2017 Glenmore Landfill Annual Report Operational ... · Operational Certificate 12218 Annual Report 2017 March 15, 2018 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this annual report is

Operational Certificate 12218 Annual Report 2017 March 15, 2018

2017 Glenmore Landfill Annual Report Operational Certificate MR 12218

EMS reference # E104956

Operational Certificate 12218 Annual Report 2017 March 15, 2018 2

Table of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3

2. STATISTICS .................................................................................................................... 4

3. OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR NEXT 12 MONTHS (SECTION 8, CSDP) ....................... 4

4. DATA AND INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 7

5. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................11


1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The purpose of this annual report is to provide information relevant to Operational Certificate MR 12218 for the Glenmore Landfill for the year 2017. Under the provisions of the Waste Management Act and in accordance with the approved Regional District of Central Okanagan Solid Waste Management Plan, the City of Kelowna is authorized to manage recyclable materials and to discharge waste to the ground at the Glenmore Landfill, located at 2720 John Hindle Drive, in the City of Kelowna.

The City of Kelowna’s most current Comprehensive Site Development Plan (CSDP) was used as guidance for the development and operation of the Glenmore Landfill. Section 8 of the CSDP is the basis of the operating plan and Section 9 forms the closure plan. Based on the projected waste volumes and filling plan, the landfill is expected to be operational until the year 2079. Based on the updated Landfill Operational Certificate in 2015 and the BC Ministry of Environment Landfill Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste (Second Edition – June 2016), the City of Kelowna retained GHD Canada in 2016 to perform a GAP Analysis of the current CSDP and supplemental studies in comparison to the requirements of the 2016 Criteria. This GAP Analysis was completed in early 2017. GHD Canada was then retained in late 2017 to develop an updated Design, Operations and Closure Plan (DOCP) to replace the existing CSDP. This work started in late 2017 and is scheduled for completion in Q3 2018. The updated DOCP will identify any tasks needed to address the Landfill Criteria Upgrading Plan and ensure compliance with the revised 2016 Criteria. The estimated population contributing to the municipal solid waste handled at the Glenmore Landfill in 2017 was 199,015 based on the BC Government Statistics website (https://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/apps/PopulationEstimates.aspx accessed on February 24, 2018). This population produced a total of 151,456 tonnes of waste (including hydrocarbon contaminated soil) that was deposited at the Glenmore Landfill in 2017. In addition to this volume of waste disposed, an additional 49,127 tonnes of organics and 18,856 tonnes of recyclable such as concrete, shingles, metal, etc. was recycled for a diversion rate of 31.0% at the Glenmore Landfill in 2017. In 2017 the volumes of contaminated soils and waste from the Central Okanagan Wastewater Treatment Plant located in West Kelowna dropped significantly from 2016. These waste volume reductions were offset by an increase in construction/demolition debris due to regional development, and waste generated by the 2017 Okanagan flood event. It is expected that a small amount of waste is likely being imported from out of region due to the higher tipping fees in neighbouring regions. Tipping fees were reviewed as part of the overall site development and 10-year Capital Plan and have been adjusted in 2018.

https://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/apps/PopulationEstimates.aspx


2. STATISTICS

The City of Kelowna Glenmore Landfill and Administration Building are located as 2720 John Hindle Drive, Kelowna, BC V1V 2C5. The Scale House has a civic address of 2710 John Hindle Drive. a. Table 1 - Discharge Quantity (tonnes):

Year Amount Discharged 2013 108,917 2014 123,178 2015 136,115 2016 154,510 2017 151,456

b. Table 2 - Service Population

Year Population 2013 186,417 2014 190,099 2015 193,936 2016 197,018 2017 199,015

Service population data is obtained annually from the BC Statistics Population Estimates of the Central Okanagan Regional District. c. Table 3 - Waste Discharge Rate (tonnes/capita):

Year Waste Discharge Rate (tonnes/capita) 2013 0.58 2014 0.65 2015 0.70 2016 0.78 2017 0.76

d. Authorized design volume: An updated Fill Plan was prepared for the City of Kelowna by CH2M Hill in 2014. This design did not change the waste footprint from previous designs, but did update the design of the side slopes, height elevations, and contours to increase the remaining design volume to approximately 40,000,000m3 as of 2014. This design meets Criteria in the 2016 BC Landfill Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste and is the basis for the updated DOCP. e. Remaining Site Life and Capacity: Based on the current waste generation volumes and filling plan options, the landfill is expected to be operational until approximately 2079. This will be reviewed and updated in the 2018 DOCP. f. Complaints The landfill received 16 service requests related to landfill operations in 2016. Three of these requests were complaints related to customer service issues. The remaining requests were related to waste pick up, or questions regarding recycling and composting. Any additional complaints were received by phone or in person were not tabulated. Typically, issues in the Service Request System were addressed with 2 business days.


3. OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR NEXT 12 MONTHS (Section 8, CSDP) a. Operational and Filling Plan Landfilling will occur in the Phase 2 area during most of 2018. Two lifts will be placed, and then operations will return to Phase 1 and proceed in a north to south direction across Phase 1. More than 200,000 tonnes of clean fill was also received in 2017 and used as cover or placed into the soil stockpile. Indications are that a similar volume should be expected in 2018. Planning and design work is underway for the demolition and decommissioning of the historical Glenmore Road entrance in late 2018 or early 2019. Once demolition is completed, and the leachate infrastructure is installed, filling operations will begin in this area in 2019. b. Landfilling Method The area method will be used to place and compact waste in cells of approximately 12,000 m3. A 0.3-meter intermediate soil cover will be applied on the lift and alternate daily cover will be applied on the working face. Wastes will be spread in thin layers (0.6 meters or less) and compacted. Compaction will be achieved using a Tana E525 landfill compactor, with a CAT 836H Compactor as back-up. c. Glengrow The production of Glengrow compost is located at the 10-hectare site constructed to the south of the Phase 3 area of the landfill. Stockpiling and grinding of yard waste feed stock is still accomplished in the receiving area east of Phase 2. Plans are in the works for relocating the organics and recyclable receiving area adjacent the composting facility to the south of the Phase 3 slough. d. Controls

Litter will be controlled by compaction of the waste and minimizing the working face. Fencing for litter control is placed around the fill area as required.

Dust control will continue by applying water and seeding of exposed areas. Vector control will continue by using a combination of distress calls, harassment

and daily cover. A falconer continues to assist in reducing the impact of nuisance birds.

Mud control for internal roads will be accomplished through the construction and maintenance of all-weather access roads to the working face. Crushed shale and ground up wood chips will be used as a pad at the tipping area. A wheel wash system is in place to minimize mud tracking coming off site.

Weeds have been mitigated primarily by mowing. Visual aesthetics have been addressed by the planting of additional trees and

shrubs in the new berm along John Hindle Drive and on the hillside to the east of the residential drop off transfer station. Additional planting projects are scheduled for 2018 along John Hindle Drive. Further landscaping along the western side of the landfill along Glenmore Road will be evaluated in future years.

e. Heavy Equipment Utilized for Landfill Operations

Caterpillar 836H Landfill Compactor TANA E525 Landfill Compactor Case 921 FXR Front End Loader Dressta TD-20M Dozer Komatsu 200 Excavator Two 3100 International Roll-off bin trucks Komatsu WA 380 Front End Loader


f. Landfill Personnel

8 Equipment Operators 9 Landfill Attendants/Spotter 4 Landfill Technicians 1 full time and 3-part time Scale Operators 2 Supervisors 1 Operations Clerk

g. Scale House Operations The City installed two unattended scale terminals on the outer inbound and outbound scales in 2015. These two scales were automated with radio frequency identification (RFID) access cards and control gates that allow high volume commercial haulers to access the landfill. The system was rolled out in 2016 using a staged approach, and by the fourth quarter the five largest haulers were using this system. This unattended scale program is scheduled to expand in 2018. From the Spring to Fall of 2017, the unattended scales are converted to manual operations on weekends to improve traffic flow for residential drop off.


4. DATA AND INFORMATION

a. Waste Reduction Accomplishments Table 4 - Material Diverted from Landfill Disposal Onsite (tonnes)

Year Material Diverted 2013 60,569 2014 49,774 2015 44,808 2016 66,506 2017 67,983

Most of the material diverted (49,127 tonnes) was organics such as yard waste, prunings and clean construction wood waste. These organic wastes are composted onsite and sold as soil conditioner known as GlenGrow. Clean dimensional lumber was supplied to Tolko Industries in exchange for hog fuel that was utilized in the production of OgoGrow, a biosolids based compost produced at another City of Kelowna facility. Treated and painted lumber is chipped and beneficially re-used on site as padding material for mud control. Slightly higher volumes of concrete and asphalt were received in 2017 than had been received in previous years. This is consistent with the increase in construction and demolition debris that has been received. A total of 6295 tonnes of drywall were received at the Glenmore Landfill in 2017. A significant volume of drywall is currently being stockpiled at the site due to changes in the receiving requirements for the recycling companies. More restrictive receiving conditions by recyclers are creating a challenging process for acceptance of this material at the landfill, and the City is working to find additional recycling capacity. Operational changes may be required in 2018 to achieve diversion of this waste stream. b. Leachate Management The leachate collection system at the Glenmore Landfill consists of gravity drains that feed two leachate lift stations shown on Figure 2 of the attached 2017 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report, Golder Associates, February 21, 2018. Leachate is treated at the north sewer lift station constructed in 2016 on the landfill site with Bioxide to address potentially elevated hydrogen sulfide levels. The sewage/leachate mixture is also aerated and odours are treated by a Biorem Multi-Stage Biofilter. The treated sewage/leachate is discharged into the municipal sanitary sewer system on Glenmore Road and is ultimately treated at the City’s Wastewater Treatment Facility. Leachate is no longer discharged to the sewer force main to the Quail Ridge subdivision as of November 2016. Leachate discharge volumes increased in 2017 due to elevated water levels from flooding and increased leachate levels. Discharge volumes are summarized in the table below.


Table 5 – Leachate Discharge to Waste Water Treatment Facility (WWTF) in m3

Year Quantity Discharged 2013 28,690 2014 52,057 2015 42,749 2016 40,998 2017 82,367

c. Leachate Recirculation The purpose of leachate recirculation is to collect the water from beneath the landfill which is pumped back into covered waste cells through landfill gas collection trenches in Phase 1. The concept is that the recirculated leachate will increase the in-situ moisture content of the waste. This would further encourage anaerobic decomposition in the buried waste cells, generating increased amounts of methane (and other landfill gases) which would result in increased throughput of landfill gas to the FORTIS BC Biogas Plant. A potential added benefit of the accelerated decomposition of in-situ waste is that the decomposing material will take up less volume in the landfill. The resulting subsidence would ultimately provide increased air space for continued landfilling activities. No leachate was re-circulated in 2017. The leachate recirculation system in Phase 1 along with a Recirculation Operations Manal were completed in late 2017. A small number of recirculation runs will be operated in 2018 in a phased approach, and the changes in the quality of the landfill gas will be evaluated. d. Landfill Gas Review The 2017 highlights related to the landfill gas management system included the installation of 2 new horizontal collector runs consisting of 215m of new pipe. While a minimal number of new collectors were added, significant gas infrastructure work was completed with an upgraded 500mm landfill gas header pipe installed and connected. A number of collector pipes installed in previous years had final connections completed in conjunction with the upgraded header pipe.

Table 6 – 2017 Landfill Gas Volume Summary Flare Flow Total 59,588,620 SCF = 1,687,565 m3 Fortis BC Biogas Plant Flow 64,295,300 SCF = 1,820,881m3 Total LFG Destroyed from Flare/Biogas Plant combined

123,883,920 SCF = 3,508,446 m3

Methane captured based on 50% methane by volume

1,754,233 m3 = 1170 tonnes

Emission reduction (tonnes of CO2) 24,572 Collection Efficiency (%) 76

Successful trials of the FORTIS BC Biogas Plant were performed in Q1 of 2017. Additional optimization and integration with the existing Landfill Flare System has continued throughout the year and almost 52% of the total landfill gas recovered was beneficially reused. Due to required infrastructure repairs, the FORTIS system was shut down in December 2017 and is expected to again be operational in Q2 of 2018. Landfill gas will continue to be flared as the backup to the Biogas Plant.


Due to the many upgrades repairs and maintenance to the system and Biogas Plant system testing the following are estimates of downtime from available data from our SCADA system and available data provided from Fortis Gas. The Landfill Gas Management System had 24 evening callouts and a total downtime of 146 hours. The majority of this downtime was scheduled for the connection of the 500mm landfill gas header. This downtime is approximately 1.7% of total operations time compared to 177 hours (2.0%) downtime in 2016.

The details of the flare efficiency and overall collection efficiency for the LFG system can be found in the Landfill Gas Collection Efficiency Study completed by CH2M Hill of Calgary, AB. This Study is based on the model and requirements of the BC Landfill Gas Facilities Design Guidelines, 2010, and is appended to this report. (2017 Landfill Gas Collection Efficiency Study – Glenmore Landfill Site, March 5, 2018).

Landfill gas was monitored monthly in all buildings within 300m of buried waste, monthly in perimeter vapour probes and at a minimum monthly at gas wellheads in compliance with the requirements of the Landfill Gas Management Regulation. Gas quality at the flare and upstream of the FORTIS Biogas Plant was monitored on a continual basis.

e. Northeast Storm Water Pond The Northeast Pond and surrounding shallow pond structures were historically constructed to control storm water runoff and act as an alternate habitat for the American Avocet that is currently breeding and foraging on the south end of the landfill. The Avocet are a blue listed bird species in British Columbia which classifies them as not immediately threatened but of special concern. The existing plans to create Avocet habitat onsite requires review in light of the revised Landfill Fill Plan, long term development plans and challenges of the present location. An updated Avocet Habitat Enhancement and Rehabilitation Design was completed in 2017. The scope of the project was to assess existing and future options for alternate Avocet habitat off the landfill site. Additional comments have been provided to the Consultant and a revised final version of this report will be provided to the City in early 2018. f. Groundwater Groundwater sampling events took place in May and September of 2017 as per the recommendations of the 2016 Annual Report. Certain wells that could not be accessed due to localized flooding were sampled in June or July. Selected redundant or unused groundwater monitoring wells were decommissioned as per the recommendations of Golder Associates.

Wells were monitored quarterly for water elevations and sampled semi-annually for the parameters of concern by Landfill Environmental Technologists. Analytical data reporting and corresponding interpretation was completed by Golder Associates of Kelowna, BC and their findings are appended to this report (2017 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report, Golder Associates, February 21, 2018). As noted in the report, no significant changes were noted at the Site in 2017 with respect to the water levels and water quality.


g. Surface Water The four onsite surface water ponds were sampled in April, June, September and November 2017. Analytical results may be found in Table 8 of the attached report (2017 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report, Golder Associates, February 21, 2018).

One of the ponds has been used as an irrigation source. Based upon recommendations from Golder Associates, until a Risk Assessment is completed, water levels were not pumped below a specified elevation to reduce the risk of leachate from being drawn into the pond. This Risk Assessment was initiated in late 2017 to assist with future surface water management options. As noted in the Golder report, all surface water is contained on the landfill property. h. Leachate Sampling As required in the operational certificate, leachate samples were collected at three locations on the Landfill site in March, June, September and December 2017. Samples were representative of Phase 1, Phase 2 and leachate prior to Bioxide treatment and aeration. Analytical results may be found in Table 9 of the attached report (2017 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report, Golder Associates, February 21, 2018). i. Hydrogeological Review No additional hydrogeological investigations or reviews were completed in 2017. j. Vegetation Analysis Observations of vegetation at the landfill perimeter were conducted monthly. There were no visible indications of adverse effects on plants due to leachate or landfill gas migrating to the root zones. The landscaped berm along Glenmore Road lost the majority of the trees due to a failure in the irrigation system. This section of landscaping will be replaced when internal road alignment work is addressed in the next two to four years. k. Remedial Activities In 2016 there was a remediation of a sewer line leak in the north east corner of the landfill property (BC Ministry of Environment DGIR File # 160621). Historically, portions of this area had been used to manage biosolids sludge. As part of the remedial activities, the City monitored selected groundwater wells in the area in 2017 to evaluate the effectiveness of the remedial works and will continue to monitor these wells in 2018. The l. Financial Security Section 11 and Table 11.2 of CSDP details costs. The City of Kelowna bases its financial systems upon 10-year capital plans, revenue generation and on a 20-year Official Community Plan (growth). As in previous years, excess revenues were deposited into a reserve fund that will be used to develop the site for infrastructure and capital costs for items such as leachate, landfill gas, and water management systems, and to cover the cost of landfill closure and post closure. A review of the ongoing Financial Security for Closure and Post Closure costs shall be completed while updating the DOCP to meet the requirements of the Second Edition of Landfill Criteria For Municipal Solid Waste (June 2016). Tipping fee rates have been scheduled for adjustment in 2018, 2019 and 2020 to ensure funding for capital projects, and to address the contributions to the Closure/Post-Closure Fund.


5. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 2017 ANNUAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT, Golder Associates, February 21, 2018 2017 LANDFILL GAS COLLECTION EFFICIENCY STUDY – GLENMORE LANDFILL SITE, CH2M Hill, March 5, 2018 2017 DGIR File # 160621 GROUNDWATER RESULTS – City of Kelowna, March 15, 2018

ATTACHMENT 1

2017 ANNUAL

WATER QUALITY

MONITORING

REPORT

Golder Associates

February 21, 2018

21 February 2018

GLENMORE LANDFILL, KELOWNA, BC

2017 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report

REP

OR

T

Report Number: 1782325-001-R-Rev0

Distribution:

1 e-copy - City of Kelowna 1 e-copy - Golder Associates Ltd.

Submitted to:City of Kelowna 1435 Water Street Kelowna, BC V1Y 1J4 Attention: Landfill Supervisor

2017 ANNUAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT

21 February 2018 Report No. 1782325-001-R-Rev0 i

Study Limitations

This report was prepared by Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder) for the exclusive use of the City of Kelowna (the City) and the Environmental Protection Division of the BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (ENV) with respect to satisfying the annual reporting requirements of the City of Kelowna Operational Certificate (OC) 12218. Any use that a third party may make of this report, or any reliance on or decisions made based on it, is the responsibility of the third parties. We disclaim responsibility for consequential financial effects on transactions or property values, or requirements for follow-up actions and costs.

Except where specifically stated to the contrary, the information contained in this report (including reports, information and data) was provided to Golder by others, and has not been independently verified or otherwise examined by Golder to determine its accuracy of completeness. Golder has relied in good faith on this information and does not accept responsibility of any deficiency, misstatements or inaccuracies contained in the report as a result of omissions, misinterpretation and/or fraudulent acts of the persons interviewed or contacted, or errors or omissions in the reviewed documentation. We accept no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy contained in this report as a result of omissions, misinterpretations or fraudulent acts of persons interviewed or contacted.

The findings, interpretations and conclusions are based solely on the Site conditions observed by City staff while at the property. The data presented in this report represent the groundwater conditions at the sampling locations tested. Conditions may vary with location, depth, sampling, methodology, analytical techniques and other factors.

The services performed as described in this report were conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill normally exercised by other members of the engineering and science professions currently practising under similar conditions, subject to the time limits and financial and physical constraints applicable to the services. The content of this report is based on information collected during our monitoring program, our present understanding of Site conditions, the assumptions stated in this report, and our professional judgement in light of such information at the time of this report. This report provides a professional opinion and, therefore, no warranty is expressed, implied, or made as to the conclusions, advice and recommendations offered in this report. This report does not provide a legal opinion regarding compliance with applicable laws. With respect to regulatory compliance issues, it should be noted that regulatory statutes and the interpretation of regulatory statutes are subject to change. The findings and conclusions of this report are valid only as of the date of the report. If new information is discovered in future work, or if the assumptions stated in this report are not met, Golder should be requested to re-evaluate the conclusions of this report, and to provide amendments as required.

The information, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report are for the sole benefit of the City and ENV. No other party may use or rely on this report or any portion thereof without Golder’s express written consent. Golder will consent to any reasonable request by the City to approve the use of this report by other parties as Approved Users. The report, all plans, data, drawings and other documents as well as all electronic media prepared by Golder are considered its professional work product and shall remain the copyright property of Golder, who authorizes only the City and Approved Users to make copies of the report, and only in such quantities as are reasonably necessary for the use of the report by those parties. The City and Approved Users may not give, lend, sell, or otherwise make available the report or any portion thereof to any other party without the express written permission of Golder, except as required by law. The City acknowledges that electronic media is susceptible to unauthorized modification, deterioration and incompatibility and therefore the City cannot rely upon the electronic media versions of Golder’s report or other work products.


21 February 2018 Report No. 1782325-001-R-Rev0 ii

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 DEFINITION OF SITE FOR REPORTING PURPOSES ........................................................................................ 1

3.0 2017 SCOPE OF WORK ....................................................................................................................................... 1

4.0 ADDITIONAL SITE WORKS – BY CITY ............................................................................................................... 3

5.0 GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER ASSESSMENT CRITERIA.............................................................. 4

6.0 PHYSICAL HYDROGEOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 5

7.0 GROUNDWATER GEOCHEMISTRY .................................................................................................................... 6

7.1 Tabulated Data ......................................................................................................................................... 6

7.2 Groundwater Quality ................................................................................................................................. 6

7.2.1 Field Observations .............................................................................................................................. 6

7.2.2 Moderate to High Leachate Monitoring Wells ..................................................................................... 7

7.2.3 Total Non-Chlorinated Phenols ........................................................................................................... 8

7.2.4 Low to Minimal Leachate-Impacted Monitoring Wells ......................................................................... 8

7.2.5 Comparison to Background Groundwater Quality ............................................................................... 9

7.2.6 Comparison to Federal Drinking Water Quality Guidelines ................................................................. 9

8.0 SURFACE WATER GEOCHEMISTRY .................................................................................................................. 9

9.0 LEACHATE CHEMISTRY .................................................................................................................................... 10

10.0 RESULTS OF QA/QC PROGRAM ...................................................................................................................... 11

11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 11

12.0 PROPOSED 2018 MONITORING PROGRAM .................................................................................................... 11

12.1 Groundwater Elevations ......................................................................................................................... 11

12.2 Groundwater Quality ............................................................................................................................... 12

12.3 Surface Water Quality ............................................................................................................................. 12

12.4 Leachate Quality ..................................................................................................................................... 13

12.5 Data Analysis and Reporting .................................................................................................................. 13

13.0 CLOSURE ............................................................................................................................................................ 13


21 February 2018 Report No. 1782325-001-R-Rev0 iii

TABLES (WITHIN TEXT)

Table 1: Summary of Sampling Locations and Analyses in 2017 .................................................................................... 2

TABLES (AFTER TEXT)

Table 2a: Groundwater Elevations

Table 2b: Surface Water Elevations

Table 3: General Parameters in Groundwater

Table 4: Dissolved Metals in Groundwater

Table 5: PAHs and Phenols in Groundwater

Table 6: Parameters in Groundwater at GL28 Well Series Compared to CDWQG

Table 7: QA/QC - Groundwater

Table 8: Parameters in Surface Water

Table 9: Leachate Quality

FIGURES (AFTER TEXT)

Figure 1: Site Plan

Figure 2: Key Plan

Figure 3: Groundwater Contours

Figure 4A: Water Elevations South End

Figure 4B: Water Elevations South

Figure 4C: Water Elevations Centre A

Figure 4D: Water Elevations Centre B

Figure 4E: Water Elevations North

Figure 4F: Water Elevations Northeast

No table of figures entries found.

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A MoE Operation Certificate 12218

APPENDIX B Methodology and Quality Assurance/Quality Control


21 February 2018 Report No. 1782325-001-R-Rev0 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This technical report, prepared for the City of Kelowna (City) by Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder), summarizes the results of the 2017 annual water quality monitoring program conducted at the Glenmore Landfill in Kelowna, BC (Figure 1). The purpose of the 2017 annual monitoring program is to satisfy the general water quality monitoring requirements of the City’s Operational Certificate (OC), provided in Appendix A; and to address recommendations made by the BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (ENV) in their letter to the City entitled “Glenmore Landfill Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2004-2009 and Groundwater Monitoring Report for 2010–MR-1228–Ministry Comments”, dated 25 May 2011 (refer to Golder, 2016a1).

2.0 DEFINITION OF SITE FOR REPORTING PURPOSES

The Glenmore Landfill consists of the following four main areas: Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 (slough) and the Compost Facility (Figure 2). For reporting purposes, the Site, as defined in this report, encompasses Phase 1, Bredin Pond, Bredin Hill, Northeast Pond and area to the northeast, Phase 2, Tutt Pond, Phase 3, the Compost Facility and lands to the immediate north of Phase 1 and to the immediate south of Phase 3. The Site boundaries are generally consistent with the Site boundaries represented in the City’s OC (refer to the amended Site Plan on page 13 of 14 of the OC provided in Appendix A). In this report, where appropriate, Phases 1, 2 and 3 have also been collectively referred to as the Landfill Footprint. The extents of the Site do not represent legal boundaries.

Several monitoring wells are located outside of the Site extents and are referred to as being located off-Site (in the direction noted). These include: GL15 well series, located west-southwest of the Site and Landfill Footprint; GL28 well series, located south of the Site and Landfill Footprint; and 06BH and 09BH well series wells located further south and southeast of the Site and Landfill. The 06BH and 09BH well series are owned by the University of British Columbia (UBC); the City is authorized by UBC to conduct monitoring and sampling of groundwater at the wells.

The Site setting is described in detail in Golder (2016a).

3.0 2017 SCOPE OF WORK

Recommendations for the 2017 monitoring and sampling program were made in Golder’s annual report for 20162, and were outlined in a subsequent work plan to the City3.

A total of 82 wells were monitored for water levels in 2017, and select locations listed in Table 1 below were sampled for water quality in 2017. Sampling locations are shown on Figure 2. Sampling methodologies and quality assurance/quality control procedures are provided in Appendix B. The field program was conducted by City Landfill staff.

1 Report entitled “2015 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report, Glenmore Landfill, Kelowna, BC”, dated 4 March 2016 (Golder, 2016a). 2 Report entitled “2016 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report, Glenmore Landfill, Kelowna, BC”, dated 27 January 2017 (Golder, 2017). 3 Work Plan entitled “Work Plan and Cost Estimate for Preparing the 2017 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Glenmore Landfill,

Kelowna, BC”, dated 17 October 2017.



Table 1: Summary of Sampling Locations and Analyses in 2017

Groundwater Sampling

Spring Sampling Event (following spring freshet)

Wells

North GL0-1, GL0-2, GL0-3 and GL3-5 Groundwater samples to be analyzed for dissolved metals, pH, alkalinity, hardness, chemical oxygen demand (COD), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total dissolved solids (TDS), anions*, and nutrients**. Groundwater samples at GL6-1 (2011), GL3-5, and GL18-2 to be analysed for hydrogen sulphide, and groundwater sample at GL6-1 (2011) to be analyzed for individual non-chlorinated phenol concentrations

Northeast of Phase 1 GL23-1

Phase 2 GL2-1, GL5-2, GL6-1 (2011) and GL18-2

Phase 3 GL9-1, GL9-3 and GL35-3 South GL12-1 and GL29-1

Southwest GL16-1, GL27-1, GL27-3 and GL17-1

Down-gradient of Site GL2801, GL28-2, GL28-3, 09BH06D and 09BH03

Fall Sampling Event

Wells

South GL12-1, GL29-1

As above. Southwest GL27-1, GL17-1, GL15-1 and GL15-2

Down-gradient of Site GL28-1, GL28-2 and GL28-3 Surface Water Sampling

Ponds

Northwest Corner of Site: Bredin Pond Bi-annual surface water sampling from Bredin Pond, Northeast Pond and the Slough, and quarterly sampling from Tutt Pond; sampling to be conducted at the same time as the groundwater sampling events. Surface water samples to be analyzed for total metals, pH, conductivity, alkalinity, hardness, COD, total organic carbon (TOC), TDS, total suspended solids (TSS), anions*, nutrients** (including total kjeldahl nitrogen, total phosphorus), total/fecal coliforms.

West side of Site: Tutt Pond

Northeast Corner of Site: Northeast Pond

Central Portion of Site: Slough (Phase 3)

Leachate Sampling

Manholes

West Side of Phase 1: MH3 (“N Pumphouse Manhole”)

Quarterly leachate sampling from each leachate collection manhole; sampling to be conducted at the same time as the groundwater sampling events. Leachate samples to be analyzed for pH, alkalinity, hardness, TDS, DOC, COD, anions*, sulphide, nutrients** (including phosphorus), dissolved metals, volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, light/heavy extractable petroleum hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes, and volatile petroleum hydrocarbons.

Southwest Corner of Phase 1: MH1 (“P1 Leachate Manhole”)

Southwest Corner of Phase 2: Wet well (“S Leachate Wet Well”).

1. Refer to Golder (2017) for detailed recommendations for the 2017 program. 2. Field parameters (pH, conductivity, temperature, re-dox potential and dissolved oxygen) to be measured during sampling. 3. A minimum of 10% field duplicates should be collected during each sampling program (refer to Golder 2017). * Anions include: bromide, chloride, fluoride, and sulphate. ** Nutrients include: ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, orthophosphate.



Minor changes were made to scope of work for 2017, as follows:

No groundwater samples were taken from GL3-5 during the spring and fall events, as the well appeared to have been plugged at a depth of approximately 13.5 m below top of casing.

GL27-3 and GL35-3 were sampled during the fall field program only, as the wells were inaccessible in the spring due to flooding.

As a result of construction and farming activities that occurred in the area of the GL28 series wells in mid-2017, the GL28 series wells were inaccessible during the spring event and were therefore sampled approximately 2 months after all other wells were sampled.

This technical report evaluates whether leachate from the Landfill is potentially migrating off-Site and identifies any significant changes noted within the Landfill footprint, based on an evaluation of 2017 water level and water quality data for the Site and off-Site areas. Previous water level and water quality data obtained prior to 2017 were considered in this evaluation; however, only significant findings are reported herein.

4.0 ADDITIONAL SITE WORKS – BY CITY

In addition to the monitoring program outlined above, the following additional Site work was conducted in 2017.

A water elevation marker was installed in Tutt Pond to provide a visual indication of the low water mark during pumping. A red cap was suspended in the water near the pump house at an elevation of 437.5 metres above sea level (masl) (437.5 masl was the lowest elevation recommended by Golder4). It was reported by the City that approximately 26 US Megagallons (US MG) was pumped out of Tutt Pond from early July to mid-September 2017; and that Tutt Pond was not drawn below an elevation of 437.5 masl during pumping in 2017.

