2018 JCIDS Changes RDT

2018 Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System (JCIDS)

Changes

Rapid Deployment Training (RDT)

Eric Jefferies, DAU, DSMC,Professor of Requirements Management

Requirements Management Centereric.jefferies@dau.mil

(703) 805-238111 October 2018

Sources:• CJCSI 5123.01H, 31 August 2018• JCIDS Manual, 31 August 2018

2

• JCIDS Policy Changes:

– Delegate authorities where appropriate to support a more streamlined and responsive system• Reduces number of Joint Staffing Designations from four to three: JROC Interest, JCB Interest,

and Joint Information (deletes Joint Integration)• Delegates validation/certification/endorsement authority to the Sponsor unless there is clear joint

interoperability or multi-service equities

– Defines Joint Performance Requirements (JPRs) to include:• How the Joint Staff Gatekeeper will designate JPRs• How JPRs will be staffed for certifications/endorsements

– Adds guidance to address joint interoperability• CDD Section added for joint interoperability that will include guidance on Modular Open System

Approach

Senior Leader Guidance/Intent (Changes 1 of 2)

3

• Minimizes touch points between Sponsor and the JROC– Reduces the number of capability requirements documents– CPD no longer required (Sponsors can update a validated CDD)

• Addresses incremental/evolutionary acquisition– Evolving threat informed by military risk & maturity of technologies– Incremental or family of systems approach

• Addresses intelligence supportability and system survivability requirements early in the process

• Adds guidance on JROC support to the Secretary of Defense’s Investment Review Process

Senior Leader Guidance/Intent(Changes 2 of 2)

4

CHARTER OF THE JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT

COUNCIL (JROC)CJCSI 5123.01G

(12 Feb 2015)

Implements the JROC as a statutory council to the Chairman of

the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS)

JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND

DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS)CJCSI 3170.01I (23 Jan 2015)

Not intended to stand alone; synchronizes with JROC Charter

and JCIDS Manual

MANUAL FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES

INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS)(12 Feb 2015, including errata as of

18 Dec 2015)

Procedural guidance for the JCIDS process as well as other

requirements-related processes & activities

2015 JCIDS Policy/Guidance (3 Documents)

5

CHARTER OF THE JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL (JROC) AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JOINT

CAPABILITIES AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS)

CJCSI 5123.01H(31 Aug 2018)

Implements the JROC as a statutory council to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS)

Not intended to stand alone; synchronizes with the JCIDS Manual

MANUAL FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION

AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS)(31 Aug 2018)

Procedural guidance for the JCIDS process as well as other requirements-related

processes & activities

2018 JCIDS Policy/Guidance (2 Documents)

New JCIDS Policy/Guidance effective 90 days after issuance

6

2016 NDAA Language

SEC. 844. MANDATORY REQUIREMENT FOR TRAINING RELATED TO THE CONDUCT OF MARKET RESEARCH.

(b) INCORPORATION INTO MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TRAINING MANDATE.—The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall ensure that the requirements of section 2377(d) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), are incorporated into the requirements management certification training mandate of the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System.

Change to JCIDS Manual:

Added CLC-004 (Market Research) to the Requirements Management Certification Training (RMCT) Curriculum as a mandatory core plus course for those members of the Requirements Management (RM) workforce assigned to a market research team

7

Level CCertification

Level BCertification

Level ACertification

Level D Executive Certification

RQM 413Senior Leader

Requirements Course

4-star GO/FO, Agency Head

18 - 24 hours online 1-week classroom 1-day Classroom

CLR 101Introduction to JCIDS

RQM 310Advanced Concepts and Skills for Requirements

Management

RQM 403Requirements Executive

Overview Workshop

1-3 star GO/FO, SES

Tailored Desktop Discussion

RQM 110Core Concepts for

Requirements Management

4 - 6 hours online

Core PlusCourses

(online)

CLR 151Analysis of Alternatives

CLR 250Capability-Based

Assessments

CLR 252Developing Performance

Attributes

• Make decisions• Set priorities • Approve & Validate JCIDS Documents

Core Courses – Mandatory for RM Certification Core Plus Courses (aka “Just-In-Time”) -- Not Required for Cert Unless Directed by Component

Learning and Development Support for All Customers- Military & Civilian, All Grades -

RMCT Curriculum(Changes)

Requirements Management Certification Training (RMCT) Curriculum

CLC 004Market Research

Added in new JCIDS Manual

• Requirements presenters & trainers

• Requirements originators & support • Requirements writers

& developers

“Requirements Apprentice”

“Requirements Journeyman”

“Requirements Core Expert”

“Requirements Validators & Prioritizors”

