(2010) James Figg the Lost Origins of the Sport of Mixed Martial Arts- John Nash

8/2/2019 (2010) James Figg the Lost Origins of the Sport of Mixed Martial Arts- John Nash

1/7

James Figg: The Lost Origins of the Sport of

Mixed Martial Arts

by John Nash on Nov 1, 2010Promoted from the Fan Posts by Kid Nate.

Tracing the lineage ofmixed martial arts back toits point of origin in nosimple thing. Unlike itssister-sport boxing, theevolutionary path of thesport of MMA has not

been a direct line. Whereas modern boxing can betraced back to theMarquis of Queensburyrules which in turn are directly descended from London Prize fighting which is directlydescended from the boxing of Jack Boughton who in turn is directly descended (both figurativelyand possibly literally) from James Figg, the first English boxing champion and the universallyaccepted father of boxing, the parentage of modern MMA is not as easily discernable. It is thechild of two parents, with one branch of the family tree reaching back to Japanese puroresu shootmatches and the mixed discipline fights of Antonio Inoki, and the other branch leading to Braziland to the Gracie clan and Vale Tudo. But, interestingly enough, if one were to go back even

further and look at the root for each of those two branches of MMA, they would see that theyboth share a common ancestor. One, coincidentally, shared by boxing: James Figg.

Born in 1695 to a poor farming family in Thames, Oxfordshire, James Figg was the youngest of7 children, who grew to be a 6-foot tall, 185-pound athlete. From early age he was an expertfencer, having become renown for his mastery of the short sword, cudgel, and quarterstaff. Laterhe took up the study of "boxing" as the unarmed combat, which had become popular in the late1600s, was commonly called. Figg himself referred to all these martial arts as "the manly art ofself-defense".

The "boxing" practiced by Figg was a very different sport in the early 1700s then from what it istoday. These were no-holds-barred contests that would usually take place over 3 bouts, one ofswordplay with a choice of live swords, daggers & shields, one of bare-knuckle boxing, and oneof quarterstaff or cudgels. The earliest "boxers" not only had to learn various weapon skills theyalso trained in a fist fighting art that included eye gouging, hair pulling, spitting, head-butting,purring (shin-kicking), stomping and kicking downed opponents, or wrestling throws andgrappling whilst on the ground. The men who partook in these matches were often referred to as


2/7

"prizefighters" because they would fight against all comers for prizes of money, free beer, hats orcups. And the best of these "prizefighters" was James Figg.

Figg had perfected a unique style of unarmed combat, which became known as "Figgs fighting".When dealing with a wrestler, instead of confining himself to only grappling, Figg would strike a

rival with his fists in the clinches when it was possible. Against a better wrestler he would usehis pugilists skills to batter them, until they could no longer continue or they were so beaten hecould easily pin or submit them. Against an opponent who could trade blows, he would grapplethem to the ground and force them to concede.

via www.historiadelboxeo.com

Figg traveled far and wide working the fairs at the time, where he challenged all comers in armedor unarmed combat "from noon til night". Soon the Earl of Peterborough became his patron andhelped him set up a fighting academy to train others, as well as build a fighting stage whichbecome known as "Figgs Amphitheatre". The amphitheatre was a raised platform surroundingby railings so that the combatants would have a proper stage to exhibit their skills. Later, othersuch amphitheatres would be built in Hyde Park and on Oxford Street in London, where crowdswould gather to watch young men participate in what was known as "boxing" or "FiggsFighting". The combatants were not always exclusively male either. There are many reports

ofbouts between women. One such match took place in 1722 when two women took the stage tobox for a prize of three guineas. The rules for this match required each woman to strike eachother in the face while holding a half-crown coin in each fist, the first to drop a coin would be theloser. According to the London Journal, the two women "maintained the Battle with great Valourfor a long Time, to the no small Satisfaction of the Spectators."


