2016-2017 - Nebraska Supreme Court...2016-2017 Nebraska Court Improvement Project Data Report DISTRICT 8 Team 8.1 Blaine, Brown, Cherry, Keya Paha and Rock Counties. ... T o t a l

2016-2017Nebraska Court Improvement Project

Data Report

DISTRICT 8

Team 8.1Blaine, Brown, Cherry, Keya Paha

and Rock Counties

2 2016-2017 Data Reports

Dear Judges, Team Members, Nebraska Legislators, and Members of the Community:

On behalf of the Through the Eyes of the Child Initiative, I would like to thank you for taking time to learn more about Nebraska’s Juvenile Court data.

At the end of the first Nebraska Children’s Summit in 2006, the Through the Eyes of the Child Initiative was officially inaugurated. The idea was to work to improve the court process in abuse/neglect cases in Nebraska by looking at the court system “through the eyes” of children and youth who are affected by the courts. This

involves collaboration by stakeholders from a variety of disciplines, with the idea that those individuals are in the best place to understand the court process.

In 2012, the Through the Eyes of the Child Initiative was expanded, recognizing the importance of improving court processes for those involved in juvenile justice cases. In order to effectuate expansion of the scope of the Initiative, the Through the Eyes teams have worked to include stakeholders who are regularly engaged in juvenile justice work in their local communities.

As is common in numerous states, many of Nebraska’s children are in foster care without permanent homes and families. Too many of our youth do not get the intervention and support needed to become productive, safe, and contributing members of our communities. National court practice and studies have consistently shown that collaboration of individuals involved in the court process improves permanency and outcomes for children and youth. Over the last ten years, our Initiative has sought to accomplish these results. Outstanding work has already been done, but there is more to do in order to continue moving in a positive direction and achieving ever-improving results.

If you are not currently a member of your local team, I would encourage you to become involved. The support of the community, from citizens to members of the Legislature, is vital in such endeavors.

Thank you for the work you do to improve the lives of children and families in Nebraska.

Sincerely,

Michael G. Heavican,Chief Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court

3The Nebraska Court Improvement Project

4 Introduction

5 District/Team Map

6 Demographics

8 Child Welfare

12 Permanency of Child Welfare Cases

15 Child Welfare | JUSTICE Data

18 Entry Into the Juvenile Justice System

23 Juvenile Justice | JUSTICE Data

28 Probation Supervision

34 References

35 Appendix

Contents

Juvenile Justice

Child Welfare


On behalf of the “Eyes” initiative we all want to thank you for your participation and

commitment to the youth and families we serve.

You will find among the various materials provided updated data reports for your team as

well as overall statewide statistics.

The Court Improvement Project has worked closely with JUSTICE to improve how data

is initially entered and ensure that the results are accurate. While there are still areas to

address, the reports provided to you reflect these ongoing efforts and represent the most

accurate data collected about our system to date. While this data cannot be the exclusive reason to pursue certain

changes we know it can be a guide for team discussions about where improvements can be made and how best to

address them.

As always, please feel free to contact anyone affiliated with the Court Improvement Project or myself if you have

any questions or concerns. Thanks to your efforts we have made important changes since we started the initiative in

2006. These latest reports will help us continue to move forward.

Lawrence D. Gendler,

Judge, Sarpy County Separate Juvenile Court

Introduction The Court Improvement Project produces annual data reports that include demographics, data on entry into foster care and permanency, and juvenile justice data. The following sources are referenced throughout the report, including full citation information for data that is publicly available.


128 11

109

76

34

1

52

12.1

12.3

12.1

8.18.2

8.3

11.1

11.2

11.3

11.4

10.1c

10.2w

10.3e

5.3

5.2

5.1

6.2 6.1

9.29.1

2.22.3

2.1

Siou

xD

awes

Sher

idan

Box

Butt

e

Scot

ts B

lu�

Bann

er

Mor

rill

Chey

enne

Ki

mba

ll

Gar

den

Deu

el

Gra

nt

Art

hur

Keith

Linc

oln

Fron

tier

Red

Will

ow

Furn

as

Gos

per

Daw

son

Cust

er

Blai

neLo

upG

ar�e

ld

How

ard

Bu�a

lo Kear

ney

Adam

s

Web

ster

Nuc

kolls

Thay

erJe

�ers

on

Gag

e

Paw

nee

Rich

rdso

n

Nem

aha

John

son

Oto

e

Sarp

y

Dou

glas

Was

hing

ton

Burt

Thur

ston

Dak

ota

Dix

on

Ceda

rKn

oxH

oltBo

ydKe

ya P

aha

Brow

n

Cher

ry

Rock

Ant

elop

ePi

erce

Way

ne

Cum

ing

Stan

ton

Mad

ison

Cass

Salin

eFi

llmor

eCl

ay

Ham

ilton

Mer

rick

Nan

ce

Plat

teCo

lfax

Dod

ge

Saun

ders

Butle

r

Polk

Lanc

aste

r

Boon

e

York

Sew

ard

Fran

klin

Har

lan

Phel

ps

Hal

l

Sher

man

Valle

y

Whe

eler

Gre

eley

Loga

n

Thom

as

Hoo

ker

McP

hers

on

Perk

ins

Chas

eH

ayes

Hitc

hcoc

kD

undy

Cha

dron

Ger

ing

Brid

gepo

rt

Kim

ball

Sidn

ey

Rus

hvill

e

Brok

en B

owO

rd

Ain

swor

thO

’Nei

ll

Oga

llala

McC

ook

Alm

a

Hol

dred

geM

inde

nH

astin

gs

Nor

th P

latt

e

Kear

ney

Gra

nd

Isla

ndLe

xing

ton

Schu

yler

Col

umbu

s

Nor

folk

Way

ne

Dako

ta Ci

ty

Frem

ont

Blai

r

Wilb

ur

Cen

tral

C

ity

Dav

idC

ityW

ahoo

Osc

eola Yo

rkSe

war

dLi

ncol

n

Plat

tsm

outh

Neb

rask

a C

ity

Papi

llion

Om

aha

Beat

rice

Aub

urn

Falls

City

Aur

ora

Har

riso

n

Har

risb

urg

Osh

kosh

Cha

ppel

l

Gra

nt

Vale

ntin

e

Elw

ood

Fran

klin

Red

Clou

d

Clay

Cen

ter

Nuc

kolls

Heb

ron

Paw

nee

City

Tecu

mse

h

Sprin

gvie

w

Bass

ett

Harti

ngto

n

Pend

er Teka

mah

Burw

ell

Bart

lett

Gre

eley

Alli

ance

Mul

len

Art

hur

Gra

nt Impe

rial

Benk

elm

anTr

ento

n

Tryo

n

The

dfor

d

Stap

leto

n

Cen

ter

Stoc

kvill

e

Beav

er C

ityFa

irbur

y

Butt

e

Brew

ster

Loup

City

St. P

aul

Cen

ter

Nel

igh

Pier

ce

Stan

ton

Wes

tPo

int

Fulle

rton

Alb

ion

Ponc

a

Gen

eva

Tayl

or

Dist

rict

6

Team

1 - M

AH

Team

2 -

MAH

Dist

rict

5

Team

1 - M

AH

Team

2 -

MAH

Te

am 3

- M

AH

Dist

rict

4 (D

ougl

as)

Te

am M

LDi

stri

ct 3

(Lan

cast

er)

Te

am M

AHDi

stri

ct 2

Te

am 1

- MAH

Te

am 2

- M

AH

Team

3 -

MAH

Dist

rict

11

Team

1 - M

AH

Team

2 -

ML

Te

am 3

- M

L

Team

4 -

ML

Dist

rict

10

Team

1c -

MAH

Te

am 2

e - M

L

Team

3w

- M

L

Dist

rict

9

Team

1 - M

AH

Team

2 -

MAH

Dist

rict

8

Team

1 - M

AH

Team

2 -

ML

Te

am 3

- M

AH

Dist

rict

7

Team

- M

AHDi

stri

ct 12

Te

am 1

- MAH

Te

am 2

- M

AH

Team

3 -

ML

Dist

rict

1

Team

ML

Proj

ect

Coor

dina

tors

:M

AH -

Mar

y An

n Ha

rvey

ML

- Mat

t Le

wis

District/Team Map1


Demographics

District 8 Total Youth

Population = 12,640.5

Team 8.1 Total Youth

Under Age 19 = 21.0%

0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County

Brown County

Cherry CountyKeya Paha County

Rock County

Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for Team 8.1

Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha Blaine Under 19 1,223 645 252 150 15619+ years 4,558 2,378 1,155 586 424

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Tota

l Pop

ula

tion

District 8: Youth Population by County for Team 8.1

1,223.0Cherry50%644.5

Brown27%

252.0Rock10%

150.0Keya Paha

6%

156.0Blaine

7%

All Youth Under 19 for Team 8.1

Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha BlaineYouth of Color 203.0 33.0 14.0 6.5 0.0White Youth 1,020.0 611.5 238.0 143.5 156.0

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Tota

l You

th P

opul

atio

n

District 8: Diversity by County for Team 8.1

0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County

Brown CountyCherry County

Keya Paha County

Rock County

Boyd County

Garfield CountyGreeley CountyHolt County

Valley County

Wheeler County

Custer County

Howard County

Loup CountySherman County

Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for District 8

All Youth Under 19 for District 8Cherry

BrownRockKeya Paha

Blaine

Holt

BoydGreeleyValleyGarfield

Wheeler

Custer

Howard

Sherman Loup

Lincoln

30%

10%

6%10%3%

11%

23%

7%Gage

Jefferson

Johnson

Nemaha

Pawnee

Richardson

Saline

Thayer

11%

6%

83%

Cass

Otoe

Sarpy

7%

13%

9%

6%

9%25%

16%

4%5%2%4%

Hamilton

Seward

York

Butler

Colfax

Platte

Saunders

Boone

Merrick

Nance

Polk

Hamilton2,337 23%

Seward4,42144%

York3,34733%

Butler2051.5

10%Colfax3,27417%

Platte8,976.5

45%

Saunders5,50228%

Boone1,29925%

Merrick1,86635%

Nance843.516%

Polk1268.5

24%

22%

32%9%

18%

6%5%

8%Dakota

Dodge

Thurston

Washington

Dixon

Burt

Cedar

6,265.0Dakota

32%

2,599.0Thurston

13%

5,211.0Washington

27%

1,533.0Dixon

8%

1,530.0Burt8%

2,245.5Cedar12%

10%

11%

11%

8%

7%9%

44%

Knox

Cuming

Wayne

Stanton

Antelope

Pierce

Madison

10%5% 2%

1%1%

21%

4%5%8%3%1%

21%

12%5%

1% Cherry

Brown

Rock

Keya Paha

Blaine

Holt

Boyd

Greeley

Valley

Garfield

Wheeler

Custer

1,223.0Cherry50%

644.5Brown27%

252.0Rock10%

150.0Keya Paha

6% 156.0Blaine

7%

2,587.0Holt49%

486.0Boyd9%

615.0Greeley

12%

972.5Valley19%

407.0Garfield

8%153.5

Wheeler3%

2,632.0Custer53%

1,568.0Howard

31%

688.0Sherman

14%

106.0Loup2%

58%

42%

Hall

45%

5%13%

9%

4%3%

9%

7%5% Adams

Webster

Phelps

Kearney

Harlan

Franklin

Clay

Fillmore

Nuckolls

8,134Adams

90%

858Webster

10%

2,356.0Phelps

43%

1,654.5Kearney

31%

798.0Harlan

15%

619.5Franklin

11%

1,591.5Clay43%

1,230.5Fillmore

33%

910.0Nuckolls

24%

6,927.0Dawson

94%

452.5Gosper

6%

1,708.0Keith43%

1,043.5Chase26%

389.0Dundy10%

695.0Perkins

17%

139.0Arthur

4%

2,692.0Red Willow

57%1,154.0Furnas25%

657.5Hitchcock

14%

204.0Hayes

4%

96.0McPherson

1%

9,191.0Lincoln

88%

608.5Frontier

6%

226.5Logan

2%

165.0Thomas

2%

100.0Hooker

1%

14%

6%

9%

6%

1%1%11%

4%

2%2%

43%

1%

Box Butte

Sheridan

Dawes

Morrill

Sioux

Grant

Cheyenne

Kimball

Garden

Deuel

Scotts Bluff

Banner

3,014.5Box Butte

36%

1,288.5Sheridan

15%

2,044.5Dawes

28%

1,229.5Morrill15%

277.5Sioux

4%

139.0Grant2%

2,498.5Cheyenne

60%

893.0Kimball

22%

377.5Garden

9%

391.5Deuel

9%

9,510.0Scotts Bluff

98%

188.0Banner

2%

All Youth Under 19 for District 5, Team 5.3



All Youth Under 19 for District 5


All Youth Under 19 for District 1 All Youth Under 19 for District 6





All Youth Under 19 for District 8, Team 8.2 All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.3e

All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.2w

All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.1c


Buffalo











26%

2%

6%

4%

1%3%

1%

10%4%2%

1%

0%

35%

2%

1%

1% 0%All Youth Under 19 for District 11

DawsonGosperKeithChaseDundyPerkinsArthurRed WillowFurnasHitchcockHayesMcPhersonLincoln

Lincoln

30%

10%

6%10%3%

11%

23%

7%Gage

Jefferson

Johnson

Nemaha

Pawnee

Richardson

Saline

Thayer

11%

6%

83%

Cass

Otoe

Sarpy

7%

13%

9%

6%

9%25%

16%

4%5%2%4%

Hamilton

Seward

York

Butler

Colfax

Platte

Saunders

Boone

Merrick

Nance

Polk

Hamilton2,337 23%

Seward4,42144%

York3,34733%

Butler2051.5

10%Colfax3,27417%

Platte8,976.5

45%

Saunders5,50228%

Boone1,29925%

Merrick1,86635%

Nance843.516%

Polk1268.5

24%

22%

32%9%

18%

6%5%

8%Dakota

Dodge

Thurston

Washington

Dixon

Burt

Cedar

6,265.0Dakota

32%

2,599.0Thurston

13%

5,211.0Washington

27%

1,533.0Dixon

8%

1,530.0Burt8%

2,245.5Cedar12%

10%

11%

11%

8%

7%9%

44%

Knox

Cuming

Wayne

Stanton

Antelope

Pierce

Madison

10%5% 2%

1%1%

21%

4%5%8%3%1%

21%

12%5%

1% Cherry

Brown

Rock

Keya Paha

Blaine

Holt

Boyd

Greeley

Valley

Garfield

Wheeler

Custer

1,223.0Cherry50%

644.5Brown27%

252.0Rock10%

150.0Keya Paha

6% 156.0Blaine

7%

2,587.0Holt49%

486.0Boyd9%

615.0Greeley

12%

972.5Valley19%

407.0Garfield

8%153.5

Wheeler3%

2,632.0Custer53%

1,568.0Howard

31%

688.0Sherman

14%

106.0Loup2%

58%

42%

Hall

45%

5%13%

9%

4%3%

9%

7%5% Adams

Webster

Phelps

Kearney

Harlan

Franklin

Clay

Fillmore

Nuckolls

8,134Adams

90%

858Webster

10%

2,356.0Phelps

43%

1,654.5Kearney

31%

798.0Harlan

15%

619.5Franklin

11%

1,591.5Clay43%

1,230.5Fillmore

33%

910.0Nuckolls

24%

6,927.0Dawson

94%

452.5Gosper

6%

1,708.0Keith43%

1,043.5Chase26%

389.0Dundy10%

695.0Perkins

17%

139.0Arthur

4%

2,692.0Red Willow

57%1,154.0Furnas25%

657.5Hitchcock

14%

204.0Hayes

4%

96.0McPherson

1%

9,191.0Lincoln

88%

608.5Frontier

6%

226.5Logan

2%

165.0Thomas

2%

100.0Hooker

1%

14%

6%

9%

6%

1%1%11%

4%

2%2%

43%

1%

Box Butte

Sheridan

Dawes

Morrill

Sioux

Grant

Cheyenne

Kimball

Garden

Deuel

Scotts Bluff

Banner

3,014.5Box Butte

36%

1,288.5Sheridan

15%

2,044.5Dawes

28%

1,229.5Morrill15%

277.5Sioux

4%

139.0Grant2%

2,498.5Cheyenne

60%

893.0Kimball

22%

377.5Garden

9%

391.5Deuel

9%

9,510.0Scotts Bluff

98%

188.0Banner

2%






All Youth Under 19 for District 1 All Youth Under 19 for District 6





All Youth Under 19 for District 8, Team 8.2 All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.3e

All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.2w

All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.1c


Buffalo











26%

2%

6%

4%

1%3%

1%

10%4%2%

1%

0%

35%

2%

1%

1% 0%All Youth Under 19 for District 11

DawsonGosperKeithChaseDundyPerkinsArthurRed WillowFurnasHitchcockHayesMcPhersonLincoln

Youth Population2

The most recent available data from the U.S. Census Bureau was used to estimate the percent of children under 19 living in poverty1 the youth population2 and the youth population of color for your team and the state. Information regarding the youth population in your area can be helpful to determine what resources may be needed through a culturally-com-petent framework. Children living in poverty are at a higher risk of maltreatment and offending, and may need access to increased resources.


For poverty comparison across the state by county, see Appendix, page 35.

Child Poverty Rate

Demographics, continued

State District 8 Team 8.116.4% 12.6% 13.1%

0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County

Brown County


Rock County



0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Tota

l Pop

ula

tion


1,223.0Cherry50%644.5

Brown27%

252.0Rock10%

150.0Keya Paha

6%

156.0Blaine

7%



0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Tota

l You

th P

opul

atio

n


0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County


Keya Paha County

Rock County

Boyd County


Valley County

Wheeler County

Custer County

Howard County




BrownRockKeya Paha

Blaine

Holt


Wheeler

Custer

Howard

Sherman Loup

0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County

Brown County


Rock County



0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Tota

l Pop

ula

tion


1,223.0Cherry50%644.5

Brown27%

252.0Rock10%

150.0Keya Paha

6%

156.0Blaine

7%



0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Tota

l You

th P

opul

atio

n


0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County


Keya Paha County

Rock County

Boyd County


Valley County

Wheeler County

Custer County

Howard County




BrownRockKeya Paha

Blaine

Holt


Wheeler

Custer

Howard

Sherman Loup



0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County

Brown County


Rock County



0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Tota

l Pop

ula

tion


1,223.0Cherry50%644.5

Brown27%

252.0Rock10%

150.0Keya Paha

6%

156.0Blaine

7%



0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Tota

l You

th P

opul

atio

n


0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County


Keya Paha County

Rock County

Boyd County


Valley County

Wheeler County

Custer County

Howard County




BrownRockKeya Paha

Blaine

Holt


Wheeler

Custer

Howard

Sherman Loup

0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County

Brown County


Rock County



0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Tota

l Pop

ula

tion


1,223.0Cherry50%644.5

Brown27%

252.0Rock10%

150.0Keya Paha

6%

156.0Blaine

7%



0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Tota

l You

th P

opul

atio

n


0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County


Keya Paha County

Rock County

Boyd County


Valley County

Wheeler County

Custer County

Howard County




BrownRockKeya Paha

Blaine

Holt


Wheeler

Custer

Howard

Sherman Loup

Child Poverty Rate3

2

In an ideal world there would be no poverty and monetary inequality would not exist. However, this is not the case, the graph (below or adjacent for teams with more than 3 counties) shows what an equal distribution of wealth would look like at different levels (i.e. the grey line). The blue line shows how poverty is actually affecting your team and district. The closer the blue line is to the center of the graph the less poverty there is in its corresponding county while those further out represent more poverty.

