24a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Mission Assurance Ron Kolecki Senior Systems Assurance Manager August 16-17, 2005

24a - 1NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

Mission Assurance

Ron KoleckiSenior Systems Assurance Manager

August 16-17, 2005


Mission Assurance Requirement Summary

GSFC Responsible

GSFC PI

Russia Responsible

UoMD PI

MIT Responsible

Boston U PI

GSFC Responsible

Mission Assurance Requirements are consistent across project with independent oversight of each

element

Mission Assurance Requirements are consistent across project with independent oversight of each

element

LRO Level 1Requirements

ESMD-RLEP-0010

LRO Level 1Requirements

ESMD-RLEP-0010

RLEP Mission AssuranceRequirements

430-RQMT-000006

RLEP Mission AssuranceRequirements

430-RQMT-000006

Mission Assurance Guidelines

300-PG-7120.2.2

Mission Assurance Guidelines

300-PG-7120.2.2

LRO Spacecraft

PAIP

LRO Spacecraft

PAIP

LOLA Instrument

PAIP

LOLA Instrument

PAIP

LEND Instrument

PAIP

LEND Instrument

PAIP

LAMPInstrument

PAIP

LAMPInstrument

PAIP

CRaTERInstrument

PAIP

CRaTERInstrument

PAIP

Diviner Instrument

PAIP

Diviner Instrument

PAIPMini RF

Tech Demo

Mini RFTech Demo

DoD Responsible

LROC Instrument

PAIP

LROC Instrument

PAIP

MSSS Responsible

Northwestern Univ PI

SwRI Responsible

NW PI

JPL Responsible

UCLA PI


Mission Assurance Organization

LRO Experienced Personnel provide oversight and technical support across all

elements of LRO Project

LRO Experienced Personnel provide oversight and technical support across all

elements of LRO Project

EEE PartsRich Williams

EEE PartsRich Williams

MaterialsPilar Joy

MaterialsPilar Joy

ReliabilityNinoIngegne

Lydia Lee

ReliabilityNinoIngegne

Lydia Lee

Hardware QAWillie JonesAlton Lacks

Hardware QAWillie JonesAlton Lacks

Software QACindy Taylor

Software QACindy Taylor

ManufacturingNick Virmani

ManufacturingNick Virmani

Systems Assurance Manager Ron Kolecki

Safety ManagerDave Bogart

Systems Assurance Manager Ron Kolecki

Safety ManagerDave Bogart

Office of System Safety and Mission Assurance

Director

Office of System Safety and Mission Assurance

Director

LRO Project ManagerCraig Tooley

LRO Project ManagerCraig Tooley


Requirements Applicable to all Mission Concepts

• QMS: ISO 9001:2000

• Nonconformance Control (NCR or PFR)

• MRB/FRB Requirements

• Hardware, S/W or Design Reuse

• Configuration Mgt.

• Reqts. Flowdown

• Contractor Surveillance

• Safety Program per NPD 8700.1

• System Safety Plan

• Hazard Analyses

• MSPSP

• Ground & Hazardous Ops.

• Orbital Debris

• Launch Site Support

• Mishap Reporting

• Probabilistic Risk Assessment

• FMEA / FTA

• Part Stress & WCA

• Trend Analysis

• Limited Life

• Risk List

• Documented Program (PAIP)

• Software Safety per NASA-STD-8719.13

• Verification & Validation, IV&V

• Configuration Mgt.

• Formal Reviews

• Problem Reporting/ Corrective Action

• Surveillance

• Independent Design Reviews

• Verification Plans/ Specs (GEVS-SE)

• Test Matrix/ Verification Reports

• Component/ Subsystem Reviews

• Verification Reports

RLEP MAR

430-RQMT-000006

300-PG-7120.2.2

(MAG)

LRO Spacecraft/

Orbiter PAIP

431-PLAN-000131

LOLA PAIPLOLA-PLAN-

0003LEND PAIP LROC PAIP CRaTER PAIP

DWG 32-01204Diviner PAIP LAMP PAIP

PAIP-05-15-11239

Quality System / Configuration Control System Safety Reliability/Risk Software Assurance Design Verification/

Technical Reviews


Requirements Applicable to all Mission Phases

RLEP MAR

430-RQMT-000006

300-PG-7120.2.2

(MAG)

• NASA-STD-8739 Series

• PWB Design per IPC 2221-2223, D-275

• PWB Mfg. Per ICP A600-6018 W/ GSFC Supplement

• PWB Coupons

• Training / Certification

• ESD – ANSI/ESD S20-20

•Level 2 parts per EEE-INST-002

•Parts Control Board

•Derating

•Radiation Effects– TID, ELDR, SEE

•Value Added Tests (PIND, etc.)

•Alerts

•Test Data & EIDP

•Photos

• Compliant Materials & MSFC-STD-3029

• Outgassing Limits (TML/CVCM)

• Shelf Life Controls

• Materials & Process Lists for LRO MAE Review & Approval

• Fastener Integrity (541-PG-8072.1.2)

• Raw Material Certs.

• Contamination Verification Process

• Contamination Control Plan

• Outgassing

• T/V Bakeouts of all Hardware

• Hardware Handling & Cleanroom Standards.

• Respond to GIDEP and NASA Advisories (GPG 5340.3)

LRO PAIP

431-PLAN-000131

Workmanship/Design/ESD

RequirementsEEE Parts Materials & Processes Contamination Control GIDEP Alerts &

Problem Advisories


RLEP/LRO MAR – PAIP Relationship

• The RLEP Mission Assurance Requirements (MAR) document was written to define the overall mission requirements for hardware, software and related critical ground support equipment.

• The Spacecraft/Orbiter and Instrument teams responded with their Performance Assurance Implementation Plans (PAIP) which outline how the individual institutions and their contractors would meet the requirements called out as CDRLs in the MAR.

• After the project has reviewed the initial PAIPs and commented back to the teams, revisions in the PAIPs may be required.

• Those requirements which the developers cannot meet will be documented on a waiver request.


Problem Failure Reporting

• Both the spacecraft/orbiter and instrument teams are required to document failures (at the first application of power at the start of end item acceptance testing or the first operation of a mechanism) or nonconformances with received product.

• The LRO project office must be notified of problem/failures within 24 hours of occurrence. A failure review board may be required to disposition the actions related to the issue.

• A closed loop nonconformance system is also required by the MAR. It shall include ensuring the corrective action is implemented to prevent recurrence.

• A Material Review Board is required to disposition other than preliminary reviews. The teams QA lead shall be a member of the MRB.

• The MRB chairperson shall notify the LRO project of all MRB actions and recommendations.


Surveillance and Audits

• The LRO Project has a surveillance plan (430-PLAN-0003) which defines how the project will monitor hardware and software development activities from all the contractors.

• Assurance reviews and audits provide an insight into how the contractors are functioning.

• Participation by SMA in boards such as CCB, PCB, MRB, FRB and others provides insight into various phases of the design and workmanship.

• The LRO SMA team will use two methods of product verification.– Direct examination: inspection of hardware and associated documentation

– Indirect examination: similar hardware fabricated by the same personnel and equipment, lot acceptance samples and material examinations that may take place at GSFC.


Mission Assurance Summary

• Mission Assurance Requirements are well defined and comprehensive.

• These are traditional requirements for GSFC Missions and they are understood.

• Systems with experienced personnel are in place and operating.

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Mission Assurance team is ready to support PDR

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Mission Assurance team is ready to support PDR

Documents

24a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Mission Assurance Ron Kolecki Senior Systems Assurance Manager August 16-17, 2005