3/7

via www.thamehistory.net

Figg became the first celebrity prizefighter of England and his fame only grew when he claimedthe Championship of England in 1719. He would go on to defend it against such noted (at thetime at least) boxers as Timothy Buck, Tom Stokes, Bill Flanders, Chris Clarkson, and Ned

Sutton. In all he is believed to have had 270 fights of which he had only lost once, to the pipe-maker Ned Sutton, after having previously beaten him.

A third, deciding match, between the two took place on the 6th of June 1727, in front of anaudience of 3,000 spectators that included the Prime Minister of England, Sir Robert Walpole.The first round was with swords and a cut to Sutton's shoulder resulted in Figg winning thatround. The second round was fist-fighting which included throws and grappling, Figg won thisround by submission. The third round was with cudgels during which Figg shattered Sutton'sknee to win the match and reclaim the title. Now that is a mixed martial artist!

The path from Figg to modern boxing is an easy one to follow. Following his retirement in 1730

(he would pass away only four years later, at the age of 38), James Figg passed theChampionship of England to his student, George Taylor. Taylor would in turn lose the title to thelegendary Jack Boughton. Boughton, himself a student of Figg and possibly his grandson -would in 1743 write down his seven rules for the bare-knuckled fighting popularized by Figg.The first person to ever codify the rules of the sport, they were intended to protect boxers, a needa remorseful Boughton saw after killing an opponent during a match. Boughtons rules, as theybecame known, governed such matters as the size of the fighting surface, who would hold thepurse, the length of the count (in this case 30-second count) and forbid such tactics as grapplingbelow the waste of a standing opponent, or kicking, hitting, or grappling a downed opponent.These rules lasted close to a hundred years, eventually giving way to the London Prizefightingrules, which were introduced in 1838 (which forbid eye-gouging, biting and limited the spikes on

ones shoes), and then revised in 1853 (the use of foreign object - stones, sticks, or resin - werenow officially banned). These in turn gave birth to an even more regulated set of rules written byJohn Graham Chambers in 1867. These new rules, which called for boxing gloves, a limitednumber of 3-minute rounds, the forbidding of any wrestling, a 10-second count, and variousother features of modern boxing, became known as the Marquis of Queensbury rules upon theMarquiss endorsement. Modern boxing had been born.


4/7

via www.umich.edu

The path from Figg to MMA is not so direct. The easiest path to follow is from Figg to Inoki andthe Japanese puroresu scene, where the concept of Shooto or shoot wrestling was merely a prowrestling match fought for real. The rules of these matches come directly from the rules that prowrestling pretends to follow. And where did these rules come from? The rules of modern "fake"pro wrestling are almost exclusively the responsibility of one Joseph "Toots" Mondt, a prowrestler of the 20s and 30s, who was also a member of the Gold Dust Trio. He was looking todevelop a new style of fighting to help his wrestling promotion, and began looking to the past forinspiration.


5/7

He [Mondt] recalled the history of an early bare-knuckle fighter, one James Figg, who dated

back to 1716. Mondt dug around in the library until he unearthed printed proof of Figgs fame

and went to BilllySandow (another member of the Gold Dust Trio and manager of Ed

"Strangler" Lewis) with his data.

Sandow was interested in what he read, but it was Mondt who supplied the inspiration.

"Well take the best features of boxing and the holds from Graeco-Roman, combine these with

the old time lumber camp style of fighting and call it "Slam Bam Western Style Wrestling,"

Mondt said.

- Fall Guys: The Barnums of Bounce by Marcus Griffin, 1937

Thus the Japanes path to mixed martial arts goes from Figg to Mondt to worked pro wrestlingmatches to real (shoot) pro wrestling matches, and then, finally, to mixed martial arts.

