11 1 12 0204 599 607 Email to King Re Records Formally Complaining of Kings SCR 105(2)(c) Violations Obstructing Access to Records

7/27/2019 11 1 12 0204 599 607 Email to King Re Records Formally Complaining of Kings SCR 105(2)(c) Violations Obstructi

1/7

RE: Records

From: Zach Coughlin([email protected])

Sent: Thu 11/01/12 4:43 PM

To: Patrick King ([email protected]); [email protected]

([email protected]); [email protected] ([email protected]);

[email protected] ([email protected]); [email protected]

([email protected]); [email protected] ([email protected]);

[email protected] ([email protected])

Dear Mr. King,

I am writing to formally complaint about your, once again, reneging on anoffer you have made to allow me access to certain materials.

Please explain your repeated misrepresentations to me regarding the "access"

you will allow me to the materials I am entitled to view, and those you havemade offers in writing to me to allow me to view and or review.

I think you might find that the attached video of Sargent Lopez pretty much

vitiates the criminal trespass conviction (and that conviction, and all of JudgeNash Holmes orders are void in light of there violation of NRS 178.405 vis a

vis NRS 5.010 and the admission in Judge Nash Holmes March 14th, 2012letter to the SBN, and beyond that In re Oliver and the fact that Judge Nash

Holmes admits on the record to be basing her Order's upon conduct not

committed in her "immediate presence" (an allegation of having a RMCMarshals look "Peeping Tom" style through a bathroom stall doesn't cut it)...

Interesting that you have chosen to subpoena your former Attorney General's

coworke Dan Wong rather than City Attorney Ormaas (given her presence atthe 2/27/12 11 TR26800 Trial from which the "summary criminal contempt"

order stems, and the allegations of her and that RMC Marshal Harley (whom

violated the "courthouse sanctuary" doctrine in one of the worst waysimaginable with his barging in on a plea bargain session to "personally serve"

a Notice of Order to Show Cause on behalf of Richard G. Hill (and the 11 tr

26800 case involved traffic citations immediately after RPD Tarter toldCoughlin to leave Hill's office, albeit without his wallet, keys, client's files,


2/7

or state issued identification....) then to have the same

WCSO Deputy Machen who lied about personally serving the lockout orderon Coughlin (in the eviction involving Hill) again lie in his 3 7 2012

Affidavit attesting to have served the notice of the 3 23 12 ORder to Show

Cause hearing (the one RMC Marshal Harley served for him, then got alljumpy and whispering in Ormaas's, and, apparently while Coughlin was in the

restroom, made allegations to Judge Nash Holmes (and afterwards incident tothe SITA) seeking to cover up his misconduct and that of Ormaas. Claiborneis not going to allow you to feign ignorance, Mr. King, nor is the proof of

receipt of all my emails and writings and media. Have fun reviewing it all.

Regardless, its not "summary contempt" if all essential elements of the

allegation, under any iteration of NRS 22 are not alleged to have occurred in

the "immediate presence" of the Judge...where, as here, that is not the case,

those RMC Marshal are going to have to sign their names to affidavits likethe big boys they strut around acting like they are, behaving in a menacing and

intimidating manner that is wholly inconsistent with traditional notions of thetype of comportment required of officers of the court.

Again, today, you have reverted to your old tricks. I want everything, not just

that which you or Clerk/Investigator Peters deem "related' to the SCR 105"Complaint" (which has three case numbers on it ng12-0204, ng12-0434, and

ng12-0435). Both you and Peters get real evasive when it comes times toanswer for who submitted or filed the ng12-0435 grievance consisting of athree year old Order by Family Court Judge Linda Garnder, yet which bares a

file stamp of March 15th, 2012 by the SBN...then there is Judge Linda

Gardner's brother, RMC Judge William Gardner refusing to recuse himselffrom the criminal trespass case, resulting in a conviction

Mr. King, one of of our recent discusson you promised to send me something inwriting informing me as to who exactly was on the screening panel. You have

failed to uphold that promise as well. Further, you and Clerk/Investigator Peters

have remained evasive and contradictory respecting who filed NG12-0435,

when, and under what circumstances it came to be a grievance. I think you will

find that a review of the hearings you finally provided in 11 CR 26405 (April

10th and May 8th, 2012) will yield some really intersting statements on the

record by Keith Loomis, Esq. (your Minden associate) and Judge William

Gardner of the RMC (brother to Family Court Judge Linda Garnder, whose 2009


3/7

sanctions order was file stamped by the SBN on March 15th, 2012 and is now

called NG12-0435, though neither you nor Peters will say anything all that

sensible about the genesis of that grievance, etc. Judge Gardner makes some

pretty curious statements respecting the competency analysis, the decision to

plow ahead with a Trial Setting on March 7th, 2012 for April 10th, 2012

(intersesting considering Coughlin filed the Notice of Appeal of the final,

appealable "summary criminal contempt" conviction on that same date, March7th, 2012 that now forms part of the asis for Judge Nash Holmes ng12-0434

