Upload
listamimo
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
gfyhjhcgfvhjbj
Citation preview
Gene expression differences induced by equimolar low doses of LHn
nd
0 Je
com
hCG (rhCG) and to highly purified human menopausal genes compared with recombinant gonadotropin exposure,
involves the use of gonadotropin preparations containing
(rLH) became available to complement recombinant FSH
growth leads to a specific differential response.
differ in carbohydrate additions (for review Fares (2006)).
269Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280(rFSH) during stimulation (Mochtar et al. 2007). Differences
in gene expression in human follicle cells were shown in
Where the conserved amino acid composition of LH and
hCG determines the ligandreceptor specificity, the divergent
DOI: 10.1530/JOE-12-0150either FSH alone or combinations of FSH plus LH activity.
LH activity in highly purified human menopausal gonado-
tropin (HP-hMG) is mainly represented by hCG stimulation
(Wolfenson et al. 2005). More recently, recombinant LH
The large N-terminal ectodomain of the LHCGR is
responsible for the high affinity and selective binding of its
two ligands LH and hCG (Caltabiano et al. 2008). The LH
and hCG b subunit share 80% sequence homology but greatlyFSH concentrations select out a dominant follicle, which can
survive due to its LH responsiveness (McGee & Hsueh 2000).
Stimulation of ovarian follicle growth in human ART practice
mouse (Zhang et al. 2001) and in women with inactivating
mutations of Lhcgr (Huhtaniemi & Alevizaki 2006). Hence,
stimulation of FSHR or LHCGR during antral follicledifferences were tested for genes involved in steroidogenesis:
Introduction
The final stages of follicle development leading to ovulation
are dependent on two pituitary glycoproteins: FSH and LH.
Granulosa cells of primary follicles start expressing FSH
receptors (Fshr) and the theca cells of secondary follicles start
expressing LH receptors (Lhcgr) (Erickson et al. 1985, Oktay
et al. 1997). Early antral follicle growth is only sustained under
rising FSH serum concentrations, which induce a rise in
estradiol (E2) and inhibin B (Inhb) (Groome et al. 1996),
followed by expression of Lhcgr on granulosa cells (Peng et al.
1991). Negative feedback mechanisms of E2 and INHB on00220795/12/0215269 q 2012 Society for Endocrinology Printed in GreatJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280
relation to the type of gonadotropin preparation used
(Grondahl et al. 2009, Adriaenssens et al. 2010), and these
might influence clinical outcome (Afnan 2009, van Wely et al.
2011). Also the origin of the gonadotropin preparation,
urinary or recombinant, might, via isoform composition
differences, affect bioavailability and bioactivity in relation to
the species (de Leeuw et al. 1996).
Gonadotropin receptors typically activate adenylyl cyclase
through G-proteins and thereby induce cAMP production.
However, the cellular response upon FSH cannot entirely
substitute for LHCGR signaling during the final stages of
follicle growth and ovulation as shown in the Lhcgr knockoutgonadotropin (HP-hMG) for 6 h, 12 h, or 3 days. Expression possibly pointing to enhanced cellular activity.or hCG in combination with FSH i
Ingrid Segers, Tom Adriaenssens, Sandra Wathlet a
Follicle Biology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 109
(Correspondence should be addressed to I Segers; Email: segersingrid@gmail.
Abstract
In a natural cycle, follicle growth is coordinated by FSH and
LH. Follicle growth stimulation in Assisted Reproductive
Technologies (ART) requires antral follicles to be exposed to
both FSH and LH bioactivity, especially after GNRH analog
pretreatment. The main aim was to detect possible
differences in gene expression in granulosa cells after
exposing the follicle during antral growth to LH or hCG,
as LH and hCG are different molecules acting on the same
receptor. Effects of five gonadotropin treatments were
investigated for 16 genes using a mouse follicle culture
model. Early (day 6) antral follicles were exposed to high
recombinant FSH combined or not with equimolar
concentrations of recombinant LH (rLH) or recombinantcultured mouse antral follicles
Johan Smitz
tte, Belgium
)
Mvk, Lss, Cyp11a1, Hsd3b1, Cyp19a1, Nr4a1, and Timp1;
final granulosa differentiation: Lhcgr, Oxtr, Pgr, Egfr, Hif1a,
and Vegfa; and cytokines: Cxcl12, Cxcr4, and Sdc4. Lhcgr was
present and upregulated by gonadotropins. Nr4a1, Cxcl12,
and Cxcr4 showed a different expression pattern if LH
bioactivity was added to high FSH in the first hours after
exposure. However, no signs of premature luteinization were
present even after a 3-day treatment as shown by Cyp19a1,
Oxtr, Pgr, and Egfr and by estrogen and progesterone
measurements. The downstream signaling by rhCG or rLH
through the LHCGR was not different for this gene
selection. Granulosa cells from follicles exposed to
HP-hMG showed an enhanced expression level for severalBritain Online version via http://www.endocrinology-journals.org
condition. The validated mouse model used is physiologically
relevant as it allows natural interactions between the three
After the initial growth period of 6 days from the preantral to
I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression270cell types of the follicle (Cortvrindt & Smitz 2002). The
responsiveness and sensitivity for FSH and LH in this in vitro
follicle model has already been studied (Cortvrindt et al. 1998,
Adriaens et al. 2004). Different gonadotropin regimens were
shown to induce differences in mRNA expression in follicle
cells (Adriaenssens et al. 2009, Sanchez et al. 2011) and in
secretion of proteins (Foster et al. 2010). Therefore, in the
current study, early antral follicles were exposed to five
different gonadotropin regimens relevant to the ART clinic.
A low rFSH tonus (10 mIU/ml) was used during the
preantral follicle stage (from days 1 to 6), followed by a high
FSH supplementation (as in clinical ART, 25 mIU/ml) in
combination or not with low doses of LH or hCG or by
HP-hMG. The doses of rLH or recombinant hCG (rhCG)
included (5.35 pM, equivalent to 5 mIU/ml rhCG) wereequimolar and similar to the amount of LH/hCG present in
HP-hMG, when the dose used in medium is 25 mIU/ml.
These doses are 240 times less than the ovulatory trigger
(1.2 IU/ml hCG) and w100 times less than the minimaleffective dose (0.4 IU/ml rhCG, historical laboratory data) toinduce mucification and maturation in the applied follicle
culture system.
Downstream acute effects of gonadotropin exposure were
studied by quantitative gene expression (day 6 at 6 and 12 h)
and the chronic effects after 3 days of exposure. The 16 genes
chosen for analysis involve LH-induced processes,
e.g. steroidogenesis: Mvk, Lss, Cyp11a1, Hsd3b1, Cyp19a1,
Nr4a1, and Timp1; final differentiation of granulosa cells:
Lhcgr, Oxtr, Pgr, Egfr, Hif1a, and Vegfa; and cytokine
expression: Cxcl12, Cxcr4, and Sdc4 (Table 1).
Materials and Methods
Mice and follicle culture
F1 mice (C57BL/6J!CBA/Ca; Charles River, Brussel,Belgium), housed and bred according to the national
standards for animal care and approved by the Ethical
Committee for animal experiments of the Free University
Brussels (Project 09-216-1), were used in this study. Preantral
follicles (110130 mm) were mechanically isolated fromovaries from 13- to 14-day-old F1 mice in L15 Leibovitzcarbohydrate chains of LH and hCG interact differently with
the LHCGR changing their affinity to the receptor and affect
half-life and hence bioactivity in living organisms (Galet &
Ascoli 2005). Although in vivo bioactivity will largely
determine differences in the extent of LHCGR stimulation
upon LH or hCG stimulation, it remains to be determined
whether LH and hCG can elicit intrinsically different
responses at the level of the Lhcgr.
Our primary interest was to differentiate low-dose effects of
LH and hCG on in vitro cultured follicles exposed to a high-
FSH dose (25 mIU/ml) comparable with a superovulationJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280the early antral follicle stage under a gonadotropin concen-
tration of 10 mIU/ml rFSH, early antral follicles were
exposed to five different gonadotropin regimens:
10 mIU/ml rFSH, 25 mIU/ml rFSH, 25 mIU/ml rFSHC5.35 pM rLH (Luveris, Ares Serono), 25 mIU/ml rFSHC5.35 pM rhCG, or 25 mIU/ml HP-hMG (Menopur,Ferring). The 10 mIU/ml rFSH condition is a continuation
of the minimal effective dose of FSH needed in culture
(Adriaens et al. 2004, Segers et al. 2012). The 25 mIU/ml
rFSH condition is considered slightly supraphysiological in
accordance with the supraphysiological FSH injections in
assisted reproductive technologies (ART) patients (Sanchez
et al. 2011). Supplementation of 25 mIU/ml rFSH with
equimolar concentrations of 5.35 pM of rLH (3.66 mIU/ml)or rhCG (5 mIU/ml) was chosen to ensure identical ligand
availability (equal to the identical amount of molecules) for
the LHCGR in this in vitro system.
