10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    1/56

    Electronic DevicesMetal-Semiconductor junctions

    prof. ing. Gianluca GiustolisiUniversit a degli studi di Catania

    Academic Year 2012/2013(ver. January 16, 2013)

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    2/56

    The Schottky barrier diode

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    3/56

    The Schottky barrier diode

    A Schottky barrier contact is made between a metal and a

    semiconductorIn general the semiconductor is n-typeThe vacuum level is used as reference level ( E vac )m and s are the metal and the semiconductor workfunctions, respectively ( m > s )

    is the electron afnity of the semiconductor

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    4/56

    Work functions and Electron afnities

    Work functionElement mAg, silver 4.26

    Al, aluminium 4.28Au, gold 5.10Cr, chromium 4.50Mo, molybdenum 4.60Ni, nickel 5.15

    Pd, palladium 5.12Pt, platinum 5.65Ti, titanium 4.33W, tungsten 4.55

    Electron afnity

    Element Ge, germanium 4.13

    Si, silicon 4.01GaAs, gallium arsenide 4.07AlAs, aluminium arsenide 3.50

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    5/56

    The Schottky barrier diode

    Joining the two materials, electrons will ow into the metaland a space charge region is created in the semiconductorThe Fermi level becomes a constant through the system inthermal equilibriumTwo barriers ( B 0 and V bi ) are createdW is the space charge region width

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    6/56

    The Schottky barrier

    B 0 is the Schottky barrier that represents the potentialbarrier seen by electrons in the metal trying to move intothe semiconductor

    B 0 = m The barrier is independent of the semiconductor dopingconcentration

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    7/56

    The built-in potential

    V bi is the built-in potential barrier, that is, the barrier seenby electrons in the semiconductor conduction band tryingto move into the metal

    V bi = m s = B 0 n The barrier depends on the semiconductor doping

    concentration as n = V t lnN c N d =

    E g 2q V t ln

    N d n i

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    8/56

    Reverse bias

    Applying V R to the semiconductor with respect to themetal, the semiconductor-to-metal barrier increases whileB 0 remains constantThe current is constant and is supported by the smallnumber of electrons that ows across B 0

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    9/56

    Forward bias

    Applying V a to the metal with respect to the semiconductor,the semiconductor-to-metal barrier decreasesElectrons can more easily ow from the semiconductor tothe metalNote that the current is supported by majority carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    10/56

    Ideal junction properties

    The electrostatic eld in the space charge region is due to

    the semiconductor charge density made of positive ionsdE dx

    = (x )

    s =

    qN d s

    for 0 x x n Integrating the Poisson equation, we have

    E = qN d s dx = qN d x s + C 1The electric eld is zero in x = x n , then

    E = qN d

    s (x x n )In the metal, a negative surface charge exists at themetal-semiconductor junction

    (x ) = qN d x n (x )

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    11/56

    Ideal junction properties

    The space charge region width is

    W = x n = 2 s qN d

    (V bi + V R )1/ 2

    A junction capacitance exists

    C = dQ dV R

    = qN d dx n dV R

    = q s N d

    2 (V bi + V R )

    1/ 2

    As for pn junctions we have

    1C

    2

    = 2 (V bi + V R )

    q s N d

    which can be used to determine V bi , N d and, after few

    manipulations, B 0

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    12/56

    Ideal junction properties

    Nonideal effects on the barrier height

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    13/56

    Nonideal effects on the barrier heightImage-force-induced lowering of the potential barrier (Schottky effect)

    In vacuum, an electron q placed at a distance x from ametal layer will create an electric eldThe eld lines shall be perpendicular to the metal surfaceThe electron behaves as if no metal exists and a positivecharge + q is placed at the same distance from the metalsurface in x (image charge )In our case, a similar model exists by using the electroneffective mass and the semiconductor dielectric constant

    Nonideal effects on the barrier height

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    14/56

    Nonideal effects on the barrier heightImage-force-induced lowering of the potential barrier (Schottky effect)

    Due to the image charge, the force acting on the electron

    q placed in x is

    F ic = q 2

    4 s (2x )2 = q E

    The electric eld in x is

    E ic = q

    16 s x 2

    And the electric potential results

    ic (x ) =

    x

    + E ( ) d =

    = +

    x

    q 16 s 2

    d =

    =

    q 16

    s

    1

    +

    x

    = q

    16 s x

    Nonideal effects on the barrier height

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    15/56

    Nonideal effects on the barrier heightImage-force-induced lowering of the potential barrier (Schottky effect)

