51
RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN Dr. Sanjay Jain Assoc. Professor Institute of Management Studies, Ghaziabad

3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

RESEARCH DESIGNRESEARCH DESIGNDr. Sanjay JainAssoc. ProfessorInstitute of Management Studies, Ghaziabad

Page 2: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Research DesignResearch Design

A research design is a framework or blueprint for conducting the research project. It specifies the details of the procedures necessary for obtaining the information needed to structure and/or solve research problem.

Page 3: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Components of a Research Components of a Research DesignDesign Define the information needed Design the exploratory, descriptive, and/or

causal phases of the research Specify the measurement and scaling

procedures Construct and pretest a questionnaire or an

appropriate form for data collection Specify the sampling process and sample size Develop a plan of data analysis

Page 4: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

4

A brief view of Research DesignA brief view of Research Design

Decide on Type of Research

Scale Variable

Design Instrument for Measurement

Test Instrument

Select Sampling Method and Analysis Method

Page 5: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

A Classification of Marketing A Classification of Marketing Research DesignsResearch Designs

Single Cross-Sectional Design

Multiple Cross-Sectional Design

Research Design

Conclusive Research Design

Exploratory Research Design

Descriptive Research

Causal Research

Cross-Sectional Design

Longitudinal Design

Page 6: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Exploratory Research Design is to explore or search through a

problem/situation to provide insight and better understanding

is related to the latent stage (ambiguity) of the problem identification.

is to get an idea of potential objectives mainly qualitative and does not provide

conclusive evidence research process is flexible and unstructured,

sample is small subsequent research expected. Result will not

point to a direct course of action. generally followed by further descriptive and/or

experimental research

Page 7: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Uses of Exploratory Uses of Exploratory ResearchResearch Formulate a problem or define a problem

more precisely

Identify alternative courses of action

Develop hypotheses

Isolate key variables and relationships for further examination

Gain insights for developing an approach to the problem

Establish priorities for further research

Page 8: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Methods of Exploratory Methods of Exploratory ResearchResearch

Survey of experts

Pilot surveys

Secondary data analysis

Qualitative research

Page 9: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Descriptive ResearchDescriptive Research To describe something – usually market

characteristics or functions Researcher has prior knowledge about the

problem situation Clear definition of what information is

needed More planned and structured than

exploratory Clear specification of who, what, when,

where, why, and way (the six Ws)

Page 10: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Descriptive ResearchDescriptive ResearchConducted for following reasons: To describe the characteristics of relevant

groups, such as consumers, salespeople, organizations, or market areas.

To estimate the percentage of units in a specified population exhibiting a certain behavior.

To determine the perceptions of product characteristics.

To determine the degree to which variables are associated.

To make specific predictions.

Page 11: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Casual ResearchCasual Research

To understand which variables are the cause (independent variables) and which variables are the effect (dependent variables) of a phenomenon

To determine the nature of the relationship (functional) between the causal variables and the effect to be predicted

METHOD: Experiments

Page 12: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Exploratory & Conclusive Exploratory & Conclusive Research DifferencesResearch Differences

Exploratory Conclusive

Objective

To provide insights and understanding

To test specific hypotheses and examine relationships

Characteristics

• Information needed is defined only loosely.

•Research process is flexible and unstructured.

•Sample is small and non-representative.

•Analysis of primary data is qualitative.

• Information needed is clearly defined.

•Research process is formal and structured.

•Sample is large and representative.

•Data analysis is quantitative.

Findings Tentative Conclusive

Outcome

Generally followed by exploratory/conclusive research

Findings used as input into decision making

Page 13: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

A Comparison of Basic A Comparison of Basic Research DesignsResearch Designs

Exploratory Conclusive Causal

Objective

Discovery of ideas and insights

Describe market characteristics or functions

Determine cause and effect relationships

Characteristics

Flexible, versatileOften the front end of total research design

Preplanned and structured design

Manipulation of one/ more independent variablesControl of other mediating variables

Methods

Expert surveysPilot surveysSecondary dataQualitative research

Quantitative analysisSurveysPanelsObservation and other data

Experiments

Page 14: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Potential Sources of Error in Research Potential Sources of Error in Research DesignsDesigns

