188242_Session 3 2014 Assignment 1 Marking Guide_2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 188242_Session 3 2014 Assignment 1 Marking Guide_2

    1/5

    : midnight AEST, Friday 5 2014

    : 30%

    / :

    : 1500 ( 10%). 2000

    .

    .

    ( , )

    .

    ,

    . :

    1. .

    2. .

    . , , . , ,

    , . .

    , .

  • 8/10/2019 188242_Session 3 2014 Assignment 1 Marking Guide_2

    2/5

    .

    1. . ( . ., ).

    .

    2. . . ,

    / , . .

    .

    3. . / . /

    .

    .

    . ,

    ,

    .

    . .

    4. . , . ,

    . :

    . , .

    .

    . . , .

  • 8/10/2019 188242_Session 3 2014 Assignment 1 Marking Guide_2

    3/5

    . ( ).

    .. .

    .. .

    .

    5. . , .

    ( ) 5 2014. .

    . .

    . , .

    .

  • 8/10/2019 188242_Session 3 2014 Assignment 1 Marking Guide_2

    4/5

    Ratings and Comments According to Criteria Mark

    Introduction.Properly describes the task and sets up the report content that follows:Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor NA

    Introduces the core conceptsExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Outlines the parameters and scope that will be used in the assignmentExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Further Comments as necessary

    /10

    Case Selection andDescription

    Selection of wo appropriate cases from appropriate sourcesExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Each case is properly described to enable the reader to understand them and their context:Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    /15

    Evidence ofSustainedCompetitiveAdvantage

    Is able to show clear evidence of marketing success/excellence or each caseExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    The evidence is sufficiently detailed and objectiveExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Further Comments as necessary

    /20

    Analysis andExplanation

    Provides a plausible explanation for the sustained marketing success of each case organisation:Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Makes appropriate use of theories, models and concepts from the course to explain competitive success:Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Shows a good understanding of theory and concepts and an ability to apply them to real case situationsExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Shows capacity to make use of analytical tools to aid assessment of marketing-related strategyExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Further Comments as necessary

    /35

    Conclusions: Draws sensible conclusions based on the analysis and discussion:Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Conclusions reveal key learning to be taken from the analysisExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Further Comments as necessary:

    /10

  • 8/10/2019 188242_Session 3 2014 Assignment 1 Marking Guide_2

    5/5

    Technical andProfessionalismAspects of the Report

    In- ext citations and proper referencing (note: an absence of in- ext citations and referencing may lead topenalties beyond the marks allocated for this criteria point):Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Appropriate sources used and referenced:Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Presented in well-thought out, consistent, readable form/appropriate length:Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Style, spelling, grammar and syntaxExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Development Poor

    Further Comments as necessary

    /10

    Total: The paper is marked out of and then adjusted to conform to the 30% loading for thecourse

    Summary Comments as Necessary:

    24

    .

    24 (

    ). 48 (

    ).

    10% 24 . 20 2

    24 10 0 .

    : .

    , . .

    . .