Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
06/10/17
1
iNudgeyou THE APPLIED BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE GROUP
www.inudgeyou.com twitter: @peguha
Nudging TaxationTaxmoraleandthevalueofdata
iNudgeyou THE APPLIED BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE GROUP
Pelle Guldborg Hansen, Behavioural Scientist, Ph.D. / CBIT, Roskilde University Director of ISSP – The Initiative for Science, Society & Policy Chairman of The Danish Nudge Network CE of INUDGEYOU – The Applied Behavioural Science Group www.inudgeyou.com twitter: @peguha
06/10/17
2
Vegetarian vs. Non-vegetarian buffet at conference setting
Group 1: At the conference a non-vegetarian buffet will be served for lunch. Mark if you would like to have a vegetarian dish prepared for you.
Group 2: At the conference a vegetarian buffet will be served for lunch. Mark if you would like to have a non-vegetarian dish prepared for you.
98%
13%2%
87%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Ikke-vegeteriskdefault(n=56) Vegetariskdefault(n=52)
Ikke-vegetarisk
Vegetarisk
Non-vegetariandef.
Vegetariandef.
Non-vegetarian
Vegetarian
Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness
iNudgeyou©2017
Thaler,R.&Sunstein,C.(2009)Nudge:ImprovingDecisionsaboutHealth,Wealth,andHappiness,RevisedandExpandedEdiQon,NewYork:PenguinBooks
A nudge is any aspect of the choice architecture that alters people’s behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives.!!
- Thaler & Sunstein 2008, 6!
06/10/17
3
A nudge is a function of any attempt at influencing people’s judgment, choice or behaviour in a predictable way, that is (1) made possible because of cognitive limitations, biases, routines, and habits in individual and social decision-making posing barriers for people to perform rationally in their own self-declared interests, and which (2) works by making use of those limitations, biases, routines, and habits as integral parts of such attempts. Thus a nudge amongst other things works independently of: (i) forbidding or adding any rationally relevant choice options, (ii) changing incentives, whether regarded in terms of time, trouble, social sanctions, economic and so forth, or (iii) the provision of factual information and rational argumentation.
Hansen, PG (2016) The Definition of Nudge and Libertarian Paternalism: Does the hand fit the glove? The European Journal of Risk Regulation
Nudge – a theoretical definition
”Any intentional aspect of a choice architecture that should not influence behaviour in principle…, but does in practice.”
Hansen, PG (2016) The Definition of Nudge and Libertarian Paternalism: Does the hand fit the glove? The European Journal of Risk Regulation
Nudge – a practical definition
06/10/17
4
Hansen, PG (2017) What is Nudging? Handbook of Behavioural Change and Public Policy, Edward Elgar
Nudging – A Science
1. The systematic use of evidence-based behavioural insights
2. Dual process cognitive theory
3. The use of scientific methods for effect-evaluation
Behavioural economics
Cognitive psychology
’Nudging’
Social psychology
Dolan,Paul,Hallsworth,Michael,Halpern,David,King,DominicandVlaev,Ivo(2010)MINDSPACE:influencingbehaviourforpublicpolicy.InsQtuteofGovernment,London,UK.
An Overview of Nudging Practices
Serviceetal(2012)EAST:Foursimplewaystoapplybehaviouralinsights,BehaviouralInsightsTeam
Ly,Kim,NinaMazar,MinZhaoogDilipSoman(2013).APracIIoner’sGuidetoNudging,Toronto:UniversityofToronto,RotmanSchoolofManagement.
Hansen,PG(2017)BASIC–APracIIoner’sMethodologytoapplyingBehaviouralInsightsinPublicPolicyMaking,forthcoming
06/10/17
5
ImplementaQon
Monitoring
Maintenance
KnowledgeDisseminaQonTarget
behaviour%
Analysis SoluQon IntervenQon ConQnuaQon
BehaviouralreducQon
Hotspot-analysis
Processchart
Behaviour
BehaviouralPadern
Who What
Currentbehaviour%
AdenQon
BeliefformaQon
DeterminaQonDefaultsSaliencePrompts…
MessengerAnchoringDescripQvenorms…
LossAversionHyperb.discounQngSocialnorms…
Impl.intenQonsSocialcommitmentSubsQtuQon…
sample
treatment Control
measurement
IntervenQon&experimental
design
Proto-testoftest
R
Ethicalscreening
When
Choice
iNudgeyou©2017
Case: Companies filing for Tax 2016 Partners: Danish Taxation Authorities & iNudgeyou År: 2016
iNudgeyou©2017
06/10/17
6
iNudgeyou©2017
Behaviour B
A
S
I
C
• AllDanishcompanieshavetofileVAT-andTax
• In2015approximatelyonlyone-thirdofDanishcompanies(35%)filedtheirTaxonQme.