The top-of-pipe elevation of 09BH07 was re-surveyed by City staff on 21 December 2017. The City informed Golder that all water levels measured at 09BH07 on and after 16 September 2016 should be referenced to this new geodetic elevation. The new elevation has been incorporated into the appropriate tables and charts of this report.

In response to the City’s request to identify and decommission monitoring wells across the Landfill that are no longer required for groundwater monitoring purposes, including those in areas where more than one monitoring well has been installed within a similar stratigraphic unit5, decommissioning of select wells was conducted by Golder/City staff on 30 August 2017as follows:

Well GL21-1: the well box (i.e., steel casing protecting the PVC monitoring well pipe) and PVC well pipe were removed by the City using a front-end loader. The borehole was then drilled out to a depth of 3.4 m

4 Golder’s report entitled “Surface Water and Groundwater Management Strategy, City of Kelowna Glenmore Landfill”, dated 21 July 2016

(Golder, 2016c). 5 Golder provided a work plan to the City for well decommissioning entitled “Work Plan to Decommission Select Monitoring Wells at the City of

Kelowna Glenmore Landfill”, dated 23 August 2016 (Golder, 2016b).



below ground surface (mbgs) using Golder’s solid stem auger rig. After the drill augers were removed, the subsurface clays expanded into the borehole annulus to a depth of 1.0 mbgs. Bentonite chips were used to backfill the hole from a depth of 1.0 mbgs up to 0.1 mbgs; bentonite chips were hydrated with water. Topsoil was used to backfill the hole from a depth of 0.1 mbgs to surface.

Well GL37: the well box and PVC well pipe were removed by the City using a front-end loader. The borehole was then drilled out to a depth of 6.0 mbgs using Golder’s solid stem auger rig. After the drill augers were removed, the subsurface clays expanded into the borehole annulus to a depth of 2.0 mbgs. Bentonite chips were used to backfill the hole from a depth of 2.0 mbgs up to 0.1 mbgs; bentonite chips were hydrated with water. Topsoil was used to backfill the hole from a depth of 0.1 mbgs to surface.

Well GL38: the well box and PVC well pipe were removed by the City using a front-end loader; however, during removal, the 4” diameter PVC well pipe broke at a depth of approximately 2.4 mbgs and therefore the entire length of well pipe could not be removed in this manner. Bentonite pellets were added into the well pipe that remained in the ground, from a depth of approximately 6.5 mbgs up to 2.4 mbgs. Bentonite chips were used to backfill the hole from a depth of 2.4 mbgs up to 0.1 mbgs; bentonite chips were hydrated with water. Topsoil was used to backfill the hole from a depth of 0.1 mbgs to surface.

Attempts were made to decommission the wells in accordance with recommendations made in Golder (2016b); however, due to the clay expansion into the borehole annulus following drilling at GL21-1 and GL37 and breakage of the well pipe at GL38 during its removal, appropriate field modifications to the recommended decommissioning methods were made. Notwithstanding the field modifications, the wells were decommissioned in general accordance with the BC Groundwater Protection Regulation (B.C. Reg. 39/2016; deposited 29 February 2016).

GL18-3 was damaged in November 2017 by equipment that hit the outer protective steel casing. The City informed Golder that the PVC well pipe inside the steel casing was not damaged, and a new steel valve box was subsequently installed by the City to protect the well pipe.

5.0 GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

Water quality data collected in 2017 were tabulated by Golder and compared to applicable criteria, as follows. Refer to Golder (2016a) for a detailed discussion on applicable criteria:

The CSR AW6 standards were used in the comparison of all groundwater quality.

The BCWQG AW7 guidelines were used in the comparison of:

Groundwater quality at GL23-1; this well is located up-gradient of Northeast Pond with respect to the groundwater flow direction in that area of the Site.

6 BC Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR) (B.C. Reg. 375/96 O.C. 1480/96, includes amendments up to B.C. Reg. 184/2016, 19 July 2016),

including the Stage 10 and 11 amendments effective 1 November 2017 for freshwater aquatic life (AW) standards. 7 BC Water Quality Guidelines in “British Columbia Approved Water Quality Guidelines: Aquatic Life, Wildlife & Agriculture, Summary Report”

dated January 2017 (BCAWQG) and “Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia (June 2017)” (BCWWQG) (collectively referred to as BCWQG) for freshwater aquatic life (AW).



Groundwater quality at the GL28, 09BH03 and 09BH06 well series; these wells represent the most down-gradient wells located between the Landfill and Little Robert/Robert Lake.

Surface water quality at Northeast Pond.

The CSR IW8 standards and BCWQG IW9 guidelines were applied to groundwater quality and surface water quality, as Tutt Pond, and previously Bredin Pond, are used for irrigation purposes.

As per ENV requirements, water quality from samples obtained at the most down-gradient wells available (GL28 well series) were compared to “Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality” (GCDWQ; February 2017), published by Health Canada on behalf of the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water.

Water quality collected from the GL28 well series were compared to the groundwater quality data at wells inferred to potentially represent background groundwater quality (i.e., GL0-1, GL0-2, 09BH03).

6.0 PHYSICAL HYDROGEOLOGY

Groundwater elevations measured in 2017 are summarized in Table 2a, attached, along with historical groundwater elevations dating back to February 2005. Surface water elevations measured in 2017 are summarized in Table 2b, attached.

Using select groundwater elevations measured at on-Site and off-Site monitoring wells on 5 June 2017, the general groundwater flow direction was from the north portions of the Site, and inward from the east and west sides of the Site, with groundwater generally flowing in a southerly direction across, and off, the Site (Figure 3 – Groundwater Contours).

Trends in groundwater elevations observed between May 2009 and November 2017 are shown on Figures 4a through Figures 4f. Seasonally, groundwater elevations were generally the highest in June 2017, likely due to increases in recharge to groundwater originating from snowmelt and heavy rains in the early to middle part of 2017 and were the lowest in September 2017, after a prolonged period of lower recharge. However, a number of wells exhibited lower groundwater elevations in June 2017 relative to March 2017. This may be due to pumping out of Tutt Pond from early July to mid-September (GL2-1 and GL20-1) and/or influences from Northeast Pond (GL4 series and GL23-1). Water levels in the GL0 series continued to increase after June 2017, potentially indicative of an additional source of recharge following spring freshet/flooding (i.e., surface water runoff10 or irrigation). In general, the Okanagan Valley experienced local flooding events in May and June 2017 as a result of heavy rainfalls combined with spring freshet. The City noted corresponding high water levels in the Phase 3 slough, which had resulted in flooding around many of the well casings (i.e., GL32 series, GL35 series, GL10-1). Flooding also occurred around additional well casings outside of Phase 3 in March and/or June 2017 (i.e., GL27 series, GL12-1 and 06BH02). It is noted that groundwater at GL2-1 (March 2017 only), GL9-1, GL17-1 and GL27-1 is flowing

8 BC CSR irrigation water (IW) standards. 9 BCWQG irrigation water (IW) guidelines. 10 Surface water runoff may include runoff from Glenmore Road, as well as releases from the Glenmore Ellison Improvement District (GEID) McKinley Reservoir. However, it is noted that releases from McKinley Reservoir have not been confirmed with GEID.



artesian (i.e., water level is above ground surface), as is the groundwater in off-Site wells 06BH02, 09BH04 and 09BH06D. Flowing artesian conditions were reported at these wells in 2016 (Golder, 2017).

Since 2009, groundwater elevations have shown an overall increase of up to approximately 2 m. Groundwater elevations in 2017 continue to exhibit increasing trends. Slight decreases to non-apparent trends are noted for groundwater elevations at GL28 series, 09BH03, 09BH04 and 09BH06 series; and may be due to these wells being located within the broader part of the Glenmore Valley (as compared to the narrow valley of the Site) and screened within continuous units that are not affected by landfilling.

Increasing water levels at GL9-1, GL12-1, GL13-1, GL17-1 and GL17-2 may be due in part to the drainage pattern across the Compost Facility. Based on Drawing No. 4478-04R Glenmore Landfill Compost Area Grading Plan (revised 13 March 2009), stormwater runoff across the Compost Facility, including runoff from water applied to the compost rows for odour suppression and pests in the summer months, is directed towards a drainage ditch located along the west side of the Compost Facility and in the area of these wells. It was noted by the City that GL12-1 was flooded over the year due to compost watering (and, likely, in addition to the generally higher surface water runoff that occurred in early 2017).

In general, and as in previous years, upward hydraulic gradients were observed across the Site in 2017 (i.e., groundwater was inferred to flow from deeper to shallower hydrostratigraphic units). However, as in previous years (refer to Golder, 2016a; Golder, 2017), downward hydraulic gradients were observed at the GL15 well series; at the south end of the Landfill Footprint, where groundwater is leaving the Landfill Footprint to the south (GL26 well series, GL27 well series, GL13/17 well series and GL29 well series); and south of the Compost Facility, where groundwater is flowing away from the Landfill (GL28 well series).

7.0 GROUNDWATER GEOCHEMISTRY

7.1 Tabulated Data

The on-Site and off-Site groundwater quality data for the spring and fall of 2017 were tabulated and compared to applicable provincial criteria and inferred representative background water quality; and assessed for general spatial and temporal trends in concentrations. The associated laboratory analytical results were provided to Golder by the City and ALS; laboratory analytical certificates are not included in this report.

The compiled 2017 analytical results, along with the applicable provincial BCWQG and CSR criteria and parameter exceedances, are presented in Table 3 (Inorganic Parameters), Table 4 (Metals) and Table 5 (Organic Parameters). Groundwater analytical results from down-gradient wells GL28-1, GL28-2 and GL28-3 were also compared to the applicable federal GCDWQ criteria for drinking water, and presented separately in Table 6.

7.2 Groundwater Quality

7.2.1 Field Observations

During the 2017 sampling events, hydrogen sulphide gas-like and leachate-like odours were noted at GL6-1 (2011) in May (only); a hydrocarbon–like odour and/or hydrogen sulphide gas-like odour was noted at GL0-2 in May (only); and an organic/musty odour was noted at GL12-1 in September (only).



7.2.2 Moderate to High Leachate Monitoring Wells

Moderate to high concentrations of leachate indicator parameters continue to be present at GL5-2, GL6-1 (2011), GL9-3, GL12-1, GL16-1, GL18-2, GL27-3 and GL35-3, suggestive that at these locations, landfill leachate has migrated from the municipal solid waste (MSW) unit into these layers. It is noted that while groundwater at GL3-5 could not be sampled in 2017, given the well location, it is expected that GL3-5 continues to exhibit moderate to high concentrations of leachate indicator parameters.

The concentrations of leachate indicator parameters in groundwater at these wells in 2017 were largely consistent with those reported at the corresponding wells between 2004 and 2016 (Golder, 2017), with the following exceptions:

The ammonia (as N) concentrations at GL12-1 in May 2017 (2.02 mg/L and 1.72 mg/L [field duplicate]) were higher than ammonia concentrations previously measured at GL12-1.

The sulphide (as S and H2S) concentrations at GL18-2 in May 2017 (0.051 mg/L and 0.054 mg/L, respectively) were higher than sulphide concentrations previously measured at GL18-2.

The ammonia (as N), chloride, fluoride, sulphate and TDS concentrations at GL29-1 in May and September 2017 were generally lower than those reported in 2016 (Golder, 2017).

The ammonia (as N), chloride, fluoride, sulphate and TDS concentrations at 09BH03 and 09BH06-D in June 2017 were slightly higher than those reported in 2016 (Golder, 2017).

It is noted that concentrations of TDS, chloride, fluoride and sulphate at GL9-3 in May 2017 were lower than those reported in 2016 (TDS, chloride, fluoride and sulphate at GL9-3 were higher in 2016 than in previous years [Golder, 2017]); however, the chloride and sulphate concentrations were still present at higher concentrations than in previous years. As reported in Golder (2016a) for nearby wells GL12-1, GL17-2 (not sampled in 2017) and GL29-1, the increasing concentrations at GL9-3 may be related to migration of leachate from the Landfill Footprint towards the south in the direction of groundwater flow, or possibly due to the drainage pattern across the Compost Facility, where stormwater runoff across the Compost Facility is directed towards the south of Phase 3.

Nitrate concentrations at GL5-2 continued to be high (as in 2016), with the highest concentration of nitrate recorded in May 2017; the concentration of chloride was also high in 2017 (as in 2016), but was not the highest historically recorded for this well.

Moderate to high concentrations of leachate indicator parameters continue to be present at GL15-2, although concentrations of leachate indicator parameters were generally lower than in 2016 (TDS, chloride, sulphate and metals at GL15-2 were higher in 2016 than in previous years [Golder, 2017]). High parameter concentrations in groundwater at GL15-2 may be due to agricultural practices and irrigation of the surrounding agricultural fields with surface waters from Tutt Pond containing relatively high parameter concentrations.

The parameter concentrations in groundwater at the moderate to high leachate monitoring wells were generally greater than the applicable CSR AW/IW standards and/or BCWQG IW guidelines for conductivity, TDS (depending on soil crop), ammonia, chloride, fluoride, sulphate, sulphide as H2S (GL6-1 (2011) and GL18-2 only), boron (GL6-1 (2011) only), chromium, iron, manganese, molybdenum, selenium (GL15-2 only) and/or uranium.



7.2.3 Total Non-Chlorinated Phenols

In previous years, a CSR AW standard was only available for total non-chlorinated phenols (NCP); thus, total NCP was analyzed rather than individual phenolic parameters. In previous years, total NCP concentrations in groundwater at GL3-5 and GL6-1 (2011) were greater than the CSR AW standard of 10 ug/L; while total NCP concentrations in groundwater at GL18-2 were non-detectable and, thus, below the CSR AW standard. As part of the recent Stage 10/11 changes to the CSR, new CSR AW standards were developed for individual phenolic parameters; therefore, for the 2017 monitoring program, individual phenolic parameters were analyzed rather than total NCP.

Groundwater at GL6-1 (2011) in 2017 exhibited phenolic parameter concentrations that were less than the reported analytical detection limits, and thus, less than the applicable CSR AW standards.

7.2.4 Low to Minimal Leachate-Impacted Monitoring Wells

The concentrations of leachate indicator parameters in groundwater at wells GL0-1, GL0-2, GL0-3, GL2-1, GL9-1, GL17-1, GL23-1, GL27-1, GL28-1, GL28-2, GL28-3, GL29-1, 09BH03 and 09BH06D were generally within the range of those reported at the corresponding wells between 2004 and 2016 (Golder, 2017). No significant changes in the 2017 groundwater quality were noted at these wells, with the following exceptions:

The chloride, sulphate and TDS concentrations at GL2-1 in May 2017 were higher than concentrations previously measured at GL2-1.

The ammonia (as N) concentration at GL9-1 in May 2017 (314 mg/L) was significantly higher than ammonia concentrations previously measured at GL9-1 and at all other monitoring wells at the Site (including the leachate-impacted wells). The City confirmed this result with the laboratory.

The shallowest well of the GL0 series (GL0-3) exhibited higher parameter concentrations than the two deeper wells of the GL0 series (GL0-2 and GL0-1) (as noted in Golder, 2017). Nitrate concentrations at GL28-2 continued to be elevated in 2017.

The parameter concentrations in groundwater at the low to minimal leachate monitoring wells were generally greater than the applicable CSR AW/IW standards and/or BCWQG AW/IW guidelines for conductivity, TDS (depending on soil crop), fluoride, sulphate, iron, manganese, molybdenum and/or uranium. At GL0-3, chloride concentrations also exceeded applicable CSR IW standard and BCWQG IW guideline; while at GL9-1, chloride concentrations also exceeded the applicable CSR IW standard and BCWQG AW/IW guidelines. At GL28-2, nitrate concentrations also exceeded the applicable BCWQG AW guideline. At 09BH03, chromium and selenium also exceeded the applicable CSR AW/IW standards and/or BCWQG AW/IW guidelines.

Groundwater at GL15-1 is not impacted by landfill leachate; only the fluoride concentration exceeded the CSR IW standard.



7.2.5 Comparison to Background Groundwater Quality

The 2017 groundwater quality at a number of down-gradient wells was compared to the 2017 groundwater quality at potential background groundwater wells screened within similar stratigraphic units (see Table 2 below), to further assess the quality of groundwater leaving the Site.

Table 2. Wells Potentially Representing Background Groundwater Quality (Modified from Golder, 2016a)

Potential Background Well Stratigraphic Unit Down-Gradient Site Wells for

Comparison

GL2-1, 09BH06-D and 09BH03 Sand and gravel GL28-1, GL28-2

GL0-2 Glacial till GL28-1 GL0-1 Bedrock/glacial till interface GL28-1 GL9-1 Volcanic bedrock GL29-1 GL17-1/GL27-1 Sedimentary bedrock GL17-1

Based on comparison of the groundwater quality, it can be inferred that groundwater leaving the Site and off-Site to the south contains groundwater that is more representative of background quality than landfill leachate. The high sulphate concentrations at GL28 well series were more in line with those at 09BH03 (and 09BH04 [Golder, 2016a]). It is inferred the elevated sulphate is due to background conditions, given the low chloride concentrations at 09BH03 and 09BH04, and as 09BH03 and 09BH04 are completed at higher elevations within the sand and gravel compared to the elevation of the sand and gravel at GL28-1 and beneath the Landfill footprint. Additionally, the screened intervals at GL28-1 and GL28-2 are separated by approximately 12 m of low-permeability clay (refer to cross-section in Golder, 2016a); groundwater conditions in the lower permeable unit at GL28-1 and upper permeable unit at GL28-2 are comparable, and likely a result of natural groundwater conditions in the broader part of the Glenmore Valley.

7.2.6 Comparison to Federal Drinking Water Quality Guidelines

A comparison of the 2017 groundwater quality data at GL28 well series to the federal GCDWQ criteria for drinking water indicated that pH falls below the acceptable range, and the concentrations of TDS, nitrate (GL28-2), sulphate, iron (GL28-1), manganese (GL28-1 and GL28-3; September only), sodium and uranium exceeded the respective criteria. This was similar to the findings in 2012 through 2016 for groundwater sampled at GL28-1 (Golder, 2017). As in Golder (2017), these concentrations are likely representative of background groundwater quality; with the exception of nitrate at GL28-2. The cause of the high nitrate concentrations at GL28-2 are not known, as no other wells in the vicinity of GL28 well series exhibited elevated nitrogen parameter concentrations.

8.0 SURFACE WATER GEOCHEMISTRY

The analytical results of surface water samples collected in 2017 at Bredin Pond, Tutt Pond, Northeast Pond and the Slough (Phase 3), along with the applicable provincial BCWQG guidelines and parameter exceedances, are presented in Table 8.



In general, parameter concentrations in surface water samples collected in 2017 at Bredin Pond, Tutt Pond, Northeast Pond and the Slough were consistent with those reported previously (Golder, 2017); with the following exceptions

A slight increasing trend in several parameter concentrations (including chloride, nitrogen species, TDS, sulphate, calcium, magnesium, sodium and zinc) was noted at Bredin Pond.

Parameter concentrations at the Northeast Pond in 2017 were similar to those reported in 2016, with no apparent increasing trend in parameter concentrations. It is noted that in 2016, parameter concentrations at the Northeast Pond were observed to be increasing (Golder, 2017)).

Based on the parameter concentrations in surface water samples collected in 2017, it is assessed that water quality is generally comparative between the water bodies and is indicative of the alkaline nature of the waters in the Glenmore valley (including, high pH, alkalinity, sodium, magnesium, sulphate, chloride, TDS). The Slough also exhibited high parameter concentrations; however, in general, parameter concentrations were slightly lower than those in 2016 (Golder, 2017). The high parameter concentrations in the Slough are inferred to be due to contact with historical waste/leachate in the Slough and to evaporation processes; the slightly lower parameter concentrations in 2017 may be due to flooding in early 2017, resulting in dilution of parameter concentrations.

Parameters that exceeded the applicable BCWQG AW and/or IW criteria in the Site ponds in 2017 are as follows: conductivity, pH (Northeast Pond only), TDS (depending on crop), chloride, fluoride, sulphate, molybdenum and/or uranium (total metals). Surface water samples collected at the Northeast Pond also exhibited aluminum, arsenic, silver and/or zinc at concentrations greater than the applicable BCWQG AW and/or IW criteria. Surface water samples collected at the Slough in 2017 also exhibited boron at concentrations greater than the applicable BCWQG IW criteria.

9.0 LEACHATE CHEMISTRY

Leachate quality in the samples collected within the Landfill Footprint in 2017 exhibited with some variability in leachate parameter concentrations between sampling events (Table 9). The variability is expected given the variability in leachate quality. As in previous reports (Golder, 2016a; Golder, 2017), parameter concentrations in the leachate collected at the S Leachate Wet Well in the southwest corner Phase 2 were generally higher than those at the N Pumphouse Manhole (west side of Phase 1) and the P1 Leachate Manhole (southwest corner Phase 1). As GL3-5 was not sampled in 2017, a comparison of the leachate quality data to groundwater quality at Phase 1 was not conducted. Similar to observations made in Golder (2017), leachate quality data (specifically, chloride) exhibited lower leachate indicator parameter concentrations than the moderate to high leachate-impacted wells in the areas of Phase 2/Phase 3 (at GL6-1 (2011)). Sulphide concentrations in leachate samples were significantly greater than in groundwater samples in the areas of Phase 2/Phase (at GL6-1 (2011) and GL18-2). All leachate samples exhibited hydrocarbon and VOC parameter concentrations, with the S Leachate Wet Well generally exhibiting the highest concentrations.



10.0 RESULTS OF QA/QC PROGRAM

A total of twenty groundwater samples, including three field duplicate groundwater samples, were collected in May/June 2017 during the spring sampling program, for a total of 15% field duplicate analysis. A total of twelve groundwater samples, including one field duplicate groundwater sample, was collected in September 2017 during the fall sampling program, for a total of 9.1% field duplicate analysis. The target of 10% field duplicate analysis was met during the spring sampling program (only). The results of the 2017 field duplicate sample analyses are presented in Table 7.

For parameters with detectable concentrations, the RPD results calculated for duplicate groundwater samples ranged from 0% to 15%, and therefore were less than Golder’s internal QA/QC target of 35% for groundwater. DF values, where calculated, ranged from 0 to 1.08, as such all values were less than Golder’s internal QA/QC target of 2.

Based on the calculated RPD and DF values for each duplicate-sample pair, the data is considered to be reproducible and suitable for this assessment of annual groundwater quality.

11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of the 2017 monitoring program, no significant changes were noted at the Site in 2017 with respect to water levels and water quality. However, monitoring should continue so as to: i) evaluate the increasing trends observed in water levels across the Site; and ii) evaluate the increasing trends in parameter concentrations at the south end of the Landfill footprint (area of GL9-3). Groundwater quality at the south end of the Site (i.e., GL27 well series, GL17 well series, and GL29 well series), and off-Site to the south (i.e., GL28 well series) should continue to be compared to the wells identified in this report as potentially representing background groundwater quality. Should any physical or operational changes be made to the Landfill, it is recommended that the City consider the need for further investigations to assess whether these changes may impact the groundwater flow regime and/or groundwater quality at the Site and at off-Site locations.

12.0 PROPOSED 2018 MONITORING PROGRAM

The following recommendations are provided for the 2018 monitoring program:

12.1 Groundwater Elevations

Groundwater levels from all accessible on-Site and off-Site wells should continue to be recorded on a quarterly basis to capture seasonal trends in water levels.



12.2 Groundwater Quality

Semi-annual groundwater samples should be collected from the wells listed in Table 1 above. Sampling should be conducted following spring freshet, when groundwater levels are high, and in the fall when groundwater levels are lower.

All groundwater samples should continue to be measured for field parameters (pH, conductivity and temperature). These field parameters should be tabulated and included in future monitoring reports.

Groundwater samples should be analyzed for dissolved metals, pH, alkalinity, hardness, chemical oxygen demand, dissolved organic carbon, total dissolved solids, chloride, fluoride, sulphate, and nutrients (ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, orthophosphate).

Groundwater samples from GL6-1, GL3-5 and GL18-2 should continue to be analyzed for hydrogen sulphide.

No hydrocarbon analyses are recommended.

As individual NCP concentrations do not exceed the new Stage 10/11 CSR AW standards, no further phenol analysis is recommended in 2018.

12.3 Surface Water Quality

Surface water levels should continue to be recorded with the electronic dataloggers currently in place (and downloaded quarterly). Manual surface water level measurements (monthly) and an annual survey of the surface should be conducted to confirm datalogger measurements.

Tutt Pond and Slough levels should continue to assess whether groundwater levels in the south portion of the Site are affected by increasing or decreasing levels in Tutt Pond and the Slough, and to confirm the groundwater flow regime in the area of Tutt Pond at different times of the year.

Flow rates for surface water removed from Tutt Pond for irrigation purposes should be recorded on a continual basis to evaluate the nearby groundwater flow regime during the pumping and non-pumping season.

Surface water sampling should be continue on a regular basis at Bredin Pond, Tutt Pond, Northeast Pond and the Slough to confirm the surface water quality at these locations and its potential impact on groundwater quality in areas where this surface water is used for irrigation purposes.

Should the City continue to supply irrigation water to surrounding properties with water from Tutt Pond, and given the high parameter concentrations in surface water at Tutt Pond (i.e., conductivity, TDS, chloride, molybdenum and uranium), a risk assessment is recommended to assess risks associated with the use of this surface water for irrigation watering purposes. Until such time, Tutt Pond should not be pumped down below an elevation of approximately 437.5 to 437.7 masl, as flow toward Tutt Pond may be induced from the Slough (Golder, 2016c11).

11 Report entitled “Surface Water and Groundwater Management Strategy, City of Kelowna Glenmore Landfill”, dated 21 July 2016

(Golder, 2016c).

