2007-2020 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN UPDATE · PDF file4 The facilities at the University of Maryland’s main campus, which are the primary focus of the Facilities Master Plan, consists

2007-2020 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN UPDATE •

Table of Contents

I Statement of Mission ��1II Program Initiatives ��1III Institution Description ��3 Condition of Existing Facilities ��4 Fall Inventory and Space Guidelines Fall 2006, Fall 2015 ��6 Physical Analysis ��7 Commitment to Greening the Campus ��7IV Institution Demographics ��8V Planning Issues ��10VI The Plan ��11 Property Acquisitions and Dispositions ��12 Global Issues: Environmental Stewardship� Vehicular and Pedestrian Circulation, and Land Use ��12 Environmental Stewardship ��13 Vehicular and Pedestrian Circulation ��13 The Use of Land and Real Property to Reflect our Mission: ��14 Campus Map ��14VII Changes to the Previous Plan ��15 Changes to Institution Description ��16 Changes to Institution Demographics ��16

Appendices

A Project List ��17B 2007-2020 Facilities Master Plan Update-Campus Map ��27

1

Statement of Mission I The University of Maryland, College Park is a public research university, the flagship institution of the University System of Maryland (USM), and the original 1862 land-grant institution in the State. As a Carnegie Doctoral/Research University-Extensive institution, the university ranks among the very best public research universities in the United States. It is one of only 62 members of the Association of American Universities, an organization composed of the leading research universities in the United States and Canada. To continue to realize its aspirations and fulfill its mandates, the university advances knowledge, provides outstanding and innovative instruction, and nourishes a climate of intellectual growth in a broad range of academic disciplines and interdisciplinary fields. As the flagship, the university shares its research, educational, cultural, and technological strengths with other institutions and their constituencies in the USM and throughout the State.

The university’s academic programs and computer and information technology infrastructure serve many audiences, and the entire State has access to and depends on the university’s libraries. In conjunction with the University of Maryland Eastern Shore, the university serves the State’s agricultural needs through the Maryland Cooperative Extension and the Agricultural Experiment Station. The university delivers continuing education programs that are consistent with its research mission and core competencies to an increasing number of degree-seeking and professional audiences.

The university values the Ph.D. and terminal professional degrees such as the M.B.A., M.F.A., and M.P.H. as its signature degrees, but also awards a wide range of quality bachelor’s, master’s and other doctoral degrees. Degree programs are offered in agriculture and natural resources, architecture; behavioral and social sciences; business and management; computer, mathematical and physical sciences; creative and performing arts; education; engineering; humanities; journalism; life sciences; information studies; public affairs; and public health. The university’s faculty achieve national and international renown for their research and scholarship, serve society at a distinguished level, are innovative and creative teachers, and participate in the tradition of shared governance.

The university counts among its greatest strengths–and a major component of its excellence–the diversity of its faculty, students and staff. It strives to hire a diverse faculty and staff of exceptional achievement through affirmative action, to celebrate diversity in all of its programs and activities, and to recruit and retain qualified graduate and undergraduate minority students. The university will work to attract first-rate international students to Maryland and continue to build partnerships abroad to facilitate the offering of our programs to international audiences as well as the collaboration of research.

The university has a clear vision of its role as a nationally-distinguished public research university. With increasing numbers of nationally-ranked graduate programs, a distinguished faculty, and research leading to the discovery of knowledge, the university is in a position to provide graduate education at the forefront of research and scholarship, which attracts the most highly qualified graduate students. The university also provides enriched and challenging undergraduate educational experiences including: a core arts and sciences curriculum; living-learning communities such as College Park Scholars and nationally renowned Honors Program; the President’s Promise, a signature initiative to enrich the academic experiences of all undergraduates; and other unique, intensive, and innovative programs such as Gemstone, Global Communities, the Hinman-CEO’s and Civicus.

Program Initiatives II The vision for the University of Maryland, College Park, formed through the strategic planning process is founded on present strengths and fueled by extraordinary progress in undergraduate education, graduate education and research.

A comprehensive analysis of the university’s strengths-and deficiencies-has led to the identification of five initiatives, and a series of specific actions, that will guide decisions and policy at all levels of the university enterprise.

2

The initiatives are:

Continue to elevate the quality of A. undergraduate education in order to provide all students an enriched and challenging educational experience. Enhanced undergraduate education has produced nationally-recognized Honors and College Park Scholars programs. The university must apply and extend the value of these lessons to all undergraduates. The university will provide enriched educational opportunities and challenging academic curricula to prepare all graduates.

Action items with facilities implications include:

Increase the number and percentage of 1. undergraduate students who participate in enrichment programs such as nationally recognized campus living-learning programs and research activities.Remain the school of choice for the most talented 2. students in Maryland and for outstanding out-of-state students by strengthening efforts to recruit students.Bring every classroom up to an established 3. minimum standard for information technology capability and create special purpose information technology enhanced classrooms and laboratories that encourage innovative pedagogy.

Build a strong, university-wide culture B. of excellence in graduate and professional education, research, scholarship, and the creative and performing arts. Many of the university’s programs and departments have achieved national distinction through the efforts of their outstanding faculty; to achieve the level of excellence of the very best public universities, it is essential to raise the expectations for excellence in all departments. We must continue to encourage programs and research activities that cut across departments and colleges. We must compete effectively for the best graduate students; recruiting and graduating a highly diverse group of graduate students remains a university priority.


Continue to improve the excellence of our 1. best research and graduate programs while increasing the number of programs of recognized and measurable excellence.Remedy the shortage of research space by 2. providing additional facilities to reduce the current deficit of approximately 750,000 NASF.

Ensure a university environment that is C. inclusive as well as diverse and that fosters a spirit of community among faculty, staff and students. The university has gained national recognition for its commitment to diversity as a major educational benefit and an essential component of academic excellence. Though progress in embracing diversity has been great, much remains to be done.


Develop a landscape master plan that will 1. establish outdoor space as a communal, inclusive meeting ground for the planned and serendipitous exchange of information, social gathering, and ecological awareness. Create landscapes that bring universal access, personal security, and aesthetic pleasure to all campus citizens, guests, and prospective faculty and students.Create an Arboretum and Botanical Gardens 2. that would be an instrument of horticultural distinction, landscape design and interpretation, and place-making reflecting the university’s education, research, and service missions.Increase the number of undergraduate beds 3. through a combination of state-owned and public-private partnerships to be undertaken on the campus and totally private projects on property contiguous to the campus.

Engage the university more fully in D. outreach and collaborative partnerships with the greater community.The role of the university as an active partner with industry, non-profit organizations, governing agencies, and State systems has been heightened.

3

One primary role the university must play is as a major contributor to the development of a knowledge-based economy. Knowledge industries and universities provide essential support to one another, and it is no accident that key centers driving progress in information based industries have clustered around great research universities.


Continue to develop the M Square Research 1. Park to create a powerful center of research excellence and promote economic development for the region. Redevelop the East Campus to promote 2. connections and partnerships with the City of College Park, and to benefit surrounding communities and university students, faculty and staff.

Ensure an administrative, operational and E.

physical infrastructure that fully supports a first-class university.It is essential that the university have a first-class, responsive and customer-oriented infrastructure that supports the work of our faculty, staff and students. Investments must be made to address a number of critical issues.


Create and maintain an electronic networking 1. infrastructure required for our faculty and staff to excel in research, scholarship and innovative approaches to teaching and learning.Develop the university’s physical facilities so 2. that they meet the needs of a leading research university.Develop a strategic renovation plan tied to 3. campus academic priorities to modernize research and office space.

Invest resources to improve attractiveness and 4. historic character of the campus’ facilities.Upgrade the university’s classrooms to ensure 5. quality teaching and learning.

Institution Description III The University of Maryland is located in the City of College Park, within Prince George’s County. The campus is 30 miles west of Annapolis, 25 miles southwest of Baltimore, and 5 miles north of Washington, D.C. The region’s concentration of cultural, scientific, research, political, economic and agricultural activities offers many advantages to the institution’s academic and research programs.

Interstates 495 and 95, located approximately three miles north of the campus, provide direct regional access to the College Park community and the institution via U. S. Route 1/Baltimore Avenue, a highly developed commercial corridor and a heavily traveled vehicular link between Baltimore and Washington. The preferred access to the campus from Interstate 495 is via Kenilworth Avenue to Paint Branch Parkway.

The 2002 Facilities Master Plan included a vision to provide a direct link between the beltway and the University of Maryland campus. The university continues to support the critical need for planning and funding of the UM Access Study as a key to revitalizing the U. S. Route 1 corridor and improving the quality of life in surrounding residential neighborhoods.

