18
11 Conceptual Site Planning Study PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 12 URBAN CONTEXT 13 VIEW 14 SITE GRADING 16 EXISTING STRUCTURES 16 STRUCTURAL AND SEISMIC CONSTRAINTS 18 CRUISE INDUSTRY AND ACTIVITY OUTLOOKS 19 CRUISE TERMINAL TRAFFIC DATA 21 CRUISE TERMINAL FACILITY 24 OPEN SPACE 26 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA

11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

11

Co

nc

ep

tua

l S

ite

Pla

nn

ing

Stu

dy

PREL

IMIN

ARY

DEV

ELO

PMEN

T CR

ITER

IA

12

URBA

N C

ON

TEXT

13

VIEW

14

SITE

GRAD

ING

16

EXIS

TIN

G S

TRU

CTU

RES

16

STRU

CTU

RAL

AN

D S

EISM

IC C

ON

STRAI

NTS

18

CRU

ISE

IND

UST

RY A

ND

ACT

IVIT

Y O

UTL

OO

KS

19

CRU

ISE

TERM

INAL

TRAF

FIC

DAT

A

21

CRU

ISE

TERM

INAL

FAC

ILIT

Y

24 O

PEN

SPA

CE

26

2 |

SI

TE

AN

AL

YS

IS

AN

D D

ES

IG

N C

RI

TE

RI

A

Page 2: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

12

Pie

r 2

7 C

ruis

e T

erm

ina

l

A n

ew cr

uise

term

inal

with

an effi

cie

nt v

ehic

ular

circ

ulat

ion

area

is

the

high

est

prio

rity

for

the

pr

ojec

t.

The

Nor

thea

st

Wha

rf

Plaz

a w

ill

be

ac

com

mod

ated

and

des

igne

d to

max

imiz

e us

e by

vis

itors

and

res

iden

ts, p

rovi

ded

that

it d

oes

not i

nter

fere

with

cru

ise

line

oper

atio

ns.

This

cru

ise

term

inal

pro

ject

mus

t mee

t cur

rent

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal s

tand

ards

for o

ne p

rim

ary

bert

h fo

r hom

e po

rt c

ruis

e te

rmin

al.

The

crui

se t

erm

inal

bui

ldin

g m

ust

effi c

ient

ly

ac

com

mod

ate

peak

use

rs.

Pier

27 sh

ed sh

ould

be r

enov

ated

to a

wor

ld-c

lass

hom

e po

rt c

ruis

e te

rmin

al, w

hile

not

trig

geri

ng

a se

ism

ic re

trofi

t of

the

pier

sub

stru

ctur

e.

PREL

IMIN

ARY

DEV

ELO

PMEN

T CR

ITER

IAW

hile

rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s ar

e ne

eded

in

the

ar

ea, t

hey

are

subo

rdin

ate

to th

e cr

uise

term

inal

an

d op

en s

pace

req

uire

men

ts. R

ecre

atio

n us

es

may

be

acco

mm

odat

ed i

n th

e Pi

er 2

9 sh

ed

(alth

ough

she

d co

lum

ns m

ay r

estr

ict

a fu

ll ra

nge

of r

ecre

atio

nal a

ctiv

ities

). Th

ere

may

be

avai

labl

e sp

ace

for r

ecre

atio

nal u

ses w

ithin

Pie

r 27

and

the

val

ley

area

, pro

vide

d th

at t

hey

do

not i

nter

fere

with

cru

ise

func

tions

and

sec

urity

re

quir

emen

ts.

Pier

27

faci

litie

s sh

ould

acc

omm

odat

e sh

ared

use

to

gene

rate

re

venu

e an

d pr

ovid

e a

com

mun

ity b

enefi

t, p

rovi

ded

that

thes

e us

es d

o no

t int

erfe

re w

ith c

ruis

e fu

nctio

ns a

nd s

ecur

ity

requ

irem

ents

.

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

Page 3: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

13

Co

nc

ep

tua

l S

ite

Pla

nn

ing

Stu

dy

0.75

mile

0.5

mile

0.25

mile

0.25

mile

0.5

mile

0.75

mile

1 m

ile1.

25 m

ile1.

5 m

ile2

mile

1 m

ile

1.25

mile

1.5

mile

1.75

mile

2 m

ile

5m

in

5m

in

10m

in

10m

in

15m

in

15m

in

20 m

in

20m

in

30m

in

30m

in

25m

in

25m

in

2931313

33

353

39

41

45

27si

te

2300 19

1715

9

31

30

28

3638 40

Bay Brid

ge

Bay Brid

ge

park

w/ s

culp

ture

fest

ival

site

rest

aura

nt te

rrac

e

law

n pa

rk w

/ scu

lptu

reki

ds a

rea

pier

plaz

a w

/ tem

p sc

ulpt

urela

wn

plaz

a / m

arke

t pla

ce

park

wat

er fr

ont

pier

park

min

i pla

za

prom

enad

e pa

rk

amph

ithea

ter

nativ

e gr

assp

ark

deck

mar

ina

ball

park

ent

ry +

mar

ina

The

Emba

rcad

ero

is a

con

tinuo

us 3

-mile

wat

erfr

ont

prom

enad

e, s

tret

chin

g fr

om P

ier

40 a

t th

e so

uth

to P

ier

45 a

t th

e no

rth.

It

links

the

AT&

T Ba

llpar

k ba

seba

ll st

adiu

m, F

erry

Bui

ldin

g at

Mar

ket

Stre

et,

and

Fish

erm

an’s

Wha

rf a

t Pie

r 39,

alo

ng w

ith se

vera

l ot

her

node

s of

act

iviti

es,

mak

ing

it an

im

port

ant

open

spa

ce n

etw

ork

for t

he c

ity o

f San

Fra

ncis

co.