Printed on: 2/16/2018 Table 2a: Groundwater Elevations, Glenmore Landfill, Kelowna, BC 1782325

Well ID GL0-1 GL0-2 GL0-3 GL1-1 GL1-2 GL2-1 GL2-2 GL3-1 GL3-2 GL3-3 GL3-5 GL4-1 GL4-2 GL5-1 GL5-2 GL5-3 GL6-1 GL7-1 GL8-1 GL8-2 GL9-1 GL9-2 GL9-3 GL10-1 GL11-1 GL12-1 GL13-1 GL14-1 GL15-1 GL15-2 GL16-1 GL17-1 GL17-2 GL18-1 GL18-2 GL18-3 GL19-1 GL20-1 GL21-1 GL22-1 GL23-1 GL24-1 GL25-1 GL25-2 2005 Well Elevation Survey 446.94 446.97 439.01 439.01 456.15 455.46 456.08 441.40 441.42 439.98 440.19 440.09 443.45 439.70 439.68 439.62 439.55 439.42 439.41 439.39 445.82 442.17 438.74 453.82 452.41 452.02 439.62 438.96 438.94 443.22 443.25 443.09 441.91 441.32 440.25 450.25 446.53 447.51February 23, 2005 442.27 442.21 438.20 437.71 439.58 439.77 437.71 437.82 437.56 437.99 437.71 437.34 437.34 438.63 437.36 437.39 437.43 437.62 438.04 437.92April 11, 2005 442.45 442.39 438.17 437.75 439.63 439.81 437.85 437.95 437.79 437.81 437.71 437.68 437.39 438.66 437.34 437.26 437.37 437.52 438.11 437.77 441.48 446.55 447.13 437.63 437.14 437.80 437.89 438.33 437.05May 6, 2005 442.58 442.51 438.16 437.78 439.57 439.78 437.90 437.99 437.82 438.04 437.69 437.79 437.45 438.60 437.35 437.25 437.38 437.59 438.26 437.91 433.48 446.71 447.32 437.71 437.52 438.02 437.88 438.30 437.19June 23, 2005 442.65 442.59 437.96 437.64 440.30 439.53 438.28 439.48 439.69 437.59 437.68 437.47 437.95 437.66 437.42 437.29 438.67 437.19 437.1 437.15 437.46 438.67 438.14 436.15 446.75 447.35 437.36 438.21 438.26 437.83 438.30 437.06July 6, 2005 440.30 439.53 438.40August 31, 2005 442.62 442.56 437.78 437.60 440.43 439.54 438.49 439.34 439.60 437.28 437.39 437.12 437.79 437.44 435.75 436.32 438.50 436.77 436.67 436.62 437.38 438.48 437.77 434.70 443.64 447.28 435.70 437.09 437.86 437.62 438.20 436.99September 29, 2005 442.70 442.62 437.80 437.59 440.46 439.61 438.91 439.45 439.70 437.28 437.37 437.10 437.76 437.45 435.88 436.24 438.47 436.66 436.57 436.56 437.33 438.29 437.58 435.98 446.47 447.03 435.85 438.19 437.71 438.14 437.65 437.01March 21, 2006 443.26 443.2 438.52 438.25 440.91 O/S 440.84 439.82 440.07 438.26 438.37 438.22 438.06 437.75 438.13 437.56 438.73 437.42 437.34 437.36 436.59 438.25 437.72 440.02 446.52 447.14 438.06 438.23 437.92 437.97 438.89 437.44April 27, 2006 440.97 O/S 439.24 438.00 438.14 437.53 438.76 437.43 437.35 440.72 446.67 447.25 437.89 438.28 438.52 437.97 439.02 437.42June 29, 2006 443.25 443.17 438.07 437.68 440.93 O/S 439.26 439.67 439.93 437.81 437.89 437.74 438.01 437.67 437.70 437.34 438.72 437.12 437.01 437.04 436.43 438.48 437.88 441.76 446.53 447.16 437.69 438.29 438.01 437.90 439.53 437.48 437.47July 14, 2006 443.18 443.12 438.04 437.68 440.89 O/S 439.27 439.66 439.92 437.58 437.65 437.38 437.94 437.62 437.04 437.06 438.67 437.00 436.90 436.98 436.38 438.37 438.01 441.69 446.51 447.16 437.02 438.39 438.16 437.86 439.47 437.46 437.91July 28, 2006 443.14 443.07 437.11 437.63 440.87 O/S 439.35 439.53 439.82 437.46 437.41 437.23 438.61 437.54 436.49 436.69 438.72 436.89 436.78 436.76 436.37 438.53 438.03 442.12 447.03 445.60 436.46 438.40 438.14 437.78 439.52 437.50 437.81August 14, 2006 443.08 443.01 437.82 437.61 440.81 O/S 439.31 439.50 439.81 437.43 437.18 438.05 437.44 435.67 436.30 436.75 436.66 436.65 436.44 438.35 437.85 441.89 446.84 447.43 436.38 438.42 437.96 438.68 440.12 437.48 438.10September 28, 2006 443.03 442.96 437.82 437.59 440.78 439.97 439.30 439.55 439.86 437.30 437.38 437.15 437.79 437.38 436.16 436.13 438.54 436.55 436.46 436.44 436.26 437.92 437.43 441.63 446.78 447.33 436.14 438.41 437.59 437.61 439.49 437.41 437.77October 11, 2006 440.83 439.95 439.27 437.76 436.31 436.14 437.73 436.48 436.40 437.87 437.25 441.39 446.53 447.21 436.28 438.04 437.50 437.61 439.45 437.44 437.46October 18, 2006 440.80 438.69 440.58 437.78 436.48 436.21 438.41 436.49 436.40 437.83 437.27 441.62 446.58 447.15 436.44 438.16 437.47 437.64 439.55 437.47 437.74March 28, 2007 443.34 443.27 438.63 438.49 440.82 439.99 439.24 439.80 440.08 438.37 438.59 438.09 437.71 438.35 437.52 437.44 437.01 437.19 435.42 437.87 437.54 446.44 447.04 438.28 438.19 437.73 438.60 440.59 437.59 437.71April 4, 2007 440.82 440.99 439.29 438.20 438.38 437.63 437.42 437.01 437.91 437.75 442.00 447.42 447.03 438.38 438.19 437.75 437.88 440.63 437.67 437.72April 16, 2007 440.79 440.78 439.30 438.21 439.46 437.65 437.37 437.31 437.92 437.55 442.00 446.11 446.82 438.40 438.19 437.72 437.98 440.65 437.69 O/SSeptember 13, 2007 443.11 443.03 437.80 437.56 440.65 439.80 439.26 439.50 439.77 437.37 437.45 437.24 438.05 437.47 437.05 436.74 438.69 436.78 436.69 436.68 435.95 436.80 436.45 441.69 446.47 446.82 437.11 438.24 436.65 437.71 440.37 437.63 O/SSeptember 24, 2007 443.13 443.04 437.82 437.59 440.68 439.80 439.19 439.55 439.81 437.35 437.44 437.21 437.98 437.48 436.93 436.71 438.60 436.73 436.62 436.65 435.88 436.70 436.33 441.70 446.44 446.22 436.91 438.22 436.53 437.73 440.39 437.59 O/SOctober 12, 2007 443.22 443.15 437.88 437.63 440.71 439.85 439.31 439.66 439.93 437.38 437.47 437.22 438.14 437.83 440.40 437.64 O/SOctober 19, 2007 443.26 443.18 437.91 437.65 440.73 439.88 439.36 439.71 439.97 438.21 436.98 436.85 438.64 436.68 436.03 436.61 436.33 441.87 446.18 446.91 436.96 438.05 436.49 437.87 440.40 437.69 O/SOctober 30, 2007 443.28 443.20 437.21 437.65 440.73 440.16 439.21 439.70 439.96 437.45 437.55 437.29 438.11 437.59 437.07 436.92 438.59 436.85 436.75 436.93 436.01 436.57 436.24 442.06 445.66 446.83 437.04 438.20 436.43 437.86 440.37 437.63 O/SNovember 22, 2007 443.34 443.26 437.41 437.67 441.01 440.13 439.11 439.62 439.86 437.45 437.63 437.43 438.05 437.00 437.29 437.06 438.41 436.92 436.83 436.96 O/S 436.54 436.18 441.87 446.23 446.69 437.25 437.34 436.39 437.89 440.33 437.63 O/S 437.85 436.81 443.46 442.94 443.18December 17, 2007 443.36 443.28 438.08 437.71 440.92 440.19 439.38 437.60 439.02 437.76 437.87 437.68 438.23 437.71 437.62 437.27 438.66 437.08 436.97 437.07 O/S 436.63 436.37 442.15 446.19 446.58 437.22 437.67 436.54 437.97 440.35 437.69 O/S 437.94 436.99 443.46 442.88 443.22May 21, 2008 438.24 438.30 437.53 437.47 437.38 O/S O/SJune 25, 2008 438.36 438.13 440.76 440.25 439.18 439.20 439.30 438.15 438.23 438.11 438.21 437.71 438.25 437.48 438.60 437.25 437.15 437.28 O/S 437.17 436.98 442.13 447.27 447.74 438.33 438.35 438.16 437.99 440.33 437.71 O/S 438.18 437.31July 23, 2008 443.21 443.13 438.11 437.72 440.68 440.20 439.17 439.10 439.18 437.78 437.83 437.63 438.09 437.56 437.68 437.29 438.57 437.06 436.95 437.04 O/S 437.13 436.88 442.05 447.26 447.72 437.65 438.33 437.06 437.83 440.13 437.69 O/S 437.96 437.04 443.50 442.81 443.09October 29, 2008 443.16 443.08 437.79 437.62 440.25 440.12 439.21 439.16 439.01 437.24 437.32 437.06 438.24 437.46 436.23 436.37 438.50 436.62 436.54 436.92 O/S 437.17 436.95 447.19 447.62 436.19 437.80 436.90 437.76 439.93 437.65 O/S 437.81 436.91 443.74 443.022009 Well Elevation Survey 446.97 447.00 438.99 438.99 455.62 454.58 455.65 441.42 441.44 439.99 440.11 440.11 443.02 439.73 439.69 439.63 439.57 439.44 439.47 439.45 441.79 439.81 453.54 452.34 452.05 439.58 439.79 439.78 442.96 443.18 442.94 441.21 440.23 450.30 446.58 447.54 459.01 459.09May 21, 2009 443.32 443.26 438.52 438.38 440.00 439.25 438.66 439.19 439.03 438.39 438.40 438.37 437.71 437.66 438.41 436.69 438.74 437.29 437.22 437.35 O/S 437.60 437.40 441.61 446.97 447.63 438.31 438.11 437.48 439.87 O/S 438.10 437.32 443.41 442.94 443.18May 28, 2009 443.31 443.24 438.50 438.37 440.01 439.25 438.66 439.19 439.01 438.40 438.39 438.36 437.70 437.65 438.38 437.55 438.75 437.29 437.25 437.32 O/S 437.62 437.40 441.78 446.92 447.57 438.29 438.13 437.45 437.68 439.86 O/S 438.20 437.29 443.40 442.93 443.18June 25, 2009 443.20 443.13 438.21 437.80 440.02 439.25 438.71 439.09 438.92 437.94 437.92 437.87 437.63 437.56 437.90 437.42 438.79 437.20 437.14 437.13 O/S 437.63 437.35 442.05 447.10 447.55 437.91 438.26 437.38 437.70 439.87 438.09 O/S 437.93 437.10 443.38 442.87 443.09 441.22 Dry August 10, 2009 443.00 442.93 437.81 437.69 440.00 439.15 438.66 438.85 438.70 437.33 437.32 437.18 437.54 437.38 436.58 436.52 438.69 436.89 436.83 436.82 O/S 437.58 437.21 441.91 447.82 448.22 436.61 438.35 437.17 439.92 438.00 O/S 437.75 436.80 443.34 442.73 442.91 442.42 Dry August 25, 2009 442.99 442.91 437.91 437.74 440.04 439.23 438.76 439.01 438.88 437.41 437.39 437.25 437.62 437.49 436.85 436.67 438.74 436.99 436.92 436.98 O/S 437.59 437.19 441.95 447.44 447.92 436.87 437.71 437.14 437.63 439.93 437.88 O/S 437.80 436.95 443.33 442.67 442.88 441.65 Dry September 28, 2009 443.01 442.93 437.82 437.68 439.97 439.33 439.07 439.07 438.90 437.35 437.33 437.19 437.76 437.50 436.91 436.59 438.68 436.90 436.85 436.80 O/S 437.61 437.25 442.11 446.93 447.41 436.93 438.11 437.16 Broken 439.93 438.11 O/S 437.80 436.80 443.32 442.56 442.88 442.80 Dry October 30, 2009 443.08 443.01 437.98 437.75 439.97 439.39 439.10 437.46 437.47 437.30 437.66 437.57 436.98 436.79 438.69 437.00 436.93 437.02 O/S 437.63 437.19 442.10 446.56 447.04 436.99 438.14 437.19 Broken 440.06 438.06 O/S 437.80 436.91 443.26 442.68 442.93 443.58 Dry November 12, 2009 443.11 443.03 437.98 437.74 439.37 439.14 439.13 438.95 437.48 437.49 437.33 437.63 437.57 437.03 436.84 438.69 437.01 436.93 437.05 O/S 437.66 437.20 442.11 446.43 446.92 437.04 438.13 437.22 Broken 440.11 O/S 437.82 437.00 443.26 442.70 442.96 444.13 Dry December 17, 2009 443.14 443.06 437.93 437.72 439.17 438.68 439.12 438.94 437.52 437.52 437.40 437.60 437.51 437.26 436.94 438.64 436.90 436.84 436.92 O/S 437.63 437.19 442.04 446.28 446.74 437.26 437.94 437.24 Broken 440.36 438.05 O/S 437.81 436.90 443.23 442.86 442.99 442.44 Dry March 16, 2010 443.25 443.19 438.63 438.51 439.50 439.24 438.74 439.37 439.14 438.50 438.51 438.51 437.97 437.71 438.36 437.58 438.75 437.41 437.39 437.46 O/S 438.10 437.64 441.73 445.97 446.48 438.35 438.12 437.68 441.33 438.21 O/S 438.26 437.42 443.26 442.84 443.12 445.55 Dry April 21, 2010 443.26 443.19 438.39 438.05 439.59 439.24 438.86 439.48 439.24 438.19 438.16 438.12 437.27 437.73 438.11 437.50 438.91 437.38 437.34 437.35 O/S 438.22 437.82 441.72 446.59 447.02 438.11 438.39 437.82 Dry 441.41 O/S 438.24 437.36 443.28 442.87 443.13 446.38 Dry May 14, 2010 443.25 443.18 438.16 437.81 439.63 439.20 438.71 439.47 439.22 437.84 437.82 437.75 437.86 437.70 437.70 437.37 438.88 437.33 437.28 437.29 O/S 438.24 437.84 441.86 446.45 446.96 437.92 438.44 437.85 Dry 441.31 O/S 438.71 437.31 443.28 442.87 443.12 446.74 Dry June 22, 2010 443.24 443.17 438.02 437.81 439.68 439.34 438.98 439.56 439.35 437.65 437.64 437.57 437.80 437.67 437.50 437.23 438.87 437.25 437.20 437.17 O/S 438.32 437.87 441.76 446.29 446.83 437.50 438.59 437.86 Dry 441.11 O/S 437.91 437.18 443.27 442.87 443.11 447.17 Dry July 21, 2010 443.17 443.08 437.94 437.69 439.74 439.50 439.35 439.59 439.44 437.62 437.60 437.53 437.78 437.56 437.42 437.08 438.81 437.07 437.01 436.89 O/S 438.35 437.90 441.69 446.13 446.68 437.44 438.56 437.85 Dry 440.97 438.15 O/S 437.86 437.02 443.27 442.84 443.05 447.39 Dry August 5, 2010 443.11 443.04 437.85 437.66 439.49 439.31 439.45 439.21 437.41 437.37 437.25 437.61 437.49 437.08 436.84 438.79 436.99 436.93 436.83 O/S 438.32 437.85 441.65 437.10 438.55 437.82 Dry 440.91 O/S 437.83 436.84 443.25 442.80 442.99 447.46 Dry 2011 Well Elevation Survey 440.52*June 16, 2011 443.51 443.45 438.32 438.03 O/S O/S O/S 438.64 439.33 438.10 438.08 438.04 437.84 437.72 438.08 437.55 438.94 437.41 437.37 437.36 O/S 440.47 438.78 441.72 446.04 446.69 438.09 439.13 438.67 O/S 437.97 O/S 438.20 443.24 442.83 443.15 445.39 Dry September 28, 2011 443.00 443.01 437.78 437.67 O/S O/S O/S 439.63 439.28 437.42 437.80 437.29 437.74 436.12 436.43 438.81 437.05 437.01 436.82 O/S 439.40 438.56 441.73 447.01 447.50 436.15 439.07 438.53 O/S 439.78 437.82 O/S 437.77 436.75 443.25 442.98 442.93 446.85 Dry December 20, 2011 443.19 443.15 437.82 437.68 O/S O/S O/S 439.67 438.64 437.28 437.09 437.74 436.51 438.68 438.23 437.17 436.97 O/S 439.32 438.61 441.80 446.37 446.90 435.68 439.03 438.52 O/S 439.65 437.97 O/S 437.71 436.97 443.23 443.10 443.41 446.38 Dry April 12, 2012 443.74 443.67 438.43 438.18 O/S O/S O/S 439.79 439.44 439.68 438.22 438.17 437.82 437.74 438.14 437.71 438.94 437.48 437.51 437.48 O/S 440.51 438.82 441.90 446.40 446.78 438.16 439.01 438.75 O/S 439.60 438.16 O/S 438.41 437.43 443.29 443.59 451.03 Dry 2012 Well Elevation Survey 449.99 449.95 450.53 457.98June 27, 2012 438.61 438.37 O/S O/S O/S 439.91 439.53 439.86 438.41 438.37 437.88 437.83 438.37 437.97 437.55 437.00 437.62 O/S 439.67 438.92 441.67 446.66 447.23 438.39 439.15 438.85 O/S 439.55 438.04 O/S 438.35 437.49 443.34 Dry September 21, 2012 443.66 443.52 437.97 437.77 O/S O/S O/S 439.77 439.40 439.76 438.10 437.97 437.81 437.59 437.41 437.17 438.76 437.34 437.39 437.39 O/S 439.56 439.05 440.72 446.42 446.63 437.43 439.19 438.63 O/S 439.69 438.15 O/S 437.89 437.26 443.12 443.48 450.80 DryOctober 3, 2012 442.72 440.94 440.87December 5, 2012 444.53 440.88 440.87 443.80 443.71 438.20 437.89 O/S O/S O/S 439.02 439.81 439.44 439.28 437.82 437.71 437.86 437.73 437.79 437.42 438.86 437.52 437.47 437.37 O/S 439.58 438.82 442.09 447.14 447.63 437.81 439.24 438.82 O/S 439.97 438.15 O/S 438.25 437.34 443.56 443.21 443.64 447.64 DryFebruary 27, 2013 444.45 440.90 440.83 443.88 443.84 438.71 438.58 O/S O/S O/S 439.32 439.85 439.51 439.98 438.52 438.50 436.66 437.84 438.62 437.90 439.05 437.64 437.61 437.77 O/S 439.72 438.85 442.26 447.15 447.71 438.54 439.07 438.87 O/S 439.80 437.18 O/S 439.24 437.70 443.65 443.39 443.73 447.47 Dry2013 Well Elevation Survey 450.05 450.01 450.54 446.97 446.98 438.99 438.99 457.90 441.40 441.41 439.97 440.08 440.09 440.51 439.74 439.73 439.66 439.59 439.48 439.51 439.39 441.83 453.83 452.37 452.09 439.61 439.83 439.82 442.96 442.89 441.23 440.25 450.34 446.63 447.60 459.04 459.12June 27, 2013 444.47 440.89 440.68 444.20 444.12 438.76 O/S O/S O/S 439.04 440.00 439.58 438.58 438.58 438.56 437.72 437.93 438.70 438.01 439.17 437.70 437.68 437.66 O/S 440.01 439.18 442.20 447.06 447.63 438.69 439.48 439.04 O/S 439.96 437.83 O/S 438.25 437.62 443.84 443.65 444.04 447.50 Dry August 22, 2013 444.43 440.93 440.87 443.94 443.86 438.31 437.95 O/S O/S O/S 439.17 439.87 439.48 438.09 438.05 438.00 437.53 437.77 438.18 437.64 439.12 437.43 437.38 437.28 O/S 440.01 439.03 442.02 447.73 448.35 438.20 439.56 438.91 O/S 439.83 437.79 O/S 438.12 437.30 443.86 443.51 443.84 447.56 DryNovember 8, 2013 444.39 440.86 440.81 444.26 444.17 438.13 437.84 O/S O/S O/S 438.97 440.18 440.51 437.73 437.75 437.63 437.71 437.86 437.92 437.58 439.20 437.65 437.60 437.50 O/S 440.02 439.12 442.26 447.89 448.34 437.93 439.68 439.06 O/S 439.80 437.93 O/S 437.82 437.52 443.84 443.65 444.11 447.56 Dry2014 Well Elevation Survey 457.82February 18, 2014 444.29 440.94 440.89 444.43 444.36 438.72 438.58 O/S O/S O/S 439.09 439.98 439.64 438.58 438.60 438.58 437.77 437.93 438.78 438.13 439.17 437.80 437.79 437.88 O/S 440.10 439.23 442.48 447.19 447.72 438.79 439.45 439.19 O/S 439.66 438.03 O/S 438.24 437.80 443.97 443.82 444.27 447.56 DryJune 2, 2014 444.22 440.87 440.82 444.52 444.44 438.66 438.50 O/S O/S O/S 438.93 440.19 439.77 438.54 438.53 438.51 437.69 437.99 438.67 438.08 439.36 437.82 437.79 437.73 O/S 440.14 439.17 442.19 446.85 447.35 438.67 439.47 439.05 O/S 439.57 437.92 O/S 438.27 437.77 444.13 443.98 444.39 447.59 DryAugust 26, 2014 444.14 440.80 440.74 444.54 444.46 438.20 437.91 O/S O/S O/S 438.99 440.13 439.61 437.82 437.77 437.67 437.33 437.74 437.67 437.51 439.29 437.50 437.46 437.32 O/S 440.05 439.09 441.91 446.99 447.48 437.70 439.73 438.96 O/S 439.36 437.63 O/S 437.90 437.37 444.19 444.05 444.43 447.59 DryNovember 21, 2014 444.12 440.80 440.75 444.65 444.57 438.16 437.94 O/S O/S O/S 439.47 440.03 439.65 437.79 437.80 437.71 437.58 437.81 437.88 437.51 439.28 437.56 437.52 437.38 O/S 439.82 439.13 442.11 447.12 447.60 437.89 439.83 439.00 O/S 439.33 437.75 O/S 437.78 437.42 444.25 444.15 444.54 447.55 Dry2015 Well Elevation Survey 440.286March 17, 2015 444.11 440.94 440.90 445.08 444.99 438.79 438.59 O/S O/S O/S 439.18 440.06 439.75 438.59 438.59 438.57 437.89 438.05 438.86 438.14 439.50 437.93 437.89 437.90 O/S 440.22 439.20 442.46 448.06 448.60 438.87 440.29 439.08 O/S 439.09 437.99 O/S 438.21 437.92 444.86 444.58 444.98 447.55 DryJune 4, 2015 444.20 440.85 440.79 444.92 444.84 438.76 438.58 O/S O/S O/S 439.10 440.21 439.70 438.62 438.63 438.61 437.87 438.11 438.78 438.08 439.50 437.94 437.90 438.15 O/S 440.16 439.16 442.41 447.40 448.00 438.78 439.94 439.07 O/S 439.50 437.93 O/S 438.26 438.02 444.89 444.48 444.82 447.62 DryAugust 27, 2015 444.21 440.75 440.69 444.46 444.39 437.46 437.72 O/S O/S O/S 439.01 439.99 439.52 437.51 437.47 437.34 437.56 437.81 437.53 437.29 439.41 437.51 437.46 437.37 O/S 439.99 439.01 442.17 447.67 448.25 437.57 439.91 438.90 O/S 439.38 437.66 O/S 437.84 437.39 444.63 444.13 444.39 447.65 DryNovember 2, 2015 444.21 440.70 440.64 444.57 444.54 438.05 437.95 O/S O/S O/S 439.03 440.04 439.59 437.49 437.51 437.33 437.56 437.84 437.26 437.09 439.39 437.68 437.64 437.94 O/S 439.89 438.96 442.19 447.78 448.33 437.28 439.94 438.96 O/S 439.59 437.66 O/S 437.71 437.74 444.47 444.14 444.52 447.63 Dry2016 Well Elevation Survey 450.00 449.96 450.49 446.96 446.97 439.00 438.99 457.44 441.36 441.37 440.00 440.11 440.12 440.48 439.72 439.64 439.57 439.57 439.44 439.44 439.41 442.25 439.76 453.81 452.32 452.04 439.57 440.24 439.78 442.90 442.83 441.16 440.17 450.30 446.60 447.61 459.01 459.108March 22, 2016 444.41 440.91 440.85 445.47 445.37 438.88 438.76 O/S O/S O/S 439.40 440.30 439.82 438.64 438.62 438.57 437.96 438.16 438.92 438.28 439.59 438.07 438.02 438.01 O/S 440.55 439.33 442.69 448.58 449.15 438.93 440.03 439.19 O/S 439.79 438.25 O/S 438.27 438.03 445.45 445.04 445.41 447.66 O/SMay 20, 2016 444.75 440.99 440.94 445.59 445.52 438.63 438.37 O/S O/S O/S 439.58 440.29 439.76 438.50 438.46 438.40 437.92 438.15 438.86 438.11 439.59 437.98 437.97 437.89 O/S 440.07 439.36 442.68 448.45 448.90 438.82 440.01 439.15 O/S 439.84 438.16 O/S 438.23 437.94 445.40 444.93 445.83 447.71 O/SSeptember 16, 2016 444.91 440.99 440.92 444.82 444.74 438.22 437.76 O/S O/S O/S 439.15 440.07 439.60 437.93 437.89 437.81 437.70 437.95 438.05 437.68 437.67 437.61 437.60 O/S 440.08 439.24 O/S 448.99 449.50 438.07 439.98 439.11 O/S 439.67 437.82 O/S 437.90 437.56 444.95 444.22 444.80 447.74 O/SNovember 24, 2016 444.93 441.00 440.93 445.07 444.99 438.65 438.41 O/S O/S O/S 439.11 440.07 439.66 438.43 438.48 438.44 437.82 438.02 438.75 438.04 437.83 437.79 438.01 O/S 440.00 439.32 O/S 448.54 449.08 438.76 439.19 O/S 439.66 437.89 O/S 438.03 437.87 O/S 444.65 445.03 O/S O/S

March 21, 2017 444.93 441.07 441.01 445.44 445.37 439.00 438.56 O/S O/S O/S 439.34 440.34 440.68 438.59 438.63 438.58 438.16 438.30 439.03 438.48 439.57 438.24 438.18 438.26 O/S 440.28 439.41 O/S 448.71 449.32 439.05 440.24 439.34 O/S 439.69 438.22 O/S 438.63 438.27 O/S 445.27 445.52 O/S O/S

June 5, 2017 445.45 441.31 441.24 445.85 445.67 438.97 438.84 O/S O/S O/S Broken 440.23 440.53 438.96 438.95 438.89 438.40 438.49 438.97 438.49 439.57 438.44 438.37 438.42 O/S 440.56 439.51 O/S 448.22 447.76 439.03 440.16 439.37 O/S 439.74 438.60 O/S 438.55 438.36 O/S 445.19 445.78 O/S O/S

August 16, 2017 445.62 441.35 441.29 444.82 444.74 438.61 438.19 O/S O/S O/S Broken 440.08 439.95 438.49 438.44 438.38 438.07 438.23 438.56 437.93 439.57 438.11 438.03 438.01 O/S 439.51 O/S 448.03 448.42 438.58 440.24 439.34 O/S 439.62 438.31 O/S 438.22 438.04 O/S 444.40 444.85 O/S O/S

September 22, 2017 445.63 441.31 441.24 444.69 444.61 438.55 438.24 O/S O/S O/S Broken 440.07 439.99 438.41 438.39 438.35 437.90 438.11 438.54 437.89 439.57 437.98 437.89 437.88 O/S 440.31 439.47 O/S 447.83 448.29 438.55 440.24 439.32 O/S 439.65 438.12 O/S 438.10 O/S O/S 444.35 444.68 O/S O/S

November 14, 2017 445.66 441.28 441.22 444.84 444.81 438.85 438.69 O/S O/S O/S Broken 440.16 440.24 438.69 438.71 438.70 437.90 438.12 438.75 438.16 439.57 438.04 437.96 438.19 O/S 440.10 439.32 O/S 447.41 448.00 438.77 440.24 439.32 O/S 439.76 438.09 O/S 438.16 O/S O/S 444.47 444.84 O/S O/S

Blank cell indicates that water level was not measured. *Groundwater levels measured at wells GL17-1 and GL17-2 were switchedBroken indicates that monitoring well standpipe is broken. 440.52* Well GL6-1 was re-drilled in 2011 between 2008 and 2011 due to mislabelling of the wells in the field. The correctDry indicates that monitoring well was dry during the monitoring event. groundwater elevations at each well are now shown in this table.O/S indicated that monitoring well was out of service or decommissioned.

Golder Associates Ltd. Page 1 of 2

Printed on: 2/16/2018 Table 2a: Groundwater Elevations, Glenmore Landfill, Kelowna, BC 1782325

Well ID 2005 Well Elevation SurveyFebruary 23, 2005April 11, 2005May 6, 2005June 23, 2005July 6, 2005August 31, 2005September 29, 2005March 21, 2006April 27, 2006June 29, 2006July 14, 2006July 28, 2006August 14, 2006September 28, 2006October 11, 2006October 18, 2006March 28, 2007April 4, 2007April 16, 2007September 13, 2007September 24, 2007October 12, 2007October 19, 2007October 30, 2007November 22, 2007December 17, 2007May 21, 2008June 25, 2008July 23, 2008October 29, 20082009 Well Elevation SurveyMay 21, 2009May 28, 2009June 25, 2009August 10, 2009August 25, 2009September 28, 2009October 30, 2009November 12, 2009December 17, 2009March 16, 2010April 21, 2010May 14, 2010June 22, 2010July 21, 2010August 5, 20102011 Well Elevation SurveyJune 16, 2011September 28, 2011December 20, 2011April 12, 20122012 Well Elevation SurveyJune 27, 2012September 21, 2012October 3, 2012December 5, 2012February 27, 20132013 Well Elevation SurveyJune 27, 2013August 22, 2013November 8, 20132014 Well Elevation SurveyFebruary 18, 2014June 2, 2014August 26, 2014November 21, 20142015 Well Elevation SurveyMarch 17, 2015June 4, 2015August 27, 2015November 2, 20152016 Well Elevation SurveyMarch 22, 2016May 20, 2016September 16, 2016November 24, 2016March 21, 2017June 5, 2017August 16, 2017September 22, 2017November 14, 2017

GL26-1 GL26-2 GL26-3 GL26-4 GL27-1 GL27-2 GL27-3 GL27-4 GL28-1 GL28-2 GL28-3 GL29-1 GL29-2 GL30-1 GL30-2 GL30-3 GL31-1 GL31-2 GL31-3 GL32-1 GL32-2 GL32-3 GL33-1 GL33-2 GL33-3 GL34-1 GL34-2 GL34-3 GL35-1 GL35-2 GL35-3 GL36-1 GL36-2 GL36-3 GL37 GL38 06BH02 09BH03 09BH04 09BH06-S09BH06-D 09BH07

441.46 441.55 441.50 441.58 440.65 439.27 439.26 439.10 438.54 438.71 438.61

439.82 437.41 437.25 437.41 436.89 429.64 437.39 437.40 435.07 435.07439.77 437.27 437.26 Dry 438.74 436.99 437.03 437.10 435.13 435.30 435.31439.80 437.47 437.46 437.46 438.70 433.16 437.01 436.98 435.16 435.38 435.38439.81 437.39 437.39 437.38 438.79 436.75 436.95 Dry 434.99 435.37 435.29439.80 437.54 437.45 437.40 438.77 436.96 437.00 Dry 434.98 435.15 435.16439.76 437.51 437.47 437.43 438.75 437.01 437.03 Dry 434.99 435.15 435.16439.80 437.36 437.36 Dry 438.68 434.79 437.07 Dry 434.95 435.07 435.08439.83 437.61 437.59 437.56 438.80 437.63 437.63 437.33 435.05 435.12 435.12439.90 437.59 437.55 437.53 438.99 437.65 437.63 437.37 435.07 435.12 435.13439.84 437.56 437.53 437.50 438.95 437.65 437.58 437.38 435.13 435.19 435.19439.84 437.58 437.50 437.46 438.91 437.60 437.49 437.38 435.12 435.17 435.18439.83 437.38 437.37 Dry 438.87 437.53 437.42 437.34 435.19 435.21 435.21439.80 437.32 437.31 Dry 438.91 437.50 437.37 437.44 435.16 435.22

440.10 440.97 440.79 440.24 440.10 440.38 438.95 438.63 438.64 440.43 440.49 440.57 440.07 440.07 440.16 438.92 439.01 439.25 440.27 440.29 440.18439.95 437.68 437.65 437.65 439.01 437.91 437.92 437.69 435.54 435.62 435.63 437.44 437.63 437.57 437.34 437.21 437.80 437.35 437.51 437.56 437.67 437.68 437.68 437.51 437.96 437.99 437.52 437.96 437.95 437.61 438.27 438.51439.80 438.26 437.34 Dry 438.92 437.71 437.53 437.56 435.60 435.73 435.73 437.18 437.38 437.25 437.26 437.20 438.44 437.45 437.62 437.30 437.39 437.40 437.40 437.17 437.31 437.34 436.15 436.26 436.13 437.31 437.98 438.22439.88 437.37 437.61 Dry 438.29 437.65 437.57 437.52 435.51 435.65 435.64 437.18 437.31 437.18 437.27 437.20 437.31 437.39 437.47 437.40 437.44 437.51 437.66 437.28 437.43 437.43 436.31 436.61 436.44 437.49 438.00 438.40439.94 437.67 437.69 437.62 439.03 438.03 438.04 437.98 435.64 435.75 435.75 437.49 437.63 437.76 437.31 437.37 437.43 437.25 437.48 437.56 437.71 437.73 437.71 439.36 438.36 437.81 437.92 438.08 437.95 437.85 438.13 438.24

442.05 441.83 441.73 445.04 444.88439.94 438.12 438.12 438.11 439.09 438.07 438.08 438.48 435.81 436.08 435.87 437.46 437.78 438.19 438.18439.70 437.58 437.38 437.56 439.03 437.59 437.74 437.61 435.90 436.14 435.92 437.30 437.42 437.26 437.30 437.35 437.33 437.21 437.37 437.39 437.49 437.50 437.50 439.10 438.10 437.49 437.07 437.38 437.40

