2015NAEMSP Poster (Boland - Wellbeing01) FINAL.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 2015NAEMSP Poster (Boland - Wellbeing01) FINAL.pdf

    1/1

    Demographic factors and social support and their associationwith burnout and perceived stress in EMS workersLori L. Boland, MPH; Russell N. Myers, BCC; Pamela J. Mink, PhD; Karl M. Fernstrom, MPH; William M. Spinelli, MD

    Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, St. Paul, Minnesota

    LIMITATIONS54% response rate

    No multivariate analysis; possible uncontrolled confounding

    RESULTSN = 217 survey responses (54%; Table 1)Prevalence of burnout was 18%, and decreasedwith age (Table 2)

    Lower prevalence of burnout observed amongthose who are married, have children, orrespond in rural settings (Table 2)

    Perceived stress scores were significantly higherin females and those who respond in metroareas (Table 2)

    Strong positive association observed between

    social isolation and both burnout and stress(Table 3)

    111023 1214 2014 ALLINA HEALTHSYSTEM. TMA TRADEMARKOF ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM.

    BACKGROUNDEmergency medical services (EMS) respondersexperience occupational stress due to repeatedexposure to traumatic and life-threatening events

    Few ambulance services in the United States haveevaluated burnout and stress among prehospitalclinicians

    OBJECTIVES

    Assess professional burnout and perceived stressamong EMS workers using validated instruments

    Investigate associations between burnout, stress,demographic characteristics, and social support

    METHODSSetting & Design

    Large ambulance service in Minnesota

    Cross-sectional, 165-item electronic survey

    Distributed to all employees (n=400) in September2012

    MeasuresMaslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)used to assessprofessional burnout

    Cohens Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score range0-14, higher values indicate more stress

    Berkmann-Syme Social Network Index (BS-SNI)used to characterize respondents degree of socialconnectedness

    Results are expressed as mean (SD) or percent (n)

    Table 1:Demographic characteristics of surveyrespondents

    Table 2:Prevalence of burnout and mean stress score bydemographic factors

    aDefined as having a high level on the emotional exhaustion or depersonalization subscales; bResults areexpressed as mean (SD); cp-value for Pearson chi-square or independent samples t-test.

    CONCLUSIONSIn this population of EMS responders, socialconnectedness was associated with lower levels ofburnout and perceived stress. These results suggestthere may be a need for organizational efforts thatfoster professional interconnectedness in EMSsystems.

    VariableRespondents

    (n=217)

    Age, y 40 (11.5)

    Age categories18-29

    30-39 40-49 50+

    27% (58)20% (43)25% (54)27% (57)

    Gender Male Female

    60% (131)40% (84)

    Highest level of education High school diploma or equivalent Some college College graduate or beyond

    4% (9)50% (108)46% (99)

    Parental Status Parent Not a parent

    65% (140)35% (74)

    Current Relationship Status Single Married/Partnered

    23% (49)77% (162)

    Years as EMS provider 1 2-5 6-10 11-20 >20

    3% (6)18% (40)23% (50)24% (51)32% (70)

    Primary response setting Metro Non-Metro/Rural

    70% (152)30% (64)

    Variable % withBurnouta

    p-valuec

    MeanPSSb

    p-valuec

    All respondents 18% (37) 4.8 (3.2)

    Age categories 18-29 30-39 40-49 50+

    27% (15)21% (9)

    20% (10)5% (3)

    0.025.2 (3.4)4.7 (3.3)4.8 (3.0)4.4 (2.9)

    0.60

    Gender Male Female

    18% (22)18% (15)

    0.96 4.4 (3.1)5.4 (3.2)

    0.03

    Parental Status Parent

    Not a parent

    13% (18)

    26% (18)

    0.02 4.6 (3.1)

    5.1 (3.4)

    0.30

    Current Relationship Status Single Married/Partnered

    28% (13)15% (23)

    0.03 5.2 (3.6)4.7 (3.1)

    0.34

    Years as EMS provider 1 2-5 6-10 11-20 >20

    0% (0)19% (7)

    27% (13)14% (7)

    15% (10)

    0.31

    3.3 (1.9)4.5 (3.1)5.4 (3.4)4.0 (3.1)5.3 (3.1)

    0.11

    Primary response setting Metro Non-Metro/Rural

    21% (31)10% (6)

    0.05 5.1 (3.2)4.1 (2.8)

    0.03

    BS-SNIscore Level of social connection % with Burnout Mean PSS

    0 or 1 Socially isolated 39% (10/26) 6.0

    2 Moderately isolated 19% (11/58) 4.8

    3 Moderately integrated 16% (8/51) 5.0

    4 Socially integrated 7% (3/43) 3.8

    Table 3:Prevalence of burnout and mean stress score by category

    of social connectednessa

    aBased on Berkmann-Syme Social Network Index (BS-SNI)