2007-04-18IAQG Relationship Growth Strategy Melbourne General Assembly1 International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Relationship Growth Strategy Ed Bayne

2007-04-18 IAQG Relationship Growth Strategy Melbourne General Assembly 1

International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG)

Relationship Growth Strategy

Ed BayneIAQG General Assembly

Melbourne, AustraliaApril 18, 2007


Strategic Focus

Relationship Growth Strategy• Civil Authorities• Space• Defense• Trade Associations

ImprovementStrategy

• Requirements• Product Realization

Process• People Capability • Supply Chain

Process Capability

IAQG Operating Management SystemIAQG Other Party Management Team


Strategy Focus Streams & Leaders

Strategy Focus LeadersSWG Mentor AAQG EAQG APAQG

IAQG Leadership Team *Bill Black Colin Clarke Guy Dion Kinsuke Hara

Operating Management System John Addey Ed Bayne *John Addey Kazuki Kanai

Other Party Management Team *Rick Downs Tim Lee Gualtiero Arsento Shuji Komori

Improvement Strategy

•Requirements Guy Dion Alan Daniels *Guy Dion Minoru Kasano

•Product Realization Process Tes Aklilu *Susan Armstrong Bernard Lauras Kouichi Watanabe

•People Capability Bill BlackLarry KibbleColin Cramp

*Herbert Mairose Miro Miletic

•Supply Chain Process Capability

Barb O’Dell *Mike Song Cherif Khelil Kouichi Watanabe

Relationship Growth Strategy *Ed Bayne

•Civil Authorities Ed Bayne Andy Brindisi Herbert Mairose Shunji Okada

•Space sector Roberto Ciaschi JJ DeGiovanni Roberto Ciaschi Satoshi Owaki

•Defense Larry Weng Larry Weng Hans Ziemer Shunji Okada

•Trade Association Alignment Scott Collinge Scott Collinge Philippe Martin TBD

• Suppliers, Accreditation Bodies Not Launched Not Launched Not Launched Not Launched

• University, Engineering, Sourcing Not Launched Not Launched Not Launched Not Launched


Civil Airworthiness Authorities

Andy BrindisiIAQG General Assembly



Civil Airworthiness Authorities Relationship

Strategic Purpose:– Enhance safety and quality by the international

airworthiness authorities and industry leaders working together to establish a system where aircraft product and parts:• Can be manufactured and maintained almost

anywhere• Move quickly and seamlessly to the end item user• Are supported by electronic documentation• There is no more than one airworthiness authorities

action for each industry activity to eliminate duplication


Civil Airworthiness Authorities Relationship

Stakeholders:– Civil Airworthiness Authorities– IAQG members involved in civil aviation– Civil Aviation supply chain

• Suppliers• Airlines• Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul (MROs)• Distributors• Etc.....


Activities

Joint:

– Alignment of Airworthiness Authorities and IAQG Initiatives

– Common Definitions and Terms

– Authorized Release Certificate (ARC)

– Recognition of Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP)and Nadcap Other Party processes

– Authorities input to 9100 revision


Activities

IAQG:Improved Supplier and Sub-tier Supplier Control

• Supply Chain Management Handbook– Supply Chain Process Capability– Product Realization Process

Authorities:– Common Supplier Surveillance Standard

• …identifies the minimum authority requirement to an approved production organisation to demonstrate satisfactory supplier control, with the purpose to ensure conformity and traceability of the supplied items

– New / revised bilateral agreements


Space Forum

John DeGiovanniIAQG General Assembly



A global forum for space quality issues - Space perspective across IAQG initiativesFocus on quality issues to improve performance across the industryNetworking

• Identify space needs and screen IAQG and other (e.g. ISO) initiatives to

• Adopt and deploy suitable initiatives• Support & influence relevant initiatives, by

liaising with the respective teams• Initiate new space specific initiatives

through IAQG or other avenues, as appropriate

• Support & influence the revision of 9100, to fill gaps

• Evaluate, negotiate changes for, and adopt certification scheme

• Solicit lessons learned and discuss way of sharing them

• Share ideas on at least one top topic per meeting

• 9100 not optimised for full range of aerospace activities.

• 9100 certification scheme not widely applied & accepted

• Space supply chain more regional than worldwide

• Space too fragmented and small volume to be influential

• Strong customer-supplier interactions & dependency

• Need for better integration of aeronautic and space business areas

• Strong project / single product culture more emphasis on Product Assurance than QMS

• Space regulations not harmonised globally

Improved space industry performance through:

• 9100 as a commonly accepted higher level QMS standard

• An 9100-based certification scheme than can be applied by all sectors.

• Space processes satisfactorily covered by NADCAP & AECMA-PRO

• Mechanism to gather best practices.

• Global cross-acceptance of space practices.

IAQG Space Forum - StrategyA commonly accepted QM standard and certificationA commonly accepted QM standard and certification

Current State Future StateIdeas on How to Proceed


Future State

Improved space industry performance through:

– 9100 as a commonly accepted higher level QMS

standard

– An 9100-based certification scheme than can be applied

by all sectors

– Space processes satisfactorily covered by NADCAP &

AECMA-PRO

– Mechanism to gather best practices

– RMC - understanding of Space uniqueness

– Global cross-acceptance of space practices

11


2006 20082007 20102009

PEOPLE CAPABILITY

RE

QU

IRE

ME

NT

SP

rod

uct

R

ealiz

atio

n

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Consolidate space Inputs to 9100 revision

Understand re

levance for

space of SUPPLY C

HAIN

Management Handbook

• Identify weak areas of 9100 implementation

• Develop training for space

Discuss initiative:Delegation of Product Assurance functions / tasks

Understand potential scope

of certification of space

processes by NADCAP /

AECMA-PRO

IAQG Space Forum - RoadmapIAQG Space Forum - Roadmap

ICOP Scheme

Support dev

elopm

ent o

f

dictio

nary

9102 review

• RMC-Space unique• “Unique training”

AS 9100:2009 reflecting space uniqueness'


Events

CAIB

Waiver/deviations

FRR impacts

Subtier controls

GenesisIntegration

Assumptions/Group think

BMAR

Risk

ManufacturingSupply

Configuration

Management

What is the Data Telling Us?

