33
Physics 451, 452, 725: Mathematical Methods Russell Bloomer 1 University of Virginia Note: There is no guarantee that these are correct, and they should not be copied 1 email: [email protected]

38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Physics 451, 452, 725: Mathematical Methods

Russell Bloomer1

University of Virginia

Note: There is no guarantee that these are correct, and they should not be copied

1email: [email protected]

Page 2: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Contents

1 451: Problem Set 2 11.1 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.4.6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.2 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.4.10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.3 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.4.16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.4 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.5.7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.5 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.5.8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.6 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.5.9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.7 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.5.12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2 451: Problem Set 5 52.1 Problem 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.2 Problem 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.3 Problem 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.4 Problem 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.5 Problem5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

3 451: Problem Set 6 93.1 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93.2 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103.3 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103.4 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113.5 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143.6 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153.7 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

4 725: Problem Set 4 174.1 Problem 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174.2 Problem 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184.3 Problem 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184.4 Problem 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

5 725: Problem Set 5 215.1 Problem 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215.2 Problem 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215.3 Problem 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225.4 Problem 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

i

Page 3: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

6 725: Problem Set 6 256.1 Problem 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256.2 Problem 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266.3 Problem 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266.4 Problem 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

A Special Functions 29

ii

Page 4: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Chapter 1

451: Problem Set 2

1.1 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.4.6

Prove:

(A×B) · (A×B) = (AB)2 − (A ·B)2

We know A×B from Eq. 1.36c and 1.381 :

A×B = (AyBz −AzBy)x + (AzBx −AxBz)y + (AxBy −AyBx)z

We also know A ·B from Eq. 1.241 :

A ·B = AxBx + AyBy + AzBz

This same equation can be used to find the magnitude of each of the vectors.We will now examine the left side of this equation.

(A×B) · (A×B) = (AyBz −AzBy)2 + (AzBx −AxBz)2 + (AxBy −AyBx)2

(A×B) · (A×B)

= A2yB2

z + AzB2y − 2AyBzAzBy + A2

zB2x+

AxB2z − 2AzBxAxBz + A2

xB2y + AyB2

x − 2AxByAyBx

(1.1)

Now that the left side has been examined, we can look at the right side of the equation.

(AB)2 = A2B2

= A2xB2

x + A2xB2

y + A2xB2

z + A2yB2

x + A2yB2

y+

A2yB2

z + A2zB

2x + A2

zB2y + A2

zB2z (1.2)

(A ·B)2

= A2xB2

x + A2yB2

y + A2zB

2z + 2AxBxAyBy + 2AxBxAzBz + 2AyByAzBz (1.3)

Now we combine Eq.2− Eq.3 yields

A2xB2

y + A2xB2

z + A2yB2

x + A2yB2

z+

A2zB

2x + A2

zB2y − 2AxBxAyBy − 2AxBxAzBz − 2AyByAzBz (1.4)

Eq.1 = Eq.4 X

1Arfken and Weber1Arfken and Weber

1

Page 5: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

1.2 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.4.10

Show that if a,b, c and d are in one plane, then (a× b)× (c× d) = 0.The cross product of a and b will be one of three cases, which are perpendicular up, down and 0. The same is truefor the vectors c and d. We can define vectors e = a× b and f = c× d. Since e and f are either up, down or 0, theyare either 0◦ or 180◦ to each other. By Eq. 1.44 2, the cross product is 0, due to a sine function. In the case of 0,the cross product is 0, because the 0 vector has no magnitude. X

1.3 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.4.16

Find the magnetic induction B given the following information:

F = q(v×B)

v = x,F

q= 2z− 4y

v = y,F

q= 4x− z

v = z,F

q= y− 2x

The induction can be found using two cross products from the given information.∣∣∣∣∣∣x y z1 0 0

Bx By Bz

∣∣∣∣∣∣ = 2z− 4y

From this matrix, we find By = 2 and Bz = 4.Now we use the next relationship to find the last term.∣∣∣∣∣∣

x y z0 1 0

Bx By Bz

∣∣∣∣∣∣ = 4x− z

From this matrix, we find Bx = 1.Combining these three yields B :

B = x + 2y + 4z X

1.4 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.5.7

Show that :

a× (b× c) + b× (c× a) + c× (a× b) = 0

From the text, we know that :

a× (b× c) = b(a · c)− c(a · b)

We can infer the other two relationship will be the same. Make these substitutions, we find:

b(a · c)− c(a · b) + c(b · a)− a(b · c) + a(c · b)− b(c · a)

Because the dot product is associative:

b(a · c)− c(a · b) + c(a · b)− a(b · c) + a(b · c)− b(a · c) = 0 X

2Arfken and Weber

2

Page 6: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

1.5 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.5.8

For a vector A, which can be decomposed into a radial component Ar and tangential component At show that :(a) Ar = r(A · r)We know from the definition of the vector that Ar = A · r and that the radial magnitude multiplied by the radialunit vector will yield the radial vector.

