23
12 C() 16 O thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives A. Lefebvre- Schuhl CSNSM Orsay Problematics Present status Perspectives . Lefebvre-Schuhl ESF-Athens 2007/12/14 December 14th 2007 ESF-Athens

12 C( a,g ) 16 O thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

  • Upload
    rocio

  • View
    27

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14. A. Lefebvre-Schuhl. 12 C( a,g ) 16 O thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives. Problematics Present status Perspectives. A. Lefebvre-Schuhl CSNSM Orsay. December 14th 2007 ESF-Athens. 9.64. 3 -. 0+. 7.65. 3  12 C. 4.44. 2 +. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

12C()16O thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

A. Lefebvre-SchuhlCSNSM Orsay

ProblematicsPresent statusPerspectives

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

December 14th 2007ESF-Athens

Page 2: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

12C+4He

16O

0+

0+

0+

0+

9.64

7.65

4.44

3-

2+

0

(7.16)

2+

2-

1-

1-

3-

6.05 6.13 6.92

7.12

8.87

9.59

12C+4He 16O

Influence on:[C]/[O]

Further hydrostatic burning stages

Final states of stars

Helium burning

3 12C

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

Page 3: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

T ~ 0.2 x 109 K

E(Gamow peak) ~ 300 keV(300 keV) 10-17 barn !

1212C (C (, , ) ) 1616OO

Reaction rates

R- or K-matrix formalismMicroscopic cluster models

Extrapolation :

Need of E1, E2 for E* ground state(-ray angular distributions)

For each contribution: capture to theground state and to excited states

E2 : Direct capture

E1 : large 1- subthreshold resonance+ 1- level below the reaction threshold

+ 2+ level below the reaction threshold

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14and for E* excited state

Page 4: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

-delayed -decay of 16N 16O Coulomb breakup

Transfer reaction, ANC method Trojan-horse method

-delayed p-decay of 17Ne

Indirect methods : A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

16N → + 16O → + 12C

Azuma et al. Phys. Rev. C 50, (1994) 1194

R: 79 21 keVbK: 82 26 keVb

SE1(300)

Page 5: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

Direct methods in direct kinematics:-beam, 12C target

-ray angular distribution : in a few steps (turn table) simultaneously (4-

array)

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

sophisticated -ray arrays: angular distribution,

background suppression: shieldings or coincidences with pulsed beams

Intense-beam : up to 700 pA (Stuttgart dynamitron) pulsed -beams (Tokyo, Karlsruhe)

12C targets: isotopically pure and resistant to -beams :

12C implantationefficient water cooling

Page 6: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

Total efficiency at 10 MeV : 1.2x10-3 in experimental conditions

(7 10-3 at 1.33MeV)

-ray angular distributions :in a few steps: turn table (as Kunz et al, Fey et al...)

simultaneously: 4-array (as Assunçao et alAssunçao et al)

« Eurogam » setup

Ex : Ex : Assunçao et al. PRC 73 (2006) 055801 : Assunçao et al. PRC 73 (2006) 055801 :

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

Ecm eff = 1.310 MeV

Compton suppression (active BGO shields)

-ray angular distribution at 9 different angles simultaneously with 9 HP-Ge detectors very good energy resolution

Page 7: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

R-matrix fits of-scattering data -delayed -decay of 16Nthe radiative capture data

taking into account 3 levels 4 interference combinations

Present SE1 results to the ground state

SE1

Hammer et al.Nucl. Phys. A758 (2005) 363

Best -> SE1(300) = 7717 keVb2

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

Page 8: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

R-matrix fits of-scattering datathe radiative capture data

taking into account 5 levels 16 interference combinations

SE2

Best -> SE2(300) = 81 22 keVb2

Hammer et al.Nucl. Phys. A758 (2005) 363

Present SE2 results to the ground state

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

Page 9: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

Cascades and SCascades and Stottot

→ SE1, SE2 to ground state

→ and the others :-cascades through: 6.05, 6.92, 7.12 MeV levels

High-ray background:

Up to 2006, only based on intensities of the 6.92 MeV and 7.12 MeV or both together-ray considered as giving the cascade amount:

only an upper limit

Results obtained either in direct or inverse kinematics

Page 10: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

FINUSTAR 2 2007/09/12

Cascades to the 6.92 and 7.12 MeV levels

Redder et al. Nucl.Phys. A462, 385 (1987)

S7.1(300) = 1.3 keVb

S6.9(300) =7 keVb

S6.9(300) =7+13 keVb-4

6.92

x : Kettner et al. Z. Phys. A 308 (1982) 73

- : Redder et al. Nucl.Phys. A462, 385 (1987)

Buchmann& BarnesNucl. Phys. A777 (2006) 254

Page 11: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

Direct methods in inverse kinematics:

12Cn+

16Om+

E-E

12C-beam, 4He-gas target

European Recoil Separator for Nuclear AstrophysicsA. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

Ecm=2.0 MeV

≈ 10 nb16O

-ray detection16O-recoil measurement

Page 12: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.01

10

100

1000

S [ke

V-b

]

Ecm

[MeV]

ERNA‘s dataSchürmann et al. EpJ A 26 (2005) 301

Thanks Schürmann, Kunz, Strieder et al.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.01

10

100

1000

S [ke

V-b

]

Ecm

[MeV]

E1E2

Kaskaden

total

E1 and E2 dataAssunçao et al. PRC 73(2006)055801and Fey et al. to be published

E1, E2, cascades

(6.92+7.12) and total contributions

R-Matrix calculation Kunz et al. Ap.J. 567 (2002) 643

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

Page 13: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

Detector of Recoils and Gammas of Nuclear reactions

-array: BGO

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

Page 14: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

S6.0(300) = 25+16 keVb-15

Cascades to the 6.045 MeV levelCascades to the 6.045 MeV level

Detector of Recoils and Gammas of Nuclear reactions

Matei et al. PRL 97 (2006) 242503DRAGON TRIUMF

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

Page 15: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

ERNA‘s dataSchürmann et al. EpJ A 26 (2005) 301

Thanks Kunz, Strieder et al.Preliminary results : new R-matrix

calculation, Kunz et al.

