Zoning ^gy AGENDA ITEM NO.: Z-2CITY OF AUSTIN "" AGENDA DATE: Thu 11/18/2004RECOMMENDATION FOR COUNCIL ACTION PAGE: 1 of 1

SUBJECT: C14-04-0163 - Crest view Neighborhood Plan Rezoning Tract 133 - Conduct a public hearingand approve an ordinance amending Chapter 25-2 of the Austin City Code by rezoning property locallyknown as 2207 - 2211 Pasadena Drive (Shoal Creek Watershed) from neighborhood commercial-mixeduse-conditional overlay-neighborhood plan (LR-MU-CO-NP) combining district zoning to neighborhoodcommercial-mixed use-conditional overlay-neighborhood plan (LR-MU-CO-NP) combining districtzoning, in order to change a condition of zoning. Planning Commission Recommendation: To grantneighborhood commercial-mixed use-conditional overlay-neighborhood plan (LR-MU-CO-NP)combining district zoning. Applicant: City of Austin. Agent: Neighborhood Planning and ZoningDepartment. City Staff: Wendy Walsh. 974-7719 and Scott Whiteman, 974-2865.

REQUESTING Neighborhood Planning DIRECTOR'SDEPARTMENT: and Zoning AUTHORIZATION: Greg Guernsey

RCA Serial*: 6%4 Dare: 1 I,'IS'0-1 Original: Yes Published:

Disposition: Adjusted version published:

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET

CASE: C 14-04-0 163 P.C. PATE: October 26, 2004November 9, 2004

ADDRESS: 2207 - 22 1 1 Pasadena Drive

APPLICANT: Cily of Austin- AGENT: City of Austin -Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Neighborhood Planning and ZoningDepartment (Scott Whiteman) Department (Wendy Walsh)

ZONING FROM: LR-MU-CO-NP TO: LR-MU-CO-NP, AREA: 0.942 acresas amended (41,033.52 square feet)

SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

The staffs recommendation is to grant neighborhood commercial - mixed use - conditional overlay -neighborhood plan (LR-MU-CO-NP) combining district zoning. The Conditional Overlay applies a25 foot setback along the east property line that prohibits buildings, structures, parking or drivewaysfor development other than single family residences, two family residences and duplexes.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:

October 26, 2004: POSTPONED UNTIL 11-09-04 (NEIGHBORHOOD)VOTE: 8-0 (D.S.. MM- 2ni[)

November 9. 2004: APPROVED WE STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF LR-MU-CO-NP DISTRICTZONING.

VOTE: 8-0 (D.S. - /'"'. CM. - 2

ISSUES:

Zoning History of Tract 133 and Adjacent Lot to the East; Basis for Staff RecommendationLot 2 and the west 30 feet of Lol 3 were zoned OR, General Retail, First Height and Area for aproposed electric and plating shop in October 1971. The eastern 30 feet of Lot 3 was zoned '*B":

Residence (converted to MF-3 in 1 9S4) for the expressed intent of establishing a gradation of zoningto protect the adjacent residential lot to the east and to provide parking. The rezoning was subject to a5 foot wide right-of-way dedication on Pasadena Drive (C 14-7 1-224 - comprising 31,635 squarefeet). The 1971 Zoning Map incorrectly shows that all of Lot 3 is zoned MF-3, while the ordinancetext correctly established the boundaries of OK and MF-3 zoning, as described above. Lot 4 waszoned Sl7-3. Please refer to Attachment A at the back of the staff report.

The City's official /on ing maps in 1 982 and March J 992 continue to show all of Lot 3 as MF-3(incorrectly as noted above) and Lol 4 as zoned SF-3 (correct). The January 2002 Zoning Mapexpanded the boundary of OR zoning to encompass all of Lot 4, while the adjacent property to theeast (not a part of this rezoning case) showed MF-3 zoning (incorrect, but was rezoned to SF-3-NP aspart of the Crestview Neighborhood Plan Rezonings, completed in April 2004). Please refer toAttachment B at the back of the staff report. Rezoning cases in proximity to Tract 133 wereresearched to try to determine when GR zoning was applied to Lot 4 and MF-3 to the adjacent lot tothe east, but attempts to clarify this issue have been unsuccessful. However, one possible explanation

C14-04-0163 Page 2

is that the errors may have occurred at the time the City's mapping converted to a GeographicInformation System.

Lots 2,3 and 4 of the C.R. Scales Subdivision (the subject properly. Tract 133 of the CrestviewNeighborhood Plan) was rezoned to LR-MU-CO-NP on April 1,2004 (Ordinance No. 040401-32B).Mixed Use was applied to this property to encourage pedestrian-oriented uses in proximity to theBumet Road corridor and residential development could occur at MF-2 standards. The CO,Conditional Overlay established a 50-foot setback from an SF-5 or more restrictive zoned property.

