1

BRUSSELS – OCTOBER 2010

Mr. Robert MADELIN

To: DIRECTOR – GENERAL

DG “INFORMATION SOCIETY”THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

From:

A PERSONAL VIEW

2

EUROPEAN COMMISSIONInformation Society and Media Directorate-General

The Director-General

Brussels, 3 August 2010INFSO/C1/JD/svc D(2010) 483128

eMail: marius.opran@eesc.europa.eu

NOTE FOR THE ATTENTION OF DR MARIUS-EUGEN OPRAN

MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE BUREAU OF

THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE

GROUP I - RO / REX & TEN

Subject: ICT4EU-SD and the Digital Agenda for Europe

Dear Dr. Opran,

Many thanks for sending me your communication dated July 2008. I note with interest that you have

pursued the work begun some two years ago in the Committee where INFSO contributed with views

and advice.

You will also have noted that the first of the Commission's seven flagship initiatives under

Europe2020 – the Digital Agenda for Europe - was launched by Commissioner Kroes in May of this

year. There are clear points of overlap and I would be interested in having your detailed comments

on our flagship – which included no less than one hundred and one actions and some thirty potential

legislative proposals.

(eSIGNED)Robert Madelin

Cc: Z. Stančič, A. Peltomäki, Assistants, D. Eckert, K. Ducatel, J. Doyle

3

Distinguished

Mr. Robert MADELIN

DIRECTOR – GENERAL

DG ”INFORMATION SOCIETY AND MEDIA”

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Esteemed Director - General,

Many thanks for Your letter dated August 3rd and for the remarks related to the content

of the brochure ”ICT for the sustainable development of the European Union” published in 2008

under the auspices of the Group I ”Employers” of ECOSOC. More than this, I want to express myparticular appreciation generated by the fact that You confirmed the existence of a number of points of overlap between our document content and the ambitious

“The Digital Agenda for Europe” launched by H.E. Commissioner Neelie Kroes, Vice President of the European Commission, in May of this year.

First though, I feel very honored by Your proposal to develop a detailed opinion on yourambitious flagship program. After a brief review of its content, I found that, statistically, it refers toa total of 16 well-defined areas of interaction IT2G, IT2C and IT2B plus three topics related to SingleMarket, Intelligent Transport and International Cooperation. According with the DG “INFSO”Communication, the program will be implemented through a number of 21 individual - type"Action Key", accompanied by 45 other supporting actions, 23 obligations of the Member States and11 adjacent tasks undertaken by the Commission – totally 100. Concerning the legislative action, theCommission is referring to a number of 6 themes, involving 13 key actions and 29 measures. Thebenchmarking will be applied for a number of 6 key performance targets, tracking the evolution of13 indicators.

As a first impression, I think that DG INFSO should pay a greater attention to “e-Inclusion”implementation, including emergency practical solutions for a range of current issues of priority inmany Member States and whose solution is urgently required by the governments of those countries- such as the integration of Roma children by intensive IT training simultaneously in several EUcountries during their schooling period, according with a special program developed within DigitalAgenda. Other spot aspect is referring to the necessity to add to Key Action 7 a special taskconcerning the need to change the current training method preparing our technicians only asdefenders, building up to our experts cyber-attack skills because if they will know how to attack,we’ll obtain a major improvement of our defence, the way of operation used by the cyber -terrorists looking familiar to our specialists. Another important improvement of our defencecapabilities in this field can be reached by setting up a mobile EU anti – cyber attack unit groupingthe best professional EU experts and equipped with the most modern equipment installed in mobilecontainers, ready to assist the European countries and our allies facing cyber – terrorism threats andattacks.

Respected Director - General,I hope to successfully complete this task, forwarding You the final report not later than

September 30th.Please accept, dear Mr. Robert Madelin, my sincere feelings of high respect and

consideration.

Best regards,

Nr. 554/EC/11.08.2010

EU NOT RESTRICTED

FEDERATIA NATIONALA A

PATRONATELOR SERVICIILOR

4

I wish to express my deep gratitude to Mrs. Irina SOCOL, President & CEO of SIVECO

and to Prof. Dr. Traian C. IONESCU, SIVECO CEO's Adviser, for their professional

remarks and permanent support.

Marius – Eugen Opran

Brussels – October 4th, 2010

5

- Key Action 1 -

Key Action 1: Simplify copyright clearance,management and cross-border licensing -by :

KA1(1): Enhancing the governance,transparency and pan Europeanlicensing for online rights management;

KA1(2): Proposing a Directive onorphan works;

KA1(3): Review the Directive on Re-Use of Public Sector Information;

KA1(4): Allowing EU citizens, to benefitfrom the full potential of the digitalinternal market, including cross-borderand pan-European licenses;

KA1(5): Issue a Green Paper on onlinedistribution of audiovisual works;

KA1(6): Protection of intellectualproperty rights in the onlineenvironment, with the guaranteesprovided in the Telecoms Framework.

6

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

Key Action 1: Simplify copyright clearance, management and cross-border licensing by :

KA1(1): Enhancing the governance, transparency and pan European licensing for onlinerights management by proposing a framework Directive on collective rightsmanagement by 2010;

MEO: KA1(1)

Since Europe is a union ship, it is desirable and normal to share not only legislation,economic values etc., but also cultural and historical heritage. Consequently, bringingdown borders which prevent free, unhindered access to such values becomes more andmore a necessity.The present structures for cross-border collective management of legitimate online musicservices - based on models developed for the analogue environment - need to beimproved for music to fulfil its unique potential as a driver for online services.Revenue achieved with online content services in the US in 2004 was almost 8x higherthan online content revenue produced in Western Europe. As music pervades Europeanculture and society, only music has the real potential to kick-start online content services.Regarding the present structures for cross-border collective management of copyrightfor the provision of online music services:The absence of EU-wide copyright licences for online content services makes it difficultfor these music services to take off.Improving cross-border licensing for music services requires the creation of entirely newstructures for cross-border collective management of copyright.The optimal solution to improve the cross-border management of copyright shouldintegrate:

The right of the right-holders to authorise a collecting society of their choice tomanage their works across the entire EU, enhancing the right – holders’ earningpotential;The right of the cross-border collecting society outside their national territories toobtain EU-wide licensing of the use made of his works;The establishment of a competitive environment for management.

With respect to cross-border distribution of royalties, the right-holders freedom to chooseany collecting society in the EU, will be a powerful incentive for these societies to provideoptimal services to all its right-holders, irrespective of their location – thereby enhancingcross-border royalty payments.The Member States would have to adopt and to implement a series of principlessupporting this solution as a competitive model for the cross-border management ofcopyright works.

7

KA1(2): Create a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination ofcultural works in Europe by proposing a Directive on orphan works by 2010, toconduct a dialogue with stakeholders with a view to further measures on out-ofprint works, complemented by rights information databases;

MEO: KA1(2)

Although digital form is by no means a compensation for the original, wideavailability of digitized works of art, orphan works, rare documents and like is a safeway towards increasing the quality of living by offering access virtually (in the propersense and also as a figure or speech) to anybody seeking higher quality of educationwithout necessarily using traditional ways (visits to museums, access to librarieslocated far away etc.).There are three long-standing assumptions on these orphan works:

Orphan work issue is linked to the lack of appropriate attribution of authorship inmany creative sectors, especially in the area of visual art and photography;Orphan works were mainly qualified as older works where copyright term by farexceeds their “commercial” life;The less commercially successful a work proved to be, the more administrativeeffort was necessary to search for possible authors.

Questions concerning the fee to be paid for the digital use of an orphan waitingfor a valid answer with the new Directive:

Whether a collecting society should in fact be able to represent right ownerswho are unknown;Whether a collecting society, after having received the license fee for the use of anorphan would have any incentive to actively search for the orphan.Whether a distinction should be made between uses that are for commercialpurposes and those that are exclusively for research and education;Whether a distinction should be made between published and unpublished orphanworks;Whether a distinction should be made between published and unpublished orphanworks;How to ensure that the costs of whatever constitutes a "reasonable" due diligencesearch do not outweigh the benefits of digitising the orphan work.

Coupled with these issues is the fact that each sector (books, music, film, soundrecordings, photographs, visual art) exhibit their own specific characteristics so that aone-size fits all approach to orphan works may not be feasible.Libraries - notably EBLIDA and the British Library - call for a legislative solution or astatutory exception:

They further identified the need to couch the problem in terms that would make adistinction between commercial uses and non-commercial uses such as those foreducation and research. This was especially pertinent in view of the fact that muchof what is contained in library collections and archives is in fact material that doesnot have an intrinsic commercial value or appeal but whose value is moreacademic or cultural.Both sides acknowledge difficulties relating to rights clearance for orphan worksand further recognise that a reasonable, good-faith due diligence search to locatethe owner of an orphan and/or their heirs should be undertaken prior to using anorphan work in the context of online libraries.Both sides recognize that users of orphan works should be protected from liabilityfor copyright infringement in the event that a right holder would reappear.

8

MEO: KA1(2)/cont.

The Commission should deal with a complex matrix of intentions, from the user andcreators perspective. Either or both intentions can be commercial, academic or non-commercial, and therefore a single solution to orphan works may not fit everyoneequally well.

On the question of payment and license, therefore the evaluation should start from aperspective that:

The common objective is the greatest dissemination of works possible;

That overheads to any scheme should be small;

That the intentions of creators are very important, be they public, private,commercial or non- commercial;

That academic, non-commercial or commercial intent of the user may createdifferent public policy objectives;

That despite this inherent complexity, solutions should be clear, simple and workacross Europe with as few barriers as possible

On these grounds, we would favour legislation to establish a copyright exception toallow copyrighted works to be republished in certain special circumstances.

We would favour a solution where:

An exception would require a publisher would have to show that they had madereasonable efforts to search for the rights holder through specified European rightsdata bases, and also in the general public realm;

An exception would then free a publisher from liability for damages if he has faileddespite these reasonable efforts to identify the owner of the rights in a previouslypublished work;

An exception would allow rights holders to identify themselves and claim royaltiesforward of that date for their works;

An exception would allow commercial reuse of commercial works, arguablyincluding some payment, possibly kept in escrow for the rights holders for aspecified period;

An exception would respect that works previously published under non-commerciallicenses or circumstances would remain non-commercial;

The reuse of a work should be for reproduction only, in a manner which is sensitiveto and in keeping with the original intent; and,

The reuse must respect the moral rights of the authors.

Works that have never been intentionally published have to be treated verysensitively. Privacy questions as well as historical value of works would be particularconcerns.

On the question of payment for use of commercial orphan works, the Commissionshould evaluate the option of selecting the principle of payment, but I have very bigdoubts that the payments will reach their creators’ bank accounts.As a private opinion, I consider that the Commission should avoid a general, paid-forsolution delivered through existing collecting societies. This is for a number of reasons:

Firstly, there are 27 member states – without legislation, which means 279 crossborder licences. This is impractical.

9

KA1(3): By 2012, review the Directive on Re-Use of Public Sector Information, notablyits scope and principles on charging for access and use;

MEO: KA1(3)

Large availability of public sector information allows for the dissemination of goodpractices and it should be favoured and encouraged by all means. Supplementary, there-use of public sector information leads to reduction in resource consumption,acceleration of providing solutions to problems and to the possibility of enlarging thescope of public activities in the citizen’s benefit.Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information (PSI Directive):encourages EU Member States to make as much public sector information available forre-use as possible. Representing an attempt to remove barriers that hinder the re-use ofpublic sector information throughout the Union, actually the common legislativeframework provided by this directive seems to become obsolete, mainly because of theenormous technological step forward done by ICT sector during the last 7 years.All 27 EU Member States have implemented the PSI Directive into their national legalorders, each of them introducing in local legislation, of course, a “National touch”!PSI covers all sorts of data generated by public sector bodies - e.g. maps, meteorological,legal, traffic, financial and economic information - that can be re-used by anyone else ininnovative products such as car navigation systems, weather forecasts, and travelinformation applications ("apps") that can be downloaded on smart phones.Public data that is reused (for free or for a fee) generates an estimated market turnoverof at least € 27 billion in the EU every year, from which: “Only the mobile apps market,partly based on PSI-generated data, could grow to € 15 billion by 2013” - according withthe declaration of H.E. Mrs Nelie Kroes, EU Commission Vice-President and EuropeanCommissioner for the Digital Agenda.

MEO: KA1(2)/cont.

A licensing solution through collecting societies would re-erect territorial boundariesmember state by member state - this goes against everything the internet is, andeverything the European Union is attempting to achieve. With the Union about toestablish full competency over intellectual property issues, we should be looking toharmonise our approach to copyright, and remove the obvious barriers to trade itcurrently imposes.Monitoring and ensuring value for money from collecting societies across Europecould prove to be impossible. I do not believe this is a task the Commission wishes totake on.Overall, it is a must to restate that this is a complex issue, but one that must beaddressed.The underlying problems with copyright should be addressed, such as term andregistration.

The academic, cultural and economic benefits of an orphan works solution could bevery high, and the changes is technology demand that a solution to the problem oforphan works be found.As a final remark, I consider that the Broadcasters' archives need a different(regulatory) solution than orphan works.

10

The Commission should act to realise the full potential of PSI for the EU economy,imposing to EU Member States to remove remaining barriers to re-use. These include:

discrimination between potential users;excessive charges for public sector information;re-use and complex licensing policies;lack of awareness of what public sector information is available;public sector bodies fail to understand the real economic potential of their data.

The Governments can stimulate content markets by making public sector informationavailable on transparent, effective and non-discriminatory terms. This is an importantsource of potential growth of innovative on-line services

KA1(4): After an extensive stakeholder dialogue, report by 2012 on the need foradditional measures beyond collective rights management allowing EU citizens,online content services providers and right-holders to benefit from the fullpotential of the digital internal market, including measures to promote cross-border and pan-European licenses, without excluding or favouring at this stageany possible legal option;

KA1(5): In preparation thereof, issue a Green Paper addressing the opportunities andchallenges of online distribution of audiovisual works and other creativecontent by 2010;

KA1(6): On the basis of the review of the Directive on the Enforcement of IntellectualProperty Rights, and following extensive stakeholder dialogue, report by 2012 onthe need for additional measures to reinforce the protection against persistentviolations of intellectual property rights in the online environment, consistent withthe guarantees provided in the Telecoms Framework and fundamental rights ondata protection and privacy.

MEO: KA1(4) This requires a careful approach, since benefiting freely of availability ofinformation in digital form might infringe on the intellectual property rights or might hindersome delicate security issues, especially in connection to the person’s rights to privacy. Wespeak about Internet market and we know that anything could be sold, but selling ofsensitive information in the name of freedom of access might have grave consequences!

MEO: KA1(5) This should be a mandatory regulatory instrument, properly dealing withrights and obligations in connection to the access to information, whatever its formand purpose.

MEO: KA1(6) - This is a very serious challenge. The wide availability of piracy, practiced at

international scale and encouraged by the uniform pricing policy (e.g. a genuine copy of a

computer operating system has the same price in Germany as in Romania, despite the fact

that the average income of a German is ten fold higher than that of a Romanian - hence the

tendency to use and even abuse of pirate software; the same approach is also applicable in

the entertainment and in other sectors).

11

GENERAL REMARKS ON KA1(4-to-6):

MEO: KA1(4…6)Copyright laws have been standardized to some extent through internationalconventions such as the Berne Convention. Although there are consistencies amongnations' intellectual property laws, each jurisdiction has separate and distinct laws andregulations about copyright, resulting huge discrepancies between the EU memberstates. It is the duty of the Commission to prepare and promote a new set of measuresperfectly fitting, without any discrimination, the rights of the intellectual propertyowners from all Community members.(1) The performance, (2) the reproduction and (3) the distribution of the same musicalworks, even when the performance, reproduction and distribution all take place inthe course of a single transmission.Any solution to the crisis in music licensing must make it easy for licensees to obtain,from a single source or at least a manageable number of sources, all the necessaryrights for all the musical compositions licensees wish to offer to the public. Such “one-stop shopping” is essentially available today with respect to performancerights. However, nothing approaching “one-stop shopping” exists with respect toreproduction and distribution rights. True “one-stop shopping” would involve: (1) allthe musical compositions one wishes to license, and (2) all necessary rights one wishesto license.

12

The Single Euro Payment Area (SEPA)and the interoperable EuropeaneInvoicing - by :

KA2(7): Ensure the completion of theSingle Euro Payment Area (SEPA)and facilitate the emergence of aninteroperable European eInvoicingframework through aCommunication.

- Key Action 2 -

13

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

Key Action 2: KA2(7): Ensure the completion of the Single Euro Payment Area (SEPA),eventually by binding legal measures fixing an end date for migrationbefore 2010 (It’s Mid-October!) and facilitate the emergence of aninteroperable European eInvoicing framework through a Communicationon eInvoicing and by establishing a multi-stakeholder forum;

MEO (KA2-7): Apart from eInvoicing framework, suitable attention must be given topayment instruments and, especially, to the security and safety of electronic transactions. Itseems to me that eInvoicing is of a secondary importance since the huge increase ofeCommerce. Here, the rules of the game have been established long time ago in the U.S.and Europe had no choice but follow suit.