Ar = (Ar)r X

(b) At = −r× (r×A)

r×A =

∣∣∣∣∣∣r t n1 0 0Ar At 0

∣∣∣∣∣∣ = Atn (1.5)

r×Atn =

∣∣∣∣∣∣r t n1 0 00 0 At

∣∣∣∣∣∣ = Att = At X (1.6)

1.6 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.5.9

Show that if (A), B and C are coplanar, then

A ·B×C = 0

We know from the text that A ·B×C = AxByCz −AxBzCy + AyBzCx −AyBxCz + AzByCx −AzBxCy. If the vectorsare coplanar then one of the components can be set to 0 under a transportation. If one of the components is 0 andall the terms have one of each of the components, then the triple value is 0. Thus it is a necessary condition.Lets assume A ·B×C = 0, now show that it is coplanar.One way to write the dot product is with a cosine, and one way to write the cross product is with a sine. Since weknow that it equals 0, then either sine or cosine or both terms are 0. If the cosine term is 0, then the cross productis perpendicular to A, which would place it in the same plane as B and C. Thus they are coplanar. Now if the sineterm is 0, then (B) and C form a line. A third vector would then form a plane with that line. Thus it is sufficientfor this condition.

A ·B×C = 0 X

1.7 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 1.5.12

Show that :

(A×B) · (C×D) = (A ·C)(B ·D)− (A ·D)(B ·C)

First we will expand the left side.

(A×B) · (C×D)

= ((AyBz −AzBy)x + (AzBx −AxBz)y + (AxBy −AyBx)z)

·((CyDz − CzDy)x + (CzDx − CxDz)y + (CxDy − CyDx)z)

= (AyBz −AzBy)(CyDz − CzDy) + (AzBx −AxBz)(CzDx − CxDz) + (AxBy −AyBx)(CxDy − CyDx)

= AyBzCyDz −AyBzCzDy −AzByCyDz + AzByCzDy + AzBxCzDx −AzBxCxDz −AxBzCzDx

+AxBzCxDz + AxByCxDy −AxByCyDx −AyBxCxDy + AyBxCyDx

3

Page 7: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

= (AxCx + AyCy + AzCz)(BxDx + ByDy + BzDz)− (AxDx + AyDy + AzDz)(BxCx + ByCy + BzCz)

= (A ·C)(B ·D)− (A ·D)(B ·C)

This is exactly the same as the right side of the equation. X

4

Page 8: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Chapter 2

451: Problem Set 5

2.1 Problem 1.

Show that :

Tij = Aij + Sij + cδijTkk

Where Aij = −Aji,antisymmetric, and Sij = Sji,symmetric, and T kk ,trace.

We can represent the antisymmetric and symmetric parts with two matrices.

Aij =

∣∣∣∣∣∣0 A12 A13

−A12 0 A23

−A13 −A23 0

∣∣∣∣∣∣ (2.1)

Sij =

∣∣∣∣∣∣0 S12 S13

S12 0 S23

S13 S23 0

∣∣∣∣∣∣ (2.2)

Now combining any ij-term, one finds that as long as i 6= j then Tij = Aij +Sij . Now we have to find for when i = j.So the last term must vanish when i¬j, we know that the Kronecker delta function has this behavior. This yields :

Tij = Aij + Sij + δij

Well this is not all of the value, because the delta function only has a value of one. There must be some constant toyield the proper result. The scalar value must have the property:

n∑i,j=1

cδij = T kk

Now combine this last term to the previous value.

Tij = Aij + Sij + cδijTkk

So what is important to note is that on any average n-dimensional term c = 1n, but for an exact value there is a need

for an indency.

2.2 Problem 2.

a.

Show for the epsilon tensor that :

εijkεilm = δjlδkm − δjmδkl

The definition for the Levi-Civita Symbol given in Arfken

εijk = ei · ej × ek (2.3)

5

Page 9: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

for a nonzero value textbfej × ek must be in the ei direction. Because of this then

εijkεilm = (ei · ej × ek) (ei · el × em)

= (ej × ek) · (el × em)

From Arfken (pg 33)

(A×B) · (C ×D) = (A · C)(B ·D)− (A ·D)(B · C)

We apply this property to find

(ej × ek) · (el × em) = (ej · el) (ek · em)− (ej · em) (ek · el)

From definition Kronecker delta, eu · ev = δuv with this then

(ej · el) (ek · em)− (ej · em) (ek · el) = δjlδkm − δjmδkl

b.

Evaluate : εijkεijl

Using part a.

εijkεijl = δjjδkl − δjlδjk

Using inspection the last term is one when j=k=l, then the first term is also one therefore it is 0. Now sum over allof the terms.

3∑j=1

3∑k=l6=j=1

δjjδkl − δjlδjk =

3∑k=l=1

2δkl = 6

2.3 Problem 3.

Prove that

Ai;j −Aj;i =∂Ai

∂xj− ∂Aj

∂xi

By the definition of a covariant derivative

Ai;j =∂Ai

∂xj−AkΓk

ij (2.4)

With switching of the indencies

Aj;i =∂Aj

∂xi−AkΓk

ji

From Arfken, we know that Γkji = Γk

ij .

Ai;j −Aj;i =∂Ai

∂xj−AkΓk

ij −∂Aj

∂xi+ AkΓk

ji

=∂Ai

∂xj− ∂Aj

∂xi+ AkΓk

ji −AkΓkij

=∂Ai

∂xj− ∂Aj

∂xi+ AkΓk

ji −AkΓkji

=∂Ai

∂xj− ∂Aj

∂xi+ 0

=∂Ai

∂xj− ∂Aj

∂xi

2.4 Problem 4.

Not required to do.