The path from James Figg to the Gracies and Vale Tudo is a little more tenuous, and a lot morefun, as we first make a side trip to the colonial United States. There immigrants from thehardscrabble highlands of Ireland and Scotland settled into the hinterlands of mostly the southernstates and mountain regions, bringing with them the new sport of boxing. Before every matchcombatants would be given the choice of "fighting fair" - Boughton rules - or "rough andtumble". "Rough and tumble - or Figgs fighting became the combat sport of the young newworld, but as befitting those that had left villages with murder rates that would shock even thosefrom the most violent inner city neighborhood, they had made it their own.

via www.martialartsregister.co.uk

The Quaker Thomas Ashe, gave a detailed description of a melee between a Virginian and aKentuckian in his travelogue, Travels in America (London, 1809), The two had agreed to "tearand rend" one another - to rough-and-tumble - rather than "fight fair". Ashe elaborated what thismeant: "You startle at the words tear and rend, and again do not understand me. You have heardthese terms, I allow, applied to beasts of prey and to carnivorous animals; and your humanitycannot conceive them applicable to man: It nevertheless is so, and the fact will not permit me theuse of any less expressive term."


6/7

Ashe goes on to describe what can only be described as truly ultimate fighting. It was the sizeand power of the Kentuckian against the science and craft of the Virginian. After exchangingcautious throws and blows, suddenly the Virginian lunged at his opponent:

"The shock received by the Kentuckyan, and the want of breath, brought him instantly to the

ground. The Virginian never lost his hold; like those bats of the South who never quit the subjecton which they fasten until they taste blood, he kept his knees in his enemy's body; fixing hisclaws in his hair, and his thumbs on his eyes, gave them an instantaneous start from their sockets.The sufferer roared aloud, but uttered no complaint. The citizens again shouted with joy. Doubtswere no longer entertained and bets of three to one were offered on the Virginian. "

The crowd roared its approval as the fight continued. The Kentuckian grabbed his smalleropponent and held him in a tight bear hug, forcing the Virginian to relinquish his facial grip.Over and over the two rolled, until, getting the Virginian under him, the big man "snapt off hisnose so close to his face that no manner of projection remained." The Virginian quicklyrecovered, seized the Kentuckian's lower lip in his teeth, and ripped it down over his enemy's

chin. This was enough: "The Kentuckyan at length gave out, on which the people carried off thevictor, and he preferring a triumph to a doctor, who came to cicatrize his face, suffered himself tobe chaired round the ground as the champion of the times, and the first rougher-and-tumbler. Thepoor wretch, whose eyes were started from their spheres, and whose lip refused its office,returned to the town, to hide his impotence, and get his countenance repaired."

"Rough and tumble" was also commonly referred to as "no-holds-barred" or "tear and render". Itwas a brutal sport for hard people in a harsh land. One where the skill with which a fighter couldpluck out the eyeball of an opponent was as celebrated by spectators as any knockout artist orsubmission expert was today. The skill was so desired that exercises were devised to helppractice the craft and many of the best gougers "fired their fingernails hard, honed them sharp,

and oiled them slick". In fact the technique became so widespread that the "rough and tumble"also became known as "gouging".

"We found the combatants' fast clinched by the hair, and their thumbs endeavoring to force a

passage into each other's eyes; while several of the bystanders were betting upon the first eye to

be turned out of its socket. For some time the combatants avoided the thumb stroke with

dexterity. At length they fell to the ground, and in an instant the uppermost sprung up with his

antagonist's eye in his hand!!! The savage crowd applauded, while, sick with horror, we

galloped away from the infernal scene. The name of the sufferer was John Butler, a Carolinian,

who, it seems, had been dared to the combat by a Georgian; and the first eye was for the honor

of the state to which they respectively belonged. "

- Charles William Janson-Janson, The Stranger in America, 1793-1806 (1807; reprint edn., NewYork, 1935),

Eventually the most brutal aspects of the sport gave away to some sort of rules preventing theplucking of eyeballs or the rendering of flesh. In many parts of the country the sport of "boxing"was banned, but still it persisted, eventually evolving into what would became known as catch-as-catch-can wrestling, catch wrestling, or no-holds-barred. In post Civil War America it would


7/7

Documents

(2010) James Figg the Lost Origins of the Sport of Mixed Martial Arts- John Nash