25
Objectives • Discuss final project deliverables • Control – Terminology – Types of controllers • Differences – Controls in the real world • Problems • Response time vs. stability

389H NO 26 Control

  • Upload
    poona

  • View
    219

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CONTROLS

Citation preview

Page 1: 389H NO 26 Control

Objectives

• Discuss final project deliverables

• Control – Terminology– Types of controllers

• Differences

– Controls in the real world• Problems

• Response time vs. stability

Page 2: 389H NO 26 Control

FINAL PROJECT DELIVERABLES AND GRADING

DELIVERABLES

1) PROJECT REPORT:- Project statement (introduction) 2 pages

Explain what are you designing/analyzing and why is that important On the second page clearly identify (bullet list) project outcomes - Building description (geometry) 1-3 pages

Schematics that focus on your system(s) Identify all assumptions and simplifications you introduced

- Methodology 1-3 pagesDescribe methodology (equations, schematics, …)Provide a list of assumptions used in your methodology

- Results 3-5 pagesFormatted results with commentsTables, Charts, Diagrams, … Analysis and Results discussion

- Conclusion 0.5-1 pageSummary of most important results

2) PRESENTATION:- 5 minutes (exactly)

-Power point presentation (4-6 slides)

GRADING CRITERIA:1) Analysis approach: 60%- Methodology 20%- Accuracy analysis 20%- Result analysis 20%2) Deliverables: 40%- Final report 30%- Presentations 10%

Page 3: 389H NO 26 Control

Sequence of operation for the control system design

mixing

CCOA

RA

SAHC

Adiabatichumidifier

Define the sequence of operation for:WINTER operation and:

- case when humidity is not controlled- case when humidity is precisely controlled

Solution on the whiteboard

Page 4: 389H NO 26 Control

Economizer Fresh air volume flow rate control

mixing

damper

Fresh(outdoor) air

T & RH sensors

Recirc. air

% fresh air

Minimum for ventilation

100%

TOA (hOA)

enthalpy

Page 5: 389H NO 26 Control

Economizer – cooling regime

Example of SEQUENCE OF OERATIONS:

If TOA < Tset-point open the fresh air damper the maximum position

Then, if Tindoor air < Tset-point start closing the cooling coil valve

If cooling coil valve is closed and T indoor air < Tset-point start closing the damper till you get T indoor air = T set-point Other variations are possible

Page 6: 389H NO 26 Control

Basic purpose of HVAC control

Daily, weekly, and seasonal swings make HVAC control challenging

Highly unsteady-state environment

Provide balance of reasonable comfort at minimum cost and energy

Two distinct actions:

1) Switching/Enabling: Manage availability of plant according to schedule using timers.

2) Regulation: Match plant capacity to demand

Page 7: 389H NO 26 Control

Terminology

• Sensor– Measures quantity of

interest

• Controller– Interprets sensor data

• Controlled device– Changes based on

controller outputFigure 2-13

Page 8: 389H NO 26 Control

DirectClosed Loop or Feedback

IndirectOpen Loop or Feedforward

outdoor

Page 9: 389H NO 26 Control

• Set Point – Desired sensor value

• Control Point– Current sensor value

• Error or Offset– Difference between control point and set point

Page 10: 389H NO 26 Control

Two-Position Control Systems

• Used in small, relatively simple systems

• Controlled device is on or off– It is a switch, not a valve

• Good for devices that change slowly

Page 11: 389H NO 26 Control

• Anticipator can be used to shorten response time• Control differential is also called deadband

Page 12: 389H NO 26 Control

Residential system - thermostat

• ~50 years old DDC thermostat

- Daily and weekly programming

Page 13: 389H NO 26 Control

Modulating Control Systems

Example: Heat exchanger control– Modulating (Analog) control

air

water

Cooling coil

(set point temperature)

x

Page 14: 389H NO 26 Control

Modulating Control Systems• Used in larger systems• Output can be anywhere in operating range• Three main types

– Proportional– PI– PID

Position (x)

fluid

Electric (pneumatic) motor

Vfluid = f(x) - linear or exponential function

Volume flow rate

Page 15: 389H NO 26 Control

The PID control algorithm

For our example of heating coil:

Proportional Integral Differential

time

Position (x)

constants

e(t) – difference between set point and measured value

d

TTdTKdTT

T

KTTKx d

i

)()()( measuredpointset

measuredpointset measuredpointset

Proportional(how much)

Integral(for how long)

Differential(how fast)

Position of the valve

Page 16: 389H NO 26 Control

Proportional Controllers

x is controller output

A is controller output with no error

(often A=0)

Kis proportional gain constant

e = is error (offset)

)( measuredpointset TTKAx

measuredpointset TT

Page 17: 389H NO 26 Control

Stable systemUnstable system

Page 18: 389H NO 26 Control

Issues with P Controllers

• Always have an offset

• But, require less tuning than other controllers

• Very appropriate for things that change slowly– i.e. building internal temperature

Page 19: 389H NO 26 Control

Proportional + Integral (PI)

K/Ti is integral gain

If controller is tuned properly, offset is reduced to zero

Figure 2-18a

dTTT

KTTKAx

i

)()( measuredpointset measuredpointset

Page 20: 389H NO 26 Control
Page 21: 389H NO 26 Control

Issues with PI Controllers

• Scheduling issues

• Require more tuning than for P

• But, no offset

Page 22: 389H NO 26 Control

Proportional + Integral + Derivative (PID)

• Improvement over PI because of faster response and less deviation from offset– Increases rate of error correction as errors get larger

• But– HVAC controlled devices are too slow responding– Requires setting three different gains

Page 23: 389H NO 26 Control

Ref: Kreider and Rabl.Figure 12.5

Page 24: 389H NO 26 Control

The control in HVAC system – only PI

dTTT

KTTKx

i

)()( measuredpointset measuredpointset

Proportional Integral

Proportionalaffect the slope

Integralaffect the shape after the first “bump”

Set point

Set point

value

Page 25: 389H NO 26 Control

The Real World

• 50% of US buildings have control problems– 90% tuning and optimization– 10% faults

• 25% energy savings from correcting control problems

• Commissioning is critically important