6

Page 10: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

2.5 Problem5.

From the transformation properties of gij and the definition of the Christoffel Symbol Γijk obtain the transformation

law for Γijk given in class.

From Arfken (pg 154)

Γsij =

1

2gks

{∂gik

∂xj+

∂gjk

∂xi−

∂gij

∂xk

}(2.5)

so then

Γ′sij =1

2g′ks

{∂g′ik∂x′j

+∂g′jk

∂x′i−

∂g′ij∂x′k

}We also know that

g′kl = gij∂xi

∂x′k∂xj

∂x′l(2.6)

g′kl =∂x′k

∂xi

∂x′l

∂xjgij (2.7)

let us examine on of part of the metric transformation and then we can use this to apply to the other parts.

∂x′kg′ij =

∂x′k

(gpm

∂xp

∂x′i∂xm

∂x′j

)=

∂gpm

∂xl

∂xl

∂x′k∂xp

∂x′i∂xm

∂x′j+ gpm

∂2xp

∂x′k∂x′i∂xm

∂x′j+ gpm

∂2xp

∂x′k∂x′j∂xm

∂x′i

The other two parts of the metric transformation are just permutations of the pervious one. So

∂x′ig′kj +

∂x′jg′ki −

∂x′kg′ik =

∂xl

∂x′k∂xp

∂x′i∂xm

∂x′j

(∂gml

∂xp+

∂gpl

∂xm− ∂gpm

∂xl

)+ 2gpm

∂2xp

∂x′i∂x′j∂xm

∂x′k

With the definition of the Christoffel Symbol we find that

Γ′sij =∂x∂s

xp

∂xl

∂x′i∂xm

∂x′jΓp

lm +∂x′s

∂xp

∂2xp

∂x′i∂x′j(2.8)

7

Page 11: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

8

Page 12: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Chapter 3

451: Problem Set 6

3.1 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.4

a.

For

a + ib ↔(

a b−b a

)Show that addition (i) and multiplication (ii) are valid

(i)

Let us define another matrix

c + id ↔(

c d−d c

)Now add the two complex numbers and convert to matrix form.

a + ib + c + id = (a + c) + i(b + d) ↔(

a + c b + d−b− d b + c

)Now add the two matrices directly.(

a b−b a

)+

(c d−d c

)=

(a + c b + d−b− d b + c

)This does hold for addition. X

(ii)

First for a real scalar

α(a + ib) = aα + ibα ↔(

aα bα−bα aα

)Now the scalar directly to the matrix

α

(a b−b a

)=

(aα bα−bα aα

)Next for two matrices. (

a b−b a

) (c d−d c

)=

(ac− bd ad + bc−bc− ad −bd + ac

)For two complex numbers multiplied

(a + ib)(c + id) = (ac− bd) + i(ad + cb) ↔(

ac− bd ad + bc−ad− bc ac− bd

)The product for two matrices. X

9

Page 13: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

b.

Find the matrix for (a + ib)−1

(a + ib)−1 ↔(

a b−b a

)−1

From equation 3.50 in Arfken.

a(−1)ij =

Cji

|A| (3.1)

So

Cji =

(a −bb a

)|A| = a2 + b2

(a + ib)−1 =

( aa2+b2

−ba2+b2

ba2+b2

aa2+b2

)X

3.2 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.5

If A is an n× n matrix, show that

det(−A) = (−1)ndetA

Let us look at the case of when the matrix is multiplied by a real scalar,α

αA = α1nA

detαA = det(α1n)detA

The determinate of a diagonal matrix is just the multiplication of the diagonal terms. In this case all the diagonalterms have a value of α.

det(α1n) =

n∏i=1

αi = αn

Now substitute this term into the previous equation.

detαA = det(α1n)detA = αndetA

Then set α = −1

det(−A) = (−1)ndetAX

3.3 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.6

a.

Show that the square of the following matrix is 0

A =

(ab b2

−a2 −ab

)Then A2 (

ab b2

−a2 −ab

) (ab b2

−a2 −ab

)=

(a2b2 − a2b2 ab3 − ab3

−a3b + a3b −a2b2 + a2b2

)= 0

b.

10

Page 14: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Show a numerical case for if C=A+B, in general det C 6= det A+det BLet

A =

(3 1−9 −3

)B =

(2 1−4 −2

)

Then

C =

(5 2−13 −5

)

Now for the determinants

detA = 0

detB = 0

detC = 1

Therefore, det C 6= det A+det B X

3.4 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.15

a.