The campus is bordered by University Boulevard, Campus Drive, Mowatt Lane, Knox Road, and Baltimore Avenue (U. S. Route 1). The campus also includes a parcel of land east of Route 1 which is primarily developed as student housing and service functions. The University Golf Course is located to the west of University Boulevard.

4

The facilities at the University of Maryland’s main campus, which are the primary focus of the Facilities Master Plan, consists of approximately 12.8 million gross square feet (GSF) in 266 buildings on 1,250 acres. With the inclusion of off-campus facilities, the building inventory totals roughly 13.6 million GSF in 463 buildings on approximately 3,800 acres. Approximately 58 percent of the total inventory is state-supported, 41 percent is auxiliary, and one percent is leased facilities as shown in Table 1.

Condition of Existing Facilities

The advanced age and deteriorating condition of UM facilities are major concerns. Insufficient funding for maintenance and facilities renewal has resulted in enormous deferred maintenance needs and an aging, increasingly obsolete physical plant. In addition, the lack of functionally

appropriate or suitable space poses a direct threat to the timely fulfillment of the university’s mission. Emphasis on graduate level education, the increased technological requirements of instruction, and advances in research technologies all contribute to a critical growing need for renewal of existing facilities.

Institutions should allocate at least two percent of replacement value of facilities annually for facilities renewal. In UM’s case, this would be $31.6M for state-owned facilities. UM has historically allocated only about one-third of this amount. Due to this historic underfunding of facilities renewal, there is a deferred maintenance backlog of $623M (2007 dollars) for state-owned facilities greater than 20 years of age and exterior infrastructure. In 2003, UM developed a ten-year plan to address this deferred maintenance backlog and renew state-owned facilities less than 20 years of age. This plan

Fall 2006 Building Overview Table 1

GSF (Gross Square Feet) NASF (Net Assignable Square Feet) * Includes Maryland Fire and Rescue Institute facilities, Agriculture Experiment Station facilities, Maryland Cooperative Extension facilities and leased facilities.

Type of Building No. of Buildings NASF GSF Percent of Total GSF

Main Campus

State-Supported 4,379,178 4,379,178 53%

Auxiliary 2,562,473 5,524,89 41%

Subtotal 266 6,941,651 12,751,848 94%

Other Facilities *State-Supported 567,478 688,146 5%

Leased Facilities 155,327 155,327 1%

Subtotal 197 722,805 843,473 6%

Total Inventory 463 7,644,456 13,595,321 100%

5

averaged $65M per year for a total of $650M in escalated dollars, and addressed 86 percent of the total backlog (the maximum that was estimated could be implemented while maintaining services and avoiding significant disruptions to campus operations).

The university’s facilities renewal problem is critical. Thirty-two percent of UM’s state-supported space is over 50 years old. UM has 69 percent of the total USM state-supported space that is over 50 years old. UM has 50 percent of the USM research lab space and 30 percent of the USM teaching lab space. Modern, functioning infrastructure is critical for labs. The most recent peer data available from 2003 shows that UM spent only 21 percent of the average of three of its peer institutions (University of North Carolina, University of Michigan and University of Illinois) on facilities renewal.

In December 2005, the Board of Regents approved a revision to its Policy on Facilities Renewal for Auxiliary and Non-auxiliary Capital Assets. The policy requires an increase in operating expenditures at an (annual five-year average) increment of 2/10 of one percent of replacement value, which for UM is $3.16M for state-supported facilities,

until the two percent target is reached. At this pace, it is estimated that the two percent target will be attained by FY 2012. Attaining the two percent target will help avoid increasing the $623M backlog, but will not reduce it. Given the magnitude of the problem, it is vitally important that UM, USM and the State work together to develop both capital and operating budget solutions.

Fifty-six percent of the total inventory is Condition Code 1 or 2 (requiring normal maintenance or minimal renovation) while roughly 41 percent of the total inventory is Condition Code 3 or 4 (requiring either major updating and modernization or major remodeling of the building) as shown in Table 2.

It should be noted that the condition of UM’s existing facilities is additionally impacted by University of Maryland University College’s (UMUC) use of UM classrooms and libraries. UMUC’s use requires added maintenance as well as renewal of facilities sooner than would be the case if used solely by UM.

Fall 2006 Building Condition by NASF and GSF Table 2

GSF (Gross Square Feet)NASF (Net Assignable Square Feet)

Type of Building No. of Buildings NASF GSF Percent of Total GSF

Code 1 (normal maintenance) 117 2,682,036 6,036,144 47.3%

Code 2 (minimal renovation) 21 682,507 1,077,812 8.5%

Code 3 (major updating) 37 1,476,646 2,372,335 18.6%

Code 4 (major remodeling) 56 1,808,833 2,883,495 22.6%

Code 5 (removal) 2 23,571 30,114 0.2%Code 6 (planned termination) 33 268,058 351,948 2.8%Grand Total 266 6,941,651 12,751,848 100%

6

Fall Inventory and Space Guidelines Fall 2006, Fall 2015

The data presented in Table 3 represent the calculated space allowance for all room use categories based on the application of the 1999 Maryland Four-Year Public College and University Space Planning Guidelines. Space allowances are compared to a static inventory generating a deficit or a surplus. The allowances in each category for existing Fall 2006 and projected Fall 2015 are driven by existing and

projected student enrollment, faculty, and staff counts. The Space Guideline Application Program (SGAP) was used to generate the space calculations.

The space planning guidelines are used as an evaluative and comparative tool in the State’s capital project approval and annual budget allocation processes. The magnitude of the existing and projected space deficits is significant. Campuswide deficits have remained in excess of 1 million square feet.

* Includes space under renovation or inactive spaces

Fall 2006 Inventory Analysis Table 3

Code Room Use Category Fall 2006 Inventory Fall 2006 Deficit/Surplus Fall 2015 Deficit Surplus

100/5 Classroom Service 349,881 (57,867) (57,867)

210/25 Class Lab/Open Lab/Svc 370,704 (26,685) (26,685)

250/5 Research Lab/Service 758,153 (753,156) (1,042,081)

300/5 Office/Service 1,707,053 35,309 (201,335)

400/5 Study/Service 421,087 (211,366) (333,872)500/5 Special Use/Service 826,803 (39,911) 36,388600/5 General Use/Service 498,273 (114,413) (114,425)

700/5 Support/Service 320,258 (71,277) (71,287)

800/5 Health 7,535 9,166 9,166

100 – 800 Subtotal 5,269,747

050/070 Unclassified * 199,711 - -

090 Other Organizations 97,729 - -

900 Residential Facilities 1,374,464 - -

100 - 900 Total Inventory 6,941,651 (1,150,379) (1,801,998)

7

Physical Analysis

The Facilities Master Plan captures the vision and incorporates the principles that are intended to guide facilities planning at the University of Maryland. Environmental preservation and enhancement form one of the underlying grids, or major infrastructures, of the final plan. It shows greenways and open space networks linking pedestrian corridors within and between districts. A second major infrastructure comprises transportation recommendations designed to accommodate more efficient vehicular and pedestrian movement and to relieve congestion. The Plan identifies possible sites for new facilities that work within the context of the environmental and transportation systems. Finally, the plan considers land use of properties adjacent to the campus, such as that east of U. S. Route 1 as a major redevelopment project. This initiative is a singular opportunity to transform an underutilized portion of the campus into a vibrant neighborhood and to catalyze the redevelopment of the U. S. Route 1 corridor. The creation of an East Campus community will strengthen the City of College Park commercial core and will benefit surrounding communities and university students, faculty, and staff.

The campus comprises eight districts on the main campus, plus outlying university-owned properties. The size of each district is defined by an approximately five to seven minute walk radius. Depending on the period of its development, each district has unique physical and cultural characteristics evidenced in its natural features, open spaces, buildings, and their uses. The plans for each district have been designed to embrace the most positive characteristics of the campus and to extend them forward into the future, utilizing physical planning principles and goals.

As with any planning document that covers an extended time period, unexpected opportunities, significant changes in a variety of circumstances, or other factors can effect changes in specific recommendations. The underlying principles and goals on which this plan is founded, however, will not change.