8

2017 NDAA Language

• Title 10 U.S. Code Section 181 Joint Requirements Oversight Council, revisions:

– Assessing joint military capabilities, and identifying, approving, and prioritizing gaps in such capabilities, to meet applicable requirements in the National Defense Strategy;

– Review and validate whether a capability proposed…fulfills a gap in joint military capabilities;

– Establishing and approving “joint performance requirements” that ensure interoperability or fulfill a capability gap of more than one armed force are necessary as designated by the CJCS

– Input from Chiefs of Staff: JROC shall seek, and strongly consider the views from the Chiefs of Staff of the armed forces, in their roles as customers of the acquisition system, on matters pertaining to capability proposed by an armed force, Defense Agency, or other entity of the DoD, and joint performance requirements

– Changes composition of JROC moving Combatant Commanders from members to advisors and adding USD(I) as an advisor;

The term ‘joint performance requirement’ means a performance requirement that is critical or essential to ensure interoperability or fulfill a capability gap of more than one armed force, Defense Agency, or other

entity of the Department of Defense, or impacts the joint force in other ways such as logistics.

9

Sec. 805 – Modular Open System Approach (MOSA) in development of Major Weapon System

“A major defense acquisition program that receives Milestone A or Milestone B approval after January 1, 2019, shall be designated and developed, to the maximum extent practicable, with a modular open system approach to enable incremental development and enhance competition, innovation, and interoperability.”

2017 NDAA Language(Continued)

10

10 USC 181Deleted, Sec. 831, 2019 NDAA

11

JROC Membership(Changes)

JCB

JROCJROC

FCB WGs

FCBs

JROC DECISION CHAIN

JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight CouncilJCB: Joint Capability BoardFCBs: Functional Capability Boards (Force Support, Battlespace Awareness, Force Application, Logistics, Protection, C4/Cyber.)FCB WGs: FCB Working Groups

JROC MEMBERSHIPChair: VCJCS. Advises the CJCS

Statutory Council Members:• Vice Chief of Staff, Army • Vice Chief of Naval Operations• Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force • Assistant Commandant of the

Marine Corps

Statutory Advisors: • USD (Policy)• USD (Intelligence)• USD (Research & Engineering)• USD (Acquisition & Sustainment)• USD (Comptroller)• Director, Cost Analysis & Program Evaluation• Director, Operational Test & Evaluation• Combatant Commands (CCMDs)

(Commander or Deputy Commander)

* * Non-statutory advisors: USD (Personnel & Readiness), DoD Chief Information Officer, Deputy Chief Management Officer, others are required

Owns JCIDS; Validates JROC Interest documents; final authority on requirements

Validates JCB Interest documents; assists JROC

Reviews documents & prioritizes prior to FCB review

Reviews documents; prioritizes within portfolio; makes validation recommendation to JCB/JROC

or

12

JROC Functions (New)

Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) Support to Other Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) Functions:

Joint Capability Development - Identifies new joint military capabilities based on advances in technology and concepts of operation needed to maintain a technological and operational superiority of the Armed Forces and recommends investments and experiments in such capabilities to the SecDef.

Comprehensive Joint Readiness. Evaluates the overall preparedness of the joint force and assesses the risks to United States missions, strategies, and military personnel that stem from shortfalls in military readiness.

13

Performance Attributes, KPPs, and Other Changes (Changes in Blue) 1 of 3

Performance attribute definitions remain unchanged: – Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) – Key System Attributes (KSAs) – Additional Performance Attributes (APAs)

Key Performance Parameters (KPPs):– Currently six (6) mandatory KPPs:

• Net-Ready, Training, System Survivability, Force Protection, Energy, and Sustainment– New JCIDS manual has four (4) statutory mandatory KPPs

• System Survivability, Force Protection, Energy, & SustainmentNet Ready performance attribute still required, but sponsor determines level (KPP, KSA, APA)Training is/may be a DOTmLPF-P non-materiel consideration

– Aspects of training that require performance attributes may be addressed in a KPP, KSA, or APA Gatekeeping (as related to JPRs): Sponsor nomination; JS Gatekeeper & lead FCB determine JPR statusPerformance attributes designated as Joint Performance Requirement (JPR) will be upgraded to KPP

– Joint Staff responsible for certification of JPRs

Deletes requirement for Acquisition Category (ACAT) I programs automatically a JSD of JROC Interest– JROC Interest no longer tied directly to cost, instead tied to joint equities as defined under the JPRs

14

Performance Attributes, KPPs, and Other Changes (Changes in Blue) 2 of 3

Change to the Sustainment KPP (adds Maintainability Mandatory Attribute)

The Sustainment KPP is derived from system availability requirements to support the required capability, assumptions for its design and operational use as specified in the CONOPS and/or OMS/MP tradeoffs between reliability, maintenance concepts, lifecycle cost, and the planned sustainment strategy

