12
Gene expression differences induced by equimolar low doses of LH or hCG in combination with FSH in cultured mouse antral follicles Ingrid Segers, Tom Adriaenssens, Sandra Wathlet and Johan Smitz Follicle Biology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium (Correspondence should be addressed to I Segers; Email: [email protected]) Abstract In a natural cycle, follicle growth is coordinated by FSH and LH. Follicle growth stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) requires antral follicles to be exposed to both FSH and LH bioactivity, especially after GNRH analog pretreatment. The main aim was to detect possible differences in gene expression in granulosa cells after exposing the follicle during antral growth to LH or hCG, as LH and hCG are different molecules acting on the same receptor. Effects of five gonadotropin treatments were investigated for 16 genes using a mouse follicle culture model. Early (day 6) antral follicles were exposed to high recombinant FSH combined or not with equimolar concentrations of recombinant LH (rLH) or recombinant hCG (rhCG) and to highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) for 6 h, 12 h, or 3 days. Expression differences were tested for genes involved in steroidogenesis: Mvk, Lss, Cyp11a1, Hsd3b1, Cyp19a1, Nr4a1, and Timp1; final granulosa differentiation: Lhcgr , Oxtr , Pgr , Egfr , Hif1a, and Vegfa; and cytokines: Cxcl12, Cxcr4, and Sdc4. Lhcgr was present and upregulated by gonadotropins. Nr4a1, Cxcl12, and Cxcr4 showed a different expression pattern if LH bioactivity was added to high FSH in the first hours after exposure. However, no signs of premature luteinization were present even after a 3-day treatment as shown by Cyp19a1, Oxtr, Pgr, and Egfr and by estrogen and progesterone measurements. The downstream signaling by rhCG or rLH through the LHCGR was not different for this gene selection. Granulosa cells from follicles exposed to HP-hMG showed an enhanced expression level for several genes compared with recombinant gonadotropin exposure, possibly pointing to enhanced cellular activity. Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269–280 Introduction The final stages of follicle development leading to ovulation are dependent on two pituitary glycoproteins: FSH and LH. Granulosa cells of primary follicles start expressing FSH receptors (Fshr) and the theca cells of secondary follicles start expressing LH receptors (Lhcgr)(Erickson et al. 1985, Oktay et al. 1997). Early antral follicle growth is only sustained under rising FSH serum concentrations, which induce a rise in estradiol (E 2 ) and inhibin B (Inhb) (Groome et al. 1996), followed by expression of Lhcgr on granulosa cells (Peng et al. 1991). Negative feedback mechanisms of E 2 and INHB on FSH concentrations select out a dominant follicle, which can survive due to its LH responsiveness (McGee & Hsueh 2000). Stimulation of ovarian follicle growth in human ART practice involves the use of gonadotropin preparations containing either FSH alone or combinations of FSH plus LH activity. LH activity in highly purified human menopausal gonado- tropin (HP-hMG) is mainly represented by hCG stimulation (Wolfenson et al. 2005). More recently, recombinant LH (rLH) became available to complement recombinant FSH (rFSH) during stimulation (Mochtar et al. 2007). Differences in gene expression in human follicle cells were shown in relation to the type of gonadotropin preparation used (Grondahl et al. 2009, Adriaenssens et al. 2010), and these might influence clinical outcome (Afnan 2009, van Wely et al. 2011). Also the origin of the gonadotropin preparation, urinary or recombinant, might, via isoform composition differences, affect bioavailability and bioactivity in relation to the species (de Leeuw et al. 1996). Gonadotropin receptors typically activate adenylyl cyclase through G-proteins and thereby induce cAMP production. However, the cellular response upon FSH cannot entirely substitute for LHCGR signaling during the final stages of follicle growth and ovulation as shown in the Lhcgr knockout mouse (Zhang et al. 2001) and in women with inactivating mutations of Lhcgr (Huhtaniemi & Alevizaki 2006). Hence, stimulation of FSHR or LHCGR during antral follicle growth leads to a specific differential response. The large N-terminal ectodomain of the LHCGR is responsible for the high affinity and selective binding of its two ligands LH and hCG (Caltabiano et al. 2008). The LH and hCG b subunit share 80% sequence homology but greatly differ in carbohydrate additions (for review Fares (2006)). Where the conserved amino acid composition of LH and hCG determines the ligand–receptor specificity, the divergent 269 Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269––280 DOI: 10.1530/JOE-12-0150 0022–0795/12/0215–269 q 2012 Society for Endocrinology Printed in Great Britain Online version via http://www.endocrinology-journals.org

2. Gene Expression Differences Induced by Equimolar Low Doses of LH

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

gfyhjhcgfvhjbj

Citation preview

  • Gene expression differences induced by equimolar low doses of LHn

    nd

    0 Je

    com

    hCG (rhCG) and to highly purified human menopausal genes compared with recombinant gonadotropin exposure,

    involves the use of gonadotropin preparations containing

    (rLH) became available to complement recombinant FSH

    growth leads to a specific differential response.

    differ in carbohydrate additions (for review Fares (2006)).

    269Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280(rFSH) during stimulation (Mochtar et al. 2007). Differences

    in gene expression in human follicle cells were shown in

    Where the conserved amino acid composition of LH and

    hCG determines the ligandreceptor specificity, the divergent

    DOI: 10.1530/JOE-12-0150either FSH alone or combinations of FSH plus LH activity.

    LH activity in highly purified human menopausal gonado-

    tropin (HP-hMG) is mainly represented by hCG stimulation

    (Wolfenson et al. 2005). More recently, recombinant LH

    The large N-terminal ectodomain of the LHCGR is

    responsible for the high affinity and selective binding of its

    two ligands LH and hCG (Caltabiano et al. 2008). The LH

    and hCG b subunit share 80% sequence homology but greatlyFSH concentrations select out a dominant follicle, which can

    survive due to its LH responsiveness (McGee & Hsueh 2000).

    Stimulation of ovarian follicle growth in human ART practice

    mouse (Zhang et al. 2001) and in women with inactivating

    mutations of Lhcgr (Huhtaniemi & Alevizaki 2006). Hence,

    stimulation of FSHR or LHCGR during antral follicledifferences were tested for genes involved in steroidogenesis:

    Introduction

    The final stages of follicle development leading to ovulation

    are dependent on two pituitary glycoproteins: FSH and LH.

    Granulosa cells of primary follicles start expressing FSH

    receptors (Fshr) and the theca cells of secondary follicles start

    expressing LH receptors (Lhcgr) (Erickson et al. 1985, Oktay

    et al. 1997). Early antral follicle growth is only sustained under

    rising FSH serum concentrations, which induce a rise in

    estradiol (E2) and inhibin B (Inhb) (Groome et al. 1996),

    followed by expression of Lhcgr on granulosa cells (Peng et al.

    1991). Negative feedback mechanisms of E2 and INHB on00220795/12/0215269 q 2012 Society for Endocrinology Printed in GreatJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280

    relation to the type of gonadotropin preparation used

    (Grondahl et al. 2009, Adriaenssens et al. 2010), and these

    might influence clinical outcome (Afnan 2009, van Wely et al.

    2011). Also the origin of the gonadotropin preparation,

    urinary or recombinant, might, via isoform composition

    differences, affect bioavailability and bioactivity in relation to

    the species (de Leeuw et al. 1996).

    Gonadotropin receptors typically activate adenylyl cyclase

    through G-proteins and thereby induce cAMP production.

    However, the cellular response upon FSH cannot entirely

    substitute for LHCGR signaling during the final stages of

    follicle growth and ovulation as shown in the Lhcgr knockoutgonadotropin (HP-hMG) for 6 h, 12 h, or 3 days. Expression possibly pointing to enhanced cellular activity.or hCG in combination with FSH i

    Ingrid Segers, Tom Adriaenssens, Sandra Wathlet a

    Follicle Biology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 109

    (Correspondence should be addressed to I Segers; Email: segersingrid@gmail.

    Abstract

    In a natural cycle, follicle growth is coordinated by FSH and

    LH. Follicle growth stimulation in Assisted Reproductive

    Technologies (ART) requires antral follicles to be exposed to

    both FSH and LH bioactivity, especially after GNRH analog

    pretreatment. The main aim was to detect possible

    differences in gene expression in granulosa cells after

    exposing the follicle during antral growth to LH or hCG,

    as LH and hCG are different molecules acting on the same

    receptor. Effects of five gonadotropin treatments were

    investigated for 16 genes using a mouse follicle culture

    model. Early (day 6) antral follicles were exposed to high

    recombinant FSH combined or not with equimolar

    concentrations of recombinant LH (rLH) or recombinantcultured mouse antral follicles

    Johan Smitz

    tte, Belgium

    )

    Mvk, Lss, Cyp11a1, Hsd3b1, Cyp19a1, Nr4a1, and Timp1;

    final granulosa differentiation: Lhcgr, Oxtr, Pgr, Egfr, Hif1a,

    and Vegfa; and cytokines: Cxcl12, Cxcr4, and Sdc4. Lhcgr was

    present and upregulated by gonadotropins. Nr4a1, Cxcl12,

    and Cxcr4 showed a different expression pattern if LH

    bioactivity was added to high FSH in the first hours after

    exposure. However, no signs of premature luteinization were

    present even after a 3-day treatment as shown by Cyp19a1,

    Oxtr, Pgr, and Egfr and by estrogen and progesterone

    measurements. The downstream signaling by rhCG or rLH

    through the LHCGR was not different for this gene

    selection. Granulosa cells from follicles exposed to

    HP-hMG showed an enhanced expression level for severalBritain Online version via http://www.endocrinology-journals.org

  • condition. The validated mouse model used is physiologically

    relevant as it allows natural interactions between the three

    After the initial growth period of 6 days from the preantral to

    I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression270cell types of the follicle (Cortvrindt & Smitz 2002). The

    responsiveness and sensitivity for FSH and LH in this in vitro

    follicle model has already been studied (Cortvrindt et al. 1998,

    Adriaens et al. 2004). Different gonadotropin regimens were

    shown to induce differences in mRNA expression in follicle

    cells (Adriaenssens et al. 2009, Sanchez et al. 2011) and in

    secretion of proteins (Foster et al. 2010). Therefore, in the

    current study, early antral follicles were exposed to five

    different gonadotropin regimens relevant to the ART clinic.

