366-370

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 366-370

    1/5

    3 6 6 J a i n e t a l Indi an J Phys io l Pharma col 2010; 54(4)

    Ind ian J Phys io l Pharmaco l 2010 ; 54 (4 ) : 366370

    C orresponding Au tho r : Dr . N idh i Ja in , Assoc ia te P ro fesso r , Dep t t . o f Phys io logy , SGR R IM&HS,Dehraudun ; Emai l : n idh i0808 ja in@red i f fmai l . com; Mob . : 9412233721

    GENDER BASED ALTERATION IN COLOR PERCEPTION

    NIDHI JAIN* , PUNAM VERMA*, SUNITA MITTAL*,

    SANJEEV MITTAL**, ANAND KUMAR SINGH*

    AND SHASHI MUNJAL***

    Departments of Physiology*, Ophthalmology** and Anatomy***

    Sri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Sciences,

    Patel Nagar, Dehradun 248 001

    ( R ecei v ed on M a rch 1 5 , 2 01 0 )

    Abstract : Human beings are able to perceive hundreds of shades of color

    which depends on the three types of cone system and various rat ios of

    s t imula t ion in response to d i f feren t wavelengths . Percep tual ly and

    cognitively, men and women may experience appearance of color differently.

    Therefore, this study was planned to assess and compare color vision in

    male and female subjects. This study was carried out in the department of

    Physiology, SGRRIM&HS, Dehradun on 60 ocular healthy subjects (equal

    number of males and females) of 1722 years of age group. The task was

    to match 22 test color strips with 2 shade charts of different colors. Total

    number of correct answers and total t ime taken in matching al l the test

    co lor s t r ips wi th the shade char t s was recorded in bo th the sexes and

    analyzed. The results of this study showed that overall, females gave more

    correct responses (P

  • 7/24/2019 366-370

    2/5

    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2010; 54(4) Gender and Color 367

    systems on reaching brain are compared to

    be perce iv ed (2 , 3, 4) .

    About 8% of men exhibi t a heredi tary

    deficiency of color perception but recently it

    was recognized that there are measurable

    di f ferences in the color percept ion even

    amongst the people with normal color vision

    (2). The subject of color and gender is an

    important and intricate topic. There may be

    some logic behind the widely accepted

    modern color convention of pink-for-gir ls

    and blue-for-boys . Here convention seems

    to be tha t women tend to prefer br ighter

    and gra t i fying colors and men are more

    comfortable with stifled and soft colors. The

    reason may be l inked to hormonal ,

    developmental and environmental differences

    amongst both the sexes (5) .

    Therefore, this study was planned in a

    very s imple and interes t ing manner toevaluate the difference of normal color vision

    between two sexes of the same age group.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    The s tudy was conducted in the

    depar tment of Physiology, SGRRIM&HS,

    Dehradun. Ins t i tu t ional E thica l Commit tee

    approved this study. 60 young and heal thy

    subjects of 1722 yrs of age having normal

    visual acui ty volunteered in th i s s tudy.Informed consent from all the subjects was

    taken. The subjects were divided into two

    groups Group 1 had 30 male subjects and

    Group 2 had 30 female subjects. History of

    any disorder related to ocular diseases was

    ruled out .

    The tes t was done in br ight sunl ight

    between 12.003.00 pm. There were 22 test

    color s t r ips and 2 shade char t s (F ig . 1)

    having various shades of different colors, and

    they were numbered wi th secre t code

    numbers. These test color st r ips and shade

    charts were given to each subject. Then each

    subject was asked to match all the test color

    strips one by one with the shade charts and

    the code numbers were noted down. Tota l

    number of cor rec t answers was a l so

    evaluated. Total time taken in the matching

    of all test color strips with shade charts wasalso recorded by s top watch for each

    individual . Stat ist ical analysis was done by

    using unpaired student t test. The level of

    signif icance was

    Fig. 1 : Shade char ts and tes t co lor s t rip s.

  • 7/24/2019 366-370

    3/5

    3 6 8 J a i n e t a l Indi an J Phys io l Pharma col 2010; 54(4)

    P

  • 7/24/2019 366-370

    4/5

    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2010; 54(4) Gender and Color 369

    the gene that encodes the photo pigment of

    the long wavelength sensi t ive cones in the

    retina (6). More than 95% of all variations

    in human color vision involve the red-green

    receptors in mens eyes. Wald suggested that

    the genes for red and green receptors were

    al tered in men. He also thought that these

    genes must l i e near each other on the

    x-chromosome (7) . Anomalous color vision,

    which i s usual ly a genet ica l ly determined

    normal state, is always a decrease in finenessof color perception. It is predominantly seen

    in males as it is carried on X-chromosome (8).