Show that [Mx,My] = iMz and so on.Lets start with defining all the products of two M-matrices

MxMy =1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

1√2

0 −i 0i 0 −i0 i 0

= i

12

0 − 12

0 0 012

0 − 12

(3.2)

MyMx =1√2

0 −i 0i 0 −i0 i 0

1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

= i

− 12

0 − 12

0 0 012

0 12

(3.3)

MxMz =1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

1 0 01 0 10 1 0

= i

0 0 0− i√

20 i√

2

0 0 0

(3.4)

MzMx =

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

= i

0 − i√2

0

0 0 00 i√

20

(3.5)

MyMz =1√2

0 −i 0i 0 −i0 i 0

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

= i

0 0 01√2

0 − 1√2

0 0 0

(3.6)

MzMy =

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

1√2

0 −i 0i 0 −i0 i 0

= i

0 1√2

0

0 0 00 − 1√

20

(3.7)

11

Page 15: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Now for the commutation relations

[Mx,My] = MxMy −MyMx = i

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

= iMz (3.8)

[My,Mx] = MyMx −MxMy = i

−1 0 00 0 00 0 1

= −iMz (3.9)

[Mz,Mx] = MzMx −MzMx = i

0 − i√2

0i√2

0 − i√2

0 i√2

0

= iMy (3.10)

[Mx,Mz] = MxMz −MzMx = i

0 i√2

0

− i√2

0 i√2

0 − i√2

0

= −iMy (3.11)

[My,Mz] = MyMz −MzMy = i

0 1√2

01√2

0 1√2

0 1√2

0

= iMx (3.12)

[Mz,My] = MzMy −MyMz = i

0 − 1√2

0

− 1√2

0 − 1√2

0 − 1√2

0

= −iMx (3.13)

This is equivalent as[Mi,Mj ] = iεijkMkX

b.

Show that

M2 ≡M2x + M2

y + M2z = 213

Examining term

M2x =

1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

=1

2

1 0 10 2 01 0 1

(3.14)

M2y =

1√2

0 −i 0i 0 −i0 i 0

1√2

0 −i 0i 0 −i0 i 0

=1

2

1 0 −10 2 0−1 0 1

(3.15)

M2z =

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

=

1 0 00 0 00 0 1

(3.16)

Now combine these terms

1

2

1 0 10 2 01 0 1

+1

2

1 0 −10 2 0−1 0 1

+

1 0 00 0 00 0 1

=

2 0 00 2 00 0 2

= 2

1 0 00 1 00 0 1

= 213X

c.

Show that [M2,Mi

]= 0 (3.17)[

Mz,L+]= L+ (3.18)[

L+,L−]

= 2Mz (3.19)

12

Page 16: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

where

L+ ≡Mx + iMy

L− ≡Mx − iMy

Let’s begin with[M2,Mi

]= 0. We know that M2 = 213, so

[M2,Mi

]= 2 [13,Mi]

= 2 (13Mi −Mi13)

= 2 (Mi −Mi)

= 2 (0)

= 0X

Now we have to find L+

L+ ≡Mx + iMy =1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

+i√2

0 −i 0i 0 −i0 i 0

=

1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

+1√2

0 1 0−1 0 10 −1 0

=

1√2

0 2 00 0 20 0 0

Now

[Mz,L+

]= L+

[Mz,L+]

= MzL+ − L+,Mz

=

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

1√2

0 2 00 0 20 0 0

− 1√2

0 2 00 0 20 0 0

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

=

1√2

0 2 00 0 00 0 0

− 1√2

0 0 00 0 −20 0 0

=

1√2

0 2 00 0 20 0 0

= L+X

Lastly for[L+,L−

]= 2Mz. We first need L−

L− ≡Mx − iMy =1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

− i√2

0 −i 0i 0 −i0 i 0

=

1√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

− 1√2

0 1 0−1 0 10 −1 0

=

1√2

0 0 02 0 00 2 0

13

Page 17: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Now for[L+,L−

]= 2Mz[

L+,L−]

= L+L− − L−L+

=1√2

0 2 00 0 20 0 0

1√2

0 0 02 0 00 2 0

− 1√2

0 0 02 0 00 2 0

1√2

0 2 00 0 20 0 0

=

1

2

4 0 00 4 00 0 0

− 1

2

0 0 00 4 00 0 4

= 2

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

= 2MzX

3.5 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.24

If A and B are diagonal, show that A and B commute.For two matrices to commute [A,B] = AB−BA = 0If A and B are diagonal then they are must be of same dimension nWe can define

A =

n∑i,j=1

aijδij (3.20)

B =

n∑i,j=1

bijδij (3.21)

Let C = AB and D = BA

C =

n∑i,j

cij =

n∑i,j=1

n∑k=1

aikbkjδikδkj

D =

n∑i,j

dij =

n∑i,j=1

n∑k=1

bikakjδikδkj

We can reduce this, because of the double δs

n∑i,j

cij =

n∑i,j=1

aiibjjδij

n∑i,j

dij =

n∑i,j=1

biiajjδij

n∑i,j

cijδij =

n∑i=1

aiibii

n∑i,j

dijδij =

n∑i=1

biiaii

So C and D are both diagonal matrices, also. Because each term of A and B are scalars, then aiibii = biiaii.Therefore

C =

n∑i,j

cijδij =

n∑i=1

aiibii =

n∑i=1

biiaii =

n∑i,j

dijδij = D

C = AB = D = BA

Therefore[A,B] = AB−BA = 0X

14

Page 18: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

3.6 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.33

Show that

detA−1 = (detA)−1

Let’s begin with the hint that we are given to use the product theorem of section 3.2 in Arfken, which is

det(AB) = detAdetB

so let A = A and B = A−1, then

detAA−1 = detAdetA−1

det(13) = detAdetA−1

By the definition of determinate det(13) = 1, and that the determinate is a scalar value.

det(13) = detAdetA−1

1 = detAdetA−1

(detA)−1 = detA−1X

3.7 Mathematical Methods for Physicists 3.2.36

Find the inverse of

A =

3 2 12 2 11 1 4

(3.22)

