Upload
catholic-charities-usa
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
1/25
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
2/25
1
2
3
Common Outcome Measures
1,000 Out of Poverty Campaign
Social Impact Financing
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
3/25
A. How to form a network focused on anfocused, achievable and measurable goal.
B. How to use a common self-sufficiency
measure in conjunction with theSupplemental Poverty Measure.
C. How to address challenges in forming a
coordinated anti-poverty strategy.D. How to develop social impact financing as
a component of the local strategy.
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
4/25
Be the Backbone
Recruit Unlikely Allies and Stakeholders
Nurture Relationships Agree on Common Goals and Accountability
Develop Networked Leadership
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
5/25
CONVENE
INCUBATEEVALUATE
ADVOCATE
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
6/25
WHAT IT ISA measurement tool that defines the poverty threshold based on abasic set of goods including food, clothing, shelter, and utilities(FCSU) as well as other needs (household supplies, personal care,transportation, etc.)
CURRENT RESEARCHConducted by Center on Poverty and Inequality, Stanford UniversityPhone: 650.724.6912E-mail: [email protected]://www.stanford.edu/group/scspi/index.html
THE DIFFERENCEUnlike the current official poverty measure, the SPM accounts forrising standards of living, differences in family compositions, andgeographic differences in housing costs.
Supplemental Poverty Measure1
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
7/25
Mission Success Measures: Five Dimensions of Poverty/Prosperity Poverty: Score Less Than 3
INCOME
EDUCATION
HOUSING
FOOD
HEALTH CARE
1. No income2. Inadequate income and/or spontaneous or inappropriate
spending
3. Can meet basic needs with subsidy; appropriate spending4. Can meet basic needs and manage debt without assistance5. Income is sufficient, well managed; has discretionary income
and is able to save
1. Literacy problems and/or no high school diploma/GED areserious barriers to employment
2. Enrolled in literacy and/or GED program and/or has sufficientcommand of English to where language is not a barrier toemployment
3. Has high school diploma/GED4. Needs additional education/training to improve employment
situation and/or to resolve literacy problems to where they areable to function effectively in society
5. Has completed education/training needed to becomeemployable. No literacy problems
1. No food or means to prepare it. Relies to a significant degreeon other sources of free or low-cost food
2. Household is on food stamps
3. Can meet basic food needs, but requires occasional assistance4. Can meet basic food needs without assistance
5. Can choose to purchase any food household desires
1. Homeless or threatened with eviction2. In transitional, temporary or substandard housing; and/or
current rent/mortgage payment is unaffordable (over 30% ofincome)
3. In stable housing that is safe but only marginally adequate
4. Household is in safe, adequate subsidized housing5. Household is safe, adequate, unsubsidized housing
1. No medical coverage with immediate need2. No medical coverage and great difficulty accessing medical
care when needed. Some household members may be in poorhealth
3. Some members (e.g. children) on Medi-Cal, but adults lack
coverage4. All members can get medical care when needed, but may strain
budget5. All members are covered by affordable, adequate health
insurance
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
8/25
THE GOALTo move 1,000 people out of poverty within one year.
THE STRATEGYThe committed organizations will form a network in which each
organization commits to select a cohort of its clientele to move outof poverty as defined by the Step Up Self Sufficiency Measure. Theorganizations agree to intentionally collaborate with one another toreach this goal.
THE DIFFERENCE
Typically success is measured by outputs: the number of servicesreceived. This pilot will measure how many clients get out ofpoverty.
Never before has this community used a common measurementsystem to evaluate whether its combined services move people
out of poverty.
1,000 Out of Poverty Campaign2
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
9/25
SUNNYVALECOMMUNITY
SERVICES
CATHOLIC
CHARITIES OFSCC
CENTER FOR
EMPLOYMENTTRAINING
COMMUNITYSOLUTIONS
EHC
LIFEBUILDERSGOODWILLINDUSTRIES
PROJECTHIRED
WEST VALLEYCOMMUNITY
SERVICES
NEXT DOORSOLUTIONS
200 100 20 20 100
20 20 10 100 100
30
ST. JOSEPHSFAMILYCENTER
THESALVATION
ARMY
15
NOVA
20
SUNDAYFRIENDS
COMMUNITYSERVICE
SOLUTIONSMOUNTAIN
VIEW
40
THEHOUSING
TRUST
25
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
10/25
ACTION DATE ACTION DATE
November 2012
SUSV network agrees tofocus on testing pilot to
move 1,000 people out ofpoverty in one year.
November 2012
Monthly:January December 2013
County agrees to share data.
Partner agencies agree onnumbers they will work on
and track within theirexisting service systemsusing the self-sufficiency
measure on a quarterlybasis.
Evaluation: University ofNotre Dame, CTA, and
County agree to evaluateprogress toward goal.Possibly use HMIS or
country data as random
control.
December 2012-January 2013
December 2012-January 2013
Agencies meet to share plan,progress, costs, resources,
and barriers.
Agencies assist clients andtrack client data.
