Upload
brittney-bradley
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2
William M. LeRoy - ModeratorPresident & CEOAmerican Legal & Financial Network “ALFN”
Matthew C. Abad, Esq. - PanelistHead of Operations - Indiana Blommer Peterman, S.C.
James V. Noonan, Esq. - PanelistPrincipalNoonan & Lieberman, Ltd.
Nancy M. Wilson, Esq. – PanelistPartner / Supervising Attorney, Litigation DepartmentSouth and Associates, PC
Webinar Introduction
Attack the remedies
Persons to whom claim or defense is directed
Standing
3
TILA claims and defenses are oftentimes plead in a deliberately vague and general manner. Examples:
a mortgagor will allege that the APR was overstated, but not explain how.
a mortgagor will allege that certain charges should not be exempt from the finance charge calculation but not identify which ones or why they should not be exempt
a mortgagor will allege that a fee is not exempt because it is not “reasonable and bona fide” 12 C.F.R. § 226.4(c)(7)) but not identify which fee, why it should not be exempt, or conflate “reasonable” or “bona fide” and leave the mortgagee to figure it out.
a mortgagor will allege that he or she was not given proper notice of right to cancel, but will not explain if the form was defective, if it was not provided in a timely manner, or if the required number of copies were not provided.
4
The strategy of pleading TILA claims this way is to avoid early dismissal and summary judgment.
It makes defending the claims on substantive grounds expensive and time consuming
From the mortgagors perspective it pressures mortgagees to modify the mortgage or agree to another loan work out solution just to avoid the cost and time of litigation.
5
Mortgagee’ Strategy:
Attack the remedies and the parties at whom
the claim or defense is directed.
At the pleading stage, if you cannot
successfully dispose of a counterclaim or
affirmative defense on the merits then try
attacking the remedies and/or the person at
whom the claim or defense is directed.
6
Is the Mortgagor able to tender the Proceeds?
Yamamoto v. Bank of New York, 329 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2003) Judicially created pleading requirement that the
mortgagor have the means to tender before considering the substance of the rescission claim
Dismissed a TILA claim because the Mortgagors could not provide proof of ability to repay Several California courts have extended this analysis Some require the mortgagee to plead ability to tender
7
Garza v. American Home Mortg., 2009 WL 188604 (E.D.Cal. Jan.27, 2009)
“[r]escission is an empty remedy without [plaintiff]'s ability to pay back what she has received”);
Carlos v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. CV F 09-0260LJOGSA (E.D.Cal. May 08, 2009)
Sitanggang v. Indymac Bank, F.S.B., No. CVF09-0367LJOSMS (E.D.Cal. May 06, 2009)
8
Guerrero v. Citi Residential Lending, Inc., No. CVF08-1878 LJO GSA (E.D.Cal. Apr. 03, 2009)
Pagtalunan v. Reunion Mortg. Inc., No. C-09-00162EDL (N.D.Cal. Apr. 08, 2009)
A claim for rescission requires a plaintiff to allege that the plaintiff can or will tender the borrowed funds back to the lender
9
Lapse of the Right to Rescind?
15 USCS § 1635(f) right of rescission expires
3 years after date of consummation of the
transaction, or sale of the property, whichever
occurs first notwithstanding the fact that the
information and forms required have not been
delivered
So what is a sale?
10
Doss v. Clearwater Title, Co., 2007 WL 1141599 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 17, 2007) rev'd and remanded sub nom. Doss v. Clearwater Title Co., 551 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2008)
TILA claim dismissed because the mortgagor had previously sold the house
11
“Sale” - not necessarily limited to transfer of the deed
“Sale” could be termination of the redemption
Bestrom v. Bankers Trust Co., 114 F. 3d 741 (8th Cir., 1997).
Timing Before sale/After Sale
Marschner v. RJR Fin. Services, Inc., 382 F. Supp. 2d 918 (E.D. Mich. 2005).
12
Is the right to rescind terminated after the mortgagor contracts to sell the home?
