34
2012 Americas School of Mines www.pwc.com Tax Risks and Tax Risks and Considerations in Mining Transactions Andrew Papadakis Kerry Gordon Darin Siders

2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

2012 Americas School ofMines

www.pwc.com

Tax Risks andTax Risks andConsiderations in MiningTransactions

Andrew PapadakisKerry GordonDarin Siders

Page 2: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Agenda

Recap of 2011 for the Mining Sector

Due Diligence

Tax Drivers and Opportunities to Add Value

PwC

Tax Drivers and Opportunities to Add Value

Recent Legislative Proposals

2

Page 3: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Section One

Recap of 2011 for the Mining Sector

PwC 3

Page 4: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Recent M&A Activity for the Mining Sector

Based on reports, 2011 saw more than 2,600 M&A deals — worth $149 billion —announced in the global mining sectors (33% higher than 2010). This level ofactivity was attributable, first, to a continuing thirst for natural resources indeveloping countries, and, second, to solid financial footing in the sector(average mining company debt was at an all-time low and cash and profitabilitypositions were high).

2011 Information Shows:

PwC

2011 Information Shows:

• Australia, U.S., and Canada led activity by transaction value

• Coal, Iron Ore, and Copper were the largest mineral transactions. Gold, as the priorcommodity leader, was driven down in 2011 transactions primary due to price

• Most transactions were domestic transactions (buyer and seller within the samejurisdiction)

• Canada buyers were the most acquisitive during this period (accounting forapproximately 30% of buyers)

4

Page 5: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Recent M&A Activity for the Mining Sector (cont’d)

Mining M&A pick up following year of low prices and pastdisinterest by non-industry investors

• Mining deals were driven by:

― Pricing arbitrage

― Synergies

PwC 5

― Synergies

― Competitive landscape and strategy (acquiring market access, technology, reducing competitors, etc.)

― Ability to successfully access the capital markets

Page 6: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Section Two – The Significance of TaxDue Diligence

PwC 6

Page 7: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence

Insight Gained in Recent M&A Due Diligence:

• Many mining companies paid less attention to taxes during priorperiods with operational losses

• Structuring benefits/efficiencies are being ignored

• Short cuts are sometimes taken in the workpapers and/or

PwC 7

• Short cuts are sometimes taken in the workpapers and/orinexperienced advisors are being used

Page 8: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Tax should be at the forefront of the M&A negotiations;otherwise, value may be left on the table. The followingquestions should be considered early on:

― Entity or assets transaction?

― If a stock acquisition, is a Section 338(h)(10) election available and

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 8

― If a stock acquisition, is a Section 338(h)(10) election available andcan it be leveraged in the transaction to unlock value?

― Is there an exit strategy? If so, how does this strategy impact the need for a holding company (and where), the placement ofguarantees and debt, how management should be compensated,etc.?

― In strategic transactions, how can varying tax profiles be joined?

These are key questions that can be vetted in due diligence.

Page 9: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Other key questions that can addressed:

― What tax risks are being acquired?

― Are tax attributes being acquired?

• If so, how much are they worth, what are the limitations onutilization, and how will they be reflected in the financial

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 9

utilization, and how will they be reflected in the financialstatements?

― What movements of assets, debt or capital should be done in advance?

• What will need to be done after closing to unlock potentialvalue?

― How strong is the tax department coming over?

Page 10: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Due diligence also provides an opportunity to vet structuringissues. These include:

• Addressing the question of which entity should incur the debt andwill there be any limitations on interest deductibility (U.S. orForeign)?

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 10

• How will the proposed structure impact other tax calculations (i.e.,how may historic results differ from the go-forward profile):

- Percentage Depletion?

- Domestic Manufacturer's Deduction (Section 199)?

- State Income Taxes and filing obligations?

- Will a Consolidated Filing be of advantage or allowed?

- The New Effective Tax Rate?

Page 11: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

And in the International Context, Due Diligence MayHighlight Questions Around:

- The Foreign Tax Credit Implications

- Alternative Financing Arrangements/Double DipTransaction/Hybrid Instruments

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 11

Transaction/Hybrid Instruments

- The Impact of Double Tax Treaties

- Impacts of Section 163(j) on interest

- Transfer Pricing Arrangements (current / creditable)

Page 12: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Furthermore, Value May Be Preserved Or Unlocked ThroughDue Diligence, Which Can Address The Following:

• Are there tax risks related to pre-acquisition periods?

- How can they be managed in the due diligence process, throughcontractual protection, etc.?

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 12

contractual protection, etc.?