The effects of different gonadotropin regimens on gene
expression in the mural cell compartment were investigated.
Early response on increased doses of gonadotropins (acute
phase) was measured at 0, 6, and 12 h after the medium
refreshment on day 6. Chronic effects of gonadotropin
treatment during early antral to late antral follicle growth were
studied by exposure for 3 days up to day 9 of culture. Cells
were collected in four sets of experiments. Follicle culture
repeats consisted of one of these possibilities: acute phase ofglutamax-I medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated
fetal bovine serum (HIA FBS), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and
100 mg/ml streptomycin (all Gibco; Invitrogen) and placed assingle units in half area 96-well plates (Costar; Elscolab,
Kruibeke, Belgium). On the first day of culture, intact
oocytegranulosa cell connections and presence of theca cells
were ascertained. At days 6, preantral follicles that developed
into early antral follicles were considered for exposure to the
five treatments during their antral growth phase. At day 9,
these follicles had developed into late antral follicles that
produced mature oocytes and expanded cumulus cells
16 h after maturation induction. Culture medium was
refreshed every 3 days by sampling 30 ml from 75 ml culturemedium and adding 30 ml fresh medium. Preantral follicleswere cultured for 6 days in a basal culture medium
supplemented with 10 mIU/ml rFSH (Gonal F, Ares
Serono). Basal culture medium consists of a-minimal essentialmedium with glutamax-I (Gibco; Invitrogen) supplemented
with 5% HIA FBS, 5 mg/ml insulin, 5 mg/ml transferrin, and5 ng/ml selenium (Sigma). Gonadotropin products were
dissolved in basal medium. At day 9 of culture, follicles in
reference plates received 1.2 IU/ml rhCG (Ovidrel, AresSerono) and 4 ng/ml r-EGF (Roche) to induce meiotic
resumption. All manipulations were done on a heated stage
and cultured follicles were grown at 37 8C, 100% humidity,and 5% CO2 in air.
Experimental designwww.endocrinology-journals.org
Table 1 Overview of the genes analyzed for gene expression in relation to different gonadotropin treatments during antral growth. Genename, symbol, and known function in the ovary are listed. The effect of high doses of LH or hCG, as in the ovulation trigger, on the geneexpression or protein level is given
Gene name (gene symbol) Function in the ovaryEffect of high doses of LH/hCG(ovulation trigger)
LH/choriogonadotropinreceptor (Lhcgr)
Receptor for both LH and hCG, important during antral folliclegrowth, maturation, and ovulation (McGee & Hsueh 2000)
Lhcgr mRNA is downregulated in ratovaries (Hoffman et al. 1991)
Mevalonate kinase (Mvk) Catalyzes conversion of mevalonic acid to mevalonate-5-phosphate, a step in lanosterol and subsequent cholesterolbiosynthesis
Mvk mRNA is transiently upregulated inrat, human, and mouse granulosa cells(Wang & Menon 2005, Wang et al.2007)MVK binds LhcgrmRNA and hereby negatively affect its stability
(Wang & Menon 2005, Wang et al. 2007)Lanosterol synthase (Lss) Catalyzes conversion of 2,3-oxidosqualene to lanosterol, a step
in cholesterol biosynthesisLanosterol enhanced meiotic resumption
in porcine oocytes (Marco-Jimenez et al.2010)Induced by FSH and inhibited by forkhead box O1 (FOXO1;
Liu et al. 2009)Cytochrome P450, family 11,
subfamily a, polypeptide 1(Cyp11a1)
Catalyzes conversion of cholesterol to pregnenolone, the firstand rate-limiting step in the synthesis of steroid hormones.Increased by FSH and E2 and decreased by FOXO1(Liu et al. 2009)
Cyp11a1 mRNA is upregulated throughEGFRERK1/2 signaling in mouse COC(Hernandez-Gonzalez et al. 2006)
Hydroxy-d-5-steroiddehydrogenase, 3b- andsteroid d-isomerase 1(Hsd3b1)
Catalyzes conversion of pregnenolone to progesterone Hsd3b1 mRNA is upregulated in mouseCOCs (Hernandez-Gonzalez et al.2006)
Upregulated by FSH and insulin (McGee et al. 1995)
Cytochrome P450, family 19,subfamily a, polypeptide 1(Cyp19a1)
Catalyzes conversion of C19 androgens to aromaticC18 estrogens
Cyp19a1 mRNA is downregulated throughEGFR signaling (Hernandez-Gonzalezet al. 2006, Andric et al. 2010)Induced by FSH through the A-kinase pathway (Fitzpatrick &
Richards 1991)Nuclear receptor subfamily 4,
group A, member 1 (Nr4a1)Orphan receptor of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily
that acts as a nuclear transcription factor implicated inimmediate-early response (Stocco et al. 2000)
Nr4a1 mRNA is rapidly and transientlyexpressed in rat granulosa cells (Parket al. 2001), which inhibits Cyp19a1expression in a human granulosa-liketumor cell line (Wu et al. 2005)
Progesterone receptor (Pgr) Essential for follicle rupture during the ovulatory process butdoes not affect follicle growth, development, differentiation,or luteinization (Robker et al. 2009)
Pgr mRNA and protein is rapidly andtransiently expressed in mouse muralgranulosa cells (Robker et al. 2000)
Chemokine (C-X-C motif)ligand 12 (Cxcl12)
Chemokine that mediates chemotaxis and homing of primordialgerm cells (Ara et al. 2003), granulosa cell survival in thepre- and periovulatory period (Kryczek et al. 2005), andimplantation (Tapia et al. 2008)
Cxcl12 mRNA and protein is present inhuman follicle fluid granulosa cellsisolated at oocyte pick up (Kryczek et al.2005)
Chemokine (C-X-C motif)receptor 4 (Cxcr4)
Receptor for CXCL12 Cxcr4 mRNA is transiently induced inmouse COCs (Hernandez-Gonzalezet al. 2006)
Human CXCR4 expression in cumulus cells is negativelycorrelated with embryo cleaving capacity (van Montfoortet al. 2008)
Induced by hypoxia and EGFR signaling (Phillips et al. 2005)Syndecan 4 (Sdc4) Proteoglycan that directly binds CXCL12 and is involved in
Cxcr4-mediated cell invasion (Charnaux et al. 2005)Sdc4 mRNA is progressively upregulated
in mouse cumulus cells (Adriaenssenset al. 2010)
Vascular endothelial growthfactor A (Vegfa)
Affects follicle growth (Danforth et al. 2003) and survival (Irustaet al. 2010), ovulation, and corpus luteum formation (Fraseret al. 2005)
Vegfa mRNA shows sustained increase inhuman luteinized granulosa cells(Koos 1995)
Tissue inhibitor of metallo-proteinase 1 (Timp1)
Secreted protein that inhibits matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)at ovulation and at corpus luteum formation and regression(Li & Curry 2009)
Timp1 mRNA is rapidly and transientlyinduced in periovulatory rat granulosacells (Li & Curry 2009)
Hypoxia inducible factor 1asubunit (Hif1a)
Forms with HIF-1B subunit: HIF1 transcription factor, stabilizedby hypoxia, inducing, e.g. VEGF (Forsythe et al. 1996) andCxcr4 (Phillips et al. 2005). Under normal oxygen levels,Hif1a can be induced by growth factors (Semenza 2003)
HIF1A is induced in human luteinizedgranulosa cells (van den Driesche et al.2008)
Epidermal growth factorreceptor (Egfr)
Receptor for several EGF-like factors (e.g. EGF, EREG, andAREG), important during follicle growth and differentiation,steroidogenesis and maturation/ovulation, where it mediatesthe LH stimulus (Conti et al. 2006)
Egfr mRNA and protein are downregulatedin mouse cumulus (Romero et al. 2011)
Oxytocin receptor (Oxtr) G-protein-coupled receptor influencing steroidogenesis,ovulation, luteinization, and luteal regression(Gimpl & Fahrenholz 2001)
Oxtr mRNA is induced in mouse muralgranulosa cells but not in cumulus cells(Segers et al. 2012)
Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 271
www.endocrinology-journals.org Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280
treatment rFSH10, rFSH25CLH, rFSH25ChCG, andHP-hMG25 (A); acute phase of treatment rFSH10 and
rFSH25 (B); chronic phase of treatment rFSH10, rFSH25CLH,rFSH25ChCG, and HP-hMG25 (C); or chronic phase oftreatment rFSH10 and rFSH25 (D). In each follicle culture
experiment, follicles were harvested from the ovaries of
several mice and randomly distributed to different culture
plates, resulting in on average ten follicles per culture plate.