439.31 440.68439.97 437.69 437.80 437.74 438.75 437.80 437.91 438.08 435.83 435.96 435.97 439.51 441.38 437.50 437.64 437.74 437.34 437.40 437.40 437.28 437.51 437.55 437.68 437.70 437.70 437.35 437.87 437.70 437.29 437.61 437.69440.04 438.06 438.17 438.02 439.14 438.11 438.18 438.22 435.97 436.13 436.13 439.55 441.21 437.60 437.76 437.86 437.43 437.61 437.48 437.30 437.62 437.71 437.80 437.82 437.82 437.57 438.06 438.06 437.93 438.44 438.42 437.06 437.35 437.51 436.54 436.50441.45 441.53 441.52 441.58 439.62 439.31 439.32 439.14 442.11 441.86 441.78 445.08 444.88 440.13 440.95 440.78 440.27 440.11 440.40 438.99 438.69 438.68 440.45 440.52 440.57 440.06 440.05 440.15 438.96 439.04 439.26 440.231 440.22 440.185 440.308 440.338 445.44 441.01 436.36 435.867 435.814 441.05440.16 438.19 438.28 438.19 439.29 438.66 438.24 438.67 436.16 436.20 436.19 439.70 441.65 437.70 437.89 437.85 437.62 437.76 437.68 437.63 437.83 437.87 437.96 437.97 437.97 437.79 438.26 438.31 438.04 438.54 438.49 438.10 438.46 438.51 437.71 437.71 443.95 435.44 435.71440.14 437.76 437.83 437.72 439.26 437.94 438.04 437.74 437.07 436.18 436.17 439.70 441.43 437.60 437.75 437.83 437.57 437.67 437.49 437.57 437.70 437.73 437.79 437.80 437.80 437.72 438.09 438.10 437.70 438.10 438.11 438.02 438.33 438.38 437.51 437.51 444.09 435.87 435.93 435.22 435.47 436.97440.17 437.95 438.01 437.88 439.34 438.65 438.17 438.56 436.10 436.27 436.27 439.79 441.27 437.69 437.84 437.93 437.62 437.70 437.57 438.56 437.77 437.80 437.89 437.91 437.90 437.63 437.91 437.87 437.37 437.88 437.89 438.03 438.38 438.49 437.71 437.71 444.14 435.80 435.93 435.39 435.54 436.92

440.30 438.09 438.18 438.17 439.40 438.81 438.76 438.74 436.15 436.29 436.29 439.89 441.11 437.75 437.91 437.97 437.72 437.79 437.84 437.64 437.88 437.91 437.95 437.97 437.96 437.79 438.27 438.28 438.10 438.62 438.60 438.02 438.34 438.42 437.76 437.76 444.05 435.86 436.01 435.46 435.59 436.60440.37 438.28 438.31 438.27 439.41 438.52 438.35 438.51 436.21 436.39 436.38 439.96 441.38 437.76 437.97 438.05 437.73 437.81 437.87 437.73 437.92 437.96 438.01 438.05 438.03 437.88 438.27 438.28 438.09 438.53 438.52 438.03 438.36 438.44 437.68 437.68 444.37 436.02 436.06 435.25 435.52 436.92440.28 437.76 437.79 437.73 439.42 438.22 438.05 437.79 436.22 436.54 436.55 439.94 441.69 437.50 438.73 437.78 437.57 437.67 437.51 437.59 437.70 437.73 437.76 437.79 437.78 437.70 437.93 437.95 437.40 437.68 437.69 437.82 438.17 438.22 437.32 437.31 444.17 435.78 435.92 435.15 435.41 436.69440.27 437.79 437.84 437.72 439.47 437.99 438.06 437.95 436.08 436.31 436.31 439.95 441.08 437.59 437.77 437.89 437.49 437.57 437.57 437.46 437.67 437.71 437.87 437.87 437.87 437.46 437.74 437.75 437.41 437.81 437.82 437.93 438.22 438.28 437.55 437.55 444.05 435.69 435.82 435.27 435.42 436.48

440.09440.60 438.18 438.26 438.18 439.97 438.33 438.41 438.26 436.38 436.70 436.70 440.18 441.42 437.91 438.07 438.07 437.86 437.95 437.99 437.80 437.99 438.04 438.11 438.12 438.12 437.94 438.38 438.40 438.17 438.74 438.73 438.10 438.39 438.46 437.89 437.88 444.10 435.87 436.06 435.42 435.62 436.72440.59 438.61 438.57 438.44 439.62 438.14 438.30 438.15 436.24 436.45 436.46 440.23 441.44 437.92 438.08 438.14 437.87 437.98 437.99 437.86 438.00 438.08 438.15 438.16 438.16 438.00 438.38 438.41 438.17 438.66 438.65 438.16 438.44 438.49 437.86 437.86 444.27 435.76 435.94 435.59 435.43 436.64440.45 437.78 437.80 437.74 439.58 438.05 438.00 437.57 436.13 436.42 436.44 440.15 441.17 437.66 437.82 437.88 437.58 437.72 437.82 437.63 437.76 437.79 437.85 437.86 437.86 437.68 437.84 437.86 437.02 437.58 437.73 438.03 438.24 438.29 437.53 437.52 444.13 435.63 435.76 435.07 435.35 436.51440.45 438.29 438.25 438.10 439.59 438.04 438.02 437.72 436.11 436.29 436.31 440.16 440.99 437.65 437.80 437.91 437.50 437.61 437.70 437.55 437.72 437.75 437.86 437.88 437.88 437.44 437.55 437.55 436.75 437.27 437.27 437.99 438.28 438.34 437.57 437.57 444.35 435.64 435.88 435.31 435.47 436.58441.46 441.51 441.50 441.57 440.05 439.27 439.29 439.09 442.07 441.78 441.72 445.05 444.74 439.99 440.72 440.56 440.25 439.99 440.33 438.97 438.67 438.64 440.17 440.26 440.26 440.03 439.88 440.07 438.91 439.00 439.22 440.045 440.05 440.057 440.144 440.075 445.35 441.00 436.34 435.87 435.80 441.04440.92 438.30 438.36 438.32 439.87 438.57 438.57 438.36 436.65 436.92 436.94 440.49 441.19 438.01 438.15 438.23 437.88 438.07 438.23 437.88 438.17 438.21 438.20 438.22 438.01 438.46 438.48 438.16 438.81 438.73 438.24 438.55 438.61 437.96 437.96 444.89 436.29 436.36 435.52 435.80 437.44440.92 438.20 438.22 438.16 439.89 438.27 438.39 438.05 436.49 436.78 436.75 440.50 441.50 438.08 438.24 438.32 437.88 438.06 438.06 437.91 438.13 438.43 438.43 438.42 438.02 438.38 438.41 438.05 438.63 438.62 438.29 438.60 438.61 437.99 438.03 445.32 436.39 436.35 435.40 435.67 437.36440.78 437.92 437.95 437.86 439.79 438.20 438.18 437.76 436.67 436.92 436.93 440.49 441.17 437.77 437.95 438.06 437.67 437.82 437.77 437.73 437.88 437.89 437.98 438.00 438.00 437.81 438.03 438.04 437.52 438.03 438.04 438.13 438.44 438.50 437.70 437.69 445.20 436.40 436.34 435.36 435.70 438.46440.82 438.26 438.34 438.25 440.03 438.41 438.41 438.47 436.60 436.85 436.86 440.46 441.40 437.85 438.03 438.10 437.76 437.89 437.87 437.75 437.96 437.99 438.05 438.06 438.05 437.83 438.19 438.21 437.95 438.64 438.63 438.49 438.53 437.75 437.80 445.33 436.25 436.34 435.49 435.75 437.99441.07 438.55 438.63 438.55 440.05 438.57 438.78 438.55 436.89 437.28 437.29 440.63 441.37 438.13 438.33 438.29 438.03 438.22 438.31 438.04 438.33 438.35 438.34 438.16 438.59 438.60 438.29 438.96 438.94 438.28 438.60 438.67 438.15 438.14 445.35 436.60 436.34 435.60 435.80 439.43441.31 438.65 438.72 438.64 440.05 438.61 438.71 438.59 436.80 437.10 437.10 440.83 441.76 438.37 438.53 438.52 438.22 438.41 438.57 438.54 438.55 438.54 438.40 438.73 438.74 438.91 439.06 438.52 438.73 438.77 438.37 438.37 445.35 436.60 436.34 435.53 435.80 438.78441.16 438.23 438.23 438.19 440.05 438.38 438.40 438.05 436.84 437.39 437.39 440.78 441.31 438.13 438.17 438.22 438.01 438.16 438.28 438.18 438.29 438.28 438.21 438.41 438.43 438.03 438.54 438.54 438.37 438.55 438.56 438.05 438.04 445.26 436.34 435.31 435.67 439.29441.09 438.13 438.12 438.09 440.05 438.29 438.35 437.97 436.52 436.82 436.81 440.73 441.02 438.01 438.14 438.13 437.91 438.04 438.17 438.00 438.15 438.16 438.15 438.07 438.30 438.32 437.98 438.49 438.49 438.32 438.48 438.48 O/S O/S 445.17 436.14 435.35 435.58 438.63441.02 438.46 438.45 438.39 440.05 438.44 438.50 438.46 436.43 436.66 436.65 440.72 440.74 438.00 438.15 438.18 437.90 438.04 438.18 437.94 438.67 438.64 438.14 438.16 438.16 438.06 438.36 438.37 438.13 438.66 438.66 438.38 438.53 438.53 O/S O/S 445.11 436.05 436.17 435.43 435.62 438.35

Blank cell indicates that water level was not measured.Broken indicates that monitoring well standpipe is broken.Dry indicates that monitoring well was dry during the monitoring event.O/S indicated that monitoring well was out of service or decommissioned.

Golder Associates Ltd. Page 2 of 2

Table 2b: Surface Water Elevations, Glenmore Landfill, Kelowna, BC 3/5/2018 1782325

Well ID Tutt Pond Bredin Pond Northeast Pond Slough 2013 Elevation Survey 440.72June 27, 2013 438.58August 22, 2013 437.82November 8, 2013 437.322014 Elevation Survey 439.21 444.22February 18, 2014 438.57 438.76June 2, 2014 438.53 438.48August 26, 2014 437.16 438.75 443.55November 21, 2014 437.55 438.66 443.212015 Elevation Survey 439.25March 17, 2015 438.58 438.70 443.53 437.86June 4, 2015 438.59 438.76 443.58 437.84August 27, 2015 436.48 438.65 443.15 437.52November 2, 2015 436.47 438.69 443.18 437.562016 Elevation Survey 440.68March 22, 2016 438.49 438.78 443.83 437.96May 20, 2016 438.22 438.69 443.85 437.90September 16, 2016 437.34 438.55 443.28 437.69November 24, 2016 438.37 438.72 443.18 437.81February 21, 2017 438.47 438.71 443.66 438.00March 21, 2017 438.72 443.53 438.15April 18, 2017 438.68 438.81 443.48 438.31May 8, 2017 438.70 438.81 443.48 438.36June 5, 2017 438.83 438.90 443.28 438.40June 21, 2017 438.79 438.85 443.16 438.36July 18, 2017 438.89 438.65 443.10 438.22August 16, 2017 438.00 438.58 443.07 438.06September 22, 2017 438.12 438.50 443.03 437.90October 26, 2017 438.39 438.69 443.12 437.86November 14, 2017 438.65 438.71 443.17 437.90December 8, 2017 438.88 438.91 443.31 437.92

https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/14628g/Deliverables/Issued to Client - Reserved for WP/1782325-001-R-Rev0/TBLs/Table 2_Water Levels_USE RED TABs.xls [TABLE 2b for report] Golder Associates Page 1 of 1

2/16/2018 Table 3: General Parameters- Groundwater

2017 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Program, Glenmore Landfill, Kelowna, BC

1782325

Criteria Used for Comparison [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8]GL2-1 GL6-1 GL9-1 GL9-3

GL2-1 GL5-2 DUP1 GL6-1 (2011) GL9-1 GL9-3L1931235-1 L1931235-2 L1931235-3 L1931235-4 L1931979-1 L1931979-5 L1934042-1 L1934042-2 L1933748-1 L1933748-2 L1997978-1 L1997174-1 L1997174-2

5/24/2017 5/25/2017 5/25/2017 5/30/2017 5/30/2017 5/29/2017

Parameter

[1]

CSR

AW-F

[2]

BCAWQG

AW-F AVG

[3]

BCAWQG

AW-F MAX

[4]

BCWWQG

AW-F

[5]

CSR

IW

[6]

BCAWQG

IW AVG

[7]

BCAWQG

IW MAX

[8]

BCWWQG

IW

Unit

Field Parameters

Condutivity 2200 [8] uS/cm 1002 1036 2066 1222 2400 [8]

2400 [8]

10990 [8] 1980 43343

[8]8248

[8]5355

[8] 1131 5700 [8]

Temperature Degrees C 11.9 12.3 12.7 13.5 12.9 12.9 17.8 11.9 11.8 23.1 22.0 12.5 13.4pH 6.5 - 9 [2] 6.5 - 9 [3] pH Units 7.63 7.77 7.30 7.71 7.39 7.39 7.34 9.29 7.60 6.85 6.54 7.47 6.83Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 0.38 0.19 0.93 0.07 5.0 5.0 0.04 0.01 0.13 0.08 0.7 0.99 2.72Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) millivolts -155 -175.6 10.3 -115 104.4 104.4 -358.1 -360 140 -120 -113 -138.8 -29Other Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) 1.31 - 18.4pH [1] 0.102 - 1.87 [2] mg/L 0.0097 0.173 0.0133 0.0537 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.119 314 [1] 0.0305 2.02

[2]1.72

[2] 0.0125 0.0076Bromide mg/L < 0.25 < 0.25 < 1.0 0.39 < 1.0 < 1.0 8.4 0.71 11.2 < 2.5 < 1.0 < 0.25 < 2.5Chloride 1500 [1] 150 [2] 100 [5] 100 [6] mg/L 7.2 7.1 131

[5][6] 45.3 550 [5][6]

543 [5][6]

941 [5][6]

159 [5][6]

1680 [1][5][6]

514 [5][6]

556 [5][6] 8.1 181

[5][6]

Fluoride 2.0 - 3.0H [1] equationH [2] 1 [5] 1 [6] mg/L 1.0 1.32 [5][6]

1.11 [5][6] 0.67 0.84 0.85 < 1.0 0.66 2.7

[5][6]1.7

[5][6]1.75

[5][6]2.09

[5][6]1.3

[5][6]

Nitrate (as N) 400 [1] 3 [2] mg/L 0.131 < 0.025 48.7 < 0.025 5.72 5.67 < 0.25 < 0.050 < 0.50 < 0.25 < 0.10 0.098 3.12Nitrite (as N) 0.2 - 2Cl [1] 0.2Cl [2] mg/L < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.020 < 0.0050 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.050 < 0.010 < 0.10 < 0.050 < 0.020 < 0.0050 < 0.050Orthophosphate, Total mg/L 0.0614 0.0463 0.0063 0.0016 0.0037 0.0038 2.69 < 0.0010 0.0065 0.372 0.157 0.0338 0.0179Phosphorous, Dissolved mg/L < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 3.28 < 0.30 < 6.0 1.98 < 0.60 < 0.30 < 0.60Sulphate 1280 - 4290H [1] 309 - >429H [2] mg/L 350 325 368 323 209 207 1210 223 34600

[1] 3850 3540 264 4560 [1]

Sulphide as S mg/L - - - - - - 6.27 - - - - - -Sulfide (as H2S), Dissolved 0.02 [1] 0.002 [4] mg/L - - - - - - 6.66

[1] - - - - - -Water Quality Parameters

Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) mg/L 196 258 396 259 510 437 4370 693 834 823 877 428 794Hardness, calcium carbonate mg/L 418 482 769 466 782 787 1260 363 11100 2610 3240 326 4190Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) mg/L < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 1150 80 1070 751 < 20 41Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) mg/L 1.22 1.2 5.28 1.94 3.52 3.59 1.19 386 21.3 10.1 272 2.06 14.8Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 1500 [8] mg/L 671 696 1420 815 1690 1670 7540 1150 46400 7280 6500 767 8470Notes for Table 3

CSR - Standards from the Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR; enacted in 1997, and updated from time to time).Land Use abbreviations: AW-F (Aquatic Life, Fresh Water); IW (Irrigation Water).- Parameter not analyzed or criteria not defined.< Indicates parameter concentration below reported analytical detection limit.pH = Standard is pH dependentH = Standard is dependent on hardnessCl = Standard varies with Chloride concentration Where an exceedence of the criteria was identified for those parameters that are pH, temperature and hardness dependent, further evaluation of the criteria was conducted using the specific pH or hardness value for that sample, and the analytical result Italics - Detection Limit greater than standardNumber in Paranthesis following the analytical result indicates the corresponding criteria that has been exceeded:[1] CSR, Schedule 3.2, Generic Numerical Water Standards for Freshwater Aquatic Life (AW-F)[2] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life long-term average (AW-F AVG)[3] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life short-term maximum (AW-F MAX)[4] BC Working Water Quality Guidelines (BCWWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life [5] CSR, Schedule 3.2, Generic Numerical Water Standards for Irrigation Water (IW)

Output generated by GalReport.

[1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8]GL15-2

GL15-2

9/25/2017

GL5-2 GL12-1

Sample Date

GL0-1

GL0-1

5/24/2017

GL0-2

GL0-2

5/24/2017 5/24/2017

GL12-1

5/29/2017

GL12-1

9/26/2017 9/25/2017Sample Lab ID

Location

Sample Name

GL0-3

GL0-3GL15-1

GL15-1

https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/14628g/Deliverables/Issued to Client - Reserved for WP/1782325-001-R-Rev0/TBLs/Tables 3 to 6 and Table 8.xlsx [Table 3 - General Parameters] Golder Associates Page 1 of 3



1782325

Criteria Used for Comparison

Parameter

[1]

CSR

AW-F

[2]

BCAWQG

AW-F AVG

[3]

BCAWQG

AW-F MAX

[4]

BCWWQG

AW-F

[5]

CSR

IW

[6]

BCAWQG

IW AVG

[7]

BCAWQG

IW MAX

[8]

BCWWQG

IW

Unit

Field Parameters

Condutivity 2200 [8] uS/cmTemperature Degrees CpH 6.5 - 9 [2] 6.5 - 9 [3] pH UnitsDissolved Oxygen mg/LOxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) millivoltsOther Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) 1.31 - 18.4pH [1] 0.102 - 1.87 [2] mg/LBromide mg/LChloride 1500 [1] 150 [2] 100 [5] 100 [6] mg/LFluoride 2.0 - 3.0H [1] equationH [2] 1 [5] 1 [6] mg/LNitrate (as N) 400 [1] 3 [2] mg/LNitrite (as N) 0.2 - 2Cl [1] 0.2Cl [2] mg/LOrthophosphate, Total mg/LPhosphorous, Dissolved mg/LSulphate 1280 - 4290H [1] 309 - >429H [2] mg/LSulphide as S mg/LSulfide (as H2S), Dissolved 0.02 [1] 0.002 [4] mg/LWater Quality Parameters

Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) mg/LHardness, calcium carbonate mg/LChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) mg/LDissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) mg/LTotal Dissolved Solids (TDS) 1500 [8] mg/LNotes for Table 3

CSR - Standards from the Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR; enacted in 1997, and updated from time to time).Land Use abbreviations: AW-F (Aquatic Life, Fresh Water); IW (Irrigation Water).- Parameter not analyzed or criteria not defined.< Indicates parameter concentration below reported analytical detection limit.pH = Standard is pH dependentH = Standard is dependent on hardnessCl = Standard varies with Chloride concentration Where an exceedence of the criteria was identified for those parameters that are pH, temperature and hardness dependent, further evaluation of the criteria was conducted using the specific pH or hardness vaItalics - Detection Limit greater than standardNumber in Paranthesis following the analytical result indicates the corresponding criteria that has been exceeded:[1] CSR, Schedule 3.2, Generic Numerical Water Standards for Freshwater Aquatic Life (AW-F)[2] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life long-term average (AW-F AVG)[3] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life short-term maximum (AW-F MAX)[4] BC Working Water Quality Guidelines (BCWWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life [5] CSR, Schedule 3.2, Generic Numerical Water Standards for Irrigation Water (IW)


Sample Date

Sample Lab ID

Location

Sample Name

[1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8]

DUP2 DUP3L1931979-2 L1931979-6 L1935125-1 L1997978-2 L1933748-3 L1931979-3 L1931979-7 L1931979-4 L1997174-3 L1997174-4 L1956939-1 L1997978-3 L1956939-2 L1997978-4

5/25/2017 5/25/2017

3966 [8]

3966 [8]

2476 [8] 1998 8031

[8] 1986 1986 2146 2299 [8]

8770 [8]

3535 [8]

3264 [8]

3986 [8]

3974 [8]

11.8 11.8 16.4 15.9 19.6 11.5 11.5 12.5 13.7 13 13.7 14 13.1 13.87.66 7.66 8.23 7.10 7.88 7.36 7.36 7.88 7.54 7.40 6.83 6.88 6.65 6.635.59 5.59 0.12 0.23 0.12 2.81 2.81 0.01 0.64 0.49 0.09 0.22 1.31 0.359.9 59.9 181.6 -158.8 -173.9 94.3 94.3 -204.6 -200.3 -55 -95 -119 70.9 -30.2

< 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.353 0.334 1.39 [2] 0.0104 < 0.0050 0.0701 0.155 0.600 0.163 0.145 < 0.0050 < 0.0050

< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 3.2 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 5.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0139

[5][6]142

[5][6] 78 81 619 [5][6] 35 35 38 32 543

[5][6] 50 48 47 500.94 0.99 1.89

[5][6]1.95

[5][6] < 1.0 0.89 0.90 3.31 [1][5][6]

3.26 [1][5][6] < 2.0 [5][6]

1.16 [5][6]

1.11 [5][6] < 0.40 < 0.40

0.33 0.28 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.25 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.50 < 0.10 < 0.10 13.1 [2]

12.1 [2]

< 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.050 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.10 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.0200.0517 0.0528 0.0146 0.0114 0.0027 0.0034 0.0033 0.0674 0.0553 0.0027 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0093 0.0095< 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.90 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 1.5 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.301710 1750 < 6.0 7.6 3820 386 387 6.0 6.6 10500

[1]2270

[2]2190

[2]2590

[2]2840

[2]

- - - - 0.051 - - - - - - - - -- - - - 0.054

[1] - - - - - - - - -

898 866 1350 1310 141 1070 1020 1560 1450 601 579 554 671 670833 847 125 121 1370 1150 1150 95.2 92 5080 1620 1620 1680 1920< 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 42 37 < 20 < 20 31 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 201.6 1.49 1.78 1.89 3.02 14.8 14.6 2.75 2.45 6.99 3.78 4.35 5.16 5.74

3530 3510 1530 1480 6310 1610 1580 1640 1650 15200 3740 3460 4400 4640

[1][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

7/11/2017

GL28-2

9/26/20179/25/2017

GL28-1

7/11/2017

GL28-1

9/26/20175/25/2017

GL27-1

5/25/2017

GL27-1

9/25/20175/31/2017

GL17-1

9/26/2017

GL18-2

GL18-2

5/29/2017

GL17-1

GL16-1

5/25/2017

GL16-1 GL23-1 GL27-1 GL28-1 GL28-2

GL17-1 GL23-1GL27-3

GL27-3 GL28-2




1782325


Parameter

[1]

CSR

AW-F

[2]

BCAWQG

AW-F AVG

[3]

BCAWQG

AW-F MAX

[4]

BCWWQG

AW-F

[5]

CSR

IW

[6]

BCAWQG

IW AVG

[7]

BCAWQG

IW MAX

[8]

BCWWQG

IW

Unit

Field Parameters

Condutivity 2200 [8] uS/cmTemperature Degrees CpH 6.5 - 9 [2] 6.5 - 9 [3] pH UnitsDissolved Oxygen mg/LOxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) millivoltsOther Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) 1.31 - 18.4pH [1] 0.102 - 1.87 [2] mg/LBromide mg/LChloride 1500 [1] 150 [2] 100 [5] 100 [6] mg/LFluoride 2.0 - 3.0H [1] equationH [2] 1 [5] 1 [6] mg/LNitrate (as N) 400 [1] 3 [2] mg/LNitrite (as N) 0.2 - 2Cl [1] 0.2Cl [2] mg/LOrthophosphate, Total mg/LPhosphorous, Dissolved mg/LSulphate 1280 - 4290H [1] 309 - >429H [2] mg/LSulphide as S mg/LSulfide (as H2S), Dissolved 0.02 [1] 0.002 [4] mg/LWater Quality Parameters

Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) mg/LHardness, calcium carbonate mg/LChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) mg/LDissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) mg/LTotal Dissolved Solids (TDS) 1500 [8] mg/LNotes for Table 3

CSR - Standards from the Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR; enacted in 1997, and updated from time to time).Land Use abbreviations: AW-F (Aquatic Life, Fresh Water); IW (Irrigation Water).- Parameter not analyzed or criteria not defined.< Indicates parameter concentration below reported analytical detection limit.pH = Standard is pH dependentH = Standard is dependent on hardnessCl = Standard varies with Chloride concentration Where an exceedence of the criteria was identified for those parameters that are pH, temperature and hardness dependent, further evaluation of the criteria was conducted using the specific pH or hardness vaItalics - Detection Limit greater than standardNumber in Paranthesis following the analytical result indicates the corresponding criteria that has been exceeded:[1] CSR, Schedule 3.2, Generic Numerical Water Standards for Freshwater Aquatic Life (AW-F)[2] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life long-term average (AW-F AVG)[3] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life short-term maximum (AW-F MAX)[4] BC Working Water Quality Guidelines (BCWWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life [5] CSR, Schedule 3.2, Generic Numerical Water Standards for Irrigation Water (IW)


Sample Date

Sample Lab ID

Location

Sample Name

[1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]09BH03 09BH06D

DUP1 09BH03 09BH06-DL1956939-3 L1997978-5 L1933748-4 L1997978-6 L1997978-8 L1997978-7 L1935534-1 L1938068-1

9/26/2017 6/1/2017 6/6/2017

5314 [8]

5049 [8] 1910 1543 1543 6700

[8]3010

[8] 113314 13.9 17.6 16.8 16.8 14 11.8 11.6

6.69 6.70 7.53 7.00 7.00 6.50 6.88 7.101.35 0.24 0.2 0.19 0.19 0.37 1.7 0.1480 -9.3 100 48.5 48.5 -145 83.6 -30

0.0084 < 0.0050 0.0206 0.0153 0.0179 1.87 0.0398 0.107< 2.5 < 1.0 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 2.6 < 1.0 < 0.25

48 49 57.9 51.6 53.1 403 [5][6] 15.0 8.2

< 1.0 < 0.40 1.13 [5][6]

1.24 [5][6]

1.24 [5][6]

1.40 [5][6]

1.03 [5][6] 0.97

0.69 1.12 1.1 0.415 0.383 < 0.25 0.69 < 0.025< 0.050 < 0.020 < 0.010 0.017 < 0.010 < 0.050 < 0.020 < 0.00500.0373 0.0358 0.0199 0.0243 0.0243 < 0.0010 0.0087 0.0092< 0.60 < 0.60 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.90 < 0.30 < 0.304000

[2]4100

[2] 408 389 401 3750 1240 [2] 286

- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -

840 807 642 644 645 1990 698 3432480 2520 586 542 539 2010 940 364< 20 < 20 90 72 72 21 < 20 < 207.48 7.16 34.1 25.8 26.5 6.06 7.36 2.396160 6150 1300 1290 1330 7480 2270 699

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

GL29-1

9/26/2017

GL29-1 GL35-3

GL35-3

9/26/2017

GL28-3

9/26/2017

GL28-3

GL29-1

5/29/2017

GL28-3

7/11/2017


2/16/2018 Table 4: Dissolved Metals - Groundwater


1782325

Criteria Used for Comparison [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8]GL0-1 GL0-2 GL0-3 GL2-1 GL6-1 GL9-1 GL9-3 GL15-1

GL0-1 GL0-2 GL0-3 GL2-1 GL5-2 DUP1 GL6-1 (2011) GL9-1 GL9-3 GL12-1 GL12-1 GL15-1L1931235-1 L1931235-2 L1931235-3 L1931235-4 L1931979-1 L1931979-5 L1934042-1 L1934042-2 L1933748-1 L1933748-2 L1997978-1 L1997174-15/24/2017 5/24/2017 5/24/2017 5/24/2017 5/25/2017 5/25/2017 5/30/2017 5/30/2017 5/29/2017 5/29/2017 9/26/2017 9/25/2017

Parameter[1]

CSR AW-F

[2]

BCAWQG

AW-F AVG

[3]

BCAWQG

AW-F MAX

[4]

BCWWQG

AW-F

[5]

CSR IW

[6]

BCAWQG

IW AVG

[7]

BCAWQG

IW MAX

[8]

BCWWQG

IW

Unit

Parameters

Hardness, Calcium Carbonate mg/L 418 482 769 466 782 787 1260 363 11100 2610 3240 326pH 6.5 - 9 [2] 6.5 - 9 [3] pH units 8.32 8.4 8.05 8.25 8.22 8.28 7.4 8.9 7.9 7.17 7.39 8.10Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 1500 [8] mg/L 671 696 1420 815 1690

[8]1670

[8]7540

[8] 1150 46400 [8]

7280 [8]

6500 [8] 767

Dissolved Metals

Aluminum 0.05 [2] 5 [5] 5 [6] mg/L < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.124 < 0.010 < 0.050 0.293 0.086 < 0.010Antimony 0.09 [1] 0.009 [4] mg/L < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010 < 0.00050 < 0.0050 0.00066 < 0.00050 < 0.00050Arsenic** (Total) 0.05 [1] 0.005 [2] 0.1 [5] 0.1 [6] mg/L 0.0031 0.0038 < 0.0010 0.0013 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0058 < 0.0010 0.0051 0.0317 0.0242 < 0.0010Barium 10 [1] 1 [4] mg/L 0.047 0.054 0.024 0.112 0.063 0.064 0.449 < 0.020 < 0.20 0.037 0.04 0.028Beryllium 0.0015 [1] 0.00013 [4] 0.1 [5] 0.1 [8] mg/L < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 < 0.0050 < 0.10 < 0.0050 < 0.010 < 0.0050