Commitment to Greening the Campus

Since the FMP was adopted in 2002, the University of Maryland has demonstrated achievements in the pursuit of its environmental stewardship goals going beyond regulatory compliance that include:

2002Establishing the Long-term Forest Protection Act Easement between UM and MD Department of Natural Resources

Developing UM-Anacostia Watershed Restoration Committee (AWRC) Partnership Agreement to mitigate both on and off-campus storm water runoff problems and other environmental impacts to the Anacostia watershed

2003Establishing the FMP Implementation Subcommittee for Environmental Stewardship

Sponsoring three international sustainability conferences since 2003--two Smart & Sustainable Campuses Conferences, and one conference: Putting the LID on Storm Water Management--with a fourth conference planned for March 31–April 2, 2008

Co-sponsoring the UM-National Wildlife Federation Campus Ecology Program international conference: Beyond Compliance: Campus Greening through Stewardship

Signing the Memorandum of Understanding: Use of Experimental Rain Gardens for Education and Research

Establishing and adopting Environmental Stewardship Guidelines

2004Developing a campus tree inventory with over 6,500 trees recorded to date via a MOU with the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources

8

2005Leading role in the Paint Branch Watershed Restoration Group (Memorandum of Agreement between UM and M-NCPPC) to develop comprehensive watershed restoration master plan for the Paint Branch and Little Paint Branch

2006Several research centers on campus actively involved, including the Center for Integrative Environmental Research, which supports UM’s climate commitment, and the Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center which is partnering with NOAA, NASA and the American Meteorological Society on the use of climate data in modeling and forecasting climate effects

2007Eco-house: Living-Learning Program of 30–70 upper division undergraduate students geared toward fostering innovative, ecologically sound lifestyles and multi-disciplinary engagement outside the classroom

Completing the UM Campus-wide Watershed Evaluation and Water Quality Improvements Study

Completing first Campus Sustainability Report: initiatives in master planning, water conservation, energy, recycling, dining, research, teaching, community outreach, transportation, storm water management, and grounds-keeping

Establishing and adopting Environmental Stewardship Best Management Practices

Signing the American College and University President’s Climate Commitment

Creating a Sustainability Office

Hiring a dedicated Environmental Planner, Landscape Architect, Manager of Recycling and Energy Manager

Developing a campus-wide sustainability website

Initiating a campus Greenhouse Gas Inventory

Establishing the U. S. Green Building Council’s Silver LEED certification as the campus goal for all new construction and major renovations

Setting a goal to reduce energy consumption by 10 percent within five years

Renewable energy purchases and projects on campus are being developed; a major energy conservation project has been initiated

In April 2007, 95 percent of our students voted to raise their fees by $12 each semester to fund clean energy on campus

The university was designated among the top 15 Green Colleges and Universities by Grist, an environmental magazine

Institution DemographicsIV UM is the State’s major land grant institution with a mission to serve the educational needs of Maryland residents and to provide the State with a premier public research university. The university attracts a diverse student population from within Maryland, other states, and foreign countries. In recent years UM has implemented strategic initiatives to meet the enrollment demands of the State and to increase access to students with a variety of backgrounds. The university has focused on improving retention and graduation rates. As a result, the university has seen steady increases in enrollment at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. The university has exceeded the 2005 enrollment targets set forth in the previous Master Plan update. Furthermore, to maintain its status as the primary research institution in the State and to achieve preeminence in the world, the university will improve the quality of the graduate research programs. At this point, the university

9

plans to focus its attention and resources to improving the quality of its education and research programs and not to increasing enrollment.

To succeed in this endeavor, the university will provide high-quality teaching and research environments. The university has steadily increased the total expenditures for research and development over the last five years. To sustain this level of growth, the university must continue to attract first-rate faculty with expertise across the spectrum of research disciplines. The university hopes to increase its faculty headcount by 10 percent over the next 10 years.

University staff have a vital role in supporting the mission of the institution. Recent comparisons to university peers suggest that UM lags significantly in the size of its support staff, which has a negative impact on all aspects of university operations. The university hopes to increase its staff headcount by 15 percent over the next 10 years. With the anticipated growth in staff headcounts, UM hopes to begin to close the gap, but expects to continue to lag behind peers in its ratios of staff-to-students and staff-to-faculty.

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2010 2015 Net Change 2006-2015

Undergrad FT 21,951 22,301 22,519 22,757 22,600 22,963 22,804 22,800 22,800 0.0%Undergrad PT 2,687 2,687 2,462 2,403 2,188 2,150 2,030 1980 1,980 -0.2%Total 24,638 24,979 24,981 25,160 24,848 25,113 24,788 24,780 24,780 0�0%Graduate FT 4,966 5,432 6,348 6,503 6,355 6,642 6,708 6,710 6,710 0.0%Graduate PT 3,585 3,629 3,213 3,380 3,438 3,285 3,240 3,250 3,250 0.3%Total Grad 8,551 9,061 9,561 9,883 9,793 9,927 9,948 9,960 9960 0.1%Total 33,189 34,040 34,542 35,043 34,641 35,040 34,736 34,740 34,740 0�0%

Headcount Enrollment Table 4

Note: Excludes regional center enrollments. Source: IRPA

Total Enrollment Full-Time Day Equivalent (FTDE) Table 5

Note: Based on IRPA Data Sheet, with adjustments made for the strategic plan that is currently in development. Source: IRPA.

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2010 2015 Net Change 2006-2015

Undergrad 21,090 20,709 20,898 21,757 22,115 22,298 22,230 22,230 22,230 0.0%Graduate 3,327 4,280 4,331 3,953 4,293 4,366 4,335 4,340 4,340 0.1%Total 24,417 24,989 25,229 25,710 26,408 26,664 26,565 26,570 26,570 0�0%

Faculty and Staff Headcount Table 6

Note: Staff includes GA’s; Source: IRPA Profiles.

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2010 2015 Net Change 2006-2015

Faculty FT 2,689 2,766 2,901 2,887 2,791 2,862 2,896 3,141 3,302 14.0%Faculty PT 914 825 755 774 772 812 856 818 859 0.4%Total 3,603 3,591 3,656 3,661 3,563 3,674 3,752 3,959 4,161 10�9%Staff FT 4,326 4,687 4,715 4,411 4,343 4,367 4,513 5,107 5,367 18.9%Staff PT 3,929 4,000 4,106 4,039 4,155 4,247 4,188 4,446 4,673 11.6%Total 8,255 8,687 8,821 8,450 8,498 8,614 8,701 9,553 10,040 15�4%

10

Planning IssuesV The following programs, activities and conditions are to be accommodated during the 10-year period.

Academic QualityConcentrate capital budget opportunities on major • building renewals as well as essential new construction to address major space deficits (Program Initiatives A and B).

Concentrate facilities renewal funding on upgrading or • replacing aging buildings and infrastructure (Program Initiatives A and B).

Expand living-learning opportunities for undergraduates • (Program Initiative A).

Improve condition of undergraduate teaching laboratories • and classrooms (Program Initiative A).

Enhance research and office space to facilitate • undergraduate involvement in faculty research projects (Program Initiative A).

Increase research space to accommodate increasing • research activity. Research space is one of the areas of greatest deficiency at UM. (Program Initiative B).

Develop executive and other continuing education • facilities (Program Initiative C).

Technological advancesIncrease library capacity and buildings’ information • technology capabilities (Program Initiatives D and E).

Update classrooms to accommodate information • technology needs (Program Initiative A).

Expand communication transmission facilities (increased • speed and bandwidth and methods of access) and ancillary facility requirements (i.e., power) to support growth in the number of devices used and amounts of information being exchanged (Program Initiative E).

Student body compositionAccommodate a continued shift in the composition of • graduate students from part-time to full-time through

enhanced teaching and research facilities (Program Initiative B).

Enrollment growth/declineAt this point, no major enrollment growth is • anticipated.

Relationship to communitySupport the development of the M Square Research • Park site as a center for policy/high tech/science organizations and businesses (Program Initiative D).

Redevelop the East Campus as a vibrant and mixed-use • community (Program Initiative D).

Peer InstitutionsThe following statistics are based on Facilities Renewal at three of UM’s peer institutions (2003 data; survey conducted by Facilities Management for UM, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, and University of Illinois–Urbana-Champaign):

UM’s state-supported 7,723,521 GSF total is 28 percent • below the peer state-supported average of 10,727,026 GSF.

UM’s annual facilities renewal budget averages $10.9 M • which is 80 percent below the peer average of $55.3M.

UM’s annual allocation of $1.41/GSF is 79 percent below • the peer average of $6.59/GSF.

Capacity for future developmentAlthough additional future projects can be • accommodated beyond this 10-year planning period, it is imperative that the university strive to take the necessary steps to ensure that all new development be sustainable and utilize campus land efficiently.

Physical Planning PrinciplesThe following Planning Principles were established to guide future physical development on the campus.

Realize Institutional Vision• The campus will be a place of beauty that celebrates history, generates pride, and manifests the university’s

11

mission, academic aspirations, programmatic needs, and concern for the quality of life.