We begin with 3 2 12 2 11 1 4

∣∣∣∣∣1 0 00 1 00 0 1

Now reorder the rows by inspection. 1 1 4

3 2 12 2 1

∣∣∣∣∣0 0 11 0 00 1 0

Now cancel all but the diagonal terms. 1 1 4

3 2 12 2 1

∣∣∣∣∣0 0 11 0 00 1 0

1 1 40 −1 −110 0 −7

∣∣∣∣∣0 0 11 0 −30 1 −2

1 1 4

0 1 110 0 −7

∣∣∣∣∣0 0 1−1 0 30 1 −2

1 0 −70 1 110 0 −7

∣∣∣∣∣1 0 −2−1 0 30 1 −2

1 0 −7

0 1 110 0 1

∣∣∣∣∣1 0 −2−1 0 30 − 1

727

1 0 00 1 00 0 1

∣∣∣∣∣1 −1 0−1 11

7− 1

7

0 − 17

27

So

A−1 =

1 −1 0−1 11

7− 1

7

0 − 17

27

(3.23)

15

Page 19: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Now let’s check that this is indeed the inverse.

AA−1 =

3 2 12 2 11 1 4

1 −1 0−1 11

7− 1

7

0 − 17

27

=

1 0 00 1 00 0 1

AA−1 =

1 −1 0−1 11

7− 1

7

0 − 17

27

3 2 12 2 11 1 4

=

1 0 00 1 00 0 1

So this is indeed the inverse. X

16

Page 20: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Chapter 4

725: Problem Set 4

4.1 Problem 1

Use only known functions (and series) to improve the convergence of∑∞

n=1 (−1)n−1 zn

nso that the final series con-

verges absolutely at z = ±1. Where is the singularity and what happens to it?

This summation is equivalent to ln (1 + z) =∑∞

n=1 (−1)n−1 zn

n. If both sides is multiplied by (1 + a1z) to find

(1 + a1z) ln (1 + z) = (1 + a1z)

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1 zn

n

=

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1 zn

n+ a1

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1 zn+1

n

Now making everything to the same power

(1 + a1z) ln (1 + z) =

z +

∞∑n=2

(−1)n−1 zn

n+ a1

∞∑n=2

(−1)n−1 zn

n− 1

= z +

∞∑n=2

(−1)n−1

(1

n− a1

n− 1

)zn

n

= z +

∞∑n=2

(−1)n−1

(n (1− a1)− 1

n(n− 1)

)zn

Now set a1 = 1. So check when z = −1

(z = −1) +

∞∑n=2

(−1)n−1

(−1

n(n− 1)

)(z = −1)n =

− 1 +

∞∑n=2

(−1)n−1

(−1

n(n− 1)

)(−1)n

= −1 +

∞∑n=2

(−1)2n−1

(−1

n(n− 1)

)

= −1 +

∞∑n=2

(−1)2n−2

(1

n(n− 1)

)Shifting the summation from n = 2 to n = 1, also (−1)2n−2 = 1

(z = −1) +

∞∑n=2

(−1)n−1

(−1

n(n− 1)

)(z = −1)n

n

= −1 +

∞∑n=1

1

n(n + 1)= −1 + 1 = 0

17

Page 21: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

The summation is known to be 1.1 This means the series converges absolutely at z = −1. Now for z = 1

(z = 1) +

∞∑n=2

(−1)n−1

(−1

n(n− 1)

)(z = 1)n

= 1 +

∞∑n=2

(−1)n−1

(−1

n(n− 1)

)(1)n

Now the absolute value of the summation, because if this converges absolutely, so does the actual summation.

1 +

∞∑n=2

1

n(n− 1)

Shifting the summation from n = 2 to n = 1

1 +

∞∑n=2

1

n(n− 1)= 1 +

∞∑n=1

1

n(n + 1)

As earlier the summation is absolutely convergent. Therefore the function is absolutely convergent at z = 1. In theoriginal summation there was a singularity at z = −1. This is removed by multiplying by a function, which at −1equals 0. This suppresses the singularity. X

4.2 Problem 2

What is the threshold energy necessary to produce a ∆ at 1232 MeV in electron scattering according to e+p → e′+∆?

The energy squared in the center of mass frame for the system is

s = (me + mp)2

The threshold energy is the energy of the electron, which in four space

Ee =pe (pp + pe)√

s=

pe · pp + pe · pe√s

Because of the small size of electrons mass pe · pe = m2e ≈ 0. Also, pe · pp = 1

2

((me′ + m∆)2 −

(m2

e + m2p

)). Again,

all m2e and m2

e′ terms are set to 0. The energy becomes

Ee ≈m2

∆ + 2m∆me′ −m2p

2√

s

=m2

∆ + 2m∆me′ −m2p

2 (m∆ + me′)

Now inserting the values for the masses

Ee ≈12322 + 2(.511)(1232)− 938.32

2(.511 + 938.3)= 340.1MeV X

4.3 Problem 3

Let A = ∂2f∂x2 , B = ∂2f

∂x∂y, and C = ∂2f

∂y2 . We have a saddle point if B2 − AC > 0. For f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) applythe Cauchy-Riemann conditions and show that u and v do not have both a maximum or minimum in a finite regionon the complex plane.