8 2016-2017 Data Reports Reentries into Foster Care Team 1

Reentries into Foster Care Team 2.1



Reentries into Foster Care Team 3

Reentries into Foster Care State of Nebraska


Reentries into Foster Care District 5





















14.5% 13.7% 14.5%

6.1% 6.6% 6.1%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

8.9% 9.3% 11.1%

12.2% 14.7% 8.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

0.0%

28.6%

14.3%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2015 2016

4.2%

12.8%18.7%

10.3%

21.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

17.0%21.2%

18.0%

5.0%

6.6% 10.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

11.7%16.0% 13.7%

4.2%

5.5%3.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

13.9% 13.8% 15.5%

6.4% 6.1%7.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

11.9% 9.5%

17.8%0.9%

11.2%

9.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

20.3%

6.1%

17.3%

5.1%

3.0%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

26.5%20.1%

10.3%

12.1%17.4%

10.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

11.7% 12.2%18.5%

1.1% 0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

0.0%

25.0% 25.0%

0.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

2014 2015 2016

25.0%

7.1%0.0%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

20.0%20.0%

25.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

21.3%15.8% 16.6%

6.7%

3.9% 4.2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

19.0% 17.3%11.1%

5.1%3.4%

8.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

21.0%

6.9% 4.9%

3.2%

10.3%

1.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

8.4% 5.0%

23.0%8.3%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

0.0%5.8%

18.2%No

Data

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

5.2% 6.1% 3.7%

5.3% 0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

9.1%

0.0%

4.5%

7.1%0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

10.8%6.5%

0.0%

8.1%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

15.3% 17.5%23.7%

10.3% 8.8%2.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

15.4%

0.0%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

7.1%10.6%

3.0%

0.0%

2.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

9.5% 11.5% 11.9%

12.7%1.4%

6.4%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge

% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge

3.7%

6.2%

22.2% 18.2%

10.5%

11.8%

2.6%

3.7%

25.0%

20.8%

2014

9.1%

21.4%

14.8% 14.5% 13.7% 14.5%

6.6% 6.1% 6.6% 6.1%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

21.4%

8.9% 9.3% 11.1%

5.6%

12.2% 14.7% 8.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

2013 2014 2015 2016

11.1% 9.1%

28.6%5.6%

14.3%

21.4%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

27.8%

4.2%

12.8%18.7%

20.8%10.3%

21.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

16.8% 17.0%21.2% 18.0%

3.2% 5.0%

6.6% 10.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

9.5% 11.7%16.0% 13.7%

3.2%4.2%

5.5%3.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

17.0% 13.9% 13.8% 15.5%

5.8%6.4% 6.1%

7.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

11.9% 9.5%17.8%

0.9%11.2%

9.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

NoData

8.1%

20.3%

6.1%

17.3%5.7%

5.1%

3.0%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

23.4% 26.5%20.1%

10.3%

12.0%12.1%

17.4%

10.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

14.0% 11.7% 12.2%18.5%

8.0%

1.1%

3.7%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

100.0%

0.0%25.0% 25.0%

0.0%

25.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

2013 2014 2015 2016

26.3% 25.0%

7.1%0.0%

25.0%

0.0%0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

0.0%

20.0% 20.0%25.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

11.5%

21.3%15.8% 16.6%

9.8%

6.7%

3.9% 4.2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

13.1%19.0% 17.3%

11.1%

5.3%

5.1%3.4%

8.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

NoData

21.0%

6.9% 4.9%

3.2%

10.3%

1.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

NoData 8.4% 5.0%

23.0%8.3%

2.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

0.0% 5.8%

18.2%No

Data

11.8%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

24.3%

5.2% 6.1% 3.7%

12.1%

5.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

17.9%9.1%

3.7%

10.7%

4.5%

7.1%0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

8.4% 10.8%6.5%

8.3%8.1%

6.2%0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

10.8%15.3% 17.5%

23.7%7.7%

10.3% 8.8%2.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

22.2%15.4%

23.5%18.2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

8.3% 7.1%10.6%

3.0%

16.7% 10.5%

2.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

13.3%9.5% 11.5% 11.9%

11.1%12.7%

1.4%6.4%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016


















































% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge


Child Welfare

State

This section presents data on youth in the Nebraska Child Welfare System provided by the Fostering Court Improve-ment (FCI) team. DHHS does not directly give data to CIP; instead, like all states, data is submitted to the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) and the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS). The FCI uses the AFCARS and NCANDS to create a report that inform the courts and child welfare agen-cies in an effort to facilitate discussions among local decision makers. More data than what is provided in this report can be found at their website: http://fosteringcourtimprovement.org/ne/. Please note that this data is provided in aggregate and not in its raw form. Data is broken down by county, DHHS service area, judicial district, and Through the Eyes of a Child teams. Data presented in this report corresponds with data provided for the teams as FCI currently has the teams broken down. The Nebraska Court Improvement team is work with FCI and DHHS to update the changes of the teams for future reports.

Re-entries into Foster Care4


Child Welfare, continued






Reentries into Foster Care State of Nebraska


Reentries into Foster Care District 5





















14.5% 13.7% 14.5%

6.1% 6.6% 6.1%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

8.9% 9.3% 11.1%

12.2% 14.7% 8.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

0.0%

28.6%

14.3%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2015 2016

4.2%

12.8%18.7%

10.3%

21.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

17.0%21.2%

18.0%

5.0%

6.6% 10.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

11.7%16.0% 13.7%

4.2%

5.5%3.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

13.9% 13.8% 15.5%

6.4% 6.1%7.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

11.9% 9.5%

17.8%0.9%

11.2%

9.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

20.3%

6.1%

17.3%

5.1%

3.0%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

26.5%20.1%

10.3%

12.1%17.4%

10.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

11.7% 12.2%18.5%

1.1% 0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

0.0%

25.0% 25.0%

0.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

2014 2015 2016

25.0%

7.1%0.0%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

20.0%20.0%

25.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

21.3%15.8% 16.6%

6.7%

3.9% 4.2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

19.0% 17.3%11.1%

5.1%3.4%

8.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

21.0%

6.9% 4.9%

3.2%

10.3%

1.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

8.4% 5.0%

23.0%8.3%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

0.0%5.8%

18.2%No

Data

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

5.2% 6.1% 3.7%

5.3% 0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

9.1%

0.0%

4.5%

7.1%0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

10.8%6.5%

0.0%

8.1%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

15.3% 17.5%23.7%

10.3% 8.8%2.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

15.4%

0.0%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

7.1%10.6%

3.0%

0.0%

2.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016

9.5% 11.5% 11.9%

12.7%1.4%

6.4%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2014 2015 2016



3.7%

6.2%

22.2% 18.2%

10.5%

11.8%

2.6%

3.7%

25.0%

20.8%

2014

9.1%

21.4%

14.8% 14.5% 13.7% 14.5%

6.6% 6.1% 6.6% 6.1%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

21.4%

8.9% 9.3% 11.1%

5.6%

12.2% 14.7% 8.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

2013 2014 2015 2016

11.1% 9.1%

28.6%5.6%

14.3%

21.4%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

27.8%

4.2%

12.8%18.7%

20.8%10.3%

21.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

16.8% 17.0%21.2% 18.0%

3.2% 5.0%

6.6% 10.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

9.5% 11.7%16.0% 13.7%

3.2%4.2%

5.5%3.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

17.0% 13.9% 13.8% 15.5%

5.8%6.4% 6.1%

7.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

11.9% 9.5%17.8%

0.9%11.2%

9.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

NoData

8.1%

20.3%

6.1%

17.3%5.7%

5.1%

3.0%

0.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

23.4% 26.5%20.1%

10.3%

12.0%12.1%

17.4%

10.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

14.0% 11.7% 12.2%18.5%

8.0%

1.1%

3.7%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

100.0%

0.0%25.0% 25.0%

0.0%

25.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

2013 2014 2015 2016

26.3% 25.0%

7.1%0.0%

25.0%

0.0%0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

0.0%

20.0% 20.0%25.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

11.5%

21.3%15.8% 16.6%

9.8%

6.7%

3.9% 4.2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

13.1%19.0% 17.3%

11.1%

5.3%

5.1%3.4%

8.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

NoData

21.0%

6.9% 4.9%

3.2%

10.3%

1.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

NoData 8.4% 5.0%

23.0%8.3%

2.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

0.0% 5.8%

18.2%No

Data

11.8%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

24.3%

5.2% 6.1% 3.7%

12.1%

5.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

17.9%9.1%

3.7%

10.7%

4.5%

7.1%0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

8.4% 10.8%6.5%

8.3%8.1%

6.2%0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

10.8%15.3% 17.5%

23.7%7.7%

10.3% 8.8%2.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

22.2%15.4%

23.5%18.2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

8.3% 7.1%10.6%

3.0%

16.7% 10.5%

2.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016

13.3%9.5% 11.5% 11.9%

11.1%12.7%

1.4%6.4%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2013 2014 2015 2016


















































% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge


Re-entries into Foster Care4

Re-entry to foster care is when a child who was previously removed and placed in foster care later returns home and then is again removed from the home. This does not include cases where a family with a prior removal later becomes involved in a voluntary case.



Placement Settings of Children in Care

0 20 40 60 80 100

Non−Relative Foster Care

Relative Foster Care

Pre−Adoptive Home

Group Home

Institution

Home Visit

Missing from Care

Independent Living Placement

District 8−Team 1 (excluding OJS Wards):Placement Settings of Children in Care

Percentage of Children In Placement Setting

District 8−Team 1 on September 30 2017District 8−Team 1 on September 30 2016Statewide on September 30 2017

Type of Out-of-Home Care5

Because of the rapid changes in the foster care population, the data on "Type of Out-of-Home Care" are a breakdown of the placement of all children in foster care on a single day – September 30, 2017.



Average Per-Diem Foster Care Payments by Place Setting

0 50 100 150 200 250

Non−Relative Foster Care

Relative Foster Care

Pre−Adoptive Home

Group Home

Institution

Home Visit

Missing from Care

Independent Living Placement

District 8−Team 1 (excluding OJS Wards): Average Per−DiemFoster Care Payments by Placement Setting

Average Per−Diem Payment (Dollars per Day)

District 8−Team 1 on September 30 2017District 8−Team 1 on September 30 2016Statewide on September 30 2017

Type of Out-of-Home Care5


Permanency of Child Welfare Cases

0 20 40 60 80 100

Reunification(N=3)

Adoption(N=1)

Transfer(N=0)

Emancipation(N=0)

Guardianship(N=3)

Missing from Care(N=0)

Death(N=0)

Unknown(N=0)

District 8−Team 1 (excluding OJS Wards):Reasons for Discharge

Percentage of Children Discharged

District 8−Team 1 (12 months)District 8−Team 1 (180 months)Statewide (12 months)

Reasons for Discharge Team 8.1

Type of Discharge7

The data show the types of discharges from the Nebraska Child Welfare System for your team

The permanency data examine the population of youth who were discharged from the child welfare system.


Permanency of Child Welfare Cases, continued 0

1020

3040

50

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Last

12

StatewideDistrict 8−Team 1 average = 11 monthsStatewide average = 15 months

District 8−Team 1 (excluding OJS Wards): Median Months to Dischargeby Year, FFY2003 to FFY2017

Time

from

Rem

oval

to D

ischa

rge

(Mon

ths)

Median Months to Discharge by Year, FFY 2003 to FFY 20177 for Team


Permanency of Child Welfare Cases, continued

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to R

euni

ficat

ion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Sta

te o

f Neb

rask

aPe

rcen

tage

of Y

outh

s Disc

harg

ed to

Re

unifi

catio

n in

less

than

12

mon

ths T

eam

5.1

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 8

.2Pe

rcen

tage

of Y

outh

s Disc

harg

ed to

Re

unifi

catio

n in

less

than

12

mon

ths T

eam

11.

1

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 2

.1Pe

rcen

tage

of Y

outh

s Disc

harg

ed to

Re

unifi

catio

n in

less

than

12

mon

ths T

eam

5.3

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 9

.1Pe

rcen

tage

of Y

outh

s Disc

harg

ed to

Re

unifi

catio

n in

less

than

12

mon

ths T

eam

11.

3

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 2

.2Pe

rcen

tage

of Y

outh

s Disc

harg

ed to

Re

unifi

catio

n in

less

than

12

mon

ths T

eam

6.1

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 9

.2

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 1

1.4

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 2

.3Pe

rcen

tage

of Y

outh

s Disc

harg

ed to

Re

unifi

catio

n in

less

than

12

mon

ths T

eam

6.2

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 1

0.1

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 1

2.1

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 3

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 7

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 1

0.2

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 1

2.2

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 4

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 8

.1Pe

rcen

tage

of Y

outh

s Disc

harg

ed to

Re

unifi

catio

n in

less

than

12

mon

ths T

eam

10.

3Pe

rcen

tage

of Y

outh

s Disc

harg

ed to

Re

unifi

catio

n in

less

than

12

mon

ths T

eam

12.

3

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 1

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 5

.2Pe

rcen

tage

of Y

outh

s Disc

harg

ed to

Re

unifi

catio

n in

less

than

12

mon

ths T

eam

8.3

Perc

enta

ge o

f You

ths D

ischa

rged

to

Reun

ifica

tion

in le

ss th

an 1

2 m

onth

s Tea

m 1

1.2

Not

e: D

ata

from

Paw

nee

coun

ty w

as n

ot p

rovi

ded

. The

mon

ths o

f Sep

tem

ber a

nd

Oct

ober

do

not h

ave

any

dat

a fro

m N

emah

a C

ount

y.

Not

e: N

ance

Cou

nty

was

not

incl

uded

in th

e d

ata.

Not

e: C

edar

Cou

nty

was

not

incl

uded

in th

e d

ata.

Not

e: B

lain

e, C

herry

, Key

a Pa

ha, a

nd R

ock

coun

ties w

ere

not i

nclu

ded

in d

ata.

Not

e: B

oyd

, Gar

field

, Val

ley,

and

Whe

eler

wer

e no

t inc

lud

ed in

the

dat

a.

Not

e: L

oup

and

She

rman

cou

ntie

s wer

e no

t inc

lud

ed in

the

dat

a.

Not

e: H

arla

n co

unty

was

not

incl

uded

in th

e d

ata.

Not

e: C

lay

coun

ty w

as n

ot in

clud

ed in

the

dat

a.

Not

e: A

rthur

and

Dun

dy

coun

ties w

ere

not i

nclu

ded

in th

e d

ata.

Not

e: H

ayes

Cou

nty

was

not

incl

uded

in th

e d

ata.

Not

e: O

nly

Linco

ln C

ount

y d

ata

was

ava

ilabl

e fo

r tea

m 1

1.4.

Not

e: G

rant

, Mor

rill,

and

Sio

ux c

ount

ies w

ere

not i

nclu

ded

in th

e d

ata.

Not

e: D

euel

cou

nty

was

not

incl

uded

in th

e d

ata.

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

0.00

%

10.0

0%

20.0

0%

30.0

0%

40.0

0%

50.0

0%

60.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-17

Mar

-17

Apr-1

7M

ay-1

7Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7Au

g-17

Sep-

17O

ct-1

7No

v-17

Dec-

17

0.00

%

10.0

0%

20.0

0%

30.0

0%

40.0

0%

50.0

0%

60.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-17

Mar

-17

Apr-1

7M

ay-1

7Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7Au

g-17

Sep-

17O

ct-1

7No

v-17

Dec-

17

0.00

%

5.00

%

10.0

0%

15.0

0%

20.0

0%

25.0

0%

30.0

0%

35.0

0%

40.0

0%

45.0

0%

50.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-17

Mar

-17

Apr-1

7M

ay-1

7Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7Au

g-17

Sep-

17O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7De

c-17

0.00

%

5.00

%

10.0

0%

15.0

0%

20.0

0%

25.0

0%

30.0

0%

35.0

0%

40.0

0%

45.0

0%

50.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-17

Mar

-17

Apr-1

7M

ay-1

7Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7Au

g-17

Sep-

17O

ct-1

7No

v-17

Dec-

17

0.00

%

10.0

0%

20.0

0%

30.0

0%

40.0

0%

50.0

0%

60.0

0%

70.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00

%

5.00

%

10.0

0%

15.0

0%

20.0

0%

25.0

0%

30.0

0%

35.0

0%

40.0

0%

45.0

0%

50.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00

%

10.0

0%

20.0

0%

30.0

0%

40.0

0%

50.0

0%

60.0

0%

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-17

Mar

-17

Apr-1

7M

ay-1

7Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7Au

g-17

Sep-

17O

ct-1

7No

v-17

Dec-

17

0.00

%

5.00

%

10.0

0%

15.0

0%

20.0

0%

25.0

0%

30.0

0%

35.0

0%

40.0

0%

45.0

0%

50.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00

%20

.00%

40.0

0%60

.00%

80.0

0%10

0.00

%12

0.00

%

0.00

%

10.0

0%

20.0

0%

30.0

0%

40.0

0%

50.0

0%

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00%

20.00

%40

.00%

60.00

%80

.00%

100.0

0%12

0.00%

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

Gag

e C

ount

y

Jeffe

rson

Cou

nty

John

son

Co

unty

Nem

aha

Co

unty

Rich

ards

on C

oun

ty

Salin

e C

ount

y

Tha

yer C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Cas

s Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Oto

e C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Sarp

y C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Lanc

aste

r Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Dou

glas

Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Ham

ilton

Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l St a

nda

rd

Butle

r Cou

nty

Col

fax

Cou

nty

Plat

te C

oun

ty

Saun

ders

Co

unty

Stat

e

Fede

ral S

tand

ard

Tha

yer C

ount

y

Boon

e C

ount

y

Mer

rickC

ount

y

Polk

Co

unty

Stat

e

Fede

ral S

tand

ard

Dod

ge C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Burt

Cou

nty

Dak

ota

Co

unty

Dixo

n C

oun

ty

Thur

ston

Co

unty

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Ant

elop

eCou

nty

Knox

Co

unty

Mad

ison

Co

unty

Pier

ce C

oun

ty

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Stat

e

Cum

ing

Cou

nty

Brow

n C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Nuc

kolls

Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Fillm

ore

Cou

nty

Phel

ps C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Kear

ney

Cou

nty

Fran

klin

Cou

nty

Web

ster

Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Buffa

lo C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Hall C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Daw

son

Cou

nty

Gos

per C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Cha

se C

ount

y

Perk

ins C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Keith

Cou

nty

Hitc

hcoc

k C

ount

y

Red

Willo

w C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Furn

as C

ount

y

Linco

ln C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Daw

es C

ount

y

Sher

idan

Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Box

Butte

Cou

nty

Gar

den

Cou

nty

Kim

ball C

ount

y

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Che

yenn

e C

ount

y

Bann

er C

ount

y

Scot

ts B

luff

Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

0.00

%

10.0

0%

20.0

0%

30.0

0%

40.0

0%

50.0

0%

60.0

0%

70.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-17

Mar

-17

Apr-1

7M

ay-1

7Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7Au

g-17

Sep-

17O

ct-1

7No

v-17

Dec-

17

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

0.00

%

5.00

%

10.0

0%

15.0

0%

20.0

0%

25.0

0%

30.0

0%

35.0

0%

40.0

0%

45.0

0%

50.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-17

Mar

-17

Apr-1

7M

ay-1

7Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7Au

g-17

Sep-

17O

ct-1

7

0.00

%

10.0

0%

20.0

0%

30.0

0%

40.0

0%

50.0

0%

60.0

0%

70.0

0%

80.0

0%

90.0

0%

100.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00

%20

.00%

40.0

0%60

.00%

80.0

0%10

0.00

%12

0.00

%

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

0.00

%

20.0

0%

40.0

0%

60.0

0%

80.0

0%

100.

00%

120.

00%

Jan-

17Fe

b-17

Mar

-17

Apr-1

7M

ay-1

7Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7Au

g-17

Sep-

17O

ct-1

7No

v-17

Dec-

17

0.00

%

10.0

0%

20.0

0%

30.0

0%

40.0

0%

50.0

0%

60.0

0%

70.0

0%

Jan-

17Fe

b-1

7M

ar-1

7A

pr-1

7M

ay-

17Ju

n-17

Jul-1

7A

ug-1

7Se

p-1

7O

ct-1

7N

ov-1

7D

ec-1

7

How

ard

Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

era

l Sta

nda

rd

Cus

ter C

ount

y

Holt

Cou

nty

Stat

e

Fed

e ra

l Sta

nda

rd

Gre

eley

Cou

nty

Not

e: A

dam

s cou

nty

was

not

incl

uded

in th

e d

ata.

