Upload
rocio
View
27
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14. A. Lefebvre-Schuhl. 12 C( a,g ) 16 O thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives. Problematics Present status Perspectives. A. Lefebvre-Schuhl CSNSM Orsay. December 14th 2007 ESF-Athens. 9.64. 3 -. 0+. 7.65. 3 12 C. 4.44. 2 +. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
12C()16O thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives
A. Lefebvre-SchuhlCSNSM Orsay
ProblematicsPresent statusPerspectives
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
December 14th 2007ESF-Athens
12C+4He
16O
0+
0+
0+
0+
9.64
7.65
4.44
3-
2+
0
(7.16)
2+
2-
1-
1-
3-
6.05 6.13 6.92
7.12
8.87
9.59
12C+4He 16O
Influence on:[C]/[O]
Further hydrostatic burning stages
Final states of stars
Helium burning
3 12C
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
T ~ 0.2 x 109 K
E(Gamow peak) ~ 300 keV(300 keV) 10-17 barn !
1212C (C (, , ) ) 1616OO
Reaction rates
R- or K-matrix formalismMicroscopic cluster models
Extrapolation :
Need of E1, E2 for E* ground state(-ray angular distributions)
For each contribution: capture to theground state and to excited states
E2 : Direct capture
E1 : large 1- subthreshold resonance+ 1- level below the reaction threshold
+ 2+ level below the reaction threshold
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14and for E* excited state
-delayed -decay of 16N 16O Coulomb breakup
Transfer reaction, ANC method Trojan-horse method
-delayed p-decay of 17Ne
Indirect methods : A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
16N → + 16O → + 12C
Azuma et al. Phys. Rev. C 50, (1994) 1194
R: 79 21 keVbK: 82 26 keVb
SE1(300)
Direct methods in direct kinematics:-beam, 12C target
-ray angular distribution : in a few steps (turn table) simultaneously (4-
array)
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
sophisticated -ray arrays: angular distribution,
background suppression: shieldings or coincidences with pulsed beams
Intense-beam : up to 700 pA (Stuttgart dynamitron) pulsed -beams (Tokyo, Karlsruhe)
12C targets: isotopically pure and resistant to -beams :
12C implantationefficient water cooling
Total efficiency at 10 MeV : 1.2x10-3 in experimental conditions
(7 10-3 at 1.33MeV)
-ray angular distributions :in a few steps: turn table (as Kunz et al, Fey et al...)
simultaneously: 4-array (as Assunçao et alAssunçao et al)
« Eurogam » setup
Ex : Ex : Assunçao et al. PRC 73 (2006) 055801 : Assunçao et al. PRC 73 (2006) 055801 :
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
Ecm eff = 1.310 MeV
Compton suppression (active BGO shields)
-ray angular distribution at 9 different angles simultaneously with 9 HP-Ge detectors very good energy resolution
R-matrix fits of-scattering data -delayed -decay of 16Nthe radiative capture data
taking into account 3 levels 4 interference combinations
Present SE1 results to the ground state
SE1
Hammer et al.Nucl. Phys. A758 (2005) 363
Best -> SE1(300) = 7717 keVb2
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
R-matrix fits of-scattering datathe radiative capture data
taking into account 5 levels 16 interference combinations
SE2
Best -> SE2(300) = 81 22 keVb2
Hammer et al.Nucl. Phys. A758 (2005) 363
Present SE2 results to the ground state
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
Cascades and SCascades and Stottot
→ SE1, SE2 to ground state
→ and the others :-cascades through: 6.05, 6.92, 7.12 MeV levels
High-ray background:
Up to 2006, only based on intensities of the 6.92 MeV and 7.12 MeV or both together-ray considered as giving the cascade amount:
only an upper limit
Results obtained either in direct or inverse kinematics
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
FINUSTAR 2 2007/09/12
Cascades to the 6.92 and 7.12 MeV levels
Redder et al. Nucl.Phys. A462, 385 (1987)
S7.1(300) = 1.3 keVb
S6.9(300) =7 keVb
S6.9(300) =7+13 keVb-4
6.92
x : Kettner et al. Z. Phys. A 308 (1982) 73
- : Redder et al. Nucl.Phys. A462, 385 (1987)
Buchmann& BarnesNucl. Phys. A777 (2006) 254
Direct methods in inverse kinematics:
12Cn+
16Om+
E-E
12C-beam, 4He-gas target
European Recoil Separator for Nuclear AstrophysicsA. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
Ecm=2.0 MeV
≈ 10 nb16O
-ray detection16O-recoil measurement
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.01
10
100
1000
S [ke
V-b
]
Ecm
[MeV]
ERNA‘s dataSchürmann et al. EpJ A 26 (2005) 301
Thanks Schürmann, Kunz, Strieder et al.