Cur

rent

ly, P

ier 2

7 si

ts in

the

mid

dle

of a

long

stre

tch

of t

he w

ater

fron

t pr

omen

ade

betw

een

two

node

s.

The

site

the

refo

re p

rese

nts

a gr

eat

oppo

rtun

ity t

o cr

eate

a n

ew f

ocus

of

activ

ity t

hat

wou

ld b

ett e

r co

nnec

t nod

es a

long

The

Em

barc

ader

o.

As

a ne

w n

ode

of a

ctiv

ity,

Pier

27

will

nee

d to

pr

ovid

e sp

ace

for v

isito

rs, r

esid

ents

and

cru

ise

ship

gu

ests

. It w

ill a

lso

need

to c

onsi

der

how

to r

educ

e th

e im

pact

of

vehi

cula

r tr

affi c

on

the

pede

stri

an

expe

rien

ce a

long

The

Em

barc

ader

o.

URBA

N C

ON

TEXT

em

ba

rca

de

rop

ark

de

ck

wa

terf

ron

t p

rom

en

ad

em

ari

na

pla

za

pie

r

EXIS

TIN

G O

PEN

SPA

CE T

YPES

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

OPE

N S

PACE

S AL

ON

G T

HE

EMBA

RCA

DER

O

Page 4: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

14

Pie

r 2

7 C

ruis

e T

erm

ina

l

29313

33

35

39

41

45

27si

tesi

te

2319

17115

99

31

30330

28

363638 40

Bay Brid

ge

His

tori

cally

, vie

ws

to t

he b

ay w

ere

bloc

ked

by t

he

pier

hea

d bu

ildin

gs al

ong

The E

mba

rcad

ero

beca

use

of th

e mar

itim

e nat

ure o

f the

wat

erfr

ont.

Occ

asio

nal

view

s exi

sts b

etw

een

pier

bui

ldin

gs.

The

sout

h en

d of

pie

r 27

shed

is p

ropo

sed

to b

e pa

rtia

lly re

mov

ed

to c

reat

e th

e op

en s

pace

pro

vidi

ng o

ppor

tuni

ty t

o op

en a

nd fr

ame

the

view

to th

e ba

y.

Vie

ws

alon

g th

e Em

barc

ader

o oc

cur

occa

sion

ally

, al

low

ed b

y ga

ps b

etw

een

Pier

bui

ldin

gs. T

hese

vie

w

oppo

rtun

ities

- to

the

Bay

and

to m

ariti

me

activ

ities

- ar

e cr

itica

l to

crea

ting

a st

rong

sen

se o

f pla

ce a

long

th

e w

ater

fron

t. N

ew p

ublic

acc

ess

and

open

spa

ces

shou

ld in

clud

e vi

ews t

o th

e Ba

y, m

ariti

me

activ

ities

, an

d if

feas

ible

, the

city

. The

y sh

ould

als

o in

clud

e co

ntac

t w

ith a

pie

r ed

ge,

seaw

all

edge

, or

oth

er

wat

erfr

ont e

dge

whe

reve

r fea

sibl

e.

Pier

27 h

as o

utst

andi

ng v

isua

l acc

ess p

oten

tial.

From

th

e ed

ge o

f th

e pi

er, o

ne h

as a

uni

que

180

degr

ee

view

of

the

Bay,

inc

ludi

ng A

lcat

raz

Isla

nd, A

ngel

Is

land

, Ye

rba

Buen

a Is

land

, Tr

easu

re I

slan

d, a

nd

the

Bay

Brid

ge. T

owar

ds th

e ci

ty, o

ne c

an v

iew

Coi

t To

wer

and

the

pyr

amid

al T

rans

amer

ica

build

ing,

tw

o m

ajor

San

Fra

ncis

co la

ndm

arks

, and

pot

entia

lly

an o

pen

view

of t

he d

ownt

own

skyl

ine

VIEW

S

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

WAT

ER V

IEW

CO

RRID

ORS

ALO

NG

EM

BARCA

DER

O

EXTE

ND

ED V

IEW

CO

RRID

ORS

BERKE

LEY

TREA

SURE

ISLA

ND

YERBA

BU

ENA

BAY

BRID

GE

ALC

ATRAZ

AN

GEL

ISL

AN

D

CO

IT T

OW

ER

TRAN

SAM

ERIC

A P

YRAM

ID

PIE

R 2

7

Page 5: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

15

Co

nc

ep

tua

l S

ite

Pla

nn

ing

Stu

dy

Alc

atra

z Is

land

Yerb

a B

uena

Trea

sure

Isla

nd

Bay B

ridge

Tran

sam

eric

a P

yram

id

Coi

t To

wer

29293113

33

35

39

41

45

277si

te

23319

1715

9

31

30

28

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

tra

ns

am

eri

ca

py

ram

idc

oit

to

we

ra

lca

tra

z

KEY

VIEW

S FR

OM

TH

E SI

TE

VIEW

S FR

OM

TH

E SI

TE

Page 6: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

16

Pie

r 2

7 C

ruis

e T

erm

ina

l

The

orig

inal

con

stru

ctio

n of

Pie

r 27

inc

lude

d a

load

ing

dock

run

ning

alo

ng th

e w

este

rn p

ortio

n of

th

e m

ariti

me

shed

cre

atin

g a

vert

ical

diff

eren

ce o

f ap

prox

imat

ely

3.5

feet

bet

wee

n th

e Pi

er 2

7 sh

ed a

nd

the

valle

y ar

ea.

