3
South Carolina General Assembly 123rd Session, 2019-2020 H. 3942 STATUS INFORMATION Joint Resolution Sponsors: Reps. King, McDaniel and Henegan Document Path: l:\council\bills\nl\13805sd19.docx Companion/Similar bill(s): 560, 3941, 4031 Introduced in the House on February 12, 2019 Currently residing in the House Committee on Judiciary Summary: Judge qualifications HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS Date Body Action Description with journal page number 2/12/2019 House Introduced and read first time (House Journal - page 6 ) 2/12/2019 House Referred to Committee on Judiciary (House Journal - page 6 ) View the latest legislative information at the website VERSIONS OF THIS BILL 2/12/2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2019-2020 Bill 3942: Judge qualifications - South … · Web viewSouth Carolina General Assembly 123rd Session, 2019-2020 H. 3942 STATUS INFORMATION Joint Resolution Sponsors: Reps

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2019-2020 Bill 3942: Judge qualifications - South … · Web viewSouth Carolina General Assembly 123rd Session, 2019-2020 H. 3942 STATUS INFORMATION Joint Resolution Sponsors: Reps

South Carolina General Assembly123rd Session, 2019-2020

H. 3942

STATUS INFORMATION

Joint ResolutionSponsors: Reps. King, McDaniel and HeneganDocument Path: l:\council\bills\nl\13805sd19.docxCompanion/Similar bill(s): 560, 3941, 4031

Introduced in the House on February 12, 2019Currently residing in the House Committee on Judiciary

Summary: Judge qualifications

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

Date Body Action Description with journal page number 2/12/2019 House Introduced and read first time (House Journal - page 6 )2/12/2019 House Referred to Committee on Judiciary (House Journal - page 6 )

View the latest legislative information at the website

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

2/12/2019

123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031

Page 2: 2019-2020 Bill 3942: Judge qualifications - South … · Web viewSouth Carolina General Assembly 123rd Session, 2019-2020 H. 3942 STATUS INFORMATION Joint Resolution Sponsors: Reps

A JOINT RESOLUTION

PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 15, ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS OF JUSTICES AND JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT, THE COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE CIRCUIT COURT, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT IN ADDITION TO THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR JUSTICES AND JUDGES CONTAINED IN THIS SECTION, NO PERSON MAY BE ELECTED AS THE CHIEF JUSTICE OR AS AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OR AS A JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS WHO HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY SERVED AS A JUDGE OF A COURT OF RECORD IN THIS STATE.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. It is proposed that Section 15, Article V of the Constitution of this State, be amended by adding a new paragraph at the end to read:

“In addition to the qualifications for justices and judges contained in this section, no person may be elected as the Chief Justice or as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court or as a judge of the Court of Appeals who has not previously served as a judge of a court of record in this State.”

SECTION 2. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballots:

[3942] 1

123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041

Page 3: 2019-2020 Bill 3942: Judge qualifications - South … · Web viewSouth Carolina General Assembly 123rd Session, 2019-2020 H. 3942 STATUS INFORMATION Joint Resolution Sponsors: Reps

“Must Section 15 of Article V of the Constitution of this State relating to qualifications for justices of the Supreme Court and judges of the Court of Appeals and the circuit court be amended so as to provide that in addition to the qualifications for justices and judges contained in this section, no person may be elected as the Chief Justice or as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court or as a judge of the Court of Appeals who has not previously served as a judge of a court of record in this State?

Yes

No

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word ‘Yes’, and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word ‘No.”

----XX----

[3942] 2

123456789

1011121314151617181920