Although Europe has a common currency, it does not have a single market forelectronic payments. Cross-border online transactions are complicated by technical andlegal snags, such as refusal of non-domestic credit cards.Two key actions designed to facilitate cross-border transactions are proposed: To complete the Single Euro Payment Area (SEPA) with binding legal measures.

Member States will also be encouraged to implement swiftly the key directivessupporting the Digital Single Market and to transpose by 2013 the VAT Directive;

To review the eSignature Directive in order to create an EU – wide secureeAuthentication system.

14

- Key Action 3 -

KA3(8): REVISION OF THEeSignature DIRECTIVE ANDINTEROPERABILITY OF SECUREeAuthentication SYSTEMS:

KA3(9): Impact of the eCommerceDirective on online;

KA3(10): Implement the KeyDirectives supporting the DigitalSingle Market;

KA3(11): Transpose the VATDirective ensuring equaltreatment for eInvoicing ;

15

KA3(8): In 2011 propose a revision of the eSignature Directive with a view to provide alegal framework for cross-border recognition and interoperability of secureeAuthentication systems;

Other actions:

KA3(9): Evaluate by end 2010 the impact of the e-Commerce Directive on online marketsand make proposals.

MEO: KA3(8)

Ordinary people are still afraid that the personal details involved in communicatingover Internet will be intercepted and misused. Authentication could use characteristicswhich cannot be mimicked or faked, such as biometric features, but this is still regardedas an invasion into a person’s privacy and the number of those who are reluctant inproviding biometric samples is and it will remain high, despite the offered improvementsregarding security.

In this respect, the Commission should cooperate with civil society representativeorganizations, which can play the role of mediator, dismantling the false perception ofthe citizens on eSignature and eAuthentication. This is the only one way to convince theordinary people to accept and to support these two performance and indispensabletools of the future generation of European eCitizen.The first step of the Directive’s revision should include a number of Citizen’s DebatesForums to be organized by the DG INFSO mainly in the less developed Member States,presenting the benefits of these technologies supporting the implementation and thesafe use of the G2C and G2B applications – as basic components of the complex,universal and never-ending application “eServices” - targeting a better life for the EUcitizens.

MEO: KA3(9)Please see the comment at Point 8. Again, much is to be learned (not necessarilycopied) from the U.S. experience in the field.

To stimulate online purchasing by consumers and SMEs, European e-Commerce mustbe reliable and easy to use, with safe and reliable payment systems and uniform EUcomplaint procedures. The Commission should consider an EU-wide system of onlinetrader certification, similar to system in The Netherlands.In addition, when making cross-border purchases citizens need confidence that theirpersonal data is secure; privacy must be guaranteed and personal data must bestored safely.Main focus to be put on e-Commerce involving children, with appropriate rules onCodes of Conduct.A special attention should be paid to Online Gambling, which is currently outside ofthe scope of the Directive and, in relation to which, there are a number of complaintsconcerning cross-border activities – i.e. the requests of the authorities from DK, DE, ITand NL demanding the online gambling service providers from other Member Statesto block access to their websites for citizens living in those states. It is the duty of theCommission to initiate the appropriate action to deal with these complaints and, toexamine the need for and scope of a possible new Community initiative.

16

Member States should:

KA-3(10): Implement swiftly and coherently the key Directives supporting the digitalsingle market, including the Services Directive, Unfair Commercial PracticesDirective and the Telecoms Framework;

KA-3(11): Transpose by 2013 the VAT Directive ensuring equal treatment for eInvoicingwith paper invoices.

MEO: KA3(10)

The notion should be properly defined and applied. Digital Single Market can easilyconvert into monopoly if free competition is not allowed to not only exist, but alsodevelop. Without this, Digital Single Market will become yet another bureaucraticexercise.

MEO: KA3(11)

This is part of a far more complex and large issue, namely gradually replacingpaperwork with electronic documents. This is a desirable action in any organizationone could name:

Government;Education;Health care;Justice;Local administration;Inter – state relationship.

In many cases, a document is initially issued in paper form. To circulate it, review,amend etc. multiple copies of the same original are produced and distributed; trackingtheir circulation throughout an organization, even if small in size, becomes an ordeal,let alone the work required to collect and implement amendments, comments a.o. Thealternative of electronic documents relieves the organizations from such burdens and,whenever needed, either a hard copy is made and authenticated or an electronicdocument endorsed by a proper digital signature is generated.This application can be developed and implemented only in connection witheSignature, eStamp and eBanking, and using strong encryption algorithms.

17

- Key Action 4 -

KA4(12): Review the EU Data ProtectionRegulatory framework

KA4(13): An optional contract law instrumentcomplementing the Consumer Rights Directive;

KA4(14): An EU-wide Online Dispute Resolutionsystem for eCommerce transactions;

KA4(15): Proposals in the field of CollectiveRedress;

KA4(16): Issue a Code of EU Online Rights;

KA4(17): Create a stakeholder platform for EUonline Trust Marks;

KA4(18): An increased harmonisation ofnumbering resources for provision of BusinessServices across Europe;

KA4(19): Improve the European Radio SpectrumPolicy Programme;

KA4(20): Investigate the cost of non-Europe inTelecommunication Markets.

18

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA4(12): Review the EU data protection regulatory framework with a view to enhancingindividuals' confidence and strengthening their rights, by the end of 2010;

Other actions:KA4(13): Propose by 2012 an optional contract law instrument complementing the

Consumer Rights Directive to overcome the fragmentation of contract law, inparticular as regards the online environment;

KA4(14): Explore by 2011, via a Green Paper, initiatives on Consumer Alternative DisputeResolution in the EU with a view to making proposals for an EU-wide OnlineDispute Resolution system for eCommerce transactions by 2012;

KA4(15): Explore proposals in the field of collective redress, based on stakeholderconsultation;

MEO: KA4(15)Collective redress is a mechanism to seek redress when multiple consumers are harmedby the same or a similar practice of a trader (e.g. by regularly overcharging all theircustomers). In the EU, 76% of consumers would be more willing to defend their rights incourt if they could join together with other consumers.

MEO: KA4(12)

This is a MUST. It is obvious that, up to now, despite efforts made by those in chargewith disseminating knowledge on data protection and providing lucrative tools tothose interested has failed to convince the population at large about the benefitsderived from enforcing strict data protection by using the fast developing ICTinfrastructure and instruments.

The Commission should cooperate with civil society representative associations,organizing a number of Citizen’s Debates Forums mainly in the less developedMember States, presenting the benefits of the ICT technologies and reinforcing thetrust of citizens in eServices.

MEO: KA4(13)We believe in the benefits brought about by transposing into reality this proposal. Theconsumer is often unaware of existing provisions defending his rights and, given thefragmentation and non-uniformity of the legislation in the field, he/she is unable todefend his/her legitimate rights. Unitary law instruments, widely advertised, wouldprevent the consumer falling into various traps set, at the boundary of law, byunscrupulous goods or service providers.

MEO: KA4(14)

Should be accompanied by special IT training programs for the judges of theCommercial Courts and for the referees of the Commercial Disputes Courts with theNational Chambers of Commerce and Industry.

19

KA4(16): Issue a Code of EU Online Rights by 2012 that summarises existing digital userrights in the EU in a clear and accessible way, complemented by an annualsweep of breaches of online consumer protection law and appropriateenforcement measures, in coordination with the European Network of ConsumerProtection Agencies;

MEO: KA4(15)Putting in place a policy mix of tools which can be either non-binding or binding. Theoption combines;

Promoting collective mediation or arbitration;Recommending to Member States that they allow consumers to bring small massclaims under their small claims procedure:Enabling consumer public authorities who are members of the EU enforcementnetwork to require traders to compensate consumers or to skim off the profit ofthe traders;Encouraging business to improve complaint handling schemes and raisingconsumers’ awareness.

Proposing a non-binding or binding EU measure to ensure that a judicial collectiveredress procedure exists in all Member States. This would mean that every consumerthroughout the EU would be able to obtain adequate redress in mass cases.EU legal systems are very different from the US legal system, which is the result of acombination of several elements (punitive damages, contingency fees, opt-out, pre-trialdiscovery procedures etc.).US practice will be not introduced in Europe being inappropriate to EU traditions,generally encouraging a competitiveness culture and not a litigation one.Impact on business:

Removing the unfair competitive advantage;Legal certainty;

A EU solution will eliminate legal uncertainty with one EU wide system for the SingleMarket.

MEO: KA4(16)

Again, this is a MUST. On one hand, it will become easier to know, understand and

properly use existing legislation, some provisions of which might be hidden in unexpected

other legislative documents. On the other hand, the production of a Code of EU Online

Rights will give the opportunity to account for and critically analyse the domain

legislation in full, which would emphasize missing parts, contradicting parts or

overlapping parts.

THE MAIN PROBLEM: How to best convince the consumers to trust on the Web in order tostart using intensively digital services such as online tax payment, car registration, shoppingand banking? European consumer will become a fan of online services only if he will trust the

technology he is using. The need of information about their online rights under EU law is crucial for the success

implementation of the program. In this respect it is the duty of the Commission to set up a.s.a.p. a Code of EU Online

Rights informing EU citizens in an understandable manner about their Digital Rights.

20

MEO: KA4(19)

Following a June decision by Obama Administration in the US to free up its 500 Mhzband as part of its wireless broadband initiative, in November 2009, the Parliament andthe Council agreed to modify EU telecoms rules and called on the Commission to proposea multi-annual Radio Spectrum Policy Programme (RSPP).The objective of the programme is to “set out the policy orientations and objectives forthe strategic planning and harmonization of the use of radio spectrum”. The EUspectrum policy, to be unveiled today, tells Member States to wind down analogueservices to make way for more digital services, thus freeing up bandwidth to higherbroadband penetration in rural areas, for example. The policy will also accommodatedemand for mobile and wireless services, like satellite positioning system on smartphones.Switching from Analogue to Digital - the Digital Switchover: Brussels proposed toallocate the 790 – 860 MHz sub-band to telecom operators to allow them to exploit the“Digital Dividend”. The 800 MHz band ranks among the most valuable freedfrequencies, since it travels long distances and through buildings.

KA4(17): Create a stakeholder platform by 2012 for EU online trust marks, notably forretail websites.

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA4(18): Propose measures for an increased harmonisation of numbering resources forprovision of business services across Europe by 2011;

KA4(19): On the basis of the European Radio Spectrum Policy Programme, coordinatethe technical and regulatory conditions applying to spectrum use and, wherenecessary, harmonise spectrum bands to create economies of scale in equipmentmarkets and allow consumers to use the same equipment and avail themselvesof the same services across the EU.

MEO: KA4(17) - This might be one of the best ways to encourage people to use electronic

preponderantly facilities as opposed to classical ways of procuring goods and services.

People often believe in others’ experience and “good practices” are readily embraced by

many. The danger that some villain businesses will intoxicate the public information with

biased opinion still exist (see the blogs associated to press releases etc., on which a flood of ill

intended comments could contribute by modifying the sense of the initial, genuine piece of

information), but this can be fought against by using tight control on the access to trust

mark site and processes and verifying opinions which look too far away from a decent

average. Anyway, common sense should prevail.

MEO: KA4(18)

The action is not only desirable, but also needed. Registration will allow easier trackingof those offering business services in an electronic form by using specific protectioninstruments (electronic signature, secured communication channels, authentication bytrusted agencies etc.).

21

MEO: KA4(19)/cont.

The EU has laid down two deadlines in its RSPP :

Member States should have completed the transfer from analogue to digitalbroadcasting by January 2012;

Freed spectrum should be available for wireless services by 2013.In rural and remote areas in particular, wireless and mobile networks will play afundamental role in bridging the gap between the digital “haves” and “have not”.Those rural areas that are not connected could be the focal point of public funding, butonly if it does not distort healthy infrastructure competition.The Commission preference for wireless services has riled some interest groups, whoargue that a push for wireless will tip the market in mobile operators’ favour.Actually we can conclude that the EU’s telecom market is not competitive enough.There are fears that the competitive situation will significantly worsen if measures arenot take to prevent discriminatory conduct in the delivery of the next-generationservices, where current evidence in a number of countries is not encouraging.Our service providers deploy between 100 and 200 Mb speeds throughout Europe.Reaching potentially over 100 Million European households, cable can help achieve50% of the ”Digital Agenda”.The spectrum enabling high speed mobile broadband should be divided betweenoperators in a fair and pro-competitive manner to ensure choice and affordability inmobile broadband services for consumers.The Commission’s 2013 objective of “Broadband for All” can only be met if satelliteplays an integral role: satellite operators are already connecting thousands of users permonth to broadband Internet. Satellite operators are also capable of providing 30Mbps services, if market demand supports it. It is unfortunate that the BroadbandCommunication did not recognize that only through satellite coverage can theseservices be extended to all citizens in Europe, a strength which is, by contrast well –recognized in the RSPP Communication.An additional spanner in the works is that of interference – a buzzing noise – ondevices. Questions: (1) What constitutes harmful interference? (2) How much of this willhit TV and radio once mobile gets hold of more of their spectrum?Making more and harmonized spectrum available quickly throughout the Union iscrucial for mobile broadband. Opening up additional spectrum for mobile broadbandservices is essential to bridge the Digital Divide and to meet rapidly consumer demand.Considering the growing importance of mobile ICT, Europe should move quicklytowards a more market-based approach to spectrum management, with moreempowerment of market actors and the introduction of more widespread spectrumtrading, and with less national bureaucratic prescription on bandwidth allocation.The Commission must be mindful to protect the interests of the citizens when workingwith global ICT companies to implement the Digital Agenda, because the interests ofEuropean citizens and those of the global ICT companies are not always aligned.As a general principle of policy, the public interest – the "public good" – should haveprimacy over private and business interests. It is clear that the market alone cannotproperly regulate itself for the benefit of the public good. Therefore, a strong regulatoryframework is needed to promote the interests of the greater number of citizens, asintended by the 2020 strategy.

22

MEO: KA4(19)/cont.

The Commission should take any possible measures to ensure that Member Statesrigorously enforce the Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications and thatimplementation is even, balanced and universal in all 27 member states.Member States should be encouraged by the Commission to assert their nationalinterests in the development and use of trunk-level transmission and switchingnetworks for the achievement of national policy objectives: like closing the broadbandgap. This can be achieved by working with Telco’s in Public - Private Partnerships.The European Union should vest responsibility in an appropriate regulatory authority,including members of the European Agency for Fundamental Rights, to implementeffectively the Critical Information Infrastructures Protection (CIIP) across the EU.

KA4(20): Conduct by 2011 an investigation into the cost of non-Europe intelecommunication markets to take further measures to reinforce the benefitsof the single market.

MEO: KA4(20)

This seems to be a formidable task, albeit very useful. Non - EU market is very difficultto discover, let alone to evaluate. Globalization of electronic services and the hugeand diverse arsenal of tools used by non-EU players can represent major obstacles inbringing to a successful end this project.

23

- Key Action 5 -

KA5(21): Reform the rules on implementation of ICTstandards in EU

KA5(22): Appropriate rules for essential intellectual propertyrights and licensing conditions in standard-setting, includingfor ex-ante disclosure;

KA5(23): Link between ICT standardisation and publicprocurement to help public authorities to use standards topromote efficiency and reduce lock-in;

KA5(24): Adopting a European Interoperability Strategy andEuropean Interoperability Framework;

KA5(25): Measures to lead significant market players tolicense Interoperability Information ;

KA5(26): Apply the European Inter-operability Frameworkat national level;

KA5(27): Implement commitments on interoperability andstandards in the Malmö and Granada Declarations.

24

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA5(21): As part of the review of EU standardisation policy, propose legal measures on ICTinteroperability by 2010 to reform the rules on implementation of ICT standardsin Europe to allow use of certain ICT for a home and consortia standards;

Other actions:

KA5(22): Promote appropriate rules for essential intellectual property rights and licensingconditions in standard-setting, including for ex-ante disclosure, in particularthrough guidelines by 2011;

KA5(23): Issue a Communication in 2011 to provide guidance on the link between ICTstandardisation and public procurement to help public authorities to usestandards to promote efficiency and reduce lock-in.

MEO: KA5(21)

PROPOSAL: Regarding the future Procurements for Computer Parts, Peripherals (alsoincluding Home Appliances and Real Estate) by Administration, companies andindividuals, we should set up and implement a new EU Standard on EnergyConsumption and Efficiency (SECE) for ICT hardware, home appliances, also homesand buildings.

As EU replica of the US “Energy Star” Joint Program, SECE - as a pure EuropeanExtended Program for Energy Efficiency covering the IT&C, home appliancesindustries including lighting, also domestic, industrial, commercial & office homes andbuildings - will allow EU Citizens and Community Business to choose properly theiracquisitions in order: to reduce the overall energy bill; to protect the Environment through Energy Efficient Products and Practices.The main tasks of SECE will be: to define new EU power consumption & energy efficiency – standards; to classify and label according to those new standards, all existing IT&C and home

appliances manufacturers, equipments and models.During the development process of SECE, the specialists should take intoconsideration two major critical factors: The attempt to bridge the gap between ICT experts and Decision Makers on a

political & economic standpoint is in this regard crucial; The actual amplitude of “Digital Divide” phenomenon at the EU level - the

enormous differences between countries inside Europe, despite the fact that WEshare the same Legal Framework!