• The Sustainment KPP is comprised of several mandatory components: Materiel Availability and Operational Availability, and three mandatory attributes (either KSAs or APAs):

– Reliability– Maintainability– O&S Cost

For more information see the Sustainment KPP Endorsement Guide: This guide provides procedures for the J-4/MMSD to review the Sustainment KPP during the staffing of a

capability requirements document

15

Change to the System Survivability (SS) KPP (adds Cyber Survivability)

SS KPP is intended to promote the development of critical warfighter capability that can survive kinetic(i.e., traditional, non-traditional, and CBRN) and non-kinetic (cyber and electromagnetic spectrum (EMS)) threats across domains and applicable environment including space. The SS KPP supports three system oriented objectives: prevention, mitigation in tactically relevant time, and recovery from threats and fires.

The SS KPP has focus elements for endorsement: Kinetic Survivability, Cyber Survivability, and Electromagnetic Spectrum (EMS) Survivability

Three (3) mandatory elements are included in the SS KPP regarding Cyber Survivability: 1. Cyber Survivability Risk Category (CSRC) identification2. Exemplar language in the CDD (tailored for an IS-CDD); and 3. Cyber Survivability Pillars (Prevent, Mitigate, and Recover from Cyber Attacks) and associated

Cyber Survivability Attributes (CSAs)

For more detailed information pertaining to Kinetic Survivability, Cyber Survivability and EMS Survivability see the various Guidebooks/Implementation Guides via KM/DS

Performance Attributes, KPPs, and Other Changes (Changes in Blue) 3 of 3

16

Cyber Survivability Endorsement

• Added Cyber Survivability to the JCIDS System Survivability (SS) Key Performance Parameter (KPP)- Cyber survivability is now part of operational risk trade-space

• CSE Implementation Guide: Joint Staff led effort with active participation from DoD CIO, USD(A&S), USD(R&E), DOT&E, OUSD(I), DIA, and NSA- Provides cyber survivability exemplar statements

- Includes cyber survivability attributes to aid requirement definition

- Describes tailoring approach for CDD & production document requirements

Design/build new weapon systems that are cyber survivable commensurate with a risk managed approach to counter a capable and determined adversary

17

Threat Summary Section Changes

• Capability requirement documents:– The Threat Summary helps ensure that the requirements are valid given the context– The Intelligence Supportability section identifies intelligence dependencies and mitigation of

shortfalls in intelligence support

• Three main processes– Threat Assessment / Intelligence Supportability Certification– Critical Intelligence Parameter (CIP) Breach– Controlled Information Compromise Assessment (CICA)

• Threat Assessment / Intelligence Supportability Certification– If JROC or JCB Interest, then Joint Staff will provide certification – document must have at least

one Joint Performance Requirement– If Joint Information, Sponsor must provide certification

For more information see: JCIDS Manual, Annex G To Appendix G To Enclosure B: INTELLIGENCE SUPPORTABILITY GUIDE

18

• CDD (Section 7 – NEW!!!): – Modular Open System Approach (MOSA)

• Synchronized with the Program Summary of the CDD (section 4)– Links to interoperability

– Intelligence Interoperability (if applicable)– Physical Interoperability

• Consistent with DoDAF OV-2 (Operational Resource Flow Description)• Description of the physical aspects of joint interoperability

– Net Ready Interoperability• Required (not mandated to be at the KPP level)• Sponsors must include a summary table in Section 5 of the CDD • Reference the Net-Ready Guide in Annex A to Appendix G

– Joint Training Technical Interoperability• For systems with a mission solely focused on training, exercises, and/or mission rehearsal,

specify how these systems will interoperate within the joint training enterprise

CDD Changes(New Section 7)

19

ICD and IS-ICD (In Blue) Format2018 JCIDS Manual Change (In Red)

• Cover page/Title *Add “Information Systems ICD for…” to title• Validation page• Waivers (if applicable)• Executive Summary • Document Body: 5 4 Sections/10 Pages (Max):

– Operational Context– Threat Summary – Capability Requirements & Gaps/Overlaps *Include NR-attribute table (Initial min value)– Assessment of Non-Materiel Approaches– Final Recommendations *Add IT-Box construct (DOTmLPF-P) recommendations added

• Appendices (limited to 4 6): – References, Acronym List, Glossary, (optional) Classified Appendix– New: Cyber Survivability Risk Categories (CSRC); EMS Survivability Risk Category

20

CDD and IS-CDD Format2018 JCIDS Manual Changes (In Red)

• Cover page/Title *Add “Information Systems CDD for…” to title• Validation page• Waivers (if applicable)• Executive Summary• Document Body 12 13 Sections /45 Pages (Max):