• LackofconformityresultsinunnecessarycostsandadministraQonforTheDanishTaxaQonAuthoriQesaswellascompanies.
iNudgeyou©2017
Analysis B
A
S
I
C
• Since2008TAXhasmadeiteasierforciQzenstofiletheirtaxbypre-fillingtheindividualtaxreportaswellasmadethisapre-setchoiceunlessyouacQvelymakechanges.
• Start-upsandsmallcompaniesmightnotbeawarethatallDanishcompaniessQllhavetoacQvelyfiletheirVAT-andTaxes.
• InaddiQon,companiesmightnotbeparQcularlymoQvatedormightstallintheprocessoffilingtheirtax.
06/10/17
7
B
A
S
I
C
iNudgeyou©2017
Solution B
A
S
I
C
• Alongseriesofstudieshaveshownthatasimplereminder,e.g.withinHealth,ohenmakesabigdifferenceinconformitytorulesandagreements,seee.g.(Hasvold&Wodon2011;Stubbsetal2012).
• AsuggesQonthatane-mailreminder(e-boks)shouldsenttoallcompaniesthathaven’tfiledtheirtaxesoneweekpriortodeadline.
• IntegraQonofloss-aversioninthemailthatemphasisesthepotenQallossbynotfilingtaxonQme–aninformaQonthatpriorto2015hadonlyfiguredaspartofthebodyoftheleder.
06/10/17
8
iNudgeyou©2017
Intervention
Sample n = (119.367)
Control:
Recipients in 2015 who did not get a reminder e-mail
Loss Aversion (LA)
Treatment + Attention
n = (39.787)
Randomisation n = (119.367)
LA Treatment +
Attention + Ego-consistency
(EC) n = (39.790)
LA Treatment +
Attention + EC
+ instructions n = (39.790)
65%74% 74% 74%
00%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
Control(2015) LossAversion(LA) LA+EgoConsistency(EC)
LA+EC+STEPS+adenQon
Continuation B
A
S
I
C
Li#eratureHasvold,P.,&Wodon,R.(2011).UseoftelephoneandSMSreminderstoimproveadendanceathospitalappointments:asystemaQcreview.JournalofTelemedicineandTelecare,17,s.358-364.Stubbs,N.,Geraci,S.,Stephenson,P.,Jones,D.,&Sanders,S.(92012).MethodstoReduceOutpaQentNon-adendance.AmericanJournalofMedicalScience344(3),s.211-219.
• TAXadoptsthecombinaQonofe-mailremindersandlossaversionaseffecQvestrategiesingeqngcompaniestofiletheirtaxonQme
• Theteamresponsibleforthe2016trialwillmonitor2017intervenQonanddevelopitfurther
• ResultsaretobedistributedthroughouttheDanishandEuropeanNudgingNetworks
06/10/17
9
ImplementaQon
Monitoring
Maintenance
KnowledgeDisseminaQonTarget
behaviour%
Analysis SoluQon IntervenQon ConQnuaQon
BehaviouralreducQon
Hotspot-analysis
Processchart
Behaviour
BehaviouralPadern
Who What
Currentbehaviour%
AdenQon
BeliefformaQon
DeterminaQonDefaultsSaliencePrompts…
MessengerAnchoringDescripQvenorms…
LossAversionHyperb.discounQngSocialnorms…
Impl.intenQonsSocialcommitmentSubsQtuQon…
sample
treatment Control
measurement
IntervenQon&experimental
design
Proto-testoftest
R
Ethicalscreening
When
Choice
iNudgeyou©2017
Targetbehaviour%
CurrentBehaviour%
Context
Bias Nudge
B
A
S
I
C
Behavioural Mapping
iNudgeyou©2017
STARTHERE
06/10/17
10
”Mandtal”
n=Ca.460.000*
Assessedforeligibility(n=ca.400.000*)Servicemeddelelseomatservicebreveterklar=nukanfolkbegyndeatindberedeselvangivelse.SendesumiddelbartviaE-boksharDorteHolmoplyst
Excluded(n=ca.60.000)
Harselvtastetitastselv(n=60.000)
UlQmoapril 23.juni*(-8dage)
Excluded(n=ca.250.000)
Harselvangivet(n=250.000)
Assessedforeligibility(n=ca.50.000–60.000)RykkermailQldemsomendnuikkeharselvangivet.SendesogsåQlE-boks,ifølgeDorteHolm.
