15 Ssynopos

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    1/22

    CONSTRUCTING A SCALE TO MEASURE THE

    EFFECTIVENESS OF FMCG DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS

    IN RURAL MARKETS IN MAHARASHTRA

    Submitted by

    Pravin Kumar Bhoyar

    For the degree of

    Doctor of Philosophy

    (Faculty of Management)

    Symbiosis International (Deemed University)

    PUNE

    In

    October, 2010

    Under the guidance of

    Dr (Mrs) Asha Nagendra

    Director

    Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies (UG)

    Noida

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    2/22

    Introduction

    The rural market offers a big attraction to marketers, it would be nave to think that any

    company can enter the market without facing any problems and walk away with a sizable

    share. Unfortunately, it is not possible to transplant successful urban marketing strategiesto rural markets, namely, deep and intensive retailing and continuous customer-pull

    generation through advertising and promotions. Distribution is the most important

    variable in the marketing plans of most consumer goods manufacturers. It is estimated

    that there are over a million market intermediaries distributors, super-stockists,

    wholesalers, stockists, transporters and retailerswho are involved in the distribution of

    a variety of consumer goods all over the country. Marketers use this network to access

    nearly 5,100 cities and towns and over half a million villages. The distribution network in

    India is characterized by a predominance of family-owned proprietary concerns. Urban

    areas have a variety of distribution outlets, ranging from large supermarkets and

    superstores to the smaller neighborhood retail stores. In contrast, in villages, small shops

    alone are the backbone of the local retail network.

    There is a need to access retailers in towns and larger villages and promote products

    there, so that the products that are purchased locally can reach smaller retail outlets in

    villages. Consumer royalty can be to the brand or to the retailer. It follows that the type of

    consumer loyalty exhibited by the target group has implications for the marketer. The

    influence of the retailer is perceived to be high in the rural market.

    The aims and objectives of the present research

    1. To identify conventional approaches to reach Rural Maharashtra.2. To find the problems perceived by channel members in distribution of Fast

    Moving Consumer Goods to Rural Market in Maharashtra.

    3. To assess the level of satisfaction of rural consumers with regard to Fast MovingConsumer Goods distribution system.

    4. To construct a scale to measure the effectiveness of rural FMCG distributionchannels.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    3/22

    Review of Literature

    Sastry et al18

    have studied the pertinent issues in rural market such as uniqueness of the

    rural consumer, uniqueness of the structure of rural markets and the peculiarities of

    distribution infrastructure in rural areas. These are special to rural markets and hence,

    require unique handling. Practically in every aspect of marketing, rural markets pose

    certain special problems, but the following are found to be important form the marketing

    point of view: Distribution logistics, storage, transport and handling, Location and degree

    of concentration of demands, dealers attitude and motivation, consumer motivation and

    buying behaviour, Transmission media, their reach and impact, & organizational

    alternatives. Thus, the rural market bristles with many problems and to achieve a firm

    footing, a marketer has to grasp these problems and provide innovative solutions to them.

    The impact of spurious brands in rural market and how it chokes the market for authentic

    items was studied by Bhattacharya2. The color and almost identical cover graphics are

    used for passing off spurious products as original. Even the names may sound similar.

    Many distinctive features between the original and fake versions can not usually be

    detected by the unwary and average customer anywhere in the market. Blockages - at

    present, most products reach the rural customers generally through wholesale channels.

    These intermediaries are not sufficiently under the control of manufacturing firms, which

    intend to enter the rural market in a big way. Skewed Distribution of Outlets - not

    surprising therefore, 76% of the estimated 3.7 million rural outlets are concentrated in

    seven states. They have all sprouted in relatively sizeable and well-off villages where

    sufficient consumer demand exists to sustain them. Then again, there are about 60,000

    villages which do not have even a shop each. Poor infrastructure for most villages in most

    areas which chronically suffer from lack of periodic supply of goods, poor availability of

    credit and capital and low purchasing power of patrons.

    The FMCG companies change the track of distribution to attract customers as studied by

    Bhattacharya3. Several FMCG companies have taken to unconventional modes of

    distribution. CavinKare Pvt. Ltd. has created two separate brands - Chinni for smaller

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    4/22

    pack sizes and Priya for larger packs - And instead of using the conventional distribution

    route, they have created a `sachet' sales force that sells only sachet packs to small

    retailers, including cigarette and pan shops. Emami Ltd. tied up with the Post and

    Telegraph Department to place its products across 5,000 post offices. Wipro Consumer

    Care and Lighting (WCCL) have been using the Andhra Pradesh Government's e-seva

    project, which aims at enhancing the common man's interface with the Government.

    Coupled with traditional distribution methods, this approach allows WCCL to reach

    consumers who otherwise may not come to a retail point. Alternative distribution

    channels do not offer better margins and are, at best, tools to gain accessibility in certain

    areas. Also, distribution margins across these channels are identical to those in

    conventional routes, so there is little cost saving. So, while alternative distribution

    options are gaining acceptability, it may be some time before these become a rage.