Reunifications within 12 Months8

Permanency of Child Welfare Cases, continued


Child Welfare | JUSTICE DataChild Welfare | JUSTICE DataThe Child Welfare Case data is obtained from the Judicial Users System To Improve Court Efficiency (JUSTICE), the Nebraska Supreme Court's Case and Financial Management System for Nebraska trial courts. Clerks enter court infor-mation on hearings and orders into JUSTICE as they occur in a case. The Court Improvement Project extracts data from Cognos, the Administrative Office of the Court’s data management system, which extracts data directly from JUS-TICE for reporting purposes. This report presents an overview of data entered into JUSTICE for fiscal year 2016-2017 as well as the first half of fiscal year 2017-2018. Fiscal years run from June 30th to July 1st each year.

Since the last data report, there have been some changes in case progression standards based on Nebraska Rule § 6-104. The Nebraska Court Improvement Project is working closely with JUSTICE staff, Judges, business analysts, and clerks to improve measurement and standardize data entry into JUSTICE to create a real time data dashboard for each Through the Eyes of a Child (TEOC) team. This will be found on our website, estimated time of completion is October, 2018.

The data presented in this report, depict the number of cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017 as well as the first half of 2017-2018 data from JUSTICE. To get a measure of case termination, a calculation of total days is computed from the date the petition was submitted to the date the case was terminated. Any case that was closed during the fiscal year is presented in this report. Additionally, the average months for the state, TEOC district, and TEOC team’s case ter-mination is included. This data does not include any youth who was transferred in or out because JUSTICE does not currently track where the youth transferred from or where they transferred. Not knowing all of the information for the youth’s case does not allow for proper data analysis. The Nebraska Court Improvement Project (CIP) is working with JUSTICE developers to better tracking transfer cases.

The state of Nebraska had a total of 1,602 child welfare cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017; 26 were for abandon-ment, 205 were for abuse, 176 were for homelessness, and 1,195 were for neglect. The following graph depicts the length of time it took your team to terminate a case, as well as the length of time it took your district to terminate a case, and for the state as a whole to terminate their cases. Additionally, it is important to note that 6 of these youth did not have a judge assigned to their case. An analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 947.66) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 525.9; F(1,1,600) = 3.837, p = .050].

For the first half of fiscal year 2017-2018, a total of 1,017 child welfare cases were terminated. Of these 1,017 cases, 32 were for abandonment, 136 were for abuse, 109 were for homelessness, and 740 were for neglect. All youth had a judge assigned for this fiscal year. However, because the full year has not come to an end a statistical analysis that compares time to termination for youth with a judge assigned to those without a judge assigned is not possible at this time. The graphs pertaining to fiscal year 2017-2018 depict the length of time it took your team to terminate a case, as well as the length of time it took your district to terminate a case, and for the state as a whole to terminate their cases.


Child Welfare | JUSTICE Data, continued

Time to Case Termination Team 1



Time to Case Termination Team 10.3



41.0% 38.9%

64.5%

19.3% 17.8%

24.2%

15.7%28.9%

11.3%

7.2%

5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=83

FY 2016n=90

FY 2017n=62

56.0%64.5%

36.2%24.2%

7.8% 11.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

STATE District/ Team 1

16.1% 18.6%

57.7%17.1%

18.9%

35.8%

20.5% 13.2%

6.6%

13.7%11.4%

14.7%19.5%

17.8% 18.4%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=409

FY 2016n=370

FY 2017n=106

56.0% 57.7%

36.2% 35.8%

7.8% 6.6%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.9% 18.2%

44.4%

23.4% 21.8%

55.6%

23.4%18.2%

11.7% 23.6%

9.1%

12.7%15.6%

5.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=77

FY 2016n=55

FY 2017n=9

56.0%44.4%

36.2% 55.6%

7.8%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017

56.0%64.0%

50%

36.2%28.0%

50%

7.8% 8.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

STATE District 10 Team 10.3

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FY 2015n=35

FY 2016n=28

FY 2017n=28

Chart Title

56.0%48.6%

9.1%

36.2%41.9%

45.5%

7.8% 9.5%

45.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


22.6%

37.2%

58.8%14.5%

33.7%

33.3%

4.8%

3.5%

7.8%

9.7%

12.8%

12.9%

11.6%

35.5%

1.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=62

FY 2016n=86

FY 2017n=51

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

State District 12 Team 12.3

1096 days and up over 3 years

731-1095 days within 3 years


366-545 days within 18 months

181-365 days within 1 year


37.5%

18.2%

50.0%

50.0%

18.2%

12.5%

12.5%

37.5%

18.2%

18.2%

27.3%

42.9%

14.3%9.1%

45.5%46.4%

25.7%

14.3%

10.7%

45.5%14.3%

7.1%

7.1%8.6%

5.7%2.9%

7.8%

36.2%

56.0%63.6% 58.8%

33.3%30.3%

6.1% 7.8%

CW Case Termination - Team 1

CW Case Termination - Team 5.2












CW Case Termination - Team 2.1 CW Case Termination - Team 7CW Case Termination - Team 5.1





Lincoln


22.70%

47.13%

22.20%

26.44%

18.40%

12.64%

12.90%

2.30%15.80%

8.05%8.10%

3.45%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State of Nebraskan=1,602

District/Team 1

n=87

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

34.80%

18.70%

19.70%21.40%

22.70%15.40%

7.60%13.80%1.50%

11.60% 13.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 1

n=66

FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26,2018

1096 thru highest - over 3 years

731 thru 1095- up to 3 years

546 thru 730 days - up to 2 years

366-545 days - up to 18 months

181-365 days - up to 1 year


22.70%16.70%

22.20% 30.20%

50.0%

18.40%21.90% 16.7%

12.90%10.40% 16.7%

15.80%15.60%

16.7%8.10% 5.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=96

Team 2.1n=6

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%13.50% 16.70%

18.70% 30.80%

50.00%

21.40%

21.20%

15.40%

19.20% 16.70%

13.80%3.80%

16.70%11.60% 11.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Districtn=52

Team 2.1n=6

FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018


22.70%16.70%

9.1%

22.20% 30.20%36.4%

18.40%21.90%

45.5%12.90%10.40%

9.1%

15.80%15.60%

8.10% 5.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=96

Team 2.2n=11

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%13.50% 0.00%

No …

18.70% 30.80%

21.40%

21.20%

15.40%

19.20%

13.80%3.80%

11.60% 11.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=52

Team 2.2n=0



22.70%16.70% 19.0%

22.20% 30.20% 27.8%

18.40%21.90% 19.0%

12.90%10.40%

10.1%

15.80%15.60%

17.7%

8.10% 5.20% 6.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraskan=1,602

District 2n=96

Team 2.3n=79

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%13.50% 13.00%

18.70% 30.80% 28.30%

21.40%

21.20% 23.90%

15.40%

19.20% 19.60%

13.80%3.80% 2.20%

11.60% 11.50% 13.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=52

Team 2.3n=46



22.70% 26.30%

22.20%20.10%

18.40% 14.30%

12.90%12.50%

15.80%16.50%

8.10% 10.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 3n=224

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 22.50%

18.70%20.00%

21.40% 15.80%

15.40% 17.50%

13.80% 15.00%

11.60% 9.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%





22.70% 19.00%

22.20%

18.30%

18.40%23.10%

12.90% 16.70%

15.80% 13.60%

8.10% 9.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.60%

18.70%16.90%

21.40%

15.70%

15.40%

17.20%

13.80%19.90%

11.60% 12.70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




22.70%17.80%

23.1%

22.20% 28.10% 19.2%

18.40% 14.10%15.4%

12.90% 22.20%

15.4%

15.80%12.60% 26.9%

8.10% 5.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=135

Team 5.1n=26

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%14.00%

26.70%

18.70%24.40%

40.00%21.40%30.20%

13.30%

15.40%

7.00%

13.80% 12.80% 6.70%

11.60% 11.60% 13.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=86

Team 5.1n=15


22.70%17.80% 17.8%

22.20% 28.10%33.3%

18.40% 14.10%10.0%

12.90% 22.20% 21.1%

15.80%12.60% 11.1%

8.10% 5.20% 6.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=135

Team 5.2n=90

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%14.00% 10.20%

18.70%24.40%

23.70%

21.40%30.20% 39.00%

15.40%

7.00%5.10%

13.80% 12.80% 10.20%

11.60% 11.60% 11.90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=86

Team 5.2n=59


22.70%17.80%

10.5%

22.20% 28.10%

15.8%

18.40% 14.10%

31.6%

12.90% 22.20%36.8%

15.80%12.60%

5.3%8.10% 5.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=135

Team 5.3n=19

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%14.00% 16.70%

18.70%24.40%

8.30%

21.40%30.20%

8.30%

15.40%7.00%

25.00%

13.80% 12.80%

33.30%

11.60% 11.60% 8.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=86

Team 5.3n=12


22.70%17.30% 13.8%

22.20%

14.30%15.4%

18.40%

19.40% 24.6%

12.90%

9.20% 6.2%

15.80%

29.60% 26.2%

8.10% 10.20% 13.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=98

Team 6.1n=65

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 16.00% 14.60%

18.70%20.00%

17.00%

21.40% 24.00%26.80%

15.40% 10.00% 9.80%

13.80%16.00% 17.10%

11.60% 14.00% 14.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=50

Team 6.1n=41



22.70%17.30%

24.2%

22.20%

14.30%

12.1%

18.40%

19.40% 9.1%

12.90%

9.20%15.2%

15.80%

29.60%36.4%

8.10% 10.20%3.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=98

Team 6.2n=33

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 16.00%22.20%

18.70%20.00%

33.30%

21.40% 24.00%

11.10%

15.40% 10.00%

11.10%

13.80%16.00%

11.10%

11.60% 14.00% 11.10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=50

Team 6.2n=9


22.70%

10.40%

22.20%

29.20%

18.40%22.90%

12.90%8.30%

15.80%

14.60%

8.10%14.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 7

n=48

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

7.70%

18.70%

11.50%

21.40%

15.40%

15.40%

30.80%

13.80%

19.20%

11.60% 15.40%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 7

n=26


22.70%29.70%

37.5%

22.20% 10.80%

37.5%18.40% 29.70%

12.90%8.10%

12.5%15.80%

16.20%

8.10% 5.40%12.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=37

Team 8.1n=8

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

22.70%29.70%

16.7%

22.20% 10.80%

18.40% 29.70%

58.3%

12.90%8.10%

16.7%15.80%16.20%

8.3%8.10% 5.40%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=37

Team 8.2n=12

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

54.50%50.00%

18.70%

13.60% 25.00%

21.40%

4.50%

8.30%

15.40%

4.50%

13.80% 9.10%

8.30%

11.60% 13.60%8.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=22

Team 8.2n=12


22.70%29.70%

35.30%

22.20% 10.80%5.90%

18.40% 29.70%23.50%

12.90%8.10%

15.80%16.20%

29.40%

8.10% 5.40% 5.90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=37

Team 8.3n=17

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

54.50%

71.40%

18.70%

13.60%

21.40%

4.50%15.40%

4.50%14.30%

13.80% 9.10%

14.30%11.60% 13.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=22

Team 8.3n=7


22.70%

10.40%14.8%

22.20%

20.90%16.70%

18.40%

18.70%24.1%

12.90%

12.70%

18.50%

15.80%

29.10%

22.2%

8.10% 8.20%3.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=134

Team 9.1n=54

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%12.90%

18.20%

18.70%

17.60%

24.20%

21.40%

24.70%

18.20%

15.40%

11.80%9.10%

13.80%22.40%

30.30%

11.60% 10.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=85

Team 9.1n=33



22.70%

10.40% 7.5%

22.20%

20.90% 23.80%

18.40%

18.70% 15.0%

12.90%

12.70%

8.80%

15.80%

29.10%

33.8%

8.10% 8.20% 11.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=134

Team 9.2n=80

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%12.90% 9.60%

18.70%

17.60%

13.50%

21.40%

24.70%

28.80%

15.40%

11.80%13.50%

13.80%22.40%

17.30%

11.60% 10.60%17.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=85

Team 9.2n=52


22.70% 21.70% 23.3%

22.20% 21.70%14.00%

18.40%

10.80%

11.6%

12.90%

18.10%20.90%

15.80%16.90% 23.3%

8.10% 10.80% 7.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=83

Team 10.1n=43

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

5.60%11.50%

18.70%

3.70%

7.70%

21.40%

31.50%19.20%

15.40%

35.20%34.60%

13.80% 14.80%15.40%

11.60% 9.30% 11.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=54

Team 10.1n=26


22.70% 21.70%13.8%

22.20% 21.70% 37.90%

18.40%

10.80%

10.3%

12.90%

18.10% 3.40%

15.80%16.90%

13.8%

8.10% 10.80%20.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=83

Team 10.2n=29

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

5.60%

18.70%

3.70%

21.40%

31.50%

36.80%

15.40%

35.20%36.80%

13.80% 14.80% 15.80%

11.60% 9.30% 10.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=54

Team 10.2n=19


22.70% 21.70%

36.4%

22.20% 21.70%

9.10%

18.40%

10.80% 9.1%

12.90%

18.10%

45.50%

15.80%16.90%

8.10% 10.80%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=83

Team 10.3n=11

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

5.60%

18.70%

3.70%

21.40%

31.50%55.60%

15.40%

35.20%

33.30%

13.80% 14.80%

11.10%11.60% 9.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=54

Team 10.3n=9


22.70% 25.00% 21.4%

22.20%23.50%

50.00%

18.40%18.40%

14.3%

12.90%15.40%

10.70%

15.80%11.80%

8.10% 5.90% 3.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=136

Team 11.1n=28

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.20%22.50%

18.70%18.10%

22.50%

21.40% 25.90%

22.50%

15.40%17.20%

12.50%

13.80% 7.80%12.50%

11.60% 13.80%7.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=116

Team 11.1n=40


22.70% 25.00%

40.9%

22.20%23.50%

18.20%18.40%

18.40%

22.7%12.90%15.40%

4.50%15.80%11.80% 4.5%

8.10% 5.90% 9.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=136

Team 11.2n=22

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.20%

18.70%18.10%

25.00%

21.40% 25.90%

25.00%

15.40%17.20%

13.80% 7.80%

50.00%

11.60% 13.80%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=116

Team 11.2n=4


22.70% 25.00%29.4%

22.20%23.50%

29.40%

18.40%18.40%

23.5%12.90%15.40%

5.90%15.80%11.80%

5.9%8.10% 5.90% 5.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=136

Team 11.3n=17

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.20%

18.70%18.10%

23.10%

21.40% 25.90% 53.80%

15.40%17.20%

15.40%13.80% 7.80%

11.60% 13.80%7.70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=116

Team 11.3n=13


22.70% 25.00%20.3%

22.20%23.50%

13.00%

18.40%18.40%

17.4%

12.90%15.40%

23.20%

15.80%11.80%

20.3%

8.10% 5.90% 5.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=136

Team 11.4n=69

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.20% 18.60%

18.70%18.10% 13.60%

21.40% 25.90%22.00%

15.40%17.20%

22.00%

13.80% 7.80%3.40%

11.60% 13.80%20.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=116

Team 11.4n=59


22.70%

37.80%

22.2%

22.20%

28.90%

33.30%

18.40%

15.60%

111.0%

12.90%

2.20%15.80%

9.60%11.1%

8.10% 5.90%22.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=135

Team 12.1n=9

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

30.10%

18.70%

23.30%

21.40%

27.40%

100.00%

15.40%

8.20%13.80%

5.50%11.60%

5.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=73

Team 12.1n=2


22.70%

37.80%

54.20%

22.20%

28.90%

20.80%

18.40%

15.60%

12.5%

12.90%

2.20%15.80%

9.60%8.30%

8.10% 5.90% 4.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=135

Team 12.2n=24

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

30.10%

66.7%18.70%

23.30%

33.30%

21.40%

27.40%15.40%

8.20%13.80%

5.50%11.60%

5.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=73

Team 12.2n=9


22.70%

37.80% 35.30%

22.20%

28.90% 30.40%18.40%

15.60% 16.7%12.90%

2.20% 2.90%15.80%9.60% 9.8%

8.10% 5.90% 4.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=135

Team 12.3n=102

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

30.10%25.8%

18.70%

23.30%22.60%

21.40%

27.40%29.00%

15.40%

8.20%9.70%13.80%

5.50% 6.50%11.60%

5.50% 6.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=73

Team 12.3n=62


19.10%

54.50%

33.30%

18.70%

13.60%

21.40%

4.50%15.40%

4.50%

13.80% 9.10%

11.60% 13.60%

66.70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=22

Team 8.1n=3


FY 2017Average Months - Team 15.0

Average Months - District 16.6Average Months - State 17.6

The data represent the amount of time between the date the petition is filed to the date the case is terminated in JUSTICE for all cases termi-nated in state fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18.

Time to Case Termination6

The data represent the amount of time between the date the petition is filed to the date the case is terminated in JUS-TICE for all cases terminated in state fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18.

FY 2017 July 1, 2016-June 30, 2017: State, District/Team Comparisons


Child Welfare | JUSTICE Data, continued







41.0% 38.9%

64.5%

19.3% 17.8%

24.2%

15.7%28.9%

11.3%

7.2%

5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=83

FY 2016n=90

FY 2017n=62

56.0%64.5%

36.2%24.2%

7.8% 11.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.1% 18.6%

57.7%17.1%

18.9%

35.8%

20.5% 13.2%

6.6%

13.7%11.4%

14.7%19.5%

17.8% 18.4%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=409

FY 2016n=370

FY 2017n=106

56.0% 57.7%

36.2% 35.8%

7.8% 6.6%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.9% 18.2%

44.4%

23.4% 21.8%

55.6%

23.4%18.2%

11.7% 23.6%

9.1%

12.7%15.6%

5.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=77

FY 2016n=55

FY 2017n=9

56.0%44.4%

36.2% 55.6%

7.8%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017

56.0%64.0%

50%

36.2%28.0%

50%

7.8% 8.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FY 2015n=35

FY 2016n=28

FY 2017n=28

Chart Title

56.0%48.6%

9.1%

36.2%41.9%

45.5%

7.8% 9.5%

45.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


22.6%

37.2%

58.8%14.5%

33.7%

33.3%

4.8%

3.5%

7.8%

9.7%

12.8%

12.9%

11.6%

35.5%

1.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=62

FY 2016n=86

FY 2017n=51

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%








37.5%

18.2%

50.0%

50.0%

18.2%

12.5%

12.5%

37.5%

18.2%

18.2%

27.3%

42.9%

14.3%9.1%

45.5%46.4%

25.7%

14.3%

10.7%

45.5%14.3%

7.1%

7.1%8.6%

5.7%2.9%

7.8%

36.2%

56.0%63.6% 58.8%

33.3%30.3%

6.1% 7.8%














CW Case Termination - Team 2.1 CW Case Termination - Team 7CW Case Termination - Team 5.1





Lincoln


22.70%

47.13%

22.20%

26.44%

18.40%

12.64%

12.90%

2.30%15.80%

8.05%8.10%

3.45%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 1

n=87

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

34.80%

18.70%

19.70%21.40%

22.70%15.40%

7.60%13.80%1.50%

11.60% 13.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 1

n=66








22.70%16.70%

22.20% 30.20%

50.0%

18.40%21.90% 16.7%

12.90%10.40% 16.7%

15.80%15.60%

16.7%8.10% 5.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=96

Team 2.1n=6

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%13.50% 16.70%

18.70% 30.80%

50.00%

21.40%

21.20%

15.40%

19.20% 16.70%

13.80%3.80%

16.70%11.60% 11.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Districtn=52