    Given the potential

    ic (x ) = q

    16 s x the energy set by the image charge is

    E ic (x ) = q ic (x ) = q 2

    16 s x This contribution must be added to the energy set by theideal Schottky barrier theory

    Nonideal effects on the barrier height

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    16/56

    Nonideal effects on the barrier heightImage-force-induced lowering of the potential barrier (Schottky effect)

    The energy set by the ideal Schottky barrier theory

    decreases almost linearly in proximity of themetal-semiconductor junction, hence

    E sb (x ) E sb (0) + dE sb

    dx x = 0 x = E sb (0) (q E sb )x

    being E sb the (positive and constant) electric eldgenerated by the Schottky barrier 1 at x = 0The overall energy is

    E (x ) = E ic (x ) + E sb (x ) = E sb (0) q 2

    16 s x q E sb x 1Remember that the electric eld and the energy are related by

    E (x ) = 1

    q

    dE (x )

    dx

    which denes E sb = 1

    q

    dE sb

    dx x = 0> 0

    Nonideal effects on the barrier height

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    17/56

    Nonideal effects on the barrier heightImage-force-induced lowering of the potential barrier (Schottky effect)

    The overall energy E (x ) = E sb (0) q 2

    16 s x q E sb x has amaximum atx m = q 16 s E sb

    which results

    E m = E sb (0)

    q

    q E sb 4 s

    Nonideal effects on the barrier height

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    18/56

    Nonideal effects on the barrier heightImage-force-induced lowering of the potential barrier (Schottky effect)

    The peak potential barrier is then lowered ( Schottky effect )With respect to the ideal case, the barrier lowering is set by

    = E m E sb (0)

    q = q E sb 4 s

    The barrier height seen by electrons in the metal is now

    Bn = B 0

    Nonideal effects on the barrier height

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    19/56

    Nonideal effects on the barrier heightEffects of the surface states

    Experimental measurements shows a monotonic relationbetween the work function and the barrier heightHowever the relationship is not linear as expected

    Bn on GaAs

    Metal Bn Au 0.87

    Bn on Si

    Metal Bn Al 0.55Au 0.81Pt 0.89W 0.68

    Nonideal effects on the barrier height

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    20/56

    Nonideal effects on the barrier heightEffects of the surface states

    Surface states may greatly inuence the potential barrieras wellSince the surface state density is not predictable with anydegree of certainty, the barrier height must be anexperimentally determined parameter

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    21/56

    Current-Voltage relationship

    Current Voltage relationship

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    22/56

    Current-Voltage relationship

    The current across a metal-semiconductor junction ismainly due to majority carriersThree different mechanisms exists

    Drift/diffusion of carriers from the semiconductor into themetalThermionic emission of carriers across the Schottky barrierQuantum-mechanical tunneling through the barrier

    Typically, only one current mechanism dominates

    Drift/diffusion current

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    23/56

    Drift/diffusion current

    Electrons are pushed

    from the semiconductorto the metal thanks to acombination ofdrift/diffusion processThe process takesplace in thesemiconductordepletion region [, x d ],with > 0 and 0

    Actually, the depletionregion does not extendup to the point x = 0because of theSchottky effect

    Drift/diffusion current

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    24/56

    Drift/diffusion current

    Let us consider the total electron current

    J dd = q n n E + D n dn dx

    = qD n n V t

    ddx

    + dn dx

    Let us multiply both members by exp V t

    J dd e

    V t = qD n n V t

    e

    V t ddx

    + e

    V t dn dx

    = qD n d

    dx n e

    V t

    Let us integrate it over the depletion region [, x d ]

    J dd =qD n n e

    V t

    x d

    x = x d

    x = e

    V t dx =

    qD n n (x d )e

    (x d )V t n ()e

    ( )