    Rajagopal12

    reported that the performance of global brands in low-profile consumer

    market segments is constrained by high transaction costs and coordination problems

    along the brand promotions, consumption and consumer value chain. Hence, firms

    looking towards managing brands in Bottom of the Pyramid (BoP) market segments need

    to reduce brand costs by increasing the volume of sales and augmenting consumer value.

    Brands of BoP market segments are socially and culturally embedded. They are co-

    created by consumers and firms, and positioned with the influence of brand equity of the

    premium market. Unlike traditional brands, BoP brands may be sufficiently malleable to

    support brand interpretations in the rural and suburban consumer segments. The paper

    offers new business strategies to managers on brand positioning and targeting in suburban

    and rural markets with convenience packaging, pricing and psychodynamics.

    Khicha8

    studied that television and direct marketing activities help rural consumers learn

    about different brands, ensuring product availability is even more critical. Marketers in

    rural India claim that setting up a supply chain that reaches the remotest rural areas is

    extremely arduous given the infrastructure in the country. HUL Project Shakti targeted

    rural women from existing self-help groups to work as direct-to-home distributors for

    HUL products, and helped the company break into a market they were unfamiliar with. A

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    5/22

    hub and spoke model of distribution is the future. As he explains Dabur has

    successfully adopted the hub and spoke model in India and it has worked very well. Here,

    feeder towns, primarily on the highways serve as hubs, where companies can rent a

    warehouse and stock their products. Spokes are comprised of cyclist salesmen who then

    distribute products to small retail outlets in nearby rural pockets.

    There are two distinct segments of consumers in the rural market. Sarangpani et al17

    studied that one set of rural consumers is less educated or even illiterate. They cannot

    read, write or understand with ease. They do not buy branded products. They have their

    own method of identification of products and communication with the retailers. For

    instance, they ask for Erra Sabbu (for Lifebuoy), Pacha Sabbu (for Nirma), Neeli Sabbu

    (for Rin), etc. Rarely do they purchase branded packaged goods and values associated

    with them. On the contrary, there is a different segment of consumers, the younger 18-35

    years age group; they are educated, more mobile and have urban exposure. They are

    brand conscious. They ask for brands of their choice. Their brand usage and recall rate is

    comparable to their counterparts in the urban areas.

    Methodology

    Purpose of the study

    There is a greater degree of rural base elite who would be going for greater consumption

    of FMCG products with reference to Kolhapur and Sangli districts. It is interesting to

    note that there is a greater degree of rural population much more oriented towards urban

    patterns of living and life style and their preferences for FMCG are on larger scale. There

    is a predominant concentration of well-to-do rural population who have recently migrated

    and settled in urban areas of Sangli district, therefore their consumption pattern would

    sway between rural taste and the elite urban style of preference. Some impressive facts

    about Sangli and Kolhapur districts are - Sangli and Kolhapur districts11

    have the highest

    literacy rate in India, i.e. 77.23 and 77.19% respectively. Per capita district domestic

    product11

    is Rs 20,411/- and Rs 20,019/- of Kolhapur and Sangli districts respectively

    which are one of the highest in the country.The prosperity and the resulting spending

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    6/22

    prowess of Kolhapur and Sangli people5

    was famously reported in a list of districts with

    the highest number of Mercedes Cars in the state of Maharashtra, where Kolhapur came

    second only to Mumbai. Retaining experienced channel members to cater to rural market

    is a big challenge for all the marketers because the attrition of rural channel members is

    double the urban counterparts. So it needs to study the various attributes such as

    promotional schemes, number of assortments and their availability which decide the

    channel satisfaction. Presently, there is a lot of gap between the urban and rural

    distribution system and to make rural customers to visit and buy their needs from the

    local shop requires in-depth analysis and suggest how to catch them hold so that the

    customers regain their confidence.

    Statement of Hypothesis

    For the present study, the following hypotheses were formulated:

    Existing FMCG channels of distribution in rural Maharashtra serve the customerswell

    Channel members are satisfied with the distribution of FMCG in rural market

    Selection of sample

    Two companies - Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) and Godrej Consumer Products

    Limited (GODREJ) which are pioneers in Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) in the

    rural market were selected to study their distribution channels in rural districts of

    Maharashtra. The researcher wanted to focus on two rural districts of Maharashtra to

    study the FMCG distribution channels. Sangli and Kolhapur districts rural market were

    found to have all types of channel levels. In the initial stages, details of only one

    distributor who caters to the Kolhapur urban market was obtained from the Pune based

    HUL distributor. There are only three HUL distributors in one district. After meeting

    with him personally, the details of one rural distributor of HUL who covers three

