20100826 Presentation Templates

8/10/2019 20100826 Presentation Templates

1/24

Templates

Version 2.0August 26, 2010Tobias Lindberg

Source: Tobias Lindberg


2/24

1

Template agenda slide

2 x

1 x


3 x

Draft


3/24

Template bullet slide

x

x


Header

Draft

2


4/243

Template governance chart

Steering group

Name

Department

Core team

Name

Department

Name

Department

NameDepartment

Project synchronization

Name

Department

Network stakeholders

Name

Department

Name

Department

Name

Department

External contact

Name

Department

Draft



5/244

x

Result

Template objective-approach-result slide

x

Approach

x

Objective

Draft



6/245

Template step slide

Step 1

Header

Step 2

Header

Step 3

Header

Description

x

Input

x

Output

x

Resources

x

Draft


Description

x

Input

x

Output

x

Resources

x

Description

x

Input

x

Output

x

Resources

x


7/24

6

Template suggestion slide

x x

x

x

X

x

x

Potentialreduction

1. Purchasing power

1. Purchasing power

2. Technical spec

1. Purchasing power2. Technical spec3. Process optimization

1

2

3

Draft



8/24

Template slide

Comment x

~x additional cost X

x

Item Cost per item Additional cost

A 1 000 100

B 500 -

C 100 -

D 500 -

E 700 50

F 700 50

G 700 50

H 400 -

I 300 -

J 200 -

K 50 50

L 1 000 100

Example

7

Draft



9/24

8

Template process slide

x

x

x x x

x

x

Date?Date? Date?

Next Step

Draft



10/24

99

Spend xxxx possible savings

Breakdown of Total Cost savings B x MNOK C x MNOK D x MNOK

Total Cost saving potential: x MNOK

Template savings slide

48 48

A A

Potentialsavings

- 30%

Baseline spend for


Draft


11/24

10

1. x

x

2. x

Description

x

x

x

Success factorsActions

Template suggestion slide

3. x

x


x

Draft


12/24

11

Categories of scope

What? How?Who/Where?

Purchasing power Specifications Process optimization

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Template lever slide

x x x

Draft


x

x

x

x


13/24

12

Spend areas

Template Pareto 80/20 slide

Questions

Major spend

80%

Total spend

100%

Other

20%

C

B

3%

E

D

A

G

F

1. What is possible to address?

2. Where are possible savingsopportunities?

3. Which lever is likely to be used?1. Price negotiation2. Technical specification3. Process improvement

Draft



14/24

13

Template workstream slide

DescriptionResponsible(key /other)

x x x

x x x

x x x

x x x

x x x

Key next steps

x x x

Draft


Spend analyses,baseline & savingshypotheses

Benchmarking

Supply market &long list

Core demand & RFI

Technicalspecification

RFQ and negotiationstrategy

Current situation &background

x x x


15/24

14

Template time plan slide

4637 38 39

Oct

40 41 42

Nov

35 43 515049484736 4544

DecAug Sep

Negotiate

Verification meetings

Negotiation round 1Negotiation round 2Negotiation round 3

Secure implementation and follow-up

Develop implementation plansEstablish control processes

Sign contract

Activity

Analyze existing contracts

Process RFIs

Technical specification

Sourcing strategy development

Evaluate savings hypotheses

Core team kick-off

Pre-RFQ

Develop supplier list

Contract structuring (dependent on RFQ)

Communicate tender processSupply market analysisInternal workshop hypothesis

Build fact base and hypothesis

Develop baseline

Working planSavings hypothesis

Develop specifications for RFQDevelop TCO

Initiate

Verify 2009 quick-win potential

Negotiation strategy development

Send and receive RFQFollow up on RFQ

Team structure and governanceDetermine scope

Draft



16/24

15

CTotal TotalBA B D Total

site

A C Total

products

From ..to

40%

X

X X

X

X X


Template from to slide Draft


17/24

16

For Telenor, having acredible swap threatis likely the singlebiggest lever

Swap costs is

estimated to X MNOK

TCOInternalcost

Swapcost

Vendorcost

Incumbentvendor

Entrant

No swap cost

Template TCO slide

SPEND xxxx

Vendorcost

BA C

Vendorcost

BA C

Draft


D ft


18/24

17

x

x

x

x

Definition Cost

Template complement TCO slide

RiskH=0,90M=0,50L=0,25

High ? MNOK

x High ? MNOK

x Mid ? MNOK

x

x Low ? MNOK

? MNOK

GENERAL ASSUMTIONSx

Draft


T l d lid D ft


19/24

18

Annual spend per OPCOSUSD millions

Major spend areasUSD millions

Template spend slide

TotalCA B

Conclusion

X

X

X

X

X

A B

-x%

Average price per unit

EDC TotalBA Other

~80%

Draft


T l t i lid Draft


20/24

z

19

Template scenario slide

Header Header

Suppliers x

Key next steps x

Estimated work plan

Key milestonesx -

Start datex

End datex

x

Challenging technical specification x

EDCBA

Process optimization x

Possible scope of supply x

Needed resources x

Draft


T l t t k lid Draft


21/24

20

Template next week slide

MondayOctober 9

TuesdayOctober 10

WednesdayOctober 11

ThursdayOctober 12

FridayOctober 13

x x xEndproduct

Activity Send RFQ Draft SGpresentation

Send SGpresentation

Meetings SG meeting Status call

x

Core team meeting

x

Notes x x x x x

SG presentation

x

x x


Draft

Template carrots and sticks slide

Draft


22/24

21

Template carrots and sticks slide

Supplier name: x

Category: x

Yearly Spend (N, NOK million): x

Yearly Spend (S, NOK million): x

Yearly Spend (D, NOK million): x

Overview Update information

Version: 1.0Date of last update: 30.03.2010

Telenor Leverage points (Carrots)

Telenor Pressure elements (Sticks)

x

Points of leverage

x

Leverage strategy

x

Supporting analysis

x

Pressure elements

x

Mitigation strategy/Counter arguments

x

Supporting analysis

Draft


Template slide Draft


23/24

22

Template slide

Immediate next steps

x

Suggested decisions by

x

Draft



24/24

23

Appendix


Documents

20100826 Presentation Templates