    A low rFSH tonus (10 mIU/ml) was used during the

    preantral follicle stage (from days 1 to 6), followed by a high

    FSH supplementation (as in clinical ART, 25 mIU/ml) in

    combination or not with low doses of LH or hCG or by

    HP-hMG. The doses of rLH or recombinant hCG (rhCG)

    included (5.35 pM, equivalent to 5 mIU/ml rhCG) wereequimolar and similar to the amount of LH/hCG present in

    HP-hMG, when the dose used in medium is 25 mIU/ml.

    These doses are 240 times less than the ovulatory trigger

    (1.2 IU/ml hCG) and w100 times less than the minimaleffective dose (0.4 IU/ml rhCG, historical laboratory data) toinduce mucification and maturation in the applied follicle

    culture system.

    Downstream acute effects of gonadotropin exposure were

    studied by quantitative gene expression (day 6 at 6 and 12 h)

    and the chronic effects after 3 days of exposure. The 16 genes

    chosen for analysis involve LH-induced processes,

    e.g. steroidogenesis: Mvk, Lss, Cyp11a1, Hsd3b1, Cyp19a1,

    Nr4a1, and Timp1; final differentiation of granulosa cells:

    Lhcgr, Oxtr, Pgr, Egfr, Hif1a, and Vegfa; and cytokine

    expression: Cxcl12, Cxcr4, and Sdc4 (Table 1).

    Materials and Methods

    Mice and follicle culture

    F1 mice (C57BL/6J!CBA/Ca; Charles River, Brussel,Belgium), housed and bred according to the national

    standards for animal care and approved by the Ethical

    Committee for animal experiments of the Free University

    Brussels (Project 09-216-1), were used in this study. Preantral

    follicles (110130 mm) were mechanically isolated fromovaries from 13- to 14-day-old F1 mice in L15 Leibovitzcarbohydrate chains of LH and hCG interact differently with

    the LHCGR changing their affinity to the receptor and affect

    half-life and hence bioactivity in living organisms (Galet &

    Ascoli 2005). Although in vivo bioactivity will largely

    determine differences in the extent of LHCGR stimulation

    upon LH or hCG stimulation, it remains to be determined

    whether LH and hCG can elicit intrinsically different

    responses at the level of the Lhcgr.

    Our primary interest was to differentiate low-dose effects of

    LH and hCG on in vitro cultured follicles exposed to a high-

    FSH dose (25 mIU/ml) comparable with a superovulationJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280the early antral follicle stage under a gonadotropin concen-

    tration of 10 mIU/ml rFSH, early antral follicles were

    exposed to five different gonadotropin regimens:

    10 mIU/ml rFSH, 25 mIU/ml rFSH, 25 mIU/ml rFSHC5.35 pM rLH (Luveris, Ares Serono), 25 mIU/ml rFSHC5.35 pM rhCG, or 25 mIU/ml HP-hMG (Menopur,Ferring). The 10 mIU/ml rFSH condition is a continuation

    of the minimal effective dose of FSH needed in culture

    (Adriaens et al. 2004, Segers et al. 2012). The 25 mIU/ml

    rFSH condition is considered slightly supraphysiological in

    accordance with the supraphysiological FSH injections in

    assisted reproductive technologies (ART) patients (Sanchez

    et al. 2011). Supplementation of 25 mIU/ml rFSH with

    equimolar concentrations of 5.35 pM of rLH (3.66 mIU/ml)or rhCG (5 mIU/ml) was chosen to ensure identical ligand

    availability (equal to the identical amount of molecules) for

    the LHCGR in this in vitro system.

    The effects of different gonadotropin regimens on gene

    expression in the mural cell compartment were investigated.

    Early response on increased doses of gonadotropins (acute

    phase) was measured at 0, 6, and 12 h after the medium

    refreshment on day 6. Chronic effects of gonadotropin

    treatment during early antral to late antral follicle growth were

    studied by exposure for 3 days up to day 9 of culture. Cells

    were collected in four sets of experiments. Follicle culture

    repeats consisted of one of these possibilities: acute phase ofglutamax-I medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated

    fetal bovine serum (HIA FBS), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and

    100 mg/ml streptomycin (all Gibco; Invitrogen) and placed assingle units in half area 96-well plates (Costar; Elscolab,

    Kruibeke, Belgium). On the first day of culture, intact

    oocytegranulosa cell connections and presence of theca cells

    were ascertained. At days 6, preantral follicles that developed

    into early antral follicles were considered for exposure to the

    five treatments during their antral growth phase. At day 9,

    these follicles had developed into late antral follicles that

    produced mature oocytes and expanded cumulus cells

    16 h after maturation induction. Culture medium was

    refreshed every 3 days by sampling 30 ml from 75 ml culturemedium and adding 30 ml fresh medium. Preantral follicleswere cultured for 6 days in a basal culture medium

    supplemented with 10 mIU/ml rFSH (Gonal F, Ares

    Serono). Basal culture medium consists of a-minimal essentialmedium with glutamax-I (Gibco; Invitrogen) supplemented

    with 5% HIA FBS, 5 mg/ml insulin, 5 mg/ml transferrin, and5 ng/ml selenium (Sigma). Gonadotropin products were

    dissolved in basal medium. At day 9 of culture, follicles in

    reference plates received 1.2 IU/ml rhCG (Ovidrel, AresSerono) and 4 ng/ml r-EGF (Roche) to induce meiotic

    resumption. All manipulations were done on a heated stage

    and cultured follicles were grown at 37 8C, 100% humidity,and 5% CO2 in air.

    Experimental designwww.endocrinology-journals.org

  • Table 1 Overview of the genes analyzed for gene expression in relation to different gonadotropin treatments during antral growth. Genename, symbol, and known function in the ovary are listed. The effect of high doses of LH or hCG, as in the ovulation trigger, on the geneexpression or protein level is given

    Gene name (gene symbol) Function in the ovaryEffect of high doses of LH/hCG(ovulation trigger)

    LH/choriogonadotropinreceptor (Lhcgr)

    Receptor for both LH and hCG, important during antral folliclegrowth, maturation, and ovulation (McGee & Hsueh 2000)

    Lhcgr mRNA is downregulated in ratovaries (Hoffman et al. 1991)

    Mevalonate kinase (Mvk) Catalyzes conversion of mevalonic acid to mevalonate-5-phosphate, a step in lanosterol and subsequent cholesterolbiosynthesis

    Mvk mRNA is transiently upregulated inrat, human, and mouse granulosa cells(Wang & Menon 2005, Wang et al.2007)MVK binds LhcgrmRNA and hereby negatively affect its stability

    (Wang & Menon 2005, Wang et al. 2007)Lanosterol synthase (Lss) Catalyzes conversion of 2,3-oxidosqualene to lanosterol, a step

    in cholesterol biosynthesisLanosterol enhanced meiotic resumption

    in porcine oocytes (Marco-Jimenez et al.2010)Induced by FSH and inhibited by forkhead box O1 (FOXO1;

    Liu et al. 2009)Cytochrome P450, family 11,

    subfamily a, polypeptide 1(Cyp11a1)

    Catalyzes conversion of cholesterol to pregnenolone, the firstand rate-limiting step in the synthesis of steroid hormones.Increased by FSH and E2 and decreased by FOXO1(Liu et al. 2009)

    Cyp11a1 mRNA is upregulated throughEGFRERK1/2 signaling in mouse COC(Hernandez-Gonzalez et al. 2006)

    Hydroxy-d-5-steroiddehydrogenase, 3b- andsteroid d-isomerase 1(Hsd3b1)

    Catalyzes conversion of pregnenolone to progesterone Hsd3b1 mRNA is upregulated in mouseCOCs (Hernandez-Gonzalez et al.2006)

    Upregulated by FSH and insulin (McGee et al. 1995)

    Cytochrome P450, family 19,subfamily a, polypeptide 1(Cyp19a1)

    Catalyzes conversion of C19 androgens to aromaticC18 estrogens

    Cyp19a1 mRNA is downregulated throughEGFR signaling (Hernandez-Gonzalezet al. 2006, Andric et al. 2010)Induced by FSH through the A-kinase pathway (Fitzpatrick &

    Richards 1991)Nuclear receptor subfamily 4,

    group A, member 1 (Nr4a1)Orphan receptor of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily

    that acts as a nuclear transcription factor implicated inimmediate-early response (Stocco et al. 2000)

