49
2014/2015 Trends in Compensation Society for Information Management Minnesota Chapter Presented by: Maureen Driscoll Principal, Compensation Consulting

2014/2015 Trends in Compensation Society for Information Management Minnesota Chapter Presented by: Maureen Driscoll Principal, Compensation Consulting

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

2014/2015 Trends in Compensation

Society for Information Management

Minnesota ChapterPresented by:

Maureen DriscollPrincipal, Compensation Consulting

Today’s Presenter

– Maureen Driscoll• Principal with Verisight’s compensation consulting group• 35 years of compensation experience• 23 years of consulting experience

2

Agenda

– Trend data• Verisight’s 2014/2015 Compensation, Retirement and

Benefits Trend Survey– Total rewards philosophy– Base pay considerations

• Job families and career pathing– Variable pay considerations– Nontraditional rewards– What employees want: rewards of work

3

Why is This Topic Important?

• Attracting and retaining skilled employees is critical• 81% of IT professionals are open to hearing about new job

opportunities, even if they are happily employed*• IT professionals report receiving an average of 34 job

solicitations each week*• Total compensation costs usually represent the greatest expense to

organizations• Turnover is costly

• Saratoga Institute 1x salary• World At Work 1.5x salary

*Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal-Dec 2014

4

Verisight and McGladrey 2014/2015 Compensation, Retirement

and Benefits Trends Report

2014/2015 Compensation, Retirement and Benefits Trends Report

2014/2015 Compensation, Retirement and Benefits Trends Report

• Fourth annual survey• More than 1,000 participants from across the country• Respondents span a range of industries• Deepest penetration in manufacturing, not-for-profit, health care and

professional services industries

6

The total compensation philosophy of the majority of employers is to position base salary at market. However, a fairly large segment of employers (34 percent), typically from firms with 500 or fewer employees, have no formal philosophy for positioning bonus and incentive compensation.

Compensation Philosophy

Compensation Practices

Base

Salar

y

Ince

ntive

Compen

satio

n

Health

and W

elfa

re B

enefi

ts

Retire

men

t Ben

efits

14%

34%

14% 16%

10%

8%

5% 7%

62%36%

44%47%

14%22%

37% 30%

Position Above Market

Position at Market

Position Below Market

No Formal Philosophy

Base = 521

7

Salary IncreasesIdentical to the past two years, median salary increases for executive, managerial, salaried and hourly non-exempt workers remained at 3.0 percent.

Compensation Practices

2014 Actual Base Salary Increases

2015 Anticipated Base Salary Increases

Executives

Mean 2.8% 2.8%

Median 3.0% 3.0%

Salaried (Exempt)

Mean 2.6% 2.8%

Median 3.0% 3.0%

Salaried (Non-exempt)

Mean 2.5% 2.6%

Median 3.0% 3.0%

Hourly (Non-exempt)

Mean 2.6% 2.7%

Median 3.0% 3.0%

Hourly (Union)

Mean 1.8% 2.0%

Median 2.3% 2.5%

Includes zeros (i.e., salary freezes)

8

Salary StructuresOnly half of organizations (50 percent) have a formal salary structure with grades, minimums, midpoints and maximums to manage compensation. The Financial/Banking/Insurance, Health Care and Not-for-profit industry sectors are far more likely than other industry groups to have a formal salary structure to manage their compensation investment, as are larger organizations with 1,000 or more employees.

Compensation Practices

Yes50%

No50%

Base = 515

9

Salary Structures

Salary structures are anticipated to move up slightly in 2015 compared to 2014.

Compensation Practices

2014 Actual Salary Structure

Adjustments

2015 Anticipated Salary Structure

Adjustments

Executives

Mean 1.1% 1.4%

Median 1.0% 1.5%

Salaried (Exempt)

Mean 1.4% 1.6%

Median 1.7% 2.0%

Salaried (Non-exempt)

Mean 1.2% 1.5%

Median 1.2% 1.8%

Hourly (Non-exempt)

Mean 1.4% 1.7%

Median 1.7% 2.1%

Hourly (Union)

Mean 0.9% 1.0%

Median 0.9% 0.9%

Base 163 148Includes zeros (i.e., no adjustments)

10

Pay for PerformanceMore than half (56 percent) of the organizations surveyed have implemented or plan to implement some type of pay-for-performance program. Larger organizations with 1,000 or more employees are much more likely to utilize pay-for-performance compared to smaller organizations.

Compensation Practices

3%

41%

9%

20%

27% Implemented Throughout the Organization

Implemented with Some Employee Groups

Considered Implementing in Next 12 Months

Not Implemented

Previously Implemented But Eliminated

Base = 508

11

Pay for Performance

While average salary increases for high performers and satisfactory performers increased slightly from 2012 to 2013, they remained relatively steady over last year at 4.8 percent and 2.9 percent respectively.