Total Error

Non-sampling Error

Random Sampling Error

Page 15: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Potential Sources of Error in Research Potential Sources of Error in Research DesignsDesigns

Total Error

Non-sampling Error

Random Sampling Error

Non-response Error

Response Error

Page 16: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Potential Sources of Error in Research Potential Sources of Error in Research DesignsDesigns

Total Error

Non-sampling Error

Random Sampling Error

Non-response Error

Response Error

Interviewer Error

Respondent Error

Researcher Error

Page 17: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Potential Sources of Error in Research Potential Sources of Error in Research DesignsDesigns

Surrogate Information Error

Measurement Error

Population Definition Error

Sampling Frame Error

Data Analysis Error

Respondent Selection Error

Questioning Error

Recording Error

Cheating Error

Inability Error

Unwillingness Error

Total Error

Non-sampling Error

Random Sampling Error

Non-response Error

Response Error

Interviewer Error

Respondent Error

Researcher Error

Page 18: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Errors in ResearchErrors in Research The total error is the variation between the

true mean value in the population of the variable of interest and the observed mean value obtained in the research project.

Random sampling error: selected sample is an imperfect representation of the population

Non-sampling errors: attributed to sources other than sampling: e.g. errors in problem definition, approach, scales, questionnaire design, interviewing methods, and data preparation and analysis.

Page 19: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Errors in ResearchErrors in Research Non-response error arises when some of

the respondents included in the sample do not respond.

Response error arises when respondents give inaccurate answers or their answers are misrecorded or misanalyzed.

Page 20: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Research ProposalResearch Proposal Executive Summary Background Problem Definition/Objectives of the

Research Approach to the Problem Research Design Fieldwork/Data Collection Data Analysis Reporting Cost and Time Appendices

Page 21: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

EXPLORATORY EXPLORATORY RESEARCH: RESEARCH:

SECONDARY DATASECONDARY DATA

Page 22: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Primary Vs. Secondary Data

Primary data are originated by a researcher for the specific purpose of addressing the problem at hand. The collection of primary data involves all six steps of the marketing research process.

Secondary data are data that have already been collected for purposes other than the problem at hand. These data can be located quickly and inexpensively.

Page 23: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Comparison of Primary & Secondary Data

Primary Data

Secondary Data

Collection purpose

For the problem at hand

For other problems

Collection process

Very involved Rapid & easy

Collection cost

HighRelatively low

Collection time

Long Short

Page 24: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Uses of Secondary Data Identify the problem

Better define the problem

Develop an approach to the problem

Formulate an appropriate research design (for example, by identifying the key variables)

Answer certain research questions and test some hypotheses

Interpret primary data more insightfully

Page 25: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

A Classification of Secondary Data

Secondary Data

Requires Further Processing

Computerized Databases

Syndicated Services

Internal External

PublishedMaterials

Ready to Use

Page 26: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Internal Secondary DataSales were analyzed to obtain:Sales by product lineSales by major department (e.g.,

men's wear, house wares)Sales by specific storesSales by geographical regionSales by cash versus credit purchasesSales in specific time periodsSales by size of purchase

Page 27: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

External Data: 1. Published Secondary Sources

StatisticalData

Guides Directories Indexes Census Data

Other Governme

nt Publicatio

ns

Published Secondary Data

General Business Sources

Government Sources

Page 28: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

External Data: 2. Computerized Databases

Bibliographic

Databases

Numeric

Databases

Full-Text

Databases

Directory

Databases

Special-Purpose Databas

es

Computerized Databases

Off-LineOnline Internet

Page 29: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Classification of ComputerizedDatabases

Bibliographic databases are composed of citations to articles

Numeric databases contain numerical and statistical information

Full-text databases contain the complete text of the source documents comprising the database

Directory databases provide information on individuals, organizations, and services

Special-purpose databases provide specialized information

Page 30: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

External Data: 3. Syndicated ServicesCompanies that collect and sell common

pools of data of known commercial value designed to serve a number of clients

Classified based on the unit of measurement (households/consumers or institutions)

Page 31: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Evaluating Secondary Data

CRITERIA ISSUES REMARKS

Specifications &

Methodology

Data collection method, response rate, quality & analysis of data, sampling technique & size, questionnaire design, fieldwork.