    Nr4a1 mRNA is rapidly and transientlyexpressed in rat granulosa cells (Parket al. 2001), which inhibits Cyp19a1expression in a human granulosa-liketumor cell line (Wu et al. 2005)

    Progesterone receptor (Pgr) Essential for follicle rupture during the ovulatory process butdoes not affect follicle growth, development, differentiation,or luteinization (Robker et al. 2009)

    Pgr mRNA and protein is rapidly andtransiently expressed in mouse muralgranulosa cells (Robker et al. 2000)

    Chemokine (C-X-C motif)ligand 12 (Cxcl12)

    Chemokine that mediates chemotaxis and homing of primordialgerm cells (Ara et al. 2003), granulosa cell survival in thepre- and periovulatory period (Kryczek et al. 2005), andimplantation (Tapia et al. 2008)

    Cxcl12 mRNA and protein is present inhuman follicle fluid granulosa cellsisolated at oocyte pick up (Kryczek et al.2005)

    Chemokine (C-X-C motif)receptor 4 (Cxcr4)

    Receptor for CXCL12 Cxcr4 mRNA is transiently induced inmouse COCs (Hernandez-Gonzalezet al. 2006)

    Human CXCR4 expression in cumulus cells is negativelycorrelated with embryo cleaving capacity (van Montfoortet al. 2008)

    Induced by hypoxia and EGFR signaling (Phillips et al. 2005)Syndecan 4 (Sdc4) Proteoglycan that directly binds CXCL12 and is involved in

    Cxcr4-mediated cell invasion (Charnaux et al. 2005)Sdc4 mRNA is progressively upregulated

    in mouse cumulus cells (Adriaenssenset al. 2010)

    Vascular endothelial growthfactor A (Vegfa)

    Affects follicle growth (Danforth et al. 2003) and survival (Irustaet al. 2010), ovulation, and corpus luteum formation (Fraseret al. 2005)

    Vegfa mRNA shows sustained increase inhuman luteinized granulosa cells(Koos 1995)

    Tissue inhibitor of metallo-proteinase 1 (Timp1)

    Secreted protein that inhibits matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)at ovulation and at corpus luteum formation and regression(Li & Curry 2009)

    Timp1 mRNA is rapidly and transientlyinduced in periovulatory rat granulosacells (Li & Curry 2009)

    Hypoxia inducible factor 1asubunit (Hif1a)

    Forms with HIF-1B subunit: HIF1 transcription factor, stabilizedby hypoxia, inducing, e.g. VEGF (Forsythe et al. 1996) andCxcr4 (Phillips et al. 2005). Under normal oxygen levels,Hif1a can be induced by growth factors (Semenza 2003)

    HIF1A is induced in human luteinizedgranulosa cells (van den Driesche et al.2008)

    Epidermal growth factorreceptor (Egfr)

    Receptor for several EGF-like factors (e.g. EGF, EREG, andAREG), important during follicle growth and differentiation,steroidogenesis and maturation/ovulation, where it mediatesthe LH stimulus (Conti et al. 2006)

    Egfr mRNA and protein are downregulatedin mouse cumulus (Romero et al. 2011)

    Oxytocin receptor (Oxtr) G-protein-coupled receptor influencing steroidogenesis,ovulation, luteinization, and luteal regression(Gimpl & Fahrenholz 2001)

    Oxtr mRNA is induced in mouse muralgranulosa cells but not in cumulus cells(Segers et al. 2012)

    Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 271

    www.endocrinology-journals.org Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280

  • treatment rFSH10, rFSH25CLH, rFSH25ChCG, andHP-hMG25 (A); acute phase of treatment rFSH10 and

    rFSH25 (B); chronic phase of treatment rFSH10, rFSH25CLH,rFSH25ChCG, and HP-hMG25 (C); or chronic phase oftreatment rFSH10 and rFSH25 (D). In each follicle culture

    experiment, follicles were harvested from the ovaries of

    several mice and randomly distributed to different culture

    plates, resulting in on average ten follicles per culture plate.

    The acute phase A was collected from in total seven follicle

    culture repeats using 49 prepubertal mice and the acute phase B

    from two follicle culture repeats using 16 mice. The chronic

    phase C was collected from four culture repeats using 28 mice

    and the chronic phase D from two culture repeats using

    14 mice. Only follicles that already showed an antral cavity

    follicles (to use as one sample in further gene expression

    instructions with addition of an on-column DNase I treatment

    (27 U/reaction; Qiagen). Total RNA (14 ml) in water wasobtained. cDNA synthesis was performed on 10 ml total RNAusing the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories)

    using the blend of oligo(dT) and random hexamers. After 30 0at 48 8C, the obtained 20 ml cDNA was diluted four timeswith RNase-free water and stored atK80 8C until expressionanalysis. Negative controls were generated in each run of

    cDNA synthesis by omitting RTenzyme or RNA.

    The PCR primer design was performed using Universal

    Probe Library (UPL) Software (Roche Diagnostics, Roche

    Applied Science). Gene expression was detected using SYBR

    green or UPL fluorescent probes. Primer specificity was

    ascertained by melting curve analysis if SYBR green

    SYBR Master or in LC480 Probes Master (Roche

    n eaan

    HP-(6)

    9.9G2.4G3.5G4.1G9.0G

    e p

    I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression272analysis), the cells collected from two culture plates were

    often combined within each treatment and time point.

    One gonadotropin treatment consisted mostly of six

    samples per time point for further use in gene expression

    analysis, as detailed in Table 2. Based on the common control

    condition rFSH10 and for the sake of clarity, acute (ACB)and chronic (CCD) sets of experiments were merged fordata representation and analysis.

    Collection of mural granulosa cells was performed after

    cumulusoocyte complex (COC) removal by securely

    pipeting with a pulled pasteur pipette. As in this culture

    system, the theca cells are firmly attached onto the bottom of

    the well as a monolayer with a multilayer-mounted mural

    granulosa cell stack on top; the dense mass of mural cells

    was collected with a Pasteur pipette. Although it cannot be

    100% excluded that also a few theca cells might have been

    aspirated, we estimate that the granulosa mass is nevertheless

    very pure.

    Gene expression analysis

    Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen)

    on the QiaCube (Qiagen) following the manufacturers

    Table 2 Gene expression results for the acute phase: early response i12 h. Values represent relative expression ratios of the specific gene

    0 h 6 h

    rFSH10(6)

    rFSH10(6)

    rFSH25(6)

    rFSH25CrLH (5)

    rFSH25CrhCG (6)

    Mvk 7.3G0.6A 12.3G1.0B 14.8G1.1 13.3G2.5 13.3G1.5Lss 1.4G0.2A 2.7G0.2B 3.0G0.2 3.1G0.5 2.9G0.2Timp1 2.2G0.2A 4.6G0.6B 5.6G0.7 5.5G0.9 4.3G0.4Vegfa 3.2G0.4A 4.7G0.6A,B 4.2G0.5 4.7G0.9 4.7G0.5Sdc4 9.2G1.2A,B 13.8G1.8A 12.4G1.6 12.4G1.6 11.1G0.8

    A,BDifferent capital letters in a row define statistical differences between the timbrackets, the amount of samples analyzed for gene expression is given.were withheld for gonadotropin exposure (around 40% of the

    initially cultured follicles). After gonadotropin exposure, cells

    were immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen pooled per

    culture plate. To obtain a pool of cells of on average eightJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280Diagnostics) with 0.01 mM probe (UPL, Roche Diagnostics)and 2 ml cDNA into a total volume of 15 ml. PCR conditionswere 100 at 95 8C followed by 45 cycles of 1000 at 95 8C and 3000at 60 8C. A log10 dilution series of a synthetic oligonucleotide(Eurogentec) corresponding to the amplicon sequence was

    simultaneously run to enable quantitative measurement of

    expression. Samples were run in triplicate for each gene. As

    endogenous control, Rn18s was detected with SYBR green

    (Adriaenssens et al. 2009). Relative expression values were

    calculated for all samples. All control samples appeared

    negative for real-time PCR assessment of Rn18s and specific

    genes. The different genes were quantified in the most

    relevant culture setting: acute phase, chronic phase, or both,

    based on the literature and in-house micro-array data.

    Steroid measurements

    Spent medium of follicle culture was pooled per plate at each

    refreshment day or at the collection time point. Samples were

    frozen atK20 8C. E2-17b production was measured with theRIA E2RIA-CT (Biosource, Nivelles, Belgium) having a

    rly antral follicles (day 6) to different gonadotropin regimes for 6 andd the endogenous control Rn18s (meanGS.E.M.)

    12 h

    hMG25 rFSH10(6)

    rFSH25(6)

    rFSH25CrLH (6)

    rFSH25CrhCG (6)

    HP-hMG25(6)

    0.7 6.2G0.2A 6.9G0.3 7.7G1.0 7.7G0.7 7.9G1.10.2 1.4G0.1A 1.6G0.1 1.4G0.2 1.5G0.2 1.6G0.20.2 1.6G0.2A 1.6G0.2 1.9G0.2 2.3G0.4 1.8G0.20.3 4.9G0.2B 6.3G0.3 4.3G0.5 4.7G0.6 5.3G0.80.4 8.0G0.1B 8.8G0.1 9.4G1.5 10.5G1.3 9.0G1.5

    oints 0, 6, and 12 h in rFSH10 treatment (P!0.05, ANOVACTukey). Betweendetection was performed and by sequencing analysis for

    both SYBR green and probe detection. Primer and reference

    sequences are detailed in Supplementary Table 1, see section

    on supplementary data given at the end of this article.

