17
12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE SINAI/NEGEV BORDER Haim Tsoar,¹ Victor Goldsmith,² Steve Schoenhaus,² Keith Clarke,² and Arnon Karnieli ³ ¹Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; ²Department of Geology and Geography, Hunter College of The City University of New York; ³Remote Sensing Laboratory, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev ABSTRACT Changes in the Israeli/Egyptian border since 1948 have affected the land use patterns of the Bedouin tribes inhabiting these areas. These changing patterns are clearly discerned from aerial photographs and satellite images in this area of extensive linear dunes. The most recent change occurred after Israel's withdrawal from the Sinai in 1982. Field observations show that the vegetation in the Negev recovered from overgrazing in a very short time, with a 180% increase in the number of Negev shrubs, coincident with a continued decrease in the number of shrubs on the Sinai side of the border. Analysis of the reflectance of the Landsat-MSS for the recovery years (1984, 1987, and 1989) shows a statistically significant difference between the two sides ofthe border for the four MSS bands. However, the spectral brightness curves of the four bands failed to reveal any specific "signature" typical for vegetation. Field measurements with a spectrometer indicate that the curve shape of the reflectance of the Landsat-MSS images is swayed by the biogenic crust in the Negev that makes the well known contrast in albedo with Sinai. INTRODUCTION The process of desertification and land degradation is of great concern in drylands that once supported agriculture and animal grazing. Anthropogenic factors accelerate desertification processes (Hellden 1991), and, contrary to the accepted notion that desertification processes on sand dunes becomes irreversible unless there is direct human interference (Reichelt 1989), vegetation can be established on sandy areas that had been fenced off from grazing (Otterman 1981, Warren and Harrison 1984). This process, although rare, is known as reversed desertification. Sand fixation protects the available sand moisture, decreases sand transport and erosion, and increases the amount of fines, thus promoting more vegetation growth (Tsoar 1990). Remote sensing is a viable and appropriate tool for studying desertification and climate change in arid and semi-arid environments (e.g., Prince et al. 1990). Remote sensing often provides the least expensive data that can be acquired and frequently is the only type of information available in remote arid zones. Arid environments afford excellent field sites because of their considerable geographic location, cloud-free weather, bright spectral properties, high DesertAeolianProcesses. Edited by Vatche P. Tchakerian. Published in 1995 by Chapman & Hall, London. ISBN 0 412 04241 X

12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE SINAI/NEGEV BORDER

Haim Tsoar,¹ Victor Goldsmith,² Steve Schoenhaus,² Keith Clarke,² and Arnon Karnieli ³

¹Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; ²Department of Geology and Geography, Hunter College of The City University of New

York; ³Remote Sensing Laboratory, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

ABSTRACT

Changes in the Israeli/Egyptian border since 1948 have affected the land use patterns of theBedouin tribes inhabiting these areas. These changing patterns are clearly discerned from aerialphotographs and satellite images in this area of extensive linear dunes. The most recent change occurred after Israel's withdrawal from the Sinai in 1982. Field observations show that thevegetation in the Negev recovered from overgrazing in a very short time, with a 180% increasein the number of Negev shrubs, coincident with a continued decrease in the number of shrubs on the Sinai side of the border. Analysis of the reflectance of the Landsat-MSS for the recovery years (1984, 1987, and 1989) shows a statistically significant difference between the two sidesofthe border for the four MSS bands. However, the spectral brightness curves of the four bandsfailed to reveal any specific "signature" typical for vegetation. Field measurements with a spectrometer indicate that the curve shape of the reflectance of the Landsat-MSS images is swayed by the biogenic crust in the Negev that makes the well known contrast in albedo withSinai.

INTRODUCTION

The process of desertification and land degradation is of great concern in drylandsthat once supported agriculture and animal grazing. Anthropogenic factors accelerate desertification processes (Hellden 1991), and, contrary to the accepted notion thatdesertification processes on sand dunes becomes irreversible unless there is direct human interference (Reichelt 1989), vegetation can be established on sandy areas that had been fenced off from grazing (Otterman 1981, Warren and Harrison 1984).This process, although rare, is known as reversed desertification. Sand fixationprotects the available sand moisture, decreases sand transport and erosion, and increases the amount of fines, thus promoting more vegetation growth (Tsoar 1990).

Remote sensing is a viable and appropriate tool for studying desertification andclimate change in arid and semi-arid environments (e.g., Prince et al. 1990). Remote sensing often provides the least expensive data that can be acquired and frequently isthe only type of information available in remote arid zones.

