57
2008 National Energy Assistance Survey NEADA Winter Meeting February 3, 2009 Jackie Berger Prepared for NEADA By

2008 National Energy Assistance Survey NEADA Winter Meeting February 3, 2009 Jackie Berger Prepared for NEADA By

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • 2008 National Energy Assistance Survey NEADA Winter Meeting February 3, 2009 Jackie Berger Prepared for NEADA By
  • Slide 2
  • Background 2003 NEA Survey Baseline survey LIHEAP recipients in 20 states Energy needs (beyond bill payment) Importance of LIHEAP 2
  • Slide 3
  • Background 2005 NEA Survey Follow-up with 2003 respondents Issue: not all current LIHEAP recipients Cannot project to LIHEAP population 3
  • Slide 4
  • 2008 Survey LIHEAP recipients in 12 states 3 states were not able to participate and were replaced Energy needs and importance of LIHEAP Change in circumstance over the past year Comparison to 2003 Survey 4
  • Slide 5
  • States Surveyed 5 CaliforniaMaineNew York DelawareMinnesotaNorth Carolina GeorgiaMontanaOhio IowaNew MexicoPennsylvania
  • Slide 6
  • Survey Topics Screener eligibility for survey Experience with energy assistance When received, how often received, plans to apply next year Actions taken to meet energy expenses Constructive Sacrifices: housing, food, health, utility service 6
  • Slide 7
  • Survey Topics Energy Insecurity Worry about energy bills, reduced expenses Borrowed, skipped paying energy bill Close off part of home, left home, unsafe temperature Use stove or oven for heat Threatened with service termination, shut off Access to heating and air conditioning 7
  • Slide 8
  • Survey Topics Change in Circumstance Energy bills Financial situation Impact of LIHEAP Would you have experienced some of these problems if LIHEAP had not been available? How important has LIHEAP been in helping you meet your needs? Demographics 8
  • Slide 9
  • Methodology Use of state LIHEAP databases Samples selected by APPRISE or state office staff Stratification by vulnerable group and poverty level Telephone survey Fielded 9/30/08 11/3/08 1,256 completed interviews Response rate ranged from 41% in NY to 73% in OH 9
  • Slide 10
  • Demographics 10
  • Slide 11
  • Household Characteristics 11 Percent of Respondents Senior43% Disabled50% Children under 618% Children under 1840% Nonvulnerable7% Own Home50%
  • Slide 12
  • Income Sources 12 Percent of Respondents Employment Income30% Retirement Income40% Public Assistance37% Non Cash Benefits59%
  • Slide 13
  • Poverty Level 13 Poverty Level Percent of Respondents 0% - 50%17% 51% - 100%46% 101% - 125%18% 126% - 150%10% >150%6% Missing Income2%
  • Slide 14
  • Health 14
  • Slide 15
  • Health Insurance 15 Percent of Respondents Entire Household70% No one in Household10%
  • Slide 16
  • Health Conditions 16 AllSeniorDisabled Child Under 18 Non- Vulnerable Health Condition* 70%80% 63%42% Medical Equipment Uses Electricity 24%20%32%31%3% *Health conditions included asthma, emphysema, COPD, diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, or stroke.
  • Slide 17
  • Health Status 17 AllSeniorDisabled Child Under 18 Non- Vulnerable Excellent6%4%2%11%5% Very Good15%13%8%20%22% Good31%27%23%34%51% Fair31%36%40%26%18% Poor16%19%27%10%3% Dont know/ Refused
  • Energy Burden 20 Pre- LIHEAP Post- LIHEAP 5%11%25% 6% - 10%28%30% 11% - 15%21% 16% - 20%16%10% 21% - 25%9%6% >25%14%8%
  • Slide 21
  • Mean Energy Burden 21 AllSeniorDisabled Child Under 18 Non- Vulnerable Pre-LIHEAP16%14%17%16%19% Post-LIHEAP12%11%12%13%14%
  • Slide 22
  • Change in Energy Bills 22 Percent of Respondents Same24% Lower13% Higher49% Dont Know/ Refused13%
  • Slide 23
  • Change in Difficulty Paying Energy Bills 23 Percent of Respondents Same42% More Difficult43% Less Difficult9% Dont Know/ Refused5%
  • Slide 24
  • Increased Difficulty Paying Energy Bills 24 Reasons for Increased Difficulty Paying Energy Bills Main Reason (Unprompted) Reasons (Prompted) Increased Energy Bill50%87% Lower Income/ Lost Job37%75% Increased Medical Expenses2%57% Increased Prescription Cost