    Real-time PCR was performed on LightCycler 480 with

    0.6 mM primers (Eurogentec, Liege, Belgium) in LC480www.endocrinology-journals.org

  • conditions were subjected to one-way ANOVACTukey

    regimens at day 9. Antral follicle survival up to day 9 was

    equally successful in all conditions (O96%; PO0.05) and

    attached to the plate. All samples expressed Lhcgr.

    gonadotropin-dependent expression (Fig. 1). Their expression

    During antral follicle growth in rFSH10 from days 6 to 9,

    Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 273In the acute exposure experiment, there was no change

    in Lhcgr expression within the first 6 h of exposure to the

    different gonadotropin conditions (Fig. 1). After 12 h, Lhcgr

    expression remained low for rFSH10, while high

    FSH25 increased Lhcgr expression (rFSH10 vs rFSH25

    and rFSH25CrhCG, P!0.05). In the large antralfollicles (rFSH10, day 9), Lhcgr was significanlty increased

    by threefold compared with day 6 (rFSH10). On day 9,

    chronic exposure to HP-hMG25 induced significantly more

    Lhcgr mRNA compared with rFSH10 (P!0.05). rFSH25,rFSH25CrLH, and rFSH25CrhCG showed intermediateLhcgr expression (Fig. 2).meiotic maturation observed at 16 h after rhCG plus rEGF

    wasO80% in control plates grown for 9 days in all condtions(PO0.05).

    LH/choriogonadotropin receptor expression

    All follicles included in our analysis had from day 6 onward a

    clear delineated COC with mural granulosa and theca cellsposttest or unpaired test using GraphPad Prism 4.0 Software

    (La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences with a P!0.05 areconsidered statistically significant.

    Results

    Follicle culture

    Early antral follicles on day 6 developed into late antral

    follicles on day 9 as expected, with extensive granulosa cell

    proliferation and enlargement of follicular structure. There

    were no obvious morphological differences between the fully

    grown follicles generated from any of the gonadotropinsensitivity of 20 pg/l and a total imprecision profile

    !10% coefficient of variation (CV). Progesterone secretionwas determined with Prog-CTRIA (Cis bio International,

    Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France) with a functional sensitivity of

    0.5 mg/l and a total imprecision profile !10% CV. E2 wasmeasured on day 6 of culture before and after acute exposure

    for 6 and 12 h to the different gonadotropin treatments. The

    average E2 production per hour was calculated, taking into

    account the residual fraction of E2 present in the well after

    medium change, e.g. after 6 h: ((E2 on 6 h)K(E2 on0 h!0.6))/6 h. E2 and progesterone were measured afterchronic exposure for 3 days from days 6 to 9 of culture.

    Statistical analysis

    Relative expression ratios were log2 transformed to ensure

    Gaussian distribution. Per time point, different gonadotropinwww.endocrinology-journals.orgLhcgr was threefold upregulated and Egfr was 1.5-folddownregulated (Fig. 2, t-test, P!0.05). After a 3-dayexposure of the growing follicles to different gonadotropin

    treatments, Cxcr4, Cyp19a1, and Cyp11a1 expression was

    gradually increasing from rFSH10 to rFSH25, to rFSH25CrLH/hCG, and highest in HP-hMG25. Statistical significance

    was obtained between rFSH10 and HP-hMG25 (P!0.05)for Cxcr4, Cyp19a1, and Cyp11a1 (Fig. 2). A tendency for

    increased expression in HP-hMG25 was present for Hsd3b1,

    Cxcl12, Oxtr, Pgr, and Sdc4 (Table 3).

    Steroid production

    The immediate effects by different gonadotropin treatments

    on E2 production on day 6 showed highest E2 production/

    hour in HP-hMG25 both at 6 h (Table 4, P!0.01 vsrFSH10) and 12 h (tendency). By day 9 of culture, the E2concentration of rFSH10 was significantly lower compared

    with the other four conditions (Table 5, P!0.001). The basalprogesterone production was elevated in rFSH25CLHbioactivity compared with rFSH10 and rFSH25 (rFSH10 vs

    rFSH25CrLH, P!0.05). Sixteen hours after the ovulatorytrigger, no differences in progesterone production were found

    between the different gonadotropin preparations (PO0.05,data not shown).was significantly induced by increasing the FSH dose (rFSH10

    vs rFSH25, P!0.05). If high FSH25 was combined with LHbioactivity, expression of Cxcr4 (rFSH25 vs rFSH25ChCG,P!0.05) and Nr4a1 (rFSH25 vs rFSH25ChCG andHP-hMG25, P!0.05) was further increased.Mvk, Lss, Timp1, Vegfa, and Sdc4 expression was not

    influenced by gonadotropin treatment. The baseline of

    rFSH10 was upregulated from 0 to 6 h and returned back

    to initial values at 12 h for Mvk, Lss, Timp1, Hif1a, Cxcl12,

    Cxcr4, and Nr4a1 (Table 2, ANOVACTukey, P!0.05).

    Chronic phase: continuous exposure to different gonadotropinregimens during antral growth from days 6 to 9Acute phase: early response in early antral follicles (day 6) todifferent gonadotropin regimens for 6 and 12 h

    After 6 h of exposure, expression of Cxcl12, Cxcr4, and Hif1a

    were differentially regulated by the different gonadotropin

    preparations (Fig. 1). Their expression was not influenced

    by increasing the FSH dose (rFSH10 vs rFSH25). Cxcl12

    expression was decreased if high FSH25 was combined with

    LH bioactivity (rFSH10 vs rFSH25CrhCG and HP-hMG25,P!0.05). Cxcr4 showed an inverse reaction and wasupregulated by high FSH25 combined with LH bioactivity

    (rFSH10 vs rFSH25CLH, rFSH25ChCG, and HP-hMG25,P!0.05). Hif1a expression was similar in all recombinantgonadotropin treatments but reduced in HP-hMG25 (P!0.05).

    After 12 h of exposure, Cxcr4, Cyp19a1, and Nr4a1 showedJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280

  • rFS

    SH2

    HP

    FSH

    H25

    HP-

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 6

    h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    6 h

    c

    1 aaA

    C

    I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression274rF r

    rFS

    Hif1a

    25

    30

    35Ba

    ab

    a

    ab

    b18s

    15

    20

    25

    n18sLhcgr

    rFSH

    10 0

    h

    rFSH

    10 6

    h

    rFSH

    25 6

    h

    H25+

    rLH

    6 h

    5+rh

    CG 6

    h

    -hM

    G25

    6 h

    rFSH

    10 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25 1

    2 h

    25+r

    LH 1

    2 h

    +rhC

    G 1

    2 h

    hMG

    25 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    10 0

    h

    rFSH

    10 6

    h

    rFSH

    25 6

    h

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    a

    b

    abb

    ab

    Lhcg

    r/Rn1

    8s

    00

    05

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35Ba

    ab

    ac

    A

    Cxcl1

    2/Rn

    18sDiscussion

    The effects of FSH, LH, and hCG during antral follicle

    growth were investigated on genes involved in Lhcgr signaling

    both immediately after exposure (acute phase) and 3 days after

    exposure (chronic phase).

    Lhcgr expression in the acute and chronic phase

    The increase in FSH at day 6 was followed 12 h later by an

    induction of Lhcgr expression. This was expected as FSH and

    estrogen (already increased at 6 h in the spent medium)

    induce Lhcgr during normal antral follicle growth (Richards

    et al. 1976, Ikeda et al. 2008). Ovulatory doses of LH are

    known to downregulate the expression of Lhcgr (Hoffman

    et al. 1991) already after 4 h (Wang & Menon 2005). This is

    directly caused by Lhcgr mRNA destabilization through

    MVK, an immediate effect that can be detected by gene

    expression as soon as 6 h after the ovulatory stimulus (Wang

    rFSH

    10 0

    h

    rFSH

    10 6

    h

    rFSH

    25 6

    h

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 6

    h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    6 h

    HP-

    hMG

    25 6

    h

    rFSH

    10 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    12

    h

    HP-

    hMG

    25 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    10 0

    h

    rFSH

    10 6

    h

    rFSH

    25 6

    h

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 6

    h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    6 h

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20 A A

    Hif1

    a/Rn

    0

    5

    10

    Cyp1

    9a1/

    R

    Figure 1 Gene expression results during the acute exposure for 6 anexpression ratios of the specific gene over the Rn18s endogeneous conANOVACTukey posttest in the rFSH10 condition over the three time pANOVACTukey posttest was also applied to the different gonadotropinsmall letters above columns. Statistical differences have at least P!0.0

    Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280HP-

    hMG

    25 6

    h

    rFSH

    10 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    12

    h

    HP-

    hMG

    25 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    10 0

    h

    rFSH

    10 6

    h

    rFSH

    25 6

    h

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 6

    h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    6 h

    HP-

    hMG

    25 6

    h

    rFSH

    10 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    12

    h

    HP-

    hMG

    25 1

    2 h

    0

    yp19a1

    b

    bb b

    Nr4a1

    25

    30

    35

    b

    bcc

    c

    B18sCxcl12

    bc A

    Cxcr4

    2

    3

    4

    5

    B ab

    c

    c

    b

    Ab

    bc

    c

    bCxcr

    4/Rn

    18set al. 2007). Lhcgr downregulation was not observed in the

    current study using high FSH25 supplemented with

    5.35 pM of rLH or rhCG during antral growth and nocorrelation with Mvk expression was found.