Exis

ting

plat

form

s at

thes

e tw

o diff e

rent

ele

vatio

ns

wer

e or

igin

ally

con

stru

cted

in

a w

ay s

o th

at t

hey

wer

e di

rect

ly ti

ed to

the

pier

subs

truc

ture

. Thr

ough

th

e as

sess

men

ts o

f the

exi

stin

g su

bstr

uctu

re, i

t was

de

term

ined

tha

t it

is n

ot e

cono

mic

ally

fea

sibl

e to

lo

wer

the

ele

vatio

ns o

f th

ese

plat

form

s w

ithou

t tr

igge

ring

a s

ignifi c

ant s

eism

ic u

pgra

des.

In o

rder

to r

esol

ve a

cces

s an

d ci

rcul

atio

n pr

oble

ms

betw

een

thes

e tw

o el

evat

ions

, tr

ansi

tiona

l sl

opes

an

d st

airs

sha

ll be

con

stru

cted

on

top

of th

e lo

wer

pl

atfo

rm. W

hen

a po

rtio

n of

Pie

r 27

is d

emol

ishe

d fo

r the

Nor

thea

st W

harf

Pla

za, a

n op

en sp

ace d

esig

n m

ust

acco

mm

odat

e tw

o diff e

rent

pla

tform

leve

ls.

Pier

29

m

ariti

me

shed

, bu

ilt

in

1915

-18,

is

a

cont

ribu

ting

hist

oric

re

sour

ce

in

the

Nat

iona

l Re

gist

er o

f His

tori

c Pla

ces,

the

refo

re, m

odifi

catio

ns

to th

e st

ruct

ure

mus

t be

min

imiz

ed to

mai

ntai

n its

hi

stor

ical

val

ue a

nd in

tegr

ity.

Pier

29

Beltl

ine

Offi

ce A

nnex

, ori

gina

lly b

uilt

in 1

903

next

to P

ier 3

, was

mov

ed to

its

pres

ent l

ocat

ion

on

The

Emba

rcad

ero

betw

een

Pier

27

and

Pier

29

in

1918

. Thi

s bu

ildin

g is

als

o de

sign

ated

as

an h

isto

ric

reso

urce

and

sha

ll be

ret

aine

d on

-site

or

poss

ibly

re

loca

ted

to a

noth

er l

ocat

ion

with

in t

he H

isto

ric

Dis

tric

t.

The

non-

hist

oric

Pie

r 27

Ann

ex b

uild

ing

will

like

ly

be d

emol

ishe

d to

allo

w fo

r ter

min

al o

pera

tions

and

as

req

uire

d un

der

the

BCD

C S

peci

al A

rea

Plan

. Li

kew

ise,

te

mpo

rary

st

ruct

ures

, su

ch

as

Teat

ro

Zinz

anni

, w

ill b

e re

loca

ted

to a

llow

for

ter

min

al

oper

atio

ns.

SITE

GRAD

ING

EXIS

TIN

G S

TRU

CTU

RES

SITE

SEC

TIO

N (

PIER

27

AND

TH

E “V

ALLE

Y” S

TRU

CTU

RE)

GRAD

E CH

ANG

E O

N S

ITE

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

PIER

29

HIS

TORIC

PIE

R H

EAD

BU

ILD

ING

PIER

29

INTE

RIO

R

Page 7: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

17

Co

nc

ep

tua

l S

ite

Pla

nn

ing

Stu

dy

+2

38

+1

75+

2+

2+

2+

2+

2+

2+

2+

22222+

22+

2+

222+

2+

2222222222+

2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222223333833838383333333383

+++1

+1

+++++1

+1

++1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+++1

++11

+++++++++1

++++1

++1

+++++++++++++7575757575575

3.5’

ele

vatio

n sh

ift

PLAT

FORM

SLO

PES

DOW

N T

O G

RADE

GRA

DE C

HAN

GE

PIE

R 2

7

PIE

R 2

9

TEA

TRO

ZIN

AN

NI

PIE

R 2

9 B

ELT

LIN

E

OFF

ICE

AN

NE

X

PIE

R 2

7A

NN

EX

+4

08

+4

08

+0

42

+2

27

+1

75

+1

75

+2

58

+0

15

+0

48TO

P O

F W

ALL

RAMP

RAMP

RAMP

SITE

GRAD

ES A

ND

EXI

STIN

G S

TRU

CTU

RES

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

Page 8: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

18

Pie

r 2

7 C

ruis

e T

erm

ina

l

Pier

27

subs

truc

ture

is in

gen

eral

ly g

ood

cond

ition

, an

d no

maj

or r

epai

rs w

ill b

e ne

cess

ary.

Pie

r 27

and

Pi

er 2

9 ar

e st

ruct

ural

ly in

tegr

ated

and

wer

e bu

ilt in

19

67, c

onst

ruct

ed w

ith p

ile-s

tres

sed

conc

rete

pile

s w

ith

conc

rete

sl

ab

and

apro

ns.

App

roxi

mat

ely

$2.5

mill

ion

of s

eism

ic u

pgra

des

for

subs

truc

ture

de

cks

of P

iers

27

and

29 w

ere

com

plet

ed i

n 19

95.

The

fend

er s

yste

m a

t Pi

er 2

7 w

ill n

eed

upgr

ades

w

ithin

the

next

fi ve

yea

rs. P

ier 2

9 su

bstr

uctu

re d

eck

requ

ires

con

side

rabl

e am

ount

of

repa

ir. T

he c

ost,

roug

hly

estim

ated

by

Win

sler

& K

elly

to b

e ab

out

$7 m

illio

n, n

eeds

to

be d

eter

min

ed aft e

r a

mor

e de

taile

d st

ruct

ural

ass

essm

ent.