Bismuth mg/L < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.60 < 0.20 < 4.0 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Boron **(total) 12 [1] 1.2 [2] 2 - 6CROP [5] 1 [6] mg/L < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 3.11

[5][6] < 0.10 < 2.0 0.54 0.34 < 0.10Cadmium 0.0005 - 0.004H [1] equationH [2] 0.005 [5] 0.0051 [8] mg/L < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.00025 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 0.000141Calcium mg/L 64 79.9 120 103 102 102 136 9.1 377 378 449 31.9Chromium* 0.09III, 0.01VI [1] 0.001 [4] 0.005III, 0.008VI[5] 0.008 [8] mg/L < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 0.00364 0.00359 0.0223

[1][5][8] < 0.00050 < 0.0050 0.0128 [1][5][8]

0.00658 [5][8] < 0.00050

Cobalt 0.04 [1] 0.004 [2] 0.05 [5] 0.05 [8] mg/L < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 0.0302 < 0.00050 < 0.0050 0.00408 0.00492 < 0.00050Copper 0.02 - 0.09H [1] equationH [2] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [7] mg/L < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0020 < 0.0010 0.016 0.001 0.0015 < 0.0010Iron 0.35 [3] 5 [5] mg/L < 0.030 0.121 < 0.030 0.651 < 0.030 < 0.030 0.374 0.127 < 0.60 6.07

[5]12.7

[5] < 0.030Lead 0.04 - 0.16H [1] equationH [2] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [7] mg/L < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0025 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Lithium 2.5 [5] 2.5 [8] mg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.065 0.065 < 0.050 0.112 < 0.20 0.137 0.133 < 0.050Magnesium mg/L 62.7 68.6 114 50.6 128 129 223 82.7 2470 404 513 59.8Manganese equationH [2] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [8] mg/L 0.029 0.126 < 0.010 0.158 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.334

[5][8] 0.027 0.14 8.18 [5][8]

11.6 [5][8] 0.02

Mercury 0.00025 [1] 0.00001 [2] 0.001 [5] 0.002 [7] mg/L < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020Molybdenum 10 [1] 1 [2] 0.01 - 0.03 CROP[5] 0.01 [6] mg/L 0.0271

[5][6]0.0249

[5][6]0.0159

[5][6]0.0114

[5][6]0.0113

[5][6]0.0115

[5][6] 0.0014 0.002 0.116 [5][6]

0.0106 [5][6]

0.0149 [5][6] 0.0054

Nickel 0.250 - 1.5H [1] equationH [4] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [8] mg/L < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.0351 < 0.0050 < 0.025 0.0252 0.0234 < 0.0050Phosphorus mg/L < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 3.28 < 0.30 < 6.0 1.98 < 0.60 < 0.30Potassium mg/L 10.6 11.2 10.4 3.7 9.1 9.3 498 13.7 121 195 145 < 2.0Selenium 0.02 [1] 0.002 [2] 0.02 [5] 0.01 [6] mg/L < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0013 < 0.0010 0.0036 0.0035 0.0016 < 0.0010 < 0.0025 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Silicon mg/L 11 11.4 9.47 8.75 8.23 8.36 19.8 2.4 6 16.9 17.1 9.15Silver 0.0005 - 0.015H [1] equationH [2] mg/L < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.00010 < 0.000050 < 0.00050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050Sodium mg/L 69.4 60.4 180 95.5 331 336 2110 359 12800 712 805 175Strontium mg/L 1.64 1.67 2.16 3.48 5.33 5.37 3.67 0.357 10.7 7.74 9.86 3.48Sulphur (S) mg/L 115 108 121 110 69.1 69.5 388 80.8 11300 793 1140 89Tellurium mg/L < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00040 < 0.00040 < 0.0020 < 0.00040 < 0.010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.00020Thallium 0.003 [1] 0.0008 [4] mg/L < 0.000010 < 0.000010 < 0.000010 < 0.000010 < 0.000020 < 0.000020 < 0.00010 < 0.000020 < 0.00050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000010Thorium-232 mg/L < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.0010 < 0.00020 < 0.0050 0.00097 < 0.00050 < 0.00010Tin mg/L < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.090 < 0.030 < 0.60 < 0.030 < 0.060 < 0.030Titanium 1 [1] mg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.20 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050Uranium 0.085 [1] 0.0085 [4] 0.01 [5] 0.01 [8] mg/L 0.00426 0.00205 0.124

[1][5][8] 0.00558 0.0207 [5][8]

0.0204 [5][8] 0.00092 0.0003 1.43

[1][5][8]0.120

[1][5][8]0.127

[1][5][8] 0.00597Vanadium 0.1 [5] 0.1 [8] mg/L < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.090 < 0.030 < 0.60 < 0.030 < 0.060 < 0.030Zinc 0.075 - 2.4H [1] equationH [2] 1-5pH [5] 1 [6] mg/L < 0.0050 0.0066 0.0071 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 < 0.0050 < 0.10 < 0.0050 < 0.010 < 0.0050Zirconium mg/L < 0.00030 < 0.00030 < 0.00030 < 0.00030 < 0.00030 < 0.00030 0.0127 < 0.00030 < 0.0030 0.0139 0.00772 < 0.00030Notes for Table 4

CSR - Standards from the Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR; enacted in 1997, and updated from time to time).Land Use abbreviations: AW-F (Aquatic Life, Fresh Water); IW (Irrigation Water).pH = Standard is pH dependentH = Standard is dependent on hardnessCROP = Standard varies depending on crop present*Chromium standard is valence dependentNumber in Paranthesis following the analytical result indicates the corresponding criteria that has been exceeded:[1] CSR, Schedule 3.2, Generic Numerical Water Standards for Freshwater Aquatic Life (AW-F)[2] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life long-term average (AW-F AVG)[3] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life short-term maximum (AW-F MAX)[4] BC Working Water Quality Guidelines (BCWWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life [5] CSR, Schedule 3.2, Generic Numerical Water Standards for Irrigation Water (IW)[6] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Irrigation Water long-term average (IW AVG)[7] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Irrigation Water short-term maximum (IW MAX)[8] BC Working Water Quality Guidelines (BCWWQG) for Irrigation Water< Indicates parameter concentration below reported analytical detection limit.- Chemical not analyzed or criteria not defined.Range in boron guideline of 2.0-6.0 mg/L used in assessment; off-Site irrigated fields reportedly used to grow forage crops (currently, alfalfa and grass).Molybdenum - Standard varies with crop, soil drainage and Mo:Cu ratio. Most conservative CSR IW standard was used.Italics - Detection Limit greater than standardOutput generated by GalReport.

Location

[1][5][6][7][8][1][5][6][7][8]

Sample Name

Sample Date

GL5-2 GL12-1

Lab Sample ID

https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/14628g/Deliverables/Issued to Client - Reserved for WP/1782325-001-R-Rev0/TBLs/Tables 3 to 6 and Table 8.xlsx [Table 4 - Dissolved Metals] Golder Associates Page 1 of 3



1782325


Parameter[1]

CSR AW-F

[2]

BCAWQG

AW-F AVG

[3]

BCAWQG

AW-F MAX

[4]

BCWWQG

AW-F

[5]

CSR IW

[6]

BCAWQG

IW AVG

[7]

BCAWQG

IW MAX

[8]

BCWWQG

IW

Unit

Parameters

Hardness, Calcium Carbonate mg/LpH 6.5 - 9 [2] 6.5 - 9 [3] pH unitsTotal Dissolved Solids (TDS) 1500 [8] mg/LDissolved Metals

Aluminum 0.05 [2] 5 [5] 5 [6] mg/LAntimony 0.09 [1] 0.009 [4] mg/LArsenic** (Total) 0.05 [1] 0.005 [2] 0.1 [5] 0.1 [6] mg/LBarium 10 [1] 1 [4] mg/LBeryllium 0.0015 [1] 0.00013 [4] 0.1 [5] 0.1 [8] mg/LBismuth mg/LBoron **(total) 12 [1] 1.2 [2] 2 - 6CROP [5] 1 [6] mg/LCadmium 0.0005 - 0.004H [1] equationH [2] 0.005 [5] 0.0051 [8] mg/LCalcium mg/LChromium* 0.09III, 0.01VI [1] 0.001 [4] 0.005III, 0.008VI[5] 0.008 [8] mg/LCobalt 0.04 [1] 0.004 [2] 0.05 [5] 0.05 [8] mg/LCopper 0.02 - 0.09H [1] equationH [2] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [7] mg/LIron 0.35 [3] 5 [5] mg/LLead 0.04 - 0.16H [1] equationH [2] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [7] mg/LLithium 2.5 [5] 2.5 [8] mg/LMagnesium mg/LManganese equationH [2] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [8] mg/LMercury 0.00025 [1] 0.00001 [2] 0.001 [5] 0.002 [7] mg/LMolybdenum 10 [1] 1 [2] 0.01 - 0.03 CROP[5] 0.01 [6] mg/LNickel 0.250 - 1.5H [1] equationH [4] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [8] mg/LPhosphorus mg/LPotassium mg/LSelenium 0.02 [1] 0.002 [2] 0.02 [5] 0.01 [6] mg/LSilicon mg/LSilver 0.0005 - 0.015H [1] equationH [2] mg/LSodium mg/LStrontium mg/LSulphur (S) mg/LTellurium mg/LThallium 0.003 [1] 0.0008 [4] mg/LThorium-232 mg/LTin mg/LTitanium 1 [1] mg/LUranium 0.085 [1] 0.0085 [4] 0.01 [5] 0.01 [8] mg/LVanadium 0.1 [5] 0.1 [8] mg/LZinc 0.075 - 2.4H [1] equationH [2] 1-5pH [5] 1 [6] mg/LZirconium mg/LNotes for Table 4


Location

Sample Name

Sample Date

Lab Sample ID

[1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8]GL15-2 GL18-2 GL27-3

GL15-2 GL16-1 DUP2 GL17-1 GL17-1 GL18-2 GL23-1 DUP3 GL27-1 GL27-1 GL27-3L1997174-2 L1931979-2 L1931979-6 L1935125-1 L1997978-2 L1933748-3 L1931979-3 L1931979-7 L1931979-4 L1997174-3 L1997174-49/25/2017 5/25/2017 5/25/2017 5/31/2017 9/26/2017 5/29/2017 5/25/2017 5/25/2017 5/25/2017 9/25/2017 9/25/2017

4190 833 847 125 121 1370 1150 1150 95.2 92 50807.59 8.51 8.45 8.13 7.95 7.95 8.45 8.41 8.83 8.14 7.82

8470 [8]

3530 [8]

3510 [8]

1530 [8] 1480 6310

[8]1610

[8]1580

[8]1640

[8]1650

[8]15200

[8]

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010< 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010< 0.0010 0.0075 0.0073 0.0024 0.0021 0.0071 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0331 0.017 0.0058< 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 0.216 0.212 < 0.030 0.072 0.078 0.451 0.438 < 0.050< 0.010 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.025

< 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.60 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20< 0.20 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.30 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.50

0.000061 0.000418 0.000385 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 0.000216 0.000219 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 0.000066368 92.8 93.3 20 19.5 282 82.6 85 14.5 14.1 361

0.00864 [5][8] < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010

< 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 0.00170.003 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0024 0.0035 0.0034 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0020

< 0.060 < 0.030 < 0.030 1.68 1.43 1.39 < 0.030 < 0.030 0.713 0.690 2.63< 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010

0.055 0.276 0.28 0.227 0.227 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.233 0.22 0.069795 146 149 18.2 17.5 161 229 228 14.3 13.8 1010

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.069 0.057 0.476 [5][8] 0.033 0.043 0.101 0.095 0.435

[5]

< 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.000200.015

[5][6]0.0146

[5][6]0.0148

[5][6] < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0411 [5][6]

0.0136 [5][6]

0.0137 [5][6]

0.079 [5][6]

0.0449 [5][6]

0.0498 [5][6]

< 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.0097 0.0098 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050< 0.60 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.90 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 1.515.1 19.7 19.8 15 14.9 16.9 14.9 15.8 14.2 13.7 25

0.0519 [1][5][6] < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010

10.3 5.51 5.48 5.53 5.32 10.6 10.1 10.5 5.92 5.66 8.65< 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.00010 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.00010

1070 952 955 614 563 1460 191 203 710 645 34008.81 16.4 16.4 3.84 3.72 4.26 4.1 4.27 3.12 2.96 9.861780 523 530 4.22 4.87 1190 123 122 9.33 8.74 3580

< 0.0010 0.0012 0.0012 < 0.00040 < 0.00040 < 0.0020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.0010 < 0.00040 < 0.0020< 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000020 < 0.000020 < 0.00010 < 0.000010 < 0.000010 < 0.000050 < 0.000020 < 0.00010< 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.0010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00050 < 0.00020 < 0.0010

< 0.060 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.090 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.15< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050

0.423 [1][5][8] 0.00843 0.00837 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 0.00223 0.0747

[4][5][8]0.0734

[4][5][8] 0.00094 0.00082 0.0794 [5][8]

< 0.060 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.090 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.15 [5]

< 0.010 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.025< 0.00030 0.00038 0.0004 0.00162 0.00127 < 0.00060 0.00037 0.00037 0.00175 0.00196 < 0.00060

[1][5][6][7][8][1][5][6][7][8][1][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]GL16-1 GL17-1 GL23-1 GL27-1




1782325


Parameter[1]

CSR AW-F

[2]

BCAWQG

AW-F AVG

[3]

BCAWQG

AW-F MAX

[4]

BCWWQG

AW-F

[5]

CSR IW

[6]

BCAWQG

IW AVG

[7]

BCAWQG

IW MAX

[8]

BCWWQG

IW

Unit

Parameters

Hardness, Calcium Carbonate mg/LpH 6.5 - 9 [2] 6.5 - 9 [3] pH unitsTotal Dissolved Solids (TDS) 1500 [8] mg/LDissolved Metals

Aluminum 0.05 [2] 5 [5] 5 [6] mg/LAntimony 0.09 [1] 0.009 [4] mg/LArsenic** (Total) 0.05 [1] 0.005 [2] 0.1 [5] 0.1 [6] mg/LBarium 10 [1] 1 [4] mg/LBeryllium 0.0015 [1] 0.00013 [4] 0.1 [5] 0.1 [8] mg/LBismuth mg/LBoron **(total) 12 [1] 1.2 [2] 2 - 6CROP [5] 1 [6] mg/LCadmium 0.0005 - 0.004H [1] equationH [2] 0.005 [5] 0.0051 [8] mg/LCalcium mg/LChromium* 0.09III, 0.01VI [1] 0.001 [4] 0.005III, 0.008VI[5] 0.008 [8] mg/LCobalt 0.04 [1] 0.004 [2] 0.05 [5] 0.05 [8] mg/LCopper 0.02 - 0.09H [1] equationH [2] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [7] mg/LIron 0.35 [3] 5 [5] mg/LLead 0.04 - 0.16H [1] equationH [2] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [7] mg/LLithium 2.5 [5] 2.5 [8] mg/LMagnesium mg/LManganese equationH [2] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [8] mg/LMercury 0.00025 [1] 0.00001 [2] 0.001 [5] 0.002 [7] mg/LMolybdenum 10 [1] 1 [2] 0.01 - 0.03 CROP[5] 0.01 [6] mg/LNickel 0.250 - 1.5H [1] equationH [4] 0.2 [5] 0.2 [8] mg/LPhosphorus mg/LPotassium mg/LSelenium 0.02 [1] 0.002 [2] 0.02 [5] 0.01 [6] mg/LSilicon mg/LSilver 0.0005 - 0.015H [1] equationH [2] mg/LSodium mg/LStrontium mg/LSulphur (S) mg/LTellurium mg/LThallium 0.003 [1] 0.0008 [4] mg/LThorium-232 mg/LTin mg/LTitanium 1 [1] mg/LUranium 0.085 [1] 0.0085 [4] 0.01 [5] 0.01 [8] mg/LVanadium 0.1 [5] 0.1 [8] mg/LZinc 0.075 - 2.4H [1] equationH [2] 1-5pH [5] 1 [6] mg/LZirconium mg/LNotes for Table 4


Location

Sample Name

Sample Date

Lab Sample ID

[1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]GL35-3 09BH03 09BH06D

GL28-1 GL28-1 GL28-2 GL28-2 GL28-3 GL28-3 GL29-1 GL29-1 DUP1 GL35-3 09BH03 09BH06-DL1956939-1 L1997978-3 L1956939-2 L1997978-4 L1956939-3 L1997978-5 L1933748-4 L1997978-6 L1997978-8 L1997978-7 L1935534-1 L1938068-17/11/2017 9/26/2017 7/11/2017 9/26/2017 7/11/2017 9/26/2017 5/29/2017 9/26/2017 9/26/2017 9/26/2017 6/1/2017 6/6/2017

1620 1620 1680 1920 2480 2520 586 542 539 2010 940 3648.21 7.67 8.03 7.48 8.13 7.6 8.1 7.88 7.88 7.45 8.13 8.42

3740 [8]

3460 [8]

4400 [8]

4640 [8]

6160 [8]

6150 [8]

1300 [8]

1290 [8] 1330 7480

[8]2270

[8] 699

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010< 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 0.00054 0.00052 0.00053 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050

0.0026 0.0033 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0021 0.0021 0.0022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0029< 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 0.068 0.069 0.068 < 0.030 0.023 0.041

< 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 < 0.0050 < 0.0050

< 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.40 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.21 0.17 0.17 < 0.30 < 0.10 < 0.10

< 0.000050 < 0.000050 0.000105 0.000072 0.000164 0.000343 0.00007 0.000297 0.000305 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050193 189 284 317 296 300 115 101 99.6 196 132 60.1

< 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 0.0115 [1][4][5][8] < 0.00050

< 0.00050 0.00055 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 0.00164 0.0126 0.013 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050< 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0013 < 0.0010 0.0015 0.0134 0.0088 0.0091 < 0.0010 0.0017 < 0.00101.68

[3]1.72

[3] < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.060 < 0.060 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 25 [5] < 0.030 0.395

[3]

< 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.00100.09 0.088 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.368 < 0.050 < 0.050276 279 236 275 423 430 72.8 70.2 70.6 369 149 51.9

0.23 [5][8]

0.237 [5][8] 0.012 0.018 0.018 0.192 < 0.010 0.312

[5][8]0.307

[5][8]0.374

[5][8] < 0.010 0.182< 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020

0.0122 [5][6]

0.0124 [5][6] 0.0049 0.0043 0.012

[5][6]0.0132

[5][6]0.0238

[5][6]0.0214

[5][6]0.0216

[5][6] < 0.0010 0.0215 [5][6]

0.0156 [5][6]

< 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.0098 0.0198 0.0212 0.0223 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050< 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.60 < 0.60 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.90 < 0.30 < 0.30

10 10.4 11 12 10.2 10.6 10.2 9.8 9.8 32.9 6.4 4.3< 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0017 0.0018 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0458

[1][2][5][6] < 0.001010.3 10.3 10.8 11 8.9 10.1 9.73 9.31 9.21 21.2 9.76 11.1

< 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050560 519 751 714 1000 1020 272 262 258 2110 494 1425.5 5.48 5.46 6.3 6.65 7.04 2.77 2.73 2.69 8.38 2.57 1.44681 702 751 854 1250 1320 145 127 128 1320 366 96.5

< 0.00040 < 0.00040 < 0.0010 < 0.00040 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.0010 < 0.00040 < 0.00020< 0.000020 < 0.000020 < 0.000050 < 0.000020 < 0.000050 0.000052 < 0.000010 < 0.000010 < 0.000010 < 0.000050 < 0.000020 < 0.000010< 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00050 < 0.00020 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00050 < 0.00020 < 0.00010

< 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.060 < 0.060 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.090 < 0.030 < 0.030< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050

0.109 [1][4][5][8]

0.107 [1][4][5][8]

0.17 [1][4][5][8]

0.168 [1][4][5][8]

0.245 [1][4][5][8]

0.232 [1][4][5][8]

0.0411 [5][8]

0.0382 [5][8]

0.0386 [5][8] 0.00375 0.124

[1][4][5][8] 0.00631< 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.060 < 0.060 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.090 < 0.030 < 0.030< 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 < 0.0050 < 0.0050

< 0.00030 < 0.00030 < 0.00030 < 0.00030 0.00083 0.00066 0.00116 0.00095 0.00093 0.00683 < 0.00030 < 0.00030

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]GL28-2 GL28-3 GL29-1GL28-1




1782325

Criteria Used for Comparison [1]GL6-1

GL6-1 (2011)L1934042-15/30/2017

Parameter

[1]

CSR

AW-F

Unit

Phenolics

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol mg/L <0.000502-Chlorophenol 0.0195 - 2.6 mg/L <0.000703-Chlorophenol 0.017 - 2.3 mg/L <0.000304-Chlorophenol 0.0085 - 1.18 mg/L <0.000402,3-Dichlorophenol 0.0055 - 0.760 mg/L <0.000302,4 & 2,5-Dichlorophenol 0.0025 - 0.340 mg/L <0.000502,6-Dichlorophenol 0.010 - 1.36 mg/L <0.0000903,4-Dichlorophenol 0.003 - 0.4 mg/L <0.0000503,5-Dichlorophenol 0.0025 - 0.3 mg/L <0.00070Pentachlorophenol 0.001 - 0.110 mg/L <0.000102,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 0.002 - 0.26 mg/L <0.000202,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 0.0055 - 0.72 mg/L <0.000102,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 0.0025 - 0.34 mg/L <0.000202,3,4-Trichlorophenol 0.0025 - 0.32 mg/L <0.000202,3,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0025 - 0.34 mg/L <0.000102,3,6-Trichlorophenol 0.008 - 1.08 mg/L <0.000202,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0025 - 0.3 mg/L <0.000202,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.006 - 0.8 mg/L <0.000203,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.001 - 0.128 mg/L <0.00020

All units in mg/L, unless otherwise noted.CSR - Standards from the Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR; enacted in 1997, and updated from time to time).Land Use abbreviations: AW-F (Aquatic Life, Fresh Water); IW (Irrigation Water).< Indicates parameter concentration below reported analytical detection limit.Where a range in standards is provided, standard varies with pH, temperature and substance isomer.

Sample Date

Sample Name

Sample Lab ID

Location

Table 6: GL28 Well Series - Groundwater


2/16/2018 1782325

GL28-1 GL28-1 GL28-2 GL28-2 GL28-3 GL28-3L1956939-1 L1997978-3 L1956939-2 L1997978-4 L1956939-3 L1997978-57/11/2017 9/26/2017 7/11/2017 9/26/2017 7/11/2017 9/26/2017

Parameter GCDWQ Notes

Field Parameters

Condutivity (uS/cm) 3535 3264 3986 3974 5314 5049Temperature (Degrees C) <15 AO 13.7 14 13.1 13.8 14 13.9pH (pH Units) 7.0 - 10.5 6.83 6.88 6.65 6.63 6.69 6.70Dissolved Oxygen 0.09 0.22 1.31 0.3 1.35 0.24Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) (millivolts) -95 -119 70.9 -30.2 80 -9.3Water Quality Parameters

Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) 579 554 671 670 840 807Hardness, calcium carbonate 1620 1620 1680 1920 2480 2520Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) 3.78 4.35 5.16 5.74 7.48 7.16Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) <500 AO 3740 3460 4400 4640 6160 6150pH (pH Units) 7.0 - 10.5 8.21 7.67 8.03 7.48 8.13 7.6Other Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) 0.163 0.145 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.0084 < 0.0050Bromide < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 2.5 < 1.0Chloride <250 AO 50 48 47 50 48 49Fluoride 1.5 MAC 1.16 1.11 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 1.0 < 0.40Nitrate (as N) 10 MAC < 0.10 < 0.10 13.1 12.1 0.69 1.12Nitrite (as N) 1 MAC < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.050 < 0.020Orthophosphate, Total < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0093 0.0095 0.0373 0.0358Phosphorous, Dissolved < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.60 < 0.60Sulphate <500 AO 2270 2190 2590 2840 4000 4100Dissolved Metals

Aluminum 0.1 OG < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Antimony 0.006 MAC < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050Arsenic 0.01 MAC 0.0026 0.0033 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Barium 1.0 MAC < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020Beryllium < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.010 < 0.010Bismuth < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.40 < 0.20Boron **(total) 5 MAC < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.20 < 0.20Cadmium 0.005 MAC < 0.000050 < 0.000050 0.000105 0.000072 0.000164 0.000343Calcium 193 189 284 317 296 300Chromium (VI) 0.05 MAC < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050Cobalt < 0.00050 0.00055 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050Copper <1.0 AO < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0013 < 0.0010 0.0015Iron <0.3 AO 1.68 1.72 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.060 < 0.060Lead 0.010 MAC < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Lithium 0.09 0.088 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050Magnesium 276 279 236 275 423 430Manganese <0.05 AO 0.23 0.237 0.012 0.018 0.018 0.192Mercury 0.001 MAC < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00020Molybdenum 0.0122 0.0124 0.0049 0.0043 0.012 0.0132Nickel < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.0098Phosphorus < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.60 < 0.60Potassium 10 10.4 11 12 10.2 10.6Selenium 0.05 MAC < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0017 0.0018 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Silicon 10.3 10.3 10.8 11 8.9 10.1Silver < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050 < 0.000050Sodium <200 AO 560 519 751 714 1000 1020Strontium 5.5 5.48 5.46 6.3 6.65 7.04Sulphur (S) 681 702 751 854 1250 1320Tellurium < 0.00040 < 0.00040 < 0.0010 < 0.00040 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Thallium < 0.000020 < 0.000020 < 0.000050 < 0.000020 < 0.000050 0.000052Thorium-232 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00050 < 0.00020 < 0.00050 < 0.00050Tin < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.060 < 0.060Titanium < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050Uranium 0.02 MAC 0.109 0.107 0.17 0.168 0.245 0.232Vanadium < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.060 < 0.060Zinc <5.0 AO < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.010 < 0.010Zirconium < 0.00030 < 0.00030 < 0.00030 < 0.00030 0.00083 0.00066Notes for Table 6

All units in mg/L, unless otherwise noted.Guidelines from Health Canada's "Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality" (GCDWQ).MAC - maximum acceptable concentration; AO - aesthetic objective; OG - operational guideline

0.121 Result exceeds GCDWQ guideline.Output generated by GalReport.< Indicates parameter concentration below reported analytical detection limit.

