2

Philip CheungAndrew HaymanRob Laronga

Clamart

Greg CookGHK

Greg Flournoy

Peter GoetzMel MarshallEl Paso

Steve Hansen

Malcolm LambBingjian Li

Mark LarsenShreveport

Mark OrgrenAlliance

Jones

Jim ReddenM-I L.L.C.

1997

15

Ted Bornemann Lindsay Fraser Amy Bunger

Robert Elphick Mike GraceClamart Didier Largeau Patrick Perrin Jay

Russell Patrick Vessereau SilverSpring Stephen Prensky SugarLand John Rasmus Don Williamson

ADN ARIBorDip CMRECS ELANFormation MicroScanner FMI

GeoFrame GeoSteeringGVR GeoVision MDT

OBDTOBMI OFA

RAB StrucViewGeoFrame UBI

SIGMADRILSIGMADRIL II M-I L.L.C. ELIAS Bureaude Recherches Geologique et Minieres BRGM

CAST EMI CBILSTAR

1. Bloys B Davis N Smolen B Bailey L Houwen OReid P Sherwood J Fraser L Hodder M

Designing and Managing Drilling Fluid OilfieldReview 6 2 1994 4 33-43

32001/2002

(OBM) (SBM)

[1]

OBMI

20

20 20

4

[2]

1934

1935 Humble

1936

[3] 1937

195060

[4]

(40%)

20 70

Foothills

(WBM)(OBM)

20 80

2080

[5]

1990 1991- -

19941996 20 90

20 90 1995

[6] >

52001/2002

303000

20

1 9 5 8Birdwell

[7]

2. Lummus JL Azar JJ Oil-Base MudsDrilling Fluids Optimization A Practical Field Approach

Tulsa PennWell(1986 ) 200-229

3. Gray R Darley HC Development of Drilling FluidsTechnology Composition and Properties ofOil Well Drilling Fluids

1980 63

4. Gray Darley 3 62-70

5. Bloys 1

6. Baud R, Peterson R Doyle C Richardson GEDeepwater Gulf of Mexico America's Emerging

Frontier Mineral Management ServiceOCS Report MMS 2000-022 2000 4 1-77

7. Prensky SE Advances in Borehole

Imaging Technology and Applications Lovell MAWilliamson G Harvey PK BoreholeImaging Applications and Case Histories GeologicalSociety Special Publication No.159Geological Society(1999 ) 1-43

> 20 10SBM 20 80

90

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

%

WBM OBM SBM

>

6

20 601968

()

80-

1986

7 7/8 20%

1988

1991FMI

7 7/8 FMI80%

1989 BRGM2 ELIAS

16

100% 20 90

7 7/8 60%

1994 EMI1995

STARSTAR

1995CAST

UBI

100%

20 90

>

62 64 192

72001/2002

FMI

[8]

[9]

>

>

OBM/SBMWBM OBM/SBMWBM WBM

8.

Serra O Information on Depositional SedimentaryEnvironments Serra O Sedimentary Environmentsfrom Wireline Logs 2 SugarLand Schlumberger Educational Services 19898 119-233

9.

A

B

C

D

E

G

H

I

1

89

141

17

18

19 20 25

37

38

39

4041

23

2421

10

1112

13

5

34

35

28

27 31

8

[10]

[11]

> FMI -

XX051 XX059

2 FMI

1in. 166

6

ft

0 120 240 360

3 3 00.15

ohm-m 200020

100

0 90

0 90

FMI FMS[12]

92001/2002

(CMR) (ECS)(ELAN)

[13]

(LWD)

(RAB)GVR

GeoVision1

> FMI CMR ECS ELANECS

1 CMR2 3 CMR T2 4 ELAN

FMI5 FMI 6

FMI

10. Al-Qarni AO Ault B, Heckman R McClure S DenooS Rowe W Fairhurst D Kaiser B Logan D McNallyAC Norville MA Seim MR Ramsey L

124 2000/2001 42-60

11. Anderson B Bryant I Lling M Spies B HelbigK Oilfield Anisotropy: Its Origins and ElectricalCharacteristics Oilfield Review 6 4 (1994

10 ) 48-56

Robertson D Kuchuk F The Value of VariationMiddle East Well Evaluation Review 18 (1997

) 42-55

12. Luthi S

Soulhaite P Fracture Aptertures from ElectricalBorehole Scans Geophysics 55 7 (1990

7 ) 821-833

13. Akbar M Petricola M Watfa M Badri M ChararaM Boyd A Cassell B Nurmi R Delhomme J-P GraceM Kenyon B Roestenburg J Classic InterpretationProblems Evaluating Carbonates Oilfield Review 7

1 (1995 1 ) 38-57

Akbar M Vissapragada B Alghamdi A Allen HerronM Carnegie A Dutta D Olesen J-R Chourasiya RLogan D Steif D Netherwood R Russel SD SaxenaK12 4 2000/2001 20-41

10

(ADN)

[14]

(OBDT)

OBDT

> RAB FMI RABFMI

1in

.