1.Juli Fristforatselvangiveforde460.000omtaltevirksomheder
Excluded(n=ca.100.000)
Harselvangivet(n=100.000)
7.Julica.
Assessedforeligibility(n=ca.150.000*)Erindringsmail.SendesQldemsomendnuikkeharselvangivet.Deterdemail,dererarbejdetpåsidsteår.SendesogsåQlE-boks,ifølgeDorteHolm
Excluded(n=ca.28.000)
?????(n=28.000)Medioaugust Assessedforeligibility(n=ca.22.000)
Densåkaldtemangellistetrækkes.Dvs.enlisteoverdem,somstadigikkeharselvangivet.DenerdenlistevilavervorestaksaQonerudfra.
1.Ophørte
UlQmoaugust Assessedforeligibility(n=ca.19.000)FysiskerykkerbrevesendesQludvalgtesegmenter
2.AkQer
3.Erhvervs-ejendom.
4.Nystartede
5.Kombiaf1-4 6. 7. 8 9
Vierfærdigemedattaksere–ogharforindkomståret2015takseretknap15.500
UlQmofebruar ”porQon”somnåratselvangiveindenvifårlavetentaksaQonQldem.Vibegynderattaksereprimoseptemberogerfærdigeca.ulQmofebruar
Excluded(n=ca.3.000)
?????(n=3.000)
06/10/17
11
ImplementaQon
Monitoring
Maintenance
KnowledgeDisseminaQonTarget
behaviour%
Analysis SoluQon IntervenQon ConQnuaQon
BehaviouralreducQon
Hotspot-analysis
Processchart
Behaviour
BehaviouralPadern
Who What
Currentbehaviour%
AdenQon
BeliefformaQon
DeterminaQonDefaultsSaliencePrompts…
MessengerAnchoringDescripQvenorms…
LossAversionHyperb.discounQngSocialnorms…
Impl.intenQonsSocialcommitmentSubsQtuQon…
sample
treatment Control
measurement
IntervenQon&experimental
design
Proto-testoftest
R
Ethicalscreening
When
Choice
iNudgeyou©2017
BASIC© by
iNudgeyou
Defaults
Salience
Prompts
Status quo bias Symmetric choice default
Opt- in opt-out defaults Default suggestions (B)
Default as reference (C)
Loss aversion
Diminishing marginal utility
Reference point
Hyperbolic discounting
Scarcity / urgency
Focusing illusion
Ordering effect
Mental models
Action direction
Action choreography
Mental accounting Psychological friction
Implementation intentions Chunking
Substitution
Tunneling
Distractors
Limited attention
Focusing effects
Diagnostic domain
Solution domain
Complex causal relations
Information overload Need to
act/react
Need to compare
Strategic
thinking
Goal maintenanc
e
Goal balancing
Intuitive coding
Directed information
Trust signals
Framing of motives
Framing of prospects
Identity drivers
Cognitive resources
Stimulus control
Planning tools
Feedback Contrasting principle Natural salience
Personalisation Learned salience
Pattern salience Strategic salience
Forced choice Suggested choice Perceived relevance
WYSIATI Planning error
Search heuristics
Instructions
Simplification Anchoring
Descriptive norms Status cascades
Authority
Priming of motives
Affect
Sunk cost effect
Risk aversion for gains
Risk attraction for losses
Ego-consistency
Social conformity
Reciprocity
Fairness
Social commitment Don’t break the chain
Social comparison Success feedback
Routine feedback
Goal-setting Visualisation Abstraction
Out of sight, out of mind Pre-emptive strike
Small steps Cognitive fatigue
Cognitive bandwidth
© iNudgeyou, 2017
iNudgeyou Den Danske Nudge Enhed