MEO: KA5(23)

What can expect different categories of users from SECE, covering the hardware areas ofIT&C, home & office appliances industries - incl. lighting, and domestic, industrial,commercial & office real estate and public buildings?

SECE for domestic habitations: Help Citizens to make Energy efficient choices;

25

MEO: KA5(23)/cont.

Energy efficient choices potentially allows families to save one third of theirEnergy bill;

Offers tools and resources to individuals looking for major improvements intheir homes, reducing the energy bills and increasing home comfort.

SECE for Business Community and for Public Authorities: A strategic approach to Energy Management, saving money on two sides: the

bottom line and environment—as typical approaches; Will also help to measure current energy performance, to set goals and track

savings; Offer a proven energy management strategy;

KA5(24): Promote interoperability by adopting in 2010 a European InteroperabilityStrategy and European Interoperability Framework;

KA5(25): Examine the feasibility of measures that could lead significant market players tolicense interoperability information to report by 2012.

MEO-KA5(24):

INTEROPERABILITY is, perhaps, the main issue in effectively implementing the full set ofEU policies. Based on guide lines available, the EU Member States have adapted existingsystems as to comply with EU recommendations and regulations.However, given the large spectrum of such systems, extreme diversity in economic power,culture and traditions and based on the need to keep restrictions to a minimum, theinteroperability issue has been left so far as a rather second priority preoccupation.With the expansion of the freedom of movement, the effective materialization of thepossibility of any EU citizen to seek employment anywhere within the community, itbecame evident that some sectors and services suffer from the lack of properinteroperability strategy and cannot operate in the proper manner. Healthcare andeducation systems are two obvious examples.Consequently, adoption of an Interoperability Strategy at European level will represent agreat leap forward towards not only speaking about a united Europe, but also fullyenjoying the benefits emerging from this reality.

MEO: KA5(25)

This matter is in tight connection to the previous point. Licensing interoperability cannotbe governed only by market and competition forces; the minimal requirementsprovided in the Interoperability Strategy adopted by all member states is the solidbackground on which licensing interoperability could be performed.

Consequently, adoption of an Interoperability Strategy at European level will representa great leap forward towards not only speaking about a united Europe, but also fullyenjoying the benefits emerging from this reality.

26

Member States should:

KA5(26): Apply the European Interoperability Framework at national level by 2013;

MEO: KA5(26)

The need is too obvious to require further comments. Once a strategy in the field isapproved, several frameworks (meant to accommodate the diversity of economicdevelopment and cultural specificities exhibited by the member states) shall berecommended and each state will be in a better position to choose what it suits best localconditions, WITHOUT conflicting with EU adopted regulations concerning Interoperability

Defining a set of recommendations and guidelines for eGovernment services so thatpublic administrations, enterprises and citizens can interact across borders, The EuropeanInteroperability Framework (EIF – 2004) established that the following principles, of ageneral nature, should be considered for any eGovernment services to be set up at apan-European level: Accessibility; Multilingualism; Security; Privacy; Subsidiarity; Use of Open Standards; Assess the benefits of Open Source Software; Use of Multilateral Solutions;

Version 2 of the EIF is currently the subject of a political debate, where maintechnology/commercial issues relate to the role of lobbying for proprietarysoftware;What are we expecting from EIF v2:

To serve as the basis for European seamless interoperability in public servicesdelivery thereby providing better public services at EU level;To support the delivery of pan-European eGovernment services by furtheringcross-border and cross-sector interoperability;To supplement the various National Interoperability Frameworks in the pan-European dimension;

Further non-technology obstacles that stand in the way of greater EIF adoptioninclude the facts that EU Member States currently differ widely in terms of:

Scope of Government - services provided, degree of state ownership of businesses,scale of armed forces, police and border control operations;Structure of Government - central/local government balance, what departmentsexist, how departments interact;Citizen / State Interaction models - processes related to key life eventsStructure of Government - central/local government balance, what departmentsexist, how departments interact;Use of Open Standards;Assess the benefits of Open Source Software;Use of Multilateral Solutions;

27

MEO: KA5(26)/cont.

Speaking from an eGovernment perspective, INTEROPERABILITY refers to thecollaboration ability of cross-border services for citizens, businesses and publicadministrations. Exchanging data can be a challenge due to language barriers,different specifications of formats and varieties of categorizations. Many morehindrances can be identified.Hence eGovernment applications need to exchange data in a semanticallyinteroperable manner. This saves time and money and reduces sources of errors.Fields of practical use are found in every policy area, be it justice, trade orparticipation etc. Clear concepts of interpretation patterns are required.All the organizations dedicated to interoperability have in common that theywant to push the development of the World Wide Web towards the semanticweb. Some concentrate on eGovernment, eBusiness or data exchange in general.In Europe, for instance, the European Commission and its IDABC programmeissue the European Interoperability Framework. They also initiated the SemanticInteroperability Centre Europe (SEMIC.EU). A European Land InformationService (EULIS) was established in 2006, as a consortium of European NationalLand Registers. The aim of the service is to establish a single portal through whichcustomers are provided with access to information about individual properties,about land and property registration services, and about the associated legalenvironment.

KA5(27): Implement commitments on interoperability and standards in the Malmö andGranada Declarations by 2013.

MEO: KA5(27) - This action could be taken ONLY after all EU member states participatedin the process of generating and adopting a common Interoperability Strategy, detailed bysectors of activity, had the choice of framework best applicable in a specific country and,henceforth can commit themselves to implement the provisions of the interoperabilitystrategy and emerging standards

MALMO Ministerial Declaration on e-Government (18 November 2009) – mainaspects: (1) Joint Vision and Policy Priorities for 2015; (2) Mobility in the Single Marketreinforced by seamless eGovernment services for the setting up and running of a business andfor studying, working, residing and retiring anywhere in the European Union; (3) Efficiencyand effectiveness is enabled by a constant effort to use eGovernment to reduce theadministrative burden, improve organizational processes and promote a sustainable low-carbon economy; (4) The implementation of the policy priorities made possible byappropriate key enablers and legal and technical preconditions; (5) Joint Governance andImplementation of the Policy Priorities.

GRANADA Ministerial Declaration on The European Digital Agenda (19 April 2010) –main subjects included: (1) Infrastructures; (2) Advanced use of the Open Internet, Securityand Trust; (3) Digital User Rights; (4) Digital Single Market; (5) Public Digital Services; (6)Strengthening the Competitiveness of Europe's ICT sector; (7) International dimension of theDigital Agenda; (8) Benchmarking.

The commitments on INTEROPERABILITY and STANDARDS perfectly fit bothDeclarations, as basic modules supporting the reinforcement of the Mobility in theSingle Market by seamless eGovernment services for the setting up and running of abusiness and for studying, working, residing and retiring anywhere in the EuropeanUnion.

28

Integrating these two modern eTools into the complex construction supporting thesuccess of both targeted Shared Objectives by 2015 and Digital Agenda, Citizens andbusinesses will reach a better understanding and a high level of practical skillsregarding the large portfolio of eGovernment services designed around users’ needsand developed in collaboration with third parties, as well as an increased access topublic information, strengthening transparency and effective means for involvementof stakeholders in the policy process.

29

- Key Action 6 -

KA6(28): Measures aiming ata reinforced and high levelNetwork and InformationSecurity Policy - including:

Legislative initiatives suchas a modernised EuropeanNetwork and InformationSecurity Agency (ENISA);

Measures allowing fasterreactions in the event ofCyber Attacks, including aCERT for the EU institutions.

30

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA6(28): Present in 2010 measures aiming at a reinforced and high level Network andInformation Security Policy, including legislative initiatives such as amodernised European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA), andmeasures allowing faster reactions in the event of cyber attacks, including aCERT for the EU institutions;

MEO: KA6(28)

EU can successful approach a high level of cyber security based on a commonframework only through close co-ordination and co-operation of both public andprivate sector, i.e. governments and industry.Moreover, an increasing number of services are available online for consumers,service providers, governments; they all expect online services to be availablesecurely, at all times, in all places. The citizens need to trust governments in orderfor them to create an effective legal framework and to guarantee legal protectionagainst data theft, as an ante-condition to use eServices, including eCommerce,eBanking etc.This includes a perfectly functioning communications infrastructure to support thedemands of the Digital Society. Moreover, the service and infrastructurecomponents will need to actively cooperate to provide a reliable environment forincreasingly complex, interdependent and mashed-up services.We can not develop high quality IT systems and infrastructure without havingglobally applicable standards and easy-to-implement procedures.The wish of enhancing NIS can be obtained only by promoting the best practicesand by raising the affordability of Internet technologies within the public-at-large,avoiding any discrimination.ICT is the backbone of both the European economy and its society.Securing Europe’s CII as well as its systems is vital to facilitate the smoothfunctioning of the Internal Market and to create a culture of NIS in Europe andglobally. Recently the Agency identified the most five relevant research areas ofnetwork and information security within the next three to five years:

cloud computing;real-time detection and diagnosis systems;future wireless networks;sensor networks;supply chain integrity.

ENISA should continue its efforts in assisting the European Commission to developa solid approach in CIIP, undertaking a number of new important tasks relatedto: Establishment of a Pan European Forum on Good Practices Exchanges;

Establishment of a strategic Public Private Partnership for Resilience;Development of national CERT capabilities;Planning and execution of the first pan European Exercise.

Recently the Agency has produced 20 recommendations to different targetaudiences, e.g.:

Member States should establish a national information sharing platform andco-operate with other Member States and Allies;Private sector should be more transparent in sharing information, improvepreparedness measures based on information exchanged;

31

MEO: KA6(28)/cont.

Research and Academia should quantify the benefits and costs of participatingin platforms; undertaking case-study research into where attacks might havebeen prevented, or their impact lessened;The EU Institutions and ENISA should establish a pan European informationsharing platform for Member States and private stakeholders. The EUCommission’s European Public - Private Partnership for Resilience (EP3R) is themain policy initiative in this area.

32

- Key Action 7 -

KA7(29): Measures aiming at areinforced and high level Networkand Information Security Policy -including:

Legislative initiatives such as amodernised European Networkand Information Security Agency(ENISA);

Measures allowing fasterreactions in the event of cyberattacks, including a CERT for theEU institutions.

33

KA7(29): Present measures, including legislative initiatives, to combat cyber attackagainst information systems by 2010, and related rules on jurisdiction incyberspace at European and international levels by 2013;

MEO: KA7(29)

Ref. Critical / weak aspects of actual situation and the threats of large-scale cyber-attackson CII – GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS :

To speed up the implementation of “Five Pillar Action Plan”:1. preparedness and prevention: to ensure preparedness at all levels;2. detection and response: to provide adequate early warning mechanisms and to

minimize the counter - reaction time;3. mitigation and recovery: to reinforce EU defence mechanisms for CII’s;4. international cooperation: to promote EU priorities internationally;5. criteria for the ICT sector: to support the implementation of the Directive on the

identification and designation of EU CII;Every Member State should have an organisation whose job it is to inform, educateand support the SME sector on issues regarding cyber security. The large firms caneasily acquire the knowledge they need, but SME’s need support.EU should appoint an official with responsibility, and sufficient power, to implementeffective protection for CII across the EU.All Member States should permanently act in order to improve the professionalperformances of the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) affiliated with EUGovernmental Emergency Response Teams Group (EGC)The Commission should accelerate its work on the establishment of the EuropeanPublic Private Partnership for Resilience (EP3R) and integrate it with the work ofENISA & EGC.Risk Management Best Practice should be the driver of the CIIP policy at all levels. Inparticular, potential cost of security and resilience failures should be quantified andmade known to the relevantresponsible stakeholders.

Financial and other penalties should be imposed on stakeholders who fail to fulfiltheir responsibilities under a CIIP policy, proportionate to risk and cost of systemfailures due to their negligence.

MEO - PROPOSALS ON KA6&7:

Although many EU countries may already have multiple security solutions in place,proper risk assessment may require the help of an experienced partner – a EU high –mobility CYBER COUNTER – ATTACK SPECIAL TASK FORCE including top - levelexperts with proven expertise in securing government environments.The need to BUILD UP TO OUR EXPERTS CYBER-ATTACK SKILLS because if they willknow how to attack, we’ll obtain a major improvement of our defense because the wayof operation used by the terrorist will look familiar to our technicians.

BROADEN THE USE OF VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS (VPNS) – reduce mobile users’exposure to eavesdropping at Wi-Fi hotspots by implementing a VPN, which allowssecure network accessibility for remote access and mobile computing.

WE SHOULD CHANGE THE CURRENT TRAINING METHODDEVELOPING OUR EXPERTS ONLY AS DEFENDERS!

34

MEO: KA7(30)

It might be possible. However, there are great chances that it will consist of merelydocuments without proper instruments to contain cybercrime. Cybercrime is nowadaysclose to perfection, the variety of means employed overtakes the most vividimagination. It is, virtually, impossible to predict the occurrence and characteristics ofnew cybercrime attacks in order to prevent them.By consequence, the main role of the European Cybercrime Platform would be that ofLIMITING the damage produced by an attack and, at the same time, elaborating armsto prevent occurrence of the SAME KIND OF ATTACK in the future. Even the mostaccurate and effective intelligence surveillance and activity cannot efficiently preventthe launching of cybercrime attacks not previously encountered.Some main aspects concerning the above-mentioned criminal activities:

The organized crime is a very flexible phenomenon. It would “always go wherethe money is and the least risk”. This would require a flexible approach to the newtrends, including large – scale use of Cyber Crime methods.As regards money laundering, there is a need to differentiate between acts ofmoney laundering committed by organized crime groups and those committedby individuals or companies. Concerning the area of counterfeiting and productpiracy, we should outline the importance of these areas, because it is first of all upto the trademark and copyright owners to protect their rights through preventivemeasures. Thus, national, European and international professional associationscould supervise markets and new trends in counterfeiting and piracy by creatingdatabases or cooperating with public authorities. This practice could be extendedalso to other public bodies, like customs authorities, police etc. I want to outlinealso the importance of training measures and of information campaigns.

Other actions:

KA7(30): Establish a European Cybercrime Platform by 2012;

MEO - PROPOSALS ON KA6&7/cont.

BROADEN THE USE OF VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS (VPNS) – reduce mobile users’exposure to eavesdropping at Wi-Fi hotspots by implementing a VPN, which allowssecure network accessibility for remote access and mobile computing.CONTINUE TO USE DATA ENCRYPTION – avoiding the nightmare of handling theexpiring keys and/or when employees leave or recovering keys and/or when users forgettheir passcode key information, maintaining strong encryption mechanisms is a must.The Governments should pay a SPECIAL ATTENTION DURING THE POLITICALCAMPAIGNS, mainly because the increasing reliance of political campaigns on web sitesfor fundraising and organizing opens the door to serious security risks, including: Diversion of online campaign donations or donor information; Web site hacking to present misinformation about candidates’ positions and conduct; Crashing of Web site at a crucial time.ANY CYBER-ATTACK AGAINST EU, NATO AND ALLIED COUNTRIESSHOULD BE PUNISHED! EU and US should sign a common declaration, warning the Cyber Terrorists that:

“IN THE CASE OF A CYBER ATTACK AGAINST THEM OR AGAINST THEIR ALLIES,THE RESPONSES WILL BE NOT LIMITED TO THE CYBER DOMAIN AND CAN ALSOINCLUDE STRONG MILITARY PUNISHING ACTIONS“!

35

FOR A BETTER UNDERSTANDING – SUPPORTING KA6 AND KA7:

To fight Cyber Crime first of all it is necessary to identify the sectoral types ofeconomic and financial crime generating an exponential growth of thisphenomenon. Without implying any order of priority, we should examine thefollowing clusters of crime, being organized or non-organized:

Corruption;Fraud, notably with regard to product counterfeiting and piracy and thefraudulent use of non-cash means of payment;Theft in the area of intellectual property;Money laundering;Other major Cyber Crime issues.

According with the same recent studies, corporate organizations did not want to

share their bad experience because of fear for their reputation. Surprisingly, two

thirds of crime-affected companies did not see the need to change their control

procedures, which had apparently failed. Therefore, it proved difficult to persuade

companies to introduce additional fraud prevention techniques. Cyber Crime issues

turned out to be an ever-growing concern for the companies.

Concerning Data Protection, we should highlight that a balanced approach of

respecting these rules on the one hand and allowing data collection for investigative

and preventive purposes would be indispensable. As regards the need to respect

legitimate interests of private sector, we are obliged to take into account the fact

that some professional groups are not determined by profit making. Also, the

specificities of all independent professions should be respected. The business

community should be strongly recognized as a partner in Cyber Crime prevention,

working voluntarily mainly in three directions: applying business security practice

and principles; issuing self-regulation in each commercial sector; adopting self-

regulation code in a single corporation, which means an internal compliance system

with ethical guidelines and control.