The

pier

sub

stru

ctur

e de

cks

will

req

uire

add

ition

al

seis

mic

upg

rade

s if

ther

e is

a c

hang

e of

use

or

sign

ifi ca

nt n

ew co

nstr

uctio

n ei

ther

on

Pier

27

or P

ier

29, a

s pe

r the

200

8 Po

rt B

uild

ing

code

. Acc

ordi

ngly

, th

e si

te

plan

ning

te

am

assu

med

re

nova

tion

of

mos

t of

the

Pie

r 27

she

d, w

ith t

he a

dditi

on o

f a

mez

zani

ne s

pace

, an

d de

mol

ition

of

a po

rtio

n of

Th

e Em

barc

ader

o en

d of

the

she

d, t

o al

low

for

th

e N

orth

east

Wha

rf P

laza

. By

care

fully

avo

idin

g si

gnifi

cant

new

con

stru

ctio

n an

d ch

ange

of u

se o

n bo

th P

ier

27 a

nd 2

9, n

o se

ism

ic u

pgra

de w

ould

be

trig

gere

d, th

ereb

y re

duci

ng th

e ov

eral

l pro

ject

cos

t. A

ll de

ck i

mpr

ovem

ents

mus

t al

so c

ompl

y w

ith

seis

mic

and

oth

er r

equi

rem

ents

of

the

2008

Por

t Bu

ildin

g C

ode.

SUBS

TRU

CTU

RE

AND

SEI

SMIC

CO

NST

RAI

NTS

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

EXIS

TIN

G S

TRU

CTU

RE

SECT

ION

Page 9: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

19

Co

nc

ep

tua

l S

ite

Pla

nn

ing

Stu

dy

Key

Poi

nts

San

Fran

cisc

o is

a p

opul

ar d

estin

atio

n fo

r bo

th

do

mes

tic a

nd in

tern

atio

nal t

rave

lers

.

As

crui

se

vaca

tions

be

com

e m

ore

popu

lar,

es

peci

ally

aft e

r 9/

11,

mor

e cr

uise

shi

ps a

re

com

ing

to S

an F

ranc

isco

.

1985

- 3,

300

visi

tors

20

05 -

225,

000

visi

tors

and

81

calls

20

08 -

Expe

cted

180

,000

vis

itors

, 62

calls

Dry

doc

k fa

cilit

ies

at P

ier

70 a

lso

mak

e Sa

n

Fran

cisc

o a

popu

lar p

ort w

here

the

ship

s can

go

thru

repa

ir w

hile

in th

e ci

ty.

San

Fran

cisc

o cu

rren

tly f

unct

ions

as

diff e

rent

type

of

port

s th

roug

h ou

t th

e ye

ar,

(hom

e,

tran

sit,

and

turn

arou

nd).

Prim

ary

crui

se

dest

inat

ions

, or

igin

atin

g fr

om S

an F

ranc

isco

, ar

e A

lask

a an

d M

exic

o.

The

port

als

o ho

sts

num

erou

s tr

ansi

t cal

ls th

at d

o no

t ori

gina

te o

r en

d in

San

Fra

ncis

co.

Peak

mon

ths

are

May

, Sep

tem

ber,

and

Oct

ober

.

Ther

e is

no

dist

inct

ion

betw

een

wee

kday

and

wee

kend

leve

ls o

f act

ivity

.

Vari

ous t

ypes

of c

ruis

es v

isit

San

Fran

cisc

o, a

nd

he

nce

the

term

inal

requ

ires

fl ex

ibili

ty:

H

ome

Port

47%

Tr

ansi

t Por

t

35%

Tu

rnar

ound

18%

CRU

ISE

ACTI

VITY

PRO

JECT

ION

S FO

R A

LL S

F PO

RTS

HIS

TORIC

AL T

REN

D (

Num

ber

of C

alls

)

PRO

JECT

ION

S

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

CRU

ISE

IND

UST

RY A

ND

ACT

IVIT

Y O

UTL

OO

KS

Page 10: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

20

Pie

r 2

7 C

ruis

e T

erm

ina

l

MO

NTH

LY T

REN

D

WEE

KLY

TREN

D

HIG

H G

RO

WTH

PRO

JECT

ION

LOW

GRO

WTH

PRO

JECT

ION

CRU

ISE

IND

UST

RY A

ND

ACT

IVIT

Y O

UTL

OO

KS

CRU

ISE

ACTI

VITY

PRO

JECT

ION

S FO

R P

RIM

ARY

PORT

(PI

ER 2

7)

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

PRO

JECT

ION

S

NU

MBE

R O

F D

AYS

WIT

H S

HIP

IN

BER

TH

Page 11: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

21

Co

nc

ep

tua

l S

ite

Pla

nn

ing

Stu

dy

Traffi

c c

ircu

latio

n in

to, o

ut o

f, an

d w

ithin

the

site

w

ill b

e cr

ucia

l to

the

effi

cien

t fu

nctio

ning

of

the

crui

se t

erm

inal

. Pi

er 2

7 ha

s a

pote

ntia

lly l

arge

ci

rcul

atio

n ar

ea

in

the

valle

y to

ac

com

mod

ate

arri

ving

and

dep

artin

g pr

ivat

ely-

owne

d ve

hicl

es

(PO

Vs)

, ta

xis,

bu

ses

and

prov

isio

ning

tr

ucks

. Pr

ogra

m r

equi

rem

ents

for

tru

cks,

bus

es,

taxi

es,

and

pass

enge

r ve

hicl

es w

ere

estim

ated

bas

ed o

n th

e da

ta p

rese

nted

in

the

tabl

e be

low

for

a 4

,400

pa

ssen

ger

crui

se

ship

. Th

e re

quir

emen

ts

wer

e pr

esen

ted

duri

ng W

orks

hop

Two,

and

the

gro

up

conc

urre

d w

ith t

he r

equi

rem

ents

.