Team 2.1n=6



22.70%16.70%

9.1%

22.20% 30.20%36.4%

18.40%21.90%

45.5%12.90%10.40%

9.1%

15.80%15.60%

8.10% 5.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=96

Team 2.2n=11

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%13.50% 0.00%

No …

18.70% 30.80%

21.40%

21.20%

15.40%

19.20%

13.80%3.80%

11.60% 11.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=52

Team 2.2n=0



22.70%16.70% 19.0%

22.20% 30.20% 27.8%

18.40%21.90% 19.0%

12.90%10.40%

10.1%

15.80%15.60%

17.7%

8.10% 5.20% 6.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=96

Team 2.3n=79

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%13.50% 13.00%

18.70% 30.80% 28.30%

21.40%

21.20% 23.90%

15.40%

19.20% 19.60%

13.80%3.80% 2.20%

11.60% 11.50% 13.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=52

Team 2.3n=46



22.70% 26.30%

22.20%20.10%

18.40% 14.30%

12.90%12.50%

15.80%16.50%

8.10% 10.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 22.50%

18.70%20.00%

21.40% 15.80%

15.40% 17.50%

13.80% 15.00%

11.60% 9.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%





22.70% 19.00%

22.20%

18.30%

18.40%23.10%

12.90% 16.70%

15.80% 13.60%

8.10% 9.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.60%

18.70%16.90%

21.40%

15.70%

15.40%

17.20%

13.80%19.90%

11.60% 12.70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




22.70%17.80%

23.1%

22.20% 28.10% 19.2%

18.40% 14.10%15.4%

12.90% 22.20%

15.4%

15.80%12.60% 26.9%

8.10% 5.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=135

Team 5.1n=26

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%14.00%

26.70%

18.70%24.40%

40.00%21.40%30.20%

13.30%

15.40%

7.00%

13.80% 12.80% 6.70%

11.60% 11.60% 13.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=86

Team 5.1n=15


22.70%17.80% 17.8%

22.20% 28.10%33.3%

18.40% 14.10%10.0%

12.90% 22.20% 21.1%

15.80%12.60% 11.1%

8.10% 5.20% 6.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=135

Team 5.2n=90

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%14.00% 10.20%

18.70%24.40%

23.70%

21.40%30.20% 39.00%

15.40%

7.00%5.10%

13.80% 12.80% 10.20%

11.60% 11.60% 11.90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=86

Team 5.2n=59


22.70%17.80%

10.5%

22.20% 28.10%

15.8%

18.40% 14.10%

31.6%

12.90% 22.20%36.8%

15.80%12.60%

5.3%8.10% 5.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=135

Team 5.3n=19

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%14.00% 16.70%

18.70%24.40%

8.30%

21.40%30.20%

8.30%

15.40%7.00%

25.00%

13.80% 12.80%

33.30%

11.60% 11.60% 8.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=86

Team 5.3n=12


22.70%17.30% 13.8%

22.20%

14.30%15.4%

18.40%

19.40% 24.6%

12.90%

9.20% 6.2%

15.80%

29.60% 26.2%

8.10% 10.20% 13.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=98

Team 6.1n=65

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 16.00% 14.60%

18.70%20.00%

17.00%

21.40% 24.00%26.80%

15.40% 10.00% 9.80%

13.80%16.00% 17.10%

11.60% 14.00% 14.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=50

Team 6.1n=41



22.70%17.30%

24.2%

22.20%

14.30%

12.1%

18.40%

19.40% 9.1%

12.90%

9.20%15.2%

15.80%

29.60%36.4%

8.10% 10.20%3.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=98

Team 6.2n=33

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 16.00%22.20%

18.70%20.00%

33.30%

21.40% 24.00%

11.10%

15.40% 10.00%

11.10%

13.80%16.00%

11.10%

11.60% 14.00% 11.10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=50

Team 6.2n=9


22.70%

10.40%

22.20%

29.20%

18.40%22.90%

12.90%8.30%

15.80%

14.60%

8.10%14.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 7

n=48

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

7.70%

18.70%

11.50%

21.40%

15.40%

15.40%

30.80%

13.80%

19.20%

11.60% 15.40%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 7

n=26


22.70%29.70%

37.5%

22.20% 10.80%

37.5%18.40% 29.70%

12.90%8.10%

12.5%15.80%

16.20%

8.10% 5.40%12.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=37

Team 8.1n=8

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

22.70%29.70%

16.7%

22.20% 10.80%

18.40% 29.70%

58.3%

12.90%8.10%

16.7%15.80%16.20%

8.3%8.10% 5.40%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=37

Team 8.2n=12

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

54.50%50.00%

18.70%

13.60% 25.00%

21.40%

4.50%

8.30%

15.40%

4.50%

13.80% 9.10%

8.30%

11.60% 13.60%8.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=22

Team 8.2n=12


22.70%29.70%

35.30%

22.20% 10.80%5.90%

18.40% 29.70%23.50%

12.90%8.10%

15.80%16.20%

29.40%

8.10% 5.40% 5.90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=37

Team 8.3n=17

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

54.50%

71.40%

18.70%

13.60%

21.40%

4.50%15.40%

4.50%14.30%

13.80% 9.10%

14.30%11.60% 13.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=22

Team 8.3n=7


22.70%

10.40%14.8%

22.20%

20.90%16.70%

18.40%

18.70%24.1%

12.90%

12.70%

18.50%

15.80%

29.10%

22.2%

8.10% 8.20%3.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=134

Team 9.1n=54

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%12.90%

18.20%

18.70%

17.60%

24.20%

21.40%

24.70%

18.20%

15.40%

11.80%9.10%

13.80%22.40%

30.30%

11.60% 10.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=85

Team 9.1n=33



22.70%

10.40% 7.5%

22.20%

20.90% 23.80%

18.40%

18.70% 15.0%

12.90%

12.70%

8.80%

15.80%

29.10%

33.8%

8.10% 8.20% 11.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=134

Team 9.2n=80

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%12.90% 9.60%

18.70%

17.60%

13.50%

21.40%

24.70%

28.80%

15.40%

11.80%13.50%

13.80%22.40%

17.30%

11.60% 10.60%17.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=85

Team 9.2n=52


22.70% 21.70% 23.3%

22.20% 21.70%14.00%

18.40%

10.80%

11.6%

12.90%

18.10%20.90%

15.80%16.90% 23.3%

8.10% 10.80% 7.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=83

Team 10.1n=43

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

5.60%11.50%

18.70%

3.70%

7.70%

21.40%

31.50%19.20%

15.40%

35.20%34.60%

13.80% 14.80%15.40%

11.60% 9.30% 11.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=54

Team 10.1n=26


22.70% 21.70%13.8%

22.20% 21.70% 37.90%

18.40%

10.80%

10.3%

12.90%

18.10% 3.40%

15.80%16.90%

13.8%

8.10% 10.80%20.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=83

Team 10.2n=29

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

5.60%

18.70%

3.70%

21.40%

31.50%

36.80%

15.40%

35.20%36.80%

13.80% 14.80% 15.80%

11.60% 9.30% 10.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=54

Team 10.2n=19


22.70% 21.70%

36.4%

22.20% 21.70%

9.10%

18.40%

10.80% 9.1%

12.90%

18.10%

45.50%

15.80%16.90%

8.10% 10.80%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=83

Team 10.3n=11

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

5.60%

18.70%

3.70%

21.40%

31.50%55.60%

15.40%

35.20%

33.30%

13.80% 14.80%

11.10%11.60% 9.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=54

Team 10.3n=9


22.70% 25.00% 21.4%

22.20%23.50%

50.00%

18.40%18.40%

14.3%

12.90%15.40%

10.70%

15.80%11.80%

8.10% 5.90% 3.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=136

Team 11.1n=28

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.20%22.50%

18.70%18.10%

22.50%

21.40% 25.90%

22.50%

15.40%17.20%

12.50%

13.80% 7.80%12.50%

11.60% 13.80%7.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=116

Team 11.1n=40


22.70% 25.00%

40.9%

22.20%23.50%

18.20%18.40%

18.40%

22.7%12.90%15.40%

4.50%15.80%11.80% 4.5%

8.10% 5.90% 9.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=136

Team 11.2n=22

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.20%

18.70%18.10%

25.00%

21.40% 25.90%

25.00%

15.40%17.20%

13.80% 7.80%

50.00%

11.60% 13.80%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=116

Team 11.2n=4


22.70% 25.00%29.4%

22.20%23.50%

29.40%

18.40%18.40%

23.5%12.90%15.40%

5.90%15.80%11.80%

5.9%8.10% 5.90% 5.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=136

Team 11.3n=17

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.20%

18.70%18.10%

23.10%

21.40% 25.90% 53.80%

15.40%17.20%

15.40%13.80% 7.80%

11.60% 13.80%7.70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=116

Team 11.3n=13


22.70% 25.00%20.3%

22.20%23.50%

13.00%

18.40%18.40%

17.4%

12.90%15.40%

23.20%

15.80%11.80%

20.3%

8.10% 5.90% 5.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=136

Team 11.4n=69

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10% 17.20% 18.60%

18.70%18.10% 13.60%

21.40% 25.90%22.00%

15.40%17.20%

22.00%

13.80% 7.80%3.40%

11.60% 13.80%20.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=116

Team 11.4n=59


22.70%

37.80%

22.2%

22.20%

28.90%

33.30%

18.40%

15.60%

111.0%

12.90%

2.20%15.80%

9.60%11.1%

8.10% 5.90%22.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=135

Team 12.1n=9

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

30.10%

18.70%

23.30%

21.40%

27.40%

100.00%

15.40%

8.20%13.80%

5.50%11.60%

5.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=73

Team 12.1n=2


22.70%

37.80%

54.20%

22.20%

28.90%

20.80%

18.40%

15.60%

12.5%

12.90%

2.20%15.80%

9.60%8.30%

8.10% 5.90% 4.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=135

Team 12.2n=24

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

30.10%

66.7%18.70%

23.30%

33.30%

21.40%

27.40%15.40%

8.20%13.80%

5.50%11.60%

5.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=73

Team 12.2n=9


22.70%

37.80% 35.30%

22.20%

28.90% 30.40%18.40%

15.60% 16.7%12.90%

2.20% 2.90%15.80%9.60% 9.8%

8.10% 5.90% 4.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=135

Team 12.3n=102

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

19.10%

30.10%25.8%

18.70%

23.30%22.60%

21.40%

27.40%29.00%

15.40%

8.20%9.70%13.80%

5.50% 6.50%11.60%

5.50% 6.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=73

Team 12.3n=62


19.10%

54.50%

33.30%

18.70%

13.60%

21.40%

4.50%15.40%

4.50%

13.80% 9.10%

11.60% 13.60%

66.70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=22

Team 8.1n=3




Time to Case Termination6

FY 2018 July 1, 2017-February 26, 2018: State, District/Team Comparisons


Entry into the Juvenile Justice System

Arrests by Team - Team 1

Arrests by Team - Team 5.3








Arrests by Team - District 6





Arrests by Team - District 2 Arrests by Team - Team 7






49%

15%

18%

13%5%

0%

n=244

Gage

Richardson

Saline

Jefferson

Nemaha Pawnee

3%

6%

91%

n=1065

CassOtoe

Sarpy

n=81

28%

62%

10%Seward

York

Hamilton

n=471

n=384

33%

67%

n=6

Polk

Merrick

n=440

n=353


n=89

Box Butte

Cherry

Holt

ValleyBrown

Custer

Howard

Sherman

n=10

n=38

84%

13%

3%

Holt

Valley Brown

n=22

77%

5%

18%

Custer

Howard

Sherman

n=873

62%

38%

Hall

Buffalo

n=253

n=29

59%

3%

38%

PhelpsHarlan

Kearney

n=14

50%50%FillmoreNuckolls

n=287

99%

1%

Dawson

Gosper

Arrests by Team - District 11n=669

n=47

n=83

99%

1%

0%

n=252

Lincoln

Frontier

Hooker


n=655%

37%

58%

Sheridan

Morrill

Dawes

n=22

73%

27%

Cheyenne

Kimball

Polk

Seward

5%10% 2%

12%

63%

3%

4%0%

1%

YorkHamilton

Saunders

Platte

Butler

Colfax

Merrick

14%

77%

4% 5%Saunders

Platte

Butler

Colfax

55%

1%

11%

2%

2%

29%

Dodge

Cedar

Washington

Burt

Dixon

Dakota

81%

2%

2%

1%

0%

14%

Madison

Cuming

Antelope

Wayne

Pierce

Stanton

42%

1%

6% 1%

1%

0%

2%

10%0%

37%

Dawson

Gosper

Keith

Chase

Perkins

Dundy

FurnasRed Willow

Hitchcock

83%

7%

0% 4%3%3%

Adams

Phelps

HarlanKearney

Fillmore Nuckolls

83%

9%

6%

2%

Keith

Chase

PerkinsDundy

18%

81%

1%

Furnas

Red Willow

Hitchcock

n=3221%

7%

12%

5%2%

73%

0%

SheridanMorrill

Dawes

CheyenneKimball

Scotts Bluff

Banner

10%

Brown

Cherry

10%

90%

Team County Arrests8.1 Brown 18.1 Cherry 9

Total 10

Arrests by Team - Team 1














Arrests by Team - District 2 Arrests by Team - Team 7






49%

15%

18%

13%5%

0%

n=244

Gage

Richardson

Saline

Jefferson

Nemaha Pawnee

3%

6%

91%

n=1065

CassOtoe

Sarpy

n=81

28%

62%

10%Seward

York

Hamilton

n=471

n=384

33%

67%

n=6

Polk

Merrick

n=440

n=353


n=89

Box Butte

Cherry

Holt

ValleyBrown

Custer

Howard

Sherman

n=10

n=38

84%

13%

3%

Holt

Valley Brown

n=22

77%

5%

18%

Custer

Howard

Sherman

n=873

62%

38%

Hall

Buffalo

n=253

n=29

59%

3%

38%

PhelpsHarlan

Kearney

n=14

50%50%FillmoreNuckolls

n=287

99%

1%

Dawson

Gosper

Arrests by Team - District 11n=669

n=47

n=83

99%

1%

0%

n=252

Lincoln

Frontier

Hooker


n=655%

37%

58%

Sheridan

Morrill

Dawes

n=22

73%

27%

Cheyenne

Kimball

Polk

Seward

5%10% 2%

12%

63%

3%

4%0%

1%

YorkHamilton

Saunders

Platte

Butler

Colfax

Merrick

14%

77%

4% 5%Saunders

Platte

Butler

Colfax

55%

1%

11%

2%

2%

29%

Dodge

Cedar

Washington

Burt

Dixon

Dakota

81%

2%

2%

1%

0%

14%

Madison

Cuming

Antelope

Wayne

Pierce

Stanton

42%

1%

6% 1%

1%

0%

2%

10%0%

37%

Dawson

Gosper

Keith

Chase

Perkins

Dundy

FurnasRed Willow

Hitchcock

83%

7%

0% 4%3%3%

Adams

Phelps

HarlanKearney

Fillmore Nuckolls

83%

9%

6%

2%

Keith

Chase

PerkinsDundy

18%

81%

1%

Furnas

Red Willow

Hitchcock

n=3221%

7%

12%

5%2%

73%

0%

SheridanMorrill

Dawes

CheyenneKimball

Scotts Bluff

Banner

10%

Brown

Cherry

10%

90%

Although the two primary child-serving entities perform different functions, they have the same objective: improving the lives of youth. The child welfare system responds to well-being, abuse, neglect, and permanency concerns. On the other hand, the juvenile justice system focuses on youth accountability and community safety by utilizing targeted case management and services that seek sustained behavioral change. In Nebraska, the juvenile justice system supervises not only those youth who were found responsible for a delinquent act, but also status youth or those who have participated in behaviors that are prohibited by law due to their status as a juvenile. The ultimate goal in juvenile justice is to prevent youth from returning to the system or becoming involved in the adult criminal justice system (recidivism) while also en-suring the juvenile does not pose a threat to the community.

Number of Arrests9

The chart and table reflect the number of arrests of youth 17 and under per 100 youths, aged 10-17 in 2016. If team/county is not listed they did not have ny youth arrests.


Entry into the Juvenile Justice System, continued

Team Youth on Diversion % Youth in Diversion1 168 4.2%

2.1 54 1.4%2.2 30 0.8%2.3 466 11.8%3 555 14.0%4 790 19.9%

5.1 56 1.4%5.2 209 5.3%5.3 54 1.4%6.1 63 1.6%6.2 112 2.8%7 243 6.1%

8.1 25 0.6%8.2 19 0.5%8.3 43 1.1%9.1 273 6.9%9.2 298 7.5%10.1 101 2.5%10.2 19 0.5%10.3 18 0.5%11.1 53 1.3%11.2 22 0.6%11.3 26 0.7%11.4 77 1.9%12.1 32 0.8%12.2 47 1.2%12.3 73 1.8%

Youth Referred to Diversion Programs10

Youth charged with minor offenses may have the chance to participate in voluntary diversion programs. Juvenile diver-sion programs allow youths who commit offenses to be directed away from more formal juvenile justice system involve-ment. This chart demonstrates the use of diversion program across Nebraska in 2016. For county level information, please reference the "Kids Count" report produced by Voices for Children in Nebraska.