More and more companies had to deal with infiltration of illicit activities and to face

the penetration of their IT systems by intruders - on the one hand and the higher

expectation of the consumers and of the public opinion - on the other hand, to

provide not only quality goods and services, but also to do this in a sustainable and

ethical way. The private sector should try to meet these new trends with self-

regulation mainly.

MEO: KA7(30)/cont.

The issue of companies as victims of Cyber Crime had become a growingconcern among stakeholders. Whilst “good management” had recognized theneed for effective in-house fraud prevention through more accountability andtransparency using ICT methods in order to limit the reputation damage, manysmall and medium-sized enterprises still did not have any anti-fraudmechanisms in place. Others are concerned rather about profit making thanexpensive crime prevention. Also, there is a trend only to comply with law-imposed action such as in the field of money laundering. Voluntary measures onthe other hand in the field of fraud prevention are still perceived like as a non-value cost.

36

The need to improve the co-operation between all actors concerned, users and

consumers, industry and law enforcement;

the need for ongoing industry and community – led initiatives.

My proposal is referring to the acceptance by consensus of the General Principles which can

be applied successfully for all the sectors under the Cyber Crime threats - as guidelines for

the future activity. Briefly, we should impose to all in-charge players and potential victim –

authorities, companies or individuals - the need to respect:

1. the rights and freedoms of individuals2. the applicable data protection rules3. competition and public procurements rules4. the legitimate interests of the industries and services involved5. the rights and obligations of independent professions6. the duties and competencies of the interest public authorities, in particular law

enforcement and public regulatory and control bodies.Also, the need:

1. to have a fair share of responsibilities between public authorities and private sector inthe implementation of crime prevention schemes

2. for partnerships based on voluntary approaches allowing for regular assessment ofcommitments and of results achieved with a view to permitting adjustments.

KA7(31): Examine the feasibility by 2011 to create a European Cybercrime Centre;

MEO: KA7(31) - Please see also the next remarks on the KA7(30…33)

It might be possible to examine, by 2011, the feasibility and issue directions to be followedto build an European Cybercrime Centre. In my opinion, the time is too short and theactors are insufficiently prepared to have, indeed, such a Centre fully operational in 2011!

MEO: KA7(30…33) - PROPOSAL FOR A NEW KEY ACTION

There are more and more complex crimes through computers and these threatsrepresents an incredible challenge for law enforcement. Actually can be defined 3 largecomponents:

Cyber Crime, which is somebody using a computer to commit crime, to makemoney, to commit fraud or murder.Cyber-terrorism, which would be terrorists using computers to attack, to bringdown the electrical grid, to attack air traffic control, those kinds of things.Information warfare – the most interesting, creative and difficult out of three.

US and the European Union are the world's biggest targets. Nobody knows how muchwas lost, the estimation varying around hundreds of billions, which is probably prettyreasonable. Unfortunately, the Businesses won't report it and, generally speaking,nobody wants to talk about it. It's a major problem. We can't solve it on our own andwe need to try to get other countries worldwide on board with us because it'sinternational. In Cyber Crime, borders don't count!

37

Internet-related crime, like any other crime, should be reported to appropriate lawenforcement investigative authorities at the local, national and Community levels,depending on the scope of the crime. It is the duty of the Commission to set-up adedicated entity at the Union level – as part of ENISA or as an independent unit -giving the victims of cyber crime a convenient and easy-to-use reporting mechanismthat alerts authorities of suspected criminal or civil violations. For law enforcement andregulatory agencies at the Community, national and local level, this unit shouldrepresent the central referral mechanism for complaints involving Internet relatedcrimes in EU space. Each of National Law Reinforcement Agencies acting in the area of Cybercrime

should have offices conveniently located country – wide, to which crimes may bereported. Contact information regarding local and national offices should be foundin local telephone directories. In general, cyber crime may be reported to the localoffice of the national law enforcement agency by using a telephone hotline and byrequesting the "Duty Complaint Agent". Depending on the scope and the amplitudeof crime, the citizens can also directly report to National Alert Platform or toCommunity Call Center by using dedicated public hotlines.

In this respect, the Commission should create a new independent entity - “The EUInternet Crime Complaint Center - EU-IC3”- the Community Central Focal Point,including the EU - level Central Calling Center - based on the partnership betweenthe Member States’ Law Reinforcement Agencies acting in the area of cyber crimeand hierarchically placed under the authority of the Commission as an independentunit. In this respect the EU-IC3 should include in his structure a high – mobility EUTask Force for rapid reaction and countermeasures against reported major threats.

EU-IC3's mission is to serve as a vehicle to receive, develop, and refer criminalcomplaints regarding the rapidly expanding arena of cyber crime, having also thecapabilities to take active measures to neutralize and eliminate the reportedthreats. The EU-IC3 gives the victims of cyber crime a convenient and easy-to-usereporting mechanism that alerts authorities of suspected criminal or civil violations.For law enforcement and regulatory agencies at the Community, member state,and local level, IC3 provides a central referral mechanism for complaints involvingInternet - related crimes.

KA7(32): Work with global stakeholders notably to strengthen global risk managementin the digital and in the physical sphere and conduct internationallycoordinated targeted actions against computer-based crime and securityattacks;

MEO: KA7(32)

An obvious need. It will be difficult to select the partners, given that interests aresometimes diverging and the objectives might not necessarily be given the samepriority. Not all countries outside the EU, although victims of Cybercrime, are willing tocommit themselves to an all-out war against this plague. If strong and resourcefulpotential partners (in this particular domain of interest), such as Russia, China, India donot want to participate in the initiative, the task accomplishment will encounter majorobstacles.

On 17 September 2010, US has urged the EU to make Cyber Security a largerpriority as Washington begins to up the ante on its own defences. Basic reasons:

38

MEO: KA7(32)/cont.

The US military services face over 100 threats a day;The Transatlantic partners should revive their Cold War alliance in fending offthreats to network security in the Western world;

NATO should build a Cyber Shield to protect the Transatlantic Alliance fromnetwork threats, in particular threats to its military and economic resources;The US recently devised a new strategy to tackle threats which would try tomonitor and track down network intruders and retaliate more quickly andeffectively;Threats are usually manifested in malware attached to innocuous-looking files;The networks are the country’s fifth domain of warfare after land, sea, air andspace;The possible outcomes of a cyber attack could range from the crashing an entirecountry’s electricity grids to the infection of high-tech military equipmentAccording with the Commission, the cost of cybercrime in the EU reached thevalue of Euro 750 Bn annually, vastly exceeding drug trafficking and isequivalent to 1% of global GDP.

According with the Convention on Cybercrime adopted in 2001 by the Council ofEurope, the EU countries could adopt a common position on practical issues such asblocking IP addresses and revoking domain names.

Though Cyber Security has been more of a peripheral issue in the EU, recentlypolicymakers have begun work on beefing up the bloc’s resources to fight possibleattacks.In April 2010, EU ministers meeting in Luxembourg asked the Commission to“assess the feasibility” of setting up a single centre on cybercrime to pool MemberStates’ efforts and resources to fight Internet crime.Though network insecurity is commonly understood as a national security threat,academic and experts have been urging policymakers that cyber warfare doesnot know national borders.I highly appreciate and fully support the proposal of Prof. John Howorth from UK– quote: “EU SHOULD ESTABLISH (1) A EUROPEAN SECURITY COUNCIL, (2) AFORMAL COUNCIL OF DEFENCE MINISTERS, (3) A EUROPEAN WHITE BOOKON SECURITY AND DEFENCE AND (4) AN INTEGRATED INTELLIGENCEAGENCY” – end of quote.

KA7(33): Support EU-wide cyber-security preparedness exercises, from 2010;

MEO: KA7(33)

Actually there is a critical need of information exchange on how Member Stateshandle ICT incidents at national level and how they are protecting the CII.Moreover, the experts should define in a rigorous way what a Pan - Europeanapproach to a CIIP crisis management could be.The first Pan - European Exercise on CIIP in accordance with Tallinn MinisterialDeclaration will represent a major step forward in this critical domain.The most important details of the exercise are referring to: (1) the establishment ofthe final list of events in the scenario, (2) the monitoring and evaluation, (3) the

39

MEO: KA7(35)

In line with the periodic review by the Commission of the functioning of the fivedirectives comprising the existing regulatory framework for electronic communicationsnetworks and services, in order to establish the need for modification in the light oftechnological and market developments.The competent national authorities should promote the interests of citizens by ensuring ahigh level of protection of personal data and privacy. To this end, competent nationalauthorities should have the necessary means to perform their duties, includingcomprehensive and reliable data about security incidents that have led to the personaldata of individuals being compromised.Providers should therefore maintain an inventory of personal data breaches to enablefurther analysis and evaluation by the competent national authorities.Software that surreptitiously monitors the actions of the user or subverts the operation ofthe user’s terminal equipment to the benefit of a third party (spyware) poses a seriousthreat to the privacy of users, as do viruses.A high and equal level of protection of the private sphere of users needs to be ensured,regardless of whether unwanted spying programmes or viruses are inadvertentlydownloaded via electronic communications networks or are delivered and installed insoftware distributed on other external data storage media, such as CDs, CD-ROMs orUSB keys.Member States should encourage the provision of information to end-users aboutavailable precautions, and should encourage them to take the necessary steps to protecttheir terminal equipment against viruses and spyware.The implementation and enforcement of the provisions of the document often requirecooperation between the national regulatory authorities of two or more Member States,for example in combating cross-border spam and spyware. Such procedures will alsoallow the resulting obligations of market actors to be harmonised, contributing to thecreation of a level playing field in the Community.

technical implementation and (4) the efficiency of the tools the ENISA has at itsdisposal.

KA7(34): As part of the modernisation of the EU personal data protectionregulatory framework to make it more coherent and legally certain, explore theextension of security breach notification provisions;

MEO: KA7(34) - This point, as well as the next three, requires a massive campaign tobetter inform the public about their rights concerning privacy. This notion does notencompass bank accounts or life within family. It also concerns information aboutvisited sites, habits and routines used when searching the net. Many features embeddedin the cookies so often infiltrated in the software represent genuine invasion into aperson’s privacy. Another aspect on which attention is to be focused is the employers’tendency to expand supervision of employers at work, under the cover that, while atwork, employees’ activity should be dedicated exclusively to the purpose. Regulationsshould be issued related to the use of cameras, microphones, authentication etc. atwork. Only after the ordinary citizens know and understand their rights and what arethe possible dangers and ways of infringing with their security breach notificationsacquire meaning and substance.

KA7(35): Give guidance by 2011 for the implementation of new Telecoms Frameworkwith regard to the protection of individuals' privacy and personal data;

40

MEO: KA7(35)/cont.

Technological progress allows the development of new applications based on devices fordata collection and identification, which could be contactless devices using radiofrequencies. For example, the wide use of RFIDs can bring considerable economic andsocial benefit and thus make a powerful contribution to the internal market, if their useis acceptable to citizens.It is necessary to ensure that all fundamental rights of individuals, including the right toprivacy and data protection, are safeguarded. When RFID devices are connected topublicly available electronic communications networks or make use of electroniccommunications services as a basic infrastructure, the relevant provisions of Directive onprivacy and electronic communications, including those on security, traffic and locationdata and on confidentiality, should apply.Support reporting points for illegal content online (hotlines) and awareness campaigns ononline safety for children run at national level and enhance pan-European cooperationand sharing of best practice in this field.The new Act includes major Amendments to the Directive on privacy and electroniccommunications – as: A precise and rigorous definition of the main tasks of the Directive:

To provide the required level of harmonisation of the national provisions; To ensure an equivalent level of protection of fundamental rights and freedoms,

and in particular the right to privacy and confidentiality, with respect to theprocessing of personal data in the electronic communication sector;

To ensure the free movement of such data and of electronic communicationequipment and services in the Community;

Ref. ‘Security of processing’, new specifications was included with respect to theprocessing of personal data: To follow closely the use of IP addresses with regard to the Processing of Personal

Data established by Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC. Ensure that personal data can be accessed only by authorised personnel for legally

authorised purposes; Protect personal data stored or transmitted against accidental or unlawful

destruction, accidental loss or alteration, and unauthorised or unlawful storage,processing, access or disclosure;

Ensure the implementation of a security policy with respect to the processing ofpersonal data.

MEO (KA7-36): Please see Remarks on KA7(30…33).

KA7(36): Support reporting points for illegal content online (hotlines) andawareness campaigns on online safety for children run at national level andenhance pan-European cooperation and sharing of best practice in this field;

41

KA7(37): Foster multi-stakeholder dialogue and self-regulation of European andglobal service providers (e.g. social networking platforms, mobilecommunications providers), especially as regards use of their services byminors.

MEO: KA7(37) - A lot of abuse is committed under the need to properly defendnational security or to protect private property. Surveillance of all kind, gatheringinformation while almost breaching legal provisions represent threats to freedom anddemocracy which should be subject to counteraction, including the domains within thescope of the Digital Agenda.

Member States should:

KA7(38): Establish by 2012 a well-functioning network of CERTs at national levelcovering all of Europe;

MEO: KA7(38) - CERTs (CSIRTs, IRTs, other kinds of the CERT teams)

CERT stands for Computer Emergency Response Team. There exist various

abbreviations for the same sort of teams:• CERT or CERT/CC (Computer Emergency Response Team / Coordination Centre)• CSIRT (Computer Security Incident Response Team)• IRT (Incident Response Team)• CIRT (Computer Incident Response Team)• SERT (Security Emergency Response Team)Recently the experts has warned that a broad array of network equipment used onthe Internet -- including switches, routers, hubs, printers and operating systems --may be vulnerable to an SNMP-related attack that could cause equipment to failor allow an attacker to take control of it. The problem relates to half-dozen vulnerabilities discovered in Simple Network

Management Protocol (SNMP) v1, a fundamental IP-based protocol formanaging networks. The vulnerabilities, reveal precisely how SNMPv1, which iswidely used by the network industry, can be exploited to disrupt systems througha denial-of-service attack or to allow a hacker to gain control of equipment.

Attackers could exploit technical weaknesses related to six classes of vulnerability-- overflow exceptions, format-string exceptions, bit-pattern exceptions, basicencoding rules, missing symbol exceptions and integral-value exceptions -- toknock equipment offline or gain control of it.

KA7(39): In cooperation with the Commission carry out large scale attack simulationand test mitigation strategies as of 2010;

42

MEO: KA7(40) Unless these hotlines are properly organized, with adequate measures to

prevent hoax calls, the use of hotlines might be not as beneficial as theoretically possible.

Failure in securing success in this action could disappoint bona fide users and compromise

the effort.

MEO: KA7(41) I have doubts regarding the start of Platform in 2010 (unless we speak about

a formal start), since such action needs preparation at EU level (the discussion about the

need for interoperability should not be set aside).

MEO: KA7(39) - In order to be successful, such simulations should be well prepared. Anessential element to be considered is the level of the infrastructure development andadequacy in each participant country. Such attacks are likely to be directed towardscountries which have created and are currently in operation large and complexinformatics systems. By no means the economic implications of such simulations (interms of human resources, money and ICT infrastructure) should be overlooked.

KA7(40): Fully implement hotlines for reporting offensive or harmful online content,organise awareness raising campaigns on online safety for children, and offerteaching online safety in schools, and encourage providers of online services toimplement self-regulatory measures regarding online safety for children by2013;

KA7(41): Set up or adapt national alert platforms to the Europol Cybercrime platform,by 2012, starting in 2010.

43

- Key Action 8 -

Key Action 8 (42): Adopt a BroadbandCommunication that lays out a commonframework to meet the Europe 2020 broadbandtargets, including:

Reinforce and rationalise the funding of high-speed broadband.

Attract capital for broadband investmentsthrough credit enhancement (backed by theEIB and EU funds).

Set up “European Spectrum PolicyProgramme”.

Encourage investment in competitive NGAnetworks.

Develop and make operational NationalBroadband Plans.

Use fully the Structural and Rural DevelopmentFunds.

44

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

Key Action 8:

KA8(42): Adopt in 2010 a Broadband Communication that lays out a commonframework for actions at EU and Member State to meet the Europe 2020broadband targets, including:

MEO: KA8(42) – The major ideas to be included, imposed by the international practices:

Open a wireless broadband pipe to each individual home after clearingspectrum currently used by UHF-TV stations and dedicating it to wirelessbroadband.Encourage fibre to the home A comprehensive broadband plan for EU wouldcopy the successes in Korea, Japan and elsewhere that were based on modest buteffective government support to national communications companies, so as tocreate effective business cases for deploying fibre to homes. Wireless broadband isnot the only solution to putting all of EU on a ubiquitous broadband network -fiber ought to be part of the network as well.Establish an inter-carrier transfer planFoster media diversityIntroduce spectrum reform A great failing of the current situation is its inabilityto translate the basic principles into rules. For example, spectrum should be freelytransferable, unlimited in its use and widely available in both licensed andunlicensed formats.Develop an international agendaReconcile programming access Currently, different distribution systems havedifferent obligations and rights with respect to programming. Given thecompetition that stems from convergence, the Commission should reconcile thedifferent regulatory regimes under a paradigm of neutrality.Reform Universal ServiceOutline public interest.Introduce management reform

KA8(43): Reinforce and rationalise, in this framework, the funding of high-speedbroadband through EU instruments (e.g. ERDF, ERDP, EAFRD, TEN, CIP) by2014 and explore how to attract capital for broadband investments throughcredit enhancement (backed by the EIB and EU funds);

MEO: KA8( 42 & 43)

Ubiquitous high-speed connectivity must be included within the scope of theUniversal Service definition. All citizens in the Union should have the legal right toaccess, at affordable prices, fast Internet connections as soon as possible. EU

45

businesses can’t continue to compete against Asian businesses with Internet 100times faster than our own.