Data should be reliable, valid, & generalizable to the problem.

Error & Accuracy

Examine errors in approach,research design, sampling, datacollection & analysis, & reporting.

Assess accuracy by comparing data from different sources.

Currency

Time lag between collection &publication, frequency of updates.

Census data are updated by syndicated firms.

ObjectiveWhy were the data collected?

The objective determines the relevance of data.

Nature

Definition of key variables, units of measurement, categories used, relationships examined.

Reconfigure the data to increase their usefulness.

Dependability

Expertise, credibility, reputation, and trustworthiness of the source.

Data should be obtained from an original source.

Page 32: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

EXPLORATORY RESEARCH: QUALITATIVE QUALITATIVE

RESEARCHRESEARCH

Page 33: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

A Classification of Marketing Research Data

Survey Data

Observational and

Other Data

Experimental Data

Qualitative Data Quantitative Data

Descriptive Causal

Marketing Research Data

Secondary Data Primary Data

Page 34: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Qualitative Vs. Quantitative Research

Qualitative Research

To gain a qualitative understanding of the underlying reasons and motivations

Small number of non-representative cases

Unstructured

Non-statistical

Develop an initial understanding

Objective

Sample

Data Collection

Data Analysis

Outcome

Quantitative Research

To quantify the data and generalize the results from the sample to the population of interest

Large number of representative cases

Structured

Statistical

Recommend a final course of action

Page 35: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Qualitative Research Procedures

Association

Techniques

Completion

Techniques

Construction Techniques

Expressive Technique

s

Direct (Non-

disguised)

Indirect (Disguised)

Focus Groups Depth Interviews

Projective Techniques

Qualitative Research Procedures

Page 36: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Focus Groups - Characteristics

Group Size 8-12

Group Composition Homogeneous, respondents,

prescreened

Physical Setting Relaxed, informal atmosphere

Time Duration 1-3 hours

Recording Use of audiocassettes and videotapes

Moderator Observational, interpersonal, and communication skills of the moderator

Page 37: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Focus Group Moderator - Key Qualifications

1. Kindness with firmness: a disciplined detachment with understanding empathy so as to generate the necessary interaction.

2. Permissiveness: permissive yet alert to signs that the group’s cordiality or purpose is disintegrating.

3. Involvement: encourage and stimulate intense personal involvement.

4. Incomplete understanding: encourage respondents to be more specific about generalized comments by exhibiting incomplete understanding.

5. Encouragement: encourage unresponsive members to participate.

6. Flexibility: able to improvise and alter the planned outline amid the distractions of the group process.

7. Sensitivity: sensitive enough to guide the group discussion at an intellectual as well as emotional level.

Page 38: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Procedure for Planning and Conducting Focus Groups

Determine the Objectives and Define the Problem

Specify the Objectives of Qualitative Research

Develop a Moderator’s Outline

Conduct the Focus Group Interviews

Review Tapes and Analyze the Data

Summarize the Findings and Plan Follow-Up Research or Action

State the Objectives/Questions to be Answered by Focus Groups

Write a Screening Questionnaire

Page 39: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Variations in Focus GroupsTwo-way focus group. This allows one

target group to listen to and learn from a related group. For example, a focus group of physicians viewed a focus group of arthritis patients discussing the treatment they desired.

Dual-moderator group. A focus group conducted by two moderators: One moderator is responsible for the smooth flow of the session, and the other ensures that specific issues are discussed.

Dueling-moderator group. There are two moderators, but they deliberately take opposite positions on the issues to be discussed.

Page 40: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Variations in Focus GroupsRespondent-moderator group. The

moderator asks selected participants to play the role of moderator temporarily to improve group dynamics.

Client-participant groups. Client personnel are identified and made part of the discussion group.

Mini groups. These groups consist of a moderator and only 4 or 5 respondents.

Tele-session groups. Focus group sessions by phone using the conference call technique.

