Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
4 Year Results from the Ovation® Global Pivotal Trial
Venkatesh Ramaiah, MD, FACS
Medical Director, Arizona Heart Hospital
Director, Peripheral Vascular and Endovascular Research, Arizona Heart Institute
Disclosure
Speaker name: Venkatesh Ramaiah, MD, FACS
.................................................................................
I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report:
Consulting – TriVascular Medical Educator
Employment in industry
Stockholder of a healthcare company
Owner of a healthcare company
Other(s) – National Co-Principal Investigator LIFE Study
I do not have any potential conflict of interest
X
X
1Morrison T, Fillinger M, Meyer C, et al. Gender disparities in endovascular treatment options for
infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/UCM359044.pdf.
Published June 25, 2013.
• Nearly 35% of men and 60% of women remain ineligible for EVAR
• Limitations based on narrow access vessels
• Inadequate neck length was a main driver of ineligibility
• Treatment options limited to surgical repair, fenestrated / branched endografts, off-label EVAR, or watchful waiting
Limitations of Conventional EVAR1 = Unmet Clinical Needs
Persistent EVAR Challenges Characteristics of Hostile Access Anatomy
• Narrow (<6mm)
• Occluded
• Tortuous
• Calcified
• Aneurysmal
Narrow Access Vessels
Access Vessel Tortuosity
40% Patients < 6mm* M2S Database – 43,000 CT Scans
3.2 mm 5.3 mm
55% Female Patients <6mm** (CHAP) Collaborative effort – 1,063 CT Scans
* Derived from M2S Measurement Database of 43,000 AAA CT Scans
** New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Matthew P. Sweet, MD et all
The influence of gender and aortic aneurysm size on eligibility for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Clinician-FDA
Collaborative effort, Characterization of Human Aortic Anatomy Project (CHAP), 1063 CT Scans
Persistent EVAR Challenges Characteristics of Hostile Neck Anatomy
• Short Aortic Necks (<15mm)
• Reverse Tapered Necks
• Calcium
• Thrombus
• Severe Angulation
• Large Diameter 48% Patients < 15mm Necks*
M2S Database – 43,000 CT Scans
63% Women < 15mm Necks** (CHAP) Collaborative effort – 1,063 CT Scans
Calcium/Thrombus lined Necks
Reverse Tapered Necks At Inferior
Renal Artery
At IR + 5
At IR + 13
* Derived from M2S Measurement Database of 43,000 AAA CT Scans
** New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Matthew P. Sweet, MD et all
The influence of gender and aortic aneurysm size on eligibility for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Clinician-FDA Collaborative effort, Characterization of Human Aortic Anatomy Project (CHAP), 1063 CT Scans
FDA Approved EVAR Devices
Excluder Endologix Endurant Ovation Lombard Zenith
Additional CE Mark EVAR Devices
Cordis Incraft® Bolton Treovance® Endologix Nellix®
Ovation Global Pivotal Trial A pivotal clinical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the TriVascular Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System
Primary Endpoint:
• MAE within 30 days of the procedure, as determined by Clinical Events Committee
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint:
• Treatment success defined as:
– Successful Delivery and Deployment
– Freedom from Rupture and Conversion to Open Surgical Repair
– Freedom from Type I and III Endoleaks, Migration, and Enlargement as determined by Core Lab
Follow-up: 1 month, 6 month and annual to 5 years
Investigator Site
Botti, Charles Riverside Methodist Hospital
Cheema, Mohiuddin Hartford Hospital
Clair, Daniel Cleveland Clinic
Eidt, John Central Arkansas VA
Eskandari, Mark Northwestern Memorial
Glickman, Mark Sentara Medical Group
Gray, Bruce Greenville Hospital