The acute phase A was collected from in total seven follicle
culture repeats using 49 prepubertal mice and the acute phase B
from two follicle culture repeats using 16 mice. The chronic
phase C was collected from four culture repeats using 28 mice
and the chronic phase D from two culture repeats using
14 mice. Only follicles that already showed an antral cavity
follicles (to use as one sample in further gene expression
instructions with addition of an on-column DNase I treatment
(27 U/reaction; Qiagen). Total RNA (14 ml) in water wasobtained. cDNA synthesis was performed on 10 ml total RNAusing the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories)
using the blend of oligo(dT) and random hexamers. After 30 0at 48 8C, the obtained 20 ml cDNA was diluted four timeswith RNase-free water and stored atK80 8C until expressionanalysis. Negative controls were generated in each run of
cDNA synthesis by omitting RTenzyme or RNA.
The PCR primer design was performed using Universal
Probe Library (UPL) Software (Roche Diagnostics, Roche
Applied Science). Gene expression was detected using SYBR
green or UPL fluorescent probes. Primer specificity was
ascertained by melting curve analysis if SYBR green
SYBR Master or in LC480 Probes Master (Roche
n eaan
HP-(6)
9.9G2.4G3.5G4.1G9.0G
e p
I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression272analysis), the cells collected from two culture plates were
often combined within each treatment and time point.
One gonadotropin treatment consisted mostly of six
samples per time point for further use in gene expression
analysis, as detailed in Table 2. Based on the common control
condition rFSH10 and for the sake of clarity, acute (ACB)and chronic (CCD) sets of experiments were merged fordata representation and analysis.
Collection of mural granulosa cells was performed after
cumulusoocyte complex (COC) removal by securely
pipeting with a pulled pasteur pipette. As in this culture
system, the theca cells are firmly attached onto the bottom of
the well as a monolayer with a multilayer-mounted mural
granulosa cell stack on top; the dense mass of mural cells
was collected with a Pasteur pipette. Although it cannot be
100% excluded that also a few theca cells might have been
aspirated, we estimate that the granulosa mass is nevertheless
very pure.
Gene expression analysis
Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen)
on the QiaCube (Qiagen) following the manufacturers
Table 2 Gene expression results for the acute phase: early response i12 h. Values represent relative expression ratios of the specific gene
0 h 6 h
rFSH10(6)
rFSH10(6)
rFSH25(6)
rFSH25CrLH (5)
rFSH25CrhCG (6)
Mvk 7.3G0.6A 12.3G1.0B 14.8G1.1 13.3G2.5 13.3G1.5Lss 1.4G0.2A 2.7G0.2B 3.0G0.2 3.1G0.5 2.9G0.2Timp1 2.2G0.2A 4.6G0.6B 5.6G0.7 5.5G0.9 4.3G0.4Vegfa 3.2G0.4A 4.7G0.6A,B 4.2G0.5 4.7G0.9 4.7G0.5Sdc4 9.2G1.2A,B 13.8G1.8A 12.4G1.6 12.4G1.6 11.1G0.8
A,BDifferent capital letters in a row define statistical differences between the timbrackets, the amount of samples analyzed for gene expression is given.were withheld for gonadotropin exposure (around 40% of the
initially cultured follicles). After gonadotropin exposure, cells
were immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen pooled per
culture plate. To obtain a pool of cells of on average eightJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280Diagnostics) with 0.01 mM probe (UPL, Roche Diagnostics)and 2 ml cDNA into a total volume of 15 ml. PCR conditionswere 100 at 95 8C followed by 45 cycles of 1000 at 95 8C and 3000at 60 8C. A log10 dilution series of a synthetic oligonucleotide(Eurogentec) corresponding to the amplicon sequence was
simultaneously run to enable quantitative measurement of
expression. Samples were run in triplicate for each gene. As
endogenous control, Rn18s was detected with SYBR green
(Adriaenssens et al. 2009). Relative expression values were
calculated for all samples. All control samples appeared
negative for real-time PCR assessment of Rn18s and specific
genes. The different genes were quantified in the most
relevant culture setting: acute phase, chronic phase, or both,
based on the literature and in-house micro-array data.
Steroid measurements
Spent medium of follicle culture was pooled per plate at each
refreshment day or at the collection time point. Samples were
frozen atK20 8C. E2-17b production was measured with theRIA E2RIA-CT (Biosource, Nivelles, Belgium) having a
rly antral follicles (day 6) to different gonadotropin regimes for 6 andd the endogenous control Rn18s (meanGS.E.M.)
12 h
hMG25 rFSH10(6)
rFSH25(6)
rFSH25CrLH (6)
rFSH25CrhCG (6)
HP-hMG25(6)
0.7 6.2G0.2A 6.9G0.3 7.7G1.0 7.7G0.7 7.9G1.10.2 1.4G0.1A 1.6G0.1 1.4G0.2 1.5G0.2 1.6G0.20.2 1.6G0.2A 1.6G0.2 1.9G0.2 2.3G0.4 1.8G0.20.3 4.9G0.2B 6.3G0.3 4.3G0.5 4.7G0.6 5.3G0.80.4 8.0G0.1B 8.8G0.1 9.4G1.5 10.5G1.3 9.0G1.5
oints 0, 6, and 12 h in rFSH10 treatment (P!0.05, ANOVACTukey). Betweendetection was performed and by sequencing analysis for
both SYBR green and probe detection. Primer and reference
sequences are detailed in Supplementary Table 1, see section
on supplementary data given at the end of this article.
Real-time PCR was performed on LightCycler 480 with
0.6 mM primers (Eurogentec, Liege, Belgium) in LC480www.endocrinology-journals.org
conditions were subjected to one-way ANOVACTukey
regimens at day 9. Antral follicle survival up to day 9 was
equally successful in all conditions (O96%; PO0.05) and
attached to the plate. All samples expressed Lhcgr.
gonadotropin-dependent expression (Fig. 1). Their expression
During antral follicle growth in rFSH10 from days 6 to 9,
Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 273In the acute exposure experiment, there was no change
in Lhcgr expression within the first 6 h of exposure to the
different gonadotropin conditions (Fig. 1). After 12 h, Lhcgr
expression remained low for rFSH10, while high
FSH25 increased Lhcgr expression (rFSH10 vs rFSH25
and rFSH25CrhCG, P!0.05). In the large antralfollicles (rFSH10, day 9), Lhcgr was significanlty increased
by threefold compared with day 6 (rFSH10). On day 9,
chronic exposure to HP-hMG25 induced significantly more
Lhcgr mRNA compared with rFSH10 (P!0.05). rFSH25,rFSH25CrLH, and rFSH25CrhCG showed intermediateLhcgr expression (Fig. 2).meiotic maturation observed at 16 h after rhCG plus rEGF
wasO80% in control plates grown for 9 days in all condtions(PO0.05).
LH/choriogonadotropin receptor expression
All follicles included in our analysis had from day 6 onward a
clear delineated COC with mural granulosa and theca cellsposttest or unpaired test using GraphPad Prism 4.0 Software
(La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences with a P!0.05 areconsidered statistically significant.
Results
Follicle culture
Early antral follicles on day 6 developed into late antral
follicles on day 9 as expected, with extensive granulosa cell
proliferation and enlargement of follicular structure. There
were no obvious morphological differences between the fully
grown follicles generated from any of the gonadotropinsensitivity of 20 pg/l and a total imprecision profile
!10% coefficient of variation (CV). Progesterone secretionwas determined with Prog-CTRIA (Cis bio International,
Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France) with a functional sensitivity of
0.5 mg/l and a total imprecision profile !10% CV. E2 wasmeasured on day 6 of culture before and after acute exposure
for 6 and 12 h to the different gonadotropin treatments. The
average E2 production per hour was calculated, taking into
account the residual fraction of E2 present in the well after
medium change, e.g. after 6 h: ((E2 on 6 h)K(E2 on0 h!0.6))/6 h. E2 and progesterone were measured afterchronic exposure for 3 days from days 6 to 9 of culture.