Hefferman v. Bitton, 882 F.2d 379 (9th Cir. 1989)
Dailey v. Leshin, 792 So.2d 527 (Fla. App. 2001)
In re Estate of Burgin, 196327, 1998 WL 1993382 (Mich. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 1998).
13
Mortgagor’s pursuit of a short sale could terminate the right to rescind Regardless of whether the transfer of title actually
occurs
What about a “refinance?”
King v. State of Cal., 784 F.2d 910 (9th Cir. 1986).
Although favorable – it is the minority position
14
The majority of the courts do not equate a refinance with a sale under 15 USCS 1635 (f)
Handy v. Anchor Mortg. Corp., 464 F.3d 760 (7th Cir., 2006)
Barrett v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 445 F.3d 874, 881 (6th Cir. 2006)
Duren v. First Gov't Mortgage and Investors Corp., 2000 WL 816042 (D.C.Cir. June 7, 2000
15
Transfer versus Sale? Official Staff Commentary to 12 C.F.R. §
226.23(a)(3) Mortgagor's rescission rights extinguish after
transfer of the consumer's interest Transfer
Mortgagor quitclaims interest Mortgagor takes legal title back through a purchase
money mortgage Mortgagor retains title through an installment sale
contract16
Statute of Limitations (SOL)
SOL – also stands for - Stiff out of Luck
17
Beach v. Ocwen Fed. Bank, 523 U.S. 410, 419, 118 S.Ct. 1408, (1998)
Court characterized § 1635(f) as a statute of repose
No right to assert a rescission as affirmative defense in a collection action brought more than three years after consummation of the transaction
§ 1635(f) “completely extinguishes the right of rescission at the end of the 3-year period”
18
Court stated that 1635(f) “talks not of a suit's commencement but of a right's duration.”
“[TILA] permits no federal right to rescind, defensively or otherwise, after the 3-year period of § 1635(f) has run.”
State statutes which extend time to bring otherwise time-barred claims do not apply to time-barred rescission claims
19
True even where the counterclaim is brought in recoupment
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Terry, 2010 WL 1223581 (Ill. App. Ct. Mar. 29, 2010)
In re Williams, 276 B.R. 394 (Bankr. E.D.Pa.2002)
Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Anderson, 1999 OK CIV APP 46, 981 P.2d 804
20
Other timing issues Hypothetical Notice of rescission sent before the expiration of
the 3 yrs Claim/defense not brought within 3 yrs Is it time-barred?
21
Miguel v. Country Funding Corp., 309 F.3d 1161 (9th Cir. 2002)
Mortgagor sent a rescission demand to the then-current servicing agent
Mortgagor filed the lawsuit within three years naming the servicing agent
Mortgagor failed to name the holder (Real Party in Interest!!!)
22
Mortgagor amended complaint naming holder (more than three after consummation)
Right expired “[b]ecause [the borrower/plaintiffs] did not attempt to rescind against the proper entity within” three-years
Other examples: Harris v. OSI Financial Services, Inc, 2009
WML 212138 (N.D.Ill) Ramos v. Citimortgage, Inc., 2009 WL 86744
(E.D.Cal)23
Relation Back Issues
Original creditor not added as a party before three years, but was notified within the three years?
Hubbard v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co. 2008 WL 4449888 (N.D.Ill)
24
Relation Back Borrower preserved the claim against the
assignee by notifying the original creditor within three years
BUT - not added to the suit within 3 yrs Schmit v. Bank United FSB, 2009 WL 320490
(N.D.Ill.)
25
SOL arguments can take many forms
Borrower timely notified/requested rescission
Did not file suit until after three years
In re Hunter, 400 B.R. 651, Bankr.N.D.Ill. 2009
TILA does not preclude a subsequent suit to enforce the right after the passing of the three-year period as long as the consumer timely exercised the right to rescind within the three-year period
26
12 CFR 226.23 a (2). . .
Notice of rescission must be in writing
By mail, telegram or other written means
considered given when mailed or filed for telegraphic transmission or, if sent by other means, when delivered to
Proper Notice of the Right to Rescind specifies the address for rescission purposes
27
Did the borrower properly give notice?