GL28-1 GL28-2 GL28-3

https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/14628g/Deliverables/Issued to Client - Reserved for WP/1782325-001-R-Rev0/TBLs/Tables 3 to 6 and Table 8.xlsx [Table 6 - GL 28 Series (CDWQG)] Golder Associates Page 1 of 1

2/16/2018 Table 7: QA/QC - Groundwater


1782325

Sample Location

Sample Name GL5-2 DUP1Sample Lab ID L1931979-1 L1931979-5

Sample Collection Date 5/25/2017 5/25/2017Parameters

Hardness, Calcium Carbonate 782 787 1 n/cpH 8.22 8.28 1 n/cTotal Dissolved Solids (TDS) 1690 1670 1 n/cDissolved Metals

Aluminum < 0.010 < 0.010 n/c 0Antimony < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Arsenic < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Barium 0.063 0.064 n/c 0.05Beryllium < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Bismuth < 0.20 < 0.20 n/c 0Boron < 0.10 < 0.10 n/c 0Cadmium < 0.000050 < 0.000050 n/c 0Calcium 102 102 0 n/cChromium 0.00364 0.00359 1 n/cCobalt < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Copper < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Iron < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Lead < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Lithium 0.065 0.065 n/c 0Magnesium 128 129 1 n/cManganese < 0.010 < 0.010 n/c 0Mercury < 0.00020 < 0.00020 n/c 0Molybdenum 0.0113 0.0115 2 n/cNickel < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Phosphorus < 0.30 < 0.30 n/c 0Potassium 9.1 9.3 n/c 0.1Selenium 0.0036 0.0035 n/c 0.1Silicon 8.23 8.36 2 n/cSilver < 0.000050 < 0.000050 n/c 0Sodium 331 336 1 n/cStrontium 5.33 5.37 1 n/cSulphur (S) 69.1 69.5 1 n/cTellurium < 0.00040 < 0.00040 n/c 0Thallium < 0.000020 < 0.000020 n/c 0Thorium-232 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 n/c 0Tin < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Titanium < 0.050 < 0.050 n/c 0Uranium 0.0207 0.0204 1 n/cVanadium < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Zinc < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Zirconium < 0.00030 < 0.00030 n/c 0Other Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Bromide < 1.0 < 1.0 n/c 0Chloride 550 543 1 n/cFluoride 0.84 0.85 n/c 0.025Nitrate (as N) 5.72 5.67 1 n/cNitrite (as N) < 0.020 < 0.020 n/c 0Orthophosphate, Total 0.0037 0.0038 n/c 0.1Phosphorous, Dissolved < 0.30 < 0.30 0 n/cSulphate 209 207 1 n/cWater Quality Parameters

Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) 510 437 15 n/cChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) < 20 < 20 n/c 0Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) 3.52 3.59 2 n/c

RPD

(%)

DR

(unitless)

GL5-2

https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/14628g/Deliverables/Issued to Client - Reserved for WP/1782325-001-R-Rev0/TBLs/TABLE-7-QAQC .XLS [Table 7 - QAQC] Golder Associates Page 1 of 4



1782325

Sample Location




Aluminum < 0.010 < 0.010 n/c 0Antimony < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Arsenic 0.0075 0.0073 3 n/cBarium < 0.020 < 0.020 n/c 0Beryllium < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Bismuth < 0.20 < 0.20 n/c 0Boron < 0.10 < 0.10 n/c 0Cadmium 0.000418 0.000385 8 n/cCalcium 92.8 93.3 1 n/cChromium < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Cobalt < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Copper < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Iron < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Lead < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Lithium 0.276 0.28 1 n/cMagnesium 146 149 2 n/cManganese < 0.010 < 0.010 n/c 0Mercury < 0.00020 < 0.00020 n/c 0Molybdenum 0.0146 0.0148 1 n/cNickel < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Phosphorus < 0.30 < 0.30 n/c 0Potassium 19.7 19.8 1 n/cSelenium < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Silicon 5.51 5.48 1 n/cSilver < 0.000050 < 0.000050 n/c 0Sodium 952 955 0 n/cStrontium 16.4 16.4 0 n/cSulphur (S) 523 530 1 n/cTellurium 0.0012 0.0012 n/c 0Thallium < 0.000050 < 0.000050 n/c 0Thorium-232 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Tin < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Titanium < 0.050 < 0.050 n/c 0Uranium 0.00843 0.00837 1 n/cVanadium < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Zinc < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Zirconium 0.00038 0.0004 n/c 0.1Other Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Bromide < 1.0 < 1.0 n/c 0Chloride 139 142 2 n/cFluoride 0.94 0.99 n/c 0.125Nitrate (as N) 0.33 0.28 n/c 0.5Nitrite (as N) < 0.020 < 0.020 n/c 0Orthophosphate, Total 0.0517 0.0528 2 n/cPhosphorous, Dissolved < 0.30 < 0.30 0 n/cSulphate 1710 1750 2 n/cWater Quality Parameters

Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) 898 866 4 n/cChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) < 20 < 20 n/c 0Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) 1.6 1.49 n/c 0.22

GL16-1

RPD

(%)

DR

(unitless)




1782325

Sample Location




Aluminum < 0.010 < 0.010 n/c 0Antimony < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Arsenic < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Barium 0.072 0.078 n/c 0.3Beryllium < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Bismuth < 0.20 < 0.20 n/c 0Boron < 0.10 < 0.10 n/c 0Cadmium 0.000216 0.000219 n/c 0.06Calcium 82.6 85 3 n/cChromium < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Cobalt < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Copper 0.0035 0.0034 n/c 0.1Iron < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Lead < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Lithium < 0.050 < 0.050 n/c 0Magnesium 229 228 0 n/cManganese 0.033 0.043 n/c 1Mercury < 0.00020 < 0.00020 n/c 0Molybdenum 0.0136 0.0137 1 n/cNickel 0.0097 0.0098 n/c 0.02Phosphorus < 0.30 < 0.30 n/c 0Potassium 14.9 15.8 6 n/cSelenium < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Silicon 10.1 10.5 4 n/cSilver < 0.000050 < 0.000050 n/c 0Sodium 191 203 6 n/cStrontium 4.1 4.27 4 n/cSulphur (S) 123 122 1 n/cTellurium < 0.00020 < 0.00020 n/c 0Thallium < 0.000010 < 0.000010 n/c 0Thorium-232 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 n/c 0Tin < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Titanium < 0.050 < 0.050 n/c 0Uranium 0.0747 0.0734 2 n/cVanadium < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Zinc < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Zirconium 0.00037 0.00037 n/c 0Other Inorganics n/c n/cAmmonia (as N) 0.01 < 0.0050 n/c 1.08Bromide < 1.0 < 1.0 n/c 0Chloride 35 35 n/c 0Fluoride 0.89 0.9 n/c 0.025Nitrate (as N) < 0.10 < 0.10 n/c 0Nitrite (as N) < 0.020 < 0.020 n/c 0Orthophosphate, Total 0.0034 0.0033 n/c 0.1Phosphorous, Dissolved < 0.30 < 0.30 0 n/cSulphate 386 387 0 n/cWater Quality Parameters

Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) 1070 1020 5 n/cChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 42 37 n/c 0.25Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) 14.8 14.6 1 n/c

GL23-1

RPD

(%)

DR

(unitless)




1782325

Sample Location




Aluminum < 0.010 < 0.010 n/c 0Antimony 0.00052 0.00053 n/c 0.02Arsenic 0.0021 0.0022 n/c 0.1Barium 0.069 0.068 n/c 0.05Beryllium < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Bismuth < 0.20 < 0.20 n/c 0Boron 0.17 0.17 n/c 0Cadmium 0.000297 0.000305 3 n/cCalcium 101 99.6 1 n/cChromium < 0.00050 < 0.00050 n/c 0Cobalt 0.0126 0.013 3 n/cCopper 0.0088 0.0091 3 n/cIron < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Lead < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Lithium 0.052 0.053 n/c 0.02Magnesium 70.2 70.6 1 n/cManganese 0.312 0.307 2 n/cMercury < 0.00020 < 0.00020 n/c 0Molybdenum 0.0214 0.0216 1 n/cNickel 0.0212 0.0223 n/c 0.22Phosphorus < 0.30 < 0.30 n/c 0Potassium 9.8 9.8 n/c 0Selenium < 0.0010 < 0.0010 n/c 0Silicon 9.31 9.21 1 n/cSilver < 0.000050 < 0.000050 n/c 0Sodium 262 258 2 n/cStrontium 2.73 2.69 1 n/cSulphur (S) 127 128 1 n/cTellurium < 0.00020 < 0.00020 n/c 0Thallium < 0.000010 < 0.000010 n/c 0Thorium-232 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 n/c 0Tin < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Titanium < 0.050 < 0.050 n/c 0Uranium 0.0382 0.0386 1 n/cVanadium < 0.030 < 0.030 n/c 0Zinc < 0.0050 < 0.0050 n/c 0Zirconium 0.00095 0.00093 n/c 0.06666667Other Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) 0.02 0.02 n/c 0.52Bromide < 0.50 < 0.50 n/c 0Chloride 51.6 53.1 3 n/cFluoride 1.24 1.24 n/c 0Nitrate (as N) 0.415 0.383 n/c 0.32Nitrite (as N) 0.017 < 0.010 n/c 0.35Orthophosphate, Total 0.0243 0.0243 0 n/cPhosphorous, Dissolved < 0.30 < 0.30 0 n/cSulphate 389 401 3 n/cWater Quality Parameters

Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) 644 645 0 n/cChemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 72 72 n/c 0Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) 25.8 26.5 3 n/c

DR

(unitless)

GL29-1

RPD

(%)


Table 8: Surface Water2017 Annual Water Quality Monitoring Program, Glenmore Landfill, Kelowna, BC

2/16/2018 1782325


Sample Name BREDIN POND BREDIN POND BREDIN POND BREDIN POND NE POND NE POND NE POND NE POND SLOUGH SLOUGH SLOUGH SLOUGH TUTT POND TUTT POND TUTT POND TUTT PONDLab Sample ID L1914458-1 L1938664-1 L1988110-1 L2017078-1 L1914458-4 L1938664-4 L1988110-4 L2017078-4 L1914458-2 L1938664-3 L1988110-3 L2017078-3 L1914458-2 L1938664-2 L1988110-2 L2017078-2

4/18/2017 6/7/2017 9/7/2017 11/17/2017 4/18/2017 6/7/2017 9/7/2017 11/17/2017 4/18/2017 6/7/2017 9/7/2017 11/17/2017 4/18/2017 6/7/2017 9/7/2017 11/17/2017

Parameter

[1]

BCAWQG

AW-Avg

[2]

BCAWQG

AW-Max

[3]

BCWWQG

AW

[4]

CSR

IW

[5]

BCAWQG

IW-Avg

[6]

BCAWQG

IW-Max

[7]

BCWWQG

IW

Units

Field Parameters

Conductivity 2200[7] uS/cm 1813 1589 1675 1795 2565 [7] 2137 2591

[7]2515

[7]7765

[7]6678

[7]11698

[7]9656

[7] 2189 1893 2566 [7]

2683 [7]

Temperature Deg C 11.4 22.2 20.5 7.3 13.5 22.9 19.9 6.8 13.7 26 21.1 7.5 12.5 23.1 21 7.8pH 6.5 - 9[1] 6.5 - 9[2] pH Units 8.74 8.45 8.9 8.82 8.85 8.77 9.23

[1][2]9.12

[1][2] 9.64 8.9 9.23 9.24 8.98 8.69 8.59 8.09DO mg/L 9.87 7.41 5.07 4.82 9.63 12.36 5.54 10.33 6.72 4.92 1.67 3.26 12.41 10.96 5.74 5.56ORP mV 94.9 32 -6 61 133.1 34.2 26.6 51.5 103.7 25.2 -9.1 20 118.5 37.4 37.4 74.2Parameters

Conductivity 2200[7] uS/cm 1770 1880 1810 1720 2460 [7]

2500 [7]

2790 [7]

2740 [7]

7460 [7]

7660 [7]

13500 [7]

15000 [7] 2090 2220

[7]2790

[7]2930

[7]

pH 6.5- 9[1] 6.5 - 9[2] pH Units 8.63 8.72 8.73 8.41 8.62 8.86 9.31 [1][2]

9.11 [1][2] 9.23 9.04 9.03 9.1 8.63 8.75 8.54 8.39

Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) mg/L 659 705 654 617 852 876 933 945 2070 2160 4700 4050 633 682 744 780Alkalinity, Carbonate (CO3) mg/L 61.8 86.4 83.8 26.6 85.4 157 403 294 672 505 1300 1220 63 96.2 64 31.4Alkalinity, Bicarbonate (HCO3) mg/L 597 619 570 591 766 719 530 651 1400 1650 3410 2820 570 586 680 749Alkalinity, Hydroxide (OH) mg/L <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Hardness mg/L 684 732 685 649 944 967 1050 1060 681 738 1070 1210 777 860 1010 1100Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 35 28 71 21 33 35 57 53 242 245 644 630 34 38 47 36Total Organic Carbon mg/L 11 10.6 19 7 13 15 20.7 15.8 77.3 89 232 261 10.8 13.1 14.8 12.8Total Dissolved Solids 1500[7] mg/L 1180 1170 1190 1030 1630

[7]1730

[7]2070

[7]1980

[7]5860

[7]5880

[7]11000

[7]12000

[7] 1420 1500 [7]

2020 [7]

2100 [7]

Total Suspended Solids mg/L < 3.0 4.9 22.4 3 3.6 6.9 4.2 3.6 10.3 11.3 15.8 39.6 < 3.0 3.3 < 3.0 6.0Other Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) 1.84 [1] mg/L 0.0618 0.0736 0.308 0.215 0.0734 0.0112 0.0718 0.122 0.913 0.574 1.09 0.701 0.0992 0.0095 0.0589 0.973Bromide mg/L < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 2.8 4.1 5.6 6.8 < 0.5 <1 <1 <1Chloride 150[1] 100 [4] 100[5] mg/L 113

[4][5]125

[4][5]145

[4][5]145

[4][5]146

[4][5]155

[1][4][5]192

[1][4][5]207

[1][4][5]466

[4][5]504

[4][5]944

[4][5]1060

[4][5]146

[4][5]164

[4][5]203

[4][5]216

[4][5]

Fluoride 1.272 [2] 1 [4] mg/L 1.06 [4]

1.25 [4]

1.15 [4]

1.22 [4]

1.32 [2][4]

1.56 [2][4]

1.57 [2][4]

1.79 [2][4] <1 <1 <2 [4] <2 0.84 1.07

[4] 0.98 0.99Nitrate (as N) 3 [1] mg/L 0.192 <0.05 <0.05 0.939 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.25 <0.25 <0.5 <0.5 0.059 <0.1 <0.1 0.15Nitrite (as N) 0.2 [1] mg/L <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.098 <0.02 <0.02 0.032 <0.02 <0.05 0.154 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 0.033TKN mg/L 1.34 0.976 3.61 1.19 1.11 1.05 2.13 1.32 7.41 6.85 17.2 19.4 0.987 0.957 1.32 2.2Orthophosphate, Total mg/L 0.0033 0.0213 < 0.0010 0.0284 0.085 0.3 0.15 0.226 2.25 2.54 5.6 5.68 0.107 0.166 0.23 0.502Phosphorous, Total mg/L <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.39 <0.3 <0.3 2.77 3.16 6 7.33 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 0.61Sulphate 309[1] mg/L 271 306 252 223 539

[1]586

[1]685

[1]676

[1] 1880 2010 3580 3980 462 510 743 852Bacteriological

Fecal Coliform MPN/100 mL 4 46 70 23 2 2 130 2 23 49 240 49 33 49 33 130Total Coliform MPN/100 mL 22 170 1600 220 5 17 170 70 46 79 350 1600 49 170 70 >1600Total Metals

Aluminum 50 [1] 5000 [4] 5000 [5] µg/L 12 16 29 12 62 [1] 31 159

[1]100

[1] 444 395 395 1030 73 26 42 45Antimony 9 [3] µg/L < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 <0.5 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 <0.5 2.9 3.4 4.9 4.6 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 <0.5Arsenic 5 [1] 100 [4] 100 [5] µg/L 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.6 2.4 4.1 6.5

[1]5.3

[1] 24.6 29.2 63 63.4 2 2.2 3.6 4.1Barium 1000 [3] µg/L 79 44 87 94 82 96 110 90 45 45 < 50 48 72 80 56 74Beryllium 0.13 [3] 100 [4] 100 [7] µg/L < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 <5 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 <5 < 15 < 15 < 25 <5 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 <5Bismuth µg/L < 200 < 200 < 200 <200 < 200 < 200 < 200 <200 < 600 < 600 < 1000 <200 < 200 < 200 < 200 <200Boron 1200 [1] 500 - 6000CROP [4] 1000 [5] µg/L < 100 < 100 < 100 <100 < 100 < 100 < 100 <100 370 440 1010

[5]1070

[5] < 100 < 100 < 100 <100Cadmium 0.189 [1] 5 [4] 5.1 [7] µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.05 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.05 0.056 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.072 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.05Calcium µg/L 46000 47400 33300 41400 51400 46400 17200 24900 35800 44200 37400 33200 76500 79100 90900 120000Chromium* 1 [3] 5III, 8VI [4] 8 [7] µg/L 0.53 < 0.50 < 0.50 <0.5 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 <0.5 2.3 2.3 3.3 4.7 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 <0.5Cobalt 4 [1] 50 [4] 50 [7] µg/L < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 <0.5 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 <0.5 1.1 1.2 2.0 2.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.56Copper 3.68 [1] 200 [4] 200 [6] µg/L 1.7 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.3 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.6 1.1 6.4 5.4 8.5 10.9 1.3 1.3 1.1 <1Iron 350 [2] 5000 [4] µg/L < 30 < 30 41 <30 81 32 162 111 655 517 630 1380 87 32 50 71Lead 6.17 [1] 200 [4] 200 [6] µg/L < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <1 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <1 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.6 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <1Lithium 2500 [4] 2500 [7] µg/L < 50 < 50 < 50 <50 < 50 < 50 < 50 <50 < 50 < 50 68 77 < 50 < 50 < 50 <50Magnesium µg/L 138000 149000 146000 133000 198000 207000 244000 241000 144000 152000 237000 273000 142000 161000 190000 194000Manganese 1009.8 [1] 200 [4] 200 [7] µg/L 19 35 74 <10 71 65 25 141 98 86 101 105 55 20 70 314Mercury 0.01 [1] 1 [4] 2 [6] µg/L < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 <0.2 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 <0.2 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 <0.2 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 <0.2Molybdenum 1000 [1] 10 - 30 CROP [4] 10 [5] µg/L 11.0

[4][5]13.8

[4][5]12.5

[4][5]21.8

[5]18.9

[4][5]17.7

[4][5]19.6

[4][5]24.7

[5]18.5

[4][5]19.3

[4][5]27.7

[4][5]29.8

[5]10.7

[4][5]11.1

[4][5]10.9

[4][5]10.5

[5]

Nickel 89.7 [3] 200 [4] 200 [7] µg/L < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 <5 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 <5 8 9 19 19.2 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 <5Potassium µg/L 13500 13100 14800 14200 17000 17300 17700 18700 111000 115000 279000 341000 12400 13300 14800 15300Selenium 2 [1] 20 [4] 10 [5] µg/L 1.3 1.1 1.3 <1 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <1 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.2 1.1 < 1.0 1 < 1.0 <1Silicon µg/L 4970 2290 13900 14100 3590 3040 3460 2580 4200 2280 4050 5100 6190 470 5170 10400Silver 0.05 [1] µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.05 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.152

[1] <0.05 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.11 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.05Sodium µg/L 186000 203000 177000 170000 300000 316000 363000 370000 1900000 1790000 3220000 3880000 234000 265000 304000 329000Strontium µg/L 2870 2920 2900 2870 3240 3360 3500 3430 1790 2120 2310 2170 3650 3850 4790 5790Tellurium µg/L 0.25 0.47 0.41 0.4 < 0.40 0.55 0.44 <0.4 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 <2 0.35 0.59 0.48 0.55Thallium 0.8 [3] µg/L < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 <0.2 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 <0.2 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 <0.2 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 <0.2Thorium-232 µg/L < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 <0.1 < 0.20 < 0.10 < 0.20 <0.2 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <1 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.20 <0.2Tin µg/L < 30 < 30 < 30 <30 < 30 < 30 < 30 <30 < 90 < 90 < 150 <30 < 30 < 30 < 30 <30Titanium µg/L < 50 < 50 < 50 <50 < 50 < 50 < 50 <50 < 50 < 50 < 50 54 < 50 < 50 < 50 <50Uranium 8.5 [3] 10 [4] 10 [7] µg/L 21.5

[4][7]23.4

[4][7]20.9

[4][7]38.1

[4][7]28.6

[3][4][7]25.6

[3][4][7]28.7

[3][4][7]34.4

[3][4][7]68.2

[4][7]67.4

[4][7]92.7

[4][7]96.8

[4][7]31.9

[4][7]32.2

[4][7]43.0

[4][7]49.4

[4][7]

Vanadium 100 [4] 100 [7] µg/L < 30 < 30 < 30 <30 < 30 < 30 < 30 <30 < 90 < 90 < 150 <30 < 30 < 30 < 30 <30Zinc 7.5 [1] 1000 - 5000pH [4] 1000 [5] µg/L 12.2 < 5.0 8.1 <5 < 5.0 15.8

[1] < 5.0 <6 15 < 15 < 25 <30 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 <6Zirconium µg/L < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 <0.3 0.78 0.61 0.46 0.45 18.8 15.5 22.5 26.9 0.69 < 0.30 0.38 0.58

pH = Standard is pH dependentCROP = Standard varies depending on crop present*Chromium standard is valence dependentNumber in Paranthesis following the analytical result indicates the corresponding criteria that has been exceeded:[1] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life long-term average (AW-F AVG)[2] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life short-term maximum (AW-F MAX)[3] BC Working Water Quality Guidelines (BCWWQG) for Freshwater Aquatic Life [4] CSR, Schedule 3.2, Generic Numerical Water Standards for Irrigation Water (IW)[5] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Irrigation Water long-term average (IW AVG)[6] BC Approved Water Quality Guidelines (BCAWQG) for Irrigation Water short-term maximum (IW MAX)[7] BC Working Water Quality Guidelines (BCWWQG) for Irrigation Water< Indicates parameter concentration below reported analytical detection limit.- Chemical not analyzed or criteria not defined.Italics and bold ‐Detection limit greater than standardBoron ‐ Standard of 4,000 ug/L used in this assessment, as off‐Site irrigated fields are reportedly used to grow forage crops (currently, alfalfa and grass).Molybdenum ‐ Standard varies with crop, soil drainage and Mo:Cu ratio. Most conservative CSR IW standard was used.

Tutt PondSlough[4][5][6][7] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] [4][5][6][7] [4][5][6][7]

Sample Date

Location Bredin Pond Northeast Pond

https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/14628g/Deliverables/Issued to Client - Reserved for WP/1782325-001-R-Rev0/TBLs/Tables 3 to 6 and Table 8.xlsx [Table 8 - Surface Water] Golder Associates Page 1 of 1

3/5/2018 Table 9: Leachate


1782325

P1 LEACHATE MH P1 LEACHATE MH P1 LEACHATE MH P1 LEACHATE MH

L1902230-3 L1938183-3 L1991981-33/15/2017 6/6/2017 9/14/2017 12/4/2017

Parameter Units

Field Parameters

Conductivity uS/cm 2944 8552 7061 6358Temperature Deg C 8.2 19.9 19.8 14.8pH pH Units 7.86 7.05 7.22 7.21DO mg/L 9.9 0.5 0.18 0.54ORP mV -230 292.1 -315.5 -353.8Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 1898.1 - 4582.5 4153Water Quality Parameters

pH pH Units 7.88 8.02 - 8.2Alkalinity (total as CaCo3) mg/L 868 4030 3700 4130Hardness, Calcium Carbonate mg/L 855 1700 1540 1650Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L - - 17.2 45Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 122 346 374 444Dissolved Organic Carbon mg/L 43.2 144 211 118Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 1730 6300 5660 6630Other Inorganics Ammonia (as N) mg/L 20.9 99.2 74.3 88.9Bromide mg/L <1 3.1 3.1 3.1Chloride mg/L 126 422 408 428Fluoride mg/L 0.91 1.1 <4 1.1Nitrate (as N) mg/L 2.53 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25Nitrite (as N) mg/L 0.059 <0.050 <0.05 <0.050Orthophosphate, Total mg/L 0.395 3.31 3.09 3.76Phosphorous, Dissolved mg/L 0.44 4.02 3.17 4.58Sulphate mg/L 565 902 933 1090Sulphide as S mg/L 138 16.2 30.5 30Sulfide (as H2S), Dissolved mg/L 147 17.2 32.4 31.9Dissolved Metals

Aluminum µg/L < 10 26 47 49.7Antimony µg/L 0.96 3.8 5.2 2.53Arsenic µg/L 2.2 10.7 12.2 8.25Barium µg/L 89 304 251 258Beryllium µg/L < 5.0 < 15 < 15 <0.50Bismuth µg/L < 200 < 600 < 600 <0.25Boron µg/L 380 1720 1330 1610Cadmium µg/L 0.056 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.025Calcium µg/L 140000 106000 106000 95000Cesium µg/L - - - 0.143Chromium µg/L 1.16 12.1 12.5 14.9Cobalt µg/L 1.13 7.5 5.6 5.7Copper µg/L 6 < 2.0 < 2.0 <1.0Iron µg/L 174 102 93 53Lead µg/L < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <0.25Lithium µg/L < 50 < 50 < 50 41.8Magnesium µg/L 122000 349000 310000 344000Manganese µg/L 249 520 560 455Mercury µg/L < 0.20 < 0.50 < 0.20 <0.25Molybdenum µg/L 6.9 1.9 1.4 1.27Nickel µg/L 7.2 13.1 13 14.3Phosphorus µg/L 440 4020 3170 4580Potassium µg/L 38600 166000 147000 175000Rubidium µg/L - - - 32.8Selenium µg/L < 1.0 1.3 5.9 3.5Silicon µg/L 10900 18600 16600 18200Silver µg/L < 0.050 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.086Sodium µg/L 329000 1750000 1590000 1960000Strontium µg/L 2340 3890 3910 3690Sulphur (S) µg/L 160000 291000 451000 528000Tellurium µg/L < 0.40 < 2.0 < 2.0 <1.0Thallium µg/L < 0.020 < 0.10 < 0.10 <0.050Thorium-232 µg/L < 0.20 < 1.0 < 1.0 <0.50Tin µg/L < 30 < 90 < 90 4.2Titanium µg/L < 50 52 62 55.1Tungsten µg/L - - - 2.43Uranium µg/L 18.8 7.41 8.64 8.34Vanadium µg/L < 30 < 90 < 90 18.9Zinc µg/L < 5.0 < 15 25 <5.0Zirconium µg/L 2.8 40.6 31 34.5

Sample Date

Location MH1

Sample Name

Lab Sample ID



1782325

P1 LEACHATE MH P1 LEACHATE MH P1 LEACHATE MH P1 LEACHATE MH

L1902230-3 L1938183-3 L1991981-33/15/2017 6/6/2017 9/14/2017 12/4/2017

Parameter Units

Sample Date

Location MH1

Sample Name

Lab Sample ID

PAH

Acenaphthene µg/L < 0.050 0.453 0.339 0.331Acenaphthylene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010Acridine µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.050Anthracene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.021Benzo(a)anthracene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 <0.0050Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 - -Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010Chrysene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene µg/L < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 <0.0050Fluoranthene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.027Benzo(b,j) fluoranthene µg/L - - < 0.050 <0.010Fluorene µg/L < 0.050 0.296 0.26 0.237Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.0101-Methylnaphthalene µg/L - - - 0.2242-Methylnaphthalene µg/L - - - <0.050Naphthalene µg/L 0.14 1.32 0.545 0.806Phenanthrene µg/L < 0.050 0.101 0.104 0.114Pyrene µg/L < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.022Quinoline µg/L < 0.050 < 0.10 < 0.050 <0.060EPH 10-19 µg/L < 250 340 < 250 <250LEPH µg/L < 250 340 < 250 <250EPH 19-32 µg/L < 250 < 250 < 250 <250HEPH µg/L < 250 < 250 < 250 <250VOC

Bromodichloromethane (BDCM) µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.0Bromoform (Tribromomethane) µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.0Carbon Tetrachloride µg/L - - < 0.50 <0.50Chlorobenzene µg/L - - 1.7 2.3Chloroethane µg/L - - 6 6.9Chloroform µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.0Chloromethane µg/L - - < 5.0 <5.0Dichloromethane (DCM) (Methylene Chloride) µg/L - - < 5.0 <5.0Dibromochloromethane (DBCM) µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,2-dichlorobenzene µg/L - - < 0.50 <0.501,3-dichlorobenzene µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,4-dichlorobenzene µg/L - - < 1.0 1.11,1-dichloroethane µg/L - - 6.4 3.21,2-dichloroethane µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,1-dichloroethene µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,2-dichloroethylene (cis) (1,2-dichloroethene) (cis) µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,2-dichloroethylene (trans) (1,2-dichloroethene) (trans) µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,2-dichloropropane (Propylene Dichloride) µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,3-dichloropropene (cis) µg/L - - < 0.50 <0.501,3-dichloropropene (trans) µg/L - - < 0.50 <0.501,3-dichloropropene, total µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L - - < 0.20 <0.20Tetrachloroethylene (PCE/PERC) µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,1,1-trichloroethane µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.01,1,2-trichloroethane µg/L - - < 0.50 <0.50Trichloroethylene (TCE) µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.0Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) µg/L - - < 1.0 <1.0Vinyl Chloride (Chloroethene) µg/L - - < 0.40 <0.40Benzene µg/L - - 1.7 2.4Ethylbenzene µg/L - - 7.33 12.5Toluene µg/L - - < 0.45 0.57Xylenes, Total µg/L - - 5.19 8.59o-Xylene µg/L - - 1.8 3.33m,p-Xylenes µg/L - - 3.39 5.25Methyl tert-Butyl Ether µg/L - - < 0.50 <0.50Styrene µg/L - - < 0.50 <0.50Analytical results for Metals, PAH and VOC provided by laboratory in mg/L; however, values have been converted to ug/L in this table for ease of reference.