For u(x, y)

A =∂2u

∂x2, B =

∂2u

∂x∂y, C =

∂2u

∂y2

1Arfken and Weber. Mathematical Methods for Physicists 5thEd. pg 316

18

Page 22: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Then B2 −AC > 0 becomes (∂2u

∂x∂y

)2

−(

∂2u

∂x2

) (∂2u

∂y2

)> 0

Applying the Cauchy-Riemann Conditions2

∂2u

∂y2→ − ∂2v

∂x∂y→ −∂2u

∂x2

Then B2 −AC > 0 simplifies to (∂2u

∂x∂y

)2

+

(∂2u

∂x2

)2

> 0

This is always greater than 0, because u is a real value function. Therefore there are no maximum nor minimum for u.

For v(x, y)

A =∂2v

∂x2, B =

∂2v

∂x∂y, C =

∂2v

∂y2

Then B2 −AC > 0 becomes (∂2v

∂x∂y

)2

−(

∂2v

∂x2

) (∂2v

∂y2

)> 0

Applying the Cauchy-Riemann Conditions

∂2v

∂x2→ − ∂2u

∂x∂y→ −∂2v

∂y2

Then B2 −AC > 0 simplifies to (∂2v

∂x∂y

)2

+

(∂2v

∂y2

)2

> 0

This is always greater than 0, because v is a real value function, because the imaginary term comes from the i infront of v. Therefore there are no maximum nor minimum for v. X

4.4 Problem 4

Find the analytic function f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y)

a

For u = x3 − 3xy

From the Cauchy-Riemann Conditions

∂u

∂x= 3x2 − 3y2 =

∂v

∂y

From this, integrate with respect to y to find v∫∂v =

∫ (3x2 − 3y2) ∂y → v = 3x2y − y3 + c′

where c′ is a constant of integration. So

w(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) + ic′

= x3 − 3xy2 + 3ix2y − iy3 + c

2Arfken and Weber. Mathematical Methods for Physicists 5thEd. pg 400

19

Page 23: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

where c = ic′. Now in the form of f(z), where z is the form z = x + iy

w(x, y) = x3 − 3xy2 + 3ix2y − iy3 + c

= (x + iy)(x2 + 2ixy − y2) + c

= (x + iy) (x + iy)2 + c → f(z) = z3 + c X

b

For v = e−y sin x

Beginning with the Cauchy-Riemann Conditions

∂v

∂y= −e−y sin x =

∂u

∂x

Integrating this with respect to x to find u∫∂u =

∫−ey sin x∂x → u = e−y cos x + k

where k is a constant of integration. So

w(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y)

= e−y cos x + ie−y sin x + k

Now in the form of f(z)

w(x, y) = e−y cos x + ie−y sin x + k

= e−y (cos x + i sin x) + k

= e−yeix + k → ei(x+iy) + k → f(z) = eiz + k X

20

Page 24: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Chapter 5

725: Problem Set 5

5.1 Problem 1

Starting with the Euler integral, analytically continue the Gamma function into the left-hand complex plane anddetermine its poles with their residues.

The Euler integral is

Γ(z) =

∫ ∞

0

e−ttz−1dt (5.1)

To extend into the the left hand side of the complex plane. Consider

Γ(z + 1) =

∫ ∞

0

e−ttzdt

= −ett−z∣∣∞0

+

∫ ∞

0

e−tztz−1dt = zΓ(z)

So consider z = −z

Γ(−z + 1) =

∫ ∞

0

e−tt−zdt

= −ett−z∣∣∞0

+

∫ ∞

0

e−t(−z)t−z−1dt

= −zΓ(−z)

This can be continued indefinitely to the left. The poles can be found know that a 0 has to be in the denominator.This occurs for z = 0,−1,−2, . . .. The value at these poles can be found from equation 6.47

f (n)(zo) =n!

2πi

∮f(z)dz

(z − zo)n+1(5.2)

For the Gamma function from the Euler integral form, f(z) = e−t. The value of f (n)(0) = ±1 depending if n is even

or odd. This becomes f (n)(0) = (−1)n. Therefore the residues are (−1)n

n!

5.2 Problem 2

What kind of analytic functions are sin z, 1/ sin z and what are their singularities?

Let sin z = sin(x + iy). This can be expanded to

sin(x + iy) = sin x cos iy + cos x sin iy

= sin x cosh y + i cos x sinh y

21

Page 25: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

At large values for y, the function approaches ∞, so the behavior at large z must be examined. So replace z = 1w

, inthe summation representation

sin z =

∞∑n=0

(−1)nz2n+1

(2n + 1)!=

∞∑n=0

(−1)n

(2n + 1)!w2n+1

So as z → ∞, w → 0 means there are “poles” at z = ∞. The problem is that the largest “poles” has power of ∞.This means that sin z has an essential singularity at z = ∞ X

Now for 1sin z

. This function has poles at z = ±nπ, where n is an integer. The pole expansion can be found usingthe method form equation 7.15.

f(z) = f(0) +

∞∑n=1

bn

{(z − an)−1 + a−1

n

}(5.3)

For this f(z), the above expansion must include all negative n. For f(z), bn = 1/ cos z|zO . This means bn = ±1.When n is even b2n = 1 and -1 for odd.