Arid environments afford excellent field sites because of their considerable geographic location, cloud-free weather, bright spectral properties, high

DesertAeolianProcesses. Edited by Vatche P. Tchakerian. Published in 1995 by Chapman & Hall, London.ISBN 0 412 04241 X

Page 2: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Desert Aeolian Processes

air and surface temperatures, high evapotranspiration rates, and sparse vegetation. Otterman (1981) found that the vegetated Negev sand dunes do not exhibitcharacteristic reflectance curves common to green vegetation. This was interpreted by Otterman et al. (1990) to result from plant debris littering the surface and theshadowing effect of desert shrubs.

The purpose of this study is to document and analyze the reverseddesertification in the Negev and to compare it with adjacent Sinai sections usingmulti temporal Landsat-MSS imagery, aerial photographs, and field spectral measurements and observations.

STUDY SITE AND METHODS

Physical Setting An area that has undergone reversed desertification is the Israeli/Egyptian border inthe northwestern Negev and northeastern Sinai deserts (Figure 1). Although created by an arbitrary political border in 1906, the Negev and Sinai are considered onegeographical desert with many linear sand dunes. The study area is located in aclimatic transition zone, with an annual average rainfall between 100 mm north of Nizzana and 104 mm in Revivim, to 175 mm in the northern Haluza sands (Figure1). The rainy season begins in October and ends in May. From 1944 to 1989, thehighest recorded precipitation in Revivim was about 202 mm and the lowest, about32 mm (Figure 2). The area has been inhabited by Bedouin nomads, who use thesand surface for growing castor, beans, barley, wheat, and watermelons. Goats,camels, and donkeys graze the dunes and follow the seasonal moves of the Bedouin(Tsoar and Mo11er 1986).

The Contrast in Albedo Between the Negev and Sinai Since the advent of satellite images in the 1960s, the sandy area of the Sinai/ Negevborder has attracted the attention of many geoscientists and ecologists because of thehigh contrast in albedo between the bright Sinai and the darker Negev (Lowman1966, Otterman 1974, Otterman et al. 1975, Muehlberger and Wilmarth 1977,Adams et al. 1978, Noy-Meir and Seligman 1979, Otterman 1981, Danin 1983,Warren and Harrison 1984, Otterman and Tucker 1985, Waise11986, Tsoar andMo11er 1986, Otterman et al. 1990, Danin 1991, Meir et al. 1992).

Qualitative analysis of aerial photographs from 1944 and 1945 showed sparsevegetation and no contrast in albedo among the linear dunes of the Sinai and Negevdesert border areas (Noy-Meir and Seligman 1979). After the creation of Israel in1948, some of the Bedouin tribes migrated from the Negev (Israeli side) into theSinai (Egyptian side) because of the Israeli military occupation. Owing to securityreasons, the tribes that remained in the Negev were relocated to areas surroundingBeer-Sheva. However, between 1949 and 1957, there were sporadic infiltrations ofBedouin from the Sinai across the border to the sandy areas in the Negev (Meir et al.1992). Post-migration

Page 3: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Reversed Desertification on Sand Dunes

Page 4: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Desert Aeolian Processes

YearFigure 2. The yearly deviation of rainfall in Revivim for the period 1944/45-1988/89. The deviation values are the number of standard deviation units each year's rainfall value is from the annual average rainfall which is 104 mm.

pressures in the northern Sinai led to the removal of shrubs by the Bedouin forfirewood, shelter, cultivation and livestock grazing. Quantitative analyses of shrub volume since 1945 show an increase in shrub density in the Negev and a decrease inthe Sinai between the 19508 and 1968 (Figure 3).

In late 1967, the border between the Negev and the Sinai was opened, allowingfor the free movement of the Bedouin. The Negev side along the border was severely overgrazed and the vegetation destroyed. As seen in Figure 3, both sides ofthe border experienced continuous decrease in vegetation density after 1968. In1982, the political border was reestablished and Bedouin activity curtailed all the Negev side. Shortly after, the vegetation began to recover in the degraded Negevareas (Figure 4). This land use change in the Negev brought the density ofvegetation in 1989 to its highest value since 1945. all the other hand, in the Sinai, vegetation density has continued to decrease at an alarming rate, and is presently atits lowest value since 1945 (Figure 3).

