8
Kent County Road Commission Partnering with 21 Townships serving over 235,000 residents and 1312 miles of Local Roads

2011 Local TWN Match Program

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Kent County Road Commission Partnering with 21 Townships serving over 235,000 residents and 1312 miles of Local Roads. 2011 Local TWN Match Program. Townships contributed over 2.5 millions dollars. Upgrading gravel roads to asphalt .80 miles Re-Surfacing Asphalt Roads 24 miles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 2011 Local TWN Match Program

Kent County Road Commission Partnering with 21 Townships serving over 235,000 residents and 1312 miles of Local Roads

Page 2: 2011 Local TWN Match Program

MDOT8%

Primary/ Major 27%

Local/ Minor65%

Centerline MilesPrimary/ Ma-

jor34%

Local/ Minor12%

MDOT54%

Distribution of Revenues

Page 3: 2011 Local TWN Match Program

2011 Local TWN Match Program

• Townships contributed over 2.5 millions dollars.• Upgrading gravel roads to asphalt .80 miles• Re-Surfacing Asphalt Roads 24 miles• Appling new gravel to existing gravel roads 53,000

tons• Improving drainage• Applying dustlayer

Page 4: 2011 Local TWN Match Program

Construction vs. Preservation

Page 5: 2011 Local TWN Match Program

 

KENT COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM MILEAGE CERTIFICATION

 MARCH 2012 SHEET 1

  TOWNSHIP

  DISTRICT

 PRIMARY ROADS

 LOCAL ROADS

 TOTAL LOCAL

 TOTAL PRIMARY AND LOCAL

 PAVED

 GRAVEL

 ADA

 3

 22.39

 8.04

 11.62

 19.66

 42.05

  

 4

 12.55

 32.90

 3.74

 36.64

 49.19

  

  

 34.94

 40.94

 15.36

 56.30

 91.24

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 ALGOMA

 2

 36.64

 51.42

 8.19

 59.61

 96.25

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 ALPINE

 3

 26.01

 66.87

 0.60

 67.47

 93.48

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 BOWNE

 4

 31.65

 20.69

 16.83

 37.52

 69.17

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 BYRON

 5

 41.60

 93.23

 2.39

 95.62

 137.22

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 CALEDONIA

 4

 40.12

 32.66

 10.02

 42.68

 82.80

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 CANNON

 2

 13.36

 57.33

 3.02

 60.35

 73.71

  

 3

 7.96

 7.01

 4.64

 11.65

 19.61

  

 4

 0

 0.09

 1.93

 2.02

 2.02

  

  

 21.32

 64.43

 9.59

 74.02

 95.34

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 CASCADE

 4

 40.92

 73.44

 5.43

 78.87

 119.79

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 COURTLAND

 2

 23.95

 52.67

 6.77

 59.44

 83.39

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 GAINES

 4

 32.12

 27.81

 0

 27.81

 59.93

  

 

16.85 

36.27 

36.27 

53.12

  

  

 48.97

 64.08

 0

 64.08

 113.05

Page 6: 2011 Local TWN Match Program
Page 7: 2011 Local TWN Match Program

PASER Good Pavements (10 – 8)

Little or no distress observed Requires little to no maintenance

Fair Pavements (7 – 5) Non-structural distresses observed Requires surface treatment or

overlay to preserve base & sub-base Poor Pavements (4 – 1)

Distress indicates structural failures Requires heavy rehab or

reconstruction

Page 8: 2011 Local TWN Match Program

Practical Selection Considerations

Right Fix, Right Road, Right Time Pavement Management Philosophy Preserve base & sub-base

Address Specific Safety Issue Wet pavement & rut filling Wedge paving & crown correction