On September 17,2004, the Planning Commission voted lo accept staffs proposal to initiate arezoning application on these three lots (known as Tract 133 of the Crestview Neighborhood PlanRezonings) to consider removal of the Conditional Overlay. Please refer to Exhibit C.

On November 2, 2004, the property owners (Jon Robinson and Sam Scott Ragsdale) and the adjacentproperty owner to the east have agreed to a Conditional Overlay for a 25 foot setback along the eastproperty line thai would not contain buildings, structures, parking or driveways (i.e., a vegetativebuffer). The President of the Crestview Neighborhood Association is also in agreement with thissetback. Please refer to the letters attached at the back of the staff report. The staff recommends thisConditional Overlay for development other than single family residences, two family residences andduplexes as it provides additional setbacks to the adjacent single family residences over and abovethat prescribed by the City's compatibility standards for small sites (Lot 4 is less than 20,000 squarefeet and a street frontage less than 100 feet and therefore, qualifies as a small site), yet also allows fordevelopment lo occur on the western side of the lot, closer to the existing parking lot and officebuilding.

DEPARTMENT COMMENTS:

The subject rezoning area consists of three platted lots (Lois 2-4 of the C.R. Scales Subdivision) andis developed with one single family residence, an office and a parking lot, and lakes access toPasadena Drive. Please refer lo Exhibits A (Zoning Map) and Exhibit A-l (Aerial View). All threelots carry neighborhood commercial - mixed use - conditional overlay - neighborhood plan (LR-MU-CO-NP) combining dislrict zoning through the Crestview Neighborhood Plan rezonings,approved by Council on April 1. 2004. The Conditional Overlay applied to these lots, as well as otherproperties along or within close proximity to Bumet Road that were identified to be of sufficientwidth, established a 50 foot setback from an SF-5 or more restrictive district. The purpose of theConditional Overlay was to enhance compatibility between commercial and residential properties. Atthe time of the re/onings, the City's parcel data indicated that the rezoning area was a single, 0.85acre trad and 245 feel wide, rather than three platted lols. The application of a 50 foot setback forLot 4 which is only 60 feet wide significantly impacts the developability of this lot. Furthermore, theConditional Overlay for the setback would not have been applied to Tract 133 had accuratesubdivision plat information been available. For example, the tract on the north side of PasadenaDrive thai includes a portion of the automotive repair and office uses (zoned GR-MU-CO-NP) isapproximately 60 feel wide and does not have a 50 fool setback.

014-04-0163 Page 3

EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES:

SiteNorth

SouthEastWest

ZONINGLR-MU-CO-NPCS-CO-NP: GR-MU-CO-NP; SF-3-NPCS-CO-NPSF-3-NPCS; CS-1

LAND USESSingle family residence; Acupuncture office; Parking lotService station with food sales; Book store; Therapy clinic;Automotive repair; 2 duplexes; Single family residencesRetail shopping centerSingle family residencesShoe repair; Dry cleaners; Office; Service station; 3 restaurants;Auto washing; Automotive repair; Retail; Bed shop

NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: Crestview/Wootcn Combined NPA

(Crestview)

TIA: Is not required

WATERSHED: Shoal Creek

CAPITOL VIEW CORRIDOR: No

NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS:

3 - Allandale Neighborhood Association283 -North Austin Neighborhood Alliance

DESIRED DEVELOPMENT ZONE: Yes

SCENIC ROADWAY: No

93 — Crestview Neighborhood Association511 - Austin Neighborhoods Council

SCHOOLS:

Brcntwood Elementary School

CASE HISTORIES:

Lamar Middle School LanierHigh School

NUMBERC 14-04-0004

REQUESTCrestview -WootcnNeighborhoodPlan CombiningDistrict Rezonings

COMMISSIONTo Grant staffrecommendations withconditions (2-10-04).

CITY COUNCILApproved withconditions (4- 1-04).

RELATED CASES:

The subject property is platted as Lots 2, 3 and 4 of the C.R. Scales Subdivision, recorded in 1964(C8s-64-39). Please refer to Exhibit B.

There arc no related site plan cases on the subject property.

ABUTTING STREETS:

STREET

Pasadena DriveBurnet Road

RIGHT-OF-WAY50 feet120 feet

PAVEMENTWIDTH

28 feet60 feel

CLASSIFICATION

Minor ResidentialArterial

C14-04-0163 Page 4

• There are existing sidewalks along both roadways.• Burnet Road is classified in the Bicycle Plan as a Priority Barrier to Traffic bike route.• Capital Metro bus service is available along Burnet Road.