Create a Coherent Campus Design• Campus planning will promote a coherent design that recognizes or reinforces natural environmental patterns, campus planning traditions, and neighborhood organizational patterns and that improves operational efficiencies.

Practice Good Environmental Stewardship• The campus plan will strive to protect and enhance existing natural environments (woodlands, wetlands, and floodplains) and create connections with adjacent habitats, and new development will be guided by principles of smart growth and environmental stewardship.

Ensure Greater Sustainability• Planning and building for the long term will be a key goal in the design of new facilities, in the renovation of existing buildings, and in the location of supporting utilities. LEED silver certification will be the campus goal for new construction and major renovation, and facility siting and development will maximize energy efficiency and minimize environmental degradation.

Enhance Campus Security• Planning and design of all areas of campus will make personal safety and the security of public and personal property a priority.

Increase the Access and Appeal of the Campus for • Pedestrians Campus planning will encourage and invite pedestrians to move freely and safely across campus through appropriate design in and between campus areas and careful control of vehicular access.

Encourage and Facilitate Use of Transportation other • than Personal Vehicles Plans for development will reduce presence of automobiles on campus and encourage and facilitate all

modes of transportation--shuttle busses, bicycles, new light rail or Metro lines--that will minimize vehicular congestion, consistent with design and environmental stewardship priorities.

Strengthen Community Relations • Planning and design patterns will strengthen the connections of the campus to the surrounding neighborhood communities and contribute to high quality town-gown relationships.

Embrace Campus Traditions and Heritage• Planners will use the best features of campus plans nationwide and of the existing campus design as a guide for future development in order to promote organizational and architectural harmony.

Emphasize the Importance of Open Spaces• Campus design will affirm the essential importance of open spaces--natural areas, lawns, malls, plazas, patios, places to sit, etc.--to the image, organization, and quality of the campus environment.

Achieve Appropriate Development Densities • Building patterns will achieve the density levels and the balance of new development, renovation, and removal that make the best long-term use of available land and financial resources.

The PlanVI Tables 7 and 8 summarize the implementation plan for the remaining 2007 – 2010 and 2011 and Beyond planning periods. The total proposed investment for implementation in these planning periods is approximately $467 million and $2.14 billion, respectively (Reference Appendix A). In addition to the projects shown in Appendix A, the university will implement many facilities renewal projects that cost under $1 million each, not identified in the Plan.

12

Fall 2011 and Beyond Project Summary Table 8

* Estimated cost is in thousands in January 2008 dollars. Amount reflects funding that remains to be authorized for the project.** Planned new construction for Public-Private Partnership projects (1,684,300 GSF/$492M) are not included in the total. Planned new construction with undesignated building sites (3.6M GSF) are not included in the total. # Number of Projects

Areas of Need/ Project Type State Supported # GSF Cost*

Auxiliary # GSF Cost

Total # GSF Cost

Planned New Construction**Planned Building RenewalPlanned Building DemolitionPlanned Environmental/Planned Site Improvementst

332335

10

1,963,3571,572,798

446,689

N/A

$874,800$397,500

N/A

$21,500

71922

0

877,4001,525,716

209,373

0

$131,200$223,200

N/A

0

404257

10

2,840,7573,908,514

656,062

0

$1,006,000$620,700

N/A

$21,500Totals 101 3,982,844 $1,293,800 48 2,612,489 $354,400 149 6,595,333 $1,648,200

Property Acquisitions and DispositionsRespond to opportunities to acquire in-parcels and • other immediately adjacent properties to round out UM campus borders.

Acquire and develop extension, research and training • facilities at selected locations throughout Maryland, as required to support University’s outreach initiatives.

Participate in collaborative projects to establish • Executive Training and continuing education facilities and to support development of the M Square Research Park site as a center for policy/high technology/science organizations and businesses.

Realize the economic value of currently underutilized • land by arranging long-term leases, sales, or trades.

Use alternative funding strategies (e.g., lease, lease-back • arrangements and leases with purchase options as techniques) to accomplish facility objectives where appropriate.

Global Issues: Environmental Stewardship, Vehicular and Pedestrian Circulation, and Land UseThis Master Plan envisions the future campus as a cohesive whole and a place of beauty, an environment that nurtures diversity and that fosters learning and community.

In developing the 2001-2020 Facilities Master Plan, the steering committee and consultants dealt first with the primary issues that will affect development across the entire campus and in every district. These global issues consist of matching our growth and planning with environmental requirements and projections, developing a comprehensive system for managing vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian circulation, and fostering land use and buildings that promote community on campus and in the surrounding neighborhoods. The Plan provides a vision of the campus that will guide efforts over the coming decades.

The following recommendations build upon the 1991 and affirm the Fall 2001-2020 Facilities Master Plans, and

Fall 2007-2010 Project Summary Table 7

* Estimated cost is in thousands in January 2008 dollars. Amount reflects funding that remains to be authorized for the project.** Planned new construction for Public-Private Partnership projects (219,000 GSF/$80M) is not included in the total. # Number of Projects

Areas of Need/ Project Type State Supported # GSF Cost*

Auxiliary # GSF Cost

Total # GSF Cost

Planned New Construction** Planned Building Renewal Planned Building Demolition Planned Environmental/Planned Site Improvements

233

10

12

430,740201,02218,628

N/A

$131,200$5,650

N/A

$23,800

760

0

1,584,800262,309

0

0

$185,650$40,520

N/A

0

309

10

12

2,015,540463,33118,628

0

$316,850$46,170

N/A

23,800Totals 48 650,390 $160,650 13 1,847,109 $226,170 61 2,497,499 $386,820

13

identify opportunities to enhance the quality of campus life by improving upon the existing physical systems:

Environmental Stewardship

Goal: Preserve and reinforce regional ecological connections, to the extent possible.Recommended Actions:

Establish greenways.• Manage invasive species.• Protect streams, and wetlands.• Protect existing specimen trees.• Restore and enhance forest cover.•

Goal: Restore the natural hydrologic cycle, to the extent possible.Recommended Actions:

Manage storm water run-off more effectively. • Improve water quality.•

Goal: Foster ecological stewardship.Recommended Actions:

Develop specific policies and goals to reduce • consumption of non-renewable resources.Minimize hazardous and toxic materials.• Promote environmentally responsible • procurement of goods and services.Adopt a waste reduction goal for the campus.• Incorporate energy conservation measures and • renewable energy production.Implement “green” architecture.•

Goal: Explore and implement historic preservation measures.Recommended Actions:

Establish campus historic preservation policies.• Complete study of campus historic resources • (buildings and landscapes).

Vehicular and Pedestrian Circulation

Goal: Maximize use of alternatives to driving to campus.Recommended Actions:

Improve the campus’s integration into the • regional transit system network in the short term by increasing the frequency of shuttle busses between campus and UM/College Park Green Line Metro station.Build UM park-and-ride facilities with high • quality transit.Support Purple Line stations on or adjacent • to campus consistent with providing central pedestrian movement.Introduce pre-tax payroll deduction for transit • pass/voucher. Offer pre-tax benefit for parking at park-and-• ride facilities.Coordinate centralized information through • the Commuter Services Office.Review Shuttle-UM commuter routes/service • for maximum use.

Goal: Create a more pedestrian-friendly central campus and significantly reduce number of automobiles.Recommended Actions:

Allow only restricted automobile access to • internal streets with high pedestrian volumes and conflicts.Establish a high quality internal campus loop • shuttle throughout the center of the campus that will provide convenient intra-campus travel and reduce internal auto travel.Organize campus growth around a series of • new open spaces friendly to pedestrians and bicycles.

14

Goal: Minimize new parking on campus.Recommended Actions:

Improve the environment for bicycles within • and around campus.Replace surface lots with garages.•

The Use of Land and Real Property to Reflect our Mission

Goal: Preserve and develop land in the best interests of the environment, the university community, and the citizens of the region.Recommended Actions:

Identify, prioritize, fund, and implement key • environmental, open space, and landscape projects as a critical part of the campus infrastructure. Support development of the U. S. Route • 1 Corridor and the East Campus “Town Commons” in ways that link them to the university’s mission and community.Provide on campus sites for the relocation of • replacement facilities, currently located on the East Campus, that will allow the mixed use redevelopment initiative.Support development of the M Square • Research Park site as a center for high technol-ogy/science organizations and businesses.Acquire and develop extension, research, • and training facilities at selected locations throughout Maryland, as required to support the university’s outreach initiatives.Acquire in-parcels and other immediately • adjacent properties as appropriate to establish a clear and attractive edge for the campus.