"decompensating" grievance, incident to her March 14th, 2012 letter to the

SBN....you might want to have Judge Gardner's statements on the record from

4/10/12 and 5/8/12 and Loomis's transcribed, as your possession of the audio

thereof arguably puts a Claiborne-esque duty upon you to inquire as to the candor

and veracity of some of those statements, especially vis a vis the "meetings"

Gardners being the RMC's "Administrative Judge", etc., etc. Further, you have

refused to allow me access to a number of materials that neither you nor Peters

deem "part of the complaint" (the SCR SBN v Coughlin complaint...though to the

extent one or more of ng12-0204, ng12-0434, 0435 mention the RMC, arguably, I

am entitled to anything at all related to me, whether submitted by the WCSO,

RMC, City of Reno, City of Reno Marshals, etc.

Patrick King ([email protected]) Add to contacts 3/27/12 To:

[email protected] From: Patrick King ([email protected])This

sender is in your safe list. Sent: Tue 3/27/12 9:24 AM To:

[email protected] ([email protected]) March 27, 2012 Dear

Mr. Coughlin, Perhaps you are not fully aware of your behavior. At our brief

meeting yesterday I perceived you as very hostile and even threatening. Underthose circumstances I felt it better to terminate the meeting. If it was not your

intent to appear hostile or to attempt to intimidate me then you might consider

how I perceived your conduct. I had intended to try to listen to you and determine

how my office could best help you address the grievances that I have received.

You said you did not have time and simply wanted to argue about your receipt of

e-mail or mail. I did not say that I did not care if you received the information I

sent to you, I said I did not care how your received it, so long as you received it. I

do care that you receive the information that I send to you. As I attempted to


4/7

explain, I will be meeting with a panel to have them make a determination about

the grievances that have been made against you by Mr. Hill and the Judge from

Department 3 that you read at my office. I have asked for a written response to

those grievances. In response I received many e-mails with attachments. I will

soon be sharing the grievances with a disciplinary panel and will advise them of

your responses to date. I will keep you advised of the panels determination.

Sincerely, Patrick King Actions Zach Coughlin ([email protected])3/26/12 To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear

Mr. King, This correspondence is sent to confirm that I visited the Double R

Blvd. offices of the State Bar of Nevada today and attempted to be provided

access the the various "other different judges" grievances that I, prior to last

Friday, was completely unaware of. I have sent you several written

correspondences detailing the tampering and other problems with my USPS mail

incident to the two domestic abuser attacks I have been subject to since

approximately 1/1/12, and ask that you copy my on all correspondences or

document production via email and fax. Today, you showed me a two page letter

from Judge Nash Holmes. Did you interpret it to be a "grievance"? How is that

designation arrived at? You refused to identify the names of any other judges from

whom you have received any other similar such materials and further refused to

allow me to view and such items. I asked for a copy of the large box of

documents, and other FOIA request materials and you refused. Further, you told

me you didn't care I received anything you sent me and stated that I did not have a

right to review such complaint letters, grievances, or other materials, prior to

being questioned by you and before any such meeting. I informed you that I amconsidering different attorneys to represent me right now, and indicated I need

these materials to prepare for any future meeting with you. My records incidate

that your letter of 3/16/12 is inaccurate to the extent it indicates that I was copied

on that letter via email on that date. Please let me know if you received any sort

of "return to sender" letter for that mailing. Sincerely, Zach Coughlin, Esq., PO

BOX 60952, RENO, NV, 89506, tel: 775 338 8118, fax: 949 667 7402;

[email protected] Nevada Bar No: 9473 2012 Microsoft Terms

Privacy Developers English (United States)

From: Patrick King ([email protected]) This sender is in your safe list. Sent:

Mon 4/02/12 3:57 PM To: [email protected] Dear Mr. Coughlin, I have

opened 3 disciplinary files against you. They are identified by number below:

NG12-0204 Zachary B. Coughlin, Esq. Bar No. 9473 (2005) Mr. Hill NG12-


5/7

0435 Zachary B. Coughlin, Esq. Bar No. 9473 (2005) Judge Holmes NG12-0434

Zachary B. Coughlin, Esq. Bar No. 9473 (2005) Judge Gardner You have

received the grievance from Mr. Hill and also the grievance from Judge Holmes.