1

sin z=

1

z+

∞∑n=1

(−1)n

{(1

z − nπ+

1

)+

(1

z + nπ+

1

−nπ

)}

=1

z+

∞∑n=1

(−1)n

{1

z − nπ+

1

z + nπ

}This reduces to

1

sin z=

1

z+

∞∑n=1

(−1)n

{1

z − nπ+

1

z + nπ

}

=1

z+

∞∑n=1

(−1)n

{2z

z2 − (nπ)2

}X

5.3 Problem 3

Evaluate the series∑∞

n=−∞1

n2+2−2 at least approximately and exactly if possible.

An approximation of the sum is with an integral.

∞∑n=−∞

1

n2 + 2−2≈

∫ ∞

−∞

dx

x2 + 2−2

This integral can be evaluated in the complex plane on the semi circle of the upper plane.∫ ∞

−∞

dx

x2 + 2−2=

∮dz

(z + 1/2i) (z − 1/2i)

The only pole in the upper plane is zo = 1/2i. The integral becomes∮dz

(z + 1/2i) (z − 1/2i)= 2πi

∑f(z)

∣∣zo

= 2πi

(1

1/2i + 1/2i

)= 2π

This value is a good approximation of the real value, which is 2π coth π/2. The approximation is within 10% of theactual. X

22

Page 26: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

5.4 Problem 4

Evaluate the integrals ∫ ∞

0

dx

1 + 2x2 + x4,

∫ ∞

0

dx

1 + 2x + 2x2 + x3(5.4)

For the first integral, the function is an even function it can be extended to the negative axis. So∫ ∞

0

dx

1 + 2x2 + x4=

1

2

∫ ∞

−∞

dx

1 + 2x2 + x4

So then map it in complex plane to find

1

2

∫ ∞

−∞

dz

1 + 2z2 + z4

Now factor into its roots

1

2

∫ ∞

−∞

dz

1 + 2z2 + z4=

1

2

∫ ∞

−∞

dz

(z − i)2 (z + i)2

There are roots of second power. Applying equation 6.461 for z = i, because the contour is only of the upper plane.

1

2

∫ ∞

−∞

dz

(z − i)2 (z + i)2=

2πi

2

[−2

(zo + i)3

∣∣∣∣zo=i

]

= πi

[1

4i

]=

π

4X

For the second integral, the use of natural logarithm as discussed in lecture will be applied. The integral can bewritten as ∫ ∞

0

dx

1 + 2x + 2x2 + x3

=

∫ ∞

0

dx

(x + 1)(x + 1+i

√3

2

) (x + 1−i

√3

2

)From lecture ∮

f(z) ln zdz = −∫ ∞

0

f(x)dx ln xdx +

∫ ∞

0

f(x)dx ln (x + 2πi)dx = 2πi

∫ ∞

0

f(x)dx

Or in terms of the real integral∫ ∞

0

f(x)dx =1

2πi

∮f(z) ln zdz = −

∑Res f(z)

∣∣zi

ln zi

where zi are the poles. The poles are first order, so∫ ∞

0

dx

(x + 1)(x + 1+i

√3

2

) (x + 1−i

√3

2

)=

1

2πi

∫ ∞

0

ln zdz

(z + 1)(z + 1+i

√3

2

) (z + 1−i

√3

2

)=

∑Res f(z)

∣∣zi

ln zi

=ln (−1)(

−1 + 1+i√

32

) (−1 + 1−i

√3

2

) +ln −1−i

√3

2(−1−i

√3

2+ 1

) (−1−i

√3

2+ 1−i

√3

2

) +ln −1+i

√3

2(−1+i

√3

2+ 1+i

√3

2

) (−1+i

√3

2+ 1

)= −π

√3

9+

π√

3

9+

3+

π√

3

9− iπ

3

=π√

3

9X

1Arfken and Weber 5th

23

Page 27: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

24

Page 28: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Chapter 6

725: Problem Set 6

6.1 Problem 1

Solve the ODE (1 + x2)y′ + (1− x)2y(x) = xe−x with initial condition y(0) = 0

First solve the homogenous equation

(1 + x2)y′ + (1− x)2y(x) = 0

Writing y′ = dydx

. Placing all the y’s on one side and the x’s the other

dy

y= − (1− x)2

1 + x2dx →

∫dy

y= −

∫(1− x)2

1 + x2dx

− ln C1 + ln y = −x + ln 1 + x2 → y = C1(1 + x2)e−x

So the homogenous solution is

yh = C1(1 + x2)e−x (6.1)

Now solve for the particular solution with the guess y = Axe−x + Be−x

(1 + x2)y′ + (1− x)2y = xe−x → (1 + x2)×

(−Ax + A−B) e−x + (1− x)2 (Ax + B) e−x = xe−x

Since e−x appears in every term it can be cancelled. Now group everything in terms of powers of x

−Ax3 + Ax3 = 0 → Nothing is learned

(A−B)x2 − 2Ax2 + Bx2 = 0 → A = 0

−Ax + Ax− 2Bx = x → B = −1/2

A−B + B = 0 → Nothing is learned

So the particular solution is

yp = −1

2e−x (6.2)

Finally solve for the boundary condition

y(0) = 0 → yh(0) + yp(0) = 0

y = C1(1 + x2)e−x − 1

2e−x → C1(1 + 02)e−0 − 1

2e−0 = 0

C1 −1

2= 0 → C1 =

1

2

Then the solution is

y =1

2(1 + x2)e−x − 1

2e−x → y =

1

2x2e−x X

25

Page 29: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

6.2 Problem 2

Solve the ODE y′′ − 56y′ + 9

25y(x) = 0 with initial conditions y(1) = 0, y′(1) = 2.