CITY COUNCIL PATE: November 18, 2004 ACTION:

ORDINANCE READINGS: 1st 2nd 3rd

ORDINANCE NUMBER:

CASE MANAGER: Wendy Walsh 1'HONE: 974-7719e-mail: wendy.walsh@ci.austin.tx.us

RETAILCENTER

SHOPPING CENTERNIGHT ^CLUB

81-012

, CS-1-CO"99-2045

GR-CO-NPOFFICES

82-43

GR-CO-NP ,

"A

i\1"=200'

fiimJFrr TRAPT Y//////,^

ZONING BOUNDARY — - — — -

CASE MGR: W.WALSH

P= ' — AZONING C^>(||!?l| A

CASE#:C14-04-0163ADDRESS: 2207-2211 PASADENA DR. DATE: °4"10

SUBJECT AREA (acres): 0.942 INTLS: TRC

CITY GRIDREFERENCENUMBER

J29

X

s

'/r I T OUN umvii muivi o 7( ),

*• *•« •

V)

v>Uj

U0

3o

L

. «

3P a oa.e-a e »£•£=>•>• -o x — cc. ofc- "1_Qtii-'o •o*en '»_^_ . =^^.SScSS-l^gr^*

*'*.1--"lii«li

M§1?

oJ"7^7 ££/?' g //•"? ?~y ^ ^-\

.~4.4-3

u c oUtVt 0w> o*>«— t- u

us-»<o

3C—jwoj'lOin

C— •) O4nu") c

m ~ - aV-*-(J »

< *•€«»a -o cEJJ«UU. V- —

£*!-§.vi^t-1, i. S.

rag« 3

— *-o Q Oc»f e

C O^— —o rt

-O —eu >

«- a c. <n*-"O o iO U

f Co TJ ca*• 6 u o ra

ooo£ ^

TJ+* Q V*-ScS- 01

C O «4>V

7 > *• 13 a;'jS M n) a ^

c+< 40 >o o - c

5*"-P2^oSfe25

Sb£c£o» o^^ -a »

B rtOf- 6

S IO-TN w

» _ r 5 O O 4- *ft C "* Q

-UUiTgo.c» -a— t >•G Cl— • i? O O H TJ

T c o co-o"" '— •«,

oilers 1=1 ^$ « wJ> — S*!*. |_

M ct jo-aTT— c-acO o C M CL a™ O UJ_ X < O O R « i= — _0

WO -CJ1 £ UOO4.U.

.OB^S=W"'SMO

. *ja<*uis>— Bo <»o3•a co— e>. — -o i. JJt »,*• MH oueoj - o O ^ g e i c j j — " i

°n o t» § w* -OM — a>^ l-^C ^ M O CL 4— e o*><9 ci> o« 1-4.3:— it. ^c f l—wao^

v»o^f4*o 'wvt eo~o^ i h f U H *a— **Vuj

^^I^IIs'tJoo'osi^3" .ocooS°'S<1'* =

iiy|| !!?!:5

KO

4-s0

>ut-(-O

ibli,.vl ~

, A

\X§*" *

6^fe• 2 s

^f1 ~* KV

^i ^3~ fe?

° UIU

i liI >-l

f O*c t*

S'o BO OJ=co*«

" -^

* M4-o O

O O3OJi

'-s*:C— 1

Mu£

* o

m, ^

st-2

£||

S * A1 VI C

S S

*D O C

*r*L- £ Q b;+-4l+-

c o cJ04- — »

S! dsi> KJ'XlS

rv "J0 ..V

.

»-*"

p-'ViVlt2.L— X.KI 1 YT^i— -/^-r . i ^ £>

M E M O R A N D U M

To: Chris Riley, Chairand Members of the Planning Commission

From: Ricardo Soliz, Neighborhood Planning ManagNeighborhood Planning and Zoning Departme:

Date: September 17, 2004

Subject: 2207-2211 Pasadena Drive, Tract 133 of the Crestview/Wooten Neighborhood Plan

Please accept this memo as a request to initiate the rezoning of the above referenced propertyfrom LR-MU-CO-NP, Neighborhood Commercial-Mixed Use-Conditional Overlay-Neighborhood Plan Combining District, to LR-MU-NP, Neighborhood Commercial-Mixed Use-Neighborhood Plan Combining District. This property was rezoned as part of theCrestview/Wooten Combined Neiuhborhood Plan and approved by Council on April 1, 2004.The neighborhood plan recommended adding a conditional overlay to commercial properties onthe Burnet Road corridor for a 50-foot setback from an SF-5 or more restrictive zone property.This setback requirement was included in the zoning recommendation for this property as theonly additional condition.

At the time of the zoning change. City records indicated that this property was a single .85-acretract. However, we have since learned that this property was actually legally subdivided into 3lots in 1964. The eastern most lot. C.R. Scales Subdivision Lot*f. is 60 feet wide. As a result,the 50-foot setback requirement renders this lot practically undevelopable.

