60
15 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/F Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and Revenues Chapter 15

15 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and Revenues

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

15 - 1©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocation of Support DepartmentCosts, Common Costs, and

Revenues

Allocation of Support DepartmentCosts, Common Costs, and

RevenuesChapter 15

15 - 2©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 1Learning Objective 1

Differentiate the single-rate

from the dual-rate

cost-allocation method.

15 - 3©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Single-Rate andDual-Rate Methods

Single-Rate andDual-Rate Methods

The single-rate cost allocation methodpools together all costs in a cost pool.

The dual-rate cost allocation methodclassifies costs in each cost pool intotwo cost pools – a variable-cost cost

pool and a fixed-cost cost pool.

15 - 4©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 2Learning Objective 2

Understand how the uncertainty

user managers face is affected

by the choice between budgeted

and actual cost-allocation rates.

15 - 5©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Budgeted versus Actual RatesBudgeted versus Actual Rates

Budgeted rates let the user department know inadvance the cost rates they will be charged.

During the budget period, the supplier department,not the user departments, bears the risk of any

unfavorable cost variances.

Why?

15 - 6©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Budgeted versus Actual RatesBudgeted versus Actual Rates

– because the user departments do not pay forany costs that exceed the budgeted rates

When actual rates are used for cost allocation,managers do not know the rates to be used

until the end of the budget period.

15 - 7©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Budgeted versus ActualUsage Allocation BasesBudgeted versus ActualUsage Allocation Bases

Organizations commit to infrastructure costs onthe basis of a long-run planning horizon.

The use of budgeted usage to allocate these fixedcosts is consistent with the long-run horizon.

15 - 8©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 3Learning Objective 3

Allocate support department costs

using the direct, step-down,

and reciprocal methods.

15 - 9©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments CostsAllocating SupportDepartments Costs

An operating department (a productiondepartment in manufacturing companies)

adds value to a product or service.

A support department (service department)provides the services that assist other operating

and support departments in the organization.

15 - 10©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments CostsAllocating SupportDepartments Costs

Direct method:Allocates support department costs to operating

departments only.

Step-down (sequential allocation) method:Allocates support department costs to other support

departments and to operating departments.

Reciprocal allocation method:Allocates costs by services provided among all

support departments.

15 - 11©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments CostsAllocating SupportDepartments Costs

The Canton Division of Smith Corporation has twooperating departments and two support departments.

Assemblyand

Finishing

Maintenanceand

Human Resources

15 - 12©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments CostsAllocating SupportDepartments Costs

Total square feet = 255,000

Total number of employees = 95

Maintenance is allocated using square feet.

Human Resources is allocated usingnumber of employees.

15 - 13©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments CostsAllocating SupportDepartments Costs

Human Maintenance Resources Budgeted costs before allocations: $300,000 $2,160,000 Square feet: 5,000 30,000 Number of employees: 8 15

15 - 14©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments CostsAllocating SupportDepartments Costs

Assembly Finishing Budgeted costs before allocations: $1,700,000 $900,000 Square feet: 110,000 110,000 Number of employees: 48 24

15 - 15©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Direct MethodDirect Method

Support Departments Operating Departments

$1,700,000Assembly

$900,000Finishing

110/220

48/72

24/72

0% 0% 110/220

Maintenance$300,000

HumanResources$2,160,000

15 - 16©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Direct MethodDirect Method

Support Departments Operating Departments

$1,700,000Assembly

$900,000Finishing

$150,000

$1,440,000

$720,000

0% 0% $150,000

Maintenance$300,000

HumanResources$2,160,000

15 - 17©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Direct MethodDirect Method

Assembly FinishingOriginal costs: $1,700,000 $ 900,000Maintenance Allocated: 150,000 150,000Human Resources Allocated: 1,440,000 720,000Total $3,290,000 $1,770,000

15 - 18©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down MethodStep-Down Method

Which support department should be allocated first?

Maintenance provides 12% of its servicesto Human Resources.

Human Resources provides 10% of itsservices to Maintenance.

Maintenance to Human Resources:30,000 ÷ 250,000 (or 12%) × $300,000 = $36,000

15 - 19©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down MethodStep-Down Method

Maintenance to Assembly:110,000 ÷ 250,000 (or 44%) × $300,000 = $132,000

Maintenance to Finishing:110,000 ÷ 250,000 (or 44%) × $300,000 = $132,000

15 - 20©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down MethodStep-Down Method

Costs before Allocated allocation costs

Maintenance: $ 300,000 ($300,000)Human Resources: $2,160,000 $ 36,000Assembly: $1,700,000 $132,000Finishing: $ 900,000 $132,000

15 - 21©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down MethodStep-Down Method

Human Resources costs to be allocated become$2,160,000 + $36,000 = $2,196,000.

