3949A-1 With Attachment

8/16/2019 3949A-1 With Attachment

1/4

Form

949 A

(2-2007)

1.Taxpayer ame

DONALD W. MALLOY

a.

Street

Address

316N. 26T HST .

oMB

# 1545-1960

2. Business ame

UNITEDSTATES

DISTRICTCOURT

DISTRICTOF MT.

a. StreetAddress

316N. 26T HST.

fl

Failure

o Withhold

ax

U

Wagering/Gambling

U

Earned

ncomeCredit

U

Otner

Describe

elow)

b. City/State/ZlP b. City/State/ZlP

BI LL I NGS. T . 59101 BILLI

M T . 5 9 1 0 1

c. SocialSecurityNumber

SSN)

c. Employer

dentificat ion umber

d. Occupation

d.

Principal us

Activity

e. Dateof Birth

3.

Marital

tatus

I

Married

n

Single

I

Head

f

Household

n

Divorced

n

Separated

3a.

Name fSpouse

4.

Alleged iolationf

Income ax

Law

Check

ll hat

apply).

Zl

FalseExemption

E

Unsubstantiatedncome

U

Unreported

ncome

Zl False eductions Z Kickback Z Narcoticsncome

E

ruuttipeiting

fl

False/Altered

ocuments

U

Public/Politicalorruption

El

Organized

rime

U

Failureo PayTax

fl

Failureo

FileReturn

Departmentf heTreasury InternalRevenue ervice

lnformationReferral

(See

instruclionson reverse)

TY

Y

5. Unreportedncome ndTaxYears

Fill

n Tax

Years

and

dollar

mount(s),

f known, .9.,TY2005

1

0,000)

T Y $ T Y $ T Y

T Y $

a. Comments

Briefly

escribehe factsof he

alleged

iolation VilhSi,4runaWVhereMhen/How.

ttach

another heet,

f needed).

SEEATTACHED

b.

Are

books/records

vailable?

[Yes n

No

d.

Banks,Financialnstitutionssedby he axpayer:

Name:

Address:

AME

AS ABOVE

SEE ATTACHED, YF WITNESSACCOIINl

6.

YourName:

u considerhe

axpayer angerous?

Yes

nNo

e. Please escribe

ow

vou

earned

nd/or btainedhe

nformationn his

eport

Attach

nother heet,

f

needed):

a. Address:

b. City/State/ZlP:

c.

Teleohone umber

Please

ncludeheArea

Code):

ForMailinT ddress, ee

nstructions

ForPaperwork eduction

ct,

see

nstructions

Catalog

Number47872E

Form3949

A

1nev.

-2007)


2/4

ATTACHMENT

Case CR95-1I7-BLG-DWM ndevery

single ourtacrosshis

country

s a co

conspirator

o this sinister rimeof

perpetuity.

How so

onemight ask?

Federal

udges

are

signing

standing rders o investall the courtcases

hrough he Court

Registry

Investment ystem, irectlydepositednto the FederalReserve ank ocatedn

Dallas/Houston,exas.

Everycourt

cases assigned,

y the

courtadministrator, US

Treasury

PublicDebt

nrmber,

placed

onto he court

document,

ncluding

but

not imited o

traffic

citations,

after he unknowing

participants

n the case ave eceived

heir copy of

the same,

ut

without the addedmonetary ransformationof that

instrument

nto a financial

ransaction,

which s the definitionof a securitization.

After the PublicDebtnumber s obtained,

which now converts

he

nstrument

nto a

counterfeit bligation

ursuant

o USCTITLE 18

S

472et seq.473

474,now

hecourt

administrator dditionally ounterfeits

he same bligation

by adding

a CUSIP@

umber.

CUSIPO

s the acronym or Committee n Uniform

Securities

dentification

Procedures.

It is a copyrightedegisteredrademark f The AmericanBankersAssociation. his

means

nly

oneof two things.Firstly being he

courtadministrators

re

knowingly

commiuingcopyright nfringement

iolations n addition

o utteringcounterfeit

obligations,

nd/orsecondlyhat

he

court

administrator

mustobviously

be

a member f

theCUSIPO.

Now the courtshave

raudulently onverted

very

court

case nto a banking

inancial

securities

nstrument,raudulently onvertinghe

court nto

the creditor

position

and he

respondent/plaintiff

n

the

matternow unknowingly

onverted

nto the debtor.

To

make

n:rattersvenworse

or

the

udges,

hey are

knowingly

actingwith a

vested

nterest

with

insiderknowledge s

nsider

rading

n addition o

violationsofjudicial

canons.

Furtherstill,

udges

are o

actwithout bias, o make

ulingson the

merit of

argument,

ut

instead remaking inancial nvestments n everycase, nowing he exactmeaning f

every

numberand/letter pplied o and

now

written

on the

aceof the

nstrument

n all

cases

n the orm of the CUSIPOandare

now ruling based

n futures

ather

han ule of

law, evidence, ral

or written argument.

Additionally, he courtsarealsocommitting

ax

fraudby shifting

he debt

created

y

every

particular

ase ackonto

he ndividual

who s the

actualCreditor,

hen

fraudulently

onveyinghe

caseinto n nvestment

nstrument

o be deposited

nto the

Dallas

HoustonTexasFederalReserve

which now

shifts

money rom

the Creditor

sideof

the ransaction

nto the

pockets

f

the Debtors ide,

deceptively

aundered

ow asa

fraudulent ebt

nto Corporate ssets,

onverted

gain

nto bonds, tocks,

nd

grants

given

back

o

the

countydeceptively

hrough he

Department

f Transportation,

r some

otheragency, owsqueaky leanafter he aundryprocess.

Please

efer o

Debenture,

ConvertibleDebenture nd

all the other

definitions

istedabove.)