    Dr. Neitz who conducted his research on

    female color vision, said only women have

    the potential for super color vision. That is

    because the genes for the pigments in red

    and green cones l i e on the x-chromosome

    and only women have two x-chromosomes,

    creating the opportunity for one type of red

    cone to be act ivated on one x-chromosomeand the other type of red cone on the other

    one. In a few cases, women may have two

    distinct green cones on either x-chromosome

    but these two red cones may be very close

    to each other in the wavelengths. So only

    few additional shades are perceived (9).

    Bimler in hi s s tudy sugges ted re la t ive

    di f ferences in the sa l ience of color -space

    axes, with the males tending to attend more

    to a l ightness axis and less to a red-greenaxis . They are a l so less re l iable in the i r

    ju dg emen ts . Th is may be du e to ex is te nce of

    pho to pig me nt het ero zy gos it y am ong fe mal es

    whi le males are hemizygous , and gender

    differences in overall color awareness (6, 10,

    11, 12, 13).

    Red and green cones may be more

    developed in females and this is proved by

    their liking towards shades of red and green

    colors . Red and green cones may be less

    developed in males therefore male subjects

    liked mostly shades of black and blue colors.

    These f indings may a l so be re la ted to the

    high incidence of red green color blindness

    in males (1, 11, 14).

    Color percept ion represents a major

    adaptive advantage which has been given by

    evolut ionary pathways . I t i s such an

    important mechanism of biological signaling,

    a source of information from the environment.

    There are fac tors other than those re la ted

    wi th phys iological v i sual processes

    influencing such percept ion, which may be

    linked to the presence of estrogen receptors

    on the ret ina (13).

    Gui l ford and Smi th (1959) found men

    were genera l ly more to lerant towardsachromat ic colors than women. Therefore ,

    they proposed that women might be more

    color-conscious and their color tastes more

    flexible and diverse (1).

    In a study on Nepalese, Curtis & Bolton

    (1978) found that women consistently listed

    more color names than men. Greene (1995)

    examined the color ident i f ica t ion and

    vocabulary ski l l s of col lege s tudents . The

    resul t s showed that women recognizedsignificantly more elaborate colors than did

    the men (1).

    At the end of this study we came to the

    conclus ion that the females can see more

    range of colors as compared to males . In

    other words , the beaut i ful wor ld i s more

    colorful to the females.

  • 7/24/2019 366-370

    5/5

    3 7 0 J a i n e t a l Indi an J Phys io l Pharma col 2010; 54(4)

    REFERENCES

    1 . K ho u w N. T h e me a ni n g of c o lo r fo r g en de r . Th e

    Color Matters e-Book. http://www.colormatters.com/

    khouw.h tml

    2. Mollon JD. Color blindness In: Backhus WG, Kliegl

    R, Werner JS, eds. Text book of color vision. De

    Gruyter, Berlin 1998.

    3. Khurana I . Sense of vision In: Text Book of Medical

    Physiology. Elsevier publication, New Delhi 2006:

    11431185.

    4 . G a no ng W F . V i si o n In : R ev i ew o f Me d ic a l

    Physio logy. McGraw Hill , USA 2001: 150171.

    5 . H u rl b er t A . Cl o th i ng a n d ge n de r i n Am e ri c an

    ch i ld r en s f ash ions 18901920 . Signs 1987 ; 13 :

    136143 .

    6 . B i ml e r DL , Ki r kl a nd J , J a me s on K A e t a l.

    Quan t i fy ing var ia t ions in per sona l co lo r spaces :

    Are there sex d if ferences in color v is ion ? Color

    Research and App l ica t ion 2004 ; 29 : 129134 .

    7 . M o nt g o m er y G . C o l or bl i n d ne s s : m o r e p r e va l e n t

    among males In: Seeing, Hearing and smelling the

    world-a repor t f rom the Howard Hughes Medical

    In s t i tu te 2008 . h t tp : / /www.hhmi .o rg /senses /

    b 1 3 0 . h t m l

    8 . C a lv e rt J B . An o ma l ou s c ol o r vi s io n 20 0 0.

    http://www.mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/optics/colvisn.html

    9 . R o th M. Some women may see 100 mi ll io co lor s ,

    thanks to their genes. Pittsburgh Post - Gazette 2006.

    10. Bimler D, Kirkland J. Sex differences in color vision

    and the sal ience of color-space axes . Journal of

    Vis ion 2002; 2(10) : 28 .

    1 1 . B i m l e r D , K ir k l a nd J . M u l t i di m e n s io n a l s c a li n g

    of D15 caps : co lor-v is ion defects among tobacco

    s m ok e rs ? In ternat ional Color Vision Society

    2003 sympos ium.

    1 2 . T o y a D H, R o b er t W . S t r uc t u r e o f th e c o n e

    receptor mosaic in the ret inal per iphery of adult

    humans : Analy s i s as a func t ion o f age , sex and

    hemif ield . Anat Embryol 2000; 201: 305316.

    13. Correa, Viviana, Estupinan, Lina, Garcia, Zioneth et

    al. Perception of the visible spectrum : Differences

    among gender and age. Re v Fa c Me d 2007; 15(1):

    714 .