1782325

Parameter Units

Field Parameters

Conductivity uS/cmTemperature Deg CpH pH UnitsDO mg/LORP mVTotal Dissolved Solids mg/LWater Quality Parameters

pH pH UnitsAlkalinity (total as CaCo3) mg/LHardness, Calcium Carbonate mg/LBiochemical Oxygen Demand mg/LChemical Oxygen Demand mg/LDissolved Organic Carbon mg/LTotal Dissolved Solids mg/LOther Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) mg/LBromide mg/LChloride mg/LFluoride mg/LNitrate (as N) mg/LNitrite (as N) mg/LOrthophosphate, Total mg/LPhosphorous, Dissolved mg/LSulphate mg/LSulphide as S mg/LSulfide (as H2S), Dissolved mg/LDissolved Metals

Aluminum µg/LAntimony µg/LArsenic µg/LBarium µg/LBeryllium µg/LBismuth µg/LBoron µg/LCadmium µg/LCalcium µg/LCesium µg/LChromium µg/LCobalt µg/LCopper µg/LIron µg/LLead µg/LLithium µg/LMagnesium µg/LManganese µg/LMercury µg/LMolybdenum µg/LNickel µg/LPhosphorus µg/LPotassium µg/LRubidium µg/LSelenium µg/LSilicon µg/LSilver µg/LSodium µg/LStrontium µg/LSulphur (S) µg/LTellurium µg/LThallium µg/LThorium-232 µg/LTin µg/LTitanium µg/LTungsten µg/LUranium µg/LVanadium µg/LZinc µg/LZirconium µg/L

Sample Date

Location

Sample Name

Lab Sample ID

N PUMPHOUSE MH N PUMPHOUSE MH N PUMPHOUSE MH N PUMPHOUSE MH

L1902230-1 L1938183-1 L1991981-13/15/2017 6/6/2017 9/14/2017 12/4/2017

5909 6708 7500 63209.9 15.7 17.2 13.2

7.52 6.87 7.07 7.332.5 0.3 0.28 0.81

-281.4 -316.6 -346.5 -3883848 - 4875 4381

7.86 7.92 - 8.432590 3400 3760 53901000 1330 1350 1420

- - 49 96283 370 508 52980.2 109 252 2443930 4470 5860 7430

108 89.9 87 65.6<25 3 3.4 3.9351 411 503 554<1 <1 1.1 <1.0

<0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.250.051 <0.05 <0.05 0.6171.87 2.33 3.33 4.52.06 3.09 3.41 8.1601 556 954 1160

<0.018 25.5 53.5 55.7<0.019 27.1 56.9 59.2

45 43 70 1564.32 6.45 8.5 4.6615 16.8 17.2 15.8

141 259 233 172< 10 < 15 < 15 <0.50

< 400 < 600 < 600 <0.25860 1580 1520 1930

< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.02574300 108000 96800 66200

- - - 0.0989.74 11.3 12.6 26.53.31 6.83 5.2 53.7 < 1.0 < 2.0 264 97 < 90 53

< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <0.25< 50 51 52 65.8

198000 259000 270000 305000328 504 411 317

< 0.20 < 0.50 < 0.20 <0.252.9 1.5 1.8 2.33

13.1 15.5 18 27.52060 3090 3410 810098000 167000 177000 253000

- - - 417.2 < 1.0 11.6 14.4

11600 15400 14500 13100< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.10 0.0781100000 1330000 1700000 3250000

3010 3360 3400 2800255000 205000 604000 1180000< 1.0 < 1.0 < 2.0 <1.0

< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.10 <0.050< 0.50 < 0.50 < 1.0 <0.50< 60 < 90 < 90 14.7< 50 < 50 59 60.1

- - - 2.8616.2 6.25 9.1 14.2< 60 < 90 < 90 19.1< 10 < 15 < 15 <5.010.7 16.4 19.6 32.7

MH3



1782325

Parameter Units

Sample Date

Location

Sample Name

Lab Sample ID

PAH

Acenaphthene µg/LAcenaphthylene µg/LAcridine µg/LAnthracene µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene µg/LChrysene µg/LDibenzo(a,h)anthracene µg/LFluoranthene µg/LBenzo(b,j) fluoranthene µg/LFluorene µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene µg/LNaphthalene µg/LPhenanthrene µg/LPyrene µg/LQuinoline µg/LEPH 10-19 µg/LLEPH µg/LEPH 19-32 µg/LHEPH µg/LVOC

Bromodichloromethane (BDCM) µg/LBromoform (Tribromomethane) µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride µg/LChlorobenzene µg/LChloroethane µg/LChloroform µg/LChloromethane µg/LDichloromethane (DCM) (Methylene Chloride) µg/LDibromochloromethane (DBCM) µg/L1,2-dichlorobenzene µg/L1,3-dichlorobenzene µg/L1,4-dichlorobenzene µg/L1,1-dichloroethane µg/L1,2-dichloroethane µg/L1,1-dichloroethene µg/L1,2-dichloroethylene (cis) (1,2-dichloroethene) (cis) µg/L1,2-dichloroethylene (trans) (1,2-dichloroethene) (trans) µg/L1,2-dichloropropane (Propylene Dichloride) µg/L1,3-dichloropropene (cis) µg/L1,3-dichloropropene (trans) µg/L1,3-dichloropropene, total µg/L1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/LTetrachloroethylene (PCE/PERC) µg/L1,1,1-trichloroethane µg/L1,1,2-trichloroethane µg/LTrichloroethylene (TCE) µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) µg/LVinyl Chloride (Chloroethene) µg/LBenzene µg/LEthylbenzene µg/LToluene µg/LXylenes, Total µg/Lo-Xylene µg/Lm,p-Xylenes µg/LMethyl tert-Butyl Ether µg/LStyrene µg/LAnalytical results for Metals, PAH and VOC provided by laboratory in mg/L

N PUMPHOUSE MH N PUMPHOUSE MH N PUMPHOUSE MH N PUMPHOUSE MH

L1902230-1 L1938183-1 L1991981-13/15/2017 6/6/2017 9/14/2017 12/4/2017

MH3

0.195 0.329 0.325 0.312< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.050< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.030< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010< 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 <0.0050< 0.050 < 0.050 - -< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010< 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 <0.0050< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.05

- - < 0.050 <0.0100.133 0.243 0.259 0.234

< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010- - - 0.479- - - 0.154

1.73 1.41 1.53 2.060.079 0.118 0.154 0.213

< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.043< 0.060 < 0.090 < 0.070 <0.070

290 270 < 250 250290 270 < 250 250

< 250 < 250 < 250 <250< 250 < 250 < 250 <250

- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.50 <0.50- - 1.8 <2.0- - 9 <3.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 5.0 <5.0- - < 5.0 <5.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 1.0 <1.0- - 1.3 1.6- - 10.1 3.2- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.20 <0.20- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.40 <0.40- - 3.34 5.43- - 18.8 41.4- - 0.7 1.23- - 13.4 31.1- - 5.76 14.8- - 7.65 16.4- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 0.50 <0.50



1782325

Parameter Units

Field Parameters

Conductivity uS/cmTemperature Deg CpH pH UnitsDO mg/LORP mVTotal Dissolved Solids mg/LWater Quality Parameters

pH pH UnitsAlkalinity (total as CaCo3) mg/LHardness, Calcium Carbonate mg/LBiochemical Oxygen Demand mg/LChemical Oxygen Demand mg/LDissolved Organic Carbon mg/LTotal Dissolved Solids mg/LOther Inorganics

Ammonia (as N) mg/LBromide mg/LChloride mg/LFluoride mg/LNitrate (as N) mg/LNitrite (as N) mg/LOrthophosphate, Total mg/LPhosphorous, Dissolved mg/LSulphate mg/LSulphide as S mg/LSulfide (as H2S), Dissolved mg/LDissolved Metals

Aluminum µg/LAntimony µg/LArsenic µg/LBarium µg/LBeryllium µg/LBismuth µg/LBoron µg/LCadmium µg/LCalcium µg/LCesium µg/LChromium µg/LCobalt µg/LCopper µg/LIron µg/LLead µg/LLithium µg/LMagnesium µg/LManganese µg/LMercury µg/LMolybdenum µg/LNickel µg/LPhosphorus µg/LPotassium µg/LRubidium µg/LSelenium µg/LSilicon µg/LSilver µg/LSodium µg/LStrontium µg/LSulphur (S) µg/LTellurium µg/LThallium µg/LThorium-232 µg/LTin µg/LTitanium µg/LTungsten µg/LUranium µg/LVanadium µg/LZinc µg/LZirconium µg/L

Sample Date

Location

Sample Name

Lab Sample ID

S LEACHATE WET WELL S LEACHATE WET WELL S LEACHATE WET WELL S LEACHATE WET WELL

L1902230-2 L1938183-2 L1991981--23/15/2017 6/6/2017 9/14/2017 12/4/2017

12338 10335 11573 996910.9 14.7 16.9 10.37.9 7.42 7.71 7.864 0.3 0.07 1.49

-285.1 -331.5 -343 -4158021 - 7533.5 6520

8.06 8.34 - 8.465910 4470 5680 64401380 1200 1430 1430

- - 125 190780 784 1110 1020211 2.65 285 2749420 8310 10700 11700

217 75.4 90.8 71.85.9 5 7.5 7735 635 888 903<2 <1 <10 <2.0

<0.5 <0.25 <0.5 <0.50<0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.105.77 6.06 7.43 8.236.1 5.9 7.6 9.18

1410 1270 1950 204035.8 101 108 11038.1 107 115 117

146 137 199 17019.1 17.3 18 847.2 52.8 45.2 32.7150 139 193 152< 25 < 25 < 25 <1.0

< 1000 < 1000 < 1000 <0.501990 2020 2490 2250

< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.05065200 80300 73400 57800

<0.1026 23.1 28.5 297.1 6.2 6.6 5.72.2 < 2.0 < 2.0 3.4

< 150 < 150 < 150 <100< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <0.50

61 66 75 71296000 243000 302000 312000

400 549 433 300< 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 <0.25

3.6 3.8 3.4 2.729.5 25.3 32.8 30.76100 5900 7600 9180

235000 231000 307000 28500043.2

12.9 8.2 14.5 18.312100 10900 12400 12400< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.14

2930000 2410000 3560000 36800002840 2460 2870 2440

2260000 634000 1590000 1460000< 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 <2.0< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 <0.10< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <1.0< 150 < 150 < 150 28.6

63 58 77 61.43.5

12.9 11.6 15.4 9.8< 150 < 150 < 150 20.1< 25 < 25 < 25 <1034.1 24.4 37.3 37.3

Wet Well



1782325

Parameter Units

Sample Date

Location

Sample Name

Lab Sample ID

PAH

Acenaphthene µg/LAcenaphthylene µg/LAcridine µg/LAnthracene µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene µg/LChrysene µg/LDibenzo(a,h)anthracene µg/LFluoranthene µg/LBenzo(b,j) fluoranthene µg/LFluorene µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene µg/LNaphthalene µg/LPhenanthrene µg/LPyrene µg/LQuinoline µg/LEPH 10-19 µg/LLEPH µg/LEPH 19-32 µg/LHEPH µg/LVOC

Bromodichloromethane (BDCM) µg/LBromoform (Tribromomethane) µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride µg/LChlorobenzene µg/LChloroethane µg/LChloroform µg/LChloromethane µg/LDichloromethane (DCM) (Methylene Chloride) µg/LDibromochloromethane (DBCM) µg/L1,2-dichlorobenzene µg/L1,3-dichlorobenzene µg/L1,4-dichlorobenzene µg/L1,1-dichloroethane µg/L1,2-dichloroethane µg/L1,1-dichloroethene µg/L1,2-dichloroethylene (cis) (1,2-dichloroethene) (cis) µg/L1,2-dichloroethylene (trans) (1,2-dichloroethene) (trans) µg/L1,2-dichloropropane (Propylene Dichloride) µg/L1,3-dichloropropene (cis) µg/L1,3-dichloropropene (trans) µg/L1,3-dichloropropene, total µg/L1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/LTetrachloroethylene (PCE/PERC) µg/L1,1,1-trichloroethane µg/L1,1,2-trichloroethane µg/LTrichloroethylene (TCE) µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) µg/LVinyl Chloride (Chloroethene) µg/LBenzene µg/LEthylbenzene µg/LToluene µg/LXylenes, Total µg/Lo-Xylene µg/Lm,p-Xylenes µg/LMethyl tert-Butyl Ether µg/LStyrene µg/LAnalytical results for Metals, PAH and VOC provided by laboratory in mg/L

S LEACHATE WET WELL S LEACHATE WET WELL S LEACHATE WET WELL S LEACHATE WET WELL

L1902230-2 L1938183-2 L1991981--23/15/2017 6/6/2017 9/14/2017 12/4/2017

Wet Well

0.343 0.416 0.389 0.42< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.011< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.050< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.028< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.020

< 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.005 0.0052< 0.050 < 0.050 - -< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010< 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 <0.0050< 0.050 < 0.050 0.065 0.07

- - < 0.050 <0.0100.236 0.27 0.299 0.29

< 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 <0.010- - - 0.766- - - 0.255

3.54 3.5 3.36 3.220.22 0.265 0.327 0.34

< 0.050 < 0.050 0.064 0.065< 0.080 < 0.070 < 0.070 <0.090

330 320 300 380330 320 290 380

< 250 < 250 < 250 <250< 250 < 250 < 250 <250

- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 5.0 <5.0- - < 5.0 <5.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 1.0 <1.0- - 2.2 2.4- - 1.6 2.2- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.20 <0.20- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 1.0 <1.0- - < 0.40 <0.50- - 6.5 7.77- - 56.4 68- - 1.73 1.82- - 40.7 50.9- - 19 24.4- - 21.6 26.5- - < 0.50 <0.50- - < 0.50 <0.50

Site Location

025

mm

1782325PHASE1000

FIGURE

10

2018-02-16

RTJ

PA

PA

JF

GLENMORE LANDFILL2017 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT KELOWNA, BC

CITY OF KELOWNA

KEY PLAN TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

PROJECTCLIENT

IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MA

TCH

WH

AT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E S

HE

ET

SIZ

E H

AS

BE

EN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

: AN

SI A

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD

Pat

h: \\

gold

er.g

ds\g

al\F

ort S

t Joh

n\C

AD

-GIS

\City

of K

elow

na\G

lenm

ore

Land

fill,

Kel

owna

\99_

PR

OJE

CTS

\166

0265

_Mon

itorin

g R

epor

t\02_

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N\1

7823

25_1

000\

DW

G\

| Fi

le N

ame:

178

2325

_100

0_01

- K

ey P

lan.

dwg

0

1:50,000

1,000 2,000

METRES

REFERENCE(S)

BASE MAP TAKEN FROM NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA, PUBLISHED 1999.

09BH06-S09BH06-D

09BH03

09BH04

09BH07

09BH05-S09BH05-D

09BH02

GL28-2GL28-1GL28-3

GL12-1GL 29-1GL 29-2

GL21-1

GL10-1

GL26-1GL26-2GL26-3GL26-4

GL25-1GL25-2

GL9-1GL9-2GL9-3

GL17-1GL17-2GL13-1

GL33-1GL33-2GL33-3

GL32-1GL32-2GL32-3

GL31-1GL31-2GL31-3

GL30-1GL30-2GL30-3

GL34-1GL34-2GL34-3

GL20-1

GL38 GL37

GL6-1 (2011) GL36-1GL36-2GL36-3

GL7-1

GL2-1GL2-2

GL4-1GL4-2

GL1-1GL1-2

GL24-1

GL3-5 GL3-1GL3-2GL3-3

GL18-1GL18-2GL18-3

BH12-16

09BH01

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

COMPOSTFACILITY

COMPOSTFACILITYCOMPOSTFACILITY





COMPOSTFACILITY

COMPOSTFACILITY

COMPOSTFACILITY

COMPOSTFACILITY


GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3PHASE 3



TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

QUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGE

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

GL15-1GL15-2

GL16-1

GL35-1GL35-2GL35-3

GL5-1GL5-2GL5-3

GL23-1

GL22-1GL0-1GL0-2GL0-3

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

GL8-1GL8-2

GL14-1

N PUMPHOUSEMH

P1 LEACHATEMH

S LEACHATEWET WELL

WET WELL

MH2

MH3

TUTT PONDMH

GL27-1GL27-2GL27-3GL27-4

SLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGH

SLOUGH MH

NE POND MH

TUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPOND


CITY OF KELOWNA

CONSULTANT

DESIGN

PREPARED

REVIEW

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD

PROJECT No. Rev.

Path: \\golder.gds\gal\Fort St John\CAD-GIS\City of Kelowna\Glenmore Landfill, Kelowna\99_PROJECTS\1660265_Monitoring Report\02_PRODUCTION\1782325_1000\DWG\ | File Name: 1782325_1000_02 - Site Plan.dwg

025

mm

IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MA

TCH

WH

AT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E S

HE

ET

SIZ

E H

AS

BE

EN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

: AN

SI B

TITLE

PROJECT

CLIENT

1782325PHASE1000

FIGURE

20

2018-02-16

PA

RTJ

PA

PA

SITE PLAN

SITE EXTENTS(FOR REPORTING PURPOSES ONLY )

APPROXIMATE LANDFILL (LANDFILL FOOTPRINT) EXTENTS(EXTENTS ARE BASED ON ACTIVE AND/OR HISTORICALLAND FILLING ACTIVITIES)

LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM

LEGEND

NOTES REFERENCES

MONITORING WELL LOCATION (GOLDER & OTHERS, 1990-2012)

DECOMMISSIONED WELL (2011, 2012, 2016 AND 2017)

APPROXIMATE MANHOLE LOCATION

APPROXIMATE LEACHATE SAMPLING LOCATIONS

APPROXIMATE SURFACE WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS

1. ORTHOPHOTO: C.O.K., DATE: 2017.2. CADASTRE: C.O.K., DATE: 2006.3. WELL LOCATIONS: MONITORING WELLS - OCT 2009.DWG4. LEACHATE COLLECTION: DWG: AECOM LEACHATE PLAN PROFILE

1. WELL LOCATIONS PROVIDED/SURVEYED BY C.O.K.

SCALE

5000

METRES

250

09BH06-S09BH06-D

09BH03

09BH04

09BH07

09BH05-S09BH05-D

06BH02

GL12-1GL 29-1GL 29-2

GL21-1

GL10-1

GL26-1GL26-2GL26-3GL26-4

GL25-1GL25-2

GL9-1GL9-2GL9-3

GL17-1GL17-2GL13-1

GL33-1GL33-2GL33-3

GL32-1GL32-2GL32-3

GL31-1GL31-2GL31-3

GL30-1GL30-2GL30-3

GL34-1GL34-2GL34-3

GL20-1

GL38 GL37

GL6-1 (2011)

GL36-1GL36-2GL36-3 GL7-1

GL2-1GL2-2

GL4-1GL4-2

GL1-1GL1-2

GL24-1

GL3-5GL3-1GL3-2GL3-3

GL18-1GL18-2GL18-3

BH12-16

09BH01

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

JOHN HINDLE DRIVE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

ROBERTLAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

LITTLEROBERT

LAKE

COMPOSTFACILITY






COMPOSTFACILITY

COMPOSTFACILITY

COMPOSTFACILITY

COMPOSTFACILITY


GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD

GLE

NMO

RE R

OAD


TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

TUTTMOUNTAIN

QUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGEQUAILRIDGE

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

BREDINPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

NORTHEASTPOND

GL15-1GL15-2

GL35-1GL35-2GL35-3

GL5-1GL5-2GL5-3

GL22-1GL0-1GL0-2GL0-3

439439439439439439439439439439439439439439439439439

447447447447447447447447447447447447447447447447447

445445445445445445445445445445445445445445445445445

443443443443443443443443443443443443443443443443443

441441441441441441441441441441441441441441441441441

439439439439439439439439439439439439439439439439439

439439439439439439439439439439439439439439439439439

441441441441441441441441441441441441441441441441441

443443443443443443443443443443443443443443443443443

445445445445445445445445445445445445445445445445445

N PUMPHOUSEMH

P1 LEACHATEMH

MH2

MH3



GL16-1

GL23-1

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

BREDINHILL

S LEACHATEWET WELL

WET WELL

TUTT PONDMH

GL27-1GL27-2GL27-3GL27-4

GL8-1GL8-2

GL14-1

GL28-2GL28-1GL28-3

441441441441441441441441441441441441441441441441441

443443443443443443443443443443443443443443443443443

445445445445445445445445445445445445445445445445445

437437437437437437437437437437437437437437437437437

SLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGHSLOUGH

SLOUGH MH

NE POND MH

TUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPONDTUTTPOND


CITY OF KELOWNA

CONSULTANT

DESIGN

PREPARED

REVIEW

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD

PROJECT No. Rev.

Path: \\golder.gds\gal\Fort St John\CAD-GIS\City of Kelowna\Glenmore Landfill, Kelowna\99_PROJECTS\1660265_Monitoring Report\02_PRODUCTION\1782325_1000\DWG\ | File Name: 1782325_1000_03 - GW.dwg

025

mm

IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MA

TCH

WH

AT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E S

HE

ET

SIZ

E H

AS

BE

EN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

: AN

SI B

TITLE

PROJECT

CLIENT

1782325PHASE1000

FIGURE

30

2018-02-16

RTJ

PA

PA

PA

GROUNDWATER CONTOURS

SITE EXTENTS(FOR REPORTING PURPOSES ONLY )

APPROXIMATE LANDFILL (LANDFILL FOOTPRINT) EXTENTS(EXTENTS ARE BASED ON ACTIVE AND/OR HISTORICALLAND FILLING ACTIVITIES)

LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM

INFERRED GROUNDWATER CONTOUR (2m INTERVALS)

INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION

LEGEND

NOTES REFERENCES

438.78

436.60

436.34

437.10

438.36*

438.42

438.64

(441.76)(440.50)

(439.37)

447.76 438.59438.37

438.49

438.22

438.54

438.37

438.49

438.49

438.40

438.91

438.89

438.84

441.24

445.19

445.78

445.67

MONITORING WELL LOCATION (GOLDER & OTHERS, 1990-2012)

DECOMMISSIONED WELL (2011, 2012 AND 2016)

APPROXIMATE MANHOLE LOCATION

APPROXIMATE LEACHATE SAMPLING LOCATIONS

APPROXIMATE SURFACE WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS

1. ORTHOPHOTO: C.O.K., DATE: 2017.2. CADASTRE: C.O.K., DATE: 2006.3. WELL LOCATIONS: MONITORING WELLS - OCT 2009.DWG4. LEACHATE COLLECTION: DWG: AECOM LEACHATE PLAN PROFILE

SCALE

5000

METRES

250

- (439.04) GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS MEASURED AT WELLS SCREENED WITHIN THE TILL UNIT (GL12-1, GL13-1 AND GL29-2) WERE NOT USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONTOURS

445.35

438.52

440.82GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS (masl) MEASURED JUNE 5, 2017AT THE SHALLOWEST WELL OF THE WELL SERIES COMPLETEDIN NATIVE MATERIALS (NON-FILL).

- 439.04* ASTERIX ON GROUNDWATER ELEVATION INDICATES GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASURED BEFORE WELL WAS DECOMMISSIONED

435.53

025

mm

1782325PHASE1000

FIGURE

4A0

2018-02-16

BM

PA

PA

JF

PROJECTGLENMORE LANDFILL2017 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT KELOWNA, BC

CITY OF KELOWNA

WATER ELEVATIONS SOUTH END TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

CLIENT

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD

Path: \\golder.gds\gal\Kelowna\CAD-GIS\Client\CITY OF KELOWNA\GLENMORE LANDFILL\99_PROJECTS\1782325\02_PRODUCTION\1000\ | File Name: 1782325-1000-004.dwg

IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MA

TCH

WH

AT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E S

HE

ET

SIZ

E H

AS

BE

EN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

: AN

SI A

025

mm

1782325PHASE1000

FIGURE

4B0

2018-02-16

PA

BM

PA

JF


CITY OF KELOWNA

WATER ELEVATIONS CENTRE-SOUTH TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

CLIENT

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD


IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MA

TCH

WH

AT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E S

HE

ET

SIZ

E H

AS

BE

EN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

: AN

SI A

025

mm

1782325PHASE1000

FIGURE

4C0

2018-02-16

PA

CF

PA

JF


CITY OF KELOWNA

WATER ELEVATIONS CENTRE A TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

CLIENT

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD


IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MA

TCH

WH

AT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E S

HE

ET

SIZ

E H

AS

BE

EN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

: AN

SI A

025

mm

1782325PHASE1000

FIGURE

4D0

2018-02-16

PA

CF

PA

JF


CITY OF KELOWNA

WATER ELEVATIONS CENTRE B TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

CLIENT

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD


IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MA

TCH

WH

AT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E S

HE

ET

SIZ

E H

AS

BE

EN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

: AN

SI A

025

mm

1782325PHASE1000

FIGURE

4E0

2018-02-16

PA

CF

PA

JF


CITY OF KELOWNA

WATER ELEVATIONS NORTH TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

CLIENT

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD


IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MA

TCH

WH

AT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E S

HE

ET

SIZ

E H

AS

BE

EN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

: AN

SI A

025

mm

1782325PHASE1000

FIGURE

4F0

2018-02-16

PA

CF

PA

JF


CITY OF KELOWNA

WATER ELEVATIONS NORTHEAST TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

CLIENT

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD


IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MA

TCH

WH

AT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E S

HE

ET

SIZ

E H

AS

BE

EN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

: AN

SI A


21 February 2018 Report No. 1782325-001-R-Rev0

APPENDIX A MoE Operation Certificate 12218


21 February 2018 Report No. 1782325-001-R-Rev0

APPENDIX B Methodology and Quality Assurance/Quality Control



GROUNDWATER MONITORING

Groundwater levels were measured in 2017 at all on-Site and off-Site monitoring wells by City staff on 21 March, 5 June, 16 August, 22 September and 14 November. Water levels were measured from a permanent marking on the top of each PVC monitoring well standpipe. Groundwater elevations were calculated relative to the geodetic datum obtained during Site surveys. An approximation of the local groundwater flow direction was inferred using groundwater elevations measured in June 2017. Groundwater elevation trends were assessed from readings collected between May 2009 and November 2017.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Groundwater samples were collected in 2017 by City staff at select on-Site and off-Site monitoring between 24 and 1 and 6 June, on 29 June, on 11 July, and between 25 and 26 September. Groundwater samples were collected in accordance with Golder’s standard groundwater sampling procedures (provided to the City by Golder). Sampling bottles, preservatives, filters and coolers used for the groundwater sampling programs were obtained by the City.

In general, purging and groundwater sampling at the monitoring wells was conducted using low flow techniques (with the exception of wells GL0-2, GL0-3, and GL9-1). Field measurements of pH, temperature and conductivity were obtained prior to sampling the groundwater at each monitoring well. At most wells, a low-flow peristaltic pump with dedicated Waterra® brand tubing was used for purging and sampling. The following exceptions are noted: a dedicated Proactive Tempest pump with flow controller was used at GL0-2, and a dedicated Proactive Typhoon pump with flow controller was used at GL0-3. Purging and groundwater sampling at GL9-1 was conducted using a dedicated submersible pump.

Groundwater was sampled once field measurements were observed to stabilize. Groundwater samples were generally field filtered and preserved, as necessary, and stored on ice or in a refrigerator. The samples were submitted to ALS Group (ALS) by City staff, within 24 hours after they were collected, for analysis of alkalinity, pH, hardness, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), bromide, chloride, fluoride, sulphate, nutrients (ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, orthophosphate), and dissolved metals. Groundwater samples collected from wells GL6-1 (2011) and GL18-2 were also analyzed hydrogen sulphide. Additionally, the groundwater sample collected at GL6-1 (2011) was analyzed for individual non-chlorinated phenol concentrations. Duplicate groundwater samples were collected during each groundwater sampling program. The associated laboratory analytical results were provided to Golder by the City (PDF format) and ALS (Equis format).

SURFACE WATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING

Surface water levels were manually measured in 2017 by City staff on a monthly basis at the Tutt Pond Manhole, Bredin Pond, Northeast Pond and Slough. Dataloggers were installed at Bredin Pond, Tutt Pond, Northeast Pond, Slough and East Pond in the spring of 2015. Dataloggers were programmed to take pressure readings once every 12 hours. A barologger is present on-Site to allow for barometric correction of the pressure readings. Datalogger and barologger readings were provided by the City to Golder following completion of this annual report. Datalogger readings will be summarized and presented in charts in the 2018 annual report.



Surface water samples were collected in 2017 by City staff on 18 April, 7 June, 7 September and 17 November at Bredin Pond, Tutt Pond, Northeast Pond and the Slough. The samples were submitted to ALS by the City for analysis of pH, conductivity, alkalinity, hardness, COD, total organic carbon (TOC), TDS, total suspended solids (TSS), bromide, chloride, fluoride, sulphate, nutrients (ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, orthophosphate, kjeldahl nitrogen, and total phosphorus), total metals, and total and fecal coliforms. The associated laboratory analytical results were provided to Golder by the City (PDF format) and ALS (Equis format).

LEACHATE SAMPLING

Leachate samples were collected in 2017 by City staff on 15 March, 6 June, 14 September and 4 December at MH3 (sample ID referred to as “N Pumphouse Manhole” on Figure 2 and in laboratory analytical reports), MH1 (sample ID referred to as “P1 Leachate Manhole” on Figure 2 and in laboratory analytical reports) and the wet well (sample ID referred to as “S Leachate Wet Well” on Figure 2 and in laboratory analytical reports). See Figure 2 for locations of leachate sampling points.

The N Pumphouse Manhole, P1 Leachate Manhole and S Leachate Wet Well leachate samples are representative of untreated leachate. The N Pumphouse Manhole samples are inferred to be representative of leachate generated within Phase 1 and Phase 2; while P1 Leachate Manhole samples are inferred to be representative of leachate generated within Phase 1 and S Leachate Wet Well samples of leachate generated within Phase 2.

The leachate samples were submitted to ALS by the City for analysis of pH, alkalinity, hardness, TDS, ammonia, bromide, chloride, fluoride, nitrate, nitrite, orthophosphate, phosphorus, sulphate, sulphide, COD, DOC, dissolved metals, volatile organic compounds (VOC), volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH), extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH), LEPH, HEPH, PAH, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and styrene. The associated laboratory analytical results were provided to Golder by the City (PDF format) and ALS (Equis format).

QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

A quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program was implemented during the program to provide sampling and analytical data that is considered interpretable, meaningful and reproducible. This involved using QA/QC measures in the collection (field program) and analysis (laboratory testing) of samples. The following provides a summary of the QA/QC measures implemented by Golder and City staff during the field program, and as part of our review of the data, as well as the QA/QC measures implemented by the analytical laboratory.

Quality Control (QC) measures used in the collection, preservation and shipment of samples included:

Sampling methods were consistent with established Golder protocols and provincial requirements.

Groundwater monitoring and sampling details for each well were recorded on dedicated monitoring sheets.

Information pertaining to the identity of duplicate samples was not provided to the laboratory.

Samples were transported to the laboratory using chain-of-custody procedures.



The Quality Assurance (QA) measures established for the field program included:

Submission of blind field duplicate samples, with a target of 10% field duplicate analysis. A blind field duplicate sample is a second sample of a certain media from the same location that is submitted to the analytical laboratory under a separate label, such that the laboratory has no prior knowledge that it is a duplicate.

The relative percent difference (RPD) between field duplicate sample results was used to assess duplicate sample data. The RPD is a measure of the variability between two outcomes from the same procedure or process and is calculated by:

absolutevaluex1– x2

average x1, x2100

where x1 is the original sample result and x2 is the blind field duplicate result. In general, the RPD should be less than 35%, depending on the parameter and the concentration. No values were found to exceed this requirement.

If the mean calculated for the duplicate samples is less than five times the reported analytical detection limit (RADL), then the precision is assessed by calculating the difference factor (DF) as follows:

absolutevaluex1– x2

RADL x1, x2

The DF should not be more than 2.

The ALS laboratory QA/QC program involved the analysis of blank samples, control samples, replicates and certified reference materials, as well as calibration checks, for each batch of testing. The following criteria were considered acceptable by Golder for laboratory QA/QC samples:

Blanks and control samples should be below the detection limits used for the specific analysis.

Replicates should meet the criteria set by the laboratory.

Analytical results for certified reference materials should be within the target specified by the laboratory.

Calibration concentrations (percent recovery) should not exceed the instrument calibration range.

Reports from the laboratory are to be internally reviewed prior to submission.

Golder Associates Ltd.

590 McKay Avenue, Suite 300

Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5A8

Canada

T: +1 (250) 860 8424

ATTACHMENT 2

2017 LANDFILL GAS

COLLECTION

EFFICIENCY STUDY -

GLENMORE

LANDFILL SITE

CH2M Hill

March 5, 2018

T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M

CH2M HILL CANADA LIMITED • COMPANY PROPRIETARY 1

2017 Landfill Gas Collection Efficiency Study ‐ Glenmore Landfill Site PREPARED FOR:

PREPARED BY:

DATE:

PROJECT NUMBER:

REVISION NO.:

APPROVED BY:

City of Kelowna

Raymond Li, Ph.D., P.Eng., CH2M HILL Canada Limited (CH2M)

March 5, 2018

694675

FINAL

Chuck Smith, P.Eng.

Introduction This technical memorandum was prepared by CH2M HILL Canada Limited (CH2M) to provide the City of Kelowna (City) with the estimated landfill gas (LFG) collection system efficiency for 2017, using up‐to‐date waste composition and waste filling data (CH2M, 2010; City, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016; personal communication with D. Enevoldson, 2018). The LFG recovery was assessed, along with the factors influencing actual LFG generation and recovery at the Glenmore Landfill (Site). The collection system’s efficiency was also calculated using the formulas contained within the BC Ministry of the Environment’s (BC MOE’s) LFG Management Facilities Design Guidelines (CRA, 2010).

Background The Site is located on Glenmore Road approximately 1.5 kilometres (km) east of Okanagan Lake and 9 km northeast of the Kelowna city centre. The Site is owned and operated by the City; has an estimated available airspace of 26,246,000 cubic metres [m3] (CH2M, 2014); and is expected to reach capacity by 2079 (City, 2015). The Site has been in operation since 1966 and had received approximately 3.6 million tonnes of solid waste by the end of 2017 (CH2M, 2010; City, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017).

