2011_L23_process optimisation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    1/16

    Optimisation Part 2Process

    Dr Simon Smart

    The University of Queensland

    CHEE4024

    Energy Systems in Sustainable Development

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    2/16

    Process Optimisation -Outlinen Considerations

    n

    n Major Approaches

    n

    n Environmental / Saftey Considerations

    n

    n Summary

    n

    n

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    3/16

    Process Optimisation -Example

    Too much wastewater

    Biotreatmentplant at capacity

    How to solve?Optimal

    Solution?

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    4/16

    Process Optimisation -Example

    Most obvioussolution is notalways best

    Think outside

    the box

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    5/16

    Considerations for ProcessDesign

    OptimisedProcess

    Current technologies

    Risk

    Safety

    Environment

    Alternatives

    Capital Costs

    Running Costs

    Product Costs

    Waste Products

    Infinite number of solutionsNarrowing them down needs experience

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    6/16

    Process Design

    n

    Early design stagesaccommodate forcurrent needs

    n Creative designq Most obvious may

    not be best

    n Process simulationq

    ASPEN, HYSYS,Matlab, etc.

    What about plantsmade 50 years ago?

    Can you see whatmight be more of aconcern in another50 years?

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    7/16

    Process Design

    n

    Heuristics (rules of thumb)q Chemical reactions

    q Mixing and recycling

    q Separation

    q T, P, and phase changeq Integration

    n Mass

    n Heat

    There are 53 heuristicprinciples stated in Seider,Seader and Lewinsprocess principles book.

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    8/16

    Major Approachesn Various areas are classically approached for

    optimisation:q Distillation heuristics

    q Mass exchange networks (MENs)

    q Heat exchanger networks (HENs)

    n Co-current vs counter-current, pipe losses etcn Pinch analysis

    q Reaction/separation staging

    q Mass and energy recycle

    q

    Pumping, turbine and compressor networks (egHP/LP dual turbines)

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    9/16

    Operation PositioningExamplen Consider a process to make isobutane: n-C4H10 i---H--The feed is 20 mol% isobutane. Show the optimal pathway

    n Solution:n

    n

    n

    Either option is valid on initial glance. On closer look, withdistillation column first, pure feed is sent to reaction operation

    leading to higher conversion to isobutane. Need to look at effectiveness of distillation efficiency

    and reaction kinetics simulated together to make decision

    - 80 mol%nC4- 20 mol% iC4

    n C4H10 iC4H10iC4

    nC4

    n C4H10 iC4H10

    iC4

    nC4

    Option 1 Option 2

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    10/16

    Equipment Choice

    n

    Chemicals and conditions tie closely withequipment choice.q Vessels: Height, diameter, orientation, pressure,

    temperature, material of construction (MOC)q

    Towers: as for vessels and tray number, heightand packing materialq Pumps: Driver type, flow, P, T, shaft power, MOCq Heat exchangers: Fluid, type, area, duty, no.

    shell and tube passes, T, P, P and MOCq Fired heaters: Type, tube P and T, duty, radiant

    and convective heat transfer are, MOC.

    n

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    11/16

    Environmental Consideration

    n

    Examples:q R134a refrigerantq Desulphurisation of dieselq Sulphur recovery

    q CO2 reductionq Waste water treatmentq Soil remediationq Combined cycle power generation

    q Waste conversion to acetone and isopropanolq Ethanol for petroleum from biomass

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    12/16

    Safety

    n

    Safety is the most important design requirementn Improved product (energy) outcome can come fromchoice of safer systems.

    n Safety costs money. Trade off actually considered bycompanies: Payouts vs safety implementation cost.

    n Some industries impossible because safety tooexpensive to make competitive product.n Safety ties in with environment

    q Bhopal, India, Dec 3, 1984: Union Carbide factory, waterflowed into tank with methyl isocyanate (MIC). Rapid T

    rise caused boiling and MIC vapours escaped. Nonfunctional scrubbers and flares on safety system allowedrelease of 25t toxic MIC. Killed 3 800 people.

    n

    n

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    13/16

    Safe Design

    n

    Fires and explosions prevented by inerting,ventilation, construction

    n Relief devices

    n Careful study of process: HAZOP, FMEA

    n MSDS

    n Ethical consideration

    n

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    14/16

    Process Integration

    n

    Holistic approach to process design,retrofitting and operation which emphasisesthe unity of the process

    n

    n A trade off clearly exists between improvedefficiency and complexity (reliability, cost,etc)

    n

    Quantify disturbancesn Flexibility

    n

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    15/16

    Process Integration HeatExample

    nHow to setupthis system?

    n

  • 8/7/2019 2011_L23_process optimisation

    16/16

    Process Integration HeatExample

    nIs this the bestway?

    n

    n

    Why not?n