At

any

give

n ho

ur d

urin

g th

e de

bark

per

iod,

a v

ehic

le ci

rcul

atio

n ar

ea m

ust b

e re

serv

ed a

nd c

apab

le o

f han

dlin

g 8

to

12 s

emi-t

ract

or tr

aile

rs (

it is

not

ed th

at th

e C

ity a

nd

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

has

res

tric

tions

for

truc

ks

long

er t

han

65 f

eet

in l

engt

h in

the

city

), an

d 6-

9 de

liver

y tr

ucks

dur

ing

a cr

uise

cal

l, as

sum

ing

the

aver

age

load

ing

dura

tion

wou

ld b

e 60

min

utes

. If

the

aver

age

dura

tion

is tw

o ho

urs,

then

the

num

ber

of tr

uck

load

ing

spac

es w

ould

dou

ble.

The

re sh

ould

al

so b

e an

are

a to

acc

omm

odat

e 5-

8 bu

s pa

rkin

g sp

aces

, as

sum

ing

the

aver

age

load

ing

dura

tion

is 3

0 m

inut

es, a

nd 3

-5 t

axi l

oadi

ng a

nd u

nloa

ding

sp

aces

, as

sum

ing

an a

vera

ge 1

.5 m

inut

e lo

adin

g tim

e.

Dem

and

is r

educ

ed d

urin

g th

e em

bark

pe

riod

.

Dur

ing

the

hour

s of

deb

ark

and

emba

rk

occu

rrin

g si

mul

tane

ousl

y, th

ere

wou

ld b

e up

to 6

80

POV

’s ci

rcul

atin

g th

e va

lley.

Thi

s w

ould

req

uire

17

POV

que

uing

spa

ces,

with

an

appr

oxim

atel

y 1.

5 m

inut

e tu

rnov

er ra

te. U

sing

the

valle

y ar

ea fo

r the

se

vehi

cles

wou

ld im

prov

e th

e effi

cie

ncy

of p

asse

nger

em

bark

atio

n an

d di

sem

bark

atio

n, a

nd r

educ

e th

e le

vel

of t

raffi

c co

nges

tion

on T

he E

mba

rcad

ero

whe

n a

crui

se s

hip

is in

ber

th.

A p

rim

ary

crui

se t

erm

inal

ope

ratio

n w

ill r

equi

re

a si

gnifi

cant

am

ount

of

spac

e to

be

used

for

the

circ

ulat

ion

of p

riva

tely

ow

ned

vehi

cles

(“P

OV

s”),

buse

s, ta

xis

and

prov

isio

ning

sup

ply

truc

ks a

s w

ell

as a

ded

icat

ed q

ueui

ng s

tagi

ng a

rea

for

crui

se s

hip

prov

isio

ning

. Fo

r ex

ampl

e, u

p to

500

pal

lets

of

prov

isio

ns m

ay b

e off -

load

ed an

d pl

aced

in a

stag

ing

area

bef

ore

bein

g lo

aded

on

to th

e cr

uise

shi

p. T

he

plan

ning

team

ack

now

ledg

ed th

at th

e si

te p

lann

ing

eff o

rt m

ust

acco

mm

odat

e ea

ch o

f th

ese

vehi

cula

r ty

pes,

the

ir r

espe

ctiv

e ci

rcul

atio

n fl o

ws,

and

the

tim

ing

of t

heir

res

pect

ive

arri

vals

and

dep

artu

res.

Fo

r ex

ampl

e, f

or a

cru

ise

ship

deb

arka

tion,

mos

t su

pply

truc

ks m

ay a

rriv

e fr

om 5

:00

a.m

. to

10:0

0 am

, w

hile

bus

es, t

axis

and

PO

Vs

arri

ve a

ppro

xim

atel

y be

twee

n 8:

00 a

.m. t

o 11

:00

am. D

urin

g th

e ho

urs

of

deba

rkat

ion

and

emba

rkat

ion

of a

4,4

00 p

asse

nger

m

ega-

crui

se sh

ip, t

here

may

be a

s man

y as

680 P

OV

s ci

rcul

atin

g th

e va

lley.

Avo

idin

g co

nfl ic

t of

the

se

fl ow

s is o

ne o

f the

mos

t im

port

ant c

ircu

latio

n is

sues

to

be

cons

ider

ed in

the

site

pla

nnin

g pr

oces

s.

(Sta

tistic

s pro

vide

d by

Lor

enzo

Loo

per a

nd Jo

hn O

ldef

endt

from

Met

ro C

ruis

e Se

rvic

es)

HO

URLY

VEH

ICLE

VO

LUM

ES F

OR 4

,400

PAS

SEN

GER

CRU

ISE

SHIP

CRU

ISE

TERM

INAL

TRAF

FIC

DAT

A

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

OFF

-STR

EET

PARKI

NG

IN

VEN

TORY

Page 12: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

22

Pie

r 2

7 C

ruis

e T

erm

ina

l

The

term

inal

wou

ld h

ave

appr

oxim

atel

y 12

0,00

0 sq

uare

fee

t of

fi r

st fl

oor

are

a, a

nd a

n ad

ditio

nal

20 p

erce

nt a

s a

new

mez

zani

ne a

rea

for

over

head

em

bark

atio

n/di

sem

bark

atio

n, v

ia a

t le

ast

one

new

pa

ssen

ger g

angw

ay s

yste

m.

A b

agga

ge a

rea

need

s to

be

at le

ast

45,0

00 s

quar

e fe

et, t

o al

low

for

larg

e ve

ssel

s on

long

er it

iner

arie

s to

eff e

ctiv

ely

sche

dule

gu

ests

’ de

bark

atio

n. A

s a

note

, a

larg

er b

agga

ge

area

of u

p to

70,

000

squa

re fe

et h

as b

een

disc

usse

d an

d co

uld

be a

ccom

mod

ated

, if r

equi

red.