Siou

xD

awes

Sher

idan

Box

Butt

e

Scot

ts B

lu�

Bann

er

Mor

rill

Chey

enne

Ki

mba

ll

Gar

den

Deu

el

Gra

nt

Art

hur

Keith

Linc

oln

Fron

tier

Red

Will

ow

Furn

as

Gos

per

Daw

son

Cust

er

Blai

neLo

upG

ar�e

ld

How

ard

Bu�a

lo Kear

ney

Adam

s

Web

ster

Nuc

kolls

Thay

erJe

�ers

on

Gag

e

Paw

nee

Rich

rdso

n

Nem

aha

John

son

Oto

e

Sarp

y

Dou

glas

Was

hing

ton

Burt

Thur

ston

Dak

ota

Dix

on

Ceda

rKn

oxH

oltBo

ydKe

ya P

aha

Brow

n

Cher

ry

Rock

Ant

elop

ePi

erce

Way

ne

Cum

ing

Stan

ton

Mad

ison

Cass

Salin

eFi

llmor

eCl

ay

Ham

ilton

Mer

rick

Nan

ce

Plat

teCo

lfax

Dod

ge

Saun

ders

Butle

r

Polk

Lanc

aste

r

Boon

e

York

Sew

ard

Fran

klin

Har

lan

Phel

ps

Hal

l

Sher

man

Valle

y

Whe

eler

Gre

eley

Loga

n

Thom

as

Hoo

ker

McP

hers

on

Perk

ins

Chas

eH

ayes

Hitc

hcoc

kD

undy

Juve

nile

Div

ersio

n Pr

ogra

m R

epor

ted


Map of Formal Diversion Programs in Nebraska | 201611


Detention Team 1

21%

8%

21%19%

31%Secure Detention

Staff Secure Detention

Shelter Care

n=62

Parent or Other Adult

Released without Restrictions

Other

Detention Team 2.1

9%

61%

4%

26%Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=23



Other

Detention Team 2.2

10%

52%5%

19%

14%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=21



Other

Detention Team 2.3

6%

62%

6%

16%

7% 3%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=340



Other

Detention Team 3

83%

2% 0% 7%7%

1%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=252



Other

Detention State of Nebraska

41%

16%8%

17%

17%

1%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=3084



Other

Detention Team 4

50%

4%5%

19%

22%

0%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=1527



Other

Detention Team 5.1

41%

28%

3%

15%

5%8%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=39



Other

Detention Team 5.2

18%

35%10%

18%

18%

1%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=116



Other

Detention Team 5.3

20%

18%

18%

21%

23%Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=34



Other

Detention Team 6.1

16%

30%

21%

22%

7%4%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=81



Other

Detention Team 6.2

3%

44%

11%5%

20%

20%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=91



Other

Detention Team 7

41%

27%

3%

11%

18%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=63



Other

Detention Team 8.1

67%7%

13%

13%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=15



Other

Detention Team 8.2

29%

29%

18%

18%

6%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=17



Other

Detention Team 8.3

67%

33% Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=6



Other

Detention Team 9.1

28%

25%18%

21%

8%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=127



Other

Detention Team 9.2

25%

24%22%

5%

13%

11%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=55



Other

Detention Team 10.1

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=56



Other

27%

12%11%

23%

27%

Detention Team 10.2

41%

6%

47%

6%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=17



Other

Detention Team 10.3

50%50%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=2



Other

39%

13%

26%

22%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=23



Other

Detention Team 11.1

Detention Team 11.2

100%

50%50%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=4



Other

Detention Team 11.3

43%

21%



Shelter Care

n=14



Other

Detention Team 11.4

40%

4%24%

20%

12%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=25



Other

Detention Team 12.1

48%

40%

8%4%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=25



Other

Detention Team 12.2

50%50%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=2



Other

Detention Team 12.3

32%

13%19%

15%

10%

11%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=47



Other


Team

State

Detention Team 1

21%

8%

21%19%

31%Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=62



Other

Detention Team 2.1

9%

61%

4%

26%Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=23



Other

Detention Team 2.2

10%

52%5%

19%

14%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=21



Other

Detention Team 2.3

6%

62%

6%

16%

7% 3%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=340



Other

Detention Team 3

83%

2% 0% 7%7%

1%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=252



Other

Detention State of Nebraska

41%

16%8%

17%

17%

1%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=3084



Other

Detention Team 4

50%

4%5%

19%

22%

0%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=1527



Other

Detention Team 5.1

41%

28%

3%

15%

5%8%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=39



Other

Detention Team 5.2

18%

35%10%

18%

18%

1%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=116



Other

Detention Team 5.3

20%

18%

18%

21%

23%Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=34



Other

Detention Team 6.1

16%

30%

21%

22%

7%4%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=81



Other

Detention Team 6.2

3%

44%

11%5%

20%

20%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=91



Other

Detention Team 7

41%

27%

3%

11%

18%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=63



Other

Detention Team 8.1

67%7%

13%

13%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=15



Other

Detention Team 8.2

29%

29%

18%

18%

6%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=17



Other

Detention Team 8.3

67%



Shelter Care

n=6



Other

Detention Team 9.1

28%

25%18%

21%

8%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=127



Other

Detention Team 9.2

25%

24%22%

5%

13%

11%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=55



Other

Detention Team 10.1

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=56



Other

27%

12%11%

23%

27%

Detention Team 10.2

41%

6%

47%

6%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=17



Other

Detention Team 10.3

50%50%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=2



Other

39%

13%

26%

22%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=23



Other

Detention Team 11.1

Detention Team 11.2

100%

50%50%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=4



Other

Detention Team 11.3

43%

21%



Shelter Care

n=14



Other

Detention Team 11.4

40%

4%24%

20%

12%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=25



Other

Detention Team 12.1

48%

40%

8%4%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=25



Other

Detention Team 12.2

50%50%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=2



Other

Detention Team 12.3

32%

13%19%

15%

10%

11%

Secure Detention


Shelter Care

n=47



Other

Detention12

A young person is screened with the Risk Assessment Instrument (RAI) if they come into contact with law enforcement and the officer believes the youth may need to be detained. The RAI tool is designed to assess the risk to re-offend,/po-tential community safety concerns, and the risk of flight from the court’s jurisdiction. The tool is designed to aid proba-tion intake officers in the decision to detain youth. The RAI will provide the officer with an intake decision.The officer may use discretion to determine if the intake decision will be utilized, or should be overridden to a higher or lower level of supervision. The graphs show the final intake decision made by officers during the 2016-17 fiscal year, and the per-cent of overrides to lower and higher levels of supervision.


Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.1



Court Petitions Filed - Team 3

















Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.3Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.2



Court Petitions Filed - Team 1 Court Petitions Filed - District 4

67%

10%

20%

3%N=5778

Court Petitions Filed - State of NE

65%7%

27%

1%N=305

72%

3%

25%

N=79

71%

7%

22%

N=86

70%

9%

21%

N=391

57%

7%

36%

N=595

60%13%

26%

1%N=1,430

74%

11%

12%3%

N=137

68%4%

13%

15%

N=306

76%

8%

14%

2%N=62

67%

14%

19%

N=117

81%

11%

7%

1%n=150

77%

7%

16%

N=242

75%

16%

9%

N=32

64%

23%

13%

N=61

58%

16%

16%

10%

N=31

79%

9%

12%

N=467

65%

23%

12%

N=90

60%

6%

13%

21%

N=212

65%9%

11%

15%

N=80

54%

10%

13%

23%

N=39

78%

12%

10%

N=180

75%

8%

5%

12%

N=59

71%

8%

19%

2%N=62

61%14%

21%

4%

N=169

79%

7%

12%

2%N=106

85%

5%

10%

N=60

72%

8%

20%

N=230

Misdemeanor

Felony

Status Offender/Truancy

Traffic Offense

























67%

10%

20%

3%N=5778


65%7%

27%

1%N=305

72%

3%

25%

N=79

71%

7%

22%

N=86

70%

9%

21%

N=391

57%

7%

36%

N=595

60%13%

26%

1%N=1,430

74%

11%

12%3%

N=137

68%4%

13%

15%

N=306

76%

8%

14%

2%N=62

67%

14%

19%

N=117

81%

11%

7%

1%n=150

77%

7%

16%

N=242

75%

16%

9%

N=32

64%

23%

13%

N=61

58%

16%

16%

10%

N=31

79%

9%

12%

N=467

65%

23%

12%

N=90

60%

6%

13%

21%

N=212

65%9%

11%

15%

N=80

54%

10%

13%

23%

N=39

78%

12%

10%

N=180

75%

8%

5%

12%

N=59

71%

8%

19%

2%N=62

61%14%

21%

4%

N=169

79%

7%

12%

2%N=106

85%

5%

10%

N=60

72%

8%

20%

N=230

Misdemeanor

Felony


Traffic Offense


Team

State

























67%

10%

20%

3%N=5778


65%7%

27%

1%N=305

72%

3%

25%

N=79

71%

7%

22%

N=86

70%

9%

21%

N=391

57%

7%

36%

N=595

60%13%

26%

1%N=1,430

74%

11%

12%3%

N=137

68%4%

13%

15%

N=306

76%

8%

14%

2%N=62

67%

14%

19%

N=117

81%

11%

7%

1%n=150

77%

7%

16%

N=242

75%

16%

9%

N=32

64%

23%

13%

N=61

58%

16%

16%

10%

N=31

79%

9%

12%

N=467

65%

23%

12%

N=90

60%

6%

13%

21%

N=212

65%9%

11%

15%

N=80

54%

10%

13%

23%

N=39

78%

12%

10%

N=180

75%

8%

5%

12%

N=59

71%

8%

19%

2%N=62

61%14%

21%

4%

N=169

79%

7%

12%

2%N=106

85%

5%

10%

N=60

72%

8%

20%

N=230

Misdemeanor

Felony


Traffic Offense

Juvenile Court Petitions Filed13

These charts show the subtypes of juvenile justice petitions filed and entered into JUSTICE during state fiscal year 2016-17. The data represent the most serious charge from original filings only and do not include any charges filed as supplemental petitions. Cases that transferred between courts or to adult criminal court are excluded from the analysis.


Juvenile Justice | JUSTICE DataThe Juvenile Justice Case data is also obtained from JUSTICE, this portion of the report also presents an overview of data entered into JUSTICE for fiscal year 2016-2017 as well as the first half of fiscal year 2017-2018. As a reminder, fiscal years run from June 30th to July 1st each year.

Like the child welfare case progression standards, juvenile justice case progression standards have also been updated (see Nebraska Rule § 6-104). The Nebraska CIP team will also include these data upates to the forthcoming dashboard for all TEOC teams. This will be found on our website, estimated time of completion is October 2018.

The data presented in the following section of this report depict the number of juvenile justices cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017 as well as the first half of 2017-2018 data from JUSTICE. Separate analyses were conducted for youth status offenses and youth delinquent acts. To get a measure of case termination for each, a calculation of total days is computed from the date the petition was submitted to the date the case was terminated. At this time, time on diversion is not in Cognos and cannot be included in the analysis. The Nebraska CIP is working with the Cognos’ framework man-agement team to get diversion start and end dates added into Cognos. Additionally, like the child welfare data, this data does not include any youth who was transferred in or out because JUSTICE does not currently track where the youth transferred from or where they transferred. Not knowing all of the information for the youth’s case does not allow for proper data analysis. The Nebraska Court Improvement Project (CIP) is working with JUSTICE developers to better tracking transfer cases. Thus, any case that was closed during the fiscal year is presented in this report. Additionally, the average months for the state, TEOC district, and TEOC team’s case termination is included.

Status Offenses The state of Nebraska had a total of 1,153 status/truancy cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017. The following graph pertaining to status offenses depict the length of time it took your team to terminate status cases, as well as the length of time it took your district to terminate these types of cases, and for the state as a whole to terminate their cases. Of these, 22 of these youth did not have a judge assigned to their case. An analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 4157) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 499; F(1,1151) = 984, p < .001].

A total of 732 status/truancy cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017. Of these, 2 of these youth did not have a judge assigned to their case. An analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 3397) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 419; F(1,730) = 91.5, p < .001]. Delinquent Acts The state of Nebraska had a total of 5,008 delinquency cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017, 166 were for traffic of-fenses, 4,224 were for misdemeanors, and 622 were for a felony. The graphs on pages 26-27 depicts the length of time it took your team to terminate delinquency cases, as well as the length of time it took your district to terminate delinquency cases, and for the state as a whole to terminate their delinquency cases. Additionally, it is important to note that 199 of these youth did not have a judge assigned to their case. An analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 3,518) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 508; F(1,5006) = 3102, p < .001].

For the first half of fiscal year 2017-2018, a total of 2,902 delinquency cases were terminated. Of these 2,902 cases, 113 were for traffic offenses, 2,406 were for misdemeanors, and 383 were for a felony. Additionally, 71 of the youth termi-nated this fiscal year did not have a judge assigned to their case, an analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 3,435) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 366; F(1,2897) = 2719, p < .001].


Juvenile Justice System | JUSTICE Data, continued







41.0% 38.9%

64.5%

19.3% 17.8%

24.2%

15.7%28.9%

11.3%

7.2%

5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=83

FY 2016n=90

FY 2017n=62

56.0%64.5%

36.2%24.2%

7.8% 11.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.1% 18.6%

57.7%17.1%

18.9%

35.8%

20.5% 13.2%

6.6%

13.7%11.4%

14.7%19.5%

17.8% 18.4%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=409

FY 2016n=370

FY 2017n=106

56.0% 57.7%

36.2% 35.8%

7.8% 6.6%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.9% 18.2%

44.4%

23.4% 21.8%

55.6%

23.4%18.2%

11.7% 23.6%

9.1%

12.7%15.6%

5.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=77

FY 2016n=55

FY 2017n=9

56.0%44.4%

36.2% 55.6%

7.8%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017

56.0%64.0%

50%

36.2%28.0%

50%

7.8% 8.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FY 2015n=35

FY 2016n=28

FY 2017n=28

Chart Title

56.0%48.6%

9.1%

36.2%41.9%

45.5%

7.8% 9.5%

45.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


22.6%

37.2%

58.8%14.5%

33.7%

33.3%

4.8%

3.5%

7.8%

9.7%

12.8%

12.9%

11.6%

35.5%

1.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=62

FY 2016n=86

FY 2017n=51

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%








37.5%

18.2%

50.0%

50.0%

18.2%

12.5%

12.5%

37.5%

18.2%

18.2%

27.3%

42.9%

14.3%9.1%

45.5%46.4%

25.7%

14.3%

10.7%

45.5%14.3%

7.1%

7.1%8.6%

5.7%2.9%

7.8%

36.2%

56.0%63.6% 58.8%

33.3%30.3%

6.1% 7.8%

FY 2017Average Months - Team N/A


JJ Case Termination - Team 1

JJ Case Termination - Team 5.2












JJ Case Termination - Team 2.1 JJ Case Termination - Team 7JJ Case Termination - Team 5.1