    V t

    x d x = e

    V t dx

    Drift/diffusion current

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    25/56

    Drift/diffusion current

    We set the reference potential at x m 0, i.e., where E c hasthe maximum, E c (x m ). Hence (x m ) = 0In x = x d we have

    n (x d ) = N d = N c e

    E c (x d ) E Fn (x d )kT = N c e

    Bn V bi

    V t

    (x d ) = V bi V a Hence we have

    n (x d )e

    (x d )V t = N c e

    Bn V bi

    V t e

    V bi V a V t = N c e

    Bn V t e

    V a V t

    Drift/diffusion current

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    26/56

    Drift/diffusion current

    In x = we have

    n () = N c e

    E c ( ) E Fn ( )kT

    () = E c () E c (x m )

    q = Bn

    E c () E Fm q

    Hence we have

    n ()e ( )

    V t = N c eE Fn ( ) E c ( )

    kT e q Bn + E c ( ) E Fm

    kT = N c e Bn

    V t eE Fn ( ) E Fm

    kT

    Drift/diffusion current

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    27/56

    Drift/diffusion current

    The total electron current is

    J dd =qD n n (x d )e

    (x d )V t n ()e

    ( )V t

    x d

    e

    V t dx =

    = qD n N c e

    Bn V t

    e

    V a V t

    eE Fn ( ) E Fm

    kT

    x d

    e

    V t dx

    The integral

    x d

    e

    V t dx may be solved assuming that (x )is the solution of the Poisson equation d2 dx 2 = qN d s , that is

    (x ) = qN d 2 s

    (x x d )2+qN d x 2d

    2 s =

    qN d x 2d 2 s

    1 1 x x d

    2

    Drift/diffusion current

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    28/56

    Drift/diffusion current

    Since (x d ) = qN d x 2d

    2 s = V bi V a we have(x ) = ( V bi V a ) 1 1

    x x d

    2

    2(V bi V a )

    x d x

    where the quadratic term has been neglected to simplifythe integral evaluationMoreover, since

    V bi V a = E max x d

    2

    we may write also(x ) = E max x

    Drift/diffusion current

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    29/56

    Drift/diffusion current

    The integral

    x d

    e

    V t dx becomes

    x d

    e

    V t dx

    x d

    0e

    E max

    V t x dx =

    V t

    E max1 e

    E max x d

    V t =

    = V t

    E max

    1 e

    2(V bi V a )V t

    V t

    E max

    where we assumed 2 (V bi V a ) > 4V t and

    E max = 2qN d (V bi V a )s The total electron current is

    J dd = q n E max N c e

    Bn V t e

    V a V t e

    E Fn ( ) E Fm kT

    Drift/diffusion current

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    30/56

    The overall current may be written in the form

    J dd = J dds eqV a kT

    e

    E Fn ( ) E Fm kT

    where, the saturation current is dened as

    J dds = q n E max N c exp q B 0kT

    expq kT

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    31/56

    Only electrons with an

    energy larger than thetop of the barrier maycross the barrierElectrons in the metalmust cross the xedbarrier q Bn (currentJ ms )Electrons in thesemiconductor must

    cross the variablebarrier q (V bi V a )(current J sm )

    J n = J sm

    J ms

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    32/56

    The thermionic current must be evaluated at x = The ow coming from the semiconductor is made ofcarriers having energy higher than the barrier, E 0c = E c |x = 0

    J s m =

    E = E 0c qv x dn =

    E = E 0c qv x dn dE

    dE

    The concentration of electrons between E and E + dE is

    dn = g c (E )f F (E )dE

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    33/56

    Considering that

    g c (E ) = 4(2m

    n )3

    2

    h 3 E E c and f F (E ) exp E E Fn

    kT

    where E Fn = E Fn () and E c = E c (), we may write

    dn dE dE =

    4(2m n )3/ 2

    h 3 E E c exp E

    E

    Fn kT dE

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    34/56

    Assuming a parabolic conduction band (with constant m n ),we may relate the carrier energy, E , to its velocity v , so that

