Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2010 JAM Junior Agricultural Mechanics San Antonio Livestock Show. CRITIQUEING PROJECTS AND EXHIBITORS. General Workmanship Square True to plan dimensions Evaluation of cutting, drilling, and welding Grinding has been kept to a minimum Project must be blue ribbon to place. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
2010 JAM Junior AgriculturalMechanics
San Antonio Livestock Show
CRITIQUEING PROJECTS
AND EXHIBITORS
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry NumberCriteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Documentation 20
Knowledge 20
Difficulty 10
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
General Workmanship•Square•True to plan dimensions•Evaluation of cutting, drilling, and welding•Grinding has been kept to a minimum
Project must be blue ribbon to place
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Trailer Workmanship•Use trailer check sheet•Inspect for protected wiring•Lights meet DOT requirements•Inspect spacing between tire and fender•Axle attachment•Weld spatter removal•Painting
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Electrical Project Workmanship•Conforms to NEC•Proper Polarity•Adequate wire length for repair•Neat and Organized•Wire to terminal attachment•Proper grounding
Design •Look for evidence that student has thought through the project
• Projects should be planned and drawn before construction begins
• Material selection
• Practical use vs. cost
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Trailer Design•Safety Chains•TxDOT standards (check sheet may be verified)•Protected wires•Fender clearance•Tie downs•Operator convenience
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
3 Point Hookup and PTO Design•Must meet ASABE standards•Sound construction and safe•Identification of pinch and wrap points•Shielding and SMV emblem use
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Wood Project Design•Proper fastener use•Selection of finish (finish matches use)•Flashing and sheet metal covers
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Documentation 20
Documentation•To be covered by additional presentation
*Students will be given a copy this year*
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Documentation 20
Knowledge 20
General Knowledge•Quality of projects has improved over the years•Points given for knowledge area are of greater importance•Questioning provides the best evaluation of knowledge•Fewer general questions –more specific
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Documentation 20
Knowledge 20
Knowledge: Judges Questions•Higher quality projects require more in depth questions to differentiate scores•Questions are tied to documentation and photos•Answers to questions should give the answer not a rehearsed speech•Student should be able to demonstrate project
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Documentation 20
Knowledge 20
Knowledge: Judges Questions• Questions should relate to project students have designed and built•Be prepared for an assortment of questions •As basic student knowledge is revealed request detailed information
Quality Project + Quality Answers =Placing Project
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Documentation 20
Knowledge 20
Knowledge: Question Ideas•Specification of material used•Welding information•Distortion control method•Project information sources•Project work sources
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry Number
Criteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30
Design 20
Documentation 20
Knowledge 20
Difficulty 10
Difficulty•Based on size, complexity and scope•Illustrated by a greater amount of skills•Construction difficulty earns more points•Intricate and moving parts earn more points
*Simple projects can be blue ribbon*
Additional Information•All members of a team built project should be able to answer questions•Try to maintain eye contact•Demonstrate project•Student must have the ability to sell themselves and their project•Student should be familiar with doc. check sheet, trailer check sheet, and critique sheet
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry NumberCriteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30 +
Design 20 ok
Documentation 20 Needs work
Knowledge 20 good
Difficulty 10 simple
SAN ANTONIO JAM JUDGES CRITIQUE
Class Item Entry NumberCriteria Possible Pts Explanation/Critique
Workmanship 30 Excellent corner fit up, good diag. Measurements, over-welding
Design 20 Intricate trailer dumping mechanism,
Quality latching mechanism
Documentation 20 Project built to plan dimension, photos show project progression, complete BOM
Knowledge 20 Excellent knowledge of welding process, knowledge of material sizing,
Difficulty 10 Trailer dump shows additional effort
Partnerships to aid students and teachers
• Teachers and other courses in school• Businesses• Industry• Family members