Statistical analysis
Relative expression ratios were log2 transformed to ensure
Gaussian distribution. Per time point, different gonadotropinwww.endocrinology-journals.orgLhcgr was threefold upregulated and Egfr was 1.5-folddownregulated (Fig. 2, t-test, P!0.05). After a 3-dayexposure of the growing follicles to different gonadotropin
treatments, Cxcr4, Cyp19a1, and Cyp11a1 expression was
gradually increasing from rFSH10 to rFSH25, to rFSH25CrLH/hCG, and highest in HP-hMG25. Statistical significance
was obtained between rFSH10 and HP-hMG25 (P!0.05)for Cxcr4, Cyp19a1, and Cyp11a1 (Fig. 2). A tendency for
increased expression in HP-hMG25 was present for Hsd3b1,
Cxcl12, Oxtr, Pgr, and Sdc4 (Table 3).
Steroid production
The immediate effects by different gonadotropin treatments
on E2 production on day 6 showed highest E2 production/
hour in HP-hMG25 both at 6 h (Table 4, P!0.01 vsrFSH10) and 12 h (tendency). By day 9 of culture, the E2concentration of rFSH10 was significantly lower compared
with the other four conditions (Table 5, P!0.001). The basalprogesterone production was elevated in rFSH25CLHbioactivity compared with rFSH10 and rFSH25 (rFSH10 vs
rFSH25CrLH, P!0.05). Sixteen hours after the ovulatorytrigger, no differences in progesterone production were found
between the different gonadotropin preparations (PO0.05,data not shown).was significantly induced by increasing the FSH dose (rFSH10
vs rFSH25, P!0.05). If high FSH25 was combined with LHbioactivity, expression of Cxcr4 (rFSH25 vs rFSH25ChCG,P!0.05) and Nr4a1 (rFSH25 vs rFSH25ChCG andHP-hMG25, P!0.05) was further increased.Mvk, Lss, Timp1, Vegfa, and Sdc4 expression was not
influenced by gonadotropin treatment. The baseline of
rFSH10 was upregulated from 0 to 6 h and returned back
to initial values at 12 h for Mvk, Lss, Timp1, Hif1a, Cxcl12,
Cxcr4, and Nr4a1 (Table 2, ANOVACTukey, P!0.05).
Chronic phase: continuous exposure to different gonadotropinregimens during antral growth from days 6 to 9Acute phase: early response in early antral follicles (day 6) todifferent gonadotropin regimens for 6 and 12 h
After 6 h of exposure, expression of Cxcl12, Cxcr4, and Hif1a
were differentially regulated by the different gonadotropin
preparations (Fig. 1). Their expression was not influenced
by increasing the FSH dose (rFSH10 vs rFSH25). Cxcl12
expression was decreased if high FSH25 was combined with
LH bioactivity (rFSH10 vs rFSH25CrhCG and HP-hMG25,P!0.05). Cxcr4 showed an inverse reaction and wasupregulated by high FSH25 combined with LH bioactivity
(rFSH10 vs rFSH25CLH, rFSH25ChCG, and HP-hMG25,P!0.05). Hif1a expression was similar in all recombinantgonadotropin treatments but reduced in HP-hMG25 (P!0.05).
After 12 h of exposure, Cxcr4, Cyp19a1, and Nr4a1 showedJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280
rFS
SH2
HP
FSH
H25
HP-
rFSH
25+r
LH 6
h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
6 h
c
1 aaA
C
I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression274rF r
rFS
Hif1a
25
30
35Ba
ab
a
ab
b18s
15
20
25
n18sLhcgr
rFSH
10 0
h
rFSH
10 6
h
rFSH
25 6
h
H25+
rLH
6 h
5+rh
CG 6
h
-hM
G25
6 h
rFSH
10 1
2 h
rFSH
25 1
2 h
25+r
LH 1
2 h
+rhC
G 1
2 h
hMG
25 1
2 h
rFSH
10 0
h
rFSH
10 6
h
rFSH
25 6
h
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
a
b
abb
ab
Lhcg
r/Rn1
8s
00
05
10
15
20
25
30
35Ba
ab
ac
A
Cxcl1
2/Rn
18sDiscussion
The effects of FSH, LH, and hCG during antral follicle
growth were investigated on genes involved in Lhcgr signaling
both immediately after exposure (acute phase) and 3 days after
exposure (chronic phase).
Lhcgr expression in the acute and chronic phase
The increase in FSH at day 6 was followed 12 h later by an
induction of Lhcgr expression. This was expected as FSH and
estrogen (already increased at 6 h in the spent medium)
induce Lhcgr during normal antral follicle growth (Richards
et al. 1976, Ikeda et al. 2008). Ovulatory doses of LH are
known to downregulate the expression of Lhcgr (Hoffman
et al. 1991) already after 4 h (Wang & Menon 2005). This is
directly caused by Lhcgr mRNA destabilization through
MVK, an immediate effect that can be detected by gene
expression as soon as 6 h after the ovulatory stimulus (Wang
rFSH
10 0
h
rFSH
10 6
h
rFSH
25 6
h
rFSH
25+r
LH 6
h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
6 h
HP-
hMG
25 6
h
rFSH
10 1
2 h
rFSH
25 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
LH 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
12
h
HP-
hMG
25 1
2 h
rFSH
10 0
h
rFSH
10 6
h
rFSH
25 6
h
rFSH
25+r
LH 6
h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
6 h
0
5
10
15
20 A A
Hif1
a/Rn
0
5
10
Cyp1
9a1/
R
Figure 1 Gene expression results during the acute exposure for 6 anexpression ratios of the specific gene over the Rn18s endogeneous conANOVACTukey posttest in the rFSH10 condition over the three time pANOVACTukey posttest was also applied to the different gonadotropinsmall letters above columns. Statistical differences have at least P!0.0
Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280HP-
hMG
25 6
h
rFSH
10 1
2 h
rFSH
25 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
LH 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
12
h
HP-
hMG
25 1
2 h
rFSH
10 0
h
rFSH
10 6
h
rFSH
25 6
h
rFSH
25+r
LH 6
h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
6 h
HP-
hMG
25 6
h
rFSH
10 1
2 h
rFSH
25 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
LH 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
12
h
HP-
hMG
25 1
2 h
0
yp19a1
b
bb b
Nr4a1
25
30
35
b
bcc
c
B18sCxcl12
bc A
Cxcr4
2
3
4
5
B ab
c
c
b
Ab
bc
c
bCxcr
4/Rn
18set al. 2007). Lhcgr downregulation was not observed in the
current study using high FSH25 supplemented with
5.35 pM of rLH or rhCG during antral growth and nocorrelation with Mvk expression was found.
The growth of the follicle from the early (day 6) to the late
(day 9) antral stage coincided with more Lhcgr expression. The
highest level of Lhcgr mRNA was found after exposure to
HP-hMG25 for 3 days. Equal levels of E2 were found in all
conditions containing high gonadotropin concentrations;
hence, E2 cannot be responsible for higher Lhcgr expression
in HP-hMG25.
Acute phase (6 and 12 h): Expression levels of Hif1a, Nr4a1,and Cyp19a1 are influenced by gonadotropins
The increase in Hif1a mRNA expression after 6 h seen in
early antral follicles in this study was independent of
increasing doses of recombinant gonadotropins but was
absent in HP-hMG25. In all conditions, Hif1a returned to
HP-
hMG
25 6
h
rFSH
10 1
2 h
rFSH
25 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
LH 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
12
h
HP-
hMG
25 1
2 h
rFSH
10 0
h
rFSH
10 6
h
rFSH
25 6
h
rFSH
25+r
LH 6
h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
6 h
HP-
hMG
25 6
h
rFSH
10 1
2 h
rFSH
25 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
LH 1
2 h
rFSH
25+r
hCG
12
h
HP-
hMG
25 1
2 h
a
0
5
10
15
20Aa
A
Nr4a
1/Rn
d 12 h to different gonadotropin regimens. Bars represent meantrol with S.E.M. error bars. Statistical analysis was performed byoints 0, 6, and 12 h, indicated by capital letters above columns.preparations per time point (separated by full lines), indicated by
5.