The Grievance from Judge Gardner relates to her Order After Trial in the case

of Ashwin Joshi v Barti Joshi, Case Number DV08-01168, wherein she

describes your conduct at pages 12 and 13. I have received certified copies of the

contempt orders, a certified copy of the conviction at Wal-Mart, and an incidentreport from Marshals Thompson and Coppa regarding your conduct on March 22,

2012. I also have the recordings of the court proceedings at issue. At this time, I

do not expect to be providing you with any additional information. If you have

additional information that you want me to be made aware of in response to the

grievances identified above please feel free to mail them to me. Sincerely,

Patrick King, Assistant Bar Counsel

\

From: Patrick King([email protected]) This sender is in your safe list.

Sent: Thu 4/19/12 2:28 PM

To: [email protected] ([email protected])

April 19, 2012

Zach Coughlin

Dear Mr. Coughlin,

A screening panel of the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Panel met on Tuesday April 10, 2011 toaddress the grievances filed against you. The panel directed me to proceed to a formal disciplinaryhearing. As such, I will be preparing a formal Complaint.
https://bay002.mail.live.com/mail/options.aspx?subsection=6&n=523106870&selection=PatrickK%40nvbar.org


6/7

I understand from the e-mail below, that you do not believe you should have been foundguilty of the theft at Wal-Mart and that you should not have been found in contempt of Court. However,it must concern you that you were found in contempt of Court by more than one Judge in two differenttrials. You wanted to know how I learned of or obtained a copy of Judge Gardners Order after trial thatwas filed in 2009. It was sent to me by the clerk of the court at my request, pursuant to myinvestigation.

It would help me and perhaps yourself, if you would respond and explain why you wereconvicted of theft and why you were held in contempt of Court. You may be well served to explain whatremedial measures you are taking to make sure you do not repeat the conduct complained about. Icannot give you legal advice. However I can suggest you cooperate with Bar counsels investigation andthat you respond specifically to the allegations contained in Judge Holmes and Richard Hill s grievanceletters to the office of Bar Counsel.

Patrick King

Zach has 16 filesto share with you on SkyDrive. To view them, click the links below.

EMAILS TO [email protected] PATRICK KING BAR COUNSEL.pdf

emails from [email protected] to Patrick King [email protected] since 3 23 12.pdf

emails since 3 23 12 from [email protected] Patrick King Bar Counsel State Bar of Nevada.pdf

5 4 09 attachment to wlc elcano email gardner 26405 01955 60302 ltrCoughlin2ndDraft.pdf

5 7 09 termination letter from wls elcano linda gardner zachcoughlin040709.pdf

5 6 09 email from wls ed elcano 26405 60302 garnder 01955 10896 60302 26800 60317 54844.pdf

11TR26800 RMC 022712 031412_20120312-1033_01cd003b8f0851d0.mp3

11CR26405 050812 Loomis_20120508-1104_01cd2d0a627f5f90.mp3

11TR26800 RMC 022712 031412_20120227-1507_01ccf5618f76c460.mp3

3 16 12 ng12-0434 SBN King letter containing RMC Judge Nash Homes 3 14 12 grievance against

Coughlin and ng12-0435 linda gardner sanction from 4 10 09 26800 00696 54844.pdf

2 14 12 SBN KING LETTER WITH HILL GRIEVANCE ATTACHED RCR2011-063341 RPD RMC 11 CR 00696

WCSO SUSICH ME.pdf

11cr26405 puentes 041012_20120410-0903_01cd16f8c3aa49b0.mp3
https://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214066&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214066&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214063&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214063&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214062&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214062&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214065&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214065&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214064&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214064&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214061&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214061&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214058&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214058&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214059&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214059&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214056&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214056&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214055&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214055&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214057&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214057&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214060&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214060&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=browse&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&sc=Photos&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMail


7/7

rpd sargent lopez i have a question for you 11 cr 26405 00696 26800.wmv

2 27 12 and 3 8 12 Affidavits of Service by WCSO Machen in 1708 and 03628 26800 00696 marshal

harley.pdf

rerevised exhibit 1 26405 61901 WITH BATES NUMBERING.pdf

12-32685 10 15 12 scr 111(4) in re coughlin petition criminal trespass conviction 61901 26405 1708

26800 12420 hill sbn.pdf

Download all

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

CC: [email protected]

Subject: Records

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:04:21 +0000

Good Morning Mr. Coughlin,

Your disciplinary file is being sent to the printer to be copied. I am having the documents bate

stamped and the printing company will mail them to you.

Formal proceeding are taking place at the state bar office so you wil l not be permitted in the

building.
https://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=downloadaszip&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214069&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214069&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214070&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214070&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214068&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214068&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214067&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%214067&parid=43084638F32F5F28%214054&authkey=%21AIJNhKfoPCfii3Y&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMail

Documents

11 1 12 0204 599 607 Email to King Re Records Formally Complaining of Kings SCR 105(2)(c) Violations Obstructing Access to Records