The key concerns of broadband users are bandwidth, ease-of-use and security.Legal right and resonable prices are somewhat contradicting issues in a free marketeconomy. The reasonable price can be achieved only as result of mass use of Internetand as result of a fair competition based on openness, transparency, fairness, qualityof service.This service should be offered to the Citizens anytime and anywhere inside the EUterritory and legally guaranteed by a European Directive promoted by theCommission and adopted by the European Parliament and by the Council of theEuropean Union, declaring the people’s right to access Internet as the secondUniversal Service in the ICT area.To speed up the evaluation and the financing of the best proposals, theCommission should evaluate the opportunity to set up a “Joint Evaluation &Support Team” including experts of DG “INFSO”, EIB and independents, having asmain task the reduction of the implementation period of the best projects.

KA8(44): Propose an ambitious European Spectrum Policy Programme in 2010 fordecision by the European Parliament and the Council that will create a co-ordinated and strategic spectrum policy at EU level in order increase theefficiency of radio spectrum management and maximise the benefits forconsumers and industry;

MEO: KA8(44)

Considering the growing importance of mobile ICT, Europe should move quickly

towards a more Market-based Approach to Spectrum Management, with more

empowerment of market players and the introduction of more widespread

spectrum trading, and with less national bureaucratic prescription on bandwidth

allocation.

The Commission must be mindful to protect the interests of the citizens when

working with global ICT companies to implement the Digital Agenda, because the

interests of European citizens and those of the global ICT companies are not always

aligned.

As a general principle of policy, the public interest – the "Public Good" – should

have primacy over private and business interests. It is clear that the market alone

cannot properly regulate itself for the benefit of the public good. Therefore, a

strong regulatory framework is needed to promote the interests of the greater

number of citizens, as intended by the 2020 strategy.

The Commission should take any possible measures to ensure that Member States

rigorously enforce the regulatory framework for electronic Communications and

that implementation is even, balanced and universal in all 27 member states.

The European Union should vest responsibility in an appropriate regulatory

authority, including members of the European Agency for Fundamental Rights, to

implement effectively the Critical Information Infrastructures Protection (CIIP)

across the EU.

46

The new, five-year Radio Spectrum Policy Programme (RSPP), aimed at

harmonising the use of frequencies across EU, which proposes opening up the

valued 800 MHz band currently used by broadcasters for wireless broadband

operators, which is being freed up by switching to digital TV.

MEO: KA8(44)/cont.

In practice, however, the Commission's ultimatum can do little to change frequency

allocation plans because harmonization is a taboo word when it comes to radio

frequencies and the approval of MS is still essential to push through binding

measures on the matter.

Note: Germany is the only EU country so far to make the broadcast spectrum

available for mobile broadband. Airwaves auction were held in May, with

Deutsche Telekom and Vodafone acquiring many of the new radio frequencies.

SPECIAL REMARKS: In other countries, the entrenched interests of national

politicians and public broadcasters represent a powerful opposition lobby against

the use of spectrum for purposes other than broadcasting. The Commission should

pay a special attention to the case of Italy, where all bidders for the freed

frequencies are at present exclusively broadcasters, not Internet service providers.

KA8(45): Issue a Recommendation in 2010 to encourage investment in competitive NextGeneration Access networks through clear and effective regulatory measures.

MEO: KA8(45)

In order to boost growth in the sector, the European Commission should focus onpromoting the roll-out of new high – speed, Next Generation Access Networksbased on optical fibre and / or new wireless technologies such as WiMax—602.16aand UWB - 802.15.3a.Recommendations:

Implementing the Broadband ladder of investment (i.e. local loop unbundlingand bit-stream access);

Ensuring competitive access across the spectrum;

Promoting wireless development for large - area coverage.Create financial facilities in order to attract investors in PPP arrangements.

Unfortunately, opposition to the plans already looks strong. The incumbentoperators that have invested in new fiber-based networks warn that theproposal would give competitors easy access to their infrastructure. This wouldstifle investment in the sector, according to ETNO.

New operators, represented by the European Competitive TelecommunicationAssociation (ECTA), sent the opposite warning, because accessing networks mayend up being too costly if European regulators are unable to impose the rightprice. ECTA stressed that this ability will remain within the competence ofnational authorities.

47

The deployment of Next - Generation Networks (NGNs) will further reduce Telcos'energy consumption, whereas the real threats are represented by services andapplications which rely on new infrastructure.

Member States should:

KA8(46): Develop and make operational national broadband plans by 2012 that meetthe coverage and speed and take-up targets defined in Europe 2020, usingpublic financing in line with EU competition and state aid rules. The Commissionwill report annually on progress as part of the Digital Agenda governance.

MEO: KA8(46)

The Broadband Strategy recognises the role of national and public authorities in orderto co-ordinate investors and to give a clear understanding when and where themarket will rely on competing infrastructures, where it will be a single commerciallydeployed infrastructure and where public finance may be available. Calling forMember States to develop a national broadband plan is the key to making this areality.The Broadband Communication that sets out a coherent framework for meeting theDigital Agenda's broadband targets and, in particular, outlines how best to encouragepublic and private investment in fast and ultra-fast broadband networks.The EU Member States should: introduce operational broadband plans for high and ultra high speed networks

with concrete implementing measures; provide guidance on how to cut investment costs, indicate how public authorities may support broadband investment, including

making better use EU funds.As a must, the broadband strategy should emphasize and recognise the role of publicauthorities in order to co-ordinate investors.

PROPOSAL: Following the NZ success story, the Commission should take the initiative to

set up “The EU Broadband Fund”, having as shareholders the EIB,

EUROFOUND and all Member States, as a financing tool supporting the

technological efforts at national level.

KA8(47): Take measures, including legal provisions, to facilitate broadband investment,such as making sure that civil engineering works systematically involvepotential investors, clearing rights of way, mapping available passiveinfrastructure suitable for cabling and upgrading in-building wiring;

MEO: KA8(47)

The Broadband Communication in particular should outline how best to encouragepublic and private investment in fast and ultra-fast broadband networks, includinglarge – scale use of PPP arrangements..

The European Commission and the European Investment Bank will bring forwardbroadband finance instruments, offering their services to the Member States.

48

MEO: KA8(48)

The main social impact derived from freeing up the 800 MHz spectrum would be

greater broadband access for all.

The “Digital Dividend” will be a major source for financing the Broadband

implementation at EU and national scales.

PROPOSAL: Following the NZ success story, to set up “The EU Broadband Fund”, having as

shareholders the EIB, EUROFOUND and all Member States, as a financing tool

supporting the implementation of this modern technology.

PROPOSAL: Following the NZ success story, to set up “The EU Broadband Fund”, having as

shareholders the EIB, EUROFOUND and all Member States, as a financing tool

supporting the technological effort of Member States to implement the Broadband

requirements included in the “Digital Agenda”

KA8(48): Full use of the Structural and Rural Development Funds that are alreadyearmarked for investment in ICT infrastructures and services;

MEO: KA8(48) - With regard to individual liberties of the citizens and the development

of the local communities, using the Structural and Rural Development Funds, the

Commission should pay a great attention to the principle that Community Radio and

Multimedia Centres represents a crucially important communication and information

tool for developing communities and bringing them together.

KA8(49): Implement the European Spectrum Policy Programme, so as to ensure the co-ordinated allocation of the spectrum needed to meet the target of 100%coverage of 30 Mbps Internet by 2020, and the NGA Recommendation.

49

- Key Action 9 -

Key Action 9 (50):Leverage more PrivateInvestment

Key Action 9 (51): Reinforcethe coordination andpooling of resources withMember States andindustry;

Key Action 9 (52):Measures for “Light & Fast”access to EU research fundsin ICT

50

MEO: KA9(51)The EU should create a special programme to foster the development of European IT

companies that can compete on a global scale with US giants like Google, Microsoft and

Intel.

The Commission should pay a greater attention not only about the undoubted

differences between the US and EU in the area of R&D and of Implementation of new

Digital Technologies, but also about the actual amplitude of “Digital Divide”

phenomenon at the EU level - the enormous Differences between Countries inside.

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA9(50): Leverage more private investment through the strategic use of pre-commercialprocurement1 and public-private partnerships, by using structural funds for research andinnovation and by maintaining a pace of 20% yearly increase of the ICT R&D budget atleast for the duration of FP7;

MEO: KA9-50 – Universal aspects:

ICT represents a powerful driver of innovation in the EU economy as a whole;The technologies developed for ICT provide spin-off in many different sectors;It makes extreme demands on its products, requiring simultaneously:• safety and reliability• low weight• good economics• minimal environmental impact• enhanced power• high efficiencyAs beneficiary of the ICT "state – of – the art" products and applications, the EUeconomy has:• delivered immense social and economic benefits to the citizens at global level;• massively multiplied and facilitated business, leisure opportunities and cultural

exchanges;• facilitated the development of international institutions and political

relationships.Investing in ICT industry, Europe can reach three major objectives:• global leadership in the sector;• a world class operational ICT system;• spread of new technologies and innovation to other industry sectors and services.

Other actions:

KA9(51): Reinforce the coordination and pooling of resources with Member States andindustry, and put greater focus on demand - and user - driven partnerships in EUsupport to ICT research and innovation;

1 In 2011-13, the Commission will co-finance five new actions on pre-commercial procurementinvolving Member States.

51

MEO: KA9(51)In order to increase the financial support for R & D activities, the EU should evaluate the

possibility to adapt the “Dual – Use” solution promoted by the US Government through

Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency - DARPA, mainly in the area of Defence,

Aerospace and ICT: finance the R&D for new products with military funds and transfer

the resulting technologies to the civilian sector!

MEO: KA9(54) - Please see also remarks on KA5(26).

KA9(52): Starting in 2011 propose measures for ‘light and fast’ access to EU researchfunds in ICT, making them more attractive notably to SMEs and young researchers inview of a wider implementation within the revision of the EU.

MEO: KA9(52) This is a highly desirable achievement. Much has been said andpromised about it throughout the time, with very few notable results. Acceding EUfunds is a dream far away from fulfilment. The draconic conditions imposed onapplicants, combined with infernal bureaucracy make securing of EU funding so difficultthat may give up from the beginning or after surrendering the results and documents ofthe first project. This will perpetuate unless drastic steps will be taken to reduce red tape,to emphasize more results rather than the ability to gather a consortium. “Light andfast” is a very nice promise. Let us all strive to make it fact!

KA9(53): Ensure sufficient financial support to joint ICT research infrastructures andinnovation clusters, develop further eInfrastructure and establish an EU strategy for cloudcomputing notably for government and science;

MEO: KA9(53) - In many EU member countries research activity is carried out mostlywithin the academic surroundings. The commercial business does R&D work mainly forthe niche domains they are attempting to conquer and the Government controlledresearch institutes have disappeared or have a negligible weight in the research world ofresearch. The role of carrying out work and getting results regarding ICT researchinfrastructures and innovation clusters should be awarded to universities and theyshould conclude partnership with selected commercial companies needed to bringpractical, applicative value to the research results. This could represent also an advancein improving the quality of the academic activity as a whole, with great impact ontraining qualified personnel so much in demand if the provision of Digital Agenda are tobe converted in realities.

KA9(54): Work with stakeholders to develop a new generation of web-basedapplications and services, including for multilingual content and services, by supportingstandards and open platforms through EU-funded programmes.

In the general consumer markets, business growth is foreseen in the short to midterm in new Web and Internet-based services taking advantage of the newgenerations of smart phones, networked sensors and convergence around IP(Internet Protocol). In addition to access to digital media through new generationuser interfaces and interaction paradigms, and generation of content and leisureservices, new opportunities are foreseen e.g. in energy efficiency at home,personalised health systems and location-based services.

52

MEO: KA9(54)/cont.

Trusted Network and Service Infrastructures Future Networks that support the convergence and interoperability of

heterogeneous mobile, wired and wireless broadband network technologies,including notably novel Internet architectures;

Cloud computing, Internet of Services and advanced software engineering Architecture and technological foundations for Internet-connected sensors,

actuators and other smart devices and objects. Trustworthy ICT including security in networked service and computing

environments; Networked media and search systems, including digital media delivery platforms,Wireless and mobile broadband systems LTE-Advanced and post-LTE systems; with focus on medium term evolution of LTE

systems towards higher rate LTE-Advanced with support to standardisation; Enabling technologies for flexible spectrum usage for mobile broadband, Novel

radio network topologies; Integration of radio technologies with optical fibre networks, for consolidation of

mobile and wireless networks into integrated communication systems (using e.g.femto-cells) which can deliver ultra high speed wireless access in the home, thestreet or in the enterprise.

High capacity end-to-end infrastructure technologies Ubiquitous fast broadband access: convergence and interoperability of dynamic

heterogeneous broadband and mobile network technologies; Ultra high capacity all-optical networks supporting ever-increasing service

bandwidth demands:Novel Internet architectures, management and operation frameworks Future Internet architectures that are resilient, trustworthy and energy-efficient

and designed to support open access, increasing heterogeneity of end-points(multimode devices, people, things) and networks (ad-hoc networks, opportunisticnetworks, networks of networks).

Visionary and "clean-slate" multi-disciplinary research on new architectures Network management and operation frameworks to support generic service

platforms, information exchange, addressing and naming, personal networks,scalability issues, agile connectivity, and the explosion of traffic and endpoints.

Flexible, resilient, broadband and integrated satellite communication Innovative system architectures and technologies making possible the advent of

ultra high capacity satellite communication systems, and seamless integrationcapabilities with Future Internet terrestrial based networks.

Novel technologies and architectures for resilient and flexible networks enablingglobal, multi service, secure and dependable communication (including mobility),for institutional missions.

Cloud Computing, Internet of Services and Advanced Software Engineering Cloud Computing Intelligent and autonomic management of cloud resources, ensuring agile elastic

scalability.

53

MEO: KA9(54)/cont. Scalable data management strategies, addressing the issues of heterogeneity,

consistency, availability, privacy and supporting security. Interoperability amongst different clouds, portability, protection of data in cloud

environments, control of data distribution and latency. Seamless support of mobile, context-aware applications. Energy efficiency and sustainability for software and services on the cloud. Architectures and technologies supporting integration of computing and

networking environments; implications of Cloud Computing paradigm on networks Open Source implementations of a software stack for CloudsInternet of Services Service engineering principles, methods and tools supporting development for the

Internet of Services, including languages and tools to model parallelism. Services enabled by technologies for seamless integration of real and virtual worlds,

through the convergence with Internet of Things and Internet of Contents. Massive scalability, self-management, verification, validation and fault localisation

for software-based services. Methods and tools to manage life cycle of secure and resilient Internet-scale

applications from requirements to run-time and their adaptive evolution overtime.

Advanced software engineering Advanced engineering for software, architectures and front ends spanning across all

abstraction levels. Quality measure and assurance techniques which adapt to changing requirements

and contexts, to flexibly deal with the complexity and openness of the FutureInternet.

Management of non-functional requirements typical of Internet-scale applications,like concurrency levels which will be orders of magnitude larger than in today'sapplications, huge data stores and guaranteed performance over time.

Tools and methods for community-based and open source software development,composition and life cycle management.

Technologies for infrastructure virtualisation, cross platforms execution as neededfor service composition across multiple, heterogenic environments, autonomousmanagement of hardware and software resources.

MEO: GENERAL REMARKS ON KA9

THE BASIC AXIOM

The major factor to be considered under all evaluations processes regarding the impact

of ICT to any economic and/or social sector – stands under the following Axiom:

“ICT cannot bring any major contribution to the Sustainable

Development of the European Union in all economic and social

sectors without a Permanent Self-Improvement of its current

Core Applications: Internet, Broadband, Multiplexing,

Networking and the Development of the next Generation of

High-Performance Microprocessors”.

54

MEO: GENERAL REMARKS ON KA9/cont.

Today, the process of globalisation coincides with a fundamental transformation to a

Knowledge-Based Society (KBS), largely driven by ICT, where knowledge and

information increasingly determine new patterns of growth and wealth-creation and

open up possibilities for more effective poverty reduction and Sustainable Development.

In addition to increasing the flow of funds to ICT innovation and R&D, the Commission

must ensure that there is proper accountability and value for the money invested.