Human Resources to Assembly:48 ÷ 72 × $2,196,000 = $1,464,000

Human Resources to Finishing:24 ÷ 72 × $2,196,000 = $732,000

15 - 22©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down MethodStep-Down Method

Costs before Allocated Allocated allocation costs costs

HumanResources: $2,160,000 $ 36,000 ($2,196,000)Assembly: $1,700,000 $132,000 $ 1,464,000Finishing: $ 900,000 $132,000 $ 732,000

15 - 23©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down MethodStep-Down Method

Total cost after allocation:

Assembly Department:$1,700,000 + $132,000 + $1,464,000 = $3,296,000

Finishing Department:$900,000 + $132,000 + $732,000 = $1,764,000

15 - 24©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

ReciprocalReciprocal

M HR A FMaintenance – 12% 44% 44%Human Resources 10% – 60% 30%

Maintenance cost = $300,000 + .10P

Human Resource cost = $2,160,000 + .12M

15 - 25©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

ReciprocalReciprocal

Maintenance cost (M)= $300,000 + .10($2,160,000 + .12M)

M = $300,000 + $216,000 + .012M

.988M = $516,000 M = $522,267

HR = $2,160,000 + .12($522,267)

HR = $2,160,000 + $62,672 = $2,222,672

15 - 26©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

ReciprocalReciprocal

M HR A FBeforeallocation: $300,000 $2,160,000 $1,700,000 $ 900,000Allocation: (522,267) 62,672 229,797 229,797Allocation: 222,267 ($2,222,672) 1,333,603 666,802Total $3,263,400 $1,796,599

Total cost Assembly Department: $3,263,400Total cost Finishing Department: $1,796,599

15 - 27©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Overview of MethodsOverview of Methods

Overhead rate for the Assembly Department isdetermined using direct labor cost as a denominator.

Overhead rate for the Finishing Department isdetermined using machine-hours as the denominator.

15 - 28©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Comparison of MethodsComparison of Methods

Assembly FinishingDirect labor cost: $698,880 $349,440Machine-hours: 24,000 23,500

What are the various overhead rates using the three methods?

15 - 29©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Overhead Rates Direct MethodOverhead Rates Direct Method

Assembly:$3,290,000 ÷ $698,880 direct labor costs

= 471% of direct labor costs

Finishing:$1,770,000 ÷ 23,500 = $75.32 per machine-hour

15 - 30©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Overhead RatesStep-Down Method

Overhead RatesStep-Down Method

Assembly:$3,296,000 ÷ $698,880 direct labor costs

= 472% of direct labor cost

Finishing:$1,764,000 ÷ 23,500 = $75.06 per machine-hour

15 - 31©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Overhead Rates ReciprocalOverhead Rates Reciprocal

Assembly:$3,263,400 ÷ $698,880 direct labor costs

= 467% of direct labor cost

Finishing:$1,796,599 ÷ 23,500 = $76.45 per machine-hour

15 - 32©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Comparison of RatesComparison of Rates

Assembly FinishingDirect method: 471% $75.32Step-down method: 472% $75.06Reciprocal method: 467% $76.45

15 - 33©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 4Learning Objective 4

Allocate common costs

using either the stand-alone

or incremental method.

15 - 34©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating Common CostsAllocating Common Costs

Two methods for allocating common cost are:

1. Stand-alone costallocation method

2. Incremental costallocation method

15 - 35©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone ExampleStand-Alone Example

A consultant in Tampa is planning to go toChicago and meet with an international client.

The round-trip Tampa/Chicago/Tampaairfare costs $540.

The consultant is also planning to attenda business meeting with a North Carolina

client in Durham.

15 - 36©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone ExampleStand-Alone Example

The round-trip Tampa/Durham/Tampaairfare costs $360.

The consultant decides to combine the twotrips into a Tampa/Durham/Chicago/Tampa

itinerary that will cost $760.

15 - 37©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone ExampleStand-Alone Example

How much should the consultant chargeto the North Carolina client?

$360 ÷ ($360 + $540) = .40

.40 × $760 = $304

How much to the international client?

$760 – $304 = $456

15 - 38©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Incremental Cost ExampleIncremental Cost Example

Assume that the business meeting in Chicagois viewed as the primary party.

What would be the cost allocation?

International client (primary) $540Durham client (incremental) $760 – $540 = $220

15 - 39©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 5Learning Objective 5

Explain the importance of

explicit agreement between

contracting parties when

reimbursement is based

on costs incurred.

