXEVWDQWLDOQHHGIRUWKHWHVWLPRQ\RUPDWHULDOWKDWFDQQRWEHRWKHUZLVHPHWZLWKRXWXQGXHKDUGVKLSDQG

    (ii) HQVXUHVWKDWWKHVXESRHQDHGSHUVRQZLOOEHUHDVRQDEO\FRPSHQVDWHG

    (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

    (1)Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information.

    7KHVHSURFHGXUHVDSSO\WRSURGXFLQJGRFXPHQWVRUHOHFWURQLFDOO\VWRUHGLQIRUPDWLRQ

    (A)Documents. $SHUVRQUHVSRQGLQJWRDVXESRHQDWRSURGXFHGRFXPHQWVPXVWSURGXFHWKHPDVWKH\DUHNHSWLQWKHRUGLQDU\FRXUVHRIEXVLQHVVRUPXVWRUJDQL]HDQGODEHOWKHPWRFRUUHVSRQGWRWKHFDWHJRULHVLQWKHGHPDQG

    (B)Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not

    Specified. ,IDVXESRHQDGRHVQRWVSHFLI\DIRUPIRUSURGXFLQJHOHFWURQLFDOO\VWRUHGLQIRUPDWLRQWKHSHUVRQUHVSRQGLQJPXVW

    SURGXFHLWLQDIRUPRUIRUPVLQZKLFKLWLVRUGLQDULO\PDLQWDLQHGRULQDUHDVRQDEO\XVDEOHIRUPRUIRUPV

    (C)Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One

    Form. 7KHSHUVRQUHVSRQGLQJQHHGQRWSURGXFHWKHVDPHHOHFWURQLFDOO\VWRUHGLQIRUPDWLRQLQPRUHWKDQRQHIRUP(D)Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. 7KHSHUVRQUHVSRQGLQJQHHGQRWSURYLGHGLVFRYHU\RIHOHFWURQLFDOO\VWRUHG

    LQIRUPDWLRQIURPVRXUFHVWKDWWKHSHUVRQLGHQWLILHVDVQRWUHDVRQDEO\DFFHVVLEOHEHFDXVHRIXQGXHEXUGHQRUFRVW2QPRWLRQWRFRPSHOGLVFRYHU\RUIRUDSURWHFWLYHRUGHUWKHSHUVRQUHVSRQGLQJPXVWVKRZWKDWWKHLQIRUPDWLRQLVQRWUHDVRQDEO\DFFHVVLEOHEHFDXVHRIXQGXH

    EXUGHQRUFRVW,IWKDWVKRZLQJLVPDGHWKHFRXUWPD\QRQHWKHOHVVRUGHUGLVFRYHU\IURPVXFKVRXUFHVLIWKHUHTXHVWLQJSDUW\VKRZVJRRGFDXVHFRQVLGHULQJWKHOLPLWDWLRQVRI5XOHE&7KHFRXUWPD\VSHFLI\FRQGLWLRQVIRUWKHGLVFRYHU\(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.

    (A)Information Withheld. $SHUVRQZLWKKROGLQJVXESRHQDHGLQIRUPDWLRQXQGHUDFODLPWKDWLWLVSULYLOHJHGRUVXEMHFWWR

    SURWHFWLRQDVWULDOSUHSDUDWLRQPDWHULDOPXVW(i) H[SUHVVO\PDNHWKHFODLPDQG(ii) GHVFULEHWKHQDWXUHRIWKHZLWKKHOGGRFXPHQWV

    FRPPXQLFDWLRQVRUWDQJLEOHWKLQJVLQDPDQQHUWKDWZLWKRXWUHYHDOLQJLQIRUPDWLRQLWVHOISULYLOHJHGRUSURWHFWHGZLOOHQDEOHWKH

    SDUWLHVWRDVVHVVWKHFODLP

    (B)Information Produced. ,ILQIRUPDWLRQSURGXFHGLQUHVSRQVHWRDVXESRHQDLVVXEMHFWWRDFODLPRISULYLOHJHRURISURWHFWLRQDVWULDO

    SUHSDUDWLRQPDWHULDOWKHSHUVRQPDNLQJWKHFODLPPD\QRWLI\DQ\SDUW\WKDWUHFHLYHGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQRIWKHFODLPDQGWKHEDVLVIRULW$IWHUEHLQJQRWLILHGDSDUW\PXVWSURPSWO\UHWXUQVHTXHVWHURUGHVWUR\WKHVSHFLILHGLQIRUPDWLRQDQGDQ\FRSLHVLWKDVPXVWQRWXVHRUGLVFORVHWKHLQIRUPDWLRQXQWLOWKHFODLPLVUHVROYHGPXVWWDNHUHDVRQDEOHVWHSVWRUHWULHYHWKHLQIRUPDWLRQLIWKHSDUW\GLVFORVHGLW

    EHIRUHEHLQJQRWLILHGDQGPD\SURPSWO\SUHVHQWWKHLQIRUPDWLRQWRWKHFRXUWXQGHUVHDOIRUDGHWHUPLQDWLRQRIWKHFODLP7KHSHUVRQZKRSURGXFHGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQPXVWSUHVHUYHWKHLQIRUPDWLRQXQWLO

    WKHFODLPLVUHVROYHG

    (e) Contempt. 7KHLVVXLQJFRXUWPD\KROGLQFRQWHPSWDSHUVRQZKRKDYLQJEHHQVHUYHGIDLOVZLWKRXWDGHTXDWHH[FXVHWRREH\WKHVXESRHQD$QRQSDUW\VIDLOXUHWRREH\PXVWEHH[FXVHGLIWKHVXESRHQDSXUSRUWVWRUHTXLUHWKHQRQSDUW\WRDWWHQGRUSURGXFHDWD

    SODFHRXWVLGHWKHOLPLWVRI5XOHF$LL

    Case4:10-cv-04381-CW Document4-1 Filed10/08/10 Page6 of 6