Does the mortgagor’s pleading constitute notice?
See Jones v. Saxon Mortgage, Inc., 537 F.3d 320, 327 (4th Cir.1998)
“the filing of a lawsuit can be sufficient written notice of rescission under TILA so long as the complaint seeks rescission”
28
Does it matter if the notice is only served on the assignee?
It depends – Hubbard v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co. 2008 WL 4449888 (N.D.Ill) Borrower notified the original creditor of the
rescission within three years The right to rescind against an assignee was
preserved (assignee added to suit after the three years)
29
Schmit v. Bank United FSB, 2009 WL 320490 (N.D.Ill.)
Timely notice to the original lender may be sufficient to effectuate rescission as to assignee who was not sued within three years
15 U.S.C. §1641(c) - Any consumer who has the right to rescind a transaction under section 1635 of this title may rescind the transaction as against any assignee
30
What if the notice is served only the servicer?
Borrower only served notice on servicing agent
The court rejected the argument that a notice of rescission was effective
Miguel v. Country Funding Corp., 309 F.3d 1161 (2002)
“no authority supports the position that notice to [the servicing agent] should suffice for notice to the Bank”
31
What if the Rescission is served on the creditor’s or assignee’s attorney?
In Re: Holland, 1994 WL 772758 (B.Mass.)
rescission claim rejected where the notice of rescission was sent to counsel for the holder, but not to the holder
32
“Strict compliance does not necessarily mean punctilious compliance.”
Will the court disallow rescission for a de minimus violation?
1st Circuit: Palmer v. Champion Mortgage, 465 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2006); Santos-Rodriguez v. Doral Mortg. Corp., 485 F.3d 12, 17 (1st
Cir. 2007)
5th Circuit Smith v. Chapman, 614 F.2d 968, 972 (5th Cir.1980)
33
How is that for strategy?
Real Estate Values are down!
Cost benefit analysis
Will the time/expense/amount recovered in foreclosure exceed the amount the borrower may be forced to tender?
34
Do the loan proceeds (minus finance charges) exceed the value of property?
Mortgagor must be able to tender the amount
If not, claim is moot - move to strike or dismiss
Nkengfack v. Homecomings Financial, LLC, 2009 WL 1663533, (D.Md. June 15, 2009)
Nichols v. Greenpoint Mortg. Funding, Inc., 2008 WL 3891126 (C.D. Cal.)
35
Personius v. HomeAmerican Credit, Inc., 234 F.Supp.2d 817, 819 (N.D.Ill.2002)
Court dismissed plaintiff's rescission claim
Creditor's “offer to rescind the loans rendered plaintiffs' claims for rescission moot ...”
Relief sought was available to them and fulfilled by servicer’s agreement to rescind
36
PRACTICE TIP Couch letter in affirmative language Do not condition rescission on mortgagor’s
tender Ask the court to set tender as a condition Compare, Velazquez v. HomeAmerican Credit,
Inc., 254 F.Supp.2d 1043, 1045 (N.D.Ill.2003)
Creditor’s promise to rescind when mortgagor tenders does not satisfy mortgagee’s obligations under Regulation Z
37
Statute of Limitations
Any action for damages must be brought within one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation. 15 U.S.C. § 1640(e).
However, a person is not barred from asserting a violation of TILA more than one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation as a matter of defense by recoupment or set-off in such action, except as otherwise provided by State law. 15 U.S.C. § 1640(e).
38
Savings statutes
Many states savings statutes allow a defendant to bring a counterclaim after the period authorized in the applicable statute of limitations has elapsed, as long as the plaintiff's claim arose before the cause of action brought as a counterclaim was barred.