As seen in Figures 2 and 3, high variation in rainfall is not well correlated to changes in the number of shrubs in the same years, thus leading to the conclusion that the amount of moisture is not necessarily a limiting factor in vegetation growth all sand dunes (Tsoar and Moller 1986, Tsoar 1990).

Several investigators (Charney 1975, alterman et al. 1975, Waise11986) have suggested that the destruction of vegetation increases the albedo of the sand, thus lowering the soil temperature and creating a stable atmosphere with lower possibility of rainfall. This has been refuted by field measurements by

Page 5: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Reversed Desertification on Sand Dunes

Balling (1988). Thus, it appears that vegetation can grow back naturally as humanand animal pressures are removed.

In addition, the presence or absence of vegetation influences dune geomor-phology. During the 1968-1982 period, straight linear vegetated dunes in the Negev changed into linear-braided and sinuous seif (sharp-crested) dunes with no vegetation (Tsoar and Moller 1986, Tsoar 1989).

Page 6: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Desert Aeolian Processes

An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after 1982 is the establishment of filamentous cyanobacteria on the sandsurface (Figure 4). This organism (which embodies glutinous gossamer) forms a crustthat is composed mostly of dust-sized particles trapped by its gelatinous surface (Danin et al. 1989).

Methods Data were analyzed using the Landsat multispectral scanner (MSS) taken on threedifferent dates: July 20, 1984; July 13, 1987; and June 8, 1989. Only images taken in the summer were selected in order to exclude the effect of annual plants and soilmoisture. The four Landsat-MSS bands are shown in Table 1.

The ERDAS-PC image processing system was used to perform all the imageanalysis for this study. The three Landsat-MSS scenes were rectified to the Cassini-Soldner (Israeli grid) map projection. Ground control point loca tions were digitized from several available maps on an Altek ACT 34-1 digitizing tablet using MICRODIJ software.

From each of the three whole Landsat-MSS scenes, 601-rows by 601 column images were rectified. These included the Sede Hallamish study area. From these, three smaller (437 rows by 371 columns) co-registered images were cut to include the most pertinent areas while excluding those with no data (this was done because the study area was at the extreme northwest of all three scenes).

Photochromatic aerial photographs of the Sede Hallamish study area were obtained for 1968, 1982, and 1989. All photos were video digitized using a Sony SSC-D5 Video Camera equipped with a Nikon Nikkor 28 mm lens. The 1982 and 1989 photo sets were rectified to the Soldner -Casini projection with 8-m and 79-m pixel size, respectively, and 1.5 RMS tolerance.

From visual inspection of the rectified 1989 photo images and field observations, sample sites were located that were representative of the vegetated Negev side in Sede Hallamish and the unvegetated Sinai in Egypt. These were labeled samples N1 and S1, respectively. Polygons enclosing the samples were digitized on the screen and the map coordinates of the vertices recorded. These coordinates were matched as closely as possible to the coarserresolution Landsat images to produce polygons containing Nl and SI samples on each working Landsat-MSS image. Further visual examination of the 1989 image resulted in four more samples being digitized on screen (see Figure 1): N2-an area in the middle Haluza dune field that appears darker than the southern Sede Hallamish dune fields (N1).

N3-a Negev dune area composed ofthree small polygons just west of the wadi Nizzana that we suspect is vegetated because of its darker appearance than the surrounding areas (high MSS band 7 reflectance versus lower reflectance in MSS 4 and 5, in the 1989 image). The aerial photo also shows this area to be darker than adjacent dune areas.

Page 7: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Reversed Desertification on Sand Dunes

S2-a bare dune area in the northern Sinai that represents an area that differs visually from the first Sinai sample south of it by being lessyellow. N4-a Negev dune area opposite S2. In situ upwelling radiance of sand and vegetation in the N 1, N2, N3, S1, and S2 sites were measured using the LICOR-1800 field spectrometer. This instrument had been set up for 2-µm wavelength increments between 0.4 µm and 1.1 µm. Readings from the hand-held spectrometer were performed from 1 m high on a clear day on October 2, 1992. The reflectance values were calculated byrelating the target radiances to the downwelling irradiation as measured by acosine-corrected receptor.

Atmospheric correction was not applied to the MSS scenes. Such a correctionis usually done by subtending the lowest brightness value in an area that does notnormally reflect much radiation from each pixel for each band, using a differentlow value for each band. The dark area in the image is usually in deep shadow or anopen body of water. These were not found in the images, since the study area is inan arid region with high sun angles.

ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

Statistical Analysis of the Brightness V Glues of the Sample Sites Descriptive statistics, including minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation,and covariance matrix, were extracted for each of the six sample sites on each ofthe three Landsat - MSS images. These statistics were used for two types ofcomparisons:

(1) Comparison of means between sample pairs (all combinations) on the samesatellite image using the test described by Silk (1979, p. 169). One-tailed tests ofsignificance were used when comparing Negev samples with Sinai samples (thenull hypothesis in each case being that there is no difference between the brightnessvalues of the samples in the comparison, and the alternate hypothesis, that theNegev side brightness values are less than the Sinai side). Two-tailed tests wereused in comparing two Sinai samples or two

Page 8: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Desert Aeolian Processes

Negev samples because there was no a priori knowledge. A BASIC program was written to perform the calculations. Results are summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4.

(2) Comparison of means of the same samples over time according to the testsuggested by Wonnacott and Wonnacott (1977, p. 217). A SAS program waswritten to compute the Z-scores. Results are summarized in Table 5.

Because of the lack of multispectral satellite data from the transitional 1982period, video-digitized panchromatic aerial photographs were used as an estimatefor the existing conditions during that time. The 1982 and 1989 digital photographs,which included samples N 1 and S 1, were rectified as before, but were resampled tomatch the 79-m spatial resolution of the MSS images. Sample statistics for N1 and S1, based solely on the panchromatic waveband (0.40-0.70 µm ), were extracted because these were the most representative sites and the available aerialphotographs did not include all six of the sample sites. This was done with theunderstanding that statistics from the panchro-

Page 9: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Reversed Desertification on Sand Dunes

matic imagery could not be compared directly with the multispectral imagerybecause of the differences in spectral range, but that they might be of value incomparing sample sites on the same image. Results show that the albedo of S1 andN1 samples were not statistically different in 1982 but were very different in 1989.

The N3 sites showed low reflectance, and along with the 1989 data, the lowestvalues (Figure 5). Field observations indicate that all N3 sites were in interduneareas, covered with wilting annuals and a high surficial silt and clay content.Examination of the N3 sites from nine aerial photographs during different years,revealed the appearance of shrubs only in years with above average rainfall. Thevolume of annuals in 1989 was higher than in 1987 and 1984 because of the higheramounts of rainfall during the three months of the rainy season. The N3 annuals arefound exclusively where soils have large percentages of fines. Owing to the texturalcharacteristics of dune sands, annuals cannot even get established during aboveaverage precipitation years (Tsoar 1990).

Page 10: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Desert Aeolian Processes

Values of Brightness Contrast Between the Negev and Sinai To make comparisons between the Negev and Sinai samples on satellite imagery and aerial photography, adjacent Sinai and Negev areas, S1-N1 and S2-N4, were selected for further study. Figures 6 and 7 show the satellite image raw sample and average brightness values for these locations. The brightness curves are all similar and indicate very low values in MSS 4, very high in MSS 5 and 6, and somewhat less in MSS 7. As the prior visual analyses from the 1 960s and 1970s showed, the Sinai side has higher brightness than the Negev side. The figures show that this is true in all three images in this study in each MSS band. The differences seem to be greater in the N4-S2 comparison than in the N1-S1.

Comparisons of Samples from the Same Image 1984 Satellite Image: The results of the difference of the Z-scores of the means are shown in Table 2. There were statistically significant differences between

Page 11: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Reversed Desertification on Sand Dunes

Table 5

Difference of means Z-scores for the same samples over time.

Period 1984-1987 1987-1989 1984-1989

Band 4 5 6 7 4 5 6 7 4 5 6 7 Sample NI -5.79 -10.52 16.82 6.42 -0.85 0.71 -14.23 7.11 -5.66 -9.33 -4.16 15.32 N2 13.41 -9.74 7.80 5.56 -9.48 -8.15 -12.75 -2.10 -22.87 -20.13 -6.42 -0.80 N3 1.90 2.75 10.40 10.49 16.58 -17.71 -23.00 -10.57 -16.72 -13.35 -6.42 0.13 N4 -7.66 -9.93 5.52 -0.42 -8.19 -8.68 -12.86 -1.10 -14.97 -27.30-10.79 -2.14 SI 1.98 3.23 8.92 17.55 -0.12 4.81 -5.86 12.30 1.00 6.10 -0.72 31.73