TheU.S.,United

States, sdefined

n

28 USC3002(15),

s

bankrupt

n

he

authority

f

Perry . UnitedStates,

94U.5.330-381;79L.Ed.9I2I,

nd

s

an obligor/grantor

o

the Federal

Reserve ank,created

y

the authority

of the

FederalReserve

ct of

1913,

38 Stat.

265, Chapter

.

TheFederal

Reserve ct of

1913.mentioned

bove,

was

an act of

Private

Law,

not


3/4

P:rblicLaw, nor PublicPolicy,

as n referenceo a Mr. Lewis which

was njuredby a

FederalReserve ehicle

and

sued

he

U.S.

government

or

damages.

he court uled,

...thatsince he FederalReserve

ystem

nd

ts twelvebranchbanksare

private

corporations,

he ederal

overnment

ould

not

be

held esponsible. ewis

v.

U.S.,

608F

2d 1239

1982)

Inasmuch severygovernments an artificialperson, n abstraction,nda creature f

the

mind

only, a

government

an nterface nly with otherartificial

persons.

The

imaginary, avingneither

actualitynor substance,s foreclosed

rom

creating

nd

attaining

arity

with the angible. The egal

manifestation

f this s that

no

government,

aswell asany aw, agency,

spect, ourt,

etc.

can

concerntself with anything

other han

corporate, rtificial

persons

nd

he contracts

etween

hem. S.C.R.

1795,

Penhallow .

Doane's dministrators,

U.S.54;

1 L.Ed.

57;3Da11.54,

upreme ourt

of theUnited

States

1795)

[Emphasis

dded.]

All

codes

Chapter

3, Part I asalleged], ules,and egulations

re or

government

authorities nly, not human/Creatorsn accordance ith God's

aws. All codes,

ulesand

rcgulations reunconstitutional nd ackingdue

process.

Rodriques

Ray Donavan

(U.S.

Departmentf Labor),769F.2d1344,348

1985).

Emphasis

dded.]

Any false epresentation

f material actsmadewith

knowledge f falsity

andwith

intent

that t shallbe actedon by anothern enteringnto contract, nd

which s so acted

upon,

constitutes

fraud,

andentitles

party

deceived

o

avoidcontracts r

recoverd'amages.

Barnsdall efining

Corp.v.Birnamwood il Co.,92

F.2d

817.

ooThe

terms

lawful

money'

and

lawful

moneyof the UnitedStates' hallbe construed

o mean

gold

or silver

coinof theUnitedStates. 12

USC

152 Also,Boricv. Trott,Pa.5

Phila.366,

404;

Klauber . Biggerstaff, 7 Wis.

55

1

(1879);

awry

v. McGhee, 6Tenn.

242

1835)

o'Money

does ot nclude

reasury

otes.

Foquet

. Headley, Conn.

534,536

o'Federal

Reserve otes

arenot dollars. U.S. Treasury,

GeneralCounsel,

Munk. Both

notesandchecks reacknowledgmentsf in debtedness notCredit]and

promise

of

payment.

Hegeman. Moon,131N.Y. 462,30N.E.

487

Smith

. Treuhart, tal.,223

N.Y.S.481

As

the useof

private

corporate ommercial

aper

Federal

Reserve

otes],debtcurrency

o; securities

checks]

s

concerned,

emoves

he sovereignty

tatus f the

government

f

We

the People nd

educes

t to an entity rather

hana

government

n the areaof

financeandcommerce sa corporation r

person.

.

. Governmentsescend

o the

evel

of

a mere

private

corporation

nd

akeon he

characteristics

f a mere

private

citizen.

This entity cannot ompel

performance

pon ts corporate

tatute r

rulesunless

t, like

any othercorporation r

person

s the

holder-in-due ourse f some

ontract

r

commercial greement etween

t

and

he oneupon

whom he

payment

nd

performance

aremadeandarewilling to

produce

aiddocuments nd

place

he same vidence

efore

trying to enforce

ts demands

alled

statutes.For

purposes

f suit, such

corporations

nd

individualsare egarded sentitiesentirelyseparate

rom

govemment.

Clearfield

Trust

Co.v. UnitedStates

18

US.

363-371

When

governments

nter he

world

of

commerce,hey

aresubject o

the same

urdens

asany

private

irm or corporation U.S.

v.

Burr,

309U.S.242 See:

U.S.C.A.286e,

ank

of

U.S.v. Planters

ank

of Georgia,

L, Ed.

9

Wheat) 44;22

U.S.C.A.

86et

seq.,

C.R.S.

1-60-103.Undera statute efining

negotiable

oteasa

note

made

y one


4/4

person

whereby e

promises

o

pay

money o

another

erson,

nd

providing

hat he word

'person'

shouldbe construedo extend o everycorporation

apable y law

of making

contracts,t

washeld

hat he word

ncluded

a state.

Stateof Indiana

. Woram,

6 Hill

(N.Y.)

33, 38.40 Am.Dec.378 A states

a

person

within hemeaning f

a statute

punishing

he

alsemaking

or

fraudulent lteration f a

public

record

with intent hat any

person

maybedefrauded.Martinv. State, 4Tex.61,

68

o'An

unconstitutional ct s not

aw; it

confers

o rights;

t imposes o duties;

affords

no

protection;

t creates o office; t

is

in

legal

contemplation,

s

noperative s

hough

t had

ni)ver

een

assed.

Nortonv. ShelbyCounty,

118

U.S.

425

[Emphasis

dded.]

No

state

egislator

r

executive

r

udicial

officer can

war against he

Constitution

without

violating is undertakingo support

t. Cooper . Aaron,358

U.S. , 78

S.Ct.

1401

(1958)

[Emphasis

dded.]

Documents

3949A-1 With Attachment