    E E c = 12

    m n v 2 ; dE = m n v dv ; E E c = v m

    n

    2

    The exponential term e E E Fn

    kT may be written as

    e E E Fn

    kT = e E E c

    kT e E c E

    Fn

    kT = e m n v

    2

    2kT e E c E

    Fn

    kT

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    35/56

    The term dn dE dE becomes

    dn dE dE = 4(2m

    n )3/ 2

    h 3 v m

    n 2 e

    m n v

    2

    2kT e E c E

    Fn

    kT m n v dv

    = 2 (m n / h )3 e

    E c E Fn

    kT e m n v

    2

    2kT 4v 2dv

    Replacing v 2 = v 2x + v 2y + v 2z and observing that

    4v 2dv = dv x dv y dv z we have

    J s m = v 0x

    v x = +

    v y = +

    v z = qv x 2m n h

    3

    e E c E

    Fn

    kT

    e

    m n v 2x

    2kT e m n v

    2y

    2kT e m n v

    2z

    2kT dv x dv

    y dv

    z

    For v y and v z the integrals are extended over any velocityin any verse ( + and signs)Along the x -axis, only negative velocities are consideredA minimum velocity, v 0x (i.e., energy) is required toovercome the barrier

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    36/56

    The term d n (v ) = f (v )dv represents the number ofelectrons in the innitesimal volume 4 v 2dv The number of electrons in the innitesimal volumedv x dv y dv z placed at a distance v from the center, i.e.,dn (v x , v y , v z ), is found dividing f (v )dv by the innitesimalvolume 4 v 2dv and multiplying the result by the

    innitesimal volume d v x dv y dv z , that is

    dn (v x , v y , v z ) = f (v )dv 4v 2dv

    dv x dv y dv z = f (v )4v 2

    dv x dv y dv z

    Hence we may write

    V f (v ) dv = V Z V Y V X f (v )4v 2 dv x dv y dv z where v 2 = v 2

    x + v 2

    y + v 2

    z

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    37/56

    Manipulating the terms we have

    J s m = 2m n h

    3e

    E c E Fn kT

    v 0x

    v x = qv x e

    m n v 2x 2kT dv x

    +

    v y = e

    m n v 2y

    2kT dv y +

    v z = e

    m n v 2z

    2kT dv z

    Integrals over v y and v z may be solved considering that

    +

    e x 22 dx = 2

    hence we have

    +

    e m n v

    2y

    2kT dv y = kT m n +

    e m n v

    2y

    2kT d m

    n kT v y = 2kT m n

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    38/56

    The integral over v x becomes

    v 0x

    qv x e

    m n v 2x 2kT dv x =

    q 2

    v 0x

    e m n v 2x

    2kT dv 2x =

    = q 2

    2kT m n

    v 0x

    e m n v

    2x

    2kT d m

    n 2kT v

    2x =

    = + qkT m n

    e m n v 2x

    2kT v 0x

    = qkT m n

    e m n v 20x

    2kT

    The term 12 m

    n v 2ox is the minimum kinetic energy required toovercome the barrier and is equal to E 0

    c E

    c The integral over v x is

    v 0x

    qv x e

    m n v 2x

    2kT dv x = qkT

    m n exp

    E 0c E c kT

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    39/56

    Combining the terms we have

    J s m = 2 m

    n h

    3

    e E c

    E

    Fn

    kT qkT m n e E

    0c E

    c

    kT 2kT m n =

    = 4qm n k 2

    h 3 T 2e

    E 0c E Fn

    kT = 4qm n k 2

    h 3 T 2e

    E 0c E Fm E Fn + E Fm

    kT =

    = 4qm

    n k 2

    h 3 T 2e

    q Bn kT e

    E Fn E Fm kT

    Thermionic emission of carriers

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    40/56

    The current of electrons owing from the semiconductor is

    J s m = AT 2e

    q Bn kT e

    E Fn E Fm kT

    where we have dened the effective Richardson constant

    A = 4qm

    n k 2

    h 3

    The current of electrons owing from the metal is constantsince the barrier height is almost constant

    J m s is then equal to J

    s m for V a = 0 and E Fn = E Fm

    The overall current is then

    J = J s m J m s = AT 2e

    q Bn kT e

    E Fn E Fm kT 1

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    41/56

    Current-Voltage relationship

  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    42/56

    We have found that

    J dd

    = J dds e

    qV a kT

    eE Fn ( ) E Fm

    kT

    J = J s eE Fn ( ) E Fm

    kT 1

    Since J n = J dd = J , setting = eE Fn ( ) E Fm

    kT , we have

    J dds eqV a kT = J s ( 1)

