Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dr Alex ParrBrighton and Sussex Medical School
Who should be tested for syphilis? Rationalising syphilis screening in
sexual health clinicsAlex Parr1, Nicolas Pinto-‐Sander2, Debbie Williams2
& Daniel Richardson1,2
1. Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK2. Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
Disclosure
No conflicts of interest
Background
• Syphilis diagnoses increased 12% from 2015 to 2016• >80% of cases are MSM
2138
4788
486 663256 301
3001
5920
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Syphilis d
iagnoses (n)
Year of diagnosis
Figure 1: Number of syphilis diagnoses in MSM, heterosexual males and heterosexual females, England, 2012-‐2016
Data source: PHE Sexually transmitted infections annual data tables
MSMHeterosexual malesHeterosexual femalesTotal
Public Health England: Sexually transmitted infections annual data tables
Background
£30M
C. White. Sexual health services on the brink BMJ 2017; 359 :j5395doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j5395The King’s Fund. Local government public health budgets for 2017/18. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2017/07/local-‐government-‐public-‐health-‐budgets-‐2017-‐18
• Many clinics perform STS for all attendees
• Significant cost implications ~£5/test
• GUM services facing budget cuts and rising demand
• Savings and efficiencies need to be found
Syphilis testing in BrightonOver 5 years between June 2012 – June 2017
Number of tests per individualNon-‐MSM
n £ people
1 22,430 112,150 22,430
2 9,704 48,520 4,852
3+ 11,581 57,905 2,935
n £
MSM 19,436 97,180
Non-‐MSM 43,715 218,575
Total 63,151 315,755
Unpublished data, Claude Nichol Centre & Lawson Unit, Brighton 2017
The 43,715 non-‐MSM tests resulted in only 116 positive cases
Objective
To assess whether we can we reduce the number of syphilis tests we perform
RISK FACTORS
Men who have sex with men
HIV positive
Known contact of syphilis
Endemicityof patient or contact
Commercial sex work
Intravenous drug use
Sexual assault
Kingston M, French P, Higgins S, McQuillian O, Sukthankar A, Stott C, et al. UK national guidelines on the management of syphilis 2015. BASHH. Int J STD AIDS 0 (0) 1-‐26.
Methods
Data team provided non-‐MSM syphilis diagnoses in previous 5 years A1, A2, A3
Identified and excluded those with risk factors using electronic record
Individual case analysis –electronic record & paper records
ResultsNon-‐MSM syphilis cases in last 5 years
TotalNon-‐MSM cases from data team 116MSM/Trans (coding errors) 15Symptomatic 36Patient from endemic area 35Contact from endemic area 15Known contact of syphilis 3Commercial sex worker 0Sexual assault 0Intravenous drug use 0
No apparent risk 12
Analysis of final 12 revealed1 MSM contact documented in past
2 MSM contact documented in past
3 MSM contact documented in past
4 MSM contact documented in past
5 MSM contact documented in past
6 MSM contact documented in past
7 Male with previous partners from African countries
8 Female who had lived in Latin America
9 Male with symptomatic penile ulcer
10 Female referred by blood transfusion services with genital ulcer
11 Indian female diagnosed at antenatal testing
12 Eastern European female diagnosed at antenatal testing
Conclusions
• Over 5 years locally we didn’t diagnose any non-‐MSM with syphilis without risk factors or symptoms
• Must ensure sexual histories are detailed enough
• Targeted repeat testing could save up to £20,000 per year in Brighton
Recommendations
All new patients should have syphilis serology
Only repeat if: MSM
Symptomatic ulcer / rash
Endemic patient or contacts
HIV positive
Commercial sex worker
Sexual assault
Consider repeating if: Other STI diagnosed
Intravenous drug use
Acknowledgments• Data team (Mr Colin Fitzpatrick)• Patients• Staff at Claude Nicol Centre & Lawson Unit
Image credit: Daniel Richardson, Syphilis infection in HIV+ patients, August 2017