Bag

gage

ca

rous

els a

re n

ot p

refe

rred

due

to th

eir s

ize,

cost

, and

m

aint

enan

ce n

eeds

, an

d th

e te

rmin

al c

an o

pera

te

with

gre

ater

fl ex

ibili

ty a

nd effi

cien

cy w

ithou

t the

m.

Sepa

rate

dis

emba

rkat

ion

and

emba

rkat

ion

zone

s ar

e ne

cess

ary

and

need

to b

e ar

rang

ed to

min

imiz

e th

e po

tent

ial f

or m

ixin

g pa

ssen

gers

, whi

ch w

ould

re

duce

eff

ect

iven

ess

and

pote

ntia

lly

heig

hten

se

curi

ty c

once

rns.

The

re s

houl

d be

suffi

cie

nt s

pace

fo

r up

to

50 c

heck

-in c

ount

ers

in t

he e

mba

rkat

ion

area

.

Add

ition

ally

, th

e te

rmin

al b

uild

ing

and

site

mus

t co

mpl

y w

ith v

ario

us s

ecur

ity r

equi

rem

ents

. Th

e bu

ildin

g its

elf

mus

t com

ply

with

CBP

reg

ulat

ions

. Th

e si

te w

ould

nee

d to

abs

orb

the

impa

cts

of t

he

CBP

regu

latio

ns, a

s wel

l as a

dher

ing

to st

anda

rd P

ort

and

Coa

st G

uard

secu

rity

mea

sure

s. T

he w

ater

fron

t w

ould

be

subj

ect t

o C

oast

Gua

rd a

nd v

esse

l-rel

ated

se

curi

ty. A

ll se

curi

ty m

easu

res

wou

ld n

eed

to b

e sc

alab

le, r

elat

ing

not o

nly

to th

e fa

cilit

y an

d its

site

, bu

t als

o to

the

loca

l are

a. S

ecur

ity p

lans

wou

ld a

lso

need

to r

espo

nd to

hei

ghte

ned

or d

ecre

ased

thre

at

leve

ls, w

hile

mai

ntai

ning

term

inal

ope

ratio

ns.

In a

dditi

on t

o cr

itica

l pr

ogra

mm

atic

cri

teri

a, t

he

term

inal

has

the

im

port

ant

oppo

rtun

ity t

o cr

eate

a

posi

tive

resp

onse

by

thos

e w

ho u

se i

t an

d ar

e im

pact

ed b

y it.

A c

ruis

e te

rmin

al is

, by

its n

atur

e,

TERM

INAL

BU

ILD

ING

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

a tr

ansi

ent

build

ing

and,

as

such

, pas

seng

ers

will

m

ake

quic

k ju

dgm

ents

abo

ut t

he q

ualit

y of

the

ir

expe

rien

ce a

s th

ey m

ove

thro

ugh

the

build

ing.

Th

ese

judg

men

ts

have

th

e im

port

ant

valu

e of

infl u

enci

ng p

asse

nger

s’ de

cisi

on t

o re

turn

in

the

futu

re, t

hus

the

long

term

via

bilit

y of

the

term

inal

. Th

e te

rmin

al h

as off e

rs g

reat

vie

w a

nd c

onne

ctio

n po

tent

ial,

to b

oth

the

City

of S

an F

ranc

isco

and

its

rem

arka

ble

wat

erfr

ont.

Cru

ise

days

and

non

-cru

ise

days

hav

e un

ique

cha

ract

eris

tics,

w

ith d

iff er

ent

oppo

rtun

ities

to

prom

ote

thos

e co

nnec

tions

. Th

e te

rmin

al

also

ha

s im

port

ant

rela

tions

hips

w

ith

the

site

’s op

erat

iona

l, ve

hicu

lar,

and

open

spa

ces.

Ea

ch o

f th

ese

rela

tions

hips

is a

n op

port

unity

for

a

posi

tive

long

-term

im

pact

. Th

e te

rmin

al p

rogr

am

mus

t in

clud

e al

l ne

cess

ary

prog

ram

el

emen

ts

cons

iste

nt w

ith a

full-

serv

ice

hom

e po

rt fa

cilit

y, fo

r a

desi

gn v

esse

l w

ith a

cap

acity

of

appr

oxim

atel

y 45

00 p

asse

nger

s.

This

inc

lude

s al

l em

bark

atio

n,

dise

mba

rkat

ion,

se

curi

ty,

crui

se

line,

cr

ew

and

term

inal

ope

ratio

nal s

pace

s.

To eff e

ctiv

ely

serv

ice

this

siz

e of

ves

sel,

the

term

inal

mus

t be

des

igne

d fo

r pl

easa

nt,

effi c

ient

, sa

fe a

nd s

ecur

e m

ovem

ent

of p

asse

nger

s an

d th

eir

belo

ngin

gs.

At

the

sam

e tim

e, t

he t

erm

inal

mus

t be

arr

ange

d to

max

imiz

e th

e effi

cie

nt a

nd s

ecur

e fl o

w o

f goo

ds a

nd b

agga

ge

to a

nd f

rom

the

ves

sel,

and

prov

ide

othe

r ve

ssel

su

ppor

t ser

vice

s as

requ

ired

.

Arr

ange

men

t of

bo

th

the

emba

rkat

ion

and

dise

mba

rkat

ion

spac

es w

ithin

the

ter

min

al c

an

be m

ade

in t

hree

bas

ic w

ays.

Th

e fi r

st i

s th

at

the

emba

rkat

ion

spac

es c

an o

rgan

ize

prim

arily

to

war

d th

e Em

barc

ader

o en

d of

th

e bu

ildin

g,

clos

est

to t

he p

edes

tria

n an

d ve

hicu

lar

entr

y to

th

e si

te.