    Solving for yields

    = J dds e

    qV a kT + J s

    J dds + J s Substituting into J , the nal current results

    J n = J dds J s

    J dds + J

    s

    eqV a kT

    1

    Current-Voltage relationship

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    43/56

    Experimental and theoreticalreverse-bias currents in PtSi-Si

    diode

    Forward-bias current density J F versus V a for W-Si and W-GaAs

    diodes

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    44/56

    Metal-semiconductor ohmic contacts

    Metal-semiconductor ohmic contacts

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    45/56

    Contacts must be made between any semiconductordevice and the outside worldThese contacts are made via ohmic contacts

    They are non-rectifying metal-semiconductor contactsWe have two types of non-rectifying contacts

    Ideal non-rectifying barrierTunneling barrier

    A specic contact resistance is used to characterize ohmiccontacts

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    46/56

    Ideal non-rectifying barriers

  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    47/56

    When a positive voltage is applied to the metal, energy

    bands in the semiconductor bend and electrons may easilyow downhill into the metalWhen a positive voltage is applied to the semiconductor,electrons can easily ow over the barrier into thesemiconductorThis junction performs an ohmic contact

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    48/56

    Tunneling barrier

  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    49/56

    The space charge width in rectifying metal-semiconductorcontact is inversely proportional to the square root of the

    semiconductor doping

    x d = 2 s V bi qN d As the doping concentration increases, the probability oftunneling through the barrier increases

    Tunneling barrier

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    50/56

    Let us analyze the case of a particle entering a potentialbarrier in x

    [0 , L] with an energy, E , lower than the

    potential energy, V (x )The Schr odinger equation is

    d2

    dx 2(x )

    2m n 2

    [V (x ) E ](x ) = 0If V (x ) = V 0 = constant, the solution for a particle movingalong the positive axis takes the form

    (x ) = (x 0)e K (x x 0 ) with K =

    2m n (V 0 E )

    If V (x ) does not change in the interval [x , x + dx ], we maywrite

    (x + dx ) = (x )e K (x )dx with K =2m n [V (x ) E ]

    Tunneling barrier

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    51/56

    Manipulating the solution in [x , x + dx ], we have

    ln (x + dx )(x ) = K (x )dx Expanding (x + dx ) in Taylor series, we have

    (x + dx ) = (x ) + ddx dx

    Substituting in the solution leads to

    ln 1 + 1

    (x )

    d

    dx dx =

    K (x )dx

    Approximating ln (1 + x ) x we have1

    (x )ddx

    dx = K (x )dx

    Tunneling barrier

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    52/56

    Integrating from x = 0 to L

    L

    0

    1(x )

    ddx

    dx = (L)

    (0)

    d(x )

    = ln(L)(0)

    = L

    0K (x ) dx

    Which leads to the nal solution

    (L) = (0) exp L

    0K (x ) dx

    The transmission coefcient is

    = (L)(L)(0)(0)

    = exp 2 L

    0K (x ) dx

    Tunneling barrier

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    53/56

    Assume the barrier has a triangular form of height q Bn and extension L

    V (x )E = q Bn 1 x L K (x ) = 2m

    n q Bn 1 x L

    The integral is

    L

    0K (x ) dx =

    2m n q

    Bn L

    0 1 x L dx =

    23 L

    2m n q

    Bn

    Tunneling barrier

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    54/56

    The transmission coefcient results

    = exp 43 L 2m n q Bn

    with L = 2 s V bi qN d The tunneling current takes the form

    J T = qv R n

    where n is the density of available electrons and v R may beassumed equal to the Richardson velocity

    v R = kT 2m n The tunneling probability is a strong function of the doping

    concentration

    Specic contact resistance

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    55/56

    A gure of merit of ohmic contacts is the specic contactresistance, R c This is dened as the reciprocal of the derivative of thecurrent density with respect to voltage at zero bias

    R c = J

    V

    1

    V = 0

    cm 2

    For a rectifying contact where the thermionic emissiondominates we have

    J = A

    T 2

    exp q Bn kT exp

    qV kT 1

    and

    R c =kT q exp +

    q Bn kT

    A

    T2

    Specic contact resistance

    http://find/
  • 8/13/2019 10 Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

    56/56

    For a metal-semiconductor

    junction with high impuritydoping concentration thetunneling process willdominate and the currentdensity is

    J exp 1

    N d The specic contactresistance is

    R c exp + 1

    N d

    http://find/