Online Focus groups. Focus groups conducted online over the Internet.

Page 41: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Focus Groups Versus Depth Interviews

Characteristic Focus Groups

Depth Interviews

Group synergy and dynamics + -

Peer pressure/group influence - +

Client involvement + -

Generation of innovative ideas + -

In-depth probing of individuals - +

Uncovering hidden motives - +

Discussion of sensitive topics - +

Page 42: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Focus Groups Versus Depth Interviews

Note: A + indicates a relative advantage over the other procedure, a - indicates a relative disadvantage.

Interviewing competitors

Interviewing professional respondents

Scheduling of respondents

Amount of information

Bias in moderation and interpretation

Cost per respondent

-

-

-

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

Characteristic Focus Groups

Depth Interviews

Might want to include this on the first slide.
Page 43: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Definition of Projective TechniquesAn unstructured, indirect form of questioning

that encourages respondents to project their underlying motivations, beliefs, attitudes or feelings regarding the issues of concern.

In projective techniques, respondents are asked to interpret the behavior of others.

In interpreting the behavior of others, respondents indirectly project their own motivations, beliefs, attitudes, or feelings into the situation.

Page 44: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

1. Word Association respondents are presented with a list of words,

one at a time, and asked to respond to each with the first word that comes to mind.

The words of interest, called test words, are interspersed throughout the list which also contains some neutral, or filler words to disguise the purpose of the study. Responses are analyzed by calculating:

(1) the frequency with which any word is given as a response;

(2) the amount of time that elapses before a response is given; and

(3) the number of respondents who do not respond at all to a test word within a reasonable period of time.

Page 45: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

1. Word AssociationEXAMPLE

STIMULUS MRS. M MRS. C washday everyday ironing fresh and sweet clean pure air soiled scrub don't; husband does clean filth this neighborhood dirt bubbles bath soap

and water

family squabbles children towels dirty wash

Page 46: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

2. Completion Techniques

In sentence completion, respondents are given incomplete sentences and asked to complete them. Generally, they are asked to use the first word or phrase that comes to mind.

A person who shops at Shoppers’ Stop is ______________________ A person who receives a gift certificate good for Reliance Fresh would be __________________________________ Vishal Mega Mart is most liked by _________________________ When I think of shopping in a department store, I ________

paragraph completion, story completion

Page 47: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

3. Construction Techniques

With a picture response, the respondents are asked to describe a series of pictures of ordinary as well as unusual events.  In cartoon tests: The respondents are asked to indicate what one cartoon character might say in response to the comments of another character.

Page 48: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

A Cartoon Test

Let’s see if we can pick up some house

wares at Sears.

SearsSears

Page 49: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

4. Expressive Techniques

In expressive techniques, respondents are presented with a verbal or visual situation and asked to relate the feelings and attitudes of other people to the situation.

Role playing Respondents are asked to play the role or assume the behavior of someone else.

Third-person technique The respondent is presented with a verbal or visual situation and the respondent is asked to relate the beliefs and attitudes of a third person rather than directly expressing personal beliefs and attitudes. This third person may be a friend, neighbor, colleague, or a “typical” person.

Page 50: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Advantages of Projective TechniquesHelpful when respondents are unwilling

or unable to give the answers

Helpful when the issues to be addressed are personal, sensitive, or subject to strong social norms.

Helpful when underlying motivations, beliefs, and attitudes are operating at a subconscious level.

Page 51: 3. Research Design- Exploratory Research

Comparison of Focus Groups, Depth Interviews, and Projective Techniques

Criteria Focus Groups

Depth Interviews

Projective Techniques

1. Degree of Structure Relatively high

Relatively medium

Relatively low

2. Probing of individual respondents

Low High Medium

3. Moderator bias Relatively medium

Relatively High

Low to High

4. Interpretation bias Relatively low

Relatively medium

Relatively High

5. Uncovering subconscious information

Low Medium to high

High

6. Discovering innovative information

High Medium Low

7. Obtaining sensitive information

Low Medium High

8. Involve unusual behavior or questioning

No To a limited extent

Yes

9. Overall usefulness Highly useful

Useful Somewhat useful