To avoid any undue burden on the property owner, Staff is requesting that the PlanningCommission initiate a new zoning application to LR-MU-NP, to remove the conditional overlayfrom the property. 1C you have any questions, please contact Scott Whiteman at 974-2865.

Attachment: Map

Greg Guernsey. Development Services Manager

C14-04-0163 Page 5

SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

The staffs recommendation is lo grant neighborhood commercial - mixed use - conditional overlay -neighborhood plan (LR-MU-CO-NP) combining district zoning. The Conditional Overlay applies a25 foot setback along the east property line that prohibits buildings, structures, parking or drivewaysfor development other than single family residences, two family residences and duplexes.

BACKGROUND

The subject rezoning area consists of three platted lots (Lots 2-4 of the C.R. Scales Subdivision) andis developed with one single family residence, an office and a parking lot, and takes access toPasadena Drive. All three lots carry neighborhood commercial - mixed use - conditional overlay -neighborhood plan (LR-MU-CO-NP) combining district zoning through the Crcstview NeighborhoodPlan rezonings, approved by Council on April 1. 2004. The Conditional Overlay applied to these lots,as well as other properties along or within close proximity to Bumet Road that were identified to beof sufficient width, established a 50 foot setback from an SF-5 or more restrictive district. Thepurpose of the Conditional Overlay was to enhance compatibility between commercial and residentialproperties. At the time of the rezonings, the City's parcel data indicated that the rezoning area was asingle, 0.85 acre tract and 245 feet wide, rather than three platted lots. The application of a 50 footsetback for Lot 4 which is only 60 feet wide significantly impacts the developability of this lot.Furthermore, the Conditional Overlay for the setback would not have been applied to Tract 133 hadaccurate subdivision plat information been available. For example, the tract on the north side ofPasadena Drive that includes a portion of the automotive repair and office uses (zoned GR-MLT-CO-NP) is approximately 60 feet wide and does not have a 50 fool setback.

BASIS FOR LAND USE RECOMMENDATION (ZONING PRINCIPLES)

1. The proposal zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district sought.

The LR, Neighborhood Commercial district is intended for shopping facilities that providelimited business services and offices to the residents of the neighborhood, such as consumerrepair services, food sales, service stations, and pet services.

2. Zoning changes should promote cm orderly and compatible relationship among land uses.

For development other than single family residences, two family residences and duplexes, thestaff recommends a 25 foot setback along the east property line that prohibits buildings,structures, parking or driveways, as it will provide additional compatibility to the adjacent singlefamily residences over and above that prescribed by the City's standards for small sites, yet alsoallows for development to occur- on the western side of the lot, closer to the existing parking lotand office building.

EXISTING CONDITIONS

Site Characteristics

The rezoning area is developed with one single family residence, an acupuncture office and a parkinglot, and there appear to be no significant topographical constraints on the site.

CM-Q4-0163 Page 6

Impervious Cover

The maximum impervious cover allowed by the LR-MU-NP zoning district would be 80%, which is aconsistent figure between the watershed and zoning regulations.

Environmental

The site is not located over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. The site is located in the ShoalCreek Watershed of the Colorado River Basin, which is classified as an Urban Watershed by Chapter25-8 of the City's Land Development Code. It is in the Desired Development Zone.

Impervious cover is not limited in this watershed class; therefore the zoning district impervious coverlimits will apply.

This site is required to provide on-sile structural water quality controls (or payment in lieu of) for alldevelopment and/or redevelopment when 5,000 s.f. cumulative is exceeded, and detention for thetwo-year storm. At this time, no information has been provided as to whether this property has anypre-existing approvals which would preempt current water quality or Code requirements.

According to flood plain maps, there is no flood plain within the project area.

At this time, site-specific information is unavailable regarding existing trees and other vegetation,areas of steep slope, or other environmental features such as bluffs, springs, canyon rimrock, caves,sinkholes, and wetlands.

Standard landscaping and tree protection will be required in accordance with LDC 25-2 and 25-8 forall development and/or redevelopment.

TPSP Right-of-Wav

The scope of this review is limited to the identification of needs for dedication and/or reservation ofright-of-way for funded Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) Roadway Construction Projects andTransportation Systems Management (T.S.M.) Projects planned for implementation by the City ofAustin. No aspect of the proposed project is being considered or approved with this review other thanthe need for right-of-way for City projects. There are separate right-of-way dedication andreservation requirements enforced by other Departments and other jurisdictions to secure right-of-wayfor roadway improvements contained in the Austin Metropolitan Area Roadway Plan, roadwayprojects funded by County and State agencies, and for dedication in accordance with the functionalclassification of the roadway.