Let’s guess that the solution has the form y = erx, so the differential equation becomes

r2erx − 5

6rerx +

9

25erx = 0

r2 − 5

6r +

9

25= 0

Solving for r

r =5

12±

√25

144− 9

25

=5

12± i

60

√671

So the solution as the form

y = C1e( 5

12+ i60√

671)x + C2e( 5

12−i60√

671)x

For ease of calculation

ω1 =5

12+

i

60

√671, ω2 =

5

12− i

60

√671

Now solve for the boundary conditions.

y(1) = 0 → C1eω1 + C2e

ω2 = 0 → C2 = −C1eω1−ω2

Now the second condition

y′(1) = 2 → C1ω1eω1 + C2ω2e

ω2 = 2

C1ω1eω1 − C1e

ω1−ω2ω2eω2 = 2

C1

(ω1e

ω1 − ω2eω1−ω2+ω2

)= 2

C1 =2e−ω1

ω1 − ω2

Therefore

C2 = −C1eω1−ω2 → C2 =

−2e−ω2

ω1 − ω2

The final solution is then

y =2e−ω1

ω1 − ω2eω1x − 2eω2

ω1 − ω2eω2x

y =

{−60ie

− 512−

i√

67160 +

(512+ i

√671

60

)x

√671

+60ie

− 512+ i

√671

60 +(

512−

i√

67160

)x

√671

X

6.3 Problem 3

Solve (x2 − 2x + 1)y′′ − 4(x− 1)y′ − 14y(x) = x3 − 3x2 + 3x− 8 for the general solution. Then adjust it to the initialcondition y(0) = 9/20, y′(0) = 11/10

This differential equation can be written as

(x− 1)2y′′ − 4(x− 1)y′ − 14y = (x− 1)3 − 7

26

Page 30: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Define z ≡ (x− 1), then differential becomes

z2y′′ − 4zy′ − 14y = z3 − 7

The homogenous equation is just Euler differential equation with y = zp

zp (p(p− 1)− 4p− 14) = 0 → p2 − 5p− 14 = 0

The solution for p is p = 7,−2. So the homogenous solution is then

yh = C1z7 + C2z

−2 (6.3)

The particular solution is of the form

y = Az3 + Bz2 + Cz + D

Now, because the second derivative is multiplied by z2 and the first derivative is multiplied by z, all terms but theconstant and z3 are zero, ie B = C = 0. So

6Az3 − 12Az3 − 14Az3 − 14D = z3 − 7

A =−1

20, D =

1

2

Therefore the particular solution is

yp =−1

20z3 +

1

2(6.4)

Finally for the constants with the boundary conditions y(−1) = 9/20 and y′(−1) = 11/10. For y(−1) = 9/20

−C1 + C2 + 1/20 + 1/2 = 9/20 → C2 = C1 − 1/10

Now, y′(−1) = 11/10

7C1 + 2 (C1 − 1/10)− 3/20 = 11/10 → C1 = 29/180

Then

C2 = 29/180− 1/10 → C2 = 11/180

The solution becomes when z = x− 1 is substituted back in

y =29

180(x− 1)7 +

11

180(x− 1)−2 − 1

20(x− 1)3 +

1

2X (6.5)

6.4 Problem 4

Determine the general solution of the ODE xy′′ = y(x)y′ that depends on two integration constants. Find anothersolution that cannot be obtained from the general solution. Explain.

The right hand side can be written as

yy′ =d

dx

(1

2y2

)Integrating both sides ∫

xy′′ =

∫d

dx

(1

2y2

)→

∫xy′′ =

1

2y2 + C′

1

The left hand side can be done by partial integration with u = x, du = dx, v = y′ and dv = y′′, so∫xy′′ = xy′ −

∫y′dx = xy′ − y + C′′

1

27

Page 31: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Combining the two constants in to one, then

xy′ − y =1

2y2 + C1 →

dy12y2 + y + C1

=dx

x

Integrating both sides ∫dy

12y2 + y + C1

=

∫dx

x

2 tan−1

[1 + y√−1 + 2C1

]/√−1 + 2C1 = ln x + C2

Solving for y

tan−1

[1 + y√−1 + 2C1

]=

√−1/2 + C1 (ln x + C2)

1 + y√−1 + 2C1

= tan[√−1/2 + C1 (ln x + C2)

]y = −1 +

√−1 + 2C1 tan

[√−1/2 + C1 (ln x + C2)

]The solution that depends on two constant is

y = −1 +√−1 + 2C1 tan

[√−1/2 + C1 (ln x + C2)

](6.6)

The third solution that cannot be obtained form the general solution is y = constant. This solution cause thedifferential equation to become trivial, because y′ = 0. Therefore, y′′ = 0. This is a solution because 0 times anynumber is 0. X

28

Page 32: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Appendix A

Special Functions

Hi

29

Page 33: 38660999 Math Methods for Physicist Solutions Webber Arfken

Index

Cauchy-Riemann Conditions, 18, 19

30