    Taluquas in Kolhapur district were sought. After establishing rapport with him and

    gaining his confidence, a comprehensive list of other members from different levels were

    sought. The distribution levels identified were- Distributors, Super-stockist, Wholesalers,

    Stockists, and Retailers.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    7/22

    Once the questionnaires were finalized, the researcher started establishing contact with

    distributors of HUL and Super-stockist of GODREJ who then provided a comprehensive

    list of wholesalers, stockists and retailers with their contacts. Side by side, the researcher

    began tele-calling and fixing appointments explaining the objectives of the present study,

    after which questionnaires were administered. The researcher was often required to meet

    them personally and assure them that all the information sought would be kept strictly

    confidential and would be used exclusively for the research study. With the prior

    permission from retailers, the questionnaire for rural consumers was administered which

    was a surprise for them. Interestingly, a few literate customers (contacts suggested by

    retailers) were contacted immediately to ascertain the authenticity of their responses and

    followed up with them promptly. Many of them evinced keen interest to offer additional

    information and discussed certain points out of the topic.

    In all, 16 distributors/stockists, 1 super-stockist and 48 wholesalers were interviewed but

    the researcher was able to get the responses from only 11 distributors/stockists and 40

    wholesalers. The remaining 6 questionnaires for distributors/stockists and 8

    questionnaires for wholesalers were found to be invalid. Similarly, the researcher

    attempted to cover 1012 retailers under wholesalers and distributors from randomly

    selected 45 villages, but again only 60 were found to be valid. 3 customers at each retail

    shop were interviewed, i.e. a total of 170180 rural customers but again only 100 fully

    filled up questionnaires were finally selected for the research analysis since the remaining

    were incomplete in many respects and hence were discarded from the final research. The

    non-probability purposive/judgmental sampling technique was used. The researcher

    chose the sample based on common trait of interest that would be appropriate for the

    study. The research study being conducted with a purpose in mind, the sample was

    selected to include people who evinced interest and excluded those who did not suit the

    purpose.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    8/22

    Validation of hypotheses

    To validate hypotheses, researcher used the statistical tools like Spearmans Rank

    Correlation and Chi-square Test.

    Constructing a scale to measure the effectiveness of FMCG distribution channels in

    rural Maharashtra

    The main purpose of the researcher was to construct a scale so that it can come out as a

    benchmark for companies to measure satisfaction of consumers regarding nine fast

    moving consumer goods. To do this, the researcher thought Multivariate Linear

    Regression Analysis (MVLRA) was the most appropriate tool to analyze the data.

    Results and Discussion

    Table: Extent of Satisfaction for Action Taken Against Channels Complaints

    Extent of SatisfactionDistributors (N=11) Wholesalers (N=40) Retailers (N=60)

    X F1 XF1 F2 XF2 F3 XF3

    Delighted 1 0 0 4 4 9 9

    More Than Satisfied 2 0 0 16 32 10 20

    Satisfied 3 0 0 10 30 32 96

    Less Than Satisfied 4 5 20 10 40 9 36

    Disgusted 5 6 30 0 0 0 0

    F1=11 XF1=50 F2=40 XF2=106 F3=60 XF3=161

    Mean=4.55;Mode=5 Mean=2.65;Mode=3 Mean=2.69;Mode=3

    a. Distributors: The values of median and mode indicate high degree of dissatisfaction

    in regard to actions taken against channels complaints and also the value of mean is

    4.55; it was apparent that 45% of the respondents were less than satisfied and also 55%

    were disgusted. So the question of more than satisfied or delighted in regard to system

    did not arise at all. On the whole, response to distributors satisfaction with actions taken

    against channels complaints was quite significant. Territory jumping by the urban

    counterpart was not allowed as per memorandum of understanding and such complaints

    remained unresolved. There was a big conflict between both urban and rural distributors.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    9/22

    b. Wholesalers: The values of median and mode indicate high degree of satisfaction in

    regard to actions taken against channels complaints and also the value of mean is 2.65;

    it was apparent that 40% of the respondents were more than satisfied and 25% and 10%

    were satisfied and delighted respectively. Only 25% were less than satisfied with the

    system. On the whole, response to wholesalers satisfaction with actions taken against

    channels complaints was quite significant. Wholesalers complaint was in the form of

    spurious products entering the supply chain.

    c. Retailers: The values of median and mode indicate high degree of satisfaction in

    regard to actions taken against channels complaints and also the value ofmean is 2.69;

    it was apparent that 54% of the respondents were satisfied, over and above 17% were

    more than satisfied and 15% were delighted with the system. On the whole, response to

    retailers satisfaction with actions taken against channels complaints was quite

    significant. Treatment meted out to the rural retailers was far inferior as compared to

    urban retailers.

    These observations are in agreement with that of Brown et al4

    who found that the impact

    of manifest conflict was found to be mediated by the degree of channel member

    satisfaction. In other words, channel member satisfaction and manifest conflict within the

    channel were both antecedents and consequences of each other.