Goal: Recognize and carefully assess the intrinsic natural value, the pedagogical value, and the commercial economic value of university land. Recommended Actions:

Use the land as an environmental asset in • education and research.Implement historical preservation policies to • determine use of land.

Develop a strategy for land use that shows • respect for local and regional natural systems of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and enhances Smart Growth principles and projects.

Campus MapA map representing the proposed plan is attached in Appendix B.

C IT Y OF C OLLE G E P AR K

UNIV E R S IT Y OF MAR Y LAND

MNC P AR K AND P LANNING

R IV E R DALE P AR K



MNC P AR K AND P LANNING




MNC P AR K AN D P LANNING




MNC P AR K AN D P LANNING


15

2001-2005 # Projects planned

# Projects Added (1)

# Total Projects

# Projects completed or in Progress (2)

% GSF Planned

GSF Added (1)

Total GSF GSF Completed/ in Progress (2)

%

new construction 25 0 25 16 64% 4,608,789 0 4,608,789 2,376,289 52%renewals 7 0 7 5 71% 500,200 0 500,200 449,238 90%demolitions 31 0 31 4 13% 302,883 0 302,883 11,339 4%infrastractureimprovements 8 0 8 2 25% 13,249 0 13,249 13,249 100%enviromental/ landscape improvements 9 0 9 3 33% N/A 0 N/A N/A N/ASubtotal 80 0 80 30 38% 4,819,355 0 4,819,355 2,827,437 59%

2006-2010 # Projects planned


# Total Projects

# Projects completed or in Progress (2)

% GSF Planned

GSF Added (1)


%

new construction 9 6 15 4 27% 1,310,000 170,040 1,480,040 176,440 12%renewals 11 1 12 1 8% 521,019 114,118 635,137 146,220 23%demolitions 4 1 5 2 40% 33,760 3,027 36,787 4,047 11%infrastractureimprovements 9 0 9 0 0% 26,625 0 26,625 0 0%enviromental/ landscape improvements 7 0 7 1 14% N/A 0 N/A N/A N/ASubtotal 40 8 48 8 17% 1,823,884 281,131 2,105,015 318,613 15%

2011 and beyond

# Projects planned


# Total Projects

# Projects completed orin Progress (2)

% GSF Planned

GSF Added (1)


%

new construction 26 1 27 0 0% 3,100,700 19,850 3,120,550 0 0%renewals 30 5 35 0 0% 2,253,053 601,448 2,854,501 0 0%demolitions 35 0 35 7 20% 346,359 0 346,359 14,087 4%infrastractureimprovements 4 0 4 0 0% N/A 0 N/A 0 N/Aenviromental/ landscape improvements 10 0 10 2 20% N/A 0 N/A N/A N/Aoff campus new 2 1 3 0 0% 53,000 13,307 66,307 0 0Subtotal 107 7 114 9 8% 5,060,394 634,605 5,694,999 14,087 0%TOTAL 227 15 242 47 19% 11,703,633 915,736 12,619,369 3,131,963 25%

Summary Table 9

Changes to the Previous PlanVII Nearly seven calendar years (2001 – 2007) of the 2001 – 2020 FMP have elapsed. We have completed or have in progress 47 of the 242 projects proposed in that plan. A summary by five-year planning period follows:

(1) Includes projects proposed subsequent to the completion of the 2001 FMP. (2) Includes projects that are completed or in construction as of September 2007. Assumes GSF as identified in the 2001 FMP; actual GSF completed may be different on a project-by-project basis.

16

Changes to Institution DescriptionThe University of Maryland’s total number of buildings • has increased slightly from 459 facilities to 463 as a result of new construction and demolitions.

The percentage of “satisfactory” facilities (condition • code 1 – normal maintenance) has increased from nearly 38 percent to more than 47 percent as a result of new facilities built between 2001 and 2006.

The university has sited several projects that reflect • adjustments to the Facilities Master Plan 2001 – 2020. Changes include the following: revised relocation of 10 projects including Knight Hall (the New Journalism Building), New School of Public Policy; sites for East Campus District and the new IT Building at the College Park Metro; and the siting of five projects not proposed in the FMP (New Housing, Addition to Kim Engineering Building, Addition to Health and Human Performance, Addition to the Laboratory for Physical Sciences, and the MFRI Northeast Training Center Upgrades).

The university has added approximately 60 acres of • land since the FMP 2001–2020. These parcels include: Avanti property (15 acres); Litton property (35 acres); and Riverdale property (9.7 acres).

Sixteen environmental projects have been completed • since the completion of the FMP 2001–2020.

Changes to Institution DemographicsNo net enrollment growth is anticipated, but we • anticipate a continued shift in the student population from part-time to full-time, both for graduate and undergraduate students.

We anticipate that the percentage of students living in • university housing will increase.

Numbers of faculty and staff will continue to increase • to maintain quality of instruction and to sustain the growth in research and development.

17

Fall 2001-Fall 2006 Planning Period

COMPLETED NEW CONSTRUCTION

Site Project District NASF GSFPotential

Fund SourceN1 Kim Engineering Building NE 84,403 155,500 StateN2 Chemistry Teaching Building NE 32,755 58,500 StateN3 Computer Science Instructional Center NE 21,000 37,222 SystemN4 Research Greenhouse Complex N 46,655 65,500 StateN5 Van Munching Hall Addition SW 56,601 103,000 State, Institutional, PrivateN6 Riggs Alumni Center W 39,933 69,000 Private/InstitutionalN7 MFRI Headquarters Addition OP 16,677 20,000 State

N13 Softball Stadium N 1,600 2,635 StateN14 Gossett Football Team House Addition/Renovation NW 12,050 23,300 PrivateN15 Health Center Addition/Renovation HC 28,179 55,000 SystemN16 Mowatt Lane Parking Garage (1,698 spaces) SW N/A 595,000 SystemN18 Comcast Center N 289,300 470,000 State, Private, SystemN19 Terrapin Trail Parking Garage N N/A 360,000 SystemN21 Housing/(570 beds) SW 115,000 145,000 PPPN24 Laboratory for Telecommunications Sciences OP 51,000 85,000 PPPN25 Capstone Housing (817 beds) NW 186,000 232,532 PPP

16 TOTAL 981,153 2,477,189


COMPLETED BUILDING RENEWALS


Fund SourceR2 Queen Anne’s Hall HC 21,902 37,237 SystemR5 Stamp Union Renovation NW 169,333 256,054 System

r1Chemical and Nuclear Engineering Bldg Renovation -Phase I NE 53,009 84,615 State

r2 Taliaferro/Key Halls Renovation (2nd and 3rd floors) HC 23,638 39,316 Facilities Renewal4 TOTAL 267,882 417,222

Fall 2001-Fall 2006 Planning PeriodCOMPLETED INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS


Fund SourceI1 North Campus SCUB NE 4,002 13,249 State, InstitutionalI3 Mowatt Lane Improvements Ph I SW N/A N/A State, Institutional, Private2 TOTAL 4,002 13,249


COMPLETED LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS


Fund Source

L6Campus Malls/Quads-Phase I (North-South Mall in S.W. District-Section I) SW N/A N/A Private

L9 Athletic Fields-Phase I (Engineering Athletic Fields) HC N/A N/A Institutional

L18Athletic Fields-(New Women’s Field Hockey/Lacrosse Field) N N/A N/A Private

L26 Academic Mall & Pond W N/A N/A Private/Institutional4 TOTAL N/A N/A

Project List Appendix A

18


COMPLETED DEMOLITIONS / REMOVALSBuilding Number Building District NASF GSF Reason for Demolition

041 Vending Machine SW 581 673 Site development project095 Garage NE 2,939 4,090 Site for new facility106 Classroom Building NE 3,155 5,136 Site development project 116 Temporary Building (English) SW 1,347 1,440 Temporary facility

4 TOTAL 8,022 11,339

Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning PeriodAcademic Facilities

PLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION

Site Project District NASF GSF Cost*Potential

Fund SourceN27 Bioscience Research Building-Phase I NW 69,374 125,600 Funded State/InstitutionalN35 New Journalism Building W 35,300 64,200 $6,000 State/PrivateN47 Addition to Van Munching Hall SW 19,820 38,440 Funded State/InstitutionalN100 Addition to Kim Engineering Building NE 4,500 7,400 Funded InstitutionalN101 MFRI Shop Building OP 4,000 5,000 Funded Institutional

-Health and Human Performance Building Addition N 9,500 15,000 $5,800 State

- Lab for Physical Sciences Addition N 2,600 3,400 $3,100 Federal7 TOTAL 145,094 259,040 $14,900