Key Characteristics

Mission Assurance


Space Factors / Unique• Fleet leader requirements (maximum life)• Pedigree of unique products

• As built Vs as designed• Product substitution (critical)

• Production support materials• Life limits and controls• MRB acceptance / waivers• Part obsolescence (EEE)

Configuration Management Control

Audit Focus• Pedigree system of compliance• Process change and controls

• Notification• Rigor

• MRB control - training and authority• Procurement & control of non production materials• Acceptance data package rigor• Planning change control• Key characteristic management

• Definition• Rigor and knowledge

Criteria / Requirements• CM control specs/plans• Contract• Deviation / waiver process• DRD requirements such as ADPs

Examples• Design Application-incorrectly applied

• Genesis sensor installed backwards• Process change not communicated - External Tank

change in cleaning (gloves) contaminates parts• Weld Parameters - un incorporated design

changes• Closed loop traceability - Alert system rigor

• Retrieve/Flow down/Risk Ident

14


Defense

Larry WengIAQG General Assembly



Purpose/Scope

• Harmonize 9100 series documents with AQAP and other defense agency documents (existing and future)

• Contact defense agencies to familiarize them with the benefits of utilizing AS9100 series standards.


Projects

• Harmonization

• AS9100 writing team Inputs

• Outreach plan


NATO Harmonization

Objective:• Harmonize AQAP 2110 & AS 9100

Progress:• Mapping & Gap analysis complete

• WG2 Coordination– WG2 liaison members assigned– Attended Prague WG2 meeting – Establishing Relationship agreement– Planning IAQG/NATO joint Workshop in Orlando

• Coordinate with NATO standardization focal


AS9100 Writing Team Inputs

Objective:• Provide inputs from Defense Sectors

Progress:• Inputs from NATO

• Inputs from Europe, Asia and Americas sectors

• Provided recommendations to writing team

• Defense Relationship participants on Writing Team– Francisco Losada– Hans Ziemer– Minoru Kasano


Outreach Plan

Objective:• Share industry QMS progress/philosophy with Defense

Agencies/Ministries

Progress:• Standard presentation

• Focused engagement with NATO

• Presented at Aerospace Industry Association (AIA) meeting

• Meeting with key Defense Agencies in each sector


Next Steps

• Continue with NATO Harmonization

• Continue dialog with Defense Agencies

• Resolve 9100 writing team decisions

• Analyze other harmonization opportunities


Trade Association Alignment

Scott CollingeIAQG General Assembly



Trade Associations Relationship

Strategic Purpose:–Establish relationships with other aviation

industry Trade Associations whose purpose and objectives overlap those of the IAQG

– Identify areas where IAQG collaboration with other Trade Associations would benefit speed of deployment of various IAQG projects


Trade Associations Relationship

Approach:– Identify Trade Associations where IAQG member

companies maintain representation.• Examples: Aerospace Industries Association (AIA),

Supplier Excellence Alliance, etc.– Identify IAQG member focal points to evaluate overlap

in goals and objectives.– Evaluate if IAQG projects would benefit from potential

collaboration with identified associations.– Pursue collaboration through Memorandum of

Understanding

Example of our Trade Association Relationship is ongoing with the Supplier Excellence Alliance (SEA)


SEA Overview

What is SEA?– The Supplier Excellence Alliance is a non-profit

industry alliance comprised of aerospace, defense, and space primes/OEMs, major subcontractors, and suppliers working together to accelerate improvement of supply chain capabilities.

Board Member Companies:BAE SystemsThe Boeing CompanyBody CoatBombardierCessnaCristek Interconnects Dresser-RandFirth RixsonHamilton Sundstrand

Hitco Carbon CompositesHoneywell AerospaceLockheed MartinNorthrop GrummanParker AerospacePhoto EtchPratt & Whitney

Roberts Tool Company Rockwell CollinsSikorskySmiths AerospaceTextronTW MetalsTyco ElectronicsUnited Technologies


SEA Overview

SEA Goals– Engage the most progressive suppliers– Expand outreach– Expand service offerings to provide a variety of

pathways– Ensure opportunities for small and minority-owned

suppliers

SEA Basic Values– Speed - moving quickly with urgency– Vision - sharing a common industry vision– Measurement - measuring our progress– Integration - a common approach for all


Potential Collaboration

Supply Chain Improvement:

–Collaboration in execution of SEA’s Roadmap and the IAQG development and deployment of the Supply Chain Handbook.

–SEA’s work on integrating supply chains supporting specific prime programs has significant traction with sub tier suppliers and primes.


MOU Elements

Phase 1 AllianceBoth parties – list each other on websites, literature, and other

communication as appropriate. – list each other as alliance partners using language

appropriate to each organization. – issue press releases stating intention to work together. – provide open invitation to each other's member

meetings, as appropriate for each organization.– SEA and IAQG representatives will conference at least

quarterly to identify opportunities to achieve the aims of this MOU.

Documents

2007-04-18IAQG Relationship Growth Strategy Melbourne General Assembly1 International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Relationship Growth Strategy Ed Bayne