S2 -0.07 0.00 5.43 21.19 9.80 0.00 -4.82 24.58 12.43 0.00 -3.08 42.10

almost all the samples at an a= 0.01, using a one-tailed test for comparisons of a Sinai and Negev sample or a two-tailed test for two Sinai or two Negev samples. Qualitative analysis of the Z-scores shows that MSS 5, 6, and 7 best differentiate two Negev samples except for N2 and N3, which were not significantly different in anybands. N3 and N4 showed smaller, but statistically significant Z-scores. The two Sinai samples were significantly different in all four bands, especially MSS 4, with S1 being less reflective than S2.

YearFigure 5. Changes in brightness values in N3 in the four bands (Table I) for the three years of the investigation.

Page 12: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Desert Aeolian Processes

Comparisons of Sinai and Negev samples yielded statisticallysignificant differences in each case in each band, yet there was a great rangein the magnitude of Z-scores. The NI and S1 Z-scores in all bands showed the smallest values. The largest values were exhibited by N1 and S2 and N2and S2, both especially in MSS 4, and N4 and S2.

Page 13: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Reversed Desertification on Sand Dunes 263

1987 Satellite Image; There were statistically significant differencesbetween all sample combinations in all bands (Table 3). Comparison of the Negev samples shows the largest differences between Nl and N2 in all bandsexcept MSS 4, between N4 and N1, except MSS 4, and N4 and N2, mostly inMSS 4. The combinations of N4 and N3, N3 and N2, and Nl and N3 showedthe smallest magnitude ofZ-scores. The comparison of Sinai samples was most significant in MSS 4, with no difference in MSS 6. The greatestdifferences between the Negev and Sinai samples were incomparingN1andS2 (especially MSS 4, but not MSS 6), N2 and S1, N2 and S2, N4 andS2, and N4 and S1 (except MSS 4). The smallest differences were found in S1 and N3(especially MSS 4), and Nl and Sl (except for MSS 5).

1989 Satellite Image: Differences between samples in almost all situa-tions seemed to be most pronounced in the 1989 image (Table 4). Negev samples were well differentiated in all bands except for N2 and N3 (MSS 7).The Sinai samples were again most distinct in MSS 4. The differencesbetween the Negev and Sinai samples were most pronounced in combinations N1-S1 (MSS 5 and MSS 7), N I-S2 (especially MSS 4, 5, and 7), and N2-S2, N2-S 1, N3-S1, N3-S2, N4-S1, N4-S2.

Comparisons of the Same Samples Over Time MSS Band 7: Almost all the band-by-band comparisons between the same samples over time showed statistically significant Z-scores at ex = 0.01 (Table 5). Qualitative analyses of the Z-scores revealed that there were larger differences in MSS 7 in Sinai samples than in Negev samples over time. TheSinai samples were brighter in this band with increasing time. The Negevsamples generally increased in brightness over time. However, N2, N3, andN4 showed some decreases in brightness in some of the time periods. Thebiggest increase in brightness magnitude for the Negev occurred during1984-1987, and for N 1, during 1984-1989.

MSS Band 6: In studying changes in MSS 6 for each sample over time,the magnitude of changes is greater in the Negev samples than in the Sinaisamples. All samples showed higher reflectance in 1987 compared to 1984,and lower reflectance in 1989 than in 1987 or 1984. The Negev samples showed a decrease in brightness values between 1984 and 1989, while one ofthe Sinai samples showed no significant change, and the other, a smallerdecrease in reflectance values than any of the Negev samples.

MSS Band 5: All the Negev samples except N3 showed highlysignificant decreases in brightness in MSS 5 from 1984 to 1987, while S1showed an increase in brightness and S2 remained unchanged. Between 1987and 1989, the results were similar to the above, except that N1 changed insignificantly and N3 showed much decreased brightness. Overall, between1984 and 1989, the Negev samples showed a great decrease in brightnessvalues, while S2 remained unchanged and S1 moderately increased inbrightness.

MSS Band 4: S1, S2, and N3 showed no significant changes in brightness between 1984 and 1987. The Sinai samples and N1 showed nosignificant

Page 14: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Desert Aeolian Processes

change between 1987 and 1989, while, for the entire period of 1984-1989, only S1 showed no change. The rest of the Negev samples showed a decrease in MSS 4during the period of vegetation recovery.

