3rd Workshop on Communications Infrastructure Strategies ...project-energise.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Presentation... · 3rd Workshop on Communications Infrastructure Strategies

ENERGISE – 3rd Workshop on Communications Infrastructure

Strategies for Smart Grid Applications

Anglet, 30.06.2016

3rd ENERGISE Workshop - Agenda

2

08h 30 Welcome Coffee

09h 00 Welcome and introduction to the 3rd ENERGISE workshop

09h 05 ENERGISE: How can cooperation between energy and

communications sector be achieved?

Daniel Schöllhorn, TÜV Rheinland Consulting GmbH

Matthias Wissner, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und

Kommunikationsdienste GmbH

- Overview of the results of ENERGISE

- Strategic and practical dimensions of cooperation between the sectors

09h 15 Strategic aspects of cooperation between telecoms and the energy

sector – perspectives from a DSO I

Philip Westbroek, Telecommunications advisor, Enexis Asset Management

(Netherlands)

- Smart metering: current status and future plans

- Enexis data communications strategy

- Why we selected LTE

- Preventing a mobile operator lock-in


sector – perspectives from a DSO II

Emmanuel Villalta, Chair of EUTC Spectrum Committee, Enedis (France)

- Update from the Radio Spectrum of the European Utility Telecom Council EUTC)

- Enedis´ (former ERDF) strategic approach for co-operation towards telecoms

10h 15 Wrap up and joint discussion

10h 30 Coffee break

11h 00 Best practice solution / lessons learnt example:

“PowerMatchingCity Groningen”

Eelko Steenhuis, EU Project Advisor, Cities Northern Netherlands

11h 30 Joint Workshop: Co-operation in critical operation status?

Daniel Iglhaut, TÜV Rheinland Consulting GmbH

12h 15 Wrap up and further steps of ENERGISE

12h 30 End of the workshop

30.06.2016 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient

(ENERGISE)

TÜV Rheinland. At Home on All Continents.

30.06.2016 3

Figures 2014

Sales in Mio. € 1.731

- abroad in % 49

EBIT in % 6,4

Employees 19,300

- abroad in % 60

Locations: more than 500 in 69 countries

ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient

(ENERGISE)

Expert for infrastructure industries

Independent research and consultancy organisation

WIK and WIK-Consult

Focus on policy and regulation of network industries

Telecommunications, Energy, Postal Services

Department Smart Energy since 2004

Approx. 35 Economists and Consultants

Based in Bad Honnef (near Bonn)

4 30.06.2016 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient

(ENERGISE)

Overview - project ENERGISE / Introduction

Framework:

CSA – Coordination and Support Action for the Horizon 2020 Call on Low Carbon Energy LCE 7 - 2014 - Distribution

grid and retail markets

General Questions:

How will the future ICT infrastructure for smart grid applications look like?

Timeline:

Start: 01/2015 – end: 03/2017

Duration: 27 months

Partners:

TÜV Rheinland Consulting

WIK

5 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient

(ENERGISE) 30.06.2016

New applications are increasing

the demand for communication and

data exchange in grids.

ENERGISE Context

6

1. Starting Point 2. Arising Problem

Differences between sectors make

synergies hard to exploit.

3. Core Question

How can cooperation between

energy and communications sector

be achieved?


(ENERGISE) 30.06.2016

ENERGISE Goal

7

4. Solution Concept

Identification of the relevant

stakeholders

Analysis of the current state of play

and assessment of

case studies and best-practices

Provide information and support

the decision making processes

Support the exchange of hands-on-

experience


(ENERGISE) 30.06.2016

European Coverage - ENERGISE

8

Use-Case Survey Case Studies

DSO and Telco Company

DSO or Telco Company

No DSO or Telco Company

Case Study already conducted

No Case Study so far


(ENERGISE)

Core Question of ENERGISE

9

Parameters influencing

decisions:

• internal – external

• technical – organisational

• financial – regulatory

• energy – telecommunication

Co-operation modes and infrastructure

usage between energy and telco sector

usage of infrastructure shared dedicated

co

-opera

tive

n

on

-co

-opera

tive

typ

e o

f in

tera

cti

on

Use Case:

integrate new

users

Use Case:

Network

security

Fiber deployment

on electric poles

Joint Venture

to deploy ICT

Existing market

based solutions


(ENERGISE) 30.06.2016

ENERGISE – What has been done so far

2014/15:

Survey plan:

Providing results of survey preparation work including survey methodology, structured questionnaire, roadmap (who,

when, in which order).

Comprehensive list of stakeholders:

The list of stakeholders contains all relevant information in a structured way, incl. information such as name of

organisation, contacts, role etc.

Survey summary report:

Summarising, categorising and aggregating the findings from the survey

First Workshop in Brussels (1 October, 2015)


(ENERGISE)

ENERGISE – What has been done so far

2016:

Interviews with stakeholders

Second Workshop in Berlin (3 – 4 March, 2016)

Analysis summary report including use cases:

Providing an aggregated and categorised summary

based on analysed use cases and other input data

collected during survey.

Results of theoretical rationale

11 30.06.2016

Category Indicator Sectors Values Impact 1 Impact 2

Interdepende

nce w. other

indicators

General data

Country Both

Sector Both Energy

Telco

Description Both Description of

business purpose

Company size

Employment

indicators Both

<250 Local focus Agility

250–1000 Regional

focus Agility

>1000 Economies of

scale

Capability to

enforce view-

points on the

political

agenda

Number of

metering

points

Energy

<100,000 Vertical

integration

>100,000 Unbundling Economies of

scale

Degree of

vertical

integration

Value creation

stages adopted

Degree of

vertical

integration

Telco Hardware vendors

Make or buy

decisions

Telco Network operators

Telco Content and

advertising services

Telco Retail and

distribution

Degree of

vertical

integration

Energy Generation

(bulk / decentral)

Energy Transport and

distribution

Legal

obligation for

unbundling

from 100,000

metering

points on;

though

separated

Number of

metering

points

Energy Sales and customer

Portfolio-size Both High

Easier

integration of

new services

Possibility for

product

bundling

Level of

vertical

integration

Low

Share of

metering

points

equipped with

smart meters

Energy

Share in absolute

numbers / percentag

e

Available

communicatio

n solutions

Existing own

infrastructure Both

Type of existing ICT

infrastructure

(leased) landline

connections or

mobile coverage in

the target area / use

case

Available

communicatio

n solutions

Organisational

structure

Type of

ownership Both

Predominantly

private

Likelihood of

‘similar’ co-

operations

Different

rationales of

investments,

incentives

and operation

modes

Predominantly public

Parent (if

applic.) Both Company size

Organisationa

l culture Both

Risk

Company size Innovation

Average age

Silo-thinking

Market activity

Scope of

operation Both

National

Transferability

of business /

co-operation

models

Company size

European

Activities in

the respective

other sector

Both Yes

No

Engagement

in smart grid

activities

Both Yes

No


(ENERGISE)

ENERGISE – What is to come

2016/17:

Developing a decision supporting

toolkit as a fundamental outcome

of the project ENERGISE.

Third Workshop in Anglet

- Introducing ENERGISE

- Learning more about strategic aspects of cooperation

- Input from participants on the issue of co-operation in critical operation status

- Community building and networking


(ENERGISE)

3rd ENERGISE Workshop - Agenda

13

08h 30 Welcome Coffee

09h 00 Welcome and introduction to the 3rd ENERGISE workshop

09h 05 ENERGISE: How can cooperation between energy and

communications sector be achieved?

Daniel Schöllhorn, TÜV Rheinland Consulting GmbH

Matthias Wissner, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und

Kommunikationsdienste GmbH

- Overview of the results of ENERGISE

- Strategic and practical dimensions of cooperation between the sectors


sector – perspectives from a DSO I

Philip Westbroek, Telecommunications advisor, Enexis Asset Management

(Netherlands)

- Smart metering: current status and future plans

- Enexis data communications strategy

- Why we selected LTE

- Preventing a mobile operator lock-in


sector – perspectives from a DSO II

Emmanuel Villalta, Chair of EUTC Spectrum Committee, Enedis (France)

- Update from the Radio Spectrum of the European Utility Telecom Council EUTC)

- Enedis´ (former ERDF) strategic approach for co-operation towards telecoms

10h 15 Wrap up and joint discussion

10h 30 Coffee break

11h 00 Best practice solution / lessons learnt example:

“PowerMatchingCity Groningen”

Eelko Steenhuis, EU Project Advisor, Cities Northern Netherlands

11h 30 Joint Workshop: Co-operation in critical operation status?

Daniel Iglhaut, TÜV Rheinland Consulting GmbH

12h 15 Wrap up and further steps of ENERGISE

12h 30 End of the workshop


(ENERGISE)

Joint Workshop: Co-operation in critical operation status?

Joint Workshop: Co-operation in critical operation status? (45 Min)

30.06.2016 15

Mobile network is utilized in multiple ways in distribution networks

Distribution automation

Remote controlled disconnectors

AMR

Repair group communication

On the other hand, mobile network base stations require

electricity to operate

Backup is available, but is rarely enough

Two basic questions

Does co-operation in general, or jointly used infrastructures lead to an increased

robustness or an increased vulnerability in the power and communications sector?

How to secure (joint) operation in co-operative systems in critical states?

Interdependencies between electricity and communication

networks

Source: Wikipedia, dailymail.co.uk


(ENERGISE)

Increasing number of loss events worldwide

04.07.2016 16

Loss events worldwide 1980-2015

Source: Munich RE, 2016


(ENERGISE)

Does co-operation in general or jointly used infrastructures lead to an increased robustness or

an increased vulnerability in the power and communications sector?

30.06.2016 17

Reasons for dedicated infrastructures

Criticality is the outstanding reason to deploy /use dedicated

infrastructures for both industries.

Use Case: Ensuring network security, system control

and quality of supply

Statements from the ENERGISE survey

Source: ENERGISE


(ENERGISE)

jointly used infrastructures are not perceived to lead to an increased robustness

Case Study Finland

04.07.2016 18

Starting point

Huge amount of outages due to weather impact etc.

Lines are mostly in wood trenches -> huge amount of outages

New Electricity Market Act (2013)

Motivated by the need to ensure electricity supply, which is critical for a modern society as well as by investment deficit

the distribution network must be planned, built and maintained so that the failure of the network as a result of a storm or snow

does not cause a power outage of more than 6 hours to customers in urban areas and more than 36 hours to those in other

areas.

The act also stipulates the supply security requirements set for the transmission grid and high-voltage distribution networks. A

general obligation of preparedness will also be set for grid owners in case of disturbances and emergencies.

The standard compensation payable to customers for power outages will be increased.

Implementation example from a Finish DSO

Legal obligation to “weather prove” the grid. Result is a huge activity to replace overhead lines with cables (approx. 200 km of

trenches per month and an increased invest)

As of today: 15 contracts with ICT providers to operate the grid and AMR –> Goal: have one provider with a turnkey solution!

Percentage of the power lines located in

forests.

Crown snow-load has bent a tree onto

overhead lines.

Sources: ENERGISE; Kim Forssén, Aalto Univesity 2016 after Tapio; Kaleva.fi, 2013


(ENERGISE)

30.06.2016 19

Which critical operation states are expected to

increase in future?

Can commercial SLAS can be achieved? Are they

expected to be sufficient?

How can operative details in for system restart in

crisis be forseen / trained?

Which measuers do you wish to be implemented by

regulatory authorities to promote co-operation in

critical operation status?

Co-operation in critical operation status? Questions to be discussed I

How to secure (joint) operation in co-operative

systems in critical states?

Does close co-operation lead to an increased

resilience in case of emergency? Or do pure market

based solutions turn out to be more efficient?

Is there a need of state owned infrastructure for

critical applications (as infrastructure „of last

resort“)?

What is “critical” infrastructure?

How much security / resilience is needed?

Does co-operation in general or jointly used

infrastructures lead to an increased robustness?


(ENERGISE)

30.06.2016 20

Data security as a critical issue?

How can it be achieved? / Who is responsible?

Co-operation in critical operation status? Questions to be discussed II

Security

What safety standard is needed?

Who shall define this standard (Government /

Industry)?

How can it be achieved? / Who is responsible?

Do we need more (or less) regulation on this issue?

What are your (country-specific) experiences?

Safety

General Issues


(ENERGISE)

Contact

21

Daniel Schöllhorn

Tel.: +49 30 756874 412

E-Mail: [email protected]

Matthias Wissner

Tel. + 49 2224 9225 37

E-Mail: [email protected]


(ENERGISE)

Back Up Back Up

Reasons for dedicated and shared infrastructure

23

Top 5 – Reasons for dedicated infrastructure


(ENERGISE)

DSOs Communications providers

Concentration on core business

Criticality of infrastructure

Data security

Existing (own) communications

infrastructure

Clear liability and responsibility

Data security

Criticality of infrastructure

Clear liability and responsibility

Existing (own) communications infrastructure

Faster implementation of new services/solutions

n=51 n=79

03.03.2016

Reasons for dedicated and shared infrastructure

24

Top 5 – Reasons for shared infrastructure


(ENERGISE)

Synergy effects during infrastructure

deployment

Better utilization of existing infrastructure

Synergy effects during operation

Financial pressure for cost savings

Faster implementation of new services/solutions


Better utilization of existing

infrastructure


deployment


New revenue options

n=51 n=79


03.03.2016

Reasons and Hurdles for co-operation for DSOs and telecoms



Increased customer access Synergy effects during operation


Strategic strengthening of the

market position (be prepared for new

markets and competitors)


deployment

Faster implementation of new

services/solutions



deployment

Faster Implementation of

new services / solutions


(ENERGISE)

Top 5 - Reasons for co-operation

25

n=51 n=79

03.03.2016

Reasons and Hurdles for co-operation for DSOs and telecoms

Top 5 - Hurdles for co-operation


(ENERGISE)

Unclear market design

Unclear regulatory

responsibilities

Different standards for energy and

telecommunication demands

Difficult liability and responsibility

(data security / data protection)

Higher complexity in

ownership structure Unclear market design

Unclear regulatory responsibilities



Dependency on cooperation partner

Different standards for energy and

telecommunication demands

26


n=51 n=79

03.03.2016

Overall Reasons and Hurdles for co-operation


(ENERGISE)

Unclear regulatory responsibilities

Unclear market design

Different standards for energy and telecommunication

demands



Dependency on cooperation partner

Higher complexity in ownership structure

Higher complexity in approval procedures for new

infrastructure

Different lengths of technology lifecycles

Higher technical complexity

Existing competitive environment

Technology availability

Other

Faster Implementation of new

services / solutions

Synergy effects during infrastructure deployment



Strategic strengthening of the market position

(be prepared for new markets and competitors)

Better access to existing know-how

Possible synergies in approval procedures for new

infrastructure

Increased customer access

Generate new revenues

Political demand for more cooperation

Other

Hurdles for cooperation Reasons for cooperation

n=294

27 03.03.2016

Documents

3rd Workshop on Communications Infrastructure Strategies ...project-energise.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Presentation... · 3rd Workshop on Communications Infrastructure Strategies