Compensation Practices

Low Performers

Satisfactory Performers

High Performers

1.2%

3.0%

4.4%

1.1%

2.9%

4.8%

Mean Median

Base = 390

12

Incentive PlansEligibility for short-term incentive pay is substantially more available to executives and salaried-exempt management than to hourly and non-exempt workers. Long-term incentive pay remains largely reserved for executives.

Compensation Practices

Hourly (Union)

Hourly (Non-exempt)

Salaried (Non-exempt)

Salaried (Exempt)

Executives

1%

7%

7%

14%

34%

6%

41%

35%

60%

59%

Short-Term Incentives (1 year or less) Base = 462

13

Incentive Plans

Compensation Practices

What is the targeted short-term incentive pay opportunity at your company for 2014?

Hourly (Union)

Hourly (Non-exempt)

Salaried (Non-exempt)

Salaried (Exempt)

Executives

8%

5%

7%

12%

20%

6%

5%

6%

12%

23%

Mean Median

Base = 133

Hourly (Union)

Hourly (Non-exempt)

Salaried (Non-exempt)

Salaried (Exempt)

Executives

8%

9%

12%

21%

32%

10%

9%

12%

21%

47%

Mean Median

Base = 133

What is the maximum short-term incentive pay opportunity at your company for 2014?

14

Exec

utiv

es

Sala

ried

(Exe

mpt

)

Sala

ried

(Non

-exe

mpt

)

Hourly

(Non

-exe

mpt

)

Hourly

(Uni

on)

87%

63%58%

55%49%

37%

46%

34%31%

18%

62%

70% 69% 67%

46%

8% 6% 8% 10%

36%Organization PerformanceDivision/Department PerformanceIndividual PerformanceOther Measures

Incentive PlansThe most important measurement criteria for executives is organizational performance, while for workers at most other levels, individual performance is most important.

Compensation Practices

Base = 325

15

Incentive PlansBy far, the most commonly used measure for organizational performance continues to be earnings before income, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), cited by 60 percent of respondents.

Compensation Practices

Other

ROIC

ROE

ROA

EBITDA

38%

6%

8%

8%

60%

Base = 227

16

Incentive PlansWhile most incentive plans are designed to set expectations up front, spot bonuses, which are usually more subjective, are also used by 40 percent of responding organizations.

Compensation Practices

Yes40%

No50%

Under Consideration10%

Base = 484

17

Total Rewards Philosophy

18

CompensationStrategies

Business Strategies

Long Term IncentivesShort Term Incentives

Base Salary Benefits

Perquisites

Pay &Reward Objectives

Organization Style & CultureInformation &

Support Systems

Stakeholder Concerns & ObjectivesCompetitive Pay & Reward PoliciesIndustry, Legislation, Market &Economic Development

19

Total Rewards Package ExampleOrganization “X” vs. Market

70K

65K

60K

55K

50K

45K

40K

Organization X Market

Base Pay

Benefits

Variable Pay *

Base Pay

Benefits

Variable

Pay *

* Variable Pay = Bonus/Incentive

20

Elements of a Total Rewards Philosophy

• Reward program objectives (overall and for each element)• Market position (who and how competitive against)• Reward mix (base versus variable pay versus benefits)• Reward focus (individual versus group)• Basis of job value (internal versus external)• Structure (traditional versus non-traditional)

21

Sample Philosophy Questions for Leadership

• What results/outcomes will be connected with what reward system?• Who are our labor market competitors? How should our rewards

compare to the market – overall and for each reward element? Does this differ by employee group (such as IT)?

• Which is more important – how jobs compare to one another internally, or how they compare to the external market?

22

Outcome

• Serves as a blueprint for the design of the company’s total rewards program

• Written document that is a powerful communication tool for employees and applicants

• Articulates the company’s “value proposition”– Tangibles and intangibles– Why should they work for you?

23

Base Pay Considerations

24

Salary Survey Sources

• Be sure to use:– data sources that are reflective of your company’s total rewards

philosophy– multiple data sources, whenever possible – data sources that have a reputation for quality control– matches that reasonably reflect job responsibilities– sound sample sizes (company and incumbent)

25

Reliability Issues with Internet Compensation Data

• Primary purpose of the site and the host– Hook/lure to sell HR/non-HR related services or products– Re-seller of data

• Site’s targeted customers− Employers or consumers?

• Underlying database for the reported pay data– Often self-reported– Jobs matched on title (results in mismatch) and no level

differentiation• Methodology used to gather data

– Lack of disclosure on effective date and data parameters– No quality control

26

Job Families

• Can represent a broad grouping of functionally related jobs– Accounting– Information Technology

• Can represent career progression within a particular job– Business Systems Analyst– Database Administrator– Systems Administrator

27

TechnicalTrack

ManagementTrack

Advanced

Associate

Senior

Principal

Information Technology

Career Pathing and Job Families

28

Level 2

Level 1

Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

Movement Between Job Families May or May Not be Feasible

29

Job Family Leveling Criteria - Examples

• Education and Experience• Knowledge, Skills and Abilities• Credentials, Licenses or Designations• Problem Solving/Decision Making• Freedom to Act• Relationships

30

Job Family/Career Pathing Example

• Large Twin Cities employer• IT Department with the following job families:

– Systems Analysis– Systems Administration– Business Systems Analysis– Data Base Administration– Telecommunications– Project management

31

Job Family/Career Pathing Example (continued)

• Each family has 3 or 4 generic “levels” based on generally defined criteria.