Lincoln











JJ Case Termination - Team 4 JJ Case Termination - Team 6.2


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State of Nebraskan=732

District/Team 1

n=52


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=63

Team 2.1n=8


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=63

Team 2.2n=5


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 2n=63

Team 2.3n=50


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=35

Team 5.1n=8


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=45

Team 5.2n=27

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=35

Team 5.3n=6


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=60

Team 6.1n=55

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=29

Team 6.1n=20


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=60

Team 6.2n=5

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 7

n=21

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=11

Team 8.1n=0

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=6

Team 8.2n=4


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=11

Team 8.3n=4

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=57

Team 9.1n=45

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=30

Team 9.2n=9


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=41

Team 10.1n=20

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=41

Team 10.2n=14

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 10n=18

Team 10.3n=2


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=62

Team 11.1n=10

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 11n=32

Team 11.2n=2


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=32

Team 11.3n=0


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=62

Team 11.4n=43

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=107

Team 12.1n=6

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 12n=49

Team 12.2n=5


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=107

Team 12.3n=93

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 1

n=79

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=74

Team 2.1n=18

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=74

Team 2.2n=2

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=74

Team 2.3n=54

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=45

Team 5.3n=8

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=45

Team 5.1n=10

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=35

Team 5.2n=21


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=11

Team 8.2n=7

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=6

Team 8.3n=1


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=41

Team 10.3n=7

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 12n=49

Team 12.1n=3


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 11n=32

Team 11.4n=24


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 10n=18

Team 10.2n=0


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=6

Team 8.1n=1


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=18

Team 10.1n=16


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=62

Team 11.3n=7

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 12n=49

Team 12.3n=41


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=62

Team 11.2n=2

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=57

Team 9.2n=12

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 7

n=11


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=29

Team 6.2n=9


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=30

Team 9.1n=21


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=32

Team 11.1n=6


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=107

Team 12.2n=8

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

30.50%

53.80%

29.20%

36.50%14.60%

5.80%

11.10%

1.90%

7.80%

1.90%6.80%

30.50%

44.40%50.00%

29.20%

31.70%

14.60%

12.70%

25.00%

11.10%

4.80%7.80%

4.80%

12.50%

6.80%1.60%

12.50%

30.50%

44.40%

29.20%

31.70%

80.00%

14.60%

12.70%

20.00%

11.10%

4.80%7.80%

4.80%6.80%1.60%

30.50%

44.40% 48.00%

29.20%

31.70%32.00%

14.60%

12.70%10.00%

11.10%

4.80% 6.00%7.80%

4.80% 4.00%6.80%1.60%

30.50%

14.40%

29.20%

23.60%

14.60%

17.80%

11.10%

16.10%

7.80%

14.90%

6.80%13.20%

26.40%33.80%

25.50%

22.40%

15.90%18.30%

9.00%

9.50%11.50%

9.90%11.70%

6.10%

30.50% 28.60%

12.50%

29.20%40%

62.50%

14.60%

20%12.50%11.10%

8.60%7.80%

6.80% 2.90%12.50%

26.40% 26.70% 29.6%

25.50%31.10%

33.3%

15.90%13.30%

14.8%9.00%

15.60%11.1%11.50%

11.10% 11.1%11.70%2.20%

30.50% 28.60%33.30%

29.20%40%

50.00%

14.60%

20%11.10%

8.60% 16.70%7.80%

6.80% 2.90%

26.40%

8.30% 9.1%

25.50%

11.70% 12.7%

15.90%

8.30% 5.5%

9.00%

11.70%7.3%

11.50%

5.00%5.5%

11.70%

55.00%60.0%

30.50%24.10%

30.00%

29.20%

24.10%

25.00%

14.60%

13.80%10.00%

11.10%

10.30% 5.00%

7.80%

20.70% 25.00%

6.80% 6.90% 5.00%

26.40%

8.30%

25.50%

11.70%

15.90%

8.30%40.0%

9.00%

11.70%

60.0%

11.50%

5.00%

11.70%

55.00%

26.40%19.00%

25.50%

28.60%

15.90%14.30%

9.00%9.50%

11.50% 19.00%

11.70% 9.50%

26.40%18.20%

0.0%No Data

25.50%

18.20%

15.90%

18.20%

9.00%

9.10%

11.50%27.30%

11.70% 9.10%

30.50%

50.00%

75.00%

29.20%

16.70%

14.60%

11.10%16.70%

7.80%16.70%

25.00%

6.80%

26.40%18.20%

25.00%

25.50%

18.20%

15.90%

18.20%

25.00%

9.00%

9.10%25.00%

11.50%27.30%

25.00%

11.70% 9.10%

26.40%

14.00% 13.3%

25.50%

35.10%42.20%

15.90% 21.10%

20.0%

9.00%

15.80%15.60%11.50%

12.30%8.9%11.70%

1.80%

30.50%20.00%

11.10%

29.20%

33.30%

33.30%

14.60%20.00%

11.10%

11.10% 10.00%

11.10%

7.80% 10.00%

22.20%

6.80% 6.70% 11.10%

26.40%

12.20% 10.0%

25.50%

12.20%10.00%

15.90%

22.00%25.0%

9.00%

22.00% 25.00%

11.50%

12.20%15.0%

11.70%19.50% 15.0%

26.40%

12.20%7.1%

25.50%

12.20%14.30%

15.90%

22.00%21.4%

9.00%

22.00%

14.30%

11.50%

12.20%

7.1%

11.70%19.50%

35.7%

30.50%22.20%

50%

29.20%

5.60%

14.60%

38.90%

11.10% 22.20%50.00%

7.80%

6.80% 11.10%

26.40% 25.80% 30.0%

25.50% 25.80%10.00%

15.90%24.20%

20.0%

9.00%

6.50%

10.00%

11.50%

12.90%

20.0%

11.70%4.80%

10.0%

30.50%

12.5%

50.00%

29.20%

34.4%

50.00%

14.60%

9.4%

11.10%

25.0%

7.80%6.3%

6.80%12.5%

30.50%

12.5%0%

No Data

29.20%

34.4%

14.60%

9.4%

11.10%

25.0%

7.80%6.3%

6.80%12.5%

26.40% 25.80% 30.2%

25.50% 25.80%

30.20%

15.90%24.20%

23.3%9.00%

6.50%

4.70%11.50%

12.90%9.3%11.70%

4.80% 2.3%

26.40%21.50%

33.3%

25.50%24.30%

15.90% 24.30%

9.00% 6.50%

50.00%

11.50% 10.30%

16.7%11.70% 13.10%

30.50% 28.60%

60.0%

29.20% 28.60%

20.00%14.60%

12.20%

11.10%12.20%

7.80%8.20%

6.80% 10.20%20.00%

26.40%21.50% 18.30%

25.50%24.30% 28.00%

15.90% 24.30% 25.8%

9.00% 6.50% 4.30%

11.50% 10.30% 9.7%

11.70% 13.10% 14.0%

26.40%

50.60%

25.50%

32.90%

15.90%

7.60%

9.00%

5.10%

11.50%

1.30%11.70%

2.50%

26.40%

41.90%

22.2%

25.50%

25.70%

16.7%

15.90%

12.20%

11.1%

9.00%

6.80%

22.2%

11.50%

12.20%

22.2%

11.70%1.40% 5.6%

26.40%

41.90%50.0%

25.50%

25.70%15.90%

12.20% 50.0%9.00%

6.80%11.50%

12.20%11.70%1.40%

26.40%

41.90%48.1%

25.50%

25.70%

29.6%15.90%

12.20%

11.1%

9.00%

6.80%

1.9%

11.50%

12.20%9.3%11.70%

1.40%

26.40%20.70%

25.50%28.20%

15.90%12.60%

9.00%

7.20%

11.50%

15.30%

11.70% 15.90%

26.40% 26.70%

25.50%31.10%

25.0%

15.90%13.30%

9.00%

15.60%

37.5%

11.50%

11.10%

25.0%

11.70%2.20%

12.5%

30.50%38.20%

29.20%

31.80%

14.60%

12.90%11.10%

8.60%7.80%4.70%

6.80% 3.90%

26.40% 26.70%

40.0%

25.50%31.10%

30.0%15.90%

13.30%

20.0%

9.00%

15.60%

10.0%

11.50%

11.10%11.70%2.20%

30.50% 28.60%33.30%

29.20%40% 28.60%

14.60%

20%28.60%

11.10%

8.60%9.50%

7.80%

6.80% 2.90%

26.40%18.20% 14.3%

25.50%

18.20% 28.60%

15.90%

18.20%14.3%

9.00%

9.10%

11.50%27.30%

28.6%

11.70% 9.10%14.3%

30.50%

50.00%

29.20%

16.70%

100.00%

14.60%

11.10%16.70%

7.80%16.70%

6.80%

26.40%

12.20%

28.6%

25.50%

12.20%

14.30%

15.90%

22.00%

14.3%

9.00%

22.00%

28.60%

11.50%

12.20%

14.3%11.70%19.50%

30.50% 28.60%33.30%

29.20% 28.60%

33.30%

14.60%12.20%

33.30%11.10%

12.20%

7.80%8.20%

6.80% 10.20%

30.50%

12.5% 12.50%

29.20%

34.4% 37.50%

14.60%

9.4%12.50%

11.10%

25.0%20.80%

7.80%6.3%

8.30%

6.80%12.5% 8.30%

30.50%22.20%

0%No Data

29.20%

5.60%

14.60%

38.90%

11.10% 22.20%

7.80%

6.80% 11.10%

30.50%

50.00%

29.20%

16.70%

14.60%

11.10%16.70%

100.00%

7.80%16.70%

6.80%

30.50%22.20% 18.80%

29.20%

5.60%6.30%

14.60%

38.90% 43.80%

11.10% 22.20% 18.80%

7.80%

6.80% 11.10% 12.50%

26.40% 25.80%

14.30%

25.50% 25.80%

15.90%24.20%

28.60%

9.00%

6.50%

14.30%

11.50%

12.90%

28.60%

11.70%4.80%

14.30%

30.50% 28.60% 24.4%

29.20% 28.60%29.30%

14.60%12.20%

12.20%

11.10%12.20%

14.60%

7.80%8.20% 9.80%

6.80% 10.20% 9.80%

26.40% 25.80%

25.50% 25.80%

50.00%

15.90%24.20%

50.0%9.00%

6.50%11.50%

12.90%11.70%

4.80%

26.40%

14.00% 16.7%

25.50%

35.10%

8.30%

15.90% 21.10%

25.0%

9.00%15.80%

16.70%

11.50%

12.30%

25.0%

11.70%1.80%

8.3%

30.50%

45.50%

29.20%

18.20%

14.60%18.20%

11.10%

9.10%7.80%

6.80% 9.10%

30.50%24.10%

11.10%

29.20%

24.10%

22.20%

14.60%

13.80%

22.20%

11.10%

10.30% 22.20%

7.80%

20.70% 11.10%

6.80% 6.90% 11.10%

30.50%20.00% 23.80%

29.20%

33.30%33.30%

14.60%20.00%

23.80%

11.10% 10.00%

9.50%7.80% 10.00%

4.80%6.80% 6.70% 4.80%

30.50%

12.5%

29.20%

34.4%

16.7%

14.60%

9.4%

11.10%

25.0%

50.0%

7.80%6.3%

6.80%12.5%

33.3%

26.40%21.50%

50.00%

25.50%24.30%

15.90% 24.30%25.0%

9.00% 6.50%

11.50% 10.30% 12.50%

11.70% 13.10% 12.5%

Time to Case Termination - Status Offenses13

The data represent the amount of time between the date the petition is filed to the date the case is terminated in JUS-TICE for all cases terminated in state fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18. The analysis separates youth adjudicated for delinquent behaviors and youth adjudicated for status offenses.










41.0% 38.9%

64.5%

19.3% 17.8%

24.2%

15.7%28.9%

11.3%

7.2%

5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=83

FY 2016n=90

FY 2017n=62

56.0%64.5%

36.2%24.2%

7.8% 11.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.1% 18.6%

57.7%17.1%

18.9%

35.8%

20.5% 13.2%

6.6%

13.7%11.4%

14.7%19.5%

17.8% 18.4%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=409

FY 2016n=370

FY 2017n=106

56.0% 57.7%

36.2% 35.8%

7.8% 6.6%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.9% 18.2%

44.4%

23.4% 21.8%

55.6%

23.4%18.2%

11.7% 23.6%

9.1%

12.7%15.6%

5.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=77

FY 2016n=55

FY 2017n=9

56.0%44.4%

36.2% 55.6%

7.8%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017

56.0%64.0%

50%

36.2%28.0%

50%

7.8% 8.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FY 2015n=35

FY 2016n=28

FY 2017n=28

Chart Title

56.0%48.6%

9.1%

36.2%41.9%

45.5%

7.8% 9.5%

45.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


22.6%

37.2%

58.8%14.5%

33.7%

33.3%

4.8%

3.5%

7.8%

9.7%

12.8%

12.9%

11.6%

35.5%

1.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=62

FY 2016n=86

FY 2017n=51

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%








37.5%

18.2%

50.0%

50.0%

18.2%

12.5%

12.5%

37.5%

18.2%

18.2%

27.3%

42.9%

14.3%9.1%

45.5%46.4%

25.7%

14.3%

10.7%

45.5%14.3%

7.1%

7.1%8.6%

5.7%2.9%

7.8%

36.2%

56.0%63.6% 58.8%

33.3%30.3%

6.1% 7.8%














JJ Case Termination - Team 2.1 JJ Case Termination - Team 7JJ Case Termination - Team 5.1





Lincoln











JJ Case Termination - Team 4 JJ Case Termination - Team 6.2


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 1

n=52


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=63

Team 2.1n=8


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=63

Team 2.2n=5


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 2n=63

Team 2.3n=50


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=35

Team 5.1n=8


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=45

Team 5.2n=27

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=35

Team 5.3n=6


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=60

Team 6.1n=55

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=29

Team 6.1n=20


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=60

Team 6.2n=5

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 7

n=21

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=11

Team 8.1n=0

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=6

Team 8.2n=4


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=11

Team 8.3n=4

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=57

Team 9.1n=45

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=30

Team 9.2n=9


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=41

Team 10.1n=20

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=41

Team 10.2n=14

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 10n=18

Team 10.3n=2


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=62

Team 11.1n=10

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 11n=32

Team 11.2n=2


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=32

Team 11.3n=0


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=62

Team 11.4n=43

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=107

Team 12.1n=6

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 12n=49

Team 12.2n=5


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=107

Team 12.3n=93

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 1

n=79

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=74

Team 2.1n=18

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=74

Team 2.2n=2

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=74

Team 2.3n=54

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=45

Team 5.3n=8

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=45

Team 5.1n=10

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=35

Team 5.2n=21


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=11

Team 8.2n=7

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=6

Team 8.3n=1


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=41

Team 10.3n=7

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 12n=49

Team 12.1n=3


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 11n=32

Team 11.4n=24


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 10n=18

Team 10.2n=0


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=6

Team 8.1n=1


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=18

Team 10.1n=16


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=62

Team 11.3n=7

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State ofNebraska

n=732

District 12n=49

Team 12.3n=41


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=62

Team 11.2n=2

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=57

Team 9.2n=12

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 7

n=11


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=29

Team 6.2n=9


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=30

Team 9.1n=21


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=32

Team 11.1n=6


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=107

Team 12.2n=8

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

30.50%

53.80%

29.20%

36.50%14.60%

5.80%

11.10%

1.90%

7.80%

1.90%6.80%

30.50%

44.40%50.00%

29.20%

31.70%

14.60%

12.70%

25.00%

11.10%

4.80%7.80%

4.80%

12.50%

6.80%1.60%

12.50%

30.50%

44.40%

29.20%

31.70%

80.00%

14.60%

12.70%

20.00%

11.10%

4.80%7.80%

4.80%6.80%1.60%

30.50%

44.40% 48.00%

29.20%

31.70%32.00%

14.60%

12.70%10.00%

11.10%

4.80% 6.00%7.80%

4.80% 4.00%6.80%1.60%

30.50%

14.40%

29.20%

23.60%

14.60%

17.80%

11.10%

16.10%

7.80%

14.90%

6.80%13.20%

26.40%33.80%

25.50%

22.40%

15.90%18.30%

9.00%

9.50%11.50%

9.90%11.70%

6.10%

30.50% 28.60%

12.50%

29.20%40%

62.50%

14.60%

20%12.50%11.10%

8.60%7.80%

6.80% 2.90%12.50%

26.40% 26.70% 29.6%

25.50%31.10%

33.3%

15.90%13.30%

14.8%9.00%

15.60%11.1%11.50%

11.10% 11.1%11.70%2.20%

30.50% 28.60%33.30%

29.20%40%

50.00%

14.60%

20%11.10%

8.60% 16.70%7.80%

6.80% 2.90%

26.40%

8.30% 9.1%

25.50%

11.70% 12.7%

15.90%

8.30% 5.5%

9.00%

11.70%7.3%

11.50%

5.00%5.5%

11.70%

55.00%60.0%

30.50%24.10%

30.00%

29.20%

24.10%

25.00%

14.60%

13.80%10.00%

11.10%

10.30% 5.00%

7.80%

20.70% 25.00%

6.80% 6.90% 5.00%

26.40%

8.30%

25.50%

11.70%

15.90%

8.30%40.0%

9.00%

11.70%

60.0%

11.50%

5.00%

11.70%

55.00%

26.40%19.00%

25.50%

28.60%

15.90%14.30%

9.00%9.50%

11.50% 19.00%

11.70% 9.50%

26.40%18.20%

0.0%No Data

25.50%

18.20%

15.90%

18.20%

9.00%

9.10%

11.50%27.30%

11.70% 9.10%

30.50%

50.00%

75.00%

29.20%

16.70%

14.60%

11.10%16.70%

7.80%16.70%

25.00%

6.80%

26.40%18.20%

25.00%

25.50%

18.20%

15.90%

18.20%

25.00%

9.00%

9.10%25.00%

11.50%27.30%

25.00%

11.70% 9.10%

26.40%

14.00% 13.3%

25.50%

35.10%42.20%

15.90% 21.10%

20.0%

9.00%

15.80%15.60%11.50%

12.30%8.9%11.70%

1.80%

30.50%20.00%

11.10%

29.20%

33.30%

33.30%

14.60%20.00%

11.10%

11.10% 10.00%

11.10%

7.80% 10.00%

22.20%

6.80% 6.70% 11.10%

26.40%

12.20% 10.0%

25.50%

12.20%10.00%

15.90%

22.00%25.0%

9.00%

22.00% 25.00%

11.50%

12.20%15.0%

11.70%19.50% 15.0%

26.40%

12.20%7.1%

25.50%

12.20%14.30%

15.90%

22.00%21.4%

9.00%

22.00%

14.30%

11.50%

12.20%

7.1%

11.70%19.50%

35.7%

30.50%22.20%

50%

29.20%

5.60%

14.60%

38.90%

11.10% 22.20%50.00%

7.80%

6.80% 11.10%

26.40% 25.80% 30.0%

25.50% 25.80%10.00%

15.90%24.20%

20.0%

9.00%

6.50%

10.00%

11.50%

12.90%

20.0%

11.70%4.80%

10.0%

30.50%

12.5%

50.00%

29.20%

34.4%

50.00%

14.60%

9.4%

11.10%

25.0%

7.80%6.3%

6.80%12.5%

30.50%

12.5%0%

No Data

29.20%

34.4%

14.60%

9.4%

11.10%

25.0%

7.80%6.3%

6.80%12.5%

26.40% 25.80% 30.2%

25.50% 25.80%

30.20%

15.90%24.20%

23.3%9.00%

6.50%

4.70%11.50%

12.90%9.3%11.70%

4.80% 2.3%

26.40%21.50%

33.3%

25.50%24.30%

15.90% 24.30%

9.00% 6.50%

50.00%

11.50% 10.30%

16.7%11.70% 13.10%

30.50% 28.60%

60.0%

29.20% 28.60%

20.00%14.60%

12.20%

11.10%12.20%

7.80%8.20%

6.80% 10.20%20.00%

26.40%21.50% 18.30%

25.50%24.30% 28.00%

15.90% 24.30% 25.8%

9.00% 6.50% 4.30%

11.50% 10.30% 9.7%

11.70% 13.10% 14.0%

26.40%

50.60%

25.50%

32.90%

15.90%

7.60%

9.00%

5.10%

11.50%

1.30%11.70%

2.50%

26.40%

41.90%

22.2%

25.50%

25.70%

16.7%

15.90%

12.20%

11.1%

9.00%

6.80%

22.2%

11.50%

12.20%

22.2%

11.70%1.40% 5.6%

26.40%

41.90%50.0%

25.50%

25.70%15.90%

12.20% 50.0%9.00%

6.80%11.50%

12.20%11.70%1.40%

26.40%

41.90%48.1%

25.50%

25.70%

29.6%15.90%

12.20%

11.1%

9.00%

6.80%

1.9%

11.50%

12.20%9.3%11.70%

1.40%

26.40%20.70%

25.50%28.20%

15.90%12.60%

9.00%

7.20%

11.50%

15.30%

11.70% 15.90%

26.40% 26.70%

25.50%31.10%

25.0%

15.90%13.30%

9.00%

15.60%

37.5%

11.50%

11.10%

25.0%

11.70%2.20%

12.5%

30.50%38.20%

29.20%

31.80%

14.60%

12.90%11.10%

8.60%7.80%4.70%

6.80% 3.90%

26.40% 26.70%

40.0%

25.50%31.10%

30.0%15.90%

13.30%

20.0%

9.00%

15.60%

10.0%

11.50%

11.10%11.70%2.20%

30.50% 28.60%33.30%

29.20%40% 28.60%

14.60%

20%28.60%

11.10%

8.60%9.50%

7.80%

6.80% 2.90%

26.40%18.20% 14.3%

25.50%

18.20% 28.60%

15.90%

18.20%14.3%

9.00%

9.10%

11.50%27.30%

28.6%

11.70% 9.10%14.3%

30.50%

50.00%

29.20%

16.70%

100.00%

14.60%

11.10%16.70%

7.80%16.70%

6.80%

26.40%

12.20%

28.6%

25.50%

12.20%

14.30%

15.90%

22.00%

14.3%

9.00%

22.00%

28.60%

11.50%

12.20%

14.3%11.70%19.50%

30.50% 28.60%33.30%

29.20% 28.60%

33.30%

14.60%12.20%

33.30%11.10%

12.20%

7.80%8.20%

6.80% 10.20%

30.50%

12.5% 12.50%

29.20%

34.4% 37.50%

14.60%

9.4%12.50%

11.10%

25.0%20.80%

7.80%6.3%

8.30%

6.80%12.5% 8.30%

30.50%22.20%

0%No Data

29.20%

5.60%

14.60%

38.90%

11.10% 22.20%

7.80%

6.80% 11.10%

30.50%

50.00%

29.20%

16.70%

14.60%

11.10%16.70%

100.00%

7.80%16.70%

6.80%

30.50%22.20% 18.80%

29.20%

5.60%6.30%

14.60%

38.90% 43.80%

11.10% 22.20% 18.80%

7.80%

6.80% 11.10% 12.50%

26.40% 25.80%

14.30%

25.50% 25.80%

15.90%24.20%

28.60%

9.00%

6.50%

14.30%

11.50%

12.90%

28.60%

11.70%4.80%

14.30%

30.50% 28.60% 24.4%

29.20% 28.60%29.30%

14.60%12.20%

12.20%

11.10%12.20%

14.60%

7.80%8.20% 9.80%

6.80% 10.20% 9.80%

26.40% 25.80%

25.50% 25.80%

50.00%

15.90%24.20%

50.0%9.00%

6.50%11.50%

12.90%11.70%

4.80%

26.40%

14.00% 16.7%

25.50%

35.10%

8.30%

15.90% 21.10%

25.0%

9.00%15.80%

16.70%

11.50%

12.30%

25.0%

11.70%1.80%

8.3%

30.50%

45.50%

29.20%

18.20%

14.60%18.20%

11.10%

9.10%7.80%

6.80% 9.10%

30.50%24.10%

11.10%

29.20%

24.10%

22.20%

14.60%

13.80%

22.20%

11.10%

10.30% 22.20%

7.80%

20.70% 11.10%

6.80% 6.90% 11.10%

30.50%20.00% 23.80%

29.20%

33.30%33.30%

14.60%20.00%

23.80%

11.10% 10.00%

9.50%7.80% 10.00%

4.80%6.80% 6.70% 4.80%

30.50%

12.5%

29.20%

34.4%

16.7%

14.60%

9.4%

11.10%

25.0%

50.0%

7.80%6.3%

6.80%12.5%

33.3%

26.40%21.50%

50.00%

25.50%24.30%

15.90% 24.30%25.0%

9.00% 6.50%

11.50% 10.30% 12.50%

11.70% 13.10% 12.5%



Time to Case Termination - Status Offenses13










41.0% 38.9%

64.5%

19.3% 17.8%

24.2%

15.7%28.9%

11.3%

7.2%

5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=83

FY 2016n=90

FY 2017n=62

56.0%64.5%

36.2%24.2%

7.8% 11.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.1% 18.6%

57.7%17.1%

18.9%

35.8%

20.5% 13.2%

6.6%

13.7%11.4%

14.7%19.5%

17.8% 18.4%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=409

FY 2016n=370

FY 2017n=106

56.0% 57.7%

36.2% 35.8%

7.8% 6.6%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.9% 18.2%

44.4%

23.4% 21.8%

55.6%

23.4%18.2%

11.7% 23.6%

9.1%

12.7%15.6%

5.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=77

FY 2016n=55

FY 2017n=9

56.0%44.4%

36.2% 55.6%

7.8%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017

56.0%64.0%

50%

36.2%28.0%

50%

7.8% 8.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FY 2015n=35

FY 2016n=28

FY 2017n=28

Chart Title

56.0%48.6%

9.1%

36.2%41.9%

45.5%

7.8% 9.5%

45.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


22.6%

37.2%

58.8%14.5%

33.7%

33.3%

4.8%

3.5%

7.8%

9.7%

12.8%

12.9%

11.6%

35.5%

1.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=62

FY 2016n=86

FY 2017n=51

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%








37.5%

18.2%

50.0%

50.0%

18.2%

12.5%

12.5%

37.5%

18.2%

18.2%

27.3%

42.9%

14.3%9.1%

45.5%46.4%

25.7%

14.3%

10.7%

45.5%14.3%

7.1%

7.1%8.6%

5.7%2.9%

7.8%

36.2%

56.0%63.6% 58.8%

33.3%30.3%

6.1% 7.8%

Delinquency Case Termination - Team 1

Delinquency Case Termination - Team 5.2












Delinquency Case Termination - Team 2.1 Delinquency Case Termination - Team 7Delinquency Case Termination - Team 5.1