Proper investment management practices should apply: investments should be granted

on the basis of expected economic and/or societal returns, and all investments should be

subject to rigorous stewardship to ensure that projected benefits are delivered.

Governance of R&D investment must ensure that there is good coordination across

programmes to maximize benefits and avoid wastage through duplication of effort.

Priority could be given to funding innovative technologies that would build on

Europe’s global lead in wireless and mobile communications, to provide universal high-

speed Internet connectivity, possibly using radio spectrum that becomes available as

broadcasting and other activities reduce their demand for radio bandwidth.

Funding should also be made available to stimulate technology and applications

that will be able to use the highly accurate location signals provided by Galileo’s services.

The EU should continue to fund R&D around the Internet of Things, which will be

manifested by technological advances in wireless technologies, the Internet and Galileo.

Investment should be targeted at finding innovative solutions to the challenges

caused by language diversity in the EU. The US and other large economies with a lingua-

franca have an advantage when it comes to developing a single, coherent online market

for goods and service. Language diversity is a special challenge for the 2020 vision.

After a careful evaluation, it is crystal clear for all of us the role and the huge potential

of ICT in Sustainable Development, outlining that this contribution should be directed to

the following 7 domains of major interest, already targeted by the DG “INFSO”:

a) Greater energy efficiency in enabling more efficient business and working practices;

b) More intelligent use of energy in buildings;

c) More intelligent mobility, with more intelligent vehicles and public transport

services;

d) ICT equipment and services emerging as major additional users of energy;

e) Increasing the energy–saving potential and the CO2 emission-reduction of ICT-

based services;

f) Optimising benefits of ICT-based innovations without a substantial rebound;

g) ICT-supported R&D on sustainable issues (e.g., modelling and simulation procedures

and storage and evaluation of data on the environment).

PROPOSAL: A new dedicated programme under the frame of "The Digital

Agenda” to address the current negative effects of using ICT, entitled “My Computer

– My Healthy & Wealthy Friend!”, based on a strategy including an ADVERTISING

CAMPAIGN TO EDUCATE THE EUROPEAN CONSUMERS - on:

55

a. Permanently measuring / monitoring hardware power consumption;

b. Using fewer servers and printers by increasing the use of virtual servers;

c. Stop over–provisioning and improving capacity planning;

d. Improving cooling efficiency;

e. Turning power management on, turning to stand-by or turning equipment off

after hours;

f. Extending the life of assets by re-use both within the enterprise and externally;

g. Ensuring and validating the correct distribution of all electronic equipment;

h. Analysing all waste.

Having the programme in place, in order to reduce the negative effect of using ICT

and to increase the impact of the package promoted under The Digital Agenda, the

DG “INFSO” can evaluate the option to take the following actions:

a. To fully support the initiatives promoted by Climate Savers Smart Computing,

ETNO, WWF and other similar projects, taking the proper measures to

discourage the use of equipment not in compliance with the new standards for

electrical power consumption;

b. Recommend that IT leaders develop initiatives that use ICT to reduce the

enterprise’s overall environmental presence;

c. Require that ICT equipment suppliers gain a better understanding of the

product life cycle;

d. Reduce CO2 emissions throughout the life cycle;

e. Increase the efficiency and effectiveness of old ICT hardware recycling and the

use of recycled materials.

The Next Generation of High Energy-Efficiency ICT Hardware

The current predictions envisage four main trajectories for this next generation of

reduced power-consumption ICT systems, specially developed to answer the

challenges now confronting the sector:

a) Networked, mobile, seamless and scalable, offering the capability to be always

best connected at any time, anywhere and to anything

b) Embedded into the things of everyday life in a way that is either invisible to the

user or brings new form-fitting solutions

c) Intelligent and personalised, and therefore more centred on the user and their

needs

d) Rich in content and experiences and in visual and multimodal interaction.

The most advanced and fastest growing ICT sectors to receive special attention

during new R&D innovation/implementation/regulation/networking activities are:

a) Broadband;

b) Mobile Internet including new technologies to increase the range of Wi-Fi

Coverage;

c) On–line against Aging / Long–life IT;

d) Booster e-Learning, e-Health, Life-long Education and Training;

56

e) Personalisation with more effective targeting;

f) User – generated Content (RSS, blogs, reviews, video, images, audio …);

g) On–line Music Download;

h) Fully secured On–Line Payments;

i) Short– and Full-length Video;

j) Interactive Entertainment;

k) VoIP;

l) Pay per Call;

m) Digital Rights Management (DRM);

n) Ubiquitous Connectivity.

Reinforcing ICT Global Leadership: ICT 4 ICTPriority Programs – according with my view – for a better life of our Citizens:

“ICT - for - Intell€nergy” Sectoral Action Plan, structured in line with the newest

technical and technological R & D in the area of energy supported by ICT, to face

and solve current challenges, with particular reference to:

a) Providing more efficient energy and electricity services to all households,

including the connection for those currently lacking access (at least several

million in EU countries and in potential candidate countries);

b) Increasing the use of environmentally appropriate and sustainable fuels, such as

renewable fuels;

c) Reducing losses in energy systems, both technical as well as anti-theft devices;

d) Reducing the impact of energy usage on the environment, ranging from local to

global;

e) Providing better energy security for users and countries, including price

stability/predictability;

f) Providing high–level security and environmental safeguards when using nuclear

materials;

g) Developing appropriate adaptation strategies for climate change and sea–level

rise.

“Intell@Building” Initiative Sectoral Action Plan: Supporting “Intelligent Building

for a better life for EU Citizens”. The action plan should be structured in line with the

newest technical and technological R&D projects supported by ICT in order to face

and solve current challenges, with particular reference to:

a) Adopting an EU set of integrated standards for “Intell@Buildings” by 2015 to

cover interoperability of technologies;

b) Developing low-cost technologies (e.g. sensors), together with suitable power

management technologies for operation in homes;

c) Developing expertise in software at EU level for optimisation and control of

networks of multiple buildings;

d) Training specialists to provide high quality energy services;

e) Building regulations to improve the demands for increased energy efficiency;

57

MEO: KA9(55) - This has been said and planned in the past. Remember EuropeanComputer Driving License and the amount of money and effort involved.

f) Establishing a strong body in each Member State for the new area of

“Intell@Buildings” which drives standards, provides an effective forum and

competence centre for members and lobbies national governments;

g) Supporting SME growth to produce new eligible energy service providers at EU

level;

h) Developing new ICT applications dedicated to network monitoring and

optimisation software.

“Intell@Transport for EU Citizens” Sectoral Action Plan: ICT – Supporting the EU

Intelligent Transportation Program. In fact, promoting the initiative entitled “ICT for

EU Intell@Transport”, a specific action plan focusing on operational activities directly

supported by ICT to face and solve current challenges in the transportation sector:

a) Reducing congestion and overcrowding in all transport systems and on the roads

within cities

b) Improving public transport systems including affordability and deploy

innovative solutions for meeting both peak and off-peak transport needs

c) Building safe and efficient rapid transport options between urban centres,

including the development of modern port facilities

d) Connecting rural areas with urban centres with all–weather roads and other

transportation systems, improve connectivity between areas of greatest demand

e) Improving inland waterway usage for low–cost bulk transportation

f) Improving the environment in urban and rural areas, as affected by

transportation

g) Increasing the safety of transportation systems

h) Improving the sustainability of transportation systems, especially regarding fuel

usage

i) Improving access for persons with special needs.

Member States should:

KA9(55): By 2020, double annual total public spending on ICT research anddevelopment spending from €5.5bn to €11bn (which includes EU programmes), in waysthat leverage an equivalent increase in private spending from € 35 billion to € 70 billion;

The results are far from satisfactory. ICT literacy should begin form the age of fourand improvement is to be sought throughout the person’s life (of course, adequatemeans must be used according to age and level acquired). Much attention is to bepaid to the education curricula in primary and secondary schools. Like foreignlanguages, this is the stage at which the knowledge acquired earlier improves andgets implanted in one’s mind until life comes to an end. Merely doubling the amountof public spending does not bear fruit if well designed and well monitored ActionPlans do not accompany this needed effort.

NOTE: “The National eAdministration Strategy of Romania” approved by the Government in September2001 imposed to all Romanian civil servants the obligation to graduate the ECDL course.

58

KA9(56): Engage in large scale pilots to test and develop innovative and interoperablesolutions in areas of public interest that are financed by the CIP.

MEO: KA9(56) – Despite of the fact that the Large Scale Pilots bring not too much news,the pilots are organic parts of a well designed strategy, implemented consequently, step bystep. Much effort has been wasted with pilots which proved something, but in many casesthe work continuation for industrial implementation did not take place!

2 THECONTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MAY 8rd, 2007

802.20

FIX(STATIONARY)

PEDESTRIAN(NOMADIC)

MOBILE(VEHICLES)

2G/2.5GCellular

Fig.3: WIRELESS STANDARDS CHART(Data Transmission Rate - in Mbit/s)

MO

BIL

ITY

802.16e

COMER-CIALLY

PROPOSED

802.16a(WiMAX) 79 x 1

MHzBLUETOOTH

> 100UWB

20802.16

5HSDPA

1.251xEVDO1xEVDV802.20

1.252G/2.5G

BANDWIDTH(MHZ)

BANDWIDTHASSUMPTIONS

WWAN(IMT-2000)

cdma2000® 1xEV-DO,cdma2000® 1xEV-DV

3.1

WCDMA HSDPA

802.15.1(Bluetooth)

802.11(WLAN)

802.15.3a(UWB)

0.1 1.0 10 100

W IRELESS DATA TRANSM ISSION STANDARDS

59

- Key Action 10 -

Key Action 10 (57):

DIGITAL LITERACYAND

COMPETENCES - APRIORITY FOR THEEUROPEAN SOCIAL

FUNDREGULATION

(2014-2020)

60

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

Key Action 10(57): Propose digital literacy and competences as a priority for theEuropean Social Fund regulation (2014-2020);

MEO: KA10(57)

Europe is suffering from a growing professional ICT skills shortage and a digitalliteracy deficit. These failings are excluding many citizens from the digital societyand economy and are holding back the large multiplier effect of ICT take-up toproductivity growth.

Again, this is part of a large and unsolved (yet) problem: computer literacy. For solong so much was done to make each and every member of EU familiar with thoseaspects of ICT which affect our day-to-day life. The results are far fromexpectations. Many still prefer the use of traditional means of conducting theiractivity; others are reluctant to switch over to new technologies, since theperspective for a senior person to look less able and familiar to use a computerbased system in comparison to his/her junior colleague or even subordinate is,indeed, frightening for that person and determines a passive attitude regardingintroduction and use of electronic data processing.

61

- Key Action 11 -

Key Action 11 (58): EuropeanFramework for ICT Professionalism

Key Action 11 (59): Make digitalliteracy and skills a priority of the "Newskills for new jobs" Flagship

Key Action 11 (60): A higherparticipation of Young Women andWomen Returners in the ICT workforce

Key Action 11(61): Develop in 2011 anOnline Consumer Education Tool on newmedia technologies

Key Action 11(62): EU-wide Indicatorsof Digital Competences and MediaLiteracy;

Key Action 11(63): Evaluateaccessibility in revisions of legislationundertaken under the Digital Agenda

62

Key Action 11(58): By 2012, develop tools to identify and recognise the competencesof ICT practitioners and users, linked to the EuropeanQualifications Framework and to EUROPASS and develop aEuropean Framework for ICT Professionalism to increase thecompetences and the mobility of ICT practitioners across Europe;

MEO: KA11(58)

Tools are good, but not enough (at least – at this moment). They should be onlytools aiding trained personnel in assessing the quality of those attempting tobecome the ICT mass of people the Digital Agenda needs for stepping down fromthe high spheres of thinking at high level into the surrounding reality, bringing theexpected results

As I already mentioned, according with The Law on Public Function and with “TheNational Strategy on e-Administration”, in Romania the civil servants can not applyfor promotion without graduating the course and obtaining the “EuropeanComputer Driving License” certificate.

Other actions:

Key Action 11(59): Make digital literacy and skills a priority of the "New skills for newjobs" Flagship to be launched in 2010, including the launch of a multi-stakeholder sectoral Council for ICT Skills and Employment to addressdemand and supply aspects; OK - NC

Key Action 11(60): Promote a higher participation of young women and womenreturners in the ICT workforce through support for web-basedtraining resources, game based eLearning and social networking; OK- NC

Key Action 11(61): Develop in 2011 an Online Consumer Education Tool on new mediatechnologies (e.g. consumer rights on the Internet, eCommerce, dataprotection, media literacy, social networks etc.). This tool will providecustomised information and education materials for consumers,teachers and other multipliers in the 27 Member States;

MEO: KA11(61) – SOME IDEAS AND OPPORTUNITIESThe New Customer Migration: Where are your customers going, why, and how can youinfluence it? Customers are migratory creatures. They consume content, comparison shop, make

purchase decisions and purchases, and share their opinions where and when it best servesthem - on websites, in stores, at call centers, with mobile devices and through social media.Our collective challenge is to figure out how to paint a complete customer picture of thiscustomer journey in a way that is at once measurable and approachable - and ultimatelyprofitable. The key problem is how to do just that through mapping your customer's multi-channel migration patterns - their channel arrival and departure habits - and influence theirbehaviours.

63

MEO: KA11(64) - A necessary condition for the public sectors to be accessible is that theyshould exist. In quite a few member countries such sites, although declared, are far from thestandards needed for them to accomplish the mission for which they have been generated.Perhaps some basic principles (recommendations) underlining the main requirements for aneffective and efficient public sector website should be issued by the EU as support to those inneed.

MEO: KA11(61)/cont.Email Marketing: The Digital Glue of Social Media Engagement is more important than ever. More marketers are using the social web

and email marketing as channels to connect, start conversations, and buildrelationships. When working together, these channels can help build yourcommunity, create brand awareness, and drive sales.

The Social Enabled Enterprise - Better products, services, relationships & support Social media is enabling businesses to build much closer customer relationships than

ever before. As the space matures smart businesses are realizing that game haschanged and they need to either adjust their approach to the market or risk beingleft behind. We should focus on how companies are taking advantage of this shift inthe communication landscape to improve their approach to marketing, customerservice, product development and sales.

Key Action 11(62): Propose by 2013 EU-wide Indicators of Digital Competences andMedia Literacy;

MEO: KA11(62) - It has been mentioned early (see comments above) that education inITC starts with acquiring basic literacy knowledge at an early age, consolidate thisknowledge when the person becomes more aware of the realities in which he/she livesand continue the improvement throughout the whole life, both active and as a seniorcitizen. UNLESS THIS IS CARRIED OUT ACCORDING TO A PLAN REZULTEDFOLLOWING CONSULTATIONS AND USING THE SYNERGIES OF ALL SOCIAL ANDECONOMIC FACTORS, THE ACTION WILL FAIL SHORT OF ATTAINING ITSOBJECTIVES. Too often we do assist to chaotic, apparently unsynchronized, uncorrelatedlaunch of initiatives, consuming time and money and ending up in results without agreat deal of significance. This is why a concerted, minutely designed approach MUST betaken.

Key Action 11(63): Systematically evaluate accessibility in revisions of legislationundertaken under the Digital Agenda, e.g. eCommerce, eIdentity & eSignature, followingthe UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; OK - NC

KA11(64): Based on a review of options, make proposals by 2011 that will make sure thatpublic sector websites (and websites providing basic services to citizens) are fully accessibleby 2015;

KA11(65): Facilitate by 2012, in cooperation with Member States and relevantstakeholders, a Memorandum of Understanding on Digital Access for persons withdisabilities in compliance with the UN Convention.

64

MEO: KA11(65)

Agreed, provided that also the addressed party thinks in the same way. Again, thekeyword is education. If education and life philosophy given to a small child are faraway from the ideals of a citizen living in a world in which ICT is a manner of living, itwould be extremely difficult and costly to redress this at a later age.

This is the right place to emphasize the major role can be played by e-Inclusion as Aapotential major solution for Roma minority integration (I’m referring to actual scholargeneration).

Member States should:KA11(66): Implement by 2011 long-term e-Skills and digital literacy policies and promote

relevant incentives for SMEs and disadvantaged groups;

MEO: KA11(66) - The main factors to be considered are:ICT enable new types of innovations in products, processes and services.People often have misperceptions of the nature and need for ICT related careers,and especially young people and women do not necessarily see them attractive.e-Skilled practitioners and managers are needed in all sectors, not only on ICT sector.Despite the crisis, the demand for e-skills increases in long term, especially for higherlevel strategic e-Skills for innovation.Multi-stakeholder partnerships and social dialogue are crucial for a sustainable andsuccessful long term skills agenda.European e-Skills agenda has accomplished several achievements but there isneed for further awareness raising and investmente-Skills for new jobs are interdisciplinary and closely related to higher levelinnovation skills, which needs to be taken into account in future actions.New alliances and approaches are needed for providing lifelong learningopportunities of relevant e-Skills and innovation skills.New modes of collaboration enabled by ICT need to be taken into account indeveloping education, business and strategic co-operation.Both lower and higher level e-Skills need attention, in order to enhance citizens’well-being, knowledge society, and competitiveness in Europe.e–Skills can be used to promote social inclusion for groups which might otherwiseface the risk of exclusion, such as Roma children.