    Problems perceived by channel members in distribution of FMCG

    During the discussion and interview with distribution channel members, it was learnt that

    there were many problems perceived by them in distribution of Fast Moving Consumer

    Goods (FMCG) in rural markets of Sangli and Kolhapur districts in Maharashtra which

    are discussed below:

    1. Immovable products

    Distributors had to spend more on immovable products due to their large turnover as they

    were the suppliers to wholesalers. Wholesalers spent lesser as compared to distributors

    due to fewer turnovers and retailers spent the least in immovable products. Overall all

    channel members spent considerable amount on immovable products and the main reason

    was the damage of products in transit. Many times such immovable products were sold at

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    10/22

    discount prices or returned to the manufacturers. These results are partly in agreement

    with those of Thakur19

    who found that the commodities which have fixed life, pose

    special problems to retailers and distributors as these have to be sold before their shelf-

    life. Retailers offer discounts on perishable products nearing their shelf-lives to

    encourage consumers to buy and studied how many units of the commodity they should

    stock on the shelf to maximize their expected profit.

    2. Dumping of goods

    There was a scheduled dumping of the goods by the Carrying and Forwarding Agencies

    who were appointed by the marketers irrespective of the requirements in a particular

    month at distributors level so it was creating so many inventories which blocks the

    money. The frequency of coverage was less for the channels that were located far away

    from the feeder village, taking cost factor into consideration. Therefore all channel

    members felt that it was very important to address such issues. These results are not

    totally in agreement with those of Sangameshwaran15

    observed that to remove the

    conflict between the manufacturer and its distributors, the consumer goods giant

    Hindustan Unilever (HUL) has tied up with a third-party logistics service provider to

    manage the entire back-end distribution chain to streamline distribution.

    3. Payment terms

    It was quite disturbing to note that majority of the distributors had problems of mode of

    payment. The reason behind this was that advanced cheques were issued to the

    manufacturers; very same day of delivery it was to be cleared; distributors had to give 8-

    10 days credit period to their wholesalers and retailers, obviously had to have overdraft

    facility with banks which was very costly so they felt it needed to be addressed by the

    manufacturers either by raising their margins or allowing credit period. These results are

    not in agreement with those of Banerjee et al1 who observed that working capital crunch

    or expansion plans of channel members going haywire has become the cause of payment

    issue.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    11/22

    4. Excessive costs

    Many of the channel members expressed their grievance over cost incurred in their

    businesses. Shrinkage cost was the biggest threat distributors were facing in Sangli and

    Kolhapur rural market; one distributor lost approximately Rs 22 24 lakhs in previous

    years. The fuel consumption and cost of recovery of credit was more. The rural retailers

    could not run their business without credit. These results are in agreement with those of

    Nottingham10

    who reported that the Indian retail industry suffered a total loss of

    staggering Rs 9,691 cr due to shoplifting and waste in 2007. The study found that the

    average shrinkage rate (stock loss from crime or waste expressed as a percentage of retail

    sales) for India is 2.90 per cent of sales.

    5. Excessive lead time

    Depending upon the turnover of the distributors products delivery was done by CFA, but

    some of the distributors faced from over dumping of products and not because of long

    lead time. Whereas majority of the retailers had grievance over excessive lead time due to

    lack ofpucca road and hence inadequate transport facilities, therefore, their waiting

    period was longer especially those who located far away from the distributors /

    wholesalers. These results are in agreement with those of Kashyap et al6

    who reported

    that poor road connectivity - lack of all-weather roads and inadequate transport facilities

    are responsible for long lead time.

    6. Dearth of promotional schemes

    FMCG companies categorized wholesalers in 2 3 types depending on their monthly

    billing so extra commission was given if he achieves the levels as prescribed by the

    manufacturers. There were some distributors who were closely associated with the same

    manufacturers but they never got benefits and the promo-offer was given directly to

    wholesalers bypassing the distributors.

    7. Lack of cooperation and cohesiveness

    Existing rural distributors expected to have distributorship of the same company in other

    areas of rural market to cover the remotest places and smoothen the distribution system

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    12/22

    which would help in reducing lead time and proper coordination and also would help in

    long association with the same company but there was no response from company even

    after discussion and assurance. These results are in agreement with those of Rajiv et al13

    who found that co-operation among distribution channel members could be fostered

    through the use of participative and supportive activities which helped in improving

    performances of the channels and fostered the relationship between co-operation and

    channel member performance.

    8. Unresolved issues

    As per company norms, there were different distributors for urban and rural market and

    different territories and they were not supposed to jump it. Rural wholesalers were

    supposed to buy goods from rural distributors, but to increase sales urban distributors

    tried to jump their territory and approached the rural wholesalers giving some 3 4%

    discount which was huge on bulk purchase. These results are partly in agreement with

    those of Ramachandran et al14

    who at All India Distributors' Association Stir reported

    that the distributors raised a strong protest with leading fast moving consumer goods

    (FMCG) companies for bypassing them and selling their products directly to large retail

    stores because making direct supplies would have a negative impact on the turnover of

    distributors.