We have reviewed the proposed rezoning case and anticipate no additional requirement for right-of-way dedication or reservation for funded C.T.P. or T.S.M. projects at this location.

Transportation

No additional right-of-way is needed at this time.

The traffic impact analysis for this site was waived because it is a City-initiated case.

C14-04-0163 Page?

Water and Wastewater

The landowner intends to serve the site with City water and wastewater utilities. If water orwastewater utility improvements, or offsite main extension, or system upgrades, or utility relocation,or utility adjustment are required, the landowner, at own expense, will be responsible for providing.Also, the utility plan must be reviewed and approved by the Austin Water Utility. The plan must be inaccordance with the City design criteria.

Compatibility Standards

The site is subject to compatibility standards. One of two situations will apply:

1) If the eastern most lot which is 60 feet wide is developed on a stand-alone basis, it qualifies assmall site and the following standards apply along the eastern property line:• No structure may be buill within 17 feet of the property line.• No structure in excess of two stories or 30 feet in height may be constructed within 50 feet of theproperty line.• No structure in excess of three stories or 40 feet in height may be constructed on the remainder ofthe tract.• No parking is permitted within S feet of the property line, and no driveways are allowed within 3feet of the property line.• In addition, a fence, berm, or dense vegetation must be provided to screen adjoining properties fromviews of parking, mechanical equipment, storage, and refuse collection.

Additional design regulations will be enforced at the time a site plan is submitted.

2) If the eastern lot is developed in conjunction with the adjacent 2 lots to the west, then thefollowing standards apply:• No structure may be buill within 25 feet of the property line.• No structure in excess of two stories or 30 feet in height may be constructed within 50 feet of theproperty line.• No structure in excess of three stories or 40 feet in height may be constructed within 100 feet of theproperty line.• No parking or driveways are allowed within 25 feet of the property line.• A landscape area at least 25 feet wide is required along the front property line. In addition, a fence,bcrm, or dense vegetation must be provided to screen adjoining properties from views of parking,mechanical equipment, storage, and refuse collection.

Additional design regulations will be enforced at the lime a site plan is submitled.

Walsh, Wendy

From: Chip Harris [chip.harris@cpa.state.tx.us]Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 12:23 PM

Walsh, WendyCc: Whiteman, ScottSubject: Postponement Request Case # C14-04-0163

RE: Case # C14-04-0163 (2207 - 2211 Pasadena)

Ms. Walsh,

Please consider this request to postpone case # C14-04-0163 for four weeksdue to confusion that has surfaced with respect to the historical zoning of2207 Pasadena. I will be attending this evening's planning commissionmeeting to make this request of the commission.

Thank you,

Chip Harris463-3672

Chip HarrisUnclaimed Property Claims(512)936-6255

-o

S • « ^• .2 g> u y.i '1 •£ B

I'S 1 1o s c -5tn X> W T-lo 3 '^. ST3 o, S §1511t— 1 J— 1 r^v o S §« £ §1St§ 2 sl^^sI 8 gJIH "-> U 4->

- § 0 ^ 7 3« c ^ S1 ,-. i> rS w

Wri

tten

com

men

ts m

ust b

tco

ntac

t per

son

liste

d on

thco

mm

ents

sho

uld

incl

ude

ida

te o

f the

pub

lic h

earin

g,lis

ted

on th

e no

tice.

a\z* sEr °t^ 'B4 .sr-- S2. i

S^ 5.T. in

Cas

e N

umbe

r: C

14-0

4-01

Con

tact

: W

endy

Wal

sh, (

Publ

ic H

eari

ng:

Oct

ober

26,

200

4 Pl

anni

ns

1 rla « ffi•s <o '••'as t« o ,i-r*H y

1",

^

IJfi*

d

S/<!/

iHI

•t (S, 4§ W

•"•** /rs 1H

,

L' ^ rtv

1 o'So1ra

'P /*o /^ 1<U i /

Jj-H \U

rt jo

4) I '

1 Qrt >^

^J

5p

i fcd ^f

IU

16

t

Ifi]

(ij

U

Vyj Ui

S

1

/

ii1

<

!

2*i-;{iii

iiIiH

;

<i

S1^

^/^J

.Jl

1 !1 41$ !4 Xfll IK

X

j

^

i

i*j?LcL

!2

g fl

a j-tj ij

)t(

HIj

a

c

b• -s13 Ci> o>

J £Sqj rt

>- &!

J5 Qm1 W>

••s o« N§ ^9 ^

If yo

u us

e th

is f

orm

to c

onC

ity o

f A

ustin

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Pl

anni

ngW

endy

Wal

shP

.O. B

ox 1

088

Aus

tin, T

X 7

8767

-881

0

oH<i

INFO

RM

rBL

IC H

EA

RIN

G

cu

•i— >rtaoa,3

T3<•>tsrtT3

§T3O

."

iU

•4-<VJu

£JjC

'r*

ONV

...

tbC

- T-Jco«

F

<u£T3ac_o

'cwVI

Q

O

i/iUJc-ib

rr*'->

• v—t

*~'-C3a.

