2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Creekview

8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Creekview

1/18

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011Campus Plans

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Creekview High School

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010-2011

Joseph LaPuma, Principal

Vision Statement:The mission of Creekview High School is to inspire a creative, challenging, and caring

community in which all students will graduate within four years prepared to pursuepost-secondary education and become productive citizens.

October 1, 2010


2/18

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

2

CIC MEMBERS

Name Position Years Served Signature

Joseph LaPuma Principal NAGinny Biggs Associate Principal NA

Kimberly Guinn Assistant Principal NA

Phyllis Reed Assistant Principal NA

Diane Jouana LOTE/ESL Teacher 2

Sandra Gipson Math Teacher 3

John Herrick Social Studies Teacher 3

Dan Marek Science Teacher 3Donna Middlekauf Math Teacher 3

Emily Seeman ELA Teacher 2

Ronelle Eddings Dance Teacher/Dept Mgr 2

Sandra Parker CATE Teacher/Dept Mgr 3

Kathy Sechrist Special Ed Teacher 3

Stacy Lovett Counselor 1

Amy Fusco Paraprofessional/Parent/Community 2

Lee Huseman PTSA President/Parent/Community 1Steve Hamberger Business/Community 3


3/18


3

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment

The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics

(e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.

The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.

5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.


4/18


4

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase Parental InvolvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools

TS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services


5/18


5

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequately Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified Teachers

G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

C. Staff Survey (to be developed)


6/18


6


7/18


7


8/18


8


9/18


9


10/18


10

Creekview High SchoolCampus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA

2011 GOALS

All Students African American Hispanic White Special EdEconomically

DisadvantagedLEP

INDICATOR2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

Reading/English Language Arts 95.2 97 94.9 97 94.4 97 97.7 99 79.8 90 92.4 95 61.8 70

Mathematics 82.9 87 74.0 80 72.8 80 90.5 93 41.2 70 74.8 80 57.7 70

Writing -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Science 91.794

87.490

86.390

96.899

71.775

85.490

65.970

Social Studies 97.8 99 98.8 100 95.6 98 99.9 100 94.7 97 96.5 99 85.4 88

All Tests

Graduation 2009 92.7 94.9 85.5 95.5 71.4 92.9 69.0

Graduation 2010 Goal 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Participation: Reading/Language Arts 99. 100 100 100 98 100 99 100 95 100 98 100 100 100

Participation: Math 99 100 98 100 98 100 100 100 98 100 99 100 100 100

Attendance 95.6


11/18


11


Campus Goals2010 Percentage of Commended Students

2011 Goals

All Students African American Hispanic White

INDICATORCam-

pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011

Goal

Cam-

pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011

Goal

Cam-

pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011

Goal

Cam-

pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011

Goal

Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

27.6 19 8.6 33 19.2 13 6.2 25 16.2 14 2.2 21 38.4 27 11.4 43

Mathematics 32.3 22 10.3 37 13.3 10 3.3 18 18.6 15 3.6 24 43.4 32 11.4 48

Writing -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Science 31.8 17 14.8 37 14.9 8 6.9 20 17.3 10 7.3 22 42.4 27 15.4 47

Social Studies 66.2 49 17.2 71 52.3 34 18.3 57 54.4 38 16.4 59 75.5 61 14.5

Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

INDICATORCam-pus

StateDiff.fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.fromstate

2011Goal

Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

4.8 3 1.8 10 17.0 13 4.0 22 2.6 2 .6 8

Mathematics 4.9 3 1.9 10 21.1 13 8.1 26 12.8 5 7.8 18

Writing -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Science 9.4 3 6.4 14 19.5 9 10.5 25 7.3 2 5.3 12

Social Studies 29.8 14 15.8 35 52.1 35 17.1 57 19.5 10 9.5 25


12/18


12


2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance Measure80% of all subpops will pass Math TAKS in 2011 D, E

80% of all subpops will pass Reading/ELA in 2011 D, E

80% of all subpops will pass Science TAKS in 2011 D, E

5% increase TAKS commended percentage (all students) FMeet AYP with 65% passing in Math D, E

Meet APY with 65% passing in Reading D, E

Increase student achievement

Campus rating of Recognized from TEA in 2011

Campus Focus #2 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureAll students increase Lexile score by 1 grade-level. B, CIncrease number of students

reading on grade level

Campus Focus #3 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureIncrease participation by 10% (ACT and SAT) H, I