    The growth of the follicle from the early (day 6) to the late

    (day 9) antral stage coincided with more Lhcgr expression. The

    highest level of Lhcgr mRNA was found after exposure to

    HP-hMG25 for 3 days. Equal levels of E2 were found in all

    conditions containing high gonadotropin concentrations;

    hence, E2 cannot be responsible for higher Lhcgr expression

    in HP-hMG25.

    Acute phase (6 and 12 h): Expression levels of Hif1a, Nr4a1,and Cyp19a1 are influenced by gonadotropins

    The increase in Hif1a mRNA expression after 6 h seen in

    early antral follicles in this study was independent of

    increasing doses of recombinant gonadotropins but was

    absent in HP-hMG25. In all conditions, Hif1a returned to

    HP-

    hMG

    25 6

    h

    rFSH

    10 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    12

    h

    HP-

    hMG

    25 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    10 0

    h

    rFSH

    10 6

    h

    rFSH

    25 6

    h

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 6

    h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    6 h

    HP-

    hMG

    25 6

    h

    rFSH

    10 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH 1

    2 h

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    12

    h

    HP-

    hMG

    25 1

    2 h

    a

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20Aa

    A

    Nr4a

    1/Rn

    d 12 h to different gonadotropin regimens. Bars represent meantrol with S.E.M. error bars. Statistical analysis was performed byoints 0, 6, and 12 h, indicated by capital letters above columns.preparations per time point (separated by full lines), indicated by

    5.

    www.endocrinology-journals.org

  • Lhcgr

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 6

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH D

    ay 9

    SH25

    +rhC

    G D

    ay 9

    HP-

    hMG

    25 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 6

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH D

    ay 9

    SH25

    +rhC

    G D

    ay 9

    HP-

    hMG

    25 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 6

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH D

    ay 9

    SH25

    +rhC

    G D

    ay 9

    HP-

    hMG

    25 D

    ay 9

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    aab

    abab

    b

    A

    B

    Lhcg

    r/Rn1

    8sEgfr

    00

    25

    50

    75

    100

    125

    150

    175A

    B

    Egfr/

    Rn18

    s

    Cxcr4

    00

    05

    10

    15

    20

    25

    a

    ab

    ab ab

    b

    Cxcr

    4/Rn

    18s

    C

    a

    Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 275rF

    Cyp19a1

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    a abab ab

    b

    9a1/

    Rn18

    s

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    a1a1

    /Rn1

    8sbaseline levels after 12 h. The transient nature of Hif1a as a

    rapid response mediator of FSH action (Alam et al. 2009) and

    the equivalent level of induction of its downstream target

    Vegfa by all gonadotropin treatments after 6 and 12 h could

    indicate that the total level of induction of Hif1a had been

    similar in all conditions but differed in kinetics.

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 6

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    Day

    9

    HP-

    hMG

    25 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 6

    rFSH

    10 D

    ay 9

    0

    10

    20Cyp1

    0

    200

    400Cyp1

    Figure 2 Gene expression results during the chronic exposure for 3 daBars represent mean expression ratios of the specific genes over the Rnwas performed by ANOVACTukey posttest on day 9 (separated by fulstatistical differences with at least P!0.05. In capital letters, statisticstwo time points (days 69) in the rFSH10 condition.

    Table 3 Gene expression results for the chronic phase: continuous expodays 6 to 9. Values represent relative expression ratios of the specific ge

    Day 6 Day 9

    FSH10 (6) rFSH10 (6) rFSH25 (6)

    Hsd3b1 629G112 812G102 650G82Cxcl12 1.26G0.24 0.84G0.23 0.59G0.16Oxtr 2.31G0.43 2.59G0.48 3.10G0.57Pgr 0.42G0.10 0.36G0.07 0.32G0.07Sdc4 15.6G5.0 25.5G3.9 23.0G3.5

    Between brackets, the amount of samples analyzed for gene expression is given.

    www.endocrinology-journals.orgrF rF

    yp11a1

    ab ab

    bAn ovulatory dose of LH/hCG causes an immediate

    response of Nr4a1 expression within 1 h in granulosa cells

    (Carletti & Christenson 2009) through cAMP-mediated

    signaling and returns back to basal levels after 9 h (Wu et al.

    2005). This stimulates HSD3B2 (Havelock et al. 2005) and

    repressesCyp19a1 (Wang & Menon 2005), shifting the steroid

    rFSH

    25 D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25+r

    LH D

    ay 9

    rFSH

    25+r

    hCG

    Day

    9

    HP-

    hMG

    25 D

    ay 9

    ys (from days 6 to 9 of culture) to different gonadotropin regimens.18s endogeneous control with S.E.M. error bars. Statistical analysisl lines from the day 6 result) with different small letters indicating(t-test, P!0.05) are shown for the regulation of the genes over the

    sure to different gonadotropin regimens during antral growth fromne and the endogenous control Rn18s (meanGS.E.M.)

    rFSH25CrLH (6) rFSH25CrhCG (4) HP-hMG25 (6)

    743G139 754G138 1118G1961.20G0.35 0.98G0.33 1.40G0.383.10G0.54 2.93G0.46 5.33G1.090.37G0.05 0.41G0.09 0.60G0.1327.4G4.9 26.9G6.1 42.3G8.3

    Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280

  • also showed E2 production within a 6-h period (Daniel &

    and progesterone content for rFSH25Clow-dose LHbioactivity was higher compared with rFSH25 alone. This

    indicates that the presence of a low dose of LH or hCG

    bioactivity during follicle growth induced a more active

    steroidogenesis (Wolfenson et al. 2005), which could be a

    result of a more active transcription of Cyp11a1 and Cyp19a1.

    Secondly, the additional supply of precursors through

    LH-stimulated theca cells, which express Cyp11a1 and

    Hsd3b1 (Nimz et al. 2009), could also provide an elevated

    steroid level. Basal progesterone levels in low-dose LH-sup-

    plemented conditions remained at least 15 times lower than

    the progesterone levels 16 h after the ovulatory hCG stimulus,

    on average 104 mg/l.

    I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression276Armstrong 1984), suggesting that FSH in our culture model is

    indeed both activating the existing CYP19A1 protein and

    inducing its mRNA expression only by 12 h. The E2production occurred mainly during the first 6 h and was

    most evident for HP-hMG. Coincidently, an induction of

    Mvk, Lss, and Timp1 expression was seen after 6 h of

    exposure, independent of gonadotropins. The temporary

    depletion of steroids after medium refreshment induced Mvk

    and Lss expression (Wang et al. 2007, Ikeda et al. 2008),

    providing the necessary precursors for E synthesis. Timp1secretion profile from estrogenic to progestagenic. In the

    current experimental setup on day 6, Nr4a1 showed a late

    induction at 12 h by FSH further elevated by LH activity,

    which coincided with an induction of Cyp19a1. FSH is

    believed to induce a slow but sustained cAMP signal during

    growth while an ovulatory LH surge would elicit a rapid but

    transient cAMP signal (Conti 2002). Our findings could

    suggest that during antral growth, Nr4a1 expression is cAMP

    mediated through Fshr and mild stimulation of Lhcgr.

    Steroidogenesis: expression of key genes and steroid productionin the acute and chronic phase

    Cyp19a1 mRNA induction by high FSH after 12 h and the

    activity of the present CYP19A1 protein (E2 production,

    Table 4) was kept intact after administration of a small dose of

    LH or hCG. In rat, cultured granulosa cells exposed to FSH

    Table 4 Estradiol-17b production on day 6 at 6 and 12 h afterdifferent gonadotropin exposures (meanGS.E.M.)

    Mean increase/h (ng/l per h)

    n 6 h n 12 h

    rFSH10 10 11G4A 6 12G5rFSH25 4 30G7A,B 4 14G9rFSH25CrLH 6 31G4A,B 6 8G3rFSH25CrhCG 6 28G5A,B 6 11G2HP-hMG25 6 49G13B 6 30G7

    A,BDifferent letters in a column define statistical differences betweentreatments (P!0.05, ANOVACTukey).2

    knockout mice showed increased E2 and decreased

    progesterone (Nothnick 2000) and TIMP1 stimulated

    progesterone production in testis (Boujrad et al. 1995). This

    could make Timp1 another target upregulated to bring the

    follicular steroidogenic environment in balance after medium

    refreshment.

    After 3 days, exposure to different gonadotropin treatments

    Cyp11a1 tended to be upregulated by low-dose LH activity.

    The potential to convert pregnenolone into progesterone was

    comparable as Hsd3b1 expression was not significantly altered.

    Cyp19a1, converting androgens into estrogens, was again

    highly expressed in HP-hMG25. Steroid measurements on

    day 9 corroborated the gene expression patterns, where the E2

    Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280Table 5 Estradiol-17b and progesterone content on day 9(meanGS.E.M.)