39
In a mortgage foreclosure context where the mortgagee’s right to recover on the debt did not arise until the mortgagor went into default more than one year after disclosures were given means that the mortgagor’s cause of action for foreclosure did not arise until after the claim was barred. See, e.g. Bank of Oklahoma v. Briscoe, 911 P. 2d 311 (Okl. App. 1995); Vikowsky v. Savannah Appliance Service Corp., 179 Ga. App. 135, 345 S.E. 2d 621 (1986).
40
Is the TILA claim “closely related” to a claim to collect a debt?
Some courts have held that a claim on the debt is not closely related or lacks a foundational connection to the TILA damage claim so state law recoupment theories do not apply. See, Hennigan v. Heights Savings Ass’n, 576 S.W.2d 126 (Tex. App. 1978); New York Guardian Mortgage Corp., v. Deitzel, 524 A. 2d 951 (Pa. Super Ct. 1987); Franklin State Bank & Trust Co., v Herring, 608 So. 2d 643 (La. App. Ct. 1992).
41
Does the TILA violation authorize statutory damages?
Actual damages are recoverable for any violation of TILA but statutory damages are available "only" for closed list of violations
42
Brown v. Payday Check Advance, Inc., 202 F.3d 987, 992 (7th Cir.2000).
Only defects in material disclosures authorize statutory damages
43
Thus, statutory Damages are not available for the following violations:
Use of the wrong form or format of the disclosures
The disclosures were not clear and conspicuous
The omission of descriptive explanations in violation of § 1638(a)(8)
The appearance of extra matter in the federal box in contravention of § 1638(b)(1)
Failing to clearly disclose the APR
Failing to disclose the existence of a variable interest rate feature
44
Practice Pointer:
To defeat a claim for damages try to solicit an
admission from the mortgagor that has no actual
damages and, if the TILA violation is one where
statutory damages are unavailable, then
mortgagors damage claim fails and his attorney cannot recover fees.
45
Detrimental reliance standard
Mortgagor must show detrimental reliance to recover actual damages
Smith v. Gold Country Lenders, 289 F. 3d 1155(9th Cir. 2002)
46
Overstated Finance Charge arguments
An otherwise excluded fee, or portion of that fee, is not reasonable or bona fide
12 C.F.R. § 226.4(c)(7)
Reasonableness versus bona fide
Distinct terms
47
If the creditor imposes an “unnecessary service” the fee may not be bona fide
Some courts equate it with fraud or deceit Claim or defense may be subject to the
heightened pleading rules required for fraud claims
Hickey v. Great Western Mortgage Corp., 1995 WL 153372 (N.D.Ill. 1995)
48
Reasonableness is less exact
Requires expert testimony
Comparison - Creditor’s charges versus prevailing industry practices/charges
49
Practice Tip Borrower alleges fee should have been
included in the finance charge calculation Fee was not reasonable If the unreasonable portion is subtracted from
the total charge and the remainder is within the tolerance
Seek dismissal
Scott v. IndyMac Bank, FSB, 2004 WL 422654 (N.D.Ill.)
50
Creditors are treated differently than Assignees
For both actual and statutory damages Creditor liability attaches to “creditors who fail to
comply with any requirements imposed” under TILA, 15 U.S.C. §1640(a)
Assignee liability - limited to violations of TILA that are apparent on the face of the disclosure
51
To determine if the violation is “Apparent on the face”
Compare the disclosure statement to the Note Any itemization of the amount financed Any other disclosure of disbursement See 15 U.S.C. §1641(e)
Violation in two circumstances
52
First - disclosure can be determined to be incomplete/inaccurate by comparison among The disclosure statement Any itemization of the amount financed The note, or Any other disclosure of disbursement
Second – disclosure does not use the terms or format required to be used 15 U.S.C. §1641(e)
53
Assignee versus creditor continued If mortgagor’s claim is based in whole or in part
Current holder’s failure to honor § 1635(g) rescission Argument that assignee not be liable If the underlying violation is not apparent on the face
15 U.S.C. §1635(g)
“[a]ny creditor who fails to comply with any requirement under this part . . . with respect to any person is liable to such person . . .”