Preliminary results : new R-matrix calculation, Kunz et al.

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

ESF-Athens 2007/12/14

Page 16: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

3 R-matrix calculations S(300)

Fey et al(2004)

2 experiments + previousEcm eff: 0.89-2.8 MeV

77 17 keVb

81 22 keVb

4 4 keVb

162 39 keVb

E10

E20

Casc.

Total

Buchmann and Barnes(2006)

All available data+ ERNA +DRAGON

80 20 keVb

53+13 keVb

7+13 keVb (6.92 MeV)

25+16 keVb (6.05 MeV)

-18

-4

-15

(=165 keVb)

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

FINUSTAR 2 2007/09/12

NACRE(1999)

79 21 keVb

120 60 keVb

Page 17: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

A. Lefebvre-Schuhl

FINUSTAR 2 2007/09/12

Detection efficiency : up to 100% of the more probable charge state at the charge equilibrium (50% of the 16O with a poststripper)

- present limitations : intensity through WF, target extension- only the total cross section

Recoil separators :

Future : Dense jet gas vs 12C targets(Coincidences with) a new -ray detector array

(angular distributions, cascades)

2 in use : DRAGON (TRIUMF) and ERNA (Bochum)

16N → + 16O → + 12C New measurements to increase the precision on the SE1

R&D

R&D

Page 18: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

Future : Accelerator of intense 4He beam

+ a recoil separator(for inverse kinematics studies)

Such as a 3 to 5 MV Pelletron with ECR

source

With pulsed beams?

(R&D needed to reach low energies)

with dense jet gas target

Page 19: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

energy resolution vs efficiency

+ a new -ray detector array

to separate the transitions enough statistics

With Ge detectors ?

10.767.93

6.02

4.744.614.50

K1.78

27Al (p,) 28Si Ep = 992 keV

LaBr3(Ce) 2’’x2’’

Preliminary results : Cimala et al.

Kraków, Debrecen, Orsay, Warsaw

A Paris detector ?(LaBr3 + CsI)

or new ones ?

Preliminary results : Cimala et al. Kraków, Debrecen, Orsay Warsaw

Page 20: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

Eurogam-detector collaborationM. Assunção, M. Fey, A. Lefebvre-Schuhl, J. Kiener, V. Tatischeff,

J.W. Hammer, C. Beck, C. Boukari-Pelissie, A. Coc, J.J. Correia, S. Courtin, F. Fleurot, E. Galanopoulos, C. Grama, F. Haas, F. Hammache,

F. Hannachi, S. Harissopulos, A. Korichi, R. Kunz, D. Ledu, A. Lopez-Martens, D. Malcherek, R. Meunier, Th. Paradellis, M. Rousseau,

N. Rowley, G. Staudt, S. Szilner, J.P. Thibaud, J.L. WeilCSNSM-Orsay; IfS-Stuttgart; IPHC/IReS-Strasbourg; KVI-Groningen;

INP-Athens; GSI-Darmstadt (IPN-Orsay); PI-Tübingen; DP-Lexington (II-Budapest)

ERNA’s collaborationL. Gialanella, G. Imbriani, A. Ordine, V. Roca, M. Romano, R. Kunz, A. di Leva, D. Rogalla, C. Rolfs, D. Schürmann, F. Strieder, N. De Cesare, A. D'Onofrio, C.

Lubritto, F. Terrasi, A. Lefebvre-Schuhl, J.P. Thibaud, C. Beck, S. Courtin, F. Haas, D. Lebhertz, M.-D. Salsac, F. Hammache, N de Séréville, F. de Oliveira;

P. Papka, S. Harissopulos, A. Lagoyannis, Th. KonstantinopoulosINFN & Univ.-Naples; IE3-Bochum; CSNSM-Orsay; IPHC-Strasbourg;

IPN-Orsay; GANIL-CAEN; iTLABS; INP-Demokritos

PARIS collaboration100 physicists, engineers and PhD students, 38 institutions from 16 countries

and principally : IFJ PAN-Kraków, ATOMKI-Debrecen, CSNSN-Orsay and Univ.-Warsaw

Page 21: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

LaBr3(Ce) 2’’x2’’

NaI 4’’x4’’

10.7 

10.7 

0.

0.

Page 22: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives
Page 23: 12 C( a,g ) 16 O  thermonuclear reaction rate: present status and perspectives

-ray width for a 2''x2'' at 15 cm

Ecm (MeV) 3,00 2,00

Eat rest (MeV) 10 7 3 9 7 2

E at rest x 0,02 (keV) 203 140 63 183 140 43

Doppler shift at 90° (keV) 117 81 34 86 66 18

To separate cascades through 7.12, 6.92, 6.05 ?

In inverse kinematics,Doppler shift : not too constraining !