Field Measurements Observations and results of the spectral analysis indicate five spectral reflectance curves for each of the surface samples (Figure 8). Two spectra show bare sand in S1 and S2 and biogenic crusts in N1 and N2. The N3 site is dominated by dense wilting annuals over crust. The sand spectra have low reflectance in the blue band, a steep slope to about 0.6 µm, then a decreasing slope to about 0.8 µm, and a shallow dip from 0.8 to 1.1 µm. This wavy shape is somewhat similar to the Landsat-MSS spectra presented in Figures 6 and 7.

The biogenic crust spectra are generally characterized by the same convex shape in the visible band and concave shape in the NIR band. However, there is a slight dip of the crust spectra from 0.6 to 0.7 µm owing to the presence of biogenic microphytes such as cyanobacteria (blue-green algae), as well as lichens (Danin 1991). In each sand and crust pair, the spectra curves cross each other around 0.55 µm. The sand has a higher reflectance in the green, red, and NIR regions of the electromagnetic spectrum, and the biogenic crust has higher reflectance in the blue band.

The higher reflectivity of the crust in the blue band is probably present because of the existence of silt, clay, and cyanobacteria. Comparison between sites shows that in the red and NIR bands, the S1 and N1 spectra are higher than the respective S2 and N2 spectra. Field observations have confirmed the yellower appearance of the S1 sand relative to the S2 sand found to the north. This yellower semblance of the sand comes from a clayey envelope around the sand grains. It may indicate a greater age of sand or post-depositional modifications (Gardner and rye 1981). On the other hand, S2 and N2 have high reflectance values in the blue band. The N3 crust has the lowest reflectance of all.

Figure 8 shows the reflectance of the Artemisia monosperma, which is the most widespread shrub in the study area. The dip in the red band (from chlorophyll absorption) is not pronounced and the spectra shape is similar to that of bare soil. Also, the overall vegetation spectra is much lower than the sand spectra, especially in the NIR, where it does not exceed 15%, while for bare sand it is more than double.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The Negev side of the border recovered very quickly once protected fromuncontrolled use by Bedouin nomads after April 1982. This quick recovery starts asthe endemic vegetation begins to re-establish in the sandy desert. Biogenic crusts areformed when the vegetation cover reaches about 20%- 30% of the area. Vegetationand the biogenic crust then act as a trap for aeolian dust particles. Both are thusresponsible for the formation of the dark gray crust.

Page 15: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Reversed Desertification on Sand Dunes

There is a small difference between the shape of the spectra of the Negevvegetated sand dunes and the adjacent Sinai grazed sand dunes (Figures 6 and 7).Likewise, very little difference in spectra exists between the bare sand and crustedsand (Figure 8). The sandy desert vegetation, as exemplified by the Artemisia monosperma, has a relatively low reflectance, especially in the NIR band.Consequently, the effect of vegetation on the general reflectance of the Negev is notperceptible (compare Figures 6 and 7 with Figure 8). Hence, it is concluded that thewell-known contrast in spectra between the Sinai and the Negev is not a direct resultof vegetation cover but is primarily caused by the biogenic crust cover.

The difference of the Z-scores of the means (Tables 2, 3, and 4) shows anincreasing difference in the red photosynthetic signal (MSS 5) between the Negevand Sinai from 1984 to 1989. This indicates that the biogenic crust with its triflingphotosynthesis, is spreading. A similar increase in difference of the NIR (MSS 7)between the two sides of the border reflects the expansion of grazing in the Sinai(bare sand dunes are reflected in a high percentage in the MSS 7 band) and theincrease in crust cover in the Negev (biogenic crust decreases its NIR reflectance).

The above conclusions are supported by the results of the difference of the Z-scores of the means over time (Table 5). The Sinai samples primarily show asignificant increase in the NIR band (increasing grazing). For the Negev samples,there is a significant decrease in MSS 5 over time, indicating the increase of thebiogenic crust over time.

Page 16: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Desert Aeolian Processes

Dry annuals considerably decrease the reflectance values as observed in the MSS 5 and 6. On the other hand, Siegal and Goetz (1977) found dead or dry vegetation not to have a large effect on reflectance values from the underlying soil.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are much obliged to Karl Szekielda for his time and stimulatingdiscussion, to Dan Blumberg and Robert Balling for comments on the manuscript, and to Sara McLafferty for her kind help in analyzing the data.