FMI RAB

112001/2002

/ (S/m)

100 10 S/m10 S /m

(OBMI)

I

V VI k

Rxo=k( V/I)

OBMI

Rxo0.2 10000 -

[15] OBMI

RxoRm

14. UBI 250kHz500kHz 250kHz

15.

> OBMI

I 5

V RxoV I k

IVV

Rxo Rxo R = k((( V/I).k 10m

8 cm

37 c

m

> OBMI Rxo1 -

900 / 1800 / (274 / 549/ )

Rxo 10000 -

100,000

1

12

Rxo 10 -0.5 1.3

Rxo1 - 0.25

0.64[16]

OBMI5

0.4 0.4 1.0 2

1.2 3.0

OBMI 1.23.0

OBMI 1.2FMI RAB [17]

OBMI

Rxo 10 2520% Rxo

1 10000 -

[18]

OBMI

[19]

1.2

3:1 1:3Rxo10:1

Rxo10

10

OBMI

OBMI

[20] OBMI

OBMI1.2 [21]

[22]

> OBMI OBMI LQC1

2 34 5 OBMI

1m/s29 11 in.6 16

0 100

API0 150

2in.6 16

Akohm0 1000

Bkohm0 1000

C0 1000

Dkohm0 1000

OBMIohm-m0.1 10,000

OBMI B 9ohm-m0.1 10,000

OBMI C 30.1 10,000

OBMI Dohm-m0.1 10,000

OBMI 20 130

40 360

LQCOBMI

101

10

10-1-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0

1.2 Rt=1

1.2 Rt=10

2 4 6 8 10

101

100

10-1-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

R = 3RR = 30

R = 3

R

132001/2002

OBMI

OBMI

OBMI

OBMI

O B M IHunton Sycamore

Hunton

Hunton

16. Cheung P Pittman D Hayman A Laronga RVessereau P Ounadjela A Desport O Hansen SKear R Lamb M Borbas T Wendt B Field TestResults of a New Oil-Base Mud Formation Imager Tool

42 SPWLA2001 6 17-20 XX

17.Cannon D Kien i t z C In terpretat ion ofAsymmetrically Invaded Formations with Azimuthaland Radial LWD Data 40 SPWLA

1999 5 30 - 63 G

Cryer J Ford G Grether B Hartner J Waters DDip Interpretation from Resistivity at Bit Images (RAB)

Provides a New and Efficient Method for EvaluatingStructurally Complex Areas in the Cook Inlet AlaskaSPE 54611 SPE

Anchorage 1999 5 26-28

Bonner S Bagersh A Clark B Dajee G Dennison MHall JS Jundt J Lovell J Rosthal R Allen D ANew Generation of Electrode Resistivity Measurements forFormation Evaluation While Drilling 35 SPWLA

Tulsa 19946 19-22 OO

18. Cheung 16

19.

20. Serra8

Scholle PAS p e a r i n g D S a n d s t o n e D e p o s i t i o n a l

Environments Tulsa1982

21.

3 9.8

22.

> OBMI 1.2 10 -OBMI 10 - OBMI

OBMI10

14

OBMI80

> OBMI OBMI

Hunton

0 200

2in.4 14

0 120 240 360

MDft

OBMI

0 20

14 14

0 120 240 360

OBMI

0 degg 90

OBMI

OBMI

FMI

20 120 OBMI OBMIohm-m0.2 20

A060ohm-m0.2 20

ohm-m0.2 20

A010ohm-m0.2 20

A030ohm-m0.2 20

26 16

1

in.

API

6

0 40

0 10 0 10

3 30.6 0

0

152001/2002

OBMI

OBMI

FMI

M-I L.L.C.SIGMADRIL

16

OBMI

2005200

/ 318000 3/ [23]

[24]

OBMI

OBMI

500150

OBMI

18

23. Lyle D Deepwater Production Surges HigherHart's E&P 74 8 (2001 8 ) 90

24. Farmer P Miller D Pieprzak A Rutledge J WoodsR Exploring the Subsalt Oilfield Review 8

1 1996 50-64

> OBMI OBMIOBMI

16

M-I L.L.C. 5

SIGMADRIL SIGMADRIL

Meaux

FMI

> Meaux 10 32.8 8 60 FMISIGMADRIL

5 2 FMISIGMADRIL

FMI

SIGMADRIL

172001/2002

SIGMADRIL

FMI

81/2SIGMADRIL

155994755 SIGMADRIL

150

2-

M-I L.L.C. SIGMADRIL II

50%

> SIGMADRIL FMI SIGMADRILFMI FMI

1 ft

FMI FMI

GVR GeoVISIONSIGMADRIL II

GVR

18

OBMI

OBMI

OBMI

MDT

10%

[25]

OBMIMDT

OBMI1.2

OBMICMR

>

3

MDT

25. Andrews J Beck G Castelijns K Chen A FadnessF Irvine-Fortescue J Williams S Cribbs M HashemM Jamaluddin A Kurkjian A Sass B MullinsOC Rylander E Van Dusen A

13 3 2001 24-43

Cuvillier G Edwards S Johnson G Plumb D SayersC Denyer G Mendonca JE Theuveny B ViseC 12

1 2000 2-17

Christie A Kishino A Cromb J Hensley R KentE McBeath B Stewart H Vidal A Koot L

114 1999/2000 2-19

26. Cheung 16

OBMIMDft

OBMI

20 API 120

26 16

1

in.

