Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Can J Gastroenterol Vol 19 No 2 February 2005 113
The annual survey of Canadian Association of
Gastroenterology (CAG) members’ educational needs
was conducted online during May and June 2004. Sixty-
eight members (7.4%) completed the needs assessment. It
was determined that the topic most in demand for future
educational events, similar to previous years, was inflamma-
tory bowel disease (IBD) from the clinical perspective. Also
highly rated were the clinical topics of endoscopy, upper
gastrointestinal bleeding and viral hepatitis. Educational
materials were by far judged to be the most valuable com-
ponent of exhibit areas (91%), and 43% reported repeated
use of the online CAG Interactive Lecture Series.
Additionally, 90% of respondents agreed that they would
use an online Canadian atlas of endoscopy if available.
However, given the very small proportion of CAG members
completing the needs assessment, results should be inter-
preted with caution.
The purpose of the CAG needs assessment was to pro-
vide guidance to the Executive and the CAG Education
Committee on areas of greatest educational need.
Conducting a needs assessment is a requirement for accred-
itation of educational events according to the Royal
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada accreditation
criteria.
METHODS
The Education Committee consists of Drs Janice Barkey,
Jamie Gregor, John Fardy, Dana Farina, Marty Fishman,
Terrence Moore, Alaa Rostom, Richard Schreiber and
Connie Switzer. The needs assessment was the same as that
used in 2003, apart from the addition of two questions.
Members were requested by e-mail to visit the CAG Web
site to complete the simple ‘tick box’ survey. Data were
compiled and analyzed at the CAG National Office.
The needs assessment included four sections. The first sec-
tion collected basic demographic information; the second
questioned members on their interest in topics for educational
events from a basic science, clinical and pediatric perspec-
tive; the third examined needs for the exhibit area; and the
fourth section explored actual use of the online Interactive
Lecture Series and potential use, if available, of an online
Canadian atlas of endoscopy.
Respondents were asked to rate their interest in
33 potential topics for educational events using a scale of
1 to 7, where 1 = no interest and 7 = extremely interested.
For exhibits, respondents selected those items of greatest
value to them. The actual and anticipated use of the
Interactive Lecture Series and an online atlas of endoscopy,
respectively, were assessed by frequency category.
RESULTS
Sixty-eight members (7.4%) of the solicited (917 with e-mail
addresses) membership completed the needs assessment.
Demographics
Of the respondents, 72% were men and 28% were women.
Regarding education, 82% were MDs, approximately 4%
were MD/PhDs, approximately 4% were PhDs and 9% held
another degree. The majority of respondents (68%) were
predominantly hospital- rather than community-based.
Most replies were from Ontario members (34%), followed
by Alberta (18%), Quebec (16%) and British Columbia
(13%), with responses distributed roughly in proportion to
provincial population.
2004 CAG Educational Needs Assessment
Report
Ronald Bridges MD FRCPC
Chair, CAG Education Committee
CAG NEWS PAGE
En français voir page 117
INC. JANUARY 12, 1962
The CAG is proud to acknowledge its Benefactor Corporate Sponsors:
Abbott Laboratories Ltd. AstraZeneca Canada Inc. Axcan Pharma Inc.
Janssen-Ortho Inc. Pfizer Canada Inc. Schering Canada Inc.
bridges.qxd 1/28/2005 11:38 AM Page 113
Can J Gastroenterol Vol 19 No 2 February 2005114
CAG News
Examining respondents’ primary role, 56% were gas-
troenterologists, 6% identified hepatology as their focus,
3% were in pediatrics and 3% were surgeons. Basic and
clinical scientists made up 13% and 1%, respectively, of
respondents. Residents accounted for 12%, and “other”
roles for 6%.
Regarding where respondents spend their time, 71%
identified clinical practice as their primary focus, and 16%
noted basic research. Teaching accounted for 3%, with 10%
reporting “other” duties.
Educational topics
The mean interest score for the 27 scientific educational
topics, from the perspectives of basic science, clinical sci-
ence and pediatrics, are shown in Figures 1 and 2. As in pre-
vious years, the highest mean interest score recorded (5.2)
was for education in clinical IBD, followed closely by the
mean interest score for clinical endoscopy (4.8). IBD con-
tinues to be the highest-scored topic within each of the cat-
egories of clinical, basic science and pediatrics, despite
holding IBD clinical and basic science symposia at
Canadian Digestive Diseases Week this past February.
Clinical sessions on upper gastrointestinal bleeding and
viral hepatitis (each scored as 4.4) were also much in
demand. Mean scores for the remaining topics ranged from
2.2 to 4.2 for clinical topics, 1.6 to 4.1 for basic science top-
ics and 1.1 to 2.3 for pediatrics.