Landfilling occurred in the Phase 1 area during the first quarter of 2017. After that, operations returned to Phase 2 and proceeded in an easterly direction across Phase 2 for five to six months before turning to Phase 1. The total tonnage for burial in 2017 was 151,456 tonnes (personal communication with D. Enevoldson, February 5, 2018).

Regulatory Framework On December 8, 2008, a regulation for the management of LFG at British Columbia (BC) regulated landfill sites was ordered and approved by the BC MOE. In accordance with the Landfill Gas Management Regulation (Regulation), a regulated landfill site is a landfill site that has 100,000 tonnes or more of municipal solid waste (MSW), or has received 10,000 or more tonnes of MSW annually for disposal into the landfill site in any calendar year after 2008 (BC MOE, 2008).

Under the Regulation, a qualified professional is required to conduct an initial LFG generation assessment (Assessment) using his or her knowledge with respect to solid waste and LFG management to select models for LFG estimation, assess results, and provide required recommendations. The Assessment must be conducted in accordance with the most recent edition of LFG guidance documents, as approved by the BC

2017 LANDFILL GAS COLLECTION EFFICIENCY STUDY ‐ GLENMORE LANDFILL SITE

2 CH2M HILL CANADA LIMITED • COMPANY PROPRIETARY

MOE Director. The guidance documents include the Landfill Gas Generation Assessment Procedure Guidelines (BC MOE LFG Guideline) that was prepared by Conestoga‐Rovers & Associates (CRA), dated March 2009, and the Landfill Gas Generation Estimation Tool (Tool) (BC MOE, 2014). Both are available on the BC MOE website and must be used in the preparation of Assessments (CRA, 2009). The City submitted its first LFG generation assessment report in 2010 (CH2M, 2010).

LFG Generation Assessment Methodology The following sections present the information required in the Regulation, in accordance with the BC MOE LFG Guideline, Section 4, Information Collection and Synthesis.

Annual Waste Buried

Table 1 presents the estimated annual amount of MSW disposed of at the Site between 1987 and 2017, as well as the projected volume of waste to be disposed at the Site for 4 years after the Assessment, which corresponds to the year 2021. Although wastes have been disposed at the Site since 1966, Table ‐1 shows tonnages from 1987, as required to estimate the LFG generation using the simulation tool recommended by BC MOE.

The quantity of wastes disposed at the Site between 1986 and 2009 was based on the Landfill Gas Generation Assessment Report (CH2M, 2010). Tonnes of refuse disposed at the Site between 2010 and 2016 are based on the annual reports for those years (City, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016). The 2017 tonnage was based on personal communication with D. Enevoldson (February 5, 2018). Quantities of waste to be disposed of at the Site between 2018 and 2022 were projected based on economy and building boom in the region and is expected to be between 150,000 to 160,000 tonnes per year. An assumed annual tonnage value of 155,000 tonnes between 2018 to 2021 was used.

Table 1. Annual Quantity of Waste Disposed at the Site

Years Waste Disposed

tonnes* Cumulative Waste Disposed

tonnes

1987 87,434 87,434

1988 87,434 174,868

1989 87,434 262,302

1990 87,434 349,736

1991 87,434 437,170

1992 93,852 531,022

1993 89,753 620,775

1994 84,272 705,047

1995 80,458 785,505

1996 80,794 866,299

1997 95,904 962,203

1998 83,756 1,045,959

1999 85,258 1,131,217

2000 89,547 1,220,764

2001 95,815 1,316,579

2002 102,522 1,419,101

2003 96,772 1,515,873

2004 106,483 1,622,356



Table 1. Annual Quantity of Waste Disposed at the Site


tonnes* Cumulative Waste Disposed

tonnes

2005 108,597 1,730,953

2006 116,218 1,847,171

2007 102,688 1,949,859

2008 100,611 2,050,470

2009 114,590 2,165,060

2010 119,861 2,284,921

2011 106,387 2,391,308

2012 108,110 2,499,418

2013 108,917 2,608,335

2014 123,178 2,731,513

2015 136,115 2,867,628

2016 154,510 3,022,138

2017 151,456 3,173,594

2018 155,000 3,328,594

2019 155,000 3,483,594

2020 155,000 3,638,594

2021 155,000 3,793,594

Notes: * The quantity of wastes disposed at the Site between 1986 and 2009 was based on the Landfill Gas Generation Assessment Report (CH2M, 2010). Tonnes of refuse disposed at the Site between 2010 and 2016 are based on the City’s landfill annual reports for those years (City, 2010; 2011; 2012; 2013; 2014; 2015 and 2016). The 2017 quantity of wastes disposed at the Site was based on personal communication with D. Enevoldson (February 05, 2018). Quantities of waste to be disposed of at the Site between 2018 and 2021 were projected by City (personal communication with D. Enevoldson (February 05, 2018).

Waste Composition

The most updated waste composition information is obtained from the 2013 Waste Composition Study of Regional District of Central Okanagan (RDCO) (Morrison Hershfield Ltd., 2016). The waste composition of garbage collected at curbside from residents is shown in Figure 1, while the waste composition of Institutional, Commercial, Industrial (ICI) garbage is shown in Figure 2.



Figure 1. Waste Composition of Garbage Collected at Curbside from Residents Source: Figure extracted from the 2013 Waste Composition Study of Regional District of Central Okanagan (RDCO) (Morrison Hershfield Ltd., 2016)

Figure 2. Waste Composition of ICI Garbage

Source: Figure extracted from the 2013 Waste Composition Study of Regional District of Central Okanagan (RDCO) (Morrison Hershfield Ltd., 2016)



Waste Categories

Characterization according to waste type is required to follow the BC MOE LFG Guideline. Waste must be characterized into three categories: relatively inert, moderately decomposable, and decomposable. Waste composition for 2017 was not available so it was assumed to be similar to that of 2016.

The 2016 waste tonnage and composition percentage (personal communication with D. Enevoldson [February 15, 2017]) for the site are as follows:

Tonnes Percentage

Residential (Cart) Garbage 37,176 24.06%

Commercial (ICI) Garbage 50,016 32.37%

Construction/Demo debris 44,684 28.92%

Contaminated soil 13,722 8.88%

Other 8,912 5.77%

Based on the 2013 Waste Composition Study of Regional District of Central Okanagan (RDCO) (Morrison Hershfield Ltd., 2016), the buried waste at the Site is categorized as follows:

Decomposable waste: 19 percent

Moderately decomposable waste: 54 percent

Relatively inert waste: 27 percent

Climate

The average annual precipitation of the nearest meteorological station (Kelowna A #1123970; located at the Kelowna airport) is 386.9 millimeters (mm) based on Canadian Climate Normals between 1981 and 2010 (Government of Canada, 2017). For the purpose of the Assessment, the average annual precipitation data of the station Kelowna A was used for calculation the methane generation rate.

Waste tonnage by Category

Table 2 presents the historical and projected waste tonnages, as well as the waste type category, as described in previous section.

Table 2. Waste Tonnage by Category


tonnes Relatively Inert (27%)

tonnes Moderately Decomposable (54%)

tonnes Decomposable (19%)

tonnes

1987 87,434 23,607 47,214 16,612

1988 87,434 23,607 47,214 16,612

1989 87,434 23,607 47,214 16,612

1990 87,434 23,607 47,214 16,612

1991 87,434 23,607 47,214 16,612

1992 93,852 25,340 50,680 17,832

1993 89,753 24,233 48,467 17,053

1994 84,272 22,753 45,507 16,012

1995 80,458 21,724 43,447 15,287

1996 80,794 21,814 43,629 15,351

1997 95,904 25,894 51,788 18,222

1998 83,756 22,614 45,228 15,914



Table 2. Waste Tonnage by Category


tonnes Relatively Inert (27%)

tonnes Moderately Decomposable (54%)

tonnes Decomposable (19%)

tonnes

1999 85,258 23,020 46,039 16,199

2000 89,547 24,178 48,355 17,014

2001 95,815 25,870 51,740 18,205

2002 102,522 27,681 55,362 19,479

2003 96,772 26,128 52,257 18,387

2004 106,483 28,750 57,501 20,232

2005 108,597 29,321 58,642 20,633

2006 116,218 31,379 62,758 22,081

2007 102,688 27,726 55,452 19,511

2008 100,611 27,165 54,330 19,116

2009 114,590 30,939 61,879 21,772

2010 119,861 32,362 64,725 22,774

2011 106,387 28,724 57,449 20,214

2012 108,110 29,190 58,379 20,541

2013 108,917 29,408 58,815 20,694

2014 123,178 33,258 66,516 23,404

2015 136,115 36,751 73,502 25,862

2016 154,510 41,718 83,435 29,357

2017 151,456 40,893 81,786 28,777

2018 155,000 41,850 83,700 29,450

2019 155,000 41,850 83,700 29,450

2020 155,000 41,850 83,700 29,450

2021 155,000 41,850 83,700 29,450

Notes: Second column data is from Table 1; other data are from calculations.



LFG Generation Model Methane production at the Site was estimated using the Tool as specified by the BC MOE LFG Guideline. The model is based on a first‐order kinetic decomposition rate equation for quantifying emissions from the decomposition of wastes in MSW landfills. Table 3 presents the parameters required to run the model.

Table 3 Input Parameters used in the Tool

Input Parameters or Constants

LFG Generation Model

BC MOE LFG Guideline/Calculation Tool

First year of historical data used 1987

Year of Assessment 2017

Annual waste tonnage Annual waste acceptance from 1987 to 2017

Annual waste tonnages for relatively inert, moderately decomposable, and decomposable wastes

k methane generation rate

Methane generation rates For relatively inert, moderately decomposable, and decomposable wastes

Lo Potential methane generation capacity

Waste types Relatively inert, moderately decomposable, and decomposable wastes

The following assumptions were used in the Tool:

Lag time before start of gas production: 1 year

Methane by volume: 50 percent

Carbon dioxide by volume: 50 percent

Methane density at 1 atmosphere, 25 degrees Celsius (°C): 0.6557 kilogram per cubic metre (kg/m3)

Carbon dioxide density, 25°C: 1.7988 kg/m3

Model Input Parameters Used and Justification

Methane Generation Rate

Input parameters used for the constant, k, are based on the BC MOE LFG Guideline, Table 5.2 (CRA, 2009).

According to the annual precipitation (386.9 mm, as mentioned in Section 3.3), the model uses k‐values for this site are as follows:

0.01/year (y) for relatively inert waste

0.02/y for moderately decomposable waste

0.05/y for decomposable waste However, the National Inventory Report 1990‐2011: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada (NIR) (Environment Canada, 2013) adopted a new methodology in 2011, which uses a new formula to calculate k‐value from precipitation. No further revision on this methodology was found in the current edition of NIR (NIR, 2016). With the NIR new methodology, the k‐value for the precipitation of 386.9 mm is 0.010. Proportionally, the new k‐value for each category is as follows:

0.00375/y for relatively inert waste

0.00750/y for moderately decomposable waste

0.01875/y for decomposable waste



Methane Generation Potential (Lo)

The input parameters used for the Lo‐value are based on the BC MOE LFG Guideline, Table 5.1 (CRA, 2009). For this Site, the model uses the following Lo‐values:

20 m3 methane/metric tonne of waste for relatively inert waste

120 m3 methane/metric tonne of waste for moderately decomposable waste

160 m3 methane/metric tonne of waste for decomposable waste

According to the BC MOE LFG Guideline, Section 5.4, the selected k‐value should be corrected based on the landfill’s operations and maintenance practices, including stormwater management, cover properties, and the extent of leachate recirculation or stormwater injection. Based on Table 5.3 of the BC MOE LFG Guideline, the water addition factor appropriate for the Site conditions in 2017 is 1.0. The reasons are as follows:

There is partial infiltration of stormwater into the waste.

There has been no recirculation of leachate into the waste during 2017 (personal communication with D. Enevoldson [January 31, 2018]).

LFG Model Results This section presents the results of the updated Assessment, in accordance with the Regulation and the BC MOE LFG Guideline, Section 7, Landfill Generation Assessment Reporting. Table 4 presents the updated annual methane production using the Tool (see Appendix A).

Table 4 Annual Methane Production Using the BC MOE Calculation Tool for the Glenmore Landfill

Estimated Quantity of Methane Produced Year Tonnes Per Year

In the year preceding the Assessment 2016 1,707

In the year of the Assessment 2017 1,793

1 year after the Assessment 2018 1,877

2 years after the Assessment 2019 1,961



According to the calculation tool results, 1,793 tonnes of methane were generated in 2017, which corresponds to approximately 312 cubic metres per hour (m3/h) or 184 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) methane generation rate (@25°C, 101.3KPa). Using a typical LFG composition of 50 percent methane and 50 percent carbon dioxide by volume, the LFG generation rate in 2017 is about 624 m3/h (367 scfm).

LFG System Efficiency 2017 LFG Collection Data

In 2017, there were 1,687,121 m3 of LFG destroyed through flaring and 1,820,881 m3 of LFG was processed through the Fortis Biogas Plant for beneficial use by FortisBC (personal communication with D. Enevoldson, January 29, 2018).

2017 LFG Operational Efficiency

There will be expected downtime for the plant based on routine and preventative maintenance requirements, system upgrades, as well as unexpected downtime due to unpredictable events, such as equipment and power failures. Annual downtimes in non‐continuous flaring can contribute to reducing the



LFG collection efficiency. Based on the facility operations data provided by the City, runtime for the biogas plant operation and the flare were 4378 hours and 4236 hours, respectively. Therefore, the actual downtime was 8,760 minutes which corresponds to approximately 1.7 percent of total time (there are 525,600 minutes in 2017) or less than 6 days, which would be within a reasonable timeframe. The total downtime for the flare was attributed to routine equipment maintenance, biomethane facility trial operations, and additional system upgrades undertaken at the blower/flare facility.

2017 LFG Collection Efficiency

In accordance with the BC MOE LFG Design Guidelines, collection efficiency (CE) is calculated based on the following equation:

CE = (Qc/Qp)*100%

Where: CE = collection efficiency expressed as a percentage (%) Qc = normalized average collected flow rate of LFG in the given calendar year (m3/h) Qp = estimated generated LFG flow rate in given calendar year (m3/h), which is calculated according to the

Tool

The normalized average collected flow rate of LFG (Qc) is calculated according to: Qc = Qa* Cm/50%

Where: Qa = average measured LFG flow rate (m3/h) Cm = annual average methane concentration measured during LFG management system uptime at a central

collection point near the blower or combustion/utilization device of the LFG management system expressed as a percentage (%)

The average measured LFG flow rate (Qa) is measured according to the following:

Qa = VLFG/(24*365)

Where: VLFG = total volume of LFG collected in the calendar year 2017 (cubic metres per year [m3/y]); 2017 with 365

days

Based on this formula:

Qa = VLFG/(24*365) Qa = 3,508,002m3/(24*365 hr) = 400.467 m3/h

Qp = 5,467,866m3/(24*365 hr) = 624.19 m3/h for 2017

Based on record data:

Cm = 59.6% ((personal communication with D. Enevoldson, February 13, 2018)

Qc = Qa* Cm/50% = 400.46*59.6%/50% = 477.34 m3/h

CE = (Qc/Qp)*100% = (477.34/624.19)*100% = 76.47%

The final collection efficiency of the LFG collection system is estimated to be 76 percent.



References

BC Ministry of Environment (BC MOE). 2008. Landfill Gas Management Regulation. Province of BC, ordered and approved December 8, 2008.

BC Ministry of Environment (BC MOE). 2014. Landfill Gas Generation Estimation Tool. http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/waste‐management/garbage/landfills. Accessed February 27, 2018.

CH2M HILL Canada Limited (CH2M). 2009. Leachate Recirculation Pilot Test – Waste Moisture Analysis and Update.

CH2M HILL Canada Limited (CH2M). 2010. Landfill Gas Generation Assessment Report – Glenmore Landfill Site.

CH2M HILL Canada Limited (CH2M). 2012. Landfill Gas Management Facilities Design Plan – Glenmore Landfill Site. January.

CH2M HILL Canada Limited (CH2M). 2014. Ultimate Long Term Filling Plan and Development Considerations for the Glenmore Landfill.

City of Kelowna (City). 2011. 2010 Glenmore Landfill Annual Report.







Conestoga‐Rovers & Associates (CRA). 2009. Landfill Gas Generation Assessment Procedure Guidelines. Prepared for the BC MOE. March.

Conestoga‐Rovers & Associates (CRA). 2010. Landfill Gas Management Facilities Design Guidelines. Prepared for the BC MOE. March.

Environment Canada. 2013. National Inventory Report 1990‐2011: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada. http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_ghg_inventories/national_inventories_submissions/items/9492.php. Accessed February 27, 2018.

Environment Canada. 2018. National Inventory Report 1990‐2015: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada. http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_ghg_inventories/national_inventories_submissions/items/9492.php. Accessed February 27, 2018.

Garg, A., G. Achari, and R.C. Joshi. 2006. A Model to Estimate the Methane Generation Rate Constant in Sanitary Landfills Using Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation. Waste Management & Research. V. 24. pp. 363‐375.

Government of Canada. 2018. Canadian Climate Normals between 1981 and 2010. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html?StationName=red%20deer&SearchType=BeginsWith&StnId=2133. Accessed February 27, 2018.



Huitric, R.L., and M.A. Rosales. 2005. Determining the Reliability of Landfill Methane Projections. Proceedings of the SWANA 10th Annual Landfill Gas Symposium and Solid Waste Manager. Boulder, Colorado. June.

Morrison Hershfield Ltd. 2016. Solid Waste Management Plan Update – Stage 1 Report Regional District of Central Okanagan.

Rajaram, Vasudevan, Faisal Zia Siddiqui, and Mohd Emran Khan. 2011. From Landfill Gas to Energy: Technologies and Challenges. CRC Press.

Appendix A BC MOE’s Methane Generation Estimation Tool Results for the

Glenmore Landfill Site

2017 LFG Management Regulation Reference154,510 (tonnes/year) 4-2-a

3,022,138 (tonnes/year) 4-2-c

Year of AssessmentAnnual Tonnage in Preceding Year Total waste in Place in the Preceding Year Methane generation in the Preceding Year 1,707 (tonnes CH4/year) 4-2-d

Waste Tonnage Methane Generation(tonnes) (tonnes CH4/year)

2017 151,456 1,793 4-2-b & 4-2-e2018 155,000 1,877 4-2-b & 4-2-e2019 155,000 1,961 4-2-b & 4-2-e2020 155,000 2,045 4-2-b & 4-2-e2021 155,000 2,127 4-2-b & 4-2-e

Next Five Years

Relatively Inert

Moderately Decomposable Decomposable

Gas Production potential, Lo = 20 120 160 m3 CH4/tonne lag time before start of gas production, lag = 1 yearsHistorical Data Used (years) 301st Year of Historical Data Used 19874 Years after Reporting Year 2021methane (by volume) 50%carbon dioxide (by volume) 50%methane (density) - 1atm, 25C 0.6557 kg/m3 (25C,SP)carbon dioxide (density) 1.7988 kg/m3 (25C,SP)

AnnualAnnual Cumulative Moderately Moderately Methane

Year Year TonnageNumber (tonnes)

Waste-in-place Relatively Inert Decomposable Decomposable Relatively Inert Decomposable Decomposable Production (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (year-1) (year-1) (year-1) (tonnes/yr)

1987 1 87,434 87,434 23,607 47,214 16,612 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.001988 2 87,434 174,868 23,607 47,214 16,612 0.00 0.01 0.02 61.331989 3 87,434 262,302 23,607 47,214 16,612 0.00 0.01 0.02 121.851990 4 87,434 349,736 23,607 47,214 16,612 0.00 0.01 0.02 181.571991 5 87,434 437,170 23,607 47,214 16,612 0.00 0.01 0.02 240.501992 6 93,852 531,022 25,340 50,680 17,832 0.00 0.01 0.02 298.651993 7 89,753 620,775 24,233 48,467 17,053 0.00 0.01 0.02 360.541994 8 84,272 705,047 22,753 45,507 16,012 0.00 0.01 0.02 418.741995 9 80,458 785,505 21,724 43,447 15,287 0.00 0.01 0.02 472.341996 10 80,794 866,299 21,814 43,629 15,351 0.00 0.01 0.02 522.561997 11 95,904 962,203 25,894 51,788 18,222 0.00 0.01 0.02 572.371998 12 83,756 1,045,959 22,614 45,228 15,914 0.00 0.01 0.02 632.131999 13 85,258 1,131,217 23,020 46,039 16,199 0.00 0.01 0.02 682.602000 14 89,547 1,220,764 24,178 48,355 17,014 0.00 0.01 0.02 733.472001 15 95,815 1,316,579 25,870 51,740 18,205 0.00 0.01 0.02 786.692002 16 102,522 1,419,101 27,681 55,362 19,479 0.00 0.01 0.02 843.622003 17 96,772 1,515,873 26,128 52,257 18,387 0.00 0.01 0.02 904.532004 18 106,483 1,622,356 28,750 57,501 20,232 0.00 0.01 0.02 960.622005 19 108,597 1,730,953 29,321 58,642 20,633 0.00 0.01 0.02 1022.802006 20 116,218 1,847,171 31,379 62,758 22,081 0.00 0.01 0.02 1085.672007 21 102,688 1,949,859 27,726 55,452 19,511 0.00 0.01 0.02 1153.082008 22 100,611 2,050,470 27,165 54,330 19,116 0.00 0.01 0.02 1210.132009 23 114,590 2,165,060 30,939 61,879 21,772 0.00 0.01 0.02 1265.012010 24 119,861 2,284,921 32,362 64,725 22,774 0.00 0.01 0.02 1328.992011 25 106,387 2,391,308 28,724 57,449 20,214 0.00 0.01 0.02 1395.862012 26 108,110 2,499,418 29,190 58,379 20,541 0.00 0.01 0.02 1452.432013 27 108,917 2,608,335 29,408 58,815 20,694 0.00 0.01 0.02 1509.492014 28 123,178 2,731,513 33,258 66,516 23,404 0.00 0.01 0.02 1566.412015 29 136,115 2,867,628 36,751 73,502 25,862 0.00 0.01 0.02 1632.612016 30 154,510 3,022,138 41,718 83,435 29,357 0.00 0.01 0.02 1707.052017 31 151,456 3,173,594 40,893 81,786 28,777 0.00 0.01 0.02 1793.462018 32 155,000 3,328,594 41,850 83,700 29,450 0.00 0.01 0.02 1876.622019 33 155,000 3,483,594 41,850 83,700 29,450 0.00 0.01 0.02 1961.212020 34 155,000 3,638,594 41,850 83,700 29,450 0.00 0.01 0.02 2044.722021 35 155,000 3,793,594 41,850 83,700 29,450 0.00 0.01 0.02 2127.19

Waste Tonnage Methane Generation Rate, k

ATTACHMENT 3

2017 DGIR File # 160621

GROUNDWATER

RESULTS

City of Kelowna

March 15, 2018

Table 1: DGIR File # 160621 GROUNDWATER RESULTS

Sample ID GL1-1 GL1-1 GL1-1 GL1-2 GL1-2 GL1-2 GL23-1 GL23-1 GL23-1 GL24-1 GL24-1 GL24-1Date Sampled 31-May-2016 8-Sep-2016 12-Oct-2017 31-May-2016 8-Sep-2016 12-Oct-2017 31-May-2016 8-Sep-2016 25-May-2017 11-Aug-2010 31-May-2016 8-Sep-2016

Lab CARO ALS Caro ALS ALS Caro ALS ALS Caro ALS ALS Exova Caro ALS

Physical Tests (Water) Units

Hardness (as CaCO3) 5 0.5 mg/L 928 788 742 891 881 732 1150 1030 1150 1200 1020 1310pH 0.01 0.1 pH 7.43 7.85 8.34 7.66 7.82 8.21 7.64 7.59 8.45 7.64 7.6Total Dissolved Solids 10 20 mg/L 1290 1230 1090 1190 1370 1080 1580 1530 1610 2110 1570 2190

Anions and Nutrients (Water) Alkalinity, Total (as CaCO3) 1 1 mg/L 664 697 631 660 759 648 1090 1130 1070 859 778 900Ammonia, Total (as N) 0.02 0.005 mg/L <0.020 0.0096 0.0187 <0.020 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.020 0.0066 0.0104 <0.01 <0.020 0.007Bromide (Br) 0.5 mg/L <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Chloride (Cl) 0.1 5 mg/L 237 193 161 232 236 193 30.6 34 35 91.4 188 173Fluoride (F) 0.1 0.2 mg/L 1.52 1.66 1.66 1.42 1.48 1.41 1.05 0.87 0.89 1.27 0.99Nitrate (as N) 0.01 0.05 mg/L 0.633 <0.050 <0.050 0.029 0.3 0.194 0.066 <0.10 <0.10 10.8 11.7 28.3Nitrite (as N) 0.01 0.01 mg/L <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.020 <0.010 <0.010 <0.020 <0.020 0.008 <0.010 0.047Orthophosphate-Dissolved (as P) 0.01 0.001 mg/L <0.01 0.0071 0.0081 <0.01 0.0058 0.0169 <0.01 0.0039 0.0034 0.034 0.1 0.0806Sulfate (SO4) 1 3 mg/L 244 272 267 209 258 203 384 380 386 762 349 618

Dissolved Metals (Water) Aluminum (Al)-Dissolved 0.05 0.01 mg/L <0.05 <0.010 <0.010 <0.05 <0.010 <0.010 <0.05 <0.010 <0.010 <0.05 <0.010Antimony (Sb)-Dissolved 0.001 0.0005 mg/L <0.001 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.001 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.001 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.001 <0.00050Arsenic (As)-Dissolved 0.005 0.001 mg/L <0.005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.005 0.0014Barium (Ba)-Dissolved 0.05 0.02 mg/L 0.05 0.045 0.039 <0.05 0.055 0.044 0.07 0.074 0.072 0.07 0.096Beryllium (Be)-Dissolved 0.001 0.005 mg/L <0.001 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.001 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.001 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.001 <0.0050Bismuth (Bi)-Dissolved 0.2 mg/L <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Boron (B)-Dissolved 0.04 0.1 mg/L 0.06 <0.10 <0.10 0.06 <0.10 <0.10 0.04 <0.10 <0.10 0.1 <0.10Cadmium (Cd)-Dissolved 0.0001 0.00005 mg/L <0.0001 0.000133 0.000181 <0.0001 0.000057 <0.000050 0.0004 0.00122 0.000216 <0.0001 0.000589Calcium (Ca)-Dissolved 2 0.1 mg/L 71.2 64.2 58.2 69.3 72.4 57.8 84.8 80.3 82.6 93 73.6 96.5Chromium (Cr)-Dissolved 0.005 0.0005 mg/L <0.005 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.005 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.005 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.005 0.00097Cobalt (Co)-Dissolved 0.0005 0.0005 mg/L <0.0005 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.0005 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.0005 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.0005 0.00064Copper (Cu)-Dissolved 0.002 0.001 mg/L <0.002 0.0013 0.0018 <0.002 0.0018 <0.0010 <0.002 0.0028 0.0035 <0.002 0.0045Iron (Fe)-Dissolved 0.1 0.03 mg/L <0.10 <0.030 <0.030 <0.10 <0.030 <0.030 <0.10 <0.030 <0.030 <0.10 <0.030Lead (Pb)-Dissolved 0.001 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001 <0.0010Lithium (Li)-Dissolved 0.001 0.05 mg/L 0.049 <0.050 <0.050 0.049 <0.050 <0.050 0.039 <0.050 <0.050 0.025 <0.050Magnesium (Mg)-Dissolved 0.1 0.1 mg/L 182 152 145 174 170 143 228 202 229 208 203 259Manganese (Mn)-Dissolved 0.002 0.01 mg/L 0.027 0.076 0.036 <0.002 <0.010 <0.010 0.025 0.28 0.033 1.4 0.007 0.145Molybdenum (Mo)-Dissolved 0.001 0.001 mg/L 0.024 0.0289 0.0293 0.021 0.0228 0.0206 0.017 0.0154 0.0136 0.011 0.0147Nickel (Ni)-Dissolved 0.002 0.005 mg/L <0.002 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.002 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.009 0.0126 0.0097 0.003 0.0124Phosphorus (P)-Dissolved 0.3 mg/L <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30Potassium (K)-Dissolved 2 mg/L 10.8 10 12.3 11 16.4 14.9 15 13.4Selenium (Se)-Dissolved 0.005 0.001 mg/L <0.005 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.005 0.0026 0.003 <0.005 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.009 0.0262Silicon (Si)-Dissolved 0.05 mg/L 8.59 7.79 9.78 9.25 10.1 10.1 9.1Silver (Ag)-Dissolved 0.0005 0.00005 mg/L <0.0005 <0.000050 <0.000050 <0.0005 <0.000050 <0.000050 <0.0005 <0.000050 <0.000050 <0.0005 <0.000050Sodium (Na)-Dissolved 0.2 2 mg/L 174 178 169 161 184 153 205 206 191 254 210 275Strontium (Sr)-Dissolved 0.01 0.005 mg/L 3.41 2.99 2.52 3.31 3.52 2.69 4.04 4.03 4.1 2.47 3.58Sulfur (S)-Dissolved 0.5 mg/L 83.8 87 79.9 64.5 117 123 236 208Thallium (Tl)-Dissolved 0.0002 0.00001 mg/L <0.0002 <0.000010 <0.000010 <0.0002 <0.000010 <0.000010 <0.0002 0.000013 <0.000010 <0.0002 0.000019Tin (Sn)-Dissolved 0.03 mg/L <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030Titanium (Ti)-Dissolved 0.05 0.05 mg/L <0.05 <0.050 <0.050 <0.05 <0.050 <0.050 <0.05 <0.050 <0.050 <0.05 <0.050Uranium (U)-Dissolved 0.0002 0.0002 mg/L 0.0563 0.054 0.0447 0.049 0.0611 0.0403 0.09 0.0822 0.0747 0.0759 0.12Vanadium (V)-Dissolved 0.01 0.03 mg/L <0.01 <0.030 <0.030 <0.01 <0.030 <0.030 <0.01 <0.030 <0.030 <0.01 <0.030Zinc (Zn)-Dissolved 0.04 0.005 mg/L <0.04 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.04 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.04 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.04 <0.0050

Leachate Indicators

Directly downgrade of spill

Documents

2017 Glenmore Landfill Annual Report Operational ... · Operational Certificate 12218 Annual Report 2017 March 15, 2018 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this annual report is