    9. Lack of action

    Some times urban distributors used to jump their territory and would sell their products to

    the wholesalers who came under the rural distributors territory. Two times such violators

    were caught with their delivery van and people, photos were taken, sought apology letter

    and forwarded to corporate office demanding termination of contract, but till today no

    action had been taken. Some wholesalers had complaint against distributors about ill

    treatment due to long distance, consequently more lead time which adversely affected

    their sales; after lodging complaints against such distributors no action had been taken

    and subsequently they could not deliver in time to their retailers.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    13/22

    10. Discrimination

    Manufacturers didnt give credit period to the distributors but distributors gave some

    credit period to wholesalers and because of that they had to have overdraft facility with

    bank and interest was high. Rural customers normally used to buy their products on credit

    so retailers couldnt pay cash to wholesalers in turn distributors also didnt get cash in

    time. Therefore all the distributors demanded at least 5-7 days credit period from

    manufacturers which they felt extremely important. But the situation in urban market was

    exactly reverse. These results are in agreement with those of Banerjee et al1. Their study

    revealed that almost all organized retailers are seeking longer credit. Small format

    retailers, who dont have an extensive network and therefore the bandwidth to negotiate

    with companies, are feeling the squeeze more than the big retail players.

    11. Menace of Fake Products

    Many distributors, wholesalers were losing profit margins due to prevalence of spurious

    goods with the same brand name and packing colours and many rural consumers were

    becoming victims of such menace. Kaul7

    also studied counterfeiting and how FMCG

    companies were facing problems due to the spurious goods entered in the distribution

    channels. He added that other than pulling down the profits of the FMCG companies, a

    counterfeit product of lesser quality gave a "bad name" to the brand.

    Levels of rural consumer satisfaction with channel members

    Rural consumers were highly satisfied with the availability of food items (54%), and

    satisfied with toiletries (70%) and cosmetics (67%) though the specific products / brands

    not available. At least one product was available under all categories which just solved

    their purpose without specific brand and they were least bothered about good / bad

    quality products. These observations are in agreement with those of Sarangpani et al17

    who studied that there are two distinct segments consumers in rural market. One set of

    rural consumers who can not read, write and understand with ease. They do not buy

    branded products. They have their own method of identification of products and

    communication with the retailers. For instance, they ask for Erra Sabbu (for Lifebuoy),

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    14/22

    Pacha Sabbu (for Nirma), Neeli Sabbu (for Rin), etc. Rarely do they purchase branded

    packaged goods and values associated with them.

    There was extremely high dissatisfaction (69% food items, 80% toiletries, and 60%

    cosmetics) among the rural consumers regarding range of products because product

    length was too short that only 2-4 products were available under each category;

    customers had no choice but to buy the available ones. These observations are in

    agreement with those of Saran16

    who emphasized that the rural FMCG market with its

    promise of millions of rural consumers is not yet touched by the cornucopia of brands

    and products.

    Once the frequently-purchased products were out of shelf it took a lot of time to reach

    the shelf back, min 5 days and max might be more than 10 days also. Therefore

    customers were dissatisfied (69% food items, 80% toiletries, and 66% cosmetics) with

    regularity of supply of products. These observations are in agreement with those of

    Kucuk9

    who provided clear insights into the influence of product availability, and thus

    distribution on double jeopardy (DJ) patterns, for frequently-purchased products (FPP).

    The distribution created behavioural brand loyalty when Frequently-purchased Products

    are widely available (excessive availability) in the market.

    If required products were not available at local shop then they had to look for other

    shops, i.e. bigger villages or town which was far away from their villages so they

    couldnt go regularly. Therefore many customers were dissatisfied (69% food items, 80%

    toiletries, and 66% cosmetics) with the proximity of retail shops. These observations are

    in agreement with those of Kashyap et al6

    who observed that there are 3.5 million outlets

    spread over 6 lakh villages whereas there are 1.68 million outlets spread over 5000 towns

    and cities, i.e. there are only 6 shops per village and 340 shops per town / city. There are

    hardly any shops in 2.3 lakh villages.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    15/22

    Summary

    The researcher studied various attributes such as mode of delivery, coverage pattern,

    mode of payment, costs, number of assortments, lead time, execution of promo-offer,

    display of products, understanding of channels requirements, communication, issues

    handled, actions taken against channels request, responsiveness during implementation,

    meetings with territory in-charge, time taken for query resolution, actions taken against

    channels complaints, quality of sales-kit, domain knowledge with territory in-charge,

    attitude of territory in-charge, and credit period for satisfaction of distributors,

    wholesalers and retailers and their responses were found quite significant. Most of the

    channel members were satisfied with the present system of FMCG distribution in the

    rural market of Sangli and Kolhapur districts in Maharashtra.