KA11(67): Implement by 2011 the provisions on disability in the Telecoms Framework andthe Audiovisual Media Services Directive; OK - NC

KA11(68): Mainstream eLearning in national policies for the modernisation of educationand training, including in curricula, assessment of learning outcomes and theprofessional development of teachers and trainers.

MEO: KA11(68) - Emphasis on using eLearning and, moreover, Collaborative eLearningprinciples and tools must be made. In a world which generates a new piece ofinformation at a speed higher than the speed required to assimilate it, onlyCollaborative eLearning can hope to keep pace with the fantastically fast informationaugmentation and renewal.

65

- Key Action 12 -

Key Action 12 (69): CommonMeasurement Methodologies for theSector's Own Energy performance andGreenhouse Gas Emissions

Key Action 12 (70): Partnershipsbetween the ICT sector and majorEmitting sectors to improve the EnergyEfficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Key Action 12 (71): Contribution ofSmart Grids to the decarbonisation ofEnergy Supply in Europe / promote theInteroperability of Smart Grids

Key Action 12(72): Green Paper onSolid State Lighting (SSL)

66

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA12(69): Assess by 2011 whether the ICT sector has complied with the timeline toadopt common measurement methodologies for the sector's own energyperformance and greenhouse gas emissions and propose legal measures ifappropriate; OK - NC

Other actions:

KA12(70): Support partnerships between the ICT sector and major emitting sectors(e.g. buildings and construction, transport and logistics, energy distribution)to improve the energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of thesesectors;

MEO: KA12(70)

First target is represented by the ICT sector itself – so-called “ICT4ICT” - because:

The Sustainable Growth at EU level for any economic and social sector by ICT’s can

be reached only if the ICT sector itself is under a permanent modernisation by R&D

- regarding Innovation/Implementation/Regulation/Networking for the most

advanced and fastest growing ICT sectors: Broadband; Mobile Internet, including

new technologies to: (1) Increase the Range of WiFi Coverage; (2) On-Line Anti-

Aging/Long Life IT; (3) Boosting e-Learning, e-Health, Continuous Education &

Training; (4) Personalisation with more effective targeting; (5) User - generated

Content (RSS, blogs, reviews, video, images, audio); (6) On-Line Music download;

(7) On-Line Payments; (8) Short- and long-size video; (9) Interactive

Entertainment; (10) VoIP; (11) Pay per Call; (12) Digital Rights Management; (13)

Ubiquitous Connectivity; (14) RFID etc.

The total estimated electricity used in powering and cooling the 2 million servers of

the 5 major search engines amounts to around 5 GW - enough to power a

metropolitan area of 10 million inhabitants during a full hot summer day.

The IT Industry should embrace new revolutionary technologies for desktop and

server manufacturing, as the new heavily processors that can execute many threads

(up to 32 instruction sequences for the Niagara” and “Piranha" new models, using

eight processing cores on a chip – called "Chip Multiprocessor Technology" - CMP).

CMPs can not solve alone the power - efficiency challenge in the field of PCs and

servers. Fundamental circuits and architectural innovations are still needed to

address longer - term trends. The continuous development of this sector should

represent a permanent concern for the Commission.

Start an advertising campaign to educate consumers on:

67

MEO: KA12(70)

a. Permanently measuring / monitoring hardware power consumption

b. Using fewer servers and printers by increasing the use of virtual servers

c. Stop over–provisioning and improving capacity planning

d. Improving cooling efficiency

e. Turning power management on, turning to stand-by or turning equipment off

after hours

f. Extending the life of assets by re-use both within the enterprise and externally

g. Ensuring and validating the correct distribution of all electronic equipment

h. Analysing all waste.

Once the programme is in place, in order to reduce the negative effect of using ICT

the following actions should be applied:

a. Fully support the initiatives promoted by Climate Savers Smart Computing,

ETNO, WWF and other similar projects, taking the proper measures to

discourage the use of equipment not in compliance with the new standards for

electrical power consumption;

b. Recommend that IT leaders develop initiatives that use ICT to reduce the

enterprise’s overall environmental presence;

c. Require that ICT equipment suppliers gain a better understanding of the

product life cycle;

d. Reduce CO2 emissions throughout the life cycle;

e. Increase the efficiency and effectiveness of recycling and the use of recycled

materials.

KA12(71): Assess by 2011 the potential contribution of smart grids to thedecarbonisation of energy supply in Europe and define a set of minimumfunctionalities to promote the interoperability of Smart Grids at European levelby the end of 2010;

MEO: KA12(71) – The actual crisis should be seen as an opportunity to boost the

current framework for investments in generation, restructure grids, and create a smart,

integrated and carbon-neutral energy economy. The Commission should evaluate and

offer practical answers on four major aspects of the EU electricity industry:

Decarbonising the power sector

To meet the 60-80% emissions reductions necessary to stabilise atmospheric CO2

emissions at 440ppm, the European power sector would have to be virtually carbon

free by 2050. The actual Electricity project showed that under the most favourable

scenario for meeting a 50% reduction for the EU 27, the carbon intensity for the

European power sector would reduce significantly. The proposed Key Action should

clarify the opportunities and barriers to achieve a EU decarbonised power sector.

Building a Smart Electricity Infrastructure for the Future

68

MEO: KA12(71)/cont.

The environmental targets of the EU cannot be achieved without changes in

Europe’s electricity grid. The emergence of renewables, distributed generation and

electric vehicles demand an infrastructure that actively integrates the actions of

generators, consumers and parties that do both.

First we should emphasize the benefits as well as technical and regulatory

challenges of the future network and the smart grids concept in particular.

Integration of Renewable Energy in the Market

The prospects of developing large share of RES generation in the near future

can be seen as an opportunity for electricity markets rather than a challenge. If

properly organised, renewables can play a positive role in the functioning of

electricity markets and their integration into regional markets.

The Commission should evaluate the potential distortions of the market arising

from the continuation under the new Renewable Energy Directive of 27

separate national RES support schemes. The Member States should make full

use of the flexible cooperation mechanisms provided by the Directive so as to

promote regional market integration and to develop intra-day and day-ahead

markets at a cross-border, regional level so as to better integrate new RES-

power.

Security of Supply – Implementing CIP on Electricity sector

Security of supply implies not only secure fuel supplies, but also adequate

transmission and distribution infrastructure, as well as sufficient and reliable

generating plant. Clear strategies need to be in place to ensure that current

problems in the capital and credit markets do not threaten the ability of utilities

to deliver in full secure conditions.

KA12(72): In 2011 publish a Green Paper on Solid State Lighting (SSL) to explore thebarriers and to put forward policy suggestions; it will in parallel supportdemonstration projects using the CIP.

MEO: KA12(72)

Europe’s lamp manufacturers also published three years ago (2007) the details of

an initiative aiming at phasing out the least efficient household lamps from the

European market by 2015. Targets: 60% reduction of CO2 emissions (23 MT

annually) in domestic lighting = 7Bn Euro = 63,000 GWh Electricity annual savings.

The proposed Green Paper should combine the technical progress and potential of

semiconductor light emitting materials with an analysis of market adoption,

revealing the useful insights into challenges and opportunities in the growing field of

solid state lighting.As the LED lighting market moves from niche applications into the mainstream of general

illumination, a large number of companies are being founded to develop innovative

technology at all levels of the supply chain, ranging from light sources, to drivers, optics and

thermal management solutions, to complete luminaires.

69

MEO: KA12(73)

Potential ICT applications to be directly implemented with the energy sector:

Data collection and system level use:

a. Metering at all levels: Real-time transfer and distribution (T&D) status data;

b. Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems;

c. New protocols for smart control;

d. T&D efficiency and loss reduction;

e. Smart control of distributed resources and micro–grids.

Examples of R&D activities needed:

a. Low-cost, reliable digital meters with ICT enhancements, such as control and

communications;

b. Convenient low–cost Sensors, efficient End–Use Devices with options for Demand

Management;

c. Transparency/clarification of decision-making authority for ongoing operations;

d. ICT enabled externality metering, such as congestion pricing;

e. New ICT innovations for Peak Management and Daylight Adjustment.

MEO: KA12(72)/cont.

The proposed Green Paper should combine the technical progress and potential of

semiconductor light emitting materials with an analysis of market adoption,

revealing the useful insights into challenges and opportunities in the growing field of

solid state lighting.

As the LED lighting market moves from niche applications into the mainstream of

general illumination, a large number of companies are being founded to develop

innovative technology at all levels of the supply chain, ranging from light sources, to

drivers, optics and thermal management solutions, to complete luminaires.

The integration of discrete LEDs into solid state lighting systems should be identified

as a critical area of both technical and business development and the key to

creating useful products and expanding new markets. Analysis of conventional and

emerging opto-semiconductor lighting industries highlights important differences of

influence within the value chain.

For solid state lighting, the significance of system integration shifts control away

from large LED manufacturers and closer to the end user and to the niche players.

Based on technology capability, industry conditions, and historical analogy, solid

state lighting can achieve wider adoption primarily through the growth of new

applications and markets, not through the substitution of existing lighting business.

Member States should:

KA12(73): Agree by the end of 2011 common additional functionalities for smartmeters;

70

KA12(74): By 2012 include specifications for total lifetime costs (rather than initialpurchase costs) for all public procurement of lighting installations.

MEO: KA12(74) – Can be defined only after the new specific standards will enter intoforce, including minimum lifetime, electrical consumption vs lighting poweretc.

71

- Key Action 13 -

Key Action 13 (76): Secure OnlineAccess to Citizen’s Medical HealthData

72

ACTIONS

The Commission will work with Member States competent authorities and all interested

stakeholders to:

KA13(76): Undertake pilot actions to equip Europeans with secure online access to theirmedical health data by 2015 and to achieve by 2020 widespread deployment oftelemedicine services;

MEO: KA13(76) - The comment refers also to the Points 77 – 79.

This is only the top of the iceberg. Again, online access must be based on theassumption that the accessed object DOES EXIST. Without massive introduction ofICT al medical service provider level (MDs, pharmacists, hospitals, healthemergency services) access to medical health data is pointless, since such data exists,perhaps, only on paper, it might be duplicated, it might show lots of incoherency,one has to retrieve it from archives stored on paper, kept in humid basements ofhospitals and medical cabinets a.s.o. By consequence, we should speak first ofproviding informatics system at medical service provider level and ONLY after thatabout the person’s access to his/her medical file. The above assertion is valid formany EU countries, including those which enjoy a comfortable economic and wellbeing level. Wording such as the one used in Point 76 is deceiving and non-lucrativefor the countries in the situation described above. This remark is made as result ofparticipating in many events on eHealth, held both in Europe and also in the U.S.Tens of pages can be written on the subject.

Practically, the security of the on-line access of citizens to their private health datacan be easy solved by using a slightly modified e-Banking application based on“token” device (a random generator of numeric sequences) in connection with ahigh-speed Internet link.

73

- Key Action 14 -

Key Action 14 (77): PatientRecords to be Accessed or ExchangedElectronically across Member States

Key Action 14 (78):Interoperability testing andcertification of eHealth systems

Key Action 14 (79): Reinforce theAmbient Assisted Living (AAL) JointProgramme

74

ACTIONS

KA14(77): Propose a recommendation defining a minimum common set of patientdata for interoperability of patient records to be accessed or exchangedelectronically across Member States by 2012; PLEASE SEE MEO: KA14(78)

Other actions:

KA14(78): Foster EU-wide standards, interoperability testing and certification ofeHealth systems by 2015 through stakeholder dialogue;

MEO: KA14(77&78)

Main Task: to engage leaders and organisations, including professionalorganisations, national competence centres, industrial associations and standardsdevelopment organisations to define and implement a research agenda on thesemantic interoperability of health information systems and particularly electronichealth records, including the definition of a minimum common set of patient data.

Participants: European and international organisations in the domains of medicalterminology, record architecture, standards, medical logic and workflow areexpected to participate. The work should also include set up and a governance of aEuropean virtual organisation for multilingual, multicultural adaptation ofinternational classifications and terminology and propose means for thesustainability and governance of health information info-structure.

KA14(79): Reinforce the Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme to allow olderpeople and persons with disabilities to live independently and be active insociety.

MEO: KA14(79) – Practically, this Key Action is referring to:

Smart and self-adaptive environments prolonging independent living: Focus ison flexible ICT solutions able: to provide early detection and adaptive support to changing individual needs

related to ageing:

increased risk of falls;

depression;

sleep deprivation;

cognitive decline; to support timely involvement of careers and family.The aim is to promote better prediction, prevention and support through long-termtrend analysis of basic daily behavioural and physiological data, building onunobtrusive sensing and advanced reasoning with humans-in-the-loop. Majorchallenges to be addressed include: self-learning solutions building on open platforms, which can share contextual

information with other artefacts in the surroundings of the user; low maintenance systems capable of graceful degradation in case of failure affective and empathetic user interaction, taking into account the capabilities

of elderly users.

75

Funding should be increased for ICT skills development and knowledge &

awareness programmes for citizens and SMEs. Information and support functions

should be established in Member States to help SMEs and citizens understand and

participate in the Digital Economy.

The Commission should support initiatives across the EU to introduce school

children, senior citizens, people with disabilities and socially disadvantaged citizens

to the use of broadband technology (e.g. Web-based learning, video conferencing,

on-line public services, etc.).

76

- Key Action 15 -

Key Action 15 (80): Sustainable Modelfor financing the EU Public DigitalLibrary

Key Action 15 (81): Green Paper on"Unlocking the potential of Cultural andCreative industries"

Key Action 15 (82): PromotingDigitisation of European Cinema

Key Action 15 (83): Implementation ofthe Audiovisual Media Services Directiveconcerning Cultural Diversity

77

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA15(80): By 2012 propose a sustainable model for financing the EU public digitallibrary Europeana and digitisation of content;

MEO: KA15(80) - A comment relevant to this has been made at the beginning of thedocuments, regarding copyrights and connected issues on multimedia, culturaland historical heritage etc.

Other actions:

KA15(81): By 2012 propose measures following the results of the consultation on its GreenPaper on "Unlocking the potential of cultural and creative industries";

MEO: KA15(81)

The target is to exploit Europe’s vast and exclusive cultural resources and learningtraditions as a source of innovation and creativity, for businesses, researchers,educational organisations and the general public.The measures should refer to the need for flexible and efficient access to informationand knowledge, for educational, training and cultural purposes. Should focus onadvances in how we learn through ICT and on enhancing the meaning andexperiences from digital cultural and scientific resources and respond to societal (activeand responsible learners) and economic needs of individuals and organisations (betterskilled and creative workforce).The proposals under this Challenge should fuel progress in a wide range of applicationsfrom schools to workplaces, museums, libraries and other cultural institutions.Individual personal spheres should be treated and extended by advances in areas likepervasive network environments, social networking technology and mobilecomputing, rising the expectations of users and consumers of the digital learning andcultural resources in terms of level of interaction and engagement.The target is to exploit Europe’s vast and exclusive cultural resources and learningtraditions as a source of innovation and creativity, for businesses, researchers,educational organisations and the general public.What can we expect: Affordability and widespread availability of tools and services for releasing the

economic potential of cultural heritage in digital form and for adding value tocultural content in educational, scientific and leisure contexts;

Wider range of users of cultural resources in diverse real and virtual contexts andconsiderably altered ways to experience culture in more personalised and adaptiveinteractive settings.

KA15(82): Issue by 2011 a Recommendation on promoting digitisation of European

Cinema;

78

MEO: KA15(82)

The European Media sector need a new strategy helping European cinemas to go

digital and to encourage more of them to screen European-made films, thus ensuring

a wider choice for cinema-goers. Because the cost of digital equipment is prohibitive

for many small cinemas, the new strategy should set out options for financial support,

including state-aid and backing from the European Regional Development Fund and

EU MEDIA program. The major opportunity created by the move to digital is to

increase the feasibility of converting films made in the first years of cinema to preservethem for future generations.

KA15(83): Ensure the implementation of the provisions of the Audiovisual Media Services

Directive concerning cultural diversity, where appropriate through co- and self-

regulation and request information from Member States on their application by

the end of 2011. OK – NC.

79

- Key Action 16 -

Key Action 16 (84…101):Mutual Recognition of e-Identification and e-Authentication across

the EU-based Online 'Authentication Services';

Green Paper on "Unlocking the Potential of Cultural and Creative

Industries";

Public Access to Environmental Information Directive;

Cross-Border eEnvironment Services;

eProcurement Inter - Connection;

eCommission 2011-2015 Action Plan;

eGovernment Services fully interoperable;

The Points of Single Contact function as fully fledged eGovernment

centres;

A common list of key Cross-Border Public Services;

Increase the speed of ITS take-up;

Adopt the Air Traffic Management Solutions for the Single European

Sky (SESAR) deployment strategy;

Deployment of e-Maritime services;

Telematic applications for Rail Passenger Services;

European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS);

Promote the internationalisation of Internet Governance and Global

Cooperation;

Support the continuation of the Internet Governance Forum beyond

2010;

Improve International Trade conditions for Digital Goods and

Services, including with regard to Intellectual Property Rights.