REFERENCES

Adams, R., Adams, M., Willens, A., and Willens, A (1978) Dry Lands: Man and Plants. The Architectural Press, London. Balling, R. C. (1988) The climatic impact of a Sonoran vegetation discontinuity. Climatic Change, v. 13, p. 99-109. Charney, J. G. (1975) Dynamics of deserts and drought in the Sahel. Quaternary Journal of the

Royal Meteorological Society, v. 101, p. 193-202. Danin, A (1983) Desert Vegetation of Israel and Sinai. Cana, Jerusalem. Danin,A. (1991)Plantadaptation in desertdunes.Journal of Arid Environmen ts, v. 21,p.193-212. Danin, A, Bar-Or, Y., Oor, I. and Yisraeli, T. (1989) The role of cyanobacteria in stabilization of

sand dunes in southern Israel. Ecologica Mediterranea, v. 15, p. 55-64. Gardner, R., and Pye, K. (1981) Nature, origin and palaeoenvironmental significance of red coastal

and desert dune sands. Progress in Physical Geography, v. 5, p. 514-534. Hellden, U. (1991) Desertification-time for an assessment? Ambio, v. 20, p. 372-383. Lowman, P. D. (1966) The Earth from orbit. National Geographic, v. 130, p. 645-671. Meir, A, Tsoar, H., and Khawalde, O. (1992) The Impact of Changes in Bedouin Land Use on the

Physical Environment Along the Egyptian-Israeli Border Since the 1940s. Research Report submitted to Jo Alon Regional Study Center, Department of Geography, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva. (in Hebrew)

Muehlberger, W. R., and Wilmarth, V. R. (1977) The shuttle era: A challenge to the Earth scientist. American Scientist, v. 65, p. 152-158. Noy-Meir, I., and Seligman, N. G. (1979) Management of semi-arid ecosystems in Israel. In B.H. Walker (ed.) Management of Semi-Arid Ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam. p. 113-160. Otterman, J. (1974) Baring high-albedo soils by overgrazing: A hypothesized desertification mechanism. Science, v. 186, p. 531-533. Otterman, J. (1981) Satellite and field studies of man's impact on the surface in arid regions. Tellus, v. 33, p. 68-77. Otterman, J., Manes, A., Rubin, S., Alpert, P., and Starr, D. O. (1990) An increase of early rains in southern Israel following land-use change? Boundary-Layer Meteorology, v. 53, p. 333 351. Otterman, J., and Tucker, C. J. (1985) Satellite measurements of surface albedo and temperatures in a semi-desert. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, v. 24, p. 228-235. Otterman, J., Waisel, Y., and Rosenberg, E. (1975) Western Negev and Sinai ecosystems: Comparative study of vegetation, albedo, and temperatures. Agro-Ecosystem, v. 2, p. 47-59. Prince, S. D.. Justice, C. 0., and Los, S. O. (1990) Remote Sensing of the Sahelian Environment. Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Brussels. Reichelt, R. (1989) Desertification in the Sahel: The exposing of the "old erg" of an earlier Sahara. Natural Resources and Development, v. 30, p. 104-113.

Page 17: 12 REVERSED DESERTIFICATION ON SAND DUNES ALONG THE …€¦ · Desert Aeolian Processes An important change that occurred in the area during the period of vegetation recovery after

Reversed Desertification on Sand Dunes

Siegal, B. S., and Goetz, A.F.H. (1977) Effect of vegetation on rock and soil type discrimination.

Photof:rammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v. 43, p. 191-196.

Silk, J. (1979) Statistical Concepts in Geography. George Allen & Unwin, London.

Tsoar,H. (1989) Linear dune-forms and formation. Progress in Physical Geography, v. 13, p. 507-528

Tsoar, H. (1990) The ecological background, deterioration and reclamation of desert dune sand.

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 33, p. 147-170.

Tsoar, H., and MplIer, J. T. (1986) The role of vegetation in the formation oflinear sand dunes. In

W. G. Nickling (ed.) Aeolian Geomorphology. Allen & Unwin, Boston, p. 75-95.

Waisel, Y. (1986) Interactions among plants, man and climate: Historical evidence from Israel.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 89B, p. 255-264.

Warren, A., and Harrison, C. M. (1984) People and the ecosystem: Biogeography as a study of ecology and culture. Geoforum, v. 15, p. 365-381.

Wonnacott, T. H., and Wonnacott, R. J. (1977) Introductory Statistics for Business and Economics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.