Thi

s pr

omot

es a

cle

ar s

ense

of

entr

y fr

om t

he E

mba

rcad

ero

but

does

not

nec

essa

rily

co

ordi

nate

with

veh

icle

dro

p-off

an

d fl o

w.

The

seco

nd w

ay is

for

emba

rkat

ion

to b

e in

the

mid

dle,

w

ith d

isem

bark

atio

n sp

aces

sur

roun

ding

it.

Thi

s ac

hiev

es

anot

her

reco

gniz

able

bu

ildin

g fo

rm

with

a d

omin

atin

g em

bark

atio

n en

try,

but

cre

ates

in

effi c

ienc

ies

with

the

lay

out

of c

ritic

al p

rogr

am

spac

es su

ch a

s bag

gage

lay-

dow

n. T

he th

ird

way

is

for

the

emba

rkat

ion

spac

es to

be

orga

nize

d to

war

d th

e w

ater

-sid

e of

the

site

. Th

is p

uts

emba

rkat

ion

furt

her

from

vie

ws

from

The

Em

barc

ader

o, b

ut

crea

tes

the

pote

ntia

l fo

r dr

amat

ic i

nter

ior

spac

es,

give

n th

e vi

ews

out t

o th

e ha

rbor

.

Page 13: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

23

Co

nc

ep

tua

l S

ite

Pla

nn

ing

Stu

dy

TERM

INAL

EM

BARKA

TIO

N /

DIS

EMBA

RKA

TIO

N

LAYO

UT

OPT

ION

S

DE

DD

E

DE

Pro

gra

m E

lem

en

t4

50

0

To

tal P

AX

1st

Leve

l2

nd

Leve

lG

rou

p S

um

ad

d c

heck

Pre

-Scr

een

Lo

bb

y2

25

02

25

00

22

50

En

try

Scr

een

ing

14

00

14

00

01

40

0

Em

bark

Waiti

ng

/Ch

eck

-in

33

75

03

37

53

03

75

33

75

0

Em

bark

/Deb

ark

Pass

ag

e3

15

00

31

50

31

50

Em

bark

Qeu

e9

00

03

00

06

00

04

95

50

90

00

CB

P P

rimary

99

00

99

00

09

90

0

CB

P S

eco

nd

ary

45

00

45

00

04

50

0

Bag

gag

e la

y-d

ow

n4

50

00

45

00

00

59

40

04

50

00

Cru

ise L

ine O

ffic

es

20

00

20

00

02

00

0

Secu

rity

10

00

10

00

01

00

0

Po

rt P

olic

e1

00

01

00

00

10

00

Cre

w S

pace

90

09

00

09

00

Sto

rag

e6

75

05

73

81

01

36

75

0

Pro

visi

on

s9

00

09

00

00

20

65

09

00

0

M/W

T.

30

00

24

00

60

03

00

0

Bld

g S

yste

ms

60

30

40

20

20

10

60

30

09

03

00

Su

b T

ota

l1

38

63

09

54

83

43

14

81

38

63

0

Ge

ne

ral

Pro

gra

m G

uid

eli

ne

s -

45

00

PA

X

Po

rt o

f S

an

Fra

nc

isc

o

Be

rth

27

Sp

ace

Allo

catio

ns

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

Page 14: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

24

Pie

r 2

7 C

ruis

e T

erm

ina

l

WAI

TING

/ C

HECK

IN(E

A)

EMBA

RK

DEBA

RK

OTHE

R

BLDG

QEUE

(EB)

PRE-

SCRE

EN

LOBB

Y(E

D)(E

E)EN

TRY

SCRE

ENIN

G

BUIL

DING

SYS

TEM

S(B

A)

M /

W T

.(B

B)

(OD)

CREW

SPA

CEPR

OVIS

IONS

STO

RAGE

(OA)

STOR

AGE

(OB)

(OC)

OFFI

CES

SECU

RITY

(OE)

(OF)

PORT

POL

ICE

BAGG

AGE

LAY

DOW

N(D

A)

FROM

M

EZZA

NINE

LE

VEL

TO

MEZ

ZANI

NE

LEVE

L

ENTR

YCB

P PR

IMAR

Y(D

B)

CBP

SECO

NDAR

Y(D

C)

TERM

INAL

BU

ILD

ING

PRO

GRAM

AD

JACE

NCI

ES:

1ST

FLO

OR

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

ADJA

CEN

CY S

TUD

IES

Page 15: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

25

Co

nc

ep

tua

l S

ite

Pla

nn

ing

Stu

dy

TERM

INAL

BU

ILD

ING

PRO

GRAM

AD

JACE

NCI

ES:

MEZ

ZAN

INE

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

ADJA

CEN

CY S

TUD

IES

EMBA

RK

DEBA

RK

OTHE

R

BLDG

WAI

TING

/ C

HECK

IN(E

A)

FROM

1S

T FL

OOR

TO S

HIP

FROM

SHI

P

TO 1

ST F

LOOR

(ON

DEBA

RK)

QEUE

(EB)

PASS

AGE

(EC)

BUILDING SYSTEMS

M / W T.

(BA)

(BB)

(OB)

STORAGE

Page 16: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

26

Pie

r 2

7 C

ruis

e T

erm

ina

l

Whi

le r

ecre

atio

n fa

cilit

ies

are

need

ed i

n th

e ar

ea,

they

are

sub

ordi

nate

to

the

crui

se t

erm

inal

and

op

en s

pace

req

uire

men

ts. R

ecre

atio

n us

es m

ay b

e ac

com

mod

ated

in

the

Pier

29

shed

, th

ough

she

d co

lum

ns m

ay r

estr

ict

a fu

ll ra

nge

of r

ecre

atio

nal

activ

ities

. Th

ere

may

be

av

aila

ble

spac

e fo

r re

crea

tiona

l use

s w

ithin

Pie

r 27

and

the

valle

y ar

ea,

prov

ided

tha

t th

ey d

o no

t in

terf

ere

with

cru

ise

func

tions

and

sec

urity

requ

irem

ents

.