    Consumerism

    It was unfortunate that very few respondents (83%) had awareness about different

    consumer protection acts and also whoever knew it was difficult to recall (13%) which

    had become again a serious concern for the marketers.

    Major Complaints / Problems with regard to Purchase of Products

    It was again an eye opening for the marketers that there was a strong presence of

    duplicate brands (58%) in rural areas which was perhaps difficult for the customers to

    identify and less awareness. Prices were almost same and they were charged as per MRP.

    Customers Complaints & Measures

    It was good that customer lodged complaint with retailers but most of them had taken

    very strong measure by switching over to other shop (71%) and some of them returned

    the goods and took money back (29%) in case of complaints against the goods. No legal

    case filed and no replacement with the new goods.

    Suggestions offered by rural consumers

    Retailers to provide information on new products; retailers to give good products;

    retailers to provide discount at par with their urban counterparts; producers to have check

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    16/22

    on retailers; producers to catch retailers who not doing malpractices and prosecuted and

    producers to ensure implementation of any scheme (promo-offer) in villages.

    Hypotheses validation

    Hypothesis I: Existing FMCG Channels of Distribution in Rural Maharashtra serve

    the customers well.

    Range of products at local retailers vs distance traveled by the rural customers

    A negative correlation and significance level was two tailed and p value = 0.01 and 0.05

    between Distance traveled by the rural consumers to buy products with Satisfaction of

    rural customers with range of products at local retailers.

    Inference: The rural customers were dissatisfied with the range of food items, toiletries,

    and cosmetics available at the local retailers, i.e. there was a lack of product width and

    depth. Only a limited range had been observed in food items, toiletries, and cosmetics.

    Therefore, it implies that the rural customers have to travel away from their villages to

    towns / cities to buy their desired products.

    Regularity of supply of products vs distance traveled by the rural customers

    A negative correlation and significance level was two tailed and p value = 0.01 and 0.05

    between Distance traveled by the rural consumers to buy products with Satisfaction of

    rural customers with regularity of supply of products in case of out of stock at local

    retailers.

    Inferences: There were limited stocks of products at village retailers, i.e. 1 to 3 products

    in one category. If the products were out of stock, rural customers had to wait for 5 days /

    10 days / even more. So, it compelled them to travel outside their villages to meet their

    demands. Therefore, the rural consumers had to travel distance away from their villages

    to taluquas or cities or towns to buy the products and hence they were not satisfied with

    the regularity of supply of products at local retailers.

    Proximity of retailers vs distance traveled by the rural customers

    A negative correlation and significance level was two tailed and p value = 0.01 and 0.05

    between Distance traveled by the rural consumers to buy products with Satisfaction of

    rural customers with proximity of retailers.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    17/22

    Inferences: If there was no range of products available at local retailers and poor

    regularity of supply of products, the rural customers had to approach other good shops

    wherein the desired products were available, which were far away from their places.

    They had to travel to Taluquas or towns or cities which were far away and could not be

    approached regularly. Therefore the rural consumers were not satisfied with the

    proximity of retailers for buying their daily needs.

    Availability of products vs distance traveled by the rural customers

    A positive correlation and significance level of two tailed p value = 0.01 and p value =

    0.05 was seen between Distance traveled by the rural consumers to buy products with

    Satisfaction of rural customers with availability of products.

    Inferences: Availability means the presence of at least one product in one category of

    FMCG, i.e. 1-2 products in bathing soap category, one product in washing soap category,

    one product in edible oil category etc. irrespective of the brand and variants. The rural

    customers are satisfied when the presence of the products at local retailers solves their

    temporary purpose. At least one product was available under all categories which solved

    their purpose without specific brand as they are not bothered about good/bad quality

    products.

    Poor quality of products vs measures initiated by the rural customers

    A positive correlation and significance level was two tailed and p value = 0.01 between

    Measures initiated by rural consumers returned goods and took money back with Poor

    quality with regard to purchase of products.

    Duplicate brands vs measures initiated by the rural customers

    A positive correlation and significance level was two tailed and p value = 0.01 between

    Measures initiated by rural consumers switched over to other brands with Higher

    prevalence of duplicate brands with regard to purchase of products.

    Inferences: Whenever there is poor quality in FMCG bought by rural customers they

    return the goods and take money back from the rural retailers. Most of the rural

    customers can now differentiate between original and duplicate brands so they switch

    over to other brands if duplicate ones are found. It implied that there was either poor

    quality or prevalence of duplicate brands in rural market. Therefore, rural customers were

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    18/22

    not getting good quality and authentic brands in rural market of Sangli and Kolhapur

    districts.

    Hence the Hypothesis I: Existing FMCG Channels of Distribution in Rural

    Maharashtra serve the customers well is not validated.