80

MEO: KA16(84) - Here there is a gap between Point 84 and Point 93. The problem ofinteroperability has been addressed earlier in this document. The same comment is validalso about identification and authentications. More detailed explanations could be added ifneeded. This comment encompasses Point 84 and also Points 93 – 97.

MEO: KA16(85) - The expansion of the European Union has led to a significant increase in

the number of cross-border activities, also growing the demand for cross-border

services.

The complexity of cross-border services provision is mostly caused by the various

interoperability issues that come up when actors from different Member States have to

cooperate in the workflow of a cross-border service. Therefore solving interoperability

problems would promote the development of cross-border services.

The development of cross-border services is not only in line with the principle of free

flow of goods, persons, capital and services; it also acts as an essential enabler to

transform this principle from theory to practice. More specifically, developing cross-

border services can bring a number of benefits to European citizens and businesses

including gain of competitiveness for businesses, gain of time and alleviation of cost etc.

In order to discuss and analyze the “cross-border” services, a new term was introduced:

“Pan-European Public Services” (henceforth referred to as PEPS) - describing the

services in which actors from more than one country are involved. To facilitate the

execution of PEPS and support it in an electronic way, interoperability among the

information systems of different Member States Administrations (henceforth referred to

as MSAd) is of vital importance, since a PEPS cannot be executed or delivered

electronically unless the systems of the engaged PA agencies have solved problems in

communication, exchange of data, data meaning, etc.

Defining Inter-Operability

Interoperability means the ability of information and communication technology

(ICT) systems and of the business processes they support to exchange data and to

enable sharing of information and knowledge.

According to EPAN (The eGovernment Working Group of the European PA

Network), the use of common standards is central in achieving interoperability.

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA16(84): Propose by 2012 a Council and Parliament Decision to ensure mutualrecognition of e-Identification and e-Authentication across the EU based ononline 'Authentication Services' to be offered in all Member States (which mayuse the most appropriate official citizen documents – issued by the public or theprivate sector);

Other actions:

KA16(85): Support seamless cross-border eGovernment services in the single marketthrough the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) andInteroperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA)Programme;

81

MEO: KA16(85)/cont.

The following three types of interoperability are identified:

Organizational interoperability, which deals with cases where the organizations

that have to cooperate have differences in their structure and in their business

processes.

Semantic interoperability, which deals with cases where the information

exchanged between organizations, is interpreted differently by each side.

Technical interoperability, which deals with the technical issues of linking

computer systems and services. Other important issues like open interfaces,

interconnection services, data integration and middleware, data presentation

and exchange, accessibility and security services are also included here

Generally, the interaction model should answer to a three-layers requirement:

Communication: exchanging messages among remotely located partners.

Content: Languages and models to describe and organize information to be

understood and used.

Business Process: Enable autonomous and heterogeneous partners to

interactions.

In 2010 Europe's first cross-border e-Government service has been launched. RISER

(Registry Information Service on European Residents), currently available as a pilot

scheme, allows companies across Europe to obtain official address information for

Germany, Austria and Ireland. By logging on and registering with the web portal

www.riser.eu.com, businesses can verify the addresses of potential and current

customers in these countries, as the portal provides access to EU member states'

individual civil registry databases.

KA16(86): Review by 2011 the Public access to Environmental Information Directive;

MEO: KA16(86)The review of the Directive should integrate three important factors : Climate changemitigation, social justice in Europe and a non-restricted access of the people to theenvironmental information.Also, the new document should take in consideration a set of recommendations comingfrom the Civil Society organisations, providing ideas for policy makers at EU, nationaland local levels to tackle the potential impact of climate change policies on the mostvulnerable people in European societies and to improve the access of the citizen to therelated information.Five specific recommendations relate to buildings, mobility, power generation andmanufacturing, consumption and attitudes, and social protection can be considered asmajor requests of the European citizens. More specifically, it has been proposed that : Social impact assessments of climate change mitigation policies should include

indicators linking social justice, poverty and environmental justice, i.e. from asocial justice perspective most climate change mitigation instruments such as taxes,emission trading or biofuels make some products more expensive and could

82

MEO: KA16(86)/cont.

therefore have a disproportionate impact on low-income households’ purchasingpower ;

The use of energy should reflect its costs and impacts on the climate and theenvironment. However, higher energy prices will have a significant impact onpeople living on lower incomes. This should be taken into account in the policy-making process ;

Concrete actions should be taken to address the problem of fuel and energypoverty and its health impacts at EU level ;

Public transport networks should be improved to support social inclusion, accessto employment, and access to consumer goods whilst reducing "last mile" deliveryemissions and ensuring that those on low incomes are not worse off ;

Emissions trading schemes should be expanded at the global level, but theirimplications for social justice should be further explored. Income generated by suchschemes should be used for environmental and social purposes ;

Amove to a low-carbon economy will mean higher unemployment in carbon-intensive industries (located mainly in poorer EU regions). While this could becompensated by employment opportunities within low-carbon sectors, such jobswill not necessarily be accessible to low-income groups : this should be attended to ;

In order to adopt more sustainable consumption patterns there should beavailable, accessible and acceptable practical information on low-cost, low-carbonconsumption for all households, with tailored information for low-income andsocially disadvantaged groups. Although now the focus is on "greener", it stilldemands the same consumption levels rather than emphasising the need to cutthem.

KA16(87): Work with Member States and stakeholders to implement cross-bordereEnvironment services, notably advanced sensor networks;

MEO: KA16(87) – The implementation should take into consideration that the Security ofthe Environment goes hand in hand with the development and delivery of Pan-European eGovernment Services.The involved actors should first clearly define the key issues that need to beaddressed, prioritize them, and recommend appropriate policy actions.Multi-stakeholder position and proposals are vital in order to ensure a measuredand perceptive solution.Also: Base line overview of key security issues and research needs for developing secure

pan-European eGovernment services; Greater awareness of the importance of security in the development of cross-

border eGovernment services; Policy recommendations: Security guarantees required to create a trusted environment

for mobile European citizens.

83

MEO: KA16(90) - The current trend in e-Government applications calls for joined-upservices that are effective, simple to use, shaped around and responding to the needs of theCitizen, and not merely arranged for the provider’s convenience. In this way, the users needhave no knowledge of – nor direct interaction with – the Government entities involved.Thus, services need to be interoperable in order to allow for data and in-formation to beexchanged and processed seamlessly across Government.

Interoperability is a key issue in the development of current eGovernment services. Itsrole should be emphasized, not only as a technical issue concerned with linking upcomputer networks, but also as a fundamental requirement to share and re-useknowledge between networks, and re-organize administrative processes to bettersupport the services themselves.The integration of services is a basic requirement of Public Administrations (PA) portals,which aim at gathering and transforming processes – needed for a particular citizen’slife event – into one single service and the corresponding back-office practices. Apromising solution is offered by the “One –Stop” Government Portals, that are unifiedon-line Access Points, where various PAs collaborate for the provision of integratedservices.Major requirements:

To support citizen mobility across European countries by the integration ofadministrative process, based on the use of an individual smart card provided toeach citizen for the storage of all personal information and documents. Servicesare delivered through dedicated kiosks.To build a Unitary European Network Architecture based on a middlewaresolution - to connect heterogeneous systems of different public administrationand to enable a service-based cooperation between public administrations.To support the automation of administrative process by involving severaladministrations and allowing there use of data.

Advantages of the proposed solution are:Providing a single Access Point to Government services via the Web,Providing citizen oriented services by means of the life event metaphor,providing the tools for collecting information from autonomous PAs, whilekeeping their internal processes and legacy systems intact.

KA16(88): Define by 2011 concrete steps in a White Paper on how to inter-connecte-Procurement capacity across the single market;

KA16(89): Lead by example on open and transparent eGovernment by creating in 2010and implementing an ambitious eCommission 2011-2015 action plan, includingfull electronic procurement.

Member States should:

KA16(90): Make eGovernment services fully interoperable, overcoming organisational,technical or semantic barriers and supporting IPv6;

84

KA16(91): Ensure that the Points of Single Contact function as fully fledged eGovernmentcentres beyond requirements and areas covered by the Services Directive;

MEO: KA16(91)The action should focus on identifying, understanding and sharing good practices andtheir context. This may entail various mechanisms such as benchmarking, jointworkshops, training, twinning schemes and the operation of an effective partner searchmechanism across the network of PSCs.Practical initiatives to benefit cross-border audiences may also be included, such astrans-national brokerage events. The specific approach should be adapted to thenature of the theme and to the capacities and priorities of the PSCs concerned.A degree of collaboration and networking with similar projects in parallel themes –especially in the context of joint/coordinated activities in the areas covered by theService Directive should be encouraged.Special attention should be given to helping less experienced PSCs to access the know-how accumulated by their colleagues from other countries and to apply it in a locallyrelevant and efficient manner.

KA16(92): Agree by 2011 on a common list of key cross-border public services thatcorrespond to well defined needs – enabling entrepreneurs to set up and run abusiness anywhere in Europe independently of their original location, andallowing citizens to study, work, reside and retire anywhere in the EuropeanUnion. These key services should be available online by 2015. OK – NC.

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA16(93): Increase the speed of ITS take-up, in particular for road and urban transport by,applying the proposed ITS Directive in support of interoperability and rapidstandardisation;

MEO: KA16(93)The priority areas for the development and use of specifications and standards to besupported by new ICT dedicated applications

1. Optimal use of road, traffic and travel data,2. Continuity of traffic and freight management ITS services,3. ITS road safety and security applications,4. Linking the vehicle with the transport infrastructure.

Priority actions1. The provision of EU-wide multimodal travel information services;2. The provision of EU-wide real-time traffic information services;3. Data and procedures for the provision, where possible, of road safety related minimum

universal traffic information free of charge to users;4. The harmonised provision for an interoperable EU-wide eCall;(e) the provision of information services for safe and secure parking places for trucks andcommercial vehicles;(f) the provision of reservation services for safe and secure parking places for trucks andcommercial vehicles.

85

KA16(94): By 2010, adopt the Air Traffic Management Solutions for the Single EuropeanSky (SESAR) deployment strategy;

MEO: KA16(94)

SESAR main aims are:

To enable the European sky to handle three times more traffic;

To ensure the safety and fluidity of air transport;

To decrease environmental damage by 10%.

Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) ATFM system provides a system-wide view for

managing an entire country or region, utilizing real time end-to-end Collaborative

Decision Making (CDM) to increase capacity utilization. This enables airlines to

optimize operations by dynamically managing their routes and allocated slots.

The new ATFM Engine (Java – based) will generate a complete framework for air

situation display applications, incorporating OpenGL for high performance graphics

that provide advanced display capabilities to present safety critical information to air

traffic controllers.

KA16(95): Propose by 2011 a Directive for the deployment of e-Maritime services;

MEO: KA16(95)

The final target for the EU e-Maritime initiative is to make maritime transport:safer,more secure,more environmentally friendlymore competitive

by improving:knowledge,facilitating business networkingdealing with externalities.

The new document should recognize the critical role of ICT for productivity andinnovation, and anticipating a new era of e-business solutions, based on integratedICT systems and tools.The new Upgraded e-Maritime solutions should facilitate decision making andinformation exchange between different stakeholder groups involved in:

Improving the safety and security of maritime transport services and assetsand environmental protection.Increasing the competitiveness of the EU maritime transport industry andstrengthening the EU presence on the international scene.Integrating sustainable waterborne transport services into efficient door-to-door transport services in Europe and beyond.Reinforcing the human factor particularly supporting competencedevelopment and welfare for seafarers.

86

MEO: KA16(95)/cont.

Improved Administration Domain Applications:

Common Reporting Interface including dynamic integration with SingleWindows;

Integrated Maritime Surveillance for cargo and ship movementsfacilitating EU and national administrations to collaborate in safety,security and environmental risk management.

Improved Business Domain Applications:Improved Shipping Operations;Improved Port Operations;Integration into Logistic chains;Promotion of seafaring profession.

The EU e-Maritime initiative is also closely aligned with the objectives of TEN-Tprogramme aimed at developing an efficient trans-European transport network(TEN-T) to support the re-launched Lisbon strategy for competitiveness andemployment in Europe. The TEN-T programme is the main instrument for EUfinancing of transport infrastructure developments including Motorways of the Seawhich invariably rely on advanced ICT integration technologies. The TEN-T cantherefore be seen an important route to the actual application of e-Maritimesolutions in the development of the trans-European transport network.

KA16(96): Propose in 2011 a Directive setting out technical specifications for Telematicapplications for Rail Passenger Services.

MEO: KA16(96)

The TECHNICAL SCOPE of "Telematics Applications For Passenger Services" of the trans-European rail system. is to cover the definitions of procedures and interfaces between alltypes of actors (Passengers, Railway Undertakings, Infrastructure Managers, StationManagers, local authorities, Tour Operators and Ticket Vendors) in order to guaranteean interoperable and cost-efficient information exchange to provide an appropriateinformation and to issue tickets to Passengers in Europe via broadly availabletechnologies.The Telematics Applications for Passenger Services Subsystem of the trans-European Rail System includes the provision of information for following aspects:

87

Systems providing Passenger with information before and during the Journey; Reservation and Payment systems; Luggage management; Management of connection between trains and with other modes of transport; Issuing of tickets via ticket offices or selling machines or telephone or internet or any

other widely available information technology and on board trains.

Member States should:

KA16(97): Fulfil their obligations under the European Rail Traffic Management System(ERTMS) deployment plan, in particular as regards the lines due to beequipped by 2015.

ACTIONS

The Commission will:

KA16(98): Promote the internationalisation of Internet governance and globalcooperation to maintain the stability of the internet, on the basis of the multi-stakeholder model;

MEO: KA16(98)

Regarding the need for joint action at European level to develop the Future Internet, I

welcome the Commission's intention to involve the Future Internet Forum (FIF) in

implementing the proposals set out in the communication, in so far as it is necessary to

coordinate activities at European level in order to avoid efforts being too scattered

and to establish shared objectives of public interest.

Given that local and regional authorities are important players in the development of

the Future Internet, I feel that they should have the option of participating in the FIF,

and I call on the Commission to make proposals to this end.

KA16(99): Support the continuation of the Internet Governance Forum beyond 2010;

OK - NC

KA16(100): Work with third countries to improve international trade conditions for digitalgoods and services, including with regard to intellectual property rights;

MEO: KA16(100) - The ICT Theme supports activities such as the RSFF scheme, the Cordis

service, EUREKA membership, the COST Programme, cross-cutting ERA-NETs, the

International Human Frontier Science Programme and the Intelligent Manufacturing

Systems secretariat.

KA16(101): Seek a mandate to update international agreements in line with technologicalprogress or, where appropriate, propose new instruments.

88

MEO: KA16(101)

International cooperation aims to support European competitiveness and to jointlyaddress, with other regions of the world, issues of common interest and mutual benefit,thereby supporting also other EU policies (sustainable development, environmentalprotection, disaster response, security etc).International cooperation activities should have three main objectives: To jointly respond to major global technological challenges by developing

interoperable solutions and standards; To jointly develop ICT solutions to major global societal challenges; To improve scientific and technological cooperation for mutual benefit.Enable Partnership building in low and middle income countries The aim is to leapfrog from traditional promotion support action projects and

launch a set of targeted research projects (STREP/SICAs) addressing at the sametime technology and business model innovations. Specific technological targetscould include for example low-cost technologies, intuitive user interfaces and localcontent provisioning.

Targeted countries: Low and middle income countries, including AfricaExpected impact : Reinforcement of strategic partnerships with selected countries and regions in

areas of mutual interest and added value in jointly addressing important issues. Reinforced international dimension of the EU ICT research programme and higher

level of international cooperation with low and middle income countries in ICTR&D with a focus on areas where the EU has a comparative advantage andwhere there are new leadership opportunities for Europe.

89

FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS

1. The EU Civil Society should play a greater active role in the development of

policy for executing the Digital Agenda and to be part of its governance

structure. This could ideally be achieved by having a permanent

representation in the Digital Agenda Commissioner’s Group, proposed to

ensure effective policy coordination across the different policy areas.

2. The Civil Society looks forward to consultation too, in due course, on the

specific Communications from the Commission regarding each detailed

aspect of the Digital Agenda.

Finally, I will try to explain and to motivate my decision to not express a personalposition towards some of the Key Actions included in “Digital Agenda”:

I do not have much more to add as comments on the remaining points.

If I commented, the ideas would express bitterness created by the sad remark thatthe United Europe is, in fact, divided by the enormous differences in economicpotential and ways of tackling and solving problems.

These points, I am sure, are relevant for 12-15 countries, but seem as distant dreamsto the rest.

Again, more – and less pessimistic remarks – will be added if needed!

Marius – Eugen Opran

Brussels – October 4th, 2010

90