Haser, Paul UMDNJ
Hassoun, Heitham Methodist Hospital
Henretta, John Mission Hospital
Hodgson, Kim Southern Illinois University
Jain, Ash Washington Hospital
Jicha, Douglas Santa Rosa Memorial
Jones, Paul Mercy Medical Center
Jordan, William UAB
Kasirajan, Karthik Emory University
Krajcer, Zvonimir St. Luke’s Hospital
Laird, John UC Davis
Maini, Brijeshwar Moffitt Heart and Vascular
Makaroun, Michel UPMC
Maldonado, Thomas NYU Hospital
Mehta, Manish Albany Medical Center
Mishkel, Gregory Prairie Heart
Moore, Wesley UCLA
Motew, Stephen Forsyth Medical Center
Murkherjee, Dipankar Inova Fairfax Hospital
Rizvi, Adnan Minneapolis Heart Institute
Sternberg, Charles Ochsner Health System
Investigator Site
Brunkwall, Jan Uni. Klinik Koln
Krankenberg, Hans Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, HH
Mathias, Klaus Klinikum Dortmund
Nolte, Thomas Herz und Gefaßzentrum, Bad Bevensen
Scheinert, Dierk Park Krankenhaus, Leipzig
Sievert, Horst CVC, Frankfurt
Torsello, Giovanni St. Franziskus-Hospital, Münster
Investigator Site
Valdes, Francisco Catholic University
Ovation Global Pivotal Trial
161 patients enrolled in Chile, Germany and USA
• First Global IDE Trial • Broadest Indication Statement • Included First-In-Man at all sites
Subject Medical History
ASA Grade
- I 5.6% (9/161)
- II 28.0% (45/161)
- III 59.6% (96/161)
- IV 6.8% (11/161)
Coronary artery disease 44.7% (72/161)
Hypertension 84.5% (136/161)
Hyperlipidemia 70.2% (113/161)
Peripheral vascular disease 23.6% (38/161)
Smoking 70.2% (113/161)
COPD 27.3% (44/161)
Ovation Global Pivotal Trial
Subject Demographics
Age (Yrs) Mean ± std 73 ± 8
Gender Male % (n/N) 87.6% (141/161)
Baseline Aortoiliac Characteristics
Mean ± SD Min, Max
Aortic diameter 13mm below renal artery (mm)1
22.7 ± 3.1 16.6, 32.3
Juxtarenal angle (degrees)1 19.1 ± 13.5 0.0, 60.0
Proximal neck length (mm)2 22.9 ± 12.5 1.0, 50.0
Aortic aneurysm diameter (mm)2 53.6 ± 9.0 37.8, 90.0
Aortic bifurcation diameter (mm)2 20.3 ± 6.9 11.5, 53.5
Left iliac minimum access diameter (mm)2 7.0 ± 1.6 3.2, 11.5
Right iliac minimum access diameter (mm)2 7.0 ± 1.6 3.5, 11.4
Ovation Global Pivotal Trial
1Data provided by site imaging 2Data provided by imaging core lab
~40% (66/161) of Ovation Trial
patients treated had access vessels
<6mm, aortic neck length <10mm, or
both. Minimum
Access Vessel <6mm;
25%
Both Criteria;
8%
Neck Length; 8%
Neither Criteria;
59%
Patient demographics, anatomical characteristics, and procedural characteristics indicate a challenging patient cohort.
Ovation Global Pivotal Trial
Safety2 0 to 30 Days
N=161
31 to 365 Days
N=159
366 to 730 Days
N=154
731 to 1095 Days
N=140
1096 to 1460 Days
N=124
Major Adverse Events 2.5% 3.8% -- -- --
Device Related MAE 0% 0% -- -- --
Rupture 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Conversion to Open Repair 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Effectiveness3 30 Day 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years
Type I and III Endoleaks 0% (0/153) 0% (0/143) 0% (0/120) 0% (0/109) 0% (0/85)
Migration Baseline 0% (0/150) 0% (0/133) 0% (0/117) 0% (0/94)
Technical Success1 All N=161
Defined as successful, delivery and deployment of one aortic body and two iliac limbs
100%
Data as of July 31, 2015 1Technical Success based on investigator reports 2Major Adverse Events and Device Related Major Adverse Events based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudicated
data. Rupture and Conversion to Open Repair based on investigator reports 3Endoleaks and Migration rates based on Core Lab Data (M2S)
4 year results of the global pivotal clinical study to evaluate the safety
and effectiveness of the TriVascular Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System.