- How should identified risks be reflected in bid price?

• Which acquisition structure(s) optimize the company's tax positionand attributes?

- What should be the due diligence posture to best unlock theirvalue?

- Can this structure help unlock cash?

• How does this impact the go-forward financials?

Page 13: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Due Diligence Can Also Help Identify Missed Elections(Statutory Versus Administrative)

• Lack of documentation of election -- Can the current tax accountingmethod be proved and maintained?

• Formal elections versus claimed treatment

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 13

• Formal elections versus claimed treatment

• Consideration of 9100 relief

Page 14: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Due Diligence Issues can be Caused by:

• Prior Changes in Control Effecting Loss Companies:

- Lack of testing documentation

- Built-in Loss rule (not considering the mineral property)

- Excess credits (special rule for electing out of bonus)

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 14

- Excess credits (special rule for electing out of bonus)

• DTL’s - Recapture Issues (Exploration Costs)

• Treatment of Exploration & Development Expenses

• Accounting Method Changes (Affirmative Elections)

• Tax Treatment of Environmental Liabilities (Section 198)

• Obsolete Equipment

• Tax Treatment of Performance Based Agreements (Royaltyagreements)

Page 15: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Due Diligence Issues can be Caused by (cont.):

• Changes in Depletable Property

• Percentage Depletion: Is the Representative Field or Market PriceSustainable?

• Aggregation of Mines

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 15

• Aggregation of Mines

• Abandonment of Sites (No deduction)

• Reclamation Elections (right to claim [Section 468] and 10 year carryback [Section 172(f)])

• Reclamation Liabilities

• Inconsistency in the Section 263A Method

• Alternative Minimum Tax treatments (no AMT or ACE adjustments)

Page 16: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Due Diligence Issues can be Caused by (cont.):

• FIRPTA (U.S. Real Property Holding Corporation or Real PropertyAssets)

• Significant change in business results (loss companies becomingprofitable without increase in tax focus)

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 16

profitable without increase in tax focus)

• Lack of communication (e.g., management, operations andengineering on a different wave length than tax)

• Being deficient in obtaining the facts or questioning the summarieson facts which do not describe a complete transaction

• Failure to document prior transactions and there legal and taxconclusions

Page 17: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

Due Diligence Issues can be Caused by (cont.):

• Consideration of other doctrines of law:

- income assignment,

- sham partnership,

- step transactions,

- duty of consistency,

PwC

- substance over form,

- void for vagueness doctrine,and

- Cohen rule

17

- economic substance,

- origin of claim,

- rescission doctrine,

- cost reimbursement,

Page 18: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Use Of Safe Harbor Without Documentation MeetingRequired Tests

• De minimis rule under Section 199

• Small Reseller under Section 263A

• Repairs and maintenance non-capital rule

The Significance of Tax Due Diligence (cont’d)

PwC 18

• Repairs and maintenance non-capital rule

• Deemed safe harbor for following GAAP

• Debt-to-equity ratio for excess interest under Section 163(j)

• Passive Foreign Investment Company asset and income tests

Page 19: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

• Multiple states of business/International locations

• State Nexus issues

• Reorganization and post transaction improvements

• State or Local transaction taxes or fees

Things to Look Out for

PwC 19

• Golden Parachute (280G) plans

• Asset deals – Does not necessarily lead to no tax diligence

Page 20: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Section Three

Tax Drivers and Opportunities to Add Valuein Deal Execution

PwC 20

Page 21: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Tax Drivers and Opportunities to Add Value inDeal Execution

Structuring considerations

• Attribute monetization

• Debt placement/pushdown

• Opportunity to combine businesses or leverage activity combinations

PwC 21

• Cleaning up old entities without a current business purpose

• Limiting intercompany transactions on which tax benefits areimmaterial

• Intercompany balances (debt, equity or something else)

• Worthless assets/entities (determination of the proper timing ofdeduction)

Page 22: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Tax Drivers and Opportunities to Add Value inDeal Execution (cont’d)

Change in Control

• Tax Attributes

- NOLs/capital losses/AMT credits/other

- Depreciation and Amortization

PwC 22

- Limitations

- Loss Corporation and NUBILs/NUBIGs

• Acquirer's Limitation

- Right to Use

- Limitations (Sections 267, 382, 383)

- Lack of documentation on prior transactions necessary tosubstantiate

Page 23: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Tax Drivers and Opportunities to Add Value inDeal Execution (cont’d)

Earnings and Profits

• Are records available?

• Can past and future distributions be determined as non-taxable ortaxable with certainty?