54
Argument is by analogy 15 U.S.C. §1640(a) addresses only a creditor’s
liability It follows that §1635(g) only applies to creditors
as well Brodo v. Bankers Trust Company, 847 F.Supp.
353 (E.D.Pa. 1994)
55
“neither Section 1641 nor any other section provides for a statutory penalty and award of attorney’s fees to a plaintiff should an assignee fail to respond to a valid rescission notice. Congress did not wish to impose liability for damages and attorney’s fees on an assignee who is not responsible for or who had no notice of TILA disclosure violations at the time of an assignment. Rescission is, therefore, the only remedy against [the assignee] to which plaintiff is entitled”
56
Parker v. Potter, 8:06-cv-183 –T-26EAJ (October 22, 2008)
Court found Plaintiff entitled to rescind due to TILA violations occurring at the loan’s origination
Court rejected Plaintiff’s argument for fees from the assignee No evidence that the assignee was responsible for
and had notice of the disclosure violations
57
Brodo rejected in some IL courts Fairbanks Capital Corp. v. Jenkins, 231
F.Supp.2d 737 (N.D.Ill. 2002) Court rejected the conclusion that an assignee
has no monetary liability for failure to honor a rescission notice
In Jenkins the violation was apparent on the face of the assigned documents
58
General Rule - Mortgagor cannot assert a TILA claim against the servicer of a loan
Exception – If the servicer also owns or owned the loan obligation
A servicer is not considered an Assignee for the purposes of 15 U.S.C. §1641(f)
Jackson v. US Bank Nat’l Ass’n Trustee, 245 B.R. 23 (E.D. Pa. 2000)
Servicing agent not liable - TILA only provides liability for original lenders and their assigns
59
Let’s use it against them for a change What if the claimant is an assignee of the
original borrower? TILA provides a duty to the “borrower” No mention of borrowers assignee Move to dismiss/strike the claim What about borrowers that file BK?
60
Review BK filing creates the BK Estate Trustee owns the BK Estate
“all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.” 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1)
Trustee owns the claim Mortgagor lacks standing to raise a TILA
defense if she had been discharged
61
Rowland v. Novus Financial Corp., 949 F.Supp. 1447 (D.Haw.1996)
Plaintiff-borrower sought rescission Plaintiff subsequently filed for Chapter 7 Court held plaintiff lacked standing to bring suit
cause of action existed before the bankruptcy and therefore [was] included in the bankruptcy estate
“bankruptcy estate [was] the proper plaintiff
62
Also, is the party bringing the TILA claim the consumer for TILA purposes?
Estate of the mortgagor have standing?
Co-obligors?
Mixed purposed Consumer/Business loan?
63
If you have any further questions that were not addressed in this presentation, or want to contact one of our speakers, please email Matt Bartel, COO of ALFN, at [email protected]. Thank you for your participation in this webinar. Please complete the brief survey which you will be directed to at the conclusion of this presentation.
ALFN provides the information contained in these webinars as a public service for educational and general information purposes only, and not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or to substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney licensed in the relevant jurisdiction.
Use of ALFN Webinar Materials The information, documents, graphics and other material made available through this Webinar are intended for use solely in connection with the American Legal and Financial Networks (hereinafter “ALFN”) educational activities. These materials are proprietary to ALFN, and may be protected by copyright, trademark and other applicable laws. You may download, view, copy and print documents and graphics incorporated in the documents from this Webinar ("Documents") subject to the following: (a) the Documents may be used solely for informational purposes related to the educational programs offered by the ALFN; and (b) the Documents may not be modified or altered in any way. Except as expressly provided herein, these materials may not be used for any other purpose, and specifically you may not use, download, upload, copy, print, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, post, transmit or distribute any information from ALFN Webinars in whole or in part without the prior written permission of ALFN. 64
ALFN’s 8th Annual Leadership ConferenceJuly 18-21, 2010
Grand Hyatt Washington D.C.
Register on our website at www.alfn.org
65