Ovation Platform Expands EVAR
*Device Indications from Company Instructions for Use 1In Ovation pivotal trial, neck length indication of ≥ 7mm
2In healthy landing zones. Measurement is outer wall to outer wall in diseased landing zones. 3Ovation iX Iliac Stent Graft System
TriVascular Ovation System
Cook Zenith Flex
Endologix AFX
Gore Excluder C3
Lombard Aorfix
Medtronic Endurant II
Key Indications
Proximal Neck Length
Conventional neck length
requirement1
≥ 15mm ≥ 15mm ≥ 15mm ≥ 15mm ≥ 10mm
Proximal Neck Angle (Degrees)
<60 if neck length ≥ 10
mm ≤ 45 if neck length < 10
mm
≤ 60 for infrarenal neck
or ≤45 degrees for
suprarenal neck
≤ 60 ≤ 60 ≤ 90 < 60
Neck Diameter 16-30mm Inner Wall
18-32mm Outer Wall
18-32mm Not Specified
19-32mm Inner Wall
19-33mm Inner Wall2
19-32mm Inner Wall
Iliac Diameter 8-25mm3 Inner Wall
7.5-20mm Outer Wall
10-23mm Not Specified
8-25mm Inner Wall
9-19mm Inner Wall2
8-25mm Inner Wall
Device Features
Profile OD (main body)
14F-15F 21F-23F 19F 20F 22F 18F-20F
Ovation Platform Improves EVAR
Sources: Ovation data as of June 6, 2012. Data Rates from Instructions For Use (IFU) and Annual Clinical Updates 1- Based on Investigator Reported Events 2- Source: Makaroun M. One-year outcomes of the US regulatory trial of the Endurant stent graft system. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:601–608. Includes re-interventions on Day 0.
Safety & Effectiveness Rates at 1-year
TriVascular Ovation IDE
Cook Zenith Flex IDE
Endologix PowerLink IDE
Gore Excluder Combined IDE
Lombard Aorfix IDE
Medtronic Endurant
IDE
Patients Enrolled 161 200 192 565 218 150
Major Adverse Event 0-30 / 31-365 days
2.5% / 3.8% Not Reported 6.3% / 18% 18.6% / 17.1% 24.3% / Not
Reported 4.0% / 6.5%
All-Cause Mortality 0-30 / 31-365 days
0.6% / 1.9% 0.5% / 3.0% 1.6% / 5.2% 1.0% / 7.0% 1.8% / Not Reported
0% / 4.3%
Type I Endoleak 0% 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0%
Type III Endoleak 0% 0.6% 0% 0.9% 0.7% 0%
Migration 0% 2.5% 1.6% 0.7% 1.2% 0%
AAA Rupture1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.5% 0.8%
Conversions1 0% 1% 2.1% 1.1% 1.8% 0%
Freedom from Sac Enlargement
99.3% 98.7% 97.8% 95.0% 98.8% 100%
Limb Occlusions1 1.2% 3.0% 3.1% 0.4% 3.7% 2.7%
Subjects Requiring Re-interventions1
6.2% 11.0% 9.9% 11.5% 15.6% 6.7%2
Ovation Platform Well Suited for Percutaneous Access
Open exposure
Percutaneous 43%
Access Type
Cut-down Percutaneous
Cut-Down Percutaneous
Major Adverse Event @ 30 Days 3.3% (3/92) 1.4% (1/69)
Treatment Success @ 1-year 98.9% (91/92) 100% (69/69)
Anesthesia Time (mean) 191 minutes 149 minutes
Procedure Time (mean) 118 minutes 98 minutes
Hospitalization (median) 2 days 1 day
In the Ovation pivotal study, subjects
undergoing percutaneous access achieved
similar clinical outcomes with slightly lower
time spent related to anesthesia, procedure
and hospitalization time.
Ovation Platform Protects the Aortic Neck
0,0
2,4
3,6
4,7
5,3
0,0 0,4
0,8
0,0
-0,2 0,0
0,2 0,2
-1,0
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
Baseline 1 Year Growth 2 Year Growth 3 Year Growth 4 Year Growth
Pro
xim
al N
eck
dia
met
er a
vera
ge
exp
ansi
on
(m
m)
Aortic Neck Dilatation Over Time*
*Based on all known peer-reviewed published clinical data with clearly outlined methodology to measure neck dilation in patients with self-expanding AAA stent grafts; measurement methodology in cited studies is comparable to measurement methodology in Ovation Pivotal Trial3,4.