• How will excess credits or previously taxed income be used in the

PwC 23

• How will excess credits or previously taxed income be used in thefuture?

Page 24: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Tax Drivers and Opportunities to Add Value inDeal Execution (cont’d)

Purchase Price Allocation vs. Cost Segregation

• Why not the same as book?

• Risk of short-cut methods

• Force of excess purchase price to goodwill without stepping down thewaterfall

PwC 24

waterfall

• Determination of existing built-in gains in mineral inventory,intangible assets, and contract rights

Page 25: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Tax Drivers and Opportunities to Add Value inDeal Execution (cont’d)

Costs of Transactions

• Transaction Costs (deductible inside/outside)

- Safe Harbor Notice (2011-29) Regarding Success Based Fees

- Deductible versus Capitalizable

PwC 25

• Sales and Use w/exclusion for occasional sales

• Real Estate registration requirement

• Excise Taxes

• Shared services agreements

Page 26: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Tax Drivers and Opportunities to Add Value inDeal Execution (cont’d)

Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Property Tax Act

• Consideration of mandatory withholding

• Reliance on GAAP Assets

• Can a reasonable determination of gain / loss be made?

PwC 26

Page 27: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Section Four

Recent Legislative Proposals

PwC 27

Page 28: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Recent Legislative Proposals

The Administration Proposed the Repeal of Incentives

• Last-In, First-Out Inventory Method

• Lower of Cost or Market Inventory Method

For Fossil Fuels Including Coal, a Repeal of:

PwC 28

• Exploration and Development Expense

• Section 199 Deduction

• Percentage Depletion

• Levy a fee on the production of hardrock minerals to restoreabandoned mines

Page 29: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Recent Legislative Proposals

State Tax Proposals:

• Many States proposed new statutory provisions for mineralsproducers, but few enacted.

• Most enacted provision where related to extensions of rates,deductions, or credits

PwC 29

deductions, or credits

• Florida -- Extension of fees on limestone and phosphate production

• Minnesota -- Expanded Net Proceeds of Minerals to process minerals

• Nevada -- Net Proceeds of Minerals

• West Virginia -- Safety Technology tax credit

Page 30: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Recent Legislative Proposals

Rulings and Cases:

• CCA 201208029 -- Non-productive lease sales is not domesticproduction gross receipts

• Esgar Corp. v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo. 2012-35, Feb. 6, 2012,overstated the value of the conservation easements

PwC 30

overstated the value of the conservation easements

• Peco Foods v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2012-18 (Jan. 17, 2012) acquireris obligated to the purchase price agreement (binding on assets) unlessinappropriate or unenforceable

• AM2012003 – Worthless stock deduction not allowed when taxrefunds and other legal claims exist which attribute value to the entity(see Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.1502-19(c)(1)(iii)(A)

Page 31: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Mining Tax Top Ten (Due Diligence Reviews)

Single Property Deal:

1. Type of Seller / Buyer

2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (LikeKind)

3. Consideration to be Paid

4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real /Contingent)

Consolidated Group Deal:

1. Consideration to be Paid

2. Tax Free Reorganization / Not

3. Value of Tax Attributables

4. Core Entities and Assets

5. Deal Objectives (core / non-coreassets)

PwC

5. List of Assets to be Acquired with ExistingTax Basis

6. Market Value of the Assets

7. How much Value should be Attributable toMineral Reserves

8. Other Intangible Assets or Rights

9. Unpaid Taxes (Assessed Against Assets)

10. Recapture, Accounting Methods,Elections

assets)

6. Market Value of the Assets

7. Documentation of Tax Elections

8. Exit Strategies

9. Inside / Outside tax basis (non-core)

10. Recording of Deferred Tax Assets /Liabilities

31

Page 32: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Summary

• Many mining related transactions are occurring and we expect thisactivity to continue.

• The tax group is important in all phases of the transaction.

• For a successful mineral acquisition transaction, one must:

Have a clear understanding of the Target's business and objects;

PwC

Have a clear understanding of the Target's business and objects;

Model how this Target may be incorporated into your existing taxreturns and plans;

Have good interview skills, but allow the other party to talk; and

Be skeptical but hear their story.

32

Page 33: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Questions/Comments?

PwC 33

Page 34: 2012 Americas School of Mines · 1. Type of Seller / Buyer 2. Type of Entity / Tax Treatment (Like Kind) 3. Consideration to be Paid 4. Liabilities to be Assumed (Real / Contingent)

Thank you.

© 2012 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the United Statesmember firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separatelegal entity. Please see www.pwc. com/structure for further details.