www.endocrinology-journals.org
Lhcgr
rFSH
10 D
ay 6
rFSH
10 D
ay 9
rFSH
25 D
ay 9
rFSH
25+r
LH D
ay 9
SH25
+rhC
G D
ay 9
HP-
hMG
25 D
ay 9
rFSH
10 D
ay 6
rFSH
10 D
ay 9
rFSH
25 D
ay 9
rFSH
25+r
LH D
ay 9
SH25
+rhC
G D
ay 9
HP-
hMG
25 D
ay 9
rFSH
10 D
ay 6
rFSH
10 D
ay 9
rFSH
25 D
ay 9
rFSH
25+r
LH D
ay 9
SH25
+rhC
G D
ay 9
HP-
hMG
25 D
ay 9
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
aab
abab
b
A
B
Lhcg
r/Rn1
8sEgfr
00
25
50
75
100
125
150
175A
B
Egfr/
Rn18
s
Cxcr4
00
05
10
15
20
25
a
ab
ab ab
b
Cxcr
4/Rn
18s
C
a
Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 275rF
Cyp19a1
30
40
50
60
70
a abab ab
b
9a1/
Rn18
s
600
800
1000
1200
1400
a1a1
/Rn1
8sbaseline levels after 12 h. The transient nature of Hif1a as a
rapid response mediator of FSH action (Alam et al. 2009) and
the equivalent level of induction of its downstream target
Vegfa by all gonadotropin treatments after 6 and 12 h could
indicate that the total level of induction of Hif1a had been
similar in all conditions but differed in kinetics.
rFSH
10 D
ay 6
rFSH
10 D
ay 9
rFSH
25 D
ay 9
rFSH
25+r
LH D
ay 9
rFSH
25+r
hCG
Day
9
HP-
hMG
25 D
ay 9
rFSH
10 D
ay 6
rFSH
10 D
ay 9
0
10
20Cyp1
0
200
400Cyp1
Figure 2 Gene expression results during the chronic exposure for 3 daBars represent mean expression ratios of the specific genes over the Rnwas performed by ANOVACTukey posttest on day 9 (separated by fulstatistical differences with at least P!0.05. In capital letters, statisticstwo time points (days 69) in the rFSH10 condition.
Table 3 Gene expression results for the chronic phase: continuous expodays 6 to 9. Values represent relative expression ratios of the specific ge
Day 6 Day 9
FSH10 (6) rFSH10 (6) rFSH25 (6)
Hsd3b1 629G112 812G102 650G82Cxcl12 1.26G0.24 0.84G0.23 0.59G0.16Oxtr 2.31G0.43 2.59G0.48 3.10G0.57Pgr 0.42G0.10 0.36G0.07 0.32G0.07Sdc4 15.6G5.0 25.5G3.9 23.0G3.5
Between brackets, the amount of samples analyzed for gene expression is given.
www.endocrinology-journals.orgrF rF
yp11a1
ab ab
bAn ovulatory dose of LH/hCG causes an immediate
response of Nr4a1 expression within 1 h in granulosa cells
(Carletti & Christenson 2009) through cAMP-mediated
signaling and returns back to basal levels after 9 h (Wu et al.
2005). This stimulates HSD3B2 (Havelock et al. 2005) and
repressesCyp19a1 (Wang & Menon 2005), shifting the steroid
rFSH
25 D
ay 9
rFSH
25+r
LH D
ay 9
rFSH
25+r
hCG
Day
9
HP-
hMG
25 D
ay 9
ys (from days 6 to 9 of culture) to different gonadotropin regimens.18s endogeneous control with S.E.M. error bars. Statistical analysisl lines from the day 6 result) with different small letters indicating(t-test, P!0.05) are shown for the regulation of the genes over the
sure to different gonadotropin regimens during antral growth fromne and the endogenous control Rn18s (meanGS.E.M.)
rFSH25CrLH (6) rFSH25CrhCG (4) HP-hMG25 (6)
743G139 754G138 1118G1961.20G0.35 0.98G0.33 1.40G0.383.10G0.54 2.93G0.46 5.33G1.090.37G0.05 0.41G0.09 0.60G0.1327.4G4.9 26.9G6.1 42.3G8.3
Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280
also showed E2 production within a 6-h period (Daniel &
and progesterone content for rFSH25Clow-dose LHbioactivity was higher compared with rFSH25 alone. This
indicates that the presence of a low dose of LH or hCG
bioactivity during follicle growth induced a more active
steroidogenesis (Wolfenson et al. 2005), which could be a
result of a more active transcription of Cyp11a1 and Cyp19a1.
Secondly, the additional supply of precursors through
LH-stimulated theca cells, which express Cyp11a1 and
Hsd3b1 (Nimz et al. 2009), could also provide an elevated
steroid level. Basal progesterone levels in low-dose LH-sup-
plemented conditions remained at least 15 times lower than
the progesterone levels 16 h after the ovulatory hCG stimulus,
on average 104 mg/l.
I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression276Armstrong 1984), suggesting that FSH in our culture model is
indeed both activating the existing CYP19A1 protein and
inducing its mRNA expression only by 12 h. The E2production occurred mainly during the first 6 h and was
most evident for HP-hMG. Coincidently, an induction of
Mvk, Lss, and Timp1 expression was seen after 6 h of
exposure, independent of gonadotropins. The temporary
depletion of steroids after medium refreshment induced Mvk
and Lss expression (Wang et al. 2007, Ikeda et al. 2008),
providing the necessary precursors for E synthesis. Timp1secretion profile from estrogenic to progestagenic. In the
current experimental setup on day 6, Nr4a1 showed a late
induction at 12 h by FSH further elevated by LH activity,
which coincided with an induction of Cyp19a1. FSH is
believed to induce a slow but sustained cAMP signal during
growth while an ovulatory LH surge would elicit a rapid but
transient cAMP signal (Conti 2002). Our findings could
suggest that during antral growth, Nr4a1 expression is cAMP
mediated through Fshr and mild stimulation of Lhcgr.
Steroidogenesis: expression of key genes and steroid productionin the acute and chronic phase
Cyp19a1 mRNA induction by high FSH after 12 h and the
activity of the present CYP19A1 protein (E2 production,
Table 4) was kept intact after administration of a small dose of
LH or hCG. In rat, cultured granulosa cells exposed to FSH
Table 4 Estradiol-17b production on day 6 at 6 and 12 h afterdifferent gonadotropin exposures (meanGS.E.M.)
Mean increase/h (ng/l per h)
n 6 h n 12 h
rFSH10 10 11G4A 6 12G5rFSH25 4 30G7A,B 4 14G9rFSH25CrLH 6 31G4A,B 6 8G3rFSH25CrhCG 6 28G5A,B 6 11G2HP-hMG25 6 49G13B 6 30G7
A,BDifferent letters in a column define statistical differences betweentreatments (P!0.05, ANOVACTukey).2
knockout mice showed increased E2 and decreased
progesterone (Nothnick 2000) and TIMP1 stimulated
progesterone production in testis (Boujrad et al. 1995). This
could make Timp1 another target upregulated to bring the
follicular steroidogenic environment in balance after medium
refreshment.
After 3 days, exposure to different gonadotropin treatments
Cyp11a1 tended to be upregulated by low-dose LH activity.
The potential to convert pregnenolone into progesterone was
comparable as Hsd3b1 expression was not significantly altered.
Cyp19a1, converting androgens into estrogens, was again
highly expressed in HP-hMG25. Steroid measurements on
day 9 corroborated the gene expression patterns, where the E2
Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280Table 5 Estradiol-17b and progesterone content on day 9(meanGS.E.M.)
Estradiol-17b (ng/l) Progesterone (mg/l)
n Day 9 n Day 9
rFSH10 13 3273G591A 10 0.20G0.08A
rFSH25 2 7300G2100B 3 0.35G0.04A,B
rFSH25CrLH 9 12 540G1959B 9 6.79G2.16B
rFSH25CrhCG 8 12 390G1458B 8 5.37G2.34A,B
HP-hMG25 8 12 640G1197B 8 2.94G1.22A,B
A,BDifferent letters in a column define statistical differences betweentreatments (P!0.05, ANOVACTukey).Cytokines Cxcl12 and Cxcr4 in the acute and chronic phase
The targets from our selection most influenced by a change in
gonadotropin regimen were Cxcl12 and its receptor Cxcr4.
An alternative (co)-receptor for Cxcl12 and Sdc4 showed no
differences. Cytokines and other immune-related processes
have been described during ovulation (Richards et al. 2008).
Cumulus cells acquire some gene expression patterns specific
for immune-like cells, like Cdc34 antigen, myelin basic
protein (Mbp), and Cxcr4 (Hernandez-Gonzalez et al. 2006).
Here was shown that Cxcr4 and Cxcl12 are present and
regulated by gonadotropins in mural/theca cells already
during antral follicle growth. Cxcl12 was elevated in
rFSH10/25 at 6 h after exposure to different treatments,
while reduced in rFSH25CLH bioactivity. As suggested forHif1a, this could be a matter of kinetics, where additional LH
activity enhances the general activity of the cell and hereby
more rapidly recovers from medium change.