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.01
10
100
1000
S [ke
V-b
]
Ecm
[MeV]
E1E2
Kaskaden
total
E1 and E2 dataAssunçao et al. PRC 73(2006)055801and Fey et al. to be published
E1, E2, cascades
(6.92+7.12) and total contributions
R-Matrix calculation Kunz et al. Ap.J. 567 (2002) 643
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
Detector of Recoils and Gammas of Nuclear reactions
-array: BGO
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
S6.0(300) = 25+16 keVb-15
Cascades to the 6.045 MeV levelCascades to the 6.045 MeV level
Detector of Recoils and Gammas of Nuclear reactions
Matei et al. PRL 97 (2006) 242503DRAGON TRIUMF
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
ERNA‘s dataSchürmann et al. EpJ A 26 (2005) 301
Thanks Kunz, Strieder et al.Preliminary results : new R-matrix
calculation, Kunz et al.
Preliminary results : new R-matrix calculation, Kunz et al.
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
ESF-Athens 2007/12/14
3 R-matrix calculations S(300)
Fey et al(2004)
2 experiments + previousEcm eff: 0.89-2.8 MeV
77 17 keVb
81 22 keVb
4 4 keVb
162 39 keVb
E10
E20
Casc.
Total
Buchmann and Barnes(2006)
All available data+ ERNA +DRAGON
80 20 keVb
53+13 keVb
7+13 keVb (6.92 MeV)
25+16 keVb (6.05 MeV)
-18
-4
-15
(=165 keVb)
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
FINUSTAR 2 2007/09/12
NACRE(1999)
79 21 keVb
120 60 keVb
A. Lefebvre-Schuhl
FINUSTAR 2 2007/09/12
Detection efficiency : up to 100% of the more probable charge state at the charge equilibrium (50% of the 16O with a poststripper)
- present limitations : intensity through WF, target extension- only the total cross section
Recoil separators :
Future : Dense jet gas vs 12C targets(Coincidences with) a new -ray detector array
(angular distributions, cascades)
2 in use : DRAGON (TRIUMF) and ERNA (Bochum)
16N → + 16O → + 12C New measurements to increase the precision on the SE1
R&D
R&D
Future : Accelerator of intense 4He beam
+ a recoil separator(for inverse kinematics studies)
Such as a 3 to 5 MV Pelletron with ECR
source
With pulsed beams?
(R&D needed to reach low energies)
with dense jet gas target
energy resolution vs efficiency
+ a new -ray detector array
to separate the transitions enough statistics
With Ge detectors ?
10.767.93
6.02
4.744.614.50
K1.78
27Al (p,) 28Si Ep = 992 keV
LaBr3(Ce) 2’’x2’’
Preliminary results : Cimala et al.
Kraków, Debrecen, Orsay, Warsaw
A Paris detector ?(LaBr3 + CsI)
or new ones ?
Preliminary results : Cimala et al. Kraków, Debrecen, Orsay Warsaw
Eurogam-detector collaborationM. Assunção, M. Fey, A. Lefebvre-Schuhl, J. Kiener, V. Tatischeff,
J.W. Hammer, C. Beck, C. Boukari-Pelissie, A. Coc, J.J. Correia, S. Courtin, F. Fleurot, E. Galanopoulos, C. Grama, F. Haas, F. Hammache,
F. Hannachi, S. Harissopulos, A. Korichi, R. Kunz, D. Ledu, A. Lopez-Martens, D. Malcherek, R. Meunier, Th. Paradellis, M. Rousseau,
N. Rowley, G. Staudt, S. Szilner, J.P. Thibaud, J.L. WeilCSNSM-Orsay; IfS-Stuttgart; IPHC/IReS-Strasbourg; KVI-Groningen;
INP-Athens; GSI-Darmstadt (IPN-Orsay); PI-Tübingen; DP-Lexington (II-Budapest)
ERNA’s collaborationL. Gialanella, G. Imbriani, A. Ordine, V. Roca, M. Romano, R. Kunz, A. di Leva, D. Rogalla, C. Rolfs, D. Schürmann, F. Strieder, N. De Cesare, A. D'Onofrio, C.
Lubritto, F. Terrasi, A. Lefebvre-Schuhl, J.P. Thibaud, C. Beck, S. Courtin, F. Haas, D. Lebhertz, M.-D. Salsac, F. Hammache, N de Séréville, F. de Oliveira;
P. Papka, S. Harissopulos, A. Lagoyannis, Th. KonstantinopoulosINFN & Univ.-Naples; IE3-Bochum; CSNSM-Orsay; IPHC-Strasbourg;
IPN-Orsay; GANIL-CAEN; iTLABS; INP-Demokritos
PARIS collaboration100 physicists, engineers and PhD students, 38 institutions from 16 countries
and principally : IFJ PAN-Kraków, ATOMKI-Debrecen, CSNSN-Orsay and Univ.-Warsaw
LaBr3(Ce) 2’’x2’’
NaI 4’’x4’’
10.7
10.7
0.
0.
-ray width for a 2''x2'' at 15 cm
Ecm (MeV) 3,00 2,00
Eat rest (MeV) 10 7 3 9 7 2
E at rest x 0,02 (keV) 203 140 63 183 140 43
Doppler shift at 90° (keV) 117 81 34 86 66 18
To separate cascades through 7.12, 6.92, 6.05 ?
In inverse kinematics,Doppler shift : not too constraining !