    Hypothesis II: Channel members are satisfied with the distribution of FMCG in

    rural markets

    There was a dependency and the two discrete variables had a strong relationship. As the

    Chi-square statistic increased, the likelihood that a relationship existed between two

    variables, i.e. the type of FMCG channels and attributes increased.

    The researcher interpreted the results by observing the difference between the observed

    and expected counts. In this case, the level of significance was 0.001. There was a

    significant difference.

    Result: X2

    (2) = 28.369, p < 0.001

    Hence Hypothesis II: Channel members are satisfied with the distribution of

    FMCG in rural market is validated.

    Constructing a scale to measure effectiveness of FMCG distribution channels

    The researcher intended to develop a statistical model to predict customer satisfaction for

    a product which was dependent on different parameters. The researcher believed firmly

    that apart from the psychological factor, the following eight factorsQuality, Size, Price,

    Packaging, Availability of products, Range of products, Regularity of supply of products,

    and Proximity of retail shops, would be predictors to predict dependent variable customer

    satisfaction for that product. In order to develop the statistical model to measure customer

    satisfaction, the researcher thought Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis (MVLRA)

    was the best tool which can be used only under the assumptions of normal distribution.

    Ordinal regression and log linear regression are the tools that can be used when the

    measurement of variable is on an ordinal scale. The researcher developed the statistical

    models (scale) for each of the following products Edible oil, Tea and coffee, Biscuits,

    Bathing soap, Washing soap, Washing powder, Face powder, Face cream and Shampoo.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    19/22

    For edible oil

    Y=0.012 + 0.106 X1 + 0.102 X2 + 0.132 X3 + 0.129 X4 + 0.269 X5 + 0.108 X6 + 0.144 X7

    For tea & coffee

    Y=0.026 + 0.068 X1 + 0.122 X2 + 0.131 X3 + 0.118 X4 + 0.289 X5 + 0.107 X6 + 0.139 X7

    For biscuits

    Y=0.042 + 0.123 X1 + 0.097 X2 + 0.074 X3 + 0.130 X4 + 0.136 X5 + 0.130 X6 + 0.102 X7

    + 0.175 X8

    For bathing soap

    Y=0.024 + 0.095 X1 + 0.106 X2 + 0.096 X3 + 0.125 X4 + 0.299 X5 + 0.111 X6 + 0.143 X7

    For washing soap

    Y=0.043 + 0.143 X1 + 0.101 X2 + 0.098 X3 + 0.097 X4 + 0.270 X5 + 0.122 X6 + 0.134 X7

    For washing powder

    Y=0.027 + 0.151 X1 + 0.109 X2 + 0.091 X3 + 0.113 X4 + 0.283 X5 + 0.100 X6 + 0.130 X7

    For face powder

    Y=0.013 + 0.093 X1 + 0.113 X2 + 0.099 X3 + 0.131 X4 + 0.145 X5 + 0.147 X6 + 0.112 X7

    + 0.149 X8

    For face cream

    Y=0.008 + 0.117 X1 + 0.138 X2 + 0.086 X3 + 0.115 X4 + 0.133 X5 + 0.140 X6 + 0.110 X7

    + 0.153 X8

    For shampoo

    Y=0.028 + 0.086 X1 + 0.125 X2 + 0.132 X3 + 0.115 X4 + 0.135 X5 + 0.132 X6 + 0.103 X7

    + 0.147 X8

    Where, Y = Customer Satisfaction for products (edible oil, tea & coffee, biscuits,bathing soap, washing soap, washing powder, face powder, face cream

    and shampoo)

    X1 = Quality,X2 = Size,

    X3 = Price,

    X4 = PackagingX5 = Availability of Products,

    X6 = Range of Products,

    X7 = Regularity of supply of Products, andX8 = Proximity of retail shop for buying products.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    20/22

    Conclusions

    Channel conflict was there among the rural and urban distributors over the jumping of

    territories allotted by the companies. There is discrimination as distributors didnt get

    credit from companies but they had to give some credit period to wholesalers and

    retailers. There is a prevalence of spurious goods with the same brand name and packing

    colours and many rural consumers were becoming victims of such menace. It was

    heartening to see that youngsters between the age group of 18 to 30 years and that too the

    married ones had emerged as decision makers in the family who could communicate

    well. Less educated people did not buy branded products and became victims of duplicate

    products. The researcher felt elated to note that the majority of the families had less

    members in family. The majority of the rural consumers had no investment at all. Many

    major brands of FMCG were available in rural area. The good behaviour and courtesy ofthe retailers had great influence on rural customers. If required brand was not available

    rural consumers postponed buying. FMCG shopping was still dominated by male. The

    rural customers traveled more distance outside the village to purchase goods.