• This is the primary tool to:– Describe what is needed to advance to higher levels

within each family– Assist employees and their managers/supervisors in

establishing a development plan

32

Job Family/Career Pathing Example (continued)

• Technical toolbox:– identifies the specific technical competencies

(knowledge, skills and/or abilities) needed within a given job family

• can include identification of ascending and descending skills

– complementary tool to identify training and development needs for the respective job families

– should be consistent with the company’s technology management, architecture and business strategies

33

Succession Planning

• IT professionals report receiving an average of 34 job solicitations each week*

• Attrition, promotion and organizational change can happen quickly and unexpectedly

• Critical that companies put programs in place to cultivate high-potential internal talent who can step into key roles when needed

• A strong succession management program serves as a powerful retention tool in a highly competitive market for IT talent

*Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal-Dec 2014

34

Variable Pay Considerations

35

Types of Variable Pay Systems

• Bonuses (usually “after the fact”)– Recognition– Project completion– Sign-on/hiring– Retention– Spot awards– Discretionary

• Short-term incentives (“before the fact”)

– Formula driven– May reflect balanced score

card• Long-term incentives (usually

3-5 years)– Usually only available at

upper management levels– Balance short- and long-

term decision making– Retention

36

Performance Criteria vs. Reward Vehicles

Job Responsibilities

Behavioral Competencies

Objectives

Developmental

Performance Improvement

Special Goals or Objectives

Base Pay

Variable Pay (Incentives or

Bonuses)

Recognition

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

Rew

ard

Veh

icle

s

37

Pros and Cons of Variable Pay

• Increased compensation expense is a variable cost

• Depending on plan design, can reward for individual, team and/or company-wide performance measures

• Allows for targeted distribution of limited compensation dollars

• Can become an “entitlement” if not properly designed, and communicated

• Discretionary bonuses typically don’t reinforce “pay for performance”

• FLSA provision complicates incentive payouts for non-exempt employees who work overtime

Opportunities Cautions

38

Why Do Incentive Plans Fail?

• Lack of buy-in, involvement (employees and managers)• Plan done in a hurry• Too complicated• Employees feel impact is too indirect• Poor communication• No payout, first or second measurement period

• Plan lacks flexibility• Too many major changes during first year (instability)• Administration too costly/confusing

39

Key Design Steps for Short-Term Plans

1Determine Objectives

2Determine

Basis of Eligibility 3

Determine Funding Mechanism(s)

4Determine Payout Basis/Size of Awards/Payout Timing

5Determine Plan Measures and Formulas

6Determine Plan Administration & Communication

40

Nontraditional Rewards

41

Nontraditional Rewards

• Flexible work arrangements• Telecommuting• Wellness and career counseling• Family/child care• Home office set-up stipends• On-site health facilities• Casual dress• “Cutting edge” technology• Leased automobiles

• Company paid spousal travel• Discounted weekend trips• Training and certification• Prepaid legal advice• Paid parking• Company paid outings• Free meals• Sabbaticals• True work/life balance

42

What Employees Want: Rewards of Work

43

What Employees Want: Rewards of Work

• Study co-sponsored by World At Work and Sibson & Company• 1200+ respondents in U.S.• Questions:

– How do they feel about rewards of work?– What do they value?– What leads them to remain?

44

What Employees Want: Rewards Of Work (continued)

• Five categories studied:– Direct financial (pay)– Indirect financial (benefits)– Work content (work itself)– Careers (long-term opportunity)– Affiliation (feelings of belonging)

WorldatWork and Sibson & Co. survey of 1200+ U.S. companies regarding employees feelings about rewards of work, related values, and retention

45

Findings

• Work content was most highly rated

• Level of satisfaction with pay was high

• Satisfaction with pay process was low

• 75% prefer traditional forms of changes in pay Merit Individual incentives Promotional increases

46

Job securitySatisfaction with manager

Career opportunitiesCareer

AutonomyJob responsibilitiesFeedback from supervisor and co-workers

Work Content

Benefit levelsBenefits processSatisfaction with time off

Indirect Pay

Pay raisesPay levelSatisfaction with process

Base Pay

DriverDriverDriverComponent

Retention Drivers

47

Overall Best Practices

• Total Rewards Philosophy– Formalized and continuously communicated

• Base Pay– Competitive with defined market– Includes opportunities for growth and development

• Variable Pay– Rewards outcomes distinct from base pay and other programs

• Non-traditional rewards– Appropriate for culture

48

THANK YOU!

49

Contact Info:

Maureen DriscollPrincipal, Compensation Consulting

[email protected]