PLANNED BUILDING RENEWALS


Fund SourceR7 Tawes Renovation W 83,295 146,220 $2,450 State/Institutional

r11Health and Human Performance Building Court Conversion NW 21,500 30,800 Funded Institutional

2 TOTAL 104,795 177,020 $2,450Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning Period

Academic Support FacilitiesPLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION


Fund SourceN8 Operations & Maintenance Shops Relocation** E 45,146 61,800 $16,200 PPPN9 Motor Pool Relocation** E 6,806 9,300 $2,500 PPPN10 Campus Mail Facility Relocation** E 4,225 5,800 $1,500 PPPN11 Service Building Relocation** E 53,018 72,600 $19,100 PPPN12 Shuttle UM Relocation** E 7,648 10,500 $2,800 PPP

5 TOTAL 116,843 160,000 42,100Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning Period

Academic Support FacilitiesPLANNED BUILDING RENEWALS


Fund SourceR1 Pocomoke Building Alteration-Public Safety E 18,902 24,002 $3,200 PPP1 TOTAL 18,902 24,002 3,200

Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning PeriodAuxiliary Enterprise Facilities



Fund SourceN17 Campus Drive Parking Garage-(1,600 spaces) W N/A 560,000 $27,300 System

19


Fund SourceN32 New Housing (1,000 beds) NW 190,000 240,000 $64,100 PPPN33 North Hill Parking Garage (1,600 spaces) NW N/A 560,000 $27,300 SystemN37 New Housing (400 beds) SW 83,000 105,000 $49,600 PPPN105 Byrd Stadium Expansion (Phase 1) NW 50,000 100,000 $12,050 System/Private

5 TOTAL 323,000 1,565,000 $180,350PLANNED BUILDING RENEWALS


Fund SourceR3 Fraternity/Sorority Houses (170,172,175) OP 29,715 33,833 $5,290 SystemR9 Denton Dining Hall Renovation NW 31363 43,859 $7,000 SystemR10 Sorority Houses (173,174) OP 17,455 20,645 $6,900 SystemR11 Carroll Hall Renovation SW 16,922 26,471 $8,200 SystemR20 Shoemaker Renovation HC 16,072 23,383 $7,430 System/Facilities RenewalR31 Elkton Hall Renovation NW 73,185 114,118 $5,700 System

6 TOTAL 184,712 262,309 $40,520Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning PeriodPublic-Private Partnership Facilities



Fund Source

N22New IT Building at College Park Metro site (carrier hotel) OP 131,400 219,000 $80,000 PPP

1 TOTAL 131,400 219,000 $80,000Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning Period

Infrastructure ImprovementsPLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION


Fund SourceI2 Lot 1 Boulevard W N/A N/A $2,900 State, Institutional, Private

I3Mowatt Lane Improvements Phase II and Gateway SW N/A N/A $2,500 State, Institutional, Private

I4 Route 1 Pedestrian Median Improvements E N/A N/A $1,900 State, Institutional, Private

I5Campuswide Pedestrian & Way Finding Improvements Phase I -- N/A N/A $1,700 State, Institutional, Private

I10 SCUB III Expansion NW N/A 12,000 Funded Insitutional/StateI11 North Campus Residence Halls SCUB NW N/A 7,500 $16,900 SystemI12 Guilford Road Extension SW N/A N/A $6,300 State, Institutional, PrivateI13 Greenmeade Drive Connector OP N/A N/A $12,000 State, Institutional, PrivateI14 Union Drive Extension W N/A N/A $2,800 State, Institutional, PrivateI20 Replace Failing Building Electrical Gear -- N/A N/A $14,000 State

I21Replace Failing Underground Heating and Cooling Piping -- N/A N/A $9,000 State

I23Replace Failing Underground Water and Storm Drain Piping -- N/A N/A $5,000 State

12 TOTAL N/A 19,500 $75,000Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning Period

Landscape ImprovementsPLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION


Fund Source

L1Campuswide Creek Improvements-Phase I (Terrapin Creek and Pond) GC N/A N/A $2,500 State, Institutional, Private

L4Campus Drive Pedestrian and Streetscape Improvements -- N/A N/A $2,500 State, Institutional, Private


Fund Source

L5Paint Branch and Stadium Drive Streetscape Improvements NE N/A N/A $1,600 State, Institutional, Private

L7 President’s Lawn Site Improvements W N/A N/A $1,500 State, Institutional, PrivateL8 East-West Pedestrian Connection HC N/A N/A $5,800 State, Institutional, Private

L10Campus Malls/Quads-Phase II (South-West Quad) SW N/A N/A $3,200 Private

L11Athletic Fields-Phase II (Tennis courts replacement-8 courts) N N/A N/A $700 Auxiliary

L12Campuswide Creek Improvements-Phase II (Paint Branch Creek) N N/A N/A $2,000 State, Institutional, Private

L13Campuswide Creek Improvements-Phase II (Guilford Run) SW N/A N/A $1,000 State, Institutional, Private

L14Wetlands Enhancement and North Gate Park-East of Paint Branch Drive NE N/A N/A $1,800 State, Institutional, Private

L15 Campus Ponds-Phase II (Chapel Pond) HC N/A N/A $1,000 State, Institutional, Private

L16Campus Malls/Quads-Phase II (Residential Quad) NW N/A N/A $200 System

12 TOTAL $23,800Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning Period

Projects Located Off-CampusPLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION


Fund Source

N61 Remote Library Storage Facility N/A 11,000 12,000 $4,500 State1 TOTAL 11,000 12,000 $4,500

Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning PeriodDemolitions/Removals

PLANNED DEMOLITIONS / REMOVALSBuilding Number Building District NASF GSF Reason for Demolition

072 English Composition Trailer SW 913 1,020 Temporary facility107 Recycling Trailer N 385 494 Temporary facility149 Cottage 2 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project150 Cottage 3 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project151 Cottage 4 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project152 Cottage 5 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project153 Cottage 6 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project154 Cottage 7 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project155 Cottage 8 NW 1,713 2,033 Site development project198 MFRI Breathing Apparatus Training Building OP 3,027 3,027 Site for new facility10 TOTAL 16,316 18,628

20


Fund Source

L5Paint Branch and Stadium Drive Streetscape Improvements NE N/A N/A $1,600 State, Institutional, Private

L7 President’s Lawn Site Improvements W N/A N/A $1,500 State, Institutional, PrivateL8 East-West Pedestrian Connection HC N/A N/A $5,800 State, Institutional, Private

L10Campus Malls/Quads-Phase II (South-West Quad) SW N/A N/A $3,200 Private

L11Athletic Fields-Phase II (Tennis courts replacement-8 courts) N N/A N/A $700 Auxiliary

L12Campuswide Creek Improvements-Phase II (Paint Branch Creek) N N/A N/A $2,000 State, Institutional, Private

L13Campuswide Creek Improvements-Phase II (Guilford Run) SW N/A N/A $1,000 State, Institutional, Private

L14Wetlands Enhancement and North Gate Park-East of Paint Branch Drive NE N/A N/A $1,800 State, Institutional, Private

L15 Campus Ponds-Phase II (Chapel Pond) HC N/A N/A $1,000 State, Institutional, Private

L16Campus Malls/Quads-Phase II (Residential Quad) NW N/A N/A $200 System

12 TOTAL $23,800Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning Period

Projects Located Off-CampusPLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION


Fund Source

N61 Remote Library Storage Facility N/A 11,000 12,000 $4,500 State1 TOTAL 11,000 12,000 $4,500

Fall 2007-Fall 2010 Planning PeriodDemolitions/Removals

PLANNED DEMOLITIONS / REMOVALSBuilding Number Building District NASF GSF Reason for Demolition

072 English Composition Trailer SW 913 1,020 Temporary facility107 Recycling Trailer N 385 494 Temporary facility149 Cottage 2 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project150 Cottage 3 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project151 Cottage 4 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project152 Cottage 5 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project153 Cottage 6 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project154 Cottage 7 NW 1,713 2,009 Site development project155 Cottage 8 NW 1,713 2,033 Site development project198 MFRI Breathing Apparatus Training Building OP 3,027 3,027 Site for new facility10 TOTAL 16,316 18,628

Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning PeriodAcademic Facilities



Fund SourceN26 BSOS Research Facility I SW 66,740 120,000 $43,800 StateN28 University Teaching Center HC 49,960 90,800 $37,800 StateN29 International Center HC 19,405 35,300 $19,300 Private/Institutional++ BSOS Research Facility II (formerly N37) SW 66,740 120,000 $43,800 State

N38Engineering Research Laboratory Building (addition to Engineering Lab Bldg) NE 44,000 80,000 $35,000 State

N39 Nutrition and Food Sciences Building HC 22,000 40,000 $17,500 StateN40 Animal Science Teaching Arena NE 16,000 18,200 $3,400 StateN41 Chesapeake Bay Mesocosm N 7,400 8,000 $1,600 Private

21


Fund Source N42 Benjamin Building Addition-Phase I W 46,500 85,000 $39,600 State

N44 Visual Arts and Cultures SW 64,000 112,300 $41,900 StateN45 Life Sciences Library NW 76,147 122,800 $44,800 StateN46 Physical Sciences Complex Phase II NW 90,000 163,600 $64,200 State

N48Biological Sciences Research Building-Phase II NW 69,095 125,600 $80,000 State

N49 Architecture Building Addition SW 48,074 84,300 $33,300 StateN50 Engineering Lab Building Replacement NE 71,500 130,000 $60,700 StateN51 Physical Sciences Complex-Phase I NW 155,000 282,000 $110,800 StateN52 Bioscience Research Support Facility NW 40,000 76,900 $60,200 State++ New School of Public Policy Building ++ 41,900 76,200 $32,900 State

++Center for Technology and Distance Learning ++ 10,725 19,850 $9,600 State/Private

19 TOTAL 1,005,186 1,790,850 $780,200Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning Period

Academic FacilitiesPLANNED BUILDING RENEWALS


Fund SourceR6 Jimenez Renovation HC 39,457 63,200 $12,300 StateR14 Renovation of Physics Building NE 140,505 237,826 $69,500 State

R15Renovation of Geology Building (converted to other use) NW 11,870 24,390 $6,400 State

R16 Biology-Psychology Building Renovation NW 146,297 250,240 $75,900 StateR17 Architecture Building Renovation SW 44,490 67,163 $13,700 StateR18 Journalism Building Renovation HC 14,389 22,647 $6,000 Facilities RenewalR19 Benjamin Building Renovation W 73,599 112,505 $23,100 Stater3 Woods Renovation (Ground and 1st floors) HC 10,817 19,596 $4,200 Facilities Renewalr4 Key Renovation (Ground and 1st floors) HC 14,444 24,804 $5,800 State

r5Chemical & Nuclear Engineering Bldg Renovation-Phase II NE 53,009 84,615 $16,400 State

r6 Animal Sciences-Wing 1 Renovation NE 31,142 62,462 $16,400 Stater7 Renovation of Energy Research (old wing) NE 15,741 21,956 $4,500 Stater8 Chemistry Building Renovation-Wings 1 & 2 NE 107,600 183,700 $55,800 Stater9 H. J. Patterson Building Renovation (partial) HC 59,700 89,700 $30,200 State

r10Symons Hall Renovation (center & north wings) HC 33,634 54,753 $7,900 State

r12Hornbake Ground and First floors Renovation (College of Information Services) NW 17,915 30,018 $4,700 Facilities Renewal

r13 Engineering/Science Library Expansion NE 4,947 8,400 $1,800 Facilities Renewal

r14Renovation of Computer & Space Sciences (East Wing infrastructure upgrades) NW 47,627 78,104 $10,200 State

r15 Van Munching Hall Renovation (partial) SW 18,600 34,900 $7,200 State19 TOTAL 885,783 1,470,979 $372,000

Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning PeriodAcademic Support Facilities



Fund Source

N53 Service Learning Center HC 10,000 18,200 $7,400 PrivateN54 New IT Building NW 59,000 100,000 $48,900 State

2 TOTAL 69,000 118,200 $56,300PLANNED BUILDING RENEWALS


Fund SourceR21 Memorial Chapel Renovation HC 15,963 25,776 $3,400 Institutional

22


Fund Sourcer16 Mitchell Building Renovation (partial) HC 28,406 19,840 $7,400 Institutionalr17 Lee Building Renovation (partial) HC 14,169 20,662 $5,400 Institutional

r18Armory Renovation (Ground Floor)-Student Services HC 21,597 35,541 $9,300 Institutional

4 TOTAL 80,135 101,819 $25,500Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning Period

Auxiliary Enterprise FacilitiesPLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION


Fund SourceN30 Graduate Center HC 7,500 12,500 $7,000 SystemN31 New Housing (400 beds) HC 79,000 100,000 $26,400 System

N55 Byrd Stadium expansion (Phase 2) NW N/A N/A $11,700 System/PrivateN56 Indoor Practice Facility NW 100,000 120,000 $38,000 System/PrivateN57 New Baseball Stadium N 5,700 11,700 $10,200 System/PrivateN58 Soccer Stadium NW 2,000 3,200 $7,200 System/Private

N59Paint Branch Drive Parking Garage (1,800 spaces) N N/A 630,000 $30,700 System

7 TOTAL 194,200 877,400 $131,200PLANNED BUILDING RENEWALS


Fund SourceR4 Caroline Hall Renovation SW 17,955 26,960 $8,200 System

R8 Rossborough Inn Renovation HC 6,255 8,963 $2,200 SystemR10 Sorority Houses (171, 176) OP 18,930 22,278 $7,300 SystemR12 Cecil Hall Renovation HC 12,811 20,096 $5,400 System

R13 Wicomico Hall Renovation SW 17,982 27,684 $8,300 System

R22 Worcester Hall Renovation HC 22,160 33,541 $9,200 System

R23 South Campus Dining Hall Renovation SW 92,525 133,845 $35,200 SystemR24 Dorchester Hall Renovation NC 23,712 35,436 $9,500 System

R25 Centreville Hall Renovation NW 76,402 128,198 $6,000 SystemR26 Cumberland Hall Renovation NW 75,635 124,486 $6,000 SystemR27 Bel Air Hall Renovation NW 17,756 29,090 $1,500 SystemR28 Chestertown Hall Renovation NW 16,928 29,090 $1,500 SystemR29 Cambridge Hall Renovation NW 34,675 55,792 $2,900 SystemR30 Cole Student Activities Building Renovation NW 176,252 248,809 $90,800 SystemR32 Denton Hall Renovation NW 69,151 115,108 $5,700 SystemR33 Easton Hall Renovation NW 72,598 115,533 $5,700 SystemR34 Ellicott Hall Renovation NW 72,301 118,303 $5,700 SystemR35 Hagerstown Hall Renovation NW 74,332 119,561 $5,700 SystemR36 La Plata Hall Renovation NW 82,142 132,943 $6,400 System19 TOTAL 980,502 1,525,716 $223,200

Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning PeriodPublic-Private Partnership Facilities



Fund Source

N20East Campus Mixed Use Development Phase I · (includes Conference Center) E 896,000 1,280,000 $373,800 PPP

N23 Day Care Facility TBD 11,000 13,500 $3,700 PPP

23


Fund Source

N34Residential Facilities Office/Service Building Relocation NW 15,500 25,800 $8,300 PPP

N60East Campus Mixed Use Development Phase II (on new Leonardtown Site) E 255,500 365,000 $106,600 PPP

4 TOTAL 1,178,000 1,684,300 $492,400Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning Period

Infrastructure ImprovementsPLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION


Fund Source

I6 Stadium Drive Gateway Enhancements W N/A N/A $1,800 State, Institutional, Private

I7 Campuswide Bike Improvements-Phase I -- N/A N/A $1,000 State, Institutional, Private

I8Transportation Improvements to support Shuttle Routes-Phase I *** -- N/A N/A $4,500 State, Institutional, Private

I9 SCUB II Expansion SW N/A 8,625 $3,200 State

I15Campuswide Pedestrian & Way Finding Improvements-Phase II -- N/A N/A $1,200 State, Institutional, Private

I16 Campuswide Bike Improvements-Phase II -- N/A N/A $600 State, Institutional, Private

I17Transportation Improvements to Support Shuttle Routes-Phase II*** -- N/A N/A $700 State, Institutional, Private

I18Roadway Improvements (Presidential Drive and Regents Drive) -- N/A N/A $1,800 State, Institutional, Private

I19 Security and Safety Systems: Infrastructure -- N/A N/A $4,200 State

I22Campuswide Pedestrian & Way Finding Improvements-Phase III -- N/A N/A $1,200 State, Institutional, Private

10 TOTAL N/A N/A $20,200Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning Period

Landscape ImprovementsPLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION


Fund Source

L2Campuswide Creek Improvements-Phase I (Campus Creek) N N/A N/A $2,000 State, Institutional, Private

L3Campus Ponds-Phase I (Create Pond East of Route 1) E N/A N/A $1,000 State, Institutional, Private

L17Campus Malls/Quads-Phase III (McKeldin Amphitheater) HC N/A N/A $600 State, Institutional, Private

L19Campuswide Creek Improvements-Phase III (College Park Woods Stream Restoration) OP N/A N/A $1,500 State, Institutional, Private

L20Campus Ponds-Phase III (Storm Water Pond-Metzerott Gate) OP N/A N/A $1,000 State, Institutional, Private

L21Campus Ponds-Phase III (Storm Water Pond Restoration) N N/A N/A $200 State, Institutional, Private

L22 Athletic Fields-Phase III (ICA Practice Fields) NW N/A N/A $3,800 System, Private

L23Campus Malls/Quads-Phase III (North-South Mall in S.W. District-Section II) SW N/A N/A $3,500 State, Institutional, Private

L24Athletic Fields-Phase III (Residential Recreation Field) W N/A N/A $600 System

L25Athletic Fields-Phase III (Ludwig Track & Field Relocation) N N/A N/A $7,300 System, Private

10 TOTAL $21,500

24

Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning PeriodProjects Located Off-Campus



Fund Source

N62 New Storage Facility N/A 28,000 41,000 $9,600 SystemN104 MFRI Northeast Training Center Upgrades N/A 10,680 13,307 $8,500 State

2 TOTAL 38,680 54,307 $18,100

Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning PeriodDemolitions/Removals

PLANNED DEMOLITIONS / REMOVALSBuilding Number Building District NASF GSF Reason for Demoliton

002 Harrison Laboratory E 56,246 62,004 Site for new facility003 Service Building E 59,049 83,590 Site for new facility006 Plant Operations & Maintenance Building E 15,405 17,466 Site for new facility011 Motor Transportation E 6,574 8,462 Site for new facility012 Plant Operations & Maintenance Shop E 11,832 13,915 Site for new facility013 Shuttle Bus Facility E 5,862 6,579 Site for new facility020 Motorcycle Storage Bldg E 360 416 Site for new facility

045 Instructional Televisison Facility NE 2,735 3,085 Site for new facility054 Preinkert Field House SW 19,837 28,592 Site for new facility

055 Plant Operations and Maintenance Storage E 680 868 Site for new facility066 West Education Annex SW 2,572 3,818 Site for new facility075 Shriver Laboratory HC 22,315 28,428 Site for new facility085 IPST NW 17,669 28,534 Site for new facility

086 IPST Storage NW 580 1,014 Site for new facility

089 Engineering Laboratory Builidng NE 63,191 84,173 Site for new facility093 Engineering Annex NE 8,329 11,291 Site for new facility100 Plant Operations & Maintenance Shop N 1,829 2,310 Site for new facility

102 Agriculture Shed NE 2,229 2,416 Site for new facility

103 Animal Science Services Building NE 1,026 1,480Incorporated in new Animal Sciences

Pavillion104 Special Education Trailer W 559 733 Site for new facility105 Special Education Trailer W 559 733 Site for new facility

108 Horse Barn NW 6,617 7,068Incorporated in new Animal Sciences

Pavillion

109 Sheep Barn NW 5,339 5,680Incorporated in new Animal Sciences

Pavillion

110 Cattle Barn NW 6,587 8,394Incorporated in new Animal Sciences

Pavillion112 Shuttle Bus Trailer(s) E 603 663 Site for new facility114 Poultry Garage (east of Apiary) NW 445 578 Site development project

119 Blacksmith Shop NW 926 960Incorporated in new Animal Sciences

Pavillion156 Apiary NW 1,680 2,082 Site development project158 Varsity Sports Teamhouse NW 12,504 18,320 Site for new facility159 Shipley Field House NW 1,541 2,830 Site for new facility

25

Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning PeriodDemolitions/Removals

PLANNED DEMOLITIONS / REMOVALSBuilding Number Building District NASF GSF Reason for Demoliton

201 Leonardtown Office Building E 10,018 12,748 Site for new facility204 Temporary Building (West of 201) E 726 868 Site for new facility207 Temporary Building (West of 201) E 687 719 Site for new facility208 Temporary Building E 666 719 Site for new facility210 Plant Operations & Maintenance Storage N 499 504 Site for new facility212 Plant Operations & Maintenance Shop N 1,874 2,088 Site for new facility215 Building Services Operations N 3,342 4,007 Site for new facility216 Heavy Equipment Building N 3,267 5,479 Site for new facility217 Plant Operations & Maintenance Storage N 682 700 Site for new facility227 Jull Hall NW 9,318 17,574 Site for new facility238 Leonardtown Apartment E 10,152 11,448 Site for new facility239 Leonardtown Apartment E 12,582 14,197 Site for new facility240 Leonardtown Apartment E 10,152 11,448 Site for new facility

241 Leonardtown Apartment E 6,291 7,099 Site for new facility242 Leonardtown Apartment E 10,152 11,448 Site for new facility243 Leonardtown Apartment E 5,076 5,724 Site for new facility244 Leonardtown Apartment E 13,452 15,654 Site for new facility245 Leonardtown Apartment E 13,452 15,654 Site for new facility246 Leonardtown Apartment E 13,452 15,654 Site for new facility247 Leonardtown Apartment E 13,452 15,654 Site for new facility

248 Leonardtown Apartment E 13,452 15,654 Site for new facility



332 Anacostia Building (Metzerott Road) OP 1,423 1,869 Site development project

343 Campus Mail Facility E 4,225 5,380 Site for new facility

369 Byrd Stadium Building NW 3,319 3,662

385 Pest Control Trailer OP 610 695 Site for new facility

57 TOTAL 515,113 656,062Fall 2011 and Beyond Planning Period

Undesignated Building SitesPLANNED NEW CONSTRUCTION

Site Functional Use District NASF GSF Number of Floors****N43 Academic W 34,300 64,200N63 Academic OP 97,000 170,000 4N64 Academic NE 43,000 75,000 2-4

N65 Science NW 33,000 60,000 1-21/2

N66 Academic NW 51,000 90,000 5****

N67 Academic NW 63,000 110,000 5****

N68 Academic/Special NW 77,000 135,000 5****

N69 Academic/Special NW 51,000 90,000 5****

N70 Special 10,000 18,000 2

26

State State Capital Improvement Program (State General Obligation Bonds, USM Academic Revenue Bonds)System System Funded Construction Program (student/faculty/staff fees)Institutional Institutional FundsFac. Renewal Facilities Renewal Program (projects over $1M)Private Private fundraising PPP Public-Private Partnership (private developer financing)

R Renewal of entire facilityr Partial renewal of the facility.* Estimated cost is in thousands in January 2008 dollars. Amount reflects funding that remains to be authorized for the project.** Facility to be relocated.*** I-8 (Transportation Improvements to Support Shuttle Routes - Phase I) on maps indicate the location of the entire shuttle route. I-17 is not on the maps, but represents the second phase of improvements at mutliple locations along the shuttle route.**** Assumes a basement++ Location to be determined-- Campuswide locations

Site Functional Use District NASF GSF Number of Floors****

N71 Athletic NW 26,000 45,000 21/2

N72 Arts W 28,000 50,000 2

N73 Special W 32,000 56,000 1-3N74 Housing W 165,000 235,000 3N75 Academic W 46,000 80,000 4N76 Academic W 63,000 110,000 4N77 Academic W 63,000 110,000 4N78 Special W 100,000 175,000 12N79 Academic W 94,000 165,000 4N80 Academic W 30,000 52,000 4

N81 Academic W 105,000 185,000 4N82 Academic W 46,000 80,000 4N83 Academic W 57,000 100,000 4N84 Special W 24,000 42,000 1-2++ Special (formerly N85) ++ 46,000 80,000 4

N86 Parking Garage (1,400 spaces) OP N/A 405,000 5 Parking LevelsN87 Science OP 16,000 30,000 2N88 Science OP 26,000 48,000 4N89 Science OP 26,000 48,000 4N90 Academic NE 71,000 125,000 4N91 Science OP 5,000 10,000 1N92 Science OP 14,000 26,000 1N93 Housing OP 193,000 275,000 4N94 Special OP 28,000 50,000 2N95 Special OP 28,000 45,000 2N96 Special HC 35,000 65,000 4N97 Residential SW 21,000 30,000 3N98 Academic (Farm) NW 24,000 40,000 2N99 Administrative N 25,740 11,700 4

38 TOTAL 1,897,040 3,585,900

27

28

2007-2020 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN UPDATE

For a detailed look at the Facilities Master Plan 2001-2020 go to www.facilities.umd.edu/masterplan

Documents

2007-2020 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN UPDATE · PDF file4 The facilities at the University of Maryland’s main campus, which are the primary focus of the Facilities Master Plan, consists