    The reasons to buy outside the village were the variety, the high quality goods of their

    choice which they did not find in their villages and reasonable prices and there was not a

    single customer who traveled for better product services. The reason for changing the

    existing brands was that new brand was of better quality and quantity. Many rural

    consumers wanted to test the new brand and not the new brand was cheaper. Traders had

    incredible influence on purchase by rural customers. In all purchase he had small or

    greater role and customers family members were also asked for their preferences. The

    purchase decision was not limited to one person from family but it was a collective

    decision. Peer group had almost no role in their purchase decision. Neighbors and friends

    did not have predominant role in purchase decision. Once the frequently-purchased

    products were out of shelf it took a lot of time to reach the shelf back. Very few rural

    consumers had awareness about different consumer protection acts and also whoever

    knew it was difficult to recall which had become again a serious concern for the

    marketers.

  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    21/22

    Recommendations for further research

    1. The present research study was limited to Sangli and Kolhapur rural markets. The

    study can be extended further by identifying other districts in Maharashtra.

    2. An in-depth study can be done on the consumer durable goods industry in rural

    markets as this has become one of the fastest growing sectors in the rural market.

    3. There are some unorganized distribution channels in rural markets i.e., mandi and

    weekly markets. These can be studied to analyze their impact on sales of branded

    products.

    Bibliography

    1. Banerjee, R. and Maiti, M. FMCG Cos Ask Retail Chains to Clear Dues, the

    Economics Times, 11th

    Nov 2008, Pg 1.

    2. Bhattacharya, K. Rural Marketing in India Problems, Prospects and Emerging

    Dimensions,Marketing Mastermind, Sept 2007, p 3243.

    3. Bhattacharya, SJ. FMCG Cos Change Distribution Tack to Woo Consumers, The

    Hindu Business Line, The Hindu Group of Publications, New Delhi, 8th

    Mar 2005.

    4. Brown, JR. and Lusch, RF. and Smith, LP. Conflict and Satisfaction in an Industrial

    Channel of Distribution, International Journal of Physical Distribution

    and Logistics Management, Vol 21, Issue 6, 1991, p 15-26.

    5. http://www.maharashtraonline.in/Profile/districts.asp

    6. Kashyap, P. and Raut, S.Rural Marketing Book, Biztantra, pp 189,190.

    7. Kaul, V. Why HLL's Power Brands Failed,www.rediff.com, 19th

    Feb 2005.

    8. Khicha, P. Building Brands in Rural India,www.brandchannel.com, 8th

    Oct 2007.

    9. Kucuk, SU. Can Distribution Explain Double Jeopardy Patterns?, International

    Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol 36, Issue 5, 2008, p

    409-425.

    10. Nottingham, UK. Shrinkage Costs Indian Retail Industry Rs 9,691 cr Study,

    Financial Express, 15th Nov, 2007.

    http://www.maharashtraonline.in/Profile/districts.asphttp://www.rediff.com/http://www.rediff.com/http://www.rediff.com/http://www.brandchannel.com/http://www.brandchannel.com/http://www.brandchannel.com/http://www.brandchannel.com/http://www.rediff.com/http://www.maharashtraonline.in/Profile/districts.asp
  • 7/30/2019 15 Ssynopos

    22/22

    11. PCDDP: Directorate of Economics and Statistics, 2001, District Domestic Product of

    Maharashtra 1993-94 to 1998-99, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

    12. Rajagopal. Branding Paradigm for the Bottom of the Pyramid Markets, Measuring

    Business Excellence, Vol 13, Issue 4, 2009, p 58-68.

    13. Rajiv, M. and Trina, L. and Bert, R. The Influence of Leadership Style on Co-

    operation in Channels of Distribution, International Journal of Physical

    Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol 26, No 6, 1996, p 32-59.

    14. Ramachandran, S. and Gupta, SD. FMCG Companies Face Kerala Distributors' Ire,

    Business Standard, 4th

    Aug 2007.

    15. Sangameshwaran, P. HUL Provides Back-end Support to Distributors - Outsourced

    Logistics Services to Ease Distributor Burden, the Economic Times, 29th

    Jul 2008, p 4.

    16. Saran, R. The New Rural Consumer,www.india-today.com, 30th

    Jan 2005.

    17. Sarangpani, A. and Mamatha, T. Rural Consumer Behavior with Regard to Selected

    FMCGs Consumption Patterns and Brand Usage: A Study, the ICFAI

    University Journal of Brand Management, Vol V, No 3, 2008, p 22-61.

    18. Sastry, BVH. and Mohan, S. Indias Rural Market A Growing Business

    Opportunity,Marketing Mastermind, Dec 2007, p 16-19.

    19.Thakur, M. Dump Dumping in India,http://www.botree.co.in/industryanalysis.php.

    http://www.india-today.com/http://www.india-today.com/http://www.india-today.com/http://www.botree.co.in/http://www.botree.co.in/http://www.botree.co.in/http://www.india-today.com/