– Operational Context– Threat Summary– Capability Discussion– Program Summary *Add IT-Box Parameters– Dev Performance Attributes *Initial min value– Other System Attributes

• Appendices (limited to 4 6)– References, Acronym List, Glossary, (optional) Classified Appendix– New: Annexes A-Z (Optional) Incremental Approach of FoS - May attach annexes to CDD

– Joint Interoperability– Spectrum Requirements– Intel Supportability– Weapons Safety Assurance– Technology Readiness– DOTmLPF-P Considerations– Program Affordability *Funding Chart

21

JCIDS Manual:(New: CPD No Longer Required)

2015 Guidance:- Utilized a CPD

2018 Guidance:- CPD no longer required- CDD can be updated - CDD can be Annexed to reflect

individual programs within a Family of Systems (FoS), or incremental capabilities over time/block upgrades

22

CDD Annex(New)

Annex Content Guide: Each individual annex will include the same sections as a CDD. Sections with no change to base document must be present but can state “No Change.” Individual annexes are not to exceed 20 pages in length.

In a FoS approach, the Sponsor shall develop a base CDD and concurrently staff annexes for individual systems within the family. The base CDD will specify attributes for the entire FoS and each annex will specify additional attributes for the individual systems.

Section 1: Operational ContextSection 2: Threat SummarySection 3: Capability DiscussionSection 4: Program SummarySection 5: Development of Performance AttributesSection 6: Other System AttributesSection 7: Joint Interoperability

Section 8: Spectrum and E3 Control RequirementsSection 9: Intelligence SupportabilitySection 10: Weapon Safety AssuranceSection 11: Technology ReadinessSection 12: DOTmLPF-P ConsiderationsSection 13: Program Affordability

23

Joint DOTmLPF-P Change Recommendation(Joint DCR)

JCIDS Manual, 2015

“Little-m” materiel. Identify any previously fielded materiel required as part of the capability solution or as an enabler to allow the capability solution to be utilized to its fullest potential. Previously fielded materiel may be leveraged in either their original capacity or in an adaptation or repurposing not originally envisioned.

JCIDS Manual, 2018

Sometimes referred to as “little m” materiel, the materiel DOTmLPF-P consideration is everything necessary to equip DoD forces to operate effectively. The letter “m” in the acronym is usually lower case, since Joint DCRs do not advocate new materiel development, but rather advocate increased quantities or alternate applications of existing materiel to include Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS), Government Off-The-Shelf (GOTS), or Non-Development Items (NDI).

24

Certifications and Endorsements(Changes in Blue)

Certifications and Endorsements JROC/JCB Interest orJoint Information1

NR Certification Sponsor (or Joint Staff if designated a JPR)

FP KPP Certification Sponsor (or Joint Staff if designated a JPR)

SS KPP Endorsement Sponsor (or Joint Staff if designated a JPR)

Sustainment KPP Endorsement Sponsor (or Joint Staff if designated a JPR)

Energy KPP Endorsement Sponsor (or Joint Staff if designated a JPR)

DOTmLPF-P Endorsement Joint Staff (delegated to Sponsor for Joint Information documents)

Threat Assessment/Intelligence Certification Joint Staff (delegated to Sponsor for Joint Information Documents)

Weapon Safety Endorsement Joint Staff (Only applicable for JROC/JCB Interest)

Note:1Sponsors have certification and endorsement authority for all performance attributes which are not JPRs. The Joint Staff has certification and endorsement authority for all JPRs. All performance attributes (KPPs, KSAs, or APAs) designated as JPRs will be upgraded as KPPs.

25

Summary of Significant Changes

• Policy/Guidance documents: From 3 to 2 (Combines CJSCI 5123.01 & 3170.01)• Key Performance Parameters (KPPs):

– Currently six (6) mandatory KPPs:• Net-Ready, Training, System Survivability, Force Protection, Energy, & Sustainment

– New JCIDS manual has four (4) mandatory KPPs• System Survivability, Force Protection, Energy, & Sustainment• SS KPP through 3 lenses (Kinetic, Cyber, and EMS)

– Cyber Security Endorsement focus (CSE Implementation Guide)• CPD no longer required• CDD changes

– New section 7: Interoperability (MOSA, Physical, Net Ready)• Performance attributes designated a JPR (will be upgraded to KPP)• Delegates Certification/Endorsement to match validation authority• Adds Classified Information Compromise Assessment procedures• VOLT replaces STAR

26

Clarification/QuestionsContact:

Eric Jefferies, DAU, DSMC,Professor of Requirements Management

Requirements Management Centereric.jefferies@dau.mil

(703) 805-2381