Cxcr4 was induced by HP-hMG25 but even more
by rFSH25CrLH/rhCG at 6 and 12 h. This pointed to adifferent reaction through the Lhcgr if ligands are from
recombinant or urinary purified origin. High FSHCLHbioactivity induced already at 6 h a massive induction of
Cxcr4; however, Cxcr4 levels only increased under the
influence of high rFSH25 alone after 12 h. This suggested a
synergy in LHCGR and FSHR signaling, both using cAMP
as second messenger in inducing Cxcr4 expression. No clearwww.endocrinology-journals.org
are activating Lhcgr signaling equally.
Cxcl12) showed a tendency for elevated expression in
Lhcgr was present and regulated by gonadotropin type and
dose in early and late antral follicles. A low dose of LH or
after 3-day exposure. Nr4a1, Cxcl12, and Cxcr4 were most
induced by the different ligands.
Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 277HP-hMG25 compared with the rFSH25/rLH/rhCG treat-
ments. An overall higher activity status of granulosa cells
under HP-hMG treatment has also been described for protein
levels: higher levels of cytokines were found in mouse follicle
culture in HP-hMG if compared with rFSH treatment only
(Foster et al. 2010). The differences in gene expression
patterns seen in HP-hMG25 are (most likely) an effect of
both differences in the FSH and the LH/hCG component.
For FSH, it was already shown that recombinant vs
urinary purified FSH contains different subsets of isoforms
and that acidity of isoforms influenced capacity to induce
meiosis in COC, to stimulate proliferation in granulosa cellsHowever, HP-hMG25 did elicit some different responses
compared to the recombinant products. Some tendencies
were noticed. Six hours after exposure of early antral follicles
to rFSH25 with or without LH activity, six of 11 genes (Mvk,
Lss, Cxcl12, Cxcr4, Hif1a, and Timp1) were upregulated by
the medium refreshment. The exposure to HP-hMG25
attenuated the initial response or accelerated the decrease to
basal levels as seen for all conditions at 12 h (Mvk, Lss, Cxcl12,
Hif1a, and Timp1). Secondly, after 3 days of growth in
HP-hMG25, nine of ten of the studied genes (all exceptinterrelation between Cxcl12 and Cxcr4 expression was
found. Preliminary laboratory data suggested a cell-type-
and cell-stage-specific expression pattern for both Cxcl12 and
its receptors; hence, the presented data in mural cells could be
too fragmentarious to reveal complex interrelations.
In the current study, exposure to HP-hMG25 for 3 days
generated the highest level of Cxcr4 expression, where the
immediate response after 6 and 12 h on day 6 was higher if
exposed to high FSH and rLH bioactivity. This suggests that
slight differences in hormone composition like in the
recombinant or urinary purified hormones could affect
downstream signaling kinetics.
Chronic phase (days 69): no differences due to gonadotropintreatment for Oxtr, Pgr, and Egfr
Three receptors implicated in ovulation and luteinization
were studied: Egfr, Oxtr, and Pgr. All three genes were not
affected by gonadotropins. Absence of significant Oxtr, Pgr,
and Egfr expression induction indicated that mural cells did
not express early signs of luteinization (Fujinaga et al. 1994,
Clemens et al. 1998, Segers et al. 2012), which was reinforced
by the endocrine profile on day 9.
Differences in expression induced by rLH, rhCG, or urinarypurified products
For all genes in this study, equimolar doses of rLH or rhCG
did not lead to differences in response in the early or late antral
granulosa cells (t-test, PO0.05). Hence, it could beconsidered that in an in vitro culture system, rLH and rhCGwww.endocrinology-journals.orgAdriaens I, Cortvrindt R & Smitz J 2004 Differential FSH exposure in
preantral follicle culture has marked effects on folliculogenesis and
oocyte developmental competence. Human Reproduction 19 398408.
(doi:10.1093/humrep/deh074)
Adriaenssens T, Mazoyer C, Segers I, Wathlet S & Smitz J 2009 Differences
in collagen expression in cumulus cells after exposure to highly purifiedDeclaration of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived
as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
Funding
This work was supported by the Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap
en Technologie, Brussels, Belgium (grant no. IWT70719), Fonds
Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium (grant no.
KN1.5.040.09) and Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Saint-Prex, Switzerland.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Ms Katy Billooye for excellent technical
assistance in the follicle culture experiments and RIA, Mr Johan Schiettecatte
for technical assistance with hormone measurements, and Ms Sandra
De Schaepdryver for editorial support.
ReferencesSupplementary data
This is linked to the online version of the paper at http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/
JOE-12-0150.influenced by introducing gonadotropin treatment in early
antral follicles. This study emphasizes the complexity of
LHCGR and FSHR signaling during folliculogenesis, where
in-depth ligandreceptor interaction studies are needed to
understand the origin of the differential expression patternshCG applied during early antral follicle growth did not
induce premature luteinization effects in both gene expression
patterns and steroid production. Gene expression responses
were identical after rLH or rhCG stimulation, suggesting an
equal in vitro biopotency. However, the urinary-derived
HP-hMG did systematically show the highest gene induction(GC) (Barrios-De-Tomasi et al. 2002), and to influence
embryonic development when applied in follicle culture
(Vitt et al. 2001). Like FSH, both LH (Burgon et al. 1996) and
hCG (Lopata et al. 1997) consist out of different isoforms
in vivo with different pI and hence implications in bioactivity.
ConclusionsJournal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280
menotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a mouse Danforth DR, Arbogast LK, Ghosh S, Dickerman A, Rofagha R & Friedman
I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression278follicle culture model. Biology of Reproduction 80 10151025. (doi:10.1095/
biolreprod.107.067462)
Adriaenssens T, Wathlet S, Segers I, Verheyen G, De Vos A, Van der Elst J,
Coucke W, Devroey P & Smitz J 2010 Cumulus cell gene expression is
associated with oocyte developmental quality and influenced by patient and
treatment characteristics. Human Reproduction 25 12591270. (doi:10.1093/
humrep/deq049)
Afnan M 2009 Identifying real differences in live birth rates between HMG
and rFSH in IVF. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 18 (Suppl 2) 2530.
(doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60445-2)
Alam H, Weck J, Maizels E, Park Y, Lee EJ, Ashcroft M & Hunzicker-Dunn M
2009 Role of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and extracellular regulated
kinase pathways in the induction of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 activity
and the HIF-1 target vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian granulosa
cells in response to follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocrinology 150 915928.
(doi:10.1210/en.2008-0850)
Andric N, Thomas M & Ascoli M 2010 Transactivation of the epidermal
growth factor receptor is involved in the lutropin receptor-mediated down-
regulation of ovarian aromatase expression in vivo. Molecular Endocrinology
24 552560. (doi:10.1210/me.2009-0450)
Ara T, Nakamura Y, Egawa T, Sugiyama T, Abe K, Kishimoto T, Matsui Y &
Nagasawa T 2003 Impaired colonization of the gonads by primordial germ
cells in mice lacking a chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1).
PNAS 100 53195323. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0730719100)
Barrios-De-Tomasi J, Timossi C, Merchant H, Quintanar A, Avalos JM, Andersen
CY & Ulloa-Aguirre A 2002 Assessment of the in vitro and in vivo biological
activities of the human follicle-stimulating isohormones. Molecular and Cellular
Endocrinology 186 189198. (doi:10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00657-8)
Boujrad N, Ogwuegbu SO, Garnier M, Lee CH, Martin BM &
Papadopoulos V 1995 Identification of a stimulator of steroid
hormone synthesis isolated from testis. Science 268 16091612. (doi:10.
1126/science.7777858)
Burgon PG, Stanton PG & Robertson DM 1996 In vivo bioactivities and
clearance patterns of highly purified human luteinizing hormone isoforms.
Endocrinology 137 48274836. (doi:10.1210/en.137.11.4827)
Caltabiano G, Campillo M, De Leener A, Smits G, Vassart G, Costagliola S &
Pardo L 2008 The specificity of binding of glycoprotein hormones to their
receptors. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 65 24842492. (doi:10.1007/
s00018-008-8002-9)
Carletti MZ & Christenson LK 2009 Rapid effects of LH on gene expression
in the mural granulosa cells of mouse periovulatory follicles. Reproduction
137 843855. (doi:10.1530/REP-08-0457)
Charnaux N, Brule S, Hamon M, Chaigneau T, Saffar L, Prost C, Lievre N &
Gattegno L 2005 Syndecan-4 is a signaling molecule for stromal cell-
derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/ CXCL12. FEBS Journal 272 19371951.
(doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04624.x)
Clemens JW, Robker RL, Kraus WL, Katzenellenbogen BS & Richards JS
1998 Hormone induction of progesterone receptor (PR) messenger
ribonucleic acid and activation of PR promoter regions in ovarian
granulosa cells: evidence for a role of cyclic adenosine 3 0,5 0-mono-phosphate but not estradiol. Molecular Endocrinology 12 12011214.
(doi:10.1210/me.12.8.1201)
Conti M 2002 Specificity of the cyclic adenosine 3 0,5 0-monophosphatesignal in granulosa cell function. Biology of Reproduction 67 16531661.
(doi:10.1095/biolreprod.102.004952)
Conti M, Hsieh M, Park JY & Su YQ 2006 Role of the epidermal growth
factor network in ovarian follicles. Molecular Endocrinology 20 715723.
(doi:10.1210/me.2005-0185)
Cortvrindt RG & Smitz JE 2002 Follicle culture in reproductive toxicology:
a tool for in-vitro testing of ovarian function? Human Reproduction Update 8
243254. (doi:10.1093/humupd/8.3.243)
Cortvrindt R, Hu Y & Smitz J 1998 Recombinant luteinizing hormone
as a survival and differentiation factor increases oocyte maturation in
recombinant follicle stimulating hormone-supplemented mouse preantral
follicle culture. Human Reproduction 13 12921302. (doi:10.1093/humrep/
13.5.1292)Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280CI 2003 Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates preantral follicle
growth in the rat ovary. Biology of Reproduction 68 17361741. (doi:10.
1095/biolreprod.101.000679)
Daniel SA & Armstrong DT 1984 Site of action of androgens on follicle-
stimulating hormone-induced aromatase activity in cultured rat granulosa
cells. Endocrinology 114 19751982. (doi:10.1210/endo-114-6-1975)
van den Driesche S, Myers M, Gay E, Thong KJ & Duncan WC 2008 HCG
up-regulates hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha in luteinized granulosa cells:
implications for the hormonal regulation of vascular endothelial growth
factor A in the human corpus luteum. Molecular Human Reproduction 14
455464. (doi:10.1093/molehr/gan040)
Erickson GF, Magoffin DA, Dyer CA & Hofeditz C 1985 The ovarian
androgen producing cells: a review of structure/function relationships.
Endocrine Reviews 6 371399. (doi:10.1210/edrv-6-3-371)
Fares F 2006 The role of O-linked and N-linked oligosaccharides on the
structurefunction of glycoprotein hormones: development of agonists
and antagonists. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1760 560567. (doi:10.1016/
j.bbagen.2005.12.022)
Fitzpatrick SL & Richards JS 1991 Regulation of cytochrome P450 aromatase
messenger ribonucleic acid and activity by steroids and gonadotropins in
rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 129 14521462. (doi:10.1210/endo-
129-3-1452)
Foster R, Segers I, Smart D, Adriaenssens T, Smitz J, Arce JC & Princivalle M
2010 A differential cytokine expression profile is induced by highly
purified human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-
stimulating hormone in a pre- and postovulatory mouse follicle culture
model. Fertility and Sterility 93 14641476. (doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.
01.136)
Forsythe JA, Jiang BH, Iyer NV, Agani F, Leung SW, Koos RD & Semenza GL
1996 Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription
by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 46044613.
Fraser HM, Wilson H, Rudge JS & Wiegand SJ 2005 Single injections of
vascular endothelial growth factor trap block ovulation in the macaque and
produce a prolonged, dose-related suppression of ovarian function.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 90 11141122. (doi:10.1210/
jc.2004-1572)
Fujinaga H, Yamoto M, Shikone T & Nakano R 1994 FSH and LH
up-regulate epidermal growth factor receptors in rat granulosa cells.
Journal of Endocrinology 140 171177. (doi:10.1677/joe.0.1400171)
Galet C & Ascoli M 2005 The differential binding affinities of the luteinizing
hormone (LH)/choriogonadotropin receptor for LH and choriogonado-
tropin are dictated by different extracellular domain residues. Molecular
Endocrinology 19 12631276. (doi:10.1210/me.2004-0410)
Gimpl G & Fahrenholz F 2001 The oxytocin receptor system: structure,
function, and regulation. Physiological Reviews 81 629683.
Grondahl ML, Borup R, Lee YB, Myrhoj V, Meinertz H & Sorensen S
2009 Differences in gene expression of granulosa cells from women
undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with either recombinant
follicle-stimulating hormone or highly purified human menopausal
gonadotropin. Fertility and Sterility 91 18201830. (doi:10.1016/j.
fertnstert.2008.02.137)
Groome NP, Illingworth PJ, OBrien M, Pai R, Rodger FE, Mather JP &
McNeilly AS 1996 Measurement of dimeric inhibin B throughout
the human menstrual cycle. Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 81
14011405. (doi:10.1210/jc.81.4.1401)
Havelock JC, Smith AL, Seely JB, Dooley CA, Rodgers RJ, Rainey WE &
Carr BR 2005 The NGFI-B family of transcription factors regulates
expression of 3b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in the human ovary.
Molecular Human Reproduction 11 7985. (doi:10.1093/molehr/gah139)
Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Robayna I, Shimada M, Wayne CM,
Ochsner SA, White L & Richards JS 2006 Gene expression profiles of
cumulus cell oocyte complexes during ovulation reveal cumulus cells express
neuronal and immune-related genes: does this expand their role in the
ovulation process? Molecular Endocrinology 20 13001321. (doi:10.1210/me.
2005-0420)www.endocrinology-journals.org
Hoffman YM, Peegel H, Sprock MJ, Zhang QY & Menon KM 1991 Evidence Oktay K, Briggs D & Gosden RG 1997 Ontogeny of follicle-stimulating
Gonadotropins influence gene expression . I SEGERS and others 279that human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptor down-
regulation involves decreased levels of receptor messenger ribonucleic acid.
Endocrinology 128 388393. (doi:10.1210/endo-128-1-388)
Huhtaniemi I & Alevizaki M 2006 Gonadotrophin resistance. Best Practice &
Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 20 561576. (doi:10.1016/
j.beem.2006.09.003)
Ikeda S, Nakamura K, Kogure K, Omori Y, Yamashita S, Kubota K, Mizutani T,
Miyamoto K & Minegishi T 2008 Effect of estrogen on the expression
of luteinizing hormonehuman chorionic gonadotropin receptor messenger
ribonucleic acid in cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 149 15241533.
(doi:10.1210/en.2007-1163)
Irusta G, Abramovich D, Parborell F & Tesone M 2010 Direct survival role of
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on rat ovarian follicular cells.
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 325 93100. (doi:10.1016/j.mce.2010.
04.018)
Koos RD 1995 Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth/perme-
ability factor in the rat ovary following an ovulatory gonadotropin stimulus:
potential roles in follicle rupture. Biology of Reproduction 52 14261435.
(doi:10.1095/biolreprod52.6.1426)
Kryczek I, Frydman N, Gaudin F, Krzysiek R, Fanchin R, Emilie D,
Chouaib S, Zou W & Machelon V 2005 The chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12
contributes to T lymphocyte recruitment in human pre-ovulatory follicles
and coordinates with lymphocytes to increase granulosa cell survival and
embryo quality. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 54 270283.
(doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00307.x)
de Leeuw R, Mulders J, Voortman G, Rombout F, Damm J & Kloosterboer L
1996 Structurefunction relationship of recombinant follicle stimulating
hormone (Puregon). Molecular Human Reproduction 2 361369.
(doi:10.1093/molehr/2.5.361)
Li F & Curry TE Jr 2009 Regulation and function of tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinase (TIMP) 1 and TIMP3 in periovulatory rat granulosa
cells. Endocrinology 150 39033912. (doi:10.1210/en.2008-1141)
Liu Z, Rudd MD, Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Robayna I, Fan HY,
Zeleznik AJ & Richards JS 2009 FSH and FOXO1 regulate genes in the
sterol/steroid and lipid biosynthetic pathways in granulosa cells. Molecular
Endocrinology 23 649661. (doi:10.1210/me.2008-0412)
Lopata A, Oliva K, Stanton PG & Robertson DM 1997 Analysis of chorionic
gonadotrophin secreted by cultured human blastocysts. Molecular Human
Reproduction 3 517521. (doi:10.1093/molehr/3.6.517)
Marco-Jimenez F, Llobat L & Vicente JS 2010 Effects of lanosterol on in vitro
maturation of porcine oocytes. Animal Reproduction Science 117 288294.
(doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.04.008)
McGee EA & Hsueh AJ 2000 Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian
follicles. Endocrine Reviews 21 200214. (doi:10.1210/er.21.2.200)
McGee E, Sawetawan C, Bird I, Rainey WE & Carr BR 1995 The effects of
insulin on 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression in human
luteinized granulosa cells. Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation 2
535541. (doi:10.1016/1071-5576(94)00061-5)
Mochtar MH, Van der Veen, Ziech M & van Wely M 2007
Recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) for controlled ovarian hyper-
stimulation in assisted reproductive cycles. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews 18 CD005070.
van Montfoort AP, Geraedts JP, Dumoulin JC, Stassen AP, Evers JL &
Ayoubi TA 2008 Differential gene expression in cumulus cells as a
prognostic indicator of embryo viability: a microarray analysis. Molecular
Human Reproduction 14 157168. (doi:10.1093/molehr/gam088)
Nimz M, Spitschak M, Schneider F, Furbass R & Vanselow J 2009
Down-regulation of genes encoding steroidogenic enzymes and hormone
receptors in late preovulatory follicles of the cow coincides with an
accumulation of intrafollicular steroids. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 37
4554. (doi:10.1016/j.domaniend.2009.02.002)
Nothnick WB 2000 Disruption of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1
gene results in altered reproductive cyclicity and uterine morphology
in reproductive-age female mice. Biology of Reproduction 63 905912.
(doi:10.1095/biolreprod63.3.905)www.endocrinology-journals.orghormone receptor gene expression in isolated human ovarian follicles.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 82 37483751. (doi:10.1210/
jc.82.11.3748)
Park JI, Park HJ, Choi HS, Lee K, Lee WK & Chun SY 2001 Gonadotropin
regulation of NGFI-B messenger ribonucleic acid expression during
ovarian follicle development in the rat. Endocrinology 142 30513059.
(doi:10.1210/en.142.7.3051)
Peng XR, Hsueh AJ, LaPolt PS, Bjersing L & Ny T 1991 Localization of
luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in
ovarian cell types during follicle development and ovulation. Endocrinology
129 32003207. (doi:10.1210/endo-129-6-3200)
Phillips RJ, Mestas J, Gharaee-Kermani M, Burdick MD, Sica A,
Belperio JA, Keane MP & Strieter RM 2005 Epidermal growth factor and
hypoxia-induced expression of CXC chemokine receptor 4 on non-small cell
lung cancer cells is regulated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/
PTEN/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway and
activation of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha. Journal of BiologicalChemistry280
2247322481. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M500963200)
Richards JS, Ireland JJ, Rao MC, Bernath GA, Midgley AR Jr &
Reichert LE Jr 1976 Ovarian follicular development in the rat: hormone
receptor regulation by estradiol, follicle stimulating hormone and
luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 99 15621570. (doi:10.1210/endo-
99-6-1562)
Richards JS, Liu Z & Shimada M 2008 Immune-like mechanisms in
ovulation. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 19 191196. (doi:10.1016/
j.tem.2008.03.001)
Robker RL, Akison LK & Russell DL 2009 Control of oocyte release by
progesterone receptor-regulated gene expression. Nuclear Receptor Signaling
7 e012.
Robker RL, Russell DL, Yoshioka S, Sharma SC, Lydon JP, OMalley BW,
Espey LL & Richards JS 2000 Ovulation: a multi-gene, multi-step process.
Steroids 65 559570. (doi:10.1016/S0039-128X(00)00114-8)
Romero S, Sanchez F, Adriaenssens T & Smitz J 2011 Mouse cumulus-oocyte
complexes from in vitro-cultured preantral follicles suggest an anti-
luteinizing role for the EGF cascade in the cumulus cells. Biology of
Reproduction 84 11641170. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.110.087551)
Sanchez F, Romero S & Smitz J 2011 Oocyte and cumulus cell transcripts
from cultured mouse follicles are induced to deviate from normal in vivo
condition by combinations of insulin, follicle-stimulating hormone, and
human chorionic gonadotropin. Biology of Reproduction 85 565574.
(doi:10.1095/biolreprod.111.091744)
Segers I, Adriaenssens T & Smitz J 2012 Expression patterns of poliovirus
receptor, erythrocyte protein band 4.1-like 3, regulator of G-protein
signaling 11, and oxytocin receptor in mouse ovarian cells during follicle
growth and early luteinization in vitro and in vivo. Biology of Reproduction 86
111. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.111.092510)
Semenza GL 2003 Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nature Reviews. Cancer
3 721732. (doi:10.1038/nrc1187)
Stocco CO, Zhong L, Sugimoto Y, Ichikawa A, Lau LF & Gibori G 2000
Prostaglandin F2alpha-induced expression of 20alpha-hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase involves the transcription factor NUR77. Journal of Biological
Chemistry 275 3720237211. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M006016200)
Tapia A, Gangi LM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Balmaceda J, Pommer R, Trejo L,
Pacheco IM, Salvatierra AM, Henriquez S, Quezada M et al. 2008
Differences in the endometrial transcript profile during the receptive period
between women who were refractory to implantation and those who
achieved pregnancy. Human Reproduction 23 340351. (doi:10.1093/
humrep/dem319)
Vitt UA, Nayudu PL, Rose UM & Kloosterboer HJ 2001 Embryonic
development after follicle culture is influenced by follicle-stimulating
hormone isoelectric point range. Biology of Reproduction 65 15421547.
(doi:10.1095/biolreprod65.5.1542)
Wang L & Menon KM 2005 Regulation of luteinizing hormone/chorionic
gonadotropin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the rat
ovary: relationship to cholesterol metabolism. Endocrinology 146 423431.
(doi:10.1210/en.2004-0805)Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280
Wang L, Nair AK & Menon KM 2007 Ribonucleic acid binding protein-
mediated regulation of luteinizing hormone receptor expression in
granulosa cells: relationship to sterol metabolism. Molecular Endocrinology 21
22332241. (doi:10.1210/me.2007-0102)
van Wely M, Kwan I, Burt AL, Thomas J, Vail A, Van der Veen F &
Al-Inany HG 2011 Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian
stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews 16 CD005354.
Wolfenson C, Groisman J, Couto AS, Hedenfalk M, Cortvrindt RG, Smitz JE &
Jespersen S 2005 Batch-to-batch consistency of human-derived gonado-
trophin preparations compared with recombinant preparations. Reproductive
Biomedicine Online 10 442454. (doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60819-X)
Wu Y, Ghosh S, Nishi Y, Yanase T, Nawata H & Hu Y 2005 The orphan
nuclear receptors NURR1 and NGFI-B modulate aromatase gene
expression in ovarian granulosa cells: a possible mechanism for repression of
aromatase expression upon luteinizing hormone surge. Endocrinology 146
237246. (doi:10.1210/en.2004-0889)
Zhang FP, Poutanen M, Wilbertz J & Huhtaniemi I 2001 Normal prenatal but
arrested postnatal sexual development of luteinizing hormone receptor
knockout (LuRKO) mice. Molecular Endocrinology 15 172183.
(doi:10.1210/me.15.1.172)
Received in final form 13 August 2012Accepted 17 August 2012Made available online as an Accepted Preprint20 August 2012
I SEGERS and others . Gonadotropins influence gene expression280Journal of Endocrinology (2012) 215, 269280 www.endocrinology-journals.org
Outline placeholderIntroductionMaterials and MethodsMice and follicle cultureExperimental designGene expression analysisSteroid measurementsStatistical analysis
ResultsFollicle cultureLH/choriogonadotropin receptor expressionAcute phase: early response in early antral follicles (day 6) to different gonadotropin regimens for 6 and 12hChronic phase: continuous exposure to different gonadotropin regimens during antral growth from days 6 to 9Steroid production
DiscussionLhcgr expression in the acute and chronic phaseAcute phase (6 and 12h): Expression levels of Hif1a, Nr4a1, and Cyp19a1 are influenced by gonadotropinsSteroidogenesis: expression of key genes and steroid production in the acute and chronic phaseCytokines Cxcl12 and Cxcr4 in the acute and chronic phaseChronic phase (days 6-9): no differences due to gonadotropin treatment for Oxtr, Pgr, and EgfrDifferences in expression induced by rLH, rhCG, or urinary purified productsConclusions
Declaration of interestFundingAcknowledgementsReferences