15 - 40©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Cost Allocation and ContractsCost Allocation and Contracts

Many commercial contracts include clauses thatrequire the use of cost accounting information.

Contract disputes arise with some regularity,often with respect to cost allocation.

Cost assignment rules should be as explicit aspossible (and in writing).

15 - 41©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 6Learning Objective 6

Understand how bundling

of products gives rise to

revenue-allocation issues.

15 - 42©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenues and Bundled ProductsRevenues and Bundled Products

A bundled product is a package of two or moreproducts (or services) sold for a single price.

Bundled product sales are also referred toas “suite sales.”

The individual components of the bundle alsomay be sold as separate items at their own

“stand-alone” prices.

15 - 43©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenues and Bundled ProductsRevenues and Bundled Products

What businesses provide bundled products?

Banks Hotels Tours Checking Safety deposit boxes Investment advisory

Lodging Food and beverage services Recreation

Transportation Lodging Guides

15 - 44©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 7Learning Objective 7

Allocate the revenues of

a bundled package to

the individual products

in that package.

15 - 45©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenue Allocation MethodsRevenue Allocation Methods

English Languages Institute buys Englishlanguage software programs locally and

then sells them in Mexico and Central America.

English sells the following programs:Grammar, Translation, and Composition

These programs are offered stand-aloneor in a bundle.

15 - 46©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenue Allocation MethodsRevenue Allocation Methods

Stand-alone PriceGrammar $255Translation $ 85Composition $185

Purchasing these softwareprograms costs English

the following:Grammar $180Translation $ 45Composition $ 95

15 - 47©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenue Allocation MethodsRevenue Allocation Methods

Bundle (Suites) PriceGrammar + Translation $290Grammar + Composition $350Grammar + Translation + Composition $410

15 - 48©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenue Allocation MethodsRevenue Allocation Methods

The two main revenue allocation methods are:

1. The stand-alonemethod

2. The incrementalmethod

15 - 49©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

There are four types of weights for thestand-alone revenue allocation method.

1. Selling prices 2. Unit costs

3. Physical units4. Stand-alone

product revenues

15 - 50©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Consider the Grammar and Translationsuite, which sells for $290 per day.

How much weight should EnglishLanguages Institute assign to each item?

15 - 51©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Selling prices:The individual selling prices are $255 for

Grammar and $85 for Translation.

Grammar:$255 ÷ $340 = 0.75, $290 × 0.75 = $217.50

Translation:$85 ÷ $340 = 0.25, $290 × 0.25 = $72.50

15 - 52©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Unit costs:This method uses the costs of the individual

products to determine the weights for therevenue allocations.

Grammar:$180 ÷ $225 = 0.80, $290 × 0.80 = $232

Translation:$45 ÷ $225 = 0.20, $290 × 0.20 = $58

15 - 53©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Physical units:This method gives each product unit in the

suite the same weight when allocatingsuite revenue to individual products.

With two products in the suite, eachproduct is allocated 50% of suite revenues.

1 ÷ (1 + 1) = 0.50$290 × 0.50 = $145

15 - 54©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-alone product revenues:This method captures the quantity of eachproduct sold as well as their selling prices.

Assume that the stand-alone revenues in 2003are Grammar $734,400, Translation $81,600,

and Composition $133,200.

What are the weights for the Grammarand Translation suite?

15 - 55©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Grammar:$734,400 ÷ $816,000 = 0.90, $290 × 0.90 = $261

Translation:$81,600 ÷ $816,000 = 0.10, $290 × 0.10 = $29

15 - 56©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Revenue Allocation Weights Grammar Translation

Selling prices $217.50 $ 72.50Unit costs 232.00 58.00Physical units 145.00 145.00Stand-alone product revenues 261.00 29.00

15 - 57©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Incremental RevenueAllocation Method

Incremental RevenueAllocation Method

The first-ranked product is termed theprimary product in the bundle.

The second-ranked product is termedthe first incremental product.

The third-ranked product is the secondincremental product, and so on.

15 - 58©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Incremental RevenueAllocation Method

Incremental RevenueAllocation Method

Assume that Grammar is designatedas the primary product.

If the suite selling price exceeds the stand-alone price of the primary product, the

primary product is allocated 100%of its stand-alone revenue.

15 - 59©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Incremental RevenueAllocation Method

Incremental RevenueAllocation Method

Grammar and Translation suite selling price= $290 per day

Allocated to Grammar: $255

Remaining to be allocated: ($290 – $255) = $35

Allocated to Translation: $35

15 - 60©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

End of Chapter 15End of Chapter 15