1Monahan JVS 2010: 52: 303-7 N=46. Devices: Cook Zenith 2Rodway Eur J Endovasc Surg 2008; 35: 685-93 EVAR: N=67, Open: N=56. Data available for up to 2 years. 3Core Lab evaluation, Ovation Global Pivotal Trial. N=94. Data as of July 31, 2015 4Neck dilation in proximal neck defined as growth > 3mm at 10mm below renals, 13mm below renals, and 15mm below renals
Ovation System3,4
Self-Expanding
Stents1
Open Repair2
Ovation Global Pivotal study demonstrates encouraging results with stable
neck diameter and durable seal through 4 years due to the unique sealing
ring technology which creates no chronic outward force and insulates the neck
from blood pressure.
Clinical Evidence to Validate the Ovation Platform
• Over 8,500 patients worldwide have been treated with Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft platform, with over 1,000 subjects in a tightly controlled study or registry
• Patient demographics, anatomical characteristics, and procedural characteristics indicate a challenging patient cohort
• At 4 years, no ruptures, conversions, Type I / III endoleaks or migrations were reported, including stable aortic neck diameter
• These data provide compelling evidence that the Ovation system can expand EVAR access to more patients and improve EVAR outcomes for all patients
The TriVascular Ovation Experience at Arizona Heart
Venkatesh Ramaiah, MD, FACS
Medical Director Arizona Heart Hospital
Director
Peripheral Vascular and Endovascular Research Arizona Heart Institute
The Ovation System at Arizona Heart
• First experience Feb 8th 2013
• 223 grafts implanted to date
– 100% technical success
• Initial interest in Ovation System:
– Short, challenging necks
– Tight, calcified and tortuous access
Ovation at AZ Heart - Results • 223 grafts implanted to date:
• 100% technical success rate
• One groin complication (pseudo aneurysm) resolved with ultrasound guided injection of thrombin.
• 1 External Iliac Artery complication (minor rupture due to pre dilatation) treated by covering with Iliac Limb
• Four intra-operative Type IA endoleaks in extremely challenging cases. All endoleaks were treated & resolved at initial implantation.
– Three by placing a Palmaz stent
– One resolved by Palmaz Stent and placing coils between the proximal and distal sealing rings.
AZ Heart Case Study
• 77 year old male
• 8.5 cm symptomatic aneurysm
Significant
juxtarenal
angle of
77deg at
IR+13
Vessel dilates
between IR+13 and
IR+16. Accurate
deployment is
essential. Calcium
and thrombus noted in
seal zone.
Length to
hypogastrics
long
bilaterally
Proximal
Right
common
iliac
aneurysmal
AZ Heart Case Study
AZ Heart Case Study
6 Month Follow-up
AZ Heart Case Study
6 Month Follow-up
Ovation at AZ Heart - Results
• 223 grafts implanted to date:
• No late Type I endoleaks
• No Type III, IV endoleaks
• One limb occlusion..Secondary to CFA/Closure
• No secondary interventions
• Average length of stay – 1.3 day
• 95% percutaneous .
• We are in the process of analyzing 1 -2 year follow up data in terms of freedom from rupture,freedom from re-intervention, migration, survival and sac shrinkage
AZ Heart Experience
Initial interest in Ovation System: Enable treatment of the most challenging anatomies
• Current status: Primary option for EVAR
• Ease and accuracy of deployment
• 14F OD Facilitates closure post PEVAR – now our preferred access method
• Patient outcomes have been extremely favorable in challenging and straightforward cases alike
• Looking ahead: Customized polymer seal offers opportunity for further enhancements to aortic disease management
Thank You
4 Year Results from the Ovation® Global Pivotal Trial
Venkatesh Ramaiah, MD, FACS
Medical Director, Arizona Heart Hospital
Director, Peripheral Vascular and Endovascular Research, Arizona Heart Institute