Increase ACT scores by 0.5 H, IIncrease combined SAT scores 1550 H, I

Increase AP test participation by 10% J

Increase achievement for

advanced academic measureson PSAT, SAT & ACT, AP

test

Increase students earning a 3 on AP test by 5% J


13/18


13



District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Campus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance Measure10% reduction in office discipline referrals from 2009-10 A

10% increase in student participation in extra-curricular activities from 2009-10

C

5% decrease in student tardies from 2009-2010 C5% decrease in ISS placement from 2009-2010 C

5% decrease in OSS placement from 2009-2010 C

Improve school climate

5% decrease in DAEP placement from 2009-2010 C

Campus Focus Criteria for Success Performance Measure



14/18


14



District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Campus Focus #5 Criteria for Success Performance Measure3% reduction in electricity usage per month DDecrease energy consumption




15/18


15



District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Campus Focus #6 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureIncrease PTA membership by 10% from 2009-10 A

Increase parent-community survey effectiveness rating by at least .5 A

Increase parent participation in teacher/student registration by 5% A

Improve parental involvement

Campus Focus #7 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureStakeholder survey B,CImprove teacher satisfaction



16/18

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2010-2011

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011Campus Plans

Campus FocusTitle

TargetArea

ACTION STRATEGYFORMATIVEMEASURE

ASSESSMENTTIMELINE

RESPONSIBLEPERSON(S)

COST/RESOURCES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

X X X T.A. 6 Create and support ProfessionalDevelopment Calendar for coredepartments for collaborative,ongoing core planning

On a 3 6 week basis OngoingLaPuma, Biggs,Guinn, & Reed

X X T.A.1,3

After analysis of data from eachprogress monitoring period,determine/ implement instructionaladjustments

By dept., create,implement, & monitor

benchmark items

9/28 10/211/9 11/1312/7 12/112/15 2/19

LaPuma, Biggs,Guinn, & Reed

X X X T.A.1,3,4

Non core teachers will continue tosupport SMART school wide goalthrough identified vocabularywords/focus

Collect campusbenchmark data at aminimum of 4 times

Benchmark datesfall between9/28 2/19


X X T.A.1,2,3

Math, Science, Reading/ELA andSocial Studies SSI mini-camps.

On a 9 week basis (8hours/grade-level, per 9

weeks)Ongoing

Core DepartmentManagers


$20,000

X X XT.A. 3

Target Marzanos scientificallyresearched based 9 InstructionalStrategies That Work, ThinkingMaps and Content LiteracyStrategies. Require teachers toimplement these strategies in theirinstructional practices.

Documentation inTeachers lesson plans

Observation byadministrators and

teachersStudent Perfomance

Aug-MayLaPuma, Biggs,Guinn, & Reed

X X X T.A. 3 Writing Across the Curriculum On a 9 week basis (one

writing summative in allcore subject areas, per 9

weeks)

OngoingLaPuma, Biggs,Guinn, & Reed

X X X T.A.1,3,6

Teachers will utilizeUnderstanding by Design (UbD)for planning and implementinginstruction

UbD documents fromCurriculum Department

PD PeriodCore Department

Managers

X T.A. 8 Implement Watt Watchersawareness

Monthly charts ofelectricity usage

OngoingLaPuma, Biggs,Guinn, & Reed

X T.A.7,8

Submit at least 70% of our schoolcalendar events to the District to be

Calendar eventssubmitted to District

August 2010through June 2011,



17/18


17

included in the District Calendar e-publication

calendar Ongoing

X XT.A. 7

Parent Conferences Parents willcome to the school and pick-up

their students grade report andvisit with teachers

Documented on Schoolschedule

March 2011LaPuma, Biggs,

Guinn, & Reed

$1000

XT.A.1,7

Host the AVID Parent Night andthe AVID IntroductionCeremony. The Parent Night willprovide an opportunity for parentsto become more aware and getinvolved in the AVID Program.

School Calendar September, AprilLaPuma, Biggs,Guinn, & Reed

$700

X T.A. 5 Maintain appropriate document ofHQ status of teachers andparaprofessionals; thereby focusingon the importance of hiring onlyHQ teachers and teachers assistantswho are HQ

Number of HQ teachersand HQ teacherassistants hired

August 2009 -May 2010, Ongoing


X T.A.5 Closely monitor the masterschedule to ascertain that theteachers have been assigned to

teaching fields in which they arehighly qualified.

Master schedule reviewJuly August 2009

Ongoing



18/18

Documents

2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Creekview