Responses for nonscientific educational event topics are
given in Figure 3. The highest scores of 3.9 for “Developing
effective presentations” and 3.8 for “GI and the internet”
were still lower than the top-scored clinical topics.
Exhibits
Replies to the question “Which of the following would be
most valuable to you in an exhibit area?” are shown in Figure 4.
Respondents were allowed to select more than one item;
thus, percentages do not sum to 100%. The overwhelming
favourite, selected by 91%, was Educational Materials, with
Product Information on Efficacy a distant second at 63%.
Interactive lecture series
Forty-three per cent of respondents reported accessing
the lecture series repeatedly, while 38% had never used
the e-library (Figure 5).
Online atlas of endoscopy
The vast majority of respondents (90%) agreed that, if
available, they would use an online Canadian atlas of
endoscopy (Figure 6).
DISCUSSION
It is disappointing that so few completed the needs assessment
this year, with only 7.4% of the membership (68 individuals)
participating. It is unlikely that this is related to the online
Score: 1=No interest, 7=Extremely interested
01234567
ytilitom lae gah po s
Esredrosid
ytilitom c inolo
Csr edrosid
x ulf eR
s ugahpose s't te rr aB
a ispepsyD
re tcabo cileH
e saes id re clu c itpeP
deelB I
G reppU
esaesid caileC
ci taercnap/s iti taercnaP
es ae sid
y railib/ reddalbllaG
e sa esi d
lewob yrota
mmalfn I
esa esid
esaesid latceronA
revil citatselohC
es ae sid
eroc
S tseretnI
naeM
Basic
Clinical
Pediatrics
Figure 1) Mean interest score for potential scientific educational topics(topics 1 to 14). GI Gastrointestinal
Score: 1=No interest, 7=Extremely interested
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
sititapehl ariV
re v iLnoi ta tnalpsn art
enum
mio tuA
sititap eh
re vi lci lob ate
Mesa esid
seus siredne
Gin
GI noit irtu
N
l acigolo camr ah
Pscit ue pa re ht
yp ocs od nE
yg ol oidaR
ygol oc nOI
G
:se ss am
re viLt nan gila
m/ ngi neb
det as ne pm oc e
D* si s oh rri c
s euss ilacihtE
eroc
Stseret
nInae
M
Basic
Clinical
Pediatrics
Figure 2) Mean interest score for potential scientific educational topics(topics 15 to 27). *Decompensated cirrhosis: ascites, varices, sponta-neous bacterial peritonitis. GI Gastrointestinal
Score: 1=No interest, 7=Extremely interested
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Officemanagement
Presentations* Teaching† GI & Working withMedia
Administrators‡
eroc
S tser etnI
naeM
the Internet
Figure 3) Mean interest score for potential educational topics (nonsci-entific). *Developing effective presentations; †Teaching theory andtechniques; ‡Dealing with administrators. GI Gastrointestinal
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
lanoitacudE
slairetam
:ofn i tc udo rP
ycaciffe
evi tcaretn Igninra el
ss ec ca liam
E
serudecorP
*oediv
stcar tsbA
eeffoc/r et aW
:o fn i tc udo rP
hcrae ser g ni ogn o
† lairetaM
DP
:ofn i tcudo rP
yte fas
‡ t reCn ia
M
noi ssu csiD
§ smurof
selas lacoLev itatn eserper
noiti tepmoc /
warD
stne
dn
opse
R fo t
necreP
Figure 4) Needs for the exhibit area. *Video on endoscopy/colonoscopy or other procedures; †Material for professional develop-ment; ‡Accredited (MainCert) personal learning objectives;§Discussion forums with key opinion leaders. PD Professional develop-ment
bridges.qxd 1/28/2005 11:38 AM Page 114
format given that last year’s e-survey saw a 24% (187 mem-
bers) completion rate, comparable with paper-based surveys.
It is possible that the low response was due to the knowledge
that a Canadian Digestive Diseases Week will not be held in
2005, because the World Congress of Gastroenterology will
take place in Montreal in September 2005. The results of this
needs assessment should be interpreted with caution because
they represent only a small portion of the membership.
Can J Gastroenterol Vol 19 No 2 February 2005 115
CAG News
How often have you used the CAG Interactive Lecture Serieslibrary of presentations?
Never (38%)
Once (19%)
2-5 times (28%)
6-10 times (9%)
>10 times (6%)
Figure 5) Use of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology(CAG) Interactive Lecture Series library of presentations availableonline for use with CD-ROM
If available, how often would you use an online Canadian Atlas of Endoscopy (images, videos)?
Unlikely to use (10%)
From time to time (51%)
Monthly (24%)
Weekly (15%)
Figure 6) Anticipated use of an online Canadian atlas of endoscopy, ifmade available
bridges.qxd 1/28/2005 11:38 AM Page 115
Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Parkinson’s Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com