2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (0000000)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    1/107

    THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO

    CIVIL DIVISION

     WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., AS TRUSTEE, Case No. 08 ! 0"#$%For Securitized Asset Backed ReceivablesLLC 2006-OP1 Mortae-Pass!t"rou"-Certi#icatesSeries 2006-OP1

     Plaintiff 

     Vs. &'()e* T+o-/ OCo11e22

    $O%& L' R(()* et a'*!!!*Defendant

    Mo-+o1 To Vaa-e A Vo+(&'()e1- a1( -o R'2e o1 -eFo22o3+1):

    Pa4- I. INTRODUCTION

    1' Now comes Defendant John A. Reed pro se* +ovi, t"is Court to Vacate a Void

    Judgement o# t"e Courts )ecisio, a,d (,tr. Re,dered o, t"e 1st  )a. o# October* 200/*

    o, t"e rou,ds t"at t"e Plai,ti## "as co++itted #raud b. bri,i, i,to t"is court

    #abricated* #ored a,d #raudule,t docu+e,ts* seci#icall.* Plai,ti##s e"ibit

    AFF3)A435 7"ic" urorts to s"o7 Plai,ti##s o7,ers"i i,terest a,d validit. o# t"e

    alleed sub8ect Mortae 9 &ote 9 Plai,ti##s e"ibit :A; Assi,+e,t #ro+ Otio, O,e

    to

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    2/107

    procured by fraud  ( emphasis added), can be attacked at any time, inany court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party isproperly before the court, Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182!"d #$8 ( %!A! & 'll! 1)!

    Please see attached Brief in Support of Void Judgments (Authorities12)

    1. Plai,ti## or t"eir assi,s "erei,a#ter :Ba,k; a,d>or

    :Plai,ti##;* 7"ile lacki, Leal Sta,di, to i,itiate suit* did cause to be #iled aai,st a,

    alleed )e#e,da,t $o", L' Reed a #oreclosure suit o, Februar. 2=t"* 200/ ultra vires'

    3')e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed* so, o# a, alleed )e#e,da,t $o", L' Reed* 7as e,8oi,ed

    7it"i, t"is #oreclosure actio, o,l. #or reaso, o# "is total a,d co+lete o7,ers"i o# "is

    reside,ce* t"e sub8ect roert.'

    2.  Plai,ti##

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    3/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    4/107

    u,substa,tiated* libelous* created a,d co++itted i,te,tio,all. 7it" +alice a,d 7it"out

    cause a,d created e,tirel. i, a, atte+t to aai, lo7er t"e value o# t"e )e#e,da,t i, t"e

    Courts e.es'

    E' )uri, t"e course o# t"ese leadi,s Plai,ti##s Cou,sel did cause de#a+atio, o# t"e

    c"aracter a,d>or did libel per se* mens rea, )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed o, ,u+erous

    occasio,s  see: Wells Fargo Bank Motion For Summary Judgment for one instane* a,d

    i, the +ost ublic +a,,er* i, 7riti,  per se* t"at "as si,ce bee, disse+i,ated

    irretrievabl. a,d loball.* stati,* as #act* t"at )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed "ad :forged; "is

    Fat"ers si,ature a,d :altered; Federal docu+e,ts' A,d* as )e#e,da,ts viabilit. i, "is

    c"ose, a,d reviousl. disti,uis"ed ro#essio,* o# &ovell &et7orki, Co,sulta,t

    "ourl. rate 100 er "r'* re?uires a :5o Securit. Cleara,ce; to er#or+* Plai,ti##s

    Cou,sel "as e##ectivel. stried )e#e,da,t o# a,. c"a,ce o# e+lo.+e,t 7it"i, "is

     ro#essio,* i, eretuit.' Plai,ti##s Cou,sel co++itted t"is o##e,se mens re* atte+ti,

    to alter t"e Courts oi,io, o# t"e )e#e,da,t to o,e o# a lesser value a,d i, so doi,

    atte+ti, to re8udice t"e Court aai,st )e#e,da,t' 3, so doi,* Plai,ti## did cause to be

     ublis"ed o,to t"e 3,ter,et t"e c"ares i,dicated above a,d i, t"e i,#or+atio, tec",olo.

    ae 7e ,o7 live i,* t"at sa+e i,#or+atio, 7as al+ost i,sta,ta,eousl. disse+i,ated

    loball. b. data +i,i, co+a,ies 7orld 7ide* ie' Leis-&eus a,d +a,. ot"ers* a,d is

    ,o7* unalterable' Plai,ti##s Cou,sels libel* a,d de#a+atio, o# c"aracter o# )e#e,da,t*

    7"ic" carr. i+utatio,s a,d asersio,s o# cri+i,al co,duct a,d alleatio,s* are ,ot o,l.

    i,8urious to )e#e,da,t i, "is c"ose, a,d establis"ed ro#essio,* t"e. 7ere "is studied

    Pro#essio,s deat" se,te,ce'

    @

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    5/107

    10' Subsequently t"e lo7er Court #ou,d )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed to be t"e Creator o#

    t"e &ote 9 MortaeG t"e, did* i, violatio, o# t"e 'S' Statute o# Frauds* t"e 'S' La7 o# 

    Co,tracts a,d Civ'R' 1=A* a,d 7it" $udicial #iat* t"e court altered t"e alleed Mortae

    9 Pro+issor. &ote* e##ectivel. destro.i, t"e orii,al Mortae a,d &ote a,d t"eir

    rerese,tatio,s o# #act* to rerese,t t"at )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed 7as t"e true o7,er a,d

    reso,sible art. #or t"e alleed Mortae a,d &ote' 5"e,* 7it"out a,. #or+al ,otice o#

    suit aai,st )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed* as court roceeded to collectivel. a,d su++aril.

    c"a,e o7,ers"i o# t"e &ote 9 Mortae* t"e. also i++ediatel. #oreclose o, sa+e*

    e##ectivel. de,.i, )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed o# a,. roer recourse t"rou" )ue Process'

    :(ver. actio, s"all be rosecuted i, t"e ,a+e o# t"e real art. i, i,terest'; CivR' 1=A

    A real art. i, i,terest is o,e 7"o is directl. be,e#ited or inured b. t"e outco+e o# t"e

    case' !lease see attached "authorities One#

    11' Based ri+aril. uo, testi+o,. o# t"e Plai,ti##s aid 7it,ess* 7"o #ails t"e

    )aubert test ,o statistical rate o# success>#ailure #or ad+issibilit. $lease see attached

    authorities “7” %* a,d oes directl. aai,st CivR 1002 b. usi, coies to ide,ti#.

    )e#e,da,ts si,ature* a,d Plai,ti##s 7it,ess o# Preside,t o# Otio,* 7"o testi#ied as to

    ,ot bei, rese,t at Mortae creatio,* a,d 7"os sa+e testi+o,. is e,tirel. "earsa.*

    Plai,ti##s cou,sel t"e, did roceed to #oreclose aai,st )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed* seeki,

    t"e roert. sold at Public Auctio, a,d u,seci#ied da+aes* 7"ic" t"e Court did a7ard'

    SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT AND ISSUES PRESENTED

    3, Parara" 11 o# t"e Orii,al co+lai,t

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    6/107

     b. a,ot"er art.' 5"us* t"e securitizatio,* 5rust or :ot"er art. * 7as t"e o7,er* i# ,otalso t"e "older o# t"e ,ote'

    3, Parara" 2D o# t"e co+lai,t*

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    7/107

    1D' Please ,ote t"e date o# si,ature o# O,e Ms 5oako Love at t"e botto+ to be Marc"=t"* 200/' Please see ("ibit HHHHHH alter,ate si,atures 9 alter,ate e+lo.ers o# Ms'5oako Love '

    3t is 7ell docu+e,ted t"at si,ce 200=

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    8/107

    ,ecessar. to #oreclosures as ?uickl. a,d e##icie,tl. as ossible #or a ,u+ber o# di##ere,tco+a,ies' 5o acco+lis" t"is ob8ective* Love does ,ot read t"e a##idavits s"e si,s or+ake a,. i,?uir. as to 7"et"er t"e state+e,ts +ade t"erei, are true a,d accurate' Lovesrobo-si,er status is docu+e,ted b. )e#e,da,ts ("ibit HHHHHHHHHHH t"ru HHHHHHHHHattac"ed "ereto' 5"ese docu+e,ts de+o,strate t"at

    a, ea+le o# a, a##idavit ive, b. Ms' 5oako LO4( i, a,ot"er O"io case"eard a,d dis+issed i, Federal Court  !euts"e Bank #ational $rust %ompany v& J'%(S)# ' 3, t"at a##idavit* Ms' LO4( rerese,ted t"at s"e 7as a dul. aoi,tedo##icer o# Otio, O,e Mortae Cororatio,' 3, t"is a##idavit* Ms' LO4( avers t"at s"eis acti, o, be"al# o# Otio, O,e as t"e servici, ae,t o# )eutsc"e Ba,k &atio,al 5rustCo+a,.'

    3 a+ also attac"i, a, a##idavit i, 7"ic" Ms' LO4( avers t"at s"e is t"e Assista,tSecretar. o# Otio, O,e Mortae  *SB% Bank +S' #' v B)-./S ' 3, t"is latterstate court case #ro+ Su++it Cou,t.* s"e avers t"at Otio, O,e is t"e servici, ae,t #or 

    %SBC Ba,k SA &A'

    3, a t"ird attac"ed a##idavit* Ms' 5oako LO4( also avers t"at s"e is t"e Assista,tSecretar. o# Otio, O,e Mortae Cororatio, as servici, ae,t #or

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    9/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    10/107

    OP1 see exhibit “A”  or Plainti!s exhibit" 11* did ,ot occur u,til *arch 2th  ( 14 a,d

    as suc" Plai,ti## lacked Leal Sta,di, to i,itiate suit' :(ver. actio, s"all be rosecuted

    i, t"e ,a+e o# t"e real art. i, i,terest'; Civ'R' 1=A' A real art. i, i,terest is o,e 7"o

    is directl. be,e#ited or i,8ured b. t"e outco+e o# t"e case' Please see attac"ed

    " Authorities “1”  # “2”  .

