5
D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005 1/5 Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode confinement and pedestal databases” Aim of paper: To provide a single reference for users who wish to use DB3v13 or the scalings derived from it Review data added since DB2 Review subsets and fitting methods used in recent years Summarise available scalings and give recommended ones Key issues concerning the whole ITPA group Completion of tokamak descriptions Reaching a consensus on approved scalings for one and two term models D C McDonald, J G Cordey, K Thomsen , O Kardaun,....

1/5 D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1/5 D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode

confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

1/5

Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode confinement and pedestal

databases”

Aim of paper:

• To provide a single reference for users who wish to use DB3v13 or the scalings derived from it– Review data added since DB2

– Review subsets and fitting methods used in recent years

– Summarise available scalings and give recommended ones

• Key issues concerning the whole ITPA group– Completion of tokamak descriptions

– Reaching a consensus on approved scalings for one and two term models

D C McDonald, J G Cordey, K Thomsen, O Kardaun,....

Page 2: 1/5 D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode

confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

2/5

Section 3: DB3v13 datasets

• 4 main datasets and weightings

• Extended standard set ( IAE2004S = 1 )

• Non-Ohmic D set ( DB3DONLY = 1 )

• ITER-like ( IAE2004S = 1 )

• Pedestal set ( IAE2004S = 1 , with pedestal data )

• Review of errors in the parameters

• Condition of datasets

No real issues

Page 3: 1/5 D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode

confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

3/5

Section 4: Power law scalings of E

• Ordinary least squares

• Errors in variables

• Principal components

• Pantula method

• PEP model (just reference)

• Dimensionless parameters

• Methods for applying Kadomstev constraints

• More restricted models (g-Bohm, ES)

• Effect of ELM Type

• Do small (Type III) ELMs fit the same scalings?

No real issues

Page 4: 1/5 D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode

confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

4/5

Section 5: Alternative models for E

• Other variables

• Density peaking, shape, power peaking

• Two term models

• Core and pedestal models

• Interaction models

No real issues

Page 5: 1/5 D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

D. C. McDonald et al, Status of the ITPA paper “Recent progress of the ITPA global H-mode

confinement and pedestal databases”, Kyoto, 18-20th Apr 2005

5/5

Section 6: Conclusion

• Recommended scalings

• Summary of scalings, together with a table showing recommended scalings

• Propose we include a set of scalings with a discussion of which to use and in which instance

• IPB98(y,2) (New dataset is still consistent with this using OLS)

• A one term EIV fit (preferred method as error analysis shows OLS is incorrect)

• A two term (although we show, following JGC’s paper, that pedestal data is very poorly conditioned, and so one terms are preferred)

• Discuss a beta independent scaling, as this scaling has been shown on the large ITER-like machines JET and DIII-D. However, cannot recommend as this is not consistent with the whole of DB3.

• Impact on ITER

• POPCON plots and brief description (not a main aim of the paper)

Agree position on scalings