Delinquency Case Termination - Team 4 Delinquency Case Termination - Team 6.2


14.40%

14.40%7.50%

8.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

15.30%6.80%

4.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=359

Team 2.1n=43

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=225

Team 2.1n=30


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=359

Team 2.2n=20

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=225

Team 2.2n=14


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=359

Team 2.3n=296

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=225

Team 2.3n=181


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




14.40%

12.40%7.50%

7.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 4n=1,094

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

10.50%6.80%

6.10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=419

Team 5.1n=108

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=261

Team 5.1n=76

July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=419

Team 5.2n=277

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=261

Team 5.2n=166


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=419

Team 5.3n=34

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=261

Team 5.3n=19


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=518

Team 6.1n=418

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=142

Team 6.1n=67


14.40%

7.90%

13.00%

7.50%

3.90%

10.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=518

Team 6.2n=100

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

16.90%

18.70%

6.80%

7.70%

5.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=142

Team 6.2n=75


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=105

Team 8.1n=29

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=50

Team 8.1n=26


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=105

Team 8.2n=42

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=50

Team 8.2n=17


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=105

Team 8.3n=34

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=50

Team 8.3n=7


14.40%16.00%

16.60%7.50%9.70%

8.90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=555

Team 9.1n=451

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60% 22.90%24.40%

6.80%6.30%

5.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=284

Team 9.1n=238


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=555

Team 9.2n=104

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=284

Team 9.2n=46


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=323

Team 10.1n=248

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=237

Team 10.1n=177


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=323

Team 10.2n=50

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=237

Team 10.2n=26


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=323

Team 10.3n=25

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=237

Team 10.3n=34


14.40%

18.70%

17.60%

7.50%

5.50%

5.90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=310

Team 11.1n=119

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%15.40%

22.00%

6.80% 8.40%

5.10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=214

Team 11.1n=59


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=310

Team 11.2n=65

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=214

Team 11.2n=39


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=310

Team 11.3n=14

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=214

Team 11.3n=3


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=310

Team 11.4n=112

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=214

Team 11.4n=113


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=404

Team 12.1n=81

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=202

Team 12.1n=34


14.40%

13.10%

15.20%7.50%

7.20%

4.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=404

Team 12.2n=46

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

8.90%

10.70%

6.80%

3.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=202

Team 12.2n=28


14.40%

13.10%

13.00%

7.50%

7.20%

7.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=404

Team 12.3n=277

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

8.90% 5.00%6.80%

3.50% 4.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=202

Team 12.3n=140


Lincoln

33.00%43.20%

24.30%

24.10%

7.20%

6.20%13.60%3.90%

40.20%49.20%

24.40%

25.80%

7.40%

3.20%7.80%2.40%

33.00%39.80%

18.60%

24.30%

32.90%

34.90%

14.40%

14.80%

9.30%

7.50%

6.70%

11.60%

7.20%

4.20%

20.90%

13.60%

1.70% 4.70%

40.20% 38.20%30.00%

24.40%35.60%

30.00%

13.60%

12.00%

23.00%

6.80%

5.30%3.30%

7.40%

5.30%10.00%

7.80%3.60% 3.30%

33.00%39.80%

30.0%

24.30%

32.90%

40.0%

14.40%

14.80%25.0%

7.50%

6.70%

7.20%

4.20%13.60%

1.70% 5.0%

40.20% 38.20%

24.40%35.60%

50.00%

13.60%

12.00%

21.40%

6.80%

5.30%7.40%

5.30%

14.30%

7.80% 3.60% 7.10%

33.00%39.80% 43.60%

24.30%

32.90%32.10%

14.40%

14.80%14.90%

7.50%

6.70%6.40%

7.20%

4.20% 2.00%13.60%

1.70% 1.00%

40.20% 38.20% 42.00%

24.40%35.60%

35.40%

13.60%

12.00%9.40%6.80%

5.30% 6.10%7.40%

5.30% 3.90%7.80%3.60% 3.30%

33.00%25.60%

24.30%

27.40%

14.40%17.00%

7.50% 8.30%

7.20% 9.90%

13.60% 11.80%

40.20%

20.70%

24.40%

22.20%

13.60%

16.50%

6.80%

11.10%

7.40%

15.30%

7.80%14.20%

33.00%

47.40%

24.30%

21.10%

7.20%

6.90%13.60%5.10%

40.20%

51.70%

24.40%

20.00%

7.40%7.70%

7.80% 4.00%

33.00%

49.20% 45.40%

24.30%

24.60% 34.30%14.40%

12.20%

13.00%

7.50%

8.10%

5.60%

7.20%

3.10%1.90%

13.60%

2.90%

40.20%

51.70%46.10%

24.40%

23.80% 31.60%

13.60%

10.00%

15.80%6.80%

8.00%

5.30%

7.40%

3.80%1.30%

7.80%2.70%

33.00%

49.20% 52.70%

24.30%

24.60% 20.90%14.40%

12.20% 11.20%7.50%

8.10% 8.70%

7.20%

3.10% 2.50%13.60%

2.90% 4.00%

40.20%

51.70%57.20%

24.40%

23.80%19.90%

13.60%

10.00% 6.00%6.80%

8.00% 9.00%7.40%

3.80% 3.60%7.80%

2.70% 4.20%

33.00%

49.20%

32.40%

24.30%

24.60%

23.50%

14.40%

12.20%

17.60%

7.50%

8.10%

11.80%7.20%

3.10%11.80%13.60%

2.90% 2.90%

40.20%

51.70%

26.30%

24.40%

23.80%

26.30%

13.60%

10.00%

21.10%

6.80%

8.00%

10.50%

7.40%

3.80%15.80%

7.80%2.70%

33.00%

9.30%4.30%

24.30%

10.40%

6.90%

14.40%

7.90%

6.70%

7.50%

3.90%

2.40%

7.20%

5.00%

2.40%

13.60%

63.50%

77.30%

40.20%30.30%

20.90%

24.40%

23.90%

28.40%

13.60%

16.90%

14.90%

6.80%

7.70%

10.40%

7.40%

9.20%9.00%

7.80%12.00%

16.40%

33.00%

9.30%

30.00%

24.30%

10.40%

25.00%

7.20%

5.00%

16.00%

13.60%

63.50%

6.00%

40.20%30.30%

38.70%

24.40%

23.90%

20.00%

7.40%

9.20%9.30%

7.80%12.00%

8.00%

33.00%

22.30%

24.30%39.50%

14.40%

17.80%7.50%

8.30%7.20%

9.60%13.60%

2.50%

40.20%

26.60%

24.40%

33.10%

13.60%16.90%

6.80% 9.70%

7.40%8.90%

7.80% 4.80%

33.00%28.60%

3.40%

24.30%

22.90%

41.40%

14.40% 22.90%

13.80%

7.50% 4.80%

7.20% 8.60%

10.30%

13.60% 12.40%

31.00%

40.20% 42.00% 42.30%

24.40%26.00%

19.20%

13.60%14.00%

7.70%

6.80%8.00%

11.50%

7.40%6.00%

11.50%

7.80% 4.00% 7.70%

33.00%28.60%

57.10%

24.30%

22.90%

9.50%14.40% 22.90%

16.70%7.50% 4.80%

7.10%7.20% 8.60%

7.10%13.60% 12.40%2.40%

40.20% 42.00%

52.90%

24.40%26.00%

23.50%

13.60%14.00%

17.60%6.80%

8.00%

5.90%

7.40%6.00%

7.80% 4.00%

33.00%28.60%

14.70%

24.30%

22.90%

23.50%

14.40% 22.90%

38.20%

7.50% 4.80%5.90%

7.20% 8.60%8.80%

13.60% 12.40% 8.80%

40.20% 42.00%

14.30%

24.40%26.00%

57.10%

13.60%14.00%

28.60%6.80%

8.00%7.40%

6.00%7.80% 4.00%

33.00%23.20% 25.50%

24.30%35.50%

39.90%

7.20%5.60%

5.10%13.60% 9.90%4.00%

40.20%32.70% 34.90%

24.40%

26.10%26.90%

7.40%6.00%

5.00%7.80% 6.00% 3.40%

33.00%23.20%

13.50%

24.30%35.50%

16.30%

14.40%16.00%

13.50%

7.50%9.70%

13.50%

7.20%5.60%

7.70%

13.60% 9.90%

35.60%

40.20%32.70%

21.70%

24.40%

26.10%

21.70%

13.60% 22.90%

15.20%

6.80%6.30%

10.90%

7.40%6.00%

10.90%

7.80% 6.00%

19.60%

33.00%

18.30%13.70%

24.30%

18.30%

15.30%

14.40%

20.10%

21.00%

7.50%

12.70%16.10%

7.20%

13.90% 16.90%

13.60% 16.70% 16.90%

40.20%

27.00%21.50%

24.40%

16.90%

17.50%

13.60%

12.20%

6.80%

6.80%

5.10%

5.10%

7.40%

7.20%

7.90%

7.80%

31.60%41.20%

33.00%

18.30%

40.0%

24.30%

18.30%

26.00%

14.40%

20.10%

8.0%7.50%

12.70%

7.20%

13.90% 6.0%

13.60% 16.70% 20.0%

40.20%27.00%

46.00%

24.40%

16.90%

15.40%

13.60%

12.20%

30.80%6.80%

5.10%

7.40%

7.20%

7.70%7.80%

31.60%

33.00%

18.30% 20.0%

24.30%

18.30%

32.00%

14.40%

20.10%

36.0%

7.50%

12.70%

4.00%

7.20%

13.90%

13.60% 16.70%8.0%

40.20%

27.00%

41.20%

24.40%

16.90%

14.70%

13.60%

12.20%

26.50%

6.80%

5.10%

8.80%7.40%

7.20%

2.90%7.80%

31.60%

5.90%

33.00%37.10% 33.60%

24.30%

27.70%26.10%

7.20%

8.10%14.30%

13.60%

2.90% 2.50%

40.20%32.20%

18.60%

24.40%

29.00%

23.70%

7.40% 8.90%

25.40%

7.80% 6.10% 5.10%

33.00%37.10%

52.30%

24.30%

27.70%

38.50%

14.40%

18.70%

9.20%

7.50%

5.50%7.20%

8.10%13.60%

2.90%

40.20%32.20%

51.30%

24.40%

29.00%

17.90%

13.60%15.40%

12.80%

6.80% 8.40%

10.30%7.40% 8.90%

7.80% 6.10% 7.70%

33.00%37.10% 35.70%

24.30%

27.70% 28.60%

14.40%

18.70%

7.10%

7.50%

5.50%21.40%7.20%

8.10%13.60%

2.90%7.10%

40.20%32.20%

66.70%

24.40%

29.00%

33.30%

13.60%15.40%

6.80% 8.40%

7.40% 8.90%

7.80% 6.10%

33.00%37.10%

32.10%

24.30%

27.70%

23.20%

14.40%

18.70%

26.80%

7.50%

5.50% 6.30%7.20%

8.10% 7.10%13.60%

2.90% 4.50%

40.20%32.20% 31.90%

24.40%

29.00%35.40%

13.60%15.40%

13.30%

6.80% 8.40%9.70%

7.40% 8.90%3.50%

7.80% 6.10% 6.20%

33.00% 31.40% 30.90%

24.30%20.00%

37.00%

14.40%

13.10%

12.30%7.50%

7.20%

7.40%7.20%

10.10%

6.20%13.60%

18.10%

6.20%

40.20%

51.50%

20.60%

24.40%

27.20%

44.10%

13.60%

8.90%

23.50%6.80%

3.50% 2.90%7.40%4.00%

7.80% 5.00% 8.80%

33.00% 31.40%

52.20%

24.30%20.00%

15.20%

7.20%

10.10%

8.70%13.60%18.10%

4.30%

40.20%

51.50% 53.60%

24.40%

27.20%32.10%

7.40%4.00%

7.80% 5.00% 3.60%

33.00% 31.40% 28.20%

24.30%20.00%

15.90%

7.20%

10.10%

11.60%

13.60%18.10%

23.80%

40.20%

51.50%58.60%

24.40%

27.20%22.10%

7.40%4.00% 5.70%

7.80% 5.00% 4.30%



Time To Case Termination - Delinquency Offenses13










41.0% 38.9%

64.5%

19.3% 17.8%

24.2%

15.7%28.9%

11.3%

7.2%

5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=83

FY 2016n=90

FY 2017n=62

56.0%64.5%

36.2%24.2%

7.8% 11.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.1% 18.6%

57.7%17.1%

18.9%

35.8%

20.5% 13.2%

6.6%

13.7%11.4%

14.7%19.5%

17.8% 18.4%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=409

FY 2016n=370

FY 2017n=106

56.0% 57.7%

36.2% 35.8%

7.8% 6.6%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


16.9% 18.2%

44.4%

23.4% 21.8%

55.6%

23.4%18.2%

11.7% 23.6%

9.1%

12.7%15.6%

5.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=77

FY 2016n=55

FY 2017n=9

56.0%44.4%

36.2% 55.6%

7.8%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017

56.0%64.0%

50%

36.2%28.0%

50%

7.8% 8.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FY 2015n=35

FY 2016n=28

FY 2017n=28

Chart Title

56.0%48.6%

9.1%

36.2%41.9%

45.5%

7.8% 9.5%

45.5%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


22.6%

37.2%

58.8%14.5%

33.7%

33.3%

4.8%

3.5%

7.8%

9.7%

12.8%

12.9%

11.6%

35.5%

1.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

FY 2015n=62

FY 2016n=86

FY 2017n=51

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%








37.5%

18.2%

50.0%

50.0%

18.2%

12.5%

12.5%

37.5%

18.2%

18.2%

27.3%

42.9%

14.3%9.1%

45.5%46.4%

25.7%

14.3%

10.7%

45.5%14.3%

7.1%

7.1%8.6%

5.7%2.9%

7.8%

36.2%

56.0%63.6% 58.8%

33.3%30.3%

6.1% 7.8%














Delinquency Case Termination - Team 2.1 Delinquency Case Termination - Team 7Delinquency Case Termination - Team 5.1