    Estradiol-17b (ng/l) Progesterone (mg/l)

    n Day 9 n Day 9

    rFSH10 13 3273G591A 10 0.20G0.08A

    rFSH25 2 7300G2100B 3 0.35G0.04A,B

    rFSH25CrLH 9 12 540G1959B 9 6.79G2.16B

    rFSH25CrhCG 8 12 390G1458B 8 5.37G2.34A,B

    HP-hMG25 8 12 640G1197B 8 2.94G1.22A,B

    A,BDifferent letters in a column define statistical differences betweentreatments (P!0.05, ANOVACTukey).Cytokines Cxcl12 and Cxcr4 in the acute and chronic phase

    The targets from our selection most influenced by a change in

    gonadotropin regimen were Cxcl12 and its receptor Cxcr4.

    An alternative (co)-receptor for Cxcl12 and Sdc4 showed no

    differences. Cytokines and other immune-related processes

    have been described during ovulation (Richards et al. 2008).

    Cumulus cells acquire some gene expression patterns specific

    for immune-like cells, like Cdc34 antigen, myelin basic

    protein (Mbp), and Cxcr4 (Hernandez-Gonzalez et al. 2006).

    Here was shown that Cxcr4 and Cxcl12 are present and

    regulated by gonadotropins in mural/theca cells already

    during antral follicle growth. Cxcl12 was elevated in

    rFSH10/25 at 6 h after exposure to different treatments,

    while reduced in rFSH25CLH bioactivity. As suggested forHif1a, this could be a matter of kinetics, where additional LH

    activity enhances the general activity of the cell and hereby

    more rapidly recovers from medium change.

    Cxcr4 was induced by HP-hMG25 but even more

    by rFSH25CrLH/rhCG at 6 and 12 h. This pointed to adifferent reaction through the Lhcgr if ligands are from

    recombinant or urinary purified origin. High FSHCLHbioactivity induced already at 6 h a massive induction of

    Cxcr4; however, Cxcr4 levels only increased under the

    influence of high rFSH25 alone after 12 h. This suggested a

    synergy in LHCGR and FSHR signaling, both using cAMP

    as second messenger in inducing Cxcr4 expression. No clearwww.endocrinology-journals.org

  • are activating Lhcgr signaling equally.

    Cxcl12) showed a tendency for elevated expression in

    Lhcgr was present and regulated by gonadotropin type and

    dose in early and late antral follicles. A low dose of LH or

    after 3-day exposure. Nr4a1, Cxcl12, and Cxcr4 were most

    induced by the different ligands.

    Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 277HP-hMG25 compared with the rFSH25/rLH/rhCG treat-

    ments. An overall higher activity status of granulosa cells

    under HP-hMG treatment has also been described for protein

    levels: higher levels of cytokines were found in mouse follicle

    culture in HP-hMG if compared with rFSH treatment only

    (Foster et al. 2010). The differences in gene expression

    patterns seen in HP-hMG25 are (most likely) an effect of

    both differences in the FSH and the LH/hCG component.

    For FSH, it was already shown that recombinant vs

    urinary purified FSH contains different subsets of isoforms

    and that acidity of isoforms influenced capacity to induce

    meiosis in COC, to stimulate proliferation in granulosa cellsHowever, HP-hMG25 did elicit some different responses

    compared to the recombinant products. Some tendencies

    were noticed. Six hours after exposure of early antral follicles

    to rFSH25 with or without LH activity, six of 11 genes (Mvk,

    Lss, Cxcl12, Cxcr4, Hif1a, and Timp1) were upregulated by

    the medium refreshment. The exposure to HP-hMG25

    attenuated the initial response or accelerated the decrease to

    basal levels as seen for all conditions at 12 h (Mvk, Lss, Cxcl12,

    Hif1a, and Timp1). Secondly, after 3 days of growth in

    HP-hMG25, nine of ten of the studied genes (all exceptinterrelation between Cxcl12 and Cxcr4 expression was

    found. Preliminary laboratory data suggested a cell-type-

    and cell-stage-specific expression pattern for both Cxcl12 and

    its receptors; hence, the presented data in mural cells could be

    too fragmentarious to reveal complex interrelations.

    In the current study, exposure to HP-hMG25 for 3 days

    generated the highest level of Cxcr4 expression, where the

    immediate response after 6 and 12 h on day 6 was higher if

    exposed to high FSH and rLH bioactivity. This suggests that

    slight differences in hormone composition like in the

    recombinant or urinary purified hormones could affect

    downstream signaling kinetics.

    Chronic phase (days 69): no differences due to gonadotropintreatment for Oxtr, Pgr, and Egfr

    Three receptors implicated in ovulation and luteinization

    were studied: Egfr, Oxtr, and Pgr. All three genes were not

    affected by gonadotropins. Absence of significant Oxtr, Pgr,

    and Egfr expression induction indicated that mural cells did

    not express early signs of luteinization (Fujinaga et al. 1994,

    Clemens et al. 1998, Segers et al. 2012), which was reinforced

    by the endocrine profile on day 9.

    Differences in expression induced by rLH, rhCG, or urinarypurified products

    For all genes in this study, equimolar doses of rLH or rhCG

    did not lead to differences in response in the early or late antral

    granulosa cells (t-test, PO0.05). Hence, it could beconsidered that in an in vitro culture system, rLH and rhCGwww.endocrinology-journals.orgAdriaens I, Cortvrindt R & Smitz J 2004 Differential FSH exposure in

    preantral follicle culture has marked effects on folliculogenesis and

    oocyte developmental competence. Human Reproduction 19 398408.

    (doi:10.1093/humrep/deh074)

    Adriaenssens T, Mazoyer C, Segers I, Wathlet S & Smitz J 2009 Differences

    in collagen expression in cumulus cells after exposure to highly purifiedDeclaration of interest

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived

    as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

    Funding

    This work was supported by the Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap

    en Technologie, Brussels, Belgium (grant no. IWT70719), Fonds

    Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium (grant no.

    KN1.5.040.09) and Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Saint-Prex, Switzerland.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors would like to thank Ms Katy Billooye for excellent technical

    assistance in the follicle culture experiments and RIA, Mr Johan Schiettecatte

    for technical assistance with hormone measurements, and Ms Sandra

    De Schaepdryver for editorial support.

    ReferencesSupplementary data

    This is linked to the online version of the paper at http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/

    JOE-12-0150.influenced by introducing gonadotropin treatment in early

    antral follicles. This study emphasizes the complexity of

    LHCGR and FSHR signaling during folliculogenesis, where

    in-depth ligandreceptor interaction studies are needed to

    understand the origin of the differential expression patternshCG applied during early antral follicle growth did not

    induce premature luteinization effects in both gene expression

    patterns and steroid production. Gene expression responses

    were identical after rLH or rhCG stimulation, suggesting an

    equal in vitro biopotency. However, the urinary-derived

    HP-hMG did systematically show the highest gene induction(GC) (Barrios-De-Tomasi et al. 2002), and to influence

    embryonic development when applied in follicle culture

    (Vitt et al. 2001). Like FSH, both LH (Burgon et al. 1996) and

    hCG (Lopata et al. 1997) consist out of different isoforms

    in vivo with different pI and hence implications in bioactivity.

    ConclusionsJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280

  • menotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a mouse Danforth DR, Arbogast LK, Ghosh S, Dickerman A, Rofagha R & Friedman

    I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression278follicle culture model. Biology of Reproduction 80 10151025. (doi:10.1095/

    biolreprod.107.067462)

    Adriaenssens T, Wathlet S, Segers I, Verheyen G, De Vos A, Van der Elst J,

    Coucke W, Devroey P & Smitz J 2010 Cumulus cell gene expression is

    associated with oocyte developmental quality and influenced by patient and

    treatment characteristics. Human Reproduction 25 12591270. (doi:10.1093/

    humrep/deq049)

    Afnan M 2009 Identifying real differences in live birth rates between HMG

    and rFSH in IVF. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 18 (Suppl 2) 2530.

    (doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60445-2)

    Alam H, Weck J, Maizels E, Park Y, Lee EJ, Ashcroft M & Hunzicker-Dunn M

    2009 Role of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and extracellular regulated

    kinase pathways in the induction of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 activity

    and the HIF-1 target vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian granulosa

    cells in response to follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocrinology 150 915928.

    (doi:10.1210/en.2008-0850)

    Andric N, Thomas M & Ascoli M 2010 Transactivation of the epidermal

    growth factor receptor is involved in the lutropin receptor-mediated down-

    regulation of ovarian aromatase expression in vivo. Molecular Endocrinology

    24 552560. (doi:10.1210/me.2009-0450)

    Ara T, Nakamura Y, Egawa T, Sugiyama T, Abe K, Kishimoto T, Matsui Y &

    Nagasawa T 2003 Impaired colonization of the gonads by primordial germ

    cells in mice lacking a chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1).

    PNAS 100 53195323. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0730719100)

    Barrios-De-Tomasi J, Timossi C, Merchant H, Quintanar A, Avalos JM, Andersen

    CY & Ulloa-Aguirre A 2002 Assessment of the in vitro and in vivo biological

    activities of the human follicle-stimulating isohormones. Molecular and Cellular

    Endocrinology 186 189198. (doi:10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00657-8)

    Boujrad N, Ogwuegbu SO, Garnier M, Lee CH, Martin BM &

    Papadopoulos V 1995 Identification of a stimulator of steroid

    hormone synthesis isolated from testis. Science 268 16091612. (doi:10.