6 16

0 40

A090ohm-m0.2 200

A060ohm-m0.2 200

ohm-m0.2 200

A010ohm-m0.2 200

A0300.2 200

ft3/ft30.6 0

3 3 0

100

API 120A090

OBMI

ohm-m 200.2API Depth, ft12020 ohm-m 200.2

1in. 166

Vol/Vol 00.6

Vol/Vol 00.6

2in. 166

ft3/ft3 3 00.6

ft3/ft3 3 00.6A060

ohm-m 200.2

A030ohm-m 200.2

A020ohm-m 200.2

A010ohm-m 200.2

2in. 166

1in. 166

0 120 240 360

00

192001/2002

OBMI CMRMDT

OFA

10% 20% 5%

OBMI

OBMI

OBMI

OBMI

[26]

OBMI

> MDT OBMI MDTMDT X108.1 OBMI

MDT X097 OBMI 4OBMI

MDT

20

0.5 1.3

XX84 OBMI

OBMI1.2

OBMI

50 15

OBDT OBMI

OBDT

OBMIOBMI

OBDT10 OBMI

OBDT OBDTOBMI

OBMIOBMI

OBDT

> OBMI 4 56 7 0.5

1.3 1.2 3.0 XX84.0XX83.4

OBMI

XX82

MDft

OBMI

XX83

XX84

XX85

XX86 262.87 48.69

263.24 48.87

263.70 49.18

264.10 49.34

264.30 49.47

A090ohm-m0.2 20 ft3/ft30.6 0

ft3/ft30.6 0

API20 120

1in.6 16

2in.6 16

A010ohm-m0.2 20

OBMIohm-m0.2 20

212001/2002

> OBDT OBMI OBDTOBMI 4 OBDT

OBMI

0 90

20 120API

ftMD

6 16in.2

6 16in.1

0.2 20ohm-m 0 90

OBDT

0 90

OBMI

AO90

0.2 0 120 240 36020ohm-mAO10

0.2 20ohm-mOBMI

OBDT

OBDT

0 120 240 360OBMI

OBDT

22

-

OBMI

OBMI

OBMIFoothills

[27]

OBMIFoothills

> StrucView OBMI 2800

250

200

150

100

1

1

1

2

2

3

3

3

1

2

3

232001/2002

El Paso SuncorFoothills

Turner Valley

OBMIOBMI

2800 9186OBMI

StrucView GeoFrameStrucView

150 3582 117503665 12020

OBMIEl

Paso 5

Turner Valley

OBMI

UBIOBMI UBI

UBI OBMI

StrucView

27. Mitra S Duplex Structures and Imbricate ThrustSystems Geometry Structural Position andHydrocarbon Potential The American Associationof Petroleum Geologists Bulletion 70 9

1986 9 1087-1112

>

1 2 3

> StrucView OBMI

OBMI

3000

3500

OBMI UBI,

0 90

24

UBI OBMIUBI

OBMI

UBI

OBMI

ElPaso

675 2215Turner Valley

FoothillsOBMI

Foothills

> OBMI UBI OBMI 1 UBI3

> Foothills X221 X200X320 OBMI

3 4

OBMIOBMI

0 90

mm2

1125

API0 150

0 90 0 90 0 90

0

252001/2002

OBMI

ArkomaPotato Hills

GHK34

920 26

Jackfork Ratcliff

BigforkOBMI Potato Hills

Bigfork

Arkoma Ouachita Mountain

(Bigfork Stanley Missouri

Mountain Polk CreekB i g f o r k W o m b l e )Ouachita

OBMIStrucView Bigfork

>

1 2

2 1

> Potato Hills StrucView OBMI 1StrucView GHK

10

0 90 0 90

26

GHK

GHK

Potato Hills

OBMIGHK

OBMI

[28] OBMIGHK

GHK

28.

( 1 2 )

> OBMI Potato Hills OBMI

0 360120 240

OBMIAPI0 150

0 90

0 360120 240

OBMI2

in.5 15

0 50

1

in.5 15 0 90

272001/2002

> OBMI 1.2UBI

LWDRAB

LWD

UBI

FMI

ADN

UBI

FMI

OBDT

ADN

WBM OBM/SBM

LWD

UBI

FMI

ADN

LWD

UBI

FMI

RAB

ADN

UBI

FMI

OBDT

LWD

UBI

FMI

RAB

ADN

WBM OBM/SBM

UBI

FMI

OBDT

ADN

LWD

UBI

FMI

RAB

ADN

WBM OBM/SBMLW

D

UBI

FMI

RAB

ADN

OBMI

OBMI

OBMI

OBMI

MG