Delinquency Case Termination - Team 4 Delinquency Case Termination - Team 6.2


14.40%

14.40%7.50%

8.20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

15.30%6.80%

4.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=359

Team 2.1n=43

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=225

Team 2.1n=30


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=359

Team 2.2n=20

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=225

Team 2.2n=14


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=359

Team 2.3n=296

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 2n=225

Team 2.3n=181


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




14.40%

12.40%7.50%

7.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District/Team 4n=1,094

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

10.50%6.80%

6.10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=419

Team 5.1n=108

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=261

Team 5.1n=76

July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=419

Team 5.2n=277

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=261

Team 5.2n=166


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=419

Team 5.3n=34

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 5n=261

Team 5.3n=19


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=518

Team 6.1n=418

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=142

Team 6.1n=67


14.40%

7.90%

13.00%

7.50%

3.90%

10.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=518

Team 6.2n=100

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

16.90%

18.70%

6.80%

7.70%

5.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 6n=142

Team 6.2n=75


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=105

Team 8.1n=29

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=50

Team 8.1n=26


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=105

Team 8.2n=42

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=50

Team 8.2n=17


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=105

Team 8.3n=34

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 8n=50

Team 8.3n=7


14.40%16.00%

16.60%7.50%9.70%

8.90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=555

Team 9.1n=451

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60% 22.90%24.40%

6.80%6.30%

5.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=284

Team 9.1n=238


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=555

Team 9.2n=104

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 9n=284

Team 9.2n=46


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=323

Team 10.1n=248

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=237

Team 10.1n=177


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=323

Team 10.2n=50

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=237

Team 10.2n=26


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=323

Team 10.3n=25

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 10n=237

Team 10.3n=34


14.40%

18.70%

17.60%

7.50%

5.50%

5.90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=310

Team 11.1n=119

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%15.40%

22.00%

6.80% 8.40%

5.10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=214

Team 11.1n=59


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=310

Team 11.2n=65

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=214

Team 11.2n=39


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=310

Team 11.3n=14

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=214

Team 11.3n=3


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=310

Team 11.4n=112

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 11n=214

Team 11.4n=113


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=404

Team 12.1n=81

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=202

Team 12.1n=34


14.40%

13.10%

15.20%7.50%

7.20%

4.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=404

Team 12.2n=46

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

8.90%

10.70%

6.80%

3.50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=202

Team 12.2n=28


14.40%

13.10%

13.00%

7.50%

7.20%

7.60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=404

Team 12.3n=277

FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

13.60%

8.90% 5.00%6.80%

3.50% 4.30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


District 12n=202

Team 12.3n=140


Lincoln

33.00%43.20%

24.30%

24.10%

7.20%

6.20%13.60%3.90%

40.20%49.20%

24.40%

25.80%

7.40%

3.20%7.80%2.40%

33.00%39.80%

18.60%

24.30%

32.90%

34.90%

14.40%

14.80%

9.30%

7.50%

6.70%

11.60%

7.20%

4.20%

20.90%

13.60%

1.70% 4.70%

40.20% 38.20%30.00%

24.40%35.60%

30.00%

13.60%

12.00%

23.00%

6.80%

5.30%3.30%

7.40%

5.30%10.00%

7.80%3.60% 3.30%

33.00%39.80%

30.0%

24.30%

32.90%

40.0%

14.40%

14.80%25.0%

7.50%

6.70%

7.20%

4.20%13.60%

1.70% 5.0%

40.20% 38.20%

24.40%35.60%

50.00%

13.60%

12.00%

21.40%

6.80%

5.30%7.40%

5.30%

14.30%

7.80% 3.60% 7.10%

33.00%39.80% 43.60%

24.30%

32.90%32.10%

14.40%

14.80%14.90%

7.50%

6.70%6.40%

7.20%

4.20% 2.00%13.60%

1.70% 1.00%

40.20% 38.20% 42.00%

24.40%35.60%

35.40%

13.60%

12.00%9.40%6.80%

5.30% 6.10%7.40%

5.30% 3.90%7.80%3.60% 3.30%

33.00%25.60%

24.30%

27.40%

14.40%17.00%

7.50% 8.30%

7.20% 9.90%

13.60% 11.80%

40.20%

20.70%

24.40%

22.20%

13.60%

16.50%

6.80%

11.10%

7.40%

15.30%

7.80%14.20%

33.00%

47.40%

24.30%

21.10%

7.20%

6.90%13.60%5.10%

40.20%

51.70%

24.40%

20.00%

7.40%7.70%

7.80% 4.00%

33.00%

49.20% 45.40%

24.30%

24.60% 34.30%14.40%

12.20%

13.00%

7.50%

8.10%

5.60%

7.20%

3.10%1.90%

13.60%

2.90%

40.20%

51.70%46.10%

24.40%

23.80% 31.60%

13.60%

10.00%

15.80%6.80%

8.00%

5.30%

7.40%

3.80%1.30%

7.80%2.70%

33.00%

49.20% 52.70%

24.30%

24.60% 20.90%14.40%

12.20% 11.20%7.50%

8.10% 8.70%

7.20%

3.10% 2.50%13.60%

2.90% 4.00%

40.20%

51.70%57.20%

24.40%

23.80%19.90%

13.60%

10.00% 6.00%6.80%

8.00% 9.00%7.40%

3.80% 3.60%7.80%

2.70% 4.20%

33.00%

49.20%

32.40%

24.30%

24.60%

23.50%

14.40%

12.20%

17.60%

7.50%

8.10%

11.80%7.20%

3.10%11.80%13.60%

2.90% 2.90%

40.20%

51.70%

26.30%

24.40%

23.80%

26.30%

13.60%

10.00%

21.10%

6.80%

8.00%

10.50%

7.40%

3.80%15.80%

7.80%2.70%

33.00%

9.30%4.30%

24.30%

10.40%

6.90%

14.40%

7.90%

6.70%

7.50%

3.90%

2.40%

7.20%

5.00%

2.40%

13.60%

63.50%

77.30%

40.20%30.30%

20.90%

24.40%

23.90%

28.40%

13.60%

16.90%

14.90%

6.80%

7.70%

10.40%

7.40%

9.20%9.00%

7.80%12.00%

16.40%

33.00%

9.30%

30.00%

24.30%

10.40%

25.00%

7.20%

5.00%

16.00%

13.60%

63.50%

6.00%

40.20%30.30%

38.70%

24.40%

23.90%

20.00%

7.40%

9.20%9.30%

7.80%12.00%

8.00%

33.00%

22.30%

24.30%39.50%

14.40%

17.80%7.50%

8.30%7.20%

9.60%13.60%

2.50%

40.20%

26.60%

24.40%

33.10%

13.60%16.90%

6.80% 9.70%

7.40%8.90%

7.80% 4.80%

33.00%28.60%

3.40%

24.30%

22.90%

41.40%

14.40% 22.90%

13.80%

7.50% 4.80%

7.20% 8.60%

10.30%

13.60% 12.40%

31.00%

40.20% 42.00% 42.30%

24.40%26.00%

19.20%

13.60%14.00%

7.70%

6.80%8.00%

11.50%

7.40%6.00%

11.50%

7.80% 4.00% 7.70%

33.00%28.60%

57.10%

24.30%

22.90%

9.50%14.40% 22.90%

16.70%7.50% 4.80%

7.10%7.20% 8.60%

7.10%13.60% 12.40%2.40%

40.20% 42.00%

52.90%

24.40%26.00%

23.50%

13.60%14.00%

17.60%6.80%

8.00%

5.90%

7.40%6.00%

7.80% 4.00%

33.00%28.60%

14.70%

24.30%

22.90%

23.50%

14.40% 22.90%

38.20%

7.50% 4.80%5.90%

7.20% 8.60%8.80%

13.60% 12.40% 8.80%

40.20% 42.00%

14.30%

24.40%26.00%

57.10%

13.60%14.00%

28.60%6.80%

8.00%7.40%

6.00%7.80% 4.00%

33.00%23.20% 25.50%

24.30%35.50%

39.90%

7.20%5.60%

5.10%13.60% 9.90%4.00%

40.20%32.70% 34.90%

24.40%

26.10%26.90%

7.40%6.00%

5.00%7.80% 6.00% 3.40%

33.00%23.20%

13.50%

24.30%35.50%

16.30%

14.40%16.00%

13.50%

7.50%9.70%

13.50%

7.20%5.60%

7.70%

13.60% 9.90%

35.60%

40.20%32.70%

21.70%

24.40%

26.10%

21.70%

13.60% 22.90%

15.20%

6.80%6.30%

10.90%

7.40%6.00%

10.90%

7.80% 6.00%

19.60%

33.00%

18.30%13.70%

24.30%

18.30%

15.30%

14.40%

20.10%

21.00%

7.50%

12.70%16.10%

7.20%

13.90% 16.90%

13.60% 16.70% 16.90%

40.20%

27.00%21.50%

24.40%

16.90%

17.50%

13.60%

12.20%

6.80%

6.80%

5.10%

5.10%

7.40%

7.20%

7.90%

7.80%

31.60%41.20%

33.00%

18.30%

40.0%

24.30%

18.30%

26.00%

14.40%

20.10%

8.0%7.50%

12.70%

7.20%

13.90% 6.0%

13.60% 16.70% 20.0%

40.20%27.00%

46.00%

24.40%

16.90%

15.40%

13.60%

12.20%

30.80%6.80%

5.10%

7.40%

7.20%

7.70%7.80%

31.60%

33.00%

18.30% 20.0%

24.30%

18.30%

32.00%

14.40%

20.10%

36.0%

7.50%

12.70%

4.00%

7.20%

13.90%

13.60% 16.70%8.0%

40.20%

27.00%

41.20%

24.40%

16.90%

14.70%

13.60%

12.20%

26.50%

6.80%

5.10%

8.80%7.40%

7.20%

2.90%7.80%

31.60%

5.90%

33.00%37.10% 33.60%

24.30%

27.70%26.10%

7.20%

8.10%14.30%

13.60%

2.90% 2.50%

40.20%32.20%

18.60%

24.40%

29.00%

23.70%

7.40% 8.90%

25.40%

7.80% 6.10% 5.10%

33.00%37.10%

52.30%

24.30%

27.70%

38.50%

14.40%

18.70%

9.20%

7.50%

5.50%7.20%

8.10%13.60%

2.90%

40.20%32.20%

51.30%

24.40%

29.00%

17.90%

13.60%15.40%

12.80%

6.80% 8.40%

10.30%7.40% 8.90%

7.80% 6.10% 7.70%

33.00%37.10% 35.70%

24.30%

27.70% 28.60%

14.40%

18.70%

7.10%

7.50%

5.50%21.40%7.20%

8.10%13.60%

2.90%7.10%

40.20%32.20%

66.70%

24.40%

29.00%

33.30%

13.60%15.40%

6.80% 8.40%

7.40% 8.90%

7.80% 6.10%

33.00%37.10%

32.10%

24.30%

27.70%

23.20%

14.40%

18.70%

26.80%

7.50%

5.50% 6.30%7.20%

8.10% 7.10%13.60%

2.90% 4.50%

40.20%32.20% 31.90%

24.40%

29.00%35.40%

13.60%15.40%

13.30%

6.80% 8.40%9.70%

7.40% 8.90%3.50%

7.80% 6.10% 6.20%

33.00% 31.40% 30.90%

24.30%20.00%

37.00%

14.40%

13.10%

12.30%7.50%

7.20%

7.40%7.20%

10.10%

6.20%13.60%

18.10%

6.20%

40.20%

51.50%

20.60%

24.40%

27.20%

44.10%

13.60%

8.90%

23.50%6.80%

3.50% 2.90%7.40%4.00%

7.80% 5.00% 8.80%

33.00% 31.40%

52.20%

24.30%20.00%

15.20%

7.20%

10.10%

8.70%13.60%18.10%

4.30%

40.20%

51.50% 53.60%

24.40%

27.20%32.10%

7.40%4.00%

7.80% 5.00% 3.60%

33.00% 31.40% 28.20%

24.30%20.00%

15.90%

7.20%

10.10%

11.60%

13.60%18.10%

23.80%

40.20%

51.50%58.60%

24.40%

27.20%22.10%

7.40%4.00% 5.70%

7.80% 5.00% 4.30%



Time To Case Termination - Delinquency Offenses13



Probation SupervisionJuvenile probation in Nebraska may work with youth at many stages of their court case(s), not just youth who receive a disposition of probation. The data represented is derived from 3 different samples provided by the Administrative Office of Probation through the Cognos reporting environment as well as the YRTC annual report. They are the following:

Youth Placed in OHP for FY 16-176

This population of youth are those that had an admission to an out-of-home placement (OHP) between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017. Please note: there may be duplicate placements for youth on this list due to youth having a court case in more than one county.

Youth at YRTC FY16-17Data was provided by the Youth Rehabilitation & Treatment Centers in Nebraska through their annual report numbers. These include all admittances by Service Area and County for fiscal year 2016-2017. Only counties with data were includ-ed in this report.

Youth with Discharges FY16-177

Youth that had a court case discharged during the fiscal year are included in this analysis. This includes data of youth of all ages and from all counties. All types of discharges are included (completion of pre-adjudication [which is different than traditional probation], successful and unsuccessful discharges). If a youth had more than one court case discharged in a year, they will be included multiple times within the data set. Court cases that were ultimately dismissed are not in-cluded in this data set.


Probation Supervision, continued

Out-of-Home Placements for FY 16-1714

This population of youth had an admission to an out-of-home placement (OHP) between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017.

Youth served by Juvenile Probation may be placed out-of-home for several reasons, including a court-ordered placement to receive services, a placement arranged by parents for treatment or care, or a placement related to a Department of Health and Human Services case. Juvenile Probation tracks all placements of youth who are under their supervision and out of home. This data is the number of placements by placement type for all youth out of home for the 2016-17 fiscal year.

Placements were categorized as one of the following: • Congregate non-treatment (Group Home A and B, Independent Living, Therapeutic Group Home) • Congregate treatment (Psychiatric Residential Treatment)• Crisis stabilization or shelter (Crisis Stabilization, Enhanced Shelter Care, Shelter Care)• Detention (Detention Secure, Detention Staff Secure)• Foster care/specialized homes (Developmental Disability Group Home, Developmental Disability Ex-

tended Family Home, Relative/Kinship, Respite Care)• Acute inpatient hospitalization and short-term residential (Acute Inpatient Hospitalization, Short-Term

Residential)• Jail • Missing from care (Runaway from Home, Runaway from Placement)

The tables in this report include the percent of each placement type which ended during the fiscal year and the median days the youth spent in those ended placements as well as the minimum days in placement and the maximum days in placement.



State

Youth in Placement Days in PlacementTotal Median Minimum Maximum % Ended

Congregate non-treatment 1 184.00 184 184 100.0%

Congregate treatment 1 91.00 91 91 100.0%

Crisis Stabilization or Shelter 1 6.00 6 6 100.0%

Detention 3 17.00 8 41 100.0%Foster Care/Special-

ized Homes 2 148.00 71 225 100.0%

Acute inpatient Hos-pitalization and Short

Term Residential0 n/a n/a n/a n/a

Jail 0 n/a n/a n/a n/aMissing from care 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a

Out-of-Home Placements for FY 16-1714

This population of youth that had an admission to an out-of-home placement (OHP) between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017.

Youth in Placement Days in PlacementTotal Median Minimum Maximum % Ended

Congregate non-treatment 697 106 0 434 76.2%

Congregate treatment 314 92 0 467 90.1%

Crisis Stabilization or Shelter 849 25 0 247 99.8%

Detention 1858 18 0 300 99.5%Foster Care/Special-

ized Homes 425 71 0 458 87.3%

Acute inpatient Hos-pitalization and Short

Term Residential130 4.5 0 164 100.0%

Jail 291 112 0 358 76.0%Missing from care 579 15 0 364 95.7%



Youth at YRTC FY16-1715

Data from Kearney and Geneva YRTC annual reports: Probation and courts placed 172 youth at YRTC facilities, 169 had a corresponding TEOC team and 4 youth were tribal youth. If team is not listed they did not have youth in the YRTC.

Team YRTC Location Total Youth in YRTC Team %Geneva Kearney

2.1 0 1 1 0.6%2.2 0 1 1 0.6%2.3 1 0 1 0.6%3 15 31 46 26.7%4 10 36 46 26.7%

5.1 1 0 1 0.6%5.2 1 5 6 3.5%6.1 0 5 5 2.9%6.2 0 4 4 2.3%7 1 12 13 7.6%

8.1 1 0 1 0.6%9.1 2 9 11 6.4%9.2 1 5 6 3.5%

10.1 0 2 2 1.2%10.3 0 1 1 0.6%11.1 1 2 3 1.7%11.2 1 0 1 0.6%11.3 0 1 1 0.6%11.4 3 11 14 8.1%12.3 1 3 4 2.3%

Tribal Youth 1 3 4 2.3%


Disposition54%

Investigation Only

22%

Post-Adjudication/Pre-Disposition

15%

Pre-Adjudication

6%

Pre-Sentence/Other3%

Nebraska Juvenile Probation Case Status Snapshot for 2017

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Disposition

Investigation Only

Post-Adjudication/Pre-Disposition

Pre-Adjudication

Pre-Sentence/Other

Nebraska Juvenile Probation Case Status Comparison by Year

2017 n=7033 2016 n=5498

Average Cases per Youth=1.2

69%

26%

5% n=3944Successfully Completed

UnsuccessfullyCompleted/Revoked

Other (Trans Adjudication,Death, District Override,Problem Solving Court,Straight Sentence)


Team

State

Discharge by Team Team 2.1



Discharge by Team Team 3

















Discharge by Team Team 12.3Discharge by Team Team 11.2

Discharge by Team Team 11.3Discharge by Team Team 8.1

Discharge by Team Team 7

Discharge by Team Team 1 Discharge by Team District 4

Successful59%

Unsuccessful35%

Other6% n=189

Successful66%

Unsuccessful28%

Other6%

n=50

Successful62%

Unsuccessful25%

Other13%

n=16

Successful73%

Unsuccessful13%

Other14%

n=178

Successful66%

Unsuccessful31%

Other3%

n=662

Successful68%

Unsuccessful30%

Other2%

n=803

Successful90%

Unsuccessful10%

n=89

Successful72%

Unsuccessful20%

Other8%

n=154

Successful69%

Unsuccessful22%

Other9%

n=58

Successful66%

Unsuccessful34%

n=116

Successful75%

Unsuccessful24%

Other1%

n=106

Successful72%

Unsuccessful19%

Other9%

n=193

Successful68%

Unsuccessful23%

Other9%

n=22

Successful69%

Unsuccessful22%

Other9%

n=23

Successful87%

Unsuccessful9%

Other4%

n=23

Successful82%

Unsuccessful15%

Other3%

n=322

n=90

Successful47%

Unsuccessful40%

Other13%

n=123

Successful57%

Unsuccessful29%

Other14%

n=123

Successful27%

Unsuccessful53%

Other20%

n=15

Successful71%

Unsuccessful28%

Other1%

n=149

Successful76%

Unsuccessful24%

n=29

Successful87%

Unsuccessful4% Other

9%

n=56

Successful74%

Unsuccessful24%

Other2%

n=132

Successful76%

Unsuccessful16%

Other8%

n=37

Successful88%

Unsuccessful9%

Other3%

n=33

Successful70%

Unsuccessful28%

Other2%

n=214

Successful55%

Unsuccessful34%

Other11%

Youth with Discharges FY16-1716

Youth that had a court case discharged during the fiscal year are included in this analysis. The charts show the breakdown of youth discharged from probation by court case discharge for the 2016-17 fiscal year by state and by team. Court cases that were dismissed are not included in the analysis.


11 years0%

12 years1%

13 years1%

14 years3%

15 years6%

16 years11%

17 years21%

18 years36%

19 years21%

Majority of Discharges are Older Youth, 17-18 Years Old

78%

n=3,944

Ave Age Discharge for StateProbation Supervision, continued

State

TeamAge at Discharge Total Percent14 years 4 18.2%15 years 2 9.1%16 years 1 4.5%17 years 1 4.5%18 years 5 22.7%19 years 9 40.9%

22

Average Age of Discharges FY16-1716


References1 Webber, T., Through the Eyes of a Child Team and District Nebraska State Map. (2017). Nebraska Court Improvement Project. Retrieved from: https://supremecourt.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/Programs/CIP/events/TEOC_District_Teams_Map_with_County_Seats.pdf

2 United States Census Bureau. (2017, December). [Poverty status in the past 12 months by sex by age]. Raw Data Table B1700, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.

3 United States Census Bureau. (2017, December). [Under 19 Total Population and non-Hispanic White and Minority Populations: Nebraska and Its Counties 2012-2016 timeframe]. Raw Data tables B01001 and B01001H, 2012-2016 American Community Survey. Data pulled by: David Drozd, UNO Center for Public Affairs Research on December 7, 2017. 4 Fostering Court Improvement: Nebraska. (2018, January). Children Removed to Foster Care During October 2016 through September 2017. Retrieved from: http://fosteringcourtimprovement.org/ne/

5 Fostering Court Improvement: Nebraska. (2018, January). Children in Foster Care During October 2016 through September 2017. Retrieved from: http://fosteringcourtimprovement.org/ne/

6 Administrative Office of the Courts (2017, December). [JUSTICE: Child Welfare 3(a)] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.

7 Fostering Court Improvement: Nebraska. (2018, January). Children Discharged During October 2016 through September 2017. Retrieved from: http://fosteringcourtimprovement.org/ne/

8 Nebraska DHHS. (2018, January). Exits to Reunification in less than 12 Months - Entry Cohort. Retrieved from Children’s Outcomes Measured in Protection and Safety Statistics – COMPASS: http://dhhs.ne.gov/children_family_services/Pages/COMPASS.aspx

9 Nebraska Crime Commission. (2018, January). [2016, January through December, Juvenile (0-17 yrs.) Arrests across all counties, across all agencies, for all offenses]. Retrieved from: http://www.nebraska.gov/crime_commission/arrest/arrest.cgi

10 Nebraska Crime Commission. (2018, January). [2017 Diversion data – Kids Count to include all data from 2016] Data pulled by: Amy Hoffman, Nebraska Crime Commision on January 11, 2018.

11 Nebraska Crime Commission. (2018, January). 2016 Diversion Map. Provided by Amy Hoffman: https://ncc.nebraska.gov/juvenile-diversion

12 Administrative Office of the Courts & Probation. (2017, October). [Youth with Intake FY 16-17] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.

13 Administrative Office of the Courts (2017, February). [JUSTICE: Juvenile Justice Data] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.

14 Nebraska Administrative Office of the Courts & Probation. (2017, October). [Youth Placed in OHP for FY 16-17] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.

15 Division of Children & Family Services Office of Juvenile Services. Youth Rehabilitation & Treatment Center- Kearney and Geneva (2017). Retrieved: http://dhhs.ne.gov/Reports/Youth%20Rehabilitation%20and%20Treatment%20Center%20Kearney%20Annual%20Report%20-%202016-2017.pdf as well as http://dhhs.ne.gov/Reports/Youth%20Rehabilitation%20and%20Treatment%20Center%20Kearney%20Annual%20Report%20-%202016-2017.pdf

16 Nebraska Administrative Office of the Courts & Probation. (2017, October). [Youth with Discharges FY 16-17] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.


County Rankings by Youth Poverty Rate

Appendix

Rank of child

poverty rate

Team County

Total Children

under age 18 in poverty

Poverty rate (%)

for children under age 18

n/a Nebraska 75,250 16.41 6.2 Thurston County 1,042 42.72 1 Pawnee County 195 34.73 1 Richardson County 518 30.44 12.1 Sheridan County 365 30.05 10.2w Harlan County 229 29.36 8.1 Brown County 162 26.67 11.3 Hitchcock County 154 26.38 11.3 Furnas County 277 25.89 8.3 Sherman County 158 23.8

10 8.1 Blaine County 33 22.911 11.1 Dawson County 1,480 22.812 12.1 Box Butte County 632 22.513 11.2 Keith County 362 21.914 9.1 Hall County 3,527 21.815 7 Cuming County 466 21.416 6.2 Dakota County 1,275 21.317 12.3 Scotts Bluff County 1,841 20.818 12.3 Banner County 38 20.519 8.1 Keya Paha County 30 20.420 7 Knox County 409 20.021 1 Jefferson County 311 19.822 7 Madison County 1,686 19.623 4 Douglas County 26,942 19.524 12.1 Grant County 24 19.424 11.4 McPherson County 18 19.426 6.2 Dixon County 273 19.127 11.4 Hooker County 18 18.428 1 Thayer County 194 17.829 11.4 Logan County 34 17.630 10.2w Franklin County 100 17.431 10.3e Nuckolls County 140 17.032 12.1 Morrill County 193 16.933 11.3 Red Willow County 409 16.434 3 Lancaster County 11,178 16.335 11.4 Lincoln County 1,372 16.3

Rank of child

poverty rate

Team County

Total Children


Poverty rate (%)


36 6.1 Dodge County 1,361 16.237 5.2 Colfax County 480 16.038 12.2 Deuel County 56 15.839 8.2 Valley County 145 15.640 11.2 Dundy County 56 15.441 11.4 Frontier County 79 15.342 6.2 Cedar County 320 15.143 2.2 Otoe County 555 15.044 9.2 Buffalo County 1,645 14.945 12.2 Cheyenne County 350 14.846 10.1c Adams County 1,061 14.847 10.3e Clay County 222 14.648 12.1 Sioux County 38 14.649 5.2 Saunders County 762 14.550 7 Antelope County 214 14.551 12.1 Dawes County 232 14.552 5.1 Hamilton County 315 14.453 1 Saline County 488 14.354 10.3e Fillmore County 152 13.855 1 Johnson County 134 13.756 8.2 Greeley County 80 13.757 1 Gage County 633 13.358 6.2 Washington County 647 13.359 11.2 Chase County 128 13.260 8.3 Custer County 319 12.961 1 Nemaha County 188 12.862 11.4 Thomas County 20 12.763 8.3 Loup County 13 12.464 10.1c Webster County 94 12.065 8.3 Howard County 178 11.966 5.2 Platte County 917 11.067 5.1 York County 328 10.668 12.2 Kimball County 89 10.669 6.2 Burt County 153 10.670 11.2 Perkins County 70 10.371 5.3 Nance County 84 10.3


Appendix, continued

Rank of child

poverty rate

Team County

Total Children


Poverty rate (%)


72 8.2 Holt County 248 10.273 8.2 Boyd County 47 10.174 5.2 Butler County 195 10.175 10.2w Phelps County 221 10.076 5.1 Seward County 367 9.377 5.3 Polk County 106 8.878 5.3 Merrick County 145 8.779 11.1 Gosper County 36 8.580 2.3 Sarpy County 3,961 8.381 2.1 Cass County 505 8.282 7 Stanton County 127 8.183 10.2w Kearney County 124 8.084 5.3 Boone County 95 7.785 12.2 Garden County 28 7.686 7 Wayne County 131 7.287 7 Pierce County 109 6.388 8.2 Wheeler County 9 6.289 8.1 Cherry County 68 5.890 11.3 Hayes County 9 4.691 8.1 Rock County 10 4.492 8.2 Garfield County 17 4.393 11.2 Arthur County 1 0.7



Nebraska Court Improvement Project5001 Central Park Drive, Suite 200

Lincoln, NE 68504

(402) 471-2864

[email protected]

Documents

2016-2017 - Nebraska Supreme Court...2016-2017 Nebraska Court Improvement Project Data Report DISTRICT 8 Team 8.1 Blaine, Brown, Cherry, Keya Paha and Rock Counties. ... T o t a l