A n

ew o

pen

spac

e at

Pie

r 27

was

fi r

st e

nvis

ione

d by

the

Port

Wat

erfr

ont L

and

Use

Pla

n, a

nd th

e Ba

y C

onse

rvat

ion

and

Dev

elop

men

t C

omm

issi

on’s

(BC

DC

) Spe

cial

Are

a Pl

an. T

he B

CD

C P

lan

calls

for

a n

ew N

orth

east

Wha

rf P

laza

, an

appr

oxim

atel

y tw

o-ac

re p

laza

tha

t w

ould

fun

ctio

n as

a m

ajor

att

rac

tion

for

visi

tors

and

res

iden

ts. T

o cr

eate

thi

s pl

aza,

the

Pla

n ca

lls f

or r

emov

al o

f ap

prox

imat

ely

56,0

00 s

quar

e fe

et o

f th

e Pi

er 2

7 sh

ed a

nd th

e Pi

er

27 A

nnex

bui

ldin

g, w

hile

reta

inin

g or

relo

catin

g th

e hi

stor

ic P

ier

29 B

eltli

ne Offi

ce A

nnex

. At

the

time

the

Spec

ial A

rea

Plan

was

ado

pted

, BC

DC

and

the

Port

ant

icip

ated

con

stru

ctio

n of

a m

ajor

mix

ed-

use,

rec

reat

ion

deve

lopm

ent p

roje

ct o

n Pi

ers

27-3

1,

not t

he c

ontin

ued

seco

ndar

y cr

uise

use

, nor

a n

ew

prim

ary

crui

se te

rmin

al a

t Pie

r 27.

The

Spec

ial

Are

a Pl

an

spec

ifi ca

lly

note

s th

at

“mar

itim

e ac

tiviti

es a

nd S

an F

ranc

isco

’s hi

stor

ic

pier

s ar

e in

trin

sica

lly

inte

rest

ing,

an

d pr

ovid

e m

uch

of t

he c

hara

cter

of

the

wat

erfr

ont.”

Fur

ther

, th

e Pl

an a

rgue

s th

at “

publ

ic a

cces

s, v

iew

site

s, a

nd

recr

eatio

n ar

eas a

re d

esir

able

add

ition

s to

mar

itim

e di

stri

cts,

pro

vide

d th

at t

hey

do n

ot i

nter

fere

with

m

ariti

me

func

tions

.”

Sinc

e th

e pr

ogra

m a

ssum

ptio

ns h

ave

chan

ged,

the

site

pla

nnin

g te

am h

as e

valu

ated

(and

will

con

tinue

to

) the

Pla

n’s

outli

ne o

f the

spa

ce, w

hile

res

pect

ing

the

size

and

int

ent

of t

he N

orth

east

Wha

rf P

laza

. Th

e st

udy

look

s at

whe

ther

the

con

fi gur

atio

n an

d or

ient

atio

n of

an

open

spa

ce a

rea

shou

ld r

emai

n as

sh

own

in th

e Spe

cial

Are

a Pl

an, o

r whe

ther

it sh

ould

be

re-

confi

gur

ed t

o ac

com

mod

ate

the

vehi

cula

r fl o

ws f

or cr

uise

term

inal

ope

ratio

ns a

nd a

llow

mor

e ex

pans

ive

view

s of

the

Bay.

500’

384’

BCD

C SA

N F

RAN

CISC

O W

ATER

FRO

NT

SPEC

IAL

AREA

PLA

N -

NO

RTH

EAST

WH

ARF

PLAZ

A

OPE

N S

PACE

2 |

site

cha

ract

eris

tics

& c

onst

rain

ts

“Pub

lic a

cces

s, vi

ew s

ites,

and

recr

eatio

n ar

eas

are

desir

able

addi

tions

to m

ariti

me

dist

ricts

, pro

vide

d th

ey d

o no

t int

erfer

e w

ith m

ariti

me f

unct

ions

.....

...Cr

eate

a “N

orth

east

Wha

rf Pl

aza,

” as a

new

, maj

or, d

estin

atio

n pl

aza b

etw

een

Pier

s 23

and

29 al

ong

The E

mba

rcad

ero,

open

ing

up v

iews f

rom

Lom

bard

Str

eet a

nd T

he E

mba

rcad

ero t

o the

Bay

, Ye

rba

Buen

a an

d Tr

easu

re I

sland

s, an

d th

e Ba

y Br

idge

. The

ap

prox

imat

ely 2

-acr

e pla

za sh

ould

be d

esig

ned

to fu

nctio

n as

a

maj

or att r

actio

n fo

r visi

tors

and

resid

ents

. In

addi

tion,

pro

vide

op

en sp

ace a

roun

d th

e Belt

line R

ailro

ad Offi

ce A

nnex

bui

ldin

g if

it re

mai

ns in

its p

rese

nt lo

catio

n, a

nd m

aint

ain

unob

stru

cted

vi

ews

from

the

Ann

ex a

cros

s th

e pl

aza

to t

he B

ay. T

he P

laza

sh

ould

be

orien

ted

to th

e O

pen

Wat

er B

asin

bet

wee

n Pi

ers

27

and

19.”

BCD

C SA

N F

RAN

CISC

O W

ATER

FRO

NT

SPEC

IAL

AREA

PLA

N

Page 17: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

27

Co

nc

ep

tua

l S

ite

Pla

nn

ing

Stu

dy

Page 18: 11 2 | SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA · 2020-01-06 · 11 conceptual site planning study 2 | site analysis and design criteria preliminary development criteria 12 urban context

28

Pie

r 2

7 C

ruis

e T

erm

ina

l