    1126/science.7777858)

    Burgon PG, Stanton PG & Robertson DM 1996 In vivo bioactivities and

    clearance patterns of highly purified human luteinizing hormone isoforms.

    Endocrinology 137 48274836. (doi:10.1210/en.137.11.4827)

    Caltabiano G, Campillo M, De Leener A, Smits G, Vassart G, Costagliola S &

    Pardo L 2008 The specificity of binding of glycoprotein hormones to their

    receptors. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 65 24842492. (doi:10.1007/

    s00018-008-8002-9)

    Carletti MZ & Christenson LK 2009 Rapid effects of LH on gene expression

    in the mural granulosa cells of mouse periovulatory follicles. Reproduction

    137 843855. (doi:10.1530/REP-08-0457)

    Charnaux N, Brule S, Hamon M, Chaigneau T, Saffar L, Prost C, Lievre N &

    Gattegno L 2005 Syndecan-4 is a signaling molecule for stromal cell-

    derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/ CXCL12. FEBS Journal 272 19371951.

    (doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04624.x)

    Clemens JW, Robker RL, Kraus WL, Katzenellenbogen BS & Richards JS

    1998 Hormone induction of progesterone receptor (PR) messenger

    ribonucleic acid and activation of PR promoter regions in ovarian

    granulosa cells: evidence for a role of cyclic adenosine 3 0,5 0-mono-phosphate but not estradiol. Molecular Endocrinology 12 12011214.

    (doi:10.1210/me.12.8.1201)

    Conti M 2002 Specificity of the cyclic adenosine 3 0,5 0-monophosphatesignal in granulosa cell function. Biology of Reproduction 67 16531661.

    (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.102.004952)

    Conti M, Hsieh M, Park JY & Su YQ 2006 Role of the epidermal growth

    factor network in ovarian follicles. Molecular Endocrinology 20 715723.

    (doi:10.1210/me.2005-0185)

    Cortvrindt RG & Smitz JE 2002 Follicle culture in reproductive toxicology:

    a tool for in-vitro testing of ovarian function? Human Reproduction Update 8

    243254. (doi:10.1093/humupd/8.3.243)

    Cortvrindt R, Hu Y & Smitz J 1998 Recombinant luteinizing hormone

    as a survival and differentiation factor increases oocyte maturation in

    recombinant follicle stimulating hormone-supplemented mouse preantral

    follicle culture. Human Reproduction 13 12921302. (doi:10.1093/humrep/

    13.5.1292)Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280CI 2003 Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates preantral follicle

    growth in the rat ovary. Biology of Reproduction 68 17361741. (doi:10.

    1095/biolreprod.101.000679)

    Daniel SA & Armstrong DT 1984 Site of action of androgens on follicle-

    stimulating hormone-induced aromatase activity in cultured rat granulosa

    cells. Endocrinology 114 19751982. (doi:10.1210/endo-114-6-1975)

    van den Driesche S, Myers M, Gay E, Thong KJ & Duncan WC 2008 HCG

    up-regulates hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha in luteinized granulosa cells:

    implications for the hormonal regulation of vascular endothelial growth

    factor A in the human corpus luteum. Molecular Human Reproduction 14

    455464. (doi:10.1093/molehr/gan040)

    Erickson GF, Magoffin DA, Dyer CA & Hofeditz C 1985 The ovarian

    androgen producing cells: a review of structure/function relationships.

    Endocrine Reviews 6 371399. (doi:10.1210/edrv-6-3-371)

    Fares F 2006 The role of O-linked and N-linked oligosaccharides on the

    structurefunction of glycoprotein hormones: development of agonists

    and antagonists. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1760 560567. (doi:10.1016/

    j.bbagen.2005.12.022)

    Fitzpatrick SL & Richards JS 1991 Regulation of cytochrome P450 aromatase

    messenger ribonucleic acid and activity by steroids and gonadotropins in

    rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 129 14521462. (doi:10.1210/endo-

    129-3-1452)

    Foster R, Segers I, Smart D, Adriaenssens T, Smitz J, Arce JC & Princivalle M

    2010 A differential cytokine expression profile is induced by highly

    purified human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-

    stimulating hormone in a pre- and postovulatory mouse follicle culture

    model. Fertility and Sterility 93 14641476. (doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.

    01.136)

    Forsythe JA, Jiang BH, Iyer NV, Agani F, Leung SW, Koos RD & Semenza GL

    1996 Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription

    by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 46044613.

    Fraser HM, Wilson H, Rudge JS & Wiegand SJ 2005 Single injections of

    vascular endothelial growth factor trap block ovulation in the macaque and

    produce a prolonged, dose-related suppression of ovarian function.

    Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 90 11141122. (doi:10.1210/

    jc.2004-1572)

    Fujinaga H, Yamoto M, Shikone T & Nakano R 1994 FSH and LH

    up-regulate epidermal growth factor receptors in rat granulosa cells.

    Journal of Endocrinology 140 171177. (doi:10.1677/joe.0.1400171)

    Galet C & Ascoli M 2005 The differential binding affinities of the luteinizing

    hormone (LH)/choriogonadotropin receptor for LH and choriogonado-

    tropin are dictated by different extracellular domain residues. Molecular

    Endocrinology 19 12631276. (doi:10.1210/me.2004-0410)

    Gimpl G & Fahrenholz F 2001 The oxytocin receptor system: structure,

    function, and regulation. Physiological Reviews 81 629683.

    Grondahl ML, Borup R, Lee YB, Myrhoj V, Meinertz H & Sorensen S

    2009 Differences in gene expression of granulosa cells from women

    undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with either recombinant

    follicle-stimulating hormone or highly purified human menopausal

    gonadotropin. Fertility and Sterility 91 18201830. (doi:10.1016/j.

    fertnstert.2008.02.137)

    Groome NP, Illingworth PJ, OBrien M, Pai R, Rodger FE, Mather JP &

    McNeilly AS 1996 Measurement of dimeric inhibin B throughout

    the human menstrual cycle. Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 81

    14011405. (doi:10.1210/jc.81.4.1401)

    Havelock JC, Smith AL, Seely JB, Dooley CA, Rodgers RJ, Rainey WE &

    Carr BR 2005 The NGFI-B family of transcription factors regulates

    expression of 3b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in the human ovary.

    Molecular Human Reproduction 11 7985. (doi:10.1093/molehr/gah139)

    Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Robayna I, Shimada M, Wayne CM,

    Ochsner SA, White L & Richards JS 2006 Gene expression profiles of

    cumulus cell oocyte complexes during ovulation reveal cumulus cells express

    neuronal and immune-related genes: does this expand their role in the

    ovulation process? Molecular Endocrinology 20 13001321. (doi:10.1210/me.

    2005-0420)www.endocrinology-journals.org

  • Hoffman YM, Peegel H, Sprock MJ, Zhang QY & Menon KM 1991 Evidence Oktay K, Briggs D & Gosden RG 1997 Ontogeny of follicle-stimulating

    Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 279that human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptor down-

    regulation involves decreased levels of receptor messenger ribonucleic acid.

    Endocrinology 128 388393. (doi:10.1210/endo-128-1-388)

    Huhtaniemi I & Alevizaki M 2006 Gonadotrophin resistance. Best Practice &

    Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 20 561576. (doi:10.1016/

    j.beem.2006.09.003)

    Ikeda S, Nakamura K, Kogure K, Omori Y, Yamashita S, Kubota K, Mizutani T,

    Miyamoto K & Minegishi T 2008 Effect of estrogen on the expression

    of luteinizing hormonehuman chorionic gonadotropin receptor messenger

    ribonucleic acid in cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 149 15241533.

    (doi:10.1210/en.2007-1163)

    Irusta G, Abramovich D, Parborell F & Tesone M 2010 Direct survival role of

    vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on rat ovarian follicular cells.

    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 325 93100. (doi:10.1016/j.mce.2010.

    04.018)

    Koos RD 1995 Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth/perme-

    ability factor in the rat ovary following an ovulatory gonadotropin stimulus:

    potential roles in follicle rupture. Biology of Reproduction 52 14261435.

    (doi:10.1095/biolreprod52.6.1426)

    Kryczek I, Frydman N, Gaudin F, Krzysiek R, Fanchin R, Emilie D,

    Chouaib S, Zou W & Machelon V 2005 The chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12

    contributes to T lymphocyte recruitment in human pre-ovulatory follicles

    and coordinates with lymphocytes to increase granulosa cell survival and

    embryo quality. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 54 270283.

    (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00307.x)

    de Leeuw R, Mulders J, Voortman G, Rombout F, Damm J & Kloosterboer L

    1996 Structurefunction relationship of recombinant follicle stimulating

    hormone (Puregon). Molecular Human Reproduction 2 361369.