~

1)

1"^—

,p

Alt

houg

h ap

plic

an

* *w

or-*_t

^O

o•4—1

1

Oco

_o

3

g

tiJ3O'

*7^4

O

^

c3 O O<!i ^ --H

ft^ rt,N

C 0 'S"" W Slv- fi sfl^ c3 b•a-s °g i- ^s ° S&. -i— • i—1ex s co 2 cS ^a &-b"^ ° £u 3> 5rt S> MJ2 -o o-t ^ *5= 00? tfl G

' O ^ ]*• ^*H ^" - f e d

c S -^GJ Pi _Cit; u .Wrt ^ o>

"O r" rt

O C3 ""^ *** t

. •< f— 4-4-< r1-) Q

* "^-^Gl -«•* O ^2

> & >,O (^ rt

IE CL, G

3

rt

4 ^-1

o

1crt

c•4-1

1-1OS

art

«£a. xs|-f-r- 1 — •

^ ^

;ion

may

pos

tpon

e II

Uj

or c

omm

is

'O13oo

_c J

s'J

3|""t

a.Vi

" "*

££

Q

c

or.£)

•d

jfl

o

rt

i— i3

-*->rt

"E.rtC

of— i*ri

Q'•j

O

OH

O

*'

1— '

rt

5o£VJ

%•

>.-(—

C•D

J3"rt>

o

i— <

coa+- *

o1or-!

,vn

rcco

mm

enda

tio]

F^

y>4-J

50g

rt

'-

rt\->

I

-a

rt'OO

'oa.

ssio

n an

noun

ces

a

• r-t

g

P

Col ,

O

•o

£

geg

_rt'

O

art• ^

fe

Oc

cont

inua

tion

tha

t i

o.,_,cr->^^O1—o

d

0)

CT-D

it, n

o fu

rthe

r no

tice

OJpc'JZjT^

S1— Crt^J

a"

o

I

^J

'o3o

•i— •OOJ

•4-"

_c

o

• "

-C— *

^. ,_[

.Q

nsiv

e zo

ning

tha

n II

>LI•t_>

'/i

O

*oc!

ON0)

O

•*-''^ i"

CJ)

'c,

asiv

e zo

ning

. II

u"H1-1ogrt

-*->

u

oo£

,rt•4— *

JD.

'•-J-4-1

D

O

-C•4-1

t)

_o"aJ

•o

4)

,o+-(

o£-(

of— 1.^-

^-

1£

J)

CO

MB

ININ

G

^Hf*

CO

Q

.5

•73

rt

"j

g

'oC

OO

e M

U C

ombi

ning

II

*~*

'B«• i-<TD

[rt*O0>r*

3oo_c"Co_]™c

r-1

\^J

2HCO

S

0)

o-4-J

c_o. ,_^

2rt

y;(DK

lllov

vs r

esid

entia

l u

to

^*f^ ,

e' jyi

-b

Q

wiO

-*-•

-3aj)

» r^cN

"rt'iJ-HSOO1— '1J>1>c/l

<u

T3)3*1*J>

,2i~^

^\j

•o?aoUM

e co

mbi

nati

on o

f 1

r^

Wi

Ei

^

Com

bini

ng D

istr

ic

^

^^f

•j*-M

'P

P

1>

H).s'«rt

_c^p

'Sw>1»P

|rt•4-"

Cu

o1-1TDdrt

SO

, 1 •-^- r-t2 C^^ I—*C L ^ i

^' Cu "Sfc oc 13

's

o

-t-J

O

r-

info

rmat

ion

on

1

i— irt

-1

•§» »—

•o•on

D:

o-4->. 1-M

i

6

'>••/IwoucV-,D.

-1 - •

COrjScx

1>•'u

flQ*sa

<u5VI

IS

.S3

*

Written comments must be submitted to the board or commission (or thecontact person listed on the notice) before or at a public hearing. Yourcomments should include the board or commission's name, the scheduleddate of the public hearing, and the Case Number and the contact personlisted on the notice.