Funding secured forevaluation and coordination
Ongoing client tracking,evaluation and gap analysis
Final report provided to theOutcomes Leadership Council
January December 2013
January 2013
June 2014
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
11/25
The 1,000 Out of Poverty cluster agrees to the following selection methodology:
The 1,000 Out of Poverty cluster will be comprised of organizations thattogether serve a diverse population which contains within it people dealing with thevarious factors known to put people at risk of poverty.
Each organization in the cluster will choose a cohort that is representative ofthe organizations clientele, thereby ensuring that all people with all risk factors areincluded.
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
12/25
o Lack of nutritious foodo Lack of safe affordable housingo Lack of education/job skillso Lack of access to healthcare including mental health serviceso Lack of income, benefits, and assetso Raceo Immigration statuso Over age 65o Veterano Disability/Addiction/Mental illnesso Criminal recordo Family/Neighborhood culture (i.e. domestic violence, parents w/o HSeduc.)o Child of single parent or in foster care
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
13/25
The 1,000 Out of Poverty cluster commits to an evaluation process led by Universityof Notre Dame Lab for Economic Opportunities.
The process will include regular meetings and communications to ensure theconsistent participation among all members of the cluster.
The cluster agrees to a process of network development in order to facilitate newthinking, learning, and effective collaboration.
The members of the cluster commit to hold one other accountable for pursuing andmeeting the goal.
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
14/25
What do we want to learn from the 1,000 campaign?1. Can multiple agencies use the same outcomes measure?2. Can the government use the same measure? The County and Cities?3. What can we learn from the measurement?
Is it meaningful or not? Does the intervention work or not? What are the bright spots?
Do we see improvement or not? Do referrals happen more seamlessly or not? Does case managed service work better than non-case managed service?
Provider intentionality? How much does it cost for how long? How intense? What are the barriers?
Regulation, Technology, Lack of resources, Categorical funding/ notflexible
What policies need to change? Were the participant engaged in decision-making?
4. Can government & NPO share data? Demographic, Poverty Cause/Solution?
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
15/25
To provide data on individuals or families who are below the poverty level and
may qualify for the pilot program to reduce poverty in Santa Clara County.
November 20, 2012
RECOMMENDED ACTIONRequest Social Services Agency to work closely with Step Up Silicon Valley to
provide data that will identify families or individuals who may qualify.Supervisor Dave Cortese
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONThe pilot will help move 1,000 people out of poverty within 12 months.
POSITIVE IMPACTThe project will provide support and service to county clients, includingseniors and those families with children. This will ultimately help them tobecome self-sufficient.
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
16/25
Facilitated & Coordinated by
Bill Wilson Center
Family Supportive Housing
http://www.housingtrustsv.org/index.phphttp://www.sundayfriends.org/index.html7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
17/25
Research Partners
Lab for Economic Opportunities LEO,
University of Notre Dame www.leo.nd.edu
Community Technology Alliance - (CTA)
Research Partners
http://www.leo.nd.edu/http://www.leo.nd.edu/7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
18/25
DESCRIPTIONNonprofits dont have the financing to scale up what works.
Social Impact Financing (SIF) funds what works by paying for results.This innovative financing mechanism is being tested in the UK andseveral cities in the U.S.
SUSVS ROLE$100,000 awarded by the Health Trust will allow SUSV to conduct adisruptive innovation feasibility study that would examine the use ofsocial impact financing for anti-poverty programs in Santa ClaraCounty.
THE TEAM
Social Impact Financing3
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
19/25
October2012
November2012
January 2013
January-March 2013
April-May2013
June-September
2013
CommunityOutreach
andEducation
LandscapeAnalysis andIdentification
of SuitableInterventions
ProcessAdvice for
County
TechnicalAssistance
forResponders
TechnicalAssistanceand Deal
Constructionfor Finalists
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
20/25
Pay for SuccessPerformance-based contracting for socialinterventions where government pays onlyif and when results are achieved
Social Innovation FinanceFunding that bridges the timing gap
between the need to pay for serviceprovision and government successpayments. Social Impact Bonds are onetype of SIF.
PFS
SIF
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
21/25
21
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
22/25
22
CashableSavings
High-Priority
Social Issues
1. Reduced days of acute care at the BAP2. Reduced incarceration rates for at-risk
crossover youth3. Reduced frequency of bench warrant
arrests
4. Sustainably housed chronic homeless5. Improved outcomes for infants and
first-time mothers6. Increased successful placements for
youth aging out of foster care
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
23/25
Engage key leaders: Govt, business, Nonprofit Networked Leadership:
Core, Cluster, Periphery
Backbone organization Shared measures and data collection using HMIS
County commitment
Corporate and funding: Cisco, Applied Materials Case managers/client advocates meet regularly
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
24/25
1000 OUT OF POVERTY - RESULTS TO DATE? Organizations committed _______17________ Number of participants entered ____________ Status of participants
PROCESS: Change is not easy Start small Celebrate quick wins
New Collaboratives formed
Admit the hard realities The power of inertia Bureaucracy
Never give up
7/27/2019 2013 Annual Gathering: Workshop#3A: 1,000 Out of Poverty
25/25