    (doi:10.1093/molehr/2.5.361)

    Li F & Curry TE Jr 2009 Regulation and function of tissue inhibitor of

    metalloproteinase (TIMP) 1 and TIMP3 in periovulatory rat granulosa

    cells. Endocrinology 150 39033912. (doi:10.1210/en.2008-1141)

    Liu Z, Rudd MD, Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Robayna I, Fan HY,

    Zeleznik AJ & Richards JS 2009 FSH and FOXO1 regulate genes in the

    sterol/steroid and lipid biosynthetic pathways in granulosa cells. Molecular

    Endocrinology 23 649661. (doi:10.1210/me.2008-0412)

    Lopata A, Oliva K, Stanton PG & Robertson DM 1997 Analysis of chorionic

    gonadotrophin secreted by cultured human blastocysts. Molecular Human

    Reproduction 3 517521. (doi:10.1093/molehr/3.6.517)

    Marco-Jimenez F, Llobat L & Vicente JS 2010 Effects of lanosterol on in vitro

    maturation of porcine oocytes. Animal Reproduction Science 117 288294.

    (doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.04.008)

    McGee EA & Hsueh AJ 2000 Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian

    follicles. Endocrine Reviews 21 200214. (doi:10.1210/er.21.2.200)

    McGee E, Sawetawan C, Bird I, Rainey WE & Carr BR 1995 The effects of

    insulin on 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression in human

    luteinized granulosa cells. Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation 2

    535541. (doi:10.1016/1071-5576(94)00061-5)

    Mochtar MH, Van der Veen, Ziech M & van Wely M 2007

    Recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) for controlled ovarian hyper-

    stimulation in assisted reproductive cycles. Cochrane Database of Systematic

    Reviews 18 CD005070.

    van Montfoort AP, Geraedts JP, Dumoulin JC, Stassen AP, Evers JL &

    Ayoubi TA 2008 Differential gene expression in cumulus cells as a

    prognostic indicator of embryo viability: a microarray analysis. Molecular

    Human Reproduction 14 157168. (doi:10.1093/molehr/gam088)

    Nimz M, Spitschak M, Schneider F, Furbass R & Vanselow J 2009

    Down-regulation of genes encoding steroidogenic enzymes and hormone

    receptors in late preovulatory follicles of the cow coincides with an

    accumulation of intrafollicular steroids. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 37

    4554. (doi:10.1016/j.domaniend.2009.02.002)

    Nothnick WB 2000 Disruption of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1

    gene results in altered reproductive cyclicity and uterine morphology

    in reproductive-age female mice. Biology of Reproduction 63 905912.

    (doi:10.1095/biolreprod63.3.905)www.endocrinology-journals.orghormone receptor gene expression in isolated human ovarian follicles.

    Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 82 37483751. (doi:10.1210/

    jc.82.11.3748)

    Park JI, Park HJ, Choi HS, Lee K, Lee WK & Chun SY 2001 Gonadotropin

    regulation of NGFI-B messenger ribonucleic acid expression during

    ovarian follicle development in the rat. Endocrinology 142 30513059.

    (doi:10.1210/en.142.7.3051)

    Peng XR, Hsueh AJ, LaPolt PS, Bjersing L & Ny T 1991 Localization of

    luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in

    ovarian cell types during follicle development and ovulation. Endocrinology

    129 32003207. (doi:10.1210/endo-129-6-3200)

    Phillips RJ, Mestas J, Gharaee-Kermani M, Burdick MD, Sica A,

    Belperio JA, Keane MP & Strieter RM 2005 Epidermal growth factor and

    hypoxia-induced expression of CXC chemokine receptor 4 on non-small cell

    lung cancer cells is regulated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/

    PTEN/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway and

    activation of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha. Journal of BiologicalChemistry280

    2247322481. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M500963200)

    Richards JS, Ireland JJ, Rao MC, Bernath GA, Midgley AR Jr &

    Reichert LE Jr 1976 Ovarian follicular development in the rat: hormone

    receptor regulation by estradiol, follicle stimulating hormone and

    luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 99 15621570. (doi:10.1210/endo-

    99-6-1562)

    Richards JS, Liu Z & Shimada M 2008 Immune-like mechanisms in

    ovulation. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 19 191196. (doi:10.1016/

    j.tem.2008.03.001)

    Robker RL, Akison LK & Russell DL 2009 Control of oocyte release by

    progesterone receptor-regulated gene expression. Nuclear Receptor Signaling

    7 e012.

    Robker RL, Russell DL, Yoshioka S, Sharma SC, Lydon JP, OMalley BW,

    Espey LL & Richards JS 2000 Ovulation: a multi-gene, multi-step process.

    Steroids 65 559570. (doi:10.1016/S0039-128X(00)00114-8)

    Romero S, Sanchez F, Adriaenssens T & Smitz J 2011 Mouse cumulus-oocyte

    complexes from in vitro-cultured preantral follicles suggest an anti-

    luteinizing role for the EGF cascade in the cumulus cells. Biology of

    Reproduction 84 11641170. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.110.087551)

    Sanchez F, Romero S & Smitz J 2011 Oocyte and cumulus cell transcripts

    from cultured mouse follicles are induced to deviate from normal in vivo

    condition by combinations of insulin, follicle-stimulating hormone, and

    human chorionic gonadotropin. Biology of Reproduction 85 565574.

    (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.111.091744)

    Segers I, Adriaenssens T & Smitz J 2012 Expression patterns of poliovirus

    receptor, erythrocyte protein band 4.1-like 3, regulator of G-protein

    signaling 11, and oxytocin receptor in mouse ovarian cells during follicle

    growth and early luteinization in vitro and in vivo. Biology of Reproduction 86

    111. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.111.092510)

    Semenza GL 2003 Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nature Reviews. Cancer

    3 721732. (doi:10.1038/nrc1187)

    Stocco CO, Zhong L, Sugimoto Y, Ichikawa A, Lau LF & Gibori G 2000

    Prostaglandin F2alpha-induced expression of 20alpha-hydroxysteroid

    dehydrogenase involves the transcription factor NUR77. Journal of Biological

    Chemistry 275 3720237211. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M006016200)

    Tapia A, Gangi LM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Balmaceda J, Pommer R, Trejo L,

    Pacheco IM, Salvatierra AM, Henriquez S, Quezada M et al. 2008

    Differences in the endometrial transcript profile during the receptive period

    between women who were refractory to implantation and those who

    achieved pregnancy. Human Reproduction 23 340351. (doi:10.1093/

    humrep/dem319)

    Vitt UA, Nayudu PL, Rose UM & Kloosterboer HJ 2001 Embryonic

    development after follicle culture is influenced by follicle-stimulating

    hormone isoelectric point range. Biology of Reproduction 65 15421547.

    (doi:10.1095/biolreprod65.5.1542)

    Wang L & Menon KM 2005 Regulation of luteinizing hormone/chorionic

    gonadotropin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the rat

    ovary: relationship to cholesterol metabolism. Endocrinology 146 423431.

    (doi:10.1210/en.2004-0805)Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280

  • Wang L, Nair AK & Menon KM 2007 Ribonucleic acid binding protein-

    mediated regulation of luteinizing hormone receptor expression in

    granulosa cells: relationship to sterol metabolism. Molecular Endocrinology 21

    22332241. (doi:10.1210/me.2007-0102)

    van Wely M, Kwan I, Burt AL, Thomas J, Vail A, Van der Veen F &

    Al-Inany HG 2011 Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian

    stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database of

    Systematic Reviews 16 CD005354.

    Wolfenson C, Groisman J, Couto AS, Hedenfalk M, Cortvrindt RG, Smitz JE &

    Jespersen S 2005 Batch-to-batch consistency of human-derived gonado-

    trophin preparations compared with recombinant preparations. Reproductive

    Biomedicine Online 10 442454. (doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60819-X)

    Wu Y, Ghosh S, Nishi Y, Yanase T, Nawata H & Hu Y 2005 The orphan

    nuclear receptors NURR1 and NGFI-B modulate aromatase gene

    expression in ovarian granulosa cells: a possible mechanism for repression of

    aromatase expression upon luteinizing hormone surge. Endocrinology 146

    237246. (doi:10.1210/en.2004-0889)

    Zhang FP, Poutanen M, Wilbertz J & Huhtaniemi I 2001 Normal prenatal but

    arrested postnatal sexual development of luteinizing hormone receptor

    knockout (LuRKO) mice. Molecular Endocrinology 15 172183.

    (doi:10.1210/me.15.1.172)

    Received in final form 13 August 2012Accepted 17 August 2012Made available online as an Accepted Preprint20 August 2012

    I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression280Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280 www.endocrinology-journals.org

    Outline placeholderIntroductionMaterials and MethodsMice and follicle cultureExperimental designGene expression analysisSteroid measurementsStatistical analysis

    ResultsFollicle cultureLH/choriogonadotropin receptor expressionAcute phase: early response in early antral follicles (day 6) to different gonadotropin regimens for 6 and 12hChronic phase: continuous exposure to different gonadotropin regimens during antral growth from days 6 to 9Steroid production

    DiscussionLhcgr expression in the acute and chronic phaseAcute phase (6 and 12h): Expression levels of Hif1a, Nr4a1, and Cyp19a1 are influenced by gonadotropinsSteroidogenesis: expression of key genes and steroid production in the acute and chronic phaseCytokines Cxcl12 and Cxcr4 in the acute and chronic phaseChronic phase (days 6-9): no differences due to gonadotropin treatment for Oxtr, Pgr, and EgfrDifferences in expression induced by rLH, rhCG, or urinary purified productsConclusions

    Declaration of interestFundingAcknowledgementsReferences