Case Number: C14-04-0163Contact: Wendy Walsh, (512) 974-7719Public Hearing:October 26, 2004 Planning Commission

J"e e ft? L. Me.Your Name (please print)

ani in favorC3 I object .:.;

Youraddress(es) affected by this application

^4-

If you use this form to comment, it may be returned to:City of AustinNeighborhood Planning and Zoning DepartmentWendy WalshP.O. Box 1088Austin, TX 78767-8810

C I T Y P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O NOctober 26,2004

One Texas Center505 Barton Springs Road

Conference Room 325

_ Matthew Moore, SecretaryJay Reddy_Chris Riley, ChairJDave Sullivan, Parliamentarian

CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M.John-Michael CortezCid GaJindoMatt Hollon, Asst. SecretaryCynthia MedJin, Vice-Chair

A. REGULAR AGENDA

EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion)The Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuantto Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on mattersspecifically listed on this agenda. The Planning Commission may also announce it will go intoExecutive Session, if necessary, to receive advice from Legal Counsel regarding any other itemon this agenda.

Private Consultation with Attorney - Section 551.07 i

CITIZEN COMMUNICATION;1. The first four (4) speakers signed up to speak will each be allowed a three-minute

allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda.

NO SPEAKERS

APPROVAL OK MINUTES2. Appros'al of minutes from October 12, 2004.MOTION: APPROVE BY CONSENTVOTE: 7-0 (DS-lst, JR-2ml; JMC- ABSTAIN)

CODE AMENDMENTS

3. CodeAmendment:

Request:Staff Rec.:Staff:

C20-04-011-

Approval of Code AmendmentRECOMMENDEDSteve Barney, 974-3126, stevc.barney@ci.auslin.lx.usNeighborhood Housing & Community Development

Facilitator: Katie Larson. 974-o413

PLANNING COMMISSION- MEETING SUMMARY (draft pending PC approval) October 26,2004

12. Rezoning: C14-04-0163 - Crestview Tract 133Location: 2207-2211 Pasadena Drive, Shoal Creek Watershed, Crestview NPAOwner/Applicant: City of Austin - Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department (Scott

Whiteman)Agent: City of Austin - Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department

(Wendy Walsh)Request: LR-MU-CO-NP to LR-MU-NPStaff Rec.: RECOMMENDEDStaff: Wendy Walsh, 974-7719, wendy.walsh@ci.austin.tx.us

Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department

DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENTWendy Walsh explained that there was an error on the zoning map for this property some timebetween 1984 and the Crestview Neighborhood Plan 2003-04 rezoning case.

FOR POSTPONEMENT TO NOVEMBER 9, 2004John Robertson, co-owner of tract, has owned the tract since 1999. It is part of his homestead.Due to the restriction on the property from the CO, the tract is unbuildable. He wants thisresolved and that can happen in the next two weeks.

AGAINST NOV.9; FOR NOV. 23 POSTPONEMENTChip Harris, president of the neighborhood association, said they want more time to review thelegal issues. They do not know how long it will lake to resolve the legal issues.

Commissioner Rilcy asked Mr. Harris the problem with postponing to November 9 if it ispossible to resolve the issues by then? Mr. Harris said if they arc resolved by then, okay, but onlyif the information is provided by then.

MOTION: POSTPONE TO NOVEMBER 9, 2004 (NEIGHBORHOOD REQUEST)VOTE: 8-0 (DS-lst, MM-2nd]

13. Rezoning: C14-04-0136 -1500 Summit StreetLocution: 1500 Summit Street, Harper's Branch Watershed, East Riverside /

Oltorf NPA (Riverside) NPAOwner/Applicant: Waterloo Partners, L.P. (John S. Graham)Agent: Thrower Design (Ron Thrower)Request: GO to GR-MUStaff Rec.: ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION: GO-MU-COStaff: Robert Heil, 974-2330. robert.heil@ci.ausLin.tx.us

Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department

DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENTGlenn JRhoades explained that the neighborhood tried to contact the staff person to submitpostponement request, but the staff person is out for two weeks.

Facililuior: Katie I.urscn 974-64I3

AUDHESS: 220S-2201 Pnsc idena

ZO-JJ.KC PJ.QUriST: Pro-'i: "A" !tcsui^nc-.i, .First Ilc-ight afld ArcnTo: \1'i:R" G t n o f j i l ^Rff tol l , First l i c i f t i i C nnd Arc;:

tDlWS&tt USE: Klcctrlc and I'lat/ny Shop /

• STXE1EIPasnder.a DrJ.vo

R. £.«_..50 fent 28 feet~

CAR COUI ITUA

CrASSIFICA'JCIOHMinor residential

HISTORY/ J^CATIp:i

*?.

B 1st Lo C l?t

A 1st to GA 1st i S 1st

Granted LR

Granted CK\

FILE

CW-70-191

CW-67-195

••s-P*

:CITY OF AUSTIN. TEXA

TRACT B: From Interim "A11 Residence District to "BD"Residence District on the property describedin File C14-71-220.. to-wit:

A 1.5 acre tract of land, out of Cherry Creek East Sub-division, as recorded in Book 54, Page 50 of the PlatRecords of Travis County, Texas,

locally known as 5620-5712 Emerald Forest Drive, in the City of Austin, TravisCounty, Texas.

TRACT C: From Interim "A" Residence District to "GR"General Retail District on the property describedin File C14-71-220, to-wit:

A 1 acre tract of land, out of Cherry Creek East Subdivision,as recorded in Book 54, Page 50 of the Plat Records of TravisCounty, Texas,

locally known as 1033-1049 Stassney Lane; 5600-5618 Emerald Forest Drive, in the |City of Austin, Travis County, Texas.

(6) TRACT 1: From "A" Residence District to "GR" GeneralRetail District on the property described inFile C14-71-224. to-wit:

Lot 2, and the west thirty feet of Lot 3, C. R. ScalesSubdivision as recorded in Book 19, Page 45 of the PlatRecords of Travis County, Texas; and,

TRACT 2: From "A" Residence District to "B" ResidenceDistrict on the property described in FileC14-71-224, to-wit:

The east thirty feet of Lot 3, C. R. Scales Subdivisionas recorded in Book 19,"Page 45 of the Plat Records ofTravis County, Texas;

locally known as 2209-2301 Pasadena Drive, in the City of Austin, Travis Count:?exas.

FART 2. It is hereby ordered that the USE maps accompanying Chapter 45 of theAustin City Code of 1967 and made a part thereof shall be changed so as torecord the change ordered in this ordinance.

PART 3. The rule requiring that ordinances shall be read on three separate daysis hereby suspended and the necessity to allow expedient development of the landherein affected creates an emergency requiring that this ordinance become effec-

:CITY OF AUSTIN. TEXA

tive immediately; therefore, upon the final passage of this ordinance as requiredby law, this ordinance shall become effective immediately.

PASSED AND APPROVED

li-APPROVED' (Signed) DON R. Bt/TLEft

., 1971(Signed) Roy Butler

ATTEST:City Attorney

110CT71

c

November 2, 2004

To the Members of the Planning Commission:Re: Case# C 14-04-0163 2207 to 2211 Pasadena Drive

I am writing re: Case # C 14-04-0163 to offer a solution to the concern voiced bya member of the Crestview Neighborhood Association. After discussions with my next-door neighbor, Jesse L. McCrady, Sam Scott Ragsdale and myself (Jon Robinson)have agreed to a 25 foot area adjacent to the 2205 Pasadena Drive that will not be usedfor a building structure or/and public parking in the proposed change to LR-MU-NP.

This agreement should resolve any of the concerns for all parties. Hopefully theprocess can be expedited without further delays. We appreciate your hard work andpatience with all of us. If you need any additional information or assistance, please letus know. Thank you for considering these issues.

Sincen

Jop#f&)binson

^&&*»Sam Scott Ragsdale

//Jesse L. McCrady

Cc: Scott WhitemanWendy Walsh

Walsh, Wendy

From: Whiteman, ScottSent: Monday, November 08, 2004 3:36 PMTo: Walsh, WendySubject: FW: C14-04-0163 2207 Pasadena CO notes

I think, this should go to you.

Scott Whiteman, AICPSenior PlannerNeighborhood Planning and Zoning DepartmentPhone: (512) 974-2865

----- Original Message -----From: Chip Harris [mailto: chip. harris@cpa . state. tx. us]Sent: Monday, November C8, 200<i 2:53 ?MTo: Whiteman, ScottSubject : Cl 4-04 -01 63 2207 Pasadena CO notes

RE: Case ft C14-Q4-0163 (2207 Pasadena Avenue)

November 8,2004

Scott,

Please add the comments bel ow i:o the file at your convenience .

Thank you,

Harris

P.S. Is it likely or possible l-.hat this will be a consent item':'

* * -A- -A- * * * •'• A- » + + * + * + ** + +* + •>•]!•* + + •;• * * -J, * * * * -i- -V + + ***>•**** A- -A- -A- >••* + **• -A- * -I- * + *• -t- -k -V •>-** + *• A- * * * + *

The Crestv.lew Neighborhood Association supports the proposed 25 footvegetative buffer a- the east sido of the property at 2207 Pasadena where itis adjacent to 2201> Paaaderiri . We ur.der stand that, the r-^sv-.lting zonir.g vn.llbe LR-MH-CO-NP and thai noth.ing besides vegetation will be allowed in thisbuffer; that is, improvements will be prohibited, driveways w.i 11 beprohibited and paikirig will be prohibited, even unauthorized parking. Thisconditional ever. lay should includ-'j a provision requiring the owner of thelot to physically bloc'?: vohd cular access to tho vegetative buffer from therest of thelot so that i1: will not be accidentally U5j«d for par king or any otherprohibited usr-.

Chip HarrisUnclaimed Property Claim.:(?]2) 93-5-6255