    LAW AND ARGUMENT

     11' )e#e,da,t* t"e State o# O"io* a,d its Citize,s i,terests are best reserved b.

    assuri, t"at t"e arties to t"e actio, are t"e roer arties' Accordi, to t"e Sure+e

    Court o# O"io :a 8ud+e,t re,dered b. a court lacki, sub8ect +atter 8urisdictio, is void

    a0 initio&1 Patton v& !iemer 1E//* D O"io St'Dd 6/* =0* 1/ &'('2d E@1' As a result* i#

    t"e Court 7ere to e,ter 8ud+e,t 7it"out 8urisdictio, or 7it"out roer arties* t"e State

    o# O"io 7ould be re8udiced b. "avi, to articiate i, 8udicial roceedi,s to set aside

    t"e sale a,d t"e, relitiate "u,dreds* eve, t"ousa,ds o# #oreclosures'

    HOLDER IN DUE COURSE12' 5"e %older i, )ue Course )e#e,se is 7ell-establis"ed i, ba,krutc. ractice'

    5o ?uote a,d i,cororate as i# +. o7, Bert (l.* a lo,ti+e a,al.st o# t"e #i,a,cial

    services i,dustr. a,d a sc"olar at t"e co,servative Cato 3,stitute 7"o 7as a+o, t"e #irst

    to redict t"e S9L sca,dal o# t"e 1E/0s* :t"is is 7ell-establis"ed i, ba,krutc. ractice*

    t"at .ou "ave to roerl. er#ect t"e securit. i,terest* a,d i# .ou "ave,t* .oure

    scre7ed;'

    “$ecuriti%ation ostensibly pro&i'es a source o capital so that (ore ho(e loans are a&ailable toborro)ers. *o)e&er+ the series o corporate an' banking transactions that (ake up securiti%ation

    cannot be per(itte' to a&oi' liability by those )ho are actually pro&i'ing the un'ing , an' oten

    controlling the transaction.” $ee -urt ggert+ *el' up in /ue Course0 Pre'atory en'ing+

     $ecuriti%ation+ an' the *ol'er in /ue Course /octrine+ 3 Creighton . 4e&. 35 62552.

    1D' 3# suc" basic lealities are,t ad"ered to* a "o+eo7,er could a. "is or "er

    7a. out o# a #oreclosure 8a+ o,l. to 7i,d u i, a,ot"er 7"e, a ,e7 lai,ti## e+eres

    10

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    11/107

    clai+i, to o7, t"e debt' Mortae le,di, a,d servici, is :a +atter o# dotti, t"e 3s

    a,d crossi, t"e 5s' I 5"ats 7"at uts t"e discili,e i, t"e rocess'# Bert (l.'

    1@' Plai,ti## attac"es docu+e,ts to its co+lai,t a,d docu+e,ts roduced t"rou"

    discover. co,#lict 7it" t"e alleatio,s o# +aterial #acts i, t"e co+lai,t i, 7"ic" t"e

     lai,ti## clai+s t"at it :o7,s t"e &ote; a,d Mortae b. virtue o# a ost-created a,d

     ost-recorded assi,+e,t' 5"ese alleatio,s co,#lict 7it" t"e alleed +ortae a,d ,ote

    attac"ed to t"e co+lai,t t"at ide,ti#ies Otio, O,e Mortae Cororatio,* as t"e le,der

    7it" t"e orii,al securit. i,terest' 5"ese alleatio,s t"ere#ore co,stitute serious

    +isrerese,tatio,s a,d could be co,strued as a #raud brou"t uo, t"e court' 

    1' Plai,ti##s o7, e"ibits* #ull. scruti,ized* urortedl. s"o7 +ultile

    tra,s#ere,ce occurre,ces B(FOR( a,d>or a#ter a, alleed tra,s#er "as alleedl. alread.

    take, lace o# t"e &ote 9 Mortae* a,d also s"o7 +a,. i,sta,ces o# ,o actual :leal

    tra,s#ere,ce; o# t"e Mortae a,d &ote at all' Also* t"e tra,s#ere,ce dates urorted

    could ,ot "ave eisted 7it"i, t"e 5i+eli,e rerese,ted' o, a co+lete Mortae

    )ocu+e,t scruti,izatio,* t"is is easil. see,'

    5RA)0'N6 57, *+R56A6, )7R+N+L+68

    !lease carefully notice all dates9

    16' 7:R -loc; +riginates the alleged *ortgage  /ate'8 9une :th + 2553

    !laintiff ,RR+R ob#uscatio, bei,s'

    1=' )ocu+e,t titled ")+R!+RA5'+N ASS'6N*,N5 +& +!,N>,ND

    *+R56A6,# e"ibit :B; dated June ?th( 1@ urorts* alo, 7it" t"e 1st Allo,e* to

    tra,s#er t"e alleed Mortae 9 &ote #ro+ %9R Block to Otio, O,e Mortae Cor'*

    .et #ails i, its re?uire+e,t to disla. 8ust /7,R, it recorded sa+e* readi, :a,d

    recorded as )ocu+e,t &o' !!!!!!!!! o,* !!!!!!!! da. o# !!!!!!!!!! i, book

    11

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    12/107

     !!!!!!!!!* ae !!!!!!!!!!* o# O##icial Records; a,d attested to b. a o,e risti

    Ca,izio 2t"e .ady of many "ats a,d Rosea,, 3,#usio ' Clearl. i, violatio, o# 'C'C'*

    true sale o0ligations a,d ot"er S(C'* O'R'C' Rules 9 Reulatio,s* a,d Co,tract 9

    Securities La7s stated else7"ere 7it"i, t"is leadi,'

    1/' Later* i, a, :Assi,+e,t; dated =12@ a,d recorded o, ==11@ Plai,ti##

    7a,ts us to believe it again tra,s#ers t"e ver. sa+e &ote 9 Mortae #ro+ t"e ver. sa+e

    e,tit. %9R Block to t"e ver. sa+e above +e,tio,ed e,tit. Otio, O,e' E>0 Allo,e exhibit “-1” to &ote as Assistant Secretary for +$tion +ne

    *ortgage )or$'B'NV,S5+RS%6>E>0 Allo,e exhibit “-2” to &ote as Assistant Secretary for 7:R -lock 

    B7R-*)%

    6>E>0 Cororatio, Assi,+e,t o# Oe, (,d Mortae as dul. aut"orized:attestor; exhibit “;” 

    C?@ as &unding)losing

    De$artment )ontact exhibit “-1D>0 my personal favorite (+lo.+e,t 4eri#icatio, Fu,der>AMSi,ature days A&5,R loan closing9 exhibit “-:” 

    C=@ as ReEiewer)loser on7D*A Audit Sheet exhibit “-3” 

    6>1@>0 as )ata 3,terit. 4eri#ier o, )ata 3,terit. Audit s"eet  1 exhibit “-=” 6>1@>0 as )ata 3,terit. 4eri#ier o, )ata 3,terit. Audit S"eet  2 exhibit “-7” 6>1@>0 )ocu+e,t rearer #or 0@E-/66 ” 

    20' Probabl. +ost i,teresti, is t"at Ms Ca,izio "olds t"e ositio, o# Assista,t

    Secretar. to t7o searate Cororate (,tities a,d also lets ass* until days A&5,R  t"e

    12

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    13/107

    alleed Mortae Loa, closi,* t"e alleed veri#icatio, o# t"e i,co+e o# t"e )e#e,da,t'

    5"e sa+e )e#e,da,t 7"o "ad ,o i,co+e* but 7"o does "ave 7it,esss 7"o are 7illi, to

    testi#. t"at t"e. 7ere rese,t a,d "eard o, seaker"o,e )e#e,da,t tell Plai,ti##s

    Ae,t* o# t"at #act o# ,o i,co+e* duri, )e#e,da,ts alleed Mortae alicatio,II

    see attac"ed exhibit “-:”  5"e ver. sa+e e+lo.+e,t veri#icatio, urortedl. taki,

     lace 3 days A&5,R t"e belo7 titled (ecutio, Co. "as alread. urortedl. sold t"e

    alleed* but ,o7 certi#ied as roerl. vetted b. Otio, O,e Mort' a,d Ms' Ca,izio* as

    ood a,d #raud #ree* Mortae a,d &ote to Barcla.s Ba,k 

    21' Plai,ti## i,troduces :as evide,ce; !laintiffFs exhibit no” 23” * 5itled

    ",G,)H5'+N )+!8# R, !urchase !rice and 5erms Agreement# )ated :As o#

     9une 15+ 2553; O,e da. a#ter t"e alleed Mortae creatio, Purorti, to elai, "o7

    Barcla.s Ba,k "as bou"t t"e alleed Mortae &ote a,d debt #ro+ Otio, O,e a#ter

    Otio, O,e "ad co+bi,ed t"at sa+e ,ote a,d debt i,to t"e ,ot .et created :5rust;' Net

    ,et* .ou 7ill ,otice t"at t"e alleed Mortae "as .et to be assigned to Otio, O,e'

    5"at 7ill ,ot occur #or a,ot"er = days BoEer months9%* its eit"er t"at or Plai,ti##

    "as brou"t #raud i,to t"e Courts 7it" its :Assi,+e,t o# Mortae to Otio, O,e #ro+

    %9R Block ; 't should also be noted that !laintiffFs e xhibit “23”  Bexhibit “” % lac;s

    any signatures or authentication b. eit"er :Bu.er; or :Seller; clearl. i, violatio, o#

    'C'C'* S(C'* O'R'C' Rules 9 Reulatio,s a,d Co,tract 9 Securities La7s rese,ted

    else7"ere 7it"i, t"is leadi, a,d as suc" rerese,ts &O5 a leall. bi,di, Co,tract as

     reviousl. ,oted'

    !laintiff ,RR+R

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    14/107

     /ate' August 13th + 2553 2 Mo,t"s a,d da.s a#ter t"e above re#ere,ced Plai,ti##s

    exhibit “23”  a,d 7"ic" lacks a,. re#ere,ce to t"e "5RHS5# SecuritiIed Asset -ac;ed

    ReceiEables LL) 1C>+!= *ortgage !ass>5hrough )ertificates( Series 1C>+!= *

    a,d is dated months before t"e Assi,+e,t #ro+ 7:R  -loc;  alleed Mortae

    Orii,ator to +$tion +ne' Plai,ti##s exhibit “15”6 exhibit “@”  

    22' 5"is docu+e,t catalos t"e urc"ase o# t"e :5rust; #ro+ t"e :Co+a,. 9

    Seller; Otio, O,e Mortae to t"e :Purc"aser;* Barcla.s Ba,k* PLC'

    2D' Aai,* it s"ould be ,oted t"at !laintiffFs exhibit “2=”   lac;s $ro$er

    signatures or aut"e,ticatio, see exhibits ?2 thru ?7  b. :Seller; clearl. i, violatio, o# 

    'C'C'* S(C'* O'R'C' Rules 9 Reulatio,s a,d Co,tract 9 Securities La7s rese,ted

    else7"ere 7it"i, t"is leadi, a,d as suc" #ails to rerese,t a leall. bi,di, Co,tract'

    2@' 5"at said* t"e co,clusio, so #ar is t"at t"e alleed &ote 9 Mortae could ,ot

    "ave bee, i,cluded i,to t"e :5rust; ,or i,to t"e o7,ers"i o# Barla.s Ba,k PLC u,til at

    least t"e da. o# or a#ter t"e da. o# t"e Assi,+e,t #ro+ %9R Block to Otio, O,e

    Mortae Cororatio, dated NoEember 11nd( 1@ a,d still oEer a month before the

    "5rust# was eEen created.

    2' !laintiffFs ,RR+R < 3 lai,ti##s exhibit “27”  titled :,G,)H5'+N )+!8 :ASS'6N*,N5 AND )+NV,8AN),; 'een'ants exhibit “*” 

    dated Auust 1Et"* 200'26' 5"is docu+e,t does urortedl. rerese,t t"e Assi,+e,t a,d Co,ve.a,ce o# 

    t"e :5rust; #ro+ Otio, O,e to Barcla.s Ba,k PLC' Aai,* it s"ould be ,oted t"at

    Plai,ti##s exhibit “27”  lac;s any $ro$er signatures see exhibits *2 thru  *

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    15/107

    %9R Block to Otio, O,e does ,ot "ae, u,til +ctober 12th( 1@* ,earl. 1 months

    A&5,R  t"e alleed assi,+e,t a,d co,ve.a,ce o# t"e :5rust; t"at Plai,ti## 7ould "ave

    us believe alread. co,tai,ed t"e +ortae* .et t"e. sub+it roo# it could ,ot "ave "ad'

    2=' N+5'), ALL +& 57, A-+V, +))HRR,D -,&+R, 57, &'RS5ASS'6N*,N5 DA5, to +!5'+N +N,9

    7:R -loc; Assigns Note : *ortgage to +$tion +ne

    see assi,+e,t dated October 27+ 2553 9 Recorded &ove+ber 22,d* 200 lai,ti##s exhibit “15” /een'ants exhibit “@” 

    !laintiffFs ,RR+R <  Plai,ti##s exhibit “2>” 6 attache' exhibit “B”  titled",G,)H5'+N )+!8# "-'LL +& SAL,# dated January 1Cth( 1C'

    2=' %ere 7e "ave a :Bill o# Sale; t"at rerese,ts t"at :BARCLANS BA& PLC

    :t"e Seller;* i, co,sideratio, o# i t"e su+ o# K=(1=(14(.3; IIIIILet +e 7rite t"at outI' O,e Millio,* t7o "u,dred a,d #ourtee, t"ousa,d* t7o

    "u,dred a,d ei"t dollars 3 uess t"e, a co+a a,d t"e, a deci+al oi,t 3

    uess a,d D0 ce,ts 3 uess dollars' 5"is &O5 a t.ora"ical error o, +. art

    see Plai,ti##s exhibit “2>” ' &a+i, Otio, O,e as t"e Servicer* Mortae

    Ra+* 3,c' as loa, er#or+a,ce advisor a,d

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    16/107

    "ereto a,d +ade a art "ereo#* i,cludi, al i,terest a,d ri,cial received b. t"e Seller

    o, or 7it" resect to t"e Mortae Loa,s';IIII' i# t"is 7ere a c"eck 3 "ad to cas"* it

    7ould,t be cas"able a,d it is si,ed a,d>or e,dorsed a,d>or aut"e,ticated b. N+ +N,9

    2/' 'n SummaryG Barkla.s Ba,k PLC suosedl. resells t"e Mortae Loa,s

    #ro+ t"e :5rust; to S(CR353() ASS(5 BAC() R(C(34ABL(S LLC as

    Purc"aser 9 )eositor* to Otio, O,e Mortae Cororatio,* as servicer a,d reso,sible

     art.* to MortaeRa+* 3,c'* as loa, er#or+a,ce advisor* a,d to

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    17/107

    5rust 5ransfers *ortgage -A)0 to +$tion +ne

    D1' As $er !ooling : SerEicing Agreement section 1M3 d attache' exhibit

    “9;* Plainti!s exhibit “1>”8 :

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    18/107

    #or eac" ot"er a,d t"at t"ere is ,o o,e Si,ator. ae co,tai,i, all si,atures* ,o

    aut"e,ticatio, o# a,. si,atures* ,o dates o# si,atures a,d ,o certi#icatio, o# a,.

    si,atures b. Po7er o# Attor,e. clearl. i, violatio, o# 'C'C'* S(C'* O'R'C' Rules 9

    Reulatio,s a,d Co,tract 9 Securities La7s reviousl. stated else7"ere 7it"i, t"is

     leadi,* a,d as suc" rerese,ts &O5 eve, a leall. bi,di, Co,tract'

    !lease note date of Re>!ossession of *ortgage Note to +$tion +ne as January 14.

    As $er !ooling : SerEicing Agreement section 13Bd%.

    &ebruary 12th ( 14 &oreclosure Action is filed

    D@' Otio, O,e then assi,s &ote 9 Mortae to

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    19/107

    )ue )ilie,ce' A,d realizi, t"at all o# t"e alleed loa, orii,atio, aers* i,cludi, t"e

    Credit reort* bear a Social Securit. ,u+ber t"at does ,ot correso,d 7it" t"e stated

    ,a+e o, t"e Mortae )ocu+e,t* a,d t"at t"e i,co,siste,cies 7it"i, al+ost all o# t"e

    loa, orii,atio, docu+e,ts are easil. ide,ti#ied* 7it" +i,i+al e##ort* eseciall. b.

    sc"ooled a,d lear,ed ro#essio,als* Plai,ti##s o7, e"ibits rove o,l. so +a,.

    irreularities a,d illealities t"at u,less eac" a,d ever. o,e is :roved;* a,d roved

    7it"i, a c"ro,olo. t"at actuall. CA& eist* t"e, t"e Plai,ti##

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    20/107

    docu+e,ted a,d clear "istor. o# violati, ever. asect o# )ue )ilie,ce A&) t"e :Clea,

    %a,ds )octri,e;' Plai,ti##s o7, e"ibits rove ,ot o,l. Plai,ti##s Lack o# Sta,di, i,

    t"e sub8ect case at "a,d* but also t"eir eaer 7illi,,ess to bri, #raud* reed a,d

    i,co+ete,ce to t"e Courts i, t"eir atte+ts at u,8ust e,ric"+e,t' Plai,ti##s Cou,sel also

    clearl. de+o,strates "is o7, lack o# er#or+a,ce o# )ue )ilie,ce i, Rerese,ti,

    Plai,ti## be#ore a t"orou" i,vestiatio, o# sa+e'

    DE'Plai,ti##

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    21/107

    Mortae as er R'C' 1D0D'22* t"ere#ore* Plai,ti##

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    22/107

    Plai,ti## t"rou" )iscover. roves t"at ,ot o,l. t"rou" lac; of signatures(dates( authentication and indorsements on each document er Sectio, R'C' 1DD'0@* 1D0D'21* 1D0D'22* D01'01 ORC A* D01'2* D0E'=E a,d CCArticle D 9 S&/&%& true sale o0ligations a,d ot"ers III''

    3> $ee+ e.g.+ Mi'irst ;ank+ $$; &. C.D. *aynes # Co.+ Bnc.+ >: @.$upp. 15

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    23/107

    also de+o,strate t"e sales o# securities based o, &O u,derl.i, Securitized assetsactuall. "eld* a,d>or utter i,co+ete,ce* a,d>or cri+i,al i,te,tio, a,d eecutio,'5o )e#e,da,ts belie# a,d k,o7lede* Plai,ti##

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    24/107

    eac" ot"er out' O,ce aai, Plai,ti## de+o,strates t"eir Lack o# Sta,di, to i,itiate t"is

    #oreclosure actio,'

    @6' Because Plai,ti##s did ,ot de+o,strate* ,or could t"e. de+o,strate* t"at t"eir

    +e+bers "ave su##ered or 7ere likel. to su##er a, i,8ur. i, #act* t"e. #ail to +eet Article

    333 sta,di, re?uire+e,ts'

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    25/107

    t"at a, u,recorded +ortae ca, be a, e##ective tra,s#erG the assignment must be

    eOecuted in writing* from the true holder in Due )ourse o# t"e alleed Mortae 9

     &ote $rior to filing the )om$laint and before t"e Plai,ti## ca, establis" t"at it "as

    sta,di, to i,voke t"e 8urisdictio, o# t"e Court' Sta,di, is a ,ecessar. rere?uisite to

    establis" a courts 8urisdictio, to "ear a case' %ain v& %al"oun 1E=E* 61 O"io A'' 2d 2@0*

    2@2 #,' 2 citi,t State e rel' )all+a, v' Court o# Co++o, Pleas 1E=D* D O"io St'2d

    1=6'

    @E' %avi, #ailed to establis" t"at it "olds a, i,terest i, t"e alleed &ote a,d>or

    Mortae* t"e Plai,ti## "as #ailed to s"o7 t"at it su##ered a, i,8ur. i, #actG t"ere#ore*

    Plai,ti## does ,ot "ave sta,di, to bri, t"is actio,' A erso, lacki, a,. ri"t or i,terest

    to rotect +a. ,ot i,voke t"e 8urisdictio, o# t"e court' State ex rel& !allman v %ourt of

    %ommon Pleas 1E=D* D O"io St' 2d 1=6* 1=/* 2E/* &'('2d 1' 5"ere#ore* Plai,ti##s

    actio, s"ould be dis+issed because t"is Court lacks 8urisdictio,'

    0' 5"e Lo7er Courts decisio, #ails to i,cororate rior ruli,s o# t"is Court o,

    ide,tical issues' 3, #act* several o# O"ios )istrict Court $udes "ave all ruled o,

    ,u+erous cases i, #avor o# t"e )e#e,da,ts ositio, 7it"i, t"e ast 16 +o,t"s see

    authorities 1 + 2 +  +

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    26/107

    B' Otio, O,e ,der7riters

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    27/107

    Co+lai,t a,d "is cou,terclai+s i, its a,d t"eir e,tiret. a,d #ro+ its i,cetio, to eac" a,d

    ever. violatio, listed'

    @' ,der t"e #acts ot"er7ise ide,ti#ied else7"ere 7it"i, t"is actio, a,d at "a,d

    )e#e,da,t did correctl.* reaso,able a,d leall. rel. o, t"e +ortae broker a,d t"e

    Plai,ti## to act #airl. 7it" "i+' )e#e,da,t "as bee, "ar+ed b. eac" a,d ever. belo7

    cou,terclai+ listed a,d Plai,ti## "as ate,tl. violated ,ot o,l. t"e 5rut" i, Le,di, Act*

    at all releva,t ti+es* but also t"e sirit o# t"e 5rut" a,d Le,di, Act ' 5"e Plai,ti##s

     broker* closi, ae,t a,d t"e Le,der>Ba,k eac"* i, t"eir o7, arts* "as +isled*

    ob#uscated* s"irked #ro+ t"eir roer )ue )ilie,ce a,d atte+ted to co,#use )e#e,da,t

    i, t"eir ractice a,d atter, a,d ursuit o# t"eir o7, u,8ust e,ric"+e,t* to 7"itG

    i' 5"e Plai,ti## did ,ot rovide aroriate disclosure as re?uired b. t"e 5rut" i, Le,di, Act i, a substa,tive a,d tec",ical+a,,er*

    !ursuant to regulations $romulgated under 5ruth in Lending Act( Eiolator

    of disclosure requirements is held to standard of strict liability( and

    therefore( borrower need not show that creditor in fact deceiEed borrower

    by ma;ing substandard disclosures. 5ruth in Lending Act( Sections =1>=4C(

    as amended( =@ H.S.). Section =C=>=CC2Be% 5ruth in Lending Regulations(

    Regulation ( Section 11C(4Bb>d%( =@ H.S.). Section =2 Soils E. &idelity

    )onsumer Discount )o.( @4 -.R. ?43(

    Jive, t"e ease o# Plai,ti##s availabilit. to veri#. )e#e,da,ts actual i,co+e* or

    lack t"ereo#* a,d )e#e,da,ts lack o# abilit. to alter a,. docu+e,tatio, it is obvious

     b. #act t"at t"e Plai,ti## did alter a,d #alsi#. Alicatio, docu+e,tatio, to re#lect

    elevated i,co+e levels #or )e#e,da,t t"ereb. #alsel. rerese,ti, t"e +aterial #act

    t"at )e#e,da,t 7as e+lo.ed 7"e, i, #act )e#e,da,t* "ad ,o #ull ti+e e+lo.+e,t

    at ti+e o# Loa, creatio,* ,or "ad a,. revious #ull ti+e e+lo.+e,t #or a eriod

    ete,di, aroi+atel. @ .ears rior to +ortae loa, creatio,* a,d exhibit :+

     (ploy(ent Jeriication; clearl. s"o7s e+lo.+e,t veri#icatio, 7as ,ot eve,

    acco+lis"ed i# ever* 7"ic" aai, seaks to due dilie,ce* u,til $u,e 1D* 200*

    so+e #our da.s A&5,R  alleed +ortae loa, closi, a,d a.out date' Suc"

    actio, o,ce aai, clearl. de+o,strates to t"e Court* Plai,ti##s co,duct a,d

    c"aracter' Plai,ti## also clai+s to "ave reviousl. sold t"is sa+e said Mortae a,d

     &ote o, $u,e 10t" 200* t"ree da.s revious to loa, veri#icatio,* to Barcla.s Ba,k

    rerese,ti, to sa+e* a,d at t"at ti+e* as #act* t"at t"e Mortae a,d &ote "ad

    2=

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    28/107

    alread. received revie7 a,d t"at t"e required )ue )ilie,ce "ad alread.*

     reviousl. bee, er#or+ed o, it* 7"e, it is a, u,disutable #act* t"at it "ad ,ot'

    "Any false re$resentation of material facts made with ;nowledge of falsity and with

    intent that it shall be acted on by another in entering into contract( and which is so acted

    u$on( constitutes Qfraud(F and entitles $arty deceiEed to aEoid contract or recoEer

    damages.# -arnsdall Refining )orn. E. -irnam wood +il )o.( ?1 & 1d 4ii' 5"e Plai,ti## did #raudule,tl. rerese,t to )e#e,da,t a*

    :7it,essed a,d 7it" 7it,esses 7illi, to testi#. to t"e #act o#it;* ro+ise o# #uture re#i,a,ci, o# t"e sa+e alleed loa, to)e#e,da,t a#ter rea.+e,t e,alt. date "ad elased a,d#uture additio,s a,d alteratio,s to roert. 7ere #i,alizedt"ereb. i,creasi, e?uitable value o# roert.* 7"ic")e#e,da,t did co+lete* as i,ce,tive i, +aki, t"e loa, a,dt"ereb. assuri, )e#e,da,t o# a #uture i,co+e 7it" 7"ic" to+ake #uture a.+e,ts attai,able*

    "'f any $art of the consideration for a $romise be illegal( or if there are seEeral

    considerations for an unseEerable $romise one of which is illegal( the $romise( whetherwritten or oral( is wholly Eoid( as it is im$ossible to say what $art or which one of the

    considerations induced the $romise.# *enominee RiEer )o. E. Augustus S$ies L : )

    )o.( =2 /is @@?( @21 =31 N/ ==11

    iii' 5"e Plai,ti## did sul. )e#e,da,t 7it" bla,k alicatio,docu+e,tatio, #or si,ature a,d retur,* later #ili, i, t"ea+ou,ts*

    "'t is not necessary for recession of a contract that the $arty ma;ing the

    misre$resentation should haEe ;nown that it was false( but recoEery is allowed eEen

    though misre$resentation is innocently made( because it would be unust to allow one

    who made false re$resentations( eEen innocently( to retain the fruits of a bargain

    induced by such re$resentations.# /hi$$ E. 'Eerson( 3 /is 1d =CC.

    iv' 5"e Plai,ti## "as caused i,8ur. to )e#e,da,t a,d did

    #raudule,tl.* a,d 7it" revious k,o7lede* did alter a,d>orc"a,e t"e docu+e,tatio, to re#lect t"at )e#e,da,t "ad a,abilit. to rea. t"is alleed &ote 9 Mortae 7it"out #uturere#i,a,ci, o# sa+e 7"e, i, #act a,d to t"eir k,o7lede "e "ad,o,e*

    Any Eiolation of the 5ruth in Lending Act( regardless of technical nature( must result

    in finding of liability against lender. 5ruth in Lending Regulations( Regulation Section

    11C.= et seq.( =@ H.S.). Section =2 5ruth in Lending Act Section =3 Ba( e%( 'S H.S.).

    Section =C Ba( e%. 'n Re Steinbrecher. == -R. =@@( ==C A.L.R. &ed. 44=.

    v' 5"e Plai,ti## "as caused i,8ur. to )e#e,da,t a,d did#raudule,tl. alter t"e Loa, )ocu+e,ts to rerese,t t"e real art. o# i,terest to be )e#e,da,ts Fat"er i, a, atte+t toob#uscate true o7,ers"i to #orce real "older o# roert. to#ace additio,al burde, o# )e#e,di, "is leiti+ate ositio, att"e ti+e o# i,te,tio,al a,d $re>ordained foreclosure b.Plai,ti##*

    "5he contract is Eoid if it is only in $art connected with the illegal transaction and the

    $romise single or entire.# 6uardian Agency E. 6uardian *utual. SaEings -an;( 112 /is

    @@( 12? N/ 43.

    2/

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    29/107

    vi' 5"e Plai,ti## "as caused i,8ur. to )e#e,da,t a,d did#raudule,tl. +isrerese,t accurate a+ou,ts #i,a,ced* erce,tae rates a,d #i,a,ce c"ares o, t"e 5rut" 3, Le,di,)ocu+e,ts 2 searate o,es'  $ee xhibit “  M ” # “  H ” 

    uestion of whether lenderFs 5ruth in Lending Act disclosures are inaccurate(

    misleading or confusing ordinarily will be for fact finder howeEer( where confusing(

    misleading and inaccurate character of dis$uted disclosure is so clear that it cannot

    reasonably be dis$uted( summary udgment for $laintiff is a$$ro$riate. 5ruth in

    Lending Act Section =1 et seq 5ruth in Lending Regulations( Regulation ( Section

    11C.= et seq.( =@ H.S.). Section =2. 6riggs E. !roEident )onsumer Discount )o. @3 &(

    Su$$ 1C( a$$eal dismissed C21 &.1d ?3( a$$eal after remand C4 &.1d ?12( certiorari

    granted( Eacated =3 S.)t( ( @? H.S. @C( 2 L.,d.1d 11@( on remand C?? ,1d C1.

    vii' Plai,ti##s closi, Ae,t did rus" )e#e,da,t t"rou" t"e:closi, rocess; 7it" a clai+ o# bei, late to :catc" "er la,e;* t"us derivi, )e#e,da,t o# a,. available ti+e torevie7 closi, docu+e,ts'

    +nce a creditor Eiolates the 5ruth 'n Lending Act( no matter how technical

    Eiolation a$$ears( unless one of statutory defenses a$$lies( )ourt has no

    discretion in im$osing liability. 5ruth in Lending Act( Sections =1>=4C asamended( =@ H.S.). Section =C=>=CC2e. Solis E. &idelity )onsumer Discount )o.

    @4 -R( ?43.

    Hoe O31e4s E5'+-/ P4o-e-+o1 A-

    HOEPA V+o2a-+o1s 

    ' 3, Je,eral -5"e %o+e O7,ers"i a,d (?uit. Protectio, Act o# 1EE@

    %O(PA or t"e Act a+e,ded 53LA b. addi, Sectio, 12E o# 53LA* 1 'S'C'

    16DE* a,d "as bee, i+le+e,ted b. Sectio,s 226'D1 a,d 226'D2 o# Reulatio, '

    12 C'F'R' 226'D1 a,d 226'D2' %O(PA 7as i+le+e,ted to seci#icall. curb

    t"e redator. le,di, ractices o# certai, sub-ri+e le,ders' Je,erall.* t"e Act

     rovides added rotectio,s to borro7ers 7"o obtai, +ore "i"-cost loa,s i, t"e

    sub-ri+e +arket'

     6' 3, t"e course o# o##eri, a,d ete,di, credit to )e#e,da,t*

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    30/107

    A' Plai,ti## "as caused i,8ur. to )e#e,da,t a,d "as violated t"e

    re?uire+e,ts o# %O(PA a,d Reulatio, b. e,ai, i, a atter, or

     ractice o# ete,di, suc" credit to a borro7er based solel. o, t"e borro7ers

    collateral rat"er t"a, co,sideri, t"e borro7ers curre,t a,d eected i,co+e*

    curre,t obliatio,s* a,d e+lo.+e,t status to deter+i,e 7"et"er t"e borro7er is

    able to +ake t"e sc"eduled a.+e,ts to rea. t"e obliatio,* i, violatio, o#

    Sectio, 12E" o# 53LA* 1 'S'C' 16DE"* a,d Sectio, 226'D2e1 o#

    Reulatio, * 12 C'F'R' 226'D2e1* 226'D@G

    5rut" i, Le,di, Act was $assed to $reEent unso$histicated consumer from being misled

    as to total cost of financing. 5ruth in Lending Act( Section =1( =@ H.S.). Section

    =C=. 6riggs E. !roEident )onsumer Discount. C4 &.1d ?12( certiorari granted(

    Eacated =3 S.)t. ( @? H.S. @C( 2 L.,d.1d 11@( on remand C?? &.1d C1.

    1. !ur$ose of 5ruth in Lending Act is for customers to be able to ma;e informed

    decisions. 5ruth in Lending Act Section =1( =@ H.S.). Section =C=. 6riggs E.

    !roEident )onsumer Discount )o. C4 &.1d ?12( certiorari granted( Eacated =3

    S.)t. ( @? H.S. @C( 2 L.,d(1d 11@( on remand C?? &(1d C1(

    B' Plai,ti## "as caused i,8ur. to )e#e,da,t a,d "as violated t"e

    re?uire+e,ts o# %O(PA a,d Reulatio, b. i,cludi, a ro"ibited :rea.+e,t

     e,alt.; rovisio,* i, violatio, o# Sectio, 12EW o# 53LA* 1 'S'C' 16DEW*

    a,d Sectio, 226'D2d6 o# Reulatio, * 12 C'F'R' 226'D2d6G

    C' Plai,ti## "as caused i,8ur. to )e#e,da,t a,d did violate t"e

    re?uire+e,ts o# %O(PA a,d Reulatio, b. +isleadi, )e#e,da,t i, t"e real

    costs o# alleed Mortae a,d &ote as is evide,ced b. lo7er courts o7,

    rerese,tatio, o# erro,eous a,d #raudule,t a+ou,ts re#ere,ced i, )ecisio,* Order 

    a,d $ud+e,t (,tr. Fi,di, 3, Favor O# Plai,ti##

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    31/107

    'S'C' 16DEW* a,d Sectio, 226'D2d6 o# Reulatio, * 12 C'F'R'

    226'D2d6G a,d

    (' Plai,ti## "as caused i,8ur. to )e#e,da,t a,d violated t"e re?uire+e,tso# %O(PA a,d Reulatio, b. #aili, to rovide )e#e,da,t re?uired

    disclosure docu+e,ted u,der Sectio, 16DE a )isclosures1A 9B* 2 A,,ual erce,tae rateB* b 5i+e o# disclosures1* 2A*D Modi#icatio,s* c &o Prea.+e,t e,alt.1AB* 2Aiii*B* )* d* e* #* "* 8* k* Sectio, 16DEd* a,d

    !ursuant to regulations $romulgated under 5ruth in Lending Act( Eiolator of

    disclosure requirements is held to standard of strict liability( and therefore( borrower

    need not show that creditor in fact deceiEed by ma;ing substandard disclosures.

    5'LA( Sections =1>=4C( as amended( =@ H.S.). Section =C=>=CC2Be% 5ruth in

    Lending Regulations( Regulation ( Section 11C(4Bb>d%( =@ H.S.). Section =2 Soils E.

    &idelity )onsumer Discount )o.( @4 -.R. ?43(

    F' Plai,ti## did violate a,d cause to i,itiate %O(PA rotectio, ri"ts a,d)e#e,da,ts ri"ts b. re?uiri, )e#e,da,t to a. an annual percentage

    rate at consummation which did exceed a, i,terest rate :+ore t"a, / erce,tae oi,ts #or #ist lie, loa,s;Ibased o, t"e .ield o, 5reasur.securities "avi, co+arable eriods o# +aturit.;II'as is re?uired b. Reulatio, * 12 C'F'R Sectio, 226'D2 a1iii* seeexhibit”4”  4 

    J' Plai,ti## #ailed i, t"eir re?uire+e,ts u,der rules W1to rovide)e#e,da,t roer docu+e,tatio, as re?uired*W2 *D*@ i, rovidi,)e#e,da,t a,. a,d all roer ,otices as is re?uired' d1*2*@**6*=iiiiiiiv '

    %' Plai,ti## did violate )e#e,da,ts ri"ts by charging discount $oints in

    Eiolation of State maOimum limitation requirement of 1 by charging

    Defendant 3.

     V+o2a-+o1s o6 -e O+o RICO A-O+o RICO, R.C. 7 #$.$

    =' )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed i,cororates b. re#ere,ce all o# t"e roceedi, a,d

    #oreoi, alleatio,s i, t"e e,tiret. o# )e#e,da,ts a,s7ers 9 leadi,s as i, reard to

    t"e Co+lai,t i, its e,tiret. a,d #ro+ its i,cetio,'

    /' )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed allees t"at

    A'

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    32/107

    u,der #alse rete,ses* 7it"out sta,di, a,d 7it"out co+l.i, 7it" O"io

    la7'

    B' )e#e,da,t allees a, i+roer taki, o# t"eir real roert. t"rou" t"e

    Plai,ti## use o# i,te,tio,al ,o,disclosure* +aterial +isrerese,tatio,* a,d

    t"e creatio, o# #raudule,t loa, docu+e,ts i, violatio, o# t"e R3CO Statute*

    a,d co,ti,ui, i,8ur. a,d da+aes i,cludi, t"e auctio, o# t"eir "o+e

    a,d #uture overa.+e,t o# #raudule,t c"ares'

    C' 5"ese activities are a atter, o# corrut a,d illeal activit. a,d i, violatio,

    o# O"io R3CO la7'

    E'

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    33/107

    60' )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed is seeki, u,seci#ied actual a,d statutor. da+aes*

    i,cludi, treble da+aes u,der O"io R3CO la7* as 7ell as attor,e.s #ees a,d costs'

    )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed also seeks t"e aoi,t+e,t o# a receiver to recover #ro+ 1 , ?1 , @1 4 as trustee i, reckless

    disreard o# t"e #act t"at Plai,ti##

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    34/107

    activities bot" as trustee i, O"io a,d #or lack o# sta,di,' 5"ese #ili,s 7ere +ade i, a

    7a,to, a,d reckless +a,,er i, a, atte+t to i,#lue,ce state a,d #ederal 8udes a,d

     8udicial o##icers i, O"io to e,ter 8ud+e,ts aai,st )e#e,da,ts o, t"e alleed +ortae

    a,d &ote* i,cludi, #or ri,cial* i,terest* late #ees* e,alties* costs a,d attor,e. #ees*

    a,d to #oreclose o, )e#e,da,ts roert. i, a 7a,to, atte+t at u,8ust e,ric"+e,t'

    66' 5"e Plai,ti##s co,duct co,stitutes a atter, o# corrut activit.* because t"e.

    "ave +ai,tai,ed +ore t"a, t7o la7suits u,der t"e #raudule,t a,d +isleadi,

    circu+sta,ces described i, t"e #oreoi, arara"s' O, i,#or+atio, a,d belie#* t"e

    de#e,da,ts "ave #iled "u,dreds o# #oreclosure co+lai,ts i, violatio, o# R'C' 2E2D'D2

    see see aut"orities =1, >1 , ?1 , @1'

    6E' 5"rou" t"e #ili, o# #oreclosure actio,s u,der #alse rete,se a,d i, violatio,

    o# 'S' La7* 'C'C'* S(C a,d O"io La7* a,d>or a,. ot"er alicable a,dXor Local La7s*

    Plai,ti##

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    35/107

    "as establis"ed t"e ele+e,ts o# +hio R')+ Eiolation to a, order divesti, +S!%, #& )"&W& !ist Judge M*arg"

    =@' /herefore( because t"e Plai,ti##s e"ibits attac"ed to t"eir leadi, are

    i,co,siste,t 7it" Plai,ti##s alleatio,s as to o7,ers"i o# t"e sub8ect ,ote a,d +ortae*

    t"ose alleatio,s are ,eutralized a,d Plai,ti##s co+lai,t is re,dered ob8ectio,able'

    Plai,ti## "as #ailed to establis" itsel# as t"e real art. i, i,terest a,d court did lack sub8ect

    +atter 8urisdictio, to "ear sa+e' )e#e,da,t $o", A' Reed does re?uest t"is Court to 1

    dis+iss t"is case with $reudice i, its e,tiret.* 2 sustai, )e#e,da,ts eressed

    de#a+atio, a,d libel c"ares* stated else7"ere 7it"i, t"is leadi,* D a7ard )e#e,da,t

    a,. actual a,d u,itive +o,etar. re7ard t"e Court dee+s #it a,d roer #or loss o#

    e+lo.+e,t si,ce #oreclosure i,cetio, i, eretuit. i, "is stated ro#essio,* a,. a,d

    all a+ou,ts re,der able u,der 53LA* %O(PA a,d R3CO c"ares stated above* lus a,

    a7ard #or e+otio,al* ".sical a,d s.c"oloical ai, 9 su##eri, as 7ell as a,. a,d all

    D

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    36/107

    costs associated 7it" t"e de#e,se o# t"is suit* a,d @ order Plai,ti##* with $reudice( to

    i++ediatel. cause to be released its alleed +ortae a,d>or a,. i,terest it +a. "ave or

    "ave obtai,ed aai,st t"e sub8ect roert. a,d retur, t"e roert. i, 7"ole to )e#e,da,t

    $o", A' Reed 7it" da+aes* a,d a7ard a,. a,d all cost a,d Leal Fees i, t"eir e,tiret.

    t"at Plai,ti##s Att.s s"ould>7ould "ave collected i, t"e case to )e#e,da,t'

    =' )e#e,da,t reserves t"e ri"ts to bri, c"ares u,der eac" a,d ever. ot"er

    violatio, a,d actio,able issue #ou,d* acts suc" as t"ose alread. discovered 7it"i,

    R(SPA* 5"e O"io Corrut Activities Act* t"e O"io Co,su+er Sales Practices Act* F5C*

    F)CPA* F)RA* 'C'C'* O'R'C 1D@* Article 333* a,d all ot"ers as t"e. beco+e aare,t

    a,d* +ore i+orta,tl. at t"is ti+e* sace 7ill allo7'

    =6' Fi,all.* 3 si,cerel. t"a,k Nour %o,or #or "is>"er ti+e a,d atie,ce i,

    revie7i, t"is le,t". docu+e,t a,d 3 ask .ou "u+bl. a,d resect#ull.* ,ot o,l. #or

     8ustice #or +.sel#* but #or t"e ,ecessar. sa,ctio,s a,d>or i,8u,ctio,s a,d>or ot"er actio,s

    t"at 7ould serve to reve,t #urt"er redator. ractices* suc" as t"ose used aai,st +e* to

     be utilized aai,st ot"er u,susecti, "o+e o7,ers' Nour %o,or* 3+ ,obod. secial* but

    3 "ave lived t"ou" t"is be#ore' A,ot"er #i,a,cial 3,stitutio, ca+e a#ter +e 2@ .ears ao*

    3 searc"ed #or k,o7ledeable leal "el t"e,' 3 could,t #i,d a,. t"e, eit"er' 5"e. ,ot

    o,l. stried +e o# all +. rocessio,s E "ouses 3d erso,all. re"abbed i,cludi, +.

    o7, o# 1E .ears* t"e. t"e, co,ti,ued to rui, +. Credit #or a,ot"er 11 .ears a#ter 3 #iled

     ba,krutc.' 3 k,o7 7"ats co+i,' 3 ca+e out "ere destitute* +oved "ere o,to a vaca,t

    lot t"at "ad bee, #or sale #or over 1 .ears* ,obod. 7a,ted it' 3 +oved i,to a 60 .ear old

    rat* raccoo, a,d sider i,#ested s"ed a,d i# it 7ere,t #or a, old c"ild"ood #rie,d* 3d

    "ave starved a,d bee, dead lo, ao' 3t ot cold a,d t"e. 7ere buildi, McMa,sio,s

    close b. a,d 3 started du+ster-divi, #or i,sulatio, a,d #ou,d lots' 3, t"e ,et .ears

    3d built +ost o# t"is "ouse* EEY o# it out o# t"e du+sters' 3 7orked ever. 8ob 3 could

    #i,d* still* +. electric a,d t"e 7ell "as bee, tur,ed o## too +a,. ti+es' A,d still* 3

    raised t"is roert. to its "i"est a,d best use'

    Resect#ull.* 

    D6

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    37/107

    $o", A' Reed pro se=E@0 Juil#ord )r')a.to,* O"io @@1@ED=-/E0-2=6Notra8ZNa"oo'co+

    D=

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    38/107

    i

    Exhibits

    Exhibit “A” Assignment from Option One to Wells Fargo  plaintiff’s exhibit 11 $9:9008

    Exhibit “B” Corporation Assignment of Open End Mortgage 1st Assignment from H&R Block to Option One   plaintiff’s exhibit “ 1” !"#"$%

    Exhibit “C”  Allonge from Option One to Blan&   plaintiff’s exhibit “8” !"#"$%

    Exhibit “D” Allonge from '() Blo*& to Option One plaintiff’s exhibit “7” !"#"$%

    E;+ $nd  Assignment from '() Blo*& to Opt One  plaintiff’s exhibit “10” 1"$+"$%

    Exhibit “E” E,EC-/O0 COP P2r*hase Pri*e and erms Agreement  plaintiff’s exhibit “25”   !"1"$%

    “E$” EC"PP(A signat2re page

    Exhibit “3” E,EC-/O0 COP 45O6 AME0DED A0D )E7AEDMO)3A3E 5OA0 P-)C'A7E A0D 6A))A0/E7 A3)EEME0

       plaintiff’s exhibit “26” 8/15/2005 

    Exhibit “3$” ?ECFAARMLPAWA@ D'e D+2+)e1e S-a-ee1-

    Exhibit “38” ?ECFAARMLPAWA@ Va2+(+-/ o6 Mo4-)a)e Do'e1-s O31e4s+

    Exhibit “39” ?ECFAARMLPAWA@ O4+)+1a-+o1 D'e D+2+)e1e

    Exhibit “3%” ?ECFAARMLPAWA@ S+)1a-o4/ a)e "

    Exhibit “3!” ?ECFAARMLPAWA@ S+)1a-o4/ a)e

    Exhibit “3+” ?ECFAARMLPAWA@ S+)1a-o4/ a)e $

    Exhibit “'” E;e'-+o1 Co/ Ass+)1e1- a1( Co1!e/a1e

    Exhibit “'$” E;e'-+o1 Co/ Ass+)1e1- a1( Co1!e/a1e S+)1a-'4e a)e "

    Exhibit “'8” E;e'-+o1 Co/ Ass+)1e1- a1( Co1!e/a1e S+)1a-'4e Pa)e $

    Exhibit “'9” E;e'-+o1 Co/ Ass+)1e1- a1( Co1!e/a1e S+)1a-'4e a)e

    Exhibit “/”  Ba42a/s Ba1 B+22 o6 Sa2e

    Exhibit “” Poo2+1) a1( Se4!++1) A)4eee1- Se. .0$

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    39/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    40/107

    Exhibit =U> I-e+a-+o1 o6 Ao'1- F+1a1e(

    Exhibit = V> Goo( Fa+- Es-+a-e o6 Se--2ee1- Cos-s "

    Exhibit =W> Goo( Fa+- Es-+a-e o6 Se--2ee1- Cos-s "

     

    ,Ohibit "A# Assignment from +$tion +ne to /ells &argo

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    41/107

    #or +ore ea+les o# Ms' 5oaka Loves Si,atures see ("ibit HHHHH#or +ore ea+les o# &otar. Ba,asze7skis Si,ature see ("ibit HHHHH

    ,Ohibit "0# 0risty ? ,m$loyment Verification

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    42/107

    0risty 3 ,Ohibit "-# Assignment from 7:R -loc; to +$tion +ne C?1@

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    43/107

    0risty = ,Ohibit ")# Allonge from +$tion +ne to -lan; 

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    44/107

    0risty 1 ,Ohibit "D# Allonge from 7:R -loc; to +$tion +ne

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    45/107

    0risty3 ,Ohibit ",# )or$oration Assignment of +$en>,nd *ortgage

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    46/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    47/107

    ,Ohibit ",# !urchase !rice : 5erms Agreement

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    48/107

    ,Ohibit ",1# !urchase !rice : 5erms Agreement signature $age

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    49/107

    ,Ohibit "6# ,G,)H5'+N )+!8 &L+/ A*,ND,D AND R,S5A5,D

    *+R56A6, L+AN !HR)7AS, AND /ARRAN5',S A6R,,*,N5

    B,)&AAR*L!A/A%

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    50/107

    ,Ohibit "61# B,)&AAR*L!A/A% Due Diligence Statement

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    51/107

    ,Ohibit "63# B,)&AAR*L!A/A% Validity of *ortgage Documents : +wnershi$

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    52/107

     

    ,Ohibit "6# B,)&AAR*L!A/A% +rigination Due Diligence

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    53/107

    ,Ohibit "6@# B,)&AAR*L!A/A% Signatory $age =

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    54/107

    ,Ohibit "6C# B,)&AAR*L!A/A% Signatory $age 1

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    55/107

    ,Ohibit "62# B,)&AAR*L!A/A% Signatory $age 3

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    56/107

    ,Ohibit "7# ,Oecution )o$y Assignment and )onEeyance

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    57/107

    ,Ohibit "71# ,Oecution )o$y Assignment and )onEeyance

    Signature $age =

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    58/107

    ,Ohibit "73# ,Oecution )o$y Assignment and )onEeyance

    Signature !age 3

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    59/107

    ,Ohibit "7# ,Oecution )o$y Assignment and )onEeyance

    Signature $age

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    60/107

    ,Ohibit "'# -arclays -an; -ill of Sale

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    61/107

    ,Ohibit "J#

    !ooling : SerEicing Agreement 1.3

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    62/107

    ",Ohibit 0 >. I1s-4'-+o1s -o C2os+1) A)e1-

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    63/107

    ",Ohibit 0 . I1s-4'-+o1s -o C2os+1) A)e1- 

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    64/107

    ",Ohibit 0 >. I1s-4'-+o1s -o C2os+1) A)e1-

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    65/107

    ",Ohibit 0@>. HMDA A'(+- See-

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    66/107

    0risti )aniIio C ,Ohibit "0C# Data 'ntegrity Sheet

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    67/107

    0risty )aniIio 2 ,Ohibit "02# Data 'ntegrity Audit

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    68/107

    0risty )aniIio 4 ,Ohibit "04# /iring 'nstructions

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    69/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    70/107

    0risty )aniIio ? ,Ohibit "0?# ,m$loyment Verification

    Child Support 1 Exhibit “L1”

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    71/107

    Child Support 1 Exhibit “L2”

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    72/107

    Child Support 1 Exhibit “L3”

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    73/107

    Exhibit “M” TILA Statement #1

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    74/107

    Exhibit “N” TILA Statement #2

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    75/107

     

    ,Ohibit "+# )redit Re$ort

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    76/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    77/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    78/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    79/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    80/107

    ,Ohibit "!# HniEersal Residential Loan A$$lication =

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    81/107

     

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    82/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    83/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    84/107

    ,Ohibit "# HniEersal Residential Loan A$$lication 1

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    85/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    86/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    87/107

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    88/107

    Exhibit ““!ederal e"ere Stati"ti$al Intere"t ate elea"e

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    89/107

     

    ,Ohibit "S# Loan Disbursement /or;sheet =

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    90/107

    E;+ Loa1 D+s

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    91/107

    E;+ I-e+a-+o1 o6 Ao'1- F+1a1e(

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    92/107

    E;+ Goo( Fa+- Es-+a-e o6 Se--2ee1- Cos-s " a)e "

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    93/107

     

    E;+ Goo( Fa+- Es-+a-e o6 Se--2ee1- Cos-s " a)e

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    94/107

    E;+ Goo( Fa+- Es-+a-e o6 Se--2ee1- Cos-s

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    95/107

    E;+ Goo( Fa+- Es-+a-e o6 Se--2ee1- Cos-s a)e

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    96/107

    Authorities +ne

    +n Standing : Due !rocess

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    97/107

    Civ' R' 1=AArticle 333* Sectio, @B o# t"e O"io Co,stitutio,S"ealy v& %amp0ell 1E/* 20 O"io St'Dd 2D* 2@& !allman v& %ourt of %ommon Pleas 1E=D* D O"io St'2d 1=6* 2E/ &'('2d 19alley Forge* @@ 'S' at @=2%oyne* 1/D F' Dd at @E@*

     Pestrak v& )"io /letions %omm’n* E26 F' 2d =D* =6 6t"

    Cir' 1EE1%ain v& %al"oun 1E=E* 61 O"io A'' 2d 2@0* 2@2 #,' 2State e rel' )all+a, v' Court o# Co++o, Pleas 1E=D* D O"io St'2d 1=6' #ort"land 7ns& %o& v& 7lluminating %o'* 11t" )ist' &os' 2002-A-00/ a,d 2002-A-0066* 200@-

    O"io-12E* at [1=$ravelers 7ndemn& %o& v& & .& Smit" %o& Ar' 1D* 2001* 11t" )ist' &o' 2000-L-01@)iscover Ba,k v' Brock+eier* 12t" )ist' &o' CA2006-0=-0=/* 200=-O"io-12* at [=%i"la,d %olida. Subdivisio, 1E=1* 2= O"io A'2d 2D=* 2@0* 2=D &'('2d E0D First +nion #atl& Bank v& *ufford 2>CC=4, =? )"io 'pp&d A, AA, AGEDC

    Wells Fargo Bank, #&'& v& Byrd * 1=/ O"io A'Dd 2/* 14-O"io-@60D

    Jurisdiction

    State ex rel& !allman v %ourt of %ommon Pleas 1E=D* D O"io St' 2d 1=6* 1=/* 2E/* &'('2d1 Patton v& !iemer 1E//* D O"io St'Dd 6/* =0* 1/ &'('2d E@1

    Authorities1

    !reEious +hio Judgments on Lac; of Standing only

    %ain v& %al"oun 1E=E* 61 O"io A'' 2d 2@0* 2@2 #,' 2 citi,t State e rel' )all+a, v' Court o#

    Co++o, Pleas 1E=D* D O"io St'2d 1=6'

    HS )ourt of A$$eals( =st A$$ellate Dist. +f +hio( 7amilton )o. A$$eal No. )>244?

    JHD6,M D'N0,LA)0,R 

    :Si,ce lai,ti##-aella,t

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    98/107

    2)V3?( 2)V33. JHD6,M 57+*AS *. R+S,

    :Federal courts "ave o,l. t"e o7er aut"orized b. Article 333 o# t"e ,ited StatesCo,stitutio, a,d t"e statutes e,acted b. Co,ress ursua,t t"ereto' Bender v& Williamsport 'rea S"ool  !istrit * @= 'S' D@* @1 1E/6' As a result* a lai,ti## +ust "ave co,stitutio,al sta,di, i, order #or a #ederal court to "ave 8urisdictio,' 7d&1

    :5"is Court is 7ell a7are t"at e,tities 7"o "old valid ,otes are e,titled to receive ti+el. a.+e,ts i, accorda,ce 7it" t"e ,otes' A,d* i# t"e. do ,ot receive ti+el. a.+e,ts* t"e e,tities "avet"e ri"t to seek #oreclosure o, t"e acco+a,.i, +ortaes' %o7ever* 7it" reard t"e e,#orce+e,t o# sta,di, a,d ot"er 8urisdictio,al re?uire+e,ts ertai,i, to #oreclosure actio,s* t"is Court is i, #ullaree+e,t 7it" $ude C"risto"er A Bo.ko o# t"e ,ited States )istrict Court #or t"e &ort"er, )istricto# O"io 7"o rece,tl. stressed t"at t"e 8udicial i,terit. o# t"e ,ited States )istrict Court is:!riceless';;

    JHD6,M 57+*AS *. R+S,

    -ased on Article ''' requirements and standing* S )istrict Court* &' O"io* (' )iv'2)V1141( 2)V1@31( 2)V1@C( 2)V1C1( 2)V1C3=( 2)V1C34( 2)V1C4=(

    2)V1C?@( 2)V1?1( 2)V1?3( 2)V1??( 2)V1?@( 2)V3( 2)V31?JHD6, )7R'S5+!7,R A. -+80+

    5"ere is ,o doubt ever. decisio, +ade b. a #i,a,cial i,stitutio, i, t"e #oreclosure rocess isdrive, b. +o,e.' A,d t"e TU? leal 7ork 7"ic" #lo7s #ro+ 7i,,i, t"e #i,a,cial i,stitutio,\s#avor is "i"l. lucrative' 5"ere is ,ot"i, i+roer or 7ro, 7it" #i,a,cial i,stitutio,s or la7#ir+s +aki, a ro#it -- to t"e co,trar. * t"e. s"ould be re7arded #or sou,d busi,ess a,d leal ractices' %o7ever* u,c"alle,ed b. u,der#i,a,ced oo,e,ts* t"e i,stitutio,s 7orr. less about 8urisdictio,al re?uire+e,ts a,d +ore about +ai+izi, retur,s' ,like t"e #ocus o# #i,a,ciali,stitutio,s* t"e #ederal courts +ust act as atekeeers* assuri, t"at o,l. t"ose 7"o +eetdiversit. a,d sta,di, re?uire+e,ts are allo7ed to ass t"rou"' Cou,sel #or t"e i,stitutio,s are,ot 7it"out leal aru+e,t to suort t"eir ositio,* but t"eir aru+e,ts #all 7oe#ull. s"ort o# 8usti#.i, t"eir re+ature #ili,s* a,d utterl. #ail to satis#. t"eir sta,di, a,d 8urisdictio,al burde,s' 5"e i,stitutio,s see+ to adot t"e attitude t"at si,ce t"e. "ave bee, doi, t"is #or solo,* u,c"alle,ed* t"is ractice e?uates 7it" leal co+lia,ce' Fi,all. ut to t"e test* t"eir 7eak lealaru+e,ts co+el t"e Court to sto t"e+ at t"e ate'

    5"e Court 7ill illustrate i, si+le ter+s its decisio, Fluidit. o# t"e +arket -- Q dollars* co,tractualarra,e+e,ts TU= bet7ee, i,stitutio,s a,d cou,sel -- Q dollars* urc"asi, +ortaes i, bulk a,dsecuritizi, -- Q dollars* rus" to #ile* slo7 to record a#ter 8ud+e,t -- Q dollars* t"e 8urisdictio,al i,terit. o# ,ited States )istrict Court -- Priceless'

    JHD6, )7R'S5+!7,R A. -+80+

    /ith DiEersity but ruled for of lac; of standing 

    S )istrict Court o# O"io* S')'*(' )iv2>cE>=CC( 2>cE>=?( 2>cE>11C( 2>cE>12?( 2>cE>13( 2>cE>@3( 2>cE>@3C( 2>cE>C1( 2>

    cE>2C( 2>cE>212( 2>cE>23=( 2>cE>?C3( 2>cE>=2( 2>cE>===?( 2>cE>==@ JHD6,M John D.

    7olschuh Dec. 12( 12

    :

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    99/107

    to bri, t"ese actio,s* a,d t"ese cases s"ould be dis+issed #or lack o# sta,di,'; JHD6, M John D.7olschuh

    Lac; of Standing !ositions 7eld

    Against /ells &argo -an; NA. 'n -old

    Dismissals Due To Plaintiff's Failure To Show Standing

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Nashe; Filed 10/1/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv02994;

    Disposed 12/3/2007; Judge James S. !"N

    • Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Ivy ; Filed 8/10/2007; Case o! 1"2007#$02%&; Dis(osed

    12//2007; )udge )ames S! *+,

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Mays; Filed 11/#/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv02334;

    Disposed 12/3/2007; Judge James S. !"N

    •  Ameriquest Funding II !" #u$sidiary %%C v. Bat ; Filed 9/10/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv0272#;

    Disposed 12/3/2007; Judge $a%&icia '. '()'N

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. A&ad ; Filed 9/#/2007; Case No. *:2007cv01703;

    Disposed 12/4/2007; Judge David D. D+!D, J&.

    • Wells Fargo Bank, N A v. Ernest ; Filed 11/2/2007; Case o! 1"2007#$0%1-; Dis(osed

    12/%/2007; )udge Da$id D! D.+D )r!• 'ashington Mutual Bank v. Clark ; Filed 10/1*/2007; Case No. *:2007cv03177; Disposed 12/4/2007;

    Judge David D. D+!D, J&.

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Brad(ord ; Filed 7/17/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv02144;

    Disposed 12/*/2007; Judge Da- 'a&o- $+S

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. DeFrati ; Filed 10/23/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv0327#;

    Disposed 12/10/2007; Judge C&is%ope& '. +5+

    • %a#alle Bank National Association v. %yons; Filed 9/10/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv02733; Disposed

    12/11/2007; Judge James S. !"N

    • CitiMortgage) Inc. v. North; Filed 10/30/2007; Case No. *:2007cv0337#; Disposed 12/12/2007;

    Judge David D. D+!D, J&.

    • MidFirst Bank v. Deem; Filed 10/22/2007; Case No. *:2007cv032#0; Disposed 12/12/2007; Judge

    David D. D+!D, J&.

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. #quires; Filed 10/6/2007; Case No. *:2007cv0307#;

    Disposed 12/12/2007; Judge David D. D+!D, J&.

    • D%* Mortgage Capital) Inc. v. +arper ; Filed 10/*/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv030*2; Disposed

    12/12/2007; Judge David D. D+!D, J&.

    • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Banfield ; Filed 7/2/2007; Case o! &"2007#$02272; Dis(osed

    12/12/2007; )udge Da$id D! D.+D )r!

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Black ; Filed 10/6/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv03074;

    Disposed 12/12/2007; Judge David D. D+!D, J&.

    • CitiMortgage) Inc. v. #tout ; Filed 10/23/2007; Case No. *:2007cv03260; Disposed 12/12/2007;

    Judge David D. D+!D, J&.

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. %e&is; Filed 9/24/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv02903;

    Disposed 12/12/2007; Judge esle !S

    Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. McFarla; Filed 7/10/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv02042;Disposed 12/12/2007; Judge esle !S

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. *ones; Filed 4/23/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv0116#;

    Disposed 12/12/2007; Judge esle !S

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. +enders; Filed 10/6/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv030#9;

    Disposed 12/20/2007; Judge Sa&a "+"

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. *ackson; Filed 9/12/2007; Case No. 1:2007cv027*3;

    Disposed 12/20/2007; Judge Sa&a "+"

    • +#BC Mortgage #ervices) Inc. v. +ilty ; Filed 3/30/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv00279; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    100/107

    • !MC Mortgage Corporation v. 'ashington; Filed 3/1#/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv0022#; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()

    • ,reen-oint Mortgage Funding v. Cook ; Filed 2/27/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv001##; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()

    • +ousehold ealty Corporation v. McCord ; Filed 11/#/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv011*0; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Raines; Filed 10/2/2007; Case o!

    • Dells @argo ;ank+ H.A. &. ;yr'+ =24 +hio A$$.3d 14@( 14>+hio>C3• 2"2007#$0111-; Dis(osed 12/27/2007; )udge )ohn D! .SC3

    • Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. ,lass; Filed 9/21/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv009#3;

    Disposed 12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()

    • "ption "ne Mortgage Corporation v. Merrit ; Filed #/#/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv00*3#; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()

    • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. +all ; Filed 7/30/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv00731; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()

    • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Muse; Filed 7/27/2007; Case o! 2"2007#$00727; Dis(osed

    12/27/2007; )udge )ohn D! .SC3

    • %a#alle Bank National Association v. Claypoole; Filed 7/24/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv0070#; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()

    • +udson City #avings Bank) F#B v. Castle$erry ; Filed 7/#/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv00#42; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()

    • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Clossman; Filed //2007; Case o! 2"2007#$00&%; Dis(osed

    12/27/2007; )udge )ohn D! .SC3

    • Nova#tar Mortgage) Inc. v. Nelson; Filed */11/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv00423; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()

    • +#BC Mortgage #ervices) Inc. v. ing; Filed 10/11/2007; Case No. 2:2007cv01047; Disposed

    12/27/2007; Judge Jo- D. )+SC)()8N+: e $'C Case Name "-de %&u-ca%es %e pa&%ies -ames a%e& *0 ca&ac%e&s. " %e

    Dee-da-%s -ame loo Case Num>e& a-d Fili-g

    Da%e.?

    Authorities 3Part. 3, 3,terest Case La7

    S"ealy v& %amp0ell 1E/* 20 O"io St'Dd 2D* 2@& 5"e urose be"i,d t"e real-art.-i,-i,terestre?uire+e,t is \to e,able t"e de#e,da,t to avail "i+sel# o# evide,ce a,d de#e,ses t"at t"e de#e,da,t"as aai,st t"e real art. i, i,terest* a,d to assure "i+ #i,alit. o# t"e 8ud+e,t* a,d t"at "e 7ill be rotected aai,st a,ot"er suit brou"t b. t"e real art. at i,terest o, t"e sa+e +atter'\ 3d' at 2@-2*?uoti, 7n re*ig"land *oliday Su0division 1E=1* 2= O"io A'2d 2D=* 2@0'

    3, #oreclosure actio,s* t"e real art. i, i,terest is t"e curre,t "older o# t"e ,ote a,d +ortae'%"ase Man"attan Mtge& %orp& v& Smit"* %a+ilto, A' &o' C-06106E* 200=-O"io-/=@* at [1/G

      (ramer v& Millott Set' 2D* 1EE@* (rie A' &o' (-E@- because t"e lai,ti## did ,ot rovet"at s"e 7as t"e "older o# t"e ,ote a,d +ortae* s"e did ,ot establis" "ersel# as a real art. i,i,terest'

    A art. 7"o #ails to establis" itsel# as t"e curre,t "older is ,ot e,titled to 8ud+e,t as a +attero# la7' First +nion #atl& Bank v& *ufford 2001* 1@6 O"io A'Dd 6=D* 6==* 6=E-6/0'

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    101/107

    5"us* i, *ufford * t"e 5"ird )istrict &o' 0=AP-61 Court o# Aeals reversed a ra,t o#su++ar. 8ud+e,t 7"ere a urorted +ortaee #ailed to roduce su##icie,t evide,ce elai,i, orde+o,strati, its ri"t to t"e ,ote a,d +ortae at issue' 3, t"at case* t"e record co,tai,ed o,l.i,#ere,ces a,d bald assertio,s a,d ,o clear state+e,t or docu+e,tatio, rovi, t"at t"e orii,al"older o# t"e ,ote a,d +ortae tra,s#erred its i,terest to t"e aellee' 3d & at 6=/' 5"e #ailure to rove7"o 7as t"e real art. i, i,terest created a e,ui,e issue o# +aterial #act t"at recluded su++ar.

     8ud+e,t' 3d' at 6=E-6/0' Si+ilarl.* i, Was"ington Mut& Bank, F&'& v& 6reen 200@* 16 O"io A'Dd@61* t"e Seve,t" )istrict Court o# Aeals reversed t"e trial court\s #i,di, o# su++ar. 8ud+e,t7"ere t"e lai,ti## #ailed to rove t"at it 7as t"e "older o# t"e ,ote a,d +ortae' 5"ere* t"e de#e,da,teecuted a ,ote a,d +ortae i, #avor o# C"eck \, Jo Mortae Services* ,ot

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    102/107

    7"at t"e. eect o# t"e )ebtor' 3t 7ill ,ot tolerate a le,ders or sevicers disreard #or

    t"e rules t"at over, litiatio,* i,cludi, co,tested +atters* i, t"e #ederal courts' 3t is t"e

    creditors reso,sibilit. to kee a borro7er a,d t"e Court i,#or+ed as to 7"o o7,s t"e

    ,te a,d +ortae a,d is servici, t"e loa,* ,ot t"e borro7ers or t"e Courts

    reso,sibilit. to #erret out t"e trut"';

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    103/107

    Securities a,d (c"a,e Act o# 1ED@ S(C' Ea 1ABC* 2* @*6b12D* 6c*de

    +thers

    Authorties 2

    %a,d7riti, A,al.sis !au0ert v& Merrill !o3 P"armaeutials, 7n&, 0E 'S' =E 1EED&35() S5A5(S OF AM(R3CA* PlaintiffE'ppellee,v' ^ &o' 01-@ED PA5R3C L(RON CR3SP

    Federal Code* Rules 9 Reulatio,s

    H.).). > 3>13 Bb%  $ransfer of an instrument, 3"et"er or not t"e transfer is a negotiation,vests in t"e transferee any rig"t of t"e transferor to enfore t"e instrument, inluding any rig"t as a"older in due ourse, but the transeree cannot acuire rights o a hol'er in 'ue course by a transer+

    'irectly or in'irectly+ ro( a hol'er in 'ue course i the transeree engage' in rau' or illegalityaecting the instru(ent.”  

    As stated i, Bukeye Federal Sav& 5 .oan 'ss’n v& 6arlinger 1EE1* 62 O"io St' Dd D12* D1stati, :ro+issor. ,otes are ,eotiable i,stru+e,ts u,der R'C 1D0D'DA;

    Accordi, to O"io Revised Code* i, order #or a ,eotiable i,stru+e,t to be roerl.tra,s#erred* it +ust be ,eotiated' R'C' 1D0D'21B' &eotiatio, i,cludes ,ot o,l. t"e ".sical

    tra,s#er o# t"e i,stru+e,t but also t"e i,dorse+e,t* 'C'C D-201* b. t"e "older to tra,s#eree* 7"ic"o# course* +ust be i, 7riti,' 7d&8 &%& 1D0D'22'

    section 3>3@Bb% of the ReEised Article 5hree of the Hniform )ommercial )odeSecurities (c"a,e Act o# 1ED@

    S(C' 10A a12D*

    S(C' Ea 1ABC* 2* @* 6b12D* 6c*de*

    O"io Revised CodeR'C 1D0D'DA;R'C' 1D0D'21B' &%& 1D0D'22

    )iE. Rule =2BA%)iER =1

    H.S. Statute of &rauds

    HS Law of )ontracts

    )iE. Rule =2A

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    104/107

    Aut"orities :A;

      -R',& 'N SH!!+R5 +& V+'D JHD6*,N5S

    4oid 8ud+e,ts are t"ose re,dered b. a court 7"ic" lacked 8urisdictio,* eit"er o# t"e sub8ect +atter ort"e arties* Wa"l v& ound 9alley Bank  D/ Ariz' @11* D00 P' E 1ED1G 5ube Cit. Mi,i, 9 Milli, Co' v'Otterso,* 16 Ariz' D0* 1@6 P' 20D 1E1@G a,d Millike, v' Me.er* D11 'S' @=* 61 S'Ct' DDE* / L'(d' 2d 2=/1E@0'

    A void 8ud+e,t 7"ic" i,cludes 8ud+e,t e,tered b. a court 7"ic" lacks 8urisdictio, over t"e arties ort"e sub8ect +atter* or lacks i,"ere,t o7er to e,ter t"e articular 8ud+e,t* or a, order rocured b. #raud* ca, beattacked at a,. ti+e* i, a,. court* eit"er directl. or collaterall.* rovided t"at t"e art. is roerl. be#ore t"ecourt* .ong v& S"ore0ank !evelopment %orp&* 1/2 F'Dd @/ C'A' = 3ll' 1EEE'

    A void 8ud+e,t is o,e 7"ic"* #ro+ its i,cetio,* 7as a co+lete ,ullit. a,d 7it"out leal e##ect* .u00en v& Selevtive Servie System .oal Bd& #o& >A * @D F'2d 6@* 1@ A'L'R' Fed' 2E/ C'A' 1 Mass' 1E=2'

    A void 8ud+e,t is o,e 7"ic" #ro+ t"e bei,,i, 7as co+lete ,ullit. a,d 7it"out a,. leal e##ect* *o00s v& +&S& )ffie of Personnel Management * @/ F'Su' @6 M')' Fla' 1E/0'

    4oid 8ud+e,t is o,e t"at* #ro+ its i,cetio,* is co+lete ,ullit. a,d 7it"out leal e##ect* *olstein v&%ity of %"iago* /0D F'Su' 20* reco,sideratio, de,ied 1@E F'R')' 1@=* a##ir+ed 2E F'Dd 11@ &')' 3ll 1EE2'

    4oid 8ud+e,t is o,e 7"ere court lacked erso,al or sub8ect +atter 8urisdictio, or e,tr. o# orderviolated due rocess* 'S'C'A' Co,st' A+e,d' - 5riad (,er. Cor' v' Mc&ell 110 F'R')' D/2 S')'&'N'1E/6'

    $ud+e,t is a void 8ud+e,t i# court t"at re,dered 8ud+e,t lacked 8urisdictio, o# t"e sub8ect +atter* oro# t"e arties* or acted i, a +a,,er i,co,siste,t 7it" due rocess* Fed' Rules Civ' Proc'* Rule 60b@* 2/'S'C'A'* 'S'C'A' Co,st' A+e,d' - (lug" v& +&S&* 620 F'Su' /E2 )'S'C' 1E/'

    A void 8ud+e,t is o,e 7"ic"* #ro+ its i,cetio,* 7as* 7as a co+lete ,ullit. a,d 7it"out leal e##ect* u0in v& Jo"ns* 10E F'R')' 1=@ )' 4iri, 3sla,ds 1E/'

    A void 8ud+e,t is o,e 7"ic"* #ro+ its i,cetio,* is a,d #orever co,ti,ues to be absolutel. ,ull* 7it"outleal e##icac.* i,e##ectual to bi,d t"e arties or to suort a ri"t* o# ,o leal #orce a,d e##ect 7"atever* a,di,caable o# e,#orce+e,t i, a,. +a,,er or to a,. deree - .oyd v& !iretor, !ept& of Pu0li Safety* @/0 So' 2d== Ala' Civ' A' 1E/'

    A 8ud+e,t s"o7, b. evide,ce to be i,valid #or 7a,t o# 8urisdictio, is a void 8ud+e,t or at all eve,ts"as all attributes o# a void 8ud+e,t* %ity of .os 'ngeles v& Morgan* 2D@ P'2d D1E Cal'A' 2 )ist' 1E1'

    4oid 8ud+e,t 7"ic" is sub8ect to collateral attack* is si+ulated 8ud+e,t devoid o# a,. ote,c. because o# 8urisdictio,al de#ects* Ward v& $erriere* D/6 P'2d D2 Colo' 1E6D'

    A void 8ud+e,t is a si+ulated 8ud+e,t devoid o# a,. ote,c. because o# 8urisdictio,al de#ects o,l.* i,t"e court re,deri, it a,d de#ect o# 8urisdictio, +a. relate to a art. or arties* t"e sub8ect +atter* t"e cause o#actio,* t"e ?uestio, to be deter+i,ed* or relie# to be ra,ted* !avidson %"evrolet, 7n& v& %ity and %ounty of !enver * DD0 P'2d 1116* certiorari de,ied =E S'Ct' 60E* DE 'S' E26* D L'(d' 2d 62E Colo' 1E/'

    4oid 8ud+e,t is o,e e,tered b. court 7it"out 8urisdictio, o# arties or sub8ect +atter or t"at lacksi,"ere,t o7er to +ake or e,ter articular order i,volved a,d suc" a 8ud+e,t +a. be attacked at a,. ti+e*

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    105/107

    eit"er directl. or collaterall.* People v& Wade* 06 &'

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    106/107

    A void 8ud+e,t is o,e 7"ic" "as a +ere se+bla,ce* but is lacki, i, so+e o# t"e esse,tial ele+e,ts7"ic" 7ould aut"orize t"e court to roceed to 8ud+e,t* *enderson v& *enderson* E S'(' 2d 22=* &'C' 1E0'

    4oid 8ud+e,t is o,e e,tered b. court 7it"out 8urisdictio, to e,ter suc" 8ud+e,t* State v& Blankens"ip*6= &'(' 2d 1D0D* O"io A' E )ist' 1EE6'

    4oid 8ud+e,t* suc" as +a. be vacated at a,. ti+e is o,e 7"ose i,validit. aears o, #ace o# 8ud+e,t

    roll* 6raff v& (elly* /1@ P'2d @/E Okl' 1EE1'

    A void 8ud+e,t is o,e t"at is void o, #ace o# 8ud+e,t roll* %apital Federal Savings Bank v& Be3ley*=E P'2d 101 Okl' 1EE0'

    A void 8ud+e,t is o,e i, 7"ic" t"e 8ud+e,t is #aciall. i,valid because t"e court lacked 8urisdictio, oraut"orit. to re,der t"e 8ud+e,t* State v& i"ie* 20 S'

  • 8/20/2019 2010-11-01 Motion to Appeal Ruling of the Lower Court and to Rule on the Following Filed Attorney Pro Se (00000…

    107/107

    3,validit. ,eed to aear o, #ace o# 8ud+e,t alo,e t"at 8ud+e,t or order +a. be said to bei,tri,sicall. void or void o, its #ace* i# lack o# 